US20120209328A1 - Structures and methods for constraining spinal processes with single connector - Google Patents
Structures and methods for constraining spinal processes with single connector Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20120209328A1 US20120209328A1 US13/455,917 US201213455917A US2012209328A1 US 20120209328 A1 US20120209328 A1 US 20120209328A1 US 201213455917 A US201213455917 A US 201213455917A US 2012209328 A1 US2012209328 A1 US 2012209328A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- attachment
- spinous process
- connector
- constraint structure
- attachment element
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B17/56—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor
- A61B17/58—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor for osteosynthesis, e.g. bone plates, screws, setting implements or the like
- A61B17/68—Internal fixation devices, including fasteners and spinal fixators, even if a part thereof projects from the skin
- A61B17/70—Spinal positioners or stabilisers ; Bone stabilisers comprising fluid filler in an implant
- A61B17/7062—Devices acting on, attached to, or simulating the effect of, vertebral processes, vertebral facets or ribs ; Tools for such devices
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B17/56—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor
- A61B17/58—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor for osteosynthesis, e.g. bone plates, screws, setting implements or the like
- A61B17/68—Internal fixation devices, including fasteners and spinal fixators, even if a part thereof projects from the skin
- A61B17/70—Spinal positioners or stabilisers ; Bone stabilisers comprising fluid filler in an implant
- A61B17/7055—Spinal positioners or stabilisers ; Bone stabilisers comprising fluid filler in an implant connected to sacrum, pelvis or skull
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B17/56—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor
- A61B17/58—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor for osteosynthesis, e.g. bone plates, screws, setting implements or the like
- A61B17/68—Internal fixation devices, including fasteners and spinal fixators, even if a part thereof projects from the skin
- A61B17/84—Fasteners therefor or fasteners being internal fixation devices
- A61B17/842—Flexible wires, bands or straps
Definitions
- the present invention relates generally to medical methods and apparatus. More particularly, the present invention relates to methods and devices for restricting spinal flexion in patients having back pain or other spinal conditions.
- discogenic pain also known as internal disc disruption.
- Patients suffering from discogenic pain tend to be young, otherwise healthy individuals who present with pain localized to the back.
- Discogenic pain usually occurs at the discs located at the L 4 -L 5 or L 5 -S 1 junctions of the spine ( FIG. 1 ). Pain tends to be exacerbated when patients put their lumbar spines into flexion (i.e. by sitting or bending forward) and relieved when they put their lumbar spines into extension (i.e. arching backwards).
- Discogenic pain can be quite disabling, and for some patients, can dramatically affect their ability to work and otherwise enjoy their lives.
- flexion instability This pain experienced by patients with discogenic low back pain can be thought of as flexion instability, and is related to flexion instability that is manifested in other conditions.
- the most prevalent of these is spondylolisthesis, a spinal condition in which abnormal segmental translation is exacerbated by segmental flexion.
- the device described here should as such also be useful for these other spinal disorders associated with segmental flexion, for which the prevention or control of spinal segmental flexion is desired.
- a spinal implant has been designed which inhibits spinal flexion while allowing substantially unrestricted spinal extension.
- the implant is placed over one or more adjacent pairs of spinal processes and provides an elastic restraint to the spreading apart of the spinal processes which occurs during flexion.
- Such devices and methods for their use are described in U.S. Patent Application 2005/02161017A1, published on Sep. 29, 2005, and having common inventors with the present application.
- an implant 10 as described in the '017 application typically comprises an upper strap component 12 and a lower strap component 14 joined by a pair of compliant members 16 .
- the upper strap 12 is shown disposed over the top of the spinous process SP 4 of L 4 while the lower strap 14 is shown extending over the bottom of the spinous process SP 5 of L 5 .
- the compliant member 16 will typically include an internal element, such as a spring of rubber block, which is attached to the straps 12 and 14 in such a way that the straps may be “elastically” or “compliantly” pulled apart as the spinous processes SP 4 and SP 5 move apart during flexion. In this way, the implant provides an elastic tension on the spinal processes which provides a force that resists flexion. The force increases as the processes move further apart.
- the straps themselves will be essentially non-compliant so that the degree of elasticity or compliance may be controlled and provided solely by the compliance members 16 .
- the compliance members 16 will remain horizontally aligned and spaced generally between the spinous processes SP 4 and SP 5 .
- the desired symmetry may be lost if the implant structure 10 becomes circumferentially displaced about the spinous processes SP 4 and SP 5 .
- Such displacement can affect the ability of the implant to provide a uniform, symmetric elastic force to inhibit flexion of the spinous processes of a spinal segment in accordance with the desired treatment.
- the symmetric designs illustrated in FIG. 2 can be difficult to deliver from the side which would be a preferred approach in percutaneous delivery techniques.
- US 2005/0216017A1 has been described above.
- US 2006/0271055 describes a spacer having superior and inferior anchors and a spacer element therebetween.
- Other patents and published applications of interest include: U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,966,600; 5,011,494; 5,092,866; 5,116,340; 5,282,863; 5,395,374; 5,415,658; 5,415,661; 5,449,361; 5,456,722; 5,462,542; 5,496,318; 5,540,698; 5,609,634; 5,645,599; 5,725,582; 5,902,305; Re.
- the present invention provides spinal implants and methods for restricting flexion of spinal segments for the treatment of discogenic pain and other spinal conditions, such as spondylolisthesis, where a physician may desire to control segmental flexion.
- Systems according to the present invention include spinous process constraint structures comprising a first attachment element adapted to be placed over a first spinous process, a second attachment element adapted to be placed over a second spinous process, and a single connector joining the first attachment element and the second attachment element.
- single connector it is meant that the connector joins a single point or location on the first attachment element to a single point or location on the second attachment element.
- the single connector for joining the first and second attachment elements reduces the likelihood that the attachment members will become displaced such that the desired symmetric attachment geometry becomes asymmetric.
- a single connector also reduces the need to balance the elastic forces being applied to the opposite sides of the spinous processes.
- the single connector will also simplify alignment of the implant during implantation, thus simplifying percutaneous implantation and potentially minimizing tissue disruption in both percutaneous and other implantation protocols.
- the single connector may comprise a single elastic member, where the single elastic member may itself comprise a continuous length of elastic material having uniform or non-uniform elastic properties along said length.
- the connector may comprise an elastic member including two or more separate components, for example inelastic or non-compliant straps, cables, or other flexible members attached to a compliance member which provides the desired elasticity.
- Different embodiments for the compliance members are described in co-pending, commonly owned application Ser. No. 12/106,103 (Attorney Docket No. 026398-000410US), filed on Apr. 18, 2008, the full disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
- the single connector and/or elastic member will provide an elastic stiffness in tension between the attachment members in the range from 7.5 N/mm to 50 N/mm, preferably from 10 N/mm to 25 N/mm, and usually in the range from 10 N/mm to 15 N/mm.
- the single connector and/or elastic member will be constructed to provide little or no elastic stiffness in compression.
- the elastic stiffness in compression will be below 3 N/mm, preferably below 0.5 N/mm.
- the ability of the constraint structures of the present invention to provide a targeted elastic stiffness in tension while providing little or no elastic stiffness in compression allows for treatment of patient's having spinal segments where the kinematics are improved by application of the elastic force to the spine in flexion while providing little or no elastic resistance to extension.
- the first and second attachment elements may have similar or different geometries. Exemplary geometries include open hook structures which may be placed about the spinous processes and which have a single attachment point for connection to the single connector.
- the attachment elements may also be loop structures which fully circumscribe the spinous process, where the loop is provided with a single connection point for connection to the single connector. Often, the attachment elements will be placed over the spinous process without further attachment. In other instances, however, it may be desirable to provide a secondary attachment to the spinous process, such as staples, pins, screws, sutures, adhesives, energy-mediated attachments (such as laser welding), or the like. In some instances, one of the two attachment elements may be adhered to the adjacent spinous process while the other of the attachment elements may be simply placed over the adjacent spinous process without adherence.
- the constraint structures of the present invention may comprise separate components which are joined or connectable together.
- each of the first attachment element, the second attachment element, and the single connector may be formed separately and interconnected by conventional techniques, such as screwing, welding, linking with male and female attachment members, strapping, soldering, or any other such fastening technique.
- any two or more of the components of the constraints of the present invention may be integrally or monolithically formed from a common structural member.
- a pair of hook-like elements may be integrally formed with an intermediate connector by forming the components from a single rod, wire, cable, polymer substrate, or the like.
- the constraint structures of the present invention may be symmetric or asymmetric.
- the connector may comprise a single axial member lying on the midline or mid-plane which bisects the spinous processes.
- Such a symmetric structure is advantageous since it applies an axial force generally free from lateral components to the loops which constrain the spinous processes.
- the attachment member may be a simple pin, screw, or other fastener which penetrates the body of the spinous process, but will more usually be a hook, loop, or other member which can attach to the spinous process without necessarily penetrating therethrough.
- the upper attachment member can be placed over a superior surface of the superior spinous process while a lower hook member may be placed around the inferior surface of the inferior spinous process.
- a reinforcement member may be placed on or over the single connector, particularly within the region between the spinous processes.
- a reinforcement sleeve may be placed coaxially over at least a portion of the single connector.
- the reinforcement member may be a slide assembly which is attached to the connector at a superior location and an inferior location and which can extend and contract together with elongation and contraction of the single connector while still maintaining alignment between the superior and inferior segments thereof.
- the attachment members may be hinged or pivotally connected to the single connector to facilitate introduction and implantation of the constraint structure in a patient.
- superior and inferior hooks may be pivotally attached at the upper and lower ends of a single connector so that the hooks may be folded to reduce the profile of the constraint as it is being introduced into position adjacent to the spinous processes. Once in position, the hooks or other attachment members may then be pivoted or otherwise moved into place around the spinous processes to provide the desired constraint.
- the attachment members may comprise clamps or similar structures which may be placed over posterior surfaces of the spinous processes to hold a single connector therebetween.
- Such posterior access is advantageous since it reduces the need to disrupt the/supraspinous ligament.
- clamps or attachment members which are placed over the posterior surface of the spinous processes is particularly advantageous when used in connection with an asymmetric single connector so that the penetration of the supraspinous/ligaments is minimized.
- the spinous process constraints of the present invention may further comprise a compliance member disposed within or as part of the single connector.
- the compliance member may have any structure which provides for the desired elasticity in the connector to permit the first and second attachment elements to spread apart as the spinal segment undergoes flexion. Suitable compliance members are described in published U.S. Application No. 2005/0216017 A1, which has been previously incorporated herein by reference.
- the single connector may comprise an elastomeric body which is disposed between the first and second attachment elements.
- the elastomeric body may be positionable over the supraspinous ligament, and in certain of those cases such elastomeric bodies may be adapted to be sutured or otherwise attached to the supraspinous ligament.
- methods for restricting flexion of a spinal segment comprise positioning a first attachment element on a first spinous process and positioning a second attachment element on a second spinous process, wherein the attachment members are joined by a single connector.
- the attachment members may be positioned in an open surgical procedure through the supraspinous ligament or may be percutaneously implanted, optionally from a single sided posterior approach avoiding the need to penetrate the supraspinous ligament.
- the elements are joined with an elastic member, where the elastic member is preferably positioned over the supraspinous ligament.
- the methods further comprise attaching the elastic member to the supraspinous ligament, for example by suturing.
- the methods further comprise penetrating the supraspinous ligament to permit passage of the attachment element(s) and/or the elastic member therethrough.
- the attachment members may be attached to the spinous processes, typically by stapling or any of the other attachment modalities described above.
- FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram illustrating the lumbar region of the spine including the spinous processes (SP), facet joints (FJ), lamina (L), transverse processes (TP), and sacrum (S).
- SP spinous processes
- FJ facet joints
- L lamina
- TP transverse processes
- S sacrum
- FIG. 2 illustrates a spinal implant of the type described in US 2005/0216017A1.
- FIG. 3 illustrates an exemplary embodiment of a spinous process constraint structure constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention.
- FIGS. 4-11 are schematic illustrations of additional exemplary embodiments of the spinous process constraint structures of the present invention, where the adjacent spinous processes are shown in section.
- FIGS. 8A and 8B illustrate use of a reinforcement member on a single connector which does not include a compliance member
- FIGS. 9A and 9B illustrate use of a reinforcement member on a single connector which includes a compliance member.
- FIG. 12 illustrates a further alternative embodiment of a spinal constraint structure of the present invention shown with a first attachment member placed over the spinous process of L 5 and a lower attachment member attached to the sacrum.
- FIGS. 13 and 14 illustrate yet another embodiment of a spinous process constraint structure of the present invention where the attachment members are placed over adjacent spinous processes with the single connector passing through and over the supraspinous ligament.
- FIGS. 15A and 15B illustrate a spinous process constraint having a pair of clamps suitable for engaging posterior surfaces of a pair of adjacent spinous processes.
- FIGS. 16A and 16B illustrate a connector similar to that shown in FIGS. 15A and 15B which further includes a compliance member. In FIG. 16B , placement of the constraint adjacent to the supraspinous/interspinous ligaments is illustrated.
- FIG. 17 illustrates a further exemplary embodiment of a spinous process constraint according to the present invention, shown with an asymmetric axial member connected using pins to the spinous processes.
- FIG. 18 illustrates a spinous process constraint similar to that shown in FIG. 17 , further including a compliance member.
- FIG. 19 illustrates a spinous process constraint according to the present invention having pivoted hooks for attachment of adjacent spinous processes.
- FIG. 20 illustrates a spinous process constraint similar to that shown in FIG. 19 , but further including a compliance member.
- a spinous process constraint structure 20 constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention comprises a first or upper attachment member 22 and a second or lower attachment member 24 .
- the first and second attachment members are connected by a single connector 26 , shown in the form of an elastic rod or cable.
- the attachment members 22 and 24 will be non-distensible, and will be firmly placed over the spinous processes, shown as the spinous process SP 4 of IA and the spinous process SP 5 of L 5 .
- the connector 26 will be elastically distensible so that it will comprise an elastic constraining force as a spinal segment undergoes flexion which causes the spinous processes SP 4 and SP 5 to spread vertically apart.
- spinal segment is synonymous with the phrase “functional spinal unit (FSU)” and intended to mean the smallest physiological motion unit of the spine that exhibits biomechanical characteristics similar to those of the entire spine.
- FSU functional spinal unit
- a spinal segment or FSU consists of two adjacent vertebrae, the intervertebral disc and all adjoining ligaments between them and excludes other connecting tissues such as muscles. The three joint complex that results is sometimes referred to as the “articular triad.”
- Another term for the FSU is spinal motion segment. These definitions are taken from White AA, Panjabi MM. (1990), Clinical Biomechanics of the Spine, Philadelphia, JB Lippincott.
- the first and second attachment members 22 and 24 may be wrapped around the associated spinous process SP 4 and SP 5 without further adherence or fastening. In some cases, however, it may be desirable to staple, suture, glue, or otherwise attach the attachment members to the underlying spinous process. It will also be appreciated that in many instances the attachment members may have a seam or closure which allows them to be wrapped around the spinous process and closed in situ thereover during an implantation procedure. It will be further appreciated that the single connector 26 may be preattached to either or both of the attachment members 22 and 24 . In other instances, however, it may be desirable to attach the connector 26 to either or both of the attachment members 22 and 24 during the implantation procedure in order to permit the length of the connector to be adjusted.
- FIG. 4 is a schematic cross-sectional view of the spinous process constraint structure 20 of FIG. 3 .
- FIG. 5 illustrates an alternative spinous process constraint structure 30 having first and second attachment members 32 and 34 , similar to those described in connection with FIGS. 3 and 4 , and joined by a single connector 36 having a compliance member 38 .
- the single connector 36 may be formed from a non-distensible material where the desired elasticity is provided by the compliance member 38 .
- a spinous process constraint structure 40 having a first or upper hook-like attachment member 42 and a second or lower hook-like attachment member 44 is illustrated.
- the first and second attachment members 42 and 44 are connected by a single contiguous or integral connector 46 , which is transversely oriented in the space between the upper spinous process SP 4 and the lower spinous process SP 5 .
- the constraint structure 40 may be formed from a spring-like metal, such as spring steel or nickel-titanium alloy, or alternatively may be formed from an elastomeric polymer.
- the hook-like attachment members could be reinforced or otherwise modified to be substantially non-compliant, while the connector 46 could be modified to enhance its elasticity, for example having a serpentine or coil spring structure.
- a further spinous process constraint system 50 comprises upper and lower hook-like attachment members 52 and 54 joined by a single connector 56 .
- the upper and lower attachment members 52 and 54 as well as the connector section 56 may be formed from metal or polymer and will typically be non-distensible.
- the desired elasticity between the attachment members is provided by a compliance member 58 .
- yet another spinous process constraint system 60 comprises first and second hook-like attachment members 62 and 64 . Instead of being connected in an S-shaped pattern, as shown in FIG. 6 , the hook members 62 and 64 are connected in a C-shaped pattern, as shown in FIG. 8 .
- Other aspects of the constraint system 60 may be similar to those described with respect to constraint 40 of FIG. 6 .
- the spinous process constraint 60 of FIG. 8 will have a tendency to deform when placed under an axial load as the spinous processes undergo a flexion causing movement in the direction of arrow 65 .
- a region 66 of the constraint will tend to bow inwardly which causes the superior and inferior hook members 62 and 64 to displace laterally, increasing the risk that they will shift from their intended positions on the spinous processes.
- a reinforcement member 67 can be placed over a portion of the single connector 63 between the hooks 62 and 64 .
- the reinforcement member may be a simple sleeve constructed from a relatively rigid material, such as a metal or rigid polymer, having a central passage which is placed over the single connector. Other reinforcement structures would also be possible.
- the sleeve embodiment shown in FIG. 8B could be modified to be used with constraint embodiments including compliance members as described elsewhere in this application.
- a spinous process constraint system 70 comprises first and second hook-like attachment members 72 and 74 arranged in C-shaped pattern, generally as shown in FIG. 8 , further comprises compliance member 78 attached to superior and inferior segments of the single connector 76 (which is preferably non-compliant). Other aspects of the system may be generally as described in connection with the constraint structure 50 of FIG. 7 .
- the spinous process constraint 70 of FIG. 9 can also undergo deformation when subjected to an axial load, as shown in FIG. 9A .
- a reinforcement assembly 73 specifically adapted for constraints having compliance members 78 is illustrated in FIG. 9B .
- the reinforcement assembly 73 connects to a superior segment 75 of the single connector 76 and includes a slide rod 71 extending toward an inferior segment 77 of the single connector 76 .
- the slide rod 71 is received in a bearing structure 79 attached to the interior segment 77 which allows the rod to translate as the segments 73 and 77 move toward and away from each other as the spine undergoes extension and flexion.
- the reinforcement assembly 71 helps maintain the proper alignment between the superior and inferior segments 75 and 77 to prevent the bowing and deformation illustrated in FIG. 9A .
- a spinous process constraint system 80 as shown in FIG. 10 , comprises a loop or encircling first attachment member 82 and a loop or encircling second attachment member 84 .
- the attachment members 82 and 84 are joined by a connector 86 which, instead of being attached at the center of the attachment members, is attached laterally to one
- spinous process constraint system 90 comprises upper and lower attachment members 92 and 94 which are similar to those described with respect to constraint structure 80 of FIG. 10 .
- a single connector 96 is typically formed from a non-distensible material, and the desired elasticity is provided by a compliance member 98 provided along the length of the single connector 96 .
- spinous process constraint systems have been intended to be placed on adjacent spinous processes. It will be appreciated that the constraint systems could be placed on spinous processes which are non-adjacent; e.g., separated by one or more additional spinous processes. It will be further appreciated that the spinous process constraint systems could be attached at a first or upper end to the spinous process SP 5 of L 5 and at a second or lower end to the sacrum S, as shown in FIG. 12 .
- spinous process constraint system 100 may include a first or upper attachment member 102 similar to any of those described previously, and a second or lower attachment member 104 which is modified to attach to the sacrum, e.g., by looping through a hole H formed in the structure of the sacrum.
- Other attachment members suitable for attaching to the sacrum are described in copending Application Ser. No. 11/827,980, filed on Jul. 13, 2007, the full disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
- a single connector 106 is provided between the upper and lower attachment members 102 and 104 , optionally including a compliance member 108 to provide the desired elasticity.
- the spinous processes constraint system 110 includes a first or upper attachment member 112 and a second or lower attachment member 114 .
- the upper and lower attachment members are joined by an elastic component, typically an elastomeric body 116 which is configured to be placed over the surface of the supraspinous ligament SSL, as shown in FIG. 14 .
- the advantage of the constraint structure 110 is that it will minimally disrupt the structure of the supraspinous ligament, typically requiring only minor penetrations to allow the placement of the attachment members 112 and 114 .
- the elastomeric body 116 may be attached to the supraspinous ligament SSL, for example by sutures 118 , or adhesives, staples, or by other conventional attachment means.
- sutures 118 or adhesives, staples, or by other conventional attachment means.
- the elastomeric body 116 will be exerting a rearward force on the attachment members 112 and 114 , it will typically be desirable to staple, pin, suture, glue, or otherwise attach the attachment members to the spinous processes SP 4 and SP 5 . While pins 120 are shown, it will be appreciated that any of the other attachment means could also be used.
- a spinous process constraint structure 140 comprises a superior clamp 142 , an inferior clamp 144 , and a single connector comprising an axial member 146 therebetween.
- the axial member 146 may have any of the structures described previously to provide the desired elasticity and modulation of flexion.
- the clamps 142 and 144 are formed so that they may be placed over the posterior surfaces PS of the spinous processes to be constrained, as shown in FIG. 15B .
- a spinous process constraint 150 having a superior clamp structure 152 and an inferior clamp structure 154 is illustrated.
- the constraint 150 is similar to that illustrated in FIGS. 15A and 15B , but further includes a compliance member 156 which joins a superior segment 158 and inferior segment 160 of a single connector between the clamps 152 and 154 .
- Placement of the spinous process constraint 150 on spinous processes SP 4 and SP 5 is illustrated in FIG. 16B .
- the clamps 152 and 154 placed over the posterior surfaces PS of the spinous processes so that minimum intrusion is made into the interspinous and supraspinous ligaments ISL/SSL.
- the single connector and compliance member 156 are on one side of the spinous processes, intrusion into the interspinous and supraspinous ligaments is further reduced.
- a single connector 180 may be connected between pins 182 and 184 which are penetrated through the bodies of superior and inferior spinous processes.
- the single connector 180 may also include a compliance member 182 , as shown in FIG. 18 .
- a spinous process constraint may comprise a single, continuous structure 200 having a superior hook 202 and an inferior hook 204 .
- the superior and inferior hooks 202 and 204 are pivotally attached to an axial portion of the constraint therebetween.
- the constraint 200 may be introduced to a position laterally adjacent to the spinous processes SP with the hooks 202 and 204 in retracted configuration. Once the constraint is in place on one side of the spinous processes, hooks 202 and 204 may be pivoted back over the superior and inferior surfaces of the spinous processes, as illustrated.
- a similar spinous process constraint structure 210 having a compliance member 212 is illustrated in FIG. 20 . Introduction of the constraint structure 210 may be performed in the same manner as constraint structure 200 .
Abstract
Spinous process constraint structures include a first attachment element for placement over a first spinous process and a second attachment element for placement over a second spinous process. The attachment elements are joined by a single connector which may optionally include a compliance member for providing controlled elasticity between the spinous processes.
Description
- This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/426,167 (Attorney Docket No. 41564-703.502), filed on Apr. 17, 2009, which is a continuation-in-part of PCT Application US2007/081815 (Attorney Docket No. 026398-000130PC), filed on Oct. 18, 2007, which claimed the benefit of Provisional Application No. 60/862,085 (Attorney Docket No. 026398-000100US), filed on Oct. 19, 2006, the full disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
- 1. Field of the Invention.
- The present invention relates generally to medical methods and apparatus. More particularly, the present invention relates to methods and devices for restricting spinal flexion in patients having back pain or other spinal conditions.
- A major source of chronic low back pain is discogenic pain, also known as internal disc disruption. Patients suffering from discogenic pain tend to be young, otherwise healthy individuals who present with pain localized to the back. Discogenic pain usually occurs at the discs located at the L4-L5 or L5-S1 junctions of the spine (
FIG. 1 ). Pain tends to be exacerbated when patients put their lumbar spines into flexion (i.e. by sitting or bending forward) and relieved when they put their lumbar spines into extension (i.e. arching backwards). Discogenic pain can be quite disabling, and for some patients, can dramatically affect their ability to work and otherwise enjoy their lives. - This pain experienced by patients with discogenic low back pain can be thought of as flexion instability, and is related to flexion instability that is manifested in other conditions. The most prevalent of these is spondylolisthesis, a spinal condition in which abnormal segmental translation is exacerbated by segmental flexion. The device described here should as such also be useful for these other spinal disorders associated with segmental flexion, for which the prevention or control of spinal segmental flexion is desired.
- Current treatment alternatives for patients diagnosed with chronic discogenic pain are quite limited. Many patients follow a conservative treatment path, such as physical therapy, massage, anti-inflammatory and analgesic medications, muscle relaxants, and epidural steroid injections, but typically continue to suffer with a significant degree of pain. Other patients elect to undergo spinal fusion surgery, which commonly requires discectomy (removal of the disk) together with fusion of adjacent vertebra. Fusion is not usually recommended for discogenic pain because it is irreversible, costly, associated with high morbidity, and of questionable effectiveness. Despite its drawbacks, however, spinal fusion for discogenic pain remains common due to the lack of viable alternatives.
- Recently, a less invasive and potentially more effective treatment for discogenic pain has been proposed. A spinal implant has been designed which inhibits spinal flexion while allowing substantially unrestricted spinal extension. The implant is placed over one or more adjacent pairs of spinal processes and provides an elastic restraint to the spreading apart of the spinal processes which occurs during flexion. Such devices and methods for their use are described in U.S. Patent Application 2005/02161017A1, published on Sep. 29, 2005, and having common inventors with the present application.
- As illustrated in
FIG. 2 , animplant 10 as described in the '017 application, typically comprises anupper strap component 12 and alower strap component 14 joined by a pair ofcompliant members 16. Theupper strap 12 is shown disposed over the top of the spinous process SP4 of L4 while thelower strap 14 is shown extending over the bottom of the spinous process SP5 of L5. Thecompliant member 16 will typically include an internal element, such as a spring of rubber block, which is attached to thestraps compliance members 16. - Ideally, the
compliance members 16 will remain horizontally aligned and spaced generally between the spinous processes SP4 and SP5. In some instances, however, the desired symmetry may be lost if theimplant structure 10 becomes circumferentially displaced about the spinous processes SP4 and SP5. Such displacement can affect the ability of the implant to provide a uniform, symmetric elastic force to inhibit flexion of the spinous processes of a spinal segment in accordance with the desired treatment. Also, the symmetric designs illustrated inFIG. 2 can be difficult to deliver from the side which would be a preferred approach in percutaneous delivery techniques. - For these reasons, it would be desirable to provide improved spinal implants and methods for their use in inhibiting flexion in patients suffering from discogenic pain. It would be particularly desirable if the improved devices would provide the desired elastic forces to the spinous processes with minimal risk of displacement or loss of symmetry of the device over time. It would be further desirable if the designs facilitated percutaneous delivery from the side and other approaches.
- Additionally, it would be advantageous if the implants and implantation methods could be performed with minimum tissue disruption via percutaneous and open surgical procedures. At least some of these objectives will be met by the invention as described hereinbelow.
- 2. Description of the Background Art
- US 2005/0216017A1 has been described above. US 2006/0271055 describes a spacer having superior and inferior anchors and a spacer element therebetween. Other patents and published applications of interest include: U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,966,600; 5,011,494; 5,092,866; 5,116,340; 5,282,863; 5,395,374; 5,415,658; 5,415,661; 5,449,361; 5,456,722; 5,462,542; 5,496,318; 5,540,698; 5,609,634; 5,645,599; 5,725,582; 5,902,305; Re. 36,221; 5,928,232; 5,935,133; 5,964,769; 5,989,256; 6,053,921; 6,312,431; 6,364,883; 6,378,289; 6,391,030; 6,468,309; 6,436,099; 6,451,019; 6,582,433; 6,605,091; 6,626,944; 6,629,975; 6,652,527; 6,652,585; 6,656,185; 6,669,729; 6,682,533; 6,689,140; 6,712,819; 6,689,168; 6,695,852; 6,716,245; 6,761,720; 6,835,205; Published U.S. Patent Application Nos. US 2002/0151978; US 2004/0024458; US 2004/0106995; US 2004/0116927; US 2004/0117017; US 2004/0127989; US 2004/0172132; US 2005/0033435; US 2005/0049708; US 2006/0069447; Published PCT Application Nos. WO 01/28442 A1; WO 02/03882 A2; WO 02/051326 Al; WO 02/071960 A1; WO 03/045262 A1; WO 2004/052246 A1; WO 2004/073532 A1; and Published Foreign Application Nos. EP 0322334 A1; and FR 2 681 525 A1.
- The present invention provides spinal implants and methods for restricting flexion of spinal segments for the treatment of discogenic pain and other spinal conditions, such as spondylolisthesis, where a physician may desire to control segmental flexion. Systems according to the present invention include spinous process constraint structures comprising a first attachment element adapted to be placed over a first spinous process, a second attachment element adapted to be placed over a second spinous process, and a single connector joining the first attachment element and the second attachment element. By “single connector,” it is meant that the connector joins a single point or location on the first attachment element to a single point or location on the second attachment element. In contrast, the prior connectors shown in
FIG. 2 , for example, provide a pair of connection points and two connectors for joining theupper component 12 to thelower strap component 14. Use of the single connector for joining the first and second attachment elements reduces the likelihood that the attachment members will become displaced such that the desired symmetric attachment geometry becomes asymmetric. A single connector also reduces the need to balance the elastic forces being applied to the opposite sides of the spinous processes. The single connector will also simplify alignment of the implant during implantation, thus simplifying percutaneous implantation and potentially minimizing tissue disruption in both percutaneous and other implantation protocols. - The single connector may comprise a single elastic member, where the single elastic member may itself comprise a continuous length of elastic material having uniform or non-uniform elastic properties along said length. Alternatively, the connector may comprise an elastic member including two or more separate components, for example inelastic or non-compliant straps, cables, or other flexible members attached to a compliance member which provides the desired elasticity. Different embodiments for the compliance members are described in co-pending, commonly owned application Ser. No. 12/106,103 (Attorney Docket No. 026398-000410US), filed on Apr. 18, 2008, the full disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. Regardless of the particular structure, the single connector and/or elastic member will provide an elastic stiffness in tension between the attachment members in the range from 7.5 N/mm to 50 N/mm, preferably from 10 N/mm to 25 N/mm, and usually in the range from 10 N/mm to 15 N/mm. In addition to providing such elastic stiffness in tension, the single connector and/or elastic member will be constructed to provide little or no elastic stiffness in compression. Usually, the elastic stiffness in compression will be below 3 N/mm, preferably below 0.5 N/mm. The ability of the constraint structures of the present invention to provide a targeted elastic stiffness in tension while providing little or no elastic stiffness in compression allows for treatment of patient's having spinal segments where the kinematics are improved by application of the elastic force to the spine in flexion while providing little or no elastic resistance to extension.
- The first and second attachment elements may have similar or different geometries. Exemplary geometries include open hook structures which may be placed about the spinous processes and which have a single attachment point for connection to the single connector. The attachment elements may also be loop structures which fully circumscribe the spinous process, where the loop is provided with a single connection point for connection to the single connector. Often, the attachment elements will be placed over the spinous process without further attachment. In other instances, however, it may be desirable to provide a secondary attachment to the spinous process, such as staples, pins, screws, sutures, adhesives, energy-mediated attachments (such as laser welding), or the like. In some instances, one of the two attachment elements may be adhered to the adjacent spinous process while the other of the attachment elements may be simply placed over the adjacent spinous process without adherence.
- The constraint structures of the present invention may comprise separate components which are joined or connectable together. For example, each of the first attachment element, the second attachment element, and the single connector may be formed separately and interconnected by conventional techniques, such as screwing, welding, linking with male and female attachment members, strapping, soldering, or any other such fastening technique. In other instances, any two or more of the components of the constraints of the present invention may be integrally or monolithically formed from a common structural member. For example, a pair of hook-like elements may be integrally formed with an intermediate connector by forming the components from a single rod, wire, cable, polymer substrate, or the like.
- The constraint structures of the present invention may be symmetric or asymmetric. For example, when loops or other attachment elements circumscribe the spinous processes the connector may comprise a single axial member lying on the midline or mid-plane which bisects the spinous processes. Such a symmetric structure is advantageous since it applies an axial force generally free from lateral components to the loops which constrain the spinous processes.
- In other instances, however, it will be desirable to position the single connector on a side of the spinous processes so that the connector does not need to pass through the region between the spinous processes. Such asymmetric constraint structures thus reduce or eliminate the need to penetrate the interspinous/supraspinous ligaments lessening patient trauma and facilitating placement protocols. For such asymmetric designs, the attachment member may be a simple pin, screw, or other fastener which penetrates the body of the spinous process, but will more usually be a hook, loop, or other member which can attach to the spinous process without necessarily penetrating therethrough. For example, when using hooks, the upper attachment member can be placed over a superior surface of the superior spinous process while a lower hook member may be placed around the inferior surface of the inferior spinous process.
- When a single connector lies asymmetrically relative to the plane of the spinous processes, the connector will place the attachment members under a rotational load, often causing the single connector to bow inward toward the spinous process plane. Such deformation of the single connector will also tend to rotate and displace the attachment members, particularly those which are not fixedly attached to the spinous processes. In order to reduce such deformation and improve the stability of the spinous process constraints, a reinforcement member may be placed on or over the single connector, particularly within the region between the spinous processes. For example, a reinforcement sleeve may be placed coaxially over at least a portion of the single connector. Alternatively, and particularly when a compliance member is included in the single connector (as described in more detail below) the reinforcement member may be a slide assembly which is attached to the connector at a superior location and an inferior location and which can extend and contract together with elongation and contraction of the single connector while still maintaining alignment between the superior and inferior segments thereof.
- In another aspect of the present invention, the attachment members may be hinged or pivotally connected to the single connector to facilitate introduction and implantation of the constraint structure in a patient. For example, superior and inferior hooks may be pivotally attached at the upper and lower ends of a single connector so that the hooks may be folded to reduce the profile of the constraint as it is being introduced into position adjacent to the spinous processes. Once in position, the hooks or other attachment members may then be pivoted or otherwise moved into place around the spinous processes to provide the desired constraint.
- In yet another specific aspect of the present invention, the attachment members may comprise clamps or similar structures which may be placed over posterior surfaces of the spinous processes to hold a single connector therebetween. Such posterior access is advantageous since it reduces the need to disrupt the/supraspinous ligament. Thus the use of clamps or attachment members which are placed over the posterior surface of the spinous processes is particularly advantageous when used in connection with an asymmetric single connector so that the penetration of the supraspinous/ligaments is minimized.
- The spinous process constraints of the present invention may further comprise a compliance member disposed within or as part of the single connector. The compliance member may have any structure which provides for the desired elasticity in the connector to permit the first and second attachment elements to spread apart as the spinal segment undergoes flexion. Suitable compliance members are described in published U.S. Application No. 2005/0216017 A1, which has been previously incorporated herein by reference.
- In other embodiments, the single connector may comprise an elastomeric body which is disposed between the first and second attachment elements. In some instances, the elastomeric body may be positionable over the supraspinous ligament, and in certain of those cases such elastomeric bodies may be adapted to be sutured or otherwise attached to the supraspinous ligament.
- In a further aspect of the present invention, methods for restricting flexion of a spinal segment comprise positioning a first attachment element on a first spinous process and positioning a second attachment element on a second spinous process, wherein the attachment members are joined by a single connector. The attachment members may be positioned in an open surgical procedure through the supraspinous ligament or may be percutaneously implanted, optionally from a single sided posterior approach avoiding the need to penetrate the supraspinous ligament. In a specific embodiment, the elements are joined with an elastic member, where the elastic member is preferably positioned over the supraspinous ligament. In particular embodiments, the methods further comprise attaching the elastic member to the supraspinous ligament, for example by suturing. Usually, the methods further comprise penetrating the supraspinous ligament to permit passage of the attachment element(s) and/or the elastic member therethrough. Still further optionally, the attachment members may be attached to the spinous processes, typically by stapling or any of the other attachment modalities described above.
- The novel features of the invention are set forth with particularity in the appended claims. A better understanding of the features and advantages of the present invention will be obtained by reference to the following detailed description that sets forth illustrative embodiments, in which the principles of the invention are utilized, and the accompanying drawings of which:
-
FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram illustrating the lumbar region of the spine including the spinous processes (SP), facet joints (FJ), lamina (L), transverse processes (TP), and sacrum (S). -
FIG. 2 illustrates a spinal implant of the type described in US 2005/0216017A1. -
FIG. 3 illustrates an exemplary embodiment of a spinous process constraint structure constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention. -
FIGS. 4-11 are schematic illustrations of additional exemplary embodiments of the spinous process constraint structures of the present invention, where the adjacent spinous processes are shown in section. -
FIGS. 8A and 8B illustrate use of a reinforcement member on a single connector which does not include a compliance member, whileFIGS. 9A and 9B illustrate use of a reinforcement member on a single connector which includes a compliance member. -
FIG. 12 illustrates a further alternative embodiment of a spinal constraint structure of the present invention shown with a first attachment member placed over the spinous process of L5 and a lower attachment member attached to the sacrum. -
FIGS. 13 and 14 illustrate yet another embodiment of a spinous process constraint structure of the present invention where the attachment members are placed over adjacent spinous processes with the single connector passing through and over the supraspinous ligament. -
FIGS. 15A and 15B illustrate a spinous process constraint having a pair of clamps suitable for engaging posterior surfaces of a pair of adjacent spinous processes. -
FIGS. 16A and 16B illustrate a connector similar to that shown inFIGS. 15A and 15B which further includes a compliance member. InFIG. 16B , placement of the constraint adjacent to the supraspinous/interspinous ligaments is illustrated. -
FIG. 17 illustrates a further exemplary embodiment of a spinous process constraint according to the present invention, shown with an asymmetric axial member connected using pins to the spinous processes. -
FIG. 18 illustrates a spinous process constraint similar to that shown inFIG. 17 , further including a compliance member. -
FIG. 19 illustrates a spinous process constraint according to the present invention having pivoted hooks for attachment of adjacent spinous processes. -
FIG. 20 illustrates a spinous process constraint similar to that shown inFIG. 19 , but further including a compliance member. - Referring now to
FIG. 3 , a spinousprocess constraint structure 20 constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention comprises a first orupper attachment member 22 and a second orlower attachment member 24. The first and second attachment members are connected by asingle connector 26, shown in the form of an elastic rod or cable. Usually, theattachment members connector 26 will be elastically distensible so that it will comprise an elastic constraining force as a spinal segment undergoes flexion which causes the spinous processes SP4 and SP5 to spread vertically apart. While being elastic in tension, thesingle connector 26 will have a very low column strength so that it exerts very little force on the spinous processes SP4 and SP5 when the spinal segment is in extension and the processes move vertically toward one another. As used herein, the phrase “spinal segment” is synonymous with the phrase “functional spinal unit (FSU)” and intended to mean the smallest physiological motion unit of the spine that exhibits biomechanical characteristics similar to those of the entire spine. A spinal segment or FSU consists of two adjacent vertebrae, the intervertebral disc and all adjoining ligaments between them and excludes other connecting tissues such as muscles. The three joint complex that results is sometimes referred to as the “articular triad.” Another term for the FSU is spinal motion segment. These definitions are taken from White AA, Panjabi MM. (1990), Clinical Biomechanics of the Spine, Philadelphia, JB Lippincott. - The first and
second attachment members single connector 26 may be preattached to either or both of theattachment members connector 26 to either or both of theattachment members connector 26 be selected so that the connector is generally fully extended but not under significant tension when the spinal segment is in its neutral (non-flexion and non-extension) condition. In such cases, theconnector 26 will begin to apply tension on the spinous processes 22 and 24 as soon as they begin to undergo flexion while collapsing and applying no force on the spinous processes as they undergo extension.FIG. 4 is a schematic cross-sectional view of the spinousprocess constraint structure 20 ofFIG. 3 . -
FIG. 5 illustrates an alternative spinous process constraint structure 30 having first andsecond attachment members FIGS. 3 and 4 , and joined by asingle connector 36 having acompliance member 38. In this embodiment, thesingle connector 36 may be formed from a non-distensible material where the desired elasticity is provided by thecompliance member 38. - Referring now to
FIG. 6 , a spinousprocess constraint structure 40 having a first or upper hook-like attachment member 42 and a second or lower hook-like attachment member 44 is illustrated. The first andsecond attachment members integral connector 46, which is transversely oriented in the space between the upper spinous process SP4 and the lower spinous process SP5. Theconstraint structure 40 may be formed from a spring-like metal, such as spring steel or nickel-titanium alloy, or alternatively may be formed from an elastomeric polymer. In some instances, the hook-like attachment members could be reinforced or otherwise modified to be substantially non-compliant, while theconnector 46 could be modified to enhance its elasticity, for example having a serpentine or coil spring structure. - Referring now to
FIG. 7 , a further spinousprocess constraint system 50 comprises upper and lower hook-like attachment members single connector 56. The upper andlower attachment members connector section 56 may be formed from metal or polymer and will typically be non-distensible. The desired elasticity between the attachment members is provided by acompliance member 58. - Referring now to
FIG. 8 , yet another spinousprocess constraint system 60 comprises first and second hook-like attachment members FIG. 6 , thehook members FIG. 8 . Other aspects of theconstraint system 60 may be similar to those described with respect toconstraint 40 ofFIG. 6 . - The
spinous process constraint 60 ofFIG. 8 will have a tendency to deform when placed under an axial load as the spinous processes undergo a flexion causing movement in the direction ofarrow 65. Typically, aregion 66 of the constraint will tend to bow inwardly which causes the superior andinferior hook members reinforcement member 67 can be placed over a portion of thesingle connector 63 between thehooks FIG. 8B could be modified to be used with constraint embodiments including compliance members as described elsewhere in this application. - Similarly, as shown in
FIG. 9 , a spinousprocess constraint system 70 comprises first and second hook-like attachment members FIG. 8 , further comprisescompliance member 78 attached to superior and inferior segments of the single connector 76 (which is preferably non-compliant). Other aspects of the system may be generally as described in connection with theconstraint structure 50 ofFIG. 7 . - The
spinous process constraint 70 ofFIG. 9 can also undergo deformation when subjected to an axial load, as shown inFIG. 9A . Areinforcement assembly 73 specifically adapted for constraints havingcompliance members 78 is illustrated inFIG. 9B . Thereinforcement assembly 73 connects to asuperior segment 75 of thesingle connector 76 and includes aslide rod 71 extending toward aninferior segment 77 of thesingle connector 76. Theslide rod 71 is received in a bearingstructure 79 attached to theinterior segment 77 which allows the rod to translate as thesegments reinforcement assembly 71 helps maintain the proper alignment between the superior andinferior segments FIG. 9A . - In still another embodiment, a spinous
process constraint system 80, as shown inFIG. 10 , comprises a loop or encirclingfirst attachment member 82 and a loop or encirclingsecond attachment member 84. Theattachment members connector 86 which, instead of being attached at the center of the attachment members, is attached laterally to one - side. It will be appreciated that the
connector 86 could just as well have been attached laterally on the opposite side. - Referring now to
FIG. 11 , spinousprocess constraint system 90 comprises upper andlower attachment members constraint structure 80 ofFIG. 10 . Asingle connector 96 is typically formed from a non-distensible material, and the desired elasticity is provided by acompliance member 98 provided along the length of thesingle connector 96. - As described thus far, spinous process constraint systems have been intended to be placed on adjacent spinous processes. It will be appreciated that the constraint systems could be placed on spinous processes which are non-adjacent; e.g., separated by one or more additional spinous processes. It will be further appreciated that the spinous process constraint systems could be attached at a first or upper end to the spinous process SP5 of L5 and at a second or lower end to the sacrum S, as shown in
FIG. 12 . As the sacrum will often not include a process or other structure sufficient for attachment, when attachment member as described previously, spinousprocess constraint system 100 may include a first orupper attachment member 102 similar to any of those described previously, and a second orlower attachment member 104 which is modified to attach to the sacrum, e.g., by looping through a hole H formed in the structure of the sacrum. Other attachment members suitable for attaching to the sacrum are described in copending Application Ser. No. 11/827,980, filed on Jul. 13, 2007, the full disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. Asingle connector 106 is provided between the upper andlower attachment members compliance member 108 to provide the desired elasticity. - Referring now to
FIGS. 13 and 14 , yet another alternative spinous process constraint system and method for its implementation are described. The spinous processesconstraint system 110 includes a first orupper attachment member 112 and a second orlower attachment member 114. The upper and lower attachment members are joined by an elastic component, typically anelastomeric body 116 which is configured to be placed over the surface of the supraspinous ligament SSL, as shown inFIG. 14 . The advantage of theconstraint structure 110 is that it will minimally disrupt the structure of the supraspinous ligament, typically requiring only minor penetrations to allow the placement of theattachment members elastomeric body 116 may be attached to the supraspinous ligament SSL, for example bysutures 118, or adhesives, staples, or by other conventional attachment means. Similarly, because theelastomeric body 116 will be exerting a rearward force on theattachment members pins 120 are shown, it will be appreciated that any of the other attachment means could also be used. - Referring to
FIGS. 15A and 15B , a spinousprocess constraint structure 140 comprises asuperior clamp 142, aninferior clamp 144, and a single connector comprising anaxial member 146 therebetween. Theaxial member 146 may have any of the structures described previously to provide the desired elasticity and modulation of flexion. Theclamps FIG. 15B . By employing clamps which are located over the posterior surfaces and further employing a laterally displacedaxial member 146 which is on the side of the spinous processes, the need to penetrate or otherwise disturb the supraspinous and interspinous ligaments is minimized. - Referring to
FIG. 16A and 16B , aspinous process constraint 150 having asuperior clamp structure 152 and aninferior clamp structure 154 is illustrated. Theconstraint 150 is similar to that illustrated inFIGS. 15A and 15B , but further includes acompliance member 156 which joins asuperior segment 158 andinferior segment 160 of a single connector between theclamps spinous process constraint 150 on spinous processes SP4 and SP5 is illustrated inFIG. 16B . Theclamps compliance member 156 are on one side of the spinous processes, intrusion into the interspinous and supraspinous ligaments is further reduced. - Other asymmetric spinous process constraint structures may be constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention. As shown in
FIG. 17 , for example, asingle connector 180 may be connected betweenpins single connector 180 may also include acompliance member 182, as shown inFIG. 18 . - As shown in
FIGS. 19 and 20 , a spinous process constraint may comprise a single,continuous structure 200 having asuperior hook 202 and aninferior hook 204. The superior andinferior hooks constraint 200 may be introduced to a position laterally adjacent to the spinous processes SP with thehooks process constraint structure 210 having acompliance member 212 is illustrated inFIG. 20 . Introduction of theconstraint structure 210 may be performed in the same manner asconstraint structure 200. - While the above is a complete description of the preferred embodiments of the invention, various alternatives, modifications, and equivalents may be used. Therefore, the above description should not be taken as limiting the scope of the invention which is defined by the appended claims.
- While preferred embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described herein, it will be obvious to those skilled in the art that such embodiments are provided by way of example only. Numerous variations, changes, and substitutions will now occur to those skilled in the art without departing from the invention. It should be understood that various alternatives to the embodiments of the invention described herein may be employed in practicing the invention. It is intended that the following claims define the scope of the invention and that methods and structures within the scope of these claims and their equivalents be covered thereby.
Claims (40)
1. A spinous process constraint structure for restricting flexion of a spinal segment, said constraint structure comprising:
a first attachment element adapted to be coupled to a first spinous process;
a second attachment element adapted to be coupled to a second spinous process or a sacrum; and
at least one connector joining the first attachment element and the second attachment element, said at least one connector lying laterally beside the sides of the spinous processes and providing a connection between said attachment elements having an elastic stiffness in tension that resists flexion of the spinal segment without resisting extension thereof.
2. A constraint structure as in claim 1 , wherein the elastic stiffness in tension is in the range from 7.5 N/mm to 50 N/mm.
3. A constraint structure as in claim 1 , wherein the elastic stiffness in tension is in the range from 10 N/mm to 25 N/mm.
4. A constraint structure as in claim 1 , wherein the elastic stiffness in tension is in the range from 10 N/mm to 15 N/mm.
5. A constraint structure as in claim 1 , wherein said connector further provides an elastic stiffness in compression below 3 N/mm.
6. A constraint structure as in claim 5 , wherein said elastic stiffness in compression is below 0.5 N/mm.
7. A constraint structure as in claim 1 , wherein the at least one connector comprises an axial member positioned to lie parallel to the sides of the spinous processes.
8. A constraint structure as in claim 1 , further comprising at least one compliance member on the at least one connector, wherein the at least one connector has a superior segment above the at least one compliance member and an inferior segment below the at least one compliance member.
9. A constraint structure as in claim 1 , wherein the single connector comprises an elastomeric body positionable beside the supraspinous ligament.
10. A constraint structure as in claim 1 , wherein at least one of the first and second attachment structures is adapted to be fixedly attached to the spinous process.
11. A constraint structure as in claim 10 , wherein the first attachment structure is adapted to be fixedly attached to a superior spinous process and the second attachment structure is adapted to be fixedly attached to an inferior spinous process.
12. A constraint structure as in claim 10 , wherein the first attachment structure is adapted to be fixedly attached to a spinous process and the second attachment structure is adapted to be fixedly secured to a sacrum.
13. A constraint structure as in claim 1 , wherein at least one of the first attachment element and the second attachment element comprise a clamp which is securable over a posterior face of the spinous process.
14. A constraint structure as in claim 1 , wherein at least one of the first attachment element and the second attachment element comprise a pin which can be secured laterally through the spinous process.
15. A constraint structure as in claim 1 , wherein at least one of the first attachment element and the second attachment element is adapted to be placed around the spinous process without fixed attachment.
16. A constraint structure as in claim 15 , wherein the first attachment element is adapted to be placed over a superior surface of a superior spinous process and the second attachment element is adapted to be placed under an inferior surface of the interior spinous process.
17. A constraint structure as in claim 15 , wherein the first attachment element is adapted to be placed over a spinous process and the second attachment element is adapted to fixedly secured to a sacrum.
18. A constraint structure as in claim 16 , wherein the first attachment element and the second attachment element are open hook structures.
19. A constraint structure as in claim 18 , wherein the hook structures are pivotally attached to the at least one connector to allow closure of the hook over the spinous process after the at least one connector has been aligned beside the spinous processes.
20. A constraint structure as in claim 18 , wherein the at least one connector comprises an axial member joining the hooks in a C-pattern.
21. A constraint structure as in claim 1 , wherein the at least one connector comprises a flexible element that extends at least partly between the two attachment members, wherein the flexible member collapses under compression.
22. A constraint structure as in claim 21 , wherein the flexible member is compliant to provide said elastic stiffness in tension.
23. A constraint structure as in claim 21 , wherein the flexible member is non-compliant under tension and located in series with a compliance member that provides the elastic stiffness in tension.
24. A method for restricting flexion of a spinal segment, said method comprising:
positioning a first attachment element on a first spinous process; and
positioning a second attachment element on a second spinous process or a sacrum;
wherein the attachment elements are joined with at least one connector extending therebetween and lying laterally beside the sides of the spinous processes, said at least one connector providing a connection between said attachment elements having an elastic stiffness in tension that resists flexion of the spinal segment without resisting extension thereof.
25. A method as in claim 24 , wherein the at least one connector provides an elastic stiffness in tension between said attachment elements in the range from 7.5 N/mm to 50 N/mm.
26. A method as in claim 24 , wherein the elastic stiffness is in the range from 10 N/mm to 25 N/mm.
27. A method as in claim 24 , wherein the elastic stiffness is in the range from 10 N/mm to 15 N/mm.
28. A method as in claim 24 , wherein the single connector provides an elastic stiffness in compression between said elements below 3 N/mm.
29. A method as in claim 28 , wherein said elastic stiffness in compression is below 0.5 N/mm.
30. A method as in claim 24 , further comprising attaching the attachment members to the spinous process and/or the sacrum.
31. A method as in claim 24 , wherein the attachment elements and elastic member are introduced percutaneously.
32. A method as in claim 31 , wherein the attachment elements and elastic member are introduced laterally from one side of the spinal midline
33. A method as in claim 31 , wherein the attachment elements and member are introduced from a posterior approach from one side of the spinal midline.
34. A method as in claim 24 , wherein at least one of the first attachment element and the second attachment element comprise a clamp positioning comprises securing the clamp over a posterior face of the spinous process.
35. A method as in claim 24 , wherein at least one of the first attachment element and the second attachment element comprise a pin and positioning comprises securing the pin laterally through the spinous process.
36. A method as in claim 24 , wherein the attachment elements comprise hooks and positioning comprises introducing the hooks in a retracted configuration and pivoting the hooks relative to the at least one connector to capture the spinous processes after the at least one connector is positioned adjacent the spinous processes.
37. A method as in claim 36 , wherein a superior hook is pivoted over a superior surface of a superior spinous process and an inferior hook is pivoted over an inferior surface of an inferior spinous process.
38. A method as in claim 24 , further comprising reinforcing the at least one connector to limit deformation under axial load.
39. A method as in claim 38 , wherein reinforcing comprises placing a reinforcement sleeve over the single connector.
40. A method as in claim 38 , wherein the at least one connector includes a compliance member and reinforcing comprises placing a slide assembly adjacent to the compliance member, said slide assembly aligning superior and inferior segments of the single connector.
Priority Applications (7)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US13/455,917 US20120209328A1 (en) | 2006-10-19 | 2012-04-25 | Structures and methods for constraining spinal processes with single connector |
US13/889,581 US9295499B2 (en) | 2006-10-19 | 2013-05-08 | Methods and systems for laterally stabilized constraint of spinous processes |
US15/053,924 US20160175016A1 (en) | 2006-10-19 | 2016-02-25 | Methods and systems for laterally stabilized constraint of spinous processes |
US15/442,503 US20170231667A1 (en) | 2006-10-19 | 2017-02-24 | Methods and systems for laterally stabilized constraint of spinous processes |
US15/805,554 US20180064472A1 (en) | 2006-10-19 | 2017-11-07 | Methods and systems for laterally stabilized constraint of spinous processes |
US16/200,312 US20190357947A1 (en) | 2006-10-19 | 2018-11-26 | Methods and systems for laterally stabilized constraint of spinous processes |
US17/519,626 US20220323118A1 (en) | 2006-10-19 | 2021-11-05 | Methods and systems for laterally stabilized constraint of spinous processes |
Applications Claiming Priority (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US86208506P | 2006-10-19 | 2006-10-19 | |
PCT/US2007/081815 WO2008051801A2 (en) | 2006-10-19 | 2007-10-18 | Structures and methods for constraining spinal processes with single connector |
US12/426,167 US8187307B2 (en) | 2006-10-19 | 2009-04-17 | Structures and methods for constraining spinal processes with single connector |
US13/455,917 US20120209328A1 (en) | 2006-10-19 | 2012-04-25 | Structures and methods for constraining spinal processes with single connector |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US12/426,167 Division US8187307B2 (en) | 2006-10-19 | 2009-04-17 | Structures and methods for constraining spinal processes with single connector |
Related Child Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/777,366 Continuation-In-Part US8029541B2 (en) | 2006-10-19 | 2007-07-13 | Methods and systems for laterally stabilized constraint of spinous processes |
US13/889,581 Continuation-In-Part US9295499B2 (en) | 2006-10-19 | 2013-05-08 | Methods and systems for laterally stabilized constraint of spinous processes |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20120209328A1 true US20120209328A1 (en) | 2012-08-16 |
Family
ID=42983222
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US12/426,167 Active 2028-08-22 US8187307B2 (en) | 2006-10-19 | 2009-04-17 | Structures and methods for constraining spinal processes with single connector |
US13/455,917 Abandoned US20120209328A1 (en) | 2006-10-19 | 2012-04-25 | Structures and methods for constraining spinal processes with single connector |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US12/426,167 Active 2028-08-22 US8187307B2 (en) | 2006-10-19 | 2009-04-17 | Structures and methods for constraining spinal processes with single connector |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US8187307B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP2419034B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP2012523903A (en) |
ES (1) | ES2527993T3 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2010121256A1 (en) |
Cited By (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20110125269A1 (en) * | 2009-11-25 | 2011-05-26 | Moskowitz Nathan C | Total artificial spino-laminar prosthetic replacement |
US8486110B2 (en) | 2004-03-09 | 2013-07-16 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Spinal implant and method for restricting spinal flexion |
US8523904B2 (en) | 2004-03-09 | 2013-09-03 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Methods and systems for constraint of spinous processes with attachment |
US8790380B2 (en) | 2007-07-26 | 2014-07-29 | Dynamic Spine, Llc | Segmental orthopaedic device for spinal elongation and for treatment of scoliosis |
US9204908B2 (en) * | 2007-07-26 | 2015-12-08 | Dynamic Spine, Llc | Segmental orthopedic device for spinal elongation and for treatment of scoliosis |
US9277950B2 (en) | 2010-06-10 | 2016-03-08 | Dynamic Spine, Llc | Low-profile, uniplanar bone screw |
US9295499B2 (en) | 2006-10-19 | 2016-03-29 | Empirical Spine, Inc. | Methods and systems for laterally stabilized constraint of spinous processes |
US9717541B2 (en) | 2015-04-13 | 2017-08-01 | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. | Lamina implants and methods for spinal decompression |
Families Citing this family (43)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7846183B2 (en) | 2004-02-06 | 2010-12-07 | Spinal Elements, Inc. | Vertebral facet joint prosthesis and method of fixation |
US9504583B2 (en) | 2004-06-10 | 2016-11-29 | Spinal Elements, Inc. | Implant and method for facet immobilization |
US8162982B2 (en) | 2006-10-19 | 2012-04-24 | Simpirica Spine, Inc. | Methods and systems for constraint of multiple spine segments |
EP2117470B1 (en) * | 2007-02-06 | 2013-03-06 | Pioneer Surgical Technology, Inc. | Intervertebral implant devices |
US8652137B2 (en) | 2007-02-22 | 2014-02-18 | Spinal Elements, Inc. | Vertebral facet joint drill and method of use |
US8992533B2 (en) | 2007-02-22 | 2015-03-31 | Spinal Elements, Inc. | Vertebral facet joint drill and method of use |
US20100036424A1 (en) | 2007-06-22 | 2010-02-11 | Simpirica Spine, Inc. | Methods and systems for increasing the bending stiffness and constraining the spreading of a spinal segment |
EP2182864B1 (en) * | 2007-06-22 | 2016-06-08 | Empirical Spine, Inc. | Devices for controlled flexion restriction of spinal segments |
US8882816B2 (en) * | 2007-08-02 | 2014-11-11 | Proactive Orthopedics, Llc | Fixation and alignment device and method used in orthopaedic surgery |
WO2009149399A1 (en) * | 2008-06-06 | 2009-12-10 | Simpirica Spine, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for deploying spinous process constraints |
WO2009149414A1 (en) | 2008-06-06 | 2009-12-10 | Simpirica Spine, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for locking a band |
WO2010088621A1 (en) * | 2009-02-02 | 2010-08-05 | Simpirica Spine, Inc. | Sacral tether anchor and methods of use |
US8529606B2 (en) | 2009-03-10 | 2013-09-10 | Simpirica Spine, Inc. | Surgical tether apparatus and methods of use |
US8562653B2 (en) | 2009-03-10 | 2013-10-22 | Simpirica Spine, Inc. | Surgical tether apparatus and methods of use |
JP5681122B2 (en) | 2009-03-10 | 2015-03-04 | シンピライカ スパイン, インコーポレイテッド | Surgical tether device and method of use |
WO2010114853A1 (en) | 2009-03-30 | 2010-10-07 | Simpirica Spine, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for improving shear loading capacity of a spinal segment |
US9622792B2 (en) * | 2009-04-29 | 2017-04-18 | Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. | Interspinous process device and method |
PL217862B1 (en) * | 2009-10-09 | 2014-08-29 | Lfc Spółka Z Ograniczoną Odpowiedzialnością | Off-load-dynamic intervertebral device |
EP2563249A4 (en) * | 2010-04-30 | 2014-11-05 | Univ Johns Hopkins | Intersegmental motion preservation system for use in the spine and methods for use thereof |
US20120109202A1 (en) * | 2010-04-30 | 2012-05-03 | Neuraxis Llc | Intersegmental motion preservation system for use in the spine and methods for use thereof |
FR2961089B1 (en) * | 2010-06-11 | 2012-06-29 | Hassan Razian | SYSTEM FOR CONNECTING TWO THIN PROCESSES |
EP2677974A1 (en) * | 2011-02-23 | 2014-01-01 | Simpirica Spine, Inc. | Flexion limiting device with spinous process attachment |
USD724733S1 (en) | 2011-02-24 | 2015-03-17 | Spinal Elements, Inc. | Interbody bone implant |
US9271765B2 (en) | 2011-02-24 | 2016-03-01 | Spinal Elements, Inc. | Vertebral facet joint fusion implant and method for fusion |
US8740949B2 (en) | 2011-02-24 | 2014-06-03 | Spinal Elements, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for stabilizing bone |
US8475497B2 (en) | 2011-10-19 | 2013-07-02 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Spinous process plate and connector assembly and method |
USD739935S1 (en) | 2011-10-26 | 2015-09-29 | Spinal Elements, Inc. | Interbody bone implant |
US9119683B2 (en) | 2012-01-18 | 2015-09-01 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Interspinous implant with overlapping arms |
US20150305779A1 (en) * | 2012-08-21 | 2015-10-29 | Pierre M. Montavon | Spring and device for stabilizing human or animal bone |
CN104602629A (en) | 2012-08-31 | 2015-05-06 | 新南创新公司 | Bone stabilization device and methods of use |
USD765853S1 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2016-09-06 | Spinal Elements, Inc. | Flexible elongate member with a portion configured to receive a bone anchor |
US9820784B2 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2017-11-21 | Spinal Elements, Inc. | Apparatus for spinal fixation and methods of use |
US9421044B2 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2016-08-23 | Spinal Elements, Inc. | Apparatus for bone stabilization and distraction and methods of use |
US9510872B2 (en) * | 2013-03-15 | 2016-12-06 | Jcbd, Llc | Spinal stabilization system |
US9592083B2 (en) * | 2013-08-30 | 2017-03-14 | New South Innovations Pty Limited | Spine stabilization device |
US9839450B2 (en) | 2013-09-27 | 2017-12-12 | Spinal Elements, Inc. | Device and method for reinforcement of a facet |
US9456855B2 (en) | 2013-09-27 | 2016-10-04 | Spinal Elements, Inc. | Method of placing an implant between bone portions |
US11478275B2 (en) | 2014-09-17 | 2022-10-25 | Spinal Elements, Inc. | Flexible fastening band connector |
JP2018502693A (en) | 2015-01-27 | 2018-02-01 | スパイナル・エレメンツ・インコーポレーテッド | Facet joint implant |
WO2018009671A1 (en) | 2016-07-07 | 2018-01-11 | Stern Mark S | Spinous laminar clamp assembly |
JP2022535698A (en) | 2019-05-22 | 2022-08-10 | スパイナル・エレメンツ・インコーポレーテッド | Bone ties and bone tie inserters |
US11457959B2 (en) | 2019-05-22 | 2022-10-04 | Spinal Elements, Inc. | Bone tie and bone tie inserter |
US11304733B2 (en) | 2020-02-14 | 2022-04-19 | Spinal Elements, Inc. | Bone tie methods |
Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20060241591A1 (en) * | 2005-04-25 | 2006-10-26 | Spineco, Inc. | Vertebral pars interarticularis clamp a new spine fixation device, instrumentation, and methodology |
Family Cites Families (179)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3648691A (en) | 1970-02-24 | 1972-03-14 | Univ Colorado State Res Found | Method of applying vertebral appliance |
US4246660A (en) | 1978-12-26 | 1981-01-27 | Queen's University At Kingston | Artificial ligament |
US4643178A (en) | 1984-04-23 | 1987-02-17 | Fabco Medical Products, Inc. | Surgical wire and method for the use thereof |
US4743260A (en) | 1985-06-10 | 1988-05-10 | Burton Charles V | Method for a flexible stabilization system for a vertebral column |
US4708132A (en) | 1986-01-24 | 1987-11-24 | Pfizer-Hospital Products Group, Inc. | Fixation device for a ligament or tendon prosthesis |
US4776851A (en) | 1986-07-23 | 1988-10-11 | Bruchman William C | Mechanical ligament |
US4794916A (en) | 1986-11-20 | 1989-01-03 | Porterfield James A | Lumbar stabilizer |
US4772286A (en) | 1987-02-17 | 1988-09-20 | E. Marlowe Goble | Ligament attachment method and apparatus |
FR2623085B1 (en) | 1987-11-16 | 1992-08-14 | Breard Francis | SURGICAL IMPLANT TO LIMIT THE RELATIVE MOVEMENT OF VERTEBRES |
FR2625097B1 (en) | 1987-12-23 | 1990-05-18 | Cote Sarl | INTER-SPINOUS PROSTHESIS COMPOSED OF SEMI-ELASTIC MATERIAL COMPRISING A TRANSFILING EYE AT ITS END AND INTER-SPINOUS PADS |
US5011494A (en) | 1988-09-16 | 1991-04-30 | Clemson University | Soft tissue implant with micron-scale surface texture to optimize anchorage |
GB8825909D0 (en) | 1988-11-04 | 1988-12-07 | Showell A W Sugicraft Ltd | Pedicle engaging means |
US4870957A (en) | 1988-12-27 | 1989-10-03 | Marlowe Goble E | Ligament anchor system |
US4966600A (en) | 1989-01-26 | 1990-10-30 | Songer Robert J | Surgical securance method |
US5116340A (en) | 1989-01-26 | 1992-05-26 | Songer Robert J | Surgical securance apparatus |
FR2642645B1 (en) | 1989-02-03 | 1992-08-14 | Breard Francis | FLEXIBLE INTERVERTEBRAL STABILIZER AND METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR CONTROLLING ITS VOLTAGE BEFORE PLACEMENT ON THE RACHIS |
USRE36221E (en) | 1989-02-03 | 1999-06-01 | Breard; Francis Henri | Flexible inter-vertebral stabilizer as well as process and apparatus for determining or verifying its tension before installation on the spinal column |
US4955910A (en) | 1989-07-17 | 1990-09-11 | Boehringer Mannheim Corporation | Fixation system for an elongated prosthesis |
US5108433A (en) | 1989-08-18 | 1992-04-28 | Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company | Tensioning means for prosthetic devices |
US5002574A (en) | 1989-08-18 | 1991-03-26 | Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Co. | Tensioning means for prosthetic devices |
US5030220A (en) | 1990-03-29 | 1991-07-09 | Advanced Spine Fixation Systems Incorporated | Spine fixation system |
EP0453393B1 (en) | 1990-04-20 | 1993-10-06 | SULZER Medizinaltechnik AG | Implant, particularly intervertebral prosthesis |
FR2666981B1 (en) | 1990-09-21 | 1993-06-25 | Commarmond Jacques | SYNTHETIC LIGAMENT VERTEBRAL. |
FR2681525A1 (en) | 1991-09-19 | 1993-03-26 | Medical Op | Device for flexible or semi-rigid stabilisation of the spine, in particular of the human spine, by a posterior route |
GB9122753D0 (en) | 1991-10-26 | 1991-12-11 | Reis Nicolas D | Internal ilio-lumbar fixator |
FR2693364B1 (en) | 1992-07-07 | 1995-06-30 | Erpios Snc | INTERVERTEBRAL PROSTHESIS FOR STABILIZING ROTATORY AND FLEXIBLE-EXTENSION CONSTRAINTS. |
GB9217578D0 (en) * | 1992-08-19 | 1992-09-30 | Surgicarft Ltd | Surgical implants,etc |
US5456722A (en) | 1993-01-06 | 1995-10-10 | Smith & Nephew Richards Inc. | Load bearing polymeric cable |
US5540703A (en) | 1993-01-06 | 1996-07-30 | Smith & Nephew Richards Inc. | Knotted cable attachment apparatus formed of braided polymeric fibers |
US5496318A (en) | 1993-01-08 | 1996-03-05 | Advanced Spine Fixation Systems, Inc. | Interspinous segmental spine fixation device |
US5415661A (en) | 1993-03-24 | 1995-05-16 | University Of Miami | Implantable spinal assist device |
US5449361A (en) | 1993-04-21 | 1995-09-12 | Amei Technologies Inc. | Orthopedic cable tensioner |
US5540698A (en) | 1993-04-21 | 1996-07-30 | Amei Technologies Inc. | System and method for securing a medical cable |
FR2709246B1 (en) * | 1993-08-27 | 1995-09-29 | Martin Jean Raymond | Dynamic implanted spinal orthosis. |
US5395374A (en) | 1993-09-02 | 1995-03-07 | Danek Medical, Inc. | Orthopedic cabling method and apparatus |
US5354917A (en) * | 1993-11-12 | 1994-10-11 | Texaco Chemical Company | Use of supported rhodium catalysts in the preparation of tertiary butyl alcohol from tertiary butyl hydroperoxide |
FR2712481B1 (en) | 1993-11-18 | 1996-01-12 | Graf Henry | Improvements to flexible inter-vertebral stabilizers. |
US5415658A (en) | 1993-12-14 | 1995-05-16 | Pioneer Laboratories, Inc. | Surgical cable loop connector |
FR2714591B1 (en) | 1994-01-06 | 1996-03-01 | Euros Sa | Prosthetic element for the lumbosacral joint. |
US5462542A (en) | 1994-01-24 | 1995-10-31 | United States Surgical Corporation | Sternum buckle with serrated strap |
CA2141911C (en) * | 1994-02-24 | 2002-04-23 | Jude S. Sauer | Surgical crimping device and method of use |
FR2717675B1 (en) | 1994-03-24 | 1996-05-03 | Jean Taylor | Interspinous wedge. |
US5458601A (en) | 1994-03-28 | 1995-10-17 | Medical University Of South Carolina | Adjustable ligament anchor |
FR2722980B1 (en) | 1994-07-26 | 1996-09-27 | Samani Jacques | INTERTEPINOUS VERTEBRAL IMPLANT |
DE69526113D1 (en) | 1994-11-16 | 2002-05-02 | Advanced Spine Fixation Syst | GRAPPING HOOKS FOR FIXING THE SPINE SEGMENTS |
US5645084A (en) * | 1995-06-07 | 1997-07-08 | Danek Medical, Inc. | Method for spinal fusion without decortication |
EP0743045A2 (en) | 1995-04-28 | 1996-11-20 | Gazzani, Romolo Igino | Devices for osteosynthesis |
US5707379A (en) * | 1995-10-20 | 1998-01-13 | Coral Medical | Method and apparatus for intracorporeal suturing |
DE19627864C2 (en) | 1996-07-11 | 2003-05-08 | Aesculap Ag & Co Kg | Surgical jig |
US6835207B2 (en) | 1996-07-22 | 2004-12-28 | Fred Zacouto | Skeletal implant |
KR100189371B1 (en) * | 1996-08-23 | 1999-06-01 | 전주범 | An interpolator of digital decoder |
US5810815A (en) | 1996-09-20 | 1998-09-22 | Morales; Jose A. | Surgical apparatus for use in the treatment of spinal deformities |
AU4480097A (en) | 1996-09-20 | 1998-04-14 | Medicinelodge, Inc. | Adjustable length strap and footing for ligament mounting and method for its use |
US6712819B2 (en) | 1998-10-20 | 2004-03-30 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Mating insertion instruments for spinal implants and methods of use |
US7201751B2 (en) * | 1997-01-02 | 2007-04-10 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Supplemental spine fixation device |
US6451019B1 (en) | 1998-10-20 | 2002-09-17 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Supplemental spine fixation device and method |
US6068630A (en) * | 1997-01-02 | 2000-05-30 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Spine distraction implant |
US5836948A (en) | 1997-01-02 | 1998-11-17 | Saint Francis Medical Technologies, Llc | Spine distraction implant and method |
DE69837626T2 (en) * | 1997-02-11 | 2007-12-20 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc., Warsaw | Plate with locking mechanism for the anterior cervical spine |
US6828357B1 (en) * | 1997-07-31 | 2004-12-07 | Metabolix, Inc. | Polyhydroxyalkanoate compositions having controlled degradation rates |
US6053921A (en) | 1997-08-26 | 2000-04-25 | Spinal Concepts, Inc. | Surgical cable system and method |
US5964769A (en) | 1997-08-26 | 1999-10-12 | Spinal Concepts, Inc. | Surgical cable system and method |
US6322279B1 (en) * | 1997-11-04 | 2001-11-27 | Sports Carriers, Inc. | Adjustable attachment device |
US6395018B1 (en) * | 1998-02-09 | 2002-05-28 | Wilfrido R. Castaneda | Endovascular graft and process for bridging a defect in a main vessel near one of more branch vessels |
FR2775183B1 (en) | 1998-02-20 | 2000-08-04 | Jean Taylor | INTER-SPINOUS PROSTHESIS |
US6224630B1 (en) | 1998-05-29 | 2001-05-01 | Advanced Bio Surfaces, Inc. | Implantable tissue repair device |
US6652527B2 (en) | 1998-10-20 | 2003-11-25 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Supplemental spine fixation device and method |
US5989256A (en) | 1999-01-19 | 1999-11-23 | Spineology, Inc. | Bone fixation cable ferrule |
US6299613B1 (en) | 1999-04-23 | 2001-10-09 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Method for the correction of spinal deformities through vertebral body tethering without fusion |
US6296643B1 (en) * | 1999-04-23 | 2001-10-02 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Device for the correction of spinal deformities through vertebral body tethering without fusion |
US6436099B1 (en) | 1999-04-23 | 2002-08-20 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Adjustable spinal tether |
FR2799640B1 (en) | 1999-10-15 | 2002-01-25 | Spine Next Sa | IMPLANT INTERVETEBRAL |
US6378289B1 (en) | 1999-11-19 | 2002-04-30 | Pioneer Surgical Technology | Methods and apparatus for clamping surgical wires or cables |
US6558389B2 (en) | 1999-11-30 | 2003-05-06 | Ron Clark | Endosteal tibial ligament fixation with adjustable tensioning |
GB9929599D0 (en) | 1999-12-15 | 2000-02-09 | Atlantech Medical Devices Limi | A graft suspension device |
US6629975B1 (en) | 1999-12-20 | 2003-10-07 | Pioneer Laboratories, Icn. | Multiple lumen crimp |
US6899716B2 (en) * | 2000-02-16 | 2005-05-31 | Trans1, Inc. | Method and apparatus for spinal augmentation |
US6248106B1 (en) | 2000-02-25 | 2001-06-19 | Bret Ferree | Cross-coupled vertebral stabilizers |
US6402750B1 (en) | 2000-04-04 | 2002-06-11 | Spinlabs, Llc | Devices and methods for the treatment of spinal disorders |
US6312431B1 (en) | 2000-04-24 | 2001-11-06 | Wilson T. Asfora | Vertebrae linking system |
US6427080B1 (en) | 2000-05-16 | 2002-07-30 | Richard E. Radak | Cervical spine gauge and process |
US6964667B2 (en) | 2000-06-23 | 2005-11-15 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Formed in place fixation system with thermal acceleration |
US6605091B1 (en) | 2000-06-30 | 2003-08-12 | Pioneer Laboratories, Inc. | Surgical cable assembly and method |
FR2811543B1 (en) | 2000-07-12 | 2003-07-04 | Spine Next Sa | INTERSOMATIC IMPLANT |
FR2811540B1 (en) | 2000-07-12 | 2003-04-25 | Spine Next Sa | IMPORTING INTERVERTEBRAL IMPLANT |
EP1192908A3 (en) | 2000-10-02 | 2004-05-26 | Howmedica Osteonics Corp. | System and method for spinal reconstruction |
US6468309B1 (en) | 2000-10-05 | 2002-10-22 | Cleveland Clinic Foundation | Method and apparatus for stabilizing adjacent bones |
US6656185B2 (en) | 2000-10-24 | 2003-12-02 | Spineology Inc. | Tension band clip |
FR2817461B1 (en) | 2000-12-01 | 2003-08-15 | Henry Graf | INTERVERTEBRAL STABILIZATION DEVICE |
US6752831B2 (en) | 2000-12-08 | 2004-06-22 | Osteotech, Inc. | Biocompatible osteogenic band for repair of spinal disorders |
FR2818530B1 (en) | 2000-12-22 | 2003-10-31 | Spine Next Sa | INTERVERTEBRAL IMPLANT WITH DEFORMABLE SHIM |
US6364883B1 (en) | 2001-02-23 | 2002-04-02 | Albert N. Santilli | Spinous process clamp for spinal fusion and method of operation |
US6652585B2 (en) | 2001-02-28 | 2003-11-25 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Flexible spine stabilization system |
FR2822051B1 (en) | 2001-03-13 | 2004-02-27 | Spine Next Sa | INTERVERTEBRAL IMPLANT WITH SELF-LOCKING ATTACHMENT |
US6582433B2 (en) | 2001-04-09 | 2003-06-24 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Spine fixation device and method |
US6589246B1 (en) * | 2001-04-26 | 2003-07-08 | Poly-4 Medical, Inc. | Method of applying an active compressive force continuously across a fracture |
GB0114783D0 (en) | 2001-06-16 | 2001-08-08 | Sengupta Dilip K | A assembly for the stabilisation of vertebral bodies of the spine |
FR2828398B1 (en) | 2001-08-08 | 2003-09-19 | Jean Taylor | VERTEBRA STABILIZATION ASSEMBLY |
US6736815B2 (en) | 2001-09-06 | 2004-05-18 | Core Medical, Inc. | Apparatus and methods for treating spinal discs |
JP4100890B2 (en) | 2001-09-11 | 2008-06-11 | ペンタックス株式会社 | Lingual spacer |
US6695852B2 (en) | 2001-10-31 | 2004-02-24 | Spineology, Inc. | Tension tools for tension band clip |
US7285121B2 (en) * | 2001-11-05 | 2007-10-23 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Devices and methods for the correction and treatment of spinal deformities |
FR2832917B1 (en) | 2001-11-30 | 2004-09-24 | Spine Next Sa | ELASTICALLY DEFORMABLE INTERVERTEBRAL IMPLANT |
US6669729B2 (en) | 2002-03-08 | 2003-12-30 | Kingsley Richard Chin | Apparatus and method for the replacement of posterior vertebral elements |
US7052497B2 (en) | 2002-08-14 | 2006-05-30 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Techniques for spinal surgery and attaching constructs to vertebral elements |
FR2844179B1 (en) | 2002-09-10 | 2004-12-03 | Jean Taylor | POSTERIOR VERTEBRAL SUPPORT KIT |
US7608094B2 (en) | 2002-10-10 | 2009-10-27 | U.S. Spinal Technologies, Llc | Percutaneous facet fixation system |
US7909853B2 (en) * | 2004-09-23 | 2011-03-22 | Kyphon Sarl | Interspinous process implant including a binder and method of implantation |
US20040210310A1 (en) | 2002-12-10 | 2004-10-21 | Trieu Hai H. | Implant system and method for intervertebral disc augmentation |
US20050055096A1 (en) * | 2002-12-31 | 2005-03-10 | Depuy Spine, Inc. | Functional spinal unit prosthetic |
US7101398B2 (en) | 2002-12-31 | 2006-09-05 | Depuy Acromed, Inc. | Prosthetic facet joint ligament |
FR2850009B1 (en) | 2003-01-20 | 2005-12-23 | Spine Next Sa | TREATMENT ASSEMBLY FOR THE DEGENERATION OF AN INTERVERTEBRAL DISC |
US8172876B2 (en) * | 2003-02-05 | 2012-05-08 | Pioneer Surgical Technology, Inc. | Spinal fixation systems |
US7335203B2 (en) | 2003-02-12 | 2008-02-26 | Kyphon Inc. | System and method for immobilizing adjacent spinous processes |
FR2851154B1 (en) * | 2003-02-19 | 2006-07-07 | Sdgi Holding Inc | INTER-SPINOUS DEVICE FOR BRAKING THE MOVEMENTS OF TWO SUCCESSIVE VERTEBRATES, AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME THEREOF |
ATE499889T1 (en) | 2003-05-02 | 2011-03-15 | Univ Yale | DYNAMIC SPINAL STABILIZER |
US6986771B2 (en) | 2003-05-23 | 2006-01-17 | Globus Medical, Inc. | Spine stabilization system |
WO2004105577A2 (en) | 2003-05-23 | 2004-12-09 | Globus Medical, Inc. | Spine stabilization system |
FR2858546B1 (en) | 2003-08-04 | 2006-04-28 | Spine Next Sa | INTERVERTEBRAL DISC PROSTHESIS |
WO2005037150A1 (en) | 2003-10-16 | 2005-04-28 | Osteotech, Inc. | System and method for flexible correction of bony motion segment |
US7591837B2 (en) * | 2003-10-28 | 2009-09-22 | Pyramid Spine, Llc | Facet triangle spinal fixation device and method of use |
US8632570B2 (en) | 2003-11-07 | 2014-01-21 | Biedermann Technologies Gmbh & Co. Kg | Stabilization device for bones comprising a spring element and manufacturing method for said spring element |
US8133500B2 (en) | 2003-12-04 | 2012-03-13 | Kensey Nash Bvf Technology, Llc | Compressed high density fibrous polymers suitable for implant |
US7553320B2 (en) * | 2003-12-10 | 2009-06-30 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Method and apparatus for replacing the function of facet joints |
US20050192581A1 (en) | 2004-02-27 | 2005-09-01 | Molz Fred J. | Radiopaque, coaxial orthopedic tether design and method |
US8636802B2 (en) | 2004-03-06 | 2014-01-28 | DePuy Synthes Products, LLC | Dynamized interspinal implant |
US7458981B2 (en) | 2004-03-09 | 2008-12-02 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Spinal implant and method for restricting spinal flexion |
US8523904B2 (en) | 2004-03-09 | 2013-09-03 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Methods and systems for constraint of spinous processes with attachment |
WO2006071251A2 (en) * | 2004-04-07 | 2006-07-06 | Tiax Llc | Tourniquet and method of using same |
US7452351B2 (en) * | 2004-04-16 | 2008-11-18 | Kyphon Sarl | Spinal diagnostic methods and apparatus |
US7524324B2 (en) * | 2004-04-28 | 2009-04-28 | Kyphon Sarl | System and method for an interspinous process implant as a supplement to a spine stabilization implant |
US20050267470A1 (en) * | 2004-05-13 | 2005-12-01 | Mcbride Duncan Q | Spinal stabilization system to flexibly connect vertebrae |
JP4382092B2 (en) | 2004-05-17 | 2009-12-09 | ウリドル スパイン ヘルス インスティチュート シーオー. | Intervertebral insert |
US20060036324A1 (en) | 2004-08-03 | 2006-02-16 | Dan Sachs | Adjustable spinal implant device and method |
FR2874167B1 (en) | 2004-08-12 | 2006-11-10 | Philippe Mengus | INTER SPINE DAMPER |
US7766940B2 (en) | 2004-12-30 | 2010-08-03 | Depuy Spine, Inc. | Posterior stabilization system |
US20060084976A1 (en) | 2004-09-30 | 2006-04-20 | Depuy Spine, Inc. | Posterior stabilization systems and methods |
US7559951B2 (en) | 2004-09-30 | 2009-07-14 | Depuy Products, Inc. | Adjustable, remote-controllable orthopaedic prosthesis and associated method |
US7918875B2 (en) | 2004-10-25 | 2011-04-05 | Lanx, Inc. | Interspinous distraction devices and associated methods of insertion |
US20060106381A1 (en) | 2004-11-18 | 2006-05-18 | Ferree Bret A | Methods and apparatus for treating spinal stenosis |
WO2006066053A1 (en) * | 2004-12-15 | 2006-06-22 | Stryker Spine | Spinal rods having segments of different elastic properties and methods of using them |
US20060195102A1 (en) | 2005-02-17 | 2006-08-31 | Malandain Hugues F | Apparatus and method for treatment of spinal conditions |
US8029549B2 (en) * | 2005-02-17 | 2011-10-04 | Kyphon Sarl | Percutaneous spinal implants and methods |
FR2884136B1 (en) * | 2005-04-08 | 2008-02-22 | Spinevision Sa | INTERVERTEBRAL SURGICAL IMPLANT FORMING BALL |
US7862590B2 (en) | 2005-04-08 | 2011-01-04 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Interspinous process spacer |
US20060271055A1 (en) | 2005-05-12 | 2006-11-30 | Jeffery Thramann | Spinal stabilization |
JP2008543449A (en) * | 2005-06-17 | 2008-12-04 | アボット・ラボラトリーズ | Improved treatment of degenerative spinal disease |
US8273088B2 (en) * | 2005-07-08 | 2012-09-25 | Depuy Spine, Inc. | Bone removal tool |
US20070083200A1 (en) * | 2005-09-23 | 2007-04-12 | Gittings Darin C | Spinal stabilization systems and methods |
US20080183209A1 (en) * | 2005-09-23 | 2008-07-31 | Spinal Kinetics, Inc. | Spinal Stabilization Device |
US7922745B2 (en) | 2006-01-09 | 2011-04-12 | Zimmer Spine, Inc. | Posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US20070233096A1 (en) | 2006-02-13 | 2007-10-04 | Javier Garcia-Bengochea | Dynamic inter-spinous device |
US8105357B2 (en) | 2006-04-28 | 2012-01-31 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Interspinous process brace |
US7862569B2 (en) * | 2006-06-22 | 2011-01-04 | Kyphon Sarl | System and method for strengthening a spinous process |
US20070299445A1 (en) | 2006-06-22 | 2007-12-27 | Shadduck John H | Spine treatment devices and methods |
US20080021466A1 (en) | 2006-07-20 | 2008-01-24 | Shadduck John H | Spine treatment devices and methods |
US20080051784A1 (en) * | 2006-08-03 | 2008-02-28 | Sohrab Gollogly | Bone repositioning apparatus and methodology |
US20080097431A1 (en) * | 2006-09-22 | 2008-04-24 | Paul Peter Vessa | Flexible spinal stabilization |
WO2008051801A2 (en) | 2006-10-19 | 2008-05-02 | Simpirica Spine, Inc. | Structures and methods for constraining spinal processes with single connector |
US8162982B2 (en) * | 2006-10-19 | 2012-04-24 | Simpirica Spine, Inc. | Methods and systems for constraint of multiple spine segments |
US8029541B2 (en) | 2006-10-19 | 2011-10-04 | Simpirica Spine, Inc. | Methods and systems for laterally stabilized constraint of spinous processes |
US20080262549A1 (en) | 2006-10-19 | 2008-10-23 | Simpirica Spine, Inc. | Methods and systems for deploying spinous process constraints |
US20080177298A1 (en) | 2006-10-24 | 2008-07-24 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Tensioner Tool and Method for Implanting an Interspinous Process Implant Including a Binder |
US20080114357A1 (en) * | 2006-11-15 | 2008-05-15 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Inter-transverse process spacer device and method for use in correcting a spinal deformity |
US8109978B2 (en) | 2006-11-28 | 2012-02-07 | Anova Corporation | Methods of posterior fixation and stabilization of a spinal segment |
ES2601355T3 (en) | 2006-12-10 | 2017-02-14 | Paradigm Spine, Llc | Dynamic post stabilization system |
US9173686B2 (en) * | 2007-05-09 | 2015-11-03 | Ebi, Llc | Interspinous implant |
EP1994901A1 (en) | 2007-05-24 | 2008-11-26 | Bio Medical S.r.L. | Intervertebral support device |
US20100036424A1 (en) * | 2007-06-22 | 2010-02-11 | Simpirica Spine, Inc. | Methods and systems for increasing the bending stiffness and constraining the spreading of a spinal segment |
EP2182864B1 (en) | 2007-06-22 | 2016-06-08 | Empirical Spine, Inc. | Devices for controlled flexion restriction of spinal segments |
US8696714B2 (en) | 2007-11-02 | 2014-04-15 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Intervertebral stabilization devices |
WO2009149414A1 (en) * | 2008-06-06 | 2009-12-10 | Simpirica Spine, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for locking a band |
WO2009149407A1 (en) | 2008-06-06 | 2009-12-10 | Simpirica Spine, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for locking a band |
WO2009149399A1 (en) * | 2008-06-06 | 2009-12-10 | Simpirica Spine, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for deploying spinous process constraints |
ES2523801T3 (en) | 2008-09-03 | 2014-12-01 | Simpirica Spine, Inc. | Apparatus for coupling a prosthesis to a segment of the spine |
US8562653B2 (en) | 2009-03-10 | 2013-10-22 | Simpirica Spine, Inc. | Surgical tether apparatus and methods of use |
US8529606B2 (en) | 2009-03-10 | 2013-09-10 | Simpirica Spine, Inc. | Surgical tether apparatus and methods of use |
WO2010114853A1 (en) | 2009-03-30 | 2010-10-07 | Simpirica Spine, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for improving shear loading capacity of a spinal segment |
US10610308B2 (en) | 2017-02-01 | 2020-04-07 | Acclarent, Inc. | Navigation guidewire with interlocked coils |
-
2009
- 2009-04-17 US US12/426,167 patent/US8187307B2/en active Active
-
2010
- 2010-04-19 JP JP2012505996A patent/JP2012523903A/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2010-04-19 ES ES10765340.4T patent/ES2527993T3/en active Active
- 2010-04-19 EP EP10765340.4A patent/EP2419034B1/en active Active
- 2010-04-19 WO PCT/US2010/031615 patent/WO2010121256A1/en active Application Filing
-
2012
- 2012-04-25 US US13/455,917 patent/US20120209328A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20060241591A1 (en) * | 2005-04-25 | 2006-10-26 | Spineco, Inc. | Vertebral pars interarticularis clamp a new spine fixation device, instrumentation, and methodology |
Cited By (17)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8486110B2 (en) | 2004-03-09 | 2013-07-16 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Spinal implant and method for restricting spinal flexion |
US8523904B2 (en) | 2004-03-09 | 2013-09-03 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Methods and systems for constraint of spinous processes with attachment |
US9149304B2 (en) | 2004-03-09 | 2015-10-06 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Sanford Junior University | Methods and systems for constraint of spinous processes with attachment |
US10080589B2 (en) | 2004-03-09 | 2018-09-25 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Methods and systems for constraint of spinous processes with attachment |
US9295499B2 (en) | 2006-10-19 | 2016-03-29 | Empirical Spine, Inc. | Methods and systems for laterally stabilized constraint of spinous processes |
US8790380B2 (en) | 2007-07-26 | 2014-07-29 | Dynamic Spine, Llc | Segmental orthopaedic device for spinal elongation and for treatment of scoliosis |
US20140336705A1 (en) * | 2007-07-26 | 2014-11-13 | Dynamic Spine, Llc | Segmental orthopedic device for spinal elongation and for treatment of scoliosis |
US9204908B2 (en) * | 2007-07-26 | 2015-12-08 | Dynamic Spine, Llc | Segmental orthopedic device for spinal elongation and for treatment of scoliosis |
US9204899B2 (en) * | 2007-07-26 | 2015-12-08 | Dynamic Spine, Llc | Segmental orthopedic device for spinal elongation and for treatment of scoliosis |
US10022238B1 (en) | 2009-11-25 | 2018-07-17 | Moskowitz Family Llc | Total artificial spino-laminar prosthetic replacement |
US9901455B2 (en) * | 2009-11-25 | 2018-02-27 | Nathan C. Moskowitz | Total artificial spino-laminar prosthetic replacement |
US20110125269A1 (en) * | 2009-11-25 | 2011-05-26 | Moskowitz Nathan C | Total artificial spino-laminar prosthetic replacement |
US11116642B2 (en) | 2009-11-25 | 2021-09-14 | Moskowitz Family Llc | Total artificial spino-laminar prosthetic replacement |
US9277950B2 (en) | 2010-06-10 | 2016-03-08 | Dynamic Spine, Llc | Low-profile, uniplanar bone screw |
US9717541B2 (en) | 2015-04-13 | 2017-08-01 | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. | Lamina implants and methods for spinal decompression |
US10342584B2 (en) | 2015-04-13 | 2019-07-09 | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. | Lamina implants and methods for spinal decompression |
US11116551B2 (en) | 2015-04-13 | 2021-09-14 | DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. | Lamina implants and methods for spinal decompression |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
ES2527993T3 (en) | 2015-02-03 |
US20090264929A1 (en) | 2009-10-22 |
EP2419034B1 (en) | 2014-11-12 |
JP2012523903A (en) | 2012-10-11 |
EP2419034A4 (en) | 2013-01-09 |
EP2419034A1 (en) | 2012-02-22 |
WO2010121256A1 (en) | 2010-10-21 |
US8187307B2 (en) | 2012-05-29 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US8187307B2 (en) | Structures and methods for constraining spinal processes with single connector | |
EP2081509B1 (en) | Structures for constraining spinal processes with single connector | |
US10080589B2 (en) | Methods and systems for constraint of spinous processes with attachment | |
JP5555711B2 (en) | Methods and devices for limiting spinal segment flexion and extension | |
US8790372B2 (en) | Methods and systems for constraint of multiple spine segments | |
US9295499B2 (en) | Methods and systems for laterally stabilized constraint of spinous processes | |
JP2010527743A (en) | Spinous process implant and method of using the same | |
US20080262549A1 (en) | Methods and systems for deploying spinous process constraints | |
JP2010537737A (en) | Spinous process implant and method of using the same | |
US20160008038A1 (en) | Methods and systems for constraint of multiple spine segments | |
US20220338905A1 (en) | Methods and systems for constraint of spinous processes with attachment |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: SIMPIRICA SPINE, INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:ALAMIN, TODD;BENNETT, IAN;FIELDING, LOUIS;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20090520 TO 20090526;REEL/FRAME:028107/0489 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |