US20110137429A1 - Control device and system for controlling an actuated prosthesis - Google Patents

Control device and system for controlling an actuated prosthesis Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20110137429A1
US20110137429A1 US12/987,801 US98780111A US2011137429A1 US 20110137429 A1 US20110137429 A1 US 20110137429A1 US 98780111 A US98780111 A US 98780111A US 2011137429 A1 US2011137429 A1 US 2011137429A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
prosthetic device
locomotion
controller
motorized
kinematic
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US12/987,801
Inventor
Stéphane Bédard
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Victhom Human Bionics Inc
Original Assignee
Victhom Human Bionics Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=31950541&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=US20110137429(A1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Victhom Human Bionics Inc filed Critical Victhom Human Bionics Inc
Priority to US12/987,801 priority Critical patent/US20110137429A1/en
Publication of US20110137429A1 publication Critical patent/US20110137429A1/en
Priority to US13/944,778 priority patent/US9649206B2/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61FFILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
    • A61F2/00Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
    • A61F2/50Prostheses not implantable in the body
    • A61F2/68Operating or control means
    • A61F2/70Operating or control means electrical
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61FFILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
    • A61F2/00Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
    • A61F2/50Prostheses not implantable in the body
    • A61F2/60Artificial legs or feet or parts thereof
    • A61F2/64Knee joints
    • A61F2/642Polycentric joints, without longitudinal rotation
    • A61F2/644Polycentric joints, without longitudinal rotation of the single-bar or multi-bar linkage type
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61FFILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
    • A61F2/00Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
    • A61F2/50Prostheses not implantable in the body
    • A61F2/60Artificial legs or feet or parts thereof
    • A61F2/66Feet; Ankle joints
    • A61F2/6607Ankle joints
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61FFILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
    • A61F2/00Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
    • A61F2/50Prostheses not implantable in the body
    • A61F2/60Artificial legs or feet or parts thereof
    • A61F2002/607Lower legs
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61FFILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
    • A61F2/00Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
    • A61F2/50Prostheses not implantable in the body
    • A61F2/60Artificial legs or feet or parts thereof
    • A61F2/66Feet; Ankle joints
    • A61F2002/6614Feet
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61FFILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
    • A61F2/00Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
    • A61F2/50Prostheses not implantable in the body
    • A61F2/68Operating or control means
    • A61F2/70Operating or control means electrical
    • A61F2002/701Operating or control means electrical operated by electrically controlled means, e.g. solenoids or torque motors
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61FFILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
    • A61F2/00Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
    • A61F2/50Prostheses not implantable in the body
    • A61F2/68Operating or control means
    • A61F2/70Operating or control means electrical
    • A61F2002/704Operating or control means electrical computer-controlled, e.g. robotic control
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61FFILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
    • A61F2/00Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
    • A61F2/50Prostheses not implantable in the body
    • A61F2/68Operating or control means
    • A61F2/70Operating or control means electrical
    • A61F2002/705Electromagnetic data transfer
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61FFILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
    • A61F2/00Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
    • A61F2/50Prostheses not implantable in the body
    • A61F2/76Means for assembling, fitting or testing prostheses, e.g. for measuring or balancing, e.g. alignment means
    • A61F2002/7615Measuring means
    • A61F2002/762Measuring means for measuring dimensions, e.g. a distance
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61FFILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
    • A61F2/00Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
    • A61F2/50Prostheses not implantable in the body
    • A61F2/76Means for assembling, fitting or testing prostheses, e.g. for measuring or balancing, e.g. alignment means
    • A61F2002/7615Measuring means
    • A61F2002/7625Measuring means for measuring angular position
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61FFILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
    • A61F2/00Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
    • A61F2/50Prostheses not implantable in the body
    • A61F2/76Means for assembling, fitting or testing prostheses, e.g. for measuring or balancing, e.g. alignment means
    • A61F2002/7615Measuring means
    • A61F2002/763Measuring means for measuring spatial position, e.g. global positioning system [GPS]
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61FFILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
    • A61F2/00Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
    • A61F2/50Prostheses not implantable in the body
    • A61F2/76Means for assembling, fitting or testing prostheses, e.g. for measuring or balancing, e.g. alignment means
    • A61F2002/7615Measuring means
    • A61F2002/7635Measuring means for measuring force, pressure or mechanical tension
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61FFILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
    • A61F2/00Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
    • A61F2/50Prostheses not implantable in the body
    • A61F2/76Means for assembling, fitting or testing prostheses, e.g. for measuring or balancing, e.g. alignment means
    • A61F2002/7615Measuring means
    • A61F2002/7645Measuring means for measuring torque, e.g. hinge or turning moment, moment of force
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61FFILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
    • A61F2/00Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
    • A61F2/50Prostheses not implantable in the body
    • A61F2/76Means for assembling, fitting or testing prostheses, e.g. for measuring or balancing, e.g. alignment means
    • A61F2002/7615Measuring means
    • A61F2002/7685Measuring means located on natural or sound-site limbs, e.g. comparison measuring means

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a control system and a method for controlling an actuated prosthesis.
  • This invention is particularly well adapted for controlling an actuated leg prosthesis for above-knee amputees.
  • the major problem remains that the energy used during mobility mainly stems from the user because conventional leg prostheses are not equipped with servomechanisms that enable self-propulsion. This energy compensation has considerable short and long-term negative effects resulting from the daily use of such prostheses. Accordingly, the dynamic role played by the stump during locomotion renders impossible the prolonged wearing of the prostheses as it may create, among other things, several skin problems such as folliculitis, contact dermatitis, edema, cysts, skin shearing, scarring and ulcers. Although these skin problems may be partially alleviated by using a silicone sheath, a complete suction socket, or powder, skin problems remain one of the major preoccupations today.
  • a method for determining a portion of locomotion and a phase of locomotion portion in view of controlling an actuated prosthesis in real time comprising:
  • a method for controlling an actuated prosthesis in real time comprising:
  • a device for determining a portion of locomotion and a phase of locomotion portion in view of controlling an actuated prosthesis in real time using a plurality of main artificial proprioceptors comprising:
  • first state machines being used to select one state among a plurality of possible states for each main artificial proprioceptor with the corresponding data and derivative signals;
  • the second state means being used to select the portion of locomotion among a plurality of possible portions of locomotion using events associated to the data signals.
  • a control system for controlling an actuated prosthesis in real time comprising:
  • first state machines being used to select one state among a plurality of possible states for each main artificial proprioceptor with the corresponding data and derivative signals;
  • the second state machine being used to select the portion of locomotion among a plurality of possible portions of locomotion using events associated to data signals;
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing the control system in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention
  • FIG. 2 is a perspective view of an example of an actuated prosthesis with a front actuator configuration
  • FIG. 3 is a perspective view of an example of an actuated prosthesis with a rear actuator configuration
  • FIG. 4 is an upper schematic view of an insole provided with plantar pressure sensors
  • FIG. 5 is a cross sectional view of a sensor shown in FIG. 4 ;
  • FIG. 6 is an example of a state machine diagram for the selection of the portion of locomotion
  • FIG. 7 is an example of the phases of locomotion portion within one portion of locomotion (BTW) in the state machine diagram shown in FIG. 6 ;
  • FIGS. 8 a to 8 d are examples of four data signals using plantar pressure sensors during typical walking on flat ground;
  • FIGS. 9 a to 9 d give an example of a data signal obtained from a plantar pressure sensor at the calcaneus region and its first three differentials;
  • FIGS. 10 a to 10 d give an example of a data signal obtained from a plantar pressure sensor at the metatarsophalangeal (MP) region and its first three differentials;
  • FIGS. 11 a to 11 d give an example of the states of a plantar pressure sensor with reference to the data signal and its three first differentiations for a plantar pressure sensor at the calcaneous region;
  • FIGS. 12 a to 12 c give an example of the states of a plantar pressure sensor with reference to the data signal and its three first differentiation for a plantar pressure sensor at the metatarsophalangeal (MP)region;
  • FIG. 13 is an example of a state machine diagram for the selection of the state of the plantar pressure sensors for the calcaneous region
  • FIG. 14 is an example of a state machine diagram for the selection of the state of the plantar pressure sensors at the metatarsophalangeal (MP) region;
  • FIG. 15 is an overall block diagram of the Phase Recognition Module (PRM);
  • FIG. 16 is a block diagram showing the zero calibration
  • FIG. 17 is a block diagram showing the subject's weight calibration
  • FIG. 18 is a block diagram of the Trajectory Generator (TG);
  • FIG. 19 is a block diagram showing the creation of the Trajectory Generator (TG) lookup table
  • FIG. 20 is a graph showing an example of curve representing a kinematic or kinetic variable for a given portion of locomotion, phase of locomotion portion and subject's speed;
  • FIG. 21 is an enlarged representation of FIG. 20 .
  • CTW Linear Walking-Cyclical path
  • ZV_FRfst x Threshold to consider the first differentiation of f rx to be positive.
  • FIG. 1 shows the control system ( 10 ) being combined with an autonomous actuated prosthesis for amputees. It is particularly well adapted for use with an actuated leg prosthesis for above-knee amputees, such as the prostheses ( 12 ) shown in FIGS. 2 and 3 . Unlike conventional prostheses, these autonomous actuated prostheses ( 12 ) are designed to supply the mechanical energy necessary to move them by themselves.
  • the purpose of the control system ( 10 ) is to provide the required signals allowing to control an actuator ( 14 ). To do so, the control system ( 10 ) is interfaced with the amputee using artificial proprioceptors ( 16 ) to ensure proper coordination between the amputee and the movements of the actuated prosthesis ( 12 ).
  • the set of artificial proprioceptors ( 16 ) captures information, in real time, about the dynamics of the amputee's movement and provides that information to the control system ( 10 ).
  • the control system ( 10 ) is then used to determine the joint trajectories and the required force or torque that must be applied by the actuator ( 14 ) in order to provide coordinated movements.
  • FIG. 2 shows an example of an actuated leg prosthesis ( 12 ) for an above-knee amputee.
  • This prosthesis ( 12 ) is powered by a linear actuator ( 14 ).
  • the actuator ( 14 ) moves a knee member ( 20 ) with reference to a trans-tibial member ( 22 ), both of which are pivotally connected using a first pivot axis.
  • More sophisticated models may be equipped with a more complex pivot or more than one pivot at that level.
  • the knee member ( 20 ) comprises a connector ( 25 ) to which a socket ( 26 ) can be attached.
  • the socket ( 26 ) is used to hold the sump of the amputee.
  • the design of the knee member ( 20 ) is such that the actuator ( 14 ) has an upper end connected to another pivot on the knee member ( 20 ).
  • the bottom end of the actuator ( 14 ) is then connected to a third pivot at the bottom end of the trans-tibial member ( 22 ).
  • the actuator ( 14 ) is operated by activating an electrical motor therein. This rotates, in one direction or another, a screw ( 28 ).
  • the screw ( 28 ) is then moved in or out with reference to a follower ( 30 ), thereby changing the relative angular position between the two movable parts, namely the knee member ( 20 ) and the trans-tibial member ( 22 ).
  • FIG. 3 shows an actuated leg prosthesis ( 12 ) in accordance to a rear actuator configuration. This embodiment is essentially similar to that of FIG. 2 and is illustrated with a different model of actuator ( 14 ).
  • the control system ( 10 ) may be used with a leg prosthesis having more than one joint.
  • a leg prosthesis having an ankle joint, a metatarsophalangeal joint or a hip joint in addition to a knee joint.
  • a osseo-integrated devices could also be used, ensuring a direct attachment between the mechanical component of the prosthesis and the amputee skeleton.
  • Other kinds of prostheses may be used as well.
  • the information provided by the artificial proprioceptors ( 16 ) are used by the control system ( 10 ) to generate an output signal.
  • These output signals are preferably sent to the actuator ( 14 ) via a power drive ( 32 ) which is itself connected to a power supply ( 34 ), for instance a battery, in order to create the movement.
  • the power drive ( 32 ) is used to control the amount of power being provided to the actuator ( 14 ). Since the actuator ( 14 ) usually includes an electrical motor, the power drive ( 32 ) generally supplies electrical power to the actuator ( 14 ) to create the movement.
  • feedback signals are received from sensors ( 36 ) provided on the prosthesis ( 12 ).
  • these feedback signals may-indicate the relative position measured between two movable parts and the torque between them. This option allows the control system ( 10 ) to adequately adjust the output signal.
  • Other types of physical parameters may be monitored as well.
  • the control system ( 10 ) shown in FIG. 1 comprises an interface ( 40 ) through which data signals coming from the artificial proprioceptors ( 16 ) are received. They may be received either from an appropriate wiring or from a wireless transmission.
  • data signals from the artificial proprioceptors ( 16 ) provided on a healthy leg are advantageously sent through the wireless transmission using an appropriate RF module.
  • a simple off-the-shelf RF module with a dedicated specific frequency, such as 916 MHz may be used.
  • the use of a RF module with a spread spectrum or frequency hopper is preferable.
  • other configurations may be used as well, such as a separate A/D converter, different resolution or sampling values and various combinations of communication link technologies such as wired, wireless, optical, etc.
  • the control system ( 10 ) further comprises a part called “Phase Recognition Module” or PRM ( 42 ).
  • PRM Phase Recognition Module
  • the PRM ( 42 ) is a very important part of the control system ( 10 ) since it is used to determine two important parameters, namely the portion of locomotion and the phase of locomotion portion. These parameters are explained later in the text.
  • the PRM ( 42 ) is connected to a Trajectory Generator, or TG ( 44 ), from which dynamic parameters required to control the actuated prosthesis ( 12 ) are calculated to create the output signal.
  • a lookup table ( 6 ) is stored in a memory connected to the TG ( 44 ).
  • the control system ( 10 ) comprises a regulator ( 48 ) at which the feedback signals are received and the output signal can be adjusted.
  • Software residing on an electronic circuit board contains all the above mentioned algorithms enabling the control system ( 10 ) to provide the required signals allowing to control the actuator ( 14 ). More specifically, the software contains the following three modules: the Phase Recognition Module (PRM), the Trajectories Generator (TG) and the Regulator (REG). Of course, any number of auxiliary modules may be added.
  • PRM Phase Recognition Module
  • TG Trajectories Generator
  • REG Regulator
  • the artificial proprioceptors ( 16 ) preferably comprise main artificial proprioceptors and auxiliary artificial proprioceptors.
  • the main artificial proprioceptors are preferably localized plantar pressure sensors which measure the vertical plantar pressure of a specific underfoot area
  • the auxiliary artificial proprioceptors are preferably a pair of gyroscopes which measure the angular speed of body segments of the lower extremities and a kinematic sensor which measures the angle of the prosthesis knee joint.
  • the plantar pressure sensors are used under both feet, including the artificial foot. It could also be used under two artificial feet if required.
  • One of the gyroscopes is located at the shank of the normal leg while the other is located on the upper portion of the prosthesis above the knee joint.
  • the kinematic sensor it is located at the prosthesis knee joint.
  • Other examples of artificial proprioceptors ( 16 ) are neuro-sensors which measure the action potential of motor nerves, myoelectrical electrodes which measure the internal or the external myoelectrical activity of muscles, needle matrix implants which measure the cerebral activity of specific region of the cerebrum cortex such as motor cortex or any other region indirectly related to the somatic mobility of limbs or any internal or external kinematic and/or kinetic sensors which measure the position and the torque at any joints of the actuated prosthesis.
  • additional types of sensors which provide information about various dynamics of human movement may be used.
  • FIG. 4 shows a right insole ( 10 ) provided with two plantar pressure sensors ( 16 ) positioned at strategic locations. Their size and position were defined in accordance with the stability and the richness (intensity) of the localized plantar pressure signals provided by certain underfoot areas during locomotion. Experimentation provided numerous data concerning the spatial distribution of foot pressures and more specifically on the Plantar Pressure Maximal Variation (PPMV) during locomotion.
  • the PPMV denoted ⁇ max f r,ij , was defined as the maximum variation of the plantar pressure at a particular point (underfoot area of coordinate i,j) during locomotion.
  • the X-Y axis ( 52 ) in FIG. 4 was used to determine the i,j coordinates of each underfoot area.
  • a PPMV of a given underfoot area of coordinates i,j during a given step denoted event x is defined as stable, through a set of N walking steps, if the ratio of the absolute difference between this PPMV and the average PPMV over the set is inferior to a certain value representing the criteria of stability, thus:
  • a PPMV of a given underfoot area of coordinates i,j during a given step denoted event x is defined as rich in information, through a set of N walking steps, if the ratio between the PPMV and the average PPMV of the set is superior to certain value representing the criteria of richness thus:
  • the plantar pressure sensors ( 16 ) are provided in a custom-made insole ( 10 ), preferably in the form of a standard orthopedic insole, that is modified to embed the two sensors ( 16 ) for the measurement of two localized plantar pressures.
  • Each sensor ( 16 ), as shown in FIG. 5 is preferably composed of a thin Force-Sensing Resistor (FSR) polymer cell ( 54 ) directly connected to the interface ( 40 ) or indirectly using an intermediary system (not shown), for instance a wireless emitter. Mechanical adapters may be used if FSR cells of appropriate size are not available.
  • the FSR cell ( 54 ) has a decreasing electrical resistance in response to an increasing force applied perpendicularly to the surface thereof.
  • Each cell ( 54 ) outputs a time variable electrical signal for which the intensity is proportional to the total vertical plantar pressure over its surface area.
  • the normalized position of the pressure sensors and their size are shown in Table 1, where the length L and the width W are respectively the length and the width of the subject's foot.
  • the coefficients in Table 1 have been obtained by experimentation.
  • a typical diameter for the plantar pressure sensors ( 16 ) is between 20 and 30 mm.
  • the PRM ( 42 ) ensures, in real-time, the recognition of the phase of locomotion portion and the portion of locomotion of an individual based on the information provided by the artificial proprioceptors ( 16 ).
  • the PRM ( 42 ) is said to operate in real time, which means that the computations and other steps are performed continuously and with almost no delay.
  • data signals received from individual artificial proprioceptors ( 16 ) can provide enough information in order to control the actuator ( 14 ) of an actuated prosthesis ( 12 ).
  • the slope (first derivative), the sign of the concavity (second derivative) and the slope of concavity (third derivative) of the data signals received from plantar pressure sensors, and of combinations of those signals give highly accurate and stable information on the human locomotion.
  • the PRM ( 42 ) is then used to decompose of the human locomotion into three levels, namely the states of each artificial proprioceptor ( 16 ), the phase of locomotion portion and the portion of locomotion. This breakdown ensures the proper identification of the complete mobility dynamics of the lower extremities in order to model the human locomotion.
  • each main artificial proprioceptor depicts the first level of the locomotion breakdown. This level is defined as the evolution of the main artificial proprioceptors' sensors during the mobility of the lower extremities. Each sensor has its respective state identified from the combination of its data signal and its first three differential signals.
  • the main artificial proprioceptors of the preferred embodiment which provide information about localized plantar pressures, it has been discovered experimentally that the localized plantar pressures signals located at the calcaneous and at the metatarsophalangeal (MP) regions may be grouped into seven and six states respectively.
  • the states are preferably as follows:
  • the states are preferably as follows:
  • phase of locomotion portion is defined as the progression of the subject's mobility within the third level of locomotion breakdown, namely the portion of locomotion.
  • This third level of the locomotion breakdown defines the type of mobility the subject is currently in, such as, for example, standing, sitting or climbing up stairs.
  • Each locomotion portion contains a set of sequential phases illustrating the progression of the subject's mobility within that locomotion portion.
  • the phase sequence mapping for each locomotion portion has been identified by experimentation according to the evolution of the state of the localized plantar pressures throughout the portion.
  • the portions of locomotion are preferably as follows:
  • FIG. 6 illustrates an example of the state machine concerning these various portions of locomotion.
  • FIG. 7 shows an example of a phase sequence mapping, BTW_ 1 to BTW_ 25 , for the Beginning Path of Linear Walking (BTW) portion of locomotion. All locomotion portions have similar patterns of phase sequence mapping, though the number of phases may vary from one locomotion portion to another. The number of phases depends on the desired granularity of the decomposition of the locomotion portion. The phases are determined experimentally by observing the states of the four localized plantar pressures at specific time intervals, which are determined by the desired granularity. Since a phase is the combination of the states of the four localized plantar pressures, the phase boundary conditions are therefore defined as the combination of each localized plantar pressure state boundary conditions.
  • the algorithm uses the state machine approach.
  • the algorithm uses a set of events which values define the conditions, or portion boundary conditions, to pass from one locomotion portion to another. These events are identified by experimentation according to the evolution of the localized plantar pressure signals, the complementary signals and their first three differentials, as well as the signals from the auxiliary artificial proprioceptors, when the subject passes from one locomotion portion to another.
  • the TG ( 44 ) can be used to calculate one or more dynamic parameter values to be converted to an output signal for the control of the actuator.
  • dynamic parameter values are the angular displacement and the torque (or moment of force) at the knee joint of the actuated leg prosthesis ( 12 ). Since these values are given in real time, they provide what is commonly referred to as the “system's trajectory”.
  • a mathematical relationship is selected according to the state of the whole system, that is the states of the main artificial proprioceptors, the phase of locomotion portion, the portion of locomotion and the walking speed.
  • the angular displacement ⁇ kn and the moment of force m kn are then computed using simple time dependant equations and static characteristics associated with the state of the system, thereby providing the joint's trajectory to the knee joint member. This process is repeated throughout the subject's locomotion.
  • FIGS. 8 a to 8 d show examples of data signals from the four localized plantar pressure sensors ( 16 ) during a standard walking path at 109,5 steps/minute.
  • the four signals, f r1 (t), f r2 (t), f r3 (t) and f r4 (t) correspond to the variation in time of the localized plantar pressure at the calcaneus region of the left foot ( FIG. 8 a ), the MP region of the left foot ( FIG. 8 b ), the calcaneus region of the right foot ( FIG. 8 c ), and the MP region of the right foot ( FIG. 8 d ).
  • the PRM ( 42 ) uses the first, the second and the third differentials of each of those four localized plantar pressure signals in order to determine the sensors' state. From there, the PRM ( 42 ) will be able to determine the phase of locomotion portion and portion of locomotion of the subject.
  • FIGS. 9 a to 9 d and 10 a to 10 d show examples of graphs of localized plantar pressures, as well as their first, second and third differentials, at the calcaneus and MP regions respectively, for a linear walking path of 109,5 steps/minute.
  • FIGS. 11 a to 11 d show graphically the state boundary conditions for a typical localized plantar pressure signal, and its first three differentials, at the calcaneous region, while FIGS. 12 a to 12 c do so for the localized plantar pressure signal, and its first two differentials, at the MP region. This shows the relationships between the various data and derivative signals, and the states.
  • the PRM ( 42 ) uses a set of first state machines to select, at each increment in time, the current state of each sensor.
  • the algorithm uses a set of events whose values define the conditions to pass from one state to another for each of the localized plantar pressures. Table 2 lists the events:
  • Position value ZV_SUMfst Threshold to consider the absolute value of ⁇ sum y / ⁇ t of the first differentiation of sum y to be positive.
  • Positive value ZV_SUMsec Threshold to consider the absolute value of ⁇ 2 sum y / ⁇ t 2 of the second differentiation of sum y to be positive
  • FIGS. 13 and 14 show, respectively, the diagrams of the state machines used for the detection of the state of the localized plantar pressure at the calcaneous and the MP regions, while Tables 6 and 7 summarize the state boundary conditions between the states of each localized plantar pressure.
  • FIG. 15 shows a flow chart that depicts the PRM algorithm, which comprises two main parts, namely the pre-processing of the main artificial proprioceptors signals and the locomotion breakdown, illustrated by blocks 100 and 102 respectively.
  • the sequence of steps performed the pre-processing of the main artificial proprioceptors signals, represented by block 100 is indicated by the sequence of blocks 104 to 118 .
  • the four localized plantar pressures signals are received from the interface and normalized at block 106 using subject specific calibration values.
  • the four normalized local plantar pressures then go through the pre-processing steps represented by blocks 104 to 118 .
  • the four normalized local plantar pressures are filtered to reduce their spectral composition.
  • a counter is then initialized at block 108 , which in turn starts a loop comprising blocks 110 to 116 .
  • the first step of the loop, at block 110 consist in the differentiation of the signals.
  • the signals resulting from the differentiation step are filtered at block 112 , in order to limit the noise induced during the differential computation, and go through binary formatting at block 114 .
  • the algorithm checks if the counter has reached 3 iterations. If so, the algorithm, having computed all first three derivatives of the four normalized local plantar pressures signals, exits the loop to block 102 . If not, the algorithm proceeds to block 110 where the counter is increased at block 118 and the loop is repeated, in order to computed the next derivative, by proceeding to block 110 .
  • the algorithm enters into the locomotion breakdown part of the algorithm.
  • the sequence of steps performed by the locomotion breakdown, represented by block 102 is indicated by the sequence of blocks 120 to 124 . From the four normalized local plantar pressures and their first three derivatives, block 120 determines the states of each sensor while blocks 122 and 124 determine the phase and the portion of locomotion, respectively.
  • the normalization step represented by block 106 , consists in levelling the magnitude of the raw data signals according to the anthropomorphic characteristics of the subject such as, in the preferred embodiment, the subject's weight.
  • the raw data signals of the four localized plantar pressures are divided by the total magnitude provided by the four sensors during calibration and then provided as the normalized local plantar pressures to block 110 .
  • the normalized raw signals of the four localized plantar pressures and their first three differentials are numerically filtered to reduce their spectral composition, as well as to limit the noise induced during the derivative computation.
  • the preferred embodiment of the PRM ( 42 ) uses a 2 nd order numerical filter in which the cut-off frequency, the damping factor and the forward shifting have been set, experimentally, to optimize the calculation according to the locomotion portion and the type of signal.
  • the PRM ( 42 ) may use other types of numerical filters as well, for example a “Butterworth” filter, as long as the filter's dynamic is similar to the one provided by the 2 nd order filter shown thereafter for each locomotion portion. Equation 4 shows the mathematical relationships of the 2 nd order numerical filter which is implemented within the PRM ( 42 ). Table 8 provides examples of filtering parameters for three different portions of locomotion.
  • ⁇ n ⁇ r 1 - 2 ⁇ ⁇ 2 , ⁇ ⁇ 1
  • the derivatives are obtained by the standard method consisting of numerically differentiating the current and the previous samples of localized plantar pressures.
  • the derivatives obtained at block 110 then go through binary formatting at block 114 .
  • the result of the binary formatting operation will be a “1” if the sign of the derivative is positive, “0” if it is negative. This step facilitates the identification of the sign changes of the differentiated signals as binary events.
  • the PRM ( 42 ) determines the current state of each sensor using state machines such as the ones shown in FIGS. 13 and 14 .
  • the states of the localized plantar pressures are preferably expressed as a 10-bit words in which each bit corresponds to a specific possible state.
  • Tables 9 to 12 list the binary equivalents of each state of the localized plantar pressures at the calcaneous and the MP regions of the left and the right foot. Of course, words of different bit length may be used as well to represent the state of each localized plantar pressure.
  • the PRM ( 42 ) generates the phase, which is preferably expressed as the direct binary combination of the states of the four localized plantar pressures.
  • the phase can be represented by a 40-bit word wherein the lower part of the lower half word, the higher part of the lower half word, the lower part of the higher half word and the higher part of the higher half word correspond, respectively, to the calcaneous area of the left foot, the MP area of the left foot, the calcaneous area of the right foot and the MP area of the right foot, as represented in Tables 9 to 12.
  • Table 13 presents an example of the identification of a phase from the states of the four localized plantar pressures.
  • the PRM ( 42 ) selects the portion of locomotion the subject is currently using the state machine shown in FIG. 6 .
  • Each portion of locomotion is composed of a sequence of phases.
  • Table 14 presents the phases sequence mapping for the Beginning Path of Linear Walking (BTW) locomotion portion corresponding to FIG. 7 .
  • This table shows the label, the decimal value and as well the phase boundary conditions of each phase.
  • Table 15 enumerates a sample of boundary conditions associated with the locomotion portion of the sitting and typical walking on flat ground movements, while Table 3 lists the thresholds used to assess if the aforementioned conditions are met.
  • the normalization step of block 106 uses specific calibration values. These values are computed the first time a subject uses the actuated prosthesis ( 12 ) or at any other time as may be required. Two calibration values are preferably used: the zero calibration value and the subject's weight calibration value.
  • the zero calibration value consists in the measurement of the four localized plantar pressures when no pressure is applied to the sensors, while the subject's weight calibration value is the subject's weight relative to the magnitude of the total response of the sensors.
  • the algorithm to obtain the zero calibration value of the sensors is depicted by the flow chart shown in FIG. 16 .
  • the sequence of steps composing the algorithm is indicated by the sequence of blocks 200 to 222 .
  • the algorithm starts with the four localized plantar pressures.
  • the subject sits on a surface high enough such that his feet hang freely in the air.
  • the subject lightly swings his feet back and forth, which initialises a timer at block 206 , which in turn starts a loop comprising blocks 208 , 210 and 212 .
  • the algorithm checks if the timer has reached 10 seconds, if so, then the algorithm exits the loop to block 220 , if not, the algorithm proceeds to block 210 and records the zero value of the four sensors. Then, at block 212 , the timer is increased and the loop is repeated by proceeding to block 208 . At block 220 , the average of each localized plantar pressures is computed and finally provided as the zero calibration value at block 222 .
  • the algorithm to obtain the subject's weight calibration value is depicted by the flow chart shown in FIG. 17 .
  • the sequence of steps composing the algorithm is indicated by the sequence of blocks 300 to 322 .
  • the algorithm starts with the four localized plantar pressure.
  • the subject stands up in a comfortable position, feet at shoulder width distance, while maintaining the body in the stance position.
  • the subject slowly swings back and forth and then left to right, which initialises a timer at block 306 , which in turn starts a loop comprising blocks 308 , 310 and 312 .
  • the algorithm checks if the timer has reached 10 seconds, if so, then the algorithm exists the loop to block 320 , if not, the algorithm proceeds to block 310 and records the subject's weight relative to the magnitude of the total response of the sensors. Then, at block 312 , the timer is increased and the loop is repeated by proceeding to block 308 . At block 320 , the average of each localized plantar pressures is computed and finally provided as the weight calibration value at block 322 .
  • FIG. 18 shows a flow chart that depicts the TG algorithm used to establish a relationship, in real-time, between the output of the PRM ( 42 ) and localized plantar pressures and the knee joint trajectory.
  • the sequence of steps composing the algorithm is indicated by the sequence of blocks 400 to 408 .
  • the algorithm receives the normalized localized plantar pressures, the phase of locomotion portion and the portion of the locomotion from the PRM ( 42 ).
  • the walking speed of the subject in steps per minute, is obtained from computing the number of frames between two heel strikes, while taking into account the sampling frequency, and is binary formatted. More specifically, the subject's speed estimate ⁇ circumflex over (x) ⁇ v [k] (steps/minute) is obtained from computing the number of frames between two heel strikes s heel [k] (frames/step):
  • a heel strike event occurs when:
  • the algorithm uses the normalized localized plantar pressures, the phase of locomotion portion, the portion of the locomotion and the subject's speed in binary format to identify a set of linear normalized static characteristics linking the knee joint kinetic/kinematic parameters with the subject's locomotion in a lookup table.
  • the TG ( 44 ) comprises two transformation functions which compute the kinetic/kinematic parameters at time k, which are the angular displacement ⁇ kn (k) and the moment of force (torque) m kn (k), using the localized plantar pressures and their corresponding mathematical relationships (time-dependant equations and static characteristics) identified at block 404 .
  • the values of the kinetic/kinematic variables are then provided to the REG ( 48 ) at block 408 .
  • the transformation functions used by the TG ( 44 ) at block 406 may generally be represented by a system of equations such as:
  • ⁇ g,h ( k ) ⁇ 1 ( ⁇ 1 ( k ), ⁇ ( k ), v ( k ))+ ⁇ 2 ( ⁇ 2 ( k ), ⁇ ( k ), v ( k ))+ . . . + ⁇ q ⁇ 1 ( ⁇ q ⁇ 1 ( k ), ⁇ ( k ), v ( k ))+ ⁇ q ( ⁇ q ( k ), ⁇ ( k ), v ( k )) Equation 7
  • Equation 7 Equation 7
  • ⁇ g,h ( k ) a 1,1 ( ⁇ ( k ), v ( k )) ⁇ 1 ( k )+ . . . + a 1,n ( ⁇ ( k ) v ( k )) ⁇ 1 ( k ) n +a 2,1 ( ⁇ ( k ), v ( k )) ⁇ 2 ( k )+ . . . + a q ⁇ 1,1 ( ⁇ ( k ), v ( k )) ⁇ q ⁇ 1 ( k )+ . . . + a q ⁇ 1,n ( ⁇ ( k ), v ( k )) ⁇ q ⁇ 1 ( k ) n + . . .
  • m,h ( k ) b 1,1 ( ⁇ ( k ), v ( k )) ⁇ 1 ( k )+ . . . + b 1,n ( ⁇ ( k ), v ( k )) ⁇ 1 ( k ) n +b 2,1 ( ⁇ ( k ), v ( k )) ⁇ 2 ( k )+ . . . + b 2,n ( ⁇ ( k ), v ( k )) ⁇ 2 ( k ) n + . . . +b q ⁇ 1,1 ( ⁇ ( k ), v ( k )) ⁇ q ⁇ 1 ( k )+ . . .
  • ⁇ g,h ( k ) a 1,1 ( ⁇ ( k ), v ( k )) ⁇ f r1 ( k )+ . . . + a q,n ( ⁇ ( k ), v ( k )) ⁇ f r1 ( k ) n +a 2,1 ( ⁇ ( k ), v ( k )) ⁇ f r2 ( k )+ . . . + a 2,n ( ⁇ ( k ), v ( k )) ⁇ f r2 ( k ) n +a 3,1 ( ⁇ ( k ), v ( k )) ⁇ f r3 ( k )+ . . .
  • h g,h ( k ) b 1,1 ( ⁇ ( k ), v ( k )) ⁇ f r1 ( k )+ . . . + b 1,n ( ⁇ ( k ), v ( k )) ⁇ f r1 ( k ) n +b 2,1 ( ⁇ ( k ), v ( k )) ⁇ f r2 ( k )+ . . . + b 2,n ( ⁇ ( k ), v ( k )) ⁇ f r2 ( k ) n +b 3,1 ( ⁇ ( k ), v ( k )) ⁇ f r3 ( k )+ . . .
  • FIG. 19 shows a flow chart that depicts the algorithm used to create the TG lookup table.
  • the sequence of steps composing the algorithm is indicated by the sequence of blocks 100 to 512 .
  • the algorithm measures the selected phenomelogical parameters, which in the preferred embodiment are the localized plantar pressures, and the kinetc/kinematic parameters ⁇ kn (k) and m kn (k) of a subject. The measured phenomelogical parameters are then normalized in function of the subject's weight.
  • the static characteristics linking the phenomelogical parameters to the kinetc/kinematic parameters and the time-dependant equations linking to the time are identified and are then normalized at block 106 .
  • the mathematical relationships (time-dependant equations and static characteristics) are broken down according to the phenomelogical parameters, the phases of locomotion portion, portions of locomotion, the speed of the subject and in the case were Equation 11 and Equation 12 are linear functions, the binary formatted data signals.
  • a polynomial regression is applied, at block 510 , to the mathematical relationships (time-dependant equations and static characteristics) contained in the set.
  • the results of the polynomial regressions are stored in the lookup table and are indexed according to the breakdown of block 108 .
  • Equation 13 If it is considered that the family of functions in Equation 13 are dependant on the state of the system they depict, thus following system of equations is obtained:
  • x j may be substituted by the time.
  • Equation 14 Equation 14 becomes:
  • Equation 15 may be written as:
  • Equation 16 and Equation 17 functions from a set of n s samples, obtained from experimentation.
  • a sample contains data related to the locomotion related phenomenon along with the corresponding kinematic ( ⁇ g,h ) or kinetic (m g,h ) variables.
  • Table 17 establishes the relationship between the time dependent state vector of the system, the locomotion related phenomenon and the kinematic and the kinetic variables of the lower extremities joints, which are the following static characteristics:
  • the methodology used to identify the parameters a j,i (x) is based on the application of a curve-fitting algorithm to a set of data provided from experimentation on human subjects. This experimentation is performed in a laboratory environment under controlled conditions, yielding a set of data in the form of an array, as shown in Table 16.
  • the curve-fitting algorithm is used to obtain the parameters a j,i (x) for every given time dependant state vector x. This data is used to construct the look-up table, as shown in Table 17.
  • the selected lower extremities joints is the knee joint, which is the joint between the thigh (th) and the shank (sh);
  • the selected plan of motion is the sagittal plan
  • the time dependant state vector further comprises the binary formatted magnitude of the four localized plantar pressures as added parameters to further segment the curve representing the kinematic ( ⁇ g,h ) or kinetic (m g,h ) variables.
  • the curve representing the kinematic ( ⁇ g,h ) or kinetic (m g,h ) variables cannot efficiently be approximated by a linear function.
  • the binary formatted plantar pressures are used to further subdivide the phase of locomotion portion in a number of intervals on which the curve representing the kinematic ( ⁇ g,h ) or kinetic (m g,h ) variables may be approximated by linear functions.
  • FIG. 21 is a close-up view of FIG. 20 where it is shown that the curve representing the kinematic ( ⁇ g,h ) or kinetic (m g,h ) variables appear relatively linear on each of the added subdivisions.
  • Equation 16 and Equation 17 which are linear functions entails that the time dependant stated vector will further comprise the binary formatted plantar pressures.
  • the lookup table contains mathematical relationships that have been normalized in amplitude.
  • the TG ( 44 ) uses the relative value of the localized plantar pressures instead of the magnitude of the signal. This means that the localized plantar pressures are set into a [0, 1] scale for a specific state of the whole system ⁇ (k). This ensures that the mathematical relationships (time-dependant equations and static characteristics) are independent of the weight of the subject.
  • the static characteristics lookup table is valid for any walking speed comprised within the operational conditions, which are, in the preferred embodiment, between 84 and 126 steps/min, though the lookup table may be computed for other intervals.
  • the Regulator ( 48 ) uses a control law with a similar structure to control algorithms currently employed in numerous commercial or experimental applications.
  • Various control laws may be implemented in the Regulator ( 48 ), examples of which are provided below.
  • the Regulator ( 48 ) may use a simple PID control law, which is written as:
  • ⁇ g,h x ( k ) ⁇ g,h x ( k ⁇ 1)+ b 0 ⁇ x g,h ( k ⁇ 2)+ b 1 ⁇ x g,h ( k ⁇ 1)+ b 2 ⁇ x g,h ( k ) Equation 23
  • the Regulator ( 48 ) may use an adaptive PID control law.
  • the transfer function of an adaptive PID is the same as that of a conventional PID but the parameters b 2 , b 1 and b 0 are function of the state of the whole system ⁇ (k). From Equation 23, the recurrence equation of the adaptive PID is:
  • ⁇ g,h x ( k ) ⁇ g,h x ( k ⁇ 1)+ b 0 ( ⁇ ( k )) ⁇ x g,h ( k ⁇ 2)+ b 1 ( ⁇ ( k )) ⁇ x g,h ( k ⁇ 1)+ b 2 ( ⁇ ( k )) ⁇ x g,h ( k ) Equation 24
  • the Regulator ( 48 ) may use a conventional PID with measured moment, which may be written as:

