Recherche Images Maps Play YouTube Actualités Gmail Drive Plus »
Connexion
Les utilisateurs de lecteurs d'écran peuvent cliquer sur ce lien pour activer le mode d'accessibilité. Celui-ci propose les mêmes fonctionnalités principales, mais il est optimisé pour votre lecteur d'écran.

Brevets

  1. Recherche avancée dans les brevets
Numéro de publicationUS4814974 A
Type de publicationOctroi
Numéro de demandeUS 06/845,489
Date de publication21 mars 1989
Date de dépôt28 mars 1986
Date de priorité2 juil. 1982
État de paiement des fraisPayé
Numéro de publication06845489, 845489, US 4814974 A, US 4814974A, US-A-4814974, US4814974 A, US4814974A
InventeursC. Murali Narayanan, Benjamin Zee
Cessionnaire d'origineAmerican Telephone And Telegraph Company, At&T Bell Laboratories
Exporter la citationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
Liens externes: USPTO, Cession USPTO, Espacenet
Programmable memory-based arbitration system for implementing fixed and flexible priority arrangements
US 4814974 A
Résumé
A digital system has a resource, such as a communication bus, adapted for access by a plurality of devices, a plurality of devices adapted to access the resource, and an arbitrator for arbitrating access to the resource by the devices. The arbitrator includes a programmable memory comprising a plurality of addressable words and an address generator for cyclically sequentially addressing each of the memory words. Each word stores information defining a priority order of the devices for accessing the resource. In particular, each word is divided into a plurality of segments, and each segment corresponds with a priority level in the order of priority. Each segment holds information identifying the device currently having the corresponding priority level. The priority order is changeable by reprogramming the contents of the memory. The priority order so implemented may be any conceivable order, and in particular may include a constant decreasing priority, a round-robin priority, or a combination of the two. A selecting arrangement responsive to the requesting devices and to the contents of the currently addressed memory word selects the highest priority requesting device for access to the resource, and an access granting arrangement grants to the selected device access to the resource.
Images(5)
Previous page
Next page
Revendications(9)
What is claimed is:
1. A digital system comprising:
(A) a resource;
(B) a plurality of devices coupled to the resource for accessing the resource; and
(C) means coupled to the devices for controlling access by the devices to the resources, the controlling means including
a programmable memory means comprising addressable locations, each of said addressable locations comprising a plurality of storage means, each storage means of an addressable location permanently corresponding with a unique priority level different from priority levels of the other storage means at that same location, and each storage means of each addressable location for storing information identifying the device having the corresponding level of priority;
addressing means coupled to the memory means for cyclically addressing each addressable location to retrieve from the addressed location the information stored by the storage means thereof; and
means coupled to the memory means and to the plurality of devices and responsive to the information stored in the plurality of storage means of an addressed location for selecting a device for access to the resource.
2. The system of claim 1 wherein the access controlling means further comprise means coupled to the plurality of devices for determining which devices request to access the resource, and wherein the selecting means are coupled to the means for determining for selecting for access to the resource a device requesting to access the resource.
3. The system of claim 1 wherein each of the plurality of devices have means for providing signals requesting device access to the resource, and wherein the selecting means are coupled to the means for providing signals to receive the requesting signals, for selecting a requesting device for access to the resource.
4. The system of claim 1 wherein
the selecting means are coupled to the memory means to receive from the plurality of means of the one currently addressed location the stored information, for selecting for access to the resource a device having a highest priority level in the order of priority.
5. The system of claim 1 wherein each storage means is reprogrammable to change the device identified thereby.
6. A digital system comprising:
(A) a resource;
(B) a plurality of devices coupled to the resource for accessing the resource; and
(C) means coupled to the devices for controlling access by the devices to the resource, the controlling means including
a programmable memory means comprising addressable locations, each of said addressable locations comprising a plurality of storage means, each storage means of an addressable location permanently corresponding with a unique priority level different from priority levels of the other storage means at that same location, and each storage means of each addressable location for storing information identifying the device having the corresponding level of priority;
addressing means coupled to the memory means for cyclically addressing each addressable location;
means coupled to the memory means and to the plurality of devices and responsive to the information stored in the plurality of storage means of an addressed location for selecting a device for access to the resource; and
means for providing clocking signals to the addressing means, wherein the addressing means respond to each clocking signal by addressing a location other than the location which the addressing means are currently addressing.
7. An arbitrator for arbitrating access by devices to a resource in a digital system which includes a resource shared by a plurality of devices, a plurality of devices coupled to the resource for generating signals to request access to the resource, and means coupled to the devices for granting to a device selected by the arbitrator access to the resource, the arbitrator comprising:
a programmable memory means comprising addressable locations, each of said addressable locations comprising a plurality of storage means, each storage means of an addressable location permanently corresponding with a unique priority level different from priority levels of the other storage means at that same location, and each storage means of each addressable location for storing information identifying the device having the corresponding priority level in an order of priority defined by that addressable location;
addressing means coupled to the memory means for cyclically addressing each addressable location to retrieve from the addressed location the information stored by the storage means thereof;
means for receiving request signals generated by the devices; and
means, coupled to the memory means and to the means for receiving and responsive to the request signals and to the information stored in the plurality of storage means of an addressed location for selecting for access to the resource a requesting device having a highest priority level in the order of priority defined by that addressed location.
8. The arbitrator of claim 7 wherein each storage means is reprogrammable to change the device identified thereby.
9. An arbitrator for arbitrating access by devices to a resources in a digital system which includes a resources shared by a plurality of devices, a plurality of devices coupled to the resource for generating signals to request access to the resource, and means coupled to the devices for granting to a device selected by the arbitrator access to the resource, the arbitrator comprising:
a programmable memory means comprising addressable locations, each of said addressable locations comprising a plurality of storage means, each storage means of an addressable location permanently corresponding with a unique priority level different from priority levels of the other storage means at that same location, and each storage means of each addressable location for storing information identifying the device having the corresponding priority level in an order of priority defined by that addressable location;
addressing means coupled to the memory means for cyclically addressing each addressable location;
means for receiving request signals generated by the devices; and
means, coupled to the memory means and to the means for receiving and responsive to the request signals and to the information stored in the plurality of storage means of an addressed location, for selecting for access to the resource a requesting device having a highest priority level in the order of priority defined by that addressed location; and
means for providing clocking signals to the addressing means, wherein the addressing means respond to each clocking signal by addressing a location other than the location which the addressing means are currently addressing.
Description
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 662,035, filed Oct. 18, 1984, now abandoned, which was a division of the application of D. R. Sloan entitled "Programmable Priority Arbitration System", filed on July 2, 1982, Ser. No. 394,888, now abandoned assigned to the same assignee as this application.

