US2920980A - Finishing fabrics - Google Patents

Finishing fabrics Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US2920980A
US2920980A US574496A US57449656A US2920980A US 2920980 A US2920980 A US 2920980A US 574496 A US574496 A US 574496A US 57449656 A US57449656 A US 57449656A US 2920980 A US2920980 A US 2920980A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
fabric
fabrics
glycol
temperature
pills
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US574496A
Inventor
David D Mooberry
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
EIDP Inc
Original Assignee
EI Du Pont de Nemours and Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority to BE556217D priority Critical patent/BE556217A/xx
Application filed by EI Du Pont de Nemours and Co filed Critical EI Du Pont de Nemours and Co
Priority to US574496A priority patent/US2920980A/en
Priority to FR1173374D priority patent/FR1173374A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US2920980A publication Critical patent/US2920980A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D06TREATMENT OF TEXTILES OR THE LIKE; LAUNDERING; FLEXIBLE MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • D06MTREATMENT, NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE IN CLASS D06, OF FIBRES, THREADS, YARNS, FABRICS, FEATHERS OR FIBROUS GOODS MADE FROM SUCH MATERIALS
    • D06M15/00Treating fibres, threads, yarns, fabrics, or fibrous goods made from such materials, with macromolecular compounds; Such treatment combined with mechanical treatment
    • D06M15/19Treating fibres, threads, yarns, fabrics, or fibrous goods made from such materials, with macromolecular compounds; Such treatment combined with mechanical treatment with synthetic macromolecular compounds
    • D06M15/37Macromolecular compounds obtained otherwise than by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds
    • D06M15/53Polyethers
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10STECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S260/00Chemistry of carbon compounds
    • Y10S260/15Antistatic agents not otherwise provided for

Definitions

  • This invention relates to a process of finishing synthetic fabrics and more particularly to a process of rcducing the pilling tendency of fabrics containing polyester bers. It has been observed for some time that fabrics made from certain synthetic bers have a tendency to form small fuzz balls on the surface which are known in the trade as -pills. It has also been observed that this undesirable property is found to a greater extent on fabrics woven from synthetic fibers which have high strength and abrasion resistance.
  • polyether glycol compounds are polyether glycols, their esters, or ethers and mixtures thereof having the formula in which R1, R2, and R3 are the same or different lower alkylene units such as methylene, ethylene, propylene and so forth up to about 5 carbon atoms.
  • R1, R2, and R3 are the same or different lower alkylene units such as methylene, ethylene, propylene and so forth up to about 5 carbon atoms.
  • A stands for hydrogen, alkyl, aryl, or an acyl group
  • B is OH, alkyl ether, aryl'ether or an alkyl or aryl ester radical.
  • Y has a value to produce a molecular weight of the alkylene oxide component of at least about 300.
  • the liquidv is applied to the fabric by impregnation, padding or spraying.
  • excess liquid is usually removed by squeeze rolls, extraction or other conventional means, and the fabric dried.
  • the surface only is heated (i.e., either one or both surfaces) rapidly to a temperature of -at least 200 C., but below the fusion temperature of the surface fibers.
  • the heat treatment should be such that the surface bers are heated, and the source of heat, or the fabric, removed before the temperature of theA entire fabric is raised to the temperature of its surface.
  • the back of the fabric may be cooled if necessary while the surface is being heated.
  • the fabric In order to preserve the good aesthetic and other properties of the polyester fabrics, it has been found that independent of the fabric composition or construction, the fabric must not undergo an absolute percent weight loss in the adoptedabrasion test of more than 5 percentage units greater than the absolute percent weight loss of the untreated control fabric when subjected to the same abrasion test; i.e., the differential weight loss between treated and untreated fabric must not be more than about 5%.
  • the abrasion resistance of the fabrics is measured in terms of fabric weight loss in the abrasion test described on page 3 of the A.A.T.C.C. Bulletin entitled, The A.A.T.C.C. Accelerotor, July 1953, using a 41/2" square sample and a 4% propeller blade driven at 1800 r.p.m. with a 400 E. grit closed coat Durite abrasive paper (Behr-Manning Co.) as the abrasive liner for a five-minute testing period.
  • the efliciency of the process in reducing pilling is determined by number of pills formed per 35 in.2 of surface fabric as determined in accordance with ASTM D-1375- 55T, Test for Pilling Propensity of Textile Fabrics- Part C-Brush and Sponge Method.
  • the value of Y in the formula is such as to yield a molecular weight of at least about 300.
  • There is no known maximum ⁇ limitation for the molecular weight although the lower range, particularly that of from 400 to 600, is preferred since compounds in this range are more rapidly soluble as well as being more available and economical.
  • the critical nature of the minimum molecular weight of the polyether glycol is shown in Table I below, wherein one particular polyester fabric is treated under optimum conditions in accordance with this invention while varying only the The polyether glycol may be etheried or esteried without affecting the pill reducing tendency of the treatment so long as the average molecular weight of the alkylene oxide unit is maintained above about 300.
  • the glycol treatment may involve the use of a single glycol or derivative thereof, or more practically, it will involve the use of mixtures of glycols which are commercially available and, therefore, much less expensive for large-scale use.
  • Specic examples of the polyether glycols and their derivatives which may be used in accordance with this invention include polyethylene glycol 400, polyethylene glycol 600, polymethylene glycol 400, polypropylene glycol 600, polyethylene glycol 400 monolaurate, polyethylene glycol 400 monostearate, polypropylene glycol 400, polytetramethylene glycol 600, polyethylene glycol 600 monolaurate, polyethylene glycol 1000 monolaurate, polyethylene glycol 1500 monoiaurate, polyethylene glycol 400 monooleate, polyethylene glycol 600 mono-I stearate, polyethylene glycol 600 monopalmitate, monomethoxy polyethylene glycol550, dibutyl ether of polyethylene glycol 400trimethylnonyl ether of polyethylene glycol 400, vmethylphenyl ether of
  • the liquid treating medium which is applied to the polyester fabric may be composed wholly of the polyether glycol or more practically, the glycol or derivative thereof will be dissolved in a miscible solvent such as water, alcohol, acetone and the like.
  • a miscible solvent such as water, alcohol, acetone and the like.
  • the use of solutions of the glycol is more economical when carried out on a commercial scale and involves the use of less glycol and, therefore, less loss or recovery of glycol is involved.
  • the liquid medium contains any diluent for the glycol, the medium must be applied to the fabric with a minimum concentration of of the glycol based on the total, weight of the liquid medium in order to achieve a satis-- factory reduction of the pilling count in the resulting fabrics.
  • the preferred operating concentration for the padding bath is an aqueous medium containing 20%40% by weight of polyether glycol.
  • Fillable fabrics may be treated by the process of this invention (i.e., glycol treatment followed by heat treatment), either with or without benefit of an additional modifying agent.
  • Typical modifying agents which may be employed in the liquid medium, together with glycols,
  • ester exchange catalysts such as the metallic salts or oxides of calcium, magnesium, lead, tin and zinc (e.g., zmc nitrate, zinc acetate, magnesium oxide, and the like).
  • the heat-treating step is likewise critical for achieving the objects of this invention.
  • the use of too high a temperature of heat treatment will cause fusion ofthe surface fibers which in turn destroys the aesthetic properties of the fabric, as welly k as causing too great a drop in abrasion resistance and other strength properties of the fabric.
  • the maximum temperature will be governed by the melting point or degradation of the particular fibers used, which, of course, will change somewhat with the composition of any copolyesters making up the fabric, as well as the nature of other fiber components when used in a blend with polyester fibers.
  • the minimum temperature necessary to achieve a satisfactory reduction in pilling propensity in this process has been found to be about 200".
  • the time/temperature relationship of the heat treatment must be-carefully controlled so that the fabric properties dofnot suffer impairment.
  • the heat treating step will be carried out on the impregnated fabric so that the surface of the fabric will be raised'.
  • a satisfactory criterion for determining the best time/ temperature relationship is to measure the abrasion resistance of a sample of fabric, both untreated and treated by the process of this invention. Since the absolute weight loss during abrasion testing is dependent on fabric constructionand composition, the best criterion for the effect of the instant process on the fabric is that the absolute percent-weight loss of the treated fabric by the standard abrasion test specified should not be more than 5 percentage units greater than the absolute percent weight loss of the untreated control fabric subjected to the same abrasion test.
  • a guide for selection of optimum temperatures for use in this invention 4 will be found in the drawing in which the single figure is a graph in which the number of pills per 35 in.2 section is plotted against temperature of the surface of the fabric treated.
  • the curves show the pills formed at various temperatures when a polyethylene terephthalate fabric is treated (I) with 20%-5 0% polyethylene glycol (av. M.W. 600) in aqueous solution, (II) with 5% to 10% of the same glycol in aqueous solutionand (III) with no treating agent.
  • the dotted lines represent portions on the curves ⁇ Where the fabric fused or had deteriorated to an extent that its feel or handle was considered unsatisfactory commercially.
  • the solid lines represent conditions-which result in little or no impairment in the handle or jfeel of the fabric.
  • the curves represent data obtained from one particular type of fabric. Curves for other types have the same general shape but do not necessanly coincide with-those shown.
  • the particular manner by which the heat is applied to the surface of the impregnated fabric is also a critical part of the heat-treating step. It has been found that merely heating the fabric in an ordinary air oven is not a satisfactory method of achieving the objects of this invention, chiefly because it does not raise the temperature of the surface fibers to 200 C. rapidly enough. Using this method by the time the surface fibers reach the critical temperature of this invention, the fibers through the body of the fabric have become degraded and the abrasion resistance and strength of the whole fabric is severely impaired.