Abstract

A device and system for controlling an actuated prosthesis. The device includes a data signal input for each of the main artificial proprioceptors. Also, means for obtaining a first and a second derivative signal for at least some of the data signals, and means for obtaining a third derivative signal for at least one of the data signals. A set of first state machines, and means for generating the phase of locomotion portion using the states of the main artificial proprioceptors, and a second state machine as also included. The system includes a plurality of main artificial proprioceptors as well as means for obtaining a first and a second derivative signal for at least some of the data signals, and means for obtaining a third derivative signal for at least one of the data signals. Also, a set of first state machines, a second state machine, means for storing a lookup table, means for determining actual coefficient values from the lookup table, means for calculating at least one dynamic parameter value of the actuated prosthesis using the lookup table and at least some of the data signals, and means for converting the dynamic parameter value into an output signal to control the actuated prosthesis.

Description

    CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • The present application is a continuation of Ser. No. 11/270,684 filed Nov. 9, 2005 entitled “CONTROL DEVICE AND SYSTEM FOR CONTROLLING AN ACTUATED PROSTHESIS,” which is a divisional of Ser. No. 10/600,725 filed Jun. 20, 2003, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,147,667, which claims the benefit of U.S. provisional patent applications No. 60/405,281 filed Aug. 22, 2002; No. 60/424,261 filed Nov. 6, 2002; and No. 60/453,556 filed Mar. 11, 2003, all of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
  • TECHNICAL FIELD
  • The present invention relates to a control system and a method for controlling an actuated prosthesis. This invention is particularly well adapted for controlling an actuated leg prosthesis for above-knee amputees.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • As is well known to control engineers, the automation of complex mechanical systems is not something easy to achieve. Among such systems, conventional powered artificial limbs, or myoelectric prostheses, as they are more commonly referred to, are notorious for having control problems. These conventional prostheses are equipped with basic controllers that artificially mobilize the joints without any interaction from the amputee and are only capable of generating basic motions. Such basic controllers do not take into consideration the dynamic conditions of the working environment, regardless of the fact that the prosthesis is required to generate appropriate control within a practical application. They are generally lacking in predictive control strategies necessary to anticipate the artificial limb's response as well as lacking in adaptive regulation enabling the adjustment of the control parameters to the dynamics of the prosthesis. Because human limb mobility is a complex process including voluntary, reflex and random events at the same time, conventional myoelectric prostheses do not have the capability to interact simultaneously with the human body and the external environment in order to have minimal appropriate functioning.
  • For example, in the case of artificial leg prostheses for above-knee amputees, the complexity of human locomotion resulted in that the technical improvements of conventional leg prostheses have until now been focused on passive mechanisms. This proved to be truly detrimental to the integration of motorized leg prostheses onto the human body. According to amputees, specific conditions of use of conventional leg prostheses, such as repetitive movements and continuous loading, typically entail problems such as increases in metabolic energy expenditures, increases of socket pressure, limitations of locomotion speeds, discrepancies in the locomotion movements, disruptions of postural balance, disruptions of the pelvis-spinal column alignment, and increases in the use of postural clinical rehabilitation programs.
  • The major problem remains that the energy used during mobility mainly stems from the user because conventional leg prostheses are not equipped with servomechanisms that enable self-propulsion. This energy compensation has considerable short and long-term negative effects resulting from the daily use of such prostheses. Accordingly, the dynamic role played by the stump during locomotion renders impossible the prolonged wearing of the prostheses as it may create, among other things, several skin problems such as folliculitis, contact dermatitis, edema, cysts, skin shearing, scarring and ulcers. Although these skin problems may be partially alleviated by using a silicone sheath, a complete suction socket, or powder, skin problems remain one of the major preoccupations today.
  • As well, the passive nature of the conventional leg prostheses typically leads to movement instability, disrupted movement synchronism and reduced speed of locomotion. Recent developments in the field of energy-saving prosthetic components have partially contributed to improve energy transfer between the amputee and the prosthesis. Nevertheless, the problem of energy expenditure is still not fully resolved and remains the major concern.
  • Considering this background, it clearly appears that there was a need to develop an improved control system and a new method for controlling an actuated prosthesis in order to fulfill the needs of amputees, in particular those of above-knee amputees.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method for determining a portion of locomotion and a phase of locomotion portion in view of controlling an actuated prosthesis in real time, the method comprising:
  • providing a plurality of main artificial proprioceptors;
  • receiving a data signal from each of the main artificial proprioceptors;
  • obtaining a first and a second derivative signal for each data signal;
  • obtaining a third derivative signal for at least one of the data signals;
  • using a set of a first state machines to select one state among a plurality of possible states for each main artificial proprioceptor with the corresponding data and derivative signals;
  • generating the phase of locomotion portion using the states of the main artificial proprioceptors; and
  • using a second state machine to select the portion of locomotion among a plurality of possible portions of locomotion using events associated to the data signals.
  • In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method for controlling an actuated prosthesis in real time, the method comprising:
  • providing a plurality of main artificial proprioceptors;
  • receiving a data signal from each of the main artificial proprioceptors;
  • obtaining a first and a second derivative signal for each data signal;
  • obtaining a third derivative signal for at least one of the data signals;
  • using a set of first state machines to select one state among a plurality of possible states for each main artificial proprioceptor with the corresponding data and derivative signals;
  • generating the phase of locomotion portion using the states of the main artificial proprioceptors;
  • using a second state machine to select the portion of locomotion among a plurality of possible portions of locomotion using events associated to the data signals;
  • calculating a locomotion speed value;
  • determining coefficient values from a lookup table using at least the phase of locomotion portion, the portion of locomotion and the locomotion speed value;
  • calculating at least one dynamic parameter value of the actuated prosthesis using the coefficient values from the lookup table; and
  • converting the dynamic parameter value into an output signal to control the actuated prosthesis.
  • In accordance with a further aspect of the present invention, there is provided a device for determining a portion of locomotion and a phase of locomotion portion in view of controlling an actuated prosthesis in real time using a plurality of main artificial proprioceptors, the device comprising:
  • a data signal input for each of the main artificial proprioceptors;
  • means for obtaining a first and a second derivative signal for each data signal;
  • means for obtaining a third derivative signal for at least one of the data signals;
  • a set of first state machines, the first state machines being used to select one state among a plurality of possible states for each main artificial proprioceptor with the corresponding data and derivative signals;
  • means for generating the phase of locomotion portion using the states of the main artificial proprioceptors; and
  • a second state machine, the second state means being used to select the portion of locomotion among a plurality of possible portions of locomotion using events associated to the data signals.
  • In accordance with a further aspect of the present invention, there is provided a control system for controlling an actuated prosthesis in real time, the system comprising:
  • a plurality of main artificial proprioceptors;
  • means for obtaining a first and a second derivative signal for each data signal;
  • means for obtaining a third derivative signal for at least one of the data signals;
  • a set of first state machines, the first state machines being used to select one state among a plurality of possible states for each main artificial proprioceptor with the corresponding data and derivative signals;
  • means for generating the phase of locomotion portion using the states of the main artificial proprioceptors;
  • a second state machine, the second state machine being used to select the portion of locomotion among a plurality of possible portions of locomotion using events associated to data signals;
  • means for calculating a locomotion speed value;
  • means for storing a lookup table comprising coefficient values with reference to at least phases of locomotion, portions of locomotion and locomotion speed values;
  • means for determining actual coefficient values from the lookup table using at least the phase of locomotion portion, the portion of locomotion and the locomotion speed value;
  • means for calculating at least one dynamic parameter value of the actuated prosthesis using the coefficient values from the lookup table; and
  • means for converting the dynamic parameter value into an output signal to control the actuated prosthesis.
  • These and other aspects of the present invention are described in or apparent from the following detailed description, which description is made in conjunction with the accompanying figures.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing the control system in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention;
  • FIG. 2 is a perspective view of an example of an actuated prosthesis with a front actuator configuration;
  • FIG. 3 is a perspective view of an example of an actuated prosthesis with a rear actuator configuration;
  • FIG. 4 is an upper schematic view of an insole provided with plantar pressure sensors;
  • FIG. 5 is a cross sectional view of a sensor shown in FIG. 4;
  • FIG. 6 is an example of a state machine diagram for the selection of the portion of locomotion;
  • FIG. 7 is an example of the phases of locomotion portion within one portion of locomotion (BTW) in the state machine diagram shown in FIG. 6;
  • FIGS. 8 a to 8 d are examples of four data signals using plantar pressure sensors during typical walking on flat ground;
  • FIGS. 9 a to 9 d give an example of a data signal obtained from a plantar pressure sensor at the calcaneus region and its first three differentials;
  • FIGS. 10 a to 10 d give an example of a data signal obtained from a plantar pressure sensor at the metatarsophalangeal (MP) region and its first three differentials;
  • FIGS. 11 a to 11 d give an example of the states of a plantar pressure sensor with reference to the data signal and its three first differentiations for a plantar pressure sensor at the calcaneous region;
  • FIGS. 12 a to 12 c give an example of the states of a plantar pressure sensor with reference to the data signal and its three first differentiation for a plantar pressure sensor at the metatarsophalangeal (MP)region;
  • FIG. 13 is an example of a state machine diagram for the selection of the state of the plantar pressure sensors for the calcaneous region;
  • FIG. 14 is an example of a state machine diagram for the selection of the state of the plantar pressure sensors at the metatarsophalangeal (MP) region;
  • FIG. 15 is an overall block diagram of the Phase Recognition Module (PRM);
  • FIG. 16 is a block diagram showing the zero calibration;
  • FIG. 17 is a block diagram showing the subject's weight calibration;
  • FIG. 18 is a block diagram of the Trajectory Generator (TG);
  • FIG. 19 is a block diagram showing the creation of the Trajectory Generator (TG) lookup table;
  • FIG. 20 is a graph showing an example of curve representing a kinematic or kinetic variable for a given portion of locomotion, phase of locomotion portion and subject's speed; and
  • FIG. 21 is an enlarged representation of FIG. 20.
  • ACRONYMS
  • The detailed description and figures refer to the following technical acronyms:
  • A/D Analog/Digital
  • BDW “Downward Inclined Walking-Beginning path” portion of locomotion
  • BGD “Going Down Stairs-Beginning path” portion of locomotion
  • BGU “Going Up Stairs-Beginning path portion of locomotion
  • BTW “Linear Walking-Beginning path” portion of locomotion
  • BTW_SWING Detection of typical walking gr leg during leg swing
  • BUW “Upward Inclined Walking-Beginning path” portion of locomotion
  • CDW “Downward Inclined Walking-Cyclical path” portion of locomotion
  • CGD “Going Down Stairs-Cyclical path” portion of locomotion
  • CGU “Going Up Stairs-Cyclical path” portion of locomotion
  • CTW “Linear Walking-Cyclical path” portion of locomotion
  • CUW “Upward Inclined Walking-Cyclical path” portion of locomotion
  • ECW “Curve Walking Path” portion of locomotion
  • EDW “Downward Inclined Walking-Ending path” portion of locomotion
  • EGD “Going Down Stairs-Ending path” portion of locomotion
  • EGU “Going Up Stairs-Ending path” portion of locomotion
  • ETW “Linear Walking-Ending path” portion of locomotion
  • EUW “Upward Inclined Walking-Ending path” portion of locomotion
  • FR_BINx Detection of a positive frx
  • FRfst_BINzx Detection of positive first differentiation of frx
  • FRsec_BINx Detection of positive second differentiation of frx
  • FRtrd_BINx Detection of positive third differentiation of frx
  • FR_HIGHx Detection of frx level above the STA envelope
  • FR_LOWx Detection of frx level between the zero envelope and the STA envelope
  • FSR Force Sensing Resistor
  • GR_POSy Detection of a positive gry
  • MIN_SIT Detection of a minimum time in portion SIT
  • MP Metatarsophalangeal
  • PID Proportional-Integral-Differential
  • PKA_SDWSit down knee angle
  • PKA_ETWEnd walking knee angle
  • PKA_STA Stance knee angle
  • PKA_SIT Sit down knee angle
  • PKA_SUP_RAMPStanding up knee angle
  • PPMV Plantar Pressure Maximal Variation
  • PPS Plantar Pressure Sensor
  • PRM Phase Recognition Module
  • REG Regulator
  • RF Radio Frequency
  • SDW “Sitting down” portion of locomotion
  • SIT “Sitting” portion of locomotion
  • STA “Stance of feet” portion of locomotion
  • STA BIN Detection of a static evolution of all frx
  • STATIC_GRy Detection of gry level below the zero angular speed envelope and the zero acceleration envelope
  • suma Localized plantar pressure signal of left foot
  • sumb Localized plantar pressure signal of right foot
  • sumc Localized plantar pressure signal of both calcaneus
  • sumd Localized plantar pressure signal of both MP
  • sume Localized plantar pressure signal of both feet
  • SUMBINy Non-Zero of sumy
  • SUP “Standing Up” portion of locomotion
  • SVD Singular Values Decomposition
  • SWINGy Detection of a swing prior to a foot strike
  • TG Trajectory Generator
  • XHLSB Heel Loading State Bottom (X=Left (L) or Right (R))
  • XHLSM Heel Loading State Middle (X=Left (L) or Right (R))
  • XHLST Heel Loading State Top (X=Left (L) or Right (R))
  • XHSTA Heel STAtic state (X=Left (L) or Right (R))
  • XHUSB Heel Unloading State Bottom (X=Left (L) or Right (R))
  • XHUST Heel Unloading State Top (X=Left (L) or Right (R))
  • XHZVS Heel Zero Value State (X=Left (L) or Right (R))
  • XMLSM MP Loading State Middle (X=Left (L) or Right (R))
  • XMLST MP Loading State Top (X=Left (L) or Right (R))
  • XMSTA MP STAtic state (X=Left (L) or Right (R))
  • XMUSB MP Unloading State Bottom (X=Left (L) or Right (R))
  • XMUST MP Unloading State Top (X=Left (L) or Right (R))
  • XMZVS MP Zero Value State (X=Left (L) or Right (R))
  • ZV_FRfstx Threshold to consider the first differentiation of frx to be positive.
  • ZV_FRsecx Threshold to consider the second differentiation of frx to be positive.
  • ZV_FRtrdx Threshold to consider the third differentiation of frx to be positive.
  • ZV_FRx Threshold to consider frs to be positive
  • ZV_SUMfst Threshold to consider the absolute value of the 1st diff. of sumy to be positive.
  • ZV_SUMsec Threshold to consider the absolute value of the 2nd diff. of sumy to be positive
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • The appended figures show a control system (10) in accordance with the preferred embodiment of the present invention. It should be understood that the present invention is not limited to the illustrated implementation since various changes and modifications may be effected herein without departing from the scope of the appended claims.
  • FIG. 1 shows the control system (10) being combined with an autonomous actuated prosthesis for amputees. It is particularly well adapted for use with an actuated leg prosthesis for above-knee amputees, such as the prostheses (12) shown in FIGS. 2 and 3. Unlike conventional prostheses, these autonomous actuated prostheses (12) are designed to supply the mechanical energy necessary to move them by themselves. The purpose of the control system (10) is to provide the required signals allowing to control an actuator (14). To do so, the control system (10) is interfaced with the amputee using artificial proprioceptors (16) to ensure proper coordination between the amputee and the movements of the actuated prosthesis (12). The set of artificial proprioceptors (16) captures information, in real time, about the dynamics of the amputee's movement and provides that information to the control system (10). The control system (10) is then used to determine the joint trajectories and the required force or torque that must be applied by the actuator (14) in order to provide coordinated movements.
  • FIG. 2 shows an example of an actuated leg prosthesis (12) for an above-knee amputee. This prosthesis (12) is powered by a linear actuator (14). The actuator (14) moves a knee member (20) with reference to a trans-tibial member (22), both of which are pivotally connected using a first pivot axis. More sophisticated models may be equipped with a more complex pivot or more than one pivot at that level.
  • An artificial foot (24) is provided under a bottom end of the trans-tibial member (22). The knee member (20) comprises a connector (25) to which a socket (26) can be attached. The socket (26) is used to hold the sump of the amputee. The design of the knee member (20) is such that the actuator (14) has an upper end connected to another pivot on the knee member (20). The bottom end of the actuator (14) is then connected to a third pivot at the bottom end of the trans-tibial member (22). In use, the actuator (14) is operated by activating an electrical motor therein. This rotates, in one direction or another, a screw (28). The screw (28) is then moved in or out with reference to a follower (30), thereby changing the relative angular position between the two movable parts, namely the knee member (20) and the trans-tibial member (22).
  • FIG. 3 shows an actuated leg prosthesis (12) in accordance to a rear actuator configuration. This embodiment is essentially similar to that of FIG. 2 and is illustrated with a different model of actuator (14).
  • It should be noted that the present invention is not limited to the mechanical configurations illustrated in FIGS. 2 and 3. The control system (10) may be used with a leg prosthesis having more than one joint. For instance, it can be used with a prosthesis having an ankle joint, a metatarsophalangeal joint or a hip joint in addition to a knee joint. Moreover, instead of a conventional socket a osseo-integrated devices could also be used, ensuring a direct attachment between the mechanical component of the prosthesis and the amputee skeleton. Other kinds of prostheses may be used as well.
  • Referring back to FIG. 1, the information provided by the artificial proprioceptors (16) are used by the control system (10) to generate an output signal. These output signals are preferably sent to the actuator (14) via a power drive (32) which is itself connected to a power supply (34), for instance a battery, in order to create the movement. The power drive (32) is used to control the amount of power being provided to the actuator (14). Since the actuator (14) usually includes an electrical motor, the power drive (32) generally supplies electrical power to the actuator (14) to create the movement.
  • Preferably, feedback signals are received from sensors (36) provided on the prosthesis (12). In the case of an actuated leg prosthesis (12) such as the one illustrated in FIGS. 2 and 3, these feedback signals may-indicate the relative position measured between two movable parts and the torque between them. This option allows the control system (10) to adequately adjust the output signal. Other types of physical parameters may be monitored as well.
  • The control system (10) shown in FIG. 1 comprises an interface (40) through which data signals coming from the artificial proprioceptors (16) are received. They may be received either from an appropriate wiring or from a wireless transmission. In the case of actuated leg prostheses for above-knee amputees, data signals from the artificial proprioceptors (16) provided on a healthy leg are advantageously sent through the wireless transmission using an appropriate RF module. For example, a simple off-the-shelf RF module with a dedicated specific frequency, such as 916 MHz, may be used. For a more robust implementation though, the use of a RF module with a spread spectrum or frequency hopper is preferable. Of course, other configurations may be used as well, such as a separate A/D converter, different resolution or sampling values and various combinations of communication link technologies such as wired, wireless, optical, etc.
  • The control system (10) further comprises a part called “Phase Recognition Module” or PRM (42). The PRM (42) is a very important part of the control system (10) since it is used to determine two important parameters, namely the portion of locomotion and the phase of locomotion portion. These parameters are explained later in the text. The PRM (42) is connected to a Trajectory Generator, or TG (44), from which dynamic parameters required to control the actuated prosthesis (12) are calculated to create the output signal. A lookup table (6) is stored in a memory connected to the TG (44). Moreover, the control system (10) comprises a regulator (48) at which the feedback signals are received and the output signal can be adjusted.
  • Software residing on an electronic circuit board contains all the above mentioned algorithms enabling the control system (10) to provide the required signals allowing to control the actuator (14). More specifically, the software contains the following three modules: the Phase Recognition Module (PRM), the Trajectories Generator (TG) and the Regulator (REG). Of course, any number of auxiliary modules may be added.
  • The artificial proprioceptors (16) preferably comprise main artificial proprioceptors and auxiliary artificial proprioceptors. The main artificial proprioceptors are preferably localized plantar pressure sensors which measure the vertical plantar pressure of a specific underfoot area, while the auxiliary artificial proprioceptors are preferably a pair of gyroscopes which measure the angular speed of body segments of the lower extremities and a kinematic sensor which measures the angle of the prosthesis knee joint. The plantar pressure sensors are used under both feet, including the artificial foot. It could also be used under two artificial feet if required. One of the gyroscopes is located at the shank of the normal leg while the other is located on the upper portion of the prosthesis above the knee joint. As for the kinematic sensor, it is located at the prosthesis knee joint. Other examples of artificial proprioceptors (16) are neuro-sensors which measure the action potential of motor nerves, myoelectrical electrodes which measure the internal or the external myoelectrical activity of muscles, needle matrix implants which measure the cerebral activity of specific region of the cerebrum cortex such as motor cortex or any other region indirectly related to the somatic mobility of limbs or any internal or external kinematic and/or kinetic sensors which measure the position and the torque at any joints of the actuated prosthesis. Of course, depending on the application, additional types of sensors which provide information about various dynamics of human movement may be used.
  • FIG. 4 shows a right insole (10) provided with two plantar pressure sensors (16) positioned at strategic locations. Their size and position were defined in accordance with the stability and the richness (intensity) of the localized plantar pressure signals provided by certain underfoot areas during locomotion. Experimentation provided numerous data concerning the spatial distribution of foot pressures and more specifically on the Plantar Pressure Maximal Variation (PPMV) during locomotion. The PPMV, denoted Δmaxfr,ij, was defined as the maximum variation of the plantar pressure at a particular point (underfoot area of coordinate i,j) during locomotion. The X-Y axis (52) in FIG. 4 was used to determine the i,j coordinates of each underfoot area.
  • A PPMV of a given underfoot area of coordinates i,j during a given step denoted event x, is defined as stable, through a set of N walking steps, if the ratio of the absolute difference between this PPMV and the average PPMV over the set is inferior to a certain value representing the criteria of stability, thus:
  • ( Δ max f r , ij x - n = 0 N Δ max f r , ij n N n = 0 N Δ max f r , ij n N ) · 100 % ( S % ) Equation 1
      • where Δmaxfr,ij|x is the PPMV localized at underfoot area of coordinates i, j during the event x, thus
      • Δmaxfr,ij|x=fr,ij max(k)|k→0 to K for the event x
      • K is the number of samples (frames),
      • N is the number of steps in the set,
      • S is the chosen criteria to define if a given PPMV is stable.
  • A PPMV of a given underfoot area of coordinates i,j during a given step denoted event x, is defined as rich in information, through a set of N walking steps, if the ratio between the PPMV and the average PPMV of the set is superior to certain value representing the criteria of richness thus:
  • Δ max f r , ij x ( R % ) · ( n = 0 N Δ max f r , ij n N ) max i , j Equation 2
      • where Δmaxfr,ij|x is the PPMV localized at underfoot area of coordinates i, j during the event x, thus
      • Δmaxfr,ij|x−fr,ij max(k)|k→0 to K−fr,ij min(k)|k→0 to K for the event x
      • K is the number of samples (frames),
      • N is the number of steps in the set,
      • R is the chosen criteria to define if a given PPMV is rich in information.
  • It was found by experimentation that the size and the position of plantar pressure sensor are well defined when the criteria are set at 5% and 10% for the stability and the richness PPMV respectively. As a result, it was found that the calcaneus and the Metatarsophalangeal (MP) regions are two regions of the foot sole where the PPMV may be considered as providing a signal that is both stable and rich in information.
  • In FIG. 4, the plantar pressure sensors (16) are provided in a custom-made insole (10), preferably in the form of a standard orthopedic insole, that is modified to embed the two sensors (16) for the measurement of two localized plantar pressures. Each sensor (16), as shown in FIG. 5, is preferably composed of a thin Force-Sensing Resistor (FSR) polymer cell (54) directly connected to the interface (40) or indirectly using an intermediary system (not shown), for instance a wireless emitter. Mechanical adapters may be used if FSR cells of appropriate size are not available. The FSR cell (54) has a decreasing electrical resistance in response to an increasing force applied perpendicularly to the surface thereof. Each cell (54) outputs a time variable electrical signal for which the intensity is proportional to the total vertical plantar pressure over its surface area.
  • The normalized position of the pressure sensors and their size are shown in Table 1, where the length L and the width W are respectively the length and the width of the subject's foot. The coefficients in Table 1 have been obtained by experimentation. A typical diameter for the plantar pressure sensors (16) is between 20 and 30 mm.
  • TABLE 1
    Normalized position and size of pressure sensors
    Area Position (X, Y) Size (diameter)
    Calcaneus (0.51 · W, 0.14 · L) 0.29 · {square root over (L · W)}
    MP  (0.7 · W, 0.76 · L) 0.24 · {square root over (L · W)}
  • In use, the PRM (42) ensures, in real-time, the recognition of the phase of locomotion portion and the portion of locomotion of an individual based on the information provided by the artificial proprioceptors (16). The PRM (42) is said to operate in real time, which means that the computations and other steps are performed continuously and with almost no delay.
