US20150153376A1 - Method and apparatus for the alignment of multi-aperture systems - Google Patents

Method and apparatus for the alignment of multi-aperture systems Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20150153376A1
US20150153376A1 US14/617,815 US201514617815A US2015153376A1 US 20150153376 A1 US20150153376 A1 US 20150153376A1 US 201514617815 A US201514617815 A US 201514617815A US 2015153376 A1 US2015153376 A1 US 2015153376A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
vehicle
accelerometer
memory
data set
sensor
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US14/617,815
Inventor
Dan Alan Preston
David Olmstead
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Eagle Harbor Holdings LLC
Original Assignee
Eagle Harbor Holdings LLC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=39125321&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=US20150153376(A1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Eagle Harbor Holdings LLC filed Critical Eagle Harbor Holdings LLC
Priority to US14/617,815 priority Critical patent/US20150153376A1/en
Assigned to EAGLE HARBOR HOLDINGS, LLC reassignment EAGLE HARBOR HOLDINGS, LLC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: OLMSTEAD, DAVID, PRESTON, DAN ALAN
Publication of US20150153376A1 publication Critical patent/US20150153376A1/en
Assigned to NORTHWATER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY FUND L.P. 2 reassignment NORTHWATER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY FUND L.P. 2 SECURITY INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: EAGLE HARBOR HOLDINGS, LLC
Assigned to CLAROVIA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC reassignment CLAROVIA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC SECURITY INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: EAGLE HARBOR HOLDINGS, LLC
Assigned to EAGLE HARBOR HOLDINGS, LLC reassignment EAGLE HARBOR HOLDINGS, LLC CORRECTING IMPROPER SECURITY INTEREST Assignors: EAGLE HARBOR HOLDINGS, LLC
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01PMEASURING LINEAR OR ANGULAR SPEED, ACCELERATION, DECELERATION, OR SHOCK; INDICATING PRESENCE, ABSENCE, OR DIRECTION, OF MOVEMENT
    • G01P15/00Measuring acceleration; Measuring deceleration; Measuring shock, i.e. sudden change of acceleration
    • G01P15/02Measuring acceleration; Measuring deceleration; Measuring shock, i.e. sudden change of acceleration by making use of inertia forces using solid seismic masses
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60WCONJOINT CONTROL OF VEHICLE SUB-UNITS OF DIFFERENT TYPE OR DIFFERENT FUNCTION; CONTROL SYSTEMS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HYBRID VEHICLES; ROAD VEHICLE DRIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR PURPOSES NOT RELATED TO THE CONTROL OF A PARTICULAR SUB-UNIT
    • B60W40/00Estimation or calculation of non-directly measurable driving parameters for road vehicle drive control systems not related to the control of a particular sub unit, e.g. by using mathematical models
    • B60W40/10Estimation or calculation of non-directly measurable driving parameters for road vehicle drive control systems not related to the control of a particular sub unit, e.g. by using mathematical models related to vehicle motion
    • B60W40/11Pitch movement
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60WCONJOINT CONTROL OF VEHICLE SUB-UNITS OF DIFFERENT TYPE OR DIFFERENT FUNCTION; CONTROL SYSTEMS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HYBRID VEHICLES; ROAD VEHICLE DRIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR PURPOSES NOT RELATED TO THE CONTROL OF A PARTICULAR SUB-UNIT
    • B60W40/00Estimation or calculation of non-directly measurable driving parameters for road vehicle drive control systems not related to the control of a particular sub unit, e.g. by using mathematical models
    • B60W40/10Estimation or calculation of non-directly measurable driving parameters for road vehicle drive control systems not related to the control of a particular sub unit, e.g. by using mathematical models related to vehicle motion
    • B60W40/112Roll movement
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60WCONJOINT CONTROL OF VEHICLE SUB-UNITS OF DIFFERENT TYPE OR DIFFERENT FUNCTION; CONTROL SYSTEMS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HYBRID VEHICLES; ROAD VEHICLE DRIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR PURPOSES NOT RELATED TO THE CONTROL OF A PARTICULAR SUB-UNIT
    • B60W40/00Estimation or calculation of non-directly measurable driving parameters for road vehicle drive control systems not related to the control of a particular sub unit, e.g. by using mathematical models
    • B60W40/10Estimation or calculation of non-directly measurable driving parameters for road vehicle drive control systems not related to the control of a particular sub unit, e.g. by using mathematical models related to vehicle motion
    • B60W40/114Yaw movement
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60WCONJOINT CONTROL OF VEHICLE SUB-UNITS OF DIFFERENT TYPE OR DIFFERENT FUNCTION; CONTROL SYSTEMS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HYBRID VEHICLES; ROAD VEHICLE DRIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR PURPOSES NOT RELATED TO THE CONTROL OF A PARTICULAR SUB-UNIT
    • B60W50/00Details of control systems for road vehicle drive control not related to the control of a particular sub-unit, e.g. process diagnostic or vehicle driver interfaces
    • B60W50/04Monitoring the functioning of the control system
    • B60W50/045Monitoring control system parameters
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60WCONJOINT CONTROL OF VEHICLE SUB-UNITS OF DIFFERENT TYPE OR DIFFERENT FUNCTION; CONTROL SYSTEMS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HYBRID VEHICLES; ROAD VEHICLE DRIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR PURPOSES NOT RELATED TO THE CONTROL OF A PARTICULAR SUB-UNIT
    • B60W50/00Details of control systems for road vehicle drive control not related to the control of a particular sub-unit, e.g. process diagnostic or vehicle driver interfaces
    • B60W2050/0001Details of the control system
    • B60W2050/0002Automatic control, details of type of controller or control system architecture
    • B60W2050/0013Optimal controllers
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60WCONJOINT CONTROL OF VEHICLE SUB-UNITS OF DIFFERENT TYPE OR DIFFERENT FUNCTION; CONTROL SYSTEMS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HYBRID VEHICLES; ROAD VEHICLE DRIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR PURPOSES NOT RELATED TO THE CONTROL OF A PARTICULAR SUB-UNIT
    • B60W50/00Details of control systems for road vehicle drive control not related to the control of a particular sub-unit, e.g. process diagnostic or vehicle driver interfaces
    • B60W2050/0062Adapting control system settings
    • B60W2050/0075Automatic parameter input, automatic initialising or calibrating means
    • B60W2050/0083Setting, resetting, calibration
    • B60W2050/0085Setting or resetting initial positions
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60WCONJOINT CONTROL OF VEHICLE SUB-UNITS OF DIFFERENT TYPE OR DIFFERENT FUNCTION; CONTROL SYSTEMS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HYBRID VEHICLES; ROAD VEHICLE DRIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR PURPOSES NOT RELATED TO THE CONTROL OF A PARTICULAR SUB-UNIT
    • B60W40/00Estimation or calculation of non-directly measurable driving parameters for road vehicle drive control systems not related to the control of a particular sub unit, e.g. by using mathematical models
    • B60W40/10Estimation or calculation of non-directly measurable driving parameters for road vehicle drive control systems not related to the control of a particular sub unit, e.g. by using mathematical models related to vehicle motion
    • B60W40/107Longitudinal acceleration
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60WCONJOINT CONTROL OF VEHICLE SUB-UNITS OF DIFFERENT TYPE OR DIFFERENT FUNCTION; CONTROL SYSTEMS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR HYBRID VEHICLES; ROAD VEHICLE DRIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR PURPOSES NOT RELATED TO THE CONTROL OF A PARTICULAR SUB-UNIT
    • B60W40/00Estimation or calculation of non-directly measurable driving parameters for road vehicle drive control systems not related to the control of a particular sub unit, e.g. by using mathematical models
    • B60W40/10Estimation or calculation of non-directly measurable driving parameters for road vehicle drive control systems not related to the control of a particular sub unit, e.g. by using mathematical models related to vehicle motion
    • B60W40/109Lateral acceleration

Definitions

  • Next generation automotive systems such as Lane Departure Warning (LDW), Collision Avoidance (CA), Blind Spot Detection (BSD) or Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC) systems will require target information from multiple sensors including a new class of sensor called sensor apertures such as radar, image or laser, similar to those found on advanced tactical fighter aircraft.
  • sensor apertures such as radar, image or laser
  • one sensor aperture may be located on the front bumper of the vehicle and obtains range and azimuth information about vehicles and stationary objects in front of the vehicle.
  • Another sensor aperture may be located on the dash of the vehicle and obtains image information about vehicles and stationary objects in front of the vehicle.
  • Another sensor aperture may be located on the side of the vehicle and obtains either range and azimuth data or image data in order to determine velocity and track information on vehicles that pass the vehicle.
  • SA Situation Awareness
  • SAP Situation Awareness Platform
  • SF Sensor Fusion
  • NF Navigation Fusion
  • One method of aligning the sensors apertures to each other and to the vehicle is to use mechanical and optical instruments, such as auto-collimators and laser boresight tools, during the production of the vehicle.
  • This technique is not only costly, but would be require if a sensor aperture were repaired or replaced after production. An alignment procedure would have to be performed again in order to assure the safety critical systems were reporting accurately. Also as the vehicle goes through normal wear and tear the sensor apertures would start to become misaligned and may not be noticed by the operator. This means that the data from the sensor apertures would not correlate with each other and the vehicle reference frame until the sensor apertures were aligned again. Again, this would be costly to the vehicle operator and until performed, the SAP may not provide accurate data. Therefore, a method to align the sensor apertures to each other and to the vehicle without the use of sophisticated optical tools is required. This patent addresses this problem by describing methods that can be used to align the sensor apertures to each other and to the vehicle that do not require external alignment equipment.
  • U.S. Pat. No. 5,245,909 Automatic Sensor Alignment
  • U.S. Pat. No. 5,245,909 relates to systems for maintaining alignment-sensitive aircraft-borne avionics and weapons sensors in precise alignment. It further relates to methods for precisely aligning sensitive avionics for weapons system instrumentation, which is subject to vibrations causing misalignment.
  • this disclosure relates to methods and systems that support advanced automotive systems not described in the prior art.
  • a second key difference is the reliance of sensor data from the vehicle as part of the alignment method. Another difference is using image apertures with elements of the vehicle in the field of view of the imager and employing optical methods for determining changes to the alignment with respect to the vehicle and vehicle reference frame, then applying a compensation based on the misalignment angle measured.
  • this system described herein does not require a reliance on boresighting and aligning any sensor to achieve a vehicle reference frame.
  • U.S. Pat. No. 6,202,027 Automatic Curve Sensor Calibration
  • U.S. Pat. No. 6,202,027 Automatic Curve Sensor Calibration
  • Different sensors can be used in vehicles to identify objects and possible collision conditions.
  • an optical sensor such as a camera
  • Another Infrared (IR) sensor may be mounted in the front grill of the vehicle.
  • a third inertial sensor may be located in yet another location in the central portion of the vehicle. Data from these different sensors is correlated together to identify and track objects that may come within a certain vicinity of the vehicle.
  • the measurements from the different sensors must be translated to a common reference point before the different data can be accurately correlated. This translation is difficult because the sensors are positioned in different locations on the vehicle. For example, the sensor located inside the front bumper of the vehicle may move in one direction during a collision while the sensor located on the top of the vehicle roof may move in a different direction.
  • One of the sensors may also experience vibrations at a different time than the other sensor.
  • the front bumper sensor may experience a vertical or horizontal movement when the vehicle runs over an obstacle before any movements or vibrations are experienced by the roof sensor. This different movements of sensors relative to each other make is very difficult to accurately determine the precise position and orientation of the sensors when the sensor readings are taken. This makes it difficult to translate the data into common reference coordinates.
  • the present invention addresses this and other problems associated with the prior art.
  • a vehicle sensor system configured to gather sensory data 360 degrees around the vehicle, comprising of sensor apertures for gathering data such as: range (e.g. ultrasonic); range and azimuth (e.g. laser and/or radar); images (e.g. optical and/or thermal).
  • the vehicle has sensors that align and establish a vehicle reference frame by measuring body yaw, pitch and roll rates as well as acceleration along the 3 axes of the vehicle.
  • the imaging apertures that have a clear view of body mold lines, like hood or rear deck, will align themselves to the vehicle reference frame, those apertures that can not align using optical methods are aligned to the vehicle using accelerometers and rates sensors by reading the inertial acceleration or angular rotation to align themselves to each other.
  • An Integrated Computing Platform hosts the SAP software that maintains complete system alignment by determining differences in alignment and applying or updating a compensation value with respect to the vehicle body coordinates resulting in a dynamically boresighted system.
  • a multi-sensor system includes multiple sensors that are integrated onto the same substrate forming a unitary multi-sensor platform that provides a known consistent physical relationship between the multiple sensors.
  • a processor can also be integrated onto the substrate so that data from the multiple sensors can be processed locally by the multi-sensor system.
  • FIG. 1 is a diagram showing how a common inertial acceleration is sensed by accelerometers on each sensor and can be used to align the sensor coordinate frames.
  • FIG. 2 is a diagram showing the pitch angles used to determine the pitch misalignment angle of the optical sensor.
  • FIG. 3 is a diagram showing the yaw data that is used to determine the yaw misalignment angle of the optical sensor.
  • FIG. 4 is a diagram showing the roll data that is used to determine the roll misalignment angle of the optical sensor.
  • FIG. 5 is an image showing the top of the hood and how it is used to compute the pitch misalignment angle.
  • FIG. 6 is a magnified image of the hood line showing the pixels of the image.
  • FIG. 7 is an image showing the top of the hood and how it is used to compute the roll misalignment angle.
  • FIG. 8 is a magnified image of the banked hood line showing the pixels of the image.
  • FIG. 9 is an image showing the top of the hood and how it is used to compute the yaw misalignment angle.
  • FIG. 10 is a flow chart that shows the alignment process when all sensors have micro-inertials.
  • FIG. 11 is a flow chart that shows the alignment process when using micro-inertials and an optical sensor.
  • FIG. 12 is a flow chart that shows the alignment process when all of the sensors are optical.
  • FIG. 13 is a flow chart that shows the alignment when the sensors are on a common platform.
  • FIG. 14 is a block diagram of a multi-sensor system.
  • FIG. 15 is a block diagram of an alternate embodiment of the multi-sensor system that includes an on-board processor.
  • FIG. 16 is a flow diagram showing how the processor in FIG. 15 operates.
  • FIG. 17 is detailed diagram showing how different elements in the multi-sensor system are electrically connected together.
  • FIG. 18 is a diagram showing how different multi-sensor systems operate together to track objects.
  • One method is to attach three axis accelerometers to each sensor and to the vehicle and use gravity and the acceleration of the vehicle, which will be sensed by the accelerometers, to align the sensor axes to each other and to the vehicle.
  • Information from the vehicle that is available on the Car Area Network (CAN) bus will also be used to perform the calculation of the misalignment angles.
  • FIG. 1 shows in two dimensions the relation between sensor aperture A frame, sensor aperture B frame and the vehicle body reference frame.
  • the vehicle experiences a linear acceleration and this common acceleration is observed by the accelerometers located on sensor aperture A, sensor aperture B and the vehicle body.
  • the accelerometers that are attached to the vehicle body are aligned to the vehicle body reference frame.
  • the misalignment angle between the two sensor apertures .theta.sa-.theta.sb, can be computed.
  • the same can be done between sensor aperture A and the vehicle body, and sensor aperture B and the vehicle body to compute all of the misalignment angles.
  • This approach can be used to compute the three dimensional misalignment angles of roll, pitch and yaw between sensor apertures and the vehicle body reference frame.
  • Acomp Asensora ⁇ wxwxR1
  • Acomp Asensora ⁇ wxwxR1
  • Asensora the acceleration measured by sensor A accelerometers
  • Asensorb the acceleration measured by sensor B accelerometers
  • w the angular rotation of the vehicle measured by the ref gyros x is the cross product of two vectors
  • R1 is the lever arm vector between sensor A and sensor B
  • Acomp is the sensor acceleration compensated for lever arm rotation.
  • the accelerometer groups will sense gravity and this can be used to help compute some of the misalignment angles.
  • Information from the vehicle CAN bus, such as wheel rotation speeds are zero, will tell the Kalman filter that the vehicle is not moving and the only sensed acceleration will be from gravity.
  • FIG. 10 is a flow chart showing the process when all of the sensor apertures, as well as the vehicle body, have a micro-inertial attached to them.
  • the micro-inertials sense the angular rotation and/or acceleration of the vehicle and this information is the input to a Kalman filter.
  • the filter uses this information to estimate the roll, pitch and yaw misalignment angles between a sensor aperture and the vehicle body frame. These misalignment angles are then used to rotate the sensor target data into the vehicle body frame. With all of the target data in a common reference frame the processor can fuse data from several sensors into an optimal target track file.
  • the second method is to use accelerometers to align the sensor apertures to each other and one of the sensor apertures is aligned to the vehicle body by using optical information from the sensor aperture itself.
  • acceleration data can be used to align sensor aperture A to sensor aperture B, but sensor aperture B is aligned to the vehicle body directly by using sensor aperture B to compute the misalignment angles between sensor aperture B and the vehicle body. Since sensor aperture A is aligned to sensor aperture B and sensor aperture B is aligned to the vehicle body, you can compute the misalignment between sensor aperture A and the vehicle body.
  • Sensor aperture B can be a visual sensor aperture, such as a video camera, and by observing the outline of the hood and body of the vehicle using this camera, you can compute the misalignment angles between sensor aperture B and the vehicle body frame.
  • FIG. 2 shows that the pitch misalignment angle is the angle between the sensor aperture's X-axis and vehicle's X-axis in the vertical plane.
  • the pitch angle between the vehicle X-axis and a line from the sensor aperture to the top point of the hood, .PHI.vehicle can be computed from the vehicle's dimensions.
  • the image from the sensor aperture FIG. 5 for example, shows the top of the hood.
  • Pp By counting the pixels from the center of the image down to the hood, Pp, the sensor aperture pitch angle can be computed. Using a 480.times.640 pixel image, this angle can be computed to within 1 pixel, see FIG. 6 .
  • FIG. 3 shows that the small yaw misalignment angle is the angle between the sensor aperture's X axis and vehicle's X axis in the horizontal plane.
  • the sensor aperture image shows the left and right edges of the hood, FIG. 9 .
  • FIG. 4 shows that the small roll misalignment angle is the angle between the sensor aperture's Y-axis and vehicle's Y-axis in the vertical plane.
  • the sensor aperture image shows that the hood line and the sensor aperture level lines cross to form the roll misalignment angle. This is shown in FIG. 7 .
  • FIG. 8 shows that the hood line can be determined accurately to within a couple of pixels.
  • FIG. 11 is a flow chart showing the process when at least one of the sensors is an optical device. All of the sensors have a micro-inertial attached to them. The optical device can see the targets and the outline of features of the vehicle, such as the hood line. The optical sensor uses the hood line information to compute the roll, pitch and yaw misalignment angles between the optical sensor frame and the vehicle body frame.
  • the micro-inertials sense the angular rotation and/or acceleration of the vehicle.
  • the Kalman filter estimates the roll, pitch and yaw misalignment angles between a sensor aperture frame and the optical sensor frame. These misalignment angles as well as the misalignment angles between the optical sensor and the vehicle body frame are then used to rotate all of the sensor target data into the vehicle body frame. Again, with all of the target data in a common reference frame the processor can fuse data from several sensors into an optimal target track file.
  • a third method is to use optical information from sensor aperture A and sensor aperture B to compute the misalignment between the two sensor apertures and to use optical information from sensor aperture B to compute the misalignment between sensor aperture B and the vehicle body.
  • sensor aperture A can be a ranging laser sensor aperture and it sends out multiply beams of light to detect a target.
  • sensor aperture B can also detect the reflected light in its video camera and using this information it can compute the misalignment between sensor aperture A and sensor aperture B.
  • FIG. 12 is a flow chart showing the process when all of the sensors on the vehicle are optical sensors.
  • Each optical device can see targets and the outline of features of the vehicle, such as the hood or truck line.
  • the optical sensors use this vehicle body information to compute the roll, pitch and yaw misalignment angles between the optical sensor frame and the vehicle body frame. These misalignment angles are then used to rotate the sensor target data from each sensor into the vehicle body frame.
  • the processor can fuse data from several sensors into an optimal target track file.
  • a fourth method is to collocate all of the sensor apertures into one box that is mounted on the vehicle, such as the roof, so that all sensor apertures are always aligned with respect to each other and the only alignment required is the alignment between this sensor aperture box and the vehicle body. This can be performed by using a set of accelerometers in the sensor aperture box and on the vehicle body frame or optically by using a video camera in the sensor aperture box.
  • FIG. 13 shows the case where all of the sensors are mounted onto one fixed platform. If one of the sensors is an optical sensor then it can be used to align the platform frame to the vehicle body frame as shown above. Once this set of misalignment angles is computed, then all of the target data from all of the sensors can be rotated to the common vehicle body reference frame. As shown above all of the target data is now in one reference frame for computing the optimal target tracks. If none of the sensors are optical, then a set of micro-inertials can be mounted on the common platform and also on the vehicle body. While the vehicle is moving the Kalman filter can now be used to compute the misalignment angles as discussed in the above paragraphs.
  • the systems described above can use dedicated processor systems, micro controllers, programmable logic devices, or microprocessors that perform some or all of the operations. Some of the operations described above may be implemented in software and other operations may be implemented in hardware.
  • FIG. 14 shows a multi-sensor system 20812 that includes different sensors 20816 and 20818 that are both integrally attached to or integrally formed into the substrate 20814 . Because the two sensors 20816 and 20818 are integrated onto the same substrate 20814 , any forces experienced by sensor 20816 are also experienced by sensor 20818 .
  • One type of material that is used for substrate 20814 is invar. Invar is a rigid metal that has been cured with respect to temperature so that its dimensions do not change with fluxuations in temperature. Any rigid material that is resilient to expansion or contraction with temperature changes can be used.
  • Locating the sensors 20816 and 20818 on the same substrate 20814 simplifies the cost of sensor manufacturing and installation.
  • the two sensors 20816 can be assembled onto the substrate 20814 in a factory prior to being installed on a vehicle. If the two sensors 20816 and 20818 were not mounted on the same substrate 20814 , then each sensor would have to be separately mounted on the vehicle and then calibrated to a known alignment with respect to each other. Even if the two sensors were installed correctly, changes in the shape of the vehicle due to wear, temperature, etc. over time could change the initial alignment between the two sensors.
  • Premounting or prefabricating the sensors 20816 and 20818 on the substrate 20814 prior to installation on a vehicle prevents these alignment errors. Only the substrate 208 14 of the multi-sensor system 20812 has to be mounted to the vehicle, not the individual sensors 20816 and 20818 . This allows the relative position 20820 and alignment between the two sensors 20816 and 20818 to remain the same regardless of how the substrate 20814 is mounted on the vehicle.
  • Wiring is also simplified since only one wiring harness has to be run through the vehicle to the multi-sensor system 20812 .
  • the senor 20816 senses an area 20824 and the sensor 20818 senses an area 20822 that are both coincident.
  • One of the sensors may have a wider field of view than the other sensor.
  • Some examples of sensors include ultrasonic, Infra-Red (IR), video, radar, and lidar sensors.
  • the sensors may be separate components that are glued or bolted onto the substrate 20814 . If the multi-sensor system 20812 is an integrated circuit, then the sensors 20816 and 20818 may be integrally fabricated onto a silicon or alternative temperature resilent substrate 20814 using known deposition processes.
  • the radar sensor 20814 may only be able to measure angle of an object to within one-half a degree. Because of the limited angle accuracy of the radar angle readings, it may not be possible to determine from the radar reading along if an oncoming vehicle is coming from the same lane of traffic or from an opposite lane of traffic.
  • the video sensor 20818 may be able to accurately determine the angle of an object to within one-tenth or one-one hundredth of a degree. By correlating the radar information with the camera information, the location of an on-coming vehicle can be determined more accurately.
  • the relative position and alignment between the two sensors remains essentially the same regardless of physical effects on the vehicle.
  • the camera data can be correlated with radar data to within fractions of a degree of accuracy.
  • a first sensor may detect one object out in front of the vehicle.
  • a second sensor located somewhere else on the vehicle may detect two different objects in front of the vehicle. Because of vibrations in different parts of the vehicle, a central processor may not be able to determine which of the two objects detected by the second sensor is associated with the object detected by the first sensor. With the multi-sensor system 20812 , measurement errors caused by this vehicle vibration is cancelled since the two sensors 20816 and 20818 effectively experience the same amount of vibration at the same time.
  • FIG. 14 shows an alternative embodiment where a processor 20826 is mounted to the substrate 20814 .
  • the processor 20826 can be a standalone component that is rigidly attached to substrate 20814 .
  • the processor 20826 is a portion of the same integrated circuit that also contains the circuitry for sensors 20816 and 20818 .
  • the processor 20826 can perform signal processing tasks for both sensor 20818 and sensor 20816 and can also handle communication and diagnostics tasks. Tracks for identified objects are sent over connection 20828 to other multi-sensor systems in the vehicle or to a vehicle control system as shown later in FIG. 18 .
  • each sensor was required to send all data back to the same central processing system. This takes additional time and circuitry to send all of the data over a bus.
  • the processor 20826 By mounting the processor 20826 in the multi-sensor system 20812 , data from both sensor 20816 and sensor 20818 can be processed locally requiring fewer reports to be sent over connection 20828 .
  • the processor 20826 in FIG. 14 receives radar reports from the first sensor 20816 in block 20834 .
  • the processor 20826 receives image reports from the second sensor 20818 in block 20836 .
  • the processor 20826 correlates the different reports in block 20838 . Since the relative position of the two sensors 20816 and 20818 are the same and possibly coincident, the processor 20826 does not have to perform as many calculations transforming sensor measurements into common body coordinates for the vehicle.
  • the correlation may include first determining if the reports actually identify an object in block 20840 .
  • the processor 20826 can verify or refine object detection information from one of the sensors with the message reports received from the other sensor. If both sensors do not verify detection of the same object within some degree of certainty, then the processor system 20826 may discard the message reports or continue to analyze additional reports in block 20840 .
  • the processor 20826 When an object is detected in block 20840 , the processor 20826 only has to send one report in block 20842 representing the information obtained from both sensor 20816 and sensor 20818 . This reduces the total amount of data that has to be sent either to a central controller or another multi-sensor system in block 20842 .
  • FIG. 17 shows in further detail the different devices that may be integrated on the multi-sensor substrate 20814 .
  • Camera optics 20850 and radar transmit/receive modules 20852 are each connected to a Central Processing Unit (CPU) 20854 and a digital signal processor 20856 .
  • a memory 20858 is used to store sensor data, signal processing applications and other operating system functions.
  • the CPU 20854 is also used for conducting distributed sensor fusion as described in further detail below.
  • different multi-sensor systems 20812 A- 20812 D are used for monitoring different zones around a vehicle 20860 .
  • system 20812 A monitors zone 1
  • system 20812 B monitors zone 2
  • system 20812 C monitors zone 3
  • system 20812 D monitors zone 4.
  • the CPU 20854 and digital signal processor 20856 FIG. 17 in each multi-sensor system 20812 A- 20812 D in combination with the camera and radar sensors identify and track objects autonomously, without having to communicate with a central controller 20868 in vehicle 20860 .
  • a track file is created for that object in memory 20858 ( FIG. 17 ). If the object moves to another zone around the vehicle 20860 , the multi-sensor system for the zone where the object was previously detected only has to send the track files to the other multi-sensor system associated with the overlapping region.
  • a bicycle 20865 may be initially detected by multi-sensor system 20812 A at location 20864 A in zone 1.
  • the multi-sensor system 20812 A creates a track file containing position, speed, acceleration, range, angle, heading, etc. for the bike 20865 .
  • the bike 20865 may move into a new position 20864 B in an overlapping region 208 66 between zone 1 and zone 2.
  • the multi-sensor system 20812 A upon detecting the bike 20865 in the overlapping region 20866 sends the latest track file for the bike 20865 to multi-sensor system 20812 B over bus 20862 . This allows the multi-sensor system 20812 B to start actively tracking bike 20865 using the track information received from multi-sensor system 20812 A.
  • the multi-sensor system 20812 A only has to send a few of the latest track files for the common area 20866 over connection 20864 to multi-sensor 20812 B in order for system 20812 B to maintain a track on bike 208 65 .
  • the track files can be exchanged between any of the multi-sensor systems 20812 A- 20812 D.
  • the track file with the greatest confidence of accuracy is used for vehicle warning, security, and control operations.
  • connection 20862 can a CAN bus, wireless 802.11 link or any other type of wired or wireless link.
  • the system described above can use dedicated processor systems, micro controllers, programmable logic devices, or microprocessors that perform some or all of the operations. Some of the operations described above may be implemented in software and other operations may be implemented in hardware.

Abstract

A vehicle sensor system consisting of video, radar, ultrasonic or laser sensors, oriented to obtain a 360 degree view around the vehicle for the purpose of developing a situation or scene awareness. The sensors may or may not have overlapping field of views, or support the same applications, but data will be shared by all. Orientation of the sensor to the vehicle body coordinates is critical in order to accurately assess threat and respond. This system describes methods based on measuring force and rotation on each sensor and computing a dynamic alignment to first each other, then second to the vehicle.

Description

    RELATED FILINGS
  • This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/698,960, filed Feb. 2, 2010, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/024,058, filed Jan. 31, 2008, which is a continuation of U.S. Pat. No. 7,337,650, Issued Mar. 4, 2008 Titled—SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ALIGNING SENSORS ON A VEHICLE the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety and further incorporates by reference: U.S. Pat. No. 6,629,033, Issued Sep. 30, 2003 Titled—OPEN COMMUNICATION SYSTEM FOR REAL-TIME MULTIPROCESSOR APPLICATIONS, U.S. Pat. No. 6,771,208, Issued Aug. 3, 2004 Titled—MULTI SENSOR SYSTEM, and U.S. Pat. No. 7,146,260, Issued Dec. 5, 2006 Titled—METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DYNAMIC CONFIGURATION OF MULTIPROCESSOR SYSTEM.
  • Applicants believe the above-incorporated material constitutes “essential material” within the meaning of 37 CFR 1.57(c)(1)-(3), applicants have amended the specification to expressly recite the essential material that is incorporated by reference as allowed by the applicable rules.
  • BACKGROUND
  • Next generation automotive systems such as Lane Departure Warning (LDW), Collision Avoidance (CA), Blind Spot Detection (BSD) or Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC) systems will require target information from multiple sensors including a new class of sensor called sensor apertures such as radar, image or laser, similar to those found on advanced tactical fighter aircraft. For example, one sensor aperture may be located on the front bumper of the vehicle and obtains range and azimuth information about vehicles and stationary objects in front of the vehicle. Another sensor aperture may be located on the dash of the vehicle and obtains image information about vehicles and stationary objects in front of the vehicle. Another sensor aperture may be located on the side of the vehicle and obtains either range and azimuth data or image data in order to determine velocity and track information on vehicles that pass the vehicle. These new systems must take all of the information from the multiple sensors apertures on the vehicle and compute an accurate picture of the moving objects around the vehicle; this is known as kinematic state of the targets, or Situation Awareness (SA). To do this the Situation Awareness Platform (SAP) must accurately align the sensors apertures to each other so that information about a target from one sensor aperture can be used with information about the target from a different sensor aperture. This is called Sensor Fusion (SF), this is necessary for the SAP to get an optimal kinematic state of the targets around the vehicle in order to assess threat. The sensor apertures must also be aligned to the body of the vehicle so that the SAP can determine the position and velocity of the target with respect to the vehicle; this is called Navigation Fusion (NF).
  • One method of aligning the sensors apertures to each other and to the vehicle is to use mechanical and optical instruments, such as auto-collimators and laser boresight tools, during the production of the vehicle. This technique is not only costly, but would be require if a sensor aperture were repaired or replaced after production. An alignment procedure would have to be performed again in order to assure the safety critical systems were reporting accurately. Also as the vehicle goes through normal wear and tear the sensor apertures would start to become misaligned and may not be noticed by the operator. This means that the data from the sensor apertures would not correlate with each other and the vehicle reference frame until the sensor apertures were aligned again. Again, this would be costly to the vehicle operator and until performed, the SAP may not provide accurate data. Therefore, a method to align the sensor apertures to each other and to the vehicle without the use of sophisticated optical tools is required. This patent addresses this problem by describing methods that can be used to align the sensor apertures to each other and to the vehicle that do not require external alignment equipment.
  • In a discussion of Prior Art, U.S. Pat. No. 5,245,909, Automatic Sensor Alignment, relates to systems for maintaining alignment-sensitive aircraft-borne avionics and weapons sensors in precise alignment. It further relates to methods for precisely aligning sensitive avionics for weapons system instrumentation, which is subject to vibrations causing misalignment. Whereas this disclosure relates to methods and systems that support advanced automotive systems not described in the prior art. A second key difference is the reliance of sensor data from the vehicle as part of the alignment method. Another difference is using image apertures with elements of the vehicle in the field of view of the imager and employing optical methods for determining changes to the alignment with respect to the vehicle and vehicle reference frame, then applying a compensation based on the misalignment angle measured. Finally, this system described herein does not require a reliance on boresighting and aligning any sensor to achieve a vehicle reference frame.
  • U.S. Pat. No. 6,202,027, Automatic Curve Sensor Calibration, describes an improved system for accurately determining the travel path of a host vehicle and the azimuth angle of a target vehicle through an automatic calibration that detects and compensates for misalignment and curve sensor drift. The difference is a reliance on observed objects and track file generation and subsequent changes to the track files over time. Whereas this patent teaches methods of alignment based force vectors, rotational rates or optically measured changes with respect to the vehicle reference frame. Essentially all observed objects are compensated for misalignment error on the observing vehicle.
  • U.S. Pat. No. 5,031,330, Electronic Boresight, teaches that pairs of level sensing devices can be used in a method that aligns plane surfaces to one another by tilting platforms equal to the amount misalignment measured to adjust the sensor azimuth. Whereas this patent teaches that the sensor apertures are rigidly mounted to the vehicle and correction to misalignment is done by compensation values observed with respect to the vehicle reference frame.
  • Different sensors can be used in vehicles to identify objects and possible collision conditions. For example, there may be an optical sensor, such as a camera, mounted to the roof of the vehicle. Another Infrared (IR) sensor may be mounted in the front grill of the vehicle. A third inertial sensor may be located in yet another location in the central portion of the vehicle. Data from these different sensors is correlated together to identify and track objects that may come within a certain vicinity of the vehicle.
  • The measurements from the different sensors must be translated to a common reference point before the different data can be accurately correlated. This translation is difficult because the sensors are positioned in different locations on the vehicle. For example, the sensor located inside the front bumper of the vehicle may move in one direction during a collision while the sensor located on the top of the vehicle roof may move in a different direction.
  • One of the sensors may also experience vibrations at a different time than the other sensor. For example, the front bumper sensor may experience a vertical or horizontal movement when the vehicle runs over an obstacle before any movements or vibrations are experienced by the roof sensor. This different movements of sensors relative to each other make is very difficult to accurately determine the precise position and orientation of the sensors when the sensor readings are taken. This makes it difficult to translate the data into common reference coordinates.
  • The present invention addresses this and other problems associated with the prior art.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • A vehicle sensor system configured to gather sensory data 360 degrees around the vehicle, comprising of sensor apertures for gathering data such as: range (e.g. ultrasonic); range and azimuth (e.g. laser and/or radar); images (e.g. optical and/or thermal). The vehicle has sensors that align and establish a vehicle reference frame by measuring body yaw, pitch and roll rates as well as acceleration along the 3 axes of the vehicle. The imaging apertures that have a clear view of body mold lines, like hood or rear deck, will align themselves to the vehicle reference frame, those apertures that can not align using optical methods are aligned to the vehicle using accelerometers and rates sensors by reading the inertial acceleration or angular rotation to align themselves to each other. An Integrated Computing Platform (ICP) hosts the SAP software that maintains complete system alignment by determining differences in alignment and applying or updating a compensation value with respect to the vehicle body coordinates resulting in a dynamically boresighted system.
  • A multi-sensor system includes multiple sensors that are integrated onto the same substrate forming a unitary multi-sensor platform that provides a known consistent physical relationship between the multiple sensors. A processor can also be integrated onto the substrate so that data from the multiple sensors can be processed locally by the multi-sensor system.
  • The foregoing and other objects, features and advantages of the invention will become more readily apparent from the following detailed description of a preferred embodiment of the invention which proceeds with reference to the accompanying drawings.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 is a diagram showing how a common inertial acceleration is sensed by accelerometers on each sensor and can be used to align the sensor coordinate frames.
  • FIG. 2 is a diagram showing the pitch angles used to determine the pitch misalignment angle of the optical sensor.
  • FIG. 3 is a diagram showing the yaw data that is used to determine the yaw misalignment angle of the optical sensor.
  • FIG. 4 is a diagram showing the roll data that is used to determine the roll misalignment angle of the optical sensor.
  • FIG. 5 is an image showing the top of the hood and how it is used to compute the pitch misalignment angle.
  • FIG. 6 is a magnified image of the hood line showing the pixels of the image.
  • FIG. 7 is an image showing the top of the hood and how it is used to compute the roll misalignment angle.
  • FIG. 8 is a magnified image of the banked hood line showing the pixels of the image.
  • FIG. 9 is an image showing the top of the hood and how it is used to compute the yaw misalignment angle.
  • FIG. 10 is a flow chart that shows the alignment process when all sensors have micro-inertials.
  • FIG. 11 is a flow chart that shows the alignment process when using micro-inertials and an optical sensor.
  • FIG. 12 is a flow chart that shows the alignment process when all of the sensors are optical.
  • FIG. 13 is a flow chart that shows the alignment when the sensors are on a common platform.
  • FIG. 14 is a block diagram of a multi-sensor system.
  • FIG. 15 is a block diagram of an alternate embodiment of the multi-sensor system that includes an on-board processor. FIG. 16 is a flow diagram showing how the processor in FIG. 15 operates.
  • FIG. 17 is detailed diagram showing how different elements in the multi-sensor system are electrically connected together.
  • FIG. 18 is a diagram showing how different multi-sensor systems operate together to track objects.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • One method is to attach three axis accelerometers to each sensor and to the vehicle and use gravity and the acceleration of the vehicle, which will be sensed by the accelerometers, to align the sensor axes to each other and to the vehicle. Information from the vehicle that is available on the Car Area Network (CAN) bus will also be used to perform the calculation of the misalignment angles. FIG. 1 shows in two dimensions the relation between sensor aperture A frame, sensor aperture B frame and the vehicle body reference frame. There are two accelerometers that sense acceleration in the X and Y axes of the sensor apertures and vehicle. This problem can easily be expanded to three dimensions with another accelerometer located in the Z-axes of each sensor and vehicle.
  • In FIG. 1 the vehicle experiences a linear acceleration and this common acceleration is observed by the accelerometers located on sensor aperture A, sensor aperture B and the vehicle body. The accelerometers that are attached to the vehicle body are aligned to the vehicle body reference frame. By taking the difference in acceleration data from the accelerometers on sensor aperture A and sensor aperture B and inputting this data in a Kalman Filter, the misalignment angle between the two sensor apertures, .theta.sa-.theta.sb, can be computed. The same can be done between sensor aperture A and the vehicle body, and sensor aperture B and the vehicle body to compute all of the misalignment angles. This approach can be used to compute the three dimensional misalignment angles of roll, pitch and yaw between sensor apertures and the vehicle body reference frame.
  • The same approach can be used when the vehicle is turning and each accelerometer group experiences a centripetal acceleration. However, in this case the difference in accelerations must be compensated by the centripetal acceleration resulting from the lever arm vector between the two sensor apertures and the angular rotation of the vehicle. The angular rotation of the vehicle is sensed by a gyro triad or micro-inertial device located at the vehicle body reference frame Acomp=Asensora−wxwxR1 The input to the Kalman filter is now: Acomp−Asensorb where: Asensora is the acceleration measured by sensor A accelerometers Asensorb is the acceleration measured by sensor B accelerometers w is the angular rotation of the vehicle measured by the ref gyros x is the cross product of two vectors R1 is the lever arm vector between sensor A and sensor B Acomp is the sensor acceleration compensated for lever arm rotation.
  • Also if the vehicle is stationary, the accelerometer groups will sense gravity and this can be used to help compute some of the misalignment angles. Information from the vehicle CAN bus, such as wheel rotation speeds are zero, will tell the Kalman filter that the vehicle is not moving and the only sensed acceleration will be from gravity.
  • FIG. 10 is a flow chart showing the process when all of the sensor apertures, as well as the vehicle body, have a micro-inertial attached to them. When the vehicle is moving, the micro-inertials sense the angular rotation and/or acceleration of the vehicle and this information is the input to a Kalman filter. The filter uses this information to estimate the roll, pitch and yaw misalignment angles between a sensor aperture and the vehicle body frame. These misalignment angles are then used to rotate the sensor target data into the vehicle body frame. With all of the target data in a common reference frame the processor can fuse data from several sensors into an optimal target track file.
  • The second method is to use accelerometers to align the sensor apertures to each other and one of the sensor apertures is aligned to the vehicle body by using optical information from the sensor aperture itself. For example, acceleration data can be used to align sensor aperture A to sensor aperture B, but sensor aperture B is aligned to the vehicle body directly by using sensor aperture B to compute the misalignment angles between sensor aperture B and the vehicle body. Since sensor aperture A is aligned to sensor aperture B and sensor aperture B is aligned to the vehicle body, you can compute the misalignment between sensor aperture A and the vehicle body. Sensor aperture B can be a visual sensor aperture, such as a video camera, and by observing the outline of the hood and body of the vehicle using this camera, you can compute the misalignment angles between sensor aperture B and the vehicle body frame.
  • FIG. 2 shows that the pitch misalignment angle is the angle between the sensor aperture's X-axis and vehicle's X-axis in the vertical plane. The pitch angle between the vehicle X-axis and a line from the sensor aperture to the top point of the hood, .PHI.vehicle, can be computed from the vehicle's dimensions. The image from the sensor aperture, FIG. 5 for example, shows the top of the hood. By counting the pixels from the center of the image down to the hood, Pp, the sensor aperture pitch angle can be computed. Using a 480.times.640 pixel image, this angle can be computed to within 1 pixel, see FIG. 6. With a vertical field of view, FOVv, the pitch angle is: .PHI.s=(Pp/480)*FOVv The pitch misalignment angle is: .PHI.misalign=.PHI.s−.PHI.vehicle.
  • FIG. 3 shows that the small yaw misalignment angle is the angle between the sensor aperture's X axis and vehicle's X axis in the horizontal plane. The sensor aperture image shows the left and right edges of the hood, FIG. 9. By computing the pixels from the left hood edge or mark on the hood to the left of the image border, Pyl, and the right hood edge or mark to the right border, Pyr, the yaw angle of the sensor aperture misalignment with a horizontal field of view, FOVh is: .PSI.Misalign=((Pyl−Pyr)/2*640)*FOVh.
  • FIG. 4 shows that the small roll misalignment angle is the angle between the sensor aperture's Y-axis and vehicle's Y-axis in the vertical plane. The sensor aperture image shows that the hood line and the sensor aperture level lines cross to form the roll misalignment angle. This is shown in FIG. 7. By measuring the pixels between the two lines at the edge of the image, Pr, the roll misalignment angle can be computed as follows: .THETA.Misalign=(2*Pr/640)*180/.pi. FIG. 8 shows that the hood line can be determined accurately to within a couple of pixels.
  • FIG. 11 is a flow chart showing the process when at least one of the sensors is an optical device. All of the sensors have a micro-inertial attached to them. The optical device can see the targets and the outline of features of the vehicle, such as the hood line. The optical sensor uses the hood line information to compute the roll, pitch and yaw misalignment angles between the optical sensor frame and the vehicle body frame.
  • When the vehicle is moving, the micro-inertials sense the angular rotation and/or acceleration of the vehicle. Like FIG. 10, the Kalman filter estimates the roll, pitch and yaw misalignment angles between a sensor aperture frame and the optical sensor frame. These misalignment angles as well as the misalignment angles between the optical sensor and the vehicle body frame are then used to rotate all of the sensor target data into the vehicle body frame. Again, with all of the target data in a common reference frame the processor can fuse data from several sensors into an optimal target track file.
  • A third method is to use optical information from sensor aperture A and sensor aperture B to compute the misalignment between the two sensor apertures and to use optical information from sensor aperture B to compute the misalignment between sensor aperture B and the vehicle body. For example, sensor aperture A can be a ranging laser sensor aperture and it sends out multiply beams of light to detect a target. When the light is reflected from the target, sensor aperture B can also detect the reflected light in its video camera and using this information it can compute the misalignment between sensor aperture A and sensor aperture B.
  • FIG. 12 is a flow chart showing the process when all of the sensors on the vehicle are optical sensors. Each optical device can see targets and the outline of features of the vehicle, such as the hood or truck line. The optical sensors use this vehicle body information to compute the roll, pitch and yaw misalignment angles between the optical sensor frame and the vehicle body frame. These misalignment angles are then used to rotate the sensor target data from each sensor into the vehicle body frame. Like the two cases above, with all of the target data in a common reference frame the processor can fuse data from several sensors into an optimal target track file.
  • A fourth method is to collocate all of the sensor apertures into one box that is mounted on the vehicle, such as the roof, so that all sensor apertures are always aligned with respect to each other and the only alignment required is the alignment between this sensor aperture box and the vehicle body. This can be performed by using a set of accelerometers in the sensor aperture box and on the vehicle body frame or optically by using a video camera in the sensor aperture box.
  • FIG. 13 shows the case where all of the sensors are mounted onto one fixed platform. If one of the sensors is an optical sensor then it can be used to align the platform frame to the vehicle body frame as shown above. Once this set of misalignment angles is computed, then all of the target data from all of the sensors can be rotated to the common vehicle body reference frame. As shown above all of the target data is now in one reference frame for computing the optimal target tracks. If none of the sensors are optical, then a set of micro-inertials can be mounted on the common platform and also on the vehicle body. While the vehicle is moving the Kalman filter can now be used to compute the misalignment angles as discussed in the above paragraphs.
  • The systems described above can use dedicated processor systems, micro controllers, programmable logic devices, or microprocessors that perform some or all of the operations. Some of the operations described above may be implemented in software and other operations may be implemented in hardware.
  • For the sake of convenience, the operations are described as various interconnected functional blocks or distinct software modules. This is not necessary, however, and there may be cases where these functional blocks or modules are equivalently aggregated into a single logic device, program or operation with unclear boundaries. In any event, the functional blocks and software modules or described features can be implemented by themselves, or in combination with other operations in either hardware or software.
  • Having described and illustrated the principles of the invention in a preferred embodiment thereof, it should be apparent that the invention may be modified in arrangement and detail without departing from such principles. Claim is made to all modifications and variation coming within the spirit and scope of the following claims.
  • FIG. 14 shows a multi-sensor system 20812 that includes different sensors 20816 and 20818 that are both integrally attached to or integrally formed into the substrate 20814. Because the two sensors 20816 and 20818 are integrated onto the same substrate 20814, any forces experienced by sensor 20816 are also experienced by sensor 20818. One type of material that is used for substrate 20814 is invar. Invar is a rigid metal that has been cured with respect to temperature so that its dimensions do not change with fluxuations in temperature. Any rigid material that is resilient to expansion or contraction with temperature changes can be used.
  • Locating the sensors 20816 and 20818 on the same substrate 20814 simplifies the cost of sensor manufacturing and installation. For example, the two sensors 20816 can be assembled onto the substrate 20814 in a factory prior to being installed on a vehicle. If the two sensors 20816 and 20818 were not mounted on the same substrate 20814, then each sensor would have to be separately mounted on the vehicle and then calibrated to a known alignment with respect to each other. Even if the two sensors were installed correctly, changes in the shape of the vehicle due to wear, temperature, etc. over time could change the initial alignment between the two sensors.
  • Premounting or prefabricating the sensors 20816 and 20818 on the substrate 20814 prior to installation on a vehicle, prevents these alignment errors. Only the substrate 208 14 of the multi-sensor system 20812 has to be mounted to the vehicle, not the individual sensors 20816 and 20818. This allows the relative position 20820 and alignment between the two sensors 20816 and 20818 to remain the same regardless of how the substrate 20814 is mounted on the vehicle.
  • Wiring is also simplified since only one wiring harness has to be run through the vehicle to the multi-sensor system 20812.
  • In one example, the sensor 20816 senses an area 20824 and the sensor 20818 senses an area 20822 that are both coincident. One of the sensors may have a wider field of view than the other sensor. There can also be more than two sensors on substrate 20814 and any active or passive sensor that provides object detection or vehicle force measurements can be mounted onto substrate 20814. Some examples of sensors include ultrasonic, Infra-Red (IR), video, radar, and lidar sensors.
  • Depending on the substrate 20814 and the types of sensors, different mounting techniques can be used. The sensors may be separate components that are glued or bolted onto the substrate 20814. If the multi-sensor system 20812 is an integrated circuit, then the sensors 20816 and 20818 may be integrally fabricated onto a silicon or alternative temperature resilent substrate 20814 using known deposition processes.
  • In one example, sensor 20814 is a radar or lidar sensor and sensor 20818 is a camera. Combining a video camera sensor with a radar and/or lidar sensor on the substrate 14 provides several advantages. The camera sensor 20818 provides good angle resolution and object identification. The radar or lidar sensor 20816 on the other hand is very effective in identifying range information.
  • Combining the camera video sensor 20818 with the radar or lidar sensor 20816 on the same substrate 20814 allows more effective correlation of camera angle and identification data with radar or lidar range information. For example, the radar sensor 20814 may only be able to measure angle of an object to within one-half a degree. Because of the limited angle accuracy of the radar angle readings, it may not be possible to determine from the radar reading along if an oncoming vehicle is coming from the same lane of traffic or from an opposite lane of traffic.
  • The video sensor 20818 may be able to accurately determine the angle of an object to within one-tenth or one-one hundredth of a degree. By correlating the radar information with the camera information, the location of an on-coming vehicle can be determined more accurately.
  • Do to vibration differences and possible inaccuracies in sensor alignment, it may not be possible, within fractional degrees of accuracy, to correlate information with separately mounted sensors. In other words, if the camera angle varies within plus or minus one degree with respect to the radar angle, then the camera data may not be able to refine the radar measurements.
  • By mounting the camera sensor 20818 and the radar sensor 20816 to the same substrate 20814, the relative position and alignment between the two sensors remains essentially the same regardless of physical effects on the vehicle. Thus, the camera data can be correlated with radar data to within fractions of a degree of accuracy.
  • In another example, a first sensor may detect one object out in front of the vehicle. A second sensor located somewhere else on the vehicle may detect two different objects in front of the vehicle. Because of vibrations in different parts of the vehicle, a central processor may not be able to determine which of the two objects detected by the second sensor is associated with the object detected by the first sensor. With the multi-sensor system 20812, measurement errors caused by this vehicle vibration is cancelled since the two sensors 20816 and 20818 effectively experience the same amount of vibration at the same time.
  • FIG. 14 shows an alternative embodiment where a processor 20826 is mounted to the substrate 20814. Again the processor 20826 can be a standalone component that is rigidly attached to substrate 20814. Alternatively, the processor 20826 is a portion of the same integrated circuit that also contains the circuitry for sensors 20816 and 20818. The processor 20826 can perform signal processing tasks for both sensor 20818 and sensor 20816 and can also handle communication and diagnostics tasks. Tracks for identified objects are sent over connection 20828 to other multi-sensor systems in the vehicle or to a vehicle control system as shown later in FIG. 18.
  • In previous multi-sensor applications, each sensor was required to send all data back to the same central processing system. This takes additional time and circuitry to send all of the data over a bus. By mounting the processor 20826 in the multi-sensor system 20812, data from both sensor 20816 and sensor 20818 can be processed locally requiring fewer reports to be sent over connection 20828.
  • Referring to FIG. 16, the processor 20826 in FIG. 14 receives radar reports from the first sensor 20816 in block 20834. The processor 20826 receives image reports from the second sensor 20818 in block 20836. The processor 20826 correlates the different reports in block 20838. Since the relative position of the two sensors 20816 and 20818 are the same and possibly coincident, the processor 20826 does not have to perform as many calculations transforming sensor measurements into common body coordinates for the vehicle.
  • The correlation may include first determining if the reports actually identify an object in block 20840. The processor 20826 can verify or refine object detection information from one of the sensors with the message reports received from the other sensor. If both sensors do not verify detection of the same object within some degree of certainty, then the processor system 20826 may discard the message reports or continue to analyze additional reports in block 20840.
  • When an object is detected in block 20840, the processor 20826 only has to send one report in block 20842 representing the information obtained from both sensor 20816 and sensor 20818. This reduces the total amount of data that has to be sent either to a central controller or another multi-sensor system in block 20842.
  • FIG. 17 shows in further detail the different devices that may be integrated on the multi-sensor substrate 20814. Camera optics 20850 and radar transmit/receive modules 20852 are each connected to a Central Processing Unit (CPU) 20854 and a digital signal processor 20856. A memory 20858 is used to store sensor data, signal processing applications and other operating system functions. The CPU 20854 is also used for conducting distributed sensor fusion as described in further detail below.
  • Distributed Sensor Fusion
  • Referring to FIG. 18, different multi-sensor systems 20812A-20812D are used for monitoring different zones around a vehicle 20860. For example, system 20812A monitors zone 1, system 20812B monitors zone 2, system 20812C monitors zone 3 and system 20812D monitors zone 4. The CPU 20854 and digital signal processor 20856 (FIG. 17) in each multi-sensor system 20812A-20812D in combination with the camera and radar sensors identify and track objects autonomously, without having to communicate with a central controller 20868 in vehicle 20860.
  • Whenever an object is detected, identified and tracked, a track file is created for that object in memory 20858 (FIG. 17). If the object moves to another zone around the vehicle 20860, the multi-sensor system for the zone where the object was previously detected only has to send the track files to the other multi-sensor system associated with the overlapping region.
  • For example, a bicycle 20865 may be initially detected by multi-sensor system 20812A at location 20864A in zone 1. The multi-sensor system 20812A creates a track file containing position, speed, acceleration, range, angle, heading, etc. for the bike 20865. As the vehicle 20860 moves, or the bike 20865 moves, or both, the bike 20865 may move into a new position 20864B in an overlapping region 208 66 between zone 1 and zone 2. The multi-sensor system 20812A upon detecting the bike 20865 in the overlapping region 20866 sends the latest track file for the bike 20865 to multi-sensor system 20812B over bus 20862. This allows the multi-sensor system 20812B to start actively tracking bike 20865 using the track information received from multi-sensor system 20812A.
  • The multi-sensor system 20812A only has to send a few of the latest track files for the common area 20866 over connection 20864 to multi-sensor 20812B in order for system 20812B to maintain a track on bike 208 65. The track files can be exchanged between any of the multi-sensor systems 20812A-20812D. When there are two multi-sensor systems that have overlapping tracks for the same object, the track file with the greatest confidence of accuracy is used for vehicle warning, security, and control operations. There are known algorithms that calculate track files and calculate a degree of confidence in the track file calculations. Therefore, describing these algorithms will not be discussed in further detail.
  • There may be vibrational effects on the different multi-sensor systems 20812A-20812D. This however does not effect the track calculations generated by the individual multi-sensor systems 20812A-20812D. The only compensation for any vibration may be when the track files are translated into body coordinates when a possible control decision is made by the central controller 208 68.
  • The connection 20862 can a CAN bus, wireless 802.11 link or any other type of wired or wireless link. The system described above can use dedicated processor systems, micro controllers, programmable logic devices, or microprocessors that perform some or all of the operations. Some of the operations described above may be implemented in software and other operations may be implemented in hardware.
  • For the sake of convenience, the operations are described as various interconnected functional blocks or distinct software modules. This is not necessary, however, and there may be cases where these functional blocks or modules are equivalently aggregated into a single logic device, program or operation with unclear boundaries. In any event, the functional blocks and software modules or features of the flexible interface can be implemented by themselves, or in combination with other operations in either hardware or software.