TECHNICAL FIELD

This invention relates to the management of shared resources in digital control and processing systems, and in particular to schemes for controlling access to the shared resources in such systems.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

A digital control or processing system, such as a computer system, may include one or more parts, such as memory devices, communication buses, and input/output devices, which are utilizable by other devices of the system as resources for the execution of system tasks. For example, processors may utilize memory as a source of data and instructions and as a resource for storage of results; the processors may also utilize input/output devices as resources for communicating with the outside world, and may utilize buses as communication paths between themselves and the memory or the input/output devices. Memory devices may likewise utilize buses as resources for sending information to processors, while input/output devices may utilize the buses as resources for sending information to memory devices and to processors.

Simultaneous use by a plurality of system devices of the same resource is likely to produce errors. For example, a processor reading data from a memory module while an input/output device is sending data to the memory module may obtain incorrect data; the output of an input/output device may be garbled when two processors simultaneously supply it with output information; and communications passing along a bus may become scrambled and nonsensical when they collide with each other.

It is therefore necessary to provide means within the system to control concurrent access by devices to the shared resources, and to allow only one device at a time to access and make use of a resource.

The prior art has generally concerned itself with controlling access to communication paths such as buses, and has provided preassigned fixed time slot allocation, and request arbitration techniques for this purpose.

Of these bus access control techniques, request arbitration has generally been the most efficient. Arbitration schemes require devices wishing to access a bus to request bus use from an arbitration mechanism, which mechanism then selects one from a set of simultaneous requests and grants bus use for a period or slot of time to the selected device. Bus arbitration schemes achieve bus use efficiency by granting time slots only to devices currently wishing to utilize the bus, unlike preassigned fixed time slot allocation schemes which grant time slots to devices irrespective of whether the devices have a need to utilize the bus at that time. Latency, or waiting time of units wishing to access the bus, is thus decreased in the arbitration schemes, and is further improved because using units wishing to use the bus can substantially immediately appraise the arbitration mechanism of this fact, without having to wait for a query from the arbitration mechanism. In contrast, a unit wishing to use the bus in a bus allocation system must wait until its predetermined allocated time slot arrives.

Conventional bus arbitration schemes generally implement a fixed, unchanging priority scheme among the using devices. Non programmable hardware logic generates bus use grant signals as a function of the incoming request signals and a fixed and unchanging priority structure. Such schemes are inflexible because the priority structure is built into the logic hardware and there is no way, short of redesigning the arbitration circuit, to accommodate different applications or changing system configurations and request loads.

The prior art has sought to alleviate these limitations by providing programmable arbitration mechanisms in which the relative priority ordering of the using devices is indicated by the contents of storage devices, such as registers, and hence may be changed by reprogramming the register contents.

While providing programmability at one level, these mechanisms have not met the needs of multiprocessor computer systems and other bus-oriented digital systems that require flexible, programmable, class-oriented priority schemes. In such systems, using devices are commonly divided into classes, with each class having a different priority, while devices within a class have the same priority and are generally scheduled to access the bus in a round-robin, equal opportunity, manner. The prior art programmable arbitration mechanisms have traditionally not possessed the flexibility necessary to adapt to such a variety and combination of priority determining manners. Hence the prior art mechanisms have not been capable of meeting the changing needs of a variety of arbitrator applications, configurations of using devices, and device response time requirements.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

This invention is directed to solving these and other disadvantages of the prior art. According to the invention, apparatus for controlling access by devices to a resource comprises a programmable memory having addressable locations, each of which comprises a plurality of storage segments wherein each storage segment of a location permanently corresponds with a unique priority level different from priority levels of the other storage segments at the location and stores information identifying the device having the corresponding priority level in defining an order of priority defined by that location. The apparatus further comprises an addressing arrangement coupled to the memory for cyclically addressing each addressable location. The access controlling apparatus also includes an arrangement coupled to the memory for selecting a device--preferably a device assigned a highest priority level--for access to the resource, based on information stored in the addressed location. Preferably, the selecting arrangement selects only a device requesting to access the resource.

Advantageously, each storage segment stores information identifying the device currently having the corresponding level of priority. "Currently" herein indicates that the device designated for a given priority may change, advantageously up to as often as each time that the access to the shared resource is arbitrated.

