US20150082199A1 - Document viewing mechanism for document sharing environment - Google Patents
Document viewing mechanism for document sharing environment Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20150082199A1 US20150082199A1 US14/262,542 US201414262542A US2015082199A1 US 20150082199 A1 US20150082199 A1 US 20150082199A1 US 201414262542 A US201414262542 A US 201414262542A US 2015082199 A1 US2015082199 A1 US 2015082199A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- window
- computing device
- area
- application
- shared window
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F9/00—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units
- G06F9/06—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units using stored programs, i.e. using an internal store of processing equipment to receive or retain programs
- G06F9/44—Arrangements for executing specific programs
- G06F9/451—Execution arrangements for user interfaces
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L12/00—Data switching networks
- H04L12/02—Details
- H04L12/16—Arrangements for providing special services to substations
- H04L12/18—Arrangements for providing special services to substations for broadcast or conference, e.g. multicast
- H04L12/1813—Arrangements for providing special services to substations for broadcast or conference, e.g. multicast for computer conferences, e.g. chat rooms
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F3/00—Input arrangements for transferring data to be processed into a form capable of being handled by the computer; Output arrangements for transferring data from processing unit to output unit, e.g. interface arrangements
- G06F3/01—Input arrangements or combined input and output arrangements for interaction between user and computer
- G06F3/048—Interaction techniques based on graphical user interfaces [GUI]
- G06F3/0481—Interaction techniques based on graphical user interfaces [GUI] based on specific properties of the displayed interaction object or a metaphor-based environment, e.g. interaction with desktop elements like windows or icons, or assisted by a cursor's changing behaviour or appearance
- G06F3/0482—Interaction with lists of selectable items, e.g. menus
Definitions
- This invention relates generally to the technology of application sharing and, more particularly, relates to a system and method for improving a viewer's experience during application sharing.
- the display of such artifacts consumes valuable viewer area, wherein useful data could be displayed.
- the shared window or information is scaled for presentation on the viewer display, so that the entire shared area fits within an application sharing window. In many cases, this requires that the shared display be scaled down to a lower resolution on the viewer's display than it has On the sharer's display. This reduction sometimes results in a document area that is difficult for the viewer to read or discern.
- a new system and method are needed whereby sharing of window information during application sharing can be executed efficiently without unnecessarily imputing the quality of the viewer display.
- a novel system and method are described for constructing a display of shared information and for displaying shared information, so that application artifacts that are of no use to the viewer are not displayed to the viewer, and so that a maximum available portion of a viewing area can be used to display document content rather than such artifacts.
- a viewer-activated document view mode allows the viewer to limit the display of shared windows to the document content of such windows, omitting toolbars, menus and other artifacts that convey no information to the viewer and that are not usable by the viewer.
- the viewer display is modified to show one or more application artifacts when a portion of one or more such artifacts intersects an application sharing view area on the viewer display.
- FIG. 1 is a block diagram generally illustrating an exemplary computer system usable in an implementation of an embodiment of the invention
- FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram showing the architecture of a network system within which an embodiment of the invention may be implemented, including multiple computers comprising a sharer computer and viewer computers;
- FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram illustrating in greater detail the placement and function of an application sharing program in an embodiment of the invention with respect to a sharer computer and a viewer computer;
- FIG. 4A is a simplified viewer screen representation showing a sharer display of a shared window including application artifact information such as a toolbar;
- FIG. 4B is a simplified viewer screen representation showing a sharer display of a shared window omitting application artifact information such as a toolbar;
- FIG. 5 depicts simplified screen representations showing exemplary viewer displays before and after a sharing user performs an action at the sharing computer that creates a shared window that is at least partially contained in the document content area of the shared window;
- FIG. 6 is a flow chart illustrating a process for identifying a document view sub-window according to an embodiment of the invention.
- FIG. 7 is a flow chart illustrating a process for constructing a display of a shared window at the viewing machine upon receipt of window data from the sharing machine according to an embodiment of the invention.
- program modules include routines, programs, objects, components, data structures, etc, that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types.
- program modules include routines, programs, objects, components, data structures, etc, that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types.
- program modules may be practiced with other computer system configurations, including hand-held devices, multi-processor systems, microprocessor based or programmable consumer electronics, network PCs, minicomputers, mainframe computers, and the like.
- the invention is primarily for use in a networked environment and may further be practiced in distributed computing environments where tasks are performed by remote processing device that are linked through a communications network.
- program modules may be located in both local and remote memory storage devices.
- FIG. 1 illustrates an example of a suitable computing system environment 100 usable in an implementation of the invention.
- the computing system environment 100 is only one example of a suitable computing environment and is not intended to suggest any limitation as to the scope of use or functionality of the invention. Neither should the computing environment 100 be interpreted as having airy dependency or requirement relating to any one or combination of components illustrated in the exemplary operating environment 100 .
- the invention is operational with numerous other general purpose or special purpose computing system environments or configurations.
- Examples of well known computing systems, environments, and/or configurations that are suitable for use with the invention include, but are not limited to, personal computers, server computers, hand-held or laptop devices, multiprocessor systems, microprocessor-based systems, set top boxes, programmable consumer electronics, network PCs, minicomputers, mainframe computers, distributed computing environments that include any of the above systems or devices, and the like.
- An exemplary system for implementing the invention includes a general-purpose computing device in the form of a computer 110 .
- Components of the computer 110 generally include, but are not limited to, a processing unit 120 , a system memory 130 , and a system bus 121 that couples various system components including the system memory to the processing unit 120 .
- the system bus 121 may be any of several types of bus structures including a memory bus or memory controller, a peripheral bus, and a local bus using any of a variety of bus architectures.
- such architectures include Industry Standard Architecture (ISA) bus, Micro Channel Architecture (MCA) bus, Enhanced ISA (EISA) bus, Video Electronics Standards Associate (VESA) local bus, and Peripheral Component Interconnect (PCI) bus also known as Mezzanine bus.
- ISA Industry Standard Architecture
- MCA Micro Channel Architecture
- EISA Enhanced ISA
- VESA Video Electronics Standards Associate
- PCI Peripheral Component Interconnect
- Computer 110 typically includes a variety of computer readable media.
- Computer readable media can be any available media that can be accessed by computer 110 and includes both volatile and nonvolatile media, removable and non-removable media
- Computer readable media may comprise computer storage media and communication media.
- Computer storage media includes volatile and nonvolatile, removable and non removable media implemented in any method or technology for storage of intonation such as computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules or other data.
- Computer storage media includes, but is not limited to, RAM, ROM, EEPROM, flash memory or other memory technology, CD-ROM, digital versatile disks (DVD) or other optical disk storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium which can be used to store the desired information and which can be accessed by computer 110 .
- Communication media typically embodies computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules or other data in a modulated data signal such as a carrier wave or other transport mechanism and includes any information delivery media.
- modulated data signal means a signal that has one or more of its characteristics (such as, for example, voltage or current level, voltage or current pulse existence or nonexistence, voltage or current pulse width, voltage or current pulse spacing, etc.) set or changed in such a manner as to encode information in the signal.
- communication media includes wired media such as a wired network or direct-wired connection, and wireless media such as acoustic, RF, infrared and other wireless media, Combinations of any of the above are also included within e scope of computer readable media.
- the system memory 130 includes computer storage media in the form of volatile and/or nonvolatile memory such as read only memory (ROM) 131 and random access memory (RAM) 131 .
- ROM read only memory
- RAM random access memory
- RAM 132 typically contains data and/or program modules that are immediately accessible to and/or presently being operated on by processing unit 120 .
- FIG. 1 illustrates RAM 132 as containing operating system 134 , application programs 135 , other program modules 136 , and program data 137 .
- the computer 110 may also include other removable/non-removable, volatile/nonvolatile computer storage media.
- FIG. 1 illustrates a hard disk drive 141 that roads from or writes to non-removable, nonvolatile magnetic media, a magnetic disk drive 151 that reads from or writes to a removable. nonvolatile magnetic disk 152 , and an optical disk drive 155 that reads from or writes to a removable, nonvolatile optical disk 156 such as a CD-ROM or other optical media.
- removable/non-removable, volatile/nonvolatile computer storage media that can be used in the exemplary operating environment include, but are not limited to, magnetic tape cassettes, flash memory cards, digital versatile disks, digital video tape, solid state RAM, solid state ROM, and the like.
- the hard disk drive 141 is typically connected to the system bus 121 through a non-removable memory interface such as interface 140
- magnetic disk drive 151 and optical disk drive 155 are typically connected to the system bus 121 by a removable memory interface, such as interface 150 .
- the drives and their associated computer storage media provide storage of computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules and other data for the computer 110 .
- hard disk drive 141 is illustrated a storing operating system 144 , application programs 145 , other program modules 146 , and program data 147 .
- operating system 144 application programs 145 , other program modules 146 , and program data 147 are given different numbers herein to illustrate that at a minimum, they are different copies.
- a user may enter commands and information into the computer 110 through input devices such as a keyboard 162 , pointing device 161 (commonly referred to as a mouse), and trackball or touch pad.
- Other input devices may include a microphone, joystick, game pad, satellite dish, scanner, or the like.
- a monitor 191 or other type of display device is also connected to the system bus 121 via an interface, such as a video interface 190 .
- computers may also include other peripheral output devices such as speakers 197 and printer 196 , which may be connected through an output peripheral interface 195 .
- the computer 110 operates in a networked environment using logical connections to one or more remote computers, such as a remote computer 180 .
- the remote computer 180 may be a personal computer, a router, a network PC, a peer device or other common network node, and in any case the remote computer or computers typically include any or all of the elements described above relative to the personal computer 110 , although only a memory storage device 181 has been illustrated in FIG. 1 .
- the logical connections depicted in FIG. 1 include a local area network (LAN) 171 and a wide area network (WAN) 173 , but the computer 110 may additionally or alternatively use one or more other networking environments. Networking environments of all types are commonplace in offices, enterprise-wide computer networks, intranets and the Internet.
- the computer 110 should include facilities for accessing the networks to which it is attachable.
- the personal computer 110 when used in a LAN networking environment, the personal computer 110 is connected to the LAN 171 through a network interface or adapter 170 , Another node on the LAN, such as a proxy server, may be further connected to a WAN such as the Internet.
- the computer 110 When used in a WAN networking environment, the computer 110 typically includes a modem 172 or other means for establishing communications directly or indirectly over the WAN 173 , such as the Internet.
- the modem 172 which may be internal or external, may be connected to the system bus 121 via the user input interface 160 , or other appropriate mechanism.
- FIG. 1 illustrates remote application programs 185 as residing on memory device 181 .
- the network connections shown are exemplary and other means of establishing a communications link between the computers may be used. It is not intended to limit the invention to use in a hard-wired network environment, since it may also be used in transiently connected environments, such as for example a wholly or partially wireless network environment interconnected wholly or partially via optical, infrared, and/or radio frequency wireless connections.
- FIG. 2 illustrates schematically a networking environment in which the present invention in preferably implemented.
- the architecture of such a system comprises one or more viewer computers illustrated as computers 201 , 203 , and 205 , connected to a sharer computer 207 via a network 209
- Each computer 201 , 203 , 205 , 207 is connected or connectable to the network 209 and hence to the others of computers 201 , 203 , 205 , 207 via network connections 211 , 213 , 215 , and 217 .
- the network connections 211 , 213 , 215 , 217 and computers 201 , 203 , 205 , 207 may be as discussed above more generally with respect to FIG. 1 .
- the network may be of any type, including, for example, a LAN, such as found in an office, university or other setting, a WAN such as the Internet, a MAN, or any other tangible or intangible, fixed or transient mechanism for computer interconnectivity. While higher data transfer rates are generally preferable to lower data transfer rates, them is no limit or requirement as to the speed of the network 209 .
- the network 209 may be a single network, or alternatively may be comprised of multiple networks of the same or different types and/or speeds. It will be understood that in many but not all cases, the network will further comprise routers, servers, and/or other computing devices in addition to the endpoint devices 201 , 203 , 205 , 207 involved in the collaborative effort.
- FIG. 3 Specific exemplary architectures of the sharer computer 207 and a viewer computer 201 are illustrated in greater detail schematically in FIG. 3 . It will be understood that although only one viewer computer is illustrated in FIG. 3 , there can be more than one such computer in an implementation of the invention, as illustrated by way of FIG. 2 .
- Sharer computer 307 is illustrated as being connected via networking connection 319 to viewer computer 301 .
- network connection 319 can include some or all of the network types and network connections discussed above, as well as other network types and connections alternatively or additionally.
- One or more user mode processes of interest 321 are running on sharer computer 307 .
- Such processes include processes, such as a program, from which information is being shared to one or more viewers such as at viewer computer 301 .
- the processes of interest 321 will be referred to hereinafter as shared processes, with the understanding that the information generated by the processes 321 need not be shared completely. That is, the information shared may consist of only a subset of the information generated by such a process 321 for display.
- Many shared processes can also be used in a non-shared manner. For example, a word processing program may be used by the sharer for non collaborative document production, and may then be used in a shared manner for group editing of the same or another document.
- the processes 321 and the operating system of the sharer computer 307 perform certain steps. For example, whether or not the process 321 is shared, the output of the process 321 will still generally be output to the graphics display driver of the sharer computer 307 .
- the application sharing program 323 If the application sharing program 323 is active, such as during a sharing session, that other processes unique to the collaborative setting also take place.
- the application sharing program 323 which is communicably linked to the process 321 , receives information from the process 321 and transfers information to the process 321 .
- the bidirectional flow of information between the process 321 and application sharing program is illustrated as being bi-directional, note that the mechanisms for transfer may vary depending upon direction of transfer.
- the process 321 need not even be aware of the presence or operation of the application sharing program 323 for the application sharing program 323 to receive information from the process 321 .
- the application sharing program 323 is communicably linked to an interceptor filter placed in the display path for the process 321 .
- a filter may be placed just before the graphics device interface (GDI) or similar interface in such a manner as to read, in a non-intrusive manner, all information sent to the screen of computer 307 by a shared process.
- GDI graphics device interface
- the WINDOWS operating system produced by MICROSOFT Corporation of Redmond, Wash.
- when an application wants to display an object it calls a GDI function and sends the various parameters for the object.
- the GDI sends commands to the screen to cause it to actually paint the object.
- the mechanism for transferring information from the application sharing program 323 to the process 321 need not involve the display path at all, and may instead involve a direct transfer of information.
- the application sharing program 323 is also communicably linked to the networking facilities 325 of the sharer computer 307 .
- Such facilities 325 may include any networking communications stack or other protocol arrangement as well as the hardware required for accessing the network connection 319 , as discussed above with respect to FIG. 1 .
- a counterpart application sharing program 327 running on the viewer computer 307 is communicably linked to the sharer computer 307 via the network connection 319 and the networking facilities 329 of the viewer computer
- the networking facilities 329 may be similar to the networking facilities 325 of the sharer computer.
- the counterpart application sharing program 327 receives input from shared process 321 via the network connection 319 and also potentially from a user of the viewer computer 301 , via one or more input channels 331 , such as a keyboard, mouse, etc. as discussed above with respect to FIG. 1 . Additionally, the counterpart application sharing program 327 outputs material for display to a display process 333 such as a GDI or similar interface, or other display process. Note that the sharing computer 307 also preferably includes input channels 335 such as those described above for receiving user input, some of which may be directed to and received by the process of interest 321 .
- the communication between the sharer computer 307 and the viewer computer 301 over the network connection 319 during application sharing may comprise a screen data stream, an input data stream, and an application data stream.
- the screen data stream represents or is associated with the display on the screen or display of the sharer computer 307 , allowing the viewer computer 301 to reconstruct a bitmap representation of the shared window on its own associated display.
- the input data stream contains information regarding an interaction at the sharer or viewer of a user with an input device such as those described above with respect to FIG. 1 .
- the application data stream contains data that allows the viewer to associate portions of the bitmap provided in the screen data stream with applications and/or windows produced by applications.
- the beneficial functionality at the viewer machine 301 described herein may be facilitated via information placed into the application data stream by the application sharing program 323 at the sharer machine 307 .
- the application data stream contains information about the shared windows as well as information about unshared windows that are relevant to the shared area, such as because of overlap with a shared window. For each window of concern, the application data stream contains information regarding the window's shape, size, and border position. From this information, the application sharing program at the viewing machine can determine what portions of the bitmap representation of the sharing machine's desktop should be shown at the viewer. The area shown is termed the “shared region.” The application data stream is further used by the application sharing program at the viewing machine to determine which portions of the sharer desktop should not be shown at the viewer.
- obscurable regions Such portions are termed “obscurable regions” or “obscured regions.”
- a region within the shared region corresponding to document content in a shared window is termed a “document view region” on the viewer display corresponding to a “document sub-window” at the sharer display.
- the calculation of a document view region in the shared window is based on an identification of the document sub-window of the currently viewed top-level window of the relevant shared application. Although the regions will often be identical in content, there are situations where other shared windows hosted by the relevant application are added to the document view region as will be discussed below.
- any one of a number of methods may be used to indicate that a shared window contains a document sub-window.
- an internal table may be maintained for associating window classes with document sub-windows.
- the application sharing program can share the top-level window and place a document view mark on the window indicating the presence of the sub-window.
- an API provided by the application sharing program object manager can be called with a sub-window in order to share the top-level window and place a document view mark on the window indicating the presence of the sub-windows
- a third party application can mark its own windows with a global atom to identify the presence and sharing of a sub-window.
- the application should use s recognized document view indicator, such as an atom name, and should use the appropriate operating system interaction mechanisms, such as Win32 APIs if the operating system is the WINDOWS brand operating system produced by MICROSOFT Corporation of Redmond, Wash.
- s recognized document view indicator such as an atom name
- operating system interaction mechanisms such as Win32 APIs if the operating system is the WINDOWS brand operating system produced by MICROSOFT Corporation of Redmond, Wash.
- the application sliming program determines a hounding rectangle, such as by intersecting a document view sub-window with its ancestors.
- the sub-window bounding rectangle is then used to determine f any other top-level windows intersect the document view region. If a top-level window intersects the region but is not the parent of the document view sub-window, then the hounding rectangle is made to include that top-level window.
- a shared window is displayed on the viewing machine 301 omitting certain application artifacts that are displayed on the sharer machine 30
- Such artifacts include menus, toolbars, etc that are displayed at the sharer machine by the shared application to allow the sharing user to affect operation of a shared application.
- the document view mode discussed herein can preferably be automatically engaged or disengaged, and is preferably also engageable and disengageable by a user of the viewing computer.
- FIG. 4A is a simplified screen display representation of a shared application window on the sharer display. It can be seen that shared window 401 in display 403 has a document content area 405 and one or more application artifact was 407 . It will be understood that references herein to an application artifact area in the singular sense includes the case where the application artifact area is dispensed in two or more non-contiguous areas such as illustrated in FIG. 4A , as well as the case where the application artifact area is localized in one contiguous area.
- the four arcuate shapes illustrated within the document content area 405 and other regions in the figures are intended to represent any appropriate user-created document content such as text, drawing, etc.
- FIG. 4B is a simplified screen display representation of the shared application window of FIG. 4A on a viewer display.
- the viewer display area 411 contains a representation 413 of the shared window. It can be seen that the viewer representation 413 of the shared window does not contain the application artifact areas 407 shown in FIG. 4A . Rather, the entire application sharing display area 417 is substantiality filled with data 415 corresponding to the document content area 405 of the corresponding shared window on the sharer display. In this manner, the application sharing display area 417 is efficiently utilized to only display that information which it is important for the viewer to see. Thus, the size of fonts and other elements shown within the application sharing display area 417 may be larger than they would be if the user were to be presented with the entire contents of the shared window 403 .
- the transformation of the viewer display of the shared window as described above will even result in a magnification of the document content, while existing systems that do not transform the display would require at least minimal shrinkage of the document content.
- Such can occur when the application sharing display area 417 is smaller than the shared window 403 but larger than the document content area 405 of the shared window 403 .
- the application sharing program at the viewing machine preferably automatically shills from a mode in which the shared window is transformed as described above to a mode Where the shared window is not transformed and thus displays all or some application artifacts, in an application artifact area.
- the first such case is when the sharing user performs an action at the sharing computer that creates a child shared window that is partially contained in the document content and application artifact areas of the shared window 403 .
- FIG. 5 Exemplary viewer displays before and after such an action are illustrated in FIG. 5 .
- display 501 corresponds to the shared window as displayed at the viewing machine before an additional shared window that overlaps the document content area at the sharing machine is created.
- the display 502 of the shared window corresponds to that of FIG. 4B , and contains only document content 503 and does not contain an area corresponding to an application artifact area such as areas 407 in FIG. 4A .
- the viewer display of the shared window transforms to one such as that shown at display 505 .
- such an action may be the activation of a toolbar item to create a drop-down menu 513 .
- a shared window such as the drop down window list 513 partially overlaps the document content area 405 and the application artifact area at the sharing computer, the mode of the application sharing program at the viewing computer is switched such that the viewer display 504 of the shared window no longer omits application artifact areas, and hence does not omit any portion of the new window.
- the shared window 504 as displayed in display 505 contains a document content area 507 as well as an application artifact area 509 corresponding to associated areas in the sharing machine display of the shared window.
- the viewer display scale of the shared window 506 is adjusted as shown in display 511 so that the entirety of the new window 508 is shown without clipping.
- the relative displayed sizes of the shared window 506 and the new window 508 may be diminished so that the entirety of the child image is displayed within the application sharing area 510 .
- the second case wherein the mode of the application sharing program at the viewing computer is switched to display application artifact areas is when such area become usable by the viewing user.
- the viewing user is preferably able to access and activate toolbar items and to make selections of options displayed by icon or otherwise in the application artifact area.
- the viewing user is preferably able to manually deactivate the document view mode so that the viewing computer display always shows the entire shared window including application artifact areas. This mode may be useful when the application artifacts are not usable by the viewing user but are nonetheless important to the viewing user, such as when a sharing user is showing a viewing user how to use an application.
- FIG. 6 illustrates a flow chart for a process of identifying a document view sub- window.
- the process is preferably executed by the application sharing program naming on the sharing machine, although such is not required to be the case.
- the program determines whether a particular top level shared window is marked, such as by a global atom, as containing a document view sub-window. If the window is not so marked, then in step 601 , the program determines whether the window class corresponding to the window under analysis is found in a window class table.
- the window class table associates known window classes with their sub-window classes, and is preferably pre-populated such as prior to distribution of the application sharing program, but may be alternatively populated through use by the application sharing program, or may be populated or augmented by a third party.
- step 603 If at step 603 it is determined that the window class corresponding to the window under analysis is not in the window class table, then the process terminates for that window at node 605 having determined that no identifiable document view sub-window exists in the window under analysis. It instead at step 603 it is determined that the window class corresponding to the window under analysis is in the window class table, then the process flows to step 607 where, having identified the class of the relevant one or more document sub-windows, the program searches for the top-most document view sub window associated with the window under analysis.
- step 609 the program determines whether a document view sub-window was identified in step 607 . If such a document view sub-window has been identified, then the process flows to step 611 , where the mark on the sub-window is updated to indicate that the identified sub-window is the top-most document view sub-window for the associated application. Finally, the process terminates at step 613 , where the identified and marked document view sub-window is utilized to facilitate construction of the viewer display of the shared window.
- step 609 it is instead determined at step 609 that a document view sub-window was not identifiable in step 607 , then the process terminates at node 605 , having determined that no identifiable document view sub-window exists in the window under analysis
- the document window mark can be added to a shared window by the application that is shared, and in this case the application need not fill or modify the class table.
- step 601 it was determined that the top level shared window under analysis is marked as containing a document view sub-window, then the process flows to step 615 , where the document view sub-window is extruded according to the mark.
- step 617 the application sharing program determines whether the extracted document view sub-window is still valid. For example, if the sub-window was dosed after the parent window was marked, then the sub-window may be considered invalid. If it is determined at step 617 that the extracted document view sub-window is no longer valid, then the process continues to step 603 and the steps that logically follow thereafter. If instead it is determined at step 617 that the extracted document view sub window is still valid, then the process moves to step 619 .
- step 619 the program determines whether the identified sub-window is still top-most of the document sub-windows associated with the same parent window. If at step 619 it is determined that the identified sub-window is still top-most, then the process terminates at node 613 . If instead it is determined that the identified sub-window is not still top-most, then the process flows to step 621 where the program locates the top-most document view sub-window associated with the parent window under analysis and updates the mark thereon. Subsequently, the process terminates at node 613 . Note that a document view sub-window can become invalid by loosing activation.
- the flow chart of FIG. 7 illustrates a process by which a display of the shared window is constructed at the viewing machine upon receipt of a list of window data from the sharing machine. Note that the process of FIG. 7 processes window data to operate on five regions: a Shared region, an Obscured region, a DVShared region, a DVObscured region, and a DVSwitch region.
- the process of FIG. 7 is described in the context of the application sharing program at the viewing machine, although the processing may alternatively be executed at another location and/or through another component.
- the application sharing program at the viewing machine initializes each aforementioned region to zero content.
- the program selects for analysis a window from the received list of windows.
- the window data will be listed in the list of windows in reverse order, and the application sharing program at the viewing machine will select windows from the list in order. Accordingly, the first window analyzed is preferably but not necessarily the lowest z-order window.
- the program determines whether the current window is shared, 11 it is determined at step 705 that the current window is shared, then at step 707 it is determined whether the current window contains an identified document view sub-window, or intersects the current DVShared region.
- step 707 it is determined that the current window contains an identified document view sub-window or intersects the current DVShared region. If it is determined that the current window intersects any shared region not in the DVShared region, then the process flows to step 711 , where the current window is added to the DVSwitch region. Subsequently at step 713 , the DV rectangle of the current window, if any, is added to the DVShared region. Note that if at step 709 it is determined that the current window does not intersect a shared region not in the DVShared region, then the process flows directly to step 713 .
- step 715 the DV rectangle is subtracted from the DVObscured region.
- step 717 the process executes step 717 , wherein the cumin window is added to the shared region. Note that if it is determined at step 707 that the current window does not contain an identified document view sub-window or intersect the current DVShared region, the process proceeds directly to step 717 . After executing step 717 , the process flows to step 719 , where the region of the current rectangle is subtracted from the DVObscured region. If it is determined at step 720 that there are more windows from the received list of windows to be analyzed, then the process returns to step 705 .
- step 721 the program determines whether the DVSwitch region is a null region and the DVShared region is not a null region. If it is determined that the DVSwitch region is a null region and the DVShared region is not a null region, then at step 723 , the program clips the currently shared view content using the DVShared and DVObscured regions. Otherwise, at step 725 the program clips the currently shared view content using the Shared and Obscured regions.
- step 705 If at step 705 it is instead determined that the current window is not shared, then at step 706 , the intersection of the current window's region and the Shared region is determined and stored. This information may be stored as a temporary region variable. Subsequently, at step 708 , the determined intersection region is added to the Obscured region, and the process flows to step 710 . At step 710 , the determined intersection region is subtracted from the Shared region, and the process flows to step 712 , wherein the determined intersection region is subtracted from the DVSwitch region. Subsequently, at step 714 , the determined intersection region is clipped via intersection with the DVShared region. That is, the intersection of the determined intersection region and the DVShared region is subtracted from the determined intersection region.
- step 716 the determined intersection region is subtracted from the DVShared region, after which the determined intersection, region is added to the DVObscured region at step 718 . From 718 , the process flows to step 720 and the steps that logically follow thereafter.
- the process of generating a document view display rather than showing all application artifacts in the shared window is preferably user settable and thus may be turned off.
- the process described by way of FIG. 7 would not need to be executed, and the visible portions of the shared window would appear the same, other than perhaps in scale, on both the sharing machine and in the viewing machine representation.
- Network connections are illustrated herein as lines, no limitation should thereby be imparted to the invention.
- Network connections may be circuit-switched, packet-switched, or otherwise, and may be transient or permanent, hard-wired or wireless, operating via any suitable protocol.
- embodiments of the invention have been described largely by reference to a sharing program that is separate from the shared process, the sharing program may not be a stand-alone program, hut may instead be an integral part of the shared process itself, or may be a DLL or other in-process entity.
- step orders and process parameters may be varied without departing from the scope of the invention.
- the examples herein often refer to a sharer and a viewer computer, any number of such sharers and viewers may be involved, and a viewer may become a sharer and a sharer may become a viewer without limitation.
- the foregoing description gives a number of examples wherein one or more windows are processed no limitation to windows is intended. That is, other types of graphical display objects may also be involved in the aforementioned processes and system, so long as they can be separated into a content area and an application artifact area. Such other graphical objects include but are not limited to non-rectilinear objects rendered on the sharer display.
- references herein to application sharing are not meant to require that all windows or material displayed on a sharer display and associated with a particular application are shared or unshared. Rather, one or more windows associated with an application running on the sharer machine are preferably sharable without requiring the sharing of all windows associated with that instance of that application.
- steps employed to construct the viewer display are discussed herein with reference to the application sharing program of the sharing computer or the viewing computer, such steps may alternatively be executed in whole or in part at a device other than that swilled in the foregoing discussion of examples.
Abstract
Description
- This invention relates generally to the technology of application sharing and, more particularly, relates to a system and method for improving a viewer's experience during application sharing.
- As computers and computer networks become more pervasive in the home and workplace, many established methods for performing everyday tasks are being replaced or streamlined through the use of computer networking technology. For example, employees are increasingly able to have a virtual presence in their workplace by logging into a computer network maintained by their employer. Perhaps the most striking development in computer networking technology today has been the advent of remote collaboration.
- One of the oldest forms of processing data is the meeting or conference, whereby multiple individuals focus their attention on common subject matter to arrive at a joint decision, consensus, or product. Increasingly, such meetings are now taking place virtually over computer networks through the use of application sharing technologies. Such technologies enable a sharing user to share an application with various viewing users. The display produced by the application running on the sharers computer is made available via a computer network to the viewers' computers. In some cases, the sharer may pass control of the application to a viewer, whereby that viewer's control inputs are then communicated back to the sharer's computer, where the actions associated with the inputs are executed, and the resulting changed display is shared back out to all viewers.
- Although application sharing has many clear benefits and can play a critical role in maintaining or increasing productivity and cooperation, current application shading systems sometimes create a less than ideal user experience. For instance, the viewer display properties often are not optimized to suit the purposes of the sharer and viewer in sharing information. An example of this inefficiency appears in the way in which a particular window may be shared. Current systems generally display the shared window as it appears on the sharer's display, without accounting for the fact that only a subset of the window information is useful to the viewer. For example, when the viewer is not controlling a shared application, it is inefficient to display tool bars, menus and other application artifacts to the viewer who by definition =not activate them at that time
- In addition, the display of such artifacts consumes valuable viewer area, wherein useful data could be displayed. Often, the shared window or information is scaled for presentation on the viewer display, so that the entire shared area fits within an application sharing window. In many cases, this requires that the shared display be scaled down to a lower resolution on the viewer's display than it has On the sharer's display. This reduction sometimes results in a document area that is difficult for the viewer to read or discern.
- A new system and method are needed whereby sharing of window information during application sharing can be executed efficiently without unnecessarily imputing the quality of the viewer display.
- A novel system and method are described for constructing a display of shared information and for displaying shared information, so that application artifacts that are of no use to the viewer are not displayed to the viewer, and so that a maximum available portion of a viewing area can be used to display document content rather than such artifacts.
- In an embodiment, a viewer-activated document view mode allows the viewer to limit the display of shared windows to the document content of such windows, omitting toolbars, menus and other artifacts that convey no information to the viewer and that are not usable by the viewer.
- In a further embodiment of the invention, the viewer display is modified to show one or more application artifacts when a portion of one or more such artifacts intersects an application sharing view area on the viewer display.
- While the claims set forth features of the present invention with particularity, the invention, together with its objects and advantages, may be best understood from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings of which:
-
FIG. 1 is a block diagram generally illustrating an exemplary computer system usable in an implementation of an embodiment of the invention; -
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram showing the architecture of a network system within which an embodiment of the invention may be implemented, including multiple computers comprising a sharer computer and viewer computers; -
FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram illustrating in greater detail the placement and function of an application sharing program in an embodiment of the invention with respect to a sharer computer and a viewer computer; -
FIG. 4A is a simplified viewer screen representation showing a sharer display of a shared window including application artifact information such as a toolbar; -
FIG. 4B is a simplified viewer screen representation showing a sharer display of a shared window omitting application artifact information such as a toolbar; -
FIG. 5 depicts simplified screen representations showing exemplary viewer displays before and after a sharing user performs an action at the sharing computer that creates a shared window that is at least partially contained in the document content area of the shared window; -
FIG. 6 is a flow chart illustrating a process for identifying a document view sub-window according to an embodiment of the invention; and -
FIG. 7 is a flow chart illustrating a process for constructing a display of a shared window at the viewing machine upon receipt of window data from the sharing machine according to an embodiment of the invention. - Turning to the drawings, wherein like reference numerals refer to like elements, the invention is illustrated as being implemented in a suitable computing environment Although not required, the invention will be described in the general context of computer executable instructions, such as program modules, being executed by a personal computer. Generally, program modules include routines, programs, objects, components, data structures, etc, that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types. Moreover, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the invention may be practiced with other computer system configurations, including hand-held devices, multi-processor systems, microprocessor based or programmable consumer electronics, network PCs, minicomputers, mainframe computers, and the like. The invention is primarily for use in a networked environment and may further be practiced in distributed computing environments where tasks are performed by remote processing device that are linked through a communications network. In a distributed computing environment, program modules may be located in both local and remote memory storage devices.
-
FIG. 1 illustrates an example of a suitablecomputing system environment 100 usable in an implementation of the invention. Thecomputing system environment 100 is only one example of a suitable computing environment and is not intended to suggest any limitation as to the scope of use or functionality of the invention. Neither should thecomputing environment 100 be interpreted as having airy dependency or requirement relating to any one or combination of components illustrated in theexemplary operating environment 100. - The invention is operational with numerous other general purpose or special purpose computing system environments or configurations. Examples of well known computing systems, environments, and/or configurations that are suitable for use with the invention include, but are not limited to, personal computers, server computers, hand-held or laptop devices, multiprocessor systems, microprocessor-based systems, set top boxes, programmable consumer electronics, network PCs, minicomputers, mainframe computers, distributed computing environments that include any of the above systems or devices, and the like.
- An exemplary system for implementing the invention includes a general-purpose computing device in the form of a
computer 110. Components of thecomputer 110 generally include, but are not limited to, aprocessing unit 120, asystem memory 130, and asystem bus 121 that couples various system components including the system memory to theprocessing unit 120. Thesystem bus 121 may be any of several types of bus structures including a memory bus or memory controller, a peripheral bus, and a local bus using any of a variety of bus architectures. By way of example only, and not limitation, such architectures include Industry Standard Architecture (ISA) bus, Micro Channel Architecture (MCA) bus, Enhanced ISA (EISA) bus, Video Electronics Standards Associate (VESA) local bus, and Peripheral Component Interconnect (PCI) bus also known as Mezzanine bus. -
Computer 110 typically includes a variety of computer readable media. Computer readable media can be any available media that can be accessed bycomputer 110 and includes both volatile and nonvolatile media, removable and non-removable media By way of example only and not limitation, computer readable media may comprise computer storage media and communication media. - Computer storage media includes volatile and nonvolatile, removable and non removable media implemented in any method or technology for storage of intonation such as computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules or other data. Computer storage media includes, but is not limited to, RAM, ROM, EEPROM, flash memory or other memory technology, CD-ROM, digital versatile disks (DVD) or other optical disk storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium which can be used to store the desired information and which can be accessed by
computer 110. - Communication media typically embodies computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules or other data in a modulated data signal such as a carrier wave or other transport mechanism and includes any information delivery media. The term “modulated data signal” means a signal that has one or more of its characteristics (such as, for example, voltage or current level, voltage or current pulse existence or nonexistence, voltage or current pulse width, voltage or current pulse spacing, etc.) set or changed in such a manner as to encode information in the signal. By way of example, and not limitation, communication media includes wired media such as a wired network or direct-wired connection, and wireless media such as acoustic, RF, infrared and other wireless media, Combinations of any of the above are also included within e scope of computer readable media.
- The
system memory 130 includes computer storage media in the form of volatile and/or nonvolatile memory such as read only memory (ROM) 131 and random access memory (RAM) 131. A basic input/output system 133 (BIOS), containing the basic routines that help to transfer information between elements withincomputer 110, such as during start-up, is typically stored inROM 131,RAM 132 typically contains data and/or program modules that are immediately accessible to and/or presently being operated on byprocessing unit 120. By way of example, and not limitation,FIG. 1 illustratesRAM 132 as containingoperating system 134, application programs 135,other program modules 136, andprogram data 137. - The
computer 110 may also include other removable/non-removable, volatile/nonvolatile computer storage media. By way of example only,FIG. 1 illustrates a hard disk drive 141 that roads from or writes to non-removable, nonvolatile magnetic media, a magnetic disk drive 151 that reads from or writes to a removable. nonvolatilemagnetic disk 152, and anoptical disk drive 155 that reads from or writes to a removable, nonvolatile optical disk 156 such as a CD-ROM or other optical media. Other removable/non-removable, volatile/nonvolatile computer storage media that can be used in the exemplary operating environment include, but are not limited to, magnetic tape cassettes, flash memory cards, digital versatile disks, digital video tape, solid state RAM, solid state ROM, and the like. The hard disk drive 141 is typically connected to thesystem bus 121 through a non-removable memory interface such asinterface 140, and magnetic disk drive 151 andoptical disk drive 155 are typically connected to thesystem bus 121 by a removable memory interface, such asinterface 150. - The drives and their associated computer storage media, disused above and illustrated in
FIG. 1 , provide storage of computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules and other data for thecomputer 110. InFIG. 1 , for example, hard disk drive 141 is illustrated a storingoperating system 144,application programs 145,other program modules 146, andprogram data 147. Note that these components can either be the same as or different fromoperating system 134, application programs 135,other program modules 136, andprogram data 137.Operating system 144,application programs 145,other program modules 146, andprogram data 147 are given different numbers herein to illustrate that at a minimum, they are different copies. A user may enter commands and information into thecomputer 110 through input devices such as a keyboard 162, pointing device 161 (commonly referred to as a mouse), and trackball or touch pad. Other input devices (not shown) may include a microphone, joystick, game pad, satellite dish, scanner, or the like. These and other input devices are often connected to theprocessing unit 120 through auser input interface 160 that is coupled to the system bus, but may be connected by other interact and bus structures, such as a parallel port, game port or a universal serial bus (USB). A monitor 191 or other type of display device is also connected to thesystem bus 121 via an interface, such as avideo interface 190. In addition to the monitor, computers may also include other peripheral output devices such asspeakers 197 and printer 196, which may be connected through an outputperipheral interface 195. - In the implementation of an embodiment of the invention, the
computer 110 operates in a networked environment using logical connections to one or more remote computers, such as aremote computer 180. Theremote computer 180 may be a personal computer, a router, a network PC, a peer device or other common network node, and in any case the remote computer or computers typically include any or all of the elements described above relative to thepersonal computer 110, although only amemory storage device 181 has been illustrated inFIG. 1 . The logical connections depicted inFIG. 1 include a local area network (LAN) 171 and a wide area network (WAN) 173, but thecomputer 110 may additionally or alternatively use one or more other networking environments. Networking environments of all types are commonplace in offices, enterprise-wide computer networks, intranets and the Internet. - The
computer 110 should include facilities for accessing the networks to which it is attachable. For example, when used in a LAN networking environment, thepersonal computer 110 is connected to the LAN 171 through a network interface or adapter 170, Another node on the LAN, such as a proxy server, may be further connected to a WAN such as the Internet. When used in a WAN networking environment, thecomputer 110 typically includes amodem 172 or other means for establishing communications directly or indirectly over theWAN 173, such as the Internet. Themodem 172, which may be internal or external, may be connected to thesystem bus 121 via theuser input interface 160, or other appropriate mechanism. In a networked environment, program modules depicted relative to thepersonal computer 110, or portions thereof, may be stored in the remote memory storage device. By way of example, and not limitation,FIG. 1 illustrates remote application programs 185 as residing onmemory device 181. It will be appreciated that the network connections shown are exemplary and other means of establishing a communications link between the computers may be used. It is not intended to limit the invention to use in a hard-wired network environment, since it may also be used in transiently connected environments, such as for example a wholly or partially wireless network environment interconnected wholly or partially via optical, infrared, and/or radio frequency wireless connections. - Herein, the invention is described with reference to acts and symbolic representations of operations that are performed by one or more computers, unless indicated otherwise. As such, it will be understood that such its and operations, which are at nines referred to as being computer-executed, include the manipulation by the processing unit of the computer of electrical signals representing data in a structured form. This manipulation transforms the data or maintains it at locations in the memory system of the computer, which reconfigures or otherwise alters the operation of the computer in a manner well understood by those skilled in the art. The data structures where data is maintained are physical locations of the memory that have particular properties defined by the format of the data. However, while the invention is being described in the foregoing context, it is not meant to be limiting as those of skill in the art will appreciate that various of the acts and operation described hereinafter may also be implemented in hardware.
-
FIG. 2 illustrates schematically a networking environment in which the present invention in preferably implemented. The architecture of such a system comprises one or more viewer computers illustrated ascomputers sharer computer 207 via a network 209 Eachcomputer computers network connections network connections computers FIG. 1 . The network may be of any type, including, for example, a LAN, such as found in an office, university or other setting, a WAN such as the Internet, a MAN, or any other tangible or intangible, fixed or transient mechanism for computer interconnectivity. While higher data transfer rates are generally preferable to lower data transfer rates, them is no limit or requirement as to the speed of the network 209. In addition, the network 209 may be a single network, or alternatively may be comprised of multiple networks of the same or different types and/or speeds. It will be understood that in many but not all cases, the network will further comprise routers, servers, and/or other computing devices in addition to theendpoint devices - Specific exemplary architectures of the
sharer computer 207 and aviewer computer 201 are illustrated in greater detail schematically inFIG. 3 . It will be understood that although only one viewer computer is illustrated inFIG. 3 , there can be more than one such computer in an implementation of the invention, as illustrated by way ofFIG. 2 .Sharer computer 307 is illustrated as being connected vianetworking connection 319 toviewer computer 301. As will be appreciated by those of skill in theart network connection 319 can include some or all of the network types and network connections discussed above, as well as other network types and connections alternatively or additionally. - One or more user mode processes of
interest 321 are running onsharer computer 307. Such processes include processes, such as a program, from which information is being shared to one or more viewers such as atviewer computer 301. The processes ofinterest 321 will be referred to hereinafter as shared processes, with the understanding that the information generated by theprocesses 321 need not be shared completely. That is, the information shared may consist of only a subset of the information generated by such aprocess 321 for display. Many shared processes can also be used in a non-shared manner. For example, a word processing program may be used by the sharer for non collaborative document production, and may then be used in a shared manner for group editing of the same or another document. In either mode, theprocesses 321 and the operating system of thesharer computer 307 perform certain steps. For example, whether or not theprocess 321 is shared, the output of theprocess 321 will still generally be output to the graphics display driver of thesharer computer 307. - If the
application sharing program 323 is active, such as during a sharing session, that other processes unique to the collaborative setting also take place. In particular, theapplication sharing program 323, which is communicably linked to theprocess 321, receives information from theprocess 321 and transfers information to theprocess 321. Although the bidirectional flow of information between theprocess 321 and application sharing program is illustrated as being bi-directional, note that the mechanisms for transfer may vary depending upon direction of transfer. For example, theprocess 321 need not even be aware of the presence or operation of theapplication sharing program 323 for theapplication sharing program 323 to receive information from theprocess 321. - Typically, the
application sharing program 323 is communicably linked to an interceptor filter placed in the display path for theprocess 321. Such a filter may be placed just before the graphics device interface (GDI) or similar interface in such a manner as to read, in a non-intrusive manner, all information sent to the screen ofcomputer 307 by a shared process. In the WINDOWS operating system produced by MICROSOFT Corporation of Redmond, Wash., when an application wants to display an object, it calls a GDI function and sends the various parameters for the object. In turn, the GDI sends commands to the screen to cause it to actually paint the object. In contrast, the mechanism for transferring information from theapplication sharing program 323 to theprocess 321 need not involve the display path at all, and may instead involve a direct transfer of information. - Regardless, the
application sharing program 323 is also communicably linked to the networking facilities 325 of thesharer computer 307. Such facilities 325 may include any networking communications stack or other protocol arrangement as well as the hardware required for accessing thenetwork connection 319, as discussed above with respect toFIG. 1 . Across thenetwork connection 319, a counterpartapplication sharing program 327 running on theviewer computer 307 is communicably linked to thesharer computer 307 via thenetwork connection 319 and thenetworking facilities 329 of the viewer computer Thenetworking facilities 329 may be similar to the networking facilities 325 of the sharer computer. The counterpartapplication sharing program 327 receives input from sharedprocess 321 via thenetwork connection 319 and also potentially from a user of theviewer computer 301, via one ormore input channels 331, such as a keyboard, mouse, etc. as discussed above with respect toFIG. 1 . Additionally, the counterpartapplication sharing program 327 outputs material for display to adisplay process 333 such as a GDI or similar interface, or other display process. Note that the sharingcomputer 307 also preferably includesinput channels 335 such as those described above for receiving user input, some of which may be directed to and received by the process ofinterest 321. - The communication between the
sharer computer 307 and theviewer computer 301 over thenetwork connection 319 during application sharing may comprise a screen data stream, an input data stream, and an application data stream. The screen data stream represents or is associated with the display on the screen or display of thesharer computer 307, allowing theviewer computer 301 to reconstruct a bitmap representation of the shared window on its own associated display. The input data stream contains information regarding an interaction at the sharer or viewer of a user with an input device such as those described above with respect toFIG. 1 . Finally, the application data stream contains data that allows the viewer to associate portions of the bitmap provided in the screen data stream with applications and/or windows produced by applications. In an embodiment of the invention, the beneficial functionality at theviewer machine 301 described herein may be facilitated via information placed into the application data stream by theapplication sharing program 323 at thesharer machine 307. - There are two primary types of windows that the application sharing program analyzes to perform many of the functions associated with embodiments described herein. These types of windows are shared windows and unshared windows. The application data stream contains information about the shared windows as well as information about unshared windows that are relevant to the shared area, such as because of overlap with a shared window. For each window of concern, the application data stream contains information regarding the window's shape, size, and border position. From this information, the application sharing program at the viewing machine can determine what portions of the bitmap representation of the sharing machine's desktop should be shown at the viewer. The area shown is termed the “shared region.” The application data stream is further used by the application sharing program at the viewing machine to determine which portions of the sharer desktop should not be shown at the viewer. Such portions are termed “obscurable regions” or “obscured regions.” A region within the shared region corresponding to document content in a shared window is termed a “document view region” on the viewer display corresponding to a “document sub-window” at the sharer display.
- The calculation of a document view region in the shared window is based on an identification of the document sub-window of the currently viewed top-level window of the relevant shared application. Although the regions will often be identical in content, there are situations where other shared windows hosted by the relevant application are added to the document view region as will be discussed below.
- Any one of a number of methods may be used to indicate that a shared window contains a document sub-window. For known applications that provide a mechanism for distinguishing the sub-windows, an internal table may be maintained for associating window classes with document sub-windows. Thus, the application sharing program can share the top-level window and place a document view mark on the window indicating the presence of the sub-window. Alternatively or additionally, an API provided by the application sharing program object manager can be called with a sub-window in order to share the top-level window and place a document view mark on the window indicating the presence of the sub-windows Finally, a third party application can mark its own windows with a global atom to identify the presence and sharing of a sub-window. In this case, the application should use s recognized document view indicator, such as an atom name, and should use the appropriate operating system interaction mechanisms, such as Win32 APIs if the operating system is the WINDOWS brand operating system produced by MICROSOFT Corporation of Redmond, Wash.
- Once a document view sub-window is identified, the application sliming program determines a hounding rectangle, such as by intersecting a document view sub-window with its ancestors. The sub-window bounding rectangle is then used to determine f any other top-level windows intersect the document view region. If a top-level window intersects the region but is not the parent of the document view sub-window, then the hounding rectangle is made to include that top-level window.
- The general operation of the architecture and components usable in embodiments of the invention will be described briefly in overview before giving a detailed exposition of the processes involved in embodiments of the invention. In an embodiment of the invention, a shared window is displayed on the
viewing machine 301 omitting certain application artifacts that are displayed on the sharer machine 30 When the application sharing program on theviewing machine 301 operates in a document view mode. Such artifacts include menus, toolbars, etc that are displayed at the sharer machine by the shared application to allow the sharing user to affect operation of a shared application. The document view mode discussed herein can preferably be automatically engaged or disengaged, and is preferably also engageable and disengageable by a user of the viewing computer. - The effect of the document view mode on the viewer display can be seen in overview by way of
FIGS. 4A and 4B .FIG. 4A is a simplified screen display representation of a shared application window on the sharer display. It can be seen that sharedwindow 401 indisplay 403 has adocument content area 405 and one or more application artifact was 407. It will be understood that references herein to an application artifact area in the singular sense includes the case where the application artifact area is dispensed in two or more non-contiguous areas such as illustrated inFIG. 4A , as well as the case where the application artifact area is localized in one contiguous area. The four arcuate shapes illustrated within thedocument content area 405 and other regions in the figures are intended to represent any appropriate user-created document content such as text, drawing, etc. -
FIG. 4B is a simplified screen display representation of the shared application window ofFIG. 4A on a viewer display. The viewer display area 411 contains arepresentation 413 of the shared window. It can be seen that theviewer representation 413 of the shared window does not contain theapplication artifact areas 407 shown inFIG. 4A . Rather, the entire application sharing display area 417 is substantiality filled withdata 415 corresponding to thedocument content area 405 of the corresponding shared window on the sharer display. In this manner, the application sharing display area 417 is efficiently utilized to only display that information which it is important for the viewer to see. Thus, the size of fonts and other elements shown within the application sharing display area 417 may be larger than they would be if the user were to be presented with the entire contents of the sharedwindow 403. This is especially important when the application sharing display area 417 is substantially smaller than the sharedwindow 403, necessitating in most cases some amount of down scaling of the content of thedocument content area 405 of the shared window. In such cases, the sealed down content will remain more legible in the document view mode. Wherein only document content is shown to the viewer, than it otherwise would, enhancing the viewer's experience during application sharing, and enhancing the usefulness of the application sharing session to the sharing user. - In some cases, the transformation of the viewer display of the shared window as described above will even result in a magnification of the document content, while existing systems that do not transform the display would require at least minimal shrinkage of the document content. Such can occur when the application sharing display area 417 is smaller than the shared
window 403 but larger than thedocument content area 405 of the sharedwindow 403. - There are primarily two situations when the application sharing program at the viewing machine preferably automatically shills from a mode in which the shared window is transformed as described above to a mode Where the shared window is not transformed and thus displays all or some application artifacts, in an application artifact area. The first such case is when the sharing user performs an action at the sharing computer that creates a child shared window that is partially contained in the document content and application artifact areas of the shared
window 403. - Exemplary viewer displays before and after such an action are illustrated in
FIG. 5 . In particular,display 501 corresponds to the shared window as displayed at the viewing machine before an additional shared window that overlaps the document content area at the sharing machine is created. Thedisplay 502 of the shared window corresponds to that ofFIG. 4B , and containsonly document content 503 and does not contain an area corresponding to an application artifact area such asareas 407 inFIG. 4A . When the user of the shining machine subsequently performs an action at the sharing computer that creates a shared window that is partially contained in the document content area oldie sharedwindow 403 and partially contained in theapplication artifact area 407, the viewer display of the shared window transforms to one such as that shown atdisplay 505. For example, such an action may be the activation of a toolbar item to create a drop-down menu 513. When a shared window such as the drop downwindow list 513 partially overlaps thedocument content area 405 and the application artifact area at the sharing computer, the mode of the application sharing program at the viewing computer is switched such that theviewer display 504 of the shared window no longer omits application artifact areas, and hence does not omit any portion of the new window. Thus, the sharedwindow 504 as displayed indisplay 505 contains a document content area 507 as well as anapplication artifact area 509 corresponding to associated areas in the sharing machine display of the shared window Note that if thenew window 508 lies partially within the document content area and application artifact area, and partially outside of the shared window on the sharer display, then the viewer display scale of the sharedwindow 506 is adjusted as shown indisplay 511 so that the entirety of thenew window 508 is shown without clipping. Alternatively, the relative displayed sizes of the sharedwindow 506 and thenew window 508 may be diminished so that the entirety of the child image is displayed within theapplication sharing area 510. - The second case wherein the mode of the application sharing program at the viewing computer is switched to display application artifact areas is when such area become usable by the viewing user. For example, when a sharing user cedes control of a shared application or document to the viewing user, the viewing user is preferably able to access and activate toolbar items and to make selections of options displayed by icon or otherwise in the application artifact area. Additionally, the viewing user is preferably able to manually deactivate the document view mode so that the viewing computer display always shows the entire shared window including application artifact areas. This mode may be useful when the application artifacts are not usable by the viewing user but are nonetheless important to the viewing user, such as when a sharing user is showing a viewing user how to use an application.
- The processes involved in constructing the viewer display of a shared window is described hereinafter in greater detail with reference to
FIGS. 6 and 7 . In particular,FIG. 6 illustrates a flow chart for a process of identifying a document view sub- window. The process is preferably executed by the application sharing program naming on the sharing machine, although such is not required to be the case. Instep 601, the program determines whether a particular top level shared window is marked, such as by a global atom, as containing a document view sub-window. If the window is not so marked, then instep 601, the program determines whether the window class corresponding to the window under analysis is found in a window class table. The window class table associates known window classes with their sub-window classes, and is preferably pre-populated such as prior to distribution of the application sharing program, but may be alternatively populated through use by the application sharing program, or may be populated or augmented by a third party. - If at
step 603 it is determined that the window class corresponding to the window under analysis is not in the window class table, then the process terminates for that window atnode 605 having determined that no identifiable document view sub-window exists in the window under analysis. It instead atstep 603 it is determined that the window class corresponding to the window under analysis is in the window class table, then the process flows to step 607 where, having identified the class of the relevant one or more document sub-windows, the program searches for the top-most document view sub window associated with the window under analysis. - At
step 609, the program determines whether a document view sub-window was identified instep 607. If such a document view sub-window has been identified, then the process flows to step 611, where the mark on the sub-window is updated to indicate that the identified sub-window is the top-most document view sub-window for the associated application. Finally, the process terminates atstep 613, where the identified and marked document view sub-window is utilized to facilitate construction of the viewer display of the shared window. However, it is instead determined atstep 609 that a document view sub-window was not identifiable instep 607, then the process terminates atnode 605, having determined that no identifiable document view sub-window exists in the window under analysis Note that the document window mark can be added to a shared window by the application that is shared, and in this case the application need not fill or modify the class table. - Alternatively, if at
step 601 it was determined that the top level shared window under analysis is marked as containing a document view sub-window, then the process flows to step 615, where the document view sub-window is extruded according to the mark. Subsequently, at step 617, the application sharing program determines whether the extracted document view sub-window is still valid. For example, if the sub-window was dosed after the parent window was marked, then the sub-window may be considered invalid. If it is determined at step 617 that the extracted document view sub-window is no longer valid, then the process continues to step 603 and the steps that logically follow thereafter. If instead it is determined at step 617 that the extracted document view sub window is still valid, then the process moves to step 619. - At
step 619 the program determines whether the identified sub-window is still top-most of the document sub-windows associated with the same parent window. If atstep 619 it is determined that the identified sub-window is still top-most, then the process terminates atnode 613. If instead it is determined that the identified sub-window is not still top-most, then the process flows to step 621 where the program locates the top-most document view sub-window associated with the parent window under analysis and updates the mark thereon. Subsequently, the process terminates atnode 613. Note that a document view sub-window can become invalid by loosing activation. That is, it there are two MDI child windows and the one that it is indicated by the mark becomes deactivated, with the other window being activated instead, then the first window may be considered invalid. It can be seen that at the conclusion of the process shown in the flow chart ofFIG. 6 , either a document view sub-window of interest will have been found, or it will have been determined that there exists no identifiable document view sub-window. In the former case, a document view is constructed according to a process to be discussed hereinafter, while in the latter, the viewer display of the shared window does not use a document view, but instead shows the entire shared window as it appears on the sharer display. - The flow chart of
FIG. 7 illustrates a process by which a display of the shared window is constructed at the viewing machine upon receipt of a list of window data from the sharing machine. Note that the process ofFIG. 7 processes window data to operate on five regions: a Shared region, an Obscured region, a DVShared region, a DVObscured region, and a DVSwitch region. The process ofFIG. 7 is described in the context of the application sharing program at the viewing machine, although the processing may alternatively be executed at another location and/or through another component. Atstep 701 of the process, the application sharing program at the viewing machine initializes each aforementioned region to zero content. Atstep 703, the program selects for analysis a window from the received list of windows. Typically, the window data will be listed in the list of windows in reverse order, and the application sharing program at the viewing machine will select windows from the list in order. Accordingly, the first window analyzed is preferably but not necessarily the lowest z-order window. Atstep 705, the program determines whether the current window is shared, 11 it is determined atstep 705 that the current window is shared, then at step 707 it is determined whether the current window contains an identified document view sub-window, or intersects the current DVShared region. - If at step 707 it is determined that the current window contains an identified document view sub-window or intersects the current DVShared region, then at
step 709, it is determined whether the current window intersects any shared region not in the DVShared region. If it is determined that the current window intersects a shared region not in the DVShared region, then the process flows to step 711, where the current window is added to the DVSwitch region. Subsequently atstep 713, the DV rectangle of the current window, if any, is added to the DVShared region. Note that if atstep 709 it is determined that the current window does not intersect a shared region not in the DVShared region, then the process flows directly to step 713. - At
step 715, the DV rectangle is subtracted from the DVObscured region. Next, the process executesstep 717, wherein the cumin window is added to the shared region. Note that if it is determined at step 707 that the current window does not contain an identified document view sub-window or intersect the current DVShared region, the process proceeds directly to step 717. After executingstep 717, the process flows to step 719, where the region of the current rectangle is subtracted from the DVObscured region. If it is determined at step 720 that there are more windows from the received list of windows to be analyzed, then the process returns to step 705. Otherwise, it moves to step 721 whereat the program determines whether the DVSwitch region is a null region and the DVShared region is not a null region. If it is determined that the DVSwitch region is a null region and the DVShared region is not a null region, then atstep 723, the program clips the currently shared view content using the DVShared and DVObscured regions. Otherwise, atstep 725 the program clips the currently shared view content using the Shared and Obscured regions. - If at
step 705 it is instead determined that the current window is not shared, then atstep 706, the intersection of the current window's region and the Shared region is determined and stored. This information may be stored as a temporary region variable. Subsequently, atstep 708, the determined intersection region is added to the Obscured region, and the process flows to step 710. At step 710, the determined intersection region is subtracted from the Shared region, and the process flows to step 712, wherein the determined intersection region is subtracted from the DVSwitch region. Subsequently, atstep 714, the determined intersection region is clipped via intersection with the DVShared region. That is, the intersection of the determined intersection region and the DVShared region is subtracted from the determined intersection region. Atstep 716 the determined intersection region is subtracted from the DVShared region, after which the determined intersection, region is added to the DVObscured region atstep 718. From 718, the process flows to step 720 and the steps that logically follow thereafter. - Note that as mentioned above the process of generating a document view display rather than showing all application artifacts in the shared window is preferably user settable and thus may be turned off. In this case, the process described by way of
FIG. 7 would not need to be executed, and the visible portions of the shared window would appear the same, other than perhaps in scale, on both the sharing machine and in the viewing machine representation. - It will be appreciated that a novel and useful system and method have been described herein for constructing a display of shared information and for displaying shared information, so that a greater percentage of a viewing area can be used to display document content rather than application artifacts. In view of the many possible embodiments to which the principles of this invention may be applied, it should be recognized that the embodiments described herein with respect to the drawing figures are meant to be illustrative only and should riot be taken as limiting the scope of invention. For example, those of skill in the art will recognize that the elements of the illustrated embodiment shown in software may be implemented in hardware and vice versa or that the illustrated embodiment can be modified in arrangement and detail without departing from the spirit of the invention. Furthermore, although network connections are illustrated herein as lines, no limitation should thereby be imparted to the invention. Network connections may be circuit-switched, packet-switched, or otherwise, and may be transient or permanent, hard-wired or wireless, operating via any suitable protocol. Also note that although embodiments of the invention have been described largely by reference to a sharing program that is separate from the shared process, the sharing program may not be a stand-alone program, hut may instead be an integral part of the shared process itself, or may be a DLL or other in-process entity.
- Moreover, the exact step orders and process parameters may be varied without departing from the scope of the invention. It will be further understood that although the examples herein often refer to a sharer and a viewer computer, any number of such sharers and viewers may be involved, and a viewer may become a sharer and a sharer may become a viewer without limitation. In addition, although the foregoing description gives a number of examples wherein one or more windows are processed no limitation to windows is intended. That is, other types of graphical display objects may also be involved in the aforementioned processes and system, so long as they can be separated into a content area and an application artifact area. Such other graphical objects include but are not limited to non-rectilinear objects rendered on the sharer display.
- Furthermore, references herein to application sharing are not meant to require that all windows or material displayed on a sharer display and associated with a particular application are shared or unshared. Rather, one or more windows associated with an application running on the sharer machine are preferably sharable without requiring the sharing of all windows associated with that instance of that application. Moreover, although the steps employed to construct the viewer display are discussed herein with reference to the application sharing program of the sharing computer or the viewing computer, such steps may alternatively be executed in whole or in part at a device other than that swilled in the foregoing discussion of examples.
- Therefore, the invention as described herein contemplates all such embodiments as may come within the scope of the following claims and equivalents thereof.
Claims (21)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US14/262,542 US20150082199A1 (en) | 2002-04-23 | 2014-04-25 | Document viewing mechanism for document sharing environment |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/127,951 US8756513B1 (en) | 2002-04-23 | 2002-04-23 | Document viewing mechanism for document sharing environment |
US14/262,542 US20150082199A1 (en) | 2002-04-23 | 2014-04-25 | Document viewing mechanism for document sharing environment |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/127,951 Continuation US8756513B1 (en) | 2002-04-23 | 2002-04-23 | Document viewing mechanism for document sharing environment |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20150082199A1 true US20150082199A1 (en) | 2015-03-19 |
Family
ID=50896940
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/127,951 Active 2028-05-30 US8756513B1 (en) | 2002-04-23 | 2002-04-23 | Document viewing mechanism for document sharing environment |
US14/262,542 Abandoned US20150082199A1 (en) | 2002-04-23 | 2014-04-25 | Document viewing mechanism for document sharing environment |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/127,951 Active 2028-05-30 US8756513B1 (en) | 2002-04-23 | 2002-04-23 | Document viewing mechanism for document sharing environment |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US8756513B1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8887059B2 (en) * | 2011-07-27 | 2014-11-11 | Kaseya Limited | Method and apparatus of locally controlling display content of a remote system |
US10126927B1 (en) * | 2013-03-15 | 2018-11-13 | Study Social, Inc. | Collaborative, social online education and whiteboard techniques |
US9900421B2 (en) * | 2013-09-04 | 2018-02-20 | Lg Electronics Inc. | Mobile terminal and control method therefor |
US9704137B2 (en) * | 2013-09-13 | 2017-07-11 | Box, Inc. | Simultaneous editing/accessing of content by collaborator invitation through a web-based or mobile application to a cloud-based collaboration platform |
GB2518298A (en) | 2013-09-13 | 2015-03-18 | Box Inc | High-availability architecture for a cloud-based concurrent-access collaboration platform |
US8892679B1 (en) | 2013-09-13 | 2014-11-18 | Box, Inc. | Mobile device, methods and user interfaces thereof in a mobile device platform featuring multifunctional access and engagement in a collaborative environment provided by a cloud-based platform |
US10866931B2 (en) | 2013-10-22 | 2020-12-15 | Box, Inc. | Desktop application for accessing a cloud collaboration platform |
Citations (16)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4931783A (en) * | 1988-07-26 | 1990-06-05 | Apple Computer, Inc. | Method and apparatus for removable menu window |
US5107443A (en) * | 1988-09-07 | 1992-04-21 | Xerox Corporation | Private regions within a shared workspace |
US5394521A (en) * | 1991-12-09 | 1995-02-28 | Xerox Corporation | User interface with multiple workspaces for sharing display system objects |
US5500936A (en) * | 1993-03-12 | 1996-03-19 | Asymetrix Corporation | Multi-media slide presentation system with a moveable, tracked popup menu with button and title bars |
US5617539A (en) * | 1993-10-01 | 1997-04-01 | Vicor, Inc. | Multimedia collaboration system with separate data network and A/V network controlled by information transmitting on the data network |
US5933597A (en) * | 1996-04-04 | 1999-08-03 | Vtel Corporation | Method and system for sharing objects between local and remote terminals |
US6144991A (en) * | 1998-02-19 | 2000-11-07 | Telcordia Technologies, Inc. | System and method for managing interactions between users in a browser-based telecommunications network |
US6219044B1 (en) * | 1995-02-13 | 2001-04-17 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method for managing top-level windows within a conferencing network system |
US20020085030A1 (en) * | 2000-12-29 | 2002-07-04 | Jamal Ghani | Graphical user interface for an interactive collaboration system |
US20020129106A1 (en) * | 2001-03-12 | 2002-09-12 | Surgency, Inc. | User-extensible system for manipulating information in a collaborative environment |
US20020130904A1 (en) * | 2001-03-19 | 2002-09-19 | Michael Becker | Method, apparatus and computer readable medium for multiple messaging session management with a graphical user interfacse |
US20020180802A1 (en) * | 1998-07-13 | 2002-12-05 | Hideaki Ogawa | Display control with movable or updatable auxiliary information |
US6608636B1 (en) * | 1992-05-13 | 2003-08-19 | Ncr Corporation | Server based virtual conferencing |
US20030167339A1 (en) * | 2000-12-29 | 2003-09-04 | Min Zhu | Distributed application sharing |
US20030182375A1 (en) * | 2002-03-21 | 2003-09-25 | Webex Communications, Inc. | Rich multi-media format for use in a collaborative computing system |
US6665707B1 (en) * | 1996-12-19 | 2003-12-16 | International Business Machines Corporation | Groupware environment that adaptively tailors open microphone sessions based on participant locality |
Family Cites Families (122)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4386416A (en) | 1980-06-02 | 1983-05-31 | Mostek Corporation | Data compression, encryption, and in-line transmission system |
USRE33894E (en) | 1981-08-12 | 1992-04-21 | International Business Machines Corporation | Apparatus and method for reading and writing text characters in a graphics display |
US4677649A (en) | 1983-04-26 | 1987-06-30 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Data receiving apparatus |
JPH0620244B2 (en) | 1983-11-18 | 1994-03-16 | 株式会社リコー | Communication terminal |
US4823122A (en) | 1984-06-01 | 1989-04-18 | Digital Equipment Corporation | Local area network for digital data processing system |
US4631521A (en) | 1984-12-31 | 1986-12-23 | Wang Laboratories, Inc. | Method and apparatus for differential run-length coding |
DE3616751A1 (en) | 1985-05-20 | 1986-11-20 | Sharp K.K., Osaka | TRANSLATION SYSTEM |
US4882687A (en) | 1986-03-31 | 1989-11-21 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Pixel processor |
US4783834A (en) | 1987-02-20 | 1988-11-08 | International Business Machines Corporation | System for creating transposed image data from a run end or run length representation of an image |
US4897799A (en) | 1987-09-15 | 1990-01-30 | Bell Communications Research, Inc. | Format independent visual communications |
US4974173A (en) | 1987-12-02 | 1990-11-27 | Xerox Corporation | Small-scale workspace representations indicating activities by other users |
US5008853A (en) | 1987-12-02 | 1991-04-16 | Xerox Corporation | Representation of collaborative multi-user activities relative to shared structured data objects in a networked workstation environment |
US4953080A (en) | 1988-04-25 | 1990-08-28 | Hewlett-Packard Company | Object management facility for maintaining data in a computer system |
AU634192B2 (en) | 1988-11-14 | 1993-02-18 | Datapoint Corporation | Lan with dynamically selectable multiple operational capabilities |
US5255361A (en) | 1988-12-19 | 1993-10-19 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method of and system for updating a display unit |
US4965677A (en) | 1989-02-01 | 1990-10-23 | International Business Machines Corporation | Compression of binary halftones |
JPH088642B2 (en) | 1989-07-27 | 1996-01-29 | 富士通株式会社 | Halftone image data compression device |
US5206934A (en) | 1989-08-15 | 1993-04-27 | Group Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for interactive computer conferencing |
US5179711A (en) | 1989-12-26 | 1993-01-12 | International Business Machines Corporation | Minimum identical consecutive run length data units compression method by searching consecutive data pair comparison results stored in a string |
US5241653A (en) | 1990-04-12 | 1993-08-31 | Adobe Systems Incorporated | Apparatus and method for adjusting and displaying scaled, rasterized characters |
US5210825A (en) | 1990-04-26 | 1993-05-11 | Teknekron Communications Systems, Inc. | Method and an apparatus for displaying graphical data received from a remote computer by a local computer |
JP2770598B2 (en) | 1990-06-13 | 1998-07-02 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Graphic display method and apparatus |
EP0475581A3 (en) | 1990-08-30 | 1993-06-23 | Hewlett-Packard Company | Method and apparatus for window sharing between computer displays |
JP3152396B2 (en) | 1990-09-04 | 2001-04-03 | 株式会社東芝 | Medical image display device |
US5057916A (en) | 1990-11-16 | 1991-10-15 | General Instrument Corporation | Method and apparatus for refreshing motion compensated sequential video images |
US5241625A (en) | 1990-11-27 | 1993-08-31 | Farallon Computing, Inc. | Screen image sharing among heterogeneous computers |
JPH0630280A (en) | 1991-03-19 | 1994-02-04 | Nec Eng Ltd | Selective coding preprocessing system by blocks for binary image data |
US5390262A (en) | 1991-10-03 | 1995-02-14 | Ncr Corporation | Method for splitting and configuring a multi-channel image processing system |
US5404436A (en) | 1991-11-27 | 1995-04-04 | Digital Equipment Corporation | Computer method and apparatus for converting compressed characters for display in full size |
JP3609097B2 (en) | 1992-01-17 | 2005-01-12 | 株式会社リコー | Image encryption playback device |
GB2270581A (en) | 1992-09-15 | 1994-03-16 | Ibm | Computer workstation |
US5298992A (en) | 1992-10-08 | 1994-03-29 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for frame-differencing based video compression/decompression with forward and reverse playback capability |
DE69332751T2 (en) | 1992-12-10 | 2003-07-10 | Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd | Server and client |
EP0604685A1 (en) | 1992-12-28 | 1994-07-06 | Océ-Nederland B.V. | Method of modifying the fatness of characters |
US5649104A (en) | 1993-03-19 | 1997-07-15 | Ncr Corporation | System for allowing user of any computer to draw image over that generated by the host computer and replicating the drawn image to other computers |
US5608872A (en) | 1993-03-19 | 1997-03-04 | Ncr Corporation | System for allowing all remote computers to perform annotation on an image and replicating the annotated image on the respective displays of other comuters |
US5835713A (en) | 1993-03-19 | 1998-11-10 | Ncr Corporation | Remote collaboration system for selectively locking the display at remote computers to prevent annotation of the display by users of the remote computers |
EP0622930A3 (en) | 1993-03-19 | 1996-06-05 | At & T Global Inf Solution | Application sharing for computer collaboration system. |
US5664086A (en) | 1993-04-16 | 1997-09-02 | Adobe Systems Incorporated | Method and apparatus for generating digital type font, and resulting fonts using generic font and descriptor file |
US5565886A (en) | 1993-11-01 | 1996-10-15 | Microsoft Corporation | Method and system for rapidly transmitting multicolor or gray scale display data having multiple bits per pixel to a display device |
JPH07271777A (en) | 1994-03-31 | 1995-10-20 | Fujitsu Ltd | Character code management system of decentralized information processing system |
US5550968A (en) | 1994-04-12 | 1996-08-27 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for providing access security to controls in a graphical user interface |
DE69523593T2 (en) | 1994-06-17 | 2002-09-26 | Intel Corp | DEVICE AND METHOD FOR DIVIDING THE APPLICATION IN A GRAPHIC USER INTERFACE |
US5727155A (en) | 1994-09-09 | 1998-03-10 | Intel Corporation | Method and apparatus for dynamically controlling a remote system's access to shared applications on a host system |
DE69533936D1 (en) | 1994-11-15 | 2005-02-24 | Canon Kk | Window Management System |
US5754873A (en) | 1995-06-01 | 1998-05-19 | Adobe Systems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for scaling a selected block of text to a preferred absolute text height and scaling the remainder of the text proportionately |
US5675755A (en) * | 1995-06-07 | 1997-10-07 | Sony Corporation | Window system preventing overlap of multiple always-visible windows |
US5831872A (en) | 1995-06-27 | 1998-11-03 | Motorola, Inc. | Method and system for compressing a video signal using dynamic frame recovery |
US5874960A (en) | 1995-07-05 | 1999-02-23 | Microsoft Corporation | Method and system for sharing applications between computer systems |
US5864711A (en) | 1995-07-05 | 1999-01-26 | Microsoft Corporation | System for determining more accurate translation between first and second translator, and providing translated data to second computer if first translator is more accurate |
US6911987B1 (en) | 1995-07-05 | 2005-06-28 | Microsoft Corporation | Method and system for transmitting data for a shared application |
US6204847B1 (en) | 1995-07-17 | 2001-03-20 | Daniel W. Wright | Shared virtual desktop collaborative application system |
US5841420A (en) | 1995-08-18 | 1998-11-24 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system in a data processing system windowing environment for displaying previously obscured information |
US5847706A (en) | 1995-11-30 | 1998-12-08 | Hewlett Packard Company | Sizeable window for tabular and graphical representation of data |
US5760769A (en) | 1995-12-22 | 1998-06-02 | Intel Corporation | Apparatus and method for identifying a shared application program in a computer during teleconferencing |
US5826051A (en) | 1995-12-27 | 1998-10-20 | Intel Corporation | Method and apparatus for simplifying active window selection, application activation, and shared command execution in a multi-application environment |
US6343313B1 (en) | 1996-03-26 | 2002-01-29 | Pixion, Inc. | Computer conferencing system with real-time multipoint, multi-speed, multi-stream scalability |
US6173315B1 (en) | 1996-03-29 | 2001-01-09 | Intel Corporation | Using shared data to automatically communicate conference status information within a computer conference |
AUPO002196A0 (en) | 1996-05-22 | 1996-06-13 | Canon Information Systems Research Australia Pty Ltd | A method of optimising an expression tree for the production of images |
US6199116B1 (en) | 1996-05-24 | 2001-03-06 | Microsoft Corporation | Method and system for managing data while sharing application programs |
US6134601A (en) | 1996-06-17 | 2000-10-17 | Networks Associates, Inc. | Computer resource management system |
US5781732A (en) | 1996-06-20 | 1998-07-14 | Object Technology Licensing Corp. | Framework for constructing shared documents that can be collaboratively accessed by multiple users |
US6728784B1 (en) * | 1996-08-21 | 2004-04-27 | Netspeak Corporation | Collaborative multimedia architecture for packet-switched data networks |
WO1999006909A1 (en) | 1997-08-01 | 1999-02-11 | Muse Technologies, Inc. | Shared multi-user interface for multi-dimensional synthetic environments |
JP3753207B2 (en) | 1997-08-11 | 2006-03-08 | 富士ゼロックス株式会社 | Collaborative work support system and collaborative work support method |
EP1014257A4 (en) | 1997-08-12 | 2000-10-04 | Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd | Window display |
US6292166B1 (en) | 1997-10-24 | 2001-09-18 | Compaq Computer Corporation | System and method for sharing diverse display types in a bit map sharing collaborative tool |
US5986655A (en) | 1997-10-28 | 1999-11-16 | Xerox Corporation | Method and system for indexing and controlling the playback of multimedia documents |
US5959717A (en) * | 1997-12-12 | 1999-09-28 | Chaum; Jerry | Motion picture copy prevention, monitoring, and interactivity system |
JPH11232226A (en) | 1998-02-13 | 1999-08-27 | Nec Corp | Cooperative work aiding system and storage medium |
US6697846B1 (en) | 1998-03-20 | 2004-02-24 | Dataplow, Inc. | Shared file system |
US6275223B1 (en) | 1998-07-08 | 2001-08-14 | Nortel Networks Limited | Interactive on line code inspection process and tool |
US7831930B2 (en) | 2001-11-20 | 2010-11-09 | Universal Electronics Inc. | System and method for displaying a user interface for a remote control application |
US6230171B1 (en) | 1998-08-29 | 2001-05-08 | International Business Machines Corporation | Markup system for shared HTML documents |
JP4365950B2 (en) | 1998-09-11 | 2009-11-18 | キヤノン株式会社 | Graphic object processing method and apparatus for high-speed raster format rendering |
AU6258499A (en) | 1998-09-22 | 2000-04-10 | Science Applications International Corporation | User-defined dynamic collaborative environments |
JP3846666B2 (en) | 1998-09-24 | 2006-11-15 | 富士通株式会社 | Shared screen controller |
US6601087B1 (en) | 1998-11-18 | 2003-07-29 | Webex Communications, Inc. | Instant document sharing |
US6564246B1 (en) | 1999-02-02 | 2003-05-13 | International Business Machines Corporation | Shared and independent views of shared workspace for real-time collaboration |
US6342906B1 (en) | 1999-02-02 | 2002-01-29 | International Business Machines Corporation | Annotation layer for synchronous collaboration |
US6584493B1 (en) | 1999-03-02 | 2003-06-24 | Microsoft Corporation | Multiparty conferencing and collaboration system utilizing a per-host model command, control and communication structure |
US6570590B1 (en) * | 1999-03-02 | 2003-05-27 | Microsoft Corporation | Application sharing in a frame |
US6456305B1 (en) | 1999-03-18 | 2002-09-24 | Microsoft Corporation | Method and system for automatically fitting a graphical display of objects to the dimensions of a display window |
US6469716B1 (en) | 1999-03-19 | 2002-10-22 | Corel Inc. | System and method for processing data for a graphical object |
US6584466B1 (en) | 1999-04-07 | 2003-06-24 | Critical Path, Inc. | Internet document management system and methods |
US6317777B1 (en) | 1999-04-26 | 2001-11-13 | Intel Corporation | Method for web based storage and retrieval of documents |
US6760048B1 (en) * | 1999-06-15 | 2004-07-06 | International Business Machines Corporation | Display of occluded display elements on a computer display |
JP2001008384A (en) | 1999-06-21 | 2001-01-12 | Toshiba Corp | System screen display and recording medium |
US6826595B1 (en) | 2000-07-05 | 2004-11-30 | Sap Portals Israel, Ltd. | Internet collaboration system and method |
US6356279B1 (en) | 1999-07-30 | 2002-03-12 | Curl Corporation | Processing of graphical objects with minimum and preferred sizes |
US6380940B1 (en) | 1999-07-30 | 2002-04-30 | Curl Corporation | Processing graphical objects having origins defined with elasticity |
JP3773716B2 (en) * | 1999-09-13 | 2006-05-10 | 富士通株式会社 | Graphical user interface display device and recording medium storing program for causing computer to execute processing in the device |
US6687698B1 (en) | 1999-10-18 | 2004-02-03 | Fisher Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Accessing and updating a configuration database from distributed physical locations within a process control system |
US6654032B1 (en) | 1999-12-23 | 2003-11-25 | Webex Communications, Inc. | Instant sharing of documents on a remote server |
US6944662B2 (en) | 2000-08-04 | 2005-09-13 | Vinestone Corporation | System and methods providing automatic distributed data retrieval, analysis and reporting services |
JP2002073242A (en) | 2000-08-31 | 2002-03-12 | Internatl Business Mach Corp <Ibm> | Annotation method and additional writing method in application window and computer device and automatic contractor and collaboration system and storage medium and computer program product and program transmitting device |
US6825860B1 (en) | 2000-09-29 | 2004-11-30 | Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. | Autoscaling/autosizing user interface window |
US6823514B1 (en) | 2000-11-14 | 2004-11-23 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for caching across multiple contexts |
US20020065919A1 (en) | 2000-11-30 | 2002-05-30 | Taylor Ian Lance | Peer-to-peer caching network for user data |
US20020075304A1 (en) | 2000-12-18 | 2002-06-20 | Nortel Networks Limited | Method and system for supporting communications within a virtual team environment |
US20020078443A1 (en) * | 2000-12-20 | 2002-06-20 | Gadkari Sanjay S. | Presentation preemption |
US7003728B2 (en) | 2000-12-21 | 2006-02-21 | David Berque | System for knowledge transfer in a group setting |
US6973627B1 (en) | 2000-12-22 | 2005-12-06 | Automated Logic Corporation | Website display emulating a display of an application program |
US6925645B2 (en) * | 2000-12-29 | 2005-08-02 | Webex Communications, Inc. | Fault tolerant server architecture for collaborative computing |
WO2002057917A2 (en) | 2001-01-22 | 2002-07-25 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Peer-to-peer network computing platform |
US20030085922A1 (en) | 2001-04-13 | 2003-05-08 | Songxiang Wei | Sharing DirectDraw applications using application based screen sampling |
US20020174181A1 (en) | 2001-04-13 | 2002-11-21 | Songxiang Wei | Sharing OpenGL applications using application based screen sampling |
US7219309B2 (en) | 2001-05-02 | 2007-05-15 | Bitstream Inc. | Innovations for the display of web pages |
US20050081239A1 (en) * | 2001-05-11 | 2005-04-14 | Denizen Llc | Method and system for producing program-integrated advertisements |
US6910188B2 (en) | 2001-06-27 | 2005-06-21 | International Business Machines Corporation | Viewing changes to a shared document in one object |
US20030028610A1 (en) | 2001-08-03 | 2003-02-06 | Pearson Christopher Joel | Peer-to-peer file sharing system and method using user datagram protocol |
US7647320B2 (en) | 2002-01-18 | 2010-01-12 | Peoplechart Corporation | Patient directed system and method for managing medical information |
US7496845B2 (en) | 2002-03-15 | 2009-02-24 | Microsoft Corporation | Interactive presentation viewing system employing multi-media components |
US7418664B2 (en) | 2002-04-03 | 2008-08-26 | Microsoft Corporation | Application sharing single document sharing |
US7028266B2 (en) | 2002-04-05 | 2006-04-11 | Microsoft Corporation | Processing occluded windows during application sharing |
ES2601484T3 (en) | 2002-04-22 | 2017-02-15 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Application Sharing Security |
US7293243B1 (en) | 2002-05-22 | 2007-11-06 | Microsoft Corporation | Application sharing viewer presentation |
US7356563B1 (en) | 2002-06-06 | 2008-04-08 | Microsoft Corporation | Methods of annotating a collaborative application display |
US7176943B2 (en) | 2002-10-08 | 2007-02-13 | Microsoft Corporation | Intelligent windows bumping method and system |
US20040260717A1 (en) | 2003-06-20 | 2004-12-23 | International Business Machines Corporation | Universal annotation server and interface |
US7008871B2 (en) | 2003-07-03 | 2006-03-07 | International Business Machines Corporation | Selective capping of copper wiring |
WO2006012568A2 (en) * | 2004-07-23 | 2006-02-02 | Learning Tree International | System and method for electronic presentations |
-
2002
- 2002-04-23 US US10/127,951 patent/US8756513B1/en active Active
-
2014
- 2014-04-25 US US14/262,542 patent/US20150082199A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (16)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4931783A (en) * | 1988-07-26 | 1990-06-05 | Apple Computer, Inc. | Method and apparatus for removable menu window |
US5107443A (en) * | 1988-09-07 | 1992-04-21 | Xerox Corporation | Private regions within a shared workspace |
US5394521A (en) * | 1991-12-09 | 1995-02-28 | Xerox Corporation | User interface with multiple workspaces for sharing display system objects |
US6608636B1 (en) * | 1992-05-13 | 2003-08-19 | Ncr Corporation | Server based virtual conferencing |
US5500936A (en) * | 1993-03-12 | 1996-03-19 | Asymetrix Corporation | Multi-media slide presentation system with a moveable, tracked popup menu with button and title bars |
US5617539A (en) * | 1993-10-01 | 1997-04-01 | Vicor, Inc. | Multimedia collaboration system with separate data network and A/V network controlled by information transmitting on the data network |
US6219044B1 (en) * | 1995-02-13 | 2001-04-17 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method for managing top-level windows within a conferencing network system |
US5933597A (en) * | 1996-04-04 | 1999-08-03 | Vtel Corporation | Method and system for sharing objects between local and remote terminals |
US6665707B1 (en) * | 1996-12-19 | 2003-12-16 | International Business Machines Corporation | Groupware environment that adaptively tailors open microphone sessions based on participant locality |
US6144991A (en) * | 1998-02-19 | 2000-11-07 | Telcordia Technologies, Inc. | System and method for managing interactions between users in a browser-based telecommunications network |
US20020180802A1 (en) * | 1998-07-13 | 2002-12-05 | Hideaki Ogawa | Display control with movable or updatable auxiliary information |
US20020085030A1 (en) * | 2000-12-29 | 2002-07-04 | Jamal Ghani | Graphical user interface for an interactive collaboration system |
US20030167339A1 (en) * | 2000-12-29 | 2003-09-04 | Min Zhu | Distributed application sharing |
US20020129106A1 (en) * | 2001-03-12 | 2002-09-12 | Surgency, Inc. | User-extensible system for manipulating information in a collaborative environment |
US20020130904A1 (en) * | 2001-03-19 | 2002-09-19 | Michael Becker | Method, apparatus and computer readable medium for multiple messaging session management with a graphical user interfacse |
US20030182375A1 (en) * | 2002-03-21 | 2003-09-25 | Webex Communications, Inc. | Rich multi-media format for use in a collaborative computing system |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US8756513B1 (en) | 2014-06-17 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7293243B1 (en) | Application sharing viewer presentation | |
US20150082199A1 (en) | Document viewing mechanism for document sharing environment | |
US7414638B2 (en) | Application sharing user interface improvements | |
US7533351B2 (en) | Method, apparatus, and program for dynamic expansion and overlay of controls | |
US7800636B2 (en) | Magnification engine | |
US9436385B2 (en) | Invocation control over keyboard user interface | |
US7418664B2 (en) | Application sharing single document sharing | |
US7583266B2 (en) | System and method for interactive grouping of pie chart slices | |
US7199802B2 (en) | Multiple-mode window presentation system and process | |
US7626599B2 (en) | Context map in computer display magnification | |
US8775965B1 (en) | Immersive mode for a web browser | |
US20030142140A1 (en) | Adjusting the tint of a translucent window to convey status | |
US20070016873A1 (en) | Visual expression of a state of an application window | |
US20060248471A1 (en) | System and method for providing a window management mode | |
US20070288640A1 (en) | Remote rendering of multiple mouse cursors | |
US20030142141A1 (en) | Displaying specified resource usage | |
US6031534A (en) | Operating system function for specifying a checked image representation and an unchecked image representation of a menu item | |
US20160062585A1 (en) | Managing objects in panorama display to navigate spreadsheet | |
JP4742051B2 (en) | Spatial and temporal motion blur effect generation method | |
CN109766034B (en) | Method, device and equipment for quickly starting application program and storage medium | |
US8913076B1 (en) | Method and apparatus to improve the usability of thumbnails | |
US20070229520A1 (en) | Buffered Paint Systems | |
US20030081006A1 (en) | Method and system for rendering display | |
US8223123B1 (en) | Hardware accelerated caret rendering |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: MICROSOFT CORPORATION, WASHINGTON Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:SCHMIEDER, ROBERT W.;BEN-SHACHAR, IDO M.;LEICHTLING, IVAN J.;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20020417 TO 20020423;REEL/FRAME:032762/0507 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, LLC, WASHINGTON Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MICROSOFT CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:034747/0417 Effective date: 20141014 Owner name: MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, LLC, WASHINGTON Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MICROSOFT CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:039025/0454 Effective date: 20141014 |
|
STCV | Information on status: appeal procedure |
Free format text: NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED |
|
STCV | Information on status: appeal procedure |
Free format text: APPEAL BRIEF (OR SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF) ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER |
|
STCV | Information on status: appeal procedure |
Free format text: EXAMINER'S ANSWER TO APPEAL BRIEF MAILED |
|
STCV | Information on status: appeal procedure |
Free format text: ON APPEAL -- AWAITING DECISION BY THE BOARD OF APPEALS |
|
STCV | Information on status: appeal procedure |
Free format text: BOARD OF APPEALS DECISION RENDERED |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- AFTER EXAMINER'S ANSWER OR BOARD OF APPEALS DECISION |