US20140304011A1 - Systems and methods for customizing insurance - Google Patents

Systems and methods for customizing insurance Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20140304011A1
US20140304011A1 US14/311,046 US201414311046A US2014304011A1 US 20140304011 A1 US20140304011 A1 US 20140304011A1 US 201414311046 A US201414311046 A US 201414311046A US 2014304011 A1 US2014304011 A1 US 2014304011A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
insurance
package
features
feature
customer
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US14/311,046
Inventor
Floyd M. Yager
Thomas J. Wilson
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Allstate Insurance Co
Original Assignee
Allstate Insurance Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Allstate Insurance Co filed Critical Allstate Insurance Co
Priority to US14/311,046 priority Critical patent/US20140304011A1/en
Publication of US20140304011A1 publication Critical patent/US20140304011A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q40/00Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
    • G06Q40/08Insurance
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • G06Q10/067Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce
    • G06Q30/02Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
    • G06Q30/0201Market modelling; Market analysis; Collecting market data
    • G06Q30/0202Market predictions or forecasting for commercial activities
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce
    • G06Q30/06Buying, selling or leasing transactions
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce
    • G06Q30/06Buying, selling or leasing transactions
    • G06Q30/0601Electronic shopping [e-shopping]
    • G06Q30/0621Item configuration or customization
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q40/00Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
    • G06Q40/02Banking, e.g. interest calculation or account maintenance

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to systems and methods for customizing property and casualty insurance and, more particularly, to customizing property and casualty insurance policies according to consumer preferences.
  • the present invention also provides systems and methods to design insurance products in a manner that allows consumers to select insurance packages that include features they consider appropriate for their needs.
  • a method consistent with the invention provides insurance using a data processing system.
  • the method comprises electronically analyzing, by a processor, data to identify a target population and a set of insurance features desired by the target population; and bundling the set of insurance features into an insurance package.
  • Another method consistent with the invention provides insurance using a data processing system.
  • the method comprises creating a standard package with a set of insurance features; electronically analyzing, by a processor, data to identify a market segment; identifying insurance features desired by the market segment; and bundling the identified insurance features into an insurance package.
  • Yet another method consistent with the invention creates an insurance package using a data processing system.
  • the method comprises creating a standard package with a set of insurance features; electronically analyzing, by a processor, data gathered through consumer research to identify a target population; identifying insurance features desired by the target population; and bundling the identified insurance features into an insurance package.
  • a system consistent with the invention provides optimized insurance.
  • the system comprises a memory; a server coupled to a network, wherein the server executes program instructions for an optimization process; and a terminal coupled to the network, wherein the terminal allows a user to execute the optimization process to create an insurance package.
  • Another method consistent with the invention provides insurance using a data processing system.
  • the method comprises retrieving, from a database, a profile of a customer accessing a website; electronically identifying, by a processor, profiles of customers in common with the profile of a customer; and presenting an insurance package to the customer for consideration that is based upon a comparison of the profile of the customer and the identified profiles.
  • the system comprises a database, the database storing a profile of a customer accessing a website; and a processor, the processor identifying profiles of customers in common with the profile of a customer and presenting an insurance package to the customer for consideration that is based upon a comparison of the profile of the customer and the identified profiles.
  • FIG. 1 is an exemplary flowchart for optimizing insurance products
  • FIG. 2 is an exemplary chart comparing feature relevance and feature differentiation
  • FIG. 3 is an exemplary method of offering insurance consistent with the principles of the present invention
  • FIG. 4 shows an exemplary insurance product comprising packages selected from FIG. 3 ;
  • FIG. 5 is another exemplary method of offering insurance consistent with the principles of the present invention.
  • FIG. 6 shows an exemplary insurance product comprising packages selected from FIG. 5 ;
  • FIG. 7 is an exemplary system consistent with the present invention.
  • FIG. 8 is an exemplary flowchart for presenting insurance packages to a customer for the customer's consideration, consistent with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • insurance is an agreement by which an insurer, sometimes referred to as an underwriter, undertakes to indemnify the insured party against loss, damage, or liability arising from certain risks.
  • the consideration paid by an insured party is typically referred to as a premium, which is paid to keep the insurance in effect.
  • an insurance policy is a contract of insurance that defines the rights and duties of the contracting parties.
  • a typical insurance policy includes limits on the amount of risk that the insurer will cover.
  • an insurance product includes more than the insurance policy. It also includes services, distribution channels, and other components which may impact the customer experience.
  • Systems and methods consistent with the present invention provide consumers with insurance products that may help them address some of their individual needs or wants by including features that a particular group may find desirable or appropriate.
  • features include coverages, terms, and rewards.
  • a coverage provides a protection or indemnification to the insured.
  • a term includes any word, phrase, or provision of import that determines the nature and scope of an agreement, such as the coverage grant in an insurance coverage or the premium charged.
  • a reward may include a discount, credit, or benefit provided to the insured upon the occurrence of a specified event.
  • Ala carte features refer to coverages, terms, and rewards that are selected by the insured on an individual basis for inclusion in an insurance product.
  • an automobile insurance product may be grouped together to form a package.
  • One grouping of features may form a value package for price conscious consumers, another grouping may form a protection plus package providing additional features, and yet another grouping may form a platinum package including yet more additional features.
  • An automobile insurance product may also include a standard package that includes coverages required by state law, such as bodily injury liability coverage and property damage liability coverage. Coverages in a standard package may also include personal injury protection coverage, medical payment coverage, uninsured motorist coverage, underinsured motorist coverage, collision coverage, and comprehensive coverage.
  • States mandate minimum types and levels of insurance coverage for automobile policies. For example, a state may require liability coverage with mandated minimum coverage limits. States can individually make common coverages mandatory or optional. Banks or financial institutions may make other coverages, such as collision and comprehensive, a prerequisite to obtain financing.
  • An automobile insurance product offering might include standard coverages required by state law and/or financial institutions. Insurance companies may offer other coverages and limits, such as towing reimbursement and car rental reimbursement.
  • Automobile insurance consumers find value in optional coverages designed around potential risks uniquely associated with driving and or repairing of vehicles. For example, a car rental reimbursement coverage may help pay for the use of a rented vehicle while the insured vehicle is being repaired due to a loss caused by a covered peril.
  • a basic package might include a reduced premium by adding in a few terms. It is designed as an alternative for the customer particularly concerned about price.
  • a customer may be required to participate in an arrangement that automatically makes periodic (for example, monthly) deductions from the insured's savings or checking account to pay the premium and other charges or fees associated with the insurance.
  • Customers will be charged an early termination fee (such as $100) if the insurance is terminated by the insured, which might include the insured's failure to accept a renewal offer, or terminated for non-payment of premium, within a specified period of time after the package is added.
  • Another optimized package might offer an accident-waiver enhancement feature and a safe-driving-deductible reward feature.
  • the accident-waiver enhancement feature might specify that the first rate-affecting accident that occurs will not cause the loss of certain discounts or result in the application of any accident surcharges. Subsequent rate-affecting accidents will not cause the loss of the discounts or the application of any accident surcharges if the insured has not received this waiver in the thirty-six month experience period ending on the date of the accident.
  • the safe-driving deductible reward feature might provide, upon enrollment, that the customer will receive an initial reduction (such as $100) in his or her collision deductible. For each twelve-month experience period the policy is not assigned an accident, the insured will receive an additional reduction (up to a maximum $500 reduction) in their collision deductible that will apply to all covered collision claims during the next policy period.
  • Yet another optimized package might offer an accident waiver enhancement plus feature, a safe-driving deductible reward feature, and a safe-driving bonus feature.
  • an accident waiver enhancement plus feature neither a single accident nor multiple accidents will cause the loss of certain discounts or the application of accident surcharges as long as the accidents occur while this feature is part of the policy.
  • the safe-driving bonus feature may provide if the policy is not assigned an accident for a designated six-month experience period, the insured will receive 5% of their previous term's premium for major coverages as a credit that can be applied toward the next six-month premium.
  • Both the above-described exemplary optimized packages may also allow the customer the opportunity to add, for an additional premium, an additional feature in the form of a new car expanded protection coverage feature on an automobile that has collision and comprehensive coverages.
  • the coverage provided by this feature will continue while collision and comprehensive coverages are maintained and will be removed at the first renewal that is effective in the calendar year that is three years greater than the auto's model year.
  • the new-car expanded protection coverage feature may provide that, in the event of a covered loss to an automobile other than a total loss, the insurance carrier will pay to repair the auto without a deduction for depreciation.
  • the repair coverage may not apply to losses caused by fire, theft, larceny, or flood.
  • the amount payable will be reduced by any amounts paid or payable under the collision or comprehensive coverages as well as any applicable collision or comprehensive deductible.
  • the new-car expanded protection coverage feature may also provide that, in the event of a covered total loss, the insurance-carrier will pay to replace the automobile with a new one of the same make and model with the same equipment or, if a new automobile of the same make and model with the same equipment is not available, a new automobile that is similar in size, class, body type and equipment (subject to a price limitation described in the coverage).
  • the replacement coverage may not apply to leased vehicles or to losses caused by fire, theft, larceny, or flood.
  • the amount payable will be reduced by any amounts paid or payable under the collision or comprehensive coverages, any applicable collision or comprehensive deductible, and the dollar amount of any unrepaired damage that occurred prior to the total loss of the automobile.
  • the new-car expanded protection coverage feature may also provide that, in the event of a covered total loss, if the amount the customer owes under the original automobile loan or automobile lease exceeds the actual cash value of the automobile at the time of loss, the insurance carrier will pay the difference between the amounts.
  • the amount payable may be reduced by any overdue loan or lease payments (and any financial penalties associated with those overdue payments), the transfer or rollover of a previous outstanding loan or lease balance from another vehicle to the original loan or lease for the covered automobile, the dollar amount of unrepaired damage which occurred prior to the total loss, all refunds paid or payable to the customer as a result of the early termination of the automobile loan or automobile lease agreement (including financed warranty/extended service contracts), and any amount paid or payable under the replacement protection of the new car expanded coverage protection feature.
  • Need states refer to the complex web of rational and subconscious triggers that prompt a consumer to make a product selection. Need states may be prompted by a consumer deciding that he or she needs or wants to obtain a product. Furthermore, they are generally a result of an individual's situation at a particular point in time. Life-stage events, such as a new driver in the family, shift consumers' need states. Of course, automobile insurance consumers may have varied circumstances, and consequently, differing insurance needs and wants. One may be a student with limited resources, and as a result, might select state-mandated coverage. Another may be near retirement and focused on protection of assets and convenience of services.
  • Systems and methods consistent with the present invention identify distinct groupings of insurance consumers with similar need states and identify the most commonly desired optional features that consumers might chose to help meet their needs.
  • Optional features are then combined by the system into optimized packages of insurance products that are offered for sale to consumers.
  • the offered products will be attractive to persons in need states that were considered when designing the packages.
  • An “optimized package” includes a set of insurance features that are packaged to help address the needs and wants of consumers in a particular grouping.
  • Ala carte features may also be optimized.
  • ala carte features may be optimized by grouping certain ala carte features together that share an attribute.
  • both optimized features and optimized ala carte features include coverages, terms, and rewards selected from a group that shares an attribute.
  • the shared attribute allows the features to be grouped around a common theme.
  • a value grouping may include features designed around lower price.
  • a protection theme may include features optimized around protecting assets. For the most part, features are grouped to share an attribute, but features grouped around a common theme may also include features that do not share the common theme or are based on a regional theme.
  • packages may be grouped to form a “plan.”
  • a plan refers to a grouping of a standard package with at least one optimized package of features.
  • a consumer may also add ala carte features, or optimized ala carte features, to a plan on an individual basis.
  • the process by which packages are designed may involve consideration of market theories. When looking to a market, one needs to identify the individuals that might decide to purchase a product.
  • a group of persons that may be interested in or share a need for a particular product or products is defined as a target population. Accordingly, the target population is the group to be reached through some action or intervention and may refer to groups with specific characteristics.
  • Market segmentation refers to the process of grouping persons in a target population into smaller subgroups called market segments.
  • a market segment is a group within a heterogeneous market consisting of consumers or organizations with relatively homogeneous needs and wants. Consumers in a market segment are expected to respond to a given set of marketing stimuli in a similar manner. Ideally, individuals within a market segment will likely have similar feelings about a marketing mix comprised of a given product, sold at a given price, distributed in a certain way, and promoted in a certain way. Accordingly, a market segment is a more specifically defined group within the target population.
  • a target population or a market segment may share one or more common characteristics that statistically describe the persons within the target population or market segment. Characteristics may include gender, age, occupation, marital status, and family size.
  • features are grouped together along marketing demand parameters. Groups of features are offered in different product structures, which are discussed in further detail below. Utility-based groupings maximize product acceptance of product packages by statistically predicting consumer demand based on multidimensional analysis of consumer motivations. These motivations are then compiled through a demand simulator to identify and target product requirements that may be attractive to various segments of the consumer population.
  • a demand simulator measures overall demand potential as well as consumer preferences for various product features and brands. By using a demand simulator, it is possible to identify the features that consumers might want most, and then measure the price they are willing to pay for them. Demand simulators are discussed more fully below.
  • An optimization process creates focused sets of features.
  • the process may organize product packages around central motivation factors, such as price points and common feature acceptance. Using feature interest as a motivating factor, the most popular features can be grouped to form a set of features that are both universally popular and provide an acceptable profit to an insurance carrier.
  • Differentiation is introduced by adding features to packages that specifically address the motivations of a specific consumer group. For example, some consumer groups are interested in security features, while others may have young drivers in the household. Because some consumers are highly driven by features while others are driven by price, package structures may be optimized based on price to motivate a consumer segment. Alternatively, package structures may be optimized based on features that appeal to less price-sensitive members of the consumer population. In addition, some optimized package structures may be based upon both price and feature considerations.
  • Insurance products generated according to the present invention may be offered for sale in a variety of manners.
  • optimized packages may be offered through any form of visual display, either electronically or by the use of brochures, posters, signs, standing displays, and any other form of visual and/or written communication.
  • one may offer optimized packages through an insurance carrier's agents in person, over the telephone, or via the Internet. In an Internet implementation, or over the telephone using a voice recognition system, such interactions may occur automatically.
  • FIG. 1 is an exemplary flow chart 100 for optimizing customizable insurance products.
  • One may optimize insurance products by designing packages using a process that takes into account the considerations discussed in further detail below.
  • the process described with respect to FIG. 1 may be implemented to determine packages for a variety of different types of insurance products.
  • the methodology may apply to automobile insurance, homeowners insurance, life insurance, and any other appropriate type of insurance in keeping with the spirit and scope of the present invention.
  • Step 110 features are identified as candidates to be offered as part of various packages, which together form an insurance product.
  • business performance data may be analyzed.
  • Business performance data may include different subsets of data obtained by collecting existing information from the marketplace to analyze for trends and to understand the landscape of available options.
  • a possible subset of business performance data is market-share data, which includes industry data used to evaluate current levels of market share for particular consumers to determine demand generated by specific product offerings. In this step of the process, one might identify a target population and/or a market segment.
  • Industry-product-offering data includes an evaluation of the products and features offered in policies from various insurance carriers.
  • this data may be supplemented by internal pricing data proprietary to the insurance carrier conducting the demand simulation.
  • Internal-pricing data may include the insurance carrier's premiums, loss, and expense data so that the cost of features can be taken into account.
  • Internal- pricing data allows one to compare a specific insurance carrier's ability to provide a product to consumers at a price consumers are willing to pay.
  • Other ways of arriving at candidate features include brainstorming with experts, examining the current and past marketplace, and by soliciting and receiving suggestions and input from consumers and agents.
  • Step 120 the cost of each candidate feature is determined.
  • the losses that are expected for a particular feature are examined when determining the premium that consumers will pay.
  • Step 130 the demand for each feature in the marketplace is evaluated.
  • consumer preferences are evaluated to form price utility curves, which are created after conducting consumer research to better understand consumer preferences for each feature or combination of features.
  • the process of evaluating demand may include collecting information using focus groups selected from different geographic regions. For example, persons participating in focus groups can be selected across all age groups that have actively shopped for insurance during an appropriate time frame. Selection of groups may occur on the basis of any identified target population and/or market segment. During this step, features may be eliminated from further consideration based upon the focus groups' preferences. In addition, focus groups may provide survey information identifying the price each individual was willing to pay for certain features. Such considerations may involve an evaluation of sample packages containing different combinations of features offered at different prices.
  • Step 140 features are grouped into possible packages.
  • cost prohibitive features may be eliminated from packages because consumers may not be willing to pay the price of a particular feature.
  • strategic alternatives data may be examined, including price-point data and variable-feature-level data.
  • Price point data includes an evaluation of a particular insurance carrier's current prices to competitors' prices and includes an evaluation of the impact of adding packaged features.
  • Variable feature level data may be considered to describe the most compelling packages of features.
  • Variable feature level data is derived from consumer research and includes uniqueness and differentiation of features to evaluate the best features and how features should be grouped in packages.
  • variable-feature-cost data describes an insurance carrier's proprietary loss and expense data and is used to determine a cost to offer a given feature.
  • Fixed-cost investments data takes into account systems, infrastructure, and other costs associated with implementation of an optimized product architecture.
  • packages When designing packages, another concept that is incorporated into the process is that of self-selection. For example, packages should include features that appeal to consumers in a particular need state such that these consumers will recognize the value of a particular package and consider including it in their insurance selections.
  • Step 150 The demand simulator estimates the number of individuals that will purchase a particular product offering. Optimization of packages is accomplished by iteratively trying all possible package combinations or by determining which features may be substituted for other features in the most optimal packages to arrive at a set of features that a consumer would find of value.
  • the demand simulator may be implemented as a software module, which processes data provided to it.
  • user input may provide the ability to select different features and to alter inputs to the module. Consistent with the present invention, processing may also occur automatically at the direction of optimization software including automated logic.
  • Additional features may be selected with utility-based product segmentation.
  • price-utility curve data may be used to determine packages.
  • a utility value for each feature may be determined through consumer research to identify the features most attractive to the overall target population as well as to subsets of the target population that form market segments.
  • Features are then grouped into packages, and groups of packages form an insurance product.
  • a user may decide whether to simulate demand again. Step 160 . If the user decides to stop, the process ends. If the user decides to continue, the process goes to step 170 .
  • processing may be further refined by re-examining costs of packages or by examining different feature combinations based on a particular set of judgment criteria. For example, if the cost of offering a particular package is high, it may be identified using variable-feature-cost data and fixed-cost investment data, as described above in connection with step 120 .
  • Step 180 User input may further provide the ability to select different features and to alter inputs to the module. The process then returns to simulate demand for the newly modified packages. Step 150 .
  • FIG. 2 shows an exemplary chart comparing feature relevance and feature differentiation used to perform analysis used in optimizing features for packages.
  • a feature set 205 that includes features that are highly relevant and distinctive. Such a process may be done for an entire population to arrive at feature set 205 and may also be done for sub-segments based on characteristics common to the sub-segments to determine the packages that most appeal to a particular group or subgroup.
  • research may be performed to identify a target population and a set of insurance features desired by the target population.
  • the set of insurance features are bundled into an insurance package.
  • a cost of the insurance package may be determined and the insurance package may be offered for sale.
  • the research to identify the insurance features is carried out through an optimization process, as described above.
  • the optimization process is based upon consumer factors.
  • the optimization process is based also upon financial criteria that provide the insurance company with an acceptable profit.
  • the research may also include examining common characteristics of the target population or of a market segment within the target population.
  • a set of ala carte features may also be identified and a cost for each of the ala carte features may also be identified, along with determining corresponding prices for the ala carte features and offering the ala carte features for sale at the corresponding prices.
  • An optimized package includes a basic set of insurance features and may be offered for sale along with the insurance package.
  • a standard package may include a set of insurance features required by a governing law.
  • a standard package may also include a set of insurance features required by a financial institution.
  • an optimized package may additionally include a set of insurance features created by performing research to identify a target population or a market segment.
  • a standard package may also be combined with the optimized package to form a plan.
  • Sets of additional insurance features may also be selected to form additional packages.
  • Each plan may include a standard package and an optimized package.
  • a third party may sell optimized packages without a standard package. Such a situation might involve a third party's sale of optimized packages as additions to an existing insurance product. An insurance carrier has sold the existing insurance product to a consumer, who has then gone to a third party from which the consumer may obtain the optimized packages.
  • the optimized packages may be created or selected consistent with the principles of the present invention.
  • FIG. 3 is an exemplary method of selling insurance consistent with the present invention.
  • a consumer is offered a variety of options related to automobile insurance. For example, a consumer may only want to purchase a basic insurance product. That consumer may select a standard package 308 . Alternatively, the consumer may select a value plan 302 , which includes a standard package 304 and a value package 306 with additional features.
  • FIG. 3 includes two exemplary optimized packages: a protection plus plan 312 and a platinum plan 318 .
  • Protection plus plan 312 includes a standard package 314 and a protection plus package 316 .
  • Protection plus package 316 may include features such as a repair/replace feature and a loan/lease-gap coverage feature.
  • the consumer may select platinum plan 318 , which includes a standard package 320 and a platinum options package 322 .
  • Platinum options package 322 may include features such as a repair/replace feature, a loan/lease-gap coverage feature, a monetary death indemnity feature, and a full roadside assistance feature.
  • Optimized ala carte features 324 are individual features sold separately as add-ons to certain optimized packages. Optimized ala carte features 324 have been keyed as a group to share an attribute. In addition, the consumer may also select from a general group of ala carte features 326 that have not been optimized. As shown in FIG. 3 , there are many possible combinations and variations from which a consumer may select to form an insurance product.
  • FIG. 4 shows an exemplary insurance product comprising packages selected from FIG. 3 .
  • the example shown in FIG. 4 displays a possible selection that a consumer may make from the options provided in FIG. 3 to form insurance product 402 .
  • Insurance product 402 includes protection plus plan 312 , which includes standard package 314 and protection plus package 316 .
  • insurance product 402 includes several ala carte features labeled A, B, and C, which may or may not be optimized.
  • FIG. 5 is another exemplary method of selling insurance consistent with the present invention.
  • a consumer combines packages in a linear fashion to form an insurance product. For example, the consumer selects a standard package 502 . Since standard package 502 meets the minimum requirements for an insurance product, the consumer may decide only to purchase standard package 502 . However, the consumer may also decide to select additional optimized packages from optimized package group 504 . For example, the consumer may also select optimized options package 506 , which is considered a “basic” optimized package. In addition, however, the consumer may also select optimized options package 508 and/or optimized options package 510 . These additional optimized packages are considered “premium” packages because they offer additional features at a cost greater than the basic optimized package.
  • optimized packages 506 - 510 may include features optimized in a manner consistent with the present invention.
  • a consumer may be required to first select, for example, a particular optimized options package before the consumer may select a further optimized package.
  • Such a “tiered” arrangement requires the purchase of an initial optimized package as a prerequisite before additional optimized packages may be purchased.
  • optimized options package 508 or optimized options package 510 the consumer may also select any one or more optimized ala carte features 512 . Additionally, a consumer that has selected any one of optimized options packages 506 - 510 may also select one or more ala carte features 514 . As shown in FIG. 5 , there are many possible combinations and variations from which a consumer may select to form an insurance product.
  • FIG. 6 shows an exemplary insurance product comprising packages from FIG. 5 .
  • the example in FIG. 6 shows a possible selection that a consumer may make to form insurance product 602 .
  • Insurance product 602 includes standard package 502 , optimized package 506 , and optimized package 508 .
  • insurance product 602 includes several ala carte features A, B, and C, which may or may not be optimized.
  • a “standard” package may include an accident waiver feature after five years for eligible customers.
  • a “value” package may be provided at a reduced rate and may require participation in a payment program. The payment program may require premiums to be paid through an automatic deduction from a checking or savings account, for example.
  • a “gold protection” package may include an accident waiver enhancement feature in the event of a first accident and a safe driving deductible reward.
  • a “platinum protection” package may include an accident waiver enhancement plus feature in the event of multiple accidents, a safe driving deductible reward feature, and a safe driving bonus feature.
  • a “new car expanded protection” package may include all of the features included in the “platinum protection” or “gold protection” packages.
  • the “new car expanded protection” package may include a repair or replacement coverage feature and a loan or lease gap coverage feature.
  • a homeowner's insurance product typically covers a building or structure on the premises and household personal property.
  • a typical homeowner's insurance product usually also includes certain personal liability coverage and coverage for medical payments to others. Additional coverages or features are purchased ala carte.
  • an insurance carrier may expand its homeowner's insurance offerings to consumers by identifying features with appeal and profitability to design packages of related features at different pricing points.
  • Customizable homeowner's insurance may include a standard package of typical coverages, and a consumer may further select optimized packages of features in a manner similar to that discussed above.
  • Homeowner's insurance consistent with the present invention provides optional coverages that reflect different lifestyles and life stage needs.
  • Optimized packages may include coverages that are popular with most homeowners, as well as optimized coverages that align with the wants and needs of a given consumer.
  • consumers can be offered optimized packages of coverages and terms that address the needs of those, for example, with a great deal of electronics, or those with a great deal of jewelry, or those with a particular liability concern.
  • a home value protection feature may more fully ensure that a home and valuables are fully covered by automatically adjusting coverage levels to account for the increasing cost to rebuild the home.
  • An identity theft coverage feature may provide coverage for specified expenses that are incurred due to identity theft.
  • a claims free discount feature may provide a discount on the following year's premium for each year in which the policyholder does not have a claim.
  • a blanket protection of valuables feature may allow a policyholder to purchase a set amount of coverage for special valuables in increments of $ 1 , 000 , rather than scheduling individual items separately.
  • a limited personal umbrella policy provides additional coverage in case of unexpected lawsuits.
  • a water backup feature offers protection in case a home is damaged due to flooding from specified causes.
  • An inventory and appraisal tool feature provides tools available at a website, on a CD-ROM, or in a booklet, that helps catalog and store a complete inventory of valuable items and provides approximate values of itemized goods.
  • FIG. 7 illustrates a system 700 consistent with the present invention for implementing the methods discussed above.
  • System 700 includes a server 705 , connected to a network 760 , including a CPU 720 , a memory 730 , and a database 740 .
  • Software loaded into memory 730 from, for example, a disk drive (not shown) at the direction of CPU 720 may be used to implement a program for optimizing automobile insurance in a manner consistent with the present invention.
  • the software may execute instructions for performing demand simulation to analyze data and to form optimized packages.
  • Memory 730 and/or database 740 may store market data and research conducted to design packages.
  • Database 740 may also include information such as customer profiles, which are discussed more fully below.
  • network 760 provides communications between the various entities in system 700 , such as user terminals 770 - 790 .
  • Network 760 may be a shared, public, or private network and encompass a wide area or local area. Further, network 760 may be implemented through any suitable combination of wired and/or wireless communication networks. By way of example, network 760 may be implemented through a wide area network (WAN), local area network (LAN), an intranet, or the Internet.
  • WAN wide area network
  • LAN local area network
  • intranet or the Internet.
  • Terminals 770 - 790 allow a user to exchange information with server 760 .
  • Terminals 770 - 790 may be any type of appropriate device for communicating with server 705 over network 760 .
  • terminal 770 may be a PDA running a program for communicating with server 705
  • terminal 780 may be a desktop type computer running a web browser for communicating with server 705 via the Internet.
  • Terminal 790 may be a standard landline telephone or wireless phone.
  • Users may access server 705 via network 760 to customize an automobile insurance product through a web browser running on, for example, terminal 780 .
  • a website may include options for the user to provide information or to fill out an application, and may present the user with a series of screens prompting the user to make various selections. The user may make appropriate selections to customize the insurance product.
  • a customer at terminal 790 a telephone
  • the customer service representative may assist a customer through a process of providing information and asking a series of questions that help the customer to consider options for customizing an insurance product.
  • the customer service representative may use software running on terminal 750 , and may send data to and from server 705 over network 760 .
  • Server 705 may also interact with a customer to determine insurance features to include for the customer's consideration in an insurance package. Customers may further modify or reject presented insurance packages and may also select insurance packages and/or features from other offerings. To determine insurance features to include in an insurance package, server 705 may use database 740 to access customer profiles, or may access customer profiles over network 760 . In other embodiments consistent with the present invention, server 705 may access customer profiles over network 760 . Further, customer profiles may be updated by a customer service representative at terminal 750 , who collects data from a customer and transmits the data over network 760 to server 705 .
  • data may be transmitted from a customer at one of terminals 770 - 790 over network 760 in response to survey questions and/or as a result of selections that a customer makes after supplying identification information to log into an account.
  • Server 750 may access database 740 to retrieve existing data already collected that pertains to customers.
  • Customer profiles may include, for example, data identifying a customer, data identifying a customer's automobiles, data pertaining to other property belonging to a customer, and/or data describing a customer's preferences.
  • Data identifying a customer may include information such as a customer's name, address, age, and marital status.
  • Data identifying a customer's automobiles may specify the number owned, as well as each automobile's make, model, and year.
  • Data pertaining to other property belonging to a customer may include information about homes, jewelry, artwork, and other possessions.
  • Data describing a customer's preferences may be collected through various surveys, both from electronically collected information and information collected from surveys sent via mail.
  • Customer preferences may indicate preferred insurance features, target costs, and preferred mode of customer service contact, such as whether a customer prefers to be connected by telephone or electronic mail.
  • Customer profiles may also include information collected from a customer that specifies a customer's risk tolerance.
  • an exemplary flow chart 800 is provided for presenting insurance packages to a customer for the customer's consideration.
  • One or more of the insurance packages that are presented for the customer's consideration may be based upon a customer profile in one embodiment of the present invention.
  • a customer at, for example, one of terminals 770 - 790 may navigate using an Internet browser to a website for an insurance company.
  • the customer may log into an existing account or create a new account by providing, for example, a name and a password.
  • Step 810 a customer may not need to create an account or log into an account, but may instead provide identification information to begin the process, such as the customer's name.
  • CPU 720 may access a customer profile stored in, for example, database 740 , which is associated with the customer that supplied identification information at the website.
  • customer profile may include a variety of data concerning the customer.
  • CPU 720 may identify profiles for other customers that include data in common with the data included in the profile of the customer. For example, if the customer owns a particular make and model of automobile, CPU 720 may identify profiles of other customers that own the same automobile.
  • CPU 720 determines an insurance package to present to the customer for consideration based upon a comparison of the customer's profile and the identified profiles. For example, this step may include presenting an insurance package to the customer that was selected by one or more customers associated with identified profiles. Further, the process may involve determining which insurance package was selected by a majority of customers having certain characteristics in common with the customer. A customer may be presented for consideration, in one example, an insurance package that was selected by a majority of customers that own the same automobile make and model. In such an example, the presentation of the insurance package may be accompanied by a message to the customer.
  • the message may state, for example, “You may be interested in the following package, which was selected by other customers that own your type of automobile.”
  • Insurance packages that are presented to a customer for consideration may be selected by CPU 720 from a comprehensive database connected to network 760 and/or from database 740 included in server 705 , for example.
  • multiple processors may be used by server 705 to implement parallel processing to rapidly process large volumes of data, including customer profiles, when selecting presented insurance features and/or insurance packages.
  • Customers may further modify or reject presented insurance packages and may also select insurance packages and/or features from other offerings.
  • One of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that the number of characteristics in common, as well as the characteristics to consider when making the comparison may vary. Accordingly, one of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that many variations are possible and consistent with the spirit and scope of the present invention.
  • server 705 may transmit the insurance package over network 760 to a customer at one of terminals 770 - 790 .
  • the details concerning the insurance package, including the particular insurance features included in the package, are then displayed to the customer for the customer's consideration on one of terminals 770 - 790 .
  • an insurance package is presented for the customer's consideration so that the customer may ultimately consider whether the insurance best suits the customer's needs.
  • a customer may further be provided with a message encouraging the customer to consider other alternatives and evaluate whether the presented insurance package meets the customer's needs.
  • a customer may prefer to speak with a customer service representative during the process.
  • a customer may be provided with a telephone number at any point in the process to review insurance packages and/or features and speak with a customer service representative.
  • a message may be displayed to the customer asking whether the customer would like to engage in a live chat session with a customer service representative.
  • an option may be made available on the customer's display so that the customer may, when desired, initiate a live Internet chat session with a customer service representative.
  • a customer service representative and a customer may exchange text messages. For example, consistent with the system shown in FIG. 7 , a customer may have a question about an insurance package or feature.
  • the customer may compose a text message, which may be transmitted from the customer at, for example, terminal 770 over network 760 to a customer service representative at terminal 750 .
  • the customer service representative may respond with a text message transmitted from terminal 750 to terminal 770 . Accordingly, during the chat session, the customer may resolve questions pertaining to presented insurance packages and/or features.
  • customers may further modify or reject presented insurance packages and may also select insurance packages and/or features from other offerings.
  • server 705 may receive an indication from the customer specifying whether the customer would like to modify or reject the presented insurance package, according to step 850 .
  • the customer receives a message at one of terminals 770 - 790 presenting the customer with additional information regarding other available packages and features and prompting the customer to indicate whether the customer would like to modify or reject the presented insurance package and features. If the customer does not wish to modify or reject the presented insurance package and features, the process ends.
  • server 705 may present a substitute or additional insurance feature that may be included in the insurance package that is presented. Step 860 .
  • Customers may further modify or reject presented insurance packages and may also select insurance packages or features from other offerings.
  • server 705 may present a substitute insurance feature based on the customer profile for the customer's consideration, which may be exchanged for an insurance feature already included in the insurance package.
  • server 705 may present an additional insurance feature based on the customer profile for the customer's consideration, which may be added to the insurance package.
  • the substitute or additional insurance feature may be selected based upon an analysis of the identified profiles of customers having characteristics in common with the customer and presented for the customer's consideration.
  • the substitute or additional insurance feature that is presented for consideration may be selected based upon an analysis of market research saved in database 740 .
  • market research previously collected for a target population may indicate preferences of individuals falling within the target population.
  • the customer profile may therefore be used to identify whether a particular customer is or is not a member of a particular target population.
  • the substitute or additional insurance feature may be selected by the customer.
  • the customer may specify a desired insurance feature or select an insurance feature from a list of all available features.
  • step 870 the customer may decide whether to modify the presented insurance package to include an additional insurance feature or to substitute an insurance feature.
  • server 705 modifies the insurance package to include the additional insurance feature or to substitute an insurance feature.
  • a customer may also change the insurance package by removing one or more insurance features. If the customer does not want to include, substitute, or remove an insurance feature, the process ends.
  • the above method allows a customer to adapt an insurance package to the customer's needs with insurance features that server 705 presents to the customer for consideration. Further, once a customer has been provided an insurance package for consideration, the customer may replace, reject, and/or add other available insurance features as the customer deems necessary.
  • One of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that the above process may iteratively allow a customer to refine the insurance package by substituting, removing, and adding features until a desired package is arrived at that the customer believes best suits his or her needs. Additional or substitute insurance features that are presented to the customer for consideration as part of an insurance package may be based on a profile of the customer, other customer profiles, or market research, for example.
  • an insurance carrier may offer annuity products to consumers for retirement or financial planning purposes by identifying features with appeal and profitability to design packages of related features at different pricing points or expense levels.
  • Customizable annuity products may include a standard annuity with typical accumulation, return, and payout features.
  • a consumer may further select enhanced packages of features in a manner similar to that discussed above for automobile insurance.
  • Additional embodiments of the present invention are possible, each designed to cover other classes of insurable risk, including but not limited to, mortality risk and life insurance products; morbidity risk and health and long-term care insurance products; as well as professional practice risk and liability insurance.
  • Customizable hybrid products may include a standard package across two or more risk classes with typical features in each class and a consumer may further select enhanced packages of features in a manner similar to that discussed above for automobile insurance.

