US20150031423A1 - System and method for betting on a participant in a group of events - Google Patents

System and method for betting on a participant in a group of events Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20150031423A1
US20150031423A1 US14/315,517 US201414315517A US2015031423A1 US 20150031423 A1 US20150031423 A1 US 20150031423A1 US 201414315517 A US201414315517 A US 201414315517A US 2015031423 A1 US2015031423 A1 US 2015031423A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
events
bet
participant
bets
index
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
US14/315,517
Other versions
US10304292B2 (en
Inventor
Lee M. Amaitis
Joseph M. Asher
Adam Burgis
Dominic Crosthwaite
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Cantor Index LLC
Original Assignee
Cantor Index LLC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Cantor Index LLC filed Critical Cantor Index LLC
Priority to US14/315,517 priority Critical patent/US10304292B2/en
Publication of US20150031423A1 publication Critical patent/US20150031423A1/en
Priority to US16/391,369 priority patent/US11043078B2/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US10304292B2 publication Critical patent/US10304292B2/en
Priority to US17/353,012 priority patent/US11798375B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Adjusted expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G07CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07FCOIN-FREED OR LIKE APPARATUS
    • G07F17/00Coin-freed apparatus for hiring articles; Coin-freed facilities or services
    • G07F17/32Coin-freed apparatus for hiring articles; Coin-freed facilities or services for games, toys, sports, or amusements
    • G07F17/3286Type of games
    • G07F17/3288Betting, e.g. on live events, bookmaking
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q40/00Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
    • G06Q40/04Trading; Exchange, e.g. stocks, commodities, derivatives or currency exchange
    • GPHYSICS
    • G07CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07FCOIN-FREED OR LIKE APPARATUS
    • G07F17/00Coin-freed apparatus for hiring articles; Coin-freed facilities or services
    • G07F17/32Coin-freed apparatus for hiring articles; Coin-freed facilities or services for games, toys, sports, or amusements
    • G07F17/3244Payment aspects of a gaming system, e.g. payment schemes, setting payout ratio, bonus or consolation prizes
    • GPHYSICS
    • G07CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07FCOIN-FREED OR LIKE APPARATUS
    • G07F17/00Coin-freed apparatus for hiring articles; Coin-freed facilities or services
    • G07F17/32Coin-freed apparatus for hiring articles; Coin-freed facilities or services for games, toys, sports, or amusements
    • G07F17/3244Payment aspects of a gaming system, e.g. payment schemes, setting payout ratio, bonus or consolation prizes
    • G07F17/3258Cumulative reward schemes, e.g. jackpots

Definitions

  • This invention relates in general to betting on events and, more particularly, to a system and method for betting on a participant in a group of events.
  • Wagering on sporting events is a large and growing industry in many parts of the world.
  • Various types of betting products or systems are available for various types of sporting events
  • typical horse racing bets allow bettors to bet on a single horse or on several horses in a particular race or series of races.
  • a bettor can bet on a particular horse to finish first (win), finish in the top two (place), or finish in the top three (show).
  • a bettor may also make various combination bets with multiple horses, such as an exacta bet (covering the top two horses in order) or a trifecta bet (covering the top three horses in order).
  • a bettor may bet on a series of races, such as the daily double (winners of two consecutive races), the pick-three (winners of three consecutive races), and the pick-six (winners of six consecutive races), for example.
  • pari-mutuel betting system In a pari-mutuel betting system, all bets regarding a particular event are aggregated, a commission (or “take-out”) is taken by the track, and the remainder is distributed among the winning bettors.
  • a commission or “take-out”
  • pari-mutuel betting systems are commonly used in North America (and other various places throughout the world) for betting on horse races.
  • a method of managing bets may include receiving one or more first type of bets and one or more second type of bets.
  • Each first type has an associated bet amount and comprises a bet that the total number of units earned by a particular participant over a course of a plurality of events will fall within a first range of numbers.
  • Each second type of bet has an associated bet amount and comprises a second bet that the total number of units earned by the particular participant in the plurality of events will fall within a second range of numbers.
  • the total number of units earned by the particular participant may be determined based at least in part on the positioning of the particular participant in each of the plurality of events.
  • the method may further include determining whether the first type of bets or the second type of bets are winning bets based at least in part on whether the total number of units earned by the particular participant falls within the first range of numbers or the second range of numbers.
  • a betting pool may be determined based at least in part on the total of the bet amounts associated with the first type of bets and the total of the bet amounts associated with the second type of bets, and an amount of a payout may be determined based at least in part on the betting pool and the total of the bet amounts associated with the winning bets.
  • the method may include, for each of a plurality of participants participating in one or more of a plurality of events, receiving one or more participant bets.
  • Each participant bet has an associated bet amount and comprises a bet that the number of units earned by that participant over the course of the plurality of events will exceed a particular index number before the number of units earned by any other of the plurality of participants exceeds the particular index number.
  • the total number of units earned by that participant may be determined based at least in part on the positioning of that participant in at least a portion of the plurality of events in which that participant participates.
  • the method may further include determining as the winning participant the participant for which the number of units earned by that participant exceeds the particular index number before the number of units earned by any other of the participants exceeds the particular index number.
  • the method may further include identifying winning participant bets based at least in part on the determined winning participant.
  • a betting provider may allow clients to place index bets on the performance of a particular participant in a plurality of betting events, such as a jockey in a group of horse races or a driver in a group of car races, for example.
  • bettors may place wagers on particular participants for a series of events, rather than on each individual event.
  • a bettor may “cash out” or settle an index bet during the life of the bet in order to mitigate potential losses or lock in guaranteed gains.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates an example system for receiving and managing index bets in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention
  • FIG. 2 illustrates one embodiment of a method for placing index bets in a pari-mutuel betting system
  • FIG. 3 illustrates one embodiment of a method for placing index bets in a spread betting system.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates an example system 10 for receiving and managing index bets 80 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • System 10 includes one or more betting system interfaces 14 and a betting system platform 16 coupled by one or more communication networks 18 .
  • one or more clients 20 may receive betting information (such as event times, betting rules, betting options and odds, for example) and/or place index bets 80 via betting system interfaces 14 .
  • Betting system interfaces 14 communicate such index bets 80 received from clients 20 to betting system platform 16 .
  • Betting system platform 16 stores the received index bets 80 , determines appropriate odds and payouts, and communicates such odds and payouts to one or more of the betting system interfaces 14 .
  • System 10 permits clients 20 to place one or more types of index bets 80 on a plurality of betting events having a plurality of event participants, such as a plurality of horse races, dog races, or auto races, for example.
  • the participants in such betting events may include jockeys, drivers, horses or dogs, for example.
  • the participants in each event are the same.
  • the participants in each event may be different.
  • the set of jockeys riding in each race may change from race to race, and the particular jockey may be racing in only six of the ten races.
  • particular types of index bets 80 may include over/under index bets 82 , range index bets 84 , head-to-head index bets 86 , purse index bets 88 and/or multi-card index bets 90 .
  • Betting system platform 16 may establish or permit one or more various types of betting formats for each type of index bet 80 .
  • betting system platform 16 may allow clients 20 to place one or more types of index bet 80 according to a pari-mutuel format and/or a spread betting format.
  • each index bet 80 may have an associated bet amount, which defines the amount that the client 20 placing the index bet 80 wishes to wager on the bet.
  • each index bet 80 may have an associated quote and unit stake.
  • the unit stake may define the amount per unit (such as per point or per dollar, for example) above or below the quote that the client 20 placing the index bet 80 wishes to wager. For example, suppose in a spread betting format that a client 20 places an index bet 80 for a unit stake of $2 per point that a particular jockey will score more than 172 points (the quote) over a series of eight races.
  • jockey scores 190 points the client 20 would win $36, or (190 points ⁇ 172 points)*($2/point). However, if the jockey scores only 162 points, the client 20 would lose $20, or (172 points ⁇ 162 points)*($2/point).
  • index bets 80 may comprise bets, or participant bets, regarding the total number of units earned by one or more particular participants in a plurality of betting events, such as particular participant in a group of horse races, dog races, or auto races, for example.
  • the betting events may include any events in which a plurality of participants compete for positions.
  • Some types of index bets 80 such as some over/under index bets 82 , for example, may comprise a bet regarding one particular participant, while other types of index bets 80 , such as some head-to-head bets 84 , for example, may comprise a bet regarding more than one particular participant.
  • the plurality of events may occur within a particular day, such as a group of horse races or car races for example.
  • the plurality of events may occur over a more extended period of time, such as a week, month, season or year, for example.
  • a particular index bet 80 may be a bet regarding the total purse money won by a particular jockey in the month of June.
  • each index bet 80 may comprise an associated unit distribution structure that defines the rules or structure for distributing units among the participants in each of the plurality of events.
  • the unit distribution structure for an index bet 80 may define the distribution of units over a particular number of positions (such as the top three finishers, for example) in each of the plurality of events.
  • the unit distribution structure may comprise the purse distribution structure, which defines the distribution of the purse in each of the plurality of events.
  • a typical thoroughbred purse distribution structure awards 60% of the purse to the winner, 20% to the second place horse, and lesser amounts to certain other finishers.
  • the unit distribution structure may parallel the typical standardbred purse distribution structure and award 50 points for a win, 25 points for second, 12 points for third, 8 points for fourth and 5 points for fifth.
  • the unit distribution structure for other index bets 80 may be similar to, or at least based on, such thoroughbred purse distribution structures or standardbred point distribution structure, and may use units other than monetary units or points.
  • the units awarded for the two or more positions may be added together and divided by two, and each of the two participants may be awarded the resulting number of units.
  • Over/under index bets 82 and range index bets 84 comprise bets that the total number of units earned by a particular participant over a course of a plurality of events will fall within a particular range of numbers.
  • the particular participant is selected from a plurality of participants that each participate in at least one of the plurality of events.
  • the particular participant may be a particular jockey or driver that participates in at least two races in a group of races, such as a group of races on a race card (such as a group of races to be run at a track in one day, for example).
  • Over/under index bets 82 comprise bets that the total number of units earned by a particular participant over a course of a plurality of events will either be over or under a particular index number determined for the bet.
  • Over/under index bets 82 include both over bets 82 A and under bets 82 B.
  • Over bets 82 A comprise bets that the total number of units earned by the particular participant in the plurality of events will fall within the range of numbers above the index number (i.e., between the index number and infinity, or the maximum possible number of units), while under bets 82 B comprise bets that the total number of units earned by the particular participant in the plurality of events will fall within the range of numbers below the index number (i.e., between zero, or the minimum possible number of units, and the index number).
  • over/under index bets 82 may be considered as a type of range index bets.
  • the index number for an over/under index bet 82 regarding a particular participant may represent the estimated or predicted total number of units that will be earned by the particular participant over the course of the group of events.
  • the index number may be determined by betting system platform 16 , and may be based on a variety of parameters, such as historical data regarding the type of the plurality of betting events, the particular participant, the number of participants in each of the plurality of events, the type of units (such as points, wins, or dollars, for example), and the unit distribution structure for the plurality of events, for example.
  • the index number for an over/under index bet 82 regarding a particular participant may be determined based at least on a track handicapper's view of the strength of the mounts in each event.
  • index number for each over/under index bet 82 associated with a particular betting location may be provided to clients 20 .
  • index numbers for over/under index bets 82 may be published in the official track program or communicated to clients 20 via one or more various betting system interfaces 14 .
  • Clients 20 who think that the particular participant covered by an over/under index bet 82 will earn more units than the index number over the course of the plurality of events would likely place an over bet 82 A, while clients 20 who think that the particular participant covered by an over/under index bet 82 will earn less units than the index number over the course of the plurality of events would likely place an under bet 82 B.
  • the index number for an over/under index bet 82 may be set at an integer plus some fraction such that landing exactly on the index number is unlikely or impossible.
  • the index number for an over/under index bet 82 may be set at X and 1 ⁇ 3, where X is an integer.
  • Using a fraction such as 1 ⁇ 3 rather than 1 ⁇ 2 or 1 ⁇ 4 may reduce or eliminate the possibility of the particular participant earning the exact number of units as the index number, since participants may earn 1 ⁇ 2 or 1 ⁇ 4 of a unit due to one or more dead heats.
  • betting system platform 16 may determine the number of units earned by the particular participant based at least on the positioning of the particular participant in each events and the relevant unit distribution structure. Betting system platform 16 may maintain and communicate a running total of units earned by the particular participant to clients 20 via one or more various betting system interfaces 14 . Betting system platform 16 may determine whether the over bets 82 A or under bets 82 B are winning bets after the plurality of events are completed or at some earlier point, such as if the units earned by the particular participant exceed the index number or if it becomes impossible for the particular participant to earn the remaining number of units required to reach the index number, for example.
  • the payout for winning over/under index bets 82 may be calculated as follows. First, the total of the bet amounts for each over bet 82 A and the total of the bet amounts for each under bet 82 B are combined to create a betting pool. A take-out or commission may be removed from the betting pool. The take-out or commission may be any suitable amount of the betting pool, such as 10% or 15% of the betting pool, for example. The remaining portion of the betting pool may then be divided among all winning bets, in proportion to the bet amount of each winning bet.
  • betting system platform 16 may close the betting pool proximate the start of the first event of the plurality of events. Alternatively, betting system platform 16 may close the betting pool proximate the start of the first event in which the particular participant is participating, which may or may not be the first of the plurality of events.
  • pre-set adjustments may be made in the event of a late scratch or other similar event, such as a cancelled race or the late scratch of one of the horses which was to be ridden by the jockey covered by an over/under index bet 82 .
  • the track may set rules such that no adjustments are made for such events.
  • betting system platform 16 may offer new over/under index bets 82 for the same participant after one or more (or after each) of the events in the plurality of events has occurred, to permit additional betting based on the performance of the participant up to that point. This may be useful to accommodate clients 20 who miss one or more of the group of events, such as clients 20 arriving late at the track.
  • Each new over/under index bets 82 may comprise a bet regarding the total number of units that will be earned by the participant in each of the remaining events (or in other words, the total number of units earned by the participant in the plurality of events excluding any of the events that have already occurred).
  • a new index number may be determined for each new over/under index bet 82 for a particular participant, based on the performance of that participant in the events that have already occurred. Generally, if the participant has performed well and earned a relatively large number of units, the index number will increase for subsequent over/under index bets 82 for that participant, and vice versa.
  • over/under index bets 82 may be structured such as to permit a client 20 to “cash out,” or request and receive a settlement payment for his or her bet after one or more of the plurality of events have occurred. This may allow a client 20 to limit his or her win/loss possibilities to take advantage of the results of events that have occurred. For example, if jockey Campbell (covered by an over/under index bet 82 ) were to win an early race on a longshot, the index number for a new over/under index bet 82 offered after the early race would be higher than that of the original over/under index bet 82 .
  • a client 20 who originally placed an over bet 82 A on Campbell could capitalize on the movement of the index number by requesting to terminate his original bet and receive a settlement payment (i.e., “cashing out”).
  • the settlement payment for client 20 may be determined based at least on the difference between the index number of the original over/under index bet 82 and the higher index number of the new over/under index bet 82 offered after the early race.
  • jockey Campbell lost an early race on a heavy favorite the index number for a new over/under index bet 82 offered after the early race would be lower than that of the original over/under index bet 82 .
  • a client 20 who originally placed an over bet 82 A on Campbell may wish to mitigate his or her losses by “cashing out.”
  • the settlement payment for client 20 may be determined based at least on the difference between the index number of the original over/under index bet 82 and the lower index number of the new over/under index bet 82 offered after the early race.
  • a client 20 may use any suitable betting system interface 14 to request that the index bet 80 be settled.
  • Betting system platform 16 may receive the request, determine the appropriate settlement payment for the client 20 , and cancel the original index bet 80 .
  • Betting system platform 16 may also cause the payment of the settlement payment to the client 20 , such as by communicating a message to a teller 30 approving the payment of the settlement payment, for example.
  • over/under index bets 82 may be offered in a spread betting format.
  • an over/under index bet 82 has an associated quote and unit stake.
  • the quote may comprise an index number, such as described above, or pair of index numbers including an upper index number and a lower index number, thus creating a spread.
  • the unit stake defines the amount per unit (such as per point or per dollar, for example) above or below the quote that the client 20 placing the over/under index bet 82 wishes to wager.
  • an over bet 82 A comprises a bet that the total number of units earned by the particular participant will be greater than the upper index number
  • a lower bet 82 B comprises a bet that the total number of units earned by the particular participant will be less than the lower index number
  • the payout for an over/under index bet 82 regarding a particular participant may be determined based at least on the quote, the unit stake, and the total number of units earned by the particular participant. In one embodiment, the payout is determined by multiplying the unit stake by the difference between the quote and the total number of units earned by the particular participant.
  • over/under index bet 82 for a particular driver Jones in a group of car races.
  • the over/under index bet 82 has a spread quote of 2121 ⁇ 3-2141 ⁇ 3.
  • a client 20 places an under bet 82 B for a unit stake of $1/point. If Jones ends up scoring a total of 192 points over the course of the plurality of events, the client 20 would win (2121 ⁇ 3 ⁇ 192)*($1/point), or $20.33. However, if Jones scored a total of 220 points, the client 20 would lose (220 ⁇ 2121 ⁇ 3)*($1/point), or $7.67. Now supposing that another client 20 places an over bet 82 A for a unit stake of $1/point.
  • range index bets 84 comprise bets that the total number of units earned by a particular participant over a course of a plurality of events will fall within a particular range of numbers.
  • Betting system platform 16 may define or establish any suitable number of ranges for each range index bet 84 , such as, for example, based upon an index number established by a track handicapper.
  • range index bets 84 on Range 3 would be winning bets.
  • one or more subsequent range index bets 84 may be offered for the same jockey after one or more races occur. Each range of numbers may change for such subsequent range index bets 84 , depending on the performance of the jockey up to that point.
  • the ranges for a particular range index bet 84 may be determined based at least in part on an index number which represents the estimated or predicted total number of units that will be earned by the particular participant over the course of the group of events. As described above, such index numbers may be determined by a track handicapper or otherwise by betting system platform 16 based on various parameters.
  • the payout for range index bets 84 may be determined according to traditional pari-mutuel principles. For example, suppose for the range index bet 84 discussed above that $100 was bet on Range 1, $200 on Range 2, $300 on Range 3, $400 on Range 4, $500 on Range 5, $600 on Range 6, and $700 on Range 7. Assume that the take out is 20%. Suppose again that the jockey earned a total of 198, and that range index bets 84 on Range 3 are winning bets.
  • the payout for bets on Range 3 may be calculated as follows. First, the total of the bet amounts for range index bets 84 made for each range (Ranges 1-7) are combined to create a betting pool, which is equal to $2,800. The 20% take-out (or $560) or commission may be removed from the betting pool, leaving $2,240, which may then be divided among all winning bets (i.e., bets on Range 3), in proportion to the bet amount of each winning bet.
  • range index bets 84 may be structured such as to permit a client 20 to “cash out,” or request and receive a settlement payment for his or her range index bet 84 after one or more of the plurality of events have occurred. This may allow a client 20 to limit his or her win/loss possibilities to take advantage of the results of events that have occurred, such as discussed above.
  • Head-to-head index bets 86 comprise bets regarding the number of units earned by a particular participant over the course of the plurality of events as compared to the number of units earned by other participants in the plurality of events. For example, some head-to-head index bets 86 comprise a bet that the number of units earned by a participant will exceed an index number before the number of units earned by any other participant exceeds the index number. Other head-to-head index bets 86 comprise a bet that a particular participant will earn more units over the course of the plurality of events than any other participant.
  • betting system platform 16 may offer head-to-head index bets 86 for each of the participants participating in any of the group of events.
  • betting system platform 16 may offer head-to-head index bets 86 for only a particular subset of the participants participating in any of the group of events.
  • a head-to-head index bet 86 for a particular participant may comprise a bet that that participant will outperform (such as by earning more total units or by being the first participant to reach a predetermined index number, as discussed above) only those other participants for whom head-to-head index bets 86 are offered.
  • a head-to-head index bet 86 regarding one of the drivers comprises a bet that that driver will outperform the other two drivers for which head-to-head index bets 86 are offered, regardless of the performance of any other drivers in the group of races.
  • head-to-head index bets 86 that comprise a race to a predetermined index number in the event that none of the participants reaches the index number, the participant with the highest total number of units would be the winning participant, in one embodiment, for the purpose of determining which head-to-head index bets 86 are winning bets.
  • the participant with the highest total number of units after that event would be the winning participant for the purpose of determining which head-to-head index bets 86 are winning bets.
  • the index number used for head-to-head index bets 86 that comprise a race to an index number may be determined by betting system platform 16 based on various parameters.
  • head-to-head index bets 86 may be offered before the start of the first of the group of events, or after one or more of the events have occurred. Offering head-to-head index bets 86 which begin after one or more of the events have occurred may allow clients 20 who have missed one or more of the group of events, such as clients 20 arriving late at the track, to make head-to-head index bets 86 . In addition, offering head-to-head index bets 86 after one or more of the events may allow clients 20 more time to analyze various events or event participants.
  • the payout for head-to-head index bets 86 may be determined according to traditional pari-mutuel principles. For example, suppose a group of races in which head-to-head index bet 86 are offered for three different drivers, Smith, Brown, and Johnson, the index number is 100 points, and that the take-out is 15%. Suppose that $300 was bet on Smith, $500 on Brown, and $200 on Johnson, and that Smith reaches 100 points first.
  • the payout for clients 20 who placed head-to-head index bet 86 on Smith may be calculated as follows. First, the total of the bet amounts for head-to-head index bets 86 on each of the three drivers are combined to create a betting pool, which is equal to $1,000. The 15% take-out (or $150) may be removed from the betting pool, leaving $850, which may then be divided among all winning bets (i.e., bets on Smith), in proportion to the bet amount of each winning bet.
  • head-to-head index bet 86 may be structured such as to permit a client 20 to “cash out,” or request and receive a settlement payment for his or her head-to-head index bet 86 after one or more of the plurality of events have occurred. This may allow a client 20 to limit his or her win/loss possibilities to take advantage of the results of events that have occurred, such as discussed above.
  • Purse index bets 88 may comprise any of the types of index bets 80 described above in which the relevant units is the amount of purse money earned or won by a particular participant in the plurality of events.
  • the unit distribution structure is equal to the purse distribution structure for each of the events.
  • purse index bets 88 are based on the amount of purse money won by the participant (or the participant's horses) over the course of the groups of events.
  • an index number may be determined which represents an amount of purse money to be earned by the participant (or the participant's horses) over the course of the groups of events.
  • a track handicapper or betting system platform 16 could establish an amount of purse money (such as $45,000, for example) as an index number for clients 20 to place bets on whether the designated participant will win more or less purse money than the index number.
  • purse index bets 88 distinguish between winning races with different size purses.
  • purse index bets 88 may distinguish between winning high-stakes (or important) races and winning an ordinary claiming race.
  • betting system platform 16 may provide to clients 20 via one or more betting system interfaces 14 a breakdown of the amount to be awarded to each finisher (or a particular number of top finishers) in each event in the group of event.
  • purse index bets 88 may be offered using pari-mutuel and/or spread betting formats, such as described above with reference to over/under index bets 82 , range index bets 84 , and head-to-head index bets 86 .
  • Multi-card index bets 90 comprise any of the types of index bets 80 described above in which the group of events occur over an extended period of time, which may include multiple “cards,” or subsets of events.
  • Example multi-card index bets 90 may include bets regarding the jockey, driver (or other type of participant) of the week, month, season or year, in which the winning participant is determined in any of a variety of manners, such as by wins, purse money, or according to a unit distribution structure as discussed above, for example.
  • each multi-card index bet 90 regarding a particular participant comprises a first bet portion regarding the number of units earned by that participant in a subset of the plurality of events and a second bet portion regarding the number of units earned by that participant in the plurality of events.
  • each multi-card index bet 90 may comprise a bet that the number of units earned by the designated participant in the subset of the plurality of events will be greater than the number of units earned by any of the other participants in the subset of the plurality of events, while the second bet portion comprises a bet that the number of units earned by the designated participant in the plurality of events will be greater than the number of units earned by any of the other participants in the plurality of events.
  • a particular head-to-head multi-card index bet 90 on a particular jockey Campbell may include a first bet portion regarding the number of wins that the jockey Campbell will win throughout June, 2003 and a second bet portion regarding the number of wins that the jockey Campbell will win throughout all of 2003.
  • a predetermined percentage of the betting pool collected for such multi-card index bet 90 may be designated for each bet portion of the multi-card index bet 90 .
  • a first payout amount may be determined for the first bet portion based at least on the collected betting pool and the predetermined percentage of the betting pool allocated for winning the first bet portion, and a second payout amount may be determined for the second bet portion based at least in part on the betting pool and the predetermined percentage of the betting pool allocated for winning the second bet portion.
  • Betting system interfaces 14 may include any suitable interface between a client 20 and betting system platform 16 .
  • betting system interfaces 14 may include physical interfaces, such as track interfaces 26 and/or off-track interfaces 28 .
  • Track interfaces 26 are generally located at a track
  • off-track interfaces 28 are generally located at an off-track-betting (OTB) establishment, such as an OTB parlor.
  • Track interfaces 26 and off-track interfaces 28 may include tellers 30 , which may receive index bets 80 from and distribute payouts to clients 20 , and/or monitors 32 , which may be viewed by clients 20 to monitor betting information such as the event time, the current odds, and the projected or actual payouts for various index bets 80 , for example.
  • Monitors 32 may include, for example, tote-boards or closed-circuit televisions located at a track or OTB establishment.
  • Track interfaces 26 and/or off-track interfaces 28 may also include one or more self-service betting machines 33 .
  • self-service betting machines 33 allow clients 20 to insert payment into the machine (such as cash or by using a voucher or a credit or debit card), place one or more bets 80 and receive a printout (such as a ticket, for example) indicating the bet or bets placed.
  • Printouts for winning bets may be inserted into the self-service betting machine, such as to receive a payment voucher (which may be used to receive a payout from a teller 30 ) or to place additional index bets 80 .
  • self-service betting machines 33 allow clients 20 to use a credit card, a debit card, or a smart card to place index bets 80 .
  • the credit or debit card may have an associated account, which may be a betting account provided and/or managed by a betting account provider using, for example, a centralized computer system.
  • the smart card may itself store information regarding a betting account and various bets, or may also be linked to a betting account using a centralized computer system.
  • a client 20 may insert or swipe his or her credit, debit, or smart card in the self-service betting machines 33 in order to update the balance on the card.
  • Self-service betting machines 33 may also allow the client 20 to print out payment vouchers which may be presented to a teller 30 in order to receive payments.
  • betting system interfaces 14 may also include various non-physical interfaces, such as one or more telephone operators 34 and one or more websites 36 .
  • Clients 20 may access or communicate with such non-physical interfaces via one or more communication networks 44 .
  • Communication networks 44 may include one or more servers, routers, switches, repeaters, backbones, links and/or any other appropriate type of communication devices coupled by links such as wire line, optical, wireless, or other appropriate links.
  • communication network 44 may include any interconnection found on any communication network, such as a telephone network, a local area network (LAN), metropolitan area network (MAN), wide area network (WAN), the Internet, portions of the Internet, or any other data exchange system.
  • LAN local area network
  • MAN metropolitan area network
  • WAN wide area network
  • the Internet portions of the Internet, or any other data exchange system.
  • clients 20 may use a computer, a personal digital assistant (PDA), a cell-phone, a remote paging device, an electronic mail communication device, a handheld betting device, or any other suitable mobile device.
  • PDA personal digital assistant
  • clients 20 may receive any suitable information, such as betting information, from betting system platform 16 via mobile devices using, for example, communication networks 44 and betting system interfaces 14 .
  • Telephone operators 34 may communicate betting information to, and take index bets 80 from, clients 20 .
  • websites 36 may communicate betting information to clients 20 and allow clients 20 to place index bets 80 .
  • One or more of such websites 36 may be hosted by one or more servers associated with system 10 , which server or servers may also host betting system platform 16 in some embodiments.
  • betting information available to clients 20 via websites 36 may be updated substantially in real time or at preset intervals (such as every 30 seconds, for example) as new index bets 80 are placed and/or as information regarding the event changes, for example.
  • one or more websites 36 may be provided by, or associated with, an Internet betting provider 46 , for example.
  • Internet betting provider 46 may provide Internet account wagering by providing online betting accounts to one or more clients 20 .
  • a client 20 may interface with one or more websites 36 associated with the Internet betting provider 46 in order to fund the account, view betting information regarding betting events, and place bets.
  • Such online betting accounts may include one or more various types of accounts, such as deposit accounts, credit accounts, stop-loss accounts, and hybrid accounts, for example.
  • betting system platform 16 is operable to receive index bets 80 from betting system interfaces 14 , store the received index bets 80 , determine appropriate index numbers, quotes, odds and/or payouts, and communicate such index numbers, quotes, odds and/or payouts to one or more of the betting system interfaces 14 , which may then display such index numbers, quotes, odds and/or payouts to clients 20 .
  • betting system platform 16 includes a processor 38 coupled to a memory 40 .
  • Processor 38 is generally operable to execute various algorithms or calculations to determine current bet data 50 , such as index numbers 51 , bet amounts 52 , betting pools 54 and/or potential payout data 56 .
  • Processor 38 may comprise any suitable processor that executes a betting system software application 42 or other computer instructions, such as a central processing unit (CPU) or other microprocessor, and may include any suitable number of processors working together.
  • CPU central processing unit
  • Memory 40 may comprise one or more memory devices suitable to facilitate execution of the computer instructions, such as one or more random access memories (RAMs), read-only memories (ROMs), dynamic random access memories (DRAMs), fast cycle RAMs (FCRAMs), static RAM (SRAMs), field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), erasable programmable read-only memories (EPROMs), electrically erasable programmable read-only memories (EEPROMs), microcontrollers, or microprocessors.
  • RAMs random access memories
  • ROMs read-only memories
  • DRAMs dynamic random access memories
  • FCRAMs fast cycle RAMs
  • SRAMs static RAM
  • FPGAs field-programmable gate arrays
  • EPROMs erasable programmable read-only memories
  • EEPROMs electrically erasable programmable read-only memories
  • microcontrollers or microprocessors.
  • Memory 40 is generally operable to store various information that may be used by processor 38 in determining index numbers, quotes, odds and/or payouts.
  • memory 40 may comprise any suitable number of databases, which may be co-located or physically and/or geographically distributed.
  • memory 40 may store any or all of the following: betting system software application 42 , current bet data 50 , one or more event parameters 58 , one or more bet parameters 60 , one or more calculation rules 62 , one or more event results 64 , and one or more bet results 66 .
  • Event parameters 58 may comprise various parameters of one or more betting events, such as, for example, the type of event, the time, date and location of the event and/or the number (or in some cases, the name) of each of the participants in the event.
  • Bet parameters 60 may comprise various parameters of one or more received index bets 80 , such as the identity of the client 20 who placed the bet 80 , the manner in which the bet 80 was placed (such as via telephone, the Internet, or in person at a track or OTB establishment, for example), the type of bet 80 , the commission rate on the bet 80 , the participant or participants covered by the bet 80 and/or the amount of the bet 80 , for example.
  • Calculation rules 62 may comprise various equations or other algorithms to be used by processor 38 in determining various current bet data 50 .
  • Event results 64 may comprise various data regarding the results of one or more betting events, such as the final position of each participant in an event, whether there was a tie or dead heat for any position and/or whether any participants did not finish the event, for example.
  • Bet results 66 may comprise various data regarding the results of various index bets 80 , such as the identity of the client 20 who placed the bet 80 , whether the bet 80 was a winning bet, the determined payout for the bet 80 and/or whether the payout was distributed to the client 20 , for example.
  • Each communication network 18 may include one or more servers, routers, switches, repeaters, backbones, links and/or any other appropriate type of communication devices coupled by links such as wire line, optical, wireless, or other appropriate links.
  • each communication network 18 may include any interconnection found on any communication network, such as a local area network (LAN), metropolitan area network (MAN), wide area network (WAN), the Internet, portions of the Internet, or any other data exchange system.
  • LAN local area network
  • MAN metropolitan area network
  • WAN wide area network
  • the Internet portions of the Internet, or any other data exchange system.
  • processor 38 is operable to execute betting system software application 42 to determine current bet data 50 , such as index numbers 51 , bet amounts 52 , betting pools 54 and/or potential payout data 56 .
  • Processor 38 may determine such current bet data 50 based at least on data received from memory 40 and/or one or more betting system interfaces 14 .
  • processor 38 may update such current bet data 50 based on new information being received by betting system platform 16 .
  • processor 38 may update current bet data 50 in real time, substantially in real time, or at preset intervals (such as every 30 seconds, for example).
  • current bet data 50 may be communicated to one or more betting system interfaces 14 via communication network 18 , as indicated by arrow 70 .
  • Current bet data 50 may then be made available to clients 20 , such as via tote boards or monitors 32 located at a track or OTB establishment, for example, or on an appropriate website 36 that may be accessed by clients 20 , for example. In this manner, clients 20 may have access to real-time or substantially real-time current bet data 50 regarding various betting events.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates an example method of placing various index bets 80 in a pari-mutuel betting system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • one or more types of index bets 80 are offered by betting system platform 16 for a plurality of events having a plurality of participants. For example, for a day of horse racing at Kentucky Downs, betting system platform 16 may offer over/under index bets 82 for jockey Goodman who is racing in six of the ten races on the race card for that day.
  • betting system platform 16 assigns an index number of 85 to the index bets 82 such that the index bets 82 include over bets 82 A that jockey Goodman will earn 85 or more points during the day and under bets 82 B that jockey Goodman will earn less than 85 points during the day.
  • various information regarding the types of index bets 80 offered at step 100 may be communicated to clients 20 via various betting system interfaces 14 shown in FIG. 1 , such as monitors 32 at a track or OTB establishment or various websites 36 , for example.
  • Information regarding various types of index bet 80 offered for the plurality of events may also be included in race programs available at tracks or OTB establishments.
  • Such information may include, for example, the details of the offered index bets 80 , such as the participant covered by each index bet 80 and/or the rules of each index bet 80 , as well as current bet data 50 , such as index numbers 51 , bet amounts 52 , betting pools 54 and/or potential payout data 56 for the types of index bet 80 offered by betting system platform 16 .
  • betting pools 54 and/or potential payout data 56 for the over bets 82 A and under bets 82 B for jockey Goodman may be displayed on monitors 32 and websites 36 .
  • clients 20 may place index bets 80 using various betting system interfaces 14 shown in FIG. 1 , such as tellers 30 or self-serving machines 33 at tracks or OTB establishments, or websites 36 , for example. In the example discussed above, clients 20 may wager various amounts on over bets 82 A and under bets 82 B for jockey Goodman.
  • various information regarding the types of index bet 80 placed for the plurality of events may be updated in real-time, substantially in real-time, or at regular intervals based on index bets 80 placed by clients 20 .
  • the betting pools 54 and/or potential payout data 56 for over bets 82 A and under bets 82 B for jockey Goodman may be updated on monitors 32 and websites 36 in real-time, substantially in real-time, or at regular intervals.
  • betting system platform 16 may close the betting on particular index bets 80 before the start of the first of the plurality of events covered by the particular index bets 80 , such as the first race in a group of races, for example. In the example discussed above, betting system platform 16 may close the betting on over bets 82 A and under bets 82 B for jockey Goodman just before the start of the first race.
  • betting system platform 16 may determine betting pools for index bets 80 based at least in part on the total amounts wagered on each type of index bet 80 .
  • betting system platform 16 may determine a betting pool by calculating the total amounts wagered on over bets 82 A and under bets 82 B for jockey Goodman.
  • the plurality of events covered by the index bets 80 occur, such as the running of a group of horse or car races, for example. In the example discussed above, the horse races at Kentucky Downs are run at step 112 .
  • results of the events are received by betting system platform 16 .
  • additional index bets 80 may be offered and placed after one or more of the plurality of events have occurred.
  • the terms of such late index bets 80 may be different from the terms of the index bets 80 placed before the start of the first event.
  • the index number 51 may be adjusted based on the results of the events that have already occurred.
  • range index bets 84 the each of the ranges may be adjusted from the original ranges.
  • a new betting pool may be opened for new index bets 80 offered after a particular number of events have occurred.
  • over bets 82 A and under bets 82 B may be offered and placed after one or more of the races at Kentucky Downs, one or more of which jockey Goodman may have raced in.
  • betting system platform 16 may determine the number of units earned various participants in the plurality of events based at least in part on the positioning of the various participants in each event. In the example discussed above, the total number of points earned by jockey Goodman during the day at Kentucky Downs is calculated based on the position of jockey Goodman in each of the races in which jockey Goodman participated.
  • betting system platform 16 may determine which index bets 80 are winning bets based at least in part on the number of units earned by various participants in the plurality of events. In the example discussed above, betting system platform 16 may determine whether the over bets 82 A or under bets 82 B for jockey Goodman are winning bets based at least in part on whether jockey Goodman earned more or less than 85 points, the index number 51 (or some other index number 51 for bets placed at step 116 after one or more of the races had occurred).
  • betting system platform 16 may determine a payout amount for winning index bets 80 determined at step 120 based at least in part on the betting pool determined at step 110 and the total amount wagered on the winning index bets 80 . Betting system platform 16 may also determine payouts for winning index bets 80 placed at step 116 after one or more events had occurred, based at least in part on the betting pools associated with such index bets 80 .
  • clients 20 who made winning index bets 80 may collect their payouts through various betting system interfaces 14 , such as tellers 30 or self-serving machines 33 at tracks or OTB establishments, or websites 36 , for example.
  • FIG. 3 illustrates an example method of placing various index bets 80 in a spread betting system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • one or more types of spread-based index bets 80 are offered by betting system platform 16 for a plurality of events having a plurality of participants.
  • Betting system platform 16 may provide a spread quote for index bets 80 on a particular participant.
  • the spread quote may be defined by an upper index number and a lower index number associated with the total number of units potentially earned by the participant in the plurality of events.
  • Betting system platform 16 may provide over bets 82 A that are bets that the total number of units earned by the participant will be greater than the upper index number, and under bets 82 B that are bets that the total number of units earned by the participant will be less than the lower index number.
  • betting system platform 16 may offer spread-based over/under index bets 82 for jockey Jennings who is racing in six of the ten races on the race card for that day. Betting system platform 16 may assigns a spread quote of 45-48 points, where 48 is the upper index number and 45 is the lower index number. Thus, betting system platform 16 provides over bets 82 A that are bets that the total number of units earned during the day by jockey Jennings will be greater than or equal to 48, and under bets 82 B that are bets that the total number of units earned by the jockey Jennings will be less than or equal to 45.
  • various information regarding the types of spread-based index bets 80 offered at step 150 may be communicated to clients 20 via various betting system interfaces 14 shown in FIG. 1 , such as discussed above regarding step 102 of FIG. 2 .
  • the spread quote and/or various current bet data 50 for the over bets 82 A and under bets 82 B for jockey Jennings may be displayed on monitors 32 and websites 36 .
  • clients 20 may place spread-based index bets 80 using various betting system interfaces 14 shown in FIG. 1 , such as tellers 30 or self-serving machines 33 at tracks or OTB establishments, or websites 36 , for example.
  • Each index bet 80 may be a particular quote (such as the upper index number or lower index number of a spread quote) and may have an associated unit stake. The quote of the index bet 80 corresponds with the total number of units potentially earned by the designated participant in the plurality of events.
  • a first client 20 may place an over bet 82 A on jockey Goodman at the upper quote of 48 points and with a unit stake of $10/point
  • a second client 20 may place an under bet 82 B on jockey Goodman at the lower quote of 45 points and with a unit stake of $15/point
  • various information regarding the types of index bet 80 placed for the plurality of events may be updated in real-time, substantially in real-time, or at regular intervals based on index bets 80 placed by clients 20 , such as discussed above regarding step 106 of FIG. 2 .
  • betting system platform 16 may close the betting on particular spread-based index bets 80 before the start of the first of the plurality of events covered by the particular index bets 80 , such as the first race in a group of races, for example. In the example discussed above, betting system platform 16 may close the betting on over bets 82 A and under bets 82 B for jockey Jennings just before the start of the first race.
  • the plurality of events covered by the index bets 80 occur, such as the running of a group of horse or car races, for example. In the example discussed above, the horse races at London Downs are run at step 160 .
  • results of the events are received by betting system platform 16 .
  • additional index bets 80 may be offered and placed after one or more of the plurality of events have occurred.
  • the terms of such late index bets 80 including the spread quote, may be different from the terms of the index bets 80 placed before the start of the first event.
  • the spread quote for such index bets 80 placed after one or more of the events has occurred may be adjusted based on the results of the events that have already occurred.
  • over bets 82 A and under bets 82 B may be offered and placed after one or more of the races at London Downs, one or more of which jockey Jennings may have raced in.
  • betting system platform 16 may determine the number of units earned various participants in the plurality of events based at least in part on the positioning of the various participants in each event. In the example discussed above, the total number of points earned by jockey Jennings during the day at London Downs is calculated based on the position of jockey Jennings in each of the races in which jockey Jennings participated.
  • betting system platform 16 may determine which spread-based index bets 80 are winning bets based at least in part on the number of units earned by various participants in the plurality of events and the spread quote for the particular index bet 80 . In the example discussed above, betting system platform 16 may determine whether the over bets 82 A or under bets 82 B for jockey Jennings are winning bets based at least in part on whether jockey Goodman earned less than 45 points, between 45 and 48 points, or more than 48 points.
  • betting system platform 16 may determine a payout amount for winning spread-based index bets 80 determined at step 168 based at least in part on the unit stake and the quote of winning index bets 80 , and the total number of units earned by the participant covered by the index bet 80 .
  • clients 20 who made winning spread-based index bets 80 may collect their payouts through various betting system interfaces 14 , such as tellers 30 or self-serving machines 33 at tracks or OTB establishments, or websites 36 , for example.

Abstract

A method of managing bets includes receiving first types of bets and second types of bets. Each first type of bet comprises a bet that the number of units earned by a participant in a plurality of events will fall within a first range of numbers. Each second type of bet comprises a bet that the number of units earned by the participant over a course of a plurality of events will fall within a second range of numbers. The total number of units earned by the participant is determined based on the positioning of the participant in each event. The method includes determining whether the first or second type of bets are winning bets. A betting pool is determined based on the total amounts associated with the first and second types of bets. A payout is determined based on the betting pool and the total amounts of the winning bets.

Description

    CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
  • This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/615,865, filed Sep. 14, 2012, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/667,923 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,353,763), filed Sep. 22, 2003, which claims benefit of U.S. Patent Application No. 60/459,561 filed Mar. 31, 2003, the disclosures of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entireties.
  • TECHNICAL FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • This invention relates in general to betting on events and, more particularly, to a system and method for betting on a participant in a group of events.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • Wagering on sporting events, such as horse races, for example, is a large and growing industry in many parts of the world. Various types of betting products or systems are available for various types of sporting events For example, typical horse racing bets allow bettors to bet on a single horse or on several horses in a particular race or series of races. For instance, a bettor can bet on a particular horse to finish first (win), finish in the top two (place), or finish in the top three (show). A bettor may also make various combination bets with multiple horses, such as an exacta bet (covering the top two horses in order) or a trifecta bet (covering the top three horses in order). In addition, a bettor may bet on a series of races, such as the daily double (winners of two consecutive races), the pick-three (winners of three consecutive races), and the pick-six (winners of six consecutive races), for example.
  • In a pari-mutuel betting system, all bets regarding a particular event are aggregated, a commission (or “take-out”) is taken by the track, and the remainder is distributed among the winning bettors. For example, pari-mutuel betting systems are commonly used in North America (and other various places throughout the world) for betting on horse races.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • In one embodiment, a method of managing bets is provided. The method may include receiving one or more first type of bets and one or more second type of bets. Each first type has an associated bet amount and comprises a bet that the total number of units earned by a particular participant over a course of a plurality of events will fall within a first range of numbers. Each second type of bet has an associated bet amount and comprises a second bet that the total number of units earned by the particular participant in the plurality of events will fall within a second range of numbers. The total number of units earned by the particular participant may be determined based at least in part on the positioning of the particular participant in each of the plurality of events. The method may further include determining whether the first type of bets or the second type of bets are winning bets based at least in part on whether the total number of units earned by the particular participant falls within the first range of numbers or the second range of numbers. A betting pool may be determined based at least in part on the total of the bet amounts associated with the first type of bets and the total of the bet amounts associated with the second type of bets, and an amount of a payout may be determined based at least in part on the betting pool and the total of the bet amounts associated with the winning bets.
  • In yet another embodiment, another method of managing bets is provided. The method may include, for each of a plurality of participants participating in one or more of a plurality of events, receiving one or more participant bets. Each participant bet has an associated bet amount and comprises a bet that the number of units earned by that participant over the course of the plurality of events will exceed a particular index number before the number of units earned by any other of the plurality of participants exceeds the particular index number. For each of the plurality of participants, the total number of units earned by that participant may be determined based at least in part on the positioning of that participant in at least a portion of the plurality of events in which that participant participates. The method may further include determining as the winning participant the participant for which the number of units earned by that participant exceeds the particular index number before the number of units earned by any other of the participants exceeds the particular index number. The method may further include identifying winning participant bets based at least in part on the determined winning participant.
  • Various embodiments of the present invention may benefit from numerous advantages. It should be noted that one or more embodiments may benefit from some, none, or all of the advantages discussed below.
  • One advantage is that a betting provider may allow clients to place index bets on the performance of a particular participant in a plurality of betting events, such as a jockey in a group of horse races or a driver in a group of car races, for example. Thus, bettors may place wagers on particular participants for a series of events, rather than on each individual event. In addition, a bettor may “cash out” or settle an index bet during the life of the bet in order to mitigate potential losses or lock in guaranteed gains.
  • Other advantages will be readily apparent to one having ordinary skill in the art from the following figures, descriptions, and claims.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • For a more complete understanding of the present invention and for further features and advantages, reference is now made to the following description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
  • FIG. 1 illustrates an example system for receiving and managing index bets in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;
  • FIG. 2 illustrates one embodiment of a method for placing index bets in a pari-mutuel betting system; and
  • FIG. 3 illustrates one embodiment of a method for placing index bets in a spread betting system.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EXAMPLE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION
  • FIG. 1 illustrates an example system 10 for receiving and managing index bets 80 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. System 10 includes one or more betting system interfaces 14 and a betting system platform 16 coupled by one or more communication networks 18. In general, one or more clients 20 may receive betting information (such as event times, betting rules, betting options and odds, for example) and/or place index bets 80 via betting system interfaces 14. Betting system interfaces 14 communicate such index bets 80 received from clients 20 to betting system platform 16. Betting system platform 16 stores the received index bets 80, determines appropriate odds and payouts, and communicates such odds and payouts to one or more of the betting system interfaces 14.
  • System 10 permits clients 20 to place one or more types of index bets 80 on a plurality of betting events having a plurality of event participants, such as a plurality of horse races, dog races, or auto races, for example. The participants in such betting events may include jockeys, drivers, horses or dogs, for example. For some groups of events, the participants in each event are the same. For other groups of events, the participants in each event may be different. For example, for an index bet 80 based on a particular jockey in a group of ten horse races, the set of jockeys riding in each race may change from race to race, and the particular jockey may be racing in only six of the ten races.
  • As shown in FIG. 1, particular types of index bets 80 may include over/under index bets 82, range index bets 84, head-to-head index bets 86, purse index bets 88 and/or multi-card index bets 90. Betting system platform 16 may establish or permit one or more various types of betting formats for each type of index bet 80. For example, as discussed below, betting system platform 16 may allow clients 20 to place one or more types of index bet 80 according to a pari-mutuel format and/or a spread betting format.
  • In a pari-mutuel betting format, each index bet 80 may have an associated bet amount, which defines the amount that the client 20 placing the index bet 80 wishes to wager on the bet. In a spread betting format, each index bet 80 may have an associated quote and unit stake. The unit stake may define the amount per unit (such as per point or per dollar, for example) above or below the quote that the client 20 placing the index bet 80 wishes to wager. For example, suppose in a spread betting format that a client 20 places an index bet 80 for a unit stake of $2 per point that a particular jockey will score more than 172 points (the quote) over a series of eight races. If the jockey scores 190 points, the client 20 would win $36, or (190 points−172 points)*($2/point). However, if the jockey scores only 162 points, the client 20 would lose $20, or (172 points−162 points)*($2/point).
  • One or more types of index bets 80 may comprise bets, or participant bets, regarding the total number of units earned by one or more particular participants in a plurality of betting events, such as particular participant in a group of horse races, dog races, or auto races, for example. The betting events may include any events in which a plurality of participants compete for positions. Some types of index bets 80, such as some over/under index bets 82, for example, may comprise a bet regarding one particular participant, while other types of index bets 80, such as some head-to-head bets 84, for example, may comprise a bet regarding more than one particular participant.
  • For some index bets 80, the plurality of events may occur within a particular day, such as a group of horse races or car races for example. For other bets, the plurality of events may occur over a more extended period of time, such as a week, month, season or year, for example. For example, a particular index bet 80 may be a bet regarding the total purse money won by a particular jockey in the month of June.
  • The units earned by various participants may comprise any suitable type of unit, such as wins, positions, points, or monetary units (such as dollars or pounds), for example. Moreover, each index bet 80 may comprise an associated unit distribution structure that defines the rules or structure for distributing units among the participants in each of the plurality of events. For example, as discussed in greater detail below, the unit distribution structure for an index bet 80 may define the distribution of units over a particular number of positions (such as the top three finishers, for example) in each of the plurality of events. For some index bets 80, the unit distribution structure may comprise the purse distribution structure, which defines the distribution of the purse in each of the plurality of events. For example, a typical thoroughbred purse distribution structure awards 60% of the purse to the winner, 20% to the second place horse, and lesser amounts to certain other finishers. For other index bets 80, the unit distribution structure may parallel the typical standardbred purse distribution structure and award 50 points for a win, 25 points for second, 12 points for third, 8 points for fourth and 5 points for fifth.
  • The unit distribution structure for other index bets 80 may be similar to, or at least based on, such thoroughbred purse distribution structures or standardbred point distribution structure, and may use units other than monetary units or points. For dead heats between two participants in an event, the units awarded for the two or more positions may be added together and divided by two, and each of the two participants may be awarded the resulting number of units. For example, for a dead heat for second place in a horse race in which the standardbred point distribution structure is used, each of the two participants in the dead heat would be awarded 18.5 points (25 points+12 points=37 points/2=18.5 points).
  • Over/under index bets 82 and range index bets 84 comprise bets that the total number of units earned by a particular participant over a course of a plurality of events will fall within a particular range of numbers. The particular participant is selected from a plurality of participants that each participate in at least one of the plurality of events. For example, the particular participant may be a particular jockey or driver that participates in at least two races in a group of races, such as a group of races on a race card (such as a group of races to be run at a track in one day, for example).
  • Over/Under Index Bets
  • Over/under index bets 82 comprise bets that the total number of units earned by a particular participant over a course of a plurality of events will either be over or under a particular index number determined for the bet. Over/under index bets 82 include both over bets 82A and under bets 82B. Over bets 82A comprise bets that the total number of units earned by the particular participant in the plurality of events will fall within the range of numbers above the index number (i.e., between the index number and infinity, or the maximum possible number of units), while under bets 82B comprise bets that the total number of units earned by the particular participant in the plurality of events will fall within the range of numbers below the index number (i.e., between zero, or the minimum possible number of units, and the index number). Thus, over/under index bets 82 may be considered as a type of range index bets.
  • The index number for an over/under index bet 82 regarding a particular participant may represent the estimated or predicted total number of units that will be earned by the particular participant over the course of the group of events. The index number may be determined by betting system platform 16, and may be based on a variety of parameters, such as historical data regarding the type of the plurality of betting events, the particular participant, the number of participants in each of the plurality of events, the type of units (such as points, wins, or dollars, for example), and the unit distribution structure for the plurality of events, for example. In some situations, the index number for an over/under index bet 82 regarding a particular participant may be determined based at least on a track handicapper's view of the strength of the mounts in each event. The index number for each over/under index bet 82 associated with a particular betting location may be provided to clients 20. For example, index numbers for over/under index bets 82 may be published in the official track program or communicated to clients 20 via one or more various betting system interfaces 14.
  • Clients 20 who think that the particular participant covered by an over/under index bet 82 will earn more units than the index number over the course of the plurality of events would likely place an over bet 82A, while clients 20 who think that the particular participant covered by an over/under index bet 82 will earn less units than the index number over the course of the plurality of events would likely place an under bet 82B.
  • The index number for an over/under index bet 82 may be set at an integer plus some fraction such that landing exactly on the index number is unlikely or impossible. For example, the index number for an over/under index bet 82 may be set at X and ⅓, where X is an integer. Using a fraction such as ⅓ rather than ½ or ¼ may reduce or eliminate the possibility of the particular participant earning the exact number of units as the index number, since participants may earn ½ or ¼ of a unit due to one or more dead heats.
  • As the plurality of events covered by an over/under index bet 82 occur, betting system platform 16 may determine the number of units earned by the particular participant based at least on the positioning of the particular participant in each events and the relevant unit distribution structure. Betting system platform 16 may maintain and communicate a running total of units earned by the particular participant to clients 20 via one or more various betting system interfaces 14. Betting system platform 16 may determine whether the over bets 82A or under bets 82B are winning bets after the plurality of events are completed or at some earlier point, such as if the units earned by the particular participant exceed the index number or if it becomes impossible for the particular participant to earn the remaining number of units required to reach the index number, for example.
  • In a pari-mutuel system, the payout for winning over/under index bets 82 may be calculated as follows. First, the total of the bet amounts for each over bet 82A and the total of the bet amounts for each under bet 82B are combined to create a betting pool. A take-out or commission may be removed from the betting pool. The take-out or commission may be any suitable amount of the betting pool, such as 10% or 15% of the betting pool, for example. The remaining portion of the betting pool may then be divided among all winning bets, in proportion to the bet amount of each winning bet.
  • For example, suppose that Client A and Client B bet $50 and $100 respectively on the jockey Campbell to finish “over” the index number, while Client C bet $250 on the jockey Campbell to finish “under” the index number. The betting pool is thus $400. Assuming the take out is 10%, $40 is removed from the betting pool, leaving $360. Suppose that Campbell finishes “over” the index number, and thus Client A's and Client B's over bets are winning bets. The remaining betting pool ($360) is then divided between Client A and Client B, in proportion to the bet amount of each of Client A and Client B. Thus, $120 is paid out to Client A and $240 is paid out to Client B.
  • In some embodiments, betting system platform 16 may close the betting pool proximate the start of the first event of the plurality of events. Alternatively, betting system platform 16 may close the betting pool proximate the start of the first event in which the particular participant is participating, which may or may not be the first of the plurality of events. In some embodiments, pre-set adjustments may be made in the event of a late scratch or other similar event, such as a cancelled race or the late scratch of one of the horses which was to be ridden by the jockey covered by an over/under index bet 82. Alternatively, the track may set rules such that no adjustments are made for such events.
  • In some embodiments, betting system platform 16 may offer new over/under index bets 82 for the same participant after one or more (or after each) of the events in the plurality of events has occurred, to permit additional betting based on the performance of the participant up to that point. This may be useful to accommodate clients 20 who miss one or more of the group of events, such as clients 20 arriving late at the track. Each new over/under index bets 82 may comprise a bet regarding the total number of units that will be earned by the participant in each of the remaining events (or in other words, the total number of units earned by the participant in the plurality of events excluding any of the events that have already occurred). A new index number may be determined for each new over/under index bet 82 for a particular participant, based on the performance of that participant in the events that have already occurred. Generally, if the participant has performed well and earned a relatively large number of units, the index number will increase for subsequent over/under index bets 82 for that participant, and vice versa.
  • In addition, over/under index bets 82 may be structured such as to permit a client 20 to “cash out,” or request and receive a settlement payment for his or her bet after one or more of the plurality of events have occurred. This may allow a client 20 to limit his or her win/loss possibilities to take advantage of the results of events that have occurred. For example, if jockey Campbell (covered by an over/under index bet 82) were to win an early race on a longshot, the index number for a new over/under index bet 82 offered after the early race would be higher than that of the original over/under index bet 82. A client 20 who originally placed an over bet 82A on Campbell could capitalize on the movement of the index number by requesting to terminate his original bet and receive a settlement payment (i.e., “cashing out”). The settlement payment for client 20 may be determined based at least on the difference between the index number of the original over/under index bet 82 and the higher index number of the new over/under index bet 82 offered after the early race.
  • Similarly, if jockey Campbell lost an early race on a heavy favorite, the index number for a new over/under index bet 82 offered after the early race would be lower than that of the original over/under index bet 82. A client 20 who originally placed an over bet 82A on Campbell may wish to mitigate his or her losses by “cashing out.” The settlement payment for client 20 may be determined based at least on the difference between the index number of the original over/under index bet 82 and the lower index number of the new over/under index bet 82 offered after the early race.
  • To cash out an index bet 80, a client 20 may use any suitable betting system interface 14 to request that the index bet 80 be settled. Betting system platform 16 may receive the request, determine the appropriate settlement payment for the client 20, and cancel the original index bet 80. Betting system platform 16 may also cause the payment of the settlement payment to the client 20, such as by communicating a message to a teller 30 approving the payment of the settlement payment, for example.
  • In addition to the pari-mutuel format discussed above, over/under index bets 82 may be offered in a spread betting format. In the spread betting format, an over/under index bet 82 has an associated quote and unit stake. The quote may comprise an index number, such as described above, or pair of index numbers including an upper index number and a lower index number, thus creating a spread. The unit stake defines the amount per unit (such as per point or per dollar, for example) above or below the quote that the client 20 placing the over/under index bet 82 wishes to wager. In a situation in which the quote comprises a pair or spread of index numbers, an over bet 82A comprises a bet that the total number of units earned by the particular participant will be greater than the upper index number, while a lower bet 82B comprises a bet that the total number of units earned by the particular participant will be less than the lower index number.
  • In a spread betting system, the payout for an over/under index bet 82 regarding a particular participant may be determined based at least on the quote, the unit stake, and the total number of units earned by the particular participant. In one embodiment, the payout is determined by multiplying the unit stake by the difference between the quote and the total number of units earned by the particular participant.
  • For example, suppose in a spread betting format an over/under index bet 82 for a particular driver Jones in a group of car races. The over/under index bet 82 has a spread quote of 212⅓-214⅓. Suppose a client 20 places an under bet 82B for a unit stake of $1/point. If Jones ends up scoring a total of 192 points over the course of the plurality of events, the client 20 would win (212⅓−192)*($1/point), or $20.33. However, if Jones scored a total of 220 points, the client 20 would lose (220−212⅓)*($1/point), or $7.67. Now supposing that another client 20 places an over bet 82A for a unit stake of $1/point. If Jones ends up scoring a total of 220 points over the course of the plurality of events, the client 20 would win (220−214⅓)*($1/point), or $5.67. However, if Jones scored only 200 points, the client 20 would lose (214⅓−200)*($1/point), or $14.33.
  • Range Index Bets
  • As discussed above, range index bets 84 comprise bets that the total number of units earned by a particular participant over a course of a plurality of events will fall within a particular range of numbers. Betting system platform 16 may define or establish any suitable number of ranges for each range index bet 84, such as, for example, based upon an index number established by a track handicapper. For example, for a particular range index bet 84 regarding the number of points earned by a jockey in a group of horse races, betting system platform 16 may define or establish the following ranges of points: Range 1=under 150; Range 2=150−179⅓; Range 3=179⅓−199⅓; Range 4=199⅓−219⅓; Range 5=219⅓-239⅓; Range 6=239⅓-269⅓; and Range 7=over 269⅓.
  • If the jockey earned a total of 198 points in the designated group of races, range index bets 84 on Range 3 would be winning bets. As discussed above with over/under index bets 82, one or more subsequent range index bets 84 may be offered for the same jockey after one or more races occur. Each range of numbers may change for such subsequent range index bets 84, depending on the performance of the jockey up to that point.
  • The ranges for a particular range index bet 84 may be determined based at least in part on an index number which represents the estimated or predicted total number of units that will be earned by the particular participant over the course of the group of events. As described above, such index numbers may be determined by a track handicapper or otherwise by betting system platform 16 based on various parameters.
  • The payout for range index bets 84 may be determined according to traditional pari-mutuel principles. For example, suppose for the range index bet 84 discussed above that $100 was bet on Range 1, $200 on Range 2, $300 on Range 3, $400 on Range 4, $500 on Range 5, $600 on Range 6, and $700 on Range 7. Assume that the take out is 20%. Suppose again that the jockey earned a total of 198, and that range index bets 84 on Range 3 are winning bets.
  • The payout for bets on Range 3 may be calculated as follows. First, the total of the bet amounts for range index bets 84 made for each range (Ranges 1-7) are combined to create a betting pool, which is equal to $2,800. The 20% take-out (or $560) or commission may be removed from the betting pool, leaving $2,240, which may then be divided among all winning bets (i.e., bets on Range 3), in proportion to the bet amount of each winning bet.
  • As discussed above regarding over/under index bets 82, range index bets 84 may be structured such as to permit a client 20 to “cash out,” or request and receive a settlement payment for his or her range index bet 84 after one or more of the plurality of events have occurred. This may allow a client 20 to limit his or her win/loss possibilities to take advantage of the results of events that have occurred, such as discussed above.
  • Head-to-Head Index Bets
  • Head-to-head index bets 86 comprise bets regarding the number of units earned by a particular participant over the course of the plurality of events as compared to the number of units earned by other participants in the plurality of events. For example, some head-to-head index bets 86 comprise a bet that the number of units earned by a participant will exceed an index number before the number of units earned by any other participant exceeds the index number. Other head-to-head index bets 86 comprise a bet that a particular participant will earn more units over the course of the plurality of events than any other participant.
  • For a particular group of events, betting system platform 16 may offer head-to-head index bets 86 for each of the participants participating in any of the group of events. Alternatively, betting system platform 16 may offer head-to-head index bets 86 for only a particular subset of the participants participating in any of the group of events. For such situations, a head-to-head index bet 86 for a particular participant may comprise a bet that that participant will outperform (such as by earning more total units or by being the first participant to reach a predetermined index number, as discussed above) only those other participants for whom head-to-head index bets 86 are offered. Thus, for example, if head-to-head index bets 86 are offered for only three drivers in a group of races, a head-to-head index bet 86 regarding one of the drivers comprises a bet that that driver will outperform the other two drivers for which head-to-head index bets 86 are offered, regardless of the performance of any other drivers in the group of races.
  • For head-to-head index bets 86 that comprise a race to a predetermined index number, in the event that none of the participants reaches the index number, the participant with the highest total number of units would be the winning participant, in one embodiment, for the purpose of determining which head-to-head index bets 86 are winning bets. In addition, in a situation in which two or more participants reach the index number in the same event, the participant with the highest total number of units after that event would be the winning participant for the purpose of determining which head-to-head index bets 86 are winning bets. The index number used for head-to-head index bets 86 that comprise a race to an index number may be determined by betting system platform 16 based on various parameters.
  • As with any of the types of index bets 80, head-to-head index bets 86 may be offered before the start of the first of the group of events, or after one or more of the events have occurred. Offering head-to-head index bets 86 which begin after one or more of the events have occurred may allow clients 20 who have missed one or more of the group of events, such as clients 20 arriving late at the track, to make head-to-head index bets 86. In addition, offering head-to-head index bets 86 after one or more of the events may allow clients 20 more time to analyze various events or event participants.
  • The payout for head-to-head index bets 86 may be determined according to traditional pari-mutuel principles. For example, suppose a group of races in which head-to-head index bet 86 are offered for three different drivers, Smith, Brown, and Johnson, the index number is 100 points, and that the take-out is 15%. Suppose that $300 was bet on Smith, $500 on Brown, and $200 on Johnson, and that Smith reaches 100 points first.
  • The payout for clients 20 who placed head-to-head index bet 86 on Smith may be calculated as follows. First, the total of the bet amounts for head-to-head index bets 86 on each of the three drivers are combined to create a betting pool, which is equal to $1,000. The 15% take-out (or $150) may be removed from the betting pool, leaving $850, which may then be divided among all winning bets (i.e., bets on Smith), in proportion to the bet amount of each winning bet.
  • As discussed above regarding over/under index bets 82 and range index bets 84, head-to-head index bet 86 may be structured such as to permit a client 20 to “cash out,” or request and receive a settlement payment for his or her head-to-head index bet 86 after one or more of the plurality of events have occurred. This may allow a client 20 to limit his or her win/loss possibilities to take advantage of the results of events that have occurred, such as discussed above.
  • Purse Index Bets
  • Purse index bets 88 may comprise any of the types of index bets 80 described above in which the relevant units is the amount of purse money earned or won by a particular participant in the plurality of events. Thus, for purse index bets 88, the unit distribution structure is equal to the purse distribution structure for each of the events. Thus, instead of using points or some other form of units, purse index bets 88 are based on the amount of purse money won by the participant (or the participant's horses) over the course of the groups of events.
  • For one or more types of purse index bets 88, an index number may be determined which represents an amount of purse money to be earned by the participant (or the participant's horses) over the course of the groups of events. Thus, for over/under purse index bets 88, a track handicapper or betting system platform 16 could establish an amount of purse money (such as $45,000, for example) as an index number for clients 20 to place bets on whether the designated participant will win more or less purse money than the index number.
  • Unlike index bets 80 which are based on a point system as described above, purse index bets 88 distinguish between winning races with different size purses. Thus, purse index bets 88 may distinguish between winning high-stakes (or important) races and winning an ordinary claiming race. To help clients 20 calculate the possible purse monies to be won in order to analyze and place purse index bets 88, betting system platform 16 may provide to clients 20 via one or more betting system interfaces 14 a breakdown of the amount to be awarded to each finisher (or a particular number of top finishers) in each event in the group of event.
  • Various types of purse index bets 88 may be offered using pari-mutuel and/or spread betting formats, such as described above with reference to over/under index bets 82, range index bets 84, and head-to-head index bets 86.
  • Multi-Card Index Bets
  • Multi-card index bets 90 comprise any of the types of index bets 80 described above in which the group of events occur over an extended period of time, which may include multiple “cards,” or subsets of events. Example multi-card index bets 90 may include bets regarding the jockey, driver (or other type of participant) of the week, month, season or year, in which the winning participant is determined in any of a variety of manners, such as by wins, purse money, or according to a unit distribution structure as discussed above, for example.
  • In some embodiments, for particular head-to-head multi-card index bet 90, each multi-card index bet 90 regarding a particular participant comprises a first bet portion regarding the number of units earned by that participant in a subset of the plurality of events and a second bet portion regarding the number of units earned by that participant in the plurality of events. For example, the first bet portion of each multi-card index bet 90 may comprise a bet that the number of units earned by the designated participant in the subset of the plurality of events will be greater than the number of units earned by any of the other participants in the subset of the plurality of events, while the second bet portion comprises a bet that the number of units earned by the designated participant in the plurality of events will be greater than the number of units earned by any of the other participants in the plurality of events. For example, a particular head-to-head multi-card index bet 90 on a particular jockey Campbell may include a first bet portion regarding the number of wins that the jockey Campbell will win throughout June, 2003 and a second bet portion regarding the number of wins that the jockey Campbell will win throughout all of 2003.
  • A predetermined percentage of the betting pool collected for such multi-card index bet 90 may be designated for each bet portion of the multi-card index bet 90. A first payout amount may be determined for the first bet portion based at least on the collected betting pool and the predetermined percentage of the betting pool allocated for winning the first bet portion, and a second payout amount may be determined for the second bet portion based at least in part on the betting pool and the predetermined percentage of the betting pool allocated for winning the second bet portion.
  • For example, supposing a client 20 placed a $10 multi-card index bet 90 on jockey Armstrong at the start of June at Belmont Park. Assuming a 20% take-out and that the total pool is divided equally between a June jockey pool and a end-of-season jockey pool, $4 of that $10 would be allocated to the June jockey pool and $4 would be allocated to the end-of-season jockey pool. If a total of $100,000 was bet in the jockey pool, $40,000 may be divided among those clients 20 who correctly bet on the leading jockey for June, while the remaining $40,000 may be placed in the end-of-season pool and later divided among those clients 20 who correctly bet on the leading jockey for the season.
  • The payout for such multi-portion multi-card index bets 90 may be determined as follows. In the example discussed above, suppose that of the $100,000 jockey pool, $30,000 was bet on jockey Armstrong, $50,000 was bet on jockey Vincent, $10,000 was bet on jockey McGee, and $10,000 was bet on jockey Luis. With a 20% take-out, assuming Armstrong was the leading rider in June, the payout for the portion of the bet covering June would be $1.33 for each $1 bet on Armstrong ($100,000−$20,000 take-out=$80,000/2 equal portions of the pool=$40,000 to be paid out on the $30,000 bet on Armstrong=$1.33 for each $1 bet on Armstrong). The remaining $40,000 would remain in the pool to be paid to those clients 20 who correctly bet on the leading jockey for the season. Supposing that Vincent was the leading jockey for the season, the $40,000 would be divided among clients 20 who bet on Vincent, in proportion to the size of such bets. In other words, the payout for the portion of the bet covering the entire season would be $0.80 for each $1 bet on Vincent ($40,000 to be paid out on the $50,000 bet on Vincent=$0.80 for each $1 bet on Vincent).
  • Betting system interfaces 14 may include any suitable interface between a client 20 and betting system platform 16. For example, as shown in FIG. 1, betting system interfaces 14 may include physical interfaces, such as track interfaces 26 and/or off-track interfaces 28. Track interfaces 26 are generally located at a track, while off-track interfaces 28 are generally located at an off-track-betting (OTB) establishment, such as an OTB parlor. Track interfaces 26 and off-track interfaces 28 may include tellers 30, which may receive index bets 80 from and distribute payouts to clients 20, and/or monitors 32, which may be viewed by clients 20 to monitor betting information such as the event time, the current odds, and the projected or actual payouts for various index bets 80, for example. In some situations, such information may be updated substantially in real time or at preset intervals (such as every 30 seconds, for example) as new index bets 80 are placed and/or as information regarding the event changes, for example. Monitors 32 may include, for example, tote-boards or closed-circuit televisions located at a track or OTB establishment.
  • Track interfaces 26 and/or off-track interfaces 28 may also include one or more self-service betting machines 33. In some embodiment, self-service betting machines 33 allow clients 20 to insert payment into the machine (such as cash or by using a voucher or a credit or debit card), place one or more bets 80 and receive a printout (such as a ticket, for example) indicating the bet or bets placed. Printouts for winning bets may be inserted into the self-service betting machine, such as to receive a payment voucher (which may be used to receive a payout from a teller 30) or to place additional index bets 80. In other embodiments, self-service betting machines 33 allow clients 20 to use a credit card, a debit card, or a smart card to place index bets 80. The credit or debit card may have an associated account, which may be a betting account provided and/or managed by a betting account provider using, for example, a centralized computer system. The smart card may itself store information regarding a betting account and various bets, or may also be linked to a betting account using a centralized computer system. In some embodiments, after the betting event is completed, a client 20 may insert or swipe his or her credit, debit, or smart card in the self-service betting machines 33 in order to update the balance on the card. Self-service betting machines 33 may also allow the client 20 to print out payment vouchers which may be presented to a teller 30 in order to receive payments.
  • As shown in FIG. 1, betting system interfaces 14 may also include various non-physical interfaces, such as one or more telephone operators 34 and one or more websites 36. Clients 20 may access or communicate with such non-physical interfaces via one or more communication networks 44. Communication networks 44 may include one or more servers, routers, switches, repeaters, backbones, links and/or any other appropriate type of communication devices coupled by links such as wire line, optical, wireless, or other appropriate links. In general, communication network 44 may include any interconnection found on any communication network, such as a telephone network, a local area network (LAN), metropolitan area network (MAN), wide area network (WAN), the Internet, portions of the Internet, or any other data exchange system. To access betting system interface 14 using communication networks 44, clients 20 may use a computer, a personal digital assistant (PDA), a cell-phone, a remote paging device, an electronic mail communication device, a handheld betting device, or any other suitable mobile device. In certain embodiments, clients 20 may receive any suitable information, such as betting information, from betting system platform 16 via mobile devices using, for example, communication networks 44 and betting system interfaces 14.
  • Telephone operators 34 may communicate betting information to, and take index bets 80 from, clients 20. Similarly, websites 36 may communicate betting information to clients 20 and allow clients 20 to place index bets 80. One or more of such websites 36 may be hosted by one or more servers associated with system 10, which server or servers may also host betting system platform 16 in some embodiments. In some embodiments, betting information available to clients 20 via websites 36 may be updated substantially in real time or at preset intervals (such as every 30 seconds, for example) as new index bets 80 are placed and/or as information regarding the event changes, for example.
  • In some embodiments, one or more websites 36 may be provided by, or associated with, an Internet betting provider 46, for example. Internet betting provider 46 may provide Internet account wagering by providing online betting accounts to one or more clients 20. Using an online betting account, a client 20 may interface with one or more websites 36 associated with the Internet betting provider 46 in order to fund the account, view betting information regarding betting events, and place bets. Such online betting accounts may include one or more various types of accounts, such as deposit accounts, credit accounts, stop-loss accounts, and hybrid accounts, for example.
  • As discussed above, betting system platform 16 is operable to receive index bets 80 from betting system interfaces 14, store the received index bets 80, determine appropriate index numbers, quotes, odds and/or payouts, and communicate such index numbers, quotes, odds and/or payouts to one or more of the betting system interfaces 14, which may then display such index numbers, quotes, odds and/or payouts to clients 20.
  • As shown in FIG. 1, betting system platform 16 includes a processor 38 coupled to a memory 40. Processor 38 is generally operable to execute various algorithms or calculations to determine current bet data 50, such as index numbers 51, bet amounts 52, betting pools 54 and/or potential payout data 56. Processor 38 may comprise any suitable processor that executes a betting system software application 42 or other computer instructions, such as a central processing unit (CPU) or other microprocessor, and may include any suitable number of processors working together. Memory 40 may comprise one or more memory devices suitable to facilitate execution of the computer instructions, such as one or more random access memories (RAMs), read-only memories (ROMs), dynamic random access memories (DRAMs), fast cycle RAMs (FCRAMs), static RAM (SRAMs), field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), erasable programmable read-only memories (EPROMs), electrically erasable programmable read-only memories (EEPROMs), microcontrollers, or microprocessors.
  • Memory 40 is generally operable to store various information that may be used by processor 38 in determining index numbers, quotes, odds and/or payouts. For example, memory 40 may comprise any suitable number of databases, which may be co-located or physically and/or geographically distributed. In the example shown in FIG. 1, memory 40 may store any or all of the following: betting system software application 42, current bet data 50, one or more event parameters 58, one or more bet parameters 60, one or more calculation rules 62, one or more event results 64, and one or more bet results 66.
  • Event parameters 58 may comprise various parameters of one or more betting events, such as, for example, the type of event, the time, date and location of the event and/or the number (or in some cases, the name) of each of the participants in the event. Bet parameters 60 may comprise various parameters of one or more received index bets 80, such as the identity of the client 20 who placed the bet 80, the manner in which the bet 80 was placed (such as via telephone, the Internet, or in person at a track or OTB establishment, for example), the type of bet 80, the commission rate on the bet 80, the participant or participants covered by the bet 80 and/or the amount of the bet 80, for example. Calculation rules 62 may comprise various equations or other algorithms to be used by processor 38 in determining various current bet data 50. Event results 64 may comprise various data regarding the results of one or more betting events, such as the final position of each participant in an event, whether there was a tie or dead heat for any position and/or whether any participants did not finish the event, for example. Bet results 66 may comprise various data regarding the results of various index bets 80, such as the identity of the client 20 who placed the bet 80, whether the bet 80 was a winning bet, the determined payout for the bet 80 and/or whether the payout was distributed to the client 20, for example.
  • As discussed above, one or more communication networks 18 couple and facilitate wireless or wireline communication between one or more betting system interfaces 14 and betting system platform 16. Each communication network 18 may include one or more servers, routers, switches, repeaters, backbones, links and/or any other appropriate type of communication devices coupled by links such as wire line, optical, wireless, or other appropriate links. In general, each communication network 18 may include any interconnection found on any communication network, such as a local area network (LAN), metropolitan area network (MAN), wide area network (WAN), the Internet, portions of the Internet, or any other data exchange system.
  • As discussed above, processor 38 is operable to execute betting system software application 42 to determine current bet data 50, such as index numbers 51, bet amounts 52, betting pools 54 and/or potential payout data 56. Processor 38 may determine such current bet data 50 based at least on data received from memory 40 and/or one or more betting system interfaces 14. In addition, processor 38 may update such current bet data 50 based on new information being received by betting system platform 16. In some embodiments, processor 38 may update current bet data 50 in real time, substantially in real time, or at preset intervals (such as every 30 seconds, for example).
  • As shown in FIG. 1, current bet data 50 may be communicated to one or more betting system interfaces 14 via communication network 18, as indicated by arrow 70. Current bet data 50 may then be made available to clients 20, such as via tote boards or monitors 32 located at a track or OTB establishment, for example, or on an appropriate website 36 that may be accessed by clients 20, for example. In this manner, clients 20 may have access to real-time or substantially real-time current bet data 50 regarding various betting events.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates an example method of placing various index bets 80 in a pari-mutuel betting system according to an embodiment of the present invention. At step 100, one or more types of index bets 80 are offered by betting system platform 16 for a plurality of events having a plurality of participants. For example, for a day of horse racing at Kentucky Downs, betting system platform 16 may offer over/under index bets 82 for jockey Goodman who is racing in six of the ten races on the race card for that day. Suppose betting system platform 16 assigns an index number of 85 to the index bets 82 such that the index bets 82 include over bets 82A that jockey Goodman will earn 85 or more points during the day and under bets 82B that jockey Goodman will earn less than 85 points during the day.
  • At step 102, various information regarding the types of index bets 80 offered at step 100 may be communicated to clients 20 via various betting system interfaces 14 shown in FIG. 1, such as monitors 32 at a track or OTB establishment or various websites 36, for example. Information regarding various types of index bet 80 offered for the plurality of events may also be included in race programs available at tracks or OTB establishments. Such information may include, for example, the details of the offered index bets 80, such as the participant covered by each index bet 80 and/or the rules of each index bet 80, as well as current bet data 50, such as index numbers 51, bet amounts 52, betting pools 54 and/or potential payout data 56 for the types of index bet 80 offered by betting system platform 16. In the example discussed above, betting pools 54 and/or potential payout data 56 for the over bets 82A and under bets 82B for jockey Goodman may be displayed on monitors 32 and websites 36.
  • At step 104, clients 20 may place index bets 80 using various betting system interfaces 14 shown in FIG. 1, such as tellers 30 or self-serving machines 33 at tracks or OTB establishments, or websites 36, for example. In the example discussed above, clients 20 may wager various amounts on over bets 82A and under bets 82B for jockey Goodman. At step 106, various information regarding the types of index bet 80 placed for the plurality of events may be updated in real-time, substantially in real-time, or at regular intervals based on index bets 80 placed by clients 20. In the example discussed above, the betting pools 54 and/or potential payout data 56 for over bets 82A and under bets 82B for jockey Goodman may be updated on monitors 32 and websites 36 in real-time, substantially in real-time, or at regular intervals.
  • At step 108, betting system platform 16 may close the betting on particular index bets 80 before the start of the first of the plurality of events covered by the particular index bets 80, such as the first race in a group of races, for example. In the example discussed above, betting system platform 16 may close the betting on over bets 82A and under bets 82B for jockey Goodman just before the start of the first race.
  • At step 110, betting system platform 16 may determine betting pools for index bets 80 based at least in part on the total amounts wagered on each type of index bet 80. In the example discussed above, betting system platform 16 may determine a betting pool by calculating the total amounts wagered on over bets 82A and under bets 82B for jockey Goodman.
  • At step 112, the plurality of events covered by the index bets 80 occur, such as the running of a group of horse or car races, for example. In the example discussed above, the horse races at Kentucky Downs are run at step 112. At step 114, results of the events, including the positioning of the participants in each event, are received by betting system platform 16.
  • At step 116, additional index bets 80 may be offered and placed after one or more of the plurality of events have occurred. The terms of such late index bets 80 may be different from the terms of the index bets 80 placed before the start of the first event. For example, for over/under index bets 80, the index number 51 may be adjusted based on the results of the events that have already occurred. For range index bets 84, the each of the ranges may be adjusted from the original ranges. In addition, a new betting pool may be opened for new index bets 80 offered after a particular number of events have occurred. In the example discussed above, over bets 82A and under bets 82B may be offered and placed after one or more of the races at Kentucky Downs, one or more of which jockey Goodman may have raced in.
  • At step 118, betting system platform 16 may determine the number of units earned various participants in the plurality of events based at least in part on the positioning of the various participants in each event. In the example discussed above, the total number of points earned by jockey Goodman during the day at Kentucky Downs is calculated based on the position of jockey Goodman in each of the races in which jockey Goodman participated.
  • At step 120, betting system platform 16 may determine which index bets 80 are winning bets based at least in part on the number of units earned by various participants in the plurality of events. In the example discussed above, betting system platform 16 may determine whether the over bets 82A or under bets 82B for jockey Goodman are winning bets based at least in part on whether jockey Goodman earned more or less than 85 points, the index number 51 (or some other index number 51 for bets placed at step 116 after one or more of the races had occurred).
  • At step 122, betting system platform 16 may determine a payout amount for winning index bets 80 determined at step 120 based at least in part on the betting pool determined at step 110 and the total amount wagered on the winning index bets 80. Betting system platform 16 may also determine payouts for winning index bets 80 placed at step 116 after one or more events had occurred, based at least in part on the betting pools associated with such index bets 80. At step 124, clients 20 who made winning index bets 80 may collect their payouts through various betting system interfaces 14, such as tellers 30 or self-serving machines 33 at tracks or OTB establishments, or websites 36, for example.
  • FIG. 3 illustrates an example method of placing various index bets 80 in a spread betting system according to an embodiment of the present invention. At step 150, one or more types of spread-based index bets 80 are offered by betting system platform 16 for a plurality of events having a plurality of participants. Betting system platform 16 may provide a spread quote for index bets 80 on a particular participant. The spread quote may be defined by an upper index number and a lower index number associated with the total number of units potentially earned by the participant in the plurality of events. Betting system platform 16 may provide over bets 82A that are bets that the total number of units earned by the participant will be greater than the upper index number, and under bets 82B that are bets that the total number of units earned by the participant will be less than the lower index number.
  • For example, for a day of horse racing at London Downs, betting system platform 16 may offer spread-based over/under index bets 82 for jockey Jennings who is racing in six of the ten races on the race card for that day. Betting system platform 16 may assigns a spread quote of 45-48 points, where 48 is the upper index number and 45 is the lower index number. Thus, betting system platform 16 provides over bets 82A that are bets that the total number of units earned during the day by jockey Jennings will be greater than or equal to 48, and under bets 82B that are bets that the total number of units earned by the jockey Jennings will be less than or equal to 45.
  • At step 152, various information regarding the types of spread-based index bets 80 offered at step 150 may be communicated to clients 20 via various betting system interfaces 14 shown in FIG. 1, such as discussed above regarding step 102 of FIG. 2. In the example discussed above, the spread quote and/or various current bet data 50 for the over bets 82A and under bets 82B for jockey Jennings may be displayed on monitors 32 and websites 36.
  • At step 154, clients 20 may place spread-based index bets 80 using various betting system interfaces 14 shown in FIG. 1, such as tellers 30 or self-serving machines 33 at tracks or OTB establishments, or websites 36, for example. Each index bet 80 may be a particular quote (such as the upper index number or lower index number of a spread quote) and may have an associated unit stake. The quote of the index bet 80 corresponds with the total number of units potentially earned by the designated participant in the plurality of events. In the example discussed above, a first client 20 may place an over bet 82A on jockey Goodman at the upper quote of 48 points and with a unit stake of $10/point, and a second client 20 may place an under bet 82B on jockey Goodman at the lower quote of 45 points and with a unit stake of $15/point,
  • At step 156, various information regarding the types of index bet 80 placed for the plurality of events may be updated in real-time, substantially in real-time, or at regular intervals based on index bets 80 placed by clients 20, such as discussed above regarding step 106 of FIG. 2.
  • At step 158, betting system platform 16 may close the betting on particular spread-based index bets 80 before the start of the first of the plurality of events covered by the particular index bets 80, such as the first race in a group of races, for example. In the example discussed above, betting system platform 16 may close the betting on over bets 82A and under bets 82B for jockey Jennings just before the start of the first race.
  • At step 160, the plurality of events covered by the index bets 80 occur, such as the running of a group of horse or car races, for example. In the example discussed above, the horse races at London Downs are run at step 160. At step 162, results of the events, including the positioning of the participants in each event, are received by betting system platform 16.
  • At step 164, additional index bets 80 may be offered and placed after one or more of the plurality of events have occurred. The terms of such late index bets 80, including the spread quote, may be different from the terms of the index bets 80 placed before the start of the first event. For example, the spread quote for such index bets 80 placed after one or more of the events has occurred may be adjusted based on the results of the events that have already occurred. In the example discussed above, over bets 82A and under bets 82B may be offered and placed after one or more of the races at London Downs, one or more of which jockey Jennings may have raced in.
  • At step 166, betting system platform 16 may determine the number of units earned various participants in the plurality of events based at least in part on the positioning of the various participants in each event. In the example discussed above, the total number of points earned by jockey Jennings during the day at London Downs is calculated based on the position of jockey Jennings in each of the races in which jockey Jennings participated.
  • At step 168, betting system platform 16 may determine which spread-based index bets 80 are winning bets based at least in part on the number of units earned by various participants in the plurality of events and the spread quote for the particular index bet 80. In the example discussed above, betting system platform 16 may determine whether the over bets 82A or under bets 82B for jockey Jennings are winning bets based at least in part on whether jockey Goodman earned less than 45 points, between 45 and 48 points, or more than 48 points.
  • At step 170, betting system platform 16 may determine a payout amount for winning spread-based index bets 80 determined at step 168 based at least in part on the unit stake and the quote of winning index bets 80, and the total number of units earned by the participant covered by the index bet 80. At step 172, clients 20 who made winning spread-based index bets 80 may collect their payouts through various betting system interfaces 14, such as tellers 30 or self-serving machines 33 at tracks or OTB establishments, or websites 36, for example.
  • Although embodiments of the invention and their advantages are described in detail, a person skilled in the art could make various alterations, additions, and omissions without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention as defined by the appended claims.

Claims (21)

1-52. (canceled)
53. An apparatus comprising:
at least one processor; and
at least one memory having instructions stored thereon that are configured to cause at least one processor to:
receive information about a first bet comprising a bet amount and a first prediction about a total number of units that will be earned by a first participant over the course of a plurality of events, the first participant participating in at least two of the plurality of events;
determine the total number of units actually earned by the first participant over the course of the plurality of events based at least in part on the positioning of the first participant in each of the at least two of the plurality of events;
determine an outcome of the first bet based at least in part on whether the total number of units actually earned by the first participant over the course of the plurality of events satisfies the first prediction; and
cause a payout to be paid on the first bet if the total number of units actually earned by the first participant over the course of the plurality of events satisfies the first prediction.
54. The apparatus of claim 53, in which the first prediction comprises a bet that the total number of units that will be earned by the first participant over the course of the plurality of events will fall within a first range of numbers.
55. The apparatus of claim 54, in which the instructions are further configured to cause the at least one processor to:
receive information about one or more second bets that the total number of units earned by the first participant over the course of the plurality of events will fall within a second range of numbers different from the first range of numbers, each second bet having an associated bet amount, in which the first range of numbers comprises at least a first number and a second number, and in which the second range of numbers comprises a third number and a fourth number that are both different from the first and second numbers, the one or more second bets having one or more respective second bet amounts;
determine a betting pool based at least in part on a sum of (1) the one or more second bet amounts and (2) all amounts of bets that the total number of units earned by a first participant over the course of a plurality of events will fall within the first range of numbers; and
in which one or more payouts on one or more winning bets are determined based at least in part on the betting pool and the total of the bet amounts associated with the one or more winning bets.
56. The apparatus of claim 54, in which the instructions are further configured to cause the at least one processor to:
determine an index number based on an expected total number of units that are expected to be earned by the first participant over the course of the plurality of events,
in which the first range of numbers comprises numbers that are both (1) less than the index number and (2) greater than a non-zero number less than the index number, and does not comprise any numbers greater than the index number or less than the non-zero number less than the index number;
in which the second range of numbers comprises numbers greater than the index number and less than a number greater than the index number, and does not comprise any numbers less than the index number or greater than the number greater than the index number; and
receive a second bet that that the total number of units earned by the first participant over the course of the plurality of events will fall within the second range of numbers, the second bet having an associated bet amount.
57. The apparatus of claim 56, in which the instructions are further
configured to cause the at least one processor to:
receive information about one or more second bets that the total number of units earned by the first participant over the course of the plurality of events will fall within a second range of numbers different from the first range of numbers, each second bet having a respective bet amount;
receive information about one or more third bets that the total number of units earned by the first participant over the course of the plurality of events will fall within a third range of numbers different from the first and second ranges of numbers, each third bet having a respective bet amount;
determine a betting pool based on the respective amounts associated with the first bet, the one or more second bets, and the one or more third bets;
cause a payout to be paid from the betting pool on each of the one or more second bets if the total number of units actually earned by the first participant over the course of the plurality of events is within the second range of numbers; and
cause a payout to be paid from the betting pool on each of the one or more third bets if the total number of units actually earned by the first participant over the course of the plurality of events is within the third range of numbers.
58. The apparatus of claim 57, in which the instructions are further configured to cause the at least one processor to:
determine an index number based on a predicted total number of units earned by the first participant over the course of the plurality of events; and
determine at least two of the first range of numbers, the second range of numbers, and the third range of numbers based at least in part on the index number,
in which the plurality of events comprises a plurality of races and the first participant comprises a driver.
59. The apparatus of claim 58,
in which the numbers within the first, second, and third ranges do not overlap.
60. The apparatus of claim 53, wherein the number of units earned by the first participant comprises an amount of money earned by the first participant during the course of the plurality of events.
61. The apparatus of claim 53, in which:
the first participant competes in at least two of the plurality of events,
a second participant competes in one or more of the plurality of events,
a third participant competes in one or more of the plurality of events,
the first, second, and third participants are different participants, and
62. The apparatus of claim 53, in which at least one of the first, second, and third participants does not compete in at least one of the plurality of events.
63. The apparatus of claim 53, in which the plurality of events comprises at least two race events, and wherein the act of determining the total number of units actually earned by the first participant comprises, for each of the at least two race events:
determining the finishing position of the first participant in the race event; and
determining a number of units earned by the first participant based at least on the finishing position of the first participant in the race event.
64. The apparatus of claim 53, wherein determining the total number of units earned by the first participant comprises, for each of at least two of the plurality of events:
determining a position of the first participant; and
determining a number of units earned by the first participant based at least on the position of the first participant and a unit distribution structure defining a distribution of units for each of a plurality of positions associated with the event.
65. The apparatus of claim 64,
in which the unit distribution structure for each of the at least two events comprises a purse distribution structure defining a distribution of a purse over a plurality of positions in the event, and
in which, for each of the plurality of events, at least two participants in the event can earn points based on their respective finishing position in that event.
66. The apparatus of claim 53, in which the plurality in which the instructions are further configured to cause the at least one processor to:
receive, after one or more of the plurality of events has occurred, information about a second bet comprising a prediction about the total number of units that will be earned by the first participant over the course of a set of remaining events, the remaining events comprising the plurality of events excluding the one or more events that have occurred, in which the information about the second bet is received after a conclusion of a first of the plurality of events and before a beginning of a second of the plurality of events.
67. The apparatus of claim 66, wherein the first bet and the second bet are received from a first user, and wherein the combination of the first bet and the second bet lock in a gain.
68. The apparatus of claim 53, in which the instructions are further configured to cause the at least one processor to, after a conclusion of at least a first one of the plurality of events and before a beginning of at least has occurred and before a start of at least a second one of the plurality of events:
receive a request to settle the first bet;
determine an amount of a settlement payment for the first bet based at least in part on the positioning of the first participant in each of the plurality of events that has occurred including the at least first one of the events; and
cause the settlement payment to be paid on the first bet, wherein the first bet is no longer eligible to win after the settlement payment is paid.
69. The apparatus of claim 53, in which the first bet is generated based on a selection of the first participant from at least three participants each participating in at least one of the plurality of events.
70. The apparatus of claim 53, in which the plurality of events comprises a plurality of horse races.
71. A method comprising:
receiving, by at least one processor electronically coupled to at least one memory, information about a first bet comprising a bet amount and a first prediction about a total number of units that will be earned by a first participant over the course of a plurality of events, the first participant participating in at least two of the plurality of events;
determining, by the at least one processor, the total number of units actually earned by the first participant over the course of the plurality of events based at least in part on the positioning of the first participant in each of the at least two of the plurality of events;
determining, by the at least one processor, an outcome of the first bet based at least in part on whether the total number of units actually earned by the first participant over the course of the plurality of events satisfies the first prediction; and
causing, by the at least one processor, a payout to be paid on the first bet if the total number of units actually earned by the first participant over the course of the plurality of events satisfies the first prediction.
72. An apparatus comprising:
means for receiving information about a first bet comprising a bet amount and a first prediction about a total number of units that will be earned by a first participant over the course of a plurality of events, the first participant participating in at least two of the plurality of events;
means for determining the total number of units actually earned by the first participant over the course of the plurality of events based at least in part on the positioning of the first participant in each of the at least two of the plurality of events;
means for determining an outcome of the first bet based at least in part on whether the total number of units actually earned by the first participant over the course of the plurality of events satisfies the first prediction; and
means for causing a payout to be paid on the first bet if the total number of units actually earned by the first participant over the course of the plurality of events satisfies the first prediction.
US14/315,517 2003-03-31 2014-06-26 System and method for betting on a participant in a group of events Active 2025-04-02 US10304292B2 (en)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US14/315,517 US10304292B2 (en) 2003-03-31 2014-06-26 System and method for betting on a participant in a group of events
US16/391,369 US11043078B2 (en) 2003-03-31 2019-04-23 System and method for betting on a participant in a group of events
US17/353,012 US11798375B2 (en) 2003-03-31 2021-06-21 System and method for betting on a participant in a group of events

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US45956103P 2003-03-31 2003-03-31
US10/667,923 US8353763B2 (en) 2003-03-31 2003-09-22 System and method for betting on a participant in a group of events
US13/615,865 US8764558B2 (en) 2003-03-31 2012-09-14 System and method for betting on a participant in a group of events
US14/315,517 US10304292B2 (en) 2003-03-31 2014-06-26 System and method for betting on a participant in a group of events

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/615,865 Continuation US8764558B2 (en) 2003-03-31 2012-09-14 System and method for betting on a participant in a group of events

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US16/391,369 Continuation US11043078B2 (en) 2003-03-31 2019-04-23 System and method for betting on a participant in a group of events

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20150031423A1 true US20150031423A1 (en) 2015-01-29
US10304292B2 US10304292B2 (en) 2019-05-28

Family

ID=32995069

Family Applications (5)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/667,923 Active 2025-10-04 US8353763B2 (en) 2003-03-31 2003-09-22 System and method for betting on a participant in a group of events
US13/615,865 Expired - Lifetime US8764558B2 (en) 2003-03-31 2012-09-14 System and method for betting on a participant in a group of events
US14/315,517 Active 2025-04-02 US10304292B2 (en) 2003-03-31 2014-06-26 System and method for betting on a participant in a group of events
US16/391,369 Expired - Lifetime US11043078B2 (en) 2003-03-31 2019-04-23 System and method for betting on a participant in a group of events
US17/353,012 Expired - Lifetime US11798375B2 (en) 2003-03-31 2021-06-21 System and method for betting on a participant in a group of events

Family Applications Before (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/667,923 Active 2025-10-04 US8353763B2 (en) 2003-03-31 2003-09-22 System and method for betting on a participant in a group of events
US13/615,865 Expired - Lifetime US8764558B2 (en) 2003-03-31 2012-09-14 System and method for betting on a participant in a group of events

Family Applications After (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US16/391,369 Expired - Lifetime US11043078B2 (en) 2003-03-31 2019-04-23 System and method for betting on a participant in a group of events
US17/353,012 Expired - Lifetime US11798375B2 (en) 2003-03-31 2021-06-21 System and method for betting on a participant in a group of events

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (5) US8353763B2 (en)
WO (1) WO2004090681A2 (en)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9218720B2 (en) 2007-04-16 2015-12-22 Cfph, Llc Box office game
US20170200591A1 (en) * 2016-01-13 2017-07-13 Mks Instruments, Inc. Method and Apparatus for Deposition Cleaning in a Pumping Line
US10586282B2 (en) 1996-03-25 2020-03-10 Cfph, Llc System and method for trading based on tournament-style events
US11043078B2 (en) 2003-03-31 2021-06-22 Cantor Index, Llc System and method for betting on a participant in a group of events

Families Citing this family (89)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6505174B1 (en) 1996-03-25 2003-01-07 Hsx, Inc. Computer-implemented securities trading system with a virtual specialist function
US20040198483A1 (en) 2003-04-03 2004-10-07 Amaitis Lee M. System and method for betting on a subset of participants in an event
US7311606B2 (en) * 2001-02-20 2007-12-25 Cantor Index, Llc System and method for betting on a subset of participants in an event wherein betting parameters may change over time
US20040029627A1 (en) * 2002-08-12 2004-02-12 Michael Hannan Skill based lottery system
US7962400B2 (en) 2003-04-02 2011-06-14 Cfph, Llc System and method for wagering based on the movement of financial markets
US7233922B2 (en) 2003-04-02 2007-06-19 Cantor Index Llc System and method for wagering-based transferable financial instruments
US20060135252A1 (en) * 2004-12-22 2006-06-22 Amaitis Lee M System and method for betting on a subset of participants in an event according to multiple groups
WO2004090678A2 (en) 2003-04-11 2004-10-21 Cantor Index Llc Lottery and auction based tournament entry exchange platform
US7716113B2 (en) * 2003-05-15 2010-05-11 Cantor Index, Llc System and method for providing an intermediary for a transaction
US7835974B2 (en) * 2003-05-15 2010-11-16 Cantor Index, LLC. System and method for managing risk associated with product transactions
US8001039B2 (en) * 2003-05-15 2011-08-16 Cantor Index, Llc System and method for establishing and providing access to an online account
US8799121B2 (en) * 2003-05-15 2014-08-05 Cantor Index, Llc System and method for managing trading order requests
US7925577B2 (en) 2003-05-15 2011-04-12 Cantor Index Llc System and method for establishing and providing access to various types of online accounts
US7996297B2 (en) * 2003-05-15 2011-08-09 Cantor Index, Llc System and method for providing access to and managing account activity for an online account
US8292729B2 (en) * 2003-12-02 2012-10-23 United Tote Company Methods and systems for presenting pari-mutuel betting options and constructing wagers
US7567931B2 (en) 2004-01-16 2009-07-28 Bgc Partners, Inc. System and method for forming a financial instrument indexed to entertainment revenue
US7698198B2 (en) 2004-01-16 2010-04-13 Bgc Partners, Inc. System and method for purchasing a financial instrument indexed to entertainment revenue
US8636571B2 (en) 2004-02-03 2014-01-28 Cantor Index, Llc System and method for managing select five horseracing bets
US9098883B2 (en) 2004-02-03 2015-08-04 Cantor Index, Llc Managing bets that select events and participants
US20050187000A1 (en) * 2004-02-23 2005-08-25 Cantor Index Llc Method for wagering
US7637810B2 (en) 2005-08-09 2009-12-29 Cfph, Llc System and method for wireless gaming system with alerts
US8092303B2 (en) 2004-02-25 2012-01-10 Cfph, Llc System and method for convenience gaming
US8616967B2 (en) 2004-02-25 2013-12-31 Cfph, Llc System and method for convenience gaming
US20070060358A1 (en) 2005-08-10 2007-03-15 Amaitis Lee M System and method for wireless gaming with location determination
US7534169B2 (en) 2005-07-08 2009-05-19 Cfph, Llc System and method for wireless gaming system with user profiles
US8128474B2 (en) 2004-03-05 2012-03-06 Cantor Index, Llc Computer graphics processing methods and systems for presentation of graphics objects or text in a wagering environment
US7835961B2 (en) 2004-03-05 2010-11-16 Cantor Index Llc System and method for wagering in a financial market environment
US7711628B2 (en) 2004-03-05 2010-05-04 Cantor Index Llc System and method for offering intraday wagering in a financial market environment
US20050197938A1 (en) 2004-03-05 2005-09-08 Cantor Index Llc System and method for determining odds for wagering in a financial market environment
US8500529B2 (en) * 2004-06-28 2013-08-06 Cfph, Llc Bets regarding intermediate points in a race
US8491366B2 (en) 2004-06-28 2013-07-23 Cfph, Llc Bets regarding ranges of times at intermediate points in a race
US8376855B2 (en) 2004-06-28 2013-02-19 Winview, Inc. Methods and apparatus for distributed gaming over a mobile device
US7306514B2 (en) 2004-06-28 2007-12-11 Cfph, Llc System and method for gaming based upon intermediate points in a race event
US11030859B2 (en) 2004-06-28 2021-06-08 Cfph, Llc System and method for gaming based upon intermediate points in a race event
US8870639B2 (en) 2004-06-28 2014-10-28 Winview, Inc. Methods and apparatus for distributed gaming over a mobile device
US10226698B1 (en) 2004-07-14 2019-03-12 Winview, Inc. Game of skill played by remote participants utilizing wireless devices in connection with a common game event
WO2006110867A2 (en) * 2005-04-12 2006-10-19 Cantor Index Llc. System and method for providing a multiple-stage contest
US8738694B2 (en) 2005-06-20 2014-05-27 Winview, Inc. Method of and system for managing client resources and assets for activities on computing devices
US10721543B2 (en) 2005-06-20 2020-07-21 Winview, Inc. Method of and system for managing client resources and assets for activities on computing devices
US10510214B2 (en) 2005-07-08 2019-12-17 Cfph, Llc System and method for peer-to-peer wireless gaming
US8070604B2 (en) 2005-08-09 2011-12-06 Cfph, Llc System and method for providing wireless gaming as a service application
US8708789B2 (en) 2005-07-26 2014-04-29 Cantor Index, Llc Conducting a jackpot race event
US7713125B2 (en) * 2005-07-26 2010-05-11 Cantor Index, Llc Jackpot race event
US9511287B2 (en) 2005-10-03 2016-12-06 Winview, Inc. Cellular phone games based upon television archives
US8705195B2 (en) 2006-04-12 2014-04-22 Winview, Inc. Synchronized gaming and programming
US9919210B2 (en) 2005-10-03 2018-03-20 Winview, Inc. Synchronized gaming and programming
US8149530B1 (en) 2006-04-12 2012-04-03 Winview, Inc. Methodology for equalizing systemic latencies in television reception in connection with games of skill played in connection with live television programming
US8874477B2 (en) 2005-10-04 2014-10-28 Steven Mark Hoffberg Multifactorial optimization system and method
US9056251B2 (en) 2006-01-10 2015-06-16 Winview, Inc. Method of and system for conducting multiple contests of skill with a single performance
US8002618B1 (en) 2006-01-10 2011-08-23 Winview, Inc. Method of and system for conducting multiple contests of skill with a single performance
US10556183B2 (en) 2006-01-10 2020-02-11 Winview, Inc. Method of and system for conducting multiple contest of skill with a single performance
US11082746B2 (en) 2006-04-12 2021-08-03 Winview, Inc. Synchronized gaming and programming
US7644861B2 (en) 2006-04-18 2010-01-12 Bgc Partners, Inc. Systems and methods for providing access to wireless gaming devices
US7549576B2 (en) 2006-05-05 2009-06-23 Cfph, L.L.C. Systems and methods for providing access to wireless gaming devices
US8939359B2 (en) 2006-05-05 2015-01-27 Cfph, Llc Game access device with time varying signal
US8292741B2 (en) 2006-10-26 2012-10-23 Cfph, Llc Apparatus, processes and articles for facilitating mobile gaming
US9306952B2 (en) 2006-10-26 2016-04-05 Cfph, Llc System and method for wireless gaming with location determination
US8645709B2 (en) 2006-11-14 2014-02-04 Cfph, Llc Biometric access data encryption
US9411944B2 (en) 2006-11-15 2016-08-09 Cfph, Llc Biometric access sensitivity
US8510567B2 (en) 2006-11-14 2013-08-13 Cfph, Llc Conditional biometric access in a gaming environment
US7942742B2 (en) 2006-11-15 2011-05-17 Cfph, Llc Accessing identification information to verify a gaming device is in communications with a server
US8012015B2 (en) 2006-11-15 2011-09-06 Cfph, Llc Verifying whether a gaming device is communicating with a gaming server
US7942739B2 (en) 2006-11-15 2011-05-17 Cfph, Llc Storing information from a verification device and accessing the information from a gaming device to verify that the gaming device is communicating with a server
US7942740B2 (en) 2006-11-15 2011-05-17 Cfph, Llc Verifying a first device is in communications with a server by storing a value from the first device and accessing the value from a second device
US7942738B2 (en) * 2006-11-15 2011-05-17 Cfph, Llc Verifying a gaming device is in communications with a gaming server
US7942741B2 (en) 2006-11-15 2011-05-17 Cfph, Llc Verifying whether a device is communicating with a server
US10068421B2 (en) * 2006-11-16 2018-09-04 Cfph, Llc Using a first device to verify whether a second device is communicating with a server
US8319601B2 (en) 2007-03-14 2012-11-27 Cfph, Llc Game account access device
US9183693B2 (en) 2007-03-08 2015-11-10 Cfph, Llc Game access device
US8581721B2 (en) 2007-03-08 2013-11-12 Cfph, Llc Game access device with privileges
US8510205B2 (en) * 2007-04-26 2013-08-13 Marketmaker Software Limited Exchange for derivative products contingent on odds-based markets
US8246432B2 (en) 2008-01-28 2012-08-21 Cfph, Llc Electronic gaming based on intermediate points in an event
AU2008252071B2 (en) * 2008-09-22 2010-09-09 Ballard, Wayne Mr Wagering System
US9716918B1 (en) 2008-11-10 2017-07-25 Winview, Inc. Interactive advertising system
GB2469375A (en) * 2010-04-01 2010-10-13 David John Bowman Tharp User interface presentation and wagering system
US8956231B2 (en) 2010-08-13 2015-02-17 Cfph, Llc Multi-process communication regarding gaming information
US8974302B2 (en) 2010-08-13 2015-03-10 Cfph, Llc Multi-process communication regarding gaming information
US8814660B2 (en) 2010-12-07 2014-08-26 Christopher Cody Thompson Fantasy betting application and associated methods
EP2794038A4 (en) 2011-12-23 2015-02-18 Razor Sports Inc Progressive betting pools
WO2013116359A1 (en) 2012-01-30 2013-08-08 Cfph, Llc Event wagering with group and/or in run options
US11557179B2 (en) 2012-07-19 2023-01-17 Philip Paul Givant Specialized slot machine for conducting a wagering fantasy sports tournament
US9589418B2 (en) 2012-07-19 2017-03-07 Philip Paul Givant Specialized slot machine for conducting a wagering game using real time or live action event content
US8714551B1 (en) * 2012-08-07 2014-05-06 Rafael Angel Santana Raffle gaming system
JP5658724B2 (en) * 2012-10-26 2015-01-28 楽天株式会社 Voting ticket information providing device, voting ticket information providing method, and program for voting ticket information providing device
US11055967B2 (en) 2014-03-26 2021-07-06 Cfph, Llc Event wagering with group and/or in run options
US11551529B2 (en) 2016-07-20 2023-01-10 Winview, Inc. Method of generating separate contests of skill or chance from two independent events
US11308765B2 (en) 2018-10-08 2022-04-19 Winview, Inc. Method and systems for reducing risk in setting odds for single fixed in-play propositions utilizing real time input
US10490028B1 (en) * 2018-11-26 2019-11-26 Grids Of Skill Llc Event box pool marketplace systems
US20210090405A1 (en) * 2019-09-24 2021-03-25 Igt System and method for customizing a sports bet based on a potential result of the sports bet

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6048269A (en) * 1993-01-22 2000-04-11 Mgm Grand, Inc. Coinless slot machine system and method
US20020151340A1 (en) * 2001-02-27 2002-10-17 Robert Guinn Remote sports wagering system
US20030144046A1 (en) * 2002-01-31 2003-07-31 Fujitsu Limited Totalizator terminal, winning horse picking method and program

Family Cites Families (405)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3499646A (en) * 1967-12-20 1970-03-10 Joseph Wesley Burgess Jr Apparatus for playing a game of stock speculation
US3581072A (en) 1968-03-28 1971-05-25 Frederick Nymeyer Auction market computation system
US3573747A (en) * 1969-02-24 1971-04-06 Institutional Networks Corp Instinet communication system for effectuating the sale or exchange of fungible properties between subscribers
US3679210A (en) 1970-09-28 1972-07-25 Marvin Glass & Associates Board game apparatus
US4412287A (en) 1975-05-29 1983-10-25 Braddock Iii Walter D Automated stock exchange
US4031376A (en) * 1975-06-30 1977-06-21 Corkin Jr Samuel Calculating method and apparatus for handicapping thoroughbred races and the like
US4108361A (en) 1976-10-12 1978-08-22 Krause Stephen R Universal mark sense betting terminal system and method
US4597046A (en) 1980-10-22 1986-06-24 Merrill Lynch, Pierce Fenner & Smith Securities brokerage-cash management system obviating float costs by anticipatory liquidation of short term assets
US4363489A (en) 1980-10-17 1982-12-14 Mattel, Inc. Electronic stock market terminal game
US4378942A (en) * 1980-12-19 1983-04-05 Isaac Paul J Trading game
US4980826A (en) 1983-11-03 1990-12-25 World Energy Exchange Corporation Voice actuated automated futures trading exchange
US4903201A (en) * 1983-11-03 1990-02-20 World Energy Exchange Corporation Automated futures trading exchange
US4874177A (en) 1984-05-30 1989-10-17 Girardin Ronald E Horse racing game
US5270922A (en) 1984-06-29 1993-12-14 Merrill Lynch & Company, Inc. System for distributing, processing and displaying financial information
US4677552A (en) 1984-10-05 1987-06-30 Sibley Jr H C International commodity trade exchange
US4674044A (en) 1985-01-30 1987-06-16 Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. Automated securities trading system
CY1493A (en) 1985-09-20 1990-02-16 Atl Pty Ltd A fixed odds betting apparatus
US6443840B2 (en) 1986-03-10 2002-09-03 Response Reward Systems, L.C. Evaluation of responses of participatory broadcast audience with prediction of winning contestants; monitoring, checking and controlling of wagering, and automatic crediting and couponing
US5508731A (en) * 1986-03-10 1996-04-16 Response Reward Systems L.C. Generation of enlarged participatory broadcast audience
JPH0130053Y2 (en) 1986-09-25 1989-09-13
US4823265A (en) * 1987-05-11 1989-04-18 Nelson George E Renewable option accounting and marketing system
US4856788A (en) 1987-08-26 1989-08-15 Mario Fischel Method of playing a game of economics and finance
US4890228A (en) 1988-01-21 1989-12-26 Beneficial Management Corporation Of America Electronic income tax refund early payment system
US5193057A (en) 1988-01-21 1993-03-09 Beneficial Franchise Company Inc. Electronic income tax refund early payment system with means for creating of a new deposit account for receipt of an electronically transferred refund from the irs
US4918603A (en) * 1988-08-01 1990-04-17 Michael B. Hughes Computerized statistical football game
US5205827A (en) * 1988-12-14 1993-04-27 Patco Ventures Ltd. Safety syringe needle device with interchangeable and retractable needle platform
US5077665A (en) 1989-05-25 1991-12-31 Reuters Limited Distributed matching system
US5136501A (en) 1989-05-26 1992-08-04 Reuters Limited Anonymous matching system
US5101353A (en) * 1989-05-31 1992-03-31 Lattice Investments, Inc. Automated system for providing liquidity to securities markets
JPH03179863A (en) 1989-09-04 1991-08-05 Hitachi Ltd Method and equipment for automatic transaction
US5027102A (en) 1989-09-15 1991-06-25 Sweeny Edward J Scoring system for athletic events
US4962950A (en) 1989-10-13 1990-10-16 Champion Joseph S Apparatus for increasing attendance at parimutuel events
US5108115A (en) * 1989-12-07 1992-04-28 Robert Berman Interactive game show and method for achieving interactive communication therewith
US5237500A (en) 1990-02-27 1993-08-17 Realvalue Corporation System and process for converting constant dollar financial instruments
US5297031A (en) 1990-03-06 1994-03-22 Chicago Board Of Trade Method and apparatus for order management by market brokers
US5202827A (en) 1990-05-10 1993-04-13 Sober Michael S Apparatus for insuring futures contracts against catastrophic loss
GB9027249D0 (en) * 1990-12-17 1991-02-06 Reuters Ltd Offer matching system
US5311423A (en) 1991-01-07 1994-05-10 Gte Service Corporation Schedule management method
US5297032A (en) * 1991-02-01 1994-03-22 Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated Securities trading workstation
US5453601A (en) 1991-11-15 1995-09-26 Citibank, N.A. Electronic-monetary system
US5375055A (en) 1992-02-03 1994-12-20 Foreign Exchange Transaction Services, Inc. Credit management for electronic brokerage system
US5692233A (en) 1992-05-28 1997-11-25 Financial Engineering Associates, Inc. Integrated system and method for analyzing derivative securities
US5970479A (en) 1992-05-29 1999-10-19 Swychco Infrastructure Services Pty. Ltd. Methods and apparatus relating to the formulation and trading of risk management contracts
US5275400A (en) 1992-06-11 1994-01-04 Gary Weingardt Pari-mutuel electronic gaming
US5794219A (en) 1996-02-20 1998-08-11 Health Hero Network, Inc. Method of conducting an on-line auction with bid pooling
JP3255754B2 (en) * 1993-04-23 2002-02-12 富士通株式会社 Electronic trading system
ZA943336B (en) 1993-05-19 1995-08-11 Menashe Julian Interactive computerised gaming system with remote terminals
US20060195355A1 (en) 1993-07-16 2006-08-31 Carl Lundgren Method and apparatus for preventing oligopoly collusion
US5497317A (en) * 1993-12-28 1996-03-05 Thomson Trading Services, Inc. Device and method for improving the speed and reliability of security trade settlements
EP1594075A2 (en) 1994-02-24 2005-11-09 Grantley Thomas Aubrey Hall Specified return determinator
US5842921A (en) 1994-02-28 1998-12-01 International Sports Wagering, Inc. System and method for wagering at fixed handicaps and/or odds on a sports event
US5573244A (en) 1994-02-28 1996-11-12 International Sports Wagering, Inc. System and method for wagering at fixed handicaps and/or odds on a sports event
WO1995027945A1 (en) 1994-04-06 1995-10-19 Morgan Stanley Group Inc. Data processing system and method for financial debt instruments
US5537314A (en) 1994-04-18 1996-07-16 First Marketrust Intl. Referral recognition system for an incentive award program
EP0686926A3 (en) 1994-05-24 1996-06-12 Ron S Dembo Method and apparatus for optimal portfolio replication
US5557517A (en) 1994-07-29 1996-09-17 Daughterty, Iii; Vergil L. System and method for determining the price of an expirationless American option and issuing a buy or sell ticket on the current price and portfolio
US6263321B1 (en) 1994-07-29 2001-07-17 Economic Inventions, Llc Apparatus and process for calculating an option
US6058377A (en) 1994-08-04 2000-05-02 The Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New York Portfolio structuring using low-discrepancy deterministic sequences
GB9416673D0 (en) 1994-08-17 1994-10-12 Reuters Ltd Data exchange filtering system
US5826241A (en) 1994-09-16 1998-10-20 First Virtual Holdings Incorporated Computerized system for making payments and authenticating transactions over the internet
US6443841B1 (en) 1994-09-21 2002-09-03 Michael T. Rossides Communications system using bets
US5950175A (en) 1994-10-14 1999-09-07 Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated System for managing real estate SWAP accounts
FI100137B (en) 1994-10-28 1997-09-30 Vazvan Simin Real-time wireless telecom payment system
US5489096A (en) 1995-04-27 1996-02-06 Double Win, Ltd. Ticket systems for wagering on sports events
US5845266A (en) 1995-12-12 1998-12-01 Optimark Technologies, Inc. Crossing network utilizing satisfaction density profile with price discovery features
US5689652A (en) 1995-04-27 1997-11-18 Optimark Technologies, Inc. Crossing network utilizing optimal mutual satisfaction density profile
US6578010B1 (en) 1995-06-05 2003-06-10 George A. Teacherson Multi-node network marketing computer system
US5745886A (en) 1995-06-07 1998-04-28 Citibank, N.A. Trusted agents for open distribution of electronic money
US6026388A (en) * 1995-08-16 2000-02-15 Textwise, Llc User interface and other enhancements for natural language information retrieval system and method
US6115698A (en) 1995-08-18 2000-09-05 Continental Power Exchange, Inc. Apparatus and method for trading electric energy
US5830068A (en) 1995-09-08 1998-11-03 Ods Technologies, L.P. Interactive wagering systems and processes
US5806048A (en) 1995-10-12 1998-09-08 Mopex, Inc. Open end mutual fund securitization process
US20030009404A2 (en) 1995-10-12 2003-01-09 Mopex, Inc. Open end mutual fund securitization process
US5819238A (en) 1996-12-13 1998-10-06 Enhanced Investment Technologies, Inc. Apparatus and accompanying methods for automatically modifying a financial portfolio through dynamic re-weighting based on a non-constant function of current capitalization weights
US5724524A (en) * 1995-12-15 1998-03-03 Pitney Bowes, Inc. Method and system for listing, brokering, and exchanging carrier capacity
US5819237A (en) 1996-02-13 1998-10-06 Financial Engineering Associates, Inc. System and method for determination of incremental value at risk for securities trading
US7487123B1 (en) * 1996-03-25 2009-02-03 Cfph, Llc Computer-implemented securities trading system with virtual currency and virtual specialist
US10586282B2 (en) 1996-03-25 2020-03-10 Cfph, Llc System and method for trading based on tournament-style events
US20060173761A1 (en) 1996-03-25 2006-08-03 Cfph, Llc System and Method for Market Research Based on Financial Exchange
US20050267836A1 (en) 1996-03-25 2005-12-01 Cfph, Llc Method and system for transacting with a trading application
US5950176A (en) 1996-03-25 1999-09-07 Hsx, Inc. Computer-implemented securities trading system with a virtual specialist function
US6505174B1 (en) 1996-03-25 2003-01-07 Hsx, Inc. Computer-implemented securities trading system with a virtual specialist function
US5713793A (en) 1996-04-05 1998-02-03 Oris, L.L.C. Sporting event options market trading game
US5846132A (en) 1996-04-10 1998-12-08 William W. Junkin Trust Interactive system allowing simulated or real time participation in a league
US6023685A (en) * 1996-05-23 2000-02-08 Brett; Kenton F. Computer controlled event ticket auctioning system
IT1283073B1 (en) * 1996-05-27 1998-04-07 Italtel Spa STRUCTURING METHOD OF DIGITAL INFORMATION TRANSPORTABLE IN BOTH DIRECTIONS ON A PASSIVE OPTICAL NETWORK (PON) IN ONE SYSTEM
US6014643A (en) * 1996-06-28 2000-01-11 Minton; Vernon F. Interactive securities trading system
US5743525A (en) 1996-07-01 1998-04-28 Haddad; George N. Sporting event wagering system
JP3651126B2 (en) 1996-07-18 2005-05-25 ブラザー工業株式会社 Information recording device
US6029146A (en) * 1996-08-21 2000-02-22 Crossmar, Inc. Method and apparatus for trading securities electronically
US6240396B1 (en) 1996-09-04 2001-05-29 Priceline.Com Incorporated Conditional purchase offer management system for event tickets
US6016483A (en) * 1996-09-20 2000-01-18 Optimark Technologies, Inc. Method and apparatus for automated opening of options exchange
US5913203A (en) 1996-10-03 1999-06-15 Jaesent Inc. System and method for pseudo cash transactions
US5842148A (en) 1996-10-07 1998-11-24 Jcp Geologists, Inc. Method of evaluating and classifying living structures for estimating potential damage thereto from physical disturbances
US5943678A (en) 1996-12-03 1999-08-24 International Business Machines Corporation Temporal displacement icon in a graphical user interface
US5905974A (en) 1996-12-13 1999-05-18 Cantor Fitzgerald Securities Automated auction protocol processor
US6113492A (en) 1997-06-30 2000-09-05 Walker Digital, Llc Gaming device for operating in a reverse payout mode and a method of operating same
US8025566B2 (en) * 2003-04-16 2011-09-27 Igt Gaming device methods and apparatus employing audio/video programming outcome presentation
US5888136A (en) 1997-03-13 1999-03-30 Herbert; Richard A. Wagering system and method of wagering
US6152822A (en) 1997-03-13 2000-11-28 Herbert; Richard A. Wagering system and method of wagering
US6112189A (en) 1997-03-19 2000-08-29 Optimark Technologies, Inc. Method and apparatus for automating negotiations between parties
US6202052B1 (en) 1997-05-08 2001-03-13 Simplification, Llc Fully-automated system for tax reporting, payment and refund
US20010037268A1 (en) 1997-05-08 2001-11-01 Miller David S. Fully-automated system for tax reporting, payment and refund and system for accessing tax information
US6161099A (en) * 1997-05-29 2000-12-12 Muniauction, Inc. Process and apparatus for conducting auctions over electronic networks
US6278981B1 (en) 1997-05-29 2001-08-21 Algorithmics International Corporation Computer-implemented method and apparatus for portfolio compression
US5949044A (en) 1997-06-13 1999-09-07 Walker Asset Management Limited Partnership Method and apparatus for funds and credit line transfers
EP0992015A4 (en) 1997-06-17 2002-11-20 Crossmar Inc Method and system for confirmation and settlement for financial transactions matching
US6120376A (en) 1997-07-01 2000-09-19 Horse Sense Corporation Wagering game based on ranking order of game participants
US5957775A (en) 1997-07-01 1999-09-28 Horse Sense Corporation Wagering game based on ranking order of game participants
US6058379A (en) 1997-07-11 2000-05-02 Auction Source, L.L.C. Real-time network exchange with seller specified exchange parameters and interactive seller participation
US6009402A (en) 1997-07-28 1999-12-28 Whitworth; Brian L. System and method for predicting, comparing and presenting the cost of self insurance versus insurance and for creating bond financing when advantageous
US6026364A (en) * 1997-07-28 2000-02-15 Whitworth; Brian L. System and method for replacing a liability with insurance and for analyzing data and generating documents pertaining to a premium financing mechanism paying for such insurance
AU9202698A (en) * 1997-08-22 1999-03-16 Grenex Corporation Exchange method and apparatus
US6154730A (en) 1997-10-20 2000-11-28 Adams; Edward S. Facility-based financing system
BR9815619A (en) 1997-11-19 2000-10-24 Robert A Sarno Process, apparatus and system for lottery games
US6021397A (en) * 1997-12-02 2000-02-01 Financial Engines, Inc. Financial advisory system
US6035287A (en) * 1997-12-17 2000-03-07 Omega Consulting, Inc. Method and apparatus for bundled asset trading
US7124106B1 (en) 1997-12-17 2006-10-17 Omega Consulting, Inc. Apparatus for trading of bundled assets including bundle substitution and method therefor
US6126543A (en) * 1998-01-08 2000-10-03 Innovative Gaming Systems Ltd Method for wagering on combined point spreads from multiple contests
US6064985A (en) 1998-01-21 2000-05-16 Assured Equities, Inc. Automated portfolio management system with internet datafeed
US20040058731A1 (en) * 1998-05-11 2004-03-25 Rossides Michael T. Communications system using bets
US6067532A (en) 1998-07-14 2000-05-23 American Express Travel Related Services Company Inc. Ticket redistribution system
US6347086B1 (en) * 1998-09-04 2002-02-12 Richard B. Strachan Pick pools system and method using packet-switched network
US6292787B1 (en) * 1998-09-11 2001-09-18 Financial Engines, Inc. Enhancing utility and diversifying model risk in a portfolio optimization framework
US6418417B1 (en) 1998-10-08 2002-07-09 Strategic Weather Services System, method, and computer program product for valuating weather-based financial instruments
US6161096A (en) 1998-10-22 2000-12-12 Bell; Lawrence L. Method and apparatus for modeling and executing deferred award instrument plan
US6358150B1 (en) 1998-10-29 2002-03-19 Racetech Llc Methods and apparatus for parimutuel historical gaming
US6450887B1 (en) 1998-10-29 2002-09-17 Racetech L.L.C. Methods and apparatus for parimutuel historical gaming
EP1461755A4 (en) 1998-11-02 2004-09-29 Hsx Inc Computer-implemented securities trading system with virtual currency and virtual specialist
US7562040B2 (en) 1998-11-05 2009-07-14 Loeper David B Method, system and computer program for auditing financial plans
US6260024B1 (en) 1998-12-02 2001-07-10 Gary Shkedy Method and apparatus for facilitating buyer-driven purchase orders on a commercial network system
US6360210B1 (en) * 1999-02-12 2002-03-19 Folio Trade Llc Method and system for enabling smaller investors to manage risk in a self-managed portfolio of assets/liabilities
US6470324B1 (en) 1999-02-19 2002-10-22 Daimlerchrysler Corporation Dealer inventory management system
US7359871B1 (en) 1999-03-02 2008-04-15 Alticor Investments Inc. System and method for managing recurring orders in a computer network
US6260019B1 (en) 1999-03-05 2001-07-10 Predict It Corporation Web-based prediction marketplace
US6369840B1 (en) * 1999-03-10 2002-04-09 America Online, Inc. Multi-layered online calendaring and purchasing
US6331148B1 (en) 1999-03-12 2001-12-18 Lawrence Alan Krause Casino/lottery/sports styled wagers and games for parimutuel operation
US6309307B1 (en) 1999-03-12 2001-10-30 Lawrence A. Krause Casino/lottery/sports styled wagers and games for parimutuel racing operations
US20040229671A1 (en) 1999-04-30 2004-11-18 Andrew Stronach Wagering system with automated entry system
US6236900B1 (en) 1999-05-03 2001-05-22 Michael P. Geiger Method and system for internet-based, competitive event prediction
US7003485B1 (en) * 1999-05-07 2006-02-21 Dale Young Ticket auction
US20050080705A1 (en) * 1999-05-10 2005-04-14 Naren Chaganti Selling shares in intangible property over the internet
US7165046B2 (en) 2000-05-18 2007-01-16 Efficient Auctions Llc System and method for an efficient dynamic multi-unit auction
US6629082B1 (en) * 1999-06-15 2003-09-30 W.R. Hambrecht & Co. Auction system and method for pricing and allocation during capital formation
WO2000079442A1 (en) 1999-06-18 2000-12-28 Stronach Andrew M Wagering system
US6604239B1 (en) 1999-06-25 2003-08-05 Eyescene Inc. System and method for virtual television program rating
US6692916B2 (en) * 1999-06-28 2004-02-17 Source Precision Medicine, Inc. Systems and methods for characterizing a biological condition or agent using precision gene expression profiles
JP3499159B2 (en) 1999-07-02 2004-02-23 株式会社ソニー・コンピュータエンタテインメント Entertainment system, entertainment apparatus and recording medium
US7177829B1 (en) 1999-07-16 2007-02-13 H & R Block Tax Services, Inc. Tax refund system
US7996296B2 (en) 1999-07-21 2011-08-09 Longitude Llc Digital options having demand-based, adjustable returns, and trading exchange therefor
US7742972B2 (en) 1999-07-21 2010-06-22 Longitude Llc Enhanced parimutuel wagering
US7389262B1 (en) 1999-07-21 2008-06-17 Longitude, Inc. Financial products having demand-based, adjustable returns, and trading exchange therefor
US8577778B2 (en) 1999-07-21 2013-11-05 Longitude Llc Derivatives having demand-based, adjustable returns, and trading exchange therefor
US7225153B2 (en) 1999-07-21 2007-05-29 Longitude Llc Digital options having demand-based, adjustable returns, and trading exchange therefor
US8126794B2 (en) 1999-07-21 2012-02-28 Longitude Llc Replicated derivatives having demand-based, adjustable returns, and trading exchange therefor
AU774959B2 (en) * 1999-08-13 2004-07-15 Cinecast, Llc System and method for digitally providing and displaying advertisement information to cinemas and theaters
US6792411B1 (en) 1999-08-27 2004-09-14 Eugene Howard Massey, Jr. Method for the sale of movies prior to the production thereof
US6598028B1 (en) 1999-09-03 2003-07-22 Lynn Sullivan Computer-implemented universal financial management/translation system and method
US7099839B2 (en) 1999-09-08 2006-08-29 Primex Holdings, Llc Opening price process for trading system
US7171386B1 (en) * 1999-10-08 2007-01-30 Rfv Holdings Real-time commodity trading method and apparatus
AU1764501A (en) 1999-11-16 2001-05-30 01, Inc. Method and system for executing financial transactions via communication medium
US7437304B2 (en) 1999-11-22 2008-10-14 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for project preparing a procurement and accounts payable system
KR20000007074A (en) 1999-11-24 2000-02-07 최강수 Method for dealing in cyber idea stocks
CA2290888A1 (en) * 1999-11-26 2001-05-26 Algorithmics International Corp. Risk management, pricing and portfolio makeup system and method
WO2001041025A2 (en) 1999-12-06 2001-06-07 Ods Properties, Inc. Systems and methods for interactive wagering
US20020052816A1 (en) 1999-12-28 2002-05-02 Clenaghan Stuart J. Method and apparatus for selling financial instruments
KR100343594B1 (en) 1999-12-29 2002-07-20 정영엽 System and method for analyzing a trade trending in virtual market
US7127425B1 (en) 2000-01-14 2006-10-24 H & R Block Tax Services, Inc. System and method for providing a loan to a taxpayer based on a pre year-end tax refund
WO2001055946A1 (en) 2000-01-31 2001-08-02 Sportsfund Company Derivative fund based on sports or political event outcomes
US20010047295A1 (en) 2000-01-31 2001-11-29 Tenembaum Samuel Sergio Equity rewards method
US6584369B2 (en) 2000-02-02 2003-06-24 Texas Instruments Incorporated Method and system for dispatching semiconductor lots to manufacturing equipment for fabrication
US7162447B1 (en) * 2000-02-02 2007-01-09 Itg Software Solutions, Inc. Method and system for obtaining a discovered price
US6296569B1 (en) 2000-02-18 2001-10-02 Philip Congello, Jr. Fractional denomination gaming system and method of playing
US20030022719A1 (en) 2000-02-22 2003-01-30 Donald Jan Forbes Regulation of gaming systems
US20020013747A1 (en) 2000-02-23 2002-01-31 Valentine Michael J. Method and apparatus for electronic filing of income tax returns by a taxpayer
AU2001238660B2 (en) 2000-02-23 2007-05-31 Financial Engines, Inc. Load aware optimization
US20010029485A1 (en) 2000-02-29 2001-10-11 E-Scoring, Inc. Systems and methods enabling anonymous credit transactions
WO2001065505A2 (en) 2000-03-01 2001-09-07 Ods Properties, Inc. User interface for interactive wagering systems
JP2003529142A (en) 2000-03-01 2003-09-30 オーディーエス プロパティーズ, インコーポレイテッド An interactive betting information setting system that allows wireless betting information setting
US7389268B1 (en) 2000-03-02 2008-06-17 Trading Technologies International, Inc. Trading tools for electronic trading
US7016873B1 (en) 2000-03-02 2006-03-21 Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. System and method for tax sensitive portfolio optimization
US6772132B1 (en) 2000-03-02 2004-08-03 Trading Technologies International, Inc. Click based trading with intuitive grid display of market depth
KR20010087622A (en) 2000-03-08 2001-09-21 황선진 System and method for estimating value of a brand employing stock trading technique
US6688978B1 (en) * 2000-03-15 2004-02-10 Bob Herman Event contest method
US7099838B1 (en) 2000-03-27 2006-08-29 American Stock Exchange, Llc Hedging exchange traded mutual funds or other portfolio basket products
US7571130B2 (en) 2002-06-17 2009-08-04 Nyse Alternext Us Llc Hedging exchange traded mutual funds or other portfolio basket products
US7373320B1 (en) 2000-03-30 2008-05-13 Mcdonough Timothy Francis Mechanism and business method for implementing a service contract futures exchange
JP2001283030A (en) 2000-03-31 2001-10-12 Internatl Business Mach Corp <Ibm> Purchase desiring price investigation system, merchandise providing system, auction server, merchandise sales method, merchandise purchasing method, storage medium and program transmitter
US6773347B1 (en) 2000-03-31 2004-08-10 Ods Properties, Inc. Interactive wagering system
US6711550B1 (en) * 2000-03-31 2004-03-23 Ford Motor Company Method and system for capacity planning
AU2001255266B2 (en) 2000-04-05 2004-03-25 Ods Properties, Inc. Interactive wagering systems and methods with parimutuel pool features
WO2001076706A2 (en) 2000-04-05 2001-10-18 Ods Properties, Inc. Interactive wagering systems and methods with multiple television feeds
WO2001077962A2 (en) 2000-04-05 2001-10-18 Ods Properties, Inc. Interactive wagering systems and methods for restricting wagering access
NZ521779A (en) 2000-04-05 2003-01-31 Ods Properties Inc Systems and methods for placing parimutuel wagers on future events
US6837791B1 (en) * 2000-04-05 2005-01-04 Ods Properties, Inc. Interactive wagering system with totalisator selection
GB2356071A (en) 2000-04-06 2001-05-09 Sporting Exchange Ltd Internet betting matches bets and lays
US20030024988A1 (en) 2000-04-24 2003-02-06 David Stanard System for providing evidence of payment
KR20010098204A (en) 2000-04-28 2001-11-08 박규헌 A method and a record device for a market survey using auction formula of stock trading shape
US20020042741A1 (en) 2000-04-28 2002-04-11 Wilson William Whiteside System, method and article of manufacture to facilitate remote station advertising
US20040235542A1 (en) 2000-05-01 2004-11-25 Andrew Stronach Pari-mutuel terminal wagering system and process
US6688976B1 (en) * 2000-05-01 2004-02-10 Walker Digital, Llc Systems and methods wherein a lottery number combination is associated with a limited number of occurrences
CA2933546A1 (en) 2000-05-01 2001-11-08 Cfph, L.L.C. Real-time interactive wagering on event outcomes
FR2809209A1 (en) 2000-05-19 2001-11-23 France Telecom Behavior simulation method for high technology product or service consumers in telecommunications uses multi-agents allowing correlation at the global level for individual variables determining each data agent.
AUPQ784100A0 (en) 2000-05-29 2000-06-22 Harkham, Gabi Method of and system for providing an on-line casino game
KR20000072451A (en) 2000-06-07 2000-12-05 신재홍 A method of dealing with cultural public offering stock through internet for investmental offering of producing fund for cultural activities
US6325721B1 (en) 2000-06-13 2001-12-04 Teletech Company, Ltd. Method for forecasting ranking of racing contests
ATE360862T1 (en) 2000-06-21 2007-05-15 Chikka Pte Ltd TRADING AND AUCTIONING SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTHENTICATING BUYERS AND SELLERS AND TRANSMITTING TRADING INSTRUCTIONS IN A TRADING AND AUCTIONING SYSTEM
US7505935B2 (en) * 2000-06-21 2009-03-17 Chikka Pte Ltd Trading and auction system, and methods for the authentication of buyers and sellers and for the transmission of trading instructions in a trading and auction system
US7890433B2 (en) 2000-06-30 2011-02-15 Tara Chand Singhal Private and secure payment system
US7131574B1 (en) 2000-07-19 2006-11-07 Lasercard Corporation Optical memory card based e-commerce business method
US20020046109A1 (en) * 2000-07-24 2002-04-18 Huw Leonard Method and system for administering a customer loyalty reward program using a browser extension
US7219071B2 (en) 2000-07-25 2007-05-15 Gallagher P Christopher J Administering incentive award program
JP2002049789A (en) 2000-08-01 2002-02-15 Yasufumi Kuramochi Market valuation method for idea by auction utilizing internet homepage and idea auction method based on the valuation
SE0002811D0 (en) 2000-08-03 2000-08-03 Ticketanywhere Europ Ab Method of handling electronic tickets
US20040078314A1 (en) * 2000-08-11 2004-04-22 Robert Maerz Method and system for offering securities based in entertainment concepts
US20020019792A1 (en) * 2000-08-11 2002-02-14 Robert Maerz Method and system for offering television pilots as a security
US7209950B2 (en) 2000-08-15 2007-04-24 Zonamovil.Com, Inc. Method and apparatus for a network independent short message delivery system
US20020077961A1 (en) 2000-08-18 2002-06-20 Eckert Daniel J. Performer income trading system and method
EP1323112A4 (en) * 2000-08-25 2006-08-02 Jonas Ulenas Method and apparatus for obtaining consumer product preferences through product selection and evaluation
US7395232B1 (en) 2000-08-30 2008-07-01 Traderisks, Inc. Method and system for providing financial functions
JP4210418B2 (en) 2000-09-04 2009-01-21 正 五井野 Competition-related rights sales method
US6996413B2 (en) 2000-09-06 2006-02-07 Eric Inselberg Method and apparatus for interactive audience participation at a live spectator event
US7201653B2 (en) 2000-09-07 2007-04-10 Benny Radom Book of wishes game
US6371855B1 (en) * 2000-09-08 2002-04-16 Winamax.Com Limited Fantasy internet sports game
US20020087447A1 (en) 2000-09-19 2002-07-04 Gazebo Inc. System and method for managing and executing event based investments
AU2001294605A1 (en) 2000-09-21 2002-04-02 Iq Company Method and system for asynchronous online distributed problem solving including problems in education, business finance and technology
US7062457B1 (en) 2000-09-22 2006-06-13 Iac/Interactivecorp. Method and system for entertainment production financing
JP2002099733A (en) 2000-09-26 2002-04-05 Dentsu Inc Project investment intermediating system
AU2002213013A1 (en) 2000-09-29 2002-04-08 Jill Fallon Systems and methods for a personal, universal, integrated organizer for legacy planning and storage
US20020055089A1 (en) 2000-10-05 2002-05-09 E-Vantage International, Inc. Method and system for delivering homework management solutions to a designated market
AUPR066300A0 (en) * 2000-10-09 2000-11-02 A & Mt Projects Pty Limited The use of wireless application protocol for making trading decisions and executing transactions in real time
US20020062243A1 (en) 2000-10-16 2002-05-23 Anderson Kent G. Method
US20020156709A1 (en) 2000-10-27 2002-10-24 Pearl Street Financial Group Ltd. Debt financing for companies
US20020077880A1 (en) 2000-11-27 2002-06-20 Gordon Donald F. Method and apparatus for collecting and reporting consumer trend data in an information distribution system
KR20020042036A (en) 2000-11-29 2002-06-05 장주성 Method for predicting/picking out bestseller and providing culture-products portal service by imitative stocks-investment game over the internet
US20020065666A1 (en) 2000-11-30 2002-05-30 Jose Ignacio Zorrila De San Martin Soto Method and system for transferring money orders
US20020068633A1 (en) 2000-12-01 2002-06-06 Schlaifer Roger L. Real-time odds-based gaming
AU2002221258A1 (en) 2000-12-08 2002-06-18 S. Stryer Jeffrey Method of electronically simulating a pit-trading environment in order to maximize liquidity in an online exchange
US7146334B2 (en) 2000-12-08 2006-12-05 Xerox Corporation System and method of determining latent demand for at least one of a plurality of commodities
DE10062120A1 (en) 2000-12-13 2002-06-20 Michael Griebel Device and method for evaluating financial derivatives using thin grids
US20020082969A1 (en) 2000-12-21 2002-06-27 O'keeffe Gerard M. Event ticket pricing and distribution system
US7418414B2 (en) 2000-12-29 2008-08-26 Eprosper System and method to organize and manage corporate capitalization and securities
US20020087454A1 (en) 2000-12-30 2002-07-04 Bea Calo Global trading system
AU2002239859A1 (en) 2001-01-12 2002-07-24 Verticalcrossings.Com, Inc. Anonymous auctioning of structured financial products over a computer network
US7172508B2 (en) * 2001-01-23 2007-02-06 Burton Simon Multi-person parimutuel betting games based on sporting events
NZ516935A (en) * 2001-02-05 2003-08-29 Tab Ltd A method for a participant to make a wager with a betting organiser in respect of an event that has more than two possible outcomes with the participant nominating the total amount of the wager
US6669565B2 (en) 2001-02-05 2003-12-30 Fantasy Sports, Inc. Method of conducting a fantasy sports game
KR100416342B1 (en) * 2001-02-06 2004-01-31 주식회사 케이티프리텔 A method for receiving data using SMS and wireless Internet and system thereof
US6527270B2 (en) 2001-02-13 2003-03-04 Casino Advisory Services, Inc. Method of effecting multiple wagers on a sports or other event
US20020115488A1 (en) * 2001-02-22 2002-08-22 Nicholas Berry System and method for conducting an online competition
US20020120490A1 (en) 2001-02-26 2002-08-29 Gajewski Arthur Joseph Vehicle systems concept development process
US7127264B2 (en) 2001-02-27 2006-10-24 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Mobile originated interactive menus via short messaging services
US20020152458A1 (en) 2001-03-02 2002-10-17 Eyer Mark Kenneth Method for establishing a price of an entertainment event by group concensus
US20020133410A1 (en) 2001-03-13 2002-09-19 Hermreck Scott A. System and method of preparing an income tax return
US6939137B1 (en) 2001-12-12 2005-09-06 Cantor Fitzgerald, Lp Method and system for training traders
US7076459B2 (en) 2001-03-21 2006-07-11 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, Lp. Demand estimation using auction price analysis
US20020156715A1 (en) 2001-04-19 2002-10-24 Cameron Wall Apparatus and method for auctioning and reissuing a ticket online
US7409367B2 (en) 2001-05-04 2008-08-05 Delta Rangers Inc. Derivative securities and system for trading same
US20020165740A1 (en) 2001-05-04 2002-11-07 Saunders Robert Miles Investment style life insurance product that allows consumer to control and replace individual policy components
US20020194097A1 (en) 2001-05-07 2002-12-19 Reitz James T. Method and system for two-way communication between asset managers and asset custodians
US20030009415A1 (en) * 2001-05-14 2003-01-09 Lutnick Howard W. Methods and systems for trading futures contracts for intangible assets
US8015097B2 (en) 2001-05-31 2011-09-06 Bgc Partners, Inc. Securities trading system with multiple levels of interest
AU2002322090A1 (en) 2001-06-13 2002-12-23 Caminus Corporation System architecture and method for energy industry trading and transaction management
US20030018571A1 (en) * 2001-06-14 2003-01-23 Eckert Daniel J. System and method of trading securities based on the income of a performer
US7236955B2 (en) 2001-06-15 2007-06-26 Goldman Sachs & Co. Method for structuring a transaction
US7120928B2 (en) 2001-06-15 2006-10-10 Dinesh Sheth Secure selective sharing of account information on an internet information aggregation system
CA2403300A1 (en) * 2002-09-12 2004-03-12 Pranil Ram A method of buying or selling items and a user interface to facilitate the same
US7699701B2 (en) * 2001-07-05 2010-04-20 Dbs Limited Partnership Method and system for providing real time sports betting information
US20030093356A1 (en) 2001-07-06 2003-05-15 Assetsight, Inc. Method for issuing a derivative contract
US20030018564A1 (en) * 2001-07-20 2003-01-23 Bonnier Marc Antoine Method of operating a game of chance utilizing bidding over a network
EP1428183B1 (en) 2001-07-25 2007-04-25 Credit Lyonnais Method and system using a user portable device for validating a request with an entity
AU2002331075A1 (en) 2001-08-10 2003-02-24 Merrill Lynch And Co, Inc. Convertible financial instruments with contingent payments
WO2003017700A2 (en) * 2001-08-14 2003-02-27 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Method of and system for providing a programming information for programming a device
DE10143725B4 (en) * 2001-08-31 2004-09-16 Siemens Ag Method and terminal for billing short written information transmitted in telecommunications networks
US20030061096A1 (en) * 2001-09-05 2003-03-27 Gallivan Gerald J. System and method for use for linking primary market research data with secondary research data
US7844514B2 (en) 2001-09-10 2010-11-30 Perot Investments, Inc. Table driven accounting method and system
US20030101128A1 (en) 2001-11-29 2003-05-29 Abernethy William Randolph State tracking system for a basket trading system
WO2003050654A2 (en) 2001-12-10 2003-06-19 Bank One, Delaware, N.A. Methods and system for adding liquidity to alternative investment transactions
US7158950B2 (en) 2002-02-05 2007-01-02 Keith A. Snyder Process for creating a financial plan for funding of college education
US7085738B2 (en) 2002-03-05 2006-08-01 Protégé Partners LLC Method and system for creating and operating an investable hedge fund index fund
SG108837A1 (en) 2002-03-11 2005-02-28 Pi Eta Consulting Co Pte Ltd An enterprise knowledge and information acquisition, management and communications system with intelligent user interfaces
US20030177055A1 (en) 2002-03-14 2003-09-18 The Procter & Gamble Company Virtual test market system and method
US6910965B2 (en) * 2002-04-19 2005-06-28 David W. Downes Pari-mutuel sports wagering system
US20030200164A1 (en) 2002-04-19 2003-10-23 Jacobs Dale F. Trust preferred security method
WO2003090102A1 (en) 2002-04-22 2003-10-30 Inphonic, Inc. Method and system for short message service (sms) transactions for wireless devices
US20030204408A1 (en) 2002-04-30 2003-10-30 Kemal Guler Method and system for optimal product bundling and design
EP1363430A1 (en) 2002-05-14 2003-11-19 Sertea S.r.l. Message service communication system
AU2003239587A1 (en) 2002-05-21 2003-12-12 Mikal Financial Method and system for financing an edifice
US7680688B2 (en) 2002-05-28 2010-03-16 American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. System and method for exchanging loyalty points for acquisitions
US20050160024A1 (en) 2002-06-07 2005-07-21 Side By Side Trading, Inc. Automated system for aggregated price discovery and electronic trading of linked cash/cash equivalent and their derivative asset packages
BG106813A (en) 2002-06-12 2005-04-30 СТОЯНОВ Румен Method for mobile payments
US7702564B2 (en) 2002-06-19 2010-04-20 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Determining a demand function for an item
US7885887B2 (en) * 2002-07-09 2011-02-08 Artistshare, Inc. Methods and apparatuses for financing and marketing a creative work
US20050154629A1 (en) 2002-07-10 2005-07-14 Fujitsu Limited Product purchasing trend analyzing system
JP2004094377A (en) 2002-08-29 2004-03-25 Mizuho Bank Ltd Product sales method and program
US7001279B1 (en) * 2002-08-30 2006-02-21 Interactive Sports Holdings, Inc. Systems and methods for providing multiple user support for shared user equipment in a fantasy sports contest application
US20040043810A1 (en) 2002-08-30 2004-03-04 Perlin Ari S. Providing a contest and obtaining marketing data therefrom
US7567935B2 (en) 2002-09-13 2009-07-28 Morgan Stanley Short trade information system
JP2004120493A (en) * 2002-09-27 2004-04-15 Nec Corp Method and program for distributing event information
US20040073688A1 (en) 2002-09-30 2004-04-15 Sampson Scott E. Electronic payment validation using Transaction Authorization Tokens
US7613645B2 (en) * 2002-10-15 2009-11-03 Timothy Knight Electronic interface configured for displaying and identifying mixed types of information
US7340425B2 (en) * 2002-10-29 2008-03-04 First Trust Portfolios, L.P. Method for generating a portfolio of stocks
US7752116B2 (en) 2002-10-30 2010-07-06 Nasdaq Liffe Markets, Llc Liquidity engine for futures trading exchange
US20040088244A1 (en) 2002-10-31 2004-05-06 Bartter William Dale System and method for accommodating rated transactions in an electronic commerce system
CN100437610C (en) 2002-12-06 2008-11-26 林铭 Method for implementation of electronic trade system
US7922570B2 (en) * 2002-12-09 2011-04-12 George Del Prado Fantasy sports auction system
US20040110552A1 (en) 2002-12-09 2004-06-10 George Del Prado Fantasy sports auction system
US7571140B2 (en) 2002-12-16 2009-08-04 First Data Corporation Payment management
KR20040062806A (en) 2003-01-03 2004-07-09 엘지전자 주식회사 Competitive Business Interceding System and Competitive Business Service Method by Using the Same
EP1588302A4 (en) 2003-01-08 2006-03-01 Mutualart Inc Diversification of risk for artists and investors
US20040138977A1 (en) 2003-01-09 2004-07-15 Tomkins Richard M. Asset monetization
US20040153375A1 (en) 2003-01-25 2004-08-05 Mukunya Alfred Kariuki System for trading and hedging product and brand sales
US20040148236A1 (en) 2003-01-27 2004-07-29 J. Peter Steidlmayer Leveraged supply contracts
US20040148244A1 (en) 2003-01-27 2004-07-29 Badeau Douglas Dauphinot System and method for consolidated order entry
KR100409095B1 (en) 2003-02-27 2003-12-11 Sk Chemicals Co Ltd Method for selling article and distributing sales profits using internet
US7152041B2 (en) 2003-03-10 2006-12-19 Chicago Mercantile Exchange, Inc. Derivatives trading methods that use a variable order price
US7571133B2 (en) 2003-03-10 2009-08-04 Chicago Mercantile Exchange, Inc. Derivatives trading methods that use a variable order price and a hedge transaction
US20040199451A1 (en) 2003-03-20 2004-10-07 Chicago Board Of Trade Municipal note index future
US7452274B2 (en) * 2003-03-31 2008-11-18 Cantor Index, Llc System and method for betting on-the-board or off-the-board in an event
US20040192437A1 (en) * 2003-03-31 2004-09-30 Amaitis Lee M. System and method for betting on an event using an auction
US8353763B2 (en) 2003-03-31 2013-01-15 Cantor Index, Llc System and method for betting on a participant in a group of events
US20040193469A1 (en) * 2003-03-31 2004-09-30 Cantor Index Llc System and method for spread betting on a participant in a group of events
US20040199471A1 (en) 2003-04-01 2004-10-07 Hardjono Thomas P. Rights trading system
US7962400B2 (en) * 2003-04-02 2011-06-14 Cfph, Llc System and method for wagering based on the movement of financial markets
US7233922B2 (en) 2003-04-02 2007-06-19 Cantor Index Llc System and method for wagering-based transferable financial instruments
US7341517B2 (en) 2003-04-10 2008-03-11 Cantor Index, Llc Real-time interactive wagering on event outcomes
WO2004090678A2 (en) * 2003-04-11 2004-10-21 Cantor Index Llc Lottery and auction based tournament entry exchange platform
US20040225554A1 (en) 2003-05-08 2004-11-11 International Business Machines Corporation Business method for information technology services for legacy applications of a client
US20040248637A1 (en) 2003-06-06 2004-12-09 Liebenberg Dawid J. Interactive networked game
WO2004114064A2 (en) * 2003-06-13 2004-12-29 Shareintel Method and system for collection and analysis of shareholder information
GB0314940D0 (en) 2003-06-26 2003-07-30 Million 21 Ltd How low will it go
US20040267657A1 (en) 2003-06-28 2004-12-30 Global Skyline Llc Method for valuing forwards, futures and options on real estate
US20050021441A1 (en) * 2003-07-22 2005-01-27 Flake Gary William Concept valuation in a term-based concept market
US20050021445A1 (en) * 2003-07-24 2005-01-27 Marshall Caro Systems and methods for augmenting the information content of financial trading protocol messages
US20050027583A1 (en) * 2003-07-30 2005-02-03 Smit Colin Julian Programmable automated trustee (PAT) system, capable of advanced oversight applications, through the tracking, monitoring and analyzing of the investment process workflow activities, identifying anomalies and trends and reporting such anomalies and trends to the user
US20050038706A1 (en) * 2003-08-15 2005-02-17 Amir Yazdani Business transaction reporting system
US20050044025A1 (en) * 2003-08-19 2005-02-24 Tutty Enterprises, Inc. Method for customizing and producing products and services
US20050064937A1 (en) * 2003-09-18 2005-03-24 Glenn Ballman A game whereby the players create a portfolio of fantasy shares that are held and traded by game players in an organized electronic market
KR100697416B1 (en) * 2003-09-30 2007-03-20 교세라 가부시키가이샤 Mobile communication terminal, information providing system, and computer readable recording medium storing program
US7752101B2 (en) * 2003-10-20 2010-07-06 Morgan Stanley System and method for increasing an amount of a security available for borrow
US20050097022A1 (en) 2003-10-31 2005-05-05 Robert Silman System and method for investment in a portfolio of entertainment productions
US20050108131A1 (en) 2003-11-17 2005-05-19 Halikias Thomas T. Box office participating securities (BOPS)
US7818225B2 (en) 2003-11-26 2010-10-19 Excel Ventures Llc Financial instrument and related business method
US20050125333A1 (en) 2003-12-09 2005-06-09 Giannetti Isaia P. Pre-order wholesale system and method
US20050010487A1 (en) * 2003-12-23 2005-01-13 Lou Weisbach Method of financing a sports stadium or entertainment center
US7698199B2 (en) 2004-01-16 2010-04-13 Bgc Partners, Inc. System and method for offering a futures contract indexed to entertainment revenue
US7698198B2 (en) 2004-01-16 2010-04-13 Bgc Partners, Inc. System and method for purchasing a financial instrument indexed to entertainment revenue
US7567931B2 (en) 2004-01-16 2009-07-28 Bgc Partners, Inc. System and method for forming a financial instrument indexed to entertainment revenue
US20110208633A1 (en) 2010-02-19 2011-08-25 Asher Joseph M System and method for trading a futures contract based on a financial instrument indexed to entertainment dividends
US7698184B2 (en) 2004-01-16 2010-04-13 Bgc Partners, Inc. System and method for trading a financial instrument indexed to entertainment revenue
US7243839B2 (en) 2004-03-12 2007-07-17 American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. Systems, methods, and devices for selling transaction instruments
US7520429B2 (en) 2004-03-31 2009-04-21 United Parcel Service Of America, Inc. Systems and methods for an electronic programmable merchandise tag
JP4454374B2 (en) 2004-04-09 2010-04-21 株式会社ゲームリパブリック Racehorse securitization server
US20070100729A1 (en) 2004-06-04 2007-05-03 Kickstartr, Llc Systems and methods for making conditional sales of investments
JP2006012098A (en) 2004-06-22 2006-01-12 Toshiyuki Yamanaka Evaluation operation system of content in broadband
US20060025208A1 (en) * 2004-07-27 2006-02-02 Kirt Ramsey Sports wagering method and system
US8176127B2 (en) * 2004-07-30 2012-05-08 Pivot Solutions, Inc. System and method for processing securities trading instructions and communicating order status via a messaging interface
US20050049731A1 (en) * 2004-07-30 2005-03-03 Terry Dell Interactive wagering contest method and system
US20060080220A1 (en) 2004-08-13 2006-04-13 Kevin Samuel Liquidity book system and method
US20060143099A1 (en) 2004-09-23 2006-06-29 Daniel Partlow System, method, and computer program for creating and valuing financial insturments linked to average credit spreads
US7742974B2 (en) 2004-10-18 2010-06-22 Trading Technologies International Inc. Flexible system and method for electronic trading
US20060100006A1 (en) 2004-11-11 2006-05-11 Onroo Entertainment, Llc Strategy gaming format with outcomes determined by external events and auction- and market-based transactions by the players
US20060259312A1 (en) 2004-11-12 2006-11-16 De Titta John E Methods and apparatus for producing and financing media productions
US20060105839A1 (en) 2004-11-15 2006-05-18 Delta Rangers, Inc. Casino game based on financial market activity
US7853496B2 (en) 2004-11-19 2010-12-14 Cox Communication, Inc. Prioritizing product development lines
US7844674B2 (en) 2004-12-03 2010-11-30 Clairmail Inc. Architecture for general purpose trusted personal access system and methods therefor
US20070060380A1 (en) * 2005-02-11 2007-03-15 The Score Line Channel, Llc Fantasy sports television programming systems and methods
US20060235783A1 (en) 2005-02-22 2006-10-19 Scott Ryles Predicting risk and return for a portfolio of entertainment projects
US20060259381A1 (en) 2005-04-11 2006-11-16 David Gershon Method and system of pricing financial instruments
WO2006110867A2 (en) 2005-04-12 2006-10-19 Cantor Index Llc. System and method for providing a multiple-stage contest
GB2425854A (en) 2005-04-21 2006-11-08 Saleh Al-Sarawi Transactions using mobile devices
US7958040B2 (en) 2005-06-03 2011-06-07 Microsoft Corporation Online computation of market equilibrium price
US20060293985A1 (en) 2005-06-27 2006-12-28 Securitization Group, Llc System and method for securitizing tangible assets in the alternative financial services industry
US7627515B2 (en) 2005-06-28 2009-12-01 Microsoft Corporation Price determination for items of low demand
US7788164B2 (en) * 2005-09-15 2010-08-31 Microsoft Corporation Truth revealing market equilibrium
US20070073608A1 (en) * 2005-09-23 2007-03-29 Garcia Crisostomo B Cash only marketplace system for trading securities
US7690990B2 (en) 2005-10-14 2010-04-06 Leviathan Entertainment, Llc Financial institutions and instruments in a virtual environment
US7677973B2 (en) 2005-10-14 2010-03-16 Leviathan Entertainment, Llc Securing virtual contracts with credit
US20070088661A1 (en) 2005-10-17 2007-04-19 Omx Technology Ab Real-time deal engagement outcome determination
US20070130040A1 (en) 2005-12-01 2007-06-07 Brent Stinski Method for selecting media products not widely known to the public at large for investment and development
US20070156594A1 (en) 2006-01-03 2007-07-05 Mcgucken Elliot System and method for allowing creators, artsists, and owners to protect and profit from content
US20070168268A1 (en) 2006-01-13 2007-07-19 Lange Jeffrey S Mortality put options and methods, systems, and products for providing same
US20090061995A1 (en) * 2006-02-07 2009-03-05 Jonathan Assia Method and system for representing financial information in a gaming environment
EP1984888A4 (en) 2006-02-07 2010-11-24 Tradonomi Ltd A method and system for representing financial information in a gaming environment
US20090062016A1 (en) * 2006-02-07 2009-03-05 Jonathan Assia Method and system for representing financial information in a gaming environment
US8696448B2 (en) 2006-02-14 2014-04-15 Leviathan Entertainment, Llc Management engine for contractual terms in a video game
US8103583B2 (en) * 2006-02-22 2012-01-24 Zvi Mowshowitz Computerized transaction method and system
US8070599B2 (en) 2006-03-03 2011-12-06 Leviathan Entertainment, Llc Apparatus and methods facilitating the use of financial transactions in a virtual environment
US20070255965A1 (en) 2006-04-15 2007-11-01 Elliot McGucken System and method for content marketplace, DRM marketplace, distribution marketplace, and search engine: the dodge city marketplace and search engine
CA2654727A1 (en) 2006-06-02 2007-12-13 G5 Enterprizes Pty Ltd Systems and methods for providing gaming activities
US20080026825A1 (en) * 2006-07-28 2008-01-31 Aruze Corp. Game medium processing device and gaming machine
JP2008035965A (en) * 2006-08-02 2008-02-21 Aruze Corp Gaming machine and method of play of gaming machine
US8364571B1 (en) 2006-08-18 2013-01-29 Cantor Entertainment Data, LP Method of and system for trading of synthetic assets
US20080088087A1 (en) 2006-10-17 2008-04-17 All In Gaming, L.L.C. Wager insurance for a No-Limit Texas Hold'Em poker game
US20080120221A1 (en) 2006-11-22 2008-05-22 Global Info Tech Services Pty Ltd Brokering Loyalty Points
US7974904B2 (en) 2007-01-31 2011-07-05 Paul Frischer Method of trading in real estate derivatives
US20080195459A1 (en) 2007-02-08 2008-08-14 Brent Stinski Method for evaluating media products for purposes of third-party association
US20080207297A1 (en) 2007-02-28 2008-08-28 Gregory Zilba Computer-based poker card game
US7451104B1 (en) 2007-06-27 2008-11-11 Lti Agency, Llc Method for funding an organization
US20090017905A1 (en) * 2007-07-10 2009-01-15 Network Ltd System and method for online pool wagering
JP4376283B2 (en) 2007-09-14 2009-12-02 株式会社コナミデジタルエンタテインメント GAME SYSTEM, GAME DEVICE COMPRISING THE SAME, AND OVERALL PRODUCTION PROCESSING DEVICE
US20090186689A1 (en) 2008-01-21 2009-07-23 Hughes John M Systems and methods for providing investment opportunities
US20090247286A1 (en) 2008-03-27 2009-10-01 Aruze Corp. Gaming machine sharing source of dividend for special game with other gaming machines and playing method thereof
US8342946B2 (en) 2008-10-24 2013-01-01 Bgc Partners, Inc. Computer graphics processing and display of selectable items
US8380602B2 (en) 2009-07-21 2013-02-19 Cfph, Llc Exchange for fractional interests and usage rights in a collection of assets

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6048269A (en) * 1993-01-22 2000-04-11 Mgm Grand, Inc. Coinless slot machine system and method
US20020151340A1 (en) * 2001-02-27 2002-10-17 Robert Guinn Remote sports wagering system
US20030144046A1 (en) * 2002-01-31 2003-07-31 Fujitsu Limited Totalizator terminal, winning horse picking method and program

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10586282B2 (en) 1996-03-25 2020-03-10 Cfph, Llc System and method for trading based on tournament-style events
US11043078B2 (en) 2003-03-31 2021-06-22 Cantor Index, Llc System and method for betting on a participant in a group of events
US9218720B2 (en) 2007-04-16 2015-12-22 Cfph, Llc Box office game
US10398983B2 (en) 2007-04-16 2019-09-03 Cfph, Llc Controlled gaming between registered and unregistered players
US11192030B2 (en) 2007-04-16 2021-12-07 Cfph, Llc Box office game
US20170200591A1 (en) * 2016-01-13 2017-07-13 Mks Instruments, Inc. Method and Apparatus for Deposition Cleaning in a Pumping Line

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20190318581A1 (en) 2019-10-17
US20210319667A1 (en) 2021-10-14
US8764558B2 (en) 2014-07-01
WO2004090681A3 (en) 2005-11-17
US11043078B2 (en) 2021-06-22
US8353763B2 (en) 2013-01-15
US11798375B2 (en) 2023-10-24
US20040193531A1 (en) 2004-09-30
US20130157755A1 (en) 2013-06-20
WO2004090681A2 (en) 2004-10-21
US10304292B2 (en) 2019-05-28

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US11798375B2 (en) System and method for betting on a participant in a group of events
US20200286334A1 (en) System and method for spread betting on a participant in a group of events
US11721170B2 (en) System and method for betting on-the-board or off-the-board in an event
US10489872B2 (en) System and method for betting on a subset of participants in an event
US20200126344A1 (en) System and method for betting on a subset of participants in an event according to multiple groups
US7311606B2 (en) System and method for betting on a subset of participants in an event wherein betting parameters may change over time
AU2022213716A1 (en) System and method for betting on a subset of participants in an event
AU2016203277A1 (en) System and method for betting on a subset of participants in an event
AU2014262267A1 (en) System and method for conducting a jackpot race event

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE MAILED -- APPLICATION RECEIVED IN OFFICE OF PUBLICATIONS

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: PUBLICATIONS -- ISSUE FEE PAYMENT VERIFIED

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

MAFP Maintenance fee payment

Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 4TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1551); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

Year of fee payment: 4