  • Any means for heating the surface of the fabric only may be used and a large variety o-f suitable apparatus is availablefin the trade for rapidly raising the temperature of the surface fibers to 200 C., such as, for example, a preheated ordinary hand iron, a standard series of National hot rolls, and an Andrews-Goodrich oven or a Morrison oven, both of which contain rolls within an oven which is preheated to the desired temperature. All of this apparatus involves direct contact between a heated surface and the surface of the fabric, which is the preferred manner of carrying out the heating step in this invention. Normally, with such contact heating equipment, the fabric will be kept taut so that the surface of the fabric conforms accurately to the contour of the heated surface, although this is ⁇ not a critical limitation in the process.
  • the increased pilling resistance resulting from the instant process is developed selectively only on the surface of the fabric in contact with the heated surface; i.e., the side of the fabric in contact with thek hot roll, when a hot roll is employed as the heating 5.
  • means. n'y othei' apparatus or. methodfor rapidly achieving the minimum temperature selectively at the surface of the fabric may be used such as radiant heat, and the like. In such instances when the heating means does not contact the surface of the fabric, the increased pilling resistance will be developed selectively on the side, or sides, of the fabric facing the source of heat.
  • the woven and knitted fabrics which may be advantageously treated in accordance with this invention include those composed of 100% linear condensation polyester fibers, as well as those constructed of blends of other fibers or yarns containing some polyester fiber, the preferred one being polyethylene terephthalate.
  • Other fabrics which may be treated to reduce the pill count may contain other polyester fibers such as those made from ethylene glycol and bibenzoc acid, ethylene glycol and hexahydroterephthalic acid, trimethylene glycol andk terephthalic acid, or tetramethylene glycol and terephthalic acid, as well as fabrics containing copolyester fibers such as those made from tetramethylene glycol, hexamethylene glycol and terephthalic acid, or those from dimethyl terephthalate, dimethyl sebacate and ethylene glycol, or similar copolyesters.
  • the fabric may also be blends of polyester fibers with wool, cotton and other natural fibers and/ or rayon, nylon, polyacrylonitrile, cellulose acetate, and other synthetic bers. It is obvious one wouldnot employ blend fibers which will not withstand the heat treating temperatures of this invention.
  • the two-step treating process of the invention is applied to fabrics before they are dyed, although in some instances, the glycol or derivative may be applied in the dye bath (e.g., when dyeing in accordance with the procedure described by Gibson in U.S. 2,663,- 612), or the two-step treatment may be applied after dyeing and after or during conventional finishing if the dyes and finishes used are stable to the final heat-treating step.
  • the treating agent in the examples may be replaced by a like amount of any compound falling within the formula given above.
  • the fabric was then heat treated on a National hot roll machine under tension at 220 C. and an exposure time of about seconds, each face 0f the fabric receiving about 12.5 seconds exposure.
  • the fabric was then scoured and dried.
  • the fabric, before treatment showed 435 pills/ 35 in.2 as measured by the ASTM pilling test, while the fabric, after treatment, showed 72 pills/ 35 in.2.
  • the untreated control fabric after dyeing and conventional finishing showed 315 pills/35 in?, whereas the treated fabric after the same nal dyeing and finishing steps showed 10 pills/35 in?.
  • Another sample of the same fabric was paddedl with an aqueous solution containing 40% by weight of polyethylene glycol 600, and 1% by weight zinc nitrate.
  • the fabric was dried in a hot-air pin tenter for 1.5 minutes at 121 C., and was then heat treated on a National hot roll machine at 220 C., as described above.
  • the fabric after treatment showed 2.5 pills/35 in?, and a weight loss of 2.65% in the standard abrasion test compared with a weight loss of 2.61% for the untreated fabric, showing the properties of the fabric had not been degraded by -the finishing treatment.
  • Example Il A 3 x 2 twill, sheen gabardine fabric composed of 65% polyethylene terephthalate staple and 35 by weight rayon staple was padded and dried in the same manner as the fabric of Example I Vusingthe same polyethylene glycol and catalyst. hot roll machine for 25 seconds at 220 C. then scoured and dried.
  • the untreated fabric showed 325 pills/35 in.2 and a weight loss in the abrasion test of 6.5%, whereas, the treated fabric showed only 7 pills/ 35 in.2 and a weight loss of 7.8%.
  • Example III A 2 x 1 twill gabardine composed of 55% polyethylene terephthalate staple fiberY and 45% rayon staple was treated in the same manner as the fabric of Example II.
  • the untreated fabric developed 710 pills/35 in.2 and the treated fabric only 20 pills/ 35 in?.V When subjected t0 heat alone at 220 C. the fabric developed 180 pills/35 in.2 section.
  • Example IV A ⁇ 3 x 2 twill sheen gabardine composed of 55% polyethylene terephthalate staple fiber and 45% wool was treated as in Example II.
  • the untreated fabric showed 684 pills/ 35 in.2 and the treated fabric only 35 pills/35 in?.
  • Example V Two samples of batiste shitting fabric were woven from 65% polyethylene terephthalate staple yarn and 35% cotton. The fabric was padded with two aqueous solutions. The first sample was padded as in Example II with an aqueous solution of 40% by weight polyethylene glycol 600 and 1% by Weight zinc nitrate catalyst. The second sample was padded the same way with the same glycol solution but in the absence of the catalyst. The two fabrics were heated on the National hot roll machine for 25 seconds at 220 C., ⁇ then scoured and dried.
  • the untreated fabric showed 175 pills/35 in?, and a weight loss in the abrasion test of 3.9%, the fabric sample padded with glycol alone showed 20 pills/35 in.2, and the sample padded with glycol and zinc nitrate catalyst showed 0 pill/ 35 in.2 and a weight loss of 6.8%.
  • Example VI An oxford shifting fabric composed of 65 polyethylene terephthalate staple fiber4 and 35 cotton was padded with an aqueous solution containing 5%r by weight of polyethylene glycol 600. The treated fabric was then heatedon a National hot roll machine for 25 seconds,
  • Example VIII The 2 x 2 twill gabardine fabric, described in Example Vl, was padded with an aqueous solution containing 40% by weight polyethylene glycol 600 and 1% by weight zinc nitrate. ⁇ Samples of the fabric were heat treated in a hot-air oven for various times. Table II below illustrates the pilling data and abrasion resistance of these fabrics, acceptable pill protection being afforded only at the expense of degraded fabrics.
  • Example IX Three samples-of an oxford fabric having a pill count ofV 100/ 35 in.2 and having the same composition as the fabric of Example VII were padded with an aqueous solution containing 20% by weight of polyethylene glycol 600. The surface of each treated fabric was Ithen ironed using a hand iron preheated to a different temperature. The sample, the surface of which was heated to 200 C., showed 25 pills/35 in?, the sample heated to 210 C. showed l5 pills/ 35 in?, and the sample heated to 220 C. showed ⁇ 0 pill/ 35 in?.
  • the chief advantage of this invention is based on the fact that the polyester fabrics which normally have a high tendency to form pills can be given a simple and commercially cheap two-step finishing treatment which greatly lowers' or leliminates the pilling and fuzzing tendency without significant impairment of other fabric properties such as strength, abrasion resistance, liveliness, crease recovery, wrinkle resistance, and thelike.
  • the lfinishing process also improves the static resistance of the fabric, as well as improving the resistance of the fabric to soiling by liquid oils. It also permits the fabric to be dyed much faster than a control fabric, andthe dyeings on these specially finished polyester fabrics are deeper and they exhaust better.
  • The'finishing treatment is most advantageously applied to wearing apparel fabrics having almost any type of construction, because it is in these fabrics that the necessity for retaining the aesthetic properties and the undesirability of pill formation is most commonly apparent.
  • the treatment may also be applied to industrial and other types of fabrics where there isa need for pill reduction, such as papermakers felts, filter fabrics, roll covers and the like.
  • polyether glycol is a polyethylene glycol having an average molecular weight of ⁇ about 600.

Description

Jan. 12, 1960 D. D. MooBERRY 2,920,980
FINISHING FABRICS Filed March 28, 1956 l g 8 c u) E 3 g 2 I o '2 2 o E ,f2
E u' C g *rf n- .Q ul z D u l E u: wr l -z f s; B2 ,/f' .f2 l: -oun Y l c\| a U 55' E q LIL o f x I E o a :l I.. LLI I o o N 'Nl '0S 9(2/ S'l-Hd INVENTOR DAVID D. MOOBERRY ATTORNEY FINISHING FABRICS David D. Mooberry, Wilmington, Del., assignor to E. I.
du Pont de Nemours and Company, Wilmington, Del., a corporation of Delaware This invention relates to a process of finishing synthetic fabrics and more particularly to a process of rcducing the pilling tendency of fabrics containing polyester bers. It has been observed for some time that fabrics made from certain synthetic bers have a tendency to form small fuzz balls on the surface which are known in the trade as -pills. It has also been observed that this undesirable property is found to a greater extent on fabrics woven from synthetic fibers which have high strength and abrasion resistance. One explanation of this tendency is that the bers of these polymers do not wear away as readily as those of the lower strength bers either before or after the formation of pillsf This explanation is supported by the fact that pill formation is almost directly proportional to the abrasion resistance of a given fabric.
It is an object of this invention to provide a process for nishing fabrics containing polyester bers which avoids formation of pills or reduces the formation of pills to an acceptable level. Another object is to provide a process for reducing or eliminating pill formation in fabrics containing a major proportion of ethylene terephthalatepolymer staple bers without significant impairment of the fabric strength, abrasion resistance or other desirable properties of these fabrics. Other objects of the invention will be apparent as the description proceeds.
These and other objects are accomplished by treating woven or knitted fabrics containing linear condensation polyester bers in major proportion with a liquid impregnatingmedium containing at least by weight of certain polyether glycol compounds. These compounds are polyether glycols, their esters, or ethers and mixtures thereof having the formula in which R1, R2, and R3 are the same or different lower alkylene units such as methylene, ethylene, propylene and so forth up to about 5 carbon atoms. In the formula, A stands for hydrogen, alkyl, aryl, or an acyl group; and B is OH, alkyl ether, aryl'ether or an alkyl or aryl ester radical. In the formula, Y has a value to produce a molecular weight of the alkylene oxide component of at least about 300.
The liquidv is applied to the fabric by impregnation, padding or spraying. After the fabric is treated with the impregnating liquid, excess liquid is usually removed by squeeze rolls, extraction or other conventional means, and the fabric dried. Then the surface only is heated (i.e., either one or both surfaces) rapidly to a temperature of -at least 200 C., but below the fusion temperature of the surface fibers. The heat treatment should be such that the surface bers are heated, and the source of heat, or the fabric, removed before the temperature of theA entire fabric is raised to the temperature of its surface. The back of the fabric may be cooled if necessary while the surface is being heated.
lT he time-temperature cycle of heating` isA thereby con- 2,920,980 Patented Jan. 12, 1960 ICC trolled to avoid degradation of the bers of the main body of the fabric beneath the surface. One convenient way of determining whether the fabric itself has retained its desirableproperties or Whether the severity of the finishing treatment has appreciably changed the aesthetic and other physical properties of the body of the fabric is to measure the weight loss of the treated and untreated fabric after subjection to a standard abrasion test dened hereinafter. In order to preserve the good aesthetic and other properties of the polyester fabrics, it has been found that independent of the fabric composition or construction, the fabric must not undergo an absolute percent weight loss in the adoptedabrasion test of more than 5 percentage units greater than the absolute percent weight loss of the untreated control fabric when subjected to the same abrasion test; i.e., the differential weight loss between treated and untreated fabric must not be more than about 5%. t u
The abrasion resistance of the fabrics is measured in terms of fabric weight loss in the abrasion test described on page 3 of the A.A.T.C.C. Bulletin entitled, The A.A.T.C.C. Accelerotor, July 1953, using a 41/2" square sample and a 4% propeller blade driven at 1800 r.p.m. with a 400 E. grit closed coat Durite abrasive paper (Behr-Manning Co.) as the abrasive liner for a five-minute testing period.
The efliciency of the process in reducing pilling is determined by number of pills formed per 35 in.2 of surface fabric as determined in accordance with ASTM D-1375- 55T, Test for Pilling Propensity of Textile Fabrics- Part C-Brush and Sponge Method.
As mentioned above, the value of Y in the formula is such as to yield a molecular weight of at least about 300. `There is no known maximum` limitation for the molecular weight although the lower range, particularly that of from 400 to 600, is preferred since compounds in this range are more rapidly soluble as well as being more available and economical. The critical nature of the minimum molecular weight of the polyether glycol is shown in Table I below, wherein one particular polyester fabric is treated under optimum conditions in accordance with this invention while varying only the The polyether glycol may be etheried or esteried without affecting the pill reducing tendency of the treatment so long as the average molecular weight of the alkylene oxide unit is maintained above about 300. The glycol treatment may involve the use of a single glycol or derivative thereof, or more practically, it will involve the use of mixtures of glycols which are commercially available and, therefore, much less expensive for large-scale use. Specic examples of the polyether glycols and their derivatives which may be used in accordance with this invention include polyethylene glycol 400, polyethylene glycol 600, polymethylene glycol 400, polypropylene glycol 600, polyethylene glycol 400 monolaurate, polyethylene glycol 400 monostearate, polypropylene glycol 400, polytetramethylene glycol 600, polyethylene glycol 600 monolaurate, polyethylene glycol 1000 monolaurate, polyethylene glycol 1500 monoiaurate, polyethylene glycol 400 monooleate, polyethylene glycol 600 mono-I stearate, polyethylene glycol 600 monopalmitate, monomethoxy polyethylene glycol550, dibutyl ether of polyethylene glycol 400trimethylnonyl ether of polyethylene glycol 400, vmethylphenyl ether of polyethylene glycol 400, p-n-butylphenyl ether of polyethylene glycol 400, p-isobutylphenyl ether of polyethylene glycol 400, pdodecylphenyl` ether of polyethylene glycol 400, p-isooctylphenyl ether of polyethylene glycol 400, oleyl ether of polyethylene glycol 400, l-hexyl-Z-naphthyl ether of polyethylene glycol 600, l-octyl-Z-naphthyl ether of polyethylene glycol 600, l-hexyl (2,3,4,5tetrahydroxy, 6-stearate) ether of polyethylene glycol 400, and the like. The numbers after the name indicate the approximate average molecular weight, for example, polyethylene glycol 400 is a mixture of polyethylene glycols, the weight average molecular weight of the mixture being about 400.
The liquid treating medium which is applied to the polyester fabric may be composed wholly of the polyether glycol or more practically, the glycol or derivative thereof will be dissolved in a miscible solvent such as water, alcohol, acetone and the like. The use of solutions of the glycol is more economical when carried out on a commercial scale and involves the use of less glycol and, therefore, less loss or recovery of glycol is involved. If the liquid medium contains any diluent for the glycol, the medium must be applied to the fabric with a minimum concentration of of the glycol based on the total, weight of the liquid medium in order to achieve a satis-- factory reduction of the pilling count in the resulting fabrics. In generaLrfor thev lowest levels of pilling, the preferred operating concentration for the padding bath is an aqueous medium containing 20%40% by weight of polyether glycol.
Fillable fabrics may be treated by the process of this invention (i.e., glycol treatment followed by heat treatment), either with or without benefit of an additional modifying agent. Typical modifying agents which may be employed in the liquid medium, together with glycols,
include ester exchange catalysts, such as the metallic salts or oxides of calcium, magnesium, lead, tin and zinc (e.g., zmc nitrate, zinc acetate, magnesium oxide, and the like).
In addition to the critical nature of the liquid-treating,
medium, it has also been found that the heat-treating step is likewise critical for achieving the objects of this invention. The use of too high a temperature of heat treatment will cause fusion ofthe surface fibers which in turn destroys the aesthetic properties of the fabric, as welly k as causing too great a drop in abrasion resistance and other strength properties of the fabric.
The maximum temperature will be governed by the melting point or degradation of the particular fibers used, which, of course, will change somewhat with the composition of any copolyesters making up the fabric, as well as the nature of other fiber components when used in a blend with polyester fibers.
The minimum temperature necessary to achieve a satisfactory reduction in pilling propensity in this process has been found to be about 200". C. when polyethylene terephthalate is the polyester fiber in the fabric. Furthermore, the time/temperature relationship of the heat treatment must be-carefully controlled so that the fabric properties dofnot suffer impairment.
the fibers within the body ofthe fabric. Normally, the heat treating step will be carried out on the impregnated fabric so that the surface of the fabric will be raised'.
rapidly to a temperature of 200 C.-230 C., preferably Too long a treat-V ment, even at optimum temperatures, will tend to degrade- 4 pill reduction Without also specifying a particular temperature for the particular fabric being treated.
A satisfactory criterion for determining the best time/ temperature relationship is to measure the abrasion resistance of a sample of fabric, both untreated and treated by the process of this invention. Since the absolute weight loss during abrasion testing is dependent on fabric constructionand composition, the best criterion for the effect of the instant process on the fabric is that the absolute percent-weight loss of the treated fabric by the standard abrasion test specified should not be more than 5 percentage units greater than the absolute percent weight loss of the untreated control fabric subjected to the same abrasion test.
A guide for selection of optimum temperatures for use in this invention 4will be found in the drawing in which the single figure is a graph in which the number of pills per 35 in.2 section is plotted against temperature of the surface of the fabric treated. The curves show the pills formed at various temperatures when a polyethylene terephthalate fabric is treated (I) with 20%-5 0% polyethylene glycol (av. M.W. 600) in aqueous solution, (II) with 5% to 10% of the same glycol in aqueous solutionand (III) with no treating agent. These three curves-involved the use of the gabardine fabric described in -Example Vl. The dotted lines represent portions on the curves `Where the fabric fused or had deteriorated to an extent that its feel or handle was considered unsatisfactory commercially. The solid lines represent conditions-which result in little or no impairment in the handle or jfeel of the fabric. The curves represent data obtained from one particular type of fabric. Curves for other types have the same general shape but do not necessanly coincide with-those shown.
The number of pills per 35 sq. in.as measured in the standardk ASTM test, considered acceptable depends upon the ultimate use of the fabric and its construction. Naturally zero pills is desirable, but up ,to 50 or even 100 is sometimes acceptable, and, considering the wide variety of fabric constructions and compositions available on the market, these levels represent a considerable improvement-over the prior art.
The particular manner by which the heat is applied to the surface of the impregnated fabric is also a critical part of the heat-treating step. It has been found that merely heating the fabric in an ordinary air oven is not a satisfactory method of achieving the objects of this invention, chiefly because it does not raise the temperature of the surface fibers to 200 C. rapidly enough. Using this method by the time the surface fibers reach the critical temperature of this invention, the fibers through the body of the fabric have become degraded and the abrasion resistance and strength of the whole fabric is severely impaired.
Any means for heating the surface of the fabric only may be used and a large variety o-f suitable apparatus is availablefin the trade for rapidly raising the temperature of the surface fibers to 200 C., such as, for example, a preheated ordinary hand iron, a standard series of National hot rolls, and an Andrews-Goodrich oven or a Morrison oven, both of which contain rolls within an oven which is preheated to the desired temperature. All of this apparatus involves direct contact between a heated surface and the surface of the fabric, which is the preferred manner of carrying out the heating step in this invention. Normally, with such contact heating equipment, the fabric will be kept taut so that the surface of the fabric conforms accurately to the contour of the heated surface, although this is `not a critical limitation in the process.
It has been noted that the increased pilling resistance resulting from the instant process is developed selectively only on the surface of the fabric in contact with the heated surface; i.e., the side of the fabric in contact with thek hot roll, when a hot roll is employed as the heating 5. means. n'y othei' apparatus or. methodfor rapidly achieving the minimum temperature selectively at the surface of the fabric may be used such as radiant heat, and the like. In such instances when the heating means does not contact the surface of the fabric, the increased pilling resistance will be developed selectively on the side, or sides, of the fabric facing the source of heat.
The woven and knitted fabrics which may be advantageously treated in accordance with this invention include those composed of 100% linear condensation polyester fibers, as well as those constructed of blends of other fibers or yarns containing some polyester fiber, the preferred one being polyethylene terephthalate. Other fabrics which may be treated to reduce the pill count may contain other polyester fibers such as those made from ethylene glycol and bibenzoc acid, ethylene glycol and hexahydroterephthalic acid, trimethylene glycol andk terephthalic acid, or tetramethylene glycol and terephthalic acid, as well as fabrics containing copolyester fibers such as those made from tetramethylene glycol, hexamethylene glycol and terephthalic acid, or those from dimethyl terephthalate, dimethyl sebacate and ethylene glycol, or similar copolyesters. The fabric may also be blends of polyester fibers with wool, cotton and other natural fibers and/ or rayon, nylon, polyacrylonitrile, cellulose acetate, and other synthetic bers. It is obvious one wouldnot employ blend fibers which will not withstand the heat treating temperatures of this invention.
Preferably, the two-step treating process of the invention is applied to fabrics before they are dyed, although in some instances, the glycol or derivative may be applied in the dye bath (e.g., when dyeing in accordance with the procedure described by Gibson in U.S. 2,663,- 612), or the two-step treatment may be applied after dyeing and after or during conventional finishing if the dyes and finishes used are stable to the final heat-treating step. v The following examples illustrate specific embodiments of'this invention without intending to limit the invention. It is to be understood that the treating agent in the examples may be replaced by a like amount of any compound falling within the formula given above.
Example l A 3 x 2 twill, sheen gabardine woven of 100% polyethylene terephthalate staple yarn was padded with an aqueous solution containing 40% by weight of polyethylene glycol 600 (i.e., average molecular weight=600). The fabric was then heat treated on a National hot roll machine under tension at 220 C. and an exposure time of about seconds, each face 0f the fabric receiving about 12.5 seconds exposure. The fabric was then scoured and dried. The fabric, before treatment, showed 435 pills/ 35 in.2 as measured by the ASTM pilling test, while the fabric, after treatment, showed 72 pills/ 35 in.2. The untreated control fabric after dyeing and conventional finishing showed 315 pills/35 in?, whereas the treated fabric after the same nal dyeing and finishing steps showed 10 pills/35 in?.
Another sample of the same fabric was paddedl with an aqueous solution containing 40% by weight of polyethylene glycol 600, and 1% by weight zinc nitrate. The fabric was dried in a hot-air pin tenter for 1.5 minutes at 121 C., and was then heat treated on a National hot roll machine at 220 C., as described above. The fabric after treatment showed 2.5 pills/35 in?, and a weight loss of 2.65% in the standard abrasion test compared with a weight loss of 2.61% for the untreated fabric, showing the properties of the fabric had not been degraded by -the finishing treatment.
Example Il A 3 x 2 twill, sheen gabardine fabric composed of 65% polyethylene terephthalate staple and 35 by weight rayon staple was padded and dried in the same manner as the fabric of Example I Vusingthe same polyethylene glycol and catalyst. hot roll machine for 25 seconds at 220 C. then scoured and dried. The untreated fabric showed 325 pills/35 in.2 and a weight loss in the abrasion test of 6.5%, whereas, the treated fabric showed only 7 pills/ 35 in.2 and a weight loss of 7.8%.
Example III A 2 x 1 twill gabardine composed of 55% polyethylene terephthalate staple fiberY and 45% rayon staple was treated in the same manner as the fabric of Example II. The untreated fabric developed 710 pills/35 in.2 and the treated fabric only 20 pills/ 35 in?.V When subjected t0 heat alone at 220 C. the fabric developed 180 pills/35 in.2 section.
Example IV A`3 x 2 twill sheen gabardine composed of 55% polyethylene terephthalate staple fiber and 45% wool was treated as in Example II. The untreated fabric showed 684 pills/ 35 in.2 and the treated fabric only 35 pills/35 in?.
Example V Two samples of batiste shitting fabric were woven from 65% polyethylene terephthalate staple yarn and 35% cotton. The fabric was padded with two aqueous solutions. The first sample was padded as in Example II with an aqueous solution of 40% by weight polyethylene glycol 600 and 1% by Weight zinc nitrate catalyst. The second sample was padded the same way with the same glycol solution but in the absence of the catalyst. The two fabrics were heated on the National hot roll machine for 25 seconds at 220 C., `then scoured and dried. The untreated fabric showed 175 pills/35 in?, and a weight loss in the abrasion test of 3.9%, the fabric sample padded with glycol alone showed 20 pills/35 in.2, and the sample padded with glycol and zinc nitrate catalyst showed 0 pill/ 35 in.2 and a weight loss of 6.8%.
Example VI An oxford shifting fabric composed of 65 polyethylene terephthalate staple fiber4 and 35 cotton was padded with an aqueous solution containing 5%r by weight of polyethylene glycol 600. The treated fabric was then heatedon a National hot roll machine for 25 seconds,
the temperature of the roll surface being 220 C. The fabric was then scoured and dried. The untreated fabric showed 630 pills/ 35 in.2 and the fabric treated with glycol pills/ 35 in.2 in the standard pilling test. A sample of the same original shirting fabric subjected to the same heat treatment on hot rolls at 220 C. but without glycol pretreatment showed 380 pills/ 35 in?.
Example VIII The 2 x 2 twill gabardine fabric, described in Example Vl, was padded with an aqueous solution containing 40% by weight polyethylene glycol 600 and 1% by weight zinc nitrate. `Samples of the fabric were heat treated in a hot-air oven for various times. Table II below illustrates the pilling data and abrasion resistance of these fabrics, acceptable pill protection being afforded only at the expense of degraded fabrics.
It was heat cured on a National.
7 TABLE n A.A.T.C.G. A'brason Resistance (Percent WeightLoss) Time of Heatngl'n HotAir Oven (220 C.) Pills/35 in.2
Example IX Three samples-of an oxford fabric having a pill count ofV 100/ 35 in.2 and having the same composition as the fabric of Example VII were padded with an aqueous solution containing 20% by weight of polyethylene glycol 600. The surface of each treated fabric was Ithen ironed using a hand iron preheated to a different temperature. The sample, the surface of which was heated to 200 C., showed 25 pills/35 in?, the sample heated to 210 C. showed l5 pills/ 35 in?, and the sample heated to 220 C. showed `0 pill/ 35 in?.
The chief advantage of this invention is based on the fact that the polyester fabrics which normally have a high tendency to form pills can be given a simple and commercially cheap two-step finishing treatment which greatly lowers' or leliminates the pilling and fuzzing tendency without significant impairment of other fabric properties such as strength, abrasion resistance, liveliness, crease recovery, wrinkle resistance, and thelike.
The lfinishing process also improves the static resistance of the fabric, as well as improving the resistance of the fabric to soiling by liquid oils. It also permits the fabric to be dyed much faster than a control fabric, andthe dyeings on these specially finished polyester fabrics are deeper and they exhaust better.
The'finishing treatment is most advantageously applied to wearing apparel fabrics having almost any type of construction, because it is in these fabrics that the necessity for retaining the aesthetic properties and the undesirability of pill formation is most commonly apparent. However, the treatment may also be applied to industrial and other types of fabrics where there isa need for pill reduction, such as papermakers felts, filter fabrics, roll covers and the like.
It will be apparent that many widely different embodiments of this inventionmay be made without departing from the spirit and scope thereof, and therefore it is not intendedto be limited except as indicated in the appended claims.
I claim:
1. The process of finishing fabrics containing substantial amounts of'linear condensation polyester fibers and which have a tendency to form surface pills in use which comprises reducing their pilling tendency without impairment of the properties: of the fabrics by impregnating the said fabrics with a liquid medium comprising at least 5% by weight of a material selected from the group consisting of polyether glycols, their esters, their ethers, and mixtures thereof, the alkylene oxide component of which has a lmolecular weight of at least 300; and thereafter heating :at least one surface of the impregnated fabric to a temperature of from about 18v C. tothe fusion temperature of the surface fibers while maintaining :the temperatureV ofthe body of the fabric sufficiently below thetemperature of the fabric surface so as to avoid degradation of the body portion of the fabric.
2. The process of claim 1 in which the weight loss differential between treatedl and untreated fabric is not more than about 5%.
3'. The process of claim 1 in which the surface fibers contain linear condensation polyester fibers and the polyether glycol has the `formula in'whichRl, R2, and R3 are the same or different alkyleue unitsV having up to 5 carbon atoms; A is selected .from the group consisting of hydrogen, alkyl, aryl and acyl groups; :and B is selected from the group consisting of OH, alkyl ether, aryl ether, alkyl `ester and aryl ester radicals, and Y has a value to produce a molecular t weight of the alkylene oxide component of at least 300.
4. The process of claim 1 in which the surface fibers are polyethylene terephthalate.
5. The process of claim 1 in which the polyether glycol component hasa molecular weight of from 400 to 600.
6. The processof claim 1 in which the polyether glycol is polyethylene glycol monolaurate, the alkylene oxide component of-which has an average molecular weight of about 400.
7. Thev process of claim 1 in which the surfacer of the -fabric isheated momentarily to a temperature of from 218 C. to 230 C.
8. Theprocess of*A claim 6 in which the temperature is from 218 C. to 222 C.
9. The process of claim 1 in which the concentration of the polyether glycol component in' the liquid is from 20-40%.
10. The process of claim 8 in which the polyether glycol is dissolved in-water.
11. The process of claim 1 in which the polyether glycol is a polyethylene glycol having an average molecular weight of` about 600.
12. Theprocess of claim 1 in which the fabric is composed of a blend of linear condensation polyester fibers and natural fibers.
ReferencesCited in the file of this patent UNITED STATES PATENTS 2,357,526 Light Sept. 5, 1944 2,645,584 Wiegerink July 14, 1953 2,663,989 Schlatter Dec. 29, 1953 2,676,115 Harmon Apr. 20, 1954 2,730,481 Day Jan. 10, 1956 2,747,981 Brown May 29, 1956 2,767,107 Young Oct. 16, 1956 UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE CERTIFICATE 0F CORRECTION Patent Nm 2,929,980
Jennery l2, i969 DEE/'Td De, Meobemy Column 4, line 53y im* "through" reed tl column 8, lime 5,
woughout for "180 C.," Teee 2180 C.,
Signed and sealed this 28th dey of June 19ML (SEAL) Attest:
KARL EL AXUNE ROBERT C. WATSON Attesting OHcer Commissioner 0f Patents

Claims (1)

1. THE PROCESS OF FINISHING FABRICS CONTAINING SUBSTANTIAL AMOUNTS OF LINEAR CONDENSATION POLYESTER FIBERS AND WHICH HAVE A TENDENCY TO FORM SURFACE PILLS IN USE WHICH COMPRISES REDUCING THEIR PILLING TENDENCY WITHOUT IMPAIRMENT OF THE PROPERTIES OF THE FABRICS BY IMPREGNATING THE SAID FABRICS WITH A LIQUID MEDIUM COMPRISING AT LEAST 5% BY WEIGHT OF A MATERIAL SELECTED FROM THE GROUP CONSISTING OF POLYETHER GLYCOLS, THEIR ESTERS, THEIR ETHERS, AND MIXTURES THEREOF, THE ALKYLENE OXIDE COMPONENT OF WHICH HAS A MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF AT LEAST 300, AND THEREAFTER HEATING AT LEAST ONE SURFACE OF THE IMPREGNATED FABRIC TO A TEMPERATURE OF FROM ABOUT 18*C. TO THE FUSION TEMPERATURE OF THE SURFACE FIBERS WHILE MAINTAINING THE TEMPERATURE OF THE BODY OF THE FABRIC SUFFICIENTLY BELOW THE TEMPERATURE OF THE FABRIC SURFACE SO AS TO AVOID DEGRADATION OF THE BODY PORTION OF THE FABRIC.
US574496A 1956-03-28 1956-03-28 Finishing fabrics Expired - Lifetime US2920980A (en)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
BE556217D BE556217A (en) 1956-03-28
US574496A US2920980A (en) 1956-03-28 1956-03-28 Finishing fabrics
FR1173374D FR1173374A (en) 1956-03-28 1957-03-27 Process for finishing synthetic fabrics

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US574496A US2920980A (en) 1956-03-28 1956-03-28 Finishing fabrics

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US2920980A true US2920980A (en) 1960-01-12

Family

ID=24296396

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US574496A Expired - Lifetime US2920980A (en) 1956-03-28 1956-03-28 Finishing fabrics

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (1) US2920980A (en)
BE (1) BE556217A (en)
FR (1) FR1173374A (en)

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2990604A (en) * 1956-07-18 1961-07-04 Ici Ltd Process of thermally treating and lubricating polyethylene terephthalate filaments and yarns
US3354138A (en) * 1963-11-22 1967-11-21 Phillips Petroleum Co Production of antistatic polymers
US3387996A (en) * 1964-08-19 1968-06-11 Du Pont Preparation of polyester yarns having improved heat characteristics
US3776766A (en) * 1970-11-18 1973-12-04 Hoechst Ag Process for improving the processing properties of polyester filaments and fibres
US4073993A (en) * 1975-03-20 1978-02-14 Standard Oil Company (Indiana) Hydrophilic finishing process for hydrophobic fibers
US4118326A (en) * 1974-11-07 1978-10-03 Basf Wyandotte Corporation Spin-finish lubricating method

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CH614968A4 (en) * 1968-04-25 1970-02-13

Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2357526A (en) * 1940-10-03 1944-09-05 American Cyanamid Co Finishing textiles with alkyd resin emulsions
US2645584A (en) * 1950-02-06 1953-07-14 Sr James G Wiegerink Ironing aid and textile refinishing composition
US2663989A (en) * 1949-03-19 1953-12-29 Schlatter Carl Coated articles and textiles and emulsions for producing them
US2676115A (en) * 1950-12-22 1954-04-20 Chicopee Mfg Corp Application of antistatic materials to dielectrics
US2730481A (en) * 1952-10-29 1956-01-10 Celastic Corp Polymerization by dielectric heating using inorganic salts as heating assistants
US2747981A (en) * 1951-06-05 1956-05-29 Divine Brothers Company Production of wear-resistnat cloth and buffing wheel made of the same
US2767107A (en) * 1954-06-29 1956-10-16 Union Carbide & Carbon Corp Antistatic treatment of hydrophobic resin articles

Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2357526A (en) * 1940-10-03 1944-09-05 American Cyanamid Co Finishing textiles with alkyd resin emulsions
US2663989A (en) * 1949-03-19 1953-12-29 Schlatter Carl Coated articles and textiles and emulsions for producing them
US2645584A (en) * 1950-02-06 1953-07-14 Sr James G Wiegerink Ironing aid and textile refinishing composition
US2676115A (en) * 1950-12-22 1954-04-20 Chicopee Mfg Corp Application of antistatic materials to dielectrics
US2747981A (en) * 1951-06-05 1956-05-29 Divine Brothers Company Production of wear-resistnat cloth and buffing wheel made of the same
US2730481A (en) * 1952-10-29 1956-01-10 Celastic Corp Polymerization by dielectric heating using inorganic salts as heating assistants
US2767107A (en) * 1954-06-29 1956-10-16 Union Carbide & Carbon Corp Antistatic treatment of hydrophobic resin articles

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2990604A (en) * 1956-07-18 1961-07-04 Ici Ltd Process of thermally treating and lubricating polyethylene terephthalate filaments and yarns
US3354138A (en) * 1963-11-22 1967-11-21 Phillips Petroleum Co Production of antistatic polymers
US3387996A (en) * 1964-08-19 1968-06-11 Du Pont Preparation of polyester yarns having improved heat characteristics
US3776766A (en) * 1970-11-18 1973-12-04 Hoechst Ag Process for improving the processing properties of polyester filaments and fibres
US4118326A (en) * 1974-11-07 1978-10-03 Basf Wyandotte Corporation Spin-finish lubricating method
US4073993A (en) * 1975-03-20 1978-02-14 Standard Oil Company (Indiana) Hydrophilic finishing process for hydrophobic fibers

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
BE556217A (en)
FR1173374A (en) 1959-02-24

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US2365931A (en) Finishing of polyamide fabrics
US2955958A (en) Process of treating woven textile fabric with a vinyl chloride polymer
US3159964A (en) Process for working up stretched filaments of aromatic polyesters of high molecular weight
US2985940A (en) Production of high bulk fabrics from staple fiber mixtures
US3442694A (en) Process for softening fabric and product thereof
US2311080A (en) Textile treatment
US2920980A (en) Finishing fabrics
US3940544A (en) Production of polyester yarn
US3705823A (en) Method of coating fibrous structure with a mixture of polyurethane pre-polymer and polyorganosiloxane
US3694257A (en) Polyester compositions and their use as textile assistants
US3983286A (en) Method of fixing copper salts to articles of synthetic polymers
US3382086A (en) Finishing textile fabric
US3749599A (en) Process for treating synthetic fiber with a fire retardant and the treated fiber
US2981978A (en) Process of shrinking solid polymethylene terephthalate with halogenated methanes
US3617188A (en) Soil release fabrics and method for producing same
US3241906A (en) Dyeing process
CN112900101B (en) Antistatic agent and preparation method thereof, fabric and preparation method thereof
US3288553A (en) Process for treating napped fabrics
US3558263A (en) Potassium iodide cross-linking inhibitor for n-methylolacrylamide
US3145073A (en) Treatment of polyolefin articles and resulting products
JPS5930967A (en) Treatment of polyester synthetic fiber fabric
US3322568A (en) Composition and method for producing leather substitute
US2577846A (en) Process for dyeing vinyl resin textile articles
US3813220A (en) Process for modifying keratinous material,composition useful therein,and keratinous material bearing thereon said composition
GB804151A (en) Improvements in or relating to textile materials