Claims (13)

Having described and illustrated the principles of the invention in a preferred embodiment thereof, it should be apparent that the invention may be modified in arrangement and detail without departing from such principles. I claim all modifications and variation coming within the spirit and scope of the following claims.
1. (canceled)
2. A method for determining accelerometer location on a vehicle, comprising:
mounting a first accelerometer on a vehicle;
mounting a second accelerometer on a vehicle;
determining the center of rotation, width of the vehicle track, and wheelbase of the vehicle and logging into memory as a vehicle data set;
establishing a uniform Cartesian grid and overlaying the vehicle data set on the Cartesian grid and logging into memory as a vehicle reference frame;
placing the vehicle into a motion parallel to its longitudinal axis at a first constant speed and first steering angle;
obtaining the first constant speed and the first steering angle of the vehicle and logging into memory as an initial velocity data set;
maneuvering the vehicle into a turn, wherein the vehicle maintains the second constant speed at a second steering angle with respect to the longitudinal axis and logging into memory as a maneuver velocity data set;
measuring the centripetal acceleration of the first accelerometer and determining magnitude and direction of the acceleration measured by the first accelerometer and logging into memory as a first accelerometer data set;
measuring the centripetal acceleration of the second accelerometer and determining magnitude and direction of the acceleration measured by the second accelerometer and logging into memory as a second accelerometer data set;
downloading the data sets logged into memory, comprising at least one of the:
vehicle reference frame,
initial velocity data set,
maneuver velocity data set,
first accelerometer data set, and
second accelerometer data set;
responsive to downloading the data sets from memory, using the data to determine at least one of the location and orientation of the first and second accelerometer with respect to the center of rotation on the vehicle reference frame.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein the first accelerometer is mounted on a first object detection sensor.
4. The method of claim 3, wherein the second accelerometer is mounted on a second object detection sensor.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein the first and second object detection sensors are components within a vehicle object detection system.
6. The system of claim 2, wherein memory comprises any, hard disk, Read Only Memory (ROM), Dynamic Random Access memory (RAM), or any combination of different memory devices.
7. A system for determining accelerometer location on a vehicle, comprising:
a first accelerometer mounted on a vehicle;
a second accelerometer mounted on a vehicle;
system memory;
a vehicle data set, wherein the vehicle data set includes at least one of center of rotation, width of the vehicle track, and wheelbase of the vehicle, and wherein the vehicle data set is logged into memory;
a uniform Cartesian grid, wherein the vehicle data set is overlaid on the Cartesian grid and logged into memory as a vehicle reference frame;
vehicle controls operative to place the vehicle into a motion parallel to its longitudinal axis at a first constant speed and a first steering angle;
one or more processors operative to:
obtain the first constant speed and a the first steering angle of the vehicle as an initial velocity data set, wherein the initial velocity data set is logged into memory;
vehicle controls further operative to maneuver the vehicle into a turn, wherein the vehicle maintains a second constant speed at a second steering angle with respect to the longitudinal axis to provide a maneuver velocity data set to be logged into memory;
the one or more processors further operative to:
measure the centripetal acceleration of the first accelerometer and determine magnitude and direction of the acceleration measured by the first accelerometer to produce a first accelerometer data set, wherein the first accelerometer data set is logged into memory;
measure the centripetal acceleration of the second accelerometer and determine magnitude and direction of the acceleration measured by the second accelerometer to produce a second accelerometer data set, wherein the second accelerometer data set is logged into memory;
download the data sets logged into memory, comprising at least one of the:
vehicle reference frame,
initial velocity data set,
maneuver velocity data set,
first accelerometer data set, and
second accelerometer data set;
download the data sets from memory, wherein the processor uses the data to determine at least one of the location and orientation of the first and second accelerometer with respect to the center of rotation on the vehicle reference frame.
8. The system of claim 7, wherein the first accelerometer is mounted on a first object detection sensor.
9. The system of claim 8, wherein the second accelerometer is mounted on a second object detection sensor.
10. The system of claim 9, wherein the first and second object detection sensors are components within a vehicle object detection system.
11. The system of claim 7, wherein memory comprises any, hard disk, Read Only Memory (ROM), Dynamic Random Access memory (RAM), or any combination of different memory devices.
12. The system of claim 11, wherein memory includes central memory that all or some of the one or more processors can access.
13. The system of claim 12, wherein memory comprises one or more different memories that are accessed by one or more specific processors.
US14/617,815 2004-11-09 2015-02-09 Method and apparatus for the alignment of multi-aperture systems Abandoned US20150153376A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US14/617,815 US20150153376A1 (en) 2004-11-09 2015-02-09 Method and apparatus for the alignment of multi-aperture systems

Applications Claiming Priority (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/985,577 US7337650B1 (en) 2004-11-09 2004-11-09 System and method for aligning sensors on a vehicle
US12/024,058 US7681448B1 (en) 2004-11-09 2008-01-31 System and method for aligning sensors on a vehicle
US12/698,960 US8001860B1 (en) 2004-11-09 2010-02-02 Method and apparatus for the alignment of multi-aperture systems
US13/010,675 US8978439B1 (en) 2004-11-09 2011-01-20 System and apparatus for the alignment of multi-aperture systems
US14/617,815 US20150153376A1 (en) 2004-11-09 2015-02-09 Method and apparatus for the alignment of multi-aperture systems

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/010,675 Continuation US8978439B1 (en) 2004-11-09 2011-01-20 System and apparatus for the alignment of multi-aperture systems

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20150153376A1 true US20150153376A1 (en) 2015-06-04

Family

ID=39125321

Family Applications (5)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/985,577 Active 2024-12-21 US7337650B1 (en) 2004-11-09 2004-11-09 System and method for aligning sensors on a vehicle
US12/024,058 Active 2024-12-03 US7681448B1 (en) 2004-11-09 2008-01-31 System and method for aligning sensors on a vehicle
US12/698,960 Expired - Fee Related US8001860B1 (en) 2004-11-09 2010-02-02 Method and apparatus for the alignment of multi-aperture systems
US13/010,675 Active 2027-09-13 US8978439B1 (en) 2004-11-09 2011-01-20 System and apparatus for the alignment of multi-aperture systems
US14/617,815 Abandoned US20150153376A1 (en) 2004-11-09 2015-02-09 Method and apparatus for the alignment of multi-aperture systems

Family Applications Before (4)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/985,577 Active 2024-12-21 US7337650B1 (en) 2004-11-09 2004-11-09 System and method for aligning sensors on a vehicle
US12/024,058 Active 2024-12-03 US7681448B1 (en) 2004-11-09 2008-01-31 System and method for aligning sensors on a vehicle
US12/698,960 Expired - Fee Related US8001860B1 (en) 2004-11-09 2010-02-02 Method and apparatus for the alignment of multi-aperture systems
US13/010,675 Active 2027-09-13 US8978439B1 (en) 2004-11-09 2011-01-20 System and apparatus for the alignment of multi-aperture systems

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (5) US7337650B1 (en)

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN111142082A (en) * 2018-11-02 2020-05-12 现代自动车株式会社 Apparatus and method for calibrating zero point of radar for vehicle
US10698084B2 (en) * 2017-06-16 2020-06-30 Robert Bosch Gmbh Method and system for carrying out a calibration of a sensor
CN111578839A (en) * 2020-05-25 2020-08-25 北京百度网讯科技有限公司 Obstacle coordinate processing method and device, electronic equipment and readable storage medium
US20210149020A1 (en) * 2018-04-20 2021-05-20 ZF Automotive UK Limited A radar apparatus for a vehicle and method of detecting misalignment
US20220179431A1 (en) * 2020-12-04 2022-06-09 Ship And Ocean Industries R&D Center Assistance system for correcting vessel path and operation method thereof
US11805390B2 (en) 2018-12-05 2023-10-31 Here Global B.V. Method, apparatus, and computer program product for determining sensor orientation

Families Citing this family (95)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7146260B2 (en) 2001-04-24 2006-12-05 Medius, Inc. Method and apparatus for dynamic configuration of multiprocessor system
US10298735B2 (en) 2001-04-24 2019-05-21 Northwater Intellectual Property Fund L.P. 2 Method and apparatus for dynamic configuration of a multiprocessor health data system
WO2006014974A2 (en) 2004-07-26 2006-02-09 Automotive Systems Laboratory, Inc. Vulnerable road user protection system
US7337650B1 (en) * 2004-11-09 2008-03-04 Medius Inc. System and method for aligning sensors on a vehicle
US7711483B2 (en) * 2005-11-15 2010-05-04 Sirf Technology, Inc. Dead reckoning system
US8494805B2 (en) 2005-11-28 2013-07-23 Orthosensor Method and system for assessing orthopedic alignment using tracking sensors
US8000926B2 (en) * 2005-11-28 2011-08-16 Orthosensor Method and system for positional measurement using ultrasonic sensing
US8098544B2 (en) 2005-11-29 2012-01-17 Orthosensor, Inc. Method and system for enhancing accuracy in ultrasonic alignment
US8864686B2 (en) * 2005-12-01 2014-10-21 Orthosensor Inc. Virtual mapping of an anatomical pivot point and alignment therewith
US8814810B2 (en) * 2005-12-01 2014-08-26 Orthosensor Inc. Orthopedic method and system for mapping an anatomical pivot point
US7779703B2 (en) * 2006-06-15 2010-08-24 The Boeing Company System and method for aligning a device relative to a reference point of a vehicle
US8421642B1 (en) 2006-08-24 2013-04-16 Navisense System and method for sensorized user interface
US8638296B1 (en) 2006-09-05 2014-01-28 Jason McIntosh Method and machine for navigation system calibration
US8086405B2 (en) * 2007-06-28 2011-12-27 Sirf Technology Holdings, Inc. Compensation for mounting misalignment of a navigation device
US8005563B2 (en) 2007-10-26 2011-08-23 The Boeing Company System for assembling aircraft
US8326587B2 (en) * 2007-12-13 2012-12-04 The Boeing Company System, method, and computer program product for predicting cruise orientation of an as-built airplane
US8733707B2 (en) 2008-04-17 2014-05-27 The Boeing Company Line transfer system for airplane
US7869895B2 (en) * 2007-12-13 2011-01-11 The Boeing Company System, method, and computer program product for computing orientation alignment transfer tool locations to transfer predicted cruise orientation alignment of an as-built airplane
US9189083B2 (en) 2008-03-18 2015-11-17 Orthosensor Inc. Method and system for media presentation during operative workflow
US8047047B2 (en) * 2008-05-16 2011-11-01 Honeywell International Inc. Inertial sensor misalignment and compensation
US8061181B2 (en) * 2008-05-16 2011-11-22 Honeywell International Inc. Inertial sensor misalignment and compensation
US9279882B2 (en) * 2008-09-19 2016-03-08 Caterpillar Inc. Machine sensor calibration system
US20100077860A1 (en) * 2008-09-30 2010-04-01 Honeywell International Inc. Systems and methods for integrated isolator and transducer components in an inertial sensor
DE102008042651B4 (en) 2008-10-07 2022-02-24 Robert Bosch Gmbh Procedure for determining measurement deviations
CN101769784B (en) * 2008-12-27 2012-06-20 鸿富锦精密工业(深圳)有限公司 Sensor assembly
US8108147B1 (en) * 2009-02-06 2012-01-31 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Apparatus and method for automatic omni-directional visual motion-based collision avoidance
US9358924B1 (en) 2009-05-08 2016-06-07 Eagle Harbor Holdings, Llc System and method for modeling advanced automotive safety systems
DE102009028072A1 (en) * 2009-07-29 2011-02-10 Robert Bosch Gmbh Calibrating method for calibrating step counter fixed at e.g. belt of chronic sick patient for detecting movement of patient, during movement conditions in medical area, involves determining phase angle between for determining signal
US8248301B2 (en) * 2009-07-31 2012-08-21 CSR Technology Holdings Inc. Method and apparatus for using GPS satellite state computations in GLONASS measurement processing
US8212874B2 (en) * 2009-10-23 2012-07-03 GM Global Technology Operations LLC Automatic camera calibration using GPS and solar tracking
US8566032B2 (en) * 2009-10-30 2013-10-22 CSR Technology Holdings Inc. Methods and applications for altitude measurement and fusion of user context detection with elevation motion for personal navigation systems
US8781737B2 (en) * 2009-11-20 2014-07-15 Qualcomm Incorporated Spatial alignment determination for an inertial measurement unit (IMU)
US9011448B2 (en) * 2009-12-31 2015-04-21 Orthosensor Inc. Orthopedic navigation system with sensorized devices
DE102010054066A1 (en) * 2010-12-10 2012-06-14 GM Global Technology Operations LLC Method for operating a sensor of a vehicle and driver assistance system for a vehicle
CA2769788C (en) * 2011-03-23 2019-08-13 Trusted Positioning Inc. Methods of attitude and misalignment estimation for constraint free portable navigation
US8775064B2 (en) * 2011-05-10 2014-07-08 GM Global Technology Operations LLC Sensor alignment process and tools for active safety vehicle applications
US8930063B2 (en) * 2012-02-22 2015-01-06 GM Global Technology Operations LLC Method for determining object sensor misalignment
US9165196B2 (en) * 2012-11-16 2015-10-20 Intel Corporation Augmenting ADAS features of a vehicle with image processing support in on-board vehicle platform
DE102013201379B4 (en) * 2013-01-29 2020-12-10 Robert Bosch Gmbh Motorcycle with a camera system
TW201443827A (en) * 2013-05-03 2014-11-16 Altek Autotronics Corp Camera image calibrating system and method of calibrating camera image
EP3076906B1 (en) * 2013-12-05 2018-07-11 Now Technologies Zrt. Personal vehicle, and control apparatus and control method therefore
US9898670B2 (en) * 2013-12-13 2018-02-20 Fts Computertechnik Gmbh Method and device for observing the environment of a vehicle
US10024955B2 (en) 2014-03-28 2018-07-17 GM Global Technology Operations LLC System and method for determining of and compensating for misalignment of a sensor
EP2933707B1 (en) * 2014-04-14 2017-12-06 iOnRoad Technologies Ltd. Head mounted display presentation adjustment
KR101579100B1 (en) 2014-06-10 2015-12-22 엘지전자 주식회사 Apparatus for providing around view and Vehicle including the same
US9836966B2 (en) * 2014-07-24 2017-12-05 Gentex Corporation Accelerometer integrated with display device
CN106030431B (en) * 2014-08-15 2017-11-03 深圳市大疆创新科技有限公司 The automatic calibration system and method for sensor
US9886040B1 (en) * 2014-09-24 2018-02-06 Rockwell Collins, Inc. System and method for platform alignment, navigation or targeting
US10890648B2 (en) * 2014-10-24 2021-01-12 Texas Instruments Incorporated Method and apparatus for generating alignment matrix for camera-radar system
FR3030091B1 (en) * 2014-12-12 2018-01-26 Airbus Operations METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR AUTOMATICALLY DETECTING A DISALLIATION IN OPERATION OF A MONITORING SENSOR OF AN AIRCRAFT.
US9886801B2 (en) * 2015-02-04 2018-02-06 GM Global Technology Operations LLC Vehicle sensor compensation
US9903945B2 (en) * 2015-02-04 2018-02-27 GM Global Technology Operations LLC Vehicle motion estimation enhancement with radar data
DE102015207375A1 (en) * 2015-04-22 2016-10-27 Robert Bosch Gmbh Method and device for monitoring an area in front of a vehicle
EP3158412B8 (en) * 2015-05-23 2019-05-22 SZ DJI Technology Co., Ltd. Sensor fusion using inertial and image sensors
US10088318B2 (en) * 2015-08-27 2018-10-02 Qualcomm Incorporated Cradle rotation insensitive inertial navigation
US10046713B2 (en) * 2016-01-04 2018-08-14 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Sensor apparatus
WO2017176689A1 (en) * 2016-04-06 2017-10-12 Karuza Andy Proximity warning device
US10365355B1 (en) 2016-04-21 2019-07-30 Hunter Engineering Company Method for collective calibration of multiple vehicle safety system sensors
DE102016208460A1 (en) * 2016-05-18 2017-11-23 Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft Position determining device for a single-track motor vehicle, single-track motor vehicle with position-determining device and method for determining the position
US10520317B2 (en) 2016-06-02 2019-12-31 Maliszewski Family 2001 Trust In-situ wheel position measurement using inertial measurement units (IMUs)
US10338887B2 (en) 2016-08-31 2019-07-02 Hunter Engineering Company Method for selective calibration of vehicle safety systems in response to vehicle alignment changes
US10788316B1 (en) 2016-09-21 2020-09-29 Apple Inc. Multi-sensor real-time alignment and calibration
DE102016225579B4 (en) * 2016-12-20 2022-11-17 Audi Ag Method for operating a sensor device of a motor vehicle and motor vehicle
DE102016226312A1 (en) * 2016-12-29 2018-07-05 Robert Bosch Gmbh Method for operating a driver assistance system for motor vehicles
DE102017105209A1 (en) 2017-03-13 2018-09-13 Valeo Schalter Und Sensoren Gmbh Determination of inclination angles with a laser scanner
KR20190130614A (en) * 2017-03-31 2019-11-22 에이캐럿큐브드 바이 에어버스 엘엘씨 Vehicle monitoring system and method for detecting foreign objects
US10272732B2 (en) * 2017-05-31 2019-04-30 GM Global Technology Operations LLC Sensor linked suspension
EP3642904A4 (en) * 2017-06-22 2021-03-17 Saab Ab Arrangement and method for autoalignment of a stabilized subsystem
US10809355B2 (en) * 2017-07-18 2020-10-20 Veoneer Us, Inc. Apparatus and method for detecting alignment of sensor and calibrating antenna pattern response in an automotive detection system
US20190120934A1 (en) * 2017-10-19 2019-04-25 GM Global Technology Operations LLC Three-dimensional alignment of radar and camera sensors
CN108279403B (en) * 2018-01-04 2020-03-17 电子科技大学 Keystone transformation parallel implementation method based on distance framing
CN108318870B (en) * 2018-03-07 2024-01-30 深圳市道通科技股份有限公司 Vehicle-mounted radar calibration equipment
US10388157B1 (en) 2018-03-13 2019-08-20 Allstate Insurance Company Processing system having a machine learning engine for providing a customized driving assistance output
GB2573015A (en) * 2018-04-20 2019-10-23 Trw Ltd A radar apparatus for a vehicle and method of detecting misalignment
US11597091B2 (en) * 2018-04-30 2023-03-07 BPG Sales and Technology Investments, LLC Robotic target alignment for vehicle sensor calibration
EP3788341B1 (en) 2018-04-30 2024-02-07 BPG Sales and Technology Investments, LLC Vehicular alignment for sensor calibration
US11781860B2 (en) 2018-04-30 2023-10-10 BPG Sales and Technology Investments, LLC Mobile vehicular alignment for sensor calibration
US11835646B2 (en) * 2018-04-30 2023-12-05 BPG Sales and Technology Investments, LLC Target alignment for vehicle sensor calibration
US11029390B2 (en) * 2018-07-10 2021-06-08 Ford Motor Company Method and system for performing a vehicle height-radar alignment check to align a radar device provided in a vehicle
US10948590B2 (en) * 2018-07-26 2021-03-16 GM Global Technology Operations LLC Estimation and compensation of transceiver position offsets in a radar system for targets at unknown positions
US10664997B1 (en) * 2018-12-04 2020-05-26 Almotive Kft. Method, camera system, computer program product and computer-readable medium for camera misalignment detection
DE102018221427B4 (en) * 2018-12-11 2020-08-06 Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft Method for determining an existing misalignment of at least one sensor within a sensor network
EP3754359A1 (en) * 2019-06-18 2020-12-23 Zenuity AB Method of determination of alignment angles of radar sensors for a road vehicle radar auto-alignment controller
US11650415B2 (en) 2019-12-16 2023-05-16 Plusai, Inc. System and method for a sensor protection mechanism
US11724669B2 (en) 2019-12-16 2023-08-15 Plusai, Inc. System and method for a sensor protection system
US11077825B2 (en) 2019-12-16 2021-08-03 Plusai Limited System and method for anti-tampering mechanism
US11470265B2 (en) 2019-12-16 2022-10-11 Plusai, Inc. System and method for sensor system against glare and control thereof
US11754689B2 (en) 2019-12-16 2023-09-12 Plusai, Inc. System and method for detecting sensor adjustment need
US11313704B2 (en) 2019-12-16 2022-04-26 Plusai, Inc. System and method for a sensor protection assembly
US11738694B2 (en) * 2019-12-16 2023-08-29 Plusai, Inc. System and method for anti-tampering sensor assembly
DE102020109787A1 (en) 2020-04-08 2021-10-14 Valeo Schalter Und Sensoren Gmbh Determining an angular position of a component of a motor vehicle
JP2021196191A (en) * 2020-06-10 2021-12-27 セイコーエプソン株式会社 Inertia sensor device and method for manufacturing inertia sensor device
CN114067001B (en) * 2022-01-14 2022-04-26 天津所托瑞安汽车科技有限公司 Vehicle-mounted camera angle calibration method, terminal and storage medium
US11772667B1 (en) 2022-06-08 2023-10-03 Plusai, Inc. Operating a vehicle in response to detecting a faulty sensor using calibration parameters of the sensor
DE102022128870B3 (en) 2022-11-01 2024-02-08 Marelli Automotive Lighting Reutlingen (Germany) GmbH Method for determining misorientation of an inertial measuring unit of a vehicle and vehicle with an inertial measuring unit

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20030048357A1 (en) * 2001-08-29 2003-03-13 Geovantage, Inc. Digital imaging system for airborne applications
US20040257441A1 (en) * 2001-08-29 2004-12-23 Geovantage, Inc. Digital imaging system for airborne applications

Family Cites Families (287)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2995318A (en) * 1957-04-26 1961-08-08 Chance Vought Corp Optical data transfer system
US4303978A (en) * 1980-04-18 1981-12-01 The Boeing Company Integrated-strapdown-air-data sensor system
DE3125161A1 (en) 1981-06-26 1983-01-20 Norbert 6500 Mainz Hinkel System for providing motor vehicles with early warning of emergency service vehicles
JPS5987597A (en) 1982-11-11 1984-05-21 日産自動車株式会社 Obstacle detector for vehicle
US4591976A (en) 1983-06-17 1986-05-27 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air Force Multiple task oriented processor
US4829434A (en) 1987-04-29 1989-05-09 General Motors Corporation Adaptive vehicle
DE3752122T3 (en) 1987-05-09 2004-07-29 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Facility for receiving and processing road news reports
US5031330A (en) 1988-01-20 1991-07-16 Kaiser Aerospace & Electronics Corporation Electronic boresight
US5045937A (en) 1989-08-25 1991-09-03 Space Island Products & Services, Inc. Geographical surveying using multiple cameras to obtain split-screen images with overlaid geographical coordinates
US5610815A (en) 1989-12-11 1997-03-11 Caterpillar Inc. Integrated vehicle positioning and navigation system, apparatus and method
US5648901A (en) 1990-02-05 1997-07-15 Caterpillar Inc. System and method for generating paths in an autonomous vehicle
GB9002951D0 (en) 1990-02-09 1990-04-04 Bowman Nigel J Crash warning system
US5008678A (en) 1990-03-02 1991-04-16 Hughes Aircraft Company Electronically scanning vehicle radar sensor
US5245909A (en) 1990-05-07 1993-09-21 Mcdonnell Douglas Corporation Automatic sensor alignment
US5111401A (en) 1990-05-19 1992-05-05 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Navigational control system for an autonomous vehicle
JP2915080B2 (en) 1990-05-25 1999-07-05 株式会社日立製作所 Data processing method in multiprocessor system
US5115245A (en) 1990-09-04 1992-05-19 Hughes Aircraft Company Single substrate microwave radar transceiver including flip-chip integrated circuits
JP3198514B2 (en) 1990-12-27 2001-08-13 株式会社デンソー GPS receiver for vehicles
US5440644A (en) 1991-01-09 1995-08-08 Square D Company Audio distribution system having programmable zoning features
US6484080B2 (en) * 1995-06-07 2002-11-19 Automotive Technologies International Inc. Method and apparatus for controlling a vehicular component
US6738697B2 (en) * 1995-06-07 2004-05-18 Automotive Technologies International Inc. Telematics system for vehicle diagnostics
US5303297A (en) 1991-07-25 1994-04-12 Motorola, Inc. Dynamic pricing method and apparatus for communication systems
FR2682202B1 (en) 1991-10-03 1994-03-11 Sextant Avionique METHOD AND DEVICE FOR REAL-TIME MANAGEMENT OF A SYSTEM COMPRISING AT LEAST ONE PROCESSOR CAPABLE OF MANAGING MULTIPLE FUNCTIONS.
DE4219678A1 (en) 1992-06-16 1994-01-05 Eduard Kuehnert Method and arrangement for securing people or objects
IL100175A (en) 1991-11-27 1994-11-11 State Of Isreal Ministry Of De Collision warning apparatus for a vehicle
US6009330A (en) 1992-01-27 1999-12-28 Highwaymaster Communications, Inc. Method and apparatus for call delivery to a mobile unit
US5287199A (en) 1992-02-27 1994-02-15 At&T Bell Laboratories Facsimile message processing and routing system
US5438361A (en) * 1992-04-13 1995-08-01 Hughes Aircraft Company Electronic gimbal system for electronically aligning video frames from a video sensor subject to disturbances
EP0590588B2 (en) 1992-09-30 2003-09-10 Hitachi, Ltd. Vehicle driving support system
DE4237987B4 (en) 1992-11-11 2004-07-22 Adam Opel Ag Electronic device
US5339086A (en) 1993-02-22 1994-08-16 General Electric Co. Phased array antenna with distributed beam steering
JPH0717347A (en) 1993-07-07 1995-01-20 Mazda Motor Corp Obstacle detecting device for automobile
US5983161A (en) 1993-08-11 1999-11-09 Lemelson; Jerome H. GPS vehicle collision avoidance warning and control system and method
US6553130B1 (en) 1993-08-11 2003-04-22 Jerome H. Lemelson Motor vehicle warning and control system and method
JP3197403B2 (en) 1993-09-07 2001-08-13 富士通株式会社 Control method of computer system when application program failure occurs
DE4334595C1 (en) 1993-10-11 1995-04-27 Siemens Ag Control for a motor vehicle
US6421429B1 (en) 1993-12-29 2002-07-16 At&T Corporation Network-based system enabling image communications
US5581462A (en) 1994-01-06 1996-12-03 Fairchild Space And Defense Corporation Vehicle computer system and method
US5500794A (en) 1994-03-31 1996-03-19 Panasonic Technologies, Inc. Distribution system and method for menu-driven user interface
US5440726A (en) 1994-06-22 1995-08-08 At&T Corp. Progressive retry method and apparatus having reusable software modules for software failure recovery in multi-process message-passing applications
US5948040A (en) 1994-06-24 1999-09-07 Delorme Publishing Co. Travel reservation information and planning system
US5572201A (en) 1994-08-05 1996-11-05 Federal Signal Corporation Alerting device and system for abnormal situations
US5532706A (en) 1994-12-05 1996-07-02 Hughes Electronics Antenna array of radiators with plural orthogonal ports
US6167253A (en) 1995-01-12 2000-12-26 Bell Atlantic Network Services, Inc. Mobile data/message/electronic mail download system utilizing network-centric protocol such as Java
US5577100A (en) 1995-01-30 1996-11-19 Telemac Cellular Corporation Mobile phone with internal accounting
KR960032262A (en) 1995-02-09 1996-09-17 배순훈 Vehicle safety system
US5915214A (en) 1995-02-23 1999-06-22 Reece; Richard W. Mobile communication service provider selection system
JP3270801B2 (en) 1995-04-11 2002-04-02 富士通株式会社 Attenuator unit, step attenuator having the same, and electronic apparatus having step attenuator
US5943427A (en) 1995-04-21 1999-08-24 Creative Technology Ltd. Method and apparatus for three dimensional audio spatialization
US5786998A (en) 1995-05-22 1998-07-28 Automated Monitoring And Control International, Inc. Apparatus and method for tracking reporting and recording equipment inventory on a locomotive
US6405132B1 (en) 1997-10-22 2002-06-11 Intelligent Technologies International, Inc. Accident avoidance system
EP1708151A3 (en) 1995-08-09 2007-01-24 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Travel plan preparing device
JPH09142236A (en) 1995-11-17 1997-06-03 Mitsubishi Electric Corp Periphery monitoring method and device for vehicle, and trouble deciding method and device for periphery monitoring device
US5794164A (en) 1995-11-29 1998-08-11 Microsoft Corporation Vehicle computer system
JP3656301B2 (en) 1995-12-28 2005-06-08 株式会社デンソー Obstacle warning device for vehicles
US5951620A (en) 1996-01-26 1999-09-14 Navigation Technologies Corporation System and method for distributing information for storage media
US20030212996A1 (en) 1996-02-08 2003-11-13 Wolzien Thomas R. System for interconnection of audio program data transmitted by radio to remote vehicle or individual with GPS location
US6343313B1 (en) 1996-03-26 2002-01-29 Pixion, Inc. Computer conferencing system with real-time multipoint, multi-speed, multi-stream scalability
US6028505A (en) 1996-03-27 2000-02-22 Clifford Electronics, Inc. Electronic vehicle security system with remote control
US6179489B1 (en) 1997-04-04 2001-01-30 Texas Instruments Incorporated Devices, methods, systems and software products for coordination of computer main microprocessor and second microprocessor coupled thereto
JPH09301068A (en) 1996-05-13 1997-11-25 Niles Parts Co Ltd Electronic flasher device
GB2313256B (en) 1996-05-17 2000-08-23 Motorola Ltd Method and apparatus for system selection
US5907293A (en) 1996-05-30 1999-05-25 Sun Microsystems, Inc. System for displaying the characteristics, position, velocity and acceleration of nearby vehicles on a moving-map
US6028537A (en) 1996-06-14 2000-02-22 Prince Corporation Vehicle communication and remote control system
US5793366A (en) 1996-11-12 1998-08-11 Sony Corporation Graphical display of an animated data stream between devices on a bus
JP3528440B2 (en) 1996-07-17 2004-05-17 日産自動車株式会社 In-vehicle information communication device
JPH1076115A (en) 1996-09-04 1998-03-24 Shinei Sangyo Kk Ceramic water purifying method
US5966658A (en) 1996-09-26 1999-10-12 Highwaymaster Communications, Inc. Automated selection of a communication path
US6523696B1 (en) 1996-10-15 2003-02-25 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Communication control device for realizing uniform service providing environment
US5959536A (en) 1996-10-15 1999-09-28 Philips Electronics North America Corporation Task-driven distributed multimedia consumer system
US7506020B2 (en) 1996-11-29 2009-03-17 Frampton E Ellis Global network computers
FR2756680B1 (en) 1996-11-29 1999-02-12 Sgs Thomson Microelectronics HIGH DYNAMIC, LOW NOISE TRANSCONDUCTANCE AMPLIFIER
US5923280A (en) 1997-01-17 1999-07-13 Automotive Systems Laboratory, Inc. Vehicle collision radar with randomized FSK wave form
US6240365B1 (en) 1997-01-21 2001-05-29 Frank E. Bunn Automated vehicle tracking and service provision system
US6009355A (en) 1997-01-28 1999-12-28 American Calcar Inc. Multimedia information and control system for automobiles
US6282714B1 (en) 1997-01-31 2001-08-28 Sharewave, Inc. Digital wireless home computer system
US6243772B1 (en) 1997-01-31 2001-06-05 Sharewave, Inc. Method and system for coupling a personal computer with an appliance unit via a wireless communication link to provide an output display presentation
JP3870983B2 (en) 1997-02-17 2007-01-24 ソニー株式会社 Electronic device control apparatus and method, and electronic device
EP0863606B1 (en) 1997-03-05 2003-09-24 Nec Corporation Direct conversion receiver capable of cancelling DC offset voltages
US6157921A (en) 1998-05-01 2000-12-05 Barnhill Technologies, Llc Enhancing knowledge discovery using support vector machines in a distributed network environment
US6298370B1 (en) 1997-04-04 2001-10-02 Texas Instruments Incorporated Computer operating process allocating tasks between first and second processors at run time based upon current processor load
US6105119A (en) 1997-04-04 2000-08-15 Texas Instruments Incorporated Data transfer circuitry, DSP wrapper circuitry and improved processor devices, methods and systems
US5909559A (en) 1997-04-04 1999-06-01 Texas Instruments Incorporated Bus bridge device including data bus of first width for a first processor, memory controller, arbiter circuit and second processor having a different second data width
US6408174B1 (en) 1997-05-13 2002-06-18 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Communication method, system, and device for reducing processor load at tariff switch
CA2260762C (en) 1997-05-19 2002-08-06 Integrated Data Communications, Inc. System and method to communicate time stamped, 3-axis geo-position data within telecommunication networks
US6690681B1 (en) 1997-05-19 2004-02-10 Airbiquity Inc. In-band signaling for data communications over digital wireless telecommunications network
US6771629B1 (en) 1999-01-15 2004-08-03 Airbiquity Inc. In-band signaling for synchronization in a voice communications network
US6493338B1 (en) 1997-05-19 2002-12-10 Airbiquity Inc. Multichannel in-band signaling for data communications over digital wireless telecommunications networks
US7164662B2 (en) 1997-05-19 2007-01-16 Airbiquity, Inc. Network delay identification method and apparatus
US5956025A (en) 1997-06-09 1999-09-21 Philips Electronics North America Corporation Remote with 3D organized GUI for a home entertainment system
US6148261A (en) 1997-06-20 2000-11-14 American Calcar, Inc. Personal communication system to send and receive voice data positioning information
US6133853A (en) 1998-07-30 2000-10-17 American Calcar, Inc. Personal communication and positioning system
US7103834B1 (en) 1997-06-25 2006-09-05 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Method and apparatus for a home network auto-tree builder
CA2401726C (en) 1997-06-25 2010-10-19 Richard James Humpleman Browser based command and control home network
EP0922201B1 (en) 1997-07-01 2002-09-11 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Navigation system for use in a vehicle
US6275231B1 (en) 1997-08-01 2001-08-14 American Calcar Inc. Centralized control and management system for automobiles
EP0905960A1 (en) 1997-08-07 1999-03-31 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Method for billing for communications services
US6707421B1 (en) 1997-08-19 2004-03-16 Siemens Vdo Automotive Corporation Driver information system
JPH1165436A (en) 1997-08-21 1999-03-05 Toyota Motor Corp Data selection support device, and map data processing system and processor including same support device
WO1999010876A1 (en) 1997-08-21 1999-03-04 Valeo Schalter Und Sensoren Gmbh Sleeve for receiving a sensor, connected to the bumper of an automobile
US5964822A (en) * 1997-08-27 1999-10-12 Delco Electronics Corp. Automatic sensor azimuth alignment
US6154123A (en) 1997-09-05 2000-11-28 Breed Automotive Technology, Inc. Driver alertness monitoring system
US6118860A (en) 1997-09-12 2000-09-12 Nortel Networks Corporation Public communications services vending method and apparatus
JPH11110700A (en) 1997-09-29 1999-04-23 Toyota Motor Corp Intersection information providing system and on-vehicle information transmitter applied to the system
US6032089A (en) 1997-12-01 2000-02-29 Chrysler Corporation Vehicle instrument panel computer interface node
US6163711A (en) 1997-12-01 2000-12-19 Nokia Mobile Phones, Ltd Method and apparatus for interfacing a mobile phone with an existing audio system
US6295541B1 (en) 1997-12-16 2001-09-25 Starfish Software, Inc. System and methods for synchronizing two or more datasets
US6032202A (en) 1998-01-06 2000-02-29 Sony Corporation Of Japan Home audio/video network with two level device control
US6038625A (en) 1998-01-06 2000-03-14 Sony Corporation Of Japan Method and system for providing a device identification mechanism within a consumer audio/video network
US6054950A (en) 1998-01-26 2000-04-25 Multispectral Solutions, Inc. Ultra wideband precision geolocation system
US6252544B1 (en) 1998-01-27 2001-06-26 Steven M. Hoffberg Mobile communication device
US6389340B1 (en) 1998-02-09 2002-05-14 Gary A. Rayner Vehicle data recorder
US5898392A (en) 1998-02-10 1999-04-27 Prince Corporation System and method for remote control of an in-vehicle voice recorder and other electrical accessories
DE19806557C2 (en) 1998-02-17 2000-08-17 Ericsson Telefon Ab L M Display of charge information using the USSD mechanism
US6374286B1 (en) 1998-04-06 2002-04-16 Rockwell Collins, Inc. Real time processor capable of concurrently running multiple independent JAVA machines
SE514332C2 (en) 1998-04-30 2001-02-12 Ehpt Sweden Ab Procedure and apparatus for payment in a computer network
JPH11321598A (en) 1998-05-07 1999-11-24 Honda Motor Co Ltd Safety device for running of vehicle
WO1999065183A2 (en) 1998-06-05 1999-12-16 British Telecommunications Public Limited Company Accounting in a communications network
AU4690899A (en) 1998-06-18 2000-01-05 Kline & Walker Llc Automated devices to control equipment and machines with remote control and accountability worldwide
US6292657B1 (en) 1998-07-13 2001-09-18 Openwave Systems Inc. Method and architecture for managing a fleet of mobile stations over wireless data networks
US6061709A (en) 1998-07-31 2000-05-09 Integrated Systems Design Center, Inc. Integrated hardware and software task control executive
US6185491B1 (en) 1998-07-31 2001-02-06 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Networked vehicle controlling attached devices using JavaBeans™
US6377860B1 (en) 1998-07-31 2002-04-23 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Networked vehicle implementing plug and play with javabeans
US6199136B1 (en) 1998-09-02 2001-03-06 U.S. Philips Corporation Method and apparatus for a low data-rate network to be represented on and controllable by high data-rate home audio/video interoperability (HAVi) network
US5977906A (en) * 1998-09-24 1999-11-02 Eaton Vorad Technologies, L.L.C. Method and apparatus for calibrating azimuth boresight in a radar system
US6434447B1 (en) 1998-10-02 2002-08-13 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Control property is mapped modally compatible GUI element
US6060989A (en) 1998-10-19 2000-05-09 Lucent Technologies Inc. System and method for preventing automobile accidents
SE513210C2 (en) 1998-10-30 2000-07-31 Ericsson Telefon Ab L M Procedure for determining movement data for objects
EP1125415B1 (en) 1998-11-02 2006-01-25 Airbiquity Inc. Geospacial internet protocol addressing
US6748541B1 (en) 1999-10-05 2004-06-08 Aladdin Knowledge Systems, Ltd. User-computer interaction method for use by a population of flexibly connectable computer systems
US7047532B1 (en) 1998-11-13 2006-05-16 The Chase Manhattan Bank Application independent messaging system
US6522875B1 (en) 1998-11-17 2003-02-18 Eric Morgan Dowling Geographical web browser, methods, apparatus and systems
US6150961A (en) 1998-11-24 2000-11-21 International Business Machines Corporation Automated traffic mapping
US6169894B1 (en) 1998-11-25 2001-01-02 Lucent Technologies, Inc. Apparatus, method and system for mobile broadcast of information specific to a geographic region
US6567069B1 (en) 1998-11-25 2003-05-20 Alliedsignal Inc. Integrated display and yoke mechanism
EP1169792A4 (en) 1998-12-23 2002-01-09 American Calcar Inc Technique for effective communications with, and provision of global positioning system (gps) based advertising information to, automobiles
US6754485B1 (en) 1998-12-23 2004-06-22 American Calcar Inc. Technique for effectively providing maintenance and information to vehicles
US6806977B1 (en) 1998-12-31 2004-10-19 Automated Business Companies Multiple integrated machine system
US6445308B1 (en) 1999-01-12 2002-09-03 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Positional data utilizing inter-vehicle communication method and traveling control apparatus
JP3555476B2 (en) 1999-01-12 2004-08-18 トヨタ自動車株式会社 Travel control device for vehicles
US6487717B1 (en) 1999-01-15 2002-11-26 Cummins, Inc. System and method for transmission of application software to an embedded vehicle computer
US6198996B1 (en) 1999-01-28 2001-03-06 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for setting automotive performance tuned preferences set differently by a driver
DE19909157A1 (en) 1999-03-02 2000-09-21 Daimler Chrysler Ag Distributed vehicle information processing and control system
US6161071A (en) 1999-03-12 2000-12-12 Navigation Technologies Corporation Method and system for an in-vehicle computing architecture
JP4258585B2 (en) 1999-03-19 2009-04-30 株式会社エクォス・リサーチ Destination setting device
US6097285A (en) 1999-03-26 2000-08-01 Lucent Technologies Inc. Automotive auditory feedback of changing conditions outside the vehicle cabin
US6181994B1 (en) 1999-04-07 2001-01-30 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for vehicle initiated delivery of advanced diagnostics based on the determined need by vehicle
US6233468B1 (en) 1999-04-09 2001-05-15 E. Lead Electronic Co., Ltd. Hand-free system capable of preventing a vehicle's automatic antenna from random operation
SE514264C2 (en) 1999-05-07 2001-01-29 Ericsson Telefon Ab L M A communication system
DE19922608A1 (en) 1999-05-17 2000-11-23 Media Praesent Ursula Nitzsche Wireless emergency signal transmission, especially to or between vehicles, involves using predefined coded RDS format message at low power in VHF radio band, preferably using free frequency
WO2000072463A2 (en) 1999-05-26 2000-11-30 Johnson Controls Interiors Technology Corp. Wireless communications system and method
US6182006B1 (en) 1999-06-01 2001-01-30 Navigation Technologies Corporation Navigation system remote control unit with data caddy functionality
AU5181700A (en) 1999-06-01 2000-12-18 Siemens Automotive Corporation Portable driver information device
US6266617B1 (en) 1999-06-10 2001-07-24 Wayne W. Evans Method and apparatus for an automatic vehicle location, collision notification and synthetic voice
US6754183B1 (en) 1999-06-14 2004-06-22 Sun Microsystems, Inc. System and method for integrating a vehicle subnetwork into a primary network
US6430164B1 (en) 1999-06-17 2002-08-06 Cellport Systems, Inc. Communications involving disparate protocol network/bus and device subsystems
US6571136B1 (en) 1999-06-19 2003-05-27 International Business Machines Corporation Virtual network adapter
JP3515926B2 (en) 1999-06-23 2004-04-05 本田技研工業株式会社 Vehicle periphery monitoring device
DE19931161A1 (en) 1999-07-06 2001-01-11 Volkswagen Ag Distance-sensitive, speed-controlled motor-vehicle road travel method, involves evaluation of predictive data about road conditions
DE60008023T2 (en) 1999-07-15 2004-09-02 Richard B. Himmelstein COMMUNICATION DEVICE FOR EFFICIENT ACCESS TO DATA FROM THE INTERNET
US7272637B1 (en) 1999-07-15 2007-09-18 Himmelstein Richard B Communication system and method for efficiently accessing internet resources
US6166627A (en) 1999-07-20 2000-12-26 Reeley; Ronald B. Mobile detection and alert system
EP1071228B1 (en) 1999-07-20 2009-04-15 Texas Instruments Inc. Wireless network with steerable antenna calibration over independent control path
US6952155B2 (en) 1999-07-23 2005-10-04 Himmelstein Richard B Voice-controlled security system with proximity detector
US8648692B2 (en) 1999-07-23 2014-02-11 Seong Sang Investments Llc Accessing an automobile with a transponder
US6496107B1 (en) 1999-07-23 2002-12-17 Richard B. Himmelstein Voice-controlled vehicle control system
US7080050B1 (en) 1999-08-05 2006-07-18 Barter Securities Electronic bartering system
US6429789B1 (en) 1999-08-09 2002-08-06 Ford Global Technologies, Inc. Vehicle information acquisition and display assembly
JP3788203B2 (en) 1999-08-10 2006-06-21 日産自動車株式会社 Hand-free telephone equipment for automobiles
US6297732B2 (en) 1999-09-08 2001-10-02 Precision Navigation, Inc. Radar/laser detection device with multi-sensing and reporting capability
US6647270B1 (en) 1999-09-10 2003-11-11 Richard B. Himmelstein Vehicletalk
US6754690B2 (en) 1999-09-16 2004-06-22 Honeywell, Inc. Method for time partitioned application scheduling in a computer operating system
US7484008B1 (en) 1999-10-06 2009-01-27 Borgia/Cummins, Llc Apparatus for vehicle internetworks
US6574610B1 (en) 1999-10-19 2003-06-03 Motorola, Inc. Trusted elements within a distributed bandwidth system
JP2003529054A (en) 1999-10-19 2003-09-30 アメリカン カルカー インコーポレイティド Effective navigation technology based on user preferences
US6614349B1 (en) 1999-12-03 2003-09-02 Airbiquity Inc. Facility and method for tracking physical assets
EP1107522B1 (en) 1999-12-06 2010-06-16 Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) Intelligent piconet forming
US7024363B1 (en) 1999-12-14 2006-04-04 International Business Machines Corporation Methods and apparatus for contingent transfer and execution of spoken language interfaces
US6559773B1 (en) 1999-12-21 2003-05-06 Visteon Global Technologies, Inc. Reconfigurable display architecture with spontaneous reconfiguration
JP2001195699A (en) 2000-01-14 2001-07-19 Yazaki Corp Vehicle circumference monitor device and recording medium for stored with vehicle collision danger judgement processing program
GB2358766B (en) 2000-01-26 2004-03-31 Hewlett Packard Co Cost-sensitive control of data transfer involving a mobile entity
US6326903B1 (en) 2000-01-26 2001-12-04 Dave Gross Emergency vehicle traffic signal pre-emption and collision avoidance system
EP1264464A2 (en) 2000-02-03 2002-12-11 Openwave Systems (ROI) Limited A network-based billing method and system
IT1319895B1 (en) 2000-02-08 2003-11-12 Bottero Spa GROUP FOR THE CLASSIFICATION AND TRANSFER OF GLASS SHEETS.
AU5015700A (en) 2000-03-21 2001-10-03 Airbiquity Inc Voiceband modem for data communications over digital wireless networks
US7187947B1 (en) 2000-03-28 2007-03-06 Affinity Labs, Llc System and method for communicating selected information to an electronic device
US6980092B2 (en) 2000-04-06 2005-12-27 Gentex Corporation Vehicle rearview mirror assembly incorporating a communication system
US6937732B2 (en) 2000-04-07 2005-08-30 Mazda Motor Corporation Audio system and its contents reproduction method, audio apparatus for a vehicle and its contents reproduction method, portable audio apparatus, computer program product and computer-readable storage medium
US6785551B1 (en) 2000-04-07 2004-08-31 Ford Motor Company Method of providing dynamic regionally relevant data to a mobile environment
US6292747B1 (en) 2000-04-20 2001-09-18 International Business Machines Corporation Heterogeneous wireless network for traveler information
US7000469B2 (en) * 2000-04-21 2006-02-21 Intersense, Inc. Motion-tracking
US20020144010A1 (en) 2000-05-09 2002-10-03 Honeywell International Inc. Communication handling in integrated modular avionics
US20020012329A1 (en) 2000-06-02 2002-01-31 Timothy Atkinson Communications apparatus interface and method for discovery of remote devices
US7006950B1 (en) 2000-06-12 2006-02-28 Siemens Corporate Research, Inc. Statistical modeling and performance characterization of a real-time dual camera surveillance system
US6417782B1 (en) 2000-06-22 2002-07-09 Larry Dean Darnall Driver's emergency alert system
US7089206B2 (en) 2000-06-30 2006-08-08 Ubs Ag Trade allocation
US6445983B1 (en) 2000-07-07 2002-09-03 Case Corporation Sensor-fusion navigator for automated guidance of off-road vehicles
US7375728B2 (en) 2001-10-01 2008-05-20 University Of Minnesota Virtual mirror
US6725031B2 (en) 2000-07-21 2004-04-20 Telemac Corporation Method and system for data rating for wireless devices
US6816458B1 (en) 2000-09-13 2004-11-09 Harris Corporation System and method prioritizing message packets for transmission
US7158956B1 (en) 2000-09-20 2007-01-02 Himmelstein Richard B Electronic real estate bartering system
US6362748B1 (en) 2000-09-27 2002-03-26 Lite Vision Corporation System for communicating among vehicles and a communication system control center
US6580973B2 (en) 2000-10-14 2003-06-17 Robert H. Leivian Method of response synthesis in a driver assistance system
JP3834463B2 (en) 2000-10-13 2006-10-18 株式会社日立製作所 In-vehicle failure alarm reporting system
US6756998B1 (en) 2000-10-19 2004-06-29 Destiny Networks, Inc. User interface and method for home automation system
JP3837282B2 (en) 2000-10-24 2006-10-25 株式会社ケーヒン Fuel injection valve
USD448366S1 (en) 2000-10-31 2001-09-25 Airbiquity Inc. Accessory module for a cellular telephone handset
US20020086706A1 (en) 2000-11-15 2002-07-04 Ming-Feng Chen Mobile device server
US20020105423A1 (en) 2000-12-05 2002-08-08 Rast Rodger H. Reaction advantage anti-collision systems and methods
US20020070852A1 (en) 2000-12-12 2002-06-13 Pearl I, Llc Automobile display control system
US20020083143A1 (en) 2000-12-13 2002-06-27 Philips Electronics North America Corporation UPnP architecture for heterogeneous networks of slave devices
JP2002189075A (en) 2000-12-20 2002-07-05 Fujitsu Ten Ltd Method for detecting stationary on-road object
US7165109B2 (en) 2001-01-12 2007-01-16 Microsoft Corporation Method and system to access software pertinent to an electronic peripheral device based on an address stored in a peripheral device
WO2002071287A2 (en) 2001-02-23 2002-09-12 Mobilitec Inc. System and method for charging for directed provisioning of user applications on limited-resource devices
US7171189B2 (en) 2001-02-28 2007-01-30 Nortel Networks Limited Location based billing of data services in a mobile telecommunication system
US6734799B2 (en) 2001-03-01 2004-05-11 Trw Inc. Apparatus and method for responding to the health and fitness of a driver of a vehicle
US7120129B2 (en) 2001-03-13 2006-10-10 Microsoft Corporation System and method for achieving zero-configuration wireless computing and computing device incorporating same
US6708100B2 (en) 2001-03-14 2004-03-16 Raytheon Company Safe distance algorithm for adaptive cruise control
US6496117B2 (en) 2001-03-30 2002-12-17 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. System for monitoring a driver's attention to driving
US7073044B2 (en) 2001-03-30 2006-07-04 Intel Corporation Method and apparatus for sharing TLB entries
US6895238B2 (en) 2001-03-30 2005-05-17 Motorola, Inc. Method for providing entertainment to a portable device
US7146260B2 (en) 2001-04-24 2006-12-05 Medius, Inc. Method and apparatus for dynamic configuration of multiprocessor system
US6629033B2 (en) 2001-04-24 2003-09-30 Medius, Inc. Open communication system for real-time multiprocessor applications
AU2002347941A1 (en) 2001-06-15 2003-01-02 Carcheckup, Llc Auto diagnosis method and device
US6973030B2 (en) 2001-06-20 2005-12-06 Motorola, Inc. Method and apparatus for controlling multiple logical data flow in a variable data rate environment
US7283567B2 (en) 2001-06-22 2007-10-16 Airbiquity Inc. Network delay identification method and apparatus
US6792351B2 (en) 2001-06-26 2004-09-14 Medius, Inc. Method and apparatus for multi-vehicle communication
US6778073B2 (en) 2001-06-26 2004-08-17 Medius, Inc. Method and apparatus for managing audio devices
US6615137B2 (en) 2001-06-26 2003-09-02 Medius, Inc. Method and apparatus for transferring information between vehicles
US6641087B1 (en) 2001-10-09 2003-11-04 Cubic Defense Systems, Inc. Anti-hijacking system operable in emergencies to deactivate on-board flight controls and remotely pilot aircraft utilizing autopilot
US7283904B2 (en) 2001-10-17 2007-10-16 Airbiquity, Inc. Multi-sensor fusion
US7099796B2 (en) 2001-10-22 2006-08-29 Honeywell International Inc. Multi-sensor information fusion technique
US8489063B2 (en) 2001-10-24 2013-07-16 Sipco, Llc Systems and methods for providing emergency messages to a mobile device
US7480501B2 (en) 2001-10-24 2009-01-20 Statsignal Ipc, Llc System and method for transmitting an emergency message over an integrated wireless network
US7215965B2 (en) 2001-11-01 2007-05-08 Airbiquity Inc. Facility and method for wireless transmission of location data in a voice channel of a digital wireless telecommunications network
US6778924B2 (en) * 2001-11-06 2004-08-17 Honeywell International Inc. Self-calibrating inertial measurement system method and apparatus
US20030158614A1 (en) 2002-02-18 2003-08-21 Friel Joseph T Audio system for vehicle with battery-backed storage
US8559951B2 (en) 2002-03-13 2013-10-15 Intellectual Ventures I Llc Method and apparatus for performing handover in a bluetooth radiocommunication system
DE10217294A1 (en) * 2002-04-18 2003-11-06 Sick Ag sensor orientation
US6771208B2 (en) * 2002-04-24 2004-08-03 Medius, Inc. Multi-sensor system
US7178049B2 (en) 2002-04-24 2007-02-13 Medius, Inc. Method for multi-tasking multiple Java virtual machines in a secure environment
US6829568B2 (en) 2002-04-26 2004-12-07 Simon Justin Julier Method and apparatus for fusing signals with partially known independent error components
US7269188B2 (en) 2002-05-24 2007-09-11 Airbiquity, Inc. Simultaneous voice and data modem
US6782315B2 (en) * 2002-06-19 2004-08-24 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Method and apparatus for compensating misalignments of a sensor system used in a vehicle dynamic control system
US20040029545A1 (en) 2002-08-09 2004-02-12 Anderson Jon J. Method and system for leaving a communication channel in a wireless communications system
USD479228S1 (en) 2002-09-03 2003-09-02 Airbiquity Inc. Hands-free kit for mounting a wireless device in a vehicle
GB0227672D0 (en) 2002-11-27 2003-01-08 Ricardo Consulting Eng Improved engine management
US7379707B2 (en) 2004-08-26 2008-05-27 Raysat Antenna Systems, L.L.C. System for concurrent mobile two-way data communications and TV reception
EP1602117B2 (en) * 2003-02-21 2015-11-18 Gentex Corporation Automatic vehicle exterior light control system assemblies
US7239949B2 (en) * 2003-02-26 2007-07-03 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Integrated sensing system
US6906619B2 (en) 2003-02-27 2005-06-14 Motorola, Inc. Visual attention influenced condition indicia apparatus and method
JP3928571B2 (en) 2003-03-14 2007-06-13 トヨタ自動車株式会社 Vehicle driving assistance device
US7263332B1 (en) 2003-04-09 2007-08-28 Cool & Useful Products, Llc Methods and apparatus for communicating in a vehicle and other radio environments
US7079993B2 (en) 2003-04-29 2006-07-18 Daniel H. Wagner Associates, Inc. Automated generator of optimal models for the statistical analysis of data
US7343160B2 (en) 2003-09-29 2008-03-11 Broadcom Corporation System and method for servicing communications using both fixed and mobile wireless networks
US20050070221A1 (en) 2003-09-30 2005-03-31 Upton Michael P. Vehicular repeater multi-unit system and method for allowing the first vehicular repeater unit on-scene to remain priority
US7689321B2 (en) 2004-02-13 2010-03-30 Evolution Robotics, Inc. Robust sensor fusion for mapping and localization in a simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) system
ES2238936B1 (en) 2004-02-27 2006-11-16 INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE TECNICA AEROESPACIAL "ESTEBAN TERRADAS" SYSTEM AND METHOD OF FUSION OF SENSORS TO ESTIMATE POSITION, SPEED AND ORIENTATION OF A VEHICLE, ESPECIALLY AN AIRCRAFT.
US7289906B2 (en) 2004-04-05 2007-10-30 Oregon Health & Science University Navigation system applications of sigma-point Kalman filters for nonlinear estimation and sensor fusion
US7260501B2 (en) 2004-04-21 2007-08-21 University Of Connecticut Intelligent model-based diagnostics for system monitoring, diagnosis and maintenance
US20050260984A1 (en) 2004-05-21 2005-11-24 Mobile Satellite Ventures, Lp Systems and methods for space-based use of terrestrial cellular frequency spectrum
US7614055B2 (en) 2004-06-14 2009-11-03 Alcatel-Lucent Usa Inc. Selecting a processor to run an executable of a distributed software application upon startup of the distributed software application
JP5306652B2 (en) 2004-11-03 2013-10-02 ティジックス インコーポレイテッド Integrated image processor
US7337650B1 (en) * 2004-11-09 2008-03-04 Medius Inc. System and method for aligning sensors on a vehicle
EP1851565B1 (en) 2005-01-18 2009-10-14 Marinvent Corporation Method and apparatus for performing a sensor fusion to provide a position of a target-of-interest
US7508810B2 (en) 2005-01-31 2009-03-24 Airbiquity Inc. Voice channel control of wireless packet data communications
US8014942B2 (en) 2005-06-15 2011-09-06 Airbiquity, Inc. Remote destination programming for vehicle navigation
US8254301B2 (en) 2005-11-22 2012-08-28 Telcordia Technologies, Inc. Group-header based method to organize local peer group of vehicles for inter-vehicle communication
US8554920B2 (en) 2005-11-22 2013-10-08 Telcordia Technologies, Inc. Linked equivalent cell header-based approach and protocol for organizing an ad-hoc network
US7924934B2 (en) 2006-04-07 2011-04-12 Airbiquity, Inc. Time diversity voice channel data communications
US20070260373A1 (en) 2006-05-08 2007-11-08 Langer William J Dynamic vehicle durability testing and simulation
US20070260372A1 (en) 2006-05-08 2007-11-08 Langer William J Dynamic vehicle suspension system testing and simulation
US8108092B2 (en) 2006-07-14 2012-01-31 Irobot Corporation Autonomous behaviors for a remote vehicle
US7979858B2 (en) 2006-10-03 2011-07-12 Sas Institute Inc. Systems and methods for executing a computer program that executes multiple processes in a multi-processor environment
US7579942B2 (en) 2006-10-09 2009-08-25 Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc. Extra-vehicular threat predictor
DE102007007266B4 (en) 2007-02-14 2016-02-25 Airbus Defence and Space GmbH Method for evaluating sensor measured values
US20090090592A1 (en) 2007-10-05 2009-04-09 Gm Global Technology Operations, Inc. High-Frequency Anti-Lock Clutch System and Method
KR101293069B1 (en) 2007-10-20 2013-08-06 에어비퀴티 인코포레이티드. Wireless in-band signaling with in-vehicle systems
US8636670B2 (en) 2008-05-13 2014-01-28 The Invention Science Fund I, Llc Circulatory monitoring systems and methods
EP2266092A4 (en) 2008-03-04 2011-07-06 Univ Sydney Method and system for exploiting information from heterogeneous sources
EP2107503A1 (en) 2008-03-31 2009-10-07 Harman Becker Automotive Systems GmbH Method and device for generating a real time environment model for vehicles
US8260515B2 (en) 2008-07-24 2012-09-04 GM Global Technology Operations LLC Adaptive vehicle control system with driving style recognition
US7983310B2 (en) 2008-09-15 2011-07-19 Airbiquity Inc. Methods for in-band signaling through enhanced variable-rate codecs
US8244408B2 (en) 2009-03-09 2012-08-14 GM Global Technology Operations LLC Method to assess risk associated with operating an autonomic vehicle control system
US8073440B2 (en) 2009-04-27 2011-12-06 Airbiquity, Inc. Automatic gain control in a personal navigation device
US8838332B2 (en) 2009-10-15 2014-09-16 Airbiquity Inc. Centralized management of motor vehicle software applications and services
US8204927B1 (en) 2010-03-15 2012-06-19 California Institute Of Technology System and method for cognitive processing for data fusion

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20030048357A1 (en) * 2001-08-29 2003-03-13 Geovantage, Inc. Digital imaging system for airborne applications
US20040257441A1 (en) * 2001-08-29 2004-12-23 Geovantage, Inc. Digital imaging system for airborne applications

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10698084B2 (en) * 2017-06-16 2020-06-30 Robert Bosch Gmbh Method and system for carrying out a calibration of a sensor
US20210149020A1 (en) * 2018-04-20 2021-05-20 ZF Automotive UK Limited A radar apparatus for a vehicle and method of detecting misalignment
CN111142082A (en) * 2018-11-02 2020-05-12 现代自动车株式会社 Apparatus and method for calibrating zero point of radar for vehicle
US11805390B2 (en) 2018-12-05 2023-10-31 Here Global B.V. Method, apparatus, and computer program product for determining sensor orientation
CN111578839A (en) * 2020-05-25 2020-08-25 北京百度网讯科技有限公司 Obstacle coordinate processing method and device, electronic equipment and readable storage medium
US20220179431A1 (en) * 2020-12-04 2022-06-09 Ship And Ocean Industries R&D Center Assistance system for correcting vessel path and operation method thereof
US11892854B2 (en) * 2020-12-04 2024-02-06 Ship And Ocean Industries R&Dcenter Assistance system for correcting vessel path and operation method thereof

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US7337650B1 (en) 2008-03-04
US8001860B1 (en) 2011-08-23
US8978439B1 (en) 2015-03-17
US7681448B1 (en) 2010-03-23

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8978439B1 (en) System and apparatus for the alignment of multi-aperture systems
US6771208B2 (en) Multi-sensor system
CN106289275B (en) Unit and method for improving positioning accuracy
US8855848B2 (en) Radar, lidar and camera enhanced methods for vehicle dynamics estimation
JP2001227982A (en) Calibration method for sensor system
JP4843190B2 (en) Image sensor system calibration method and apparatus
CN101793528A (en) Use sensor fusion to estimate the system and method in path, track
JP6776202B2 (en) In-vehicle camera calibration device and method
WO2017145541A1 (en) Mobile object
KR20160120467A (en) Azimuth correction apparatus and method of 2-dimensional radar for vehicle
JPWO2018042954A1 (en) In-vehicle camera, adjustment method of in-vehicle camera, in-vehicle camera system
JP2019194559A (en) Optical atmospheric data compensation system using inertia assistance
US11592559B2 (en) Vehicle sensor fusion
RU2733198C1 (en) Method of vehicle movement control and vehicle movement control device
EP3486871B1 (en) A vision system and method for autonomous driving and/or driver assistance in a motor vehicle
KR102038482B1 (en) Inertial sensor enhancement
JP2019212015A (en) Time synchronization device/method for vehicle data
JP5425500B2 (en) Calibration apparatus and calibration method
WO2019239775A1 (en) Vehicle object sensing device
JP6594546B2 (en) Angle measuring device
JP3357290B2 (en) Vehicle position detection device
JP7234840B2 (en) position estimator
JP6901584B2 (en) Posture sensor device for moving objects
JP6704307B2 (en) Moving amount calculating device and moving amount calculating method
JP6632727B2 (en) Angle measuring device

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: EAGLE HARBOR HOLDINGS, LLC, WASHINGTON

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:PRESTON, DAN ALAN;OLMSTEAD, DAVID;SIGNING DATES FROM 20150213 TO 20150223;REEL/FRAME:035189/0719

AS Assignment

Owner name: NORTHWATER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY FUND L.P. 2, DELA

Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:EAGLE HARBOR HOLDINGS, LLC;REEL/FRAME:038762/0729

Effective date: 20101115

AS Assignment

Owner name: CLAROVIA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, WASHINGTON

Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:EAGLE HARBOR HOLDINGS, LLC;REEL/FRAME:041565/0469

Effective date: 20170127

AS Assignment

Owner name: EAGLE HARBOR HOLDINGS, LLC, WASHINGTON

Free format text: CORRECTING IMPROPER SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:EAGLE HARBOR HOLDINGS, LLC;REEL/FRAME:041651/0884

Effective date: 20170207

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO PAY ISSUE FEE