US5463777A - System for segmenting data packets to form binary decision trees which determine filter masks combined to filter the packets for forwarding - Google Patents

System for segmenting data packets to form binary decision trees which determine filter masks combined to filter the packets for forwarding Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US5463777A
US5463777A US08/396,374 US39637495A US5463777A US 5463777 A US5463777 A US 5463777A US 39637495 A US39637495 A US 39637495A US 5463777 A US5463777 A US 5463777A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
node
final
packet
nodes
binary tree
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US08/396,374
Inventor
Jan Bialkowski
John Krawczyk
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Rockstar Consortium US LP
Original Assignee
Wellfleet Communications Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Wellfleet Communications Inc filed Critical Wellfleet Communications Inc
Priority to US08/396,374 priority Critical patent/US5463777A/en
Assigned to BAY NETWORKS, INC. reassignment BAY NETWORKS, INC. CHANGE OF NAME (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: WELLFLEET COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Priority to US08/550,525 priority patent/US5574910A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US5463777A publication Critical patent/US5463777A/en
Assigned to NORTEL NETWORKS NA INC. reassignment NORTEL NETWORKS NA INC. CHANGE OF NAME (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: BAY NETWORKS, INC.
Assigned to NORTEL NETWORKS CORPORATION reassignment NORTEL NETWORKS CORPORATION ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: NORTEL NETWORKS NA INC.
Assigned to NORTEL NETWORKS LIMITED reassignment NORTEL NETWORKS LIMITED CHANGE OF NAME (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: NORTEL NETWORKS CORPORATION
Assigned to Rockstar Bidco, LP reassignment Rockstar Bidco, LP ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: NORTEL NETWORKS LIMITED
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Assigned to ROCKSTAR CONSORTIUM US LP reassignment ROCKSTAR CONSORTIUM US LP ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: Rockstar Bidco, LP
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L12/00Data switching networks
    • H04L12/28Data switching networks characterised by path configuration, e.g. LAN [Local Area Networks] or WAN [Wide Area Networks]
    • H04L12/46Interconnection of networks
    • H04L12/4604LAN interconnection over a backbone network, e.g. Internet, Frame Relay
    • H04L12/462LAN interconnection over a bridge based backbone
    • H04L12/4625Single bridge functionality, e.g. connection of two networks over a single bridge
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L9/00Cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for secret or secure communications; Network security protocols
    • H04L9/40Network security protocols
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L69/00Network arrangements, protocols or services independent of the application payload and not provided for in the other groups of this subclass
    • H04L69/22Parsing or analysis of headers
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10STECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S707/00Data processing: database and file management or data structures
    • Y10S707/99931Database or file accessing
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10STECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S707/00Data processing: database and file management or data structures
    • Y10S707/99941Database schema or data structure
    • Y10S707/99943Generating database or data structure, e.g. via user interface

Definitions

  • the invention relates generally to the transmission, processing, and forwarding of data communications packets, and in particular, to the method and apparatus for processing the packets at an intermediate node during transmission from source to destination.
  • the process of transmitting data packets from a source to a destination typically requires at least one intermediate forwarding node.
  • the equipment at the intermediate node often called a router or a bridge, receives the data packet, examines or analyzes it, and forwards it on to a next node or destination on the network as is appropriate.
  • the process of examining the packet typically employs table look-ups, and the process of demultiplexing the packet, and analyzing, filtering and forwarding the packet headers, requires a substantial amount of table look-up. Their frequency, and the overall computer processor time expended for those tasks, requires substantial processor capability. Accordingly, methods have been employed to reduce the CPU requirements, and, accordingly, improve throughput through the node and maintain effective costs.
  • Other objects of the invention include high reliability, the capability of handling complex packet headers, and effectively providing filtering results simultaneously with the destination address determination.
  • the invention relates to a method and apparatus for processing binary data packets which have an information containing portion and a data containing portion.
  • the method features the steps of creating and storing at least one binary tree decision table which has a plurality of non-final nodes and a plurality of final nodes.
  • the table represents a binary decision tree structure.
  • the method further features the steps of processing the information containing portion of the data packet to be processed using the binary tree table for determining the processing to be used for the packet, and thereafter processing the packet in accordance with the processing results just obtained.
  • the apparatus and method of the invention are particularly advantageous in using the binary tree search for determining whether a particular key value is contained in a predefined range of data values previously input by the user. If a key included in the information containing portion of the packet falls within a predefined range, the search algorithm provides user data and filter mask data for use by the packet processing system. The use of the user supplied data does not require a priori knowledge of where in the range the key value is positioned and the binary tree search method similarly does not attempt to provide an exact match to the key value (except in the special instance where the range contains only one value).
  • the creating and storing step features the steps of dividing a storage table or memory into a numbered sequence of subarrays, ordering the binary tree structure in a dependency order of numbered tree nodes, and storing left and right node children of a node numbered "n", and stored at subarray "n", at subarrays "2n” and “2n+1” corresponding to nodes "2n” and “2n+1", respectively.
  • the method further features the steps of assigning a weight to each node which is equal to sum of the weights of each of its child nodes "+1", and thereafter balancing the binary tree structure whenever the weights associated with two child nodes of a common parent node differ by more than one.
  • the packet processing method further features the ability to add and delete nodes from an existing binary tree structure by modifying the binary tree decision table.
  • the method further features, in a particular embodiment of the invention, processing the incoming information containing portion of a packet by deciding, for each non-final node, whether a selected subset of the portion is greater than a predetermined node threshold value and thereafter proceeding to one of the lower order right child node or left child node depending on the relative values of the subset and the threshold.
  • the non-final subarrays thereby store threshold values, and each final subarray is reached by passing through a sequence of non-final nodes.
  • the final node contains an information data portion and a filter mask containing portion.
  • the described binary tree structure is particularly advantageous for searching for a range of values.
  • the invention further features segmenting the input information containing portion into a plurality of information subset segments, processing the segments to determine a filter mask for each segment, and AND'ing the results of each filter mask with an initial filter mask to determine the final filter processing for the data packet.
  • the invention features dividing each segment (or the entire information containing portion) into a plurality of subsegments, processing each subsegment through the binary tree structure as noted above, and AND'ing the filter mask results for the subsegments to achieve a final filter mask instruction.
  • the apparatus of the invention implements the method described above, and typically features circuitry for creating and storing at least one binary tree decision table having a plurality of non-final nodes and a plurality of final nodes.
  • the table represents a binary decision tree structure.
  • the apparatus further features circuitry for processing the information containing portion of the data packet, segmenting it if necessary, using the binary tree table for determining the processing to be used for the packet. The packet is then processed in accordance with those processing results.
  • circuitry is further provided for efficiently storing the binary tree table, balancing the table as necessary, adding and deleting nodes, passing through the binary tree in an ordered fashion using the threshold values stored in, in association with each node, the memory subarray, and segmenting the information containing portions either due to length of the portion or the separation of related information, into subsegments of the information containing portion, which subsegments are then serially processed.
  • FIG. 1 is an illustrative network including source/destination and analyzing/forwarding nodes of a typical network
  • FIG. 2 illustrates the structure of a typical data packet to be analyzed and operated upon in accordance with the invention
  • FIG. 3 illustrates a decision tree structure in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the invention
  • FIG. 4 illustrates a memory structure accordance for storing and implementing the binary tree structure of FIG. 3 in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the invention
  • FIG. 5 illustrates the deletion of a node from a binary tree structure
  • FIG. 6 illustrates the insertion of a node in a decision tree structure
  • FIG. 7 illustrates the balancing of a binary decision tree in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the invention
  • FIG. 8 is a flow chart illustrating operation of the analysis and filtering system in accordance with the preferred embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 9 is a hardware configuration capable of implementing the preferred embodiment of the invention.
  • a data communications network 10 can have a plurality of source, or destination, nodes 10a, 10b, . . . , 10n and a plurality of intermediate connecting or forwarding nodes 12a, 12b, . . . , 12m.
  • the various nodes, whether they are source/destination nodes, or intermediate/forwarding nodes, are interconnected in various circuit patterns by interconnecting data links 14a, 14b, . . . , 14p.
  • a data packet sent, for example, from a (source) node 10a to a (destination) node 10d can traverse a plurality of different paths 14, depending upon, for example, the availability of the paths, the cost of the various paths, the speed of the various paths, the operability of the paths, etc.
  • the data sent from a source node to a destination node is transmitted in the form of a data packet 16.
  • a typical data packet 16 is transmitted by appending to the data portion 18 of the packet, a header portion 20, and adding at the end of the data packet, a trailer portion 22.
  • the header portion can contain any of a number of different items of information, which, according to the protocol being employed, will appear in known positional locations within the header.
  • the header information may include, for example, the address of the destination node, the address of the source node, a preferred path to take, instructions with regard to timing of the data and forwarding the data in accordance with various filtering operations.
  • the trailer portion of the data packet may include, for example, a CRC check to insure accuracy and integrity of the data packet once it is received.
  • the header portion of the data packet is decoded so that the intermediate or forwarding node 12 has sufficient information to forward (or not forward) and otherwise process the data packet in an appropriate manner over the appropriate paths.
  • an intermediate or forwarding node 12b has the option of passing a data packet over path 14d or 14e when, for example, the destination is node 10d.
  • the header information being provided can simplify that choice or provide a command which eliminates the ability of the node to "choose".
  • the header information can be quite long, for example, over several hundred bits of data. Accordingly, the decoding process for the header can be either long or tedious, or both, and can take substantial CPU time, which otherwise could be used for more "profitable" functions. In any case, the passage of the packet through the intermediate node can be accordingly delayed.
  • a binary tree structure is employed to speed the data packet through the intermediate node 12 to its eventual destination. The binary tree structure operates, in a simple manner, to process and analyze the incoming data packet, filter it, and thereby, if appropriate, pass it on to a next node.
  • a specialized and highly optimized table look-up service for demultiplexing, forwarding, and filtering the data packet.
  • the look-up table method implements, preferably in a software embodiment, an associative memory that stores the data identified by various "keys", such as the destination and source addresses, so that during a look-up operation, the information can be scanned until a match of the key being processed is obtained. While a linear search could be implemented, it is far too slow to be of practical use. In particular, since the keys which are to be supported can be of arbitrary length (but typically are contiguous), the linear search does not provide a practical solution. In addition, it is typical that a key has a range of values, each of which causes the same filtering operation(s) to take place.
  • a unique binary tree table is employed to effect the look-up service.
  • key fields within the packets are defined using bit offsets from a convenient reference point, for example, the beginning of the packet.
  • the header keys can have variable formats, for example, IP options, and additional reference points may be needed.
  • the bit offsets are stored in the table where they can be referenced during the table search.
  • the look-up table binary tree is uniquely adapted to searching for ranges of data, and to apply user supplied information to the entire range. In this manner, a key incorporating, for example, IP options, can be advantageously and quickly decoded and a range of values will provide a common, user-identified, result.
  • the look-up table can directly deal with at most only 32-bit contiguous keys in accordance with the illustrated embodiment of the invention. Smaller, that is, shorter length keys, are always preferably left adjusted and larger, but continguous keys are transparently divided or chopped into 32 bit fragments by system interface software routines. Non-contiguous keys, which are useful for performing arbitrary filtering, require a more intimate involvement with the application, that is, the look-up table must be segmented so that the first look-up stage processes one 32 bit key fragment or subfragment, and thereby results in a reference to a second stage look-up table, and so on. The final look-up result returns the user data supplied when the entry was installed in the table.
  • the left shifting of the shorter key lengths is equivalent to providing a range of values defined by the most significant bits of the left shifted key, with the lower order bits, the bits shifted into a 32 bit word, being in effect "don't care" bits.
  • the described binary tree search is particularly adapted to searching for a range of values set up by the left shifted key in accordance with the invention.
  • the second, third, and further levels of table will occupy exponentially growing space within the memory.
  • a first level table has 1,000 entries pointing to 1,000 second level tables, each with 1,000 entries, it becomes clear that the process will not adequately work because the second and subsequent set of tables must be shared among many, and preferably all, entries in preceding level tables.
  • the table sharing loses information about earlier look-up results in the process. For example, if all first level entries pointed to the same second level table, the first level look-up entry would have only a one bit result: either the entry was found, in which case it would go to the second table or not, in which case the packet would be dropped. This is insufficient to implement any rational filter.
  • a binary tree table approach is employed, in which the decision process is reduced to "simple binary decisions" based upon the various keys 22 in the packet.
  • a typical look-up binary tree structure is illustrated in FIG. 3, in which, starting from a root node 24, the tree structure emmanates. The binary tree structure provides that for each parent node, such as root node 24, there exists a left child node such as node 26 and a right child node, such as node 28.
  • the system makes binary decisions for determining, at the various nodes, whether a particular range of values, or a specific value (a range limited to one value) exists.
  • the process thus provides for passing through various non-final nodes in the tree to a final node at which a selected range or value is determined to exist.
  • the final node provides both a filter mask instruction word, as well as user data.
  • the filter mask instruction word in fact a filter mask, is a specification word, each bit of which is associated with a different operation. Thus, one bit may provide for dropping the packet and not passing it forward, while another bit will provide for a different action.
  • the apparatus can thus, once the final node has been determined, take the filter mask and perform operations upon the packet data in accordance with the bits set therein.
  • each non-final node thus represents, itself, a range of values, the left child node of which represents a lower portion of the range and the right child node represents the upper portion of the range.
  • the user data and filter mask of the final node are thus applicable to all values in the range represented by the final node.
  • each of the various masks can be advantageously and, in the preferred embodiment are, "AND'ed" together, so that only bits set for each and every filter mask will survive and be effective. In a properly constructed binary tree structure, the operations will not be self-contradicting.
  • the length of the filter mask is arbitrarily set at 32 bits, each of the bits being used for filtering in the illustrated embodiment.
  • the length of the mask is arbitrary, and one or more bits could be set aside, for example the 32nd bit of the mask could be reserved for normal forwarding.
  • the binary tree table can be stored as a "look up table" as follows. First, as illustrated in FIG. 3, the nodes are numbered, in sequence, so that the root node is numbered "1" its children are numbered "2" and "3" for the left hand and right hand child, respectively, and each successive node in the tree, node n, is numbered so that its children are numbered 2n and 2n+1 for the left and right child nodes, respectively. In this manner, referring to FIG. 4, a unique and compact structure is provided for storing the binary tree look-up table.
  • each of the "numbered" nodes is represented with and associated with, a subarray of memory corresponding to its number in the sequence.
  • each subarray associated with a non-final node need only contain a threshold value, so that if the value of the key is greater than or equal to the threshold value, then the right child node is selected; otherwise, the left child node is selected. In this manner, a unique and simple memory structure is achieved to store the binary tree nodes.
  • the tree in order to achieve efficient operation, is balanced wherein each final node of the tree is given a "weight" of "0" and each non-final node of the tree is given a weight equal to the sum of the weights of its right and left hand children, plus 1.
  • the tree can be restructured so that the children of any node will no longer have a difference in the weight greater than 1.
  • FIGS. 7A and 7B Such a rebalancing is illustrated in FIGS. 7A and 7B.
  • Such balancing of the binary tree provides a particularly efficient table search function for any particular value of the key being examined. This efficiency results by a minimization of a number of overall average number of steps needed to search the value of the key, assuming the values have a uniform probability density distribution.
  • the header keys when the header portion is composed of a plurality of different keys, all of which can affect the filtering, if any, to be performed upon the data packet, the header keys can be separately selected, thus segmenting the header, and each of the keys can be processed through a separate binary tree structure to determine the filter mask appropriate to that key to be applied to the data packet.
  • the resulting filter masks are AND'ed together to provide an overall filtering capability for processing that data packet.
  • the resulting filter value is also AND'ed with a predetermined limited number of filter options, designated by a 32 bit preset filter word, which limits the number of filter operations which the user has designated as applying to that binary tree decoding process.
  • the invention provides for segmenting, or subsegmenting any key or segmented portion of the header so that the various portions of the header are handled separately in 32 bit "chunks".
  • the remaining portion of the key is left shifted to the most significant portion of the 32 bit word representing the key subsegment.
  • FIG. 5 there is a provided a method for adding or deleting nodes from the tree structure of FIG. 3, and thereby reconfigure the memory configuration of FIG. 4.
  • FIG. 5 there are deleted nodes numbered 4, 9, 18 and 19.
  • the nondeleted child nodes of each deleted parent replace the parent in this structure and each of the child nodes of the now new "parent" are renumbered in accordance with the invention.
  • node 4 and its left hand children are deleted.
  • the nomenclature used within the node defining circle is "node number: threshold value”.
  • FIG. 6 The addition of a node is illustrated in FIG. 6, in which a new node has been inserted, at node 4, due to the change in threshold value at node 4. In this example, therefore, previously "final" nodes 8 and 9 provide new threshold decision values.
  • FIGS. 5 and 6 also illustrate the use of a special threshold values, "0" in the examples, to denote a final node.
  • FIGS. 7A and 7B there is illustrated a typical balancing rearrangement, in which, in FIG. 7A, the tree is "too heavy” on the left branch of node 1 and, accordingly, is “rebalanced” in FIG. 7B by moving some of the "weight” from the left hand side of the tree to the right hand side of the tree. Note that the two trees of FIGS. 7A and 7B are equivalent to each other, but that the weight associated with the child nodes is now "balanced”.
  • Each final node of the tree also provides user data which can be employed as required for effecting user instructed operations. Typically, this will depend, at least in part, upon the filtering to be performed by the system.
  • FIG. 8 there is illustrated an overall flow chart illustrating total operation of the system of FIG. 9, in accordance with the illustrated embodiment of the invention.
  • the implementation of the invention is preferably performed in accordance with a hardware/software embodiment.
  • the various elements of the invention can be embodied solely in hardware, solely in software or firmware, or in a combination of the two, as is desired for the particular application and the related throughput and costs associated therewith.
  • a central processing unit 100 controls operation of the packet forwarding apparatus 102 and initially receives user input data, typically from a keyboard input device 104 (although other input devices can be employed) to define the binary decision tree as indicated at 106 of the operational flow chart (FIG. 8).
  • the CPU begins operation and creates and stores a look-up table (corresponding to FIG. 4) in memory, which will be used to process incoming packets. This is indicated at 108.
  • the decision tree table is stored in a memory 110, which can be, and preferably is, RAM.
  • the system is then ready to receive, analyze and process, and forward incoming data packets.
  • the system waits, at 112, for a packet to be received.
  • the received packet is available in an input buffer 114, operating semi-autonomously under the control of the central processing unit 100.
  • the various keys available in the header are extracted and provided to a key storage memory 116. Packet storage and recovery of the header keys is indicated at 118 in FIG. 8.
  • the CPU examines the keys, determines typically a priori, whether the keys need to be segmented for proper processing, and, if they do, segmentation is effected at 120.
  • the CPU thereafter recalls an initial filter mask for this packet, which defines and limits the number of operations which can be performed on the packet (indicated at 122) and thereafter passes the segments, serially, through their respective binary trees, and obtains from each binary tree table both a filter mask word and user data.
  • the various filter mask words (32 bit words as noted in this illustrated embodiment of the invention), are AND'ed together with the initial filter mask, at 124, to achieve an overall processing for this data packet.
  • the CPU thereafter processes the data packet in the input buffer in accordance with the filter mask data and creates, in an output buffer 126, the output data packet, which will then be sent over the selected data communications path to a next node on the network. This is indicated at 128.
  • a next packet can be received and processed.
  • a different word length can be used without adversely affecting operation in accordance with the invention. Further, the word length need not correspond exactly to the operating width of either the filter mask, user data, keys or other aspects of the invention.

Abstract

A packet processing method and apparatus efficiently process a binary data packet based upon information contained in the header portion of the packet. The method and apparatus employ a binary tree search method for determining ranges of key elements of the packet and associating with each of the ranges a user supplied data and filter mask. The binary search process employs a unique binary tree storage structure which both conserves storage memory and enables efficient processing to reach a final node of the binary tree decision table. Nodes can be added or deleted from the table by the user as the data packet processing needs change.

Description

This is a continuation of application Ser. No. 07/908,248, filed Jul. 2, 1992, now abandoned.
The invention relates generally to the transmission, processing, and forwarding of data communications packets, and in particular, to the method and apparatus for processing the packets at an intermediate node during transmission from source to destination.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The process of transmitting data packets from a source to a destination typically requires at least one intermediate forwarding node. The equipment at the intermediate node, often called a router or a bridge, receives the data packet, examines or analyzes it, and forwards it on to a next node or destination on the network as is appropriate. The process of examining the packet typically employs table look-ups, and the process of demultiplexing the packet, and analyzing, filtering and forwarding the packet headers, requires a substantial amount of table look-up. Their frequency, and the overall computer processor time expended for those tasks, requires substantial processor capability. Accordingly, methods have been employed to reduce the CPU requirements, and, accordingly, improve throughput through the node and maintain effective costs.
It is therefore an object of this invention to provide a yet further improved throughput through a router or bridge, and simultaneously reduce the need for CPU processor time while maintaining memory requirements and other hardware needs at a minimum. Other objects of the invention include high reliability, the capability of handling complex packet headers, and effectively providing filtering results simultaneously with the destination address determination.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The invention relates to a method and apparatus for processing binary data packets which have an information containing portion and a data containing portion. The method features the steps of creating and storing at least one binary tree decision table which has a plurality of non-final nodes and a plurality of final nodes. The table represents a binary decision tree structure. The method further features the steps of processing the information containing portion of the data packet to be processed using the binary tree table for determining the processing to be used for the packet, and thereafter processing the packet in accordance with the processing results just obtained.
The apparatus and method of the invention are particularly advantageous in using the binary tree search for determining whether a particular key value is contained in a predefined range of data values previously input by the user. If a key included in the information containing portion of the packet falls within a predefined range, the search algorithm provides user data and filter mask data for use by the packet processing system. The use of the user supplied data does not require a priori knowledge of where in the range the key value is positioned and the binary tree search method similarly does not attempt to provide an exact match to the key value (except in the special instance where the range contains only one value). Accordingly, as is well known in the art, many key values to be searched in a data packet header need only be associated with a contiguous range of data and the described binary tree search method and apparatus uniquely provides in an efficient manner the "imprecise" match of the key value to the range and thereafter associates with that key value the designated user data and filter mask information previously provided to the system.
In particular embodiments of the invention, the creating and storing step features the steps of dividing a storage table or memory into a numbered sequence of subarrays, ordering the binary tree structure in a dependency order of numbered tree nodes, and storing left and right node children of a node numbered "n", and stored at subarray "n", at subarrays "2n" and "2n+1" corresponding to nodes "2n" and "2n+1", respectively. In order to achieve better and more balanced processing, the method further features the steps of assigning a weight to each node which is equal to sum of the weights of each of its child nodes "+1", and thereafter balancing the binary tree structure whenever the weights associated with two child nodes of a common parent node differ by more than one.
The packet processing method further features the ability to add and delete nodes from an existing binary tree structure by modifying the binary tree decision table. The method further features, in a particular embodiment of the invention, processing the incoming information containing portion of a packet by deciding, for each non-final node, whether a selected subset of the portion is greater than a predetermined node threshold value and thereafter proceeding to one of the lower order right child node or left child node depending on the relative values of the subset and the threshold. The non-final subarrays thereby store threshold values, and each final subarray is reached by passing through a sequence of non-final nodes. The final node contains an information data portion and a filter mask containing portion. The described binary tree structure is particularly advantageous for searching for a range of values.
There will be times when the input information containing portion of the packet to be processed can be advantageously segmented into a plurality of information subset segments, thereby enabling the segments to be processed separately. Accordingly, the invention further features segmenting the input information containing portion into a plurality of information subset segments, processing the segments to determine a filter mask for each segment, and AND'ing the results of each filter mask with an initial filter mask to determine the final filter processing for the data packet. In those instances where a segment has a length greater than the operating word length associated with the process, the invention features dividing each segment (or the entire information containing portion) into a plurality of subsegments, processing each subsegment through the binary tree structure as noted above, and AND'ing the filter mask results for the subsegments to achieve a final filter mask instruction.
The apparatus of the invention, implements the method described above, and typically features circuitry for creating and storing at least one binary tree decision table having a plurality of non-final nodes and a plurality of final nodes. As before, the table represents a binary decision tree structure. The apparatus further features circuitry for processing the information containing portion of the data packet, segmenting it if necessary, using the binary tree table for determining the processing to be used for the packet. The packet is then processed in accordance with those processing results. Where necessary, circuitry is further provided for efficiently storing the binary tree table, balancing the table as necessary, adding and deleting nodes, passing through the binary tree in an ordered fashion using the threshold values stored in, in association with each node, the memory subarray, and segmenting the information containing portions either due to length of the portion or the separation of related information, into subsegments of the information containing portion, which subsegments are then serially processed.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Other objects, features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following description taken together with the drawings in which:
FIG. 1 is an illustrative network including source/destination and analyzing/forwarding nodes of a typical network;
FIG. 2 illustrates the structure of a typical data packet to be analyzed and operated upon in accordance with the invention;
FIG. 3 illustrates a decision tree structure in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 4 illustrates a memory structure accordance for storing and implementing the binary tree structure of FIG. 3 in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 5 illustrates the deletion of a node from a binary tree structure;
FIG. 6 illustrates the insertion of a node in a decision tree structure;
FIG. 7 illustrates the balancing of a binary decision tree in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 8 is a flow chart illustrating operation of the analysis and filtering system in accordance with the preferred embodiment of the invention; and
FIG. 9 is a hardware configuration capable of implementing the preferred embodiment of the invention.
DESCRIPTION OF A PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
Referring to FIG. 1, a data communications network 10 can have a plurality of source, or destination, nodes 10a, 10b, . . . , 10n and a plurality of intermediate connecting or forwarding nodes 12a, 12b, . . . , 12m. The various nodes, whether they are source/destination nodes, or intermediate/forwarding nodes, are interconnected in various circuit patterns by interconnecting data links 14a, 14b, . . . , 14p. In this data transmission environment, therefore, a data packet sent, for example, from a (source) node 10a to a (destination) node 10d, can traverse a plurality of different paths 14, depending upon, for example, the availability of the paths, the cost of the various paths, the speed of the various paths, the operability of the paths, etc.
In accordance with the preferred embodiment of the invention, the data sent from a source node to a destination node, is transmitted in the form of a data packet 16. Referring to FIG. 2, a typical data packet 16 is transmitted by appending to the data portion 18 of the packet, a header portion 20, and adding at the end of the data packet, a trailer portion 22. The header portion can contain any of a number of different items of information, which, according to the protocol being employed, will appear in known positional locations within the header. The header information may include, for example, the address of the destination node, the address of the source node, a preferred path to take, instructions with regard to timing of the data and forwarding the data in accordance with various filtering operations. The trailer portion of the data packet may include, for example, a CRC check to insure accuracy and integrity of the data packet once it is received.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the invention, the header portion of the data packet is decoded so that the intermediate or forwarding node 12 has sufficient information to forward (or not forward) and otherwise process the data packet in an appropriate manner over the appropriate paths. For example, an intermediate or forwarding node 12b has the option of passing a data packet over path 14d or 14e when, for example, the destination is node 10d. The header information being provided can simplify that choice or provide a command which eliminates the ability of the node to "choose".
In accordance with the illustrated embodiment of the invention, the header information can be quite long, for example, over several hundred bits of data. Accordingly, the decoding process for the header can be either long or tedious, or both, and can take substantial CPU time, which otherwise could be used for more "profitable" functions. In any case, the passage of the packet through the intermediate node can be accordingly delayed. In accordance with the present invention, a binary tree structure is employed to speed the data packet through the intermediate node 12 to its eventual destination. The binary tree structure operates, in a simple manner, to process and analyze the incoming data packet, filter it, and thereby, if appropriate, pass it on to a next node.
In accordance with the invention, therefore, a specialized and highly optimized table look-up service is provided for demultiplexing, forwarding, and filtering the data packet. The look-up table method implements, preferably in a software embodiment, an associative memory that stores the data identified by various "keys", such as the destination and source addresses, so that during a look-up operation, the information can be scanned until a match of the key being processed is obtained. While a linear search could be implemented, it is far too slow to be of practical use. In particular, since the keys which are to be supported can be of arbitrary length (but typically are contiguous), the linear search does not provide a practical solution. In addition, it is typical that a key has a range of values, each of which causes the same filtering operation(s) to take place.
Accordingly, in accordance with the preferred embodiment of the invention, a unique binary tree table is employed to effect the look-up service. In accordance with the illustrated preferred embodiment, key fields within the packets are defined using bit offsets from a convenient reference point, for example, the beginning of the packet. The header keys can have variable formats, for example, IP options, and additional reference points may be needed. The bit offsets are stored in the table where they can be referenced during the table search. The look-up table binary tree is uniquely adapted to searching for ranges of data, and to apply user supplied information to the entire range. In this manner, a key incorporating, for example, IP options, can be advantageously and quickly decoded and a range of values will provide a common, user-identified, result.
The look-up table can directly deal with at most only 32-bit contiguous keys in accordance with the illustrated embodiment of the invention. Smaller, that is, shorter length keys, are always preferably left adjusted and larger, but continguous keys are transparently divided or chopped into 32 bit fragments by system interface software routines. Non-contiguous keys, which are useful for performing arbitrary filtering, require a more intimate involvement with the application, that is, the look-up table must be segmented so that the first look-up stage processes one 32 bit key fragment or subfragment, and thereby results in a reference to a second stage look-up table, and so on. The final look-up result returns the user data supplied when the entry was installed in the table.
The left shifting of the shorter key lengths is equivalent to providing a range of values defined by the most significant bits of the left shifted key, with the lower order bits, the bits shifted into a 32 bit word, being in effect "don't care" bits. The described binary tree search is particularly adapted to searching for a range of values set up by the left shifted key in accordance with the invention.
There is, however, one problem with this approach. The second, third, and further levels of table will occupy exponentially growing space within the memory. Thus, for example, if a first level table has 1,000 entries pointing to 1,000 second level tables, each with 1,000 entries, it becomes clear that the process will not adequately work because the second and subsequent set of tables must be shared among many, and preferably all, entries in preceding level tables. The table sharing, however, loses information about earlier look-up results in the process. For example, if all first level entries pointed to the same second level table, the first level look-up entry would have only a one bit result: either the entry was found, in which case it would go to the second table or not, in which case the packet would be dropped. This is insufficient to implement any rational filter.
Thus, for a header made up of a plurality of key values 22a, 22b, 22c, which may correspond, for example, to source address, destination address, and protocol type, the system must decide how the packets will be processed. In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the invention, a binary tree table approach is employed, in which the decision process is reduced to "simple binary decisions" based upon the various keys 22 in the packet. A typical look-up binary tree structure is illustrated in FIG. 3, in which, starting from a root node 24, the tree structure emmanates. The binary tree structure provides that for each parent node, such as root node 24, there exists a left child node such as node 26 and a right child node, such as node 28. This procedure continues for the entire tree, so that, for the illustrated embodiment, further left and right child nodes are provided and labelled 30, 32, . . . , 52. In accordance with this embodiment, for each key of the header, the system makes binary decisions for determining, at the various nodes, whether a particular range of values, or a specific value (a range limited to one value) exists. The process thus provides for passing through various non-final nodes in the tree to a final node at which a selected range or value is determined to exist. Beyond this final node, there are no further nodes and the final node provides both a filter mask instruction word, as well as user data. The filter mask instruction word, in fact a filter mask, is a specification word, each bit of which is associated with a different operation. Thus, one bit may provide for dropping the packet and not passing it forward, while another bit will provide for a different action. The apparatus can thus, once the final node has been determined, take the filter mask and perform operations upon the packet data in accordance with the bits set therein.
The resulting "look-up table" thus provides for a method for determining whether a range of values, or a specific value (a range limited to one value) has been found and, when found, the filtering operation to be applied to that range of values. Accordingly, each non-final node thus represents, itself, a range of values, the left child node of which represents a lower portion of the range and the right child node represents the upper portion of the range. At the end of the search process, the user data and filter mask of the final node are thus applicable to all values in the range represented by the final node.
If the operation upon the packet is determined by a plurality of keys, rather than one key of the header, there can result a sequence of tree searches with a resulting sequence of filter mask values for determining operations upon the data packet. In this instance, each of the various masks can be advantageously and, in the preferred embodiment are, "AND'ed" together, so that only bits set for each and every filter mask will survive and be effective. In a properly constructed binary tree structure, the operations will not be self-contradicting.
The length of the filter mask is arbitrarily set at 32 bits, each of the bits being used for filtering in the illustrated embodiment. In fact, in other embodiments of the invention, the length of the mask is arbitrary, and one or more bits could be set aside, for example the 32nd bit of the mask could be reserved for normal forwarding.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, and to avoid using excessive memory, the binary tree table can be stored as a "look up table" as follows. First, as illustrated in FIG. 3, the nodes are numbered, in sequence, so that the root node is numbered "1" its children are numbered "2" and "3" for the left hand and right hand child, respectively, and each successive node in the tree, node n, is numbered so that its children are numbered 2n and 2n+1 for the left and right child nodes, respectively. In this manner, referring to FIG. 4, a unique and compact structure is provided for storing the binary tree look-up table. In its most general form, each of the "numbered" nodes, is represented with and associated with, a subarray of memory corresponding to its number in the sequence. In a particular embodiment of the invention, each subarray associated with a non-final node need only contain a threshold value, so that if the value of the key is greater than or equal to the threshold value, then the right child node is selected; otherwise, the left child node is selected. In this manner, a unique and simple memory structure is achieved to store the binary tree nodes.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, in order to achieve efficient operation, the tree is balanced wherein each final node of the tree is given a "weight" of "0" and each non-final node of the tree is given a weight equal to the sum of the weights of its right and left hand children, plus 1. Under these circumstances, if the weights of the children of any node differ by more than 1, the tree can be restructured so that the children of any node will no longer have a difference in the weight greater than 1. Such a rebalancing is illustrated in FIGS. 7A and 7B. Such balancing of the binary tree provides a particularly efficient table search function for any particular value of the key being examined. This efficiency results by a minimization of a number of overall average number of steps needed to search the value of the key, assuming the values have a uniform probability density distribution.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the invention, when the header portion is composed of a plurality of different keys, all of which can affect the filtering, if any, to be performed upon the data packet, the header keys can be separately selected, thus segmenting the header, and each of the keys can be processed through a separate binary tree structure to determine the filter mask appropriate to that key to be applied to the data packet. The resulting filter masks are AND'ed together to provide an overall filtering capability for processing that data packet. In addition, in accordance with the preferred embodiment of the invention, the resulting filter value is also AND'ed with a predetermined limited number of filter options, designated by a 32 bit preset filter word, which limits the number of filter operations which the user has designated as applying to that binary tree decoding process.
In addition, since the keys themselves, in this illustrated embodiment of the invention, are limited to a 32 bit value, the invention provides for segmenting, or subsegmenting any key or segmented portion of the header so that the various portions of the header are handled separately in 32 bit "chunks". For any portion of a header less than 32 bits in length, in accordance with a particular preferred embodiment of the invention, the remaining portion of the key is left shifted to the most significant portion of the 32 bit word representing the key subsegment. The results of each of the segmentation analyses in accordance with the invention are thereby AND'ed together to provide the resulting filter solution for analyzing and enabling processing of the packet.
Further, in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the invention, there is a provided a method for adding or deleting nodes from the tree structure of FIG. 3, and thereby reconfigure the memory configuration of FIG. 4. In accordance with this aspect of the apparatus, referring to FIG. 5, there are deleted nodes numbered 4, 9, 18 and 19. In accordance with the process of node deletion, the nondeleted child nodes of each deleted parent replace the parent in this structure and each of the child nodes of the now new "parent" are renumbered in accordance with the invention. Thus, in FIG. 5, node 4 and its left hand children are deleted. In FIG. 5, the nomenclature used within the node defining circle is "node number: threshold value".
The addition of a node is illustrated in FIG. 6, in which a new node has been inserted, at node 4, due to the change in threshold value at node 4. In this example, therefore, previously "final" nodes 8 and 9 provide new threshold decision values.
The insertion of nodes typically results in the splitting of ranges (that is the addition of a new range boundary), whereas the deletion of nodes typically represents the combining of two or more existing ranges and hence then elimination of one (or more) range boundaries (that is, the merger of smaller ranges). The particular examples of FIGS. 5 and 6 also illustrate the use of a special threshold values, "0" in the examples, to denote a final node.
Referring to FIGS. 7A and 7B, there is illustrated a typical balancing rearrangement, in which, in FIG. 7A, the tree is "too heavy" on the left branch of node 1 and, accordingly, is "rebalanced" in FIG. 7B by moving some of the "weight" from the left hand side of the tree to the right hand side of the tree. Note that the two trees of FIGS. 7A and 7B are equivalent to each other, but that the weight associated with the child nodes is now "balanced".
Each final node of the tree also provides user data which can be employed as required for effecting user instructed operations. Typically, this will depend, at least in part, upon the filtering to be performed by the system.
Referring to FIG. 8, there is illustrated an overall flow chart illustrating total operation of the system of FIG. 9, in accordance with the illustrated embodiment of the invention.
Referring to FIGS. 8 and 9, the implementation of the invention is preferably performed in accordance with a hardware/software embodiment. As will be apparent to those skilled in the art, the various elements of the invention can be embodied solely in hardware, solely in software or firmware, or in a combination of the two, as is desired for the particular application and the related throughput and costs associated therewith.
In accordance with the illustrated embodiment, a central processing unit 100 controls operation of the packet forwarding apparatus 102 and initially receives user input data, typically from a keyboard input device 104 (although other input devices can be employed) to define the binary decision tree as indicated at 106 of the operational flow chart (FIG. 8). Once the binary decision tree (such as that of FIG. 3) has been defined, the CPU begins operation and creates and stores a look-up table (corresponding to FIG. 4) in memory, which will be used to process incoming packets. This is indicated at 108. The decision tree table is stored in a memory 110, which can be, and preferably is, RAM.
The system is then ready to receive, analyze and process, and forward incoming data packets. The system waits, at 112, for a packet to be received. The received packet is available in an input buffer 114, operating semi-autonomously under the control of the central processing unit 100. Under the control of the CPU, in this illustrated embodiment of the invention, the various keys available in the header, the locations of which are known beforehand by the CPU, are extracted and provided to a key storage memory 116. Packet storage and recovery of the header keys is indicated at 118 in FIG. 8.
The CPU examines the keys, determines typically a priori, whether the keys need to be segmented for proper processing, and, if they do, segmentation is effected at 120. The CPU thereafter recalls an initial filter mask for this packet, which defines and limits the number of operations which can be performed on the packet (indicated at 122) and thereafter passes the segments, serially, through their respective binary trees, and obtains from each binary tree table both a filter mask word and user data. The various filter mask words (32 bit words as noted in this illustrated embodiment of the invention), are AND'ed together with the initial filter mask, at 124, to achieve an overall processing for this data packet. The CPU thereafter processes the data packet in the input buffer in accordance with the filter mask data and creates, in an output buffer 126, the output data packet, which will then be sent over the selected data communications path to a next node on the network. This is indicated at 128. When the processing is complete, as indicated at 130, a next packet can be received and processed.
In this manner, a highly effective throughput and processing of input data packets can be achieved in accordance with the invention, by using the simple concept of binary tree searching with the particular memory saving features and data packet processing concepts embodied in the method and apparatus of the invention.
In other embodiments of the invention, a different word length can be used without adversely affecting operation in accordance with the invention. Further, the word length need not correspond exactly to the operating width of either the filter mask, user data, keys or other aspects of the invention.
Additions, subtractions, and other modifications of the described embodiments of the invention will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the field and are within the scope of the following claims.

Claims (24)

What is claimed is:
1. A method for processing a data communications binary data packet for forwarding said packet to a next destination within a data communications network, said packet including a data portion and an information containing portion having keys, each key having a data value, comprising the steps of
segmenting said information containing portion into a plurality of information subset segments, each segment associated with at least one of said keys,
creating and storing a binary tree decision table associated with each of said segments, each of said binary tree decision tables having a plurality of non-final nodes, and a plurality of final nodes, each of the tables representing a binary decision tree structure,
processing each of said information subset segments using the associated binary tree decision tables to determine a filter mask for each segment,
combining the results of each filter mask to provide a final filter mask for determining data processing to be used for said packet for filtering and forwarding said packet to a next destination on the basis of the data values of the keys being within preselected ranges of data values, and
processing said packet in accordance with the processing results using said final filter mask.
2. The packet processing method of claim 1 wherein said table creating and storing step comprises the steps of
dividing a table storage into a numbered sequence of subarrays for each table,
ordering each of the binary decision tree structures in a dependency order of numbered nodes, and
storing a left and a right node child of a node "n", stored at subarray "n", at subarrays "2n" and "2n+1".
3. The packet processing method of claim 2 further comprising the step of
balancing each of the binary tree structures prior to said ordering step.
4. The packet processing method of claim 3 further comprising the steps of
adding nodes to an existing binary tree structure by modifying the associated binary tree decision table, and
deleting nodes from an existing binary tree structure by modifying the associated binary tree decision table.
5. The packet processing method of claim 2 further comprising the steps of
assigning a weight to each node equal to the sum of the weights of each of its child nodes plus one, and
balancing each of the binary tree structures whenever the weights associated with two child nodes of a common node differ by more than 1.
6. The packet processing method of claim 2 wherein each said subarray is associated with each of said non-final and final nodes, each subarray associated with a non-final node storing a bit offset value and a predetermined node threshold value, and each final subarray of said tree nodes, associated with a final node, is designated by passing through a sequence of non-final nodes.
7. The packet processing method of claim 6 wherein each final node has a predetermined node threshold value.
8. The packet processing method of claim 7 wherein said predetermined node threshold value is zero.
9. The packet processing method of claim 2 wherein each tree structure has at least one final subarray and each said final subarray contains said information data portion and said filter mask containing portion.
10. The packet processing method of claim 9 wherein said plurality of information subset segments are processed serially to determine a filter mask for each segment, and
said final filter mask is AND'ed with an initial filter mask.
11. The packet processing method of claim 1 wherein said segmenting step further comprises the step of
dividing each segment having a bit length greater than an operating word length into a plurality of subsegments, and
processing said subsegments through said binary tree structure.
12. The packet processing method of claim 1 wherein said first processing step comprises the steps of
deciding, for each non-final node, whether a data value of a selected key of said information containing portion is within a range of data values defined by a bit offset value referenced from a predetermined node associated threshold value associated with each non-final node, and
proceeding to one of a lower order right child node and a lower order left child node depending upon the relative values of said data value and said range of data values.
13. An apparatus for processing a data communications binary data packet for forwarding said packet to a next destination within a data communications network, said packet including an information containing portion having keys, each key having a data value, comprising:
means for segmenting said information containing portion into a plurality of information subset segments, each segment associated with at least one of said keys,
means for creating and storing a binary tree decision table associated with each of said segments, each of said binary tree decision tables having a plurality of non-final nodes, and a plurality of final nodes, each of the tables representing a binary decision tree structure,
means for processing each of said information subset segments using the associated binary tree decision tables to determine a filter mask for each segment,
means for combining the results of each filter mask to provide a final filter mask for determining the data processing to be used for said packet for filtering and forwarding said packet onto a next destination on the basis of the data values of the keys being within preselected ranges of data values, and
means for processing said packet in accordance with the processing results using said final filter mask.
14. The packet processing apparatus of claim 13 wherein said table creating and storing means comprises
means for dividing a table storage into a numbered sequence of subarrays for each table,
means for ordering each of the binary tree structures in a dependency order of numbered nodes, and
means for storing a left and a right node child of a node "n", stored at subarray "n", at subarrays "2n" and "2n+1".
15. The packet processing apparatus of claim 14 further comprising
means for balancing each of the binary tree structures prior to said ordering.
16. The packet processing apparatus of claim 15 further comprising
means for adding nodes to an existing binary tree structure by modifying the associated binary tree decision table, and
means for deleting nodes from an existing binary tree structure by modifying the associated binary tree decision table.
17. The packet processing apparatus of claim 14 further comprising
means for assigning a weight to each node equal to the sum of the weights of each of its child nodes plus one, and
means for balancing each of the binary tree structures whenever the weights associated with two child nodes of a parent node differ by more than 1.
18. The packet processing method of claim 14 wherein each said subarray is associated with each of said non-final and final nodes, each subarray associated with a non-final node storing a bit offset value and a predetermined node threshold value, and each final subarray of said tree nodes, associated with a final node, is designated by passing through a sequence of non-final nodes.
19. The packet processing apparatus of claim 18 wherein each said final node stores a predetermined node threshold value.
20. The packet processing apparatus of claim 19 wherein said predetermined node threshold value is zero.
21. The packet processing apparatus of claim 14 wherein each tree structure has at least one final subarray and each said final subarray contains said information data portion and said filter mask containing portion.
22. The packet processing apparatus of claim 21 wherein said information subset segments are processed serially to determine a filter mask for each segment, and
said means for combining the results of each filter mask comprises means for AND'ing the results of each filter mask with an initial filter mask.
23. The packet processing apparatus of claim 22 wherein said segmenting means further comprises
means for dividing each segment having a bit length greater than an operating word length into a plurality of subsegments, and
means for processing said subsegments through said binary tree structure.
24. The packet processing apparatus of claim 13 wherein said first processing means comprises
means for deciding, for each non-final node, whether a data value of a selected key of said information containing portion is within a range of data values defined by a bit offset value referenced from a predetermined node associated threshold value associated with each non-final node, and
means for proceeding to one of a lower order right child node and a lower order left child node depending upon the relative values of said data value and said range of data values.
US08/396,374 1992-07-02 1995-02-28 System for segmenting data packets to form binary decision trees which determine filter masks combined to filter the packets for forwarding Expired - Lifetime US5463777A (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US08/396,374 US5463777A (en) 1992-07-02 1995-02-28 System for segmenting data packets to form binary decision trees which determine filter masks combined to filter the packets for forwarding
US08/550,525 US5574910A (en) 1992-07-02 1995-10-30 Method for segmenting data packets to form binary decision trees which determine filter masks combined to filter the packets for forwarding

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US90824892A 1992-07-02 1992-07-02
US08/396,374 US5463777A (en) 1992-07-02 1995-02-28 System for segmenting data packets to form binary decision trees which determine filter masks combined to filter the packets for forwarding

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US90824892A Continuation 1992-07-02 1992-07-02

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US08/550,525 Continuation US5574910A (en) 1992-07-02 1995-10-30 Method for segmenting data packets to form binary decision trees which determine filter masks combined to filter the packets for forwarding

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US5463777A true US5463777A (en) 1995-10-31

Family

ID=25425443

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US08/396,374 Expired - Lifetime US5463777A (en) 1992-07-02 1995-02-28 System for segmenting data packets to form binary decision trees which determine filter masks combined to filter the packets for forwarding
US08/550,525 Expired - Fee Related US5574910A (en) 1992-07-02 1995-10-30 Method for segmenting data packets to form binary decision trees which determine filter masks combined to filter the packets for forwarding

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US08/550,525 Expired - Fee Related US5574910A (en) 1992-07-02 1995-10-30 Method for segmenting data packets to form binary decision trees which determine filter masks combined to filter the packets for forwarding

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (2) US5463777A (en)
AU (1) AU4661793A (en)
WO (1) WO1994001828A1 (en)

Cited By (86)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5566176A (en) * 1994-07-07 1996-10-15 Lg Industrial Systems Co., Ltd. Parameter setting method for PLC communication system
US5574910A (en) * 1992-07-02 1996-11-12 Bay Networks, Inc. Method for segmenting data packets to form binary decision trees which determine filter masks combined to filter the packets for forwarding
US5761424A (en) * 1995-12-29 1998-06-02 Symbios, Inc. Method and apparatus for programmable filtration and generation of information in packetized communication systems
US5809254A (en) * 1993-06-24 1998-09-15 Nec Corporation Data communication mechanism capable of producing data packet having optimal segment size in communication system
US5813001A (en) * 1993-10-22 1998-09-22 Nodel Corporation Method for performing optimized intelligent searches of knowledge bases using submaps associated with search objects
US5835727A (en) * 1996-12-09 1998-11-10 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Method and apparatus for controlling access to services within a computer network
US5848233A (en) * 1996-12-09 1998-12-08 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Method and apparatus for dynamic packet filter assignment
US5917821A (en) * 1993-12-24 1999-06-29 Newbridge Networks Corporation Look-up engine for packet-based network
EP0948214A2 (en) * 1998-04-03 1999-10-06 Nds Limited Method and apparatus for detecting a start code in a bitstream
US5970064A (en) * 1997-06-12 1999-10-19 Northern Telecom Limited Real time control architecture for admission control in communications network
WO1999059303A2 (en) * 1998-05-14 1999-11-18 Telia Ab (Publ) A communications network or an ip-network which incorporates a packet classifier
US6128712A (en) * 1997-01-31 2000-10-03 Macromedia, Inc. Method and apparatus for improving playback of interactive multimedia works
US6275861B1 (en) * 1996-09-27 2001-08-14 Pmc-Sierra, Inc. Method and apparatus to identify flows in data systems
US6298340B1 (en) 1999-05-14 2001-10-02 International Business Machines Corporation System and method and computer program for filtering using tree structure
GB2365666A (en) * 2000-03-31 2002-02-20 Ibm Controlling data packet transmission through a computer system by means of filter rules
US6381227B1 (en) * 1993-06-17 2002-04-30 Gilat Florida Inc. Frame relay protocol-based multiplex switching scheme for satellite mesh network
US20020075874A1 (en) * 2000-12-15 2002-06-20 Takahiro Yamashita Datagram transmission device
US20020097719A1 (en) * 2000-12-01 2002-07-25 Chaskar Hemant M. Method and apparatus for traffic shaping for IP router queues/egress
US6457001B1 (en) * 1998-03-26 2002-09-24 Kawasaki Microelectronics, Inc. Method and apparatus for data retrieval
US20020198981A1 (en) * 2001-06-22 2002-12-26 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for exploiting likelihood in filter rule enforcement
US20030009474A1 (en) * 2001-07-05 2003-01-09 Hyland Kevin J. Binary search trees and methods for establishing and operating them
US20030018693A1 (en) * 2001-07-18 2003-01-23 P-Cube Ltd. Method and apparatus for set intersection rule matching
US6553002B1 (en) * 1997-08-29 2003-04-22 Ascend Communications, Inc. Apparatus and method for routing data packets through a communications network
US20030118046A1 (en) * 2001-06-13 2003-06-26 Interdigital Technology Corporation User equipment with binary-tree multiplexing scheduling
US20030120621A1 (en) * 2001-12-21 2003-06-26 Mcdaniel Betty A. Method of improving the lookup performance of tree-type knowledge base searches
US20030204584A1 (en) * 2002-04-26 2003-10-30 P-Cube Ltd. Apparatus and method for pattern matching in text based protocol
US6691168B1 (en) * 1998-12-31 2004-02-10 Pmc-Sierra Method and apparatus for high-speed network rule processing
US20040117596A1 (en) * 2002-12-11 2004-06-17 Henry Russell J. Method and apparatus for performing a high speed binary search in time critical environments
US6771617B1 (en) 1993-06-17 2004-08-03 Gilat Satellite Networks, Ltd. Frame relay protocol-based multiplex switching scheme for satellite mesh network
US20040267692A1 (en) * 2003-06-27 2004-12-30 Emulex Corporation Sparse and non-sparse data management method and system
US6879596B1 (en) 2001-04-11 2005-04-12 Applied Micro Circuits Corporation System and method for systolic array sorting of information segments
US20060206513A1 (en) * 2005-03-08 2006-09-14 International Business Machines Corporation Method for speed-efficient and memory-efficient construction of a trie
US20070160052A1 (en) * 2006-01-06 2007-07-12 Fujitsu Limited Packet processing apparatus and method
US20080259933A1 (en) * 2003-07-08 2008-10-23 Masakuni Okada Path Controller, Path Control Method, and Program Therefor
US20090268740A1 (en) * 1996-12-16 2009-10-29 Juniper Networks, Inc. Memory organization in a switching device
US7668095B2 (en) 1997-07-03 2010-02-23 At&T Corp. Traffic management for frame relay switched data service
US7668168B2 (en) 1997-07-03 2010-02-23 At&T Corp. Frame relay switched data service
US7899821B1 (en) 2005-04-29 2011-03-01 Karl Schiffmann Manipulation and/or analysis of hierarchical data
US8037102B2 (en) 2004-02-09 2011-10-11 Robert T. and Virginia T. Jenkins Manipulating sets of hierarchical data
US8111697B1 (en) 2008-12-31 2012-02-07 Juniper Networks, Inc. Methods and apparatus for packet classification based on multiple conditions
US8139591B1 (en) * 2008-09-30 2012-03-20 Juniper Networks, Inc. Methods and apparatus for range matching during packet classification based on a linked-node structure
US8144596B2 (en) * 2007-11-25 2012-03-27 Trilliant Networks, Inc. Communication and message route optimization and messaging in a mesh network
US8171364B2 (en) 2007-11-25 2012-05-01 Trilliant Networks, Inc. System and method for power outage and restoration notification in an advanced metering infrastructure network
US8289182B2 (en) 2008-11-21 2012-10-16 Trilliant Networks, Inc. Methods and systems for virtual energy management display
US8316059B1 (en) 2004-12-30 2012-11-20 Robert T. and Virginia T. Jenkins Enumeration of rooted partial subtrees
US8319658B2 (en) 2009-03-11 2012-11-27 Trilliant Networks, Inc. Process, device and system for mapping transformers to meters and locating non-technical line losses
US8334787B2 (en) 2007-10-25 2012-12-18 Trilliant Networks, Inc. Gas meter having ultra-sensitive magnetic material retrofitted onto meter dial and method for performing meter retrofit
US8443339B2 (en) 2005-02-28 2013-05-14 Robert T. and Virginia T. Jenkins Method and/or system for transforming between trees and strings
US8499030B1 (en) 1994-05-31 2013-07-30 Intellectual Ventures I Llc Software and method that enables selection of one of a plurality of network communications service providers
US8571034B2 (en) 2008-09-30 2013-10-29 Juniper Networks, Inc. Methods and apparatus related to packet classification associated with a multi-stage switch
US8606314B2 (en) 2002-05-23 2013-12-10 Wounder Gmbh., Llc Portable communications device and method
US8612461B2 (en) 2004-11-30 2013-12-17 Robert T. and Virginia T. Jenkins Enumeration of trees from finite number of nodes
US8615530B1 (en) 2005-01-31 2013-12-24 Robert T. and Virginia T. Jenkins as Trustees for the Jenkins Family Trust Method and/or system for tree transformation
US8626777B2 (en) 2004-10-29 2014-01-07 Robert T. Jenkins Method and/or system for manipulating tree expressions
US8675648B1 (en) 2008-09-30 2014-03-18 Juniper Networks, Inc. Methods and apparatus for compression in packet classification
US8699377B2 (en) 2008-09-04 2014-04-15 Trilliant Networks, Inc. System and method for implementing mesh network communications using a mesh network protocol
US8725274B2 (en) 2007-11-25 2014-05-13 Trilliant Networks, Inc. Energy use control system and method
US20140188875A1 (en) * 2011-05-10 2014-07-03 Tao Hong Method for measuring coefficient of contacts of online social network
US8798057B1 (en) 2008-09-30 2014-08-05 Juniper Networks, Inc. Methods and apparatus to implement except condition during data packet classification
US8804950B1 (en) 2008-09-30 2014-08-12 Juniper Networks, Inc. Methods and apparatus for producing a hash value based on a hash function
US8832428B2 (en) 2010-11-15 2014-09-09 Trilliant Holdings Inc. System and method for securely communicating across multiple networks using a single radio
US8856323B2 (en) 2011-02-10 2014-10-07 Trilliant Holdings, Inc. Device and method for facilitating secure communications over a cellular network
US8970394B2 (en) 2011-01-25 2015-03-03 Trilliant Holdings Inc. Aggregated real-time power outages/restoration reporting (RTPOR) in a secure mesh network
US9001787B1 (en) 2011-09-20 2015-04-07 Trilliant Networks Inc. System and method for implementing handover of a hybrid communications module
US9013173B2 (en) 2010-09-13 2015-04-21 Trilliant Networks, Inc. Process for detecting energy theft
US9020961B2 (en) 2005-03-31 2015-04-28 Robert T. and Virginia T. Jenkins Method or system for transforming between trees and arrays
US9041349B2 (en) 2011-03-08 2015-05-26 Trilliant Networks, Inc. System and method for managing load distribution across a power grid
US9077515B2 (en) 2004-11-30 2015-07-07 Robert T. and Virginia T. Jenkins Method and/or system for transmitting and/or receiving data
US9084120B2 (en) 2010-08-27 2015-07-14 Trilliant Networks Inc. System and method for interference free operation of co-located transceivers
US9137340B2 (en) 2011-08-02 2015-09-15 Cavium, Inc. Incremental update
US9183244B2 (en) 2011-08-02 2015-11-10 Cavium, Inc. Rule modification in decision trees
US9195939B1 (en) * 2013-03-15 2015-11-24 Cavium, Inc. Scope in decision trees
US9208438B2 (en) 2011-08-02 2015-12-08 Cavium, Inc. Duplication in decision trees
US9275336B2 (en) 2013-12-31 2016-03-01 Cavium, Inc. Method and system for skipping over group(s) of rules based on skip group rule
US9282383B2 (en) 2011-01-14 2016-03-08 Trilliant Incorporated Process, device and system for volt/VAR optimization
US9430511B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2016-08-30 Cavium, Inc. Merging independent writes, separating dependent and independent writes, and error roll back
US9544402B2 (en) 2013-12-31 2017-01-10 Cavium, Inc. Multi-rule approach to encoding a group of rules
US9595003B1 (en) 2013-03-15 2017-03-14 Cavium, Inc. Compiler with mask nodes
US9646107B2 (en) * 2004-05-28 2017-05-09 Robert T. and Virginia T. Jenkins as Trustee of the Jenkins Family Trust Method and/or system for simplifying tree expressions such as for query reduction
US9667446B2 (en) 2014-01-08 2017-05-30 Cavium, Inc. Condition code approach for comparing rule and packet data that are provided in portions
US10083200B2 (en) 2013-03-14 2018-09-25 Cavium, Inc. Batch incremental update
US10229139B2 (en) 2011-08-02 2019-03-12 Cavium, Llc Incremental update heuristics
US10333696B2 (en) 2015-01-12 2019-06-25 X-Prime, Inc. Systems and methods for implementing an efficient, scalable homomorphic transformation of encrypted data with minimal data expansion and improved processing efficiency
US10380089B2 (en) 2004-10-29 2019-08-13 Robert T. and Virginia T. Jenkins Method and/or system for tagging trees
US10489449B2 (en) 2002-05-23 2019-11-26 Gula Consulting Limited Liability Company Computer accepting voice input and/or generating audible output
US10803126B1 (en) 2005-01-13 2020-10-13 Robert T. and Virginia T. Jenkins Method and/or system for sorting digital signal information

Families Citing this family (58)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5509006A (en) * 1994-04-18 1996-04-16 Cisco Systems Incorporated Apparatus and method for switching packets using tree memory
US5519704A (en) * 1994-04-21 1996-05-21 Cisco Systems, Inc. Reliable transport protocol for internetwork routing
US5778371A (en) * 1994-09-13 1998-07-07 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Code string processing system and method using intervals
US6058429A (en) * 1995-12-08 2000-05-02 Nortel Networks Corporation Method and apparatus for forwarding traffic between locality attached networks using level 3 addressing information
US5884297A (en) * 1996-01-30 1999-03-16 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ.) System and method for maintaining a table in content addressable memory using hole algorithms
WO1997041674A2 (en) * 1996-04-30 1997-11-06 3Com Corporation Packet filtering based on socket or application identification
DE19629765A1 (en) * 1996-07-23 1998-01-29 Siemens Ag Address reduction method in ATM switching systems
US6157641A (en) 1997-08-22 2000-12-05 Cisco Technology, Inc. Multiprotocol packet recognition and switching
US6061679A (en) * 1997-11-25 2000-05-09 International Business Machines Corporation Creating and searching a data structure ordered by ranges of key masks associated with the data structure
US6418450B2 (en) 1998-01-26 2002-07-09 International Business Machines Corporation Data warehouse programs architecture
US7028043B2 (en) 1998-04-10 2006-04-11 International Business Machines Corporation Creation of customized trees
DE69829645T2 (en) 1998-05-01 2006-03-09 Hewlett-Packard Development Co., L.P., Houston Method for changing dynamic decision trees
US6430196B1 (en) 1998-05-01 2002-08-06 Cisco Technology, Inc. Transmitting delay sensitive information over IP over frame relay
EP0954140B1 (en) * 1998-05-01 2003-10-29 Hewlett-Packard Company, A Delaware Corporation Method of managing dynamic decision trees
US6167047A (en) * 1998-05-18 2000-12-26 Solidum Systems Corp. Packet classification state machine
DE19833931C2 (en) * 1998-07-28 2000-06-15 Siemens Ag Method for transmitting data packets to several recipients in a heterogeneous communication network
US7133400B1 (en) * 1998-08-07 2006-11-07 Intel Corporation System and method for filtering data
US7333484B2 (en) 1998-08-07 2008-02-19 Intel Corporation Services processor having a packet editing unit
US6253195B1 (en) * 1998-09-21 2001-06-26 Microsoft Corporation Optimized query tree
US6771642B1 (en) 1999-01-08 2004-08-03 Cisco Technology, Inc. Method and apparatus for scheduling packets in a packet switch
US6721842B2 (en) 1999-01-29 2004-04-13 Intel Corporation Boundary addressable memory
US6651096B1 (en) * 1999-04-20 2003-11-18 Cisco Technology, Inc. Method and apparatus for organizing, storing and evaluating access control lists
JP4817502B2 (en) * 1999-04-23 2011-11-16 オラクル・インターナショナル・コーポレイション System and method for generating a decision tree
US7197504B1 (en) 1999-04-23 2007-03-27 Oracle International Corporation System and method for generating decision trees
US7249149B1 (en) 1999-08-10 2007-07-24 Washington University Tree bitmap data structures and their use in performing lookup operations
US6687247B1 (en) * 1999-10-27 2004-02-03 Cisco Technology, Inc. Architecture for high speed class of service enabled linecard
EP1098491A3 (en) * 1999-11-08 2002-12-18 Agilent Technologies, Inc. (a Delaware corporation) System and method for identifying related protocol data units
US6539394B1 (en) * 2000-01-04 2003-03-25 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for performing interval-based testing of filter rules
US6473763B1 (en) * 2000-03-31 2002-10-29 International Business Machines Corporation System, method and computer program for filtering multi-action rule set
US6484171B1 (en) 2000-03-31 2002-11-19 International Business Machines Corporation System method and computer program for prioritizing filter rules
US7200684B1 (en) * 2000-04-13 2007-04-03 International Business Machines Corporation Network data packet classification and demultiplexing
EP1158431A3 (en) * 2000-05-22 2006-05-17 Broadcom Corporation Method and apparatus for performing a binary search on an expanded tree
US6826561B2 (en) 2000-05-22 2004-11-30 Broadcom Corporation Method and apparatus for performing a binary search on an expanded tree
US6850980B1 (en) 2000-06-16 2005-02-01 Cisco Technology, Inc. Content routing service protocol
US7149216B1 (en) 2000-09-05 2006-12-12 Cisco Technology, Inc. M-trie based packet processing
US20020089937A1 (en) * 2000-11-16 2002-07-11 Srinivasan Venkatachary Packet matching method and system
US7218632B1 (en) 2000-12-06 2007-05-15 Cisco Technology, Inc. Packet processing engine architecture
US7028098B2 (en) * 2001-07-20 2006-04-11 Nokia, Inc. Selective routing of data flows using a TCAM
US7257590B2 (en) * 2001-08-29 2007-08-14 Nokia Corporation Method and system for classifying binary strings
US7245620B2 (en) * 2002-03-15 2007-07-17 Broadcom Corporation Method and apparatus for filtering packet data in a network device
US7274698B2 (en) * 2002-03-15 2007-09-25 Broadcom Corporation Multilevel parser for conditional flow detection in a network device
US7508825B2 (en) * 2002-08-05 2009-03-24 Intel Corporation Data packet classification
GB2395395B (en) * 2002-11-15 2004-11-10 3Com Corp Classification search scheme and rules engine for network unit
GB2400940A (en) * 2003-03-25 2004-10-27 Clearing Corp Method and system for clearing trades
US7571156B1 (en) * 2003-03-28 2009-08-04 Netlogic Microsystems, Inc. Network device, storage medium and methods for incrementally updating a forwarding database
US7426518B2 (en) * 2003-03-28 2008-09-16 Netlogic Microsystems, Inc. System and method for efficiently searching a forwarding database that is split into a bounded number of sub-databases having a bounded size
US7415472B2 (en) * 2003-05-13 2008-08-19 Cisco Technology, Inc. Comparison tree data structures of particular use in performing lookup operations
US7415463B2 (en) * 2003-05-13 2008-08-19 Cisco Technology, Inc. Programming tree data structures and handling collisions while performing lookup operations
US8868790B2 (en) 2004-02-13 2014-10-21 Oracle International Corporation Processor-memory module performance acceleration in fabric-backplane enterprise servers
US7633955B1 (en) 2004-02-13 2009-12-15 Habanero Holdings, Inc. SCSI transport for fabric-backplane enterprise servers
US7953903B1 (en) 2004-02-13 2011-05-31 Habanero Holdings, Inc. Real time detection of changed resources for provisioning and management of fabric-backplane enterprise servers
US8234309B2 (en) * 2005-01-31 2012-07-31 International Business Machines Corporation Method for automatically modifying a tree structure
US7694068B1 (en) 2005-12-08 2010-04-06 Netlogic Microsystems, Inc. Re-entrant processing in a content addressable memory
US7904642B1 (en) 2007-02-08 2011-03-08 Netlogic Microsystems, Inc. Method for combining and storing access control lists
US20090028150A1 (en) * 2007-07-26 2009-01-29 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) Protocol-Independent Packet Header Analysis
FR2930861B1 (en) * 2008-05-05 2012-10-19 Groupe Des Ecoles De Telecommunications Get Ecole Nationale Superieure Des Telecommunications Enst METHOD FOR DECODING A SIGNAL USING A PROGRESSIVE CONSTRUCTION OF A DECODING TREE, CORRESPONDING COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT AND SIGNAL
US8438330B2 (en) 2010-05-17 2013-05-07 Netlogic Microsystems, Inc. Updating cam arrays using prefix length distribution prediction
US11176049B2 (en) * 2020-03-17 2021-11-16 Silicon Motion, Inc. Flash memory controller mechanism capable of generating host-based cache information or flash-memory-based cache information to build and optimize binary tree with fewer nodes when cache stores data from host

Citations (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4456957A (en) * 1981-09-28 1984-06-26 Ncr Corporation Apparatus using a decision table for routing data among terminals and a host system
US4593282A (en) * 1983-04-14 1986-06-03 At&T Information Systems Inc. Network protocol for integrating synchronous and asynchronous traffic on a common serial data bus
US4813038A (en) * 1987-06-29 1989-03-14 Bell Communications Research, Inc. Non-blocking copy network for multicast packet switching
US4924426A (en) * 1985-09-03 1990-05-08 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Apparatus with selection circuitry for distributing data blocks from external memory to processing units according to attribute data contained in each data block
US4987539A (en) * 1987-08-05 1991-01-22 Stanford University Apparatus and method for multidimensional characterization of objects in real time
US5130983A (en) * 1990-03-27 1992-07-14 Heffner Iii Horace W Method of polling to determine service needs and the like
US5249292A (en) * 1989-03-31 1993-09-28 Chiappa J Noel Data packet switch using a primary processing unit to designate one of a plurality of data stream control circuits to selectively handle the header processing of incoming packets in one data packet stream
US5271000A (en) * 1991-03-22 1993-12-14 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for testing and evaluation of distributed networks
US5276899A (en) * 1981-04-01 1994-01-04 Teredata Corporation Multi processor sorting network for sorting while transmitting concurrently presented messages by message content to deliver a highest priority message
US5327127A (en) * 1989-06-30 1994-07-05 Inmos Limited Message encoding which utilizes control codes and data codes

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
AU4661793A (en) * 1992-07-02 1994-01-31 Wellfleet Communications Data packet processing method and apparatus

Patent Citations (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5276899A (en) * 1981-04-01 1994-01-04 Teredata Corporation Multi processor sorting network for sorting while transmitting concurrently presented messages by message content to deliver a highest priority message
US4456957A (en) * 1981-09-28 1984-06-26 Ncr Corporation Apparatus using a decision table for routing data among terminals and a host system
US4593282A (en) * 1983-04-14 1986-06-03 At&T Information Systems Inc. Network protocol for integrating synchronous and asynchronous traffic on a common serial data bus
US4924426A (en) * 1985-09-03 1990-05-08 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Apparatus with selection circuitry for distributing data blocks from external memory to processing units according to attribute data contained in each data block
US4813038A (en) * 1987-06-29 1989-03-14 Bell Communications Research, Inc. Non-blocking copy network for multicast packet switching
US4987539A (en) * 1987-08-05 1991-01-22 Stanford University Apparatus and method for multidimensional characterization of objects in real time
US5249292A (en) * 1989-03-31 1993-09-28 Chiappa J Noel Data packet switch using a primary processing unit to designate one of a plurality of data stream control circuits to selectively handle the header processing of incoming packets in one data packet stream
US5327127A (en) * 1989-06-30 1994-07-05 Inmos Limited Message encoding which utilizes control codes and data codes
US5130983A (en) * 1990-03-27 1992-07-14 Heffner Iii Horace W Method of polling to determine service needs and the like
US5271000A (en) * 1991-03-22 1993-12-14 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for testing and evaluation of distributed networks

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Sedgewick, Algorithms, Addison Wesley, 1983, Table of Contents, pp. 127 140; 171 185; 187 200; 225 231. *
Sedgewick, Algorithms, Addison-Wesley, 1983, Table of Contents, pp. 127-140; 171-185; 187-200; 225-231.

Cited By (166)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5574910A (en) * 1992-07-02 1996-11-12 Bay Networks, Inc. Method for segmenting data packets to form binary decision trees which determine filter masks combined to filter the packets for forwarding
US8068472B2 (en) 1993-06-17 2011-11-29 Gilat Satellite Networks, Ltd Multiplex switching scheme for communications network
US6771617B1 (en) 1993-06-17 2004-08-03 Gilat Satellite Networks, Ltd. Frame relay protocol-based multiplex switching scheme for satellite mesh network
US6625130B2 (en) 1993-06-17 2003-09-23 Gilat Satellite Networks, Ltd. Frame relay protocol-based multiplex switching scheme for satellite mesh network
US6381227B1 (en) * 1993-06-17 2002-04-30 Gilat Florida Inc. Frame relay protocol-based multiplex switching scheme for satellite mesh network
US5809254A (en) * 1993-06-24 1998-09-15 Nec Corporation Data communication mechanism capable of producing data packet having optimal segment size in communication system
WO2000017780A1 (en) * 1993-10-22 2000-03-30 Obtek, L.L.C. Methods for searching a knowledge base
EP1032895A4 (en) * 1993-10-22 2006-06-14 Obtek L L C Methods for searching a knowledge base
US5813001A (en) * 1993-10-22 1998-09-22 Nodel Corporation Method for performing optimized intelligent searches of knowledge bases using submaps associated with search objects
EP1032895A1 (en) * 1993-10-22 2000-09-06 Obtek, L.L.C. Methods for searching a knowledge base
US5917821A (en) * 1993-12-24 1999-06-29 Newbridge Networks Corporation Look-up engine for packet-based network
US8719339B2 (en) 1994-05-31 2014-05-06 Intellectual Ventures I Llc Software and method that enables selection of one of a plurality of online service providers
US8635272B2 (en) 1994-05-31 2014-01-21 Intellectual Ventures I Llc Method for distributing a list of updated content to a user station from a distribution server wherein the user station may defer installing the update
US8499030B1 (en) 1994-05-31 2013-07-30 Intellectual Ventures I Llc Software and method that enables selection of one of a plurality of network communications service providers
US8812620B2 (en) 1994-05-31 2014-08-19 Intellectual Property I LLC Software and method that enables selection of one of a plurality of online service providers
US9111604B2 (en) 1994-05-31 2015-08-18 Intellectual Ventures I Llc Software and method that enables selection of on-line content from one of a plurality of network content service providers in a single action
US9484077B2 (en) 1994-05-31 2016-11-01 Intellectual Ventures I Llc Providing services from a remote computer system to a user station over a communications network
US9484078B2 (en) 1994-05-31 2016-11-01 Intellectual Ventures I Llc Providing services from a remote computer system to a user station over a communications network
US5566176A (en) * 1994-07-07 1996-10-15 Lg Industrial Systems Co., Ltd. Parameter setting method for PLC communication system
US5761424A (en) * 1995-12-29 1998-06-02 Symbios, Inc. Method and apparatus for programmable filtration and generation of information in packetized communication systems
US6275861B1 (en) * 1996-09-27 2001-08-14 Pmc-Sierra, Inc. Method and apparatus to identify flows in data systems
US5835727A (en) * 1996-12-09 1998-11-10 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Method and apparatus for controlling access to services within a computer network
US5848233A (en) * 1996-12-09 1998-12-08 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Method and apparatus for dynamic packet filter assignment
US8761180B2 (en) 1996-12-16 2014-06-24 Juniper Networks, Inc. Memory organization in a network device
US7903659B2 (en) * 1996-12-16 2011-03-08 Juniper Networks, Inc. Memory organization in a switching device
US8477784B2 (en) 1996-12-16 2013-07-02 Juniper Networks, Inc. Memory organization in a switching device
US20090268740A1 (en) * 1996-12-16 2009-10-29 Juniper Networks, Inc. Memory organization in a switching device
US6442658B1 (en) 1997-01-31 2002-08-27 Macromedia, Inc. Method and apparatus for improving playback of interactive multimedia works
US6128712A (en) * 1997-01-31 2000-10-03 Macromedia, Inc. Method and apparatus for improving playback of interactive multimedia works
US5970064A (en) * 1997-06-12 1999-10-19 Northern Telecom Limited Real time control architecture for admission control in communications network
US9276849B2 (en) 1997-07-03 2016-03-01 At&T Intellectual Property Ii, L.P. Frame relay switched data service
US7668168B2 (en) 1997-07-03 2010-02-23 At&T Corp. Frame relay switched data service
US8027257B2 (en) 1997-07-03 2011-09-27 At&T Intellectual Property Ii, L.P. Traffic management for frame relay switched data service
US8014286B2 (en) 1997-07-03 2011-09-06 At&T Intellectual Property Ii, L.P. Frame relay switched data service
US7668095B2 (en) 1997-07-03 2010-02-23 At&T Corp. Traffic management for frame relay switched data service
US8717896B2 (en) 1997-07-03 2014-05-06 At&T Intellectual Property Ii, L.P. Frame relay switched data service
US6553002B1 (en) * 1997-08-29 2003-04-22 Ascend Communications, Inc. Apparatus and method for routing data packets through a communications network
US6457001B1 (en) * 1998-03-26 2002-09-24 Kawasaki Microelectronics, Inc. Method and apparatus for data retrieval
EP0948214A2 (en) * 1998-04-03 1999-10-06 Nds Limited Method and apparatus for detecting a start code in a bitstream
EP0948214A3 (en) * 1998-04-03 2000-03-15 Nds Limited Method and apparatus for detecting a start code in a bitstream
WO1999059303A3 (en) * 1998-05-14 2000-03-09 Telia Ab A communications network or an ip-network which incorporates a packet classifier
WO1999059303A2 (en) * 1998-05-14 1999-11-18 Telia Ab (Publ) A communications network or an ip-network which incorporates a packet classifier
US6691168B1 (en) * 1998-12-31 2004-02-10 Pmc-Sierra Method and apparatus for high-speed network rule processing
US6298340B1 (en) 1999-05-14 2001-10-02 International Business Machines Corporation System and method and computer program for filtering using tree structure
US6529897B1 (en) 2000-03-31 2003-03-04 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for testing filter rules using caching and a tree structure
GB2365666A (en) * 2000-03-31 2002-02-20 Ibm Controlling data packet transmission through a computer system by means of filter rules
GB2365666B (en) * 2000-03-31 2004-02-11 Ibm Controlling data packet transmission through a computer system by means of filter rules
US20020097719A1 (en) * 2000-12-01 2002-07-25 Chaskar Hemant M. Method and apparatus for traffic shaping for IP router queues/egress
US6836475B2 (en) * 2000-12-01 2004-12-28 Nokia Corporation Method and apparatus for traffic shaping for IP router queues/egress
US20020075874A1 (en) * 2000-12-15 2002-06-20 Takahiro Yamashita Datagram transmission device
US6879596B1 (en) 2001-04-11 2005-04-12 Applied Micro Circuits Corporation System and method for systolic array sorting of information segments
US6904050B2 (en) * 2001-06-13 2005-06-07 Interdigital Technology Corporation User equipment with binary-tree multiplexing scheduling
US20030118046A1 (en) * 2001-06-13 2003-06-26 Interdigital Technology Corporation User equipment with binary-tree multiplexing scheduling
US20050201377A1 (en) * 2001-06-13 2005-09-15 Interdigital Technