Numéro de publication | US20110156891 A1 |

Type de publication | Demande |

Numéro de demande | US 13/032,694 |

Date de publication | 30 juin 2011 |

Date de dépôt | 23 févr. 2011 |

Date de priorité | 25 juin 2008 |

Autre référence de publication | CN101612938A, CN101612938B, DE102009029847A1, US7916006, US20090322500 |

Numéro de publication | 032694, 13032694, US 2011/0156891 A1, US 2011/156891 A1, US 20110156891 A1, US 20110156891A1, US 2011156891 A1, US 2011156891A1, US-A1-20110156891, US-A1-2011156891, US2011/0156891A1, US2011/156891A1, US20110156891 A1, US20110156891A1, US2011156891 A1, US2011156891A1 |

Inventeurs | Aamrapali Chatterjee, Paul R. Williams |

Cessionnaire d'origine | GM Global Technology Operations LLC |

Exporter la citation | BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan |

Citations de brevets (12), Référencé par (1), Classifications (15), Événements juridiques (2) | |

Liens externes: USPTO, Cession USPTO, Espacenet | |

US 20110156891 A1

Résumé

A vehicle has a safety system including at least one object sensor to detect a distance from an object in a path of the vehicle and the speed and acceleration of the object. The sensor data is input into a control to determine a desired braking judgment line and a steering judgment line between the vehicle and the object. The safety system then compares the vehicle and object acceleration. Following, the safety system calculates a judgment line between the object and the vehicle based upon equations for the determined scenario. The judgment line is then used to determine a warning distance and warn a vehicle operator.

Revendications(8)

at least one object sensor configured to detect a distance from an object in a path of the vehicle and the speed and acceleration of the object;

at least one vehicle sensor configured to determine a speed and acceleration of the vehicle; and

a control to determine a first amount of time until the vehicle must begin braking to avoid contact with the object and a second amount of time until the vehicle must begin steering to avoid contact with the object, wherein the first amount of time and the second amount of time are based on the detected distance, the speed and acceleration of the object and the speed and acceleration of the vehicle.

Description

- [0001]This application is a divisional application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/145,638, filed Jun. 25, 2008, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
- [0002]The present invention relates generally to a vehicle safety system for automobiles, and more specifically to braking and steering determinations by a vehicle safety system.
- [0003]Conventional vehicle safety systems regulate vehicle speed according to a speed setting that a vehicle operator may set and adjust while driving. Adaptive cruise control systems detect moving objects in the vehicle path, such as preceding vehicles, and provide throttle and brake control, as necessary, to maintain a trailing distance from the preceding vehicle.
- [0004]However, these systems do not take into account acceleration or deceleration of the host vehicle or the detected object. Due to the variety of situations which arise when accounting for changes in acceleration, prior vehicle safety systems cannot perform the calculations for all situations without null values occurring. Accordingly, these safety systems are programmed to maintain a trailing distance utilizing current vehicle velocity. These safety systems utilize velocity of the vehicle and performs the calculations frequently to take into account any changes in the velocity.
- [0005]A vehicle safety system which determines a time until braking or steering must begin in order to avoid contact with an object, including accounting for the acceleration of the vehicle and the detected object, is desired.
- [0006]A vehicle has a safety system including at least one object sensor to detect a distance from an object in a path of the vehicle and the speed and acceleration of the object. Additionally, at least one vehicle sensor determines a speed and acceleration of the vehicle. The sensor data is input into a control to determine a time until the vehicle must begin braking to avoid contact with the object (i.e. a “braking judgment line”) and another time until the vehicle must begin steering to avoid contact with the object (i.e., a “steering judgment line”) based upon the sensor information.
- [0007]A method for determining a warning for the vehicle safety system includes initiating the safety system with at least one input from the sensors. The safety system then compares the vehicle acceleration and the object acceleration to determine a safety system scenario. Based upon the equations selected for the determined scenario the safety system calculates a judgment line between the object and the vehicle. The judgment line is then used to determine a warning distance and warn a vehicle operator.
- [0008]The above features and advantages, and other features and advantages of the present invention will be readily apparent from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments and best modes for carrying out the present invention when taken in connection with the accompanying drawings.
- [0009]
FIG. 1 is a schematic plan view illustrating a vehicle having a vehicle safety system and a target vehicle; and - [0010]
FIG. 2 is a flow diagram illustrating a method for determining a braking judgment line and a steering judgment line for the vehicle safety system ofFIG. 1 . - [0011]Referring to the Figures, wherein like reference numbers refer to the same or similar components throughout the several views,
FIG. 1 is a schematic view of an exemplary motor vehicle, identified generally as**10**, having a vehicle safety system**12**. A preceding or target vehicle**14**is located on a roadway a distance ahead of the host vehicle**10**. - [0012]A control
**16**manages the vehicle safety system**12**. The control**16**is connected to an object sensor**18**for detecting the distance between the host vehicle**10**and the target vehicle**14**, and the speed and change in speed of the target vehicle**14**. The sensor**18**may be any type of sensor that provides the required information or may incorporate multiple sensors each providing one type of information. For the purposes of simplification the embodiment illustrates a detected object as the target vehicle**14**. Any object that would be located on the roadway with the host vehicle**10**would also be detected and subject to the vehicle safety system**12**. - [0013]Additionally, the host vehicle
**10**includes a speedometer**20**for measuring the speed of the host vehicle**10**. Information from the speedometer**20**is sent to the control**16**for operation of the vehicle safety system**12**. - [0014]A judgment line (JL) of the host vehicle
**10**determines the latest possible time at which the host vehicle**10**should brake or steer to avoid contact with the target vehicle**14**(or an object). The control**16**for the vehicle safety system**12**calculates the judgment line (JL) for the host vehicle**10**in order to provide a vehicle operator with sufficient warning to avoid contact between the host vehicle**10**and the target vehicle**14**. - [0015]The determination of the judgment line (JL) includes the determination of two times: a braking judgment line (JLB) determines the last possible moment when the host vehicle
**10**should brake to avoid contact with the object/target vehicle**14**, and a steering judgment line (JLS) determines the last possible moment when the host vehicle**10**should steer to avoid contact with the object/target vehicle**14**. Both the JLB and JLS take into account vehicle characteristics such as, weight, center of gravity, turn radius of the vehicle, tires, braking system, etc. - [0016]The braking judgment line (JLB) is expressed as:
- [0000]