Abstract

System and methods provide customizable insurance according to consumer preferences. Demand simulators guide the creation of optimized packages of features, which consumers may select from to form an insurance product appropriate for their particular needs. Packages may be formed with a particular appeal to consumers with common needs, wants, or characteristics. In addition, methods and systems are provided for presenting insurance products for consideration by customers over a network. Presented insurance products may be formed through an optimization process or according to customer preferences.

Description

    CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/139,048 filed on Dec. 23, 2013 and entitled “Systems and Methods for Customizing Insurance,” which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/730,079 filed on Dec. 28, 2012 and entitled “Systems and Methods for Customizing Insurance,” which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/353,218 filed on Jan. 18, 2012 and entitled “Systems and Methods for Customizing Insurance,” which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/774,442 filed on Jul. 6, 2007 and entitled “Systems and Methods for Customizing Insurance,” which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/270,611, filed Nov. 10, 2005 and entitled “Systems and Methods for Customizing Insurance,” which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/629,318, filed Nov. 19, 2004. The entire disclosures of each of the above applications are incorporated herein by reference for all purposes.
  • TECHNICAL FIELD
  • The present invention relates to systems and methods for customizing property and casualty insurance and, more particularly, to customizing property and casualty insurance policies according to consumer preferences. The present invention also provides systems and methods to design insurance products in a manner that allows consumers to select insurance packages that include features they consider appropriate for their needs.
  • BACKGROUND
  • Today's consumer is more pressed than ever for time. With increasing time demands placed, many consumers do not have much time to shop, and what time they do have seems to be consumed in reviewing the massive amount of information they encounter in shopping. The pressures attendant the time constraints and information can pervade a consumer's shopping experience, including shopping for insurance.
  • New technologies, however, now make possible aids to help consumers as they make insurance choices in much less time than they could years ago. The challenge is how to harness those technologies.
  • SUMMARY
  • A method consistent with the invention provides insurance using a data processing system. The method comprises electronically analyzing, by a processor, data to identify a target population and a set of insurance features desired by the target population; and bundling the set of insurance features into an insurance package.
  • Another method consistent with the invention provides insurance using a data processing system. The method comprises creating a standard package with a set of insurance features; electronically analyzing, by a processor, data to identify a market segment; identifying insurance features desired by the market segment; and bundling the identified insurance features into an insurance package.
  • Yet another method consistent with the invention creates an insurance package using a data processing system. The method comprises creating a standard package with a set of insurance features; electronically analyzing, by a processor, data gathered through consumer research to identify a target population; identifying insurance features desired by the target population; and bundling the identified insurance features into an insurance package.
  • A system consistent with the invention provides optimized insurance. The system comprises a memory; a server coupled to a network, wherein the server executes program instructions for an optimization process; and a terminal coupled to the network, wherein the terminal allows a user to execute the optimization process to create an insurance package.
  • Another method consistent with the invention provides insurance using a data processing system. The method comprises retrieving, from a database, a profile of a customer accessing a website; electronically identifying, by a processor, profiles of customers in common with the profile of a customer; and presenting an insurance package to the customer for consideration that is based upon a comparison of the profile of the customer and the identified profiles.
  • Another system consistent with the invention provides insurance. The system comprises a database, the database storing a profile of a customer accessing a website; and a processor, the processor identifying profiles of customers in common with the profile of a customer and presenting an insurance package to the customer for consideration that is based upon a comparison of the profile of the customer and the identified profiles.
  • Both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory only and do not restrict the claimed invention.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
  • The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention and, together with the description, explain the principles of the invention. In the drawings:
  • FIG. 1 is an exemplary flowchart for optimizing insurance products;
  • FIG. 2 is an exemplary chart comparing feature relevance and feature differentiation;
  • FIG. 3 is an exemplary method of offering insurance consistent with the principles of the present invention;
  • FIG. 4 shows an exemplary insurance product comprising packages selected from FIG. 3;
  • FIG. 5 is another exemplary method of offering insurance consistent with the principles of the present invention;
  • FIG. 6 shows an exemplary insurance product comprising packages selected from FIG. 5;
  • FIG. 7 is an exemplary system consistent with the present invention; and
  • FIG. 8 is an exemplary flowchart for presenting insurance packages to a customer for the customer's consideration, consistent with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • Generally, insurance is an agreement by which an insurer, sometimes referred to as an underwriter, undertakes to indemnify the insured party against loss, damage, or liability arising from certain risks. The consideration paid by an insured party is typically referred to as a premium, which is paid to keep the insurance in effect. In general, an insurance policy is a contract of insurance that defines the rights and duties of the contracting parties. A typical insurance policy includes limits on the amount of risk that the insurer will cover.
  • For the purposes of this application, an insurance product includes more than the insurance policy. It also includes services, distribution channels, and other components which may impact the customer experience.
  • Systems and methods consistent with the present invention provide consumers with insurance products that may help them address some of their individual needs or wants by including features that a particular group may find desirable or appropriate. For the purposes of this application, features include coverages, terms, and rewards. Generally, a coverage provides a protection or indemnification to the insured. A term includes any word, phrase, or provision of import that determines the nature and scope of an agreement, such as the coverage grant in an insurance coverage or the premium charged. A reward may include a discount, credit, or benefit provided to the insured upon the occurrence of a specified event.
  • When a feature is not included in a group, that particular feature is referred to as an “ala carte” feature. Ala carte features refer to coverages, terms, and rewards that are selected by the insured on an individual basis for inclusion in an insurance product.
  • Features may be grouped together to form a package. For example, the present invention may apply to an automobile insurance product that comprises a package of features. One grouping of features may form a value package for price conscious consumers, another grouping may form a protection plus package providing additional features, and yet another grouping may form a platinum package including yet more additional features. An automobile insurance product may also include a standard package that includes coverages required by state law, such as bodily injury liability coverage and property damage liability coverage. Coverages in a standard package may also include personal injury protection coverage, medical payment coverage, uninsured motorist coverage, underinsured motorist coverage, collision coverage, and comprehensive coverage.
  • Most states mandate minimum types and levels of insurance coverage for automobile policies. For example, a state may require liability coverage with mandated minimum coverage limits. States can individually make common coverages mandatory or optional. Banks or financial institutions may make other coverages, such as collision and comprehensive, a prerequisite to obtain financing.
  • An automobile insurance product offering might include standard coverages required by state law and/or financial institutions. Insurance companies may offer other coverages and limits, such as towing reimbursement and car rental reimbursement.
  • Automobile insurance consumers find value in optional coverages designed around potential risks uniquely associated with driving and or repairing of vehicles. For example, a car rental reimbursement coverage may help pay for the use of a rented vehicle while the insured vehicle is being repaired due to a loss caused by a covered peril.
  • The following provides a summary of an exemplary basic optimized package, two additional optimized packages, and various exemplary ala carte features that may be added by a consumer to one of the optimized packages. For example, a basic package might include a reduced premium by adding in a few terms. It is designed as an alternative for the customer particularly concerned about price. In particular, a customer may be required to participate in an arrangement that automatically makes periodic (for example, monthly) deductions from the insured's savings or checking account to pay the premium and other charges or fees associated with the insurance. Customers will be charged an early termination fee (such as $100) if the insurance is terminated by the insured, which might include the insured's failure to accept a renewal offer, or terminated for non-payment of premium, within a specified period of time after the package is added.
  • Another optimized package might offer an accident-waiver enhancement feature and a safe-driving-deductible reward feature. The accident-waiver enhancement feature might specify that the first rate-affecting accident that occurs will not cause the loss of certain discounts or result in the application of any accident surcharges. Subsequent rate-affecting accidents will not cause the loss of the discounts or the application of any accident surcharges if the insured has not received this waiver in the thirty-six month experience period ending on the date of the accident.
  • The safe-driving deductible reward feature might provide, upon enrollment, that the customer will receive an initial reduction (such as $100) in his or her collision deductible. For each twelve-month experience period the policy is not assigned an accident, the insured will receive an additional reduction (up to a maximum $500 reduction) in their collision deductible that will apply to all covered collision claims during the next policy period.
  • Yet another optimized package might offer an accident waiver enhancement plus feature, a safe-driving deductible reward feature, and a safe-driving bonus feature. With the accident-waiver enhancement plus feature, neither a single accident nor multiple accidents will cause the loss of certain discounts or the application of accident surcharges as long as the accidents occur while this feature is part of the policy. The safe-driving bonus feature may provide if the policy is not assigned an accident for a designated six-month experience period, the insured will receive 5% of their previous term's premium for major coverages as a credit that can be applied toward the next six-month premium.
  • Both the above-described exemplary optimized packages may also allow the customer the opportunity to add, for an additional premium, an additional feature in the form of a new car expanded protection coverage feature on an automobile that has collision and comprehensive coverages. The coverage provided by this feature will continue while collision and comprehensive coverages are maintained and will be removed at the first renewal that is effective in the calendar year that is three years greater than the auto's model year.
  • The new-car expanded protection coverage feature may provide that, in the event of a covered loss to an automobile other than a total loss, the insurance carrier will pay to repair the auto without a deduction for depreciation. The repair coverage may not apply to losses caused by fire, theft, larceny, or flood. Furthermore, the amount payable will be reduced by any amounts paid or payable under the collision or comprehensive coverages as well as any applicable collision or comprehensive deductible.
  • The new-car expanded protection coverage feature may also provide that, in the event of a covered total loss, the insurance-carrier will pay to replace the automobile with a new one of the same make and model with the same equipment or, if a new automobile of the same make and model with the same equipment is not available, a new automobile that is similar in size, class, body type and equipment (subject to a price limitation described in the coverage). The replacement coverage may not apply to leased vehicles or to losses caused by fire, theft, larceny, or flood. Furthermore, the amount payable will be reduced by any amounts paid or payable under the collision or comprehensive coverages, any applicable collision or comprehensive deductible, and the dollar amount of any unrepaired damage that occurred prior to the total loss of the automobile.
  • The new-car expanded protection coverage feature may also provide that, in the event of a covered total loss, if the amount the customer owes under the original automobile loan or automobile lease exceeds the actual cash value of the automobile at the time of loss, the insurance carrier will pay the difference between the amounts. The amount payable may be reduced by any overdue loan or lease payments (and any financial penalties associated with those overdue payments), the transfer or rollover of a previous outstanding loan or lease balance from another vehicle to the original loan or lease for the covered automobile, the dollar amount of unrepaired damage which occurred prior to the total loss, all refunds paid or payable to the customer as a result of the early termination of the automobile loan or automobile lease agreement (including financed warranty/extended service contracts), and any amount paid or payable under the replacement protection of the new car expanded coverage protection feature.
  • In forming the above exemplary packages that are offered for sale by an insurance carrier, one forming the package offerings might decide to consider consumer “need states” to group features into packages offered for sale. Need states refer to the complex web of rational and subconscious triggers that prompt a consumer to make a product selection. Need states may be prompted by a consumer deciding that he or she needs or wants to obtain a product. Furthermore, they are generally a result of an individual's situation at a particular point in time. Life-stage events, such as a new driver in the family, shift consumers' need states. Of course, automobile insurance consumers may have varied circumstances, and consequently, differing insurance needs and wants. One may be a student with limited resources, and as a result, might select state-mandated coverage. Another may be near retirement and focused on protection of assets and convenience of services.
  • Systems and methods consistent with the present invention identify distinct groupings of insurance consumers with similar need states and identify the most commonly desired optional features that consumers might chose to help meet their needs. Optional features are then combined by the system into optimized packages of insurance products that are offered for sale to consumers. By grouping features into packages that align with common need states, the offered products will be attractive to persons in need states that were considered when designing the packages.
  • An “optimized package” includes a set of insurance features that are packaged to help address the needs and wants of consumers in a particular grouping. Ala carte features may also be optimized. For example, ala carte features may be optimized by grouping certain ala carte features together that share an attribute. Accordingly, both optimized features and optimized ala carte features include coverages, terms, and rewards selected from a group that shares an attribute. The shared attribute allows the features to be grouped around a common theme. For example, a value grouping may include features designed around lower price. A protection theme may include features optimized around protecting assets. For the most part, features are grouped to share an attribute, but features grouped around a common theme may also include features that do not share the common theme or are based on a regional theme.
  • In addition, packages may be grouped to form a “plan.” A plan refers to a grouping of a standard package with at least one optimized package of features. A consumer may also add ala carte features, or optimized ala carte features, to a plan on an individual basis.
  • The process by which packages are designed may involve consideration of market theories. When looking to a market, one needs to identify the individuals that might decide to purchase a product. A group of persons that may be interested in or share a need for a particular product or products is defined as a target population. Accordingly, the target population is the group to be reached through some action or intervention and may refer to groups with specific characteristics.
  • Market segmentation refers to the process of grouping persons in a target population into smaller subgroups called market segments. A market segment is a group within a heterogeneous market consisting of consumers or organizations with relatively homogeneous needs and wants. Consumers in a market segment are expected to respond to a given set of marketing stimuli in a similar manner. Ideally, individuals within a market segment will likely have similar feelings about a marketing mix comprised of a given product, sold at a given price, distributed in a certain way, and promoted in a certain way. Accordingly, a market segment is a more specifically defined group within the target population.
  • A target population or a market segment may share one or more common characteristics that statistically describe the persons within the target population or market segment. Characteristics may include gender, age, occupation, marital status, and family size.
  • To select features that might appeal to a particular target population or market segment, features are grouped together along marketing demand parameters. Groups of features are offered in different product structures, which are discussed in further detail below. Utility-based groupings maximize product acceptance of product packages by statistically predicting consumer demand based on multidimensional analysis of consumer motivations. These motivations are then compiled through a demand simulator to identify and target product requirements that may be attractive to various segments of the consumer population. A demand simulator measures overall demand potential as well as consumer preferences for various product features and brands. By using a demand simulator, it is possible to identify the features that consumers might want most, and then measure the price they are willing to pay for them. Demand simulators are discussed more fully below.
  • For example, certain features have more universal consumer appeal while other features appeal to a specific consumer characteristic. An optimization process creates focused sets of features. The process may organize product packages around central motivation factors, such as price points and common feature acceptance. Using feature interest as a motivating factor, the most popular features can be grouped to form a set of features that are both universally popular and provide an acceptable profit to an insurance carrier.
  • Differentiation is introduced by adding features to packages that specifically address the motivations of a specific consumer group. For example, some consumer groups are interested in security features, while others may have young drivers in the household. Because some consumers are highly driven by features while others are driven by price, package structures may be optimized based on price to motivate a consumer segment. Alternatively, package structures may be optimized based on features that appeal to less price-sensitive members of the consumer population. In addition, some optimized package structures may be based upon both price and feature considerations.
  • Insurance products generated according to the present invention may be offered for sale in a variety of manners. For example, consistent with the present invention, optimized packages may be offered through any form of visual display, either electronically or by the use of brochures, posters, signs, standing displays, and any other form of visual and/or written communication. In addition, one may offer optimized packages through an insurance carrier's agents in person, over the telephone, or via the Internet. In an Internet implementation, or over the telephone using a voice recognition system, such interactions may occur automatically.
  • Reference will now be made in detail to exemplary embodiments of the invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Wherever possible, the same reference numbers will be used throughout the drawings to refer to the same or like parts.
  • FIG. 1 is an exemplary flow chart 100 for optimizing customizable insurance products. One may optimize insurance products by designing packages using a process that takes into account the considerations discussed in further detail below. Furthermore, the process described with respect to FIG. 1 may be implemented to determine packages for a variety of different types of insurance products. For example, the methodology may apply to automobile insurance, homeowners insurance, life insurance, and any other appropriate type of insurance in keeping with the spirit and scope of the present invention.
  • As shown in FIG. 1, first, features are identified as candidates to be offered as part of various packages, which together form an insurance product. Step 110. To identify those features that one might consider as candidates, business performance data may be analyzed. Business performance data may include different subsets of data obtained by collecting existing information from the marketplace to analyze for trends and to understand the landscape of available options. A possible subset of business performance data is market-share data, which includes industry data used to evaluate current levels of market share for particular consumers to determine demand generated by specific product offerings. In this step of the process, one might identify a target population and/or a market segment.
  • Other categories of data considered in this step include industry-product- offering data and internal-pricing data. Industry-product-offering data includes an evaluation of the products and features offered in policies from various insurance carriers. In addition, this data may be supplemented by internal pricing data proprietary to the insurance carrier conducting the demand simulation.
  • Internal-pricing data may include the insurance carrier's premiums, loss, and expense data so that the cost of features can be taken into account. Internal- pricing data allows one to compare a specific insurance carrier's ability to provide a product to consumers at a price consumers are willing to pay. Other ways of arriving at candidate features include brainstorming with experts, examining the current and past marketplace, and by soliciting and receiving suggestions and input from consumers and agents.
  • Next, the cost of each candidate feature is determined. Step 120. In determining costs of the candidate features, the losses that are expected for a particular feature are examined when determining the premium that consumers will pay.
  • Once candidate features and costs are determined, the demand for each feature in the marketplace is evaluated. Step 130. During the evaluation, consumer preferences are evaluated to form price utility curves, which are created after conducting consumer research to better understand consumer preferences for each feature or combination of features.
  • The process of evaluating demand may include collecting information using focus groups selected from different geographic regions. For example, persons participating in focus groups can be selected across all age groups that have actively shopped for insurance during an appropriate time frame. Selection of groups may occur on the basis of any identified target population and/or market segment. During this step, features may be eliminated from further consideration based upon the focus groups' preferences. In addition, focus groups may provide survey information identifying the price each individual was willing to pay for certain features. Such considerations may involve an evaluation of sample packages containing different combinations of features offered at different prices.
  • Next, features are grouped into possible packages. Step 140. During this step, cost prohibitive features may be eliminated from packages because consumers may not be willing to pay the price of a particular feature. Also, strategic alternatives data may be examined, including price-point data and variable-feature-level data. Price point data includes an evaluation of a particular insurance carrier's current prices to competitors' prices and includes an evaluation of the impact of adding packaged features. Variable feature level data may be considered to describe the most compelling packages of features. Variable feature level data is derived from consumer research and includes uniqueness and differentiation of features to evaluate the best features and how features should be grouped in packages.
  • In addition, incremental costs of strategic alternatives data include variable-feature-cost data and fixed-cost-investments data. Variable-feature-cost data describes an insurance carrier's proprietary loss and expense data and is used to determine a cost to offer a given feature. Fixed-cost investments data takes into account systems, infrastructure, and other costs associated with implementation of an optimized product architecture.
  • When designing packages, another concept that is incorporated into the process is that of self-selection. For example, packages should include features that appeal to consumers in a particular need state such that these consumers will recognize the value of a particular package and consider including it in their insurance selections.
  • Next, demand is simulated using a demand simulator. Step 150. The demand simulator estimates the number of individuals that will purchase a particular product offering. Optimization of packages is accomplished by iteratively trying all possible package combinations or by determining which features may be substituted for other features in the most optimal packages to arrive at a set of features that a consumer would find of value.
  • The demand simulator may be implemented as a software module, which processes data provided to it. During the operation of the demand simulator, user input may provide the ability to select different features and to alter inputs to the module. Consistent with the present invention, processing may also occur automatically at the direction of optimization software including automated logic.
  • Features that are used by the demand simulator may be selected with utility-based product segmentation. As discussed above, price-utility curve data may be used to determine packages. A utility value for each feature may be determined through consumer research to identify the features most attractive to the overall target population as well as to subsets of the target population that form market segments. Features are then grouped into packages, and groups of packages form an insurance product.
  • After the demand simulator provides an initial processing of features, a user may decide whether to simulate demand again. Step 160. If the user decides to stop, the process ends. If the user decides to continue, the process goes to step 170. In step 170, processing may be further refined by re-examining costs of packages or by examining different feature combinations based on a particular set of judgment criteria. For example, if the cost of offering a particular package is high, it may be identified using variable-feature-cost data and fixed-cost investment data, as described above in connection with step 120.
  • After inspecting the costs, certain features may be removed or added to packages. Step 180. User input may further provide the ability to select different features and to alter inputs to the module. The process then returns to simulate demand for the newly modified packages. Step 150.
  • FIG. 2 shows an exemplary chart comparing feature relevance and feature differentiation used to perform analysis used in optimizing features for packages. By plotting the data as shown in FIG. 2, it is possible to determine a feature set 205 that includes features that are highly relevant and distinctive. Such a process may be done for an entire population to arrive at feature set 205 and may also be done for sub-segments based on characteristics common to the sub-segments to determine the packages that most appeal to a particular group or subgroup.
  • Accordingly, research may be performed to identify a target population and a set of insurance features desired by the target population. The set of insurance features are bundled into an insurance package. A cost of the insurance package may be determined and the insurance package may be offered for sale.
  • Furthermore, the research to identify the insurance features is carried out through an optimization process, as described above. In some embodiments, the optimization process is based upon consumer factors. In other embodiments, the optimization process is based also upon financial criteria that provide the insurance company with an acceptable profit. The research may also include examining common characteristics of the target population or of a market segment within the target population.
  • This procedure may be repeated for additional market segments. A set of ala carte features may also be identified and a cost for each of the ala carte features may also be identified, along with determining corresponding prices for the ala carte features and offering the ala carte features for sale at the corresponding prices.
  • An optimized package includes a basic set of insurance features and may be offered for sale along with the insurance package. A standard package may include a set of insurance features required by a governing law. Alternatively, a standard package may also include a set of insurance features required by a financial institution.
  • For example, an optimized package may additionally include a set of insurance features created by performing research to identify a target population or a market segment. Alternatively, a standard package may also be combined with the optimized package to form a plan. Sets of additional insurance features may also be selected to form additional packages. Each plan may include a standard package and an optimized package.
  • In addition, a third party may sell optimized packages without a standard package. Such a situation might involve a third party's sale of optimized packages as additions to an existing insurance product. An insurance carrier has sold the existing insurance product to a consumer, who has then gone to a third party from which the consumer may obtain the optimized packages. The optimized packages, however, may be created or selected consistent with the principles of the present invention.
  • FIG. 3 is an exemplary method of selling insurance consistent with the present invention. As shown in FIG. 3, a consumer is offered a variety of options related to automobile insurance. For example, a consumer may only want to purchase a basic insurance product. That consumer may select a standard package 308. Alternatively, the consumer may select a value plan 302, which includes a standard package 304 and a value package 306 with additional features.
  • However, if a consumer would like to purchase more than a basic insurance product, the consumer may select from optimized package group 310. FIG. 3 includes two exemplary optimized packages: a protection plus plan 312 and a platinum plan 318. Protection plus plan 312 includes a standard package 314 and a protection plus package 316. Protection plus package 316 may include features such as a repair/replace feature and a loan/lease-gap coverage feature. Alternatively, the consumer may select platinum plan 318, which includes a standard package 320 and a platinum options package 322. Platinum options package 322 may include features such as a repair/replace feature, a loan/lease-gap coverage feature, a monetary death indemnity feature, and a full roadside assistance feature.
  • In addition, the consumer may select from optimized ala carte features 324. Optimized ala carte features 324 are individual features sold separately as add-ons to certain optimized packages. Optimized ala carte features 324 have been keyed as a group to share an attribute. In addition, the consumer may also select from a general group of ala carte features 326 that have not been optimized. As shown in FIG. 3, there are many possible combinations and variations from which a consumer may select to form an insurance product.
  • FIG. 4 shows an exemplary insurance product comprising packages selected from FIG. 3. The example shown in FIG. 4 displays a possible selection that a consumer may make from the options provided in FIG. 3 to form insurance product 402. Insurance product 402 includes protection plus plan 312, which includes standard package 314 and protection plus package 316. In addition, insurance product 402 includes several ala carte features labeled A, B, and C, which may or may not be optimized.
  • FIG. 5 is another exemplary method of selling insurance consistent with the present invention. In the method shown in FIG. 5, a consumer combines packages in a linear fashion to form an insurance product. For example, the consumer selects a standard package 502. Since standard package 502 meets the minimum requirements for an insurance product, the consumer may decide only to purchase standard package 502. However, the consumer may also decide to select additional optimized packages from optimized package group 504. For example, the consumer may also select optimized options package 506, which is considered a “basic” optimized package. In addition, however, the consumer may also select optimized options package 508 and/or optimized options package 510. These additional optimized packages are considered “premium” packages because they offer additional features at a cost greater than the basic optimized package. Furthermore, optimized packages 506-510 may include features optimized in a manner consistent with the present invention. In some embodiments, a consumer may be required to first select, for example, a particular optimized options package before the consumer may select a further optimized package. Such a “tiered” arrangement requires the purchase of an initial optimized package as a prerequisite before additional optimized packages may be purchased.
  • Once the consumer has selected optimized options package 508 or optimized options package 510, the consumer may also select any one or more optimized ala carte features 512. Additionally, a consumer that has selected any one of optimized options packages 506-510 may also select one or more ala carte features 514. As shown in FIG. 5, there are many possible combinations and variations from which a consumer may select to form an insurance product.
  • FIG. 6 shows an exemplary insurance product comprising packages from FIG. 5. The example in FIG. 6 shows a possible selection that a consumer may make to form insurance product 602. Insurance product 602 includes standard package 502, optimized package 506, and optimized package 508. In addition, insurance product 602 includes several ala carte features A, B, and C, which may or may not be optimized.
  • With regard to the example of automobile insurance, the following provides an overview of exemplary packages that may be made available to customers. For example, a “standard” package may include an accident waiver feature after five years for eligible customers. A “value” package may be provided at a reduced rate and may require participation in a payment program. The payment program may require premiums to be paid through an automatic deduction from a checking or savings account, for example.
  • Additional packages may also be available that include more features. A “gold protection” package may include an accident waiver enhancement feature in the event of a first accident and a safe driving deductible reward. A “platinum protection” package may include an accident waiver enhancement plus feature in the event of multiple accidents, a safe driving deductible reward feature, and a safe driving bonus feature. Furthermore, a “new car expanded protection” package may include all of the features included in the “platinum protection” or “gold protection” packages. In addition, the “new car expanded protection” package may include a repair or replacement coverage feature and a loan or lease gap coverage feature.
  • One of ordinary skill in the art will readily recognize how to adapt the methodologies described above to a variety of areas of insurance. For example, a homeowner's insurance product typically covers a building or structure on the premises and household personal property. A typical homeowner's insurance product usually also includes certain personal liability coverage and coverage for medical payments to others. Additional coverages or features are purchased ala carte.
  • Consistent with the present invention, an insurance carrier may expand its homeowner's insurance offerings to consumers by identifying features with appeal and profitability to design packages of related features at different pricing points. Customizable homeowner's insurance may include a standard package of typical coverages, and a consumer may further select optimized packages of features in a manner similar to that discussed above.
  • Homeowner's insurance consistent with the present invention provides optional coverages that reflect different lifestyles and life stage needs. In particular, by implementing a methodology consistent with that described above in relation to automobile insurance, one may also create optimized homeowner packages. Optimized packages may include coverages that are popular with most homeowners, as well as optimized coverages that align with the wants and needs of a given consumer. Consistent with the invention, consumers can be offered optimized packages of coverages and terms that address the needs of those, for example, with a great deal of electronics, or those with a great deal of jewelry, or those with a particular liability concern.
  • The following provides examples of homeowners insurance features that may be included in packages that are selected according to the methods described above. For example, a home value protection feature may more fully ensure that a home and valuables are fully covered by automatically adjusting coverage levels to account for the increasing cost to rebuild the home. An identity theft coverage feature may provide coverage for specified expenses that are incurred due to identity theft. A claims free discount feature may provide a discount on the following year's premium for each year in which the policyholder does not have a claim. A blanket protection of valuables feature may allow a policyholder to purchase a set amount of coverage for special valuables in increments of $1,000, rather than scheduling individual items separately. A limited personal umbrella policy provides additional coverage in case of unexpected lawsuits. A water backup feature offers protection in case a home is damaged due to flooding from specified causes. An inventory and appraisal tool feature provides tools available at a website, on a CD-ROM, or in a booklet, that helps catalog and store a complete inventory of valuable items and provides approximate values of itemized goods. One of skill in the art will recognize that other features are consistent with embodiments of the present invention.
  • FIG. 7 illustrates a system 700 consistent with the present invention for implementing the methods discussed above. System 700 includes a server 705, connected to a network 760, including a CPU 720, a memory 730, and a database 740. Software loaded into memory 730 from, for example, a disk drive (not shown) at the direction of CPU 720 may be used to implement a program for optimizing automobile insurance in a manner consistent with the present invention. For example, the software may execute instructions for performing demand simulation to analyze data and to form optimized packages. Memory 730 and/or database 740 may store market data and research conducted to design packages. Database 740 may also include information such as customer profiles, which are discussed more fully below.
  • Additionally, network 760 provides communications between the various entities in system 700, such as user terminals 770-790. Network 760 may be a shared, public, or private network and encompass a wide area or local area. Further, network 760 may be implemented through any suitable combination of wired and/or wireless communication networks. By way of example, network 760 may be implemented through a wide area network (WAN), local area network (LAN), an intranet, or the Internet.
  • Terminals 770-790 allow a user to exchange information with server 760. Terminals 770-790 may be any type of appropriate device for communicating with server 705 over network 760. For example, terminal 770 may be a PDA running a program for communicating with server 705, while terminal 780 may be a desktop type computer running a web browser for communicating with server 705 via the Internet. Terminal 790 may be a standard landline telephone or wireless phone.
  • Users may access server 705 via network 760 to customize an automobile insurance product through a web browser running on, for example, terminal 780. A website may include options for the user to provide information or to fill out an application, and may present the user with a series of screens prompting the user to make various selections. The user may make appropriate selections to customize the insurance product. For example, a customer at terminal 790, a telephone, may contact a customer service representative at terminal 750. The customer service representative may assist a customer through a process of providing information and asking a series of questions that help the customer to consider options for customizing an insurance product. During the process, the customer service representative may use software running on terminal 750, and may send data to and from server 705 over network 760.
  • Server 705 may also interact with a customer to determine insurance features to include for the customer's consideration in an insurance package. Customers may further modify or reject presented insurance packages and may also select insurance packages and/or features from other offerings. To determine insurance features to include in an insurance package, server 705 may use database 740 to access customer profiles, or may access customer profiles over network 760. In other embodiments consistent with the present invention, server 705 may access customer profiles over network 760. Further, customer profiles may be updated by a customer service representative at terminal 750, who collects data from a customer and transmits the data over network 760 to server 705. In other embodiments, data may be transmitted from a customer at one of terminals 770-790 over network 760 in response to survey questions and/or as a result of selections that a customer makes after supplying identification information to log into an account. Server 750 may access database 740 to retrieve existing data already collected that pertains to customers.
  • Customer profiles may include, for example, data identifying a customer, data identifying a customer's automobiles, data pertaining to other property belonging to a customer, and/or data describing a customer's preferences. Data identifying a customer may include information such as a customer's name, address, age, and marital status. Data identifying a customer's automobiles may specify the number owned, as well as each automobile's make, model, and year. Data pertaining to other property belonging to a customer may include information about homes, jewelry, artwork, and other possessions. Data describing a customer's preferences may be collected through various surveys, both from electronically collected information and information collected from surveys sent via mail. Customer preferences may indicate preferred insurance features, target costs, and preferred mode of customer service contact, such as whether a customer prefers to be connected by telephone or electronic mail. Customer profiles may also include information collected from a customer that specifies a customer's risk tolerance.
  • Referring now to FIG. 8, an exemplary flow chart 800 is provided for presenting insurance packages to a customer for the customer's consideration. One or more of the insurance packages that are presented for the customer's consideration may be based upon a customer profile in one embodiment of the present invention. A customer at, for example, one of terminals 770-790, may navigate using an Internet browser to a website for an insurance company. At the website, the customer may log into an existing account or create a new account by providing, for example, a name and a password. Step 810. In other embodiments, a customer may not need to create an account or log into an account, but may instead provide identification information to begin the process, such as the customer's name.
  • Next, in step 820, CPU 720 may access a customer profile stored in, for example, database 740, which is associated with the customer that supplied identification information at the website. As discussed above, customer profile may include a variety of data concerning the customer. In step 830, CPU 720 may identify profiles for other customers that include data in common with the data included in the profile of the customer. For example, if the customer owns a particular make and model of automobile, CPU 720 may identify profiles of other customers that own the same automobile.
  • Next, in step 840, CPU 720 determines an insurance package to present to the customer for consideration based upon a comparison of the customer's profile and the identified profiles. For example, this step may include presenting an insurance package to the customer that was selected by one or more customers associated with identified profiles. Further, the process may involve determining which insurance package was selected by a majority of customers having certain characteristics in common with the customer. A customer may be presented for consideration, in one example, an insurance package that was selected by a majority of customers that own the same automobile make and model. In such an example, the presentation of the insurance package may be accompanied by a message to the customer. The message may state, for example, “You may be interested in the following package, which was selected by other customers that own your type of automobile.” Insurance packages that are presented to a customer for consideration may be selected by CPU 720 from a comprehensive database connected to network 760 and/or from database 740 included in server 705, for example. Furthermore, multiple processors (not shown) may be used by server 705 to implement parallel processing to rapidly process large volumes of data, including customer profiles, when selecting presented insurance features and/or insurance packages. Customers may further modify or reject presented insurance packages and may also select insurance packages and/or features from other offerings. One of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that the number of characteristics in common, as well as the characteristics to consider when making the comparison may vary. Accordingly, one of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that many variations are possible and consistent with the spirit and scope of the present invention.
  • Once an insurance package is selected, server 705 may transmit the insurance package over network 760 to a customer at one of terminals 770-790. The details concerning the insurance package, including the particular insurance features included in the package, are then displayed to the customer for the customer's consideration on one of terminals 770-790. Furthermore, an insurance package is presented for the customer's consideration so that the customer may ultimately consider whether the insurance best suits the customer's needs. A customer may further be provided with a message encouraging the customer to consider other alternatives and evaluate whether the presented insurance package meets the customer's needs.
  • In some situations, a customer may prefer to speak with a customer service representative during the process. A customer may be provided with a telephone number at any point in the process to review insurance packages and/or features and speak with a customer service representative. Furthermore, periodically, a message may be displayed to the customer asking whether the customer would like to engage in a live chat session with a customer service representative. Alternatively, an option may be made available on the customer's display so that the customer may, when desired, initiate a live Internet chat session with a customer service representative. During the Internet chat session, a customer service representative and a customer may exchange text messages. For example, consistent with the system shown in FIG. 7, a customer may have a question about an insurance package or feature. The customer may compose a text message, which may be transmitted from the customer at, for example, terminal 770 over network 760 to a customer service representative at terminal 750. The customer service representative may respond with a text message transmitted from terminal 750 to terminal 770. Accordingly, during the chat session, the customer may resolve questions pertaining to presented insurance packages and/or features.
  • Additionally, customers may further modify or reject presented insurance packages and may also select insurance packages and/or features from other offerings. For example, server 705 may receive an indication from the customer specifying whether the customer would like to modify or reject the presented insurance package, according to step 850. In step 850, the customer receives a message at one of terminals 770-790 presenting the customer with additional information regarding other available packages and features and prompting the customer to indicate whether the customer would like to modify or reject the presented insurance package and features. If the customer does not wish to modify or reject the presented insurance package and features, the process ends.
  • If the customer would like to modify or reject the presented insurance package, server 705 may present a substitute or additional insurance feature that may be included in the insurance package that is presented. Step 860. Customers may further modify or reject presented insurance packages and may also select insurance packages or features from other offerings. In this step, server 705 may present a substitute insurance feature based on the customer profile for the customer's consideration, which may be exchanged for an insurance feature already included in the insurance package. Alternatively, server 705 may present an additional insurance feature based on the customer profile for the customer's consideration, which may be added to the insurance package. In other embodiments, the substitute or additional insurance feature may be selected based upon an analysis of the identified profiles of customers having characteristics in common with the customer and presented for the customer's consideration. Further, the substitute or additional insurance feature that is presented for consideration may be selected based upon an analysis of market research saved in database 740. For example, market research previously collected for a target population may indicate preferences of individuals falling within the target population. The customer profile may therefore be used to identify whether a particular customer is or is not a member of a particular target population. Still further, the substitute or additional insurance feature may be selected by the customer. For example, the customer may specify a desired insurance feature or select an insurance feature from a list of all available features.
  • In step 870, the customer may decide whether to modify the presented insurance package to include an additional insurance feature or to substitute an insurance feature. Next, if the customer makes a change in the insurance package, in step 880, server 705 modifies the insurance package to include the additional insurance feature or to substitute an insurance feature. A customer may also change the insurance package by removing one or more insurance features. If the customer does not want to include, substitute, or remove an insurance feature, the process ends.
  • The above method allows a customer to adapt an insurance package to the customer's needs with insurance features that server 705 presents to the customer for consideration. Further, once a customer has been provided an insurance package for consideration, the customer may replace, reject, and/or add other available insurance features as the customer deems necessary. One of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that the above process may iteratively allow a customer to refine the insurance package by substituting, removing, and adding features until a desired package is arrived at that the customer believes best suits his or her needs. Additional or substitute insurance features that are presented to the customer for consideration as part of an insurance package may be based on a profile of the customer, other customer profiles, or market research, for example.
  • As discussed herein, personal automobile and homeowners insurance are examples of property and casualty insurance offerings. One skilled in the art will recognize that the above-described methodology is applicable to other types of insurance products as well, such as commercial insurance for business customers. In addition, an insurance carrier may offer annuity products to consumers for retirement or financial planning purposes by identifying features with appeal and profitability to design packages of related features at different pricing points or expense levels. Customizable annuity products may include a standard annuity with typical accumulation, return, and payout features. A consumer may further select enhanced packages of features in a manner similar to that discussed above for automobile insurance.
  • Additional embodiments of the present invention are possible, each designed to cover other classes of insurable risk, including but not limited to, mortality risk and life insurance products; morbidity risk and health and long-term care insurance products; as well as professional practice risk and liability insurance.
  • Although not common in today's marketplace, it is possible to apply the disclosed methodologies to so-called hybrid or multi-risk products that combine the coverages of two or more products from different classes of insurance risk into a single product. Customizable hybrid products may include a standard package across two or more risk classes with typical features in each class and a consumer may further select enhanced packages of features in a manner similar to that discussed above for automobile insurance.
  • The foregoing descriptions of the invention have been presented for purposes of illustration and description. They are not exhaustive and do not limit the invention to the precise form disclosed. Modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teachings or may be acquired from practicing of the invention. For example, the described implementation includes software but the present invention may be implemented as a combination of hardware and software or in hardware alone. Additionally, although aspects of the present invention are described as being stored in memory, one skilled in the art will appreciate that these aspects can also be stored on other types of computer-readable media, such as secondary storage devices, like hard disks, floppy disks, or CD-ROM; a carrier wave from the Internet or other propagation medium; or other forms of RAM or ROM. The scope of the invention is defined by the claims and their equivalents. Accordingly, other embodiments of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the specification and practice of the invention disclosed herein. The specification and examples should be considered as exemplary only, with a true scope and spirit of the invention being indicated by the following claims.

Claims (20)

What is claimed is:
1. A system of apparatuses comprising:
an insurance customer terminal including,
at least one processor;
a memory unit;
at least one input device; and
an electronic display; and
an insurance computer server including,
at least one processor; and
a memory storing computer-readable instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the insurance computer server to:
transmit an insurance policy customization user interface to the insurance customer terminal via a computer network;
receive, from the insurance customer terminal and via the computer network, an indication of a selection of a standard insurance package from the user interface;
determine a premium price associated with the selected standard insurance package;
receive, from the insurance customer terminal and via the computer network, an indication of a selection of one or more optional insurance features not included in the standard insurance package;
determine one or more feature prices associated with the one or more selected optional insurance features; and
calculate an insurance policy premium based on the premium price associated with the selected standard insurance package and the one or more feature prices associated with the one or more selected optional insurance features.
2. The system of claim 1, the memory unit of the insurance customer terminal storing computer-readable instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the insurance customer terminal to perform:
receive the insurance policy customization user interface from the insurance computer server, and display the insurance policy customization user interface via the electronic display;
receive a first user input via the at least one input device corresponding to the selection of the standard insurance package;
display a set of optional insurance features within the insurance policy customization user interface, via the electronic display, wherein the first set of optional insurance features is determined based on selection of the standard insurance package;
receive a second user input via the at least one input device corresponding to the selection of the one or more optional insurance features not included in the standard insurance package; and
transmit data identifying the standard insurance package and the selected one or more optional insurance features via the computer network to the insurance computer server.
3. The system of claim 1, wherein the indication of the selection of one or more optional insurance features comprises:
one or more indications corresponding to customer selections of one or more insurance options packages, each said insurance options package comprising a plurality of insurance features not included in the standard insurance package; and
one or more additional indications corresponding to customer selections of one or more ala carte insurance features, each ala carte insurance feature not included in the standard insurance package or in the one or more selected insurance options packages.
4. The system of claim 1, wherein said one or more optional insurance features comprises a first optional insurance feature corresponding to an additional insurance coverage offered for an additional premium price.
5. The system of claim 4, wherein said one or more optional insurance features further comprises a second optional insurance feature corresponding to a reduced premium price offered for an additional customer requirement.
6. The system of claim 1, wherein the insurance policy customization user interface corresponds to a vehicle insurance customization user interface, and wherein the optional insurance features include one or more of:
an accident waiver enhancement feature;
a safe driving deductible reward feature;
a safe driving bonus feature;
a repair or replacement coverage feature; or
a loan or lease gap coverage feature.
7. The system of claim 1, wherein the insurance policy customization user interface corresponds to a homeowners insurance customization user interface, and wherein the optional insurance features include one or more of:
a home value protection feature;
an identity theft coverage feature;
a claims free discount feature;
a blanket protection of valuables feature;
a limited personal umbrella policy feature;
a water backup feature; or
an inventory and appraisal tool feature.
8. The system of claim 1, wherein receiving the indication of the selection of one or more optional insurance features comprises:
receiving a customer selection corresponding to a first insurance options package comprising a first plurality of insurance features; and
receiving a customer selection corresponding to a second insurance options package comprising a second plurality of insurance features, wherein selection of the first insurance options package is a prerequisite to selection of the second insurance options package.
9. The system of claim 1, wherein receiving the indication of the selection of one or more optional insurance features comprises:
receiving a customer selection corresponding to a first insurance options package comprising a first plurality of insurance features; and
receiving one or more customer selections corresponding to one or more ala carte insurance features, wherein selection of the first insurance options package is a prerequisite to selection of each of the selected ala carte insurance features.
10. One or more non-transitory computer-readable storage media having computer-executable program instructions stored thereon, that when executed by an insurance server processor, cause the insurance server processor to:
transmit an insurance policy customization user interface to an insurance customer terminal via a computer network;
receive, from the insurance customer terminal and via the computer network, an indication of a selection of a standard insurance package from the user interface;
determine a premium price associated with the selected standard insurance package;
receive, from the insurance customer terminal and via the computer network, an indication of a selection of one or more optional insurance features not included in the standard insurance package;
determine one or more feature prices associated with the one or more selected optional insurance features; and
calculate an insurance policy premium based on the premium price associated with the selected standard insurance package and the one or more feature prices associated with the one or more selected optional insurance features.
11. The non-transitory computer-readable storage media of claim 10, wherein the indication of the selection of one or more optional insurance features comprises:
one or more indications corresponding to selection of one or more insurance options packages, each said insurance options package comprising a plurality of insurance features not included in the standard insurance package; and
one or more additional indications corresponding to selection of one or more ala carte insurance features, each ala carte insurance feature not included in the standard insurance package or in the one or more selected insurance options packages.
12. The non-transitory computer-readable storage media of claim 10, wherein the insurance policy customization user interface corresponds to a vehicle insurance customization user interface, and wherein the optional insurance features include one or more of:
an accident waiver enhancement feature;
a safe driving deductible reward feature;
a safe driving bonus feature;
a repair or replacement coverage feature; or
a loan or lease gap coverage feature.
13. The non-transitory computer-readable storage media of claim 10, wherein the insurance policy customization user interface corresponds to a homeowners insurance customization user interface, and wherein the optional insurance features include one or more of:
a home value protection feature;
an identity theft coverage feature;
a claims free discount feature;
a blanket protection of valuables feature;
a limited personal umbrella policy feature;
a water backup feature; or
an inventory and appraisal tool feature.
14. The non-transitory computer-readable storage media of claim 10, wherein receiving the indication of the selection of one or more optional insurance features comprises:
receiving a selection corresponding to a first insurance options package comprising a first plurality of insurance features; and
receiving a selection corresponding to a second insurance options package comprising a second plurality of insurance features, wherein selection of the first insurance options package is a prerequisite to selection of the second insurance options package.
15. A system of apparatuses comprising:
an insurance customer terminal including,
at least one processor;
a memory unit;
at least one input device; and
an electronic display; and
an insurance computer server including,
at least one processor; and
a memory storing computer-readable instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the insurance computer server to perform:
receive, from the insurance customer terminal and via a computer network, data identifying a first insurance customer;
determine a first insurance package based on the data identifying the first insurance customer;
transmit, to the insurance customer terminal and via the computer network, an insurance policy customization user interface, the insurance policy customization user interface identifying the first insurance package and a plurality of possible customer modifications to the first insurance package;
receive data corresponding to one or more selected customer modifications to the first insurance package from the insurance customer terminal; and
calculate an insurance policy premium based on a premium price associated with the first insurance package and one or more prices associated with the selected customer modifications.
16. The system of claim 15, the memory unit of the insurance customer terminal storing computer-readable instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the insurance customer terminal to perform:
receive the data identifying the first insurance customer via the at least one input device, and transmit said data identifying the first insurance customer to the insurance computer server;
receive the insurance policy customization user interface from the insurance computer server, and display the insurance policy customization user interface via the electronic display; and
receive one or more selected customer modifications to the first insurance package via the insurance policy customization user interface, and transmit the data corresponding to the one or more selected customer modifications to the insurance computer server.
17. The system of claim 16, wherein receiving the one or more selected customer modifications to the first insurance package via the insurance policy customization user interface comprises:
receiving, via the insurance policy customization user interface, a customer selection of an additional insurance feature that is not included in the first insurance package but is compatible with the first insurance package.
18. The system of claim 16, wherein receiving the one or more selected customer modifications to the first insurance package via the insurance policy customization user interface comprises:
receiving, via the insurance policy customization user interface, a customer selection of an insurance feature to be removed from the first insurance package.
19. The system of claim 16, wherein receiving the one or more selected customer modifications to the first insurance package via the insurance policy customization user interface comprises:
receiving, via the insurance policy customization user interface, a customer selection of a replacement insurance feature to substitute for an existing insurance feature of the first insurance package.
20. The system of claim 15, wherein the insurance policy customization user interface corresponds to at least one of a vehicle insurance customization user interface, a homeowners insurance customization user interface, or an annuity product customization user interface.
US14/311,046 2004-11-19 2014-06-20 Systems and methods for customizing insurance Abandoned US20140304011A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US14/311,046 US20140304011A1 (en) 2004-11-19 2014-06-20 Systems and methods for customizing insurance

Applications Claiming Priority (7)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US62931804P 2004-11-19 2004-11-19
US27061105A 2005-11-10 2005-11-10
US77444207A 2007-07-06 2007-07-06
US201213353218A 2012-01-18 2012-01-18
US201213730079A 2012-12-28 2012-12-28
US14/139,048 US9881341B1 (en) 2004-11-19 2013-12-23 Systems and methods for customizing insurance
US14/311,046 US20140304011A1 (en) 2004-11-19 2014-06-20 Systems and methods for customizing insurance

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/139,048 Continuation US9881341B1 (en) 2004-11-19 2013-12-23 Systems and methods for customizing insurance

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20140304011A1 true US20140304011A1 (en) 2014-10-09

Family

ID=51655109

Family Applications (7)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/060,326 Active US9875508B1 (en) 2004-11-19 2013-10-22 Systems and methods for customizing insurance
US14/139,048 Active 2028-01-05 US9881341B1 (en) 2004-11-19 2013-12-23 Systems and methods for customizing insurance
US14/311,046 Abandoned US20140304011A1 (en) 2004-11-19 2014-06-20 Systems and methods for customizing insurance
US14/501,287 Active US10878506B1 (en) 2004-11-19 2014-09-30 Insurance product development and maintenance system and method
US14/671,551 Active 2029-08-08 US11481844B1 (en) 2004-11-19 2015-03-27 Insurance product development maintenance system and method
US15/838,179 Active 2027-11-26 US11023965B1 (en) 2004-11-19 2017-12-11 Systems and methods for customizing insurance
US17/888,315 Abandoned US20220391991A1 (en) 2004-11-19 2022-08-15 Systems and methods for customizing insurance

Family Applications Before (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/060,326 Active US9875508B1 (en) 2004-11-19 2013-10-22 Systems and methods for customizing insurance
US14/139,048 Active 2028-01-05 US9881341B1 (en) 2004-11-19 2013-12-23 Systems and methods for customizing insurance

Family Applications After (4)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/501,287 Active US10878506B1 (en) 2004-11-19 2014-09-30 Insurance product development and maintenance system and method
US14/671,551 Active 2029-08-08 US11481844B1 (en) 2004-11-19 2015-03-27 Insurance product development maintenance system and method
US15/838,179 Active 2027-11-26 US11023965B1 (en) 2004-11-19 2017-12-11 Systems and methods for customizing insurance
US17/888,315 Abandoned US20220391991A1 (en) 2004-11-19 2022-08-15 Systems and methods for customizing insurance

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (7) US9875508B1 (en)

Cited By (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20140257869A1 (en) * 2013-03-10 2014-09-11 State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Adjusting Insurance Policies Based on Common Driving Routes and Other Risk Factors
US10043217B1 (en) * 2014-10-27 2018-08-07 State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Systems and methods for quoting multiple homeowner insurance products
US20180336640A1 (en) * 2017-05-22 2018-11-22 Insurance Zebra Inc. Rate analyzer models and user interfaces
WO2018232492A1 (en) * 2017-06-21 2018-12-27 The Bank Of Nova Scotia Group insurance package customization system
CN110069535A (en) * 2017-12-01 2019-07-30 连子智 The system that Insurance Product Design is carried out using the technology and data of networking
US10810504B1 (en) 2015-03-11 2020-10-20 State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Route scoring for assessing or predicting driving performance
US10832336B2 (en) * 2017-05-22 2020-11-10 Insurance Zebra Inc. Using simulated consumer profiles to form calibration data for models
US11508138B1 (en) 2020-04-27 2022-11-22 State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Systems and methods for a 3D home model for visualizing proposed changes to home
US20230017992A1 (en) * 2021-07-13 2023-01-19 State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Systems and methods for improved determination of insurance data
US11645720B2 (en) * 2019-08-01 2023-05-09 Patty, Llc Multi-channel cognitive digital personal lines property and casualty insurance and home services rate quoting, comparison shopping and enrollment system and method
US11734767B1 (en) 2020-02-28 2023-08-22 State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Systems and methods for light detection and ranging (lidar) based generation of a homeowners insurance quote
US11887166B1 (en) * 2016-10-27 2024-01-30 United Services Automobile Association (Usaa) Methods and systems for generating and using content item leads
US11972491B2 (en) 2022-03-23 2024-04-30 State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Dynamic auto insurance policy quote creation based on tracked user data

Families Citing this family (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10282785B1 (en) 2004-11-19 2019-05-07 Allstate Insurance Company Delivery of customized insurance products and services
US7774217B1 (en) 2004-11-19 2010-08-10 Allstate Insurance Company Systems and methods for customizing automobile insurance
US9875508B1 (en) 2004-11-19 2018-01-23 Allstate Insurance Company Systems and methods for customizing insurance
US9396494B1 (en) 2013-03-14 2016-07-19 Liberty Mutual Insurance Company Carsharing peril analysis
US11599951B1 (en) 2020-01-13 2023-03-07 State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Systems and methods for generating on-demand insurance policies

Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20020087364A1 (en) * 2000-11-07 2002-07-04 Lerner Andrew S. System and method for enabling real time underwriting of insurance policies
US20020120474A1 (en) * 2000-11-06 2002-08-29 Hele John C.R. Automated insurance policy application
US20020188484A1 (en) * 2000-05-19 2002-12-12 Grover Ruth B. Method and system for furnishing an on-line quote for an insurance product
US20030182165A1 (en) * 2002-03-19 2003-09-25 Atsushi Kato Travel insurance reception apparatus and method
US20040153362A1 (en) * 1996-01-29 2004-08-05 Progressive Casualty Insurance Company Monitoring system for determining and communicating a cost of insurance
US20050102172A1 (en) * 2003-10-31 2005-05-12 Sirmans James R.Jr. System and method for evaluating insurance member activity and pricing insurance products
US7333939B1 (en) * 2000-07-21 2008-02-19 Travelers Property Casualty Corp. Method for providing web-based insurance data processing services to users

Family Cites Families (152)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2143978A (en) 1983-07-19 1985-02-20 William David Devine Vehicle safety device
US4567359A (en) 1984-05-24 1986-01-28 Lockwood Lawrence B Automatic information, goods and services dispensing system
US4843578A (en) 1984-10-01 1989-06-27 Wade Ted R Vehicle speed monitoring and logging means
JPH0341537Y2 (en) 1985-07-03 1991-08-30
US4667336A (en) 1985-10-09 1987-05-19 Burlington Industries, Inc. Automatic detection of seat belt usage
JPH0416649Y2 (en) 1986-10-30 1992-04-14
DE3815724A1 (en) 1988-05-07 1989-11-16 Basf Ag METHOD FOR PRODUCING AQUEOUS FLEECE BINDERS WITH LOW FORMALDEHYDEMISSION WHEN HARDENING
JPH02117237A (en) 1988-10-27 1990-05-01 Matsushita Seiko Co Ltd Home bus system
JPH02149984A (en) 1988-11-30 1990-06-08 Toshiba Corp Magnetic disk device
JPH02203108A (en) 1989-01-31 1990-08-13 Mitsubishi Heavy Ind Ltd Waste liquid processing device
JPH0341537A (en) 1989-07-10 1991-02-22 Fujitsu Ltd Retrying read control system for storage device
US5191522A (en) 1990-01-18 1993-03-02 Itt Corporation Integrated group insurance information processing and reporting system based upon an enterprise-wide data structure
JP2917502B2 (en) 1990-11-19 1999-07-12 オムロン株式会社 Premium determination device
US5430432A (en) 1992-12-14 1995-07-04 Camhi; Elie Automotive warning and recording system
US5359528A (en) 1993-02-19 1994-10-25 Rockwell International Corp. System for accurately determining the mileage traveled by a vehicle within a state without human intervention
US5950169A (en) 1993-05-19 1999-09-07 Ccc Information Services, Inc. System and method for managing insurance claim processing
US5845256A (en) 1993-08-19 1998-12-01 John B. Pescitelli Interactive self-service vending system
SE516278C2 (en) 1994-03-04 2001-12-10 Volvo Ab Traffic information systems and procedures for providing traffic information
US5483442A (en) 1994-07-12 1996-01-09 Investigator Marketing Inc. Accident documentation system
US5550551A (en) 1994-07-25 1996-08-27 At&T Corp. Position monitoring system and method
US5752236A (en) 1994-09-02 1998-05-12 Sexton; Frank M. Life insurance method, and system
US5499182A (en) 1994-12-07 1996-03-12 Ousborne; Jeffrey Vehicle driver performance monitoring system
US5839112A (en) 1994-12-28 1998-11-17 Automatic Data Processing Method and apparatus for displaying and selecting vehicle parts
US5638273A (en) 1995-03-29 1997-06-10 Remote Control Systems, Inc. Vehicle data storage and analysis system and methods
JPH11512118A (en) 1995-07-18 1999-10-19 ユニリーバー・ナームローゼ・ベンノートシヤープ Concentrated aqueous degreasing detergent
US6044352A (en) 1996-01-11 2000-03-28 Deavers; Karl Method and system for processing and recording the transactions in a medical savings fund account
US6868386B1 (en) 1996-01-29 2005-03-15 Progressive Casualty Insurance Company Monitoring system for determining and communicating a cost of insurance
US5797134A (en) 1996-01-29 1998-08-18 Progressive Casualty Insurance Company Motor vehicle monitoring system for determining a cost of insurance
US5893072A (en) 1996-06-20 1999-04-06 Aetna Life & Casualty Company Insurance classification plan loss control system
US6418415B1 (en) 1996-09-04 2002-07-09 Priceline.Com Incorporated System and method for aggregating multiple buyers utilizing conditional purchase offers (CPOS)
US5877707A (en) 1997-01-17 1999-03-02 Kowalick; Thomas M. GPS based seat belt monitoring system & method for using same
US5873066A (en) 1997-02-10 1999-02-16 Insurance Company Of North America System for electronically managing and documenting the underwriting of an excess casualty insurance policy
US5963951A (en) 1997-06-30 1999-10-05 Movo Media, Inc. Computerized on-line dating service for searching and matching people
US6026364A (en) 1997-07-28 2000-02-15 Whitworth; Brian L. System and method for replacing a liability with insurance and for analyzing data and generating documents pertaining to a premium financing mechanism paying for such insurance
US6725201B2 (en) 1997-07-31 2004-04-20 Raymond Anthony Joao Apparatus and method for providing insurance products, services and/or coverage for leased entities.
US6092047A (en) 1997-10-07 2000-07-18 Benefits Technologies, Inc. Apparatus and method of composing a plan of flexible benefits
US6925441B1 (en) 1997-10-27 2005-08-02 Marketswitch Corp. System and method of targeted marketing
US20010014868A1 (en) 1997-12-05 2001-08-16 Frederick Herz System for the automatic determination of customized prices and promotions
ID25826A (en) 1998-01-23 2000-11-09 Toyota Motor Co Ltd COST PROCESSING SYSTEM, COST CALCULATION SYSTEM AND COST PROCESSING CARD
US6029139A (en) 1998-01-28 2000-02-22 Ncr Corporation Method and apparatus for optimizing promotional sale of products based upon historical data
CA2235566A1 (en) 1998-02-11 1999-08-11 Robert J. Mcmillan Motor vehicle monitoring system for determining a cost of insurance
US6185567B1 (en) 1998-05-29 2001-02-06 The Trustees Of The University Of Pennsylvania Authenticated access to internet based research and data services
US7720723B2 (en) 1998-09-18 2010-05-18 Amazon Technologies, Inc. User interface and methods for recommending items to users
US20020013754A1 (en) 1999-07-02 2002-01-31 Glenn Frank Financial optimization system and method
US6397212B1 (en) 1999-03-04 2002-05-28 Peter Biffar Self-learning and self-personalizing knowledge search engine that delivers holistic results
US7124088B2 (en) 1999-07-30 2006-10-17 Progressive Casualty Insurance Company Apparatus for internet on-line insurance policy service
US7398218B1 (en) 1999-08-27 2008-07-08 Accenture Llp Insurance pattern analysis
US20010042002A1 (en) 1999-08-30 2001-11-15 Jeff Koopersmith Method and system for communicating targeted information
FR2798489B1 (en) 1999-09-09 2002-02-15 Banque Cortal ASSISTANCE SYSTEM FOR THE SELECTION OF FINANCIAL PRODUCTS BY AN INDIVIDUAL
CA2321459A1 (en) 1999-10-01 2001-04-01 Genesis Financial Products Inc. Computer-based method for creating an optimal configuration of at least one life insurance policy
US6735569B1 (en) 1999-11-04 2004-05-11 Vivius, Inc. Method and system for providing a user-selected healthcare services package and healthcare services panel customized based on a user's selections
FR2801262A1 (en) 1999-11-18 2001-05-25 Siemens Automotive Corp Lp Card-controlled enforcement system, for driving license restrictions, has on-board verification unit, reading driver's authorization card, communicating with remote monitoring point
WO2001039090A1 (en) 1999-11-26 2001-05-31 Esurance, Inc. Insurance marketing methods
US20020010598A1 (en) 1999-12-18 2002-01-24 Johnson Jerome Dale System and method for providing configuration and sales information to assist in the development of insurance plans
WO2001052136A1 (en) 1999-12-23 2001-07-19 Car Point Korea Co. Ltd. Method and system for processing automobile insurance of a prepaid type according to driving distance and time of vehicle
US20020049617A1 (en) 1999-12-30 2002-04-25 Choicelinx Corporation System and method for facilitating selection of benefits
WO2001052156A1 (en) 2000-01-12 2001-07-19 Coverdell & Company Method and system for providing insurance policy incentive rewards
US7505921B1 (en) 2000-03-03 2009-03-17 Finali Corporation System and method for optimizing a product configuration
US8799208B2 (en) 2000-03-07 2014-08-05 E-Rewards, Inc. Method and system for evaluating, reporting, and improving on-line promotion effectiveness
US7366675B1 (en) 2000-03-10 2008-04-29 Walker Digital, Llc Methods and apparatus for increasing, monitoring and/or rewarding a party's compliance with a schedule for taking medicines
IL140047A0 (en) 2000-03-27 2002-02-10 Good Space Ltd Vehicle related services system and methodology
US7953615B2 (en) 2000-04-03 2011-05-31 Mitchell International, Inc. System and method of administering, tracking and managing of claims processing
US20020002475A1 (en) 2000-04-13 2002-01-03 Joel Freedman Automated insurance system and method
US7376573B1 (en) 2000-04-28 2008-05-20 Accenture Llp Claims data analysis toolkit
US20020002502A1 (en) 2000-05-19 2002-01-03 Patricia Maes Product brokering method and system
JP2002073990A (en) 2000-06-15 2002-03-12 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd System for adjusting content of insurance
US7035935B1 (en) 2000-06-16 2006-04-25 8×8, Inc. Communications service provider network
AU2001280449A1 (en) 2000-06-30 2002-01-14 Thomas D. Harrison Method and apparatus for promoting safe and accountable driving
US7249039B2 (en) 2000-07-06 2007-07-24 Hitachi, Ltd. Processing system for providing services and processing method therefor
US20020007289A1 (en) 2000-07-11 2002-01-17 Malin Mark Elliott Method and apparatus for processing automobile repair data and statistics
US20020111725A1 (en) 2000-07-17 2002-08-15 Burge John R. Method and apparatus for risk-related use of vehicle communication system data
US6978249B1 (en) 2000-07-28 2005-12-20 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Profile-based product demand forecasting
WO2002015090A1 (en) 2000-08-14 2002-02-21 Ge Financial Assurance Holdings, Inc. Process and system for providing premium increase protection for insurance policies
AU2001284654A1 (en) 2000-08-17 2002-02-25 Farmers Insurance Exchange Automated claims filing and tracking
JP2004538537A (en) 2000-09-08 2004-12-24 ジーイー・キャピタル・マーケット・サービス・インコーポレーテッド Automated system and method for matching potential investors and financial products based on investor profile
US7409355B1 (en) 2000-09-22 2008-08-05 Accenture Llp Line item data processing
US20020107730A1 (en) 2001-02-05 2002-08-08 Robert Bernstein Method and apparatus for identifying customers for delivery of promotional materials
US20020099596A1 (en) 2000-11-27 2002-07-25 Geraghty Michael Kevin Dynamic ratemaking for insurance
KR20020045186A (en) 2000-12-08 2002-06-19 오성준 System and method for managing a insurance event of a vehicle using the cable/radio communications network
US7421406B2 (en) 2001-01-05 2008-09-02 Delores A. Dixon, legal representative System and method for asset accumulation and risk management
US7376574B2 (en) 2001-01-12 2008-05-20 Express Scripts, Inc. System and method for optimizing benefit plan designs
US6502020B2 (en) 2001-01-18 2002-12-31 Brook W. Lang Driving record monitoring system and method
WO2002069080A2 (en) * 2001-01-18 2002-09-06 Coveragemaker, Inc. System and method of dispensing insurance through a computer network
US6980098B2 (en) 2001-01-29 2005-12-27 Sony Corporation Information processing apparatus, information processing method and program executed in information processing apparatus
US20020103677A1 (en) 2001-02-01 2002-08-01 Sexton Frank M. Method and system for disproportional allocation of multi-risk insurance policy
US20020103678A1 (en) 2001-02-01 2002-08-01 Burkhalter Swinton B. Multi-risk insurance system and method
JP2002318844A (en) 2001-02-15 2002-10-31 Hitachi Ltd Method for managing vehicle
US20020143680A1 (en) 2001-02-27 2002-10-03 Walters Edmond J. Financial planning method and computer system
JP2002259708A (en) 2001-03-06 2002-09-13 Toyota Motor Corp Vehicular insurance bill calculating system, on-vehicle device, and server device
JP2002358425A (en) 2001-03-27 2002-12-13 Hitachi Ltd Contents setting system, premium setting system, and premium collection system for automobile insurance
EP1251333A1 (en) 2001-04-20 2002-10-23 CELTRAK RESEARCH LIMITED, IDA Industrial Estate A method and apparatus for monitoring movement of a vehicle
US20020188480A1 (en) 2001-04-30 2002-12-12 Liebeskind Michael B. Insurance risk, price, and enrollment optimizer system and method
KR20020091629A (en) 2001-05-31 2002-12-06 (주)카포인트시스템즈 Method for transmitting vehicle's travelling record information via wireless communication network
US6792408B2 (en) 2001-06-12 2004-09-14 Dell Products L.P. Interactive command recognition enhancement system and method
US20020194033A1 (en) 2001-06-18 2002-12-19 Huff David S. Automatic insurance data extraction and quote generating system and methods therefor
US20030139985A1 (en) 2001-06-29 2003-07-24 Terri Hollar Lease transaction management and accounting system
WO2003012572A2 (en) 2001-07-31 2003-02-13 Frederick Roelof Van Rensburg An insurance product
JP2003041537A (en) 2001-07-31 2003-02-13 Yagikuma:Kk Structural body for joint type cushion block
US20030061132A1 (en) 2001-09-26 2003-03-27 Yu, Mason K. System and method for categorizing, aggregating and analyzing payment transactions data
KR100449635B1 (en) 2001-09-28 2004-09-22 (주)팍스인슈 The system and method for calculating insurance fee according to public traffic utilization amount
KR100460319B1 (en) 2001-11-27 2004-12-08 김기원 A system calculating a premium for automobile insurance and managing service for car
JP2003168006A (en) 2001-11-29 2003-06-13 Hitachi Ltd System for recording/storing vehicle state/driving state of accident
US20030177032A1 (en) 2001-12-31 2003-09-18 Bonissone Piero Patrone System for summerizing information for insurance underwriting suitable for use by an automated system
US7895062B2 (en) 2001-12-31 2011-02-22 Genworth Financial, Inc. System for optimization of insurance underwriting suitable for use by an automated system
US20030171959A1 (en) 2002-02-06 2003-09-11 David Galloway Method and apparatus for generating an automobile insurance endorsement
JP4416374B2 (en) 2002-03-26 2010-02-17 富士通株式会社 Insurance premium setting method, insurance premium setting program, and insurance premium setting device
US7904327B2 (en) 2002-04-30 2011-03-08 Sas Institute Inc. Marketing optimization system
US20040024619A1 (en) 2002-05-15 2004-02-05 Dibella Joseph Patrick System and method for facilitating the determination of property and casualty insurance rates
US6795795B2 (en) 2002-06-13 2004-09-21 Honeywell International Inc. Probabilistic map for a building
EP1519717B1 (en) 2002-07-05 2010-09-29 Temrel Limited Controlled release composition
US7885829B2 (en) 2002-08-07 2011-02-08 Metropolitan Property And Casualty Insurance Company System and method for identifying and assessing comparative negligence in insurance claims
US20040039609A1 (en) 2002-08-22 2004-02-26 Sarah Burkitt System and method for payment of insurance premiums for vessels
US7483840B2 (en) 2002-08-23 2009-01-27 Atera /Solutions Llc Randomized competitive insurance pricing system and method
US6795759B2 (en) 2002-08-26 2004-09-21 International Business Machines Corporation Secure logging of vehicle data
US20040230460A1 (en) 2002-09-16 2004-11-18 Thomas Bruce Bradford Secondary loss expense coverage
US7249067B2 (en) 2002-10-04 2007-07-24 Vpi Color, Llc System and method for creating customized catalogues
WO2004044696A2 (en) 2002-11-08 2004-05-27 Arbitration Forums, Inc. A system and process for electronic subrogation, inter-organization workflow management, inter-organization transaction processing and optimized web-baser user interaction
US7831513B2 (en) 2002-11-21 2010-11-09 Capital One Financial Corporation Systems and methods for soliciting customers using computer readable media
US20040103022A1 (en) 2002-11-21 2004-05-27 Chilcoat Charles B. Method and system for web-based marketing of goods and services having incentive features, tracking and processing incentive based marketing data
US20040117217A1 (en) 2002-12-17 2004-06-17 Reber Richard R. Financial incentive through insurance offerings for vehicles that utilize a safety system
JP4402890B2 (en) 2003-02-19 2010-01-20 東北リコー株式会社 Recorder / Erase device
US7346525B1 (en) 2003-03-27 2008-03-18 Philip John Milanovich Method and system for providing insurance to consumers against unfavorable outcomes resulting from services, and method of rating risks associated with the services
US20040193455A1 (en) 2003-03-28 2004-09-30 The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company Dynamic preloading of insurance product data in insurance policy management system
US7873527B2 (en) 2003-05-14 2011-01-18 International Business Machines Corporation Insurance for service level agreements in e-utilities and other e-service environments
US20040249643A1 (en) 2003-06-06 2004-12-09 Ma Laboratories, Inc. Web-based computer programming method to automatically fetch, compare, and update various product prices on the web servers
US20040260579A1 (en) 2003-06-19 2004-12-23 Tremiti Kimberly Irene Technique for providing automobile insurance
US7324623B2 (en) 2003-07-15 2008-01-29 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N. V. Computed tomography scanner with large gantry bore
US7689445B2 (en) 2003-10-08 2010-03-30 Kurt Laning System and method for insuring against tax liabilities
US20050108064A1 (en) 2003-11-14 2005-05-19 Ge Mortgage Holdings, Llc Methods and apparatus for developing and marketing combined insurance packages
JP4182868B2 (en) 2003-11-21 2008-11-19 Jsr株式会社 Radiation sensitive resin composition
US20050267774A1 (en) 2004-06-01 2005-12-01 David Merritt Method and apparatus for obtaining and using vehicle sales price data in performing vehicle valuations
WO2006013425A2 (en) 2004-07-26 2006-02-09 Discovery Holdings Limited A data processing system for accurately calculating a policyholder's discount in a medical insurance plan and a method therefor
US20060053038A1 (en) 2004-09-08 2006-03-09 Warren Gregory S Calculation of driver score based on vehicle operation
US8271299B2 (en) 2004-09-10 2012-09-18 Davidson S Kenneth Return-of-premium insurance system and method
US7246070B2 (en) 2004-09-24 2007-07-17 James Dennis Schwartz Method and apparatus for bundling insurance coverages in order to gain a pricing advantage
US20060106670A1 (en) 2004-11-15 2006-05-18 Simin Cai System and method for interactively and progressively determining customer satisfaction within a networked community
US9875508B1 (en) 2004-11-19 2018-01-23 Allstate Insurance Company Systems and methods for customizing insurance
US7774217B1 (en) 2004-11-19 2010-08-10 Allstate Insurance Company Systems and methods for customizing automobile insurance
US20070136109A1 (en) 2004-11-19 2007-06-14 Allstate Insurance Company Systems and Methods for Customizing Homeowner's Insurance
JP2006168006A (en) 2004-12-14 2006-06-29 Mitsubishi Pencil Co Ltd Pressurizing type ball-point pen
US20060155587A1 (en) 2005-01-07 2006-07-13 Sparrow Robert D Business methods, design
DE102005033101A1 (en) 2005-07-15 2007-01-25 Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma Gmbh & Co. Kg Resorbable polyether esters and their use for the manufacture of medical implants
US20070100668A1 (en) 2005-10-28 2007-05-03 Webb Torry C Insurance deductible payment plans and related services
US7827046B2 (en) 2005-11-22 2010-11-02 Plymouth Rock Assurance Corporation Premium transition factor
US20070136104A1 (en) 2005-12-08 2007-06-14 The Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection And Insurance Company Method for valuation of real and personal property
JP4214158B2 (en) 2006-02-24 2009-01-28 株式会社エコエントリーホールディングス Internet car insurance management server with questionnaire function, its program and recording medium
WO2008016350A1 (en) 2006-07-31 2008-02-07 National Autos Llc Negative equity insurance
US20080243556A1 (en) 2006-10-31 2008-10-02 Dennis Hogan Historical insurance transaction system and method
US20080228699A1 (en) 2007-03-16 2008-09-18 Expanse Networks, Inc. Creation of Attribute Combination Databases
WO2009006617A1 (en) 2007-07-04 2009-01-08 Global Analytics, Inc. Systems and methods for making structured reference credit decisions
US8417608B2 (en) 2009-01-26 2013-04-09 Bank Of America Corporation Dynamically providing financial solution recommendations
KR20140051264A (en) 2011-07-12 2014-04-30 엘지전자 주식회사 Priority-based data transmission method in a peer-to-peer communication system

Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20040153362A1 (en) * 1996-01-29 2004-08-05 Progressive Casualty Insurance Company Monitoring system for determining and communicating a cost of insurance
US20020188484A1 (en) * 2000-05-19 2002-12-12 Grover Ruth B. Method and system for furnishing an on-line quote for an insurance product
US7333939B1 (en) * 2000-07-21 2008-02-19 Travelers Property Casualty Corp. Method for providing web-based insurance data processing services to users
US20020120474A1 (en) * 2000-11-06 2002-08-29 Hele John C.R. Automated insurance policy application
US20020087364A1 (en) * 2000-11-07 2002-07-04 Lerner Andrew S. System and method for enabling real time underwriting of insurance policies
US20030182165A1 (en) * 2002-03-19 2003-09-25 Atsushi Kato Travel insurance reception apparatus and method
US20050102172A1 (en) * 2003-10-31 2005-05-12 Sirmans James R.Jr. System and method for evaluating insurance member activity and pricing insurance products

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Mutual Benefit Group, "Homeowners/Renters Insurance: The 'security system' you can't afford to overlook", 3 April 2004, http://mutualbenefitgroup.com/products_home.html *

Cited By (28)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US11068989B2 (en) * 2013-03-10 2021-07-20 State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Adjusting insurance policies based on common driving routes and other risk factors
US9865020B1 (en) 2013-03-10 2018-01-09 State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Systems and methods for generating vehicle insurance policy data based on empirical vehicle related data
US11610270B2 (en) 2013-03-10 2023-03-21 State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Adjusting insurance policies based on common driving routes and other risk factors
US10373264B1 (en) 2013-03-10 2019-08-06 State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Vehicle image and sound data gathering for insurance rating purposes
US10387967B1 (en) 2013-03-10 2019-08-20 State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Systems and methods for generating vehicle insurance policy data based on empirical vehicle related data
US20140257869A1 (en) * 2013-03-10 2014-09-11 State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Adjusting Insurance Policies Based on Common Driving Routes and Other Risk Factors
US10043217B1 (en) * 2014-10-27 2018-08-07 State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Systems and methods for quoting multiple homeowner insurance products
US10650465B1 (en) 2014-10-27 2020-05-12 State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Systems and methods for quoting multiple homeowner insurance products
US11868915B2 (en) 2015-03-11 2024-01-09 State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Route scoring for assessing or predicting driving performance
US10810504B1 (en) 2015-03-11 2020-10-20 State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Route scoring for assessing or predicting driving performance
US11593688B1 (en) 2015-03-11 2023-02-28 State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Route scoring for assessing or predicting driving performance
US11887166B1 (en) * 2016-10-27 2024-01-30 United Services Automobile Association (Usaa) Methods and systems for generating and using content item leads
US11532052B2 (en) * 2017-05-22 2022-12-20 Insurance Zebra Inc. Using simulated consumer profiles to form calibration data for models
US20210110481A1 (en) * 2017-05-22 2021-04-15 Insurance Zebra Inc. Using simulated consumer profiles to form calibration data for models
US20180336640A1 (en) * 2017-05-22 2018-11-22 Insurance Zebra Inc. Rate analyzer models and user interfaces
US10832336B2 (en) * 2017-05-22 2020-11-10 Insurance Zebra Inc. Using simulated consumer profiles to form calibration data for models
WO2018232492A1 (en) * 2017-06-21 2018-12-27 The Bank Of Nova Scotia Group insurance package customization system
CN110069535A (en) * 2017-12-01 2019-07-30 连子智 The system that Insurance Product Design is carried out using the technology and data of networking
US11645720B2 (en) * 2019-08-01 2023-05-09 Patty, Llc Multi-channel cognitive digital personal lines property and casualty insurance and home services rate quoting, comparison shopping and enrollment system and method
US11756129B1 (en) * 2020-02-28 2023-09-12 State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Systems and methods for light detection and ranging (LIDAR) based generation of an inventory list of personal belongings
US11734767B1 (en) 2020-02-28 2023-08-22 State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Systems and methods for light detection and ranging (lidar) based generation of a homeowners insurance quote
US11676343B1 (en) 2020-04-27 2023-06-13 State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Systems and methods for a 3D home model for representation of property
US11508138B1 (en) 2020-04-27 2022-11-22 State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Systems and methods for a 3D home model for visualizing proposed changes to home
US11830150B1 (en) 2020-04-27 2023-11-28 State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Systems and methods for visualization of utility lines
US11663550B1 (en) 2020-04-27 2023-05-30 State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Systems and methods for commercial inventory mapping including determining if goods are still available
US11900535B1 (en) 2020-04-27 2024-02-13 State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Systems and methods for a 3D model for visualization of landscape design
US20230017992A1 (en) * 2021-07-13 2023-01-19 State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Systems and methods for improved determination of insurance data
US11972491B2 (en) 2022-03-23 2024-04-30 State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Dynamic auto insurance policy quote creation based on tracked user data

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US9881341B1 (en) 2018-01-30
US20220391991A1 (en) 2022-12-08
US10878506B1 (en) 2020-12-29
US11023965B1 (en) 2021-06-01
US11481844B1 (en) 2022-10-25
US9875508B1 (en) 2018-01-23

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20220391991A1 (en) Systems and methods for customizing insurance
US11341579B1 (en) Processing an application for insurance coverage
US20070136109A1 (en) Systems and Methods for Customizing Homeowner's Insurance
US20240062309A1 (en) Delivery of customized insurance products and services
US8554584B2 (en) Interactive credential system and method
US20220215476A1 (en) Machine Learning Technologies for Efficiently Obtaining Insurance Coverage
US20020103678A1 (en) Multi-risk insurance system and method
US20080262877A1 (en) Interactive credential system and method
US8290797B2 (en) Interactive credential system and method
US20090037228A1 (en) System and Method for Analyzing Complex Insurance Policy Proposals
US20050278246A1 (en) Software solution management of problem loans
US20010034700A1 (en) Vehicle leasing and customer credit rehabilitation system and method
US8589190B1 (en) System and method for underwriting a prepackaged business owners insurance policy
Baker et al. You want insurance with that; Using behavioral economics to protect consumers from add-on insurance products
US20110320224A1 (en) Systems and Methods for Customizing Product Selections Based on Member Parameters and Providing the Selections to Members for Purchase
US20140188660A1 (en) Method and apparatus for conveying the right to broker real property transfers
WO2013044250A1 (en) A system and method of expedited credit and loan processing
US20160239924A1 (en) Data Structures For Providing Customized Marketing Information
JP2003531417A (en) Decision support system and method using multidimensional analysis
US20230084026A1 (en) Systems and methods for customizing option packages
Adam et al. Analysis of website utilization for online motor vehicle insurance purchases
US20200320554A1 (en) Method for predicting future seller product values for determining investor capital contributions
MEKONNEN MOTOR INSURANCE SERVICE QUALITY AND CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:(THE CASE OF ABAY INSURANCE SC)
McGregor et al. The JAV Insurance Group: A Case Comparing Financial Statement Measurement and Long-Term Economic Benefits.
Tegegn Potential Contribution of E-Commerce Application in Ethiopian Insurance Industry

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION