|Numéro de publication||US4184768 A|
|Type de publication||Octroi|
|Numéro de demande||US 05/848,706|
|Date de publication||22 janv. 1980|
|Date de dépôt||4 nov. 1977|
|Date de priorité||4 nov. 1977|
|Numéro de publication||05848706, 848706, US 4184768 A, US 4184768A, US-A-4184768, US4184768 A, US4184768A|
|Inventeurs||John C. Murphy, Leonard C. Aamodt|
|Cessionnaire d'origine||The Johns Hopkins University|
|Exporter la citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Citations de brevets (2), Référencé par (32), Classifications (8)|
|Liens externes: USPTO, Cession USPTO, Espacenet|
The invention herein described was made in the course of or under a contract or subcontract thereunder, with the Department of the Navy.
Recently Photoacoustic Spectroscopy (PAS) has emerged as a significant new tool for the study of light absorption in solids and liquids. It is especially useful in cases where strong light scattering or opacity in the absorbing sample makes the application of conventional optical absorption methods difficult. It also has application in studying energy conversion processes which compete with thermalization in the sample for the energy in the absorbed light. At its current state of development PAS-derived information has been primarily qualitative in nature with the principal experimental result being the determination of the relative spectral amplitude of the PAS signal as a function of wavelength. Detailed considerations of the responsivity of fluid filled photoacoustic cells have shown that the measured PAS signal depends on thermal diffusion in four regions which constitute the complete cell, viz. the light-absorbing sample, the support or backing which holds the sample, the gas or liquid pressure transducing medium, and the cell walls and light-admitting window. In keeping with the diffusion character of the basic processes responsible for generation of the effect, the PAS signal is scale dependent, that is, it depends on the size of each region of the photoacoustic cell relative to the thermal diffusion lengths, μi =[2ai /ω]1/2, in each region, where a is the thermal diffusivity, and ω the angular modulation frequency. The thermal diffusion lengths in both the cell and sample depend on the modulation frequency and hence the cell responsivity is frequency dependent. Since the basic objective of the measurement is the determination of the sample properties, including the optical absorption co-efficient, these cell-dependent effects are experimental impediments which must be removed if the sample properties are to be determined. Fortunately, for fixed modulation frequency operation in a single cell, these complications do not interfere with the measurement of the relative sample absorption spectrum. This type of measurement has characterized the bulk of prior art PAS measurement methods.
U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,911,276; 3,893,771; 3,820,901; and 3,700,890 all describe photoacoustic spectrometers which measure relative absorption spectra without reference to absolute values of energy. The problems of cell structure dependency and the inability to translate data between cells remain unsolved by the prior art techniques. Another U.S. Pat. No. 3,948,345 employs a metal black sample in a standard cell wherein pulsed light is split between the standard cell and a test cell including a test sample. A comparison between the pressure waves generated in the standard cell and the pressure waves generated in the test cell is made to determine the relative absorption in the test cell. The reference does not provide an absolute measurement independent of cell characteristics. The conductivity of the black sample is not important in the reference; the black sample is not used for self-calibration.
The present invention is basically a marriage between two conventional measuring techniques which together provide new and unexpected useful results. The concept of photoacoustics is a well-known one, wherein a pulsed light beam directed towards a sample heats the sample which in turn generates pressure waves which can be measured. Similarly, the theory of Joule-heating a wire to heat a sample, thereby increasing the temperature of the sample and producing pressure waves in the surrounding gas is also known. The present invention, by switching between the photoacoustic effect and the Joule effect, can measure, on an absolute scale, the intensity of light striking the sample and can be used in calibrating a standard photoacoustic spectrometer cell in terms of absolute conventional energy units.
The ramifications of coupling the two techniques by means of a metal black conductive film are significant. First, as suggested by the previous discussion, the present invention can be used as a radiometer which measures light intensity in terms of the electric power in. Such a radiometer is not only self-calibrating but is also independent of the wavelength and pulse frequency of the incoming light. Second, as a photoacoustic spectrometer, the invention can be used to make standard measurements that are independent of cell characteristics. There are numerous applications which require cell measurements made at various pulse frequencies of light. While the prior art devices could not be adapted for use at differing frequencies, the present invention features such flexibility. Third, the present apparatus retains the advantages of the prior art PAS devices. These include the non-destructive measurement of light absorption in solids and liquids where strong light scattering and opacity in the absorption techniques difficult.
A number of applications, such as the calibration of microphones, the detection of pollutants, the detection of bacteria, the analysis of blood, the measuring of uniformity of coatings on floor tile and the like, and examining chromotographic films for impurities may use PAS techniques which employ the present invention.
It is thus an object of the present invention to provide a useful improvement for prior art spectrometers, which adds the capability of measuring the light absorption of a sample in absolute, conventional, energy units.
It is another object of the invention to provide a self-calibrated radiometer based on the photoacoustic effect.
It is still another object of the invention to provide a photoacoustic spectrometer the cell of which is calibrated and, which based on the calibration, measures light absorption in a sample in absolute energy units.
It is yet another object of the invention to combine a photoacoustic cell with a thermophone cell to produce a self-calibrating cell.
It is still another object of the invention to provide a useful heat absorbing element that uses an electrically conductive, spectrally flat, black sample to permit heat absorption from optical and electrical inputs.
FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a photoacoustic spectrometer (PAS) showing optical and electrical heating of a metal black sample.
FIG. 2 shows a radiometer feedback path employed to provide a null in the effects generated by heating a black sample optically and electrically.
FIG. 3 shows a block diagram of a calibrated PAS wherein a black sample used in the calibrating is replaced by a test sample.
FIG. 4 shows experimental data which illustrate the agreement between the heating effects due optical or light inputs and electrical inputs.
Referring to FIG. 1, apparatus is illustrated which measures the intensity of light entering a photoacoustic cell 2 in terms of absolute, quantitative, accurate, and conventional electrical units. Light from a xenon light source 4, which might also be a laser or other light source, passes through a monochrometer 6 which confines the light in spectral frequency and a conventional light chopper 8 which produces light pulses (shown as arrows in series) at a frequency regulated by a modulation source 10. The light pulses enter cell 2 through a window 12 and impinge on a solid black, optically absorbing, electrically conductive sample 14. Several members of the carbon black/pyrolitic graphite family satisfy these requirements. Preferably, a metal black electrolytically-plated on a chromium layer, which is vacuum deposited on a glass substrate, can be used. The light pulses are absorbed by the spectrally flat black sample 14 which experiences a rise in temperature. The rise in temperature in the black sample 14 induces a temperature rise and related pressure variations in the fluid, including liquid or gas, boundary layer 16 adjacent to the black sample 14. The pressure changes are transmitted through the cell as a series of pulses or waves or similar disturbances in fluid 18, enclosed within cell 2. A microphone 20 is provided to convert the pressure waves (which include the pulses and other such acoustic or other longitudinal disturbances) into electrical signals. Instead of the microphone 20, a thermometer or gas diffusion measuring device may be substituted to measure temperature or transport variations rather than pressure; however, with a loss of accuracy.
In addition to the light input, a second energy source is provided in cell 2 which makes cell 2 not only a photoacoustic cell but also a thermophone cell. That is, the electrically conductive black sample 14 is Joule-heated to create further temperature and pressure changes in cell 2. Specifically, a squarewave generator 22 provides current through the electrically conductive black sample 14 generating heat and resultant pressure waves which can be detected and measured by microphone 20. The signals detected by microphone 20 for the two cases of optical and electrical heating are equal when the same total energy is deposited by each. This equality is used in the present disclosure as the basis of the applications cited. For example, if the current pulse from squarewave generator 22 is caused to occur when the light pulse is not entering cell 2, the A.C. signal at microphone 20 will depend on the difference in total electrical and optical energy incident on the cell. By equating, or otherwise relating, the power of each, no A.C. signal will be present at microphone 20. The prior art teaches numerous methods and devices for equating the power generated from two independent sources-- for example, varying pulse amplitude, pulsewidth, and the like. The squarewave generator 22 as well may be replaced by a sinewave or other pulse generator or current source, the only limitations being that the output be readily measurable in energy units and provide energy to heat the black sample 14.
A radiometer is an instrument which measures the intensity of light. By referring to FIG. 2 it can be seen how the present invention of FIG. 1 can be used in a radiometer application. Light whose intensity is defined generally as Io ejωt enters window 12 and strikes black sample 14 represented as a resistance in series with squarewave generator 22. If the pressure waves due to light and energy pulses are unequal, the output of microphone 20 will have an A.C. component. By including a lock-in amplifier 24 (see FIG. 1) which is clocked by the modulation source 10 (see FIG. 1), it is readily determined whether the power from squarewave generator 22 must be increased or diminished to effect nullification. An amplifier 26, which receives the A.C. component, or "error signal," from microphone 20 as input, is tuned to angular modulation frequency ω. In feedback fashion shown in FIG. 2, the signal from amplifier 26 enters a modulator 28 to vary the current fed into black sample 14 from squarewave generator 22 until there is no "error signal," i.e. the A.C. component will vanish. When the "error signal" is reduced to zero, either the light source 4 or the squarewave generator 22 (or other measurable heat providing means) may be shut off to yield a peak current, SPAS, which is a measure of the energy applied to the black sample 14 by either the light source 4 or the squarewave generator 22 alone. By varying the light source 4 and zeroing the "error signal" by varying the input of the measurable squarewave generator 22, a relationship between heat energy introduced by the squarewave generator 22 and heat energy introduced by the light source 4 can be established using the peak current signal SPAS as an equality factor. In other words, SPAS, which represents the peak signal at microphone 22 is equal for each input source (4 or 22) when the heat or longitudinal pressure waves generated by each source is equal. By measuring the energy introduced by the squarewave generator 22 for a given SPAS (where the "error signal" is zero), a corresponding value for energy absorbed due to the light source 4 can be determined. With the black sample 14, all light is absorbed, so the electrical energy measured from the squarewave generator 22 for a given SPAS indicates not only the energy absorption of the black sample 14 but also provides a measurement of the light intensity generated by the light source 4. It should be noted that the peak current signal SPAS for a light input can be generally defined as:
SPAS =PL ·K(λ)·Dcell
where PL corresponds to light intensity; K(λ) is generally a wavelength-dependent function which accounts for the optical absorption and heat generation factors of a sample; and Dcell refers to cell dependent characteristics such as geometry, location of sample in the cell, and window size. With the black sample 14, K(λ)=1 regardless of wavelength. Because the same photoacoustic cell 2 is used for each measurement, the cell dependent variations Dcell are eliminated. SPAS thus varies (when there is no other energy source input) only as a function of light intensity PL. The peak current SPAS resulting when only the squarewave, generator 22 (or other measurable source) is present is also directly related to the measured energy of the squarewave generator 22. The direct relationship between the energy provided to the black sample 14 by the light source 4 and the squarewave generator 22 (or other measurable source) exists only because the K(λ) and Dcell factors in the SPAS definition are eliminated from the cell measurements.
With the black sample 14 in the cell, light intensity into the photoacoustic cell 2 is also the light absorbed. Light absorbed can be measured in terms of the energy required by the squarewave generator 22 to produce a zero "error signal". (SPAS due to the light source 4 equals SPAS due to the squarewave generator 22). The photoacoustic cell 2 thereby acts as a radiometer.
In addition to determining light intensity, the present invention can determine the amount of light absorbed by a test sample, in terms of absolute energy units, in a spectrometer-type application. Using the apparatus of FIG. 1, for any given cell enclosing a given gas with light entering at selected spectral and pulse frequencies, cell 2 can be calibrated and the absorption of light by the test sample can be quantitatively measured. The spectrometry method using the photothermophone device of the present invention is now detailed.
With the black sample 14 in place, the squarewave generator 22 is adjusted to create the A.C. nullification previously described with respect to the radiometer application. Either light source 4 or squarewave generator 22 can then be disconnected. The pressure wave due to or equal to only the Joule-heating results. The power generated by squarewave generator 22, which is proportional to the light absorbed by the black sample 14, is related to the output of microphone 20 after light source 4 or squarewave generator 22 is disconnected. Light source 4 can be reconnected with a change in strength; nullification by adjusting squarewave generator 22 can be effected; the output of microphone 20 can again be related to the power (or current generated by squarewave generator 22; and so on. A functional relationship between the output of microphone 20 and the power generated by squarewave generator 22 (and, hence, the light absorbed by black sample 14) is established. Squarewave generator 22 can then be disconnected and black sample 14 may be replaced by a test sample 14' as shown in FIG. 3. By measuring the output from microphone 20, the light absorbed when light pulses impinge on test sample 14' can be calculated based on the functional relationship established with the black sample 14.
FIG. 4 shows the experimental agreement between the microphone 20 outputs resulting from light absorption and electrical energy conduction, respectively. Changes in microphone 20 output in response to electrical energy power changes at 100 Hz is also illustrated. Finally, with a test sample 14', light absorption can be calculated from FIG. 4. If the output of microphone 20 is measured at 0.02 mv at approximately 70 Hz the electrical power and light intensity can be measured as 1.4 mw.
Given the calibration of light absorption in absolute energy units (based on black sample measurements), various light absorption measurements can be readily made. By varying only the frequency of the pulses of light, an absorption spectrum for the test sample 14' as a function of pulse frequency can be derived (see FIG. 4). By varying only the energy magnitude of the light pulses, the light absorption characteristics as a function of light intensity can be derived by comparing the signals detected at the microphone 22 for the black sample 14 and the test sample 14'. Similarly, once a given magnitude of light from the light source 4 is measured in absolute units taken from the squarewave generator 22 when there is a zero "error signal" with the black sample 14 in the cell 2, the test sample 14' can be placed in the photoacoustic cell 2 instead of the black sample 14 and a measurement of energy absorbed by the test sample 14' as a function of light intensity can be made. Alternatively, cell fluid characteristics can be measured by examining SPAS outputs as a function of various light intensity inputs. Further, by comparing the SPAS light intensity functions for various cell fluids, the relative characteristics of the cell fluids may be determined, keeping in mind that the propogation of light through the cell fluid and the propogation of pressure waves through the cell fluid affect the SPAS output for a given light intensity input.
Various modifications can be made to the invention as specifically described without departing from the invention as contemplated and claimed.
|Brevet cité||Date de dépôt||Date de publication||Déposant||Titre|
|US4051371 *||26 avr. 1976||27 sept. 1977||Massachusetts Institute Of Technology||Opto-acoustic spectroscopy employing amplitude and wavelength modulation|
|SU241761A1 *||Titre non disponible|
|Brevet citant||Date de dépôt||Date de publication||Déposant||Titre|
|US4381148 *||23 mars 1981||26 avr. 1983||The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy||Power meter for high energy lasers|
|US4512371 *||13 juin 1983||23 avr. 1985||The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army||Photofluidic interface|
|US4589783 *||4 avr. 1984||20 mai 1986||Wayne State University||Thermal wave imaging apparatus|
|US4594511 *||29 mars 1985||10 juin 1986||Sri International||Method and apparatus for double modulation spectroscopy|
|US4606375 *||4 juin 1985||19 août 1986||United Technologies Corporation||Fluidic device|
|US4610274 *||4 juin 1985||9 sept. 1986||United Technologies Corporation||Fluidic device|
|US4903248 *||13 oct. 1988||20 févr. 1990||Mine Safety Appliances Company||Photo-acoustic detector|
|US5151590 *||20 août 1991||29 sept. 1992||Shiseido Company, Ltd.||Photoacoustic cell and photoacoustic measuring device|
|US5376793 *||15 sept. 1993||27 déc. 1994||Stress Photonics, Inc.||Forced-diffusion thermal imaging apparatus and method|
|US5582485 *||8 déc. 1994||10 déc. 1996||Stress Photonics, Inc.||Structure analysis method using time-varying thermal signal|
|US5719395 *||12 sept. 1996||17 févr. 1998||Stress Photonics Inc.||Coating tolerant thermography|
|US5737086 *||27 janv. 1994||7 avr. 1998||International Business Machines Corporation||Apparatus and method for spectroscopic measurement as a deflection of a bimorph carrying a sample that is heated by radiation|
|US6560005||7 août 2001||6 mai 2003||Tkd, Inc.||Acousto-optic devices|
|US6729185 *||19 janv. 2001||4 mai 2004||Battelle Memorial Institute||Photoacoustic sample vessel and method of elevated pressure operation|
|US7057164 *||11 sept. 2003||6 juin 2006||Foss Analytical Ab||Reference standard and method for calibration|
|US7489136 *||4 août 2006||10 févr. 2009||Nu-Trek, Inc.||Apparatus and method of detecting radiation|
|US7576853||12 juin 2006||18 août 2009||The Research Foundation Of State University Of New York||Electronically modulated dynamic optical phantoms for biomedical imaging|
|US7586611||21 mai 2004||8 sept. 2009||Dublin City University||Method and apparatus for analysis of semiconductor materials using photoacoustic spectroscopy techniques|
|US8434366||15 déc. 2010||7 mai 2013||Texas Instruments Incorporated||Active detection techniques for photoacoustic sensors|
|US9268061||22 févr. 2010||23 févr. 2016||Vaisala Oyj||Method for calibrating or testing a detector surface of a device for detecting hydrometeors and a calibration and testing device|
|US20040262510 *||11 sept. 2003||30 déc. 2004||Foss Tecator Ab||Reference standard and method for calibration|
|US20060256339 *||21 mai 2004||16 nov. 2006||Donnacha Lowney||Method and apparatus for analysis of semiconductor materials using photoacoustic spectroscopy techniques|
|US20070004026 *||12 juin 2006||4 janv. 2007||Nirx Medical Technologies, L.L.C.||Electronically modulated dynamic optical phantoms for biomedical imaging|
|US20110056272 *||7 mai 2009||10 mars 2011||Dublin City University||system for analysing plasma|
|US20120266653 *||28 juin 2012||25 oct. 2012||Applied Nanotech Holdings, Inc.||Analysis of gases|
|CN102812384A *||22 févr. 2010||5 déc. 2012||威易拉有限公司||A Method For Calibrating Or Testing A Detector Surface Of A Device For Detecting Hydrometeors And A Calibration And Testing Device|
|EP0213468A2 *||11 août 1986||11 mars 1987||Hitachi, Ltd.||Apparatus and method for analyzing particles in a medium|
|WO1997049984A1 *||20 juin 1997||31 déc. 1997||Oscar Oehler||Tuning and calibrating a photothermal gas detector|
|WO2004104562A1 *||21 mai 2004||2 déc. 2004||Dublin City University||A method and apparatus for analysis of semiconductor materials using photoacoustic spectroscopy techniques|
|WO2006135850A2 *||12 juin 2006||21 déc. 2006||Barbour Randall L||Electronically modulated dynamic optical phantoms for biomedical imaging|
|WO2006135850A3 *||12 juin 2006||8 févr. 2007||Randall L Barbour||Electronically modulated dynamic optical phantoms for biomedical imaging|
|WO2011101528A1 *||22 févr. 2010||25 août 2011||Vaisala Oyj||A method for calibrating or testing a detector surface of a device for detecting hydrometeors and a calibration and testing device|
|Classification aux États-Unis||356/326, 250/252.1, 356/216, 356/217, 250/351|