JLB=TTC−*t′,* - [0017]where TTC is the time to contact and t′ is the time to brake. In other words, the time to brake (t′) is the time by which the host vehicle
**10**must begin braking to reach the target velocity (Vt) with the target minimum gap (TMG) between the host vehicle**10**and the target vehicle**14**. The target minimum gap (TMG) is the minimum distance desired between the host vehicle**10**and the target vehicle**14**. A typical target minimum gap (TMG) is approximately 0.25 m. The target minimum gap (TMG) distance may be selected according to the host vehicle**10**configuration and driver standards. One skilled in the art would be able to select an appropriate target minimum gap (TMG). - [0018]When either of the vehicles are accelerating or decelerating, the time to contact (TTC) can be calculated by:
- [0000]
$\mathrm{TTC}=\frac{\Delta \ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89eV}{\left(\Delta \ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89eA\right)}\mp \sqrt{\frac{{\left(\Delta \ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89eV\right)}^{2}-2\ue89eX*\left(\Delta \ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89eA\right)}{{\left(\Delta \ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89eA\right)}^{2}}},$ - [0019]where X is the distance between the host vehicle
**10**and the target vehicle**14**, and AA is the difference in acceleration between the host vehicle**10**and the target vehicle**14**. The difference in acceleration (ΔA) is calculated by: - [0000]

Δ*A=At−Ah,* - [0020]where At is the acceleration/deceleration of the target vehicle
**14**and Ah is the acceleration/deceleration of the host vehicle**10**. ΔV is the difference in velocity between the host vehicle**10**and the target vehicle**14**. The difference in velocity (ΔV) can be calculated by - [0000]

ΔV=Vh+Ah**t*′−(Vt+At**t*′), - [0021]where Vh is the velocity of the host vehicle
**10**and Vt is velocity of the target vehicle**14**. - [0022]Thus, when the host vehicle velocity (Vh) and the target vehicle velocity (Vt) have no difference in acceleration. (i.e. velocity of each vehicle is constant) the time to contact (TTC) can be simplified to:
- [0000]
$\mathrm{TTC}=\frac{X}{\Delta \ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89eV}.$ - [0023]To calculate the time to brake (t′) for determining the difference in velocity (ΔV) when at least one of the host vehicle
**10**and the target vehicle**14**is accelerating and for determining the braking judgment line (JLB), the distance to brake (Bd) must first be calculated. The distance to brake (Bd) is the distance covered during the time to brake (t′), i.e. the distance covered prior to the last possible moment at which braking must occur. When the distance to brake (Bd) has been reached, the host vehicle**10**must begin braking to avoid contact with the target vehicle**14**. The distance to brake (Bd) can be calculated by: - [0000]
$\mathrm{Bd}=\mathrm{TMG}+\Delta \ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89eV*{T}_{\mathrm{brake}}+\frac{\left(A\ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89e\mathrm{max}-\mathrm{At}\right)*{\left({T}_{\mathrm{brake}}\right)}^{2}}{2}$ - [0024]where Amax is the maximum rate at which the host vehicle
**10**can decelerate, and ΔV is taken at t′ (see above equation for ΔV). Further, T_{brake }is the time taken by the host vehicle**10**to attain the velocity of the target vehicle (Vt). That is, the time period after braking begins. T_{brake }begins after time to brake (t′) and distance to brake (Bd) have been reached. After the braking time (T_{brake}) is concluded, the target minimum gap (TMG) will remain between the host vehicle**10**and the target vehicle**14**. - [0025]The braking time (T
_{brake}) can be calculated by: - [0000]
${T}_{\mathrm{brake}}=\frac{-\Delta \ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89eV-\left(\Delta \ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89eA\right)*{t}^{\prime}}{\mathrm{At}-A\ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89e\mathrm{max}}.$ - [0026]Substituting the above equation for the time to brake (T
_{brake}) into the above equation for the distance to brake (Bd) the equation for the distance to brake (Bd) becomes: - [0000]
$\mathrm{Bd}=\mathrm{TMG}+\frac{-{\left(\Delta \ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89eV-\Delta \ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89eA*{t}^{\prime}\right)}^{2}}{2*\left(\mathrm{At}-A\ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89e\mathrm{max}\right)}.$ - [0027]Additionally, distance to brake (Bd) can also be calculated using the following equation:
- [0000]
$\mathrm{Bd}=X-\Delta \ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89eV*{t}^{\prime}+\frac{\Delta \ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89eA*{\left({t}^{\prime}\right)}^{2}}{2}.$ - [0028]By combining the previous equations for distance to brake (Bd), the time to brake (t′) can be found. Because of the complexity of the equations and to avoid null values (e.g. values causing the calculations to become impossible for the control
**16**to solve), the equations for time to brake (t′) are simplified according to several operating scenarios. - [0029]The first scenario is when the host vehicle
**10**has constant velocity and the target vehicle**14**has a constant velocity (i.e. for Ah=0, At =0), and the equation for time to brake (t′) is: - [0000]
${t}^{\prime}=\frac{X}{\Delta \ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89eV}+\frac{\Delta \ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89eV}{2*A\ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89e\mathrm{max}}-\frac{\mathrm{TMG}}{\Delta \ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89eV}.$ - [0030]Substituting this into the above equation for braking judgment line (JLB) determination, the equation below is reached:
- [0000]
$\mathrm{JLB}=\frac{\mathrm{TMG}}{\Delta \ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89eV}-\frac{\Delta \ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89eV}{2*A\ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89e\mathrm{max}}.$ - [0031]The second scenario is when the host vehicle
**10**has constant velocity and the target vehicle**14**has a changing velocity (i.e. for Ah=0, At≠0), and the equations for time to brake (t′) and braking judgment line (JLB) become: - [0000]
$\phantom{\rule{4.4em}{4.4ex}}\ue89e{t}^{\prime}=\frac{\Delta \ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89eV}{\mathrm{At}}\mp {\left(\frac{{\left(\Delta \ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89eV\right)}^{2}}{{\left(\mathrm{At}\right)}^{2}}-\frac{\Delta \ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89eV\ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89e2+2\ue89e\left(\mathrm{TMG}-X\right)\ue89e\left(\mathrm{At}-A\ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89e\mathrm{max}\right)}{\mathrm{At}*A\ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89e\mathrm{max}}\right)}^{1/2};$ $\mathrm{JLB}=-{\left(\frac{{\left(\Delta \ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89eV\right)}^{2}}{{\mathrm{At}}^{2}}-\frac{2\ue89eX}{\mathrm{At}}\right)}^{1/2}+{\left(\frac{{\left(\Delta \ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89eV\right)}^{2}}{{\mathrm{At}}^{2}}-\frac{2\ue89e\left(\mathrm{At}-A\ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89e\mathrm{max}\right)\ue89e\left(\mathrm{TMG}-X\right)+{\left(\Delta \ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89eV\right)}^{2}}{\mathrm{At}*A\ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89e\mathrm{max}}\right)}^{1/2}.$ - [0032]The third scenario is when the host vehicle
**10**has changing velocity and the target vehicle**14**has constant velocity (i.e. for Ah≠0 and At=0), and the equations for time to brake (t′) and braking judgment line (JLB) become: - [0000]
$\phantom{\rule{4.4em}{4.4ex}}\ue89e{t}^{\prime}=-\frac{\Delta \ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89eV}{\mathrm{Ah}}\mp {\left(\frac{A\ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89e\mathrm{max}*{\left(\Delta \ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89eV\right)}^{2}-2*\mathrm{Ah}*\left(\mathrm{TMG}-X\right)}{\mathrm{Ah}*\left(A\ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89e\mathrm{max}-\mathrm{Ah}\right)}\right)}^{1/2};$ $\mathrm{JLB}=-{\left(\frac{{\left(\Delta \ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89eV\right)}^{2}+2*X*\mathrm{Ah}}{{\left(\mathrm{Ah}\right)}^{2}}\right)}^{1/2}+{\left(\frac{\mathrm{Adec}*{\left(\Delta \ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89eV\right)}^{2}-2*\mathrm{Ah}*\left(\mathrm{TMG}-X\right)}{\mathrm{Ah}*\left(A\ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89e\mathrm{max}-\mathrm{Ah}\right)}\right)}^{1/2}.$ - [0033]Finally, the fourth scenario is when the host vehicle
**10**and the target vehicle**14**both have changing velocity (i.e. for Ah≠0 and At≠0), and the equations for time to brake (t′) and braking judgment line (JLB) become: - [0000]
$\phantom{\rule{4.4em}{4.4ex}}\ue89e{t}^{\prime}=-\frac{\Delta \ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89eV}{\Delta \ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89eA}\mp \frac{1}{\Delta \ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89eA}\ue89e{\left(\frac{\left(A\ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89e\mathrm{max}-\mathrm{At}\right)*\left({\left(\Delta \ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89eV\right)}^{2}+2\ue89eX*\Delta \ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89eA\right)}{\left(A\ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89e\mathrm{max}-\mathrm{Ah}\right)}\right)}^{1/2};$ $\mathrm{JLB}=-{\left(\frac{{\left(\Delta \ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89eV\right)}^{2}+2*X*\Delta \ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89eA}{2*{\left(A\ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89e\mathrm{max}-\mathrm{Ah}\right)}^{2}}\right)}^{1/2}\mp \frac{1}{\Delta \ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89eA}\ue89e{\left(\frac{\left(A\ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89e\mathrm{max}-\mathrm{At}\right)*\left({\left(\Delta \ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89eV\right)}^{2}+2\ue89eX*\Delta \ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89eA\right)}{\left(A\ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89e\mathrm{max}-\mathrm{Ah}\right)}\right)}^{1/2}.$ - [0034]Using the calculated JLB and working in a time delay based upon the time taken to reach maximum deceleration (Amax) a warning distance (Dwarn) can be calculated by:
- [0000]

Dwarn=*X−ΔV**(TTC−JLB−WTM) - [0035]where WTM is the warn time margin. In other words, the amount of time after which the operator of the host vehicle
**10**must be warned in order to allow the target minimum gap (TMG) after the braking time (T_{brake}) is complete. The warn time margin (WTM) takes into account the amount of time it will take the operator and the host vehicle**10**to respond to the warning. An approximate warning time margin (WTM) is 0.8 sec. Adding the warn time margin (WTM) and the JLB time together gives the warning time (Twarn) or the amount of time prior to collision at which the driver should be warned. - [0036]Similar calculations can be completed for the steering judgment line (JLS). For example, the steering judgment line (JLS) can be calculated by:
- [0000]

JLS=TTC−*St′,* - [0037]where St′ is the time after which the host vehicle
**10**must begin steering, or turn, to avoid contact with the target vehicle**14**. The time to contact (TTC) is calculated in the same manner as described above, using the time to steer (St′) in the equations rather than the time to brake (t′). The time to steer (St′) for determining the time to contact (TTC) and the steering judgment line (JLS) is calculated by: - [0000]
${\mathrm{St}}^{\prime}=\frac{X-\mathrm{Sd}}{\Delta \ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89eV}.$ - [0038]As above, X is the distance between the host vehicle
**10**and the target vehicle**14**. Sd is the distance traveled until the time to steer (St′). That is, the distance that will be traveled until steering must begin. When the distance to steer (Sd) has been reached the host vehicle**10**must begin steering (i.e. turning to avoid the target vehicle**14**). The distance to steer (Sd) can be calculated by determining how much forward distance will be required for the host vehicle**10**to turn and taking into account the distance the target vehicle**14**will travel in the same amount of time. Thus, the distance to steer (Sd) can be calculated by: - [0000]

*Sd=Xh−Xt,* - [0039]where Xh is the distance, forward, the host vehicle
**10**has traveled after they begin turning. Xt is the distance the target vehicle**14**has traveled after the host vehicle**10**began turning. The host vehicle**10**forward travel distance (Xh) can be calculated by: - [0000]

*Xh=Rf*sin Θ−*L,* - [0040]where L is the wheelbase of the host vehicle
**10**. Rf is the radius from the outer edge of the side mirror**22**of the host vehicle**10**to the center**24**of the turn, shown inFIG. 1 . Θ is the angle formed between the host vehicle**10**and the target vehicle**14**at the center**24**of the turn, illustrated inFIG. 1 . - [0041]The angle to furthest tire (Θ) is calculated using the outer edge of the furthest tire. That is, the rear wheel
**26**of the host vehicle**10**to the center**24**of the turn and a rear corner**28**of the target vehicle**14**to the center**24**of the turn. Incidentally, the distance from the rear corner**28**of the target vehicle**14**to the center**24**of the turn for the host vehicle**10**is the same distance as the distance from the outer edge of the side mirror**22**of the host vehicle**10**to the center**24**of the turn, Rf. - [0042]The angle to furthest tire (Θ) is calculated by:
- [0000]

Rf cos Θ=Ravg; - [0043]where Ravg is the average radius from the host vehicle
**10**to the center**24**of the turn. The average radius from the host vehicle**10**(Ravg) can be expressed by: - [0000]

Ravg=√{square root over ((*Rf*)^{2}*−L*^{2})}. - [0044]Substituting this into the above equation and solving for the angle to furthest tire (Θ) we get:
- [0000]
$\Theta ={\mathrm{cos}}^{-1}\left(\frac{{\left({\left(\mathrm{Rf}\right)}^{2}-{L}^{2}\right)}^{1/2}+\frac{\mathrm{Vh}}{\mathrm{Rf}}}{\mathrm{Rf}}\right).$ - [0045]The radius to side mirror (Rf) can be calculated by:
- [0000]
$\mathrm{Rf}=\frac{L}{\mathrm{sin}\ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89e\delta \ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89ef}.$ - [0046]δf is the slip angle for the tires of the host vehicle
**10**. Slip angle (δf) is calculated by: - [0000]
$\delta \ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89ef={\mathrm{sin}}^{-1}\ue89e\frac{1}{\sqrt{\frac{{\left(\sqrt{{R}^{2}-{b}^{2}}+\frac{w}{2}\right)}^{2}}{{L}^{2}}+1}};$ - [0047]where b is the distance between the center of gravity
**30**and the rear axle**32**of the host vehicle**10**and w is the track width of the host vehicle**10**. R is the radius from the center of gravity**30**to the turn center**24**, illustrated inFIG. 1 and represented by the equation: - [0000]
$R=\frac{{\left(\mathrm{Vh}\right)}^{2}}{G};$ - [0048]where G is the center of gravity
**30**of the host vehicle**10**. By substituting the equations for slip angle (δf) and radius to center of gravity (R) back into the equation above for the radius to side mirror (Rf), the following equation results: - [0000]
$\mathrm{Rf}=\sqrt{{\left({\left({R}^{2}-{b}^{2}\right)}^{1/2}+\frac{w}{2}\right)}^{2}+{L}^{2}}.$ - [0049]By adding this to the equation for the angle to furthest tire (Θ) we get:
- [0000]
$\Theta ={\mathrm{sin}}^{-1}\ue89e\sqrt{\frac{{L}^{2}+2\ue89ew\ue89e\sqrt{{R}^{2}-{b}^{2}}}{{L}^{2}+{\left(\sqrt{{R}^{2}-{b}^{2}}+\frac{w}{2}\right)}^{2}}}.$ - [0050]Going back to the equation for distance to steer (Sd), we must still determine distance the target vehicle has traveled (Xt). The distance the target vehicle has traveled (Xt) can be calculated by:
- [0000]

*Xt=Vt**Tturn - [0051]where Tturn is the time required to turn the host vehicle
**10**. In other words the time from when the host vehicle**10**begins turning until the host vehicle**10**has reached the target minimum gap (TMG). The time to turn (Tturn) can be calculated by: - [0000]
$\mathrm{Tturn}=\frac{\mathrm{Rf}*{\Theta}^{\prime}}{\mathrm{Vh}}.$ - [0052]Where Θ′ is the angle formed from the outer edge of the side mirror
**22**of the host vehicle**10**to the center**24**of the turn and from the target vehicle**14**and the center**24**of the turn, illustrated inFIG. 1 . The angle from the side mirror (Θ′) can be calculated by: - [0000]

Θ′=Θ−*B;* - [0053]where B is the angle formed from the outer edge of the side mirror
**22**of the host vehicle**10**to the center**24**of the turn and the rear wheel**26**of the host vehicle**10**to the center**24**of the turn, illustrated inFIG. 1 . We know that: - [0000]

*Rf sin B=L.* - [0054]Thus, knowing the wheelbase (L) and the radius (Rf) from the rear tire
**26**to the turn center**24**we can substitute these values and solve for difference in angles (B) the equation becomes: - [0000]
$B={\mathrm{sin}}^{-1}\ue89e\frac{L}{\sqrt{{L}^{2}+{\left(\sqrt{{R}^{2}-{b}^{2}}+\frac{t}{2}\right)}^{2}}}.$ - [0055]Knowing the difference in angles (B) and the previously calculated value angle to furthest tire (Θ) we can now calculate the target vehicle forward travel (Xt). Thus, by combining these equations we can solve for distance to steer (Sd):
- [0000]
$\mathrm{Sd}=\mathrm{Rf}\ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89e\mathrm{sin}\ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89e\Theta -L-\mathrm{Vt}\ue8a0\left(\frac{\mathrm{Rf}*{\Theta}^{\prime}}{\mathrm{Vh}}\right).$ - [0056]Using the above equation of distance to steer (Sd) the time to steer (St′) can be found:
- [0000]
${\mathrm{St}}^{\prime}=\frac{X-\mathrm{Rf}\ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89e\mathrm{sin}\ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89e\Theta -L-\mathrm{Vt}\ue8a0\left(\frac{\mathrm{Rf}*{\Theta}^{\prime}}{\mathrm{Vh}}\right)}{\Delta \ue89e\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0.3ex}}\ue89eV}.$ - [0057]This can be plugged into the above equation (JLS=TTC−St′) for determining steering judgment line (JLS). Again the calculations for time to contact (TTC), time to steer (St′) and steering judgment line (JLS) can be simplified for each of the scenarios above, relating to acceleration of the host vehicle
**10**and target vehicle**14**, for input into the control**16**. By separating and simplifying the above equations for each scenario any null inputs for the control**16**may be avoided. - [0058]
FIG. 2 illustrates a summary of the process**34**used by the control**16**. The control**16**receives input from the sensors**18**, such as an indication that an object is detected in the path of the host vehicle**10**, and input from the speedometer**20**, in step**36**. The control**16**then begins either the braking judgment line (JLB) determination or the steering judgment line (JLS) determination. Additionally, the control**16**may have the capability of performing both determinations simultaneously. For the braking judgment line (JLB) determination, the control**16**compares the acceleration of the host vehicle (Ah) and target vehicle acceleration (Ah) to determine which equations to use, step**42**. Then, using the appropriate equations the control**16**calculates the time to contact (TTC) and time to brake (t′), step**44**. The calculated time to contact (TTC) and time to brake (t′) are used to calculate the braking judgment line (JLB), step**46**. Using the determined braking judgment line (JLB) the control**16**calculates a warning distance, step**48**. The control**16**at the appropriate time initiates a warning signal to the operator of the host vehicle**10**, step**50**. The warning signal may be, but is not limited to, an audio signal, visual signal, or any combination of these. - [0059]Alternately, or in addition to, the control
**16**begins the steering judgment line (JLS) determination, by comparing the host vehicle acceleration (Ah) and target vehicle acceleration (Ah) to determine which equations to use, step**52**. Then, using the appropriate equations the control**16**calculates the time to contact (TTC) and time to steer (St′), step**54**. The calculated time to contact (TTC) and time to steer (St′) are used to calculate the steering judgment line (JLS), step**56**. Using the determined steering judgment line (JLS) the control**16**determines a warning distance, step**58**. The control at the appropriate time initiates a warning signal to the operator of the host vehicle**10**, step**50**. - [0060]The control
**16**may warn the vehicle operator of both the brake warning distance (Dwarn) and the steering warning distance (SDwarn). Alternately, the step**50**of warning the vehicle operator can also include a comparison of the brake warning distance (Dwarn) with the steering warning distance (SDwarn). The control**16**can then warn the vehicle operator based upon the warning distance (Dwarn or SDwarn) that is the furthest point. That is, the last possible distance at which the vehicle can brake or steer. In this instance, the safety system**12**must distinguish between the brake warning and the steer warning such that the vehicle operator will know the appropriate action required (i.e., the warnings must be distinguishable to the vehicle operator). - [0061]While the best modes for carrying out the invention have been described in detail, those familiar with the art to which this invention relates will recognize various alternative designs and embodiments for practicing the invention within the scope of the appended claims.

Citations de brevets

Brevet cité | Date de dépôt | Date de publication | Déposant | Titre |
---|---|---|---|---|

US5357438 * | 3 juin 1993 | 18 oct. 1994 | Dan Davidian | Anti-collision system for vehicles |

US5502432 * | 10 déc. 1992 | 26 mars 1996 | Stanley Electric Co., Ltd. | Apparatus and method of warning rear-end collision |

US5530651 * | 3 août 1993 | 25 juin 1996 | Mazda Motor Corporation | Running-safety system for an automotive vehicle |

US5754099 * | 24 mars 1995 | 19 mai 1998 | Nippondenso Co., Ltd. | Obstacle warning system for a vehicle |

US6014601 * | 7 janv. 1997 | 11 janv. 2000 | J. Martin Gustafson | Driver alert system |

US6282483 * | 28 juil. 2000 | 28 août 2001 | Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha | Follow-up cruise control apparatus |

US6324465 * | 24 mars 2000 | 27 nov. 2001 | Denso Corporation | Automatic cruising control apparatus |

US6504473 * | 20 juin 2001 | 7 janv. 2003 | Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Vehicle travel safety apparatus |

US6604042 * | 19 nov. 2001 | 5 août 2003 | Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. | Braking control system with object detection system interaction |

US20030009275 * | 22 juil. 2002 | 9 janv. 2003 | Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha | Positional data utilizing inter-vehicle communication method and traveling control apparatus |

US20030201878 * | 22 avr. 2003 | 30 oct. 2003 | Hitachi, Ltd. And Hitachi Car Engineering, Co., Ltd. | Automotive radar system |

US20070080793 * | 11 oct. 2005 | 12 avr. 2007 | Blase Gaynell L | Auto brake alert |

Référencé par

Brevet citant | Date de dépôt | Date de publication | Déposant | Titre |
---|---|---|---|---|

US8694222 | 26 oct. 2011 | 8 avr. 2014 | GM Global Technology Operations LLC | Collision avoidance system and method of operating the same |

Classifications

Classification aux États-Unis | 340/435, 701/70 |

Classification internationale | B60Q1/00, G06F19/00 |

Classification coopérative | B60T2201/022, B62D15/029, B60W2550/306, B60W2520/105, B60W2550/302, B60T2260/02, B60W30/09, B60W2520/10, B60T8/17558 |

Classification européenne | B62D15/02K, B60T8/1755M |

Événements juridiques

Date | Code | Événement | Description |
---|---|---|---|

28 juin 2012 | AS | Assignment | Owner name: WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY, DELAWARE Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC;REEL/FRAME:028466/0870 Effective date: 20101027 |

7 nov. 2014 | AS | Assignment | Owner name: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC, MICHIGAN Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY;REEL/FRAME:034287/0159 Effective date: 20141017 |

Faire pivoter