Being reprogrammable, the memory is adapted to change the priority order of the devices. And since different locations may have different contents, the access controlling apparatus is adapted to redetermine the priority order of the devices, by changing the level of priority assigned to devices, in any desired manner. The manner for changing the priority order advantageously includes constant decreasing priority, round-robin priority, or a combination of a plurality of manners. Constant decreasing priority herein refers to a fixed, static, priority ordering of the devices or classes of devices, which ordering changes only upon being reprogrammed. Unlike a round-robin priority ordering, for example, the constant decreasing priority is not changed when redetermined between reprogramming. While redetermining may occur as often as each time the shared resource is arbitrated, reprogramming generally occurs less frequently, for example at system initialization or reconfiguration, or at times of load shifts.

The above-described invention is well-suited for use in arbitration schemes, and thus it secures the advantages of high efficiency in time slot allocation and of low access latency for devices. By being reprogrammable in terms of both the order of priority among the devices and the manner of redetermining the priority order, the invention achieves flexibility which enables it to accommodate different applications, changing system configurations, changing request loads, and varying device response time requirements. The invention meets the requirements of class-oriented priority systems, as it is adapted to implement a manner of redetermining the priority order which manner is a combination of a plurality of manners, for example a constant decreasing priority manner among the classes and a round-robin manner among devices within a class.

These and other advantages of the present invention will become more apparent during the following description of an illustrative embodiment of the invention considered together with the drawing.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING

FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a system embodying an illustrative example of the invention;

FIG. 2 diagrams in block form that portion of the arbitrator of FIG. 1 which is involved in arbitrating access by devices to the system bus of FIG. 1;

FIG. 3 is a block diagram of the permutation network of FIG. 2;

FIG. 4 is a block diagram of the device number selector of FIG. 2; and

FIG. 5 is a block diagram of the priority designator of FIG. 2 showing an embodiment of the priority generators of FIG. 2.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

While the present invention may be utilized in any suitable digital system for controlling access by any suitable number of devices to any suitable resource, for purposes of illustrating the invention FIG. 1 shows a particular system 20 embodying the invention.

SYSTEM

The system 20 is a multiprocessor computer system in which a plurality of devices 0-15, such as processor units 0-12, I/O units 13-14, and a shared memory unit 15, communicate with each other across a system bus 28 which serves as a shared communication medium for the system 20. The system 20 further includes a system maintenance and initialization block 29 which is connected to the devices 0-15 by a maintenance bus 16. The block 29 performs conventional initialization and maintenance functions in the system 20.

In order to preserve the integrity of communications within the system 20, an arbitrator 27 is associated with the bus 28 and allows only a single device 0-15 to transmit on the bus 28 at any one time. The arbitrator 27 is connected to the maintenance bus 16 for initialization.

Each of the devices 0-15 has a REQUEST line 31-46, respectively, and a GRANT line 51-66, respectively, connecting it to the arbitrator 27. The lines 31-46 and 51-66 provide signaling paths between the arbitrator 27 and the devices 0-15.

When a device 0-15 wishes to access the system bus 28 for purposes of sending a communication thereon, it asserts its associated REQUEST line 31-46 to request access to the bus 28 from the arbitrator 27. The arbitrator 27 receives the request from that, and any other, device 0-15 wishing to use the bus 28. When a plurality of devices 0-15 request use of the bus 28 substantially simultaneously, i.e., within the same predetermined period of time, or while the bus 28 is in use, the arbitrator 27 selects one of the requests according to some order of priority and signals the selected device 0-15 over the associated GRANT line 51-66 that it has been granted access to the bus 28.

Alternatively, the GRANT lines 51-66 may be replaced by a common GRANT bus (not shown) that is connected to all of the devices 0-15. In such a configuration, the arbitrator 27 generates identification (ID), such as the device number, of the selected device 0-15 and broadcasts it along the GRANT bus to all of the devices 0-15. Each device 0-15 has an ID decoder (not shown) associated therewith and adapted to recognize the ID of its associated device 0-15. The ID decoder of the selected device 0-15 recognizes the broadcast ID and signals the device 0-15 that it has been awarded the grant of access to the system bus 28.

ARBITRATOR

Turning now to FIG. 2, there is shown diagramed the portion of the arbitrator 27 which is involved in selecting a device 0-15 for access to the bus 28.

As the system 20 includes 16 devices 0-15, the arbitrator 27 must distinguish 16 levels of priority to uniquely designate the priority level of each device 0-15. For this purpose, the arbitrator 27 includes a priority designator 24 whose outputs designate the current order of priority of the devices 0-15. The priority designator 24 of this illustrative embodiment comprises 16 programmable priority generators 71-86, each of which is associated with one priority level. The first generator 71 is associated with the highest priority level, the second generator 72 is associated with the second highest priority level, and so on, down to the generator 86 which is associated with the lowest priority level. Each generator 71-86 generates the identification, such as the device number, of the unique device 0-15 currently having that level of priority. The generators 71-86 are preferably all the same, and for illustrative purposes the generator 71 is discussed in further detail in conjunction with FIG. 5. Each generator 71-86 outputs the device number in binary form onto four DEVICE NO. leads which connect the generator 71-86 to control ports of a permutation network 67 and a device number selector 70. Thus the network 67 and the selector 70 each have 64 control inputs from the priority designator 24.

The REQUEST lines 31-46 from the devices 0-15, respectively, are connected to an input port of the permutation network 67. The permutation network 67 is a conventional logic network whose outputs are simply its inputs, possibly rearranged according to some predetermined order. The network 67 reorders the REQUEST lines 31-46 in the order of the priority of their associated devices 0-15, as specified by the inputs from the priority generators 71-86. The permutation network 67 is diagramed in FIG. 3.

As that figure shows, the network 67 is comprised of a set of 16 sixteen-to-one multiplexers 91-106 The 16 REQUEST lines 31-46 are connected to the input port of each multiplexer 91-106. The select (SEL) input port of each multiplexer 91-106 is connected to the four DEVICE NO. leads from the associated priority generator 71-86, respectively. Based on the input from the associated priority generator 71-86, each multiplexer 91-106 selects a single REQUEST line 31-46 for connection to its output lead. Thus the multiplexer 91 connects the REQUEST line of the highest priority device 0-15 to its output, the multiplexer 92 connects the REQUEST line of the second highest priority device 0-15 to its output, and so on down to the multiplexer 105 which connects the request line of the second lowest priority device 0-15 to its output, and the multiplexer 106 which connects the REQUEST line of the lowest priority device 0-15 to its output. The output leads of the multiplexers 91-106 are arranged sequentially such that the request lines at the output of the network 67, referred to as the PRIORITIZED REQUEST lines, are arranged in the order of priority of their associated device 0-15, with the leftmost line representing the highest priority device 0-15.

While FIG. 3 shows the permutation network 67 constructed from a single stage of multiplexers, it will be clear to those skilled in the art that other embodiments and configurations of devices to achieve the same functionality are possible.

Returning now to FIG. 2, the PRIORITIZED REQUEST lines at the outputs of the permutation network 67 are connected to an input port of a sixteen-to-four priority encoder 68. The encoder 68 is any suitable device or set of devices that finds the highest priority asserted REQUEST line from the PRIORITIZED REQUEST lines and encodes the number of that REQUEST line. Those skilled in the art can readily construct a sixteen-to-four priority encoder from commonly available eight-to-three or four-to-two priority encoder parts.

If devices 0-15 request access to the system bus 28 by asserting their REQUEST lines 31-46 low, (i.e., logic 0), and the PRIORITIZED REQUEST lines 31-46 are arranged at the output of the network 67 such that the leftmost REQUEST line is the highest priority REQUEST line, the priority encoder 68 is a conventional sixteen line "find leftmost zero" circuit. The number of the selected REQUEST line is a function of its position relative to the other REQUEST lines among the PRIORITIZED REQUEST lines. The leftmost position is REQUEST line number 0, while the rightmost position is REQUEST line number 15. In the above example, if the selected line were the one connecting to the output of the multiplexer 91 (see FIG. 3), the encoder 68 would identify it as the REQUEST line number 0, while if the selected line were the one connecting to the output of the multiplexer 106, the encoder 68 would identify it as the REQUEST line number 15.

The encoder 68 has four PRIORITY LINE NO. output leads across which it outputs the number of the selected line. The priority encoder 68 has an additional output lead referred to as NO REQUEST lead, which it asserts when none of the REQUEST lines are asserted and hence no access to the bus 28 is granted.

The four PRIORITY LINE NO. leads are connected to a control input port of the device number selector 70. Other inputs to the selector 70 comprise the 64 DEVICE NO. leads from the priority designator 24. The selector 70 uses the DEVICE NO. inputs to convert the number of the line selected by the encoder 68 into the number of the corresponding selected device. The selector 70 is diagramed in FIG. 4.

As is shown by that figure, the selector 70 comprises four 16:1 multiplexers 126-129. Each multiplexer 126-129 has its input port connected to one DEVICE NO. line from each of the priority generators 71-86 of the priority designator 24. The 16 DEVICE NO. lines connected to one multiplexer 126-129 are all of the same order. For example, the multiplexer 126 is connected to the DEVICE NO. lines which specify the most significant binary digit of the device numbers generated by the generators 71-86, while the multiplexer 129 is connected to the DEVICE NO. lines which specify the least significant binary digit of the device numbers generated by those generators 71-86.

The four PRIORITY LINE NO. leads from the encoder 68 are connected to the select (SEL) input port of each of the multiplexers 126-129. As a function of the select inputs, each of the multiplexers 126-129 selects one of its 16 inputs from the generators 71-86 for connection to its output. The selected input is the input from the generator 71-86 whose priority level corresponds to the line number generated by the encoder 68. Thus, for example, if the PRIORITY LINE NO. leads specify the first line, the multiplexers 126-129 select the input leads from the first priority generator 71; if the second line is specified, the input leads from the second priority generator 72 are selected; and so on. The priority line number is thus converted by the selector 70 into the device number of the device selected for access to the bus 28. The device number of the selected device is output by the selector 70 onto four PRIORITY DEVICE NO. leads.

As shown in FIG. 2, the PRIORITY DEVICE NO. leads from the selector 70 are connected to a select (SEL) input port of a device decoder 69, while the NO REQUEST lead from the encoder 68 is connected to an enable (EN) input of the decoder 69. Outputs of the decoder 69 are connected to the 16 GRANT lines 51-66. The decoder 69 responds to the priority device number input from the selector 70 by asserting the GRANT line of that device 0-15 to signal that device 0-15 that it has been granted access to the system bus 28. When no requests are present and the priority encoder 68 asserts the NO REQUEST lead, the decoder 69 is disabled from asserting any of the GRANT lines 51-66, and consequently none of the devices 0-15 become enabled to use the bus 28.

In the above-described alternative wherein GRANT lines dedicated to individual devices 0-15 are replaced by a GRANT bus connected to all of the devices 0-15, the decoder 69 is not used and the GRANT bus (not shown) is connected to the PRIORITY DEVICE NO. output leads of the selector 70 and to the NO REQUEST lead of the encoder 68. The decoding function of selecting the device whose number is output on the GRANT bus is then performed by the comparators (not shown) one of which is located at each device 0-15. Each comparator compares the GRANT bus contents with the device number of the associated device 0-15. When a comparator detects a match and when the NO REQUEST line is not asserted, the comparator outputs a signal to the associated device 0-15 to advise it that it has been granted access to the bus 28.

PROGRAMMABLE PRIORITY GENERATORS

Returning now to a consideration of the programmable priority generators 71-86 of the priority designator 24, they are substantial duplicates of each other, and hence only one, the generator 71, need be considered in detail, it being understood that the discussion applies to the others as well.

The priority generator 71 may be comprised of a memory unit, in which the contents of each memory word specify a device number, and an address generator which selects one of the memory words at any one time and causes its contents to be output onto the DEVICE NO. leads. In such an embodiment of the generator 71, all the generators 71-86 are preferably combined into a single unit priority designator 24 to avoid unnecessary duplication of circuitry.

Such an embodiment of the priority designator 24 is shown in FIG. 5. The priority designator 24 is comprised of a programmable memory 200, such as a random access memory (RAM), and an address generator 201. The memory 200 is comprised of a plurality of words 202, each of which is 64 bits wide. The memory 200 is divided into 16 columns 211-226 each 4 bits wide. The bits of the 64 bit memory word may be distributed among several memory modules, depending on the width of the memory package used. Memory packages are typically 1 bit, 4 bit, 8 bits, or 9 bits wide. Each column 211-226 contains a 4 bits long segment 203 of each of the words 202. Each column 211-226 represents a single priority generator 71-86, respectively, and contains the data, the device numbers, that must be generated by the generator 71-86. Each word 202 contains the data, the device numbers, to specify a single particular priority ordering of the sixteen devices 0-15.

Thus, the column 211 specifies all of the devices 0-15 that will at any time have first priority, the column 212 specifies all of the devices 0-15 that will at any time have second priority, and so on down to the column 226, which specifies all of the devices 0-15 that will at any time have sixteenth priority. A segment 203 of the column 211 specifies a single device 0-15 that will have first priority at some period in time, while another segment 203 of the column 211 specifies a single device 0-15 that will have first priority at some other period in time. And a word 202 of the memory 200 specifies a particular order of priority of the devices 0-15, from first priority to last priority, that will exist at some period in time, while another word 202 specifies a particular priority order that will exist at some other period in time.

To change the order of priority of the devices 0-15 and/or the manner of determining their priority, the contents of the words 202 of the memory 200 are changed by reprogramming the memory 200.

The words 202 have addresses associated with them, and the address generator 201 generates these addresses, one at a time. The address generator 201 has as inputs the INITIALIZE line from the system maintenance and initialization block 29, and the system CLOCK input. Upon initialization, in response to the INITIALIZE signal and the receipt of a CLOCK pulse, the address generator 201 generates a predetermined address of a word 202 of the memory 200, and thereafter upon the receipt of each CLOCK pulse, it generates a new address according to some predetermined scheme.

Address generators are well known to the art, and the address generator 201 may be any suitable unit. For example, the generator 201 may be a simple binary counter which upon initialization begins to count at 0 and for each received CLOCK pulse increments its output, up to the number of words 202 contained in the memory 200. Having counted to that number, the counter resets its count to 0 upon the receipt of the next CLOCK pulse and begins to cycle through the count again, performing the counting loop over and over again. Alternatively, the generator 201 may be a dynamically traffic-driven device, which monitors the contents of the word 202 that it is currently addressing (not shown) and generates a subsequent address as a function of these contents.

The memory 200 is connected to the DEVICE NO. lines; in particular, the column 211 is connected to the first priority DEVICE NO. lines, the column 212 is connected to the second priority DEVICE NO. lines, and so on down to the column 226, which is connected to the 16th priority DEVICE NO. lines.

Each address generated by the address generator 201 forms an input to the memory 200 where it selects a word 202 for connection to the DEVICE NO. lines. The contents of the word 202, which is currently being addressed, are transferred onto the DEVICE NO. lines and are conducted thereby to the permutation network 67 and to the device number selector 70 (see FIG. 2), to designate the current order of priority of the devices 0-15.

The art is well acquainted with the programming and reprogramming of conventional memories; hence no discussion thereof is needed here.

Of course, it should be understood that various changes and modifications to the illustrative embodiment described above will be apparent to those skilled in the art. Such changes and modifications can be made without departing from the spirit and the scope of the invention and without diminishing its attendant advantages. It is therefore intended that all such changes and modifications be covered by the following claims.

Citations de brevets
Brevet cité Date de dépôt Date de publication Déposant Titre
US4005391 *6 juin 197525 janv. 1977Burroughs CorporationPeripheral interrupt priority resolution in a micro program data processor having plural levels of subinstruction sets
US4271467 *2 janv. 19792 juin 1981Honeywell Information Systems Inc.I/O Priority resolver
US4449183 *13 oct. 198115 mai 1984Digital Equipment CorporationArbitration scheme for a multiported shared functional device for use in multiprocessing systems
US4470111 *12 nov. 19814 sept. 1984Ncr CorporationPriority interrupt controller
Citations hors brevets
Référence
1 *C. H. Grant et al, Subchannel Addressing, IBM Tech. Disclos. Bulletin, (vol. 13, No. 8, Jan. 1971), pp. 2288 2290.
2C. H. Grant et al, Subchannel Addressing, IBM Tech. Disclos. Bulletin, (vol. 13, No. 8, Jan. 1971), pp. 2288-2290.
3C. H. Grant et al., "Priority Interrupt Queing", I.B.M. Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 15, No. 10 (Mar. 1973), pp. 3046-3048.
4 *C. H. Grant et al., Priority Interrupt Queing , I.B.M. Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 15, No. 10 (Mar. 1973), pp. 3046 3048.
5Christensen NT, "Programmable Priority Mechanism", IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 17, No. 7, pp. 2052-2053.
6 *Christensen NT, Programmable Priority Mechanism , IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 17, No. 7, pp. 2052 2053.
7W. A. Barker et al., "Line Scanner Providing Priority Control Signals", I.B.M. Tech. Disclos. Bull., vol. 13, No. 10 (Mar. 1971), pp. 3032-3033.
8 *W. A. Barker et al., Line Scanner Providing Priority Control Signals , I.B.M. Tech. Disclos. Bull., vol. 13, No. 10 (Mar. 1971), pp. 3032 3033.
Référencé par
Brevet citant Date de dépôt Date de publication Déposant Titre
US4914653 *22 déc. 19863 avr. 1990American Telephone And Telegraph CompanyInter-processor communication protocol
US4949338 *14 nov. 198814 août 1990Racal Data Communications Inc.Arbitration in multiprocessor communication node
US4974148 *6 juil. 198727 nov. 1990Motorola Computer X, Inc.Bus arbiter with equitable priority scheme
US5072363 *22 déc. 198910 déc. 1991Harris CorporationMultimode resource arbiter providing round robin arbitration or a modified priority arbitration
US5077733 *11 sept. 198931 déc. 1991Wang Laboratories, Inc.Priority apparatus having programmable node dwell time
US5132967 *29 oct. 199021 juil. 1992International Business Machines CorporationSingle competitor arbitration scheme for common bus
US5155854 *3 févr. 198913 oct. 1992Digital Equipment CorporationSystem for arbitrating communication requests using multi-pass control unit based on availability of system resources
US5157659 *7 juin 199020 oct. 1992Canai Computer And Network Architecture Inc.Packet communication system and method of clearing communication bus
US5203007 *3 oct. 199113 avr. 1993International Business Machines CorporationOverriding programmable priority and selective blocking in a computer system
US5241632 *30 janv. 199231 août 1993Digital Equipment CorporationProgrammable priority arbiter
US5247622 *28 juin 199121 sept. 1993Goldstar Co., Ltd.Id processing dedicated scsi bus interface logic circuit
US5247671 *14 févr. 199021 sept. 1993International Business Machines CorporationScalable schedules for serial communications controller in data processing systems
US5257382 *11 mars 199126 oct. 1993Unisys CorporationData bank priority system
US5265212 *1 avr. 199223 nov. 1993Digital Equipment CorporationSharing of bus access among multiple state machines with minimal wait time and prioritization of like cycle types
US5265223 *31 juil. 199223 nov. 1993Hewlett-Packard CompanyPreservation of priority in computer bus arbitration
US5274822 *2 juil. 199028 déc. 1993Ncr CorporationFast centralized arbitrator
US5280591 *22 juil. 199118 janv. 1994International Business Machines, CorporationCentralized backplane bus arbiter for multiprocessor systems
US5301283 *16 avr. 19925 avr. 1994Digital Equipment CorporationDynamic arbitration for system bus control in multiprocessor data processing system
US5301332 *23 déc. 19925 avr. 1994Ncr CorporationMethod and apparatus for a dynamic, timed-loop arbitration
US5303382 *12 nov. 199212 avr. 1994Digital Equipment CorporationArbiter with programmable dynamic request prioritization
US5307466 *30 avr. 199226 avr. 1994International Business Machines CorporationDistributed programmable priority arbitration
US5311461 *30 déc. 198810 mai 1994International Business Machines Corp.Programmable priority and selective blocking in a compute system
US5369748 *23 août 199129 nov. 1994Nexgen MicrosystemsBus arbitration in a dual-bus architecture where one bus has relatively high latency
US5381551 *7 avr. 199310 janv. 1995Sony CorporationSemiconductor integrated circuit including an arbitrate circuit for giving priority to a plurality of request signals
US5392033 *5 janv. 199321 févr. 1995International Business Machines CorporationPriority generator for providing controllable guaranteed fairness in accessing a shared bus
US5392434 *3 sept. 199321 févr. 1995Motorola, Inc.Arbitration protocol system granting use of a shared resource to one of a plurality of resource users
US5414820 *21 mars 19949 mai 1995Nexgen, Inc.Crossing transfers for maximizing the effective bandwidth in a dual-bus architecture
US5463741 *16 oct. 199231 oct. 1995International Business Machines CorporationDuplicated logic and interconnection system for arbitration among multiple information processors
US5475819 *17 juin 199412 déc. 1995Digital Equipment CorporationDistributed configuration profile for computing system
US5481680 *14 avr. 19952 janv. 1996At&T Corp.Dynamically programmable bus arbiter with provisions for historical feedback and error detection and correction
US5506968 *28 déc. 19929 avr. 1996At&T Global Information Solutions CompanyTerminating access of an agent to a shared resource when a timer, started after a low latency agent requests access, reaches a predetermined value
US5548762 *14 avr. 199420 août 1996Digital Equipment CorporationImplementation efficient interrupt select mechanism
US5566305 *5 juin 199515 oct. 1996International Business Machines CorporationDuplicated logic and interconnection system for arbitration among multiple information processors
US5586331 *2 juin 199517 déc. 1996International Business Machines CorporationDuplicated logic and interconnection system for arbitration among multiple information processors
US5594733 *10 sept. 199214 janv. 1997U.S. Philips CorporationMulti-station bus system having means for polling and updating of globally relevant information, in particular a station address, and station for use in such system
US5617545 *9 juin 19931 avr. 1997Hitachi, Ltd.Arbitration circuit capable of changing the priority and arrival time of nonselected requests
US5623672 *23 déc. 199422 avr. 1997Cirrus Logic, Inc.Arrangement and method of arbitration for a resource with shared user request signals and dynamic priority assignment
US5627976 *20 mars 19956 mai 1997Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.Crossing transfers for maximizing the effective bandwidth in a dual-bus architecture
US5649206 *15 juin 199515 juil. 1997Motorola, Inc.Priority arbitration protocol with two resource requester classes and system therefor
US5682467 *29 sept. 199428 oct. 1997Xerox CorporationArbitrating apparatus for controlling selective access of multiple bus masters to a printing system video bus
US5729702 *24 déc. 199617 mars 1998Digital Equipment CorporationMulti-level round robin arbitration system
US5790849 *22 déc. 19954 août 1998Intel CorporationMethod and apparatus to permit the boot of a shared memory buffer architecture employing an arbitrary operating system
US5838680 *7 août 199517 nov. 1998Oki Electric Industry, Co., Ltd.ATM cell switch with master and slave demultiplexer modules and reduced current fluctuations
US5870560 *20 déc. 19969 févr. 1999Bull Hn Information Systems Italia S.P.A.Arbitraion unit with round-robin priority, particularly for multiprocessor systems with syncronous symmetrical processors
US5896539 *14 avr. 199720 avr. 1999International Business Machines CorporationMethod and system for controlling access to a shared resource in a data processing system utilizing dynamically-determined weighted pseudo-random priorities
US5901296 *6 déc. 19964 mai 1999International Business Machines CorporationDistributed scheduling for the transfer of real time, loss sensitive and non-real time data over a bus
US5920707 *17 déc. 19966 juil. 1999Nec CorporationBus controller and method therefor for supporting a live-line insertion/disconnection in a synchronous bus
US5931931 *4 avr. 19973 août 1999International Business Machines CorporationMethod for bus arbitration in a multiprocessor system
US6073132 *27 mars 19986 juin 2000Lsi Logic CorporationPriority arbiter with shifting sequential priority scheme
US6098109 *30 déc. 19961 août 2000Compaq Computer CorporationProgrammable arbitration system for determining priority of the ports of a network switch
US6119188 *27 avr. 199812 sept. 2000Fusion Micromedia Corp.Priority allocation in a bus interconnected discrete and/or integrated digital multi-module system
US6311244 *19 juil. 200030 oct. 2001Fusion Micromedia CorporationPriority allocation in a bus interconnected discrete and/or integrated digital multi-module system
US6389480 *1 août 200014 mai 2002Compaq Computer CorporationProgrammable arbitration system for determining priority of the ports of a network switch
US640827721 juin 200018 juin 2002Banter LimitedSystem and method for automatic task prioritization
US6411218 *22 janv. 199925 juin 2002Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.Priority-encoding device selection using variable arbitrary rankings
US6473813 *17 août 199929 oct. 2002Sitera, Inc.Module based address translation arrangement and transaction offloading in a digital system
US6589187 *8 déc. 20008 juil. 2003Medtronic, Inc.Prioritized dynamic memory allocation of arrhythmia episode detail collection
US6813265 *24 mars 20002 nov. 2004AlcatelMethod and system for controlling the order of departure of temporarily stored information or objects
US69617204 déc. 20011 nov. 2005Iphrase Technologies, Inc.System and method for automatic task prioritization
US6996646 *4 avr. 20027 févr. 2006Infineon Technologies AgBus system
US7012930 *30 juil. 200114 mars 2006Lg Electronics Inc.Apparatus and method for pre-arbitrating use of a communication link
US70998553 janv. 200129 août 2006International Business Machines CorporationSystem and method for electronic communication management
US7143219 *31 déc. 200228 nov. 2006Intel CorporationMultilevel fair priority round robin arbiter
US720073223 janv. 20043 avr. 2007Tellabs Petaluma, Inc.Method and apparatus of adding grant information to a memory
US72665357 déc. 20054 sept. 2007International Business Machines CorporationSystem and method for electronic communication management
US7266824 *17 août 20014 sept. 2007Texas Instruments IncorporatedAddress space priority arbitration
US7373445 *21 mars 200513 mai 2008Infineon Technologies AgMethod and apparatus for allocating bus access rights in multimaster bus systems
US738923022 avr. 200317 juin 2008International Business Machines CorporationSystem and method for classification of voice signals
US743749527 avr. 200614 oct. 2008Tellabs Petaluma, Inc.Method and apparatus for assigning bus grant requests
US762190512 août 200324 nov. 2009Remon Medical Technologies Ltd.Devices for intrabody delivery of molecules and systems and methods utilizing same
US764161919 sept. 20075 janv. 2010Remon Medical Technologies, Ltd.Barometric pressure correction based on remote sources of information
US76440575 mai 20045 janv. 2010International Business Machines CorporationSystem and method for electronic communication management
US775215923 août 20076 juil. 2010International Business Machines CorporationSystem and method for classifying text
US77565735 sept. 200613 juil. 2010Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc.Implantable medical device diagnostic data acquisition and storage
US775681023 août 200713 juil. 2010International Business Machines CorporationSoftware tool for training and testing a knowledge base
US781380823 nov. 200512 oct. 2010Remon Medical Technologies LtdImplanted sensor system with optimized operational and sensing parameters
US784904428 oct. 20057 déc. 2010International Business Machines CorporationSystem and method for automatic task prioritization
US794814813 oct. 200924 mai 2011Remon Medical Technologies Ltd.Piezoelectric transducer
US795526820 juil. 20077 juin 2011Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc.Multiple sensor deployment
US82003241 juin 201012 juin 2012Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc.Implantable medical device diagnostic data acquisition and storage
US827109317 sept. 200418 sept. 2012Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc.Systems and methods for deriving relative physiologic measurements using a backend computing system
US829076827 mars 200216 oct. 2012International Business Machines CorporationSystem and method for determining a set of attributes based on content of communications
US849500229 avr. 200423 juil. 2013International Business Machines CorporationSoftware tool for training and testing a knowledge base
US870468820 mars 201222 avr. 2014Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc.Implantable medical device diagnostic data acquisition and storage
US92081091 juin 20118 déc. 2015Altera CorporationMemory controllers with dynamic port priority assignment capabilities
US958466525 avr. 200728 févr. 2017International Business Machines CorporationSystem and method for optimizing timing of responses to customer communications
US969912930 juin 20034 juil. 2017International Business Machines CorporationSystem and method for increasing email productivity
US20020044565 *30 juil. 200118 avr. 2002Park Hee ChulApparatus and method for pre-arbitrating use of a communication link
US20020065867 *17 août 200130 mai 2002Gerard ChauvelAddress Space priority arbitration
US20020156955 *4 avr. 200224 oct. 2002Jens BarrenscheenBus system
US20030067937 *13 août 200210 avr. 2003Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.System for transmitting data between modules and method for controlling the same
US20030172213 *6 mars 200211 sept. 2003GARCIA EnriqueArtificially intelligent arbitration system and process for optimizing multiple processes sharing a resource
US20040254904 *5 mai 200416 déc. 2004Yoram NelkenSystem and method for electronic communication management
US20050177665 *23 janv. 200411 août 2005Ripy Paul B.Method and apparatus of adding grant information to a memory
US20050187913 *5 mai 200425 août 2005Yoram NelkenWeb-based customer service interface
US20050223147 *21 mars 20056 oct. 2005Infineon Technologies AgMethod and apparatus for allocating bus access rights in multimaster bus systems
US20060080267 *28 oct. 200513 avr. 2006Yoram NelkenSystem and method for automatic task prioritization
US20060195641 *27 avr. 200631 août 2006Ripy Paul BMethod and apparatus for assigning bus grant requests
US20070016709 *29 juin 200618 janv. 2007Nec Electronics CorporationBus control system and a method thereof
US20070294201 *23 août 200720 déc. 2007International Business Machines CorporationSoftware tool for training and testing a knowledge base
US20080015421 *19 sept. 200717 janv. 2008Remon Medical Technologies, Ltd.Barometric pressure correction based on remote sources of information
US20080021333 *20 juil. 200724 janv. 2008Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc.Multiple sensor deployment
US20080058651 *5 sept. 20066 mars 2008Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc.Implantable Medical Device Diagnostic Data Acquisition and Storage
US20080312553 *22 mai 200818 déc. 2008Timmons Michael JIntracorporeal pressure measurement devices and methods
US20100094105 *13 oct. 200915 avr. 2010Yariv PoratPiezoelectric transducer
EP0704807A129 sept. 19953 avr. 1996Xerox CorporationProgrammable arbitrating apparatus
EP1052573A1 *9 mars 200015 nov. 2000Alcatel Alsthom Compagnie Generale D'electriciteMethod and device for controlling the output-order of data or of temporarily stored objects
EP1557983A1 *21 janv. 200527 juil. 2005Advanced Fibre CommunicationsMethod of adding grant information to a memory and communications circuit
EP1668457A2 *16 sept. 200414 juin 2006Tellabs Petaluma, Inc.System for allocating minimum and maximum bandwidths
EP1668457A4 *16 sept. 200423 janv. 2008Tellabs Petaluma IncSystem for allocating minimum and maximum bandwidths
EP1668519A2 *16 sept. 200414 juin 2006Tellabs Petaluma, Inc.Allocating bandwidths in system with redundant circuits
EP1668519A4 *16 sept. 200423 janv. 2008Tellabs Petaluma IncAllocating bandwidths in system with redundant circuits
WO1997023824A1 *12 juil. 19963 juil. 1997Intel CorporationThe boot of a shared memory buffer architecture employing an arbitrary operating system
Classifications
Classification aux États-Unis710/244, 370/462
Classification internationaleG06F13/364
Classification coopérativeG06F13/364
Classification européenneG06F13/364
Événements juridiques
DateCodeÉvénementDescription
17 juil. 1992FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 4
28 juil. 1992CCCertificate of correction
29 juil. 1996FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 8
30 août 2000FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 12