US3740572A - Control of power system for optimum economy - Google Patents
Control of power system for optimum economy Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US3740572A US3740572A US00268234A US3740572DA US3740572A US 3740572 A US3740572 A US 3740572A US 00268234 A US00268234 A US 00268234A US 3740572D A US3740572D A US 3740572DA US 3740572 A US3740572 A US 3740572A
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- value
- companies
- pool
- generation
- signal
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H02—GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
- H02J—CIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS OR SYSTEMS FOR SUPPLYING OR DISTRIBUTING ELECTRIC POWER; SYSTEMS FOR STORING ELECTRIC ENERGY
- H02J3/00—Circuit arrangements for ac mains or ac distribution networks
- H02J3/04—Circuit arrangements for ac mains or ac distribution networks for connecting networks of the same frequency but supplied from different sources
- H02J3/06—Controlling transfer of power between connected networks; Controlling sharing of load between connected networks
Definitions
- Economic loading of generators in the interconnected companies of a power pool may be normally carried out by producing and broadcasting to the participating companies a common A signal of value sufficient to provide through control the desired total generation.
- Such control is modified by biasing the common signal to a particular company whose net tie-line interchange has exceeded a predetermined limit. The modification is such that the net interchange is not allowed to exceed the limit. Similar modification may be made when it is desired to prevent a particular tie from exceeding a limit.
- This invention relates to the control of the loading of generators of the individual interconnected power companies of a power pool for the maintenance of adequate generation in the pool. More particularly, the invention relates to the control of the generators of the interconnected power companies to provide an economic distribution of the load among those generators with the provision of means for altering the economic distribution as'may be required, by limitations in the operation of a particular company.
- FIGS. 9, l and 11 illustrate a control arrangement applicable to a power pool having participating and interconnected operating companies each with their own dispatching offices and each with their own regulating sources.
- FIG. 9 represents equipment that may be installed at the Pool Load Dispatching Office
- FIG. illustrates apparatus at a participating companys load dispatching office
- FIG. l 1 shows equipment for a source at a station of one of the participating companies.
- the desirable mode of operation may be that which maintains the net tie-line interchange at its limit value.
- the improvement comprises means which are operable when the tie-line interchange of one of the companies with respect to another exceeds a predetermined limit for modifying the value of the common incremental cost signal so as to produce an incremental cost signal for that particular company for establishing an associated value for the output of its generators such that the output will tend to maintain the tie-line interchange so that it will not exceed the limit value.
- FIGURE is a circuit diagram partially in block form showing the improvement as it would be applied to the control system of FIGS. 9-ll of my U. S. Pat. No. 3,270,209.
- the power pool being controlled is shown as pool No. 1 having three participating companies, namely, companies A, B and C which are interconnected as by tie-lines 10, 12 and 14, and which may be interconnected to another pool such as pool No. 2 as by tie-line 16.
- A, B and C may be considered individual power pools each having its own group of interconnected companies with the tie-lines l0, l2 and 14 interconnecting the pools into a group whose load is to be. economically maintained.
- the net tie-line interchange between company A and the other participating companies ZTLI may be measured by recorder 18a which receives as inputs signals from thermal converter 20 in tie-line l0 and thermal converter 22 in tieline 14. The recorder 18a then operates to produce by way of its retransmitting slidewire 24 the signal ZTLI representing the net tie-line interchange for company A. This signal is produced at slidewire contact 24a which is shown as being operated by the retransmitting coupling connection 26.
- the slidewire 24 is shown as having a power source consisting of battery 28 across its terminals as well as potentiometer 30 whose adjustable contact 30a is positioned by way of the hand adjusted knob 30b so that the position of the contact 30a is established for the magnitude of the limit for the power out" measured as the net tie-line interchange for participating company A.
- the input resistor 38 in conjunction with the high gain amplifier 40 and the feedback capacitor 44 with its shunting high impedance resistor 48 form an operational amplifier which is effective to integrate the input from contact 240 so as to provide an ever increasing value for the potential at the output 42.
- the circuit elements incorporated in block 50 a may be considered as an integrating circuit or a reset control circuit responding to the net tieline interchange deviation from its preset limit value when the deviation is such that the net power out of company A exceeds the limit.
- Block 148 of the FIGURE may be substituted for block 148 ofFIG. 9 in U. S. Pat. No. 3,270,209 in order to provide for the incorporation of the improvement of this invention in the system of FIGS. 9-ll of said patent.
- block 148 has an input signal in the form of a mechanical connection which is operable to position the contact 60a or slidewire 60 so that it represents a value for A, which in FIG. 9 of U. S. Pat. No. 3,270,209 is representative of the common incremental cost of delivered power which is, in the system of that patent, intended to be the incremental cost of delivered power associated with the levels of generation of each of the participating companies.
- the present improvement provides for a modification of the A signal transmitted to company A whenever the net tie-line interchange for company A indicates that the power out exceeds its predetermined limit value. That modification is carried out by the introduction ofa second input to amplifier 64 over line 78a and through input resistor 80 to amplifier 64, the effect being such that the signal on the telemetering channel 72a is modified by the signal on line 780 so that the value of A for company A will not increase as the value of the common A represented by the potential on contact 60a continues to increase, but instead will be maintained at a value such that the output of the generators of company A will maintain the net tie-line interchange such that it will not exceed its limit value.
- the signal on line 78a is effectively subtracted from the signal derived from contact 60a.
- the control of participating company B may be effected in a similar manner as that described for company A whenever the net tie-line interchange exceeds a predetermined limit.
- a net tie-line interchange recorder 1811 which is connected through mechanical coupling 26b to block 50b where block 5012 corresponds to block 50a for area A.
- the output of 50b over line 78b to block 80b of block 148 serves to modify the A signal sent to company B over the telemetering channel 72b in that it modifies the signal received from contact 60a over line 82.
- the block 80b is similar to block 80a for comp y
- the participating company C has associated net tie-line interchange recorder connected by me chanical coupling 26c to block 506.
- Block 500 is, of course, similar to block 50a for company A, and the output of 50c is transmitted over line 78c to block 80c so as to modify the A signal supplied to block 80c on line 84 from contact 60a.
- the signal thus provided over the telemetering channel 720 is a A signal for determining the generation desired from company C.
- the system disclosed may, of course, be used to control the distribution of load in a pool in which the companies A and B may be connected with another pool as is shown for company C in the FIGURE. Also, the system is applicable to the control of a plurality of pools interconnected into a group. Thus, for the purposes of this description and the appended claims the word company" may be interpreted as a number of interconnected power suppliers having separate economic interests or as one supplier representing a single economic interest.
- a system for controlling the output of the generators in a plurality of power companies interconnected to form a power pool comprising:
- each company includes in its computation of values of output for each generator the incremental transmission losses in the company's distribution system.
- a system as set forth in claim 5 in which the value of generation for said function generator is established by summing the total load on the pool and a value representing the change in generation required to meet that load.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Power Engineering (AREA)
- Supply And Distribution Of Alternating Current (AREA)
Abstract
Economic loading of generators in the interconnected companies of a power pool may be normally carried out by producing and broadcasting to the participating companies a common lambda signal of value sufficient to provide through control the desired total generation. Such control is modified by biasing the common lambda signal to a particular company whose net tie-line interchange has exceeded a predetermined limit. The modification is such that the net interchange is not allowed to exceed the limit. Similar modification may be made when it is desired to prevent a particular tie from exceeding a limit.
Description
[ 1 June 19, 1973 ABSTRACT 7 Claims, 1 Drawing Figure Primary Examinerl-lerman J. Hohauser Assistant ExaminerM. Ginsburg Atl0rneyWilliam G. Miller, Jr.
Economic loading of generators in the interconnected companies of a power pool may be normally carried out by producing and broadcasting to the participating companies a common A signal of value sufficient to provide through control the desired total generation. Such control is modified by biasing the common signal to a particular company whose net tie-line interchange has exceeded a predetermined limit. The modification is such that the net interchange is not allowed to exceed the limit. Similar modification may be made when it is desired to prevent a particular tie from exceeding a limit.
CONTROL OF POWER SYSTEM FOR OPTIMUM ECONOMY Inventor: Nathan Cohn, Jenkintown, Pa.
Assignee: Leeds & Northrup Company,
Philadelphia, Pa.
Filed: July 3, 1972 Appl. No.: 268,234
235/l5l.2l
[56] 7 References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS 3,270,209 8/l966 -4,
United States Patent Cohn [51] Int. [58] Field of Search...............................
Patented June 19, 1973 IIIIIl-lllll II BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION This invention relates to the control of the loading of generators of the individual interconnected power companies of a power pool for the maintenance of adequate generation in the pool. More particularly, the invention relates to the control of the generators of the interconnected power companies to provide an economic distribution of the load among those generators with the provision of means for altering the economic distribution as'may be required, by limitations in the operation of a particular company.
In the operation of a plurality of interconnected power companies participating in the maintenance of the load in the power pool formed by the interconnection there may be utilized a control system of the type fully described in my U.S. Pat. No. 3,270,209, issued Aug. 30, 1966, wherein FIGS. 9, l and 11 illustrate a control arrangement applicable to a power pool having participating and interconnected operating companies each with their own dispatching offices and each with their own regulating sources. In that patent, FIG. 9 represents equipment that may be installed at the Pool Load Dispatching Office, FIG. illustrates apparatus at a participating companys load dispatching office, and FIG. l 1 shows equipment for a source at a station of one of the participating companies. As indicated in FIGS. 9-1 1 of said patent, suitable telemetering channels link control apparatus at the pool office to control apparatus at each'of the participating companys dispatching office's, and suitable telemetering channels link control equipment at a participating companys dispatching office to control equipment at it respective stations. Thus, in the system described in FIGS. 9, 10 and 1 I there is computed at the Pool Load Dispatching Office a common signal, )gwhich is transmitted to each of the participating companys load dispatchers offices where it is used as a basis for calculating the incremental cost of generation for each of .the generating stations. The generators of the station are then controlled so that their output is at a level corresponding with that incremental cost value.
In the operation of the individual participating companies it may be found desirable to limit the value of the net interchange of power between that company and the other participating companies or in some cases the interchange over a particular tie line between that company and another participating company. Such a limitation may be dictated, for example, by the necessity of limiting the generation of the company as a whole for the proper maintenance of reserve capability. Thus, a participating company may desire to fully participate in the maintenance of optimum economic distribution of the pool load up to the point where that companys reserve capability is endangered. That point may be detected by measuring the net interchange between that company and the other participating companies, and it may be found desirable to avoid a continued increase in generation output. For example, as the pool load increases with a corresponding increase in the signal representing the value of the incremental cost of delivered power, established at the Pool Load Dispatchers Office and transmitted to the participating companies, the desirable mode of operation may be that which maintains the net tie-line interchange at its limit value.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION In accordance with the present invention there is provided an improvement in the system for controlling the economic distribution of electrical load among generators of participating power companies which are interconnected to form a power pool wherein the output of the generation of each of the companies is controlled to a level such that the incremental cost of delivered power associated with those outputs corresponds to the value represented by a common cost signal for the pool with said incremental cost signal being modified to bring the total actual generation in the pool into equality with the total desired generation. The improvement comprises means which are operable when the tie-line interchange of one of the companies with respect to another exceeds a predetermined limit for modifying the value of the common incremental cost signal so as to produce an incremental cost signal for that particular company for establishing an associated value for the output of its generators such that the output will tend to maintain the tie-line interchange so that it will not exceed the limit value.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING The FIGURE is a circuit diagram partially in block form showing the improvement as it would be applied to the control system of FIGS. 9-ll of my U. S. Pat. No. 3,270,209.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT For a complete description of this invention, reference should be made to U. S. Pat. No. 3,270,209, and more specifically to that portion of the specification starting at Column 1 1, line 30, in conjunction with the present FIGURE, showing the improvement which will now be described.
In the FIGURE, the power pool being controlled is shown as pool No. 1 having three participating companies, namely, companies A, B and C which are interconnected as by tie- lines 10, 12 and 14, and which may be interconnected to another pool such as pool No. 2 as by tie-line 16. Alternatively, A, B and C may be considered individual power pools each having its own group of interconnected companies with the tie-lines l0, l2 and 14 interconnecting the pools into a group whose load is to be. economically maintained.
Since the apparatus associated with each of the companies is the same in many respects, it will be described only as it relates to company A. Thus, the net tie-line interchange between company A and the other participating companies ZTLI may be measured by recorder 18a which receives as inputs signals from thermal converter 20 in tie-line l0 and thermal converter 22 in tieline 14. The recorder 18a then operates to produce by way of its retransmitting slidewire 24 the signal ZTLI representing the net tie-line interchange for company A. This signal is produced at slidewire contact 24a which is shown as being operated by the retransmitting coupling connection 26. The slidewire 24 is shown as having a power source consisting of battery 28 across its terminals as well as potentiometer 30 whose adjustable contact 30a is positioned by way of the hand adjusted knob 30b so that the position of the contact 30a is established for the magnitude of the limit for the power out" measured as the net tie-line interchange for participating company A.
It will be evident that when the contact 24a is positioned along slidewire 24 in that region of slidewire 24 at which the potential is positive, then there will be no current flow through the diode 32 which has its cathode connected to contact 24a. On the other hand, when the contact 24a has moved to the left far enough to be beyond the potential point corresponding with the position of contact 30a, there will then be a negative potential of contact 24a which will allow current to flow through diode 32 producing by way of the input resistor 38 a negative potential on the input to the high gain amplifier 40 which will in turn produce a positive potential at its output point 42. The input resistor 38 in conjunction with the high gain amplifier 40 and the feedback capacitor 44 with its shunting high impedance resistor 48 form an operational amplifier which is effective to integrate the input from contact 240 so as to provide an ever increasing value for the potential at the output 42. Thus, the circuit elements incorporated in block 50 a may be considered as an integrating circuit or a reset control circuit responding to the net tieline interchange deviation from its preset limit value when the deviation is such that the net power out of company A exceeds the limit.
The present improvement provides for a modification of the A signal transmitted to company A whenever the net tie-line interchange for company A indicates that the power out exceeds its predetermined limit value. That modification is carried out by the introduction ofa second input to amplifier 64 over line 78a and through input resistor 80 to amplifier 64, the effect being such that the signal on the telemetering channel 72a is modified by the signal on line 780 so that the value of A for company A will not increase as the value of the common A represented by the potential on contact 60a continues to increase, but instead will be maintained at a value such that the output of the generators of company A will maintain the net tie-line interchange such that it will not exceed its limit value. Thus, the signal on line 78a is effectively subtracted from the signal derived from contact 60a.
It may be desirable to also limit the power flowing into company A by adding another circuit similar to that of block 50a. It would only be necessary to reverse the polarity of diode 32 in the added circuit to so limit the net interchange. When limiting the power in" the A is not allowed to decrease as much as the common A.
It will be evident that as long as the net tie-line interchange as measured by recorder 18a exceeds the limit value set by the positioning of contact 30a the signal on line 78a will continue to increase in a positive polarity so as to cause the signal on line 68 to continue to increase in a negative polarity, the appropriate polarity for effecting a change in the generation at company A in a direction to decrease the generation as a result of the A signal telemetered over channel 72a.
The control of participating company B may be effected in a similar manner as that described for company A whenever the net tie-line interchange exceeds a predetermined limit. Thus, there is associated with company B a net tie-line interchange recorder 1811 which is connected through mechanical coupling 26b to block 50b where block 5012 corresponds to block 50a for area A. The output of 50b over line 78b to block 80b of block 148 serves to modify the A signal sent to company B over the telemetering channel 72b in that it modifies the signal received from contact 60a over line 82. The block 80b is similar to block 80a for comp y Similarly, the participating company C has associated net tie-line interchange recorder connected by me chanical coupling 26c to block 506. The net interchange ETLI for company C, however, does not include the flow over tie 16 to pool No. 2 for the flow over the remaining ties may adequately indicate the limit condition which is to be detected. Block 500 is, of course, similar to block 50a for company A, and the output of 50c is transmitted over line 78c to block 80c so as to modify the A signal supplied to block 80c on line 84 from contact 60a. The signal thus provided over the telemetering channel 720 is a A signal for determining the generation desired from company C.
The system disclosed may, of course, be used to control the distribution of load in a pool in which the companies A and B may be connected with another pool as is shown for company C in the FIGURE. Also, the system is applicable to the control of a plurality of pools interconnected into a group. Thus, for the purposes of this description and the appended claims the word company" may be interpreted as a number of interconnected power suppliers having separate economic interests or as one supplier representing a single economic interest.
It will be evident to those skilled in the art that the net tie-line interchange recorders may be replaced with 1. In a system for controlling the economic distribution of electrical load among the generators of participating power companies interconnected to form a power pool wherein the output of the generators of each of the companies is controlled to a level such that the incremental cost of delivered power associated with those outputs corresponds to the value represented by a common incremental cost signal for the pool and said incremental cost signal is modified to bring the total actual generation in said pool into equality with the total desired generation for the pool, the improvement which comprises:
means operable when the tie-line interchange of one of said companies with respect to another exceeds a predetermined limit for modifying the value of the common incremental cost signal to produce an incremental cost signal for said one of said companies for establishing an associated value for the output of its generators such that said output value tends to maintain said tie-line interchange at a value which does not exceed said limit.
2. In a system for controlling the economic distribution of electrical load among the generators of participating power companies interconnected to form a power pool wherein the output of the generators of each of the companies is controlled to a level such that the incremental cost of delivered power associated with those outputs corresponds to the value represented by a common incremental cost signal for the pool and said incremental cost signal is modified to bring the total actual generation in said pool into equality with the total desired generation for the pool, the improvement which comprises:
means operable when the net tie-line interchange of one of said companies with respect to the others exceeds'a predetermined limit for modifying the value of the common incremental cost signal to produce an incremental cost signal for said one of said companies for establishing an associated value for the output of its generators such that said output value tends to maintain said net tie-line interchange at a value which does not exceed said limit.
3. A system for controlling the output of the generators in a plurality of power companies interconnected to form a power pool comprising:
means responsive to the magnitude of the total generation required to meet the load on said pool for establishing in accordance with a predetermined function a common value for the incremental cost of delivered power associated with each of the companies,
means responsive to the change required in the generation in the pool to meet the pool load for continually modifying said common value until said load is met, means associated with each company for controlling the output of each of the companies generators so that the company is operating at a generation level corresponding with said common value, and
means responsive to the net interchange of each of said companies with the others exceeding a predetermined limit for modifying the level of incremental cost of delivered power at which the companies are operating so that said level will be modifed from said common value as required to maintain said net interchange at a value not exceeding said limit.
4. A system as set forth in claim 3 in which each company includes in its computation of values of output for each generator the incremental transmission losses in the company's distribution system.
5. A system as set forth in claim 3 in which said predetermined function is established by a function generator relating the common value for the incremental cost of delivered power to a value of generation.
6. A system as set forth in claim 5 in which the value of generation for said function generator is established by summing the total load on the pool and a value representing the change in generation required to meet that load.
7. The method for controlling the output of the generators in a plurality of power companies interconnected to form a power pool comprising the steps of:
automatically producing a signal representing a common value for the interchange of delivered power for each of the companies in response to the magnitude of the total generation required to meet the load on said pool, said signal having a predetermined functional relationship to said total generation magnitude,
automatically modifying said signal as long as the generation in the pool is inadequate to meet the pool load,
automatically controlling the generation level of the generators in each of said companies so that the generation level corresponds with the common value for the interchange of delivered power represented by said signal, and
automatically modifying said signal as it is associated with a particular company whenever the net interchange of said company with the other companies exceeds a predetermined limit, said modification being effected in magnitude and direction so as to maintain the net interchange at a value not exceeding its limit value.
UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE I CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION Patent No. 2 7M0 ,572 Dated June 19 1973 Inventor) Nathan Cohn I It is certified that error appears in the aboQe-identified patent and that said Letters Patent are hereby corrected as shown below:
"or" should read --of--.
Column 3, line 3 1,
Column 3, line &6, "it" should read -ics--.
Column l, line 62, "present" should ead -pr'eset-'--.
Signed and sealed this 20th day of November 1973.
(SEAL) Attest:
EDWARD MJETCHERJR. RENE D. TEG'IT HBYER Attesting Officer Acting Commissioner of Patents Po-wso UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE (s/ss) CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION Patent No. a 7U,O 572 Dated June 19, 1973 Inventor(s) Nathan Cohn l It is certified that error appears in the above-identified patent and that said Letters Patent are hereby corrected as shown below:
Column 3, line 3 4, "or" should read --of-.
Column 3, line 16, "it" should read --its--.
Column l, line 62, present" should need p1"eset-'-.
' Signed and sealed this 20th day of November 1973.
(SEAL) Attest:
EDWARD I LFLETCHERJR. RENE D. 'I'EGTMEYER Attesting Officer Acting Commissioner of Patents
Claims (7)
1. In a system for controlling the economic distribution of electrical load among the generators of participating power companies interconnected to form a power pool wherein the output of the generators of each of the companies is controlled to a level such that the incremental cost of delivered power associated with those outputs corresponds to the value represented by a common incremental cost signal for the pool and said incremental cost signal is modified to bring the total actual generation in said pool into equality with the total desired generation for the pool, the improvement which comprises: means operable when the tie-line interchange of one of said companies with respect to another exceeds a predetermined limit for modifying the value of the common incremental cost signal to produce an incremental cost signal for said one of said companies for establishing an assoCiated value for the output of its generators such that said output value tends to maintain said tie-line interchange at a value which does not exceed said limit.
2. In a system for controlling the economic distribution of electrical load among the generators of participating power companies interconnected to form a power pool wherein the output of the generators of each of the companies is controlled to a level such that the incremental cost of delivered power associated with those outputs corresponds to the value represented by a common incremental cost signal for the pool and said incremental cost signal is modified to bring the total actual generation in said pool into equality with the total desired generation for the pool, the improvement which comprises: means operable when the net tie-line interchange of one of said companies with respect to the others exceeds a predetermined limit for modifying the value of the common incremental cost signal to produce an incremental cost signal for said one of said companies for establishing an associated value for the output of its generators such that said output value tends to maintain said net tie-line interchange at a value which does not exceed said limit.
3. A system for controlling the output of the generators in a plurality of power companies interconnected to form a power pool comprising: means responsive to the magnitude of the total generation required to meet the load on said pool for establishing in accordance with a predetermined function a common value for the incremental cost of delivered power associated with each of the companies, means responsive to the change required in the generation in the pool to meet the pool load for continually modifying said common value until said load is met, means associated with each company for controlling the output of each of the companies generators so that the company is operating at a generation level corresponding with said common value, and means responsive to the net interchange of each of said companies with the others exceeding a predetermined limit for modifying the level of incremental cost of delivered power at which the companies are operating so that said level will be modifed from said common value as required to maintain said net interchange at a value not exceeding said limit.
4. A system as set forth in claim 3 in which each company includes in its computation of values of output for each generator the incremental transmission losses in the company''s distribution system.
5. A system as set forth in claim 3 in which said predetermined function is established by a function generator relating the common value for the incremental cost of delivered power to a value of generation.
6. A system as set forth in claim 5 in which the value of generation for said function generator is established by summing the total load on the pool and a value representing the change in generation required to meet that load.
7. The method for controlling the output of the generators in a plurality of power companies interconnected to form a power pool comprising the steps of: automatically producing a signal representing a common value for the interchange of delivered power for each of the companies in response to the magnitude of the total generation required to meet the load on said pool, said signal having a predetermined functional relationship to said total generation magnitude, automatically modifying said signal as long as the generation in the pool is inadequate to meet the pool load, automatically controlling the generation level of the generators in each of said companies so that the generation level corresponds with the common value for the interchange of delivered power represented by said signal, and automatically modifying said signal as it is associated with a particular company whenever the net interchange of said company with the other companies exceeds a predetermined limit, said modification being effected In magnitude and direction so as to maintain the net interchange at a value not exceeding its limit value.
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US26823472A | 1972-07-03 | 1972-07-03 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US3740572A true US3740572A (en) | 1973-06-19 |
Family
ID=23022059
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US00268234A Expired - Lifetime US3740572A (en) | 1972-07-03 | 1972-07-03 | Control of power system for optimum economy |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US3740572A (en) |
Cited By (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3898442A (en) * | 1974-05-07 | 1975-08-05 | Nathan Cohn | Methods of and systems for synchronized coordination of energy balancing and system time in the control of bulk power transfers |
US4075699A (en) * | 1976-06-24 | 1978-02-21 | Lockheed Electronics Co., Inc. | Power monitoring and load shedding system |
US4333021A (en) * | 1980-05-12 | 1982-06-01 | The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy | Transient stability enhancement of electric power generating systems by 120-degree phase rotation |
US4412136A (en) * | 1981-12-15 | 1983-10-25 | The Babcock & Wilcox Company | Load control for energy converters |
US4604714A (en) * | 1983-11-08 | 1986-08-05 | Westinghouse Electric Corp. | Steam optimization and cogeneration system and method |
US6115698A (en) * | 1995-08-18 | 2000-09-05 | Continental Power Exchange, Inc. | Apparatus and method for trading electric energy |
US6473744B1 (en) | 1995-08-18 | 2002-10-29 | Mhc Investment Company | Apparatus and method for trading electric energy |
US20040015433A1 (en) * | 1997-02-24 | 2004-01-22 | Geophonic Networks, Inc. | Bidding for energy supply to resellers and their customers |
US9152988B2 (en) | 2000-12-05 | 2015-10-06 | Open Invention Network | Method and device utilizing polymorphic data in E-commerce |
Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3270209A (en) * | 1962-12-17 | 1966-08-30 | Leeds & Northrup Co | Economic loading of power systems |
-
1972
- 1972-07-03 US US00268234A patent/US3740572A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Patent Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3270209A (en) * | 1962-12-17 | 1966-08-30 | Leeds & Northrup Co | Economic loading of power systems |
Cited By (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3898442A (en) * | 1974-05-07 | 1975-08-05 | Nathan Cohn | Methods of and systems for synchronized coordination of energy balancing and system time in the control of bulk power transfers |
US4075699A (en) * | 1976-06-24 | 1978-02-21 | Lockheed Electronics Co., Inc. | Power monitoring and load shedding system |
US4333021A (en) * | 1980-05-12 | 1982-06-01 | The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy | Transient stability enhancement of electric power generating systems by 120-degree phase rotation |
US4412136A (en) * | 1981-12-15 | 1983-10-25 | The Babcock & Wilcox Company | Load control for energy converters |
US4604714A (en) * | 1983-11-08 | 1986-08-05 | Westinghouse Electric Corp. | Steam optimization and cogeneration system and method |
US6115698A (en) * | 1995-08-18 | 2000-09-05 | Continental Power Exchange, Inc. | Apparatus and method for trading electric energy |
US6473744B1 (en) | 1995-08-18 | 2002-10-29 | Mhc Investment Company | Apparatus and method for trading electric energy |
US20040015433A1 (en) * | 1997-02-24 | 2004-01-22 | Geophonic Networks, Inc. | Bidding for energy supply to resellers and their customers |
US20080010182A2 (en) * | 1997-02-24 | 2008-01-10 | Geophonic Networks, Inc. | Bidding for Energy Supply to Resellers and Their Customers |
US8504463B2 (en) | 1997-02-24 | 2013-08-06 | Geophonic Networks, Inc. | Bidding for energy supply |
US8527389B2 (en) | 1997-02-24 | 2013-09-03 | Geophonic Networks, Inc. | Bidding for energy supply to resellers and their customers |
US9152988B2 (en) | 2000-12-05 | 2015-10-06 | Open Invention Network | Method and device utilizing polymorphic data in E-commerce |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US3740572A (en) | Control of power system for optimum economy | |
US2379132A (en) | Control system | |
SE7900606L (en) | WAY TO CONTROL A DC POWER TRANSMISSION AND CONTROL SYSTEM TO CONTROL A TRANSMISSION ACCORDING TO THIS WAY | |
GB1170249A (en) | Improvements in Control Systems for H.V.D.C. Transmission Links | |
US3270209A (en) | Economic loading of power systems | |
DE3165483D1 (en) | Power supply system for electronic assemblies | |
US2866148A (en) | Control device in a high voltage d | |
DE169756T1 (en) | STABILIZED ELECTRICAL POWER SUPPLY. | |
US3400258A (en) | Economic control of power pools | |
US2839692A (en) | Electric power control system | |
GB1192419A (en) | Improvements in High Voltage Direct Current Power Transmission Plants | |
US3510637A (en) | Load-frequency control system | |
US2871375A (en) | Generation control system | |
US2933615A (en) | Load and frequency control of power generating systems | |
US3546472A (en) | Control for hydroelectric generators including variable response rate | |
US3005589A (en) | Simplified analog dispatch computer | |
US3426186A (en) | Analog computing circuits for absolute values | |
US2985765A (en) | Load control system for plural generators | |
US2888575A (en) | Automatic dispatching system | |
US3454749A (en) | Error adaptive control system | |
ATE3685T1 (en) | CIRCUIT ARRANGEMENT FOR REMOTE SUPPLY OF INTERMEDIATE CENTERS OF A COMMUNICATIONS TRANSMISSION TECHNOLOGY EQUIPMENT BY MEANS OF DIRECT CURRENT SERIES SUPPLY. | |
SU1457061A1 (en) | Device for distributing active power in electricity system | |
JPS54156143A (en) | Power source system | |
US885847A (en) | Electrical distribution. | |
SU1480012A2 (en) | Device for automatic control of frequency and active power in energy system |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: LEEDS AND NORTHRUP COMPANY, PENNSYLVANIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:LEEDS & NOTHRUP COMPANY A CORP. OF PA.;REEL/FRAME:004060/0224 Effective date: 19780929 Owner name: LEEDS AND NORTHRUP COMPANY A CORP. OF DE. Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNOR:LEEDS & NOTHRUP COMPANY A CORP. OF PA.;REEL/FRAME:004060/0224 Effective date: 19780929 |