|Numéro de publication||US3725888 A|
|Type de publication||Octroi|
|Date de publication||3 avr. 1973|
|Date de dépôt||5 avr. 1971|
|Date de priorité||5 avr. 1971|
|Autre référence de publication||DE2216236A1, DE2216236B2|
|Numéro de publication||US 3725888 A, US 3725888A, US-A-3725888, US3725888 A, US3725888A|
|Cessionnaire d'origine||Pyrotector Inc|
|Exporter la citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Citations de brevets (5), Référencé par (45), Classifications (15), Événements juridiques (5)|
|Liens externes: USPTO, Cession USPTO, Espacenet|
36794- sss: SR ge a I: W 24514 XR anamaaa ge United States Patent 1191 1111 3,725,888 Solomon [451 Apr. 3, 1973 v S /5  DETECTOR SYSTEM 3,564,529 2 1971 Kaufman et al. ..340 258 1) 9 I 3,573,8l7 4/1971 Akers ..340/258 52-;  Inventor Elias Duxbury Mass 3,242,486 3/1966 Corbell.... ..340/258 A  Assignee: Pyrotector, Incorporated, Hingham, 3,560,950 2/1971 Peters ..340/258 D Z3? Mass. fit  Filed. Apr 5 1971 Primary Examiner-David L. Trafton Attorney-Robert E. Ross fi a  Appl. No.: 131,222 )5 57 ABSTRACT  CL "340/258 340/258 6 An intruder detector system that utilizes both a DOP.  Int CL Gosh 13/16 Gosh 3/18 pler effect detector system and an optical detector Field of 3 0 25 R A, B, 25 system monitoring thfi same space. An alarm output signal produced by either detector under alarm conditions is prevented from activating an alarm unless the 5 References Cited other detector also is producing an alarm signal.
UNITED STATES PATENTS 3 Claims, 1 Drawing g r 3,010,102 11/1961 Ketchledge et al 340/228 S X ie i a 10 *1 l i T V50 C/fiCW/T I man/route)? k 5 THAAljH/ITER 2 0R, R l Tam/rowan I CE/V AMPLIFIER may I MIXER DUE-CT wrscmro/e I 1 M0 ALARM 5 N; I qA-rs ACTUATOR l AMPLIFIEQ Pl/DI'OELECTRIC 4 ms: l E R s T DISCEIMINATDR OUT, /I 0 rzcm V $/AT f I Em AND ENTRY oeuy 1 1 BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION a. Field of the invention This invention relates to electronic intruder detection devices.
b. Description of the prior art One form of widely used device for intruder detection utilizes an accoustic generator that creates a pattern of standing waves in a space to be protected. Reflected waves are received by the detector, and if the reflected waves maintain a predetermined frequency, no alarm signal is created. However the motion of a person in the room or air currents due to heat from a fire will cause a change in the frequency received, and this change is utilized to actuate an alarm.
Another device of this type utilizes microwaves in the electro-magnetic spectrum, with the method of operation being substantially as described with respect to the acoustic system.
Although such devices have achieved considerable commercial success, they have the disadvantage of being extremely subject to false alarms from extraneous sounds from both inside and outside the protected space. For example, outside sounds such as automobile engine noises, sirens, thunder, airplanes, or construction equipment can contain sufficient high frequency components to cause an alarm response of the acoustic type of detector. Internally, sounds of thermostats or other devices with contacts, electric motors, telephones, doorbells, or the motion of animals such as cats, rodents, or guard dogs can cause an alarm response, as can air turbulence due to hot air heating systems.
In the case of the microwave type of detector, a false alarm may be caused by spurious R.F. signals or motion of a person or article in an area beyond the confined space, since the transmission passes through any wall not made of metallic material.
Although some of these causes of false alarms can often be prevented by the use of delay features in the alarm portion of the circuit, or by controlling the sensitivity of the device, such features reduce the effectiveness of the device in detecting intruders.
Another type of volumetric space surveillance system (as opposed to a line of sight type of detector) is an optical detector which utilizes the rate of change of light intensity to actuate an alarm. This type of device is also prone to false alarms, due to unpredictable sudden changes in ambient illumination such as head lights from passing cars, lightning, lightbulb failure or momentary power failure.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION In accordance with the present invention a detector system comprises-a Doppler effect intruder detector and a volumetric optical detection system combined to monitor the same space. The outputs of the detectors are connected to an AND gate, with the output of the AND gate being connected to alarm actuating means. Phenomena that cause false alarms in Doppler effect detectors and those that cause false alarms in optical detection are so different that the possibility is very slight that phenomena that affect each will occur simultaneously.
DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING The single FIGURE of the drawing is a block diagram illustrating a detector system embodying the features of the invention.
DESCRIPTION OF A PREFERRED EMBODIMENT Asillustrated in the drawing a detector system embodying the features of the invention comprises a Doppler effect detector 10 and a photo-electric detector 12 positioned for surveillance of the same space to be protected from intruders. The detectors l0 and 12 cooperate to energize an alarm on detecting an intruder or other condition in a manner to appear herein after.
Both Doppler effect detectors and optical detectors are known in the art and the specific types of detectors to be described are by way of example only, since other types may be used without departing from the scope of the invention.
The detector 10 comprises a tuned circuit resonating at, for example, 40 kHz which drives a piezq-ele ctric tranducer transmitter, which radiates at 40 kl lz into the protected space. When the detector is in use, a
standing wave pattern of 40 kHz is established in the space, a portion of which is reflected back to the transducer, which also has a resonating frequency of 40' kHz. The output of the receiver transducer is fed into an amplifier and mixer which also receives a 40 kHz signal from the tuned circuit driver. If there is no disturbance in the ultra-sonic waves, the frequency received at the receiver transducer and therefore at the mixer is the same as the 40 kHz signal from the tuned circuit driver. However if there is any movement of a body in the protected space a different frequency is received at the receiver transducer, which when amplified and compared with the driver frequency in the mixer, produces a beat frequency. The detector allows this beat frequency to filter through to the delay integrator, which insures that the beat frequency is present for a predetermined time before transmitting a signal to the AND gate.
In the illustrated embodiment theoptical detector system 12 comprises a photo-electric detector which is positioned to receive ambient light from the same space into which the Doppler effect system 10 is transmitting, an amplifier and discriminator which receives the signal from the photo-electric detector, and an output pulse generator which feeds an alarm pulse to the AND gate.
The photo-electric devices may be photoresistive or photo-generative and may have various optical filters to make the device insensitive to light of certain band widths.
The discriminator responds to a predetermined change in illumination reaching the photo-electric detector to provide an output pulse to the AND gate.
As illustrated schematically, if the rate of change of the light received by the photo-electric detector is below a certain value, no signal is transmitted to the pulse output generator whereas if the rate of change is above said minimum value a signal is transmitted to the pulse output generator to produce an alarm pulse to the AND gate.
If both the Doppler effect detector and the optical detector provide an output signal at the same time, an output alarm signal will be transmitted to the alarm activating device, However the AND gate will not allow the alarm to be actuated if only one detector provides an output signal.
Although each detector in the above described system is subject to the false alarm conditions previously described, no single false alarm cause will cause a false alarm in both detectors simultaneously. The probability that a false alarm condition that affects the Doppler type detector will occur simultaneously with a false alarm condition that affects the optical detector, if not absolutely non-existent is very slight. The inhibiting of each detector by the other does not, however reduce the effectiveness of the detector in providing an alarm in response to an intruder.
in the illustrated embodiment of the invention, an entry and exit delay feature may be provided between the AND gateand the alarm actuating device to allow personnel time to leave the protected space after energizing the detector system, without actuating the alann, and when re-entering, to allow them time to de-energize the system before the alarm is actuated by their presence.
Since certain obvious changes may be made in the embodiment described herein, it is intended that all matter contained herein be interpreted in an illustrative and not a limiting sense.
1. An intruder detector system, comprising first and second detector devices arranged to monitor substantially the same confined space, each of said detector devices being responsive to the entry of an intruder to provide an output signal, one of said detectors being responsive to a Doppler effect to produce its output signal, the other being responsive to a change in light intensity to produce its output signal, means receiving the output of each of said detectors, said means producing an-alarm output signal only when said detectors produce an output signal simultaneously.
2. A detector system comprising a detection device of the type utilizing a change in frequency to cause an alarm output signal and a detector device utilizing a rate of change in light intensity to cause an alarm output signal, said detector devices being arranged to monitor substantially the same confined space, an AND gate, the output of said detectors being connected to said AND gate, the output of said AND gate being connected to an alarm actuating device, whereby the AND gate transmit a signal to the alarm actuating device only if both alarm devices produce an alarm output signal simultaneously.
3. A detector system, comprising a first detector producing an alarm signal output in response to a change in frequency between a transmitted signal and a received signal, and a second detector arranged to monitor at least a portion of a confined space being monitored by the first detector, said second detector being responsive to a predetermined change of light intensity to cause an alarm signal output, and means preventing said alarm signal output from either detector from actuating an alann unless the other detector also simultaneously generates an alarm signal output.
|Brevet cité||Date de dépôt||Date de publication||Déposant||Titre|
|US3010102 *||5 juil. 1947||21 nov. 1961||Bell Telephone Labor Inc||Combination radar and thermalenergy detection system|
|US3242486 *||20 avr. 1962||22 mars 1966||Johnson Service Co||Intrusion detection system|
|US3560950 *||2 mars 1967||2 févr. 1971||Peters Duane||Warning signal for swinging doors|
|US3564529 *||21 oct. 1965||16 févr. 1971||Us Navy||Electrostatic field rate detector|
|US3573817 *||28 févr. 1968||6 avr. 1971||North American Rockwell||Monitoring system|
|Brevet citant||Date de dépôt||Date de publication||Déposant||Titre|
|US3801978 *||20 juil. 1972||2 avr. 1974||E Systems Inc||Ultrasonic-microwave doppler intrusion alarm system|
|US3866198 *||17 oct. 1973||11 févr. 1975||Leopold Cohen||Ultrasonic intrusion detection systems employing turbulence discrimination|
|US3898640 *||24 juil. 1973||5 août 1975||Romen Faser Kunststoff||Method and apparatus for providing space security based upon the acoustical characteristics of the space|
|US3922660 *||12 déc. 1974||25 nov. 1975||American District Telegraph Co||Volumetric intrusion alarm using both Doppler and net-change signal processing|
|US4010459 *||5 nov. 1975||1 mars 1977||Borge Schloger||Systems for the detection of moving objects within a survey area by microwave diffraction|
|US4087814 *||27 déc. 1976||2 mai 1978||Ernst Spirig||Intruder alarm systems|
|US4141091 *||10 déc. 1976||27 févr. 1979||Pulvari Charles F||Automated flush system|
|US4331952 *||22 sept. 1980||25 mai 1982||American District Telegraph Company||Redundant sensor adapter|
|US4401976 *||14 janv. 1981||30 août 1983||Stadelmayr Hans G||Multiple sensor interconnected alarm system responsive to different variables|
|US4710750 *||5 août 1986||1 déc. 1987||C & K Systems, Inc.||Fault detecting intrusion detection device|
|US4833450 *||15 avr. 1988||23 mai 1989||Napco Security Systems, Inc.||Fault detection in combination intrusion detection systems|
|US4940967 *||31 août 1989||10 juil. 1990||Burle Technologies, Inc.||Balanced digital infrared detector circuit|
|US4942384 *||31 mars 1989||17 juil. 1990||Matsushita Electric Works, Ltd.||Composite type crime preventive sensor|
|US5189393 *||7 juin 1991||23 févr. 1993||The Watt Stopper Inc.||Dual technology motion sensor|
|US5475365 *||2 déc. 1994||12 déc. 1995||C & K Systems, Inc.||Methods and apparatus for intrusion detection having improved immunity to false alarms|
|US5581236 *||1 juil. 1994||3 déc. 1996||C & K Systems, Inc.||Methods and apparatus for intrusion detection having improved immunity to false alarms|
|US5821642 *||4 nov. 1996||13 oct. 1998||Hubbell Incorporated||Arc prevention circuit for a mechanical switch|
|US5986357 *||4 févr. 1997||16 nov. 1999||Mytech Corporation||Occupancy sensor and method of operating same|
|US6078253 *||15 oct. 1997||20 juin 2000||Mytech Corporation||Occupancy sensor and method of operating same|
|US6415205||26 août 1999||2 juil. 2002||Mytech Corporation||Occupancy sensor and method of operating same|
|US6538570||22 juin 2000||25 mars 2003||Honeywell International||Glass-break detector and method of alarm discrimination|
|US7113092||12 nov. 2003||26 sept. 2006||Qinetiq Limited||Ferromagnetic object detector|
|US7194209 *||21 août 2003||20 mars 2007||Xantech Corporation||Interference resistant infrared extension system|
|US7411489||1 juil. 2005||12 août 2008||Cooper Wiring Devices, Inc.||Self-adjusting dual technology occupancy sensor system and method|
|US7486193||6 févr. 2006||3 févr. 2009||Cooper Technologies Company||Occupancy sensor network|
|US7489128||11 mars 2002||10 févr. 2009||Kopp Keith A||MRI protector|
|US7541924||6 févr. 2006||2 juin 2009||Cooper Technologies Company||Infrared occupancy sensor|
|US7680283||7 févr. 2005||16 mars 2010||Honeywell International Inc.||Method and system for detecting a predetermined sound event such as the sound of breaking glass|
|US7777632||6 févr. 2006||17 août 2010||Cooper Technologies Company||Acoustic occupancy sensor|
|US8044336||1 févr. 2006||25 oct. 2011||Pyronix Limited||Detector and optical system|
|US8063375 *||22 juin 2007||22 nov. 2011||Intel-Ge Care Innovations Llc||Sensible motion detector|
|US8148989||27 janv. 2009||3 avr. 2012||Keith Kopp||Ferromagnetic detection enhancer compatible with magnetic resonance|
|US8164437||2 févr. 2006||24 avr. 2012||Pyronix Limited||Detection apparatus|
|US8389924||23 sept. 2011||5 mars 2013||Pyronix Limited||Detector and optical system|
|US20040135687 *||12 nov. 2003||15 juil. 2004||Qinetiq Limited||Ferromagnetic object detector|
|US20050206515 *||22 mars 2004||22 sept. 2005||Alexander Pakhomov||Systems for protection against intruders|
|US20060177071 *||7 févr. 2005||10 août 2006||Honeywell International, Inc.||Method and system for detecting a predetermined sound event such as the sound of breaking glass|
|USRE33824 *||30 oct. 1989||18 févr. 1992||Fault detecting intrusion detection device|
|DE3911180A1 *||6 avr. 1989||19 oct. 1989||Matsushita Electric Works Ltd||Meldevorrichtung zur verhuetung von straftaten mittels eines verbund-sensorsystems|
|EP0147925A1 *||9 oct. 1984||10 juil. 1985||C & K Systems, Inc.||Combination infrared microwave intrusion detector|
|EP0255812A2 *||29 juil. 1987||10 févr. 1988||ELKRON S.p.A.||Monitoring device with infrared and radio-frequency sensor components|
|EP0276306A1 *||12 mai 1987||3 août 1988||Denning Mobile Robotics, Inc.||Intrusion detection system|
|EP0367402A1 *||28 sept. 1989||9 mai 1990||C & K Systems, Inc.||An intrusion detection system and a method therefor|
|WO2004044620A1 *||5 nov. 2003||27 mai 2004||Qinetiq Ltd||Ferromagnetic object detector|
|WO2008061496A1||13 nov. 2007||29 mai 2008||S M S Smart Microwave Sensors||Method and radar arrangement for monitoring a monitoring area|
|Classification aux États-Unis||340/522, 367/94, 340/555|
|Classification internationale||G01S13/56, G08B13/189, G08B13/24, G01S13/00|
|Classification coopérative||G08B13/2494, G08B13/24, G08B13/189, G01S13/56|
|Classification européenne||G01S13/56, G08B13/189, G08B13/24, G08B13/24C2|
|9 oct. 1990||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: WALTER KIDDE AEROSPACE INC., A CORP. OF DE
Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:GRAVINER, INC., A CORP. OF DE;REEL/FRAME:005541/0064
Effective date: 19891018
|9 oct. 1990||AS03||Merger|
Owner name: GRAVINER, INC., A CORP. OF DE
Owner name: WALTER KIDDE AEROSPACE INC., A CORP. OF DE
Effective date: 19891018
|18 juin 1990||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: GRAVINER, INC., A CORP. OF DE
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNOR:PYROTECTOR, INC.;REEL/FRAME:005381/0071
Effective date: 19900605
|8 févr. 1983||AS02||Assignment of assignor's interest|
Owner name: 333 LINCOLN ST., HINGHAM, MA. A CORP OF RI.
Owner name: CHLORIDE INCORPORATED
Effective date: 19830103
Owner name: PYROTECTOR, INC.
|8 févr. 1983||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: PYROTECTOR, INC.; 333 LINCOLN ST., HINGHAM, MA. A
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNOR:CHLORIDE INCORPORATED;REEL/FRAME:004094/0656
Effective date: 19830103