  • In accordance with the present invention, it was found that data signals received from individual artificial proprioceptors (16) can provide enough information in order to control the actuator (14) of an actuated prosthesis (12). For instance, in the case of plantar pressure sensors, it has been noticed experimentally that the slope (first derivative), the sign of the concavity (second derivative) and the slope of concavity (third derivative) of the data signals received from plantar pressure sensors, and of combinations of those signals, give highly accurate and stable information on the human locomotion. The PRM (42) is then used to decompose of the human locomotion into three levels, namely the states of each artificial proprioceptor (16), the phase of locomotion portion and the portion of locomotion. This breakdown ensures the proper identification of the complete mobility dynamics of the lower extremities in order to model the human locomotion.
  • The actual states of each main artificial proprioceptor depict the first level of the locomotion breakdown. This level is defined as the evolution of the main artificial proprioceptors' sensors during the mobility of the lower extremities. Each sensor has its respective state identified from the combination of its data signal and its first three differential signals. For the main artificial proprioceptors of the preferred embodiment, which provide information about localized plantar pressures, it has been discovered experimentally that the localized plantar pressures signals located at the calcaneous and at the metatarsophalangeal (MP) regions may be grouped into seven and six states respectively.
  • For the sensors at the calcaneous regions, the states are preferably as follows:
  • XHLSB Heel Loading State Bottom (X=Left (L) or Right (R))
  • XHLSM Heel Loading State Middle (X=Left (L) or Right (R))
  • XHLST Heel Loading State Top (X=Left (L) or Right (R))
  • XHSTA Heel STAtic State (X=Left (L) or Right (R))
  • XHUSB Heel Unloading State Bottom (X=Left (L) or Right (R))
  • XHUST Heel Unloading State Top (X=Left (L) or Right (R))
  • XHZVS Heel Zero Value State (X=Left (L) or Right (R))
  • For the sensors at the MP regions, the states are preferably as follows:
  • XMLSB MP Loading State Bottom (X=Left (L) or Right (R))
  • XMLST MP Loading State Top (X=Left (L) or Right (R))
  • XMSTA MP STAtic State (X=Left (L) or Right (R))
  • XMUSB MP Unloading State Bottom (X=Left (L) or Right (R))
  • XMUST MP Unloading State Top (X=Left (L) or Right (R))
  • XMZVS MP Zero Value State (X=Left (L) or Right (R))
  • Identifying the states at each sensor allows to obtain the second level of the locomotion breakdown, referred to as the phase of locomotion portion. The phase of locomotion portion is defined as the progression of the subject's mobility within the third level of locomotion breakdown, namely the portion of locomotion. This third level of the locomotion breakdown defines the type of mobility the subject is currently in, such as, for example, standing, sitting or climbing up stairs. Each locomotion portion contains a set of sequential phases illustrating the progression of the subject's mobility within that locomotion portion. The phase sequence mapping for each locomotion portion has been identified by experimentation according to the evolution of the state of the localized plantar pressures throughout the portion.
  • The portions of locomotion are preferably as follows:
  • BDW “Downward Inclined Walking-Beginning path”
  • BGD “Going Down Stairs-Beginning path”
  • BGU “Going Up Stairs-Beginning path
  • BTW “Linear Walking-Beginning path”
  • BUW “Upward Inclined Walking Beginning path”
  • CDW “Downward Inclined Walking-Cyclical path”
  • CGD “Going Down Stairs-Cyclical path”
  • CGU “Going Up Stairs-Cyclical path”
  • CTW “Linear Walking-Cyclical path”
  • CUW “Upward Inclined Walking-Cyclical path”
  • ECW “Curve Walking Path”
  • EDW “Downward Inclined Walking-Ending path”
  • EGD “Going Down Stairs-Ending path”
  • EGU “Going Up Stairs-Ending path”
  • ETW “Linear Walking-Ending path”
  • EUW “Upward Inclined Walking-Ending path”
  • SDW “Sitting down”
  • SIT “Sitting”
  • STA “Stance of feet”
  • SUP “Standing Up”
  • FIG. 6 illustrates an example of the state machine concerning these various portions of locomotion.
  • FIG. 7 shows an example of a phase sequence mapping, BTW_1 to BTW_25, for the Beginning Path of Linear Walking (BTW) portion of locomotion. All locomotion portions have similar patterns of phase sequence mapping, though the number of phases may vary from one locomotion portion to another. The number of phases depends on the desired granularity of the decomposition of the locomotion portion. The phases are determined experimentally by observing the states of the four localized plantar pressures at specific time intervals, which are determined by the desired granularity. Since a phase is the combination of the states of the four localized plantar pressures, the phase boundary conditions are therefore defined as the combination of each localized plantar pressure state boundary conditions.
  • For the selection of the portion of locomotion the subject is in, the algorithm uses the state machine approach. For this purpose, the algorithm uses a set of events which values define the conditions, or portion boundary conditions, to pass from one locomotion portion to another. These events are identified by experimentation according to the evolution of the localized plantar pressure signals, the complementary signals and their first three differentials, as well as the signals from the auxiliary artificial proprioceptors, when the subject passes from one locomotion portion to another.
  • Having determined the states of the main artificial proprioceptors' sensors, the phase of locomotion portion and portion of locomotion of the subject, the TG (44) can be used to calculate one or more dynamic parameter values to be converted to an output signal for the control of the actuator. Examples of dynamic parameter values are the angular displacement and the torque (or moment of force) at the knee joint of the actuated leg prosthesis (12). Since these values are given in real time, they provide what is commonly referred to as the “system's trajectory”. At any time k during the subject's locomotion, a mathematical relationship is selected according to the state of the whole system, that is the states of the main artificial proprioceptors, the phase of locomotion portion, the portion of locomotion and the walking speed. Following which, the angular displacement θkn and the moment of force mkn are then computed using simple time dependant equations and static characteristics associated with the state of the system, thereby providing the joint's trajectory to the knee joint member. This process is repeated throughout the subject's locomotion.
  • FIGS. 8 a to 8 d show examples of data signals from the four localized plantar pressure sensors (16) during a standard walking path at 109,5 steps/minute. The four signals, fr1(t), fr2(t), fr3(t) and fr4(t), correspond to the variation in time of the localized plantar pressure at the calcaneus region of the left foot (FIG. 8 a), the MP region of the left foot (FIG. 8 b), the calcaneus region of the right foot (FIG. 8 c), and the MP region of the right foot (FIG. 8 d).
  • In accordance with the present invention, the PRM (42) uses the first, the second and the third differentials of each of those four localized plantar pressure signals in order to determine the sensors' state. From there, the PRM (42) will be able to determine the phase of locomotion portion and portion of locomotion of the subject.
  • FIGS. 9 a to 9 d and 10 a to 10 d show examples of graphs of localized plantar pressures, as well as their first, second and third differentials, at the calcaneus and MP regions respectively, for a linear walking path of 109,5 steps/minute.
  • FIGS. 11 a to 11 d show graphically the state boundary conditions for a typical localized plantar pressure signal, and its first three differentials, at the calcaneous region, while FIGS. 12 a to 12 c do so for the localized plantar pressure signal, and its first two differentials, at the MP region. This shows the relationships between the various data and derivative signals, and the states.
  • In use, for the detection of the state of the four localized plantar pressures, denoted frx where x=[1, 4], the PRM (42) uses a set of first state machines to select, at each increment in time, the current state of each sensor. For this purpose, the algorithm uses a set of events whose values define the conditions to pass from one state to another for each of the localized plantar pressures. Table 2 lists the events:
  • TABLE 2
    List of events used to evaluate the state boundary
    condition of a localized plantar pressure
    Event Acronym Description
    Non-Zero of frx FR_BINx Detection of a positive frx
    First Differentiation FRfst_BINx Detection of positive first
    of frx differentiation of frx
    Second Differentiation FRsec_BINx Detection of positive second
    of frx differentiation of frx
    Third Differentiation FRtrd_BINx Detection of positive third
    of frx differentiation of frx
    Static frx STA_BINx Detection of a static
    evolution of all frx
  • The conditions placed on the values of each of the depicted events of Table 2 define when the state machines pass from one state to another for each of the localized plantar pressures. Table 3 lists the thresholds used to assess if the aforementioned conditions are met, in which sumy depicts the five complementary signals, for y=[a, e] as described in Table 4, while Table 5 shows the mathematical form of the events used to evaluate the state boundary condition of the localized plantar pressures.
  • TABLE 3
    List of thresholds used to evaluate the state boundary
    condition of a localized plantar pressure
    Threshold Acronym Description
    Positive value ZV_FRx Threshold to consider frx to be positive
    of frx
    Positive value ZV_FRfstx Threshold to consider the first
    of ∂frx/∂t differentiation of frx to be positive.
    Positive value ZV_FRsecx Threshold to consider the second
    of ∂2frx/∂t2 differentiation of frx to be positive.
    Positive value ZV_FRtrdx Threshold to consider the third
    of ∂3frx/∂t3 differentiation of frx to be positive.
    Position value ZV_SUMfst Threshold to consider the absolute value
    of ∂sumy/∂t of the first differentiation of sumy to be
    positive.
    Positive value ZV_SUMsec Threshold to consider the absolute value
    of ∂2sumy/∂t2 of the second differentiation of sumy to
    be positive
  • TABLE 4
    List of complementary signals built from the four
    localized plantar pressure fr1, fr2, fr3, fr4,
    Mathematical
    Signal Acronym Description value
    Left foot suma Localized plantar pressure (fr1 + fr2)/2
    signal of left foot
    Right foot sumb Localized plantar pressure (fr3 + fr4)/2
    signal of right foot
    Both sumc Localized plantar pressure (fr1 + fr3)/2
    calcaneus signal of both calcaneus
    Both MP sumd Localized plantar pressure (fr2 + fr4)/2
    signal of both MP
    Both feet sume Localized plantar pressure (fr1 + fr2 +
    signal of both feet fr3 + fr4)/4
  • TABLE 5
    Mathematical formulation of events
    Acronym Mathematical form
    FR_BINx { 0 if f rx ( k ) < ZV_FR x 1 otherwise }
    FRfst_BINx { 0 if df rx ( k ) d ( k ) < ZV_FRfst x 1 otherwise }
    FRsec_BINx { 0 if d 2 f rx ( k ) d 2 ( k ) < ZV_FRsec x 1 otherwise }
    FRtrd_BINx { 0 if d 3 f rx ( k ) d 3 ( k ) < ZV_FRtrd x 1 otherwise }
    STA_BIN { 0 if ( ( dsum y ( k ) d ( k ) > ZV_SUMfst ) ( d 2 sum y ( k ) d 2 ( k ) > ZV_SUMsec ) ) y 1 otherwise }
  • FIGS. 13 and 14 show, respectively, the diagrams of the state machines used for the detection of the state of the localized plantar pressure at the calcaneous and the MP regions, while Tables 6 and 7 summarize the state boundary conditions between the states of each localized plantar pressure.
  • TABLE 6
    List of state boundary conditions defining the states of the
    main artificial proprioceptors at the calcaneus region
    CURRENT NEXT
    STATE STATE BOUNDARY CONDITIONS STATE
    Any state !FR_BINx XHZVS
    Any state FR_BINx && STA_BINx XHSTA
    Any state FR_BINx && !STA_BINx && XHLSB
    FRfst_BINx && FRsec_BINx &&
    FRtrd_BINx
    Any state FR_BINx && !STA_BINx && XHLSM
    FRfst_BINx && FRsec_BINx &&
    !FRtrd_BINx
    Any state FR_BINx && !STA_BINx && XHLST
    FRfst_BINx && !FRsec_ BINx
    Any state FR_BINx && !STA_BINx && XHUST
    !FRfst_BINx && !FRsec_ BINx
    Any state FR_BINx && !STA_BINx && XHUSB
    !FRfst_BINx && FRsec_ BINx
  • TABLE 7
    List of state boundary conditions defining the states of the
    main artificial proprioceptors at metatarsophalangeal region
    CURRENT NEXT
    STATE STATE BOUNDARY CONDITIONS STATE
    Any state !FR_BINx XMZVS
    Any state FR_BINx && STA_BINx XMSTA
    Any state FR_BINx && !STA_BINx && XMLSB
    FRfst_BINx && FRsec_ BINx
    Any state FR_BINx && !STA_BINx && XMLST
    FRfst_BINx && !FRsec_ BINx
    Any state FR_BINx && !STA_BINx && XMUST
    !FRfst_BINx && !FRsec_ BINx
    Any state FR_BINx && !STA_BINx && XMUSB
    !FRfst_BINx && FRsec_ BINx
  • FIG. 15 shows a flow chart that depicts the PRM algorithm, which comprises two main parts, namely the pre-processing of the main artificial proprioceptors signals and the locomotion breakdown, illustrated by blocks 100 and 102 respectively. The sequence of steps performed the pre-processing of the main artificial proprioceptors signals, represented by block 100, is indicated by the sequence of blocks 104 to 118. At block 104, the four localized plantar pressures signals are received from the interface and normalized at block 106 using subject specific calibration values. The four normalized local plantar pressures then go through the pre-processing steps represented by blocks 104 to 118. At block 112, the four normalized local plantar pressures are filtered to reduce their spectral composition. A counter is then initialized at block 108, which in turn starts a loop comprising blocks 110 to 116. The first step of the loop, at block 110, consist in the differentiation of the signals. The signals resulting from the differentiation step are filtered at block 112, in order to limit the noise induced during the differential computation, and go through binary formatting at block 114. At block 116, the algorithm checks if the counter has reached 3 iterations. If so, the algorithm, having computed all first three derivatives of the four normalized local plantar pressures signals, exits the loop to block 102. If not, the algorithm proceeds to block 110 where the counter is increased at block 118 and the loop is repeated, in order to computed the next derivative, by proceeding to block 110. When the loop exists to block 102, the algorithm enters into the locomotion breakdown part of the algorithm. The sequence of steps performed by the locomotion breakdown, represented by block 102, is indicated by the sequence of blocks 120 to 124. From the four normalized local plantar pressures and their first three derivatives, block 120 determines the states of each sensor while blocks 122 and 124 determine the phase and the portion of locomotion, respectively.
  • The normalization step, represented by block 106, consists in levelling the magnitude of the raw data signals according to the anthropomorphic characteristics of the subject such as, in the preferred embodiment, the subject's weight. The raw data signals of the four localized plantar pressures are divided by the total magnitude provided by the four sensors during calibration and then provided as the normalized local plantar pressures to block 110.
  • At block 112 the normalized raw signals of the four localized plantar pressures and their first three differentials are numerically filtered to reduce their spectral composition, as well as to limit the noise induced during the derivative computation. The preferred embodiment of the PRM (42) uses a 2nd order numerical filter in which the cut-off frequency, the damping factor and the forward shifting have been set, experimentally, to optimize the calculation according to the locomotion portion and the type of signal. The PRM (42) may use other types of numerical filters as well, for example a “Butterworth” filter, as long as the filter's dynamic is similar to the one provided by the 2nd order filter shown thereafter for each locomotion portion. Equation 4 shows the mathematical relationships of the 2nd order numerical filter which is implemented within the PRM (42). Table 8 provides examples of filtering parameters for three different portions of locomotion.
  • Laplace Form
  • H ( s ) = ω n 2 s 2 + 2 · ζ · ω n · s + ω n 2 Equation 3
      • where ωn in the nth damping natural frequency,
  • ω n = ω r 1 - 2 ζ 2 , ζ < 1
      • ωr is called the resonance frequency for ζ<1
      • ζ is the damping factor
    Recursive Form
  • H ( z ) = b 2 z - 1 + b 3 z - 2 a 1 + a 2 z - 1 + a 3 z - 2 a 1 y ( k ) = b 2 x ( k - 1 ) + b 3 x ( k - 2 ) - a 2 y ( k - 1 ) - a 3 y ( k - 2 ) where a 1 = 1 a 2 = - 2 · α · β a 3 = α 2 b 1 = 0 b 2 = 1 - α · [ β + ζ · ω n · ω r ] b 3 = α 2 + α · [ ζ · ω n · ω r - β ] α = - ζ · ω n T e β = cos ( ω r T e ) = sin ( ω r T e ) T e = sampling rate Equation 4
  • TABLE 8
    Examples of parameters of 2nd order filters used by the PRM
    Filtering Parameters
    Type of Cut-Off Damping Forward
    Portion of locomotion signal Frequency (Fc) Factor (z) Shifting
    Linear Walking - Raw 2 0.680 7
    Beginning path (BTW) Derivative 3 0.700 3
    Linear Walking - Raw 2 0.680 7
    Cyclical path (CTW) Derivative 3 0.700 3
    Linear Walking - Raw 2 0.680 7
    Ending path (ETW) Derivative 3 0.700 3
  • At block 110, the derivatives are obtained by the standard method consisting of numerically differentiating the current and the previous samples of localized plantar pressures.
  • The derivatives obtained at block 110 then go through binary formatting at block 114. The result of the binary formatting operation will be a “1” if the sign of the derivative is positive, “0” if it is negative. This step facilitates the identification of the sign changes of the differentiated signals as binary events.
  • At block 120, the PRM (42) determines the current state of each sensor using state machines such as the ones shown in FIGS. 13 and 14.
  • In the PRM (42), the states of the localized plantar pressures are preferably expressed as a 10-bit words in which each bit corresponds to a specific possible state. Tables 9 to 12 list the binary equivalents of each state of the localized plantar pressures at the calcaneous and the MP regions of the left and the right foot. Of course, words of different bit length may be used as well to represent the state of each localized plantar pressure.
  • TABLE 9
    Numerical labels of the states for the localized plantar
    pressure at calcaneous area of the left foot
    DECIMAL
    STATE BINARY LABEL LABEL
    LHSBS
    0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
    LHLSB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
    LHLSM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2
    LHLST 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3
    LHUST 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 4
    LHUSM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5
    LHUSB 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 6
    LHZVS 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7
    LHSTA 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8
  • TABLE 10
    Numerical labels of the states for the localized plantar
    pressure at metatarsophalangeal area of the left foot
    DECIMAL
    STATE BINARY LABEL LABEL
    LMSBS
    0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
    LMLSB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
    LMLSM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2
    LMLST 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3
    LMUST 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 4
    LMUSM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5
    LMUSB 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 6
    LMZVS 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7
    LHSTA 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8
  • TABLE 11
    Numerical labels of the states for the localized plantar
    pressure at calcaneous area of the right foot
    DECIMAL
    STATE BINARY LABEL LABEL
    RHSBS
    0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
    RHLSB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
    RHLSM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2
    RHLST 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3
    RHUST 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 4
    RHUSM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5
    RHUSB 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 6
    RHZVS 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7
    RHSTA 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8
  • TABLE 12
    Numerical labels of the states for the localized plantar
    pressure at metatarsophalangeal area of the right foot
    DECIMAL
    STATE BINARY LABEL LABEL
    RMSBS
    0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
    RMLSB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
    RMLSM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2
    RMLST 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3
    RMUST 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 4
    RMUSM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5
    RMUSB 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 6
    RMZVS 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7
    RHSTA 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8
  • At block 122, the PRM (42) generates the phase, which is preferably expressed as the direct binary combination of the states of the four localized plantar pressures. Accordingly, the phase can be represented by a 40-bit word wherein the lower part of the lower half word, the higher part of the lower half word, the lower part of the higher half word and the higher part of the higher half word correspond, respectively, to the calcaneous area of the left foot, the MP area of the left foot, the calcaneous area of the right foot and the MP area of the right foot, as represented in Tables 9 to 12. Table 13 presents an example of the identification of a phase from the states of the four localized plantar pressures.
  • TABLE 13
    Identification of a phase from the states of the main artificial proprioceptors
    State of Localized Plantar Pressure
    Right Foot Left Foot
    MP area Calcaneous MP area Calcaneous Corresponding Phase
    0000000100 0000010000 0000000001 0000010000 00000001000000010000
    00000000010000010000
  • At block 124, the PRM (42) selects the portion of locomotion the subject is currently using the state machine shown in FIG. 6. Each portion of locomotion is composed of a sequence of phases.
  • Accordingly, Table 14 presents the phases sequence mapping for the Beginning Path of Linear Walking (BTW) locomotion portion corresponding to FIG. 7. This table shows the label, the decimal value and as well the phase boundary conditions of each phase.
  • TABLE 14
    Example of phases sequence mapping for the locomotion portion
    labeled “Beginning Path of Linear Walking” (BTW)
    Phase Phase Boundary Conditions
    Label Value Fr1 Fr2 Fr3 Fr4
    BTW_1 27516604800 8 8 8 8
    BTW_2 3449396416 5 7 3 7
    BTW_3 2281717888 1 7 4 7
    BTW_4 4429217920 2 7 5 7
    BTW_5 17213489280 4 5 6 7
    BTW_6 1731119808 4 7 5 7
    BTW_7 34493988992 5 7 5 7
    BTW_8 34494087296 5 7 7 7
    BTW_9 3436186816 5 1 5 7
    BTW_10 34361966720 5 1 7 7
    BTW_11 68723802240 6 2 7 7
    BTW_12 68727996544 6 3 7 7
    BTW_13 68727867520 6 3 1 7
    BTW_14 137455732864 7 4 1 7
    BTW_15 137455734912 7 4 2 7
    BTW_16 137455739008 7 4 3 7
    BTW_17 13772512128 7 5 2 7
    BTW_18 13772516224 7 5 3 7
    BTW_19 1377252416 7 5 4 7
    BTW_20 137573187712 7 7 4 7
    BTW_21 137573204096 7 7 5 7
    BTW_22 137573187586 7 7 4 1
    BTW_23 137573203970 7 7 5 1
    BTW_24 137573236740 7 7 6 2
    BTW_25 137573236744 7 7 6 3
  • Table 15 enumerates a sample of boundary conditions associated with the locomotion portion of the sitting and typical walking on flat ground movements, while Table 3 lists the thresholds used to assess if the aforementioned conditions are met.
  • TABLE 15
    Example of a list of portion boundary conditions defining
    specific locomotion portions such as sitting movements (STA-
    SUP-SIT-SDW-STA locomotion portion) and typical walking on
    flat ground (STA-BTW-CTW-ETW-STA locomotion portion)
    Current Next
    Portion Set of Events Portion
    STA SWINGleg BTW
    !STATIC_GRleg ∥ !STATIC_GRprost
    FR_LOWprost_heel
    FR_BINleg_heel
    BTW_SWING
    FR_HIGHleg_heel SDW
    FR_HIGHprost_heel
    PKA_SDW
    BTW STATIC_GRleg ETW
    STATIC_GRprost
    SUM_BINprost CTW
    SWINGprost
    CTW STATIC_GRleg STA
    STATIC_GRprost
    FR_BINprost_heel ETW
    FR_BINleg_heel
    PKA_ETW
    STATIC_GRleg ∥ STATIC_GRprost
    ETW PKA_STA STA
    SDW PKA_SIT SIT
    PKA_STA STA
    SIT GR_POSleg SUP
    MIN_SIT
    FR_HIGHleg_mp
    FR_HIGHprost_mp
    PKA_STA STA
    SUP !SUM_BINprost SIT
    !SUM_BINleg
    PKA_STA STA
    !PKA_SUP_RAMP SIT
  • TABLE 16
    Example of a list of events used to evaluate the portion boundary
    conditions defining specific locomotion portions such as sitting
    movements (STA-SUP-SIT-SDW-STA locomotion portion) and typical waking
    on flat ground (STA-BTW-CTW-ETW-STA locomotion portion)
    Event Acromyn Description
    Swing occurence SWINGy Detection of a swing prior to a foot strike
    Non-Zero of frx FR_BINx Detection of a positive frx
    Low frx FR_LOWx Detection of frx level between the zero
    envelope and the STA envelope
    High frx FR_HIGHx Detection of frx level above the STA envelope
    Static gry STATIC_GRy Detection of gry level below the zero angular
    speed envelope and the zero acceleration
    envelope
    Non-Zero of sumy SUM_BINy Detection of a positive sumy
    BTW swing BTW_SWING Detection of typical walking gr_leg during leg
    occurrence swing
    Positive gry GR_POSy Detection of a positive gry
    Minimum sitting MIN_SIT Detection of a minimum time in portion SIT
    Sit down knee angle PKA_SDW Detection of knee angle higher than the STA
    envelope
    End walking knee PKA_ETW Detection of knee angle lower than the STA
    angle envelope
    Stance knee angle PKA_STA Detection of knee angle lower than the STA
    envelope
    Sit down knee angle PKA_SIT Detection of knee angle higher than the SIT
    envelope
    Standing up knee PKA_SUP_RAMP Detection of standing up knee angle evolution
    angle
      • where X stands for leg_heel, leg_mp, prosthetic_heel or prosthetic_mp
      • Y stands for leg or prosthesis
  • The normalization step of block 106 uses specific calibration values. These values are computed the first time a subject uses the actuated prosthesis (12) or at any other time as may be required. Two calibration values are preferably used: the zero calibration value and the subject's weight calibration value. The zero calibration value consists in the measurement of the four localized plantar pressures when no pressure is applied to the sensors, while the subject's weight calibration value is the subject's weight relative to the magnitude of the total response of the sensors.
  • The algorithm to obtain the zero calibration value of the sensors is depicted by the flow chart shown in FIG. 16. The sequence of steps composing the algorithm is indicated by the sequence of blocks 200 to 222. In block 200, the algorithm starts with the four localized plantar pressures. At block 202, the subject sits on a surface high enough such that his feet hang freely in the air. Then, at block 204, the subject lightly swings his feet back and forth, which initialises a timer at block 206, which in turn starts a loop comprising blocks 208, 210 and 212. At block 208, the algorithm checks if the timer has reached 10 seconds, if so, then the algorithm exits the loop to block 220, if not, the algorithm proceeds to block 210 and records the zero value of the four sensors. Then, at block 212, the timer is increased and the loop is repeated by proceeding to block 208. At block 220, the average of each localized plantar pressures is computed and finally provided as the zero calibration value at block 222.
  • In a similar fashion, the algorithm to obtain the subject's weight calibration value is depicted by the flow chart shown in FIG. 17. The sequence of steps composing the algorithm is indicated by the sequence of blocks 300 to 322. In block 300, the algorithm starts with the four localized plantar pressure. At block 302, the subject stands up in a comfortable position, feet at shoulder width distance, while maintaining the body in the stance position. Then, at block 304, the subject slowly swings back and forth and then left to right, which initialises a timer at block 306, which in turn starts a loop comprising blocks 308, 310 and 312. At block 308, the algorithm checks if the timer has reached 10 seconds, if so, then the algorithm exists the loop to block 320, if not, the algorithm proceeds to block 310 and records the subject's weight relative to the magnitude of the total response of the sensors. Then, at block 312, the timer is increased and the loop is repeated by proceeding to block 308. At block 320, the average of each localized plantar pressures is computed and finally provided as the weight calibration value at block 322.
  • FIG. 18 shows a flow chart that depicts the TG algorithm used to establish a relationship, in real-time, between the output of the PRM (42) and localized plantar pressures and the knee joint trajectory. The sequence of steps composing the algorithm is indicated by the sequence of blocks 400 to 408. At block 400, the algorithm receives the normalized localized plantar pressures, the phase of locomotion portion and the portion of the locomotion from the PRM (42). Then, at block 402, the walking speed of the subject, in steps per minute, is obtained from computing the number of frames between two heel strikes, while taking into account the sampling frequency, and is binary formatted. More specifically, the subject's speed estimate {circumflex over (x)}v [k] (steps/minute) is obtained from computing the number of frames between two heel strikes sheel [k] (frames/step):
  • x ^ v = 60 f s s heel [ k ] - s heel [ k - 1 ] Equation 5
  • where fs is the frame sampling frequency (frames/second).
    A heel strike event occurs when:

  • THRESHOLDHEELLOADING <f ri f [k]−f ri f [k−1], i f=1, 3   Equation 6
  • At block 404, the algorithm uses the normalized localized plantar pressures, the phase of locomotion portion, the portion of the locomotion and the subject's speed in binary format to identify a set of linear normalized static characteristics linking the knee joint kinetic/kinematic parameters with the subject's locomotion in a lookup table. At block 406 the TG (44) comprises two transformation functions which compute the kinetic/kinematic parameters at time k, which are the angular displacement θkn(k) and the moment of force (torque) mkn(k), using the localized plantar pressures and their corresponding mathematical relationships (time-dependant equations and static characteristics) identified at block 404. The values of the kinetic/kinematic variables are then provided to the REG (48) at block 408.
  • The transformation functions used by the TG (44) at block 406 may generally be represented by a system of equations such as:

  • θg,h(k)=Ω11(k),χ(k), v(k))+Ω22(k),χ(k),v(k))+ . . . +Ωq−1q−1(k),χ(k),v(k))+Ωqq(k),χ(k),v(k))   Equation 7

  • j g,h(k)=M 11(k),χ(k), v(k))+M 22(k),χ(k),v(k))+ . . . +M q−1q−1(k),χ(k),v(k))+M qq(k),χ(k),v(k))   Equation 8
  • where g=[sagittal (sg), frontal (fr), transversal (tr)] is the plane of the motion
      • h=[hip (hp), knee (kn), ankle (an), metatarsophalangeal (mp)] is the joint
      • q is the number of the main artificial proprioceptors' sensors
      • Θq is the phenomenological entity related to the locomotion and provided by the main artificial proprioceptors' sensors
      • Ωq is the transformation function between the phenomenological entity related to the locomotion, the kinematic variables of the lower extremities and the time
      • Mq is the transformation function between the phenomenological entity related to the locomotion, the kinetic variables of the lower extremities and the time
      • Θq is the phenomenological entity related to the locomotion and provided by the main artificial proprioceptors' sensors
      • χ(k)=Ω(ph (k),pr (k),v(k)) is the state of the whole system (amputee and the AAP) in which k is the current increment
      • ph (k) is the phase of the respective locomotion portion
      • pr (k) is the locomotion portion
      • v(k) is the walking speed
      • k is the current increment
  • In the case where the TG (44) uses polynomial relationships of order n, Equation 7 and Equation 8 become:

  • θg,h(k)=a 1,1(χ(k),v(k))·Θ1(k)+ . . . +a 1,n(χ(k)v(k))·Θ1(k)n +a 2,1(χ(k),v(k))·Θ2(k)+ . . . +a q−1,1(χ(k),v(k))·Θq−1(k)+ . . . +a q−1,n(χ(k),v(k))·Θq−1(k)n + . . . +a q,1(χ(k),v(k))·Θq(k)+ . . . +a q,n(χ(k),v(k))·Θq(k)n   Equation 9

  • m,h(k)=b 1,1(χ(k),v(k))·Θ1(k)+ . . . +b 1,n(χ(k),v(k))·Θ1(k)n +b 2,1(χ(k),v(k))·Θ2(k)+ . . . +b 2,n(χ(k),v(k))·Θ2(k)n + . . . +b q−1,1(χ(k),v(k))·Θq−1(k)+ . . . +b q−1,n(χ(k),v(k))·Θq−1(k)n + . . . +b q,1(χ(k),v(k))·Θq(k)+ . . . +b q,n(χ(k),v(k))·Θq(k)n   Equation 10
      • where ai,j(χ(k)) and bi,j(χ(k)) i=1→q are the coefficients for the state χ(k) of the whole system and the walking speed v(k) and n is the order of the polynomial
        The preferred embodiment uses four localized plantar pressures, thus Equation 9 and Equation 10 become:

  • Θg,h(k)=a 1,1(χ(k),v(k))·f r1(k)+ . . . +a q,n(χ(k),v(k))·f r1(k)n +a 2,1(χ(k),v(k))·f r2(k)+ . . . +a 2,n(χ(k),v(k))·f r2(k)n +a 3,1(χ(k),v(k))·f r3(k)+ . . . +a 3,n(χ(k),v(k))·f r3(k)n +a 4,1(χ(k),v(k))·f r3(k)+ . . . +a 4,n(χ(k),v(k))·f r3(k)n   Equation 11

  • h g,h(k)=b 1,1(χ(k),v(k))·f r1(k)+ . . . +b 1,n(χ(k),v(k))··f r1(k)n +b 2,1(χ(k),v(k))·f r2(k)+ . . . +b 2,n(χ(k),v(k))·f r2(k)n +b 3,1(χ(k),v(k))·f r3(k)+ . . . +b 3,n(χ(k),v(k))·f r3(k)n +b 4,1(χ(k),v(k))·f r3(k)+ . . . +b 4,n(χ(k),v(k))·f r3(k)n   Equation 12
      • where ai,j(χ(k)) and bi,j(χ(k)) i=1→q are the coefficients for the state χ(k) of the whole system and the walking speed v(k) and n is the order of the polynomial
  • Since all the kinetic/kinematic parameters θkn(k) and mkn(k) are computed from non complex mathematical relationships, the computation of the trajectory is simple and fast and can be calculated by a non-sophisticated electronic circuit board.
  • The mathematical relationships (time-dependant equations and static characteristics) used in these non complex mathematical relationships are contained in a lookup table referenced at block 404. FIG. 19 shows a flow chart that depicts the algorithm used to create the TG lookup table. The sequence of steps composing the algorithm is indicated by the sequence of blocks 100 to 512. At block 100, the algorithm measures the selected phenomelogical parameters, which in the preferred embodiment are the localized plantar pressures, and the kinetc/kinematic parameters θkn (k) and mkn (k) of a subject. The measured phenomelogical parameters are then normalized in function of the subject's weight. At block 104, the static characteristics linking the phenomelogical parameters to the kinetc/kinematic parameters and the time-dependant equations linking to the time are identified and are then normalized at block 106. Then at block 108, the mathematical relationships (time-dependant equations and static characteristics) are broken down according to the phenomelogical parameters, the phases of locomotion portion, portions of locomotion, the speed of the subject and in the case were Equation 11 and Equation 12 are linear functions, the binary formatted data signals. For each set of mathematical relationships (time-dependant equations and static characteristics) created by the breakdown, a polynomial regression is applied, at block 510, to the mathematical relationships (time-dependant equations and static characteristics) contained in the set. Finally, at block 512, the results of the polynomial regressions are stored in the lookup table and are indexed according to the breakdown of block 108.
  • The method for building this TG lookup table depicted by the flow chart of FIG. 19 may be applied to any equations belonging to the following analytical/logical family of functions:
  • y g , h = a 0 + a 1 x 1 + a 2 x 1 2 + + b 0 + b 1 x 2 + b 2 x 2 2 + + b m x 2 m + β 0 + β 1 x χ + β 2 x χ 2 + + β η x χ η Equation 13 y g , h = i = 0 n a i x 1 i + i = 0 m b i x 2 i + i = 0 η β i x χ i y g , h = i = 0 n 1 a 1 , i x 1 i + i = 0 n 2 a 2 , i x 2 i + i = 0 n χ a χ , i x χ i y g , h = j = 1 χ i = 0 n j a j , i · x j i
      • where yg,h is the estimated kinematic ({circumflex over (θ)}g,h) or kinetic ({circumflex over (m)}g,h) variables for the g lower extremities joint through the h plane of motion
      • g is the lower extremities joint among the following set: hip, knee, ankle and metatarsophalangeal
      • h is the plan of motion among the following set: sagittal, frontal and transversal
      • xj is the jth locomotion related phenomenon, for example the jth localized plantar pressure
      • aj,i is the ith coefficient associated the jth locomotion related phenomenon denoted xj
      • nj is the order of the polynomial depicting the jth locomotion related phenomenon denoted xj
      • χ is the number of locomotion related phenomena
  • If it is considered that the family of functions in Equation 13 are dependant on the state of the system they depict, thus following system of equations is obtained:
  • y g , h = j = 1 χ i = 0 n j a j , i ( x ) · x j i Equation 14
  • where x is the time dependant state vector of the system
  • In the preferred embodiment, xj may be substituted by the localized plantar pressures denoted fri r , where if=[1, χ]. In the case of time-dependant equations, xj may be substituted by the time. Thus, in the case of plantar pressures, Equation 14 becomes:
  • y g , h = i f = 1 χ i = 0 n i f a i f , i ( x ) · f ri f i Equation 15
  • where x is the time dependant state vector of the system
  • Previously, yg,h has been defined as the estimated kinematic ({circumflex over (θ)}g,h) or kinetic) ({circumflex over (m)}g,h) variable for the g lower extremities joints through the h plan of motion. Thus, Equation 15 may be written as:
  • θ ^ g , h = i f = 1 χ i = 0 n i f a i f , i ( x ) · f ri f i Equation 16 or m ^ g , h = i f = 1 χ i = 0 n i f a i f , i ( x ) · f ri f i Equation 17
  • The goal is the identification of the Equation 16 and Equation 17 functions from a set of ns samples, obtained from experimentation. A sample contains data related to the locomotion related phenomenon along with the corresponding kinematic (θg,h) or kinetic (mg,h) variables.
  • The following array of data is obtained from experimentation:
  • TABLE 16
    Data obtained from experimentation
    t x x1 x2 . . . xj . . . xx θg, h mg, h
    1
    2
    . . . .
    .
    .
    is . . . xj, i s . . .
    . . . .
    .
    .
    ns
      • where j, χ is the index and the number of locomotion related phenomena
      • is, ns is the index and the number of frames
      • t is the time [s]
      • x is the time dependant state vector of the system
      • xj is the selected locomotion related phenomenon
      • θg,h is the kinematic variables for the g lower extremities joint through the h plan of motion
      • mg,h is the kinetic variable for the g lower extremities joint through the h plan of motion
  • The logical functions aj,i(x) are then presented in the form of a look-up table, as shown in the following example:
  • TABLE 17
    Look-up table example
    aj, i (x)
    t x a1, 0 a1, 1 . . . a2, 0 a2, 1 . . . ax, 0 ax, 1 . . . ax, n x
    1 x1 34.5 23.1 . . . 12.3 92.5 . . . 83.6 52.4 . . . 72.5
    2 x2 23.6 87.5 . . . 64.4 84.9 . . . 93.4 38.6 . . . 28.5
    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
    ic xic 76.9 82.5 . . . 93.3 aj, i, i c . . . 37.5 82.3 . . . 84.4
    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
    nc xnc 61.4 90.6 . . . 72.3 26.4 . . . 83.5 26.4 . . . 28.6
      • where ic, nc index and dimension of the look-up table (nc is the number of considered quantized states)
      • x is the time dependant state vector of the system
  • Table 17 establishes the relationship between the time dependent state vector of the system, the locomotion related phenomenon and the kinematic and the kinetic variables of the lower extremities joints, which are the following static characteristics:

  • {circumflex over (θ)}g,h =f θ(x, x)   Equation 18

  • {circumflex over (m)} g,h =f m(x, x)   Equation 19
  • The methodology used to identify the parameters aj,i(x) is based on the application of a curve-fitting algorithm to a set of data provided from experimentation on human subjects. This experimentation is performed in a laboratory environment under controlled conditions, yielding a set of data in the form of an array, as shown in Table 16.
  • The curve-fitting algorithm is used to obtain the parameters aj,i(x) for every given time dependant state vector x. This data is used to construct the look-up table, as shown in Table 17.
  • An example of configuration for the method previously described is presented below:
  • the particularities of this configuration are:
      • a. the locomotion related phenomenon is composed of a set of four localized plantar pressures supplied by the main artificial proprioceptors;
      • b. the time dependant state vector is composed of:
        • i. the walking speed of the subject;
        • ii. the phase of locomotion portion and the portion of locomotion;
        • iii. and if Equation 16 and Equation 17 are linear functions:
        • iv. the binary formatted magnitude of the four localized plantar pressures;
  • the family of functions depicting the static characteristics {circumflex over (θ)}g,h=fθ(x, x) and {circumflex over (m)}g,h=fm(x, x), as described in Equation 16 and Equation 17;
  • or
      • a. the family of functions depicting the time-dependant equations {circumflex over (θ)}g,h=fθ(x, t) and {circumflex over (m)}g,h=fm(x,t), as described in Equation 16 and Equation 17 when fri f is substituted by time t.
  • the selected lower extremities joints is the knee joint, which is the joint between the thigh (th) and the shank (sh);
  • the selected plan of motion is the sagittal plan;
  • In the case where Equation 16 and Equation 17 are linear functions, the time dependant state vector further comprises the binary formatted magnitude of the four localized plantar pressures as added parameters to further segment the curve representing the kinematic (θg,h) or kinetic (mg,h) variables. This is due to the fact that, as shown by FIG. 20, that for a given portion of locomotion, phase of locomotion portion and subject's speed, the curve representing the kinematic (θg,h) or kinetic (mg,h) variables cannot efficiently be approximated by a linear function. To that end, the binary formatted plantar pressures are used to further subdivide the phase of locomotion portion in a number of intervals on which the curve representing the kinematic (θg,h) or kinetic (mg,h) variables may be approximated by linear functions. FIG. 21 is a close-up view of FIG. 20 where it is shown that the curve representing the kinematic (θg,h) or kinetic (mg,h) variables appear relatively linear on each of the added subdivisions. Thus, the use of Equation 16 and Equation 17 which are linear functions entails that the time dependant stated vector will further comprise the binary formatted plantar pressures.
  • It should be noted that in the preferred embodiment, the lookup table contains mathematical relationships that have been normalized in amplitude. The TG (44) uses the relative value of the localized plantar pressures instead of the magnitude of the signal. This means that the localized plantar pressures are set into a [0, 1] scale for a specific state of the whole system χ(k). This ensures that the mathematical relationships (time-dependant equations and static characteristics) are independent of the weight of the subject. It is worth to note that, because the TG's architecture use the walking speed as a component of the state of the whole system, the static characteristics lookup table is valid for any walking speed comprised within the operational conditions, which are, in the preferred embodiment, between 84 and 126 steps/min, though the lookup table may be computed for other intervals.
  • The Regulator (48) uses a control law with a similar structure to control algorithms currently employed in numerous commercial or experimental applications. Various control laws may be implemented in the Regulator (48), examples of which are provided below.
  • First, the Regulator (48) may use a simple PID control law, which is written as:

  • μ(t)=k d {dot over (x)} (t)+k i x dt   Equation 20
      • where kd is the gain associated to the differential component of the regulator
      • kp is the gain associated to the proportional component of the regulator
      • ki is the gain associated to the integral component of the regulator
      • xi is the requested trajectory
      • xo is the trajectory performed by the system
      • x is the error between the requested (xi) and performed trajectory (xo)
      • μ is the set point intended to the system
        applied to the proposed system, that is x=θ or x=m, we have:

  • μg,h x(t)=k d {dot over (x)} g,h(t)+k p x g,h +k i x g,h dt   Equation 21
      • where g=[sagittal (sg), frontal (fr), transversal (tr)] is the plan of the motion
      • h=[hip (hp), knee (kn), ankle (an), metatarsophalangeal (mp)] is the joint
      • x=θ or m
        where the transfer function between the error x and the set-point is expressed as:
  • μ g , h θ ( t ) x _ g , h ( t ) = b 2 · z 2 + b 1 · z + b 0 z ( z - 1 ) Equation 22
      • where b2=ki+kp+kd
      • b1=−(kp+kd)
      • bo=kd
      • x=θ or m
        in which the corresponding recurrent equation is:

  • μg,h x(k)=μg,h x(k−1)+b 0 · x g,h(k−2)+b 1 · x g,h(k−1)+b 2 · x g,h(k)   Equation 23
      • where k is the current increment
      • x=θor m
  • Secondly, the Regulator (48) may use an adaptive PID control law. The transfer function of an adaptive PID is the same as that of a conventional PID but the parameters b2, b1 and b0 are function of the state of the whole system χ(k). From Equation 23, the recurrence equation of the adaptive PID is:

  • μg,h x(k)=μg,h x(k−1)+b 0(χ(k))· x g,h(k−2)+b 1(χ(k))· x g,h(k−1)+b 2(χ(k))· x g,h(k)   Equation 24
      • where k is the current increment
      • x=θ or m
  • Thirdly, the Regulator (48) may use a conventional PID with measured moment, which may be written as:

  • f g,h μ(k)=f g,h m(k)+ f g,h(k)   Equation 25
      • where fg,h m(k) is the force measured at the joint
      • f g,h(k) is the force generated by the regulator
      • fg,h μ(k) is the set point of the force intended to the joint
  • Form Equation 22, the transfer function between the position error x g,h and the force set-point f g,h (k) is expressed as:
  • f _ g , h ( t ) x _ g , h ( t ) = K · ( b 2 · z 2 + b 1 · z + b 0 z ( z - 1 ) ) Equation 26
      • where K is the gain yielded by the device between the position and the force set point
      • x=θ or m
  • Thus, the recurrent equation of the final force set point fg,h μ(k) is given by the following relationship:

  • f g,h μ(k)=f m(k)+ f g,h(k−1)+b 0 · x g,h(k−2)+b 1 · x g,h(k−1)+b 2 · x g,h(k)   Equation 27
      • where k is the current increment
      • x=θ or m

Claims (21)

1.-41. (canceled)
42. A motorized prosthetic device comprising:
a joint member;
a limb member operatively coupled with the joint member;
a pressure sensor configured to indicate an interaction between the motorized prosthetic device and ground;
a kinematic sensor configured to measure torque at the joint member;
a controller configured to receive data from at least the pressure sensor and kinematic sensor and output a control signal based at least on the received data; and
an electrical motor configured to receive the control signal and operate an actuator in accordance with the received control signal.
43. The motorized prosthetic device of claim 42, wherein operation of the actuator induces movement of the limb member.
44. The motorized prosthetic device of claim 42, wherein the controller is further configured to calculate a trajectory of the motorized prosthetic device using at least the data from the kinematic sensor.
45. The motorized prosthetic device of claim 44, wherein the controller is further configured to output the control signal based at least on the calculated trajectory of the motorized prosthetic device.
46. The motorized prosthetic device of claim 42, wherein the joint member comprises a knee joint.
47. The motorized prosthetic device of claim 42, wherein the limb member comprises a trans-tibial member.
48. The motorized prosthetic device of claim 42, wherein the controller is further configured to determine a state of the pressure sensor using at least a first derivative of at least a portion of the data from the pressure sensor.
49. The motorized prosthetic device of claim 42, wherein the controller is further configured to determine a phase of locomotion using at least a portion of the data from the pressure sensor.
50. The motorized prosthetic device of claim 42, wherein the controller is further configured to determine a portion of locomotion using at least a portion of the data from the pressure sensor.
51. A prosthetic controller configured to control a motorized prosthetic device, the controller comprising:
a first data signal input configured to receive a pressure data signal indicative of an interaction between a motorized prosthetic device and ground;
a second data signal input configured to receive a kinematic data signal indicative of a torque at a joint of the prosthetic device; and
a processor configured to calculate a control signal based at least on the pressure data signal and the kinematic data signal and further configured to transmit the control signal to an electrical motor, wherein the electrical motor operates an actuator in accordance with the control signal.
52. The prosthetic controller of claim 51, wherein operation of the actuator induces movement in a limb member of the motorized prosthetic device.
53. The prosthetic controller of claim 51, wherein the processor is further configured to calculate a trajectory of the motorized prosthetic device using at least the data from the kinematic signal.
54. The prosthetic controller of claim 53, wherein the processor is further configured to calculate the control signal based at least on the calculated trajectory of the motorized prosthetic device.
55. The prosthetic controller of claim 51, wherein the joint is a knee joint.
56. A method for controlling a motorized prosthetic device, the method comprising:
receiving a pressure data signal indicative of an interaction between a prosthetic device and ground;
receiving a kinematic data signal indicative of a torque at a joint of the prosthetic device;
calculating, using one or more processors, a control signal based at least on a portion of the pressure data signal and at least a portion of the kinematic data signal;
transmitting the control signal to an electrical motor; and
operating an actuator in accordance with the calculated control signal.
57. The method of claim 56, wherein operation of the actuator induces movement in the motorized prosthetic device
58. The method of claim 56, further comprising calculating a trajectory of the motorized prosthetic device using at least the kinematic data signal.
59. The method of claim 58, wherein the control signal is calculated based at least on the calculated trajectory of the motorized prosthetic device.
60. The method of claim 56, further comprising determining a state of a pressure sensor associated with the pressure data signal using at least a first derivative of at least a portion of the pressure data signal.
61. A prosthetic controller configured to control a motorized prosthetic device, the controller comprising:
a first layer configured to calibrate a prosthetic device to a user; and
a second layer comprising at least one pressure sensor input and at least one kinematic sensor input and configured to determine a phase of locomotion using the at least one pressure sensor input and the at least one kinematic sensor input, and further configured to operate an actuator using an electrical motor based on the determined phase of locomotion.
US12/987,801 2002-08-22 2011-01-10 Control device and system for controlling an actuated prosthesis Abandoned US20110137429A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12/987,801 US20110137429A1 (en) 2002-08-22 2011-01-10 Control device and system for controlling an actuated prosthesis
US13/944,778 US9649206B2 (en) 2002-08-22 2013-07-17 Control device and system for controlling an actuated prosthesis

Applications Claiming Priority (6)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US40528102P 2002-08-22 2002-08-22
US42426102P 2002-11-06 2002-11-06
US45355603P 2003-03-11 2003-03-11
US10/600,725 US7147667B2 (en) 2002-08-22 2003-06-20 Control system and method for controlling an actuated prosthesis
US11/270,684 US7867284B2 (en) 2002-08-22 2005-11-09 Control device and system for controlling an actuated prosthesis
US12/987,801 US20110137429A1 (en) 2002-08-22 2011-01-10 Control device and system for controlling an actuated prosthesis

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/270,684 Continuation US7867284B2 (en) 2002-08-22 2005-11-09 Control device and system for controlling an actuated prosthesis

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/944,778 Continuation US9649206B2 (en) 2002-08-22 2013-07-17 Control device and system for controlling an actuated prosthesis

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20110137429A1 true US20110137429A1 (en) 2011-06-09

Family

ID=31950541

Family Applications (7)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/463,495 Expired - Lifetime US7314490B2 (en) 2002-08-22 2003-06-17 Actuated leg prosthesis for above-knee amputees
US10/600,725 Expired - Lifetime US7147667B2 (en) 2002-08-22 2003-06-20 Control system and method for controlling an actuated prosthesis
US11/270,684 Active 2027-06-22 US7867284B2 (en) 2002-08-22 2005-11-09 Control device and system for controlling an actuated prosthesis
US11/289,038 Active 2027-05-26 US8231687B2 (en) 2002-08-22 2005-11-29 Actuated leg prosthesis for above-knee amputees
US12/987,801 Abandoned US20110137429A1 (en) 2002-08-22 2011-01-10 Control device and system for controlling an actuated prosthesis
US13/540,342 Abandoned US20130035769A1 (en) 2002-08-22 2012-07-02 Actuated leg prosthesis for above-knee amputees
US13/944,778 Expired - Lifetime US9649206B2 (en) 2002-08-22 2013-07-17 Control device and system for controlling an actuated prosthesis

Family Applications Before (4)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/463,495 Expired - Lifetime US7314490B2 (en) 2002-08-22 2003-06-17 Actuated leg prosthesis for above-knee amputees
US10/600,725 Expired - Lifetime US7147667B2 (en) 2002-08-22 2003-06-20 Control system and method for controlling an actuated prosthesis
US11/270,684 Active 2027-06-22 US7867284B2 (en) 2002-08-22 2005-11-09 Control device and system for controlling an actuated prosthesis
US11/289,038 Active 2027-05-26 US8231687B2 (en) 2002-08-22 2005-11-29 Actuated leg prosthesis for above-knee amputees

Family Applications After (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/540,342 Abandoned US20130035769A1 (en) 2002-08-22 2012-07-02 Actuated leg prosthesis for above-knee amputees
US13/944,778 Expired - Lifetime US9649206B2 (en) 2002-08-22 2013-07-17 Control device and system for controlling an actuated prosthesis

Country Status (11)

Country Link
US (7) US7314490B2 (en)
EP (3) EP2535024B2 (en)
JP (3) JP4808026B2 (en)
KR (2) KR100690909B1 (en)
CN (2) CN100506189C (en)
AT (1) ATE416734T1 (en)
AU (2) AU2003236750B2 (en)
CA (2) CA2494364C (en)
DE (1) DE60325221D1 (en)
ES (1) ES2316771T3 (en)
WO (3) WO2004017872A1 (en)

Cited By (26)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20090299480A1 (en) * 2007-01-05 2009-12-03 Victhom Human Bionics Inc. Joint Actuation Mechanism for a Prosthetic and/or Orthotic Device Having a Compliant Transmission
US8323354B2 (en) 2003-11-18 2012-12-04 Victhom Human Bionics Inc. Instrumented prosthetic foot
US8657886B2 (en) 2004-02-12 2014-02-25 össur hf Systems and methods for actuating a prosthetic ankle
US8702811B2 (en) 2005-09-01 2014-04-22 össur hf System and method for determining terrain transitions
US8801802B2 (en) 2005-02-16 2014-08-12 össur hf System and method for data communication with a mechatronic device
US8814949B2 (en) 2005-04-19 2014-08-26 össur hf Combined active and passive leg prosthesis system and a method for performing a movement with such a system
US9066817B2 (en) 2007-01-05 2015-06-30 Victhom Human Bionics Inc. High torque active mechanism for orthotic and/or prosthetic devices
US9078774B2 (en) 2004-12-22 2015-07-14 össur hf Systems and methods for processing limb motion
US20160058582A1 (en) * 2014-08-28 2016-03-03 Rehabilitation Institute Of Chicago Minimum Jerk Swing Control for Assistive Device
US9333345B2 (en) 2013-10-03 2016-05-10 Ensilver Canada Electrical stimulation for a functional electrical stimulation system
US9358137B2 (en) 2002-08-22 2016-06-07 Victhom Laboratory Inc. Actuated prosthesis for amputees
US9364657B2 (en) 2014-10-31 2016-06-14 Ensilver Canada Cuff unit for a functional electrical stimulation system
US9375570B2 (en) 2013-10-03 2016-06-28 Ensilver Canada Sensor unit for a functional electrical stimulation (FES) orthotic system
US9375569B2 (en) 2013-10-03 2016-06-28 Ensilver Canada Controller unit for a functional electrical stimulation (FES) orthotic system
US9526636B2 (en) 2003-11-18 2016-12-27 Victhom Laboratory Inc. Instrumented prosthetic foot
US9561118B2 (en) 2013-02-26 2017-02-07 össur hf Prosthetic foot with enhanced stability and elastic energy return
US9649206B2 (en) 2002-08-22 2017-05-16 Victhom Laboratory Inc. Control device and system for controlling an actuated prosthesis
US9707104B2 (en) 2013-03-14 2017-07-18 össur hf Prosthetic ankle and method of controlling same based on adaptation to speed
US9808357B2 (en) 2007-01-19 2017-11-07 Victhom Laboratory Inc. Reactive layer control system for prosthetic and orthotic devices
US9895240B2 (en) 2012-03-29 2018-02-20 Ösur hf Powered prosthetic hip joint
US9925071B2 (en) * 2010-09-29 2018-03-27 össur hf Prosthetic and orthotic devices and methods and systems for controlling the same
US10195057B2 (en) 2004-02-12 2019-02-05 össur hf. Transfemoral prosthetic systems and methods for operating the same
US10251762B2 (en) 2011-05-03 2019-04-09 Victhom Laboratory Inc. Impedance simulating motion controller for orthotic and prosthetic applications
US10390974B2 (en) 2014-04-11 2019-08-27 össur hf. Prosthetic foot with removable flexible members
US10543109B2 (en) 2011-11-11 2020-01-28 Össur Iceland Ehf Prosthetic device and method with compliant linking member and actuating linking member
US10575970B2 (en) 2011-11-11 2020-03-03 Össur Iceland Ehf Robotic device and method of using a parallel mechanism

Families Citing this family (162)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6377868B1 (en) * 1999-10-28 2002-04-23 Ecolab Inc. Data processing system for managing chemical product usage
US20090030530A1 (en) * 2002-04-12 2009-01-29 Martin James J Electronically controlled prosthetic system
CN100438828C (en) * 2002-07-08 2008-12-03 奥瑟Hf公司 Socket liner incorporating sensors to monitor amputee progress
US20040064195A1 (en) * 2002-07-15 2004-04-01 Hugh Herr Variable-mechanical-impedance artificial legs
US7186270B2 (en) * 2002-10-15 2007-03-06 Jeffrey Elkins 2002 Corporate Trust Foot-operated controller
US8074559B2 (en) 2007-02-06 2011-12-13 Deka Products Limited Partnership Dynamic support apparatus and system
US7198071B2 (en) * 2003-05-02 2007-04-03 Össur Engineering, Inc. Systems and methods of loading fluid in a prosthetic knee
US8075633B2 (en) 2003-09-25 2011-12-13 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Active ankle foot orthosis
AU2003286026B2 (en) * 2003-11-18 2009-12-03 Victhom Human Bionics Inc. Instrumented prosthetic foot
WO2005079712A2 (en) * 2004-02-12 2005-09-01 össur hf System and method for motion-controlled foot unit
US20060184280A1 (en) * 2005-02-16 2006-08-17 Magnus Oddsson System and method of synchronizing mechatronic devices
CN1984623B (en) 2004-03-10 2011-04-13 奥瑟Hf公司 Control system and method for a prosthetic knee
US20050283257A1 (en) * 2004-03-10 2005-12-22 Bisbee Charles R Iii Control system and method for a prosthetic knee
WO2005110293A2 (en) * 2004-05-07 2005-11-24 Ossur Engineering, Inc. Magnetorheologically actuated prosthetic knee
GB0419480D0 (en) * 2004-09-02 2004-10-06 Univ Surrey Movement description and analysis
CA2595639C (en) * 2005-01-25 2015-03-31 Victhom Human Bionics, Inc. Power supply charging method and device
WO2006083913A2 (en) * 2005-02-02 2006-08-10 össur hf Sensing systems and methods for monitoring gait dynamics
WO2006084219A2 (en) 2005-02-02 2006-08-10 össur hf Prosthetic and orthotic systems usable for rehabilitation
US10080672B2 (en) * 2005-03-31 2018-09-25 Bionx Medical Technologies, Inc. Hybrid terrain-adaptive lower-extremity systems
US20070043449A1 (en) 2005-03-31 2007-02-22 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Artificial ankle-foot system with spring, variable-damping, and series-elastic actuator components
US20060249315A1 (en) 2005-03-31 2006-11-09 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Artificial human limbs and joints employing actuators, springs, and variable-damper elements
US8500823B2 (en) 2005-03-31 2013-08-06 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Powered artificial knee with agonist-antagonist actuation
US20070123997A1 (en) 2005-03-31 2007-05-31 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Exoskeletons for running and walking
US11278433B2 (en) 2005-03-31 2022-03-22 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Powered ankle-foot prosthesis
US8864846B2 (en) 2005-03-31 2014-10-21 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Model-based neuromechanical controller for a robotic leg
US20070162152A1 (en) 2005-03-31 2007-07-12 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Artificial joints using agonist-antagonist actuators
US8512415B2 (en) 2005-03-31 2013-08-20 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Powered ankle-foot prothesis
US10307272B2 (en) 2005-03-31 2019-06-04 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Method for using a model-based controller for a robotic leg
DE102005021412A1 (en) * 2005-05-04 2006-11-09 Otto Bock Healthcare Products Gmbh System of a liner with a myoelectric electrode unit
CN101263641B (en) 2005-08-10 2012-01-11 仿生能源有限公司 Methods and apparatus for harvesting biomechanical energy
US7485152B2 (en) 2005-08-26 2009-02-03 The Ohio Willow Wood Company Prosthetic leg having electronically controlled prosthetic knee with regenerative braking feature
US8048172B2 (en) 2005-09-01 2011-11-01 össur hf Actuator assembly for prosthetic or orthotic joint
US7531006B2 (en) * 2005-09-01 2009-05-12 össur hf Sensing system and method for motion-controlled foot unit
US7717962B2 (en) * 2006-03-22 2010-05-18 Wilson Michael T Proprioception enhancement device
US8403997B2 (en) * 2006-03-24 2013-03-26 Blatchford Products Limited Lower limb prosthesis and control unit
US7578799B2 (en) * 2006-06-30 2009-08-25 Ossur Hf Intelligent orthosis
FR2908293B1 (en) * 2006-11-15 2009-07-31 Commissariat Energie Atomique DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MONITORING THE MOVEMENT OF A LIVING BEING
WO2008098053A1 (en) * 2007-02-06 2008-08-14 Deka Integrated Solutions Corp. Dynamic support apparatus
US8453340B2 (en) 2007-02-06 2013-06-04 Deka Products Limited Partnership System, method and apparatus for orientation control
US10426638B2 (en) 2007-02-06 2019-10-01 Deka Products Limited Partnership Arm prosthetic device
US11779476B2 (en) 2007-02-06 2023-10-10 Deka Products Limited Partnership Arm prosthetic device
EP2114316B1 (en) * 2007-02-06 2014-07-16 DEKA Products Limited Partnership Method and apparatus for control of a prosthetic
WO2010120403A2 (en) * 2009-04-13 2010-10-21 Deka Products Limited Partnership System, method and apparatus for control of a prosthetic device
US8864845B2 (en) * 2007-02-06 2014-10-21 DEKA Limited Partnership System for control of a prosthetic device
US9114030B2 (en) 2007-02-06 2015-08-25 Deka Products Limited Partnership System for control of a prosthetic device
WO2008098057A2 (en) * 2007-02-06 2008-08-14 Deka Integrated Solutions Corp. Arm prosthetic device
US8449624B2 (en) * 2007-02-06 2013-05-28 Deka Products Limited Partnership Arm prosthetic device
US8979943B2 (en) 2007-02-06 2015-03-17 Deka Products Limited Partnership Arm prosthetic device
EP1955679B1 (en) 2007-02-09 2013-11-06 Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd. Assist device
US8828093B1 (en) 2008-04-15 2014-09-09 Rehabilitation Institute Of Chicago Identification and implementation of locomotion modes using surface electromyography
US9180025B2 (en) 2008-04-21 2015-11-10 Vanderbilt University Powered leg prosthesis and control methodologies for obtaining near normal gait
US8652218B2 (en) 2008-04-21 2014-02-18 Vanderbilt University Powered leg prosthesis and control methodologies for obtaining near normal gait
US9351855B2 (en) 2008-06-16 2016-05-31 Ekso Bionics, Inc. Powered lower extremity orthotic and method of operation
ES2707273T3 (en) * 2008-06-16 2019-04-03 Univ California Semi-annotated transfemoral prosthetic knee
WO2010025403A1 (en) 2008-08-28 2010-03-04 Raytheon Sarcos, Llc Control logic for biomimetic joint actuators
CN102196785B (en) * 2008-08-28 2014-02-26 雷神公司 A biomimetic mechanical joint
US20110213599A1 (en) * 2008-08-28 2011-09-01 Raytheon Company Method of Sizing Actuators for a Biomimetic Mechanical Joint
DE102008045113B4 (en) 2008-09-01 2011-08-25 Otto Bock HealthCare GmbH, 37115 Prosthetic knee joint and method for operating a prosthetic knee joint
EP3219295B1 (en) 2008-09-04 2023-11-15 Otto Bock HealthCare LP Hybrid terrain-adaptive lower-extremity systems
US20110082566A1 (en) 2008-09-04 2011-04-07 Herr Hugh M Implementing a stand-up sequence using a lower-extremity prosthesis or orthosis
US8685093B2 (en) 2009-01-23 2014-04-01 Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. Methods and systems for diagnosing, treating, or tracking spinal disorders
US20100191100A1 (en) * 2009-01-23 2010-07-29 Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. Methods and systems for diagnosing, treating, or tracking spinal disorders
US8126736B2 (en) 2009-01-23 2012-02-28 Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. Methods and systems for diagnosing, treating, or tracking spinal disorders
CN101496751B (en) * 2009-03-11 2011-08-10 河北工业大学 Active mode human leg prosthetic limb
US9017418B2 (en) * 2009-05-05 2015-04-28 össur hf Control systems and methods for prosthetic or orthotic devices
US9387096B2 (en) * 2009-06-17 2016-07-12 Ossur Hf Feedback control systems and methods for prosthetic or orthotic devices
DE102009030995A1 (en) 2009-06-30 2011-01-05 Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der angewandten Forschung e.V. Active prosthetic device with terrain detection and method for controlling an active prosthetic device
US9265625B2 (en) 2009-08-20 2016-02-23 Vanderbilt University Jointed mechanical devices
EP2467101B1 (en) 2009-08-20 2016-04-06 Vanderbilt University Control system for jointed mechanical devices
CA2772620A1 (en) 2009-08-31 2011-03-03 Iwalk, Inc. Implementing a stand-up sequence using a lower-extremity prosthesis or orthosis
DE102009052895A1 (en) * 2009-11-13 2011-05-19 Otto Bock Healthcare Products Gmbh Method and device for controlling an artificial orthotic or prosthetic knee joint
DE102009052887B4 (en) * 2009-11-13 2016-09-15 Otto Bock Healthcare Products Gmbh Method for controlling an orthotic or prosthetic joint of a lower extremity
DE102009052894A1 (en) 2009-11-13 2011-06-01 Otto Bock Healthcare Products Gmbh Method and device for controlling an artificial orthotic or prosthetic joint
CN102892388A (en) 2010-04-05 2013-01-23 Iwalk股份有限公司 Controlling torque in a prosthesis or orthosis
US9844447B2 (en) 2010-04-09 2017-12-19 Deka Products Limited Partnership System and apparatus for robotic device and methods of using thereof
EP2588039B1 (en) * 2010-07-01 2015-10-07 Vanderbilt University Systems and method for volitional control of jointed mechanical devices based on surface electromyography
WO2012006462A1 (en) 2010-07-07 2012-01-12 össur hf Ground contact sensing systems and methods for lower-limb orthotic and prosthetic devices
EP2663267B1 (en) 2011-01-10 2019-07-31 Iwalk, Inc. Powered joint orthosis
US20120259430A1 (en) 2011-01-12 2012-10-11 Zhixiu Han Controlling powered human augmentation devices
WO2012100250A1 (en) 2011-01-21 2012-07-26 Iwalk, Inc. Terrain adaptive powered joint orthosis
EP2672931A1 (en) 2011-02-10 2013-12-18 Université de Mons Method for determining an artificial periodic patterned signal
WO2012119156A2 (en) * 2011-03-03 2012-09-07 D-Rev: Design For The Other Ninety Percent Polycentric knee joint prosthesis for extreme affordability
WO2012125562A1 (en) 2011-03-11 2012-09-20 Iwalk, Inc. Biomimetic joint actuators
US8764849B2 (en) 2011-05-31 2014-07-01 Ossur Hf Prosthetic knee
USD733883S1 (en) 2011-05-31 2015-07-07 Ossur Hf Prosthetic knee
US8736087B2 (en) 2011-09-01 2014-05-27 Bionic Power Inc. Methods and apparatus for control of biomechanical energy harvesting
CA2852695C (en) 2011-10-31 2019-10-01 Ossur Hf Orthopedic device for dynamically treating the knee
US9737419B2 (en) 2011-11-02 2017-08-22 Bionx Medical Technologies, Inc. Biomimetic transfemoral prosthesis
US9032635B2 (en) 2011-12-15 2015-05-19 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Physiological measurement device or wearable device interface simulator and method of use
CN102641196B (en) * 2011-12-30 2013-12-11 中国科学院深圳先进技术研究院 Rehealthy training robot control system and control method thereof
US9198780B2 (en) 2012-02-14 2015-12-01 Ossur Hf Vacuum assisted suspension system
US9622884B2 (en) * 2012-02-17 2017-04-18 Springactive, Inc. Control systems and methods for gait devices
US10307271B2 (en) * 2012-02-17 2019-06-04 Össur Iceland Ehf Control system and method for non-gait ankle and foot motion in human assistance device
US9017419B1 (en) 2012-03-09 2015-04-28 össur hf Linear actuator
US9149371B2 (en) 2012-04-05 2015-10-06 Ossur Hf Prosthetic knee
US9221177B2 (en) 2012-04-18 2015-12-29 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Neuromuscular model-based sensing and control paradigm for a robotic leg
EP2844195B1 (en) 2012-04-30 2019-03-20 Össur HF Prosthetic device, system and method for increasing vacuum attachment
WO2014007917A1 (en) * 2012-05-24 2014-01-09 Ekso Bionics, Inc. Powered lower extremity orthotic and method of operation
CA2876187C (en) * 2012-06-12 2021-01-26 Iwalk, Inc. Prosthetic, orthotic or exoskeleton device
DE102012013141A1 (en) 2012-07-03 2014-05-08 Otto Bock Healthcare Gmbh Orthotic or prosthetic joint device and method for its control
US9259343B2 (en) 2012-07-06 2016-02-16 Newman Technologies LLC Device for mitigating plantar fasciitis
EP2877130B1 (en) 2012-07-27 2017-02-22 Proteor Hydraulic system for a knee-ankle assembly controlled by a microprocessor
DE102012107117A1 (en) 2012-08-02 2014-02-06 Georg-August-Universität Göttingen Stiftung Öffentlichen Rechts Orthesensteuerung
EP2702963A1 (en) 2012-08-27 2014-03-05 ETH Zürich Powered prosthesis with serial and/or parallel compliance
CN102783766B (en) * 2012-08-28 2014-11-19 中国科学院深圳先进技术研究院 Fall prevention device
WO2014033876A1 (en) 2012-08-30 2014-03-06 ナブテスコ株式会社 Hermetically sealed artificial leg
KR20150077413A (en) 2012-09-17 2015-07-07 프레지던트 앤드 펠로우즈 오브 하바드 칼리지 Soft exosuit for assistance with human motion
EP2895116B1 (en) 2012-09-17 2020-04-29 Vanderbilt University A method for controlling a powered ankle prostheses
KR101401435B1 (en) * 2012-10-16 2014-05-30 인하대학교 산학협력단 Artificial leg
WO2014089331A1 (en) 2012-12-06 2014-06-12 Ossur Hf Electrical stimulation for orthopedic devices
US10413437B2 (en) 2013-01-25 2019-09-17 Ossur Iceland Ehf Orthopedic device having a dynamic control system and method for using the same
US10314723B2 (en) * 2013-05-23 2019-06-11 Rehabilitation Institute Of Chicago Effective shape controller for lower limb
CN108670195B (en) 2013-05-31 2022-05-10 哈佛大学校长及研究员协会 Soft machine armor for assisting human body movement
EP3010456B1 (en) 2013-06-21 2020-05-27 Ossur Iceland EHF Dynamic tension system for orthopedic device
CN104224411B (en) * 2013-06-24 2017-03-22 苏州大学 Method for providing affected limb side knee joint reference motions in real time
KR102146363B1 (en) * 2013-10-31 2020-08-20 삼성전자주식회사 Wearable robot and control method for the same
US9044859B2 (en) * 2013-10-31 2015-06-02 Disney Enterprises, Inc. Method for gait generation and tracking control for a bipedal walking robot
EP4104757A3 (en) 2013-12-09 2023-01-04 President and Fellows of Harvard College Assistive flexible suits, flexible suit systems, and methods for making and control thereof to assist human mobility
EP3102171A4 (en) 2014-02-05 2018-03-28 President and Fellows of Harvard College Systems, methods, and devices for assisting walking for developmentally-delayed toddlers
EP3107501B1 (en) 2014-02-18 2019-11-27 Össur hf Prosthetic joint with cam locking mechanism
EP3128963A4 (en) 2014-04-10 2017-12-06 President and Fellows of Harvard College Orthopedic device including protruding members
EP3164100B1 (en) 2014-07-01 2018-04-18 Ossur Iceland EHF Pump mechanism for vacuum suspension system
JP6878271B2 (en) 2014-09-19 2021-05-26 プレジデント アンド フェローズ オブ ハーバード カレッジ Soft exo suit to assist people's exercise
KR102342072B1 (en) * 2014-10-14 2021-12-22 삼성전자주식회사 Method and apparatus for conrolling walking assist
WO2016069839A1 (en) 2014-10-31 2016-05-06 Ossur Hf Orthopedic device having a dynamic control system
US10357381B2 (en) * 2014-12-08 2019-07-23 Rehabilitation Instititute of Chicago Powered and passive assistive device and related methods
US10028845B2 (en) 2015-01-08 2018-07-24 Ossur Iceland Ehf Pump mechanism
EP4257092A3 (en) 2015-03-04 2024-01-24 Ottobock Prosthetics, LLC Lower limb prosthesis
EP3285694B1 (en) 2015-04-20 2021-03-10 Ossur Iceland EHF Electromyography with prosthetic or orthotic devices
WO2016187608A1 (en) 2015-05-21 2016-11-24 Ossur Iceland Ehf Pump system
US10179055B2 (en) * 2015-05-29 2019-01-15 Ossur Iceland Ehf Pump system for use with a prosthetic device
US20170067548A1 (en) * 2015-08-17 2017-03-09 Peter Neuhaus Linkage Actuator
EP3340941B1 (en) 2015-08-27 2021-11-10 Ossur Iceland EHF Pump system
US9949850B2 (en) 2015-09-18 2018-04-24 Össur Iceland Ehf Magnetic locking mechanism for prosthetic or orthotic joints
CA2999413C (en) * 2015-09-23 2022-07-19 Universite Catholique De Louvain Rehabilitation system and method
US10898350B2 (en) 2015-11-24 2021-01-26 University Of South Carolina Dynamic linear adjustable prosthetic
US10195099B2 (en) 2016-01-11 2019-02-05 Bionic Power Inc. Method and system for intermittently assisting body motion
US11590046B2 (en) 2016-03-13 2023-02-28 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Flexible members for anchoring to the body
DE102016107615B3 (en) * 2016-04-25 2017-10-12 Cavos Bagatelle Verwaltungs Gmbh & Co. Kg prosthesis
KR101836636B1 (en) * 2016-05-19 2018-03-09 현대자동차주식회사 Wearable walking assistant robot and method for controlling the same
EP3487666A4 (en) 2016-07-22 2020-03-25 President and Fellows of Harvard College Controls optimization for wearable systems
US10512554B2 (en) 2016-08-26 2019-12-24 Ossur Iceland Ehf Pump system
CN107795653B (en) 2016-08-30 2020-03-17 上银科技股份有限公司 Linear drive system for installation in a prosthetic limb
KR101859063B1 (en) 2016-09-22 2018-05-17 하이윈 테크놀로지스 코포레이션 In-prosthesis linear drive system
CN109982665B (en) * 2016-11-10 2022-01-04 国立大学法人东京大学 Knee joint
US11103369B2 (en) 2016-11-18 2021-08-31 Cyberdyne Inc. Artificial leg motion assisting apparatus and artificial leg motion assisting method
JP6936573B2 (en) * 2016-11-24 2021-09-15 川崎重工業株式会社 Robot joint structure
US10253855B2 (en) 2016-12-15 2019-04-09 Boston Dynamics, Inc. Screw actuator for a legged robot
WO2018170170A1 (en) 2017-03-14 2018-09-20 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Systems and methods for fabricating 3d soft microstructures
CN106974750A (en) * 2017-05-03 2017-07-25 哈尔滨理工大学 A kind of power type knee joint artificial limb
CA3072735A1 (en) 2017-08-21 2019-02-28 Celgene Corporation Processes for the preparation of (s)-tert-butyl 4,5-diamino-5-oxopentanoate
CN107456300A (en) * 2017-09-21 2017-12-12 哈尔滨工业大学 The quick myoelectricity code control system of multiple freedom degrees hand-prosthesis based on FSM
CN107618018B (en) * 2017-10-26 2020-08-25 杭州电子科技大学 Manipulator action speed proportional control method based on myoelectricity
US11547590B2 (en) 2017-11-27 2023-01-10 Ossur Iceland Ehf Orthopedic device having a suspension element
KR20190102485A (en) 2018-02-26 2019-09-04 한국기계연구원 Method of controlling robotic artificial leg and apparatus for controlling robotic artificial leg
KR102207703B1 (en) 2019-02-07 2021-01-26 한국기계연구원 Robot artificial leg and method of operating robot artificial leg
KR102073621B1 (en) 2019-02-28 2020-02-06 한국기계연구원 Integrated drive apparatus and knee-type robot artificial leg
DE102019118399A1 (en) 2019-07-08 2021-01-14 Georg-August-Universität Göttingen Stiftung Öffentlichen Rechts, Universitätsmedizin Methods and systems for controlling active prostheses
CN110394801B (en) * 2019-08-06 2021-04-16 前元运立(北京)机器人智能科技有限公司 Joint control system of robot
KR102328754B1 (en) 2020-03-20 2021-11-18 한국기계연구원 Knee-type robot artificial leg and method of controlling the same
KR102267250B1 (en) * 2020-09-09 2021-06-22 근로복지공단 Verification system for walking algorithm
KR102419344B1 (en) 2020-09-14 2022-07-11 한국기계연구원 Robot artificial leg and method of operating robot artificial leg

Citations (103)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3316558A (en) * 1963-11-12 1967-05-02 La Vaughn L Mortensen Prosthetic leg with a hydraulic knee control
US3501776A (en) * 1966-08-30 1970-03-24 Tno Electropneumatic converter for operating an artificial limb
US3659294A (en) * 1969-05-03 1972-05-02 Bock Orthopaed Ind Adjustable link for prosthetic limb
US3791375A (en) * 1971-09-29 1974-02-12 E Pfeiffer Device for sensing and warning of excessive ambulation force
US3866246A (en) * 1972-11-14 1975-02-18 Us Navy Shoulder disarticulation prosthetic system
US3871032A (en) * 1974-03-08 1975-03-18 Forsch Orthopadie Technik Artificial hydraulic ankle joint
US4005496A (en) * 1974-06-28 1977-02-01 Hosmer/Dorrance Corporation Prosthetic knee joint
US4023215A (en) * 1976-02-17 1977-05-17 Moore Robert R Locking prosthetic knee
US4065815A (en) * 1976-09-28 1978-01-03 Sen Jung Chen Hydraulically controlled artificial leg
US4310932A (en) * 1978-09-27 1982-01-19 Naeder Max Artificial knee-joint
US4314379A (en) * 1979-02-26 1982-02-09 Agency Of Industrial Science & Technology, Ministry Of International Trade & Industry Apparatus for discrimination of myoelectric potential patterns
US4433679A (en) * 1981-05-04 1984-02-28 Mauldin Donald M Knee and elbow brace
US4518307A (en) * 1982-09-29 1985-05-21 The Boeing Company Compliant robot arm adapter assembly
US4569352A (en) * 1983-05-13 1986-02-11 Wright State University Feedback control system for walking
US4578083A (en) * 1983-05-16 1986-03-25 Williams Allton C Artificial leg
US4649934A (en) * 1985-06-07 1987-03-17 Faro Medical Technologies, Inc. Joint laxity measurement
US4657000A (en) * 1981-07-23 1987-04-14 Dynasplints Systems, Inc. Adjustable splint and securing means therefor
US4657470A (en) * 1984-11-15 1987-04-14 Westinghouse Electric Corp. Robotic end effector
US4726404A (en) * 1986-12-15 1988-02-23 Habley Medical Technology Corporation Combination container and air removal fixture for simplified filling of an implantable hydraulic device
US4730625A (en) * 1986-12-15 1988-03-15 Faro Medical Technologies Inc. Posture monitoring system
SU1447366A1 (en) * 1985-03-04 1988-12-30 Украинский Научно-Исследовательский Институт Протезирования, Протезостроения, Экспертизы И Восстановления Трудоспособности Инвалидов Apparatus for controlling prostheses of the lower extermities
US4795474A (en) * 1985-11-06 1989-01-03 Otto Bock Orthopadische Industrie Besitz - Und Verwaltungs-Kg Rotary joint especially for a knee prosthesis
US4805455A (en) * 1987-04-24 1989-02-21 Myo-Tech Corp. Muscle testing apparatus and method
US4808187A (en) * 1987-10-05 1989-02-28 Iowa State University Research Foundation, Inc. Tactile stimulus receptor for a hand prosthesis
US4814661A (en) * 1986-05-23 1989-03-21 Washington State University Research Foundation, Inc. Systems for measurement and analysis of forces exerted during human locomotion
US4892554A (en) * 1987-12-21 1990-01-09 Robinson David L Prosthetic foot
US4893648A (en) * 1987-10-02 1990-01-16 Otto Bock Orthopadische Industrie Besitz - Und Verwaltungs - Kg Control valve
US4919418A (en) * 1988-01-27 1990-04-24 Miller Jan W Computerized drive mechanism for exercise, physical therapy and rehabilitation
US4989161A (en) * 1987-02-27 1991-01-29 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Control unit for a multi-degree-of freedom manipulator
US4994086A (en) * 1989-08-09 1991-02-19 United States Manufacturing Company Universal modular frame for above-knee endoskeletal prosthesis
US5062673A (en) * 1988-12-28 1991-11-05 Kabushiki Kaisha Toyota Chuo Kenkyusho Articulated hand
US5086785A (en) * 1989-08-10 1992-02-11 Abrams/Gentille Entertainment Inc. Angular displacement sensors
US5092902A (en) * 1990-08-16 1992-03-03 Mauch Laboratories, Inc. Hydraulic control unit for prosthetic leg
US5181931A (en) * 1990-01-26 1993-01-26 Otto Bock Orthopaedische Industrie Besitz- und Verwaltungs-Kommanditgesel lschaft Swivel connection between two parts of an orthopedic technical aid
US5201772A (en) * 1991-01-31 1993-04-13 Maxwell Scott M System for resisting limb movement
US5252901A (en) * 1990-11-30 1993-10-12 Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha System for controlling locomotion of legged walking robot
US5277281A (en) * 1992-06-18 1994-01-11 Lord Corporation Magnetorheological fluid dampers
US5282460A (en) * 1992-01-06 1994-02-01 Joyce Ann Boldt Three axis mechanical joint for a power assist device
US5284330A (en) * 1992-06-18 1994-02-08 Lord Corporation Magnetorheological fluid devices
WO1994009727A2 (en) * 1992-10-29 1994-05-11 Brian Andrews Orthosis and prosthesis
US5382373A (en) * 1992-10-30 1995-01-17 Lord Corporation Magnetorheological materials based on alloy particles
US5383939A (en) * 1991-12-05 1995-01-24 James; Kelvin B. System for controlling artificial knee joint action in an above knee prosthesis
US5394132A (en) * 1993-07-19 1995-02-28 Poil; James E. Magnetic motion producing device
US5405409A (en) * 1992-12-21 1995-04-11 Knoth; Donald E. Hydraulic control unit for prosthetic leg
US5405410A (en) * 1992-08-12 1995-04-11 Ohio Willow Wood Company Adjustable lower limb prosthesis having conical support
US5405510A (en) * 1992-05-18 1995-04-11 Ppg Industries, Inc. Portable analyte measuring system for multiple fluid samples
US5405407A (en) * 1992-02-24 1995-04-11 Nabco Limited Cylinder for artificial leg
US5408873A (en) * 1994-07-25 1995-04-25 Cleveland Medical Devices, Inc. Foot force sensor
US5504415A (en) * 1993-12-03 1996-04-02 Electronic Power Technology, Inc. Method and apparatus for automatic equalization of series-connected batteries
US5619149A (en) * 1994-03-25 1997-04-08 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Single ended dynamic sense amplifier
US5624389A (en) * 1994-05-30 1997-04-29 Otto Bock Orthopadische Industrie Besitz-und Verwaltungs-Kommanditgesells chaft Knee joint orthosis
US5704945A (en) * 1995-02-24 1998-01-06 Otto Bock Orthopaedische Industrie Besitzund Verwaltungs-Kommanditgesells chaft Brake-action knee joint
US5704946A (en) * 1996-03-13 1998-01-06 United States Manufacturing Company Multi-purpose prosthetic knee component
US5711746A (en) * 1996-03-11 1998-01-27 Lord Corporation Portable controllable fluid rehabilitation devices
US5728170A (en) * 1995-09-08 1998-03-17 Otto Bock Orthopaedische Industrie Besitz- und Verwaltungs-Kommanditgesel lschaft Below-knee prosthesis
US5728174A (en) * 1994-03-31 1998-03-17 Biedermann Motech Gmbh Swing phase control for an artificial knee joint
US5878851A (en) * 1996-07-02 1999-03-09 Lord Corporation Controllable vibration apparatus
US5888213A (en) * 1997-06-06 1999-03-30 Motion Control, Inc. Method and apparatus for controlling an externally powered prosthesis
USD407490S (en) * 1997-08-28 1999-03-30 Otto Bock Orthopaedische Industrie Besitz Und Verwaltungs Kommanditgesellschaft Knee joint orthotic device
US5888239A (en) * 1995-06-09 1999-03-30 Otto Bock Orthopaedische Industrie Besitz-Und Verwaltungs-Kommanditge-Sel lschaft Jointless foot prosthesis
US5888236A (en) * 1994-11-25 1999-03-30 Otto Bock Orthopadische Industrie Besitz Und Verwaltungs Kommanditgesellschaft Pivot device between parts of an orthopedic aid
US5888246A (en) * 1994-03-12 1999-03-30 Royal Infirmary Of Edinburgh Nhs Trust Motor drive system and linkage for hand prosthesis
US5888212A (en) * 1997-06-26 1999-03-30 Mauch, Inc. Computer controlled hydraulic resistance device for a prosthesis and other apparatus
US5893891A (en) * 1993-06-11 1999-04-13 Chas. A. Blatchford & Sons Limited Prosthesis control system
US5895430A (en) * 1998-02-06 1999-04-20 O'connor; Roderick S. Prosthesis for long femur and knee disarticulation amputation
USRE36521E (en) * 1992-04-01 2000-01-18 Otto Bock Orthopaedische Industrie Besitz - Und Verwaltungs Kg Connecting part between leg prosthesis components
US6039091A (en) * 1998-08-03 2000-03-21 Mentor Corporation Filling device for use in manufacturing of gel filled prostheses
US6168634B1 (en) * 1999-03-25 2001-01-02 Geoffrey W. Schmitz Hydraulically energized magnetorheological replicant muscle tissue and a system and a method for using and controlling same
US6183425B1 (en) * 1995-10-13 2001-02-06 The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration Method and apparatus for monitoring of daily activity in terms of ground reaction forces
US6195921B1 (en) * 1999-09-28 2001-03-06 Vinncente Hoa Gia Truong Virtual intelligence shoe with a podiatric analysis system
USD439339S1 (en) * 1998-03-25 2001-03-20 Otto Bock Orthopaedische Industrie Besitz-Und Verwaltungs-Kommanditgessellschaft Knee joint
US6206934B1 (en) * 1998-04-10 2001-03-27 Flex-Foot, Inc. Ankle block with spring inserts
US6206933B1 (en) * 1995-09-22 2001-03-27 Chas. A. Blatchford & Sons Limited Knee prosthesis
US6206932B1 (en) * 1998-11-24 2001-03-27 Timothy Johnson Alignment device for a prosthetic limb
US6342076B1 (en) * 1996-01-22 2002-01-29 Handevelop Ab Prosthetic device for joints
US6350286B1 (en) * 1996-02-16 2002-02-26 Seattle Orthopedic Group, Inc. Prosthetic ankle and walking system
US6352144B1 (en) * 1996-11-21 2002-03-05 Advanced Fluid Systems Limited Flow-control valve and damper
US6361570B1 (en) * 1997-10-24 2002-03-26 Lothian Primary Care Nhs Trust Upper limb prosthesis
US6373152B1 (en) * 1999-12-17 2002-04-16 Synergy Scientech Corp. Electrical energy storage device
WO2002092164A2 (en) * 2001-05-16 2002-11-21 Fondation Suisse Pour Les Cybertheses Therapeutic and/or training device for a person's lower limbs
US20030019700A1 (en) * 2001-07-25 2003-01-30 Michael Wittig Magnetorheological fluid damper
US6513381B2 (en) * 1997-10-14 2003-02-04 Dynastream Innovations, Inc. Motion analysis system
US6522266B1 (en) * 2000-05-17 2003-02-18 Honeywell, Inc. Navigation system, method and software for foot travel
US6537322B1 (en) * 1997-05-30 2003-03-25 Christopher Lyle Johnson Prosthetic foot assembly having improved resilient cushions and components
US20030120183A1 (en) * 2000-09-20 2003-06-26 Simmons John C. Assistive clothing
US6610101B2 (en) * 2000-03-29 2003-08-26 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Speed-adaptive and patient-adaptive prosthetic knee
US6679920B2 (en) * 2000-01-11 2004-01-20 Biedermann Motech Gmbh Device and method for remote maintenance of an electronically controllable prosthesis
US20040064195A1 (en) * 2002-07-15 2004-04-01 Hugh Herr Variable-mechanical-impedance artificial legs
US6719806B1 (en) * 1998-03-04 2004-04-13 Chas. A. Blatchford & Sons Limited Lower limb prosthesis and control unit
US20040083007A1 (en) * 2002-10-29 2004-04-29 Molino Joseph L. Prosthetic device
US20040167638A1 (en) * 2002-11-01 2004-08-26 Caspers Carl A. Pressure/temperature monitoring device for prosthetics
US6855170B2 (en) * 2000-08-25 2005-02-15 Gramtec Innovation Ab Device in a leg prosthesis
US6875241B2 (en) * 2000-06-30 2005-04-05 Roland J. Christensen, As Operating Manager Of Rjc Development Lc, General Partner Of The Roland J. Christensen Family Limited Partnership Variable resistance cell
US6876135B2 (en) * 2001-10-05 2005-04-05 Sri International Master/slave electroactive polymer systems
US7029500B2 (en) * 2002-04-12 2006-04-18 James Jay Martin Electronically controlled prosthetic system
US7164967B2 (en) * 2000-05-04 2007-01-16 Iguana Robotics, Inc. Biomorphic rhythmic movement controller
US20070016329A1 (en) * 2005-03-31 2007-01-18 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Biomimetic motion and balance controllers for use in prosthetics, orthotics and robotics
US20070043449A1 (en) * 2005-03-31 2007-02-22 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Artificial ankle-foot system with spring, variable-damping, and series-elastic actuator components
US7182738B2 (en) * 2003-04-23 2007-02-27 Marctec, Llc Patient monitoring apparatus and method for orthosis and other devices
US7198071B2 (en) * 2003-05-02 2007-04-03 Össur Engineering, Inc. Systems and methods of loading fluid in a prosthetic knee
US7314490B2 (en) * 2002-08-22 2008-01-01 Victhom Human Bionics Inc. Actuated leg prosthesis for above-knee amputees
US7641700B2 (en) * 2002-08-30 2010-01-05 Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha Joint device for artificial leg, method of controlling the joint device, and control unit
US8109890B2 (en) * 2002-02-07 2012-02-07 Ecole Polytechnique Federale De Lausanne-Service Des Relations Industrielles Body movement monitoring device

Family Cites Families (330)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US909859A (en) 1909-01-19 John T Apgar Artificial leg.
US544528A (en) * 1895-08-13 Button-attaching machine
US52663A (en) * 1866-02-20 Improvement in sleds
US577935A (en) * 1897-03-02 Horse-detacher
US229400A (en) * 1880-06-29 Car-coupling
US2619652A (en) 1947-09-18 1952-12-02 A J Hosmer Corp Artificial limb
US2568051A (en) 1947-10-10 1951-09-18 John G Catranis Artificial leg
US2475373A (en) 1947-12-11 1949-07-05 John G Catranis Three-part artificial foot(lateral motion and ankle rotation)
US2859451A (en) 1956-11-05 1958-11-11 Hans A Mauch Hydraulic system
DE1491236A1 (en) 1965-09-28 1969-05-22 Teufel Wilh Jul Fa Artificial knee joint for prosthetic legs
US3589134A (en) 1969-10-30 1971-06-29 Westinghouse Electric Corp Manipulator apparatus
US3820168A (en) 1970-05-01 1974-06-28 Bock O Orthopaedische Ind Fa K System for operating a prosthetic limb
US3701368A (en) 1971-06-23 1972-10-31 Rca Corp Fabrication of liquid crystal devices
CH543277A (en) * 1971-09-27 1973-10-31 Battelle Memorial Institute Replacement prosthesis for part of a lower limb
GB1454913A (en) 1974-02-26 1976-11-10 Blatchford & Sons Ltd Artificial limbs
FR2293185A1 (en) * 1974-12-02 1976-07-02 Bernard Jean Artificial leg with actuator - has unit on good leg moved by body weight coupled by flexible guide to receiver
US3995324A (en) 1975-09-12 1976-12-07 The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration Actuator device for artificial leg
FR2002163A1 (en) * 1976-01-22 1969-10-17 Siemens Ag
US4030141A (en) * 1976-02-09 1977-06-21 The United States Of America As Represented By The Veterans Administration Multi-function control system for an artificial upper-extremity prosthesis for above-elbow amputees
US4064569A (en) 1976-09-23 1977-12-27 Campbell Harry E Artificial polycentric knee joint
US4100918A (en) 1977-03-25 1978-07-18 Indiana University Foundation Dynamic orthotic knee extension assist device
US4209860A (en) 1978-02-13 1980-07-01 The United States of America as represented by the Administrator of Veterans' Affairs System and method for multifunctional control of upper limb prosthesis via EMg signal identification
US4179759A (en) * 1978-02-16 1979-12-25 Smith James A Artificial leg having a lockable knee joint
US4354676A (en) 1978-10-13 1982-10-19 Pepsico, Inc. Exerciser
US4212087A (en) 1978-11-16 1980-07-15 Mortensen Lavaugh L Prosthetic leg with a hydraulic control
US4387472A (en) 1980-10-02 1983-06-14 Medical Center Prosthetics, Inc. Torque absorber with biofeedback
US4386891A (en) 1981-04-23 1983-06-07 General Motors Corporation Rotary hydraulic vane pump with undervane passages for priming
EP0068658B1 (en) 1981-06-09 1986-02-19 J.E. HANGER &amp; COMPANY LIMITED Knee joint for artificial legs
US4521924A (en) * 1983-03-01 1985-06-11 University Of Utah Electrically driven artificial arm
JPS59189843A (en) 1983-04-11 1984-10-27 工業技術院長 Foot neck operating mechanism in power artificial leg
US4556956A (en) 1983-09-16 1985-12-03 General Electric Company Adjustable gain controller for valve position control loop and method for reducing jitter
JPS6081530A (en) 1983-10-12 1985-05-09 Nec Corp Viscous damper
CA1276710C (en) 1983-11-30 1990-11-20 Kazuo Asakawa Robot force controlling system
US4558704A (en) * 1983-12-15 1985-12-17 Wright State University Hand control system
US4579558A (en) 1984-01-10 1986-04-01 Ramer James L Mechanical hip joint
FR2559394B1 (en) * 1984-02-10 1986-07-11 Carsalade Charles APPARATUS TO FACILITATE THE PRACTICE OF ALPINE SKIING IN PARTICULAR
US4600357A (en) 1984-02-21 1986-07-15 Heath Company Gripper force sensor/controller for robotic arm
JPS60177102A (en) 1984-02-24 1985-09-11 Mazda Motor Corp Method for impregnating lead to ferrous sintered alloy
US4602619A (en) 1984-10-02 1986-07-29 Wolf Susan G Method and device for producing variable spinal traction
DE3519046A1 (en) 1985-05-28 1986-12-04 Otto Bock Orthopädische Industrie Besitz- und Verwaltungs-Kommanditgesellschaft, 3408 Duderstadt BRAKE KNEE JOINT
DE8515598U1 (en) 1985-05-28 1985-07-11 Otto Bock Orthopädische Industrie Besitz- und Verwaltungs-Kommanditgesellschaft, 3408 Duderstadt Lockable knee joint
GB2177603B (en) 1985-07-09 1989-07-19 David Ernest Young Modular lower limb bracing system
DE3543291A1 (en) 1985-12-07 1987-06-11 Bosch Gmbh Robert Hydraulic shock absorber (damper)
CA1260986A (en) 1985-12-11 1989-09-26 Frank R. Bubic Artificial musculoskeletal mechanism
US4711242A (en) 1986-02-18 1987-12-08 Wright State University Control system for knee joint
US4652266A (en) 1986-03-07 1987-03-24 Kingsley Mfg. Co. Molded elastomeric prosthetic foot having energy-storing articulated keel
US4760850A (en) 1986-05-15 1988-08-02 Wright State University Method for balancing assistance
FR2599246B1 (en) 1986-06-02 1991-10-25 Paris Administ Gle Assistance DYNAMIC ORTHESIS OF THE KNEE.
GB8625144D0 (en) 1986-10-21 1986-11-26 Hennequin J R Pneumatic/hydraulic artificial muscle
GB2201260B (en) 1987-02-07 1991-02-13 Christopher Charles Box A method of control of a mechanised artificial leg
US4770662A (en) 1987-07-13 1988-09-13 Giampapa Vincent C Sensate vibratory prosthesis
US4878913A (en) 1987-09-04 1989-11-07 Pfizer Hospital Products Group, Inc. Devices for neural signal transmission
JPS6471686A (en) * 1987-09-09 1989-03-16 Komatsu Mfg Co Ltd Flexible arm robot
AT388658B (en) 1987-09-22 1989-08-10 Bock Orthopaed Ind DOUBLE ACTING HYDRAULIC PISTON CYLINDER UNIT
AT391801B (en) 1987-10-30 1990-12-10 Bock Orthopaed Ind HYDRAULIC CONTROL
FR2623086B1 (en) * 1987-11-17 1994-03-18 Adcro Section Ceraval PROSTHETIC KNEE CONTROLLED BY A MICROPROCESSOR
US4790522A (en) 1988-02-25 1988-12-13 Trw Inc. Electroviscous fluid control device
US4876944A (en) 1988-03-03 1989-10-31 Duke University Pneumatic limb control system
US5112356A (en) 1988-03-04 1992-05-12 Chas A. Blatchford & Sons Limited Lower limb prosthesis with means for restricting dorsi-flexion
US5133773A (en) * 1988-03-25 1992-07-28 Kabushiki Kaisha Kobe Seiko Sho Teaching playback swing-phase-controlled above-knee prosthesis
DE3909672A1 (en) * 1988-03-25 1989-10-19 Kobe Steel Ltd THIGH PROSTHESIS
JP2501862B2 (en) 1988-03-25 1996-05-29 社会福祉法人兵庫県社会福祉事業団 Thigh prosthesis and stance phase swing leg phase discrimination device for thigh prosthesis
US5133774A (en) * 1988-03-25 1992-07-28 Kabushiki Kaisha Kobe Seiko Sho Teaching playback swing-phase-controlled above-knee prosthesis
US5219365A (en) 1988-03-31 1993-06-15 Sabolich, Inc. Prosthetic foot
US4843921A (en) 1988-04-18 1989-07-04 Kremer Stephen R Twisted cord actuator
SU1731210A1 (en) * 1988-08-29 1992-05-07 Л.А. Максименко Active prosthesis of a lower extremity provided with bioelectric control means
DE3830330A1 (en) * 1988-09-07 1990-03-15 Schuett & Grundei Orthopaedie KNEE JOINT FOR A LEG PROSTHESIS
US4865024A (en) * 1988-10-21 1989-09-12 Hensley Dvid E Extension deceleration orthosis
CN2043873U (en) * 1988-11-21 1989-09-06 张红军 One-sided mobile artificial legs
CA2008248A1 (en) 1989-01-24 1990-07-24 Robert D. Singer Electronic range of motion apparatus, for orthosis, prosthesis and cpm machine
US5252102A (en) * 1989-01-24 1993-10-12 Electrobionics Corporation Electronic range of motion apparatus, for orthosis, prosthesis, and CPM machine
US4928676A (en) 1989-02-27 1990-05-29 Timothy Pansiera Knee brace with flexible secondary joint
DE3923057A1 (en) 1989-07-13 1991-01-24 Bernd Dr Ing Kuenne Knee-joint prosthesis with free wheel - allows lower leg to be swung to straight position
DE3923056A1 (en) 1989-07-13 1991-01-24 Bernd Dr Ing Kuenne Knee-joint with free-wheel - is fitted with brake which is controlled by sensor inside prosthesis
US5139525A (en) 1989-07-31 1992-08-18 Kristinsson Oessur Prosthetic foot
JP2918258B2 (en) 1989-12-12 1999-07-12 株式会社ユニシアジェックス Variable damping force type shock absorber
US5033291A (en) 1989-12-11 1991-07-23 Tekscan, Inc. Flexible tactile sensor for measuring foot pressure distributions and for gaskets
US5044360A (en) 1989-12-26 1991-09-03 United States Manufacturing Company Orthosis with variable motion controls
US5217500A (en) 1990-01-12 1993-06-08 Phillips L Van Prosthetic leg
US5052375A (en) 1990-02-21 1991-10-01 John G. Stark Instrumented orthopedic restraining device and method of use
SE469739B (en) 1990-04-02 1993-09-06 Finn Gramnaes ARTIFICIAL KNAELED
SE469780B (en) 1990-04-02 1993-09-13 Finn Gramnaes Artificial foot and use of a ball screw and ball nut at such foot
GB2244006B (en) 1990-05-04 1994-05-25 Blatchford & Sons Ltd An artificial limb
US5062857A (en) * 1990-06-05 1991-11-05 Advanced Prosthestetics Development Corporation Myoelectrically controlled knee joint locking device
US5157372A (en) 1990-07-13 1992-10-20 Langford Gordon B Flexible potentiometer
JPH0478337A (en) 1990-07-17 1992-03-12 Kayaba Ind Co Ltd Hydraulic buffer
US5376141A (en) 1990-09-21 1994-12-27 Phillips; Van L. Low-profile symes foot prosthesis
US5153496A (en) 1990-09-27 1992-10-06 Baxtrer International Inc. Cell monitor and control unit for multicell battery
US5020790A (en) 1990-10-23 1991-06-04 Board Of Supervisors Of Louisiana State University And Agricultural And Mechanical College Powered gait orthosis
US5265890A (en) 1990-12-03 1993-11-30 Peter J. Balsells Seal with spring energizer
US5230672A (en) 1991-03-13 1993-07-27 Motivator, Inc. Computerized exercise, physical therapy, or rehabilitating apparatus with improved features
GB9105464D0 (en) 1991-03-14 1991-05-01 Blatchford & Sons Ltd An artificial leg
EP0503775A1 (en) * 1991-03-14 1992-09-16 CHAS. A. BLATCHFORD &amp; SONS LIMITED An artificial leg
US5197488A (en) 1991-04-05 1993-03-30 N. K. Biotechnical Engineering Co. Knee joint load measuring instrument and joint prosthesis
US5246465A (en) 1991-04-19 1993-09-21 Richard G. Rincoe Prosthetic knee joint
US5112296A (en) 1991-04-30 1992-05-12 The Board Of Supervisors Of Louisiana State University Biofeedback activated orthosis for foot-drop rehabilitation
US5253656A (en) 1991-05-23 1993-10-19 Rincoe Richard G Apparatus and method for monitoring contact pressure between body parts and contact surfaces
GB2260495B (en) * 1991-10-04 1996-02-07 Steeper Hugh Ltd An orthotic or prosthetic walking brace
JPH05123348A (en) 1991-11-09 1993-05-21 Imasen Gijutsu Kenkyusho:Kk Foot part of artificial leg
JP3181957B2 (en) 1991-12-16 2001-07-03 モーク・ラボラトリーズ・インコーポレーテッド Hydraulic pressure control unit for prosthesis
FR2688404B1 (en) 1992-03-11 1995-07-13 Proteor Sa DEVICE FOR HYDRAULIC REGULATION OF THE WALKING OF FEMALE AMPUTES.
US5642096A (en) 1992-03-20 1997-06-24 Paromed Medizintechnik Gmbh Device for prevention of ulcers in the feet of diabetes patients
US5455497A (en) 1992-04-20 1995-10-03 Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha Legged mobile robot and a system for controlling the same
DK0567673T3 (en) 1992-04-29 1995-08-14 Bock Orthopaed Ind Knee joint orthosis
US5357696A (en) 1992-05-01 1994-10-25 Gray Frank B Device for measuring force applied to a wearer's foot
SE500984C2 (en) 1992-06-02 1994-10-10 Lindhs Ortopediska Ab Foot prosthesis comprising a support member with cooperating foot
US5336269A (en) 1992-06-09 1994-08-09 Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. Method and apparatus for switching degrees of freedom in a prosthetic limb
JPH05337146A (en) 1992-06-09 1993-12-21 Hyogo Pref Gov Shakai Fukushi Jigyodan Leg play phase controlled artificial leg
US5327790A (en) 1992-06-19 1994-07-12 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Reaction sensing torque actuator
US5413611A (en) 1992-07-21 1995-05-09 Mcp Services, Inc. Computerized electronic prosthesis apparatus and method
US5376128A (en) 1992-08-31 1994-12-27 The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration Control system for prosthetic devices
DE4229330A1 (en) 1992-09-02 1994-03-10 Ludger Springob Limb function restoration using somatronic device - has microchip which responds to detected movement of sound limb to provide signals for stimulating impaired limb
US6500210B1 (en) 1992-09-08 2002-12-31 Seattle Systems, Inc. System and method for providing a sense of feel in a prosthetic or sensory impaired limb
EP0660691A1 (en) 1992-09-14 1995-07-05 CHAS A BLATCHFORD &amp; SONS LIMITED Artificial leg
DE4233247A1 (en) 1992-10-02 1994-04-07 Biedermann Motech Gmbh Swing phase controller
EP0667029B1 (en) 1992-10-30 1998-09-23 Lord Corporation Thixotropic magnetorheological materials
WO1994010943A1 (en) 1992-11-17 1994-05-26 Allen Scott E Coil spring prosthetic foot
US5443528A (en) * 1992-11-17 1995-08-22 Allen; Scott Coil spring prosthetic foot
US5443521A (en) 1992-12-21 1995-08-22 Mauch Laboratories, Inc. Hydraulic control unit for prosthetic leg
US5323650A (en) 1993-01-14 1994-06-28 Fullen Systems, Inc. System for continuously measuring forces applied to the foot
US5422558A (en) 1993-05-05 1995-06-06 Astec International Ltd. Multicell battery power system
US5954621A (en) 1993-07-09 1999-09-21 Kinetecs, Inc. Exercise apparatus and technique
US5476441A (en) * 1993-09-30 1995-12-19 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Controlled-brake orthosis
DE4338946C1 (en) 1993-11-15 1995-05-24 Bock Orthopaed Ind Prosthetic joint
US5437611A (en) 1993-12-01 1995-08-01 Orthotic Rehabilitation Products, Inc. Dynamic brace joint
US5678448A (en) 1994-01-14 1997-10-21 Fullen Systems, Inc. System for continuously measuring forces applied by the foot
NL9400269A (en) 1994-02-22 1995-10-02 P G Van De Veen Consultancy B Device for pivotally connecting parts of an orthopedic device.
DE4410730C1 (en) 1994-03-28 1995-06-08 Biedermann Motech Gmbh Servo-hydraulic swing phase control for artificial knee joint
US5472412A (en) 1994-04-05 1995-12-05 Mauch Laboratories, Inc. Limb brace with adjustable hydraulic resistance unit
USD373194S (en) 1994-05-28 1996-08-27 Otto Bock Orthopaedische Industrie Besitz-Und Verwaltungs-Kommanditgesell Schaft Ankle joint brace
US5586557A (en) 1994-05-31 1996-12-24 Bcam International, Inc. Functional ambulation performance scoring device
US5551525A (en) 1994-08-19 1996-09-03 Vanderbilt University Climber robot
DE19581773T1 (en) * 1994-09-09 1997-10-16 Univ Toledo Improved knee joint mechanism for a prosthesis for knee disabilities
CA2201297A1 (en) 1994-09-30 1996-04-11 Richard G. Rincoe Artificial ankle joint and prosthetic devices formed therewith
US5593891A (en) * 1994-11-10 1997-01-14 Banes; Albert J. Culture plate with splash guard
US5687467A (en) 1994-11-30 1997-11-18 Bergmann Orthotic Lab, Inc. Method for preparing an orthotic appliance
FR2728408B1 (en) 1994-12-20 1997-01-31 Alsthom Cge Alcatel ELECTRICAL SUPPLY DEVICE, PARTICULARLY FOR PORTABLE DEVICES
US5571212A (en) 1995-01-10 1996-11-05 M+Ind (Model & Instrument Development Corporation Prosthetic ankle joint for pivotally connecting a residual limb to a prosthetic foot
SE511750C2 (en) 1995-02-21 1999-11-15 Gramtec Innovation Ab Adjustable prosthetic joint, such as prosthetic ankle or prosthetic foot
USD383542S (en) 1995-02-13 1997-09-09 Otto Bock Orthopadishe Industrie Besitz-und VerWaltungs-Kommanditgesellsc haft Prosthetic knee joint
DE19507894C2 (en) 1995-03-07 1998-07-02 Bock Orthopaed Ind Lower leg prosthesis
US5563458A (en) 1995-03-08 1996-10-08 Ericson; Paul L. Apparatus and method for sensing surface flexure
US5566479A (en) 1995-03-21 1996-10-22 Gray; Frank B. Shoe contruction for use by diabetic persons
DE19511890C1 (en) 1995-03-31 1996-11-07 Bock Orthopaed Ind Prosthetic brake joint
US5817030A (en) 1995-04-07 1998-10-06 University Of Miami Method and apparatus for controlling a device based on spatial discrimination of skeletal myopotentials
US5899869A (en) 1997-12-22 1999-05-04 Barrack, Jr.; Herb J. Orthopedic appliance with weight activated brake and variable extension assist
US5662693A (en) 1995-06-05 1997-09-02 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air Force Mobility assist for the paralyzed, amputeed and spastic person
DE19520585C2 (en) 1995-06-06 1999-11-25 Bock Orthopaed Ind Seat orthotic system
GB9511648D0 (en) 1995-06-08 1995-08-02 Coker Ian Apparatus for helping persons to walk
DE19521464C2 (en) 1995-06-13 1999-08-19 Leuven K U Res & Dev Procedure for controlling the knee brake of a prosthetic knee joint and thigh prosthesis
US5650704A (en) * 1995-06-29 1997-07-22 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Elastic actuator for precise force control
GB2302949B (en) 1995-07-01 1999-04-14 Univ Salford A transducer
US5749533A (en) 1995-08-03 1998-05-12 Daniels; John J. Fishing reel with electronically variable brake for preventing backlash
US5656915A (en) 1995-08-28 1997-08-12 Eaves; Stephen S. Multicell battery pack bilateral power distribution unit with individual cell monitoring and control
US5670077A (en) 1995-10-18 1997-09-23 Lord Corporation Aqueous magnetorheological materials
US5900184A (en) 1995-10-18 1999-05-04 Lord Corporation Method and magnetorheological fluid formulations for increasing the output of a magnetorheological fluid device
WO1997027822A1 (en) 1996-01-30 1997-08-07 John Chilver Artificial muscle
US20020087216A1 (en) 1996-02-16 2002-07-04 Atkinson Stewart L. Prosthetic walking system
US5987726A (en) 1996-03-11 1999-11-23 Fanuc Robotics North America, Inc. Programmable positioner for the stress-free assembly of components
US5919149A (en) 1996-03-19 1999-07-06 Allum; John H. Method and apparatus for angular position and velocity based determination of body sway for the diagnosis and rehabilitation of balance and gait disorders
GB2311466B (en) * 1996-03-29 1999-11-10 Steeper Hugh Ltd A prosthetic foot
GB9607749D0 (en) 1996-04-15 1996-06-19 Blatchford & Sons Ltd Specification of an artifical limb
US5800561A (en) 1996-05-15 1998-09-01 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Power-assisted upper extremity orthosis
US5779735A (en) * 1996-05-17 1998-07-14 Molino; Joseph L. Knee unit for above-knee prosthetic leg
US5683615A (en) 1996-06-13 1997-11-04 Lord Corporation Magnetorheological fluid
US5906767A (en) 1996-06-13 1999-05-25 Lord Corporation Magnetorheological fluid
US6113642A (en) * 1996-06-27 2000-09-05 Mauch, Inc. Computer controlled hydraulic resistance device for a prosthesis and other apparatus
US5842547A (en) 1996-07-02 1998-12-01 Lord Corporation Controllable brake
USD402368S (en) 1996-07-29 1998-12-08 Otto Bock Orthopaedische Industrie Besitz- und Verwaltungs-Kommanditgesel lschaft Knee joint
GB9621137D0 (en) 1996-10-10 1996-11-27 Chas A Blatchford And Sons Lim An above-knee lower limb prosthesis and a shin component for the prosthesis
CA2218242C (en) 1996-10-11 2005-12-06 Kenneth R. Fyfe Motion analysis system
US5998930A (en) 1996-10-24 1999-12-07 Motorola Inc. Electronic ballast with two-step boost converter and method
US6007528A (en) * 1996-12-31 1999-12-28 The Procter & Gamble Company Sanitary napkin having stabilized members in the end regions
US6695885B2 (en) 1997-02-26 2004-02-24 Alfred E. Mann Foundation For Scientific Research Method and apparatus for coupling an implantable stimulator/sensor to a prosthetic device
US6095486A (en) 1997-03-05 2000-08-01 Lord Corporation Two-way magnetorheological fluid valve assembly and devices utilizing same
US5947238A (en) 1997-03-05 1999-09-07 Lord Corporation Passive magnetorheological fluid device with excursion dependent characteristic
DE19709006A1 (en) 1997-03-05 1998-09-24 Biedermann Motech Gmbh Spring device for a prosthetic leg
US5982156A (en) 1997-04-15 1999-11-09 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air Force Feed-forward control of aircraft bus dc boost converter
SE512643C2 (en) 1997-04-29 2000-04-17 Handevelop Ab Apparatus for artificial sensation by recording touch sounds
US5823309A (en) 1997-05-23 1998-10-20 General Motors Corporation Magnetorheological transmission clutch
JPH11345A (en) 1997-06-12 1999-01-06 Imasen Gijutsu Kenkyusho:Kk Ankle joint device for artificial leg
WO1999000075A1 (en) 1997-06-26 1999-01-07 Mauch, Inc. Computer controlled hydraulic resistance device for a prosthesis and other apparatus
WO1999005991A2 (en) 1997-08-01 1999-02-11 Alt Artificial Limb Technology Ltd. Walk induced energy accumulator
GB2367753B (en) 1997-08-15 2002-05-29 Blatchford & Sons Ltd A lower limb prosthesis
GB9813904D0 (en) * 1997-08-15 1998-08-26 Blatchford & Sons Ltd A lower limb prosthesis
US5929332A (en) 1997-08-15 1999-07-27 Brown; Norma Sensor shoe for monitoring the condition of a foot
JPH1156885A (en) 1997-08-25 1999-03-02 Nabco Ltd Motor-driven artificial hand
DE29715794U1 (en) 1997-09-03 1997-10-23 Bock Orthopaed Ind Orthotic joint
US6104759A (en) 1997-09-15 2000-08-15 Research In Motion Limited Power supply system for a packet-switched radio transmitter
US5984972A (en) 1997-09-18 1999-11-16 Amputee Solutions, Inc. Pylon assembly for leg prosthesis
US5967273A (en) 1997-10-17 1999-10-19 Eaton Corporation Magneto-rheological fluid coupling
DE19754690A1 (en) 1997-12-10 1999-07-01 Biedermann Motech Gmbh Leg prosthesis with an artificial knee joint with a control device
JPH11215793A (en) 1998-01-26 1999-08-06 Sony Corp Driving equipment
US5948021A (en) 1998-02-24 1999-09-07 Hosmer-Dorrance Corporation Hydraulic cylinders for limb gait control
DE19810385C2 (en) 1998-03-11 2000-06-21 Bock Orthopaed Ind Prosthetic brake joint
US5960918A (en) 1998-03-27 1999-10-05 Behr America, Inc. Viscous clutch assembly
JP3245828B2 (en) 1998-04-03 2002-01-15 株式会社ナブコ Prosthesis with extension assist mechanism
JP4212174B2 (en) 1998-04-11 2009-01-21 オットー・ボック・ヘルスケア・ゲーエムベーハー Foot bush for artificial foot
CA2330631A1 (en) 1998-04-28 1999-11-04 Gramtec Innovation Ab Knee prosthesis
GB2338653A (en) 1998-06-26 1999-12-29 Blatchford & Sons Ltd A lower limb prosthesis
US6129690A (en) 1998-07-29 2000-10-10 Empi Corp. Unidirectional resistance pivot assembly for a splint
US6080123A (en) 1998-09-14 2000-06-27 Pansiera; Timothy Thomas Orthotic joint with radial hydraulic force transfer
AU6043099A (en) 1998-09-14 2000-04-03 Rutgers, The State University Of New Jersey Prosthetic, orthotic, and other rehabilitative robotic assistive devices actuated by smart materials
US6517503B1 (en) 1998-09-18 2003-02-11 Becker Orthopedic Appliance Company Orthosis knee joint
US7410471B1 (en) 1998-09-18 2008-08-12 Becker Orthopedic Appliance Company Orthosis knee joint and sensor
US6425925B1 (en) 1998-10-01 2002-07-30 Schütt & Grundei Orthopädietechnik GmbH Leg exoprosthesis for adaptation to a thigh stump
GB9823946D0 (en) 1998-11-03 1998-12-30 Hammond Richard V Prosthesis control unit
AU1394699A (en) 1998-11-10 2000-05-29 Mauch, Inc. Computer controlled hydraulic resistance device for a prosthesis and other apparatus
FR2785812B1 (en) 1998-11-16 2002-11-29 Commissariat Energie Atomique BIOACTIVE PROSTHESES, IN PARTICULAR WITH IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE PROPERTIES, ANTISTENOSIS AND ANTITHROMBOSIS, AND THEIR MANUFACTURE
US6093162A (en) 1998-11-16 2000-07-25 Fairleigh; Angela Dynamic splint for post-operative treatment of flexible implant arthroplasty of the fingers
CN1089011C (en) 1998-12-04 2002-08-14 清华大学 Functional neuromyo-electric signal identification and stimulation apparatus
DE19859931A1 (en) * 1998-12-24 2000-07-06 Biedermann Motech Gmbh Prosthesis with an artificial knee joint and method for controlling a prosthetic leg
US6117177A (en) 1999-03-12 2000-09-12 Teh Lin Prosthetic & Orthopaedic Inc. Artificial knee joint having a swing phase control member
US6472839B1 (en) 1999-04-05 2002-10-29 Sony Corporation Robot, servo circuit, actuator, robot control method, and actuator control method
KR100289537B1 (en) 1999-04-21 2001-05-02 김순택 lithum secondary battery
US6425926B1 (en) * 1999-05-04 2002-07-30 Jakobus Hindriks Thermosol treatment of textiles carrying a dye
US6602295B1 (en) 1999-05-24 2003-08-05 Ohio Willow Wood Company Prosthetic foot having shock absorption
US6241775B1 (en) 1999-05-25 2001-06-05 Chas. A. Blatchford & Sons Ltd. Specification of an artificial limb
US6517828B1 (en) * 1999-05-28 2003-02-11 Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas System C-CAM as an angiogenesis inhibitor
GB9914989D0 (en) * 1999-06-28 1999-08-25 Cooper John E Swing phase control for an artifical knee
US6187052B1 (en) 1999-07-14 2001-02-13 Joseph L. Molino Prosthetic ankle joint
US6409695B1 (en) 1999-07-27 2002-06-25 John D. Connelly Ankle-foot orthotic
GB9921026D0 (en) 1999-09-06 1999-11-10 Blatchford & Sons Ltd A lower limb prosthesis
KR20000017774A (en) 1999-12-03 2000-04-06 김동연 A power supply control circuit for digital electronic device
KR100334902B1 (en) 1999-12-06 2002-05-04 윤덕용 6 Degree-of-freedom Parallel Mechanism for Micro-positioning Task
US6671531B2 (en) 1999-12-09 2003-12-30 Masimo Corporation Sensor wrap including foldable applicator
CN2400072Y (en) 1999-12-10 2000-10-11 郑嘉宝 Improved knee joint
US6599439B2 (en) 1999-12-14 2003-07-29 Delphi Technologies, Inc. Durable magnetorheological fluid compositions
FI110159B (en) 1999-12-17 2002-12-13 Respecta Oy Lower extremity prosthesis
CA2396617C (en) * 2000-01-20 2008-12-30 Bruce W. Deffenbaugh Electronically controlled prosthetic knee
EP1125825A3 (en) 2000-02-18 2002-04-24 Delphi Technologies, Inc. Variable road feedback device for steer-by-wire systems
JP4632560B2 (en) 2000-03-01 2011-02-16 シーグ パック システムズ アクチェンゲゼルシャフト Robots that operate products in a three-dimensional space
WO2001065121A2 (en) * 2000-03-01 2001-09-07 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Force-controlled hydro-elastic actuator
JP2001277175A (en) 2000-03-30 2001-10-09 Hiroshima Pref Gov Multi-fingered movable robot hand and its gripping control method
US6430843B1 (en) 2000-04-18 2002-08-13 Nike, Inc. Dynamically-controlled cushioning system for an article of footwear
AU143535S (en) 2000-04-29 2001-04-10 Otto Bock Orthopaedische Industrie Besitz Und Verwaltungs Kg Prosthesis knee joint
US6811571B1 (en) 2000-05-02 2004-11-02 Van L. Phillips Universal prosthesis with cushioned ankle
US6395193B1 (en) 2000-05-03 2002-05-28 Lord Corporation Magnetorheological compositions
DE20010892U1 (en) * 2000-06-20 2000-09-21 Cheng Chia Pao Knee joint
WO2002002034A1 (en) 2000-06-30 2002-01-10 Roland J. Christensen, As Operating Manager Of Rjc Development, Lc, General Partner Of The Roland J. Christensen Family Limited Partnership Prosthetic foot
FR2811220B1 (en) * 2000-07-04 2003-01-31 Francis Artigue MODULAR ACTIVE PROSTHESIS FOR ARMS AND FOREARM
WO2002010281A1 (en) 2000-07-31 2002-02-07 Bando Chemical Industries Ltd Stably dispersed magnetic viscous fluid
US6704024B2 (en) 2000-08-07 2004-03-09 Zframe, Inc. Visual content browsing using rasterized representations
EP1179955A1 (en) 2000-08-08 2002-02-13 Texas Instruments Incorporated Method and a telecommunication apparatus for creating an alerting signal
US6805677B2 (en) 2000-09-20 2004-10-19 John Castle Simmons Wheel-less walking support and rehabilitation device
KR20030070019A (en) 2000-10-26 2003-08-27 플렉스-푸트, 인크. Foot prosthesis having cushioned ankle
FR2816463A1 (en) 2000-11-03 2002-05-10 Jean Noel Charpentier DC power supply for electronic equipment has voltage doubler circuit for storing battery energy in capacitor followed by voltage regulator
KR100401457B1 (en) 2000-11-27 2003-10-10 산재의료관리원 Multi-functioning artificial foot
JP2002174243A (en) 2000-12-11 2002-06-21 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd Manufacturing method for dynamic pressure bearing device and dynamic pressure bearing device
US6443995B1 (en) 2000-12-22 2002-09-03 Barry W. Townsend Prosthetic foot
JP2002191654A (en) * 2000-12-22 2002-07-09 Tama Tlo Kk Walking prosthesis
JP4384822B2 (en) * 2001-01-26 2009-12-16 本田技研工業株式会社 Prosthetic limb drive
US6485519B2 (en) 2001-01-29 2002-11-26 Bristol-Myers Squibb Company Constrained prosthetic knee with rotating bearing
DE60226368D1 (en) * 2001-03-14 2008-06-19 Honda Motor Co Ltd Stirling engine
US6443993B1 (en) 2001-03-23 2002-09-03 Wayne Koniuk Self-adjusting prosthetic ankle apparatus
US6587728B2 (en) 2001-03-30 2003-07-01 Neurocontrol Corporation Systems and methods for performing prosthetic or therapeutic neuromuscular stimulation using an external, battery powered controller with power conservation features
EP1252871A1 (en) 2001-03-30 2002-10-30 I.N.A.I.L. Centro per la Sperimentazione ed Applicazione di Protesi e Presidi Ortopedici per Gli Informtuni Sul Lavoro A system for the control and monitoring of functional devices for disabled with energy from outside the body and a method for the remote control thereof
NL1017771C2 (en) 2001-04-04 2002-10-07 Otto Bock Austria Ges M B H Device for mutually pivotal connection of an orthopedic device.
JP4611580B2 (en) 2001-06-27 2011-01-12 本田技研工業株式会社 Torque application system
GB0116503D0 (en) 2001-07-06 2001-08-29 Univ Reading Rotatable joint stop mechanism
DE10139333A1 (en) 2001-08-10 2003-03-06 Biedermann Motech Gmbh Sensor device, in particular for a prosthesis and prosthesis with such a sensor device
US6764521B2 (en) 2001-08-24 2004-07-20 Joseph L. Molino Multi-axial ankle joint
DE60238781D1 (en) 2001-10-16 2011-02-10 Honda Motor Co Ltd DEVICE AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING A STATE OF DESTINATION
US7209788B2 (en) 2001-10-29 2007-04-24 Duke University Closed loop brain machine interface
AUPR967301A0 (en) 2001-12-21 2002-01-24 Energy Storage Systems Pty Ltd A control circuit
US20040078299A1 (en) 2002-01-31 2004-04-22 Kathleen Down-Logan Portable color and style analysis, match and management system
US7308333B2 (en) 2002-01-31 2007-12-11 Melco Industries, Inc. Computerized stitching including embroidering
JP3976129B2 (en) 2002-02-28 2007-09-12 本田技研工業株式会社 Parallel link mechanism and artificial joint device using the same
JP2005520630A (en) 2002-03-19 2005-07-14 ザ・ボード・オブ・トラスティーズ・オブ・ザ・ユニバーシティ・オブ・イリノイ System and method for a prosthesis attached to a joint and balanced
DE10214357A1 (en) 2002-03-28 2003-10-16 Bock Healthcare Gmbh Prosthetic knee joint with a hydraulic damping cylinder
CA2380945A1 (en) 2002-04-08 2003-10-08 Powergenix Systems, Inc. Hybrid battery configuration
US20090030530A1 (en) 2002-04-12 2009-01-29 Martin James J Electronically controlled prosthetic system
FR2839916B1 (en) 2002-05-22 2004-10-15 Agence Spatiale Europeenne EXOSQUELET FOR HUMAN ARMS, ESPECIALLY FOR SPATIAL APPLICATIONS
US6813582B2 (en) 2002-07-31 2004-11-02 Point Research Corporation Navigation device for personnel on foot
JP3930399B2 (en) 2002-08-21 2007-06-13 本田技研工業株式会社 Walking assist device
US7736394B2 (en) 2002-08-22 2010-06-15 Victhom Human Bionics Inc. Actuated prosthesis for amputees
AU2003250679B2 (en) * 2002-08-22 2006-04-27 Victhom Human Bionics Inc. Positioning of lower extremities artificial proprioceptors
US7066896B1 (en) * 2002-11-12 2006-06-27 Kiselik Daniel R Interactive apparatus and method for developing ability in the neuromuscular system
US7396337B2 (en) 2002-11-21 2008-07-08 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Powered orthotic device
US6966882B2 (en) 2002-11-25 2005-11-22 Tibion Corporation Active muscle assistance device and method
US7295892B2 (en) 2002-12-31 2007-11-13 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Speed-adaptive control scheme for legged running robots
DE10307328A1 (en) * 2003-02-17 2004-09-02 Eska Implants Gmbh & Co. prosthetic leg
JP2006524303A (en) 2003-04-17 2006-10-26 ヴィクソム ヒューマン バイオニクス インコーポレーテッド High power / weight ratio braking system based on shape memory material technology
ITTO20030309A1 (en) * 2003-04-18 2004-10-19 St Microelectronics Srl RELATIVE ANGULAR POSITION MEASURING DEVICE
US7101487B2 (en) 2003-05-02 2006-09-05 Ossur Engineering, Inc. Magnetorheological fluid compositions and prosthetic knees utilizing same
JP2005000500A (en) 2003-06-13 2005-01-06 Yaskawa Electric Corp Foot joint electric device
AU2003286026B2 (en) 2003-11-18 2009-12-03 Victhom Human Bionics Inc. Instrumented prosthetic foot
US7815689B2 (en) 2003-11-18 2010-10-19 Victhom Human Bionics Inc. Instrumented prosthetic foot
US20050107889A1 (en) 2003-11-18 2005-05-19 Stephane Bedard Instrumented prosthetic foot
US7896927B2 (en) 2004-02-12 2011-03-01 össur hf. Systems and methods for actuating a prosthetic ankle based on a relaxed position
WO2005079712A2 (en) 2004-02-12 2005-09-01 össur hf System and method for motion-controlled foot unit
US20060184280A1 (en) 2005-02-16 2006-08-17 Magnus Oddsson System and method of synchronizing mechatronic devices
US20050283257A1 (en) 2004-03-10 2005-12-22 Bisbee Charles R Iii Control system and method for a prosthetic knee
US7066964B2 (en) 2004-03-12 2006-06-27 Hosmer-Dorrance Corporation Prosthetic knee and rotary hydraulic chamber
EP1732482A2 (en) 2004-03-16 2006-12-20 Tensegrity Prosthetics, Inc. Tensegrity joints for prosthetic, orthotic, and robotic devices
WO2005110293A2 (en) 2004-05-07 2005-11-24 Ossur Engineering, Inc. Magnetorheologically actuated prosthetic knee
DE102004031562A1 (en) 2004-06-29 2006-02-16 Otto Bock Healthcare Ip Gmbh & Co. Kg Artificial foot
GB0419480D0 (en) 2004-09-02 2004-10-06 Univ Surrey Movement description and analysis
WO2006037101A2 (en) 2004-09-27 2006-04-06 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Ankle interface
JP2008519941A (en) 2004-11-09 2008-06-12 ノースイースタン ユニバーシティ Electrorheological fluid brake or actuator device and straightening device using the same
CA2863933C (en) 2004-12-22 2018-08-07 Ossur Hf Systems and methods for processing limb motion
WO2006084219A2 (en) 2005-02-02 2006-08-10 össur hf Prosthetic and orthotic systems usable for rehabilitation
US8801802B2 (en) 2005-02-16 2014-08-12 össur hf System and method for data communication with a mechatronic device
US7942935B2 (en) 2005-03-29 2011-05-17 Motion Control Device and system for prosthetic knees and ankles
US8864846B2 (en) 2005-03-31 2014-10-21 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Model-based neuromechanical controller for a robotic leg
US20070162152A1 (en) 2005-03-31 2007-07-12 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Artificial joints using agonist-antagonist actuators
US20070123997A1 (en) 2005-03-31 2007-05-31 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Exoskeletons for running and walking
US20060249315A1 (en) 2005-03-31 2006-11-09 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Artificial human limbs and joints employing actuators, springs, and variable-damper elements
SE528516C2 (en) 2005-04-19 2006-12-05 Lisa Gramnaes Combined active and passive leg prosthesis system and a method for performing a movement cycle with such a system
US20060259153A1 (en) 2005-05-13 2006-11-16 Chang-Yu Mechanical System Ltd. Artificial knee with cushion function
EP2762108B1 (en) 2005-07-29 2018-08-22 Freedom Innovations, LLC Computer controlled prosthetic knee device
US7485152B2 (en) 2005-08-26 2009-02-03 The Ohio Willow Wood Company Prosthetic leg having electronically controlled prosthetic knee with regenerative braking feature
US7531006B2 (en) 2005-09-01 2009-05-12 össur hf Sensing system and method for motion-controlled foot unit
WO2007027808A2 (en) 2005-09-01 2007-03-08 össur hf System and method for determining terrain transitions
US8048172B2 (en) 2005-09-01 2011-11-01 össur hf Actuator assembly for prosthetic or orthotic joint
DE102005051646A1 (en) 2005-10-26 2007-05-10 Otto Bock Healthcare Ip Gmbh & Co. Kg Procedure for checking the setting of a prosthetic knee joint
US7552664B2 (en) * 2005-11-04 2009-06-30 Northrop Grumman Guidance and Electronics Co., Inc. Harmonic drive gear assembly with asymmetrical wave generator and associated flexspline
DE102005062231A1 (en) 2005-12-22 2007-07-05 Otto Bock Healthcare Ip Gmbh & Co. Kg Artificial foot comprises a lower connecting element extending into the heel region
US8403997B2 (en) 2006-03-24 2013-03-26 Blatchford Products Limited Lower limb prosthesis and control unit
CA2673399C (en) 2007-01-05 2017-08-29 Victhom Human Bionics, Inc. Joint actuation mechanism for a prosthetic and/or orthotic device having a compliant transmission
EP2120801B1 (en) 2007-01-19 2018-04-11 Victhom Laboratory Inc. Reactive layer control system for prosthetic and orthotic devices
WO2009120637A1 (en) 2008-03-24 2009-10-01 Ossur Hf Transfemoral prosthetic systems and methods for operating the same
EP3219295B1 (en) 2008-09-04 2023-11-15 Otto Bock HealthCare LP Hybrid terrain-adaptive lower-extremity systems
US8588977B2 (en) 2008-11-20 2013-11-19 University Of Utah Research Foundation Signal modulator for visual indicator
EP2533728B1 (en) 2010-02-12 2021-05-05 Proteor USA, LLC Method of optimizing a prosthetic joint system and corresponding prosthetic joint system
CN102892388A (en) 2010-04-05 2013-01-23 Iwalk股份有限公司 Controlling torque in a prosthesis or orthosis
US9060884B2 (en) 2011-05-03 2015-06-23 Victhom Human Bionics Inc. Impedance simulating motion controller for orthotic and prosthetic applications
US9820871B2 (en) 2011-07-01 2017-11-21 Otto Bock Healthcare Gmbh Prosthetic hydraulic joint with accumulator and methods for controlling joint
CN105228559B (en) 2013-02-26 2018-01-09 奥苏尔公司 The pseudopod of stability and bullet performance recovery with enhancing
EP2967920B1 (en) 2013-03-14 2021-04-21 Ossur Hf Prosthetic ankle: a method of controlling based on adaptation to speed

Patent Citations (108)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3316558A (en) * 1963-11-12 1967-05-02 La Vaughn L Mortensen Prosthetic leg with a hydraulic knee control
US3501776A (en) * 1966-08-30 1970-03-24 Tno Electropneumatic converter for operating an artificial limb
US3659294A (en) * 1969-05-03 1972-05-02 Bock Orthopaed Ind Adjustable link for prosthetic limb
US3791375A (en) * 1971-09-29 1974-02-12 E Pfeiffer Device for sensing and warning of excessive ambulation force
US3866246A (en) * 1972-11-14 1975-02-18 Us Navy Shoulder disarticulation prosthetic system
US3871032A (en) * 1974-03-08 1975-03-18 Forsch Orthopadie Technik Artificial hydraulic ankle joint
US4005496A (en) * 1974-06-28 1977-02-01 Hosmer/Dorrance Corporation Prosthetic knee joint
US4023215A (en) * 1976-02-17 1977-05-17 Moore Robert R Locking prosthetic knee
US4065815A (en) * 1976-09-28 1978-01-03 Sen Jung Chen Hydraulically controlled artificial leg
US4310932A (en) * 1978-09-27 1982-01-19 Naeder Max Artificial knee-joint
US4314379A (en) * 1979-02-26 1982-02-09 Agency Of Industrial Science & Technology, Ministry Of International Trade & Industry Apparatus for discrimination of myoelectric potential patterns
US4433679A (en) * 1981-05-04 1984-02-28 Mauldin Donald M Knee and elbow brace
US4657000A (en) * 1981-07-23 1987-04-14 Dynasplints Systems, Inc. Adjustable splint and securing means therefor
US4518307A (en) * 1982-09-29 1985-05-21 The Boeing Company Compliant robot arm adapter assembly
US4569352A (en) * 1983-05-13 1986-02-11 Wright State University Feedback control system for walking
US4578083A (en) * 1983-05-16 1986-03-25 Williams Allton C Artificial leg
US4657470A (en) * 1984-11-15 1987-04-14 Westinghouse Electric Corp. Robotic end effector
SU1447366A1 (en) * 1985-03-04 1988-12-30 Украинский Научно-Исследовательский Институт Протезирования, Протезостроения, Экспертизы И Восстановления Трудоспособности Инвалидов Apparatus for controlling prostheses of the lower extermities
US4649934A (en) * 1985-06-07 1987-03-17 Faro Medical Technologies, Inc. Joint laxity measurement
US4795474A (en) * 1985-11-06 1989-01-03 Otto Bock Orthopadische Industrie Besitz - Und Verwaltungs-Kg Rotary joint especially for a knee prosthesis
US4814661A (en) * 1986-05-23 1989-03-21 Washington State University Research Foundation, Inc. Systems for measurement and analysis of forces exerted during human locomotion
US4726404A (en) * 1986-12-15 1988-02-23 Habley Medical Technology Corporation Combination container and air removal fixture for simplified filling of an implantable hydraulic device
US4730625A (en) * 1986-12-15 1988-03-15 Faro Medical Technologies Inc. Posture monitoring system
US4989161A (en) * 1987-02-27 1991-01-29 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Control unit for a multi-degree-of freedom manipulator
US4805455A (en) * 1987-04-24 1989-02-21 Myo-Tech Corp. Muscle testing apparatus and method
US4893648A (en) * 1987-10-02 1990-01-16 Otto Bock Orthopadische Industrie Besitz - Und Verwaltungs - Kg Control valve
US4808187A (en) * 1987-10-05 1989-02-28 Iowa State University Research Foundation, Inc. Tactile stimulus receptor for a hand prosthesis
US4892554A (en) * 1987-12-21 1990-01-09 Robinson David L Prosthetic foot
US4919418A (en) * 1988-01-27 1990-04-24 Miller Jan W Computerized drive mechanism for exercise, physical therapy and rehabilitation
US5062673A (en) * 1988-12-28 1991-11-05 Kabushiki Kaisha Toyota Chuo Kenkyusho Articulated hand
US4994086A (en) * 1989-08-09 1991-02-19 United States Manufacturing Company Universal modular frame for above-knee endoskeletal prosthesis
US5086785A (en) * 1989-08-10 1992-02-11 Abrams/Gentille Entertainment Inc. Angular displacement sensors
US5181931A (en) * 1990-01-26 1993-01-26 Otto Bock Orthopaedische Industrie Besitz- und Verwaltungs-Kommanditgesel lschaft Swivel connection between two parts of an orthopedic technical aid
US5092902A (en) * 1990-08-16 1992-03-03 Mauch Laboratories, Inc. Hydraulic control unit for prosthetic leg
US5252901A (en) * 1990-11-30 1993-10-12 Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha System for controlling locomotion of legged walking robot
US5201772A (en) * 1991-01-31 1993-04-13 Maxwell Scott M System for resisting limb movement
US5383939A (en) * 1991-12-05 1995-01-24 James; Kelvin B. System for controlling artificial knee joint action in an above knee prosthesis
US5282460A (en) * 1992-01-06 1994-02-01 Joyce Ann Boldt Three axis mechanical joint for a power assist device
US5405407A (en) * 1992-02-24 1995-04-11 Nabco Limited Cylinder for artificial leg
USRE36521E (en) * 1992-04-01 2000-01-18 Otto Bock Orthopaedische Industrie Besitz - Und Verwaltungs Kg Connecting part between leg prosthesis components
US5405510A (en) * 1992-05-18 1995-04-11 Ppg Industries, Inc. Portable analyte measuring system for multiple fluid samples
US5284330A (en) * 1992-06-18 1994-02-08 Lord Corporation Magnetorheological fluid devices
US5277281A (en) * 1992-06-18 1994-01-11 Lord Corporation Magnetorheological fluid dampers
US5405410A (en) * 1992-08-12 1995-04-11 Ohio Willow Wood Company Adjustable lower limb prosthesis having conical support
WO1994009727A2 (en) * 1992-10-29 1994-05-11 Brian Andrews Orthosis and prosthesis
US5382373A (en) * 1992-10-30 1995-01-17 Lord Corporation Magnetorheological materials based on alloy particles
US5405409A (en) * 1992-12-21 1995-04-11 Knoth; Donald E. Hydraulic control unit for prosthetic leg
US5893891A (en) * 1993-06-11 1999-04-13 Chas. A. Blatchford & Sons Limited Prosthesis control system
US5394132A (en) * 1993-07-19 1995-02-28 Poil; James E. Magnetic motion producing device
US5504415A (en) * 1993-12-03 1996-04-02 Electronic Power Technology, Inc. Method and apparatus for automatic equalization of series-connected batteries
US5888246A (en) * 1994-03-12 1999-03-30 Royal Infirmary Of Edinburgh Nhs Trust Motor drive system and linkage for hand prosthesis
US5619149A (en) * 1994-03-25 1997-04-08 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Single ended dynamic sense amplifier
US5728174A (en) * 1994-03-31 1998-03-17 Biedermann Motech Gmbh Swing phase control for an artificial knee joint
US5624389A (en) * 1994-05-30 1997-04-29 Otto Bock Orthopadische Industrie Besitz-und Verwaltungs-Kommanditgesells chaft Knee joint orthosis
US5408873A (en) * 1994-07-25 1995-04-25 Cleveland Medical Devices, Inc. Foot force sensor
US6187051B1 (en) * 1994-11-25 2001-02-13 Otto Bock Orthopadische Industrie Besitz-Und Verwaltungs-Kommanditgesesllschaft Pivot device between parts of an orthopedic aid
US5888236A (en) * 1994-11-25 1999-03-30 Otto Bock Orthopadische Industrie Besitz Und Verwaltungs Kommanditgesellschaft Pivot device between parts of an orthopedic aid
US5704945A (en) * 1995-02-24 1998-01-06 Otto Bock Orthopaedische Industrie Besitzund Verwaltungs-Kommanditgesells chaft Brake-action knee joint
US5888239A (en) * 1995-06-09 1999-03-30 Otto Bock Orthopaedische Industrie Besitz-Und Verwaltungs-Kommanditge-Sel lschaft Jointless foot prosthesis
US5728170A (en) * 1995-09-08 1998-03-17 Otto Bock Orthopaedische Industrie Besitz- und Verwaltungs-Kommanditgesel lschaft Below-knee prosthesis
US6206933B1 (en) * 1995-09-22 2001-03-27 Chas. A. Blatchford & Sons Limited Knee prosthesis
US6183425B1 (en) * 1995-10-13 2001-02-06 The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration Method and apparatus for monitoring of daily activity in terms of ground reaction forces
US6342076B1 (en) * 1996-01-22 2002-01-29 Handevelop Ab Prosthetic device for joints
US6350286B1 (en) * 1996-02-16 2002-02-26 Seattle Orthopedic Group, Inc. Prosthetic ankle and walking system
US5711746A (en) * 1996-03-11 1998-01-27 Lord Corporation Portable controllable fluid rehabilitation devices
US5704946A (en) * 1996-03-13 1998-01-06 United States Manufacturing Company Multi-purpose prosthetic knee component
US5878851A (en) * 1996-07-02 1999-03-09 Lord Corporation Controllable vibration apparatus
US6352144B1 (en) * 1996-11-21 2002-03-05 Advanced Fluid Systems Limited Flow-control valve and damper
US6537322B1 (en) * 1997-05-30 2003-03-25 Christopher Lyle Johnson Prosthetic foot assembly having improved resilient cushions and components
US5888213A (en) * 1997-06-06 1999-03-30 Motion Control, Inc. Method and apparatus for controlling an externally powered prosthesis
US5888212A (en) * 1997-06-26 1999-03-30 Mauch, Inc. Computer controlled hydraulic resistance device for a prosthesis and other apparatus
USD407490S (en) * 1997-08-28 1999-03-30 Otto Bock Orthopaedische Industrie Besitz Und Verwaltungs Kommanditgesellschaft Knee joint orthotic device
US6513381B2 (en) * 1997-10-14 2003-02-04 Dynastream Innovations, Inc. Motion analysis system
US6361570B1 (en) * 1997-10-24 2002-03-26 Lothian Primary Care Nhs Trust Upper limb prosthesis
US5895430A (en) * 1998-02-06 1999-04-20 O'connor; Roderick S. Prosthesis for long femur and knee disarticulation amputation
US6719806B1 (en) * 1998-03-04 2004-04-13 Chas. A. Blatchford & Sons Limited Lower limb prosthesis and control unit
USD439339S1 (en) * 1998-03-25 2001-03-20 Otto Bock Orthopaedische Industrie Besitz-Und Verwaltungs-Kommanditgessellschaft Knee joint
US6206934B1 (en) * 1998-04-10 2001-03-27 Flex-Foot, Inc. Ankle block with spring inserts
US6039091A (en) * 1998-08-03 2000-03-21 Mentor Corporation Filling device for use in manufacturing of gel filled prostheses
US6206932B1 (en) * 1998-11-24 2001-03-27 Timothy Johnson Alignment device for a prosthetic limb
US6168634B1 (en) * 1999-03-25 2001-01-02 Geoffrey W. Schmitz Hydraulically energized magnetorheological replicant muscle tissue and a system and a method for using and controlling same
US6195921B1 (en) * 1999-09-28 2001-03-06 Vinncente Hoa Gia Truong Virtual intelligence shoe with a podiatric analysis system
US6373152B1 (en) * 1999-12-17 2002-04-16 Synergy Scientech Corp. Electrical energy storage device
US6679920B2 (en) * 2000-01-11 2004-01-20 Biedermann Motech Gmbh Device and method for remote maintenance of an electronically controllable prosthesis
US6610101B2 (en) * 2000-03-29 2003-08-26 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Speed-adaptive and patient-adaptive prosthetic knee
US7164967B2 (en) * 2000-05-04 2007-01-16 Iguana Robotics, Inc. Biomorphic rhythmic movement controller
US6522266B1 (en) * 2000-05-17 2003-02-18 Honeywell, Inc. Navigation system, method and software for foot travel
US6875241B2 (en) * 2000-06-30 2005-04-05 Roland J. Christensen, As Operating Manager Of Rjc Development Lc, General Partner Of The Roland J. Christensen Family Limited Partnership Variable resistance cell
US6855170B2 (en) * 2000-08-25 2005-02-15 Gramtec Innovation Ab Device in a leg prosthesis
US20030120183A1 (en) * 2000-09-20 2003-06-26 Simmons John C. Assistive clothing
US7918808B2 (en) * 2000-09-20 2011-04-05 Simmons John C Assistive clothing
US20040172097A1 (en) * 2001-05-16 2004-09-02 Roland Brodard Therapeutic and/or training device for a person's lower limbs
WO2002092164A2 (en) * 2001-05-16 2002-11-21 Fondation Suisse Pour Les Cybertheses Therapeutic and/or training device for a person's lower limbs
US20030019700A1 (en) * 2001-07-25 2003-01-30 Michael Wittig Magnetorheological fluid damper
US6876135B2 (en) * 2001-10-05 2005-04-05 Sri International Master/slave electroactive polymer systems
US8109890B2 (en) * 2002-02-07 2012-02-07 Ecole Polytechnique Federale De Lausanne-Service Des Relations Industrielles Body movement monitoring device
US7029500B2 (en) * 2002-04-12 2006-04-18 James Jay Martin Electronically controlled prosthetic system
US20040064195A1 (en) * 2002-07-15 2004-04-01 Hugh Herr Variable-mechanical-impedance artificial legs
US7867284B2 (en) * 2002-08-22 2011-01-11 Victhom Human Bionics Inc. Control device and system for controlling an actuated prosthesis
US7314490B2 (en) * 2002-08-22 2008-01-01 Victhom Human Bionics Inc. Actuated leg prosthesis for above-knee amputees
US20130035769A1 (en) * 2002-08-22 2013-02-07 Victhom Human Bionics, Inc. Actuated leg prosthesis for above-knee amputees
US7641700B2 (en) * 2002-08-30 2010-01-05 Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha Joint device for artificial leg, method of controlling the joint device, and control unit
US20040083007A1 (en) * 2002-10-29 2004-04-29 Molino Joseph L. Prosthetic device
US20040167638A1 (en) * 2002-11-01 2004-08-26 Caspers Carl A. Pressure/temperature monitoring device for prosthetics
US7182738B2 (en) * 2003-04-23 2007-02-27 Marctec, Llc Patient monitoring apparatus and method for orthosis and other devices
US7198071B2 (en) * 2003-05-02 2007-04-03 Össur Engineering, Inc. Systems and methods of loading fluid in a prosthetic knee
US20070043449A1 (en) * 2005-03-31 2007-02-22 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Artificial ankle-foot system with spring, variable-damping, and series-elastic actuator components
US20070016329A1 (en) * 2005-03-31 2007-01-18 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Biomimetic motion and balance controllers for use in prosthetics, orthotics and robotics

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
English translation of SU 1447366 A1 (published on December 30, 1988) *

Cited By (47)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9649206B2 (en) 2002-08-22 2017-05-16 Victhom Laboratory Inc. Control device and system for controlling an actuated prosthesis
US9358137B2 (en) 2002-08-22 2016-06-07 Victhom Laboratory Inc. Actuated prosthesis for amputees
US8986397B2 (en) 2003-11-18 2015-03-24 Victhom Human Bionics, Inc. Instrumented prosthetic foot
US8323354B2 (en) 2003-11-18 2012-12-04 Victhom Human Bionics Inc. Instrumented prosthetic foot
US9526636B2 (en) 2003-11-18 2016-12-27 Victhom Laboratory Inc. Instrumented prosthetic foot
US10195057B2 (en) 2004-02-12 2019-02-05 össur hf. Transfemoral prosthetic systems and methods for operating the same
US8657886B2 (en) 2004-02-12 2014-02-25 össur hf Systems and methods for actuating a prosthetic ankle
US9271851B2 (en) 2004-02-12 2016-03-01 össur hf. Systems and methods for actuating a prosthetic ankle
US9078774B2 (en) 2004-12-22 2015-07-14 össur hf Systems and methods for processing limb motion
US8801802B2 (en) 2005-02-16 2014-08-12 össur hf System and method for data communication with a mechatronic device
US8814949B2 (en) 2005-04-19 2014-08-26 össur hf Combined active and passive leg prosthesis system and a method for performing a movement with such a system
US9066819B2 (en) 2005-04-19 2015-06-30 össur hf Combined active and passive leg prosthesis system and a method for performing a movement with such a system
US9717606B2 (en) 2005-04-19 2017-08-01 össur hf Combined active and passive leg prosthesis system and a method for performing a movement with such a system
US8852292B2 (en) 2005-09-01 2014-10-07 Ossur Hf System and method for determining terrain transitions
US8702811B2 (en) 2005-09-01 2014-04-22 össur hf System and method for determining terrain transitions
US9526635B2 (en) 2007-01-05 2016-12-27 Victhom Laboratory Inc. Actuated leg orthotics or prosthetics for amputees
US20090299480A1 (en) * 2007-01-05 2009-12-03 Victhom Human Bionics Inc. Joint Actuation Mechanism for a Prosthetic and/or Orthotic Device Having a Compliant Transmission
US11007072B2 (en) 2007-01-05 2021-05-18 Victhom Laboratory Inc. Leg orthotic device
US8435309B2 (en) 2007-01-05 2013-05-07 Victhom Human Bionics Joint actuation mechanism for a prosthetic and/or orthotic device having a compliant transmission
US9066817B2 (en) 2007-01-05 2015-06-30 Victhom Human Bionics Inc. High torque active mechanism for orthotic and/or prosthetic devices
US9730824B2 (en) 2007-01-05 2017-08-15 Victhom Laboratory Inc. High torque active mechanism for orthotic and/or prosthetic devices
US11607326B2 (en) 2007-01-19 2023-03-21 Victhom Laboratory Inc. Reactive layer control system for prosthetic devices
US10405996B2 (en) 2007-01-19 2019-09-10 Victhom Laboratory Inc. Reactive layer control system for prosthetic and orthotic devices
US9808357B2 (en) 2007-01-19 2017-11-07 Victhom Laboratory Inc. Reactive layer control system for prosthetic and orthotic devices
US10299943B2 (en) 2008-03-24 2019-05-28 össur hf Transfemoral prosthetic systems and methods for operating the same
US11020250B2 (en) 2010-09-29 2021-06-01 Össur Iceland Ehf Prosthetic and orthotic devices and methods and systems for controlling the same
US9925071B2 (en) * 2010-09-29 2018-03-27 össur hf Prosthetic and orthotic devices and methods and systems for controlling the same
US11185429B2 (en) 2011-05-03 2021-11-30 Victhom Laboratory Inc. Impedance simulating motion controller for orthotic and prosthetic applications
US10251762B2 (en) 2011-05-03 2019-04-09 Victhom Laboratory Inc. Impedance simulating motion controller for orthotic and prosthetic applications
US10543109B2 (en) 2011-11-11 2020-01-28 Össur Iceland Ehf Prosthetic device and method with compliant linking member and actuating linking member
US10575970B2 (en) 2011-11-11 2020-03-03 Össur Iceland Ehf Robotic device and method of using a parallel mechanism
US9895240B2 (en) 2012-03-29 2018-02-20 Ösur hf Powered prosthetic hip joint
US10940027B2 (en) 2012-03-29 2021-03-09 Össur Iceland Ehf Powered prosthetic hip joint
US9561118B2 (en) 2013-02-26 2017-02-07 össur hf Prosthetic foot with enhanced stability and elastic energy return
US10369019B2 (en) 2013-02-26 2019-08-06 Ossur Hf Prosthetic foot with enhanced stability and elastic energy return
US11285024B2 (en) 2013-02-26 2022-03-29 Össur Iceland Ehf Prosthetic foot with enhanced stability and elastic energy return
US10695197B2 (en) 2013-03-14 2020-06-30 Össur Iceland Ehf Prosthetic ankle and method of controlling same based on weight-shifting
US9707104B2 (en) 2013-03-14 2017-07-18 össur hf Prosthetic ankle and method of controlling same based on adaptation to speed
US11576795B2 (en) 2013-03-14 2023-02-14 össur hf Prosthetic ankle and method of controlling same based on decreased loads
US9375569B2 (en) 2013-10-03 2016-06-28 Ensilver Canada Controller unit for a functional electrical stimulation (FES) orthotic system
US9375570B2 (en) 2013-10-03 2016-06-28 Ensilver Canada Sensor unit for a functional electrical stimulation (FES) orthotic system
US9333345B2 (en) 2013-10-03 2016-05-10 Ensilver Canada Electrical stimulation for a functional electrical stimulation system
US10390974B2 (en) 2014-04-11 2019-08-27 össur hf. Prosthetic foot with removable flexible members
US11446166B2 (en) 2014-04-11 2022-09-20 Össur Iceland Ehf Prosthetic foot with removable flexible members
US10213324B2 (en) * 2014-08-28 2019-02-26 Rehabilitation Institute Of Chicago Minimum jerk swing control for assistive device
US20160058582A1 (en) * 2014-08-28 2016-03-03 Rehabilitation Institute Of Chicago Minimum Jerk Swing Control for Assistive Device
US9364657B2 (en) 2014-10-31 2016-06-14 Ensilver Canada Cuff unit for a functional electrical stimulation system

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN1678258A (en) 2005-10-05
AU2003236750A1 (en) 2004-03-11
WO2004017871A2 (en) 2004-03-04
CN100477973C (en) 2009-04-15
WO2004017872A1 (en) 2004-03-04
CA2494364C (en) 2009-08-25
US20130297041A1 (en) 2013-11-07
KR100690909B1 (en) 2007-03-09
JP2005536318A (en) 2005-12-02
EP1531766A1 (en) 2005-05-25
US7867284B2 (en) 2011-01-11
CA2494365A1 (en) 2004-03-04
AU2003236761B2 (en) 2006-01-12
US9649206B2 (en) 2017-05-16
CA2494365C (en) 2009-09-01
JP2010075727A (en) 2010-04-08
EP1531767A1 (en) 2005-05-25
US20060122711A1 (en) 2006-06-08
KR20050058417A (en) 2005-06-16
JP4808026B2 (en) 2011-11-02
US20040049290A1 (en) 2004-03-11
US20130035769A1 (en) 2013-02-07
AU2003236750B2 (en) 2006-08-10
JP4300213B2 (en) 2009-07-22
WO2004017873A1 (en) 2004-03-04
CN100506189C (en) 2009-07-01
US7314490B2 (en) 2008-01-01
US8231687B2 (en) 2012-07-31
US7147667B2 (en) 2006-12-12
KR20050062769A (en) 2005-06-27
CA2494364A1 (en) 2004-03-04
ES2316771T3 (en) 2009-04-16
US20040111163A1 (en) 2004-06-10
JP2005536317A (en) 2005-12-02
CN1678257A (en) 2005-10-05
US20060122710A1 (en) 2006-06-08
ATE416734T1 (en) 2008-12-15
KR100702212B1 (en) 2007-04-03
EP1531767B1 (en) 2008-12-10
JP5068302B2 (en) 2012-11-07
DE60325221D1 (en) 2009-01-22
AU2003236761A1 (en) 2004-03-11
EP2535024B1 (en) 2014-05-21
WO2004017871A3 (en) 2004-05-06
EP2535024A1 (en) 2012-12-19
EP2535024B2 (en) 2019-01-16
EP1531766B1 (en) 2012-08-01

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US9649206B2 (en) Control device and system for controlling an actuated prosthesis
EP1542627B1 (en) Positioning of lower extremities artificial proprioceptors
Grimes et al. Feasibility of an active control scheme for above knee prostheses
EP2704671B1 (en) Impedance simulating motion controller for orthotic and prosthetic applications
US7637957B2 (en) System and method for motion-controlled foot unit
US7955398B2 (en) Instrumented prosthetic foot
US9526636B2 (en) Instrumented prosthetic foot
Zahedi et al. Adaptive prosthesis–a new concept in prosthetic knee control
WO2015170964A1 (en) A prosthetic limb integrated with a sensory system

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION