US20110302001A1 - System and Method for Estimating Forward Retail Commodity Price Within a Geographic Boundary - Google Patents
System and Method for Estimating Forward Retail Commodity Price Within a Geographic Boundary Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20110302001A1 US20110302001A1 US13/210,602 US201113210602A US2011302001A1 US 20110302001 A1 US20110302001 A1 US 20110302001A1 US 201113210602 A US201113210602 A US 201113210602A US 2011302001 A1 US2011302001 A1 US 2011302001A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- retail
- price
- commodity
- geographic boundary
- prices
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce
- G06Q30/02—Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
- G06Q30/0283—Price estimation or determination
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce
- G06Q30/02—Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce
- G06Q30/02—Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
- G06Q30/0201—Market modelling; Market analysis; Collecting market data
- G06Q30/0202—Market predictions or forecasting for commercial activities
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Systems or methods specially adapted for specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/06—Electricity, gas or water supply
Definitions
- the present invention relates generally to predictive modeling on retail commodity prices. More particularly, the present invention relates to a system and method for determining forward retail commodity prices with particular constraints including time and geographic boundaries.
- the retail price of a commodity generally reflects the wholesale price plus the cost of marketing the commodity from the raw material level to the retail level.
- EIA Energy Information Administration
- DOE/EIA-0626 the independent statistical and analytical agency within the Department of Energy
- the retail price of gasoline is divided into three main components: crude oil prices, manufacturing and marketing costs and profits, and taxes (see FIG. 1 ). Crude oil prices are considered to be the most important component of the retail price of gasoline.
- Price asymmetry is the phenomenon where prices tend to move differently depending on their direction. In the case of gasoline, this means that retail prices for gasoline may rise faster than they fall.
- retail prices are not very closely correlated to rack prices (see FIG. 4 ), for the most part they move in response to changes in wholesale or raw material prices further upstream in the manufacturing-distribution chain.
- lagged wholesale prices alone can thus be used to predict retail prices.
- FIG. 5 shows an example of a national average of actual and forecasted retail prices for gasoline on the national level where the forecasted retail prices are calculated using lagged wholesale prices on a week-by-week basis.
- next week's change in retail gasoline prices on the national level can be predicted from a symmetrical response model which consists of a moving average of prior wholesale gasoline prices.
- the closeness of the predicted estimates to the actual values shows that, on the national level, wholesale and retail gasoline prices are generally very closely linked. This closeness helps explain why it remains very difficult to predict price movement of gasoline, a type of commodity, below the national level and/or at a particular locale.
- the term “commodity” refers to an article of commerce—an item that can be bought and sold freely on a market. It may be a product which trades on a commodity exchange or spot market and which may fall into one of several categories, including energy, food, grains, and metals.
- commodities that can be traded on a commodity exchange include, but are not limited to, crude oil, light crude oil, natural gas, heating oil, gasoline, propane, ethanol, electricity, uranium, lean hogs, pork bellies, live cattle, feeder cattle, wheat, corn, soybeans, oats, rice, cocoa, coffee, cotton, sugar, gold, silver, platinum, copper, lead, zinc, tin, aluminum, titanium, nickel, steel, rubber, wool, polypropylene, and so on.
- a commodity can refer to tangible things as well as more ephemeral products. Foreign currencies and financial indexes are examples of the latter.
- commodities are goods or products with relative homogeneousness that have value and that are produced in large quantities by many different producers; the goods or products from each different producer are considered equivalent.
- Commoditization occurs as a goods or products market loses differentiation across its supply base.
- items that used to carry premium margins for market participants have become commodities, of which crude oil is an example.
- a commodity generally has a definable quality or meets a standard so that all parties trading in the market will know what is being traded.
- each of the hundreds of grades of fuel oil may be defined. For example, West Texas Intermediate (WTI), North Sea Brent Crude, etc.
- gasoline represent examples of energy-related commodities that may meet standardized definitions.
- gasoline with an octane grade of 87 may be a commodity and gasoline with an octane grade of 93 may also be a commodity, and they may demand different prices because the two are not identical—even though they may be related.
- octane grade of 87 may be a commodity
- gasoline with an octane grade of 93 may also be a commodity, and they may demand different prices because the two are not identical—even though they may be related.
- Other commodities may have other ways to define a quality.
- Other energy-related commodities that may have a definable quality or that meet a standard include, but are not limited to, diesel fuel, heating oils, aviation fuel, and emission credits.
- Diesel fuels may generally be classified according to seven grades based in part on sulfur content, emission credits may be classified based on sulfur or carbon content, etc.
- risk is the reason exchange trading of commodities began. For example, because a farmer does not know what the selling price will be for his crop, he risks the margin between the cost of producing the crop and the price he achieves in the market. In some cases, investors can buy or sell commodities in bulk through futures contracts. The price of a commodity is subject to supply and demand.
- a commodity may refer to a retail commodity that can be purchased by a consuming public and not necessarily the wholesale market only.
- One skilled in the art will recognize that embodiments disclosed herein may provide means and mechanisms through which commodities that currently can only be traded on the wholesale level may be made available to retail level for retail consumption by the public.
- One way to achieve this is to bring technologies that were once the private reserves of the major trading houses and global energy firms down to the consumer level and provide tools that are applicable and useful to the retail consumer so they can mitigate and/or manage their measurable risks involved in buying/selling their commodities.
- An energy related retail commodity is motor fuels, which may include various grades of gasoline.
- motor fuels may include 87 octane grade gasoline, 93 octane grade gasoline, etc as well as various grades of diesel fuels.
- Other examples of an energy related retail commodity could be jet fuel, heating oils, electricity or emission credits such as carbon offsets. Other retail commodities are possible and/or anticipated.
- a retail commodity and a wholesale commodity may refer to the same underlying good, they are associated with risks that can be measured and handled differently.
- wholesale commodities generally involve sales of large quantities
- retail commodities may involve much smaller transaction volumes and relate much more closely to how and where a good is consumed.
- the risks associated with a retail commodity therefore may be affected by local supply and demand and perhaps different factors.
- Pricing a retail commodity can be a very difficult process, particularly if that retail commodity tends to fluctuate in an unpredictable manner.
- gasoline as an example, as the price of oil continues to fluctuate globally and fluidly, fuel prices at the pump can change from location to location on a daily or even hourly basis. In such a volatile market, it is extremely difficult to reliably predict retail fuel prices for a specific location, time period, and fuel grade/type.
- Embodiments disclosed herein provide a new way to generate estimated forward retail gas prices within a geographic boundary based on a plurality of factors. More specifically, some embodiments disclosed herein provide a system and method for determining an estimated forward retail price (EFRP) for gasoline based on location (L), time period (T), and fuel grade (G) within a geographic boundary that represents a target market.
- EFRP estimated forward retail price
- embodiments disclosed herein enable the creation of a forward estimate of retail prices on fuels for a specific location, time period, and fuel grade.
- Data generated in the process can be used as the primary input to an analytic process that supports a fuel purchase management and decision making tool, benefiting its variety of users. Examples of such users include, but not limited to, fleet managers, financial managers, consumers, investment bankers, and other financial analysts, etc.
- the process of creating a forward estimate of retail prices on fuels comprises performing a predictive modeling utilizing wholesale gasoline prices, rack markup, retail markup, and taxes on a location, time period, and fuel grade basis.
- the predictive model disclosed herein can be augmented in various ways. As an example, one embodiment of the predictive model can be configured to take into consideration the effect of low-probability events on the future prices of gasoline. Examples of such events may include, but not limited to, natural or manmade events such as hurricanes, fire, war, etc.
- FIG. 1 depicts a plot diagram showing one way of dividing the retail price of gasoline into three components.
- FIG. 2 depicts a plot diagram showing the historical relationship between crude oil prices and spot gasoline prices.
- FIG. 3 depicts a plot diagram showing the historical relationship between spot gasoline prices and rack prices.
- FIG. 4 depicts a plot diagram showing the historical relationship between rack prices and retail prices.
- FIG. 5 depicts a plot diagram showing actual and forecasted retail prices for gasoline on a weekly basis at the national level.
- FIG. 6 depicts a simplified block diagram showing components of the forward retail price for a retail commodity according to one embodiment.
- FIG. 7 is a flow diagram depicting one example embodiment of a method for determining the current retail price of a commodity for a specific location (L), time period (T), and grade (G).
- FIG. 8 is a plot diagram depicting exemplary NYMEX RBOB gasoline futures historical data.
- FIG. 9 is a flow diagram depicting a method for synthetically creating a forward market curve of an expected retail price for gasoline for a period of time within a market having a geographic boundary.
- FIG. 10 is an exemplary plot depicting the increase as well as decrease of the estimated wholesale price over time.
- the terms “comprises,” “comprising,” “includes,” “including,” “has,” “having” or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion.
- a process, product, article, or apparatus that comprises a list of elements is not necessarily limited only those elements but may include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, process, article, or apparatus.
- “or” refers to an inclusive or and not to an exclusive or. For example, a condition A or B is satisfied by any one of the following: A is true (or present) and B is false (or not present), A is false (or not present) and B is true (or present), and both A and B are true (or present).
- any examples or illustrations given herein are not to be regarded in any way as restrictions on, limits to, or express definitions of, any term or terms with which they are utilized. Instead these examples or illustrations are to be regarded as being described with respect to one particular embodiment and as illustrative only. Those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that any term or terms with which these examples or illustrations are utilized encompass other embodiments as well as implementations and adaptations thereof which may or may not be given therewith or elsewhere in the specification and all such embodiments are intended to be included within the scope of that term or terms. Language designating such nonlimiting examples and illustrations includes, but is not limited to: “for example,” “for instance,” “e.g.,” “in one embodiment,” and the like.
- one embodiment can include a computer communicatively coupled to a network (e.g., the Internet).
- the computer can include a central processing unit (“CPU”), at least one read-only memory (“ROM”), at least one random access memory (“RAM”), at least one hard drive (“HD”), and one or more input/output (“I/O”) device(s).
- the I/O devices can include a keyboard, monitor, printer, electronic pointing device (e.g., mouse, trackball, stylist, etc.), or the like.
- the computer has access to at least one database.
- ROM, RAM, and HD are computer memories for storing computer-executable instructions executable by the CPU.
- the term “computer-readable medium” is not limited to ROM, RAM, and HD and can include any type of data storage medium that can be read by a processor.
- a computer-readable medium may refer to a data cartridge, a data backup magnetic tape, a floppy diskette, a flash memory drive, an optical data storage drive, a CD-ROM, ROM, RAM, HD, or the like.
- the functionalities and processes described herein can be implemented in suitable computer-executable instructions.
- the computer-executable instructions may be stored as software code components or modules on one or more computer readable media. Examples of computer readable media include, but are not limited to, non-volatile memories, volatile memories, DASD arrays, magnetic tapes, floppy diskettes, hard drives, optical storage devices, or any other appropriate computer-readable medium or storage device, etc.
- the computer-executable instructions may include lines of compiled C++, Java, HTML, or any other programming or scripting code.
- the functions of the present disclosure may be implemented on one computer or shared/distributed among two or more computers in or across a network. Communications between computers implementing embodiments of the invention can be accomplished using any electronic, optical, radio frequency signals, or other suitable methods and tools of communication in compliance with known network protocols.
- a geographic boundary may be defined as a city, a borough, a county, a state, a country, a region, a zip code, or other predetermined area, or may be arbitrarily defined as a designated market area (DMA), or some combination or division.
- DMA designated market area
- the retail price of a commodity can have many components. Take gasoline as an example, in one embodiment, the retail price for gasoline may be divided into four components: the wholesale price component, the rack markup component, the retail markup component, and the taxes component.
- gasoline is used herein as a specific example of a retail commodity, one skilled in the art will appreciate that embodiments disclosed herein may be implemented or otherwise adapted for virtually any commodities, including, but not limited to electricity, natural gas, ethanol, etc.
- the rack markup and the retail markup components together represent the total markup price for gasoline.
- lagged wholesale gasoline prices may be used to forecast retail gasoline prices on a week-by-week basis at the national level, there is not a direct and precisely predictable correlation between wholesale prices and retail prices that can be used to predict forward retail gasoline prices below the national level and/or within a particular locale, including, but not limited to, city, a borough, a county, a state, a country, a region, a zip code, a designated market area (DMA) or the like, and may include some combination or division thereof.
- DMA designated market area
- Embodiments disclosed herein provide the ability to predict, in a more reliable and accurate manner, forward retail prices of a retail commodity over a period of time in a market having a geographic boundary. This ability can be advantageous to an entity that provides price protection on that retail commodity to other entities as well as end consumers in that market.
- the pricing model disclosed herein can be compared with historical fuel consumption and potential hedging schemes to implement a comprehensive solution (also referred to as the Pricelock system) for price protection on retail commodities.
- a comprehensive solution also referred to as the Pricelock system
- a price protection service provider would need to know what the projected future retail price for gas in Austin would be three months from now, six months from now, a year from now, and so on.
- such knowledge may be obtained by synthetically creating a forward market curve of an expected retail price for gasoline for a year or some longer period.
- the wholesale price component of the retail price for gasoline includes and closely correlates to the price of crude oil.
- the wholesale price component of the retail price for gasoline on any particular day can be determined based on some futures contract traded on the New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX) on that day.
- suitable futures contracts may include, but not limited to, unleaded gasoline futures contracts, reformulated gasoline blendstock for oxygenate blending (RBOB) futures contracts, or the like.
- RBOB is an unfinished gasoline product that does not contain the oxygenate methyl tertiary butyl ether chemical (MTBE), which is banned in many states for polluting groundwater.
- RBOB contracts are traded per grade on the NYMEX on the wholesale basis in units of 1,000 barrels (42,000 gallons). They are based on delivery at petroleum products terminals in the New York harbor, the major East Coast trading center for imports and domestic shipments from refineries in the New York harbor area or from the Gulf Coast refining centers.
- RBOB conforms to industry standards for reformulated regular gasoline blendstock for blending with 10% denatured fuel ethanol (92% purity) as listed by the Colonial Pipeline for fungible F grade for sales in New York and New Jersey.
- RBOB is a wholesale non-oxygenated blendstock that is ready for the addition of 10% ethanol at the truck rack.
- other refined products may include gasoline meeting the specifications of the California Air Resources Board (GARB), CARB diesel fuel, low-sulfur and ultra-low-sulfur diesel fuel, and oxygenates (liquid hydrocarbon compounds containing oxygen), conventional gasoline, distillates, jet fuel, asphalt, petrochemicals, lubricants.
- GEB California Air Resources Board
- CARB diesel fuel low-sulfur and ultra-low-sulfur diesel fuel
- oxygenates liquid hydrocarbon compounds containing oxygen
- conventional gasoline distillates
- jet fuel jet fuel
- asphalt asphalt
- petrochemicals lubricants
- Gasoline is the largest single volume refined product sold in the United States and accounts for almost half of national oil consumption. It is a highly diverse market, with hundreds of wholesale distributors and thousands of retail outlets, making it subject to intense competition and price volatility.
- These refined products, branded and unbranded are generally marketed on a wholesale basis in the United States and Canada through a bulk and rack marketing network. Some producers may sell refined products through their own network of retail and wholesale branded outlets.
- the rack markup component represents the cost to deliver that gas from a refinery to a retailer such as a gas station (i.e., from wholesale to rack).
- the retailer buys the gas at the rack price, sometimes referred to as the rack rate, which is typically marked up by whoever is involved in the transportation and distribution chain, including terminal distribution facilities, transportation companies, etc.
- Sellers at each step of the distribution chain generally try to set their target prices at a level reflecting their current costs plus a markup.
- the rack markup component may be determined using the wholesale price component, perhaps taking a percentage thereof as an input to the rack markup component.
- the rack markup component may be determined using information provided by an information service provider such as Oil Price Information Service (OPIS) of Rockville, Md., USA.
- OPIS Oil Price Information Service
- Gasoline and diesel rack prices are available from OPIS for more than 360 wholesale rack locations every day.
- cities nationwide contain the OPIS Smart Rack which details retail gasoline lows, averages and margins.
- the tax component may include all types of taxes related to a retail commodity. In the case of petroleum products, in addition to income, severance, production, property, and other taxes, they are subject to various excise taxes. Specifically, in some embodiment, the tax component may include federal gas tax, state and local gas taxes, and fees. The federal tax is collected in all states in addition to any state or local taxes on gasoline sales. As an example, the federal gas tax may be 18.4 cents per gallon (cpg) while the state gas tax may be 20 cpg in the state of Texas.
- cpg cents per gallon
- Gasoline taxes are levied in various ways in different states. Each state may impose different amounts of taxes depending upon the type and/or grade and may include different types of charges and fees. For example, according to data collected by the American Petroleum Institute (API) in 2005, in the state of Alabama, the state gas tax is 18 cpg for gasoline and 19 cpg for diesel, each type of tax including a 2-cpg inspection fee. Some states, such as Alaska, Arizona, California, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Kansas, New Hampshire, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming, levy a flat rate per gallon for gasoline and diesel.
- API American Petroleum Institute
- Some states allow local communities to levy gasoline taxes in addition to any state taxes that might be levied. Some may charge a tax similar to a sales tax in that it applies to the monetary amount of the gasoline sold. For example, in the state of California, the state gas tax is 18 cpg for gasoline and diesel, plus a 6% state sales tax, a 1.25% county tax, and additional local sales taxes. Thus, determining the amount of tax paid on one gallon of gasoline or diesel fuel purchased by a consumer at the pump can involve numerous factors and calculations.
- the tax rate may vary depending on the whether the area where the fuel is purchased is in compliance with federal clean air standards, whether a threshold amount of revenue has been collected for the taxing jurisdiction for the fiscal year, and how much is being charged for the pre-tax price of a gallon of fuel.
- the API is one exemplary source that collects motor fuel tax information for all 50 states and compiles a report and chart detailing changes from the previous update and calculating a nationwide average. Although tax rates do change, they are considered relatively stable as compared to crude oil prices, which could fluctuate continuously, not just daily. Thus, in some embodiments, tax information obtained from the API can be parsed for use in the tax component in determining the forward retail price for gasoline in a market having a geographic boundary.
- the wholesale price component can be parsed from RBOB contracts
- the rack markup component can be derived from data provided by the OPIS
- the tax component can be calculated based on information provided by the API.
- the retail markup component is very difficult to determine as each retailer may tailor the markup, which is often kept secret, per location (L), time period (T), and grade (G).
- the retail markup component can be estimated, alone with the rack markup component, based on purchased wholesale gas pricing data. Current retail prices from other sources may also be utilized to determine the retail markup component with respect to a particular location (L), time period (T), and grade (G).
- FIG. 7 is a flow diagram depicting one example embodiment of a method for determining the current retail price of a commodity for a specific location (L), time period (T), and grade (G).
- software code implementing embodiments of the present invention can be stored on a computer-readable medium and executed by a processor to cause the processor to perform particular functions disclosed herein.
- a first functionality operates to estimate the total markup, which includes the rack markup and the retail markup, for gas for a specified location and grade.
- the determination of the Estimated Total Markup (ETM) can be based on a number of factors.
- the ETM may be determined based on purchased wholesale gas pricing data, where available, from oil companies, regional retailers, OPIS, and/or other similar sources.
- the ETM may be determined by extrapolating or ‘reverse engineering’ historical differences in wholesale pricing from NY delivery markets and other markets across the nation, but using the retail prices to begin the extrapolation.
- the retail markup is therefore the difference between the ETM and the rack markup.
- FIG. 8 is a plot diagram depicting exemplary NYMEX RBOB gasoline futures historical data. If the NY delivery markets (from which the RBOB contract is priced) historically have differed by 10% for California markets, then the California projected wholesale pricing could be adjusted by this difference.
- another factor in determining the ETM is an aggregated composite retail price for gasoline for a location and grade, which is referred to herein as “Pricelock Aggregated Composite Retail Price (PACRP)” and which is generated by a proprietary system and method for determining a retail commodity price within a geographic boundary.
- PACRP Pricelock Aggregated Composite Retail Price
- Other types of aggregated composite retail price for gasoline within a specific locale may also be utilized.
- the ETM is the difference between the PACRP and the wholesale price by fuel type/grade and location.
- a second functionality operates to subtract the ETM from the PACRP for a specific location and a specific grade or type of fuel to generate the effective wholesale price for that particular location and that particular grade.
- the output of this step is to have estimated wholesale gas prices, by location and grade, at the current moment.
- FIG. 9 is a flow diagram depicting a method for synthetically creating a forward market curve of an expected retail price for gasoline for a period of time within a market having a geographic boundary.
- a forward market curve can be utilized to project the future retail prices for gasoline in Austin three months from now, six months from now, a year from now, and so on.
- the Estimated Forward Retail Gas Price can be projected, station by station, using the following components: RBOB contracts on wholesale gas by type and time period, the current ETM for each location and fuel type, the market volatility and current gas trend as the wholesale to retail correlation and price change lag can differ under various market conditions. Examples of market conditions include contango and backwardation. Backwardation describes a market where spot or prompt prices are higher than prices in the future—a downward sloping forward curve. It indicates that prompt demand is high. Contango is the opposite, with future prices higher than spot prices.
- step 902 software code implementing a third functionality may be executed to estimate, for each grade (fuel type), the increase/decrease of the wholesale price over a period of time using project wholesale pricing from futures market on NY delivery markets.
- FIG. 10 is an exemplary plot depicting the increase as well as decrease of the estimated wholesale price over time.
- step 904 software code implementing a fourth functionality may be executed to consider the market conditions inherent in the forward contracts (e.g., contango or backwardation) and determine the rate of change between the retail and wholesale spreads over time.
- This step can provide a desired granularity on the final outcome.
- an individual station EFRP may be calculated by applying the adjusted ETM (based on step 902 ) to each monthly forecasted MERC wholesale contract price.
- This near final station EFRP can be further adjusted by a “market trend” factor, depending on whether it is in a contango or a backwardated market.
- software code implementing a fifth functionality may operate to determine a geographic EFRP by aggregating, station by station, EFRP monthly “strips”.
- the geographic EFRP e.g., local, regional, national, etc.
- the geographic EFRP may be calibrated by weighting individual EFRPs based on gas purchase volumes by fuel type.
- software code implementing a sixth functionality may operate to determine additional markup where applicable. For example, a sensitivity analysis may be performed on the EFRP from step 906 based on world events. Furthermore, the functionality may be configured with an ability to “toggle” pricing based upon a choice of user-defined events such as hurricanes, war, political changes. Although these events are theoretically priced into the forward contracts on wholesale prices, they are assumed to be low probability. However, once they occur, the price of gas can spike upward and modify pricing on forward contracts. The algorithm used to calculate effects on the EFRP can be implemented to rely on historical analysis of actual retail price changes across the nation due to actual events and their individual event locations.
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Finance (AREA)
- Accounting & Taxation (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Water Supply & Treatment (AREA)
- Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
- Public Health (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- Financial Or Insurance-Related Operations Such As Payment And Settlement (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
Embodiments disclosed herein provide a new way to generate estimated forward retail prices for a retail commodity within a geographic boundary that represents a target market. Using estimates for local retail prices, combined with knowledge of current and historical wholesale prices, embodiments disclosed herein enable the creation of a forward estimate of retail prices on fuels for a specific location, time period, and fuel grade. In some embodiment, the process of creating a forward estimate of retail prices on fuels comprises performing a predictive modeling utilizing wholesale gasoline prices, rack markup, retail markup, and taxes on a location, time period, and fuel grade basis. In some cases, the estimated forward retail prices thus generated can be used in a pricing model for price protection services for that retail commodity in that target market.
Description
- This application is a continuation of, and claims a benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. 120 of the filing date of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/030,086, filed Feb. 12, 2008, entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ESTIMATING FORWARD RETAIL COMMODITY PRICE WITHIN A GEOGRAPHIC BOUNDARY”, which in turn claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. §119 to Provisional Patent Application No. 60/900,931, filed Feb. 12, 2007, entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ESTIMATING FORWARD RETAIL COMMODITY PRICE,” Provisional Patent Application No. 60/900,930, filed Feb. 12, 2007, entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD OF DETERMINING A RETAIL COMMODITY PRICE WITHIN A GEOGRAPHIC BOUNDARY,” and Provisional Patent Application No. 60/966,566, filed Aug. 29, 2007, entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD OF DETERMINING A RETAIL COMMODITY PRICE WITHIN A GEOGRAPHIC BOUNDARY,” the entire contents of which are hereby expressly incorporated by reference for all purposes.
- The present invention relates generally to predictive modeling on retail commodity prices. More particularly, the present invention relates to a system and method for determining forward retail commodity prices with particular constraints including time and geographic boundaries.
- There is a continuing interest in the relationship between the retail price and the wholesale price for commodities. The retail price of a commodity generally reflects the wholesale price plus the cost of marketing the commodity from the raw material level to the retail level. In the case of gasoline, the Energy Information Administration (EIA), the independent statistical and analytical agency within the Department of Energy (DOE), published a study entitled “Price Changes in the Gasoline Market,” DOE/EIA-0626, February 1999. In this EIA report, the retail price of gasoline is divided into three main components: crude oil prices, manufacturing and marketing costs and profits, and taxes (see
FIG. 1 ). Crude oil prices are considered to be the most important component of the retail price of gasoline. One reason is that, while manufacturing and marketing costs may change relatively slowly, crude oil prices can be extremely volatile, even on a daily basis. This volatility makes accurate prediction of the retail price of the gasoline very difficult. At the refinery level, the spot gasoline prices may move symmetrically in response to crude oil changes, which means that the volatility is also evident at the refinery level (seeFIG. 2 ). The existence of a futures market for domestic crude oil permits the knowledge of actual prices to be disseminated very quickly. This allows gasoline prices further down the distribution chain such as rack prices to be closely correlated to spot prices (seeFIG. 3 ). - However, at the retail level, previous studies on gasoline prices have found price asymmetry. Price asymmetry is the phenomenon where prices tend to move differently depending on their direction. In the case of gasoline, this means that retail prices for gasoline may rise faster than they fall. Moreover, although retail prices are not very closely correlated to rack prices (see
FIG. 4 ), for the most part they move in response to changes in wholesale or raw material prices further upstream in the manufacturing-distribution chain. At the national level, lagged wholesale prices alone can thus be used to predict retail prices.FIG. 5 shows an example of a national average of actual and forecasted retail prices for gasoline on the national level where the forecasted retail prices are calculated using lagged wholesale prices on a week-by-week basis. Specifically, the next week's change in retail gasoline prices on the national level can be predicted from a symmetrical response model which consists of a moving average of prior wholesale gasoline prices. The closeness of the predicted estimates to the actual values shows that, on the national level, wholesale and retail gasoline prices are generally very closely linked. This closeness helps explain why it remains very difficult to predict price movement of gasoline, a type of commodity, below the national level and/or at a particular locale. - Within this disclosure, the term “commodity” refers to an article of commerce—an item that can be bought and sold freely on a market. It may be a product which trades on a commodity exchange or spot market and which may fall into one of several categories, including energy, food, grains, and metals. Currently, commodities that can be traded on a commodity exchange include, but are not limited to, crude oil, light crude oil, natural gas, heating oil, gasoline, propane, ethanol, electricity, uranium, lean hogs, pork bellies, live cattle, feeder cattle, wheat, corn, soybeans, oats, rice, cocoa, coffee, cotton, sugar, gold, silver, platinum, copper, lead, zinc, tin, aluminum, titanium, nickel, steel, rubber, wool, polypropylene, and so on. Note that a commodity can refer to tangible things as well as more ephemeral products. Foreign currencies and financial indexes are examples of the latter. For example, positions in the Goldman Sachs Commodity Index (GSCI) and the Reuters Jefferies Consumer Research Board Index (RJCRB Index) can be traded as a commodity. What matters is that something be exchanged for the thing. New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX) and Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME) are examples of a commodity exchange. Other commodities exchanges also exist and are known to those skilled in the art.
- In a simplified sense, commodities are goods or products with relative homogeneousness that have value and that are produced in large quantities by many different producers; the goods or products from each different producer are considered equivalent. Commoditization occurs as a goods or products market loses differentiation across its supply base. As such, items that used to carry premium margins for market participants have become commodities, of which crude oil is an example. However, a commodity generally has a definable quality or meets a standard so that all parties trading in the market will know what is being traded. In the case of crude oil, each of the hundreds of grades of fuel oil may be defined. For example, West Texas Intermediate (WTI), North Sea Brent Crude, etc. refer to grades of crude oil that meet selected standards such as sulfur content, specific gravity, etc., so that all parties involved in trading crude oil know the qualities of the crude oil being traded. Motor fuels such as gasoline represent examples of energy-related commodities that may meet standardized definitions. Thus, gasoline with an octane grade of 87 may be a commodity and gasoline with an octane grade of 93 may also be a commodity, and they may demand different prices because the two are not identical—even though they may be related. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that other commodities may have other ways to define a quality. Other energy-related commodities that may have a definable quality or that meet a standard include, but are not limited to, diesel fuel, heating oils, aviation fuel, and emission credits. Diesel fuels may generally be classified according to seven grades based in part on sulfur content, emission credits may be classified based on sulfur or carbon content, etc.
- Historically, risk is the reason exchange trading of commodities began. For example, because a farmer does not know what the selling price will be for his crop, he risks the margin between the cost of producing the crop and the price he achieves in the market. In some cases, investors can buy or sell commodities in bulk through futures contracts. The price of a commodity is subject to supply and demand.
- A commodity may refer to a retail commodity that can be purchased by a consuming public and not necessarily the wholesale market only. One skilled in the art will recognize that embodiments disclosed herein may provide means and mechanisms through which commodities that currently can only be traded on the wholesale level may be made available to retail level for retail consumption by the public. One way to achieve this is to bring technologies that were once the private reserves of the major trading houses and global energy firms down to the consumer level and provide tools that are applicable and useful to the retail consumer so they can mitigate and/or manage their measurable risks involved in buying/selling their commodities. One example of an energy related retail commodity is motor fuels, which may include various grades of gasoline. For example, motor fuels may include 87 octane grade gasoline, 93 octane grade gasoline, etc as well as various grades of diesel fuels. Other examples of an energy related retail commodity could be jet fuel, heating oils, electricity or emission credits such as carbon offsets. Other retail commodities are possible and/or anticipated.
- While a retail commodity and a wholesale commodity may refer to the same underlying good, they are associated with risks that can be measured and handled differently. One reason is that, while wholesale commodities generally involve sales of large quantities, retail commodities may involve much smaller transaction volumes and relate much more closely to how and where a good is consumed. The risks associated with a retail commodity therefore may be affected by local supply and demand and perhaps different factors. Within the context of this disclosure, there is a definable relationship between a retail commodity and the exposure of risks to the consumer. This retail level of the exposure of risks may correlate to the size and the specificity of the transaction in which the retail commodity is traded. Other factors may include the granularity of the geographic market where the transaction takes place, and so on. For example, the demand for heating oil No. 2 in January may be significantly different in the Boston market than in the Miami market.
- Pricing a retail commodity can be a very difficult process, particularly if that retail commodity tends to fluctuate in an unpredictable manner. Take gasoline as an example, as the price of oil continues to fluctuate globally and fluidly, fuel prices at the pump can change from location to location on a daily or even hourly basis. In such a volatile market, it is extremely difficult to reliably predict retail fuel prices for a specific location, time period, and fuel grade/type.
- Embodiments disclosed herein provide a new way to generate estimated forward retail gas prices within a geographic boundary based on a plurality of factors. More specifically, some embodiments disclosed herein provide a system and method for determining an estimated forward retail price (EFRP) for gasoline based on location (L), time period (T), and fuel grade (G) within a geographic boundary that represents a target market.
- Using estimates for local retail prices, combined with knowledge of current and historical wholesale prices, embodiments disclosed herein enable the creation of a forward estimate of retail prices on fuels for a specific location, time period, and fuel grade. Data generated in the process can be used as the primary input to an analytic process that supports a fuel purchase management and decision making tool, benefiting its variety of users. Examples of such users include, but not limited to, fleet managers, financial managers, consumers, investment bankers, and other financial analysts, etc. In some embodiment, the process of creating a forward estimate of retail prices on fuels comprises performing a predictive modeling utilizing wholesale gasoline prices, rack markup, retail markup, and taxes on a location, time period, and fuel grade basis. The predictive model disclosed herein can be augmented in various ways. As an example, one embodiment of the predictive model can be configured to take into consideration the effect of low-probability events on the future prices of gasoline. Examples of such events may include, but not limited to, natural or manmade events such as hurricanes, fire, war, etc.
- These, and other, aspects will be better appreciated and understood when considered in conjunction with the following description and the accompanying drawings. The following description, while indicating various embodiments and numerous specific details thereof, is given by way of illustration and not of limitation. Many substitutions, modifications, additions or rearrangements may be made within the scope of the disclosure, and the disclosure includes all such substitutions, modifications, additions or rearrangements.
- A more complete understanding of the disclosure and the advantages thereof may be acquired by referring to the following description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which like reference numbers generally indicate like features and wherein:
-
FIG. 1 depicts a plot diagram showing one way of dividing the retail price of gasoline into three components. -
FIG. 2 depicts a plot diagram showing the historical relationship between crude oil prices and spot gasoline prices. -
FIG. 3 depicts a plot diagram showing the historical relationship between spot gasoline prices and rack prices. -
FIG. 4 depicts a plot diagram showing the historical relationship between rack prices and retail prices. -
FIG. 5 depicts a plot diagram showing actual and forecasted retail prices for gasoline on a weekly basis at the national level. -
FIG. 6 depicts a simplified block diagram showing components of the forward retail price for a retail commodity according to one embodiment. -
FIG. 7 is a flow diagram depicting one example embodiment of a method for determining the current retail price of a commodity for a specific location (L), time period (T), and grade (G). -
FIG. 8 is a plot diagram depicting exemplary NYMEX RBOB gasoline futures historical data. -
FIG. 9 is a flow diagram depicting a method for synthetically creating a forward market curve of an expected retail price for gasoline for a period of time within a market having a geographic boundary. -
FIG. 10 is an exemplary plot depicting the increase as well as decrease of the estimated wholesale price over time. - The disclosure and the various features and advantageous details thereof are explained more fully with reference to the non-limiting embodiments that are illustrated in the accompanying drawings and detailed in the following description. Descriptions of well known starting materials, processing techniques, components and equipment are omitted so as not to unnecessarily obscure the disclosure in detail. Skilled artisans should understand, however, that the detailed description and the specific examples, while disclosing preferred embodiments, are given by way of illustration only and not by way of limitation. Various substitutions, modifications, additions or rearrangements within the scope of the underlying inventive concept(s) will become apparent to those skilled in the art after reading this disclosure.
- As used herein, the terms “comprises,” “comprising,” “includes,” “including,” “has,” “having” or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion. For example, a process, product, article, or apparatus that comprises a list of elements is not necessarily limited only those elements but may include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, process, article, or apparatus. Further, unless expressly stated to the contrary, “or” refers to an inclusive or and not to an exclusive or. For example, a condition A or B is satisfied by any one of the following: A is true (or present) and B is false (or not present), A is false (or not present) and B is true (or present), and both A and B are true (or present).
- Additionally, any examples or illustrations given herein are not to be regarded in any way as restrictions on, limits to, or express definitions of, any term or terms with which they are utilized. Instead these examples or illustrations are to be regarded as being described with respect to one particular embodiment and as illustrative only. Those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that any term or terms with which these examples or illustrations are utilized encompass other embodiments as well as implementations and adaptations thereof which may or may not be given therewith or elsewhere in the specification and all such embodiments are intended to be included within the scope of that term or terms. Language designating such nonlimiting examples and illustrations includes, but is not limited to: “for example,” “for instance,” “e.g.,” “in one embodiment,” and the like.
- Before discussing specific embodiments, an exemplary hardware architecture for implementing certain embodiments is described. Specifically, one embodiment can include a computer communicatively coupled to a network (e.g., the Internet). As is known to those skilled in the art, the computer can include a central processing unit (“CPU”), at least one read-only memory (“ROM”), at least one random access memory (“RAM”), at least one hard drive (“HD”), and one or more input/output (“I/O”) device(s). The I/O devices can include a keyboard, monitor, printer, electronic pointing device (e.g., mouse, trackball, stylist, etc.), or the like. In some embodiments, the computer has access to at least one database.
- ROM, RAM, and HD are computer memories for storing computer-executable instructions executable by the CPU. Within this disclosure, the term “computer-readable medium” is not limited to ROM, RAM, and HD and can include any type of data storage medium that can be read by a processor. For example, a computer-readable medium may refer to a data cartridge, a data backup magnetic tape, a floppy diskette, a flash memory drive, an optical data storage drive, a CD-ROM, ROM, RAM, HD, or the like.
- The functionalities and processes described herein can be implemented in suitable computer-executable instructions. The computer-executable instructions may be stored as software code components or modules on one or more computer readable media. Examples of computer readable media include, but are not limited to, non-volatile memories, volatile memories, DASD arrays, magnetic tapes, floppy diskettes, hard drives, optical storage devices, or any other appropriate computer-readable medium or storage device, etc. In one exemplary embodiment of the invention, the computer-executable instructions may include lines of compiled C++, Java, HTML, or any other programming or scripting code.
- Additionally, the functions of the present disclosure may be implemented on one computer or shared/distributed among two or more computers in or across a network. Communications between computers implementing embodiments of the invention can be accomplished using any electronic, optical, radio frequency signals, or other suitable methods and tools of communication in compliance with known network protocols.
- Attention is now directed to one exemplary process flow for determining estimated future retail prices for a retail commodity over a time period in a market defined by a geographic boundary. Within this disclosure, a geographic boundary may be defined as a city, a borough, a county, a state, a country, a region, a zip code, or other predetermined area, or may be arbitrarily defined as a designated market area (DMA), or some combination or division.
- The retail price of a commodity can have many components. Take gasoline as an example, in one embodiment, the retail price for gasoline may be divided into four components: the wholesale price component, the rack markup component, the retail markup component, and the taxes component. Although gasoline is used herein as a specific example of a retail commodity, one skilled in the art will appreciate that embodiments disclosed herein may be implemented or otherwise adapted for virtually any commodities, including, but not limited to electricity, natural gas, ethanol, etc.
- In the example shown in
FIG. 6 , the rack markup and the retail markup components together represent the total markup price for gasoline. Although lagged wholesale gasoline prices may be used to forecast retail gasoline prices on a week-by-week basis at the national level, there is not a direct and precisely predictable correlation between wholesale prices and retail prices that can be used to predict forward retail gasoline prices below the national level and/or within a particular locale, including, but not limited to, city, a borough, a county, a state, a country, a region, a zip code, a designated market area (DMA) or the like, and may include some combination or division thereof. - Embodiments disclosed herein provide the ability to predict, in a more reliable and accurate manner, forward retail prices of a retail commodity over a period of time in a market having a geographic boundary. This ability can be advantageous to an entity that provides price protection on that retail commodity to other entities as well as end consumers in that market. In some embodiments, the pricing model disclosed herein can be compared with historical fuel consumption and potential hedging schemes to implement a comprehensive solution (also referred to as the Pricelock system) for price protection on retail commodities. For more detailed teachings on the Pricelock system, readers are directed to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/705,571, filed Feb. 12, 2007, entitled “METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING PRICE PROTECTION FOR COMMODITY PURCHASING THROUGH PRICE PROTECTION CONTRACTS,” which is incorporated herein as if set forth in full. As one skilled in the art can appreciate, the estimated future retail fuel prices can be useful in estimating future fuel costs and volatility as well as potential benefits from a price cap created via the aforementioned Pricelock system. Within this disclosure, the terms “gasoline”, “gas”, and “fuel” are used interchangeably.
- As a specific example, suppose it is desired to provide price protection services against retail gasoline prices to customers located in Austin, Tex., U.S.A. In order to price such services competitively and profitably, a price protection service provider would need to know what the projected future retail price for gas in Austin would be three months from now, six months from now, a year from now, and so on. In some embodiments, such knowledge may be obtained by synthetically creating a forward market curve of an expected retail price for gasoline for a year or some longer period. To create such a forward market curve for projecting the future retail prices for gasoline in Austin, one would need to first assess the aforementioned components (i.e., the wholesale price component, the rack markup component, the retail markup components, and the tax component) of today's retail price for gasoline with respect to Austin.
- In some embodiments, the wholesale price component of the retail price for gasoline includes and closely correlates to the price of crude oil. In some embodiments, the wholesale price component of the retail price for gasoline on any particular day can be determined based on some futures contract traded on the New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX) on that day. Examples of suitable futures contracts may include, but not limited to, unleaded gasoline futures contracts, reformulated gasoline blendstock for oxygenate blending (RBOB) futures contracts, or the like.
- RBOB is an unfinished gasoline product that does not contain the oxygenate methyl tertiary butyl ether chemical (MTBE), which is banned in many states for polluting groundwater. RBOB contracts are traded per grade on the NYMEX on the wholesale basis in units of 1,000 barrels (42,000 gallons). They are based on delivery at petroleum products terminals in the New York harbor, the major East Coast trading center for imports and domestic shipments from refineries in the New York harbor area or from the Gulf Coast refining centers. RBOB conforms to industry standards for reformulated regular gasoline blendstock for blending with 10% denatured fuel ethanol (92% purity) as listed by the Colonial Pipeline for fungible F grade for sales in New York and New Jersey. As a specific example, traded in the New York Harbor barge market, RBOB is a wholesale non-oxygenated blendstock that is ready for the addition of 10% ethanol at the truck rack.
- In addition to RBOB, other refined products may include gasoline meeting the specifications of the California Air Resources Board (GARB), CARB diesel fuel, low-sulfur and ultra-low-sulfur diesel fuel, and oxygenates (liquid hydrocarbon compounds containing oxygen), conventional gasoline, distillates, jet fuel, asphalt, petrochemicals, lubricants. Gasoline is the largest single volume refined product sold in the United States and accounts for almost half of national oil consumption. It is a highly diverse market, with hundreds of wholesale distributors and thousands of retail outlets, making it subject to intense competition and price volatility. These refined products, branded and unbranded, are generally marketed on a wholesale basis in the United States and Canada through a bulk and rack marketing network. Some producers may sell refined products through their own network of retail and wholesale branded outlets.
- While the wholesale price component represents the price of gasoline at the refinery level, the rack markup component represents the cost to deliver that gas from a refinery to a retailer such as a gas station (i.e., from wholesale to rack). The retailer buys the gas at the rack price, sometimes referred to as the rack rate, which is typically marked up by whoever is involved in the transportation and distribution chain, including terminal distribution facilities, transportation companies, etc. Sellers at each step of the distribution chain generally try to set their target prices at a level reflecting their current costs plus a markup.
- Studies have found that the rack price and the wholesale price are closely correlated. Thus, in some embodiments, the rack markup component may be determined using the wholesale price component, perhaps taking a percentage thereof as an input to the rack markup component. In some embodiments, the rack markup component may be determined using information provided by an information service provider such as Oil Price Information Service (OPIS) of Rockville, Md., USA. OPIS tracks what rack markups would be, perhaps based on historical data. Gasoline and diesel rack prices are available from OPIS for more than 360 wholesale rack locations every day. In addition, over 240 cities nationwide contain the OPIS Smart Rack which details retail gasoline lows, averages and margins.
- The tax component may include all types of taxes related to a retail commodity. In the case of petroleum products, in addition to income, severance, production, property, and other taxes, they are subject to various excise taxes. Specifically, in some embodiment, the tax component may include federal gas tax, state and local gas taxes, and fees. The federal tax is collected in all states in addition to any state or local taxes on gasoline sales. As an example, the federal gas tax may be 18.4 cents per gallon (cpg) while the state gas tax may be 20 cpg in the state of Texas.
- Gasoline taxes are levied in various ways in different states. Each state may impose different amounts of taxes depending upon the type and/or grade and may include different types of charges and fees. For example, according to data collected by the American Petroleum Institute (API) in 2005, in the state of Alabama, the state gas tax is 18 cpg for gasoline and 19 cpg for diesel, each type of tax including a 2-cpg inspection fee. Some states, such as Alaska, Arizona, California, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, New Hampshire, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming, levy a flat rate per gallon for gasoline and diesel.
- Some states allow local communities to levy gasoline taxes in addition to any state taxes that might be levied. Some may charge a tax similar to a sales tax in that it applies to the monetary amount of the gasoline sold. For example, in the state of California, the state gas tax is 18 cpg for gasoline and diesel, plus a 6% state sales tax, a 1.25% county tax, and additional local sales taxes. Thus, determining the amount of tax paid on one gallon of gasoline or diesel fuel purchased by a consumer at the pump can involve numerous factors and calculations. The tax rate may vary depending on the whether the area where the fuel is purchased is in compliance with federal clean air standards, whether a threshold amount of revenue has been collected for the taxing jurisdiction for the fiscal year, and how much is being charged for the pre-tax price of a gallon of fuel.
- The API is one exemplary source that collects motor fuel tax information for all 50 states and compiles a report and chart detailing changes from the previous update and calculating a nationwide average. Although tax rates do change, they are considered relatively stable as compared to crude oil prices, which could fluctuate continuously, not just daily. Thus, in some embodiments, tax information obtained from the API can be parsed for use in the tax component in determining the forward retail price for gasoline in a market having a geographic boundary.
- Thus, as a simplified example, the wholesale price component can be parsed from RBOB contracts, the rack markup component can be derived from data provided by the OPIS, and the tax component can be calculated based on information provided by the API. The retail markup component, however, is very difficult to determine as each retailer may tailor the markup, which is often kept secret, per location (L), time period (T), and grade (G). In some embodiments, as discussed below, the retail markup component can be estimated, alone with the rack markup component, based on purchased wholesale gas pricing data. Current retail prices from other sources may also be utilized to determine the retail markup component with respect to a particular location (L), time period (T), and grade (G).
-
FIG. 7 is a flow diagram depicting one example embodiment of a method for determining the current retail price of a commodity for a specific location (L), time period (T), and grade (G). As described above, software code implementing embodiments of the present invention can be stored on a computer-readable medium and executed by a processor to cause the processor to perform particular functions disclosed herein. - At
step 701, according to one embodiment, a first functionality operates to estimate the total markup, which includes the rack markup and the retail markup, for gas for a specified location and grade. The determination of the Estimated Total Markup (ETM) can be based on a number of factors. For example, the ETM may be determined based on purchased wholesale gas pricing data, where available, from oil companies, regional retailers, OPIS, and/or other similar sources. Additionally, the ETM may be determined by extrapolating or ‘reverse engineering’ historical differences in wholesale pricing from NY delivery markets and other markets across the nation, but using the retail prices to begin the extrapolation. In this example, the retail markup is therefore the difference between the ETM and the rack markup. - As a specific example, a RBOB contract may be utilized as algorithm input on the wholesale gasoline price.
FIG. 8 is a plot diagram depicting exemplary NYMEX RBOB gasoline futures historical data. If the NY delivery markets (from which the RBOB contract is priced) historically have differed by 10% for California markets, then the California projected wholesale pricing could be adjusted by this difference. - According to embodiments disclosed herein, another factor in determining the ETM is an aggregated composite retail price for gasoline for a location and grade, which is referred to herein as “Pricelock Aggregated Composite Retail Price (PACRP)” and which is generated by a proprietary system and method for determining a retail commodity price within a geographic boundary. For detailed teachings on the PACRP, readers are directed to co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/030,119, filed Feb. 12, 2008, entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD OF DETERMINING A RETAIL COMMODITY PRICE WITHIN A GEOGRAPHIC BOUNDARY,” which is hereby incorporated herein as if set forth in full. Other types of aggregated composite retail price for gasoline within a specific locale may also be utilized. In some embodiments, the ETM is the difference between the PACRP and the wholesale price by fuel type/grade and location.
- At
step 703, a second functionality operates to subtract the ETM from the PACRP for a specific location and a specific grade or type of fuel to generate the effective wholesale price for that particular location and that particular grade. The output of this step is to have estimated wholesale gas prices, by location and grade, at the current moment. -
FIG. 9 is a flow diagram depicting a method for synthetically creating a forward market curve of an expected retail price for gasoline for a period of time within a market having a geographic boundary. Referring to the above specific example where it is desired to provide price protection services with respect to retail gasoline prices to customers located in Austin, Tex., U.S.A., such a forward market curve can be utilized to project the future retail prices for gasoline in Austin three months from now, six months from now, a year from now, and so on. - According to one embodiment, the Estimated Forward Retail Gas Price (EFRP) can be projected, station by station, using the following components: RBOB contracts on wholesale gas by type and time period, the current ETM for each location and fuel type, the market volatility and current gas trend as the wholesale to retail correlation and price change lag can differ under various market conditions. Examples of market conditions include contango and backwardation. Backwardation describes a market where spot or prompt prices are higher than prices in the future—a downward sloping forward curve. It indicates that prompt demand is high. Contango is the opposite, with future prices higher than spot prices. By way of example, at
step 902, software code implementing a third functionality may be executed to estimate, for each grade (fuel type), the increase/decrease of the wholesale price over a period of time using project wholesale pricing from futures market on NY delivery markets.FIG. 10 is an exemplary plot depicting the increase as well as decrease of the estimated wholesale price over time. - Next, at
step 904, software code implementing a fourth functionality may be executed to consider the market conditions inherent in the forward contracts (e.g., contango or backwardation) and determine the rate of change between the retail and wholesale spreads over time. This step can provide a desired granularity on the final outcome. For example, an individual station EFRP may be calculated by applying the adjusted ETM (based on step 902) to each monthly forecasted MERC wholesale contract price. This near final station EFRP can be further adjusted by a “market trend” factor, depending on whether it is in a contango or a backwardated market. - At
step 906, according to one embodiment, software code implementing a fifth functionality may operate to determine a geographic EFRP by aggregating, station by station, EFRP monthly “strips”. The geographic EFRP (e.g., local, regional, national, etc.) may be calibrated by weighting individual EFRPs based on gas purchase volumes by fuel type. - At
step 908, according to one embodiment, software code implementing a sixth functionality may operate to determine additional markup where applicable. For example, a sensitivity analysis may be performed on the EFRP fromstep 906 based on world events. Furthermore, the functionality may be configured with an ability to “toggle” pricing based upon a choice of user-defined events such as hurricanes, war, political changes. Although these events are theoretically priced into the forward contracts on wholesale prices, they are assumed to be low probability. However, once they occur, the price of gas can spike upward and modify pricing on forward contracts. The algorithm used to calculate effects on the EFRP can be implemented to rely on historical analysis of actual retail price changes across the nation due to actual events and their individual event locations. For example, Hurricane Katrina, which struck the United States through the Gulf of Mexico, may impact gas wholesale prices differently than Hurricane Andrew, which struck the Atlantic Coast. Thus, software code implementing this algorithm can be a useful tool for adding sensitivities to the underlying process of creating the forward total retail gas price based on prior events. Any additional markup is then added to the geographic EFRP, perhaps weighted, to generate the estimated forward retail gas price for the specified fuel type/grade and time. In some embodiments, the specified time period may range from one month to six months. - In the foregoing specification, the invention has been described with reference to specific embodiments. However, one of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that various modifications and changes can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention disclosed herein. Accordingly, the specification and figures disclosed herein are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense, and all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of the disclosure as defined in the following claims and their legal equivalents.
Claims (15)
1. A method for predicting a forward retail price of a commodity within a geographic boundary over a time period, comprising:
providing a computer having a processor and a non-transitory computer readable medium storing a set of instructions executable to perform:
assessing the components of a retail commodity within a geographic boundary, comprising:
obtaining a current retail price for a retail location within the geographic boundary;
determining a wholesale price associated with the trade of a wholesale product corresponding to the retail commodity;
determining a rack markup component associated with transporting and distributing the retail location to the retail location within the geographic boundary;
obtaining a tax component associated with the retail location within the geographic boundary;
subtracting the rack markup component, the tax component, and the wholesale price from the current retail price to determine a retail markup component associated with the retail location within the geographic boundary;
and
creating a forward market curve indicating forward retail price of the commodity for a period of time within the geographic boundary, comprising:
determining a market condition associated with the sale of the commodity over a past period of time within the geographic boundary on a monthly basis; and
calculating an estimated forward retail price for the location within the geographic boundary over a time period based on the current retail price of the commodity within the geographic boundary, the estimated current wholesale price of the commodity, the market condition associated with the sale of the commodity within the geographic boundary.
2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the market condition includes contango and backwardation, wherein contango describes a market condition where spot prices of the commodity are lower than further prices of the commodity, and wherein backwardation describes a market condition where spot prices of the commodity are higher than further prices of the commodity.
3. The method of claim 2 , further comprising adjusting the estimated forward retail price for the location based on a user-defined event.
4. The method of claim 3 , further comprising performing a historical analysis of actual retail price changes due to the user-defined event.
5. The method of claim 1 , wherein a wholesale price associated with the trade of a wholesale product is determined based on a futures contract.
6. The method of claim 5 , wherein the futures contract is traded on the New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX) on that day.
7. The method of claim 6 , wherein the futures contract is a gasoline futures contract.
8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the estimated total markup is determined by extrapolating historical differences in wholesale prices.
9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the rack markup component is determined using a percentage of the wholesale price component.
10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the rack markup component is determined using information provided by an information service provider.
11. The method of claim 1 , wherein the rack markup component and the retail markup component are determined by extrapolating historical differences between retail prices and wholesale prices as an estimated total markup.
12. A system for predicting a forward retail price of a commodity within a geographic boundary over a time period, comprising:
a computer coupled to a network and having a processor and a non-transitory computer readable medium storing a set of instructions executable to perform:
receiving, from a retail computer coupled to the network, a current retail price for a retail location within the geographic boundary;
receiving, from a wholesale market computer coupled to the network, a wholesale price associated with the trade of a wholesale product corresponding to the retail commodity;
receiving, from an information service provider computer, a rack markup component associated with transporting and distributing the retail location to the retail location within the geographic boundary;
obtaining a tax component associated with the retail location within the geographic boundary;
determining a retail markup component associated with the retail location within the geographic boundary;
determining a market condition associated with the sale of the commodity over a past period of time within the geographic boundary on a monthly basis; and
calculating an estimated forward retail price for the location within the geographic boundary over a time period based on the current retail price of the commodity within the geographic boundary, the estimated current wholesale price of the commodity, the market condition associated with the sale of the commodity within the geographic boundary, and the retail markup component associated with the retail location within the geographic boundary.
13. The system of claim 12 , wherein determining a retail markup component associated with the retail location within the geographic boundary comprises subtracting the wholesale price, the rack markup component, and the tax component from the current retail price of the commodity within the geographic boundary.
14. The system of claim 12 , wherein the retail computer is located at a retail location within the geographic boundary.
15. The system of claim 12 , wherein the retail computer communicates with a retail location within the geographic boundary to obtain retail price information.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US13/210,602 US20110302001A1 (en) | 2007-02-12 | 2011-08-16 | System and Method for Estimating Forward Retail Commodity Price Within a Geographic Boundary |
Applications Claiming Priority (5)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US90093007P | 2007-02-12 | 2007-02-12 | |
US90093107P | 2007-02-12 | 2007-02-12 | |
US96656607P | 2007-08-29 | 2007-08-29 | |
US12/030,086 US8019694B2 (en) | 2007-02-12 | 2008-02-12 | System and method for estimating forward retail commodity price within a geographic boundary |
US13/210,602 US20110302001A1 (en) | 2007-02-12 | 2011-08-16 | System and Method for Estimating Forward Retail Commodity Price Within a Geographic Boundary |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US12/030,086 Continuation US8019694B2 (en) | 2007-02-12 | 2008-02-12 | System and method for estimating forward retail commodity price within a geographic boundary |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20110302001A1 true US20110302001A1 (en) | 2011-12-08 |
Family
ID=39690482
Family Applications (3)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US12/030,119 Expired - Fee Related US8538795B2 (en) | 2007-02-12 | 2008-02-12 | System and method of determining a retail commodity price within a geographic boundary |
US12/030,086 Expired - Fee Related US8019694B2 (en) | 2007-02-12 | 2008-02-12 | System and method for estimating forward retail commodity price within a geographic boundary |
US13/210,602 Abandoned US20110302001A1 (en) | 2007-02-12 | 2011-08-16 | System and Method for Estimating Forward Retail Commodity Price Within a Geographic Boundary |
Family Applications Before (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US12/030,119 Expired - Fee Related US8538795B2 (en) | 2007-02-12 | 2008-02-12 | System and method of determining a retail commodity price within a geographic boundary |
US12/030,086 Expired - Fee Related US8019694B2 (en) | 2007-02-12 | 2008-02-12 | System and method for estimating forward retail commodity price within a geographic boundary |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (3) | US8538795B2 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2008100902A1 (en) |
Cited By (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20140019316A1 (en) * | 2012-07-11 | 2014-01-16 | Cross Consulting Partners, LLC | System, Method and Computer Program Product for Implementation and Management of Change-of-Control Severance |
WO2015112185A1 (en) * | 2014-01-27 | 2015-07-30 | Thales Energy, Inc. | System and methods for pricing a commodity |
US10380690B2 (en) | 2015-05-21 | 2019-08-13 | Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. | Dataset cleansing |
US11562388B2 (en) | 2020-07-17 | 2023-01-24 | Sap Se | Machine learned models for items with time-shifts |
US11875371B1 (en) | 2017-04-24 | 2024-01-16 | Skyline Products, Inc. | Price optimization system |
Families Citing this family (77)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8065191B2 (en) * | 2000-03-15 | 2011-11-22 | Rodney Senior | Electronic quantity purchasing system |
WO2008100910A1 (en) * | 2007-02-12 | 2008-08-21 | Pricelock, Inc. | Management and decision making tool for commodity purchases with hedging scenarios |
US8156022B2 (en) | 2007-02-12 | 2012-04-10 | Pricelock, Inc. | Method and system for providing price protection for commodity purchasing through price protection contracts |
WO2008100916A1 (en) * | 2007-02-12 | 2008-08-21 | Pricelock, Inc. | System and method of driving commodity consumers to selective retail locations |
US8538795B2 (en) * | 2007-02-12 | 2013-09-17 | Pricelock, Inc. | System and method of determining a retail commodity price within a geographic boundary |
US8108286B2 (en) | 2007-04-09 | 2012-01-31 | Goldman Sachs & Co. | Fuel offering and purchase management system |
US20080306861A1 (en) * | 2007-04-09 | 2008-12-11 | Pricelock, Inc. | System and method for index based settlement under price protection contracts |
US20080306776A1 (en) * | 2007-04-09 | 2008-12-11 | Pricelock, Inc. | System and method for risk acceptance in the provisioning of price protection products |
US8121930B2 (en) | 2007-04-09 | 2012-02-21 | Goldman Sachs & Co. | Fuel offering and purchase management system |
US7945501B2 (en) | 2007-04-09 | 2011-05-17 | Pricelock, Inc. | System and method for constraining depletion amount in a defined time frame |
CN102903061A (en) * | 2007-08-21 | 2013-01-30 | 水族指数有限公司 | Method for establishing stable index value, method and system for obtaining stable fresh water price |
US20090198621A1 (en) * | 2008-02-04 | 2009-08-06 | Schneier Lance W | Energy price protection system and method |
US8160952B1 (en) | 2008-02-12 | 2012-04-17 | Pricelock, Inc. | Method and system for providing price protection related to the purchase of a commodity |
US8396738B1 (en) * | 2008-02-22 | 2013-03-12 | Bank Of America Corporation | System and method for evaluating third party marketing services |
US20100057586A1 (en) * | 2008-09-04 | 2010-03-04 | China Software Venture | Offer Reporting Apparatus and Method |
US20120209660A1 (en) * | 2011-02-16 | 2012-08-16 | Knowledge Support Systems Ltd. | Fuel price data generation |
US20130191183A1 (en) * | 2012-01-25 | 2013-07-25 | Beverley Kite | Information Sharing System for On-Line Real-Time, Localized Cost Comparison for Services |
US20130254131A1 (en) * | 2012-03-23 | 2013-09-26 | Freightgate | Global rfp/rfq/tender management |
US9898746B2 (en) * | 2012-07-13 | 2018-02-20 | Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. | Locating a specific product within a retail environment in furtherance of a comparison of product information based on product codes |
US10140643B2 (en) * | 2012-11-21 | 2018-11-27 | Sony Corporation | Method for acquisition and distribution of product price information |
WO2014178815A1 (en) * | 2013-04-29 | 2014-11-06 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Service price index |
MX2020003138A (en) | 2013-06-26 | 2021-03-25 | Indigo Ag Inc | Seed-origin endophyte populations, compositions, and methods of use. |
AU2014315191A1 (en) | 2013-09-04 | 2016-04-21 | Indigo Ag, Inc. | Agricultural endophyte-plant compositions, and methods of use |
US20150088613A1 (en) * | 2013-09-23 | 2015-03-26 | Comdata Network, Inc. | Systems, methods, and computer program products for managing fuel costs |
US9494445B2 (en) | 2013-09-26 | 2016-11-15 | Wex Inc. | Methods and systems for determining optimum fuel station |
CN106061243B (en) | 2013-11-06 | 2019-07-26 | 德克萨斯A&M大学体系 | For improving the fungi endophyte of crop yield and insect-pest |
TWI529634B (en) * | 2013-11-14 | 2016-04-11 | Inst Information Industry | Crop production planning systems, crop production planning methods and computer-readable recording media |
US20150178751A1 (en) * | 2013-12-23 | 2015-06-25 | Kalibrate Technologies Plc | Fuel price data generation |
WO2015100432A2 (en) | 2013-12-24 | 2015-07-02 | Symbiota, Inc. | Method for propagating microorganisms within plant bioreactors and stably storing microorganisms within agricultural seeds |
US9364005B2 (en) | 2014-06-26 | 2016-06-14 | Ait Austrian Institute Of Technology Gmbh | Plant-endophyte combinations and uses therefor |
US10685364B2 (en) | 2014-02-27 | 2020-06-16 | Here Global B.V. | Method and apparatus for causing a recommendation of a point of interest |
US20170076307A1 (en) * | 2014-03-28 | 2017-03-16 | Nec Corporation | Price estimation device, price estimation method, and recording medium |
US20160055467A1 (en) * | 2014-08-22 | 2016-02-25 | Michael A. Racusin | Commodity discount card |
US10275935B2 (en) | 2014-10-31 | 2019-04-30 | Fyusion, Inc. | System and method for infinite synthetic image generation from multi-directional structured image array |
US10726593B2 (en) * | 2015-09-22 | 2020-07-28 | Fyusion, Inc. | Artificially rendering images using viewpoint interpolation and extrapolation |
US10262426B2 (en) | 2014-10-31 | 2019-04-16 | Fyusion, Inc. | System and method for infinite smoothing of image sequences |
JP2016126393A (en) * | 2014-12-26 | 2016-07-11 | 株式会社タツノ | Oil supply place management system |
RU2017141632A (en) | 2015-05-01 | 2019-06-03 | Индиго Агрикултуре, Инк. | ISOLATED COMPLEX ENDOPHITIC COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF IMPROVING PLANT SIGNS |
WO2016200987A1 (en) | 2015-06-08 | 2016-12-15 | Indigo Agriculture, Inc. | Streptomyces endophyte compositions and methods for improved agronomic traits in plants |
US11006095B2 (en) | 2015-07-15 | 2021-05-11 | Fyusion, Inc. | Drone based capture of a multi-view interactive digital media |
US11095869B2 (en) | 2015-09-22 | 2021-08-17 | Fyusion, Inc. | System and method for generating combined embedded multi-view interactive digital media representations |
US10147211B2 (en) | 2015-07-15 | 2018-12-04 | Fyusion, Inc. | Artificially rendering images using viewpoint interpolation and extrapolation |
US10852902B2 (en) | 2015-07-15 | 2020-12-01 | Fyusion, Inc. | Automatic tagging of objects on a multi-view interactive digital media representation of a dynamic entity |
US10242474B2 (en) | 2015-07-15 | 2019-03-26 | Fyusion, Inc. | Artificially rendering images using viewpoint interpolation and extrapolation |
US10222932B2 (en) | 2015-07-15 | 2019-03-05 | Fyusion, Inc. | Virtual reality environment based manipulation of multilayered multi-view interactive digital media representations |
US10445823B2 (en) | 2015-07-27 | 2019-10-15 | Alg, Inc. | Advanced data science systems and methods useful for auction pricing optimization over network |
US10311511B2 (en) | 2015-09-14 | 2019-06-04 | The Toronto-Dominion Bank | Connected device-based property evaluation |
US11783864B2 (en) | 2015-09-22 | 2023-10-10 | Fyusion, Inc. | Integration of audio into a multi-view interactive digital media representation |
US20170161833A1 (en) * | 2015-12-08 | 2017-06-08 | Formula Technologies, Inc. | Financial Monitoring and Forecasting Systems and Methods |
SG10201510392WA (en) * | 2015-12-17 | 2017-07-28 | Mastercard International Inc | Methods for effecting and optimizing item descriptor and item value combinations |
WO2017112827A1 (en) | 2015-12-21 | 2017-06-29 | Indigo Agriculture, Inc. | Endophyte compositions and methods for improvement of plant traits in plants of agronomic importance |
US11202017B2 (en) | 2016-10-06 | 2021-12-14 | Fyusion, Inc. | Live style transfer on a mobile device |
CN106503258B (en) * | 2016-11-18 | 2020-05-12 | 深圳市世强元件网络有限公司 | Accurate searching method in website |
WO2018102733A1 (en) | 2016-12-01 | 2018-06-07 | Indigo Ag, Inc. | Modulated nutritional quality traits in seeds |
US20190362371A1 (en) * | 2016-12-09 | 2019-11-28 | Shawn Hutchinson | Unique pricing engine |
US11807586B2 (en) | 2016-12-23 | 2023-11-07 | The Texas A&M University System | Fungal endophytes for improved crop yields and protection from pests |
US10437879B2 (en) | 2017-01-18 | 2019-10-08 | Fyusion, Inc. | Visual search using multi-view interactive digital media representations |
WO2018140700A1 (en) * | 2017-01-27 | 2018-08-02 | Hutchinson Shawn | Secure authentication and financial attributes services |
US9890908B1 (en) * | 2017-04-18 | 2018-02-13 | Air Products And Chemicals, Inc. | Control system in a gas pipeline network to increase capacity factor |
US11882838B2 (en) | 2017-04-27 | 2024-01-30 | The Flinders University Of South Australia | Bacterial inoculants |
US10313651B2 (en) | 2017-05-22 | 2019-06-04 | Fyusion, Inc. | Snapshots at predefined intervals or angles |
US11069147B2 (en) | 2017-06-26 | 2021-07-20 | Fyusion, Inc. | Modification of multi-view interactive digital media representation |
US11263707B2 (en) | 2017-08-08 | 2022-03-01 | Indigo Ag, Inc. | Machine learning in agricultural planting, growing, and harvesting contexts |
US10460748B2 (en) | 2017-10-04 | 2019-10-29 | The Toronto-Dominion Bank | Conversational interface determining lexical personality score for response generation with synonym replacement |
US10339931B2 (en) | 2017-10-04 | 2019-07-02 | The Toronto-Dominion Bank | Persona-based conversational interface personalization using social network preferences |
JP6981539B2 (en) * | 2018-03-30 | 2021-12-15 | 日本電気株式会社 | Model estimation system, model estimation method and model estimation program |
US11367093B2 (en) | 2018-04-24 | 2022-06-21 | Indigo Ag, Inc. | Satellite-based agricultural modeling |
US20190325466A1 (en) | 2018-04-24 | 2019-10-24 | Indigo Ag, Inc. | Satellite-based agricultural modeling |
US10592747B2 (en) | 2018-04-26 | 2020-03-17 | Fyusion, Inc. | Method and apparatus for 3-D auto tagging |
US11049194B2 (en) * | 2018-11-05 | 2021-06-29 | Honda Motor Co., Ltd. | Identifying and analyzing vehicle refueling events |
CN111222727A (en) * | 2018-11-23 | 2020-06-02 | 北京嘀嘀无限科技发展有限公司 | Service information adjusting method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium |
JP6903708B2 (en) * | 2019-04-26 | 2021-07-14 | コスモ石油マーケティング株式会社 | A method / system for proposing when to purchase fuel oil, and a method / system for presenting future over-the-counter fuel oil prices. |
US11430061B2 (en) * | 2019-09-25 | 2022-08-30 | S&P Global | Dynamic multi-party message reporting system |
US10664932B1 (en) | 2019-12-30 | 2020-05-26 | Michael A. Racusin | Online system for retail gas sales |
WO2022000302A1 (en) * | 2020-06-30 | 2022-01-06 | 深圳市世强元件网络有限公司 | Component e-commerce platform search result classification and display method |
US11880853B2 (en) * | 2020-11-03 | 2024-01-23 | Capital One Services, Llc | Utilizing machine learning and transaction data to determine fuel prices at fuel stations |
CA3230474A1 (en) | 2021-08-31 | 2023-03-09 | Eleanor Elizabeth Campbell | Systems and methods for ecosystem credit recommendations |
Citations (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20020143616A1 (en) * | 2001-03-28 | 2002-10-03 | Hajdukiewicz Richard Stanley | System and method for providing a fuel purchase incentive with the sale of a vehicle |
US20040215529A1 (en) * | 2004-04-16 | 2004-10-28 | Foster Andre E. | System and method for energy price forecasting automation |
US20050228738A1 (en) * | 2004-04-08 | 2005-10-13 | Harris William R | Base line futures contract (BLC) |
US7376603B1 (en) * | 1997-08-19 | 2008-05-20 | Fair Isaac Corporation | Method and system for evaluating customers of a financial institution using customer relationship value tags |
US20080243663A1 (en) * | 2007-01-31 | 2008-10-02 | Ronald Eveland | Route Planning and Commodity Cost Estimating System |
US20090204316A1 (en) * | 2008-02-08 | 2009-08-13 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | System and method for determining a vehicle refueling strategy |
US7617111B1 (en) * | 2002-05-29 | 2009-11-10 | Microsoft Corporation | System and method for processing gasoline price data in a networked environment |
Family Cites Families (288)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3691527A (en) * | 1965-07-10 | 1972-09-12 | Omron Tateisi Electronics Co | Credit card actuated vending machine system |
FR2178034B1 (en) | 1972-03-29 | 1976-05-21 | Rudd Kenneth | |
US4910672A (en) * | 1984-07-18 | 1990-03-20 | Catalina Marketing Corporation | Method and apparatus for dispensing discount coupons |
US5173851A (en) | 1984-07-18 | 1992-12-22 | Catalina Marketing International, Inc. | Method and apparatus for dispensing discount coupons in response to the purchase of one or more products |
US4723212A (en) | 1984-07-18 | 1988-02-02 | Catalina Marketing Corp. | Method and apparatus for dispensing discount coupons |
JPS62184596A (en) * | 1986-02-10 | 1987-08-12 | オムロン株式会社 | Electronic type cash register |
US4825045A (en) | 1986-07-24 | 1989-04-25 | Advance Promotion Technologies, Inc. | System and method for checkout counter product promotion |
US5200889A (en) | 1988-10-31 | 1993-04-06 | Teraoka Seiko Co., Ltd. | System for maintaining continuous total of refund amounts due a customer and for allowing customer designation of the amount of refund to be applied to a purchase |
US5202826A (en) * | 1989-01-27 | 1993-04-13 | Mccarthy Patrick D | Centralized consumer cash value accumulation system for multiple merchants |
JP2704543B2 (en) | 1989-02-20 | 1998-01-26 | トキコ株式会社 | Product sales system at gas stations |
US5056019A (en) | 1989-08-29 | 1991-10-08 | Citicorp Pos Information Servies, Inc. | Automated purchase reward accounting system and method |
US5265008A (en) | 1989-11-02 | 1993-11-23 | Moneyfax, Inc. | Method of and system for electronic funds transfer via facsimile with image processing verification |
GB9011633D0 (en) | 1990-05-24 | 1990-07-11 | Bilgrey Samson & Co Ltd | Trading discount system |
JP2584546B2 (en) | 1991-05-13 | 1997-02-26 | 株式会社テック | Product sales data processing device |
GB9114945D0 (en) | 1991-07-11 | 1991-08-28 | Renishaw Metrology Ltd | Touch probe |
DE69217548T2 (en) | 1991-11-09 | 1997-06-05 | Renishaw Metrology Ltd | MEASURING PROBE |
US5353218A (en) * | 1992-09-17 | 1994-10-04 | Ad Response Micromarketing Corporation | Focused coupon system |
JP3022053B2 (en) * | 1993-05-28 | 2000-03-15 | 富士通株式会社 | POS terminal device |
CA2182596C (en) * | 1994-02-04 | 2004-04-20 | James E. Biorge | Method and system for allocating and redeeming incentive credits between a portable device and a base device |
US5594782A (en) | 1994-02-24 | 1997-01-14 | Gte Mobile Communications Service Corporation | Multiple mode personal wireless communications system |
US5862222A (en) * | 1994-05-27 | 1999-01-19 | Gunnarsson; Staffan | System at a vehicle for debiting at automatic fuelling |
FR2733068B1 (en) | 1995-04-14 | 1997-07-04 | G C Tech | ELECTRONIC PAYMENT METHOD FOR PERFORMING TRANSACTIONS RELATED TO THE PURCHASE OF GOODS ON A COMPUTER NETWORK |
US5710887A (en) | 1995-08-29 | 1998-01-20 | Broadvision | Computer system and method for electronic commerce |
US6151565A (en) | 1995-09-08 | 2000-11-21 | Arlington Software Corporation | Decision support system, method and article of manufacture |
US5873069A (en) | 1995-10-13 | 1999-02-16 | American Tv & Appliance Of Madison, Inc. | System and method for automatic updating and display of retail prices |
JP3133243B2 (en) | 1995-12-15 | 2001-02-05 | 株式会社エヌケーインベストメント | Online shopping system |
US6152591A (en) | 1996-03-04 | 2000-11-28 | Dresser Industries, Inc. | Interactive graphics display system for a fuel dispenser |
US6249772B1 (en) | 1997-07-08 | 2001-06-19 | Walker Digital, Llc | Systems and methods wherein a buyer purchases a product at a first price and acquires the product from a merchant that offers the product for sale at a second price |
US6754636B1 (en) * | 1996-09-04 | 2004-06-22 | Walker Digital, Llc | Purchasing systems and methods wherein a buyer takes possession at a retailer of a product purchased using a communication network |
JPH10111985A (en) | 1996-10-03 | 1998-04-28 | Tec Corp | Article sale registration data processor |
US6135446A (en) | 1996-10-22 | 2000-10-24 | Oce Printing Systems Gmbh | Aligning device |
US6193155B1 (en) * | 1996-12-09 | 2001-02-27 | Walker Digital, Llc | Method and apparatus for issuing and managing gift certificates |
GB2322036A (en) | 1997-02-10 | 1998-08-12 | Ericsson Telefon Ab L M | An arrangement for automatically answering telephone calls in which an e-mail is sent to the absent subscriber |
US20010001203A1 (en) * | 2000-04-04 | 2001-05-17 | Mccall Don C. | Fuel dispensing system |
US6321984B1 (en) | 1997-02-25 | 2001-11-27 | Dresser Equipment Group, Inc. | Adjustable price fuel dispensing system |
US6112981A (en) * | 1997-02-25 | 2000-09-05 | Dresser Industries, Inc. | Bar code reader for a fuel dispenser |
US6298329B1 (en) | 1997-03-21 | 2001-10-02 | Walker Digital, Llc | Method and apparatus for generating a coupon |
US6157871A (en) | 1997-09-26 | 2000-12-05 | Marconi Commerce Systems Inc. | Fuel dispensing system preventing customer drive-off |
US6098879A (en) | 1997-09-26 | 2000-08-08 | Gilbarco, Inc. | Fuel dispensing system providing customer preferences |
US6421653B1 (en) | 1997-10-14 | 2002-07-16 | Blackbird Holdings, Inc. | Systems, methods and computer program products for electronic trading of financial instruments |
US20060190383A1 (en) * | 2003-03-24 | 2006-08-24 | Blackbird Holdings, Inc. | Systems for risk portfolio management |
US6741968B2 (en) | 1998-04-24 | 2004-05-25 | Fuel Partners, L.P. | Method for processing information through a clearinghouse |
ES2281183T3 (en) | 1998-07-10 | 2007-09-16 | Calgene Llc | EXPRESSION OF GENES OF TOLERANCE TO HERBICIDE IN VEGETABLE PLASTIDES. |
US6116505A (en) * | 1998-07-21 | 2000-09-12 | Gilbarco Inc. | Fuel transaction system for enabling the purchase of fuel and non-fuel items on a single authorization |
US6332128B1 (en) | 1998-07-23 | 2001-12-18 | Autogas Systems, Inc. | System and method of providing multiple level discounts on cross-marketed products and discounting a price-per-unit-volume of gasoline |
US6885996B2 (en) * | 1998-07-23 | 2005-04-26 | Auto Gas Systems, Inc. | Method of providing price-per-unit discounts for fuel to a customer |
US6175823B1 (en) * | 1998-09-15 | 2001-01-16 | Amazon.Com, Inc. | Electronic gift certificate system |
US6078900A (en) | 1998-10-23 | 2000-06-20 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method for estimating stock levels in production-distribution networks with inventory control |
AU1762200A (en) | 1998-12-05 | 2000-06-26 | Energy Storage Systems Pty Ltd | A charge storage device |
US7634441B2 (en) | 1999-03-11 | 2009-12-15 | Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co. | Method for managing risk in markets related to commodities delivered over a network |
AU3732900A (en) | 1999-03-11 | 2000-09-28 | Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co. | Method for managing risk in markets related to commodities delivered over a network |
US7634442B2 (en) * | 1999-03-11 | 2009-12-15 | Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co. | Method for managing risk in markets related to commodities delivered over a network |
US7664705B2 (en) | 1999-03-31 | 2010-02-16 | Walker Digital, Llc | Methods and systems for accepting offers via checks |
US6145741A (en) | 1999-04-27 | 2000-11-14 | Wisdom; Juanita J. | Universal pre-paid gasoline and travel card |
US6609104B1 (en) | 1999-05-26 | 2003-08-19 | Incentech, Inc. | Method and system for accumulating marginal discounts and applying an associated incentive |
US6862580B1 (en) | 1999-06-11 | 2005-03-01 | Robert M. Ford | System and method for managing tier-priced commodity transactions |
US7742972B2 (en) | 1999-07-21 | 2010-06-22 | Longitude Llc | Enhanced parimutuel wagering |
US8126794B2 (en) * | 1999-07-21 | 2012-02-28 | Longitude Llc | Replicated derivatives having demand-based, adjustable returns, and trading exchange therefor |
US20020073007A1 (en) | 1999-08-11 | 2002-06-13 | Elie Ayache | System, method, and computer program product for use of lattices in valuating options |
US7606731B2 (en) | 1999-08-17 | 2009-10-20 | Mcclung Iii Guy Lamonte | Price guarantee methods and systems |
US7912761B2 (en) | 1999-08-27 | 2011-03-22 | Tech Venture Associates, Inc. | Initial product offering system and method |
US6778967B1 (en) | 1999-10-05 | 2004-08-17 | Auto Gas Systems, Inc. | System and method of cross-selling products and increasing fuel sales at a fuel service station |
EP1238351A4 (en) | 1999-10-06 | 2003-01-08 | Goldman Sachs & Co | Order centric tracking system and protocol for communications with handheld trading units |
WO2001025989A1 (en) | 1999-10-06 | 2001-04-12 | Goldman Sachs | Handheld trading system interface |
US6505175B1 (en) | 1999-10-06 | 2003-01-07 | Goldman, Sachs & Co. | Order centric tracking system |
US6625583B1 (en) | 1999-10-06 | 2003-09-23 | Goldman, Sachs & Co. | Handheld trading system interface |
US20020038279A1 (en) | 1999-10-08 | 2002-03-28 | Ralph Samuelson | Method and apparatus for using a transaction system involving fungible, ephemeral commodities including electrical power |
US6862612B1 (en) | 1999-12-10 | 2005-03-01 | Dell Products L.P. | Multiple ‘express buy’ profiles for multiple stores (dell.com and gigabuys.com) |
US6741969B1 (en) * | 1999-12-15 | 2004-05-25 | Murray Huneke | System and method for reducing excess capacity for restaurants and other industries during off-peak or other times |
US7188076B2 (en) * | 1999-12-20 | 2007-03-06 | Ndex Systems Inc. | System and method for creating a true customer profile |
US20010042036A1 (en) | 2000-01-25 | 2001-11-15 | Sanders Steven J. | Method and system for investing in customizable investment products |
US7024383B1 (en) | 2000-01-31 | 2006-04-04 | Goldman, Sachs & Co. | Online sales risk management system |
US7376580B1 (en) | 2000-06-13 | 2008-05-20 | Walker Digital, Llc | Method and apparatus for providing a benefit during a transaction for use during a later transaction |
US8065191B2 (en) | 2000-03-15 | 2011-11-22 | Rodney Senior | Electronic quantity purchasing system |
GB2367396A (en) * | 2000-03-15 | 2002-04-03 | Premier Points Inc | Electronic quantity purchasing system |
US7979347B1 (en) | 2000-03-16 | 2011-07-12 | Goldman Sachs & Co. | Automated online sales risk management |
US7373320B1 (en) | 2000-03-30 | 2008-05-13 | Mcdonough Timothy Francis | Mechanism and business method for implementing a service contract futures exchange |
US7970681B1 (en) | 2000-04-10 | 2011-06-28 | Goldman Sachs & Co. | Reduction of financial instrument volatility |
WO2001077965A2 (en) * | 2000-04-10 | 2001-10-18 | Eastman Chemical Company | Systems and methods for facilitating transactions in a commodity marketplace |
US7315838B2 (en) | 2000-04-13 | 2008-01-01 | Superderivatives, Inc. | Method and system for pricing options |
US20010049651A1 (en) * | 2000-04-28 | 2001-12-06 | Selleck Mark N. | Global trading system and method |
US7080034B1 (en) | 2000-05-04 | 2006-07-18 | Reams John M | Interactive specialty commodities information and exchange system and method |
WO2001088743A2 (en) | 2000-05-15 | 2001-11-22 | Goldman Sachs & Co. | Automated investment suitability gauge |
US20010049668A1 (en) | 2000-06-05 | 2001-12-06 | Wright Dolores M. | Integrated marketplace model |
WO2001095225A1 (en) | 2000-06-08 | 2001-12-13 | Goldman, Sachs & Co. | Method and system for automated transaction compliance processing |
US20040111370A1 (en) | 2000-06-27 | 2004-06-10 | Digital World Access, Inc. | Single source money management system |
EP1312017A4 (en) | 2000-07-14 | 2006-02-01 | Goldman Sachs & Co | Enhanced online sales risk management system |
US8180698B2 (en) * | 2000-07-18 | 2012-05-15 | Lerner Julie A | System for physicals commodity trading |
US20020013758A1 (en) * | 2000-07-25 | 2002-01-31 | Khaitan Ajay P. | Commodity trading system |
US6965872B1 (en) | 2000-08-02 | 2005-11-15 | Zipandshop Llc | Systems, methods and computer program products for facilitating the sale of commodity-like goods/services |
WO2002013091A1 (en) | 2000-08-04 | 2002-02-14 | Goldman, Sachs & Co. | System for processing raw financial data to produce validated product offering information to subscribers |
EP1313665A4 (en) | 2000-08-09 | 2005-09-14 | Ge Capital Services Structured | Web-based system and method for evaluating oil and gas properties |
US7162444B1 (en) | 2000-08-18 | 2007-01-09 | Planalytics, Inc. | Method, system and computer program product for valuating natural gas contracts using weather-based metrics |
WO2002017193A1 (en) | 2000-08-22 | 2002-02-28 | Goldman, Sachs & Co. | Foreign exchange trading system |
JP2002092395A (en) | 2000-09-20 | 2002-03-29 | Denso Corp | Cost estimation method and cost estimation device |
US7305361B2 (en) | 2000-10-14 | 2007-12-04 | Goldman Sachs & Co. | Apparatus, methods and articles of manufacture for constructing and executing computerized transaction processes and programs |
US20020046146A1 (en) | 2000-10-14 | 2002-04-18 | Otero Hernan G. | Apparatus, methods and articles of manufacture for constructing and executing computerized transaction processes and programs |
US7496535B2 (en) | 2000-10-14 | 2009-02-24 | Goldman Sachs & Co. | Computerized interface for constructing and executing computerized transaction processes and programs |
US20020049661A1 (en) | 2000-10-14 | 2002-04-25 | Goldman, Sachs & Company | Apparatus, methods and articles of manufacture for constructing and executing computerized transaction processes and programs |
US7983976B2 (en) | 2000-10-17 | 2011-07-19 | Hedgestreet, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for formulation, initial public or private offering, and secondary market trading of risk management contracts |
US20020046127A1 (en) | 2000-10-18 | 2002-04-18 | Gary Reding | System and method for automated commodities transactions including an automatic hedging function |
US6601033B1 (en) | 2000-10-24 | 2003-07-29 | Richard F. Sowinski | Pollution credit method using electronic networks |
US7080026B2 (en) | 2000-10-27 | 2006-07-18 | Manugistics, Inc. | Supply chain demand forecasting and planning |
WO2002037433A2 (en) | 2000-11-01 | 2002-05-10 | International Carbon Bank And Exchange | Method and system for banking and exchanging emission reduction credits |
US6950806B2 (en) * | 2000-11-02 | 2005-09-27 | Cargill, Inc. | Sales transactions for transfer of commodities |
US7092929B1 (en) | 2000-11-08 | 2006-08-15 | Bluefire Systems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for planning analysis |
US7457774B1 (en) | 2000-11-28 | 2008-11-25 | Goldman Sachs & Co. | Dynamic reallocation hedge accounting |
US20050182660A1 (en) * | 2000-11-29 | 2005-08-18 | Med Bid Exchange Llc | Business method and system for providing an on-line healthcare market exchange for procuring and financing medical services and products |
US8756154B2 (en) | 2000-12-07 | 2014-06-17 | Catalina Marketing Corporation | Price paid database method and system |
US6637648B1 (en) | 2000-12-21 | 2003-10-28 | Marathon Ashland Petroleum Llc | Credit/debit card for regulated transactions |
US20020138392A1 (en) * | 2000-12-28 | 2002-09-26 | Leblanc Donald G. | Network based system for real-time trading of physical commodities |
JP3669488B2 (en) | 2001-01-23 | 2005-07-06 | Necソフト株式会社 | Product price information provision method and method |
US7181428B2 (en) | 2001-01-30 | 2007-02-20 | Goldman, Sachs & Co. | Automated political risk management |
JP3800011B2 (en) * | 2001-02-02 | 2006-07-19 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Reagent management method and management apparatus used in analyzer |
US7200572B2 (en) | 2001-02-02 | 2007-04-03 | E-Markets, Inc. | Method and apparatus for pricing a commodity |
US20040024692A1 (en) | 2001-02-27 | 2004-02-05 | Turbeville Wallace C. | Counterparty credit risk system |
US7904358B2 (en) | 2001-02-28 | 2011-03-08 | Goldman Sachs & Co. | Computerized interface for monitoring financial information and executing financial transactions |
US8036969B2 (en) | 2001-02-28 | 2011-10-11 | Goldman Sachs & Co. | Basket option hedging method |
US7287280B2 (en) | 2002-02-12 | 2007-10-23 | Goldman Sachs & Co. | Automated security management |
US20020138371A1 (en) | 2001-03-20 | 2002-09-26 | David Lawrence | Online transaction risk management |
US20020138417A1 (en) | 2001-03-20 | 2002-09-26 | David Lawrence | Risk management clearinghouse |
US8527400B2 (en) | 2001-03-20 | 2013-09-03 | Goldman, Sachs & Co. | Automated account risk management |
US20020178046A1 (en) | 2001-03-20 | 2002-11-28 | David Lawrence | Product and service risk management clearinghouse |
US8140415B2 (en) | 2001-03-20 | 2012-03-20 | Goldman Sachs & Co. | Automated global risk management |
US20030074206A1 (en) | 2001-03-23 | 2003-04-17 | Restaurant Services, Inc. | System, method and computer program product for utilizing market demand information for generating revenue |
US20030078787A1 (en) | 2001-03-23 | 2003-04-24 | Restaurant Services, Inc. | System, method and computer program product for generating revenue in a supply chain management framework |
US20030050807A1 (en) | 2001-03-23 | 2003-03-13 | Restaurant Services, Inc. | System, method and computer program product for a gas station supply chain management framework |
US20030033154A1 (en) * | 2001-05-11 | 2003-02-13 | Hajdukiewicz Richard Stanley | System and method for providing a fuel purchase incentive with the sale of a vehicle |
EP1381979A4 (en) | 2001-03-30 | 2005-01-26 | Goldman Sachs & Co | Method and system for processing queries requiring coordinated access to distributed databases |
US20020143562A1 (en) | 2001-04-02 | 2002-10-03 | David Lawrence | Automated legal action risk management |
US7882008B2 (en) | 2001-04-02 | 2011-02-01 | Goldman Sachs & Co. | Apparatus, methods and articles of manufacture for computerized transaction execution and processing |
US20020161645A1 (en) | 2001-04-10 | 2002-10-31 | Walker Jay S. | Method and apparatus for offering forward commitment agreements |
US7840475B2 (en) | 2002-08-01 | 2010-11-23 | Farms Technology, Llc | Methods and systems for purchase of commodities |
US7590594B2 (en) | 2001-04-30 | 2009-09-15 | Goldman Sachs & Co. | Method, software program, and system for ranking relative risk of a plurality of transactions |
AU2002305317A1 (en) | 2001-04-30 | 2002-11-11 | Goldman, Sachs And Co. | Universal interface to a financial trading system |
US20020165809A1 (en) | 2001-05-02 | 2002-11-07 | Edward Gendelman | Process for packaging and securitization of future crude oil and natural gas production streams |
US7409367B2 (en) * | 2001-05-04 | 2008-08-05 | Delta Rangers Inc. | Derivative securities and system for trading same |
US6766303B2 (en) | 2001-05-16 | 2004-07-20 | Goldman Sachs & Co. | Method for hedging one or more liabilities associated with a deferred compensation plan |
US20030208437A1 (en) | 2001-05-23 | 2003-11-06 | Ralph Samuelson | Method and systems supporting trading of fungible ephemeral commodities and fungible non-ephemeral commodities incorporating transmission contracting |
US20020184133A1 (en) | 2001-05-31 | 2002-12-05 | Zangari Peter J. | Method and system for verifying the integrity of data in a data warehouse and applying warehoused data to a plurality of predefined analysis models |
EP1407409A4 (en) | 2001-06-05 | 2004-07-21 | Goldman Sachs & Co | A credit index, a system and method for structuring a credit index, and a system and method for operating a credit index |
US7310616B2 (en) | 2001-06-15 | 2007-12-18 | Goldman Sachs & Co. | Method for structuring a transaction |
US7236955B2 (en) | 2001-06-15 | 2007-06-26 | Goldman Sachs & Co. | Method for structuring a transaction |
US20020194094A1 (en) * | 2001-06-18 | 2002-12-19 | Capital One Financial Corporation | System and method for providing financial products |
AU2002318358A1 (en) | 2001-06-19 | 2003-01-02 | Goldman, Sachs And Co. | Foreign exchange covered warrant system and structure |
US8234156B2 (en) * | 2001-06-28 | 2012-07-31 | Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. | System and method for characterizing and selecting technology transition options |
US7222094B2 (en) | 2001-06-29 | 2007-05-22 | Goldman Sachs & Co. | Method for structuring an obligation |
US20030014287A1 (en) | 2001-07-02 | 2003-01-16 | Dell Products, L.P. | Continuity of supply risk and cost management tool |
WO2003012584A2 (en) | 2001-07-27 | 2003-02-13 | Goldman, Sachs & Co. | Systems and methods for facilitating use of agreement information via an agreement modeling system |
WO2003012586A2 (en) | 2001-07-27 | 2003-02-13 | Goldman, Sachs & Co. | Systems and methods for facilitating agreement generation and negotiation via an agreement modeling system |
US20030023539A1 (en) | 2001-07-27 | 2003-01-30 | Wilce Scot D. | Systems and methods for facilitating agreement definition via an agreement modeling system |
US20030088435A1 (en) | 2001-08-16 | 2003-05-08 | King Sandra Ray | Zip code savings |
JP2003108850A (en) | 2001-09-28 | 2003-04-11 | Riho Okubo | Area reference price value processing device, information processing device, and user terminal device |
US6975996B2 (en) | 2001-10-09 | 2005-12-13 | Goldman, Sachs & Co. | Electronic subpoena service |
US20030074267A1 (en) | 2001-10-11 | 2003-04-17 | Kamal Acharya | Method and sytem for integrated online and brick and mortar provider shopping |
JP3895577B2 (en) | 2001-10-16 | 2007-03-22 | トキコテクノ株式会社 | Fuel supply system |
US7346548B2 (en) | 2001-10-25 | 2008-03-18 | Goldman Sachs & Co. | System, method, apparatus and means evaluating historical network activity |
US20030084167A1 (en) | 2001-10-25 | 2003-05-01 | Dweck Jay S. | System, method, apparatus and means for information transmission over a computer network |
US8028001B2 (en) | 2001-10-30 | 2011-09-27 | Goldman Sachs & Co. | Systems and methods for facilitating access to documents via a set of content selection tags |
US7191185B2 (en) | 2001-10-30 | 2007-03-13 | Goldman Sachs & Co. | Systems and methods for facilitating access to documents via an entitlement rule |
US6970870B2 (en) | 2001-10-30 | 2005-11-29 | Goldman, Sachs & Co. | Systems and methods for facilitating access to documents via associated tags |
AU2002334940A1 (en) | 2001-10-30 | 2003-05-12 | Goldman, Sachs And Co. | Risk management clearinghouse |
GB0126232D0 (en) | 2001-11-01 | 2002-01-02 | Renishaw Plc | Calibration of an analogue probe |
US20030177087A1 (en) | 2001-11-28 | 2003-09-18 | David Lawrence | Transaction surveillance |
US20030197060A1 (en) | 2001-12-06 | 2003-10-23 | Vince Coyner | Consumer-focused gallon-based prepaid gasoline card, system and method for a car drivers |
WO2003053124A2 (en) | 2001-12-06 | 2003-07-03 | Goldman, Sachs & Co. | Charitable transaction risk management clearinghouse |
US6904336B2 (en) | 2001-12-28 | 2005-06-07 | Fannie Mae | System and method for residential emissions trading |
GB0201845D0 (en) | 2002-01-26 | 2002-03-13 | Renishaw Plc | Analogue probe |
JP2003233743A (en) | 2002-02-08 | 2003-08-22 | Kurappu:Kk | Method and system for promoting commodity sales |
US20030158773A1 (en) | 2002-02-15 | 2003-08-21 | Tracy Brunner | Objective value discovery method |
WO2003079214A1 (en) | 2002-03-11 | 2003-09-25 | Goldman, Sachs & Co. | Network access risk management |
US20040122764A1 (en) | 2002-03-27 | 2004-06-24 | Bernie Bilski | Capped bill systems, methods and products |
GB0207912D0 (en) | 2002-04-05 | 2002-05-15 | Renishaw Plc | Kinematic coupling |
US20040034584A1 (en) | 2002-05-12 | 2004-02-19 | Cory John Raborg | System and method for implementing risk management strategies in regulated and/or deregulated energy markets |
WO2003105054A1 (en) | 2002-06-07 | 2003-12-18 | Goldman, Sachs & Co. | Travel related risk management clearinghouse |
AU2003256267A1 (en) | 2002-06-11 | 2003-12-22 | Goldman, Sachs And Co. | Electronic fund transfer participant risk management clearing |
AU2003243508A1 (en) | 2002-06-11 | 2003-12-22 | Goldman, Sachs And Co. | Systems and methods for managing risk associated with a geo-political area |
AU2003245559A1 (en) | 2002-06-20 | 2004-01-06 | Goldman, Sachs And Co. | Proprietary risk management clearinghouse |
WO2004001538A2 (en) | 2002-06-20 | 2003-12-31 | Goldman, Sachs & Co. | Hedge fund risk management |
WO2004001544A2 (en) | 2002-06-21 | 2003-12-31 | Goldman, Sachs & Co. | Biometric risk management |
US8108276B2 (en) | 2002-06-28 | 2012-01-31 | Goldman Sachs & Co. | Method and apparatus for reference data scrubbing |
AU2003251558A1 (en) | 2002-07-01 | 2004-01-19 | Goldman, Sachs And Co. | Risk management customer registry |
US7343341B2 (en) | 2002-07-20 | 2008-03-11 | Chicago Climate Exchange, Inc. | Systems and methods for trading emission reductions |
AU2003263792A1 (en) | 2002-07-20 | 2004-02-09 | Chicago Climate Exchange, Inc. | Emission reduction trading system and method |
US20060184445A1 (en) | 2002-07-20 | 2006-08-17 | Richard Sandor | Systems and methods for trading emission reductions |
AU2003256706A1 (en) | 2002-07-22 | 2004-02-09 | Goldman, Sachs And Co. | Long term care risk management clearinghouse |
WO2004021102A2 (en) | 2002-07-24 | 2004-03-11 | Goldman, Sachs & Co. | Gaming industry risk management clearinghouse |
GB2391343A (en) * | 2002-07-31 | 2004-02-04 | Hewlett Packard Co | A method for determining pricing |
WO2006110121A1 (en) | 2002-08-01 | 2006-10-19 | Goldman, Sachs & Co. | Construction industry risk management clearinghouse |
AU2003272815A1 (en) | 2002-09-30 | 2004-04-19 | Goldman Sachs And Co. | System for analyzing a capital structure |
JP2004145534A (en) | 2002-10-23 | 2004-05-20 | Nippon Steel Corp | Method and device for electronic commerce, for certificate of environmental improvement and/or goods with certificate of environmental improvement |
US20040088179A1 (en) | 2002-11-06 | 2004-05-06 | Cogen Jack D. | Emissions reduction portfolio |
US20040093298A1 (en) | 2002-11-07 | 2004-05-13 | Mcclure Robert E. | Method for providing energy commodities trade outsourcing services within the energy markets |
WO2004047082A2 (en) | 2002-11-14 | 2004-06-03 | Goldman, Sachs & Co. | Independent research consensus earnings estimates and methods of determining such |
US20040103003A1 (en) | 2002-11-22 | 2004-05-27 | E-Comm Connect, Llc | Method and system for insuring users of electronic trading systems or exchanges and traditional established commodity exchanges against weather-related risks and hazards |
US20040117291A1 (en) | 2002-12-12 | 2004-06-17 | O'callahan Dennis M. | Method of trading derivative investment products based on an index adapted to reflect the relative performance of two different investment assets |
US20040168086A1 (en) | 2002-12-18 | 2004-08-26 | Carl Young | Interactive security risk management |
AU2003300826A1 (en) | 2002-12-19 | 2004-07-29 | Goldman, Sachs And Co. | Bond issue risk management |
US20040122732A1 (en) | 2002-12-23 | 2004-06-24 | Comer F. David | Method of selling fuel |
JP4444841B2 (en) * | 2002-12-26 | 2010-03-31 | 日本たばこ産業株式会社 | Investigation system and investigation method |
US7337122B2 (en) * | 2003-01-14 | 2008-02-26 | Mirant Americas, Inc. | Method for producing a superior insurance model for commodity event risk |
US7676406B2 (en) * | 2003-01-24 | 2010-03-09 | Kinnear Kirk P | Method and system for consolidating commodity futures contracts having guaranteed physical delivery |
US20040148236A1 (en) | 2003-01-27 | 2004-07-29 | J. Peter Steidlmayer | Leveraged supply contracts |
US8566190B2 (en) | 2003-02-06 | 2013-10-22 | Goldman, Sachs & Co. | Method and apparatus for evaluating and monitoring collateralized debt obligations |
WO2004072803A2 (en) | 2003-02-10 | 2004-08-26 | Goldman, Sachs & Co. | Insider trading risk management |
JP4279004B2 (en) | 2003-02-18 | 2009-06-17 | 三菱電機株式会社 | Weather derivative product recommendation device and weather derivative product recommendation method and program |
US20040215540A1 (en) | 2003-02-24 | 2004-10-28 | Olly Buxton | System and method for multi-jurisdictional repacking program |
US20040177019A1 (en) | 2003-03-05 | 2004-09-09 | Vlado Slavov | Method for pooling commodity purchases |
WO2004084046A2 (en) | 2003-03-14 | 2004-09-30 | Goldman, Sachs & Co. | Public offering risk management |
WO2004084028A2 (en) | 2003-03-14 | 2004-09-30 | Goldman, Sachs & Co. | Link analysis mapping program risk management |
CA2519693A1 (en) | 2003-03-27 | 2004-10-14 | University Of Washington | Performing predictive pricing based on historical data |
US8925808B2 (en) | 2003-04-10 | 2015-01-06 | Wayne Fueling Systems Llc | Fuel dispenser commerce |
JP2004318422A (en) | 2003-04-15 | 2004-11-11 | Toshiba Corp | Fuel selling system and method |
US20040210478A1 (en) | 2003-04-16 | 2004-10-21 | Pettigrew F Alexander | Emissions credit method |
US20040260613A1 (en) | 2003-06-18 | 2004-12-23 | Mills Lloyd Paul | Method and system for calculating risk components associated with the consumption of an indirect procurement commodity |
US20040260632A1 (en) | 2003-06-19 | 2004-12-23 | Wanasek Thomas Joseph | Prepaid commodity purchase system |
US7437323B1 (en) * | 2003-06-25 | 2008-10-14 | Pros Revenue Management; L.P. | Method and system for spot pricing via clustering based demand estimation |
US20050044001A1 (en) | 2003-08-18 | 2005-02-24 | International Business Machines Corporation | Purchase price protection agent |
US8484076B2 (en) | 2003-09-11 | 2013-07-09 | Catalina Marketing Corporation | Proximity-based method and system for generating customized incentives |
US7379890B2 (en) | 2003-10-17 | 2008-05-27 | Makor Issues And Rights Ltd. | System and method for profit maximization in retail industry |
US20050091139A1 (en) | 2003-10-24 | 2005-04-28 | Michael Kumar | Transaction structures and methods concerning the forward sale of a commodity |
JP2005135347A (en) | 2003-10-31 | 2005-05-26 | Tokyo Electric Power Co Inc:The | Fuel forward curve estimation method and system using estimated fuel forward curve |
US20050097025A1 (en) | 2003-10-31 | 2005-05-05 | Horton Bruce M. | System and method for settling transactions on an eroding basis |
US20050125326A1 (en) | 2003-12-04 | 2005-06-09 | Rishi Nangalia | Methods and apparatus for routing securities orders |
US20050216384A1 (en) | 2003-12-15 | 2005-09-29 | Daniel Partlow | System, method, and computer program for creating and valuing financial instruments linked to real estate indices |
US20050144113A1 (en) | 2003-12-24 | 2005-06-30 | Daniel Opperman | Methods and apparatus for facilitating financial instrument trading orders |
US20050144100A1 (en) | 2003-12-30 | 2005-06-30 | Craig Shapiro | Payment systems and methods for earning incentives using at least two financial instruments |
US20050154669A1 (en) | 2004-01-08 | 2005-07-14 | Foy Streetman | Carbon credit marketing system |
US10810666B2 (en) | 2004-01-14 | 2020-10-20 | Hybridarts Llc | Apparatus, method and system for a versatile financial mechanism and transaction generator and interface |
US20050160004A1 (en) | 2004-01-15 | 2005-07-21 | Cairo Inc. | Techniques for identifying and comparing local retail prices |
US20050160006A1 (en) | 2004-01-20 | 2005-07-21 | Bancot Global Technologies Corporation | Model and process of assimilating, transmitting and disseminating an internet based comparative shopping tool for local grocery stores |
US20050209917A1 (en) | 2004-03-17 | 2005-09-22 | Brian Anderson | Employee incentive program |
US20050228747A1 (en) | 2004-04-13 | 2005-10-13 | Gumport Michael A | Cash exercise performance target securities (Cash xPRTs) |
US7949590B2 (en) | 2004-04-16 | 2011-05-24 | Goldman Sachs & Co. | Apparatus, method and system for designing and trading macroeconomic investment views |
US20050289021A1 (en) * | 2004-05-17 | 2005-12-29 | Lagergren Peter J | Utility model billing system for propane and heating oil consumers |
US20060015424A1 (en) | 2004-07-15 | 2006-01-19 | Augusta Systems, Inc. | Management method, system and product for enterprise environmental programs |
US7386487B2 (en) | 2004-08-04 | 2008-06-10 | International Business Machines Corporation | Comparison shopping via financial management software |
US20060036530A1 (en) * | 2004-08-10 | 2006-02-16 | Gary Shkedy | Method and apparatus for facilitating micro energy derivatives transactions on a network system |
WO2006055117A2 (en) | 2004-10-08 | 2006-05-26 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Fractional forward contracts |
US7958039B2 (en) * | 2004-10-08 | 2011-06-07 | Citadel Investment Group, L.L.C. | Computer implemented and/or assisted methods and systems for providing rapid execution of, for example, listed options contracts using toxicity and/or profit analyzers |
US20060080265A1 (en) | 2004-10-13 | 2006-04-13 | Mark Hinds | Method for pricing products in a retail store |
US20060085252A1 (en) * | 2004-10-18 | 2006-04-20 | Kersenbrock Robert D | Incentive program |
US20060095361A1 (en) | 2004-10-29 | 2006-05-04 | Rude Michael G | Methods and apparatus for automatic settlement of foreign securities trades in trader's operating currency |
US7747500B2 (en) * | 2004-11-01 | 2010-06-29 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Managing and evaluating procurement risk |
EP1807800A4 (en) | 2004-11-02 | 2009-11-04 | Longview Funds Man Llc | Method and system for investing in commodity futures contracts |
JP2005122766A (en) | 2004-12-21 | 2005-05-12 | Nec Soft Ltd | Merchandise price information registration system and method |
US7783544B2 (en) | 2004-12-21 | 2010-08-24 | Weather Risk Solutions, Llc | Financial activity concerning tropical weather events |
US20060155423A1 (en) * | 2005-01-10 | 2006-07-13 | Budike Lothar E S Jr | Automated energy management system |
EP1686528A3 (en) | 2005-01-27 | 2007-07-11 | Market Axess Inc. | A method and apparatus for automated order protection trading |
WO2006083709A2 (en) | 2005-02-01 | 2006-08-10 | Goldman Sachs & Co. | Systems and methods for improving auction liquidity |
US7729998B2 (en) * | 2005-03-10 | 2010-06-01 | Dickman Craig S | Method for shippers to manage fuel costs |
US20060212384A1 (en) | 2005-03-21 | 2006-09-21 | Spurgin Richard B | Commodity futures index and methods and systems of trading in futures contracts that minimize turnover and transactions costs |
US20060241951A1 (en) | 2005-04-21 | 2006-10-26 | Cynamom Joshua D | Embedded Renewable Energy Certificates and System |
US7729971B2 (en) * | 2005-05-09 | 2010-06-01 | Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. | Computer-aided financial security analysis system and method |
JP4316535B2 (en) | 2005-06-03 | 2009-08-19 | 株式会社富永製作所 | Gas station system |
US20060287911A1 (en) | 2005-06-21 | 2006-12-21 | Honeywell International Inc. | Competitive usability assessment system |
US20060293953A1 (en) | 2005-06-22 | 2006-12-28 | Nicholson G R | System and method for influencing customer behavior |
US7742942B2 (en) | 2005-06-22 | 2010-06-22 | Excentus Corporation | System and method for discounting fuel |
US20060293952A1 (en) | 2005-06-22 | 2006-12-28 | Nicholson G R | Debit card incentive system and method |
US20060293980A1 (en) | 2005-06-23 | 2006-12-28 | Planalytics, Inc. | Weather-based financial index |
JP4945937B2 (en) | 2005-07-01 | 2012-06-06 | 東京エレクトロン株式会社 | Tungsten film forming method, film forming apparatus, and storage medium |
US7647163B2 (en) | 2005-08-04 | 2010-01-12 | The Boeing Company | Automated fueling information tracking and fuel hedging |
US20070038553A1 (en) | 2005-08-15 | 2007-02-15 | Miller Jeffrey A | Full price protection method as a marketing tool |
US20070061174A1 (en) * | 2005-09-12 | 2007-03-15 | Travelocity.Com Lp | System, method, and computer program product for detecting and resolving pricing errors for products listed in an inventory system |
US20070276738A1 (en) | 2005-09-20 | 2007-11-29 | Rajunas Joseph V Iii | Method of prepaid gasoline and other motor vehicle propellant products fixed price retail purchasing |
US20070198385A1 (en) | 2005-10-07 | 2007-08-23 | Mcgill Bradley | Process and method for establishing a commodity ceiling cap option targeted for retail consumption |
US8577698B2 (en) | 2005-10-25 | 2013-11-05 | Intellectual Ventures I Llc | Retail price hedging |
JP2007122592A (en) | 2005-10-31 | 2007-05-17 | Toshiba Corp | System, method and program for supporting wholesale merchandise market bidding price setting |
US20070095890A1 (en) | 2005-11-02 | 2007-05-03 | Elefant Steven M | System and method for providing consolidated fuel pricing information |
WO2007079228A2 (en) | 2005-12-30 | 2007-07-12 | Redefining Progress | Determining an individual's environmental impact by analyzing consumption behavior |
JP2007249410A (en) | 2006-03-14 | 2007-09-27 | Nippon Oil Corp | Fuel consumption management system and method |
US20070233616A1 (en) | 2006-03-30 | 2007-10-04 | Caterpillar Inc. | Method for packaging greenhouse gas credits with a product transaction |
US20070288312A1 (en) | 2006-03-31 | 2007-12-13 | Caliber Data, Inc. | Purchase-transaction-settled online consumer referral and reward service using real-time specific merchant sales information |
US20070255457A1 (en) | 2006-04-28 | 2007-11-01 | Bright Planet Network, Inc. | Consumer Pollution Impact Profile System and Method |
US20070267482A1 (en) | 2006-05-16 | 2007-11-22 | Bellsouth Intellectual Property Corporation | Pre-payment for goods and/or services at a point of sale |
US20070267479A1 (en) | 2006-05-16 | 2007-11-22 | Chockstone, Inc. | Systems and methods for implementing parking transactions and other financial transactions |
US20080015981A1 (en) | 2006-07-11 | 2008-01-17 | Andre Danesh | Process for supplying fuel |
US20080027737A1 (en) | 2006-07-25 | 2008-01-31 | Alan Wayne Watkins | Shipping Price Protection |
AU2006100751A4 (en) | 2006-09-04 | 2006-12-07 | Khai Hee Kwan | Apparatus, method and program for originating and trading carbon credits |
US20080080682A1 (en) | 2006-09-29 | 2008-04-03 | Garmin Ltd. | System and method for displaying prices via an electronic device |
US7797187B2 (en) * | 2006-11-13 | 2010-09-14 | Farecast, Inc. | System and method of protecting prices |
US8538795B2 (en) * | 2007-02-12 | 2013-09-17 | Pricelock, Inc. | System and method of determining a retail commodity price within a geographic boundary |
US8156022B2 (en) * | 2007-02-12 | 2012-04-10 | Pricelock, Inc. | Method and system for providing price protection for commodity purchasing through price protection contracts |
WO2008124719A1 (en) * | 2007-04-09 | 2008-10-16 | Pricelock, Inc. | System and method for providing an insurance premium for price protection |
US7945501B2 (en) * | 2007-04-09 | 2011-05-17 | Pricelock, Inc. | System and method for constraining depletion amount in a defined time frame |
AU2007100932A4 (en) | 2007-09-28 | 2007-10-25 | Muthuswamy, Vaidyanathan Mr | Multi sector carbon trading method (MCTM) |
US20090198621A1 (en) * | 2008-02-04 | 2009-08-06 | Schneier Lance W | Energy price protection system and method |
US8160952B1 (en) * | 2008-02-12 | 2012-04-17 | Pricelock, Inc. | Method and system for providing price protection related to the purchase of a commodity |
-
2008
- 2008-02-12 US US12/030,119 patent/US8538795B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2008-02-12 US US12/030,086 patent/US8019694B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2008-02-12 WO PCT/US2008/053674 patent/WO2008100902A1/en active Application Filing
-
2011
- 2011-08-16 US US13/210,602 patent/US20110302001A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7376603B1 (en) * | 1997-08-19 | 2008-05-20 | Fair Isaac Corporation | Method and system for evaluating customers of a financial institution using customer relationship value tags |
US20020143616A1 (en) * | 2001-03-28 | 2002-10-03 | Hajdukiewicz Richard Stanley | System and method for providing a fuel purchase incentive with the sale of a vehicle |
US7617111B1 (en) * | 2002-05-29 | 2009-11-10 | Microsoft Corporation | System and method for processing gasoline price data in a networked environment |
US20050228738A1 (en) * | 2004-04-08 | 2005-10-13 | Harris William R | Base line futures contract (BLC) |
US20040215529A1 (en) * | 2004-04-16 | 2004-10-28 | Foster Andre E. | System and method for energy price forecasting automation |
US20080243663A1 (en) * | 2007-01-31 | 2008-10-02 | Ronald Eveland | Route Planning and Commodity Cost Estimating System |
US20090204316A1 (en) * | 2008-02-08 | 2009-08-13 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | System and method for determining a vehicle refueling strategy |
Non-Patent Citations (3)
Title |
---|
Edwards, Franklin R., and Canter, Michael S., "The Collapse of Metallgesellschaft: Unhedgeable Risks, Poor Hedging Strategy, or Just Bad Luck?" The Journal of Futures Markets, May, 1995, p. 211 * |
Schaal, A. Michael, "New Power Plant Project Trends," Power Engineering, Barrington, September, 2002, Vol. 106, Iss. 9, p. 12 * |
Wong, G., "Crude Oil Prices Slip Ahead of U.S. Fuel Data Expected to Show Stocks Raise," Daily Bulletin, Final Edition, May 10, 2006, p. 7-7 * |
Cited By (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20140019316A1 (en) * | 2012-07-11 | 2014-01-16 | Cross Consulting Partners, LLC | System, Method and Computer Program Product for Implementation and Management of Change-of-Control Severance |
US8799118B2 (en) * | 2012-07-11 | 2014-08-05 | Cross Consulting Partners, LLC | System, method and computer program product for implementation and management of change-of-control severance |
WO2015112185A1 (en) * | 2014-01-27 | 2015-07-30 | Thales Energy, Inc. | System and methods for pricing a commodity |
US10380690B2 (en) | 2015-05-21 | 2019-08-13 | Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. | Dataset cleansing |
US11875371B1 (en) | 2017-04-24 | 2024-01-16 | Skyline Products, Inc. | Price optimization system |
US11562388B2 (en) | 2020-07-17 | 2023-01-24 | Sap Se | Machine learned models for items with time-shifts |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20080313014A1 (en) | 2008-12-18 |
US8019694B2 (en) | 2011-09-13 |
US8538795B2 (en) | 2013-09-17 |
WO2008100902A1 (en) | 2008-08-21 |
US20080313013A1 (en) | 2008-12-18 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US8019694B2 (en) | System and method for estimating forward retail commodity price within a geographic boundary | |
US7945500B2 (en) | System and method for providing an insurance premium for price protection | |
Ma et al. | The Russia-Saudi Arabia oil price war during the COVID-19 pandemic | |
Irwin et al. | Index funds, financialization, and commodity futures markets | |
US7945501B2 (en) | System and method for constraining depletion amount in a defined time frame | |
US8478685B2 (en) | Fuel offering and purchase management system | |
Kojima et al. | Fossil fuel subsidies: approaches and valuation | |
Kang et al. | The information content of net buying pressure: Evidence from the KOSPI 200 index option market | |
US20090132434A1 (en) | Methods and Systems for Determining Composition of a Commodity Index | |
US20080313070A1 (en) | System, method and apparatus for consumer purchase and future distributed delivery of commodity at predetermined prices | |
US20080306821A1 (en) | System and Method of Driving Commodity Consumers to Selective Retail Locations | |
Niyas et al. | Impact of financial brand values on firm profitability and firm value of Indian FMCG companies | |
US20080306861A1 (en) | System and method for index based settlement under price protection contracts | |
US20080306789A1 (en) | System and Method for Generating Revenues in a Retail Commodity Network | |
US20080306776A1 (en) | System and method for risk acceptance in the provisioning of price protection products | |
KR101538140B1 (en) | Apparatus and method for estimating stock price | |
US20080313067A1 (en) | Management and decision making tool for commodity purchases with hedging scenarios | |
WO2008100904A1 (en) | System and method of determining a retail commodity price within a geographic boundary | |
James | An Investigation of Commodity Spot and Futures Prices | |
Kim et al. | Institutional Ownership and Corporate Takeovers | |
Peterson | Who’s Spoofing Whom? | |
Guo et al. | Term spreads of implied volatility smirk and variance risk premium | |
Considine et al. | The Value of Spot Sales to a Producing Country Subject to Production Quotas | |
Zant | Market Integration with Transaction Costs in Developing Country Staple Food Markets: the Case of the Malawi Maize market | |
US20080306858A1 (en) | System and method for enabling hedging customers to lock forward positions with customer-friendly payment options |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: PRICELOCK, INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:FELL, ROBERT M.;PAINTER, SCOTT;BONSIGNORE, MICHAEL R.;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20080808 TO 20080812;REEL/FRAME:027282/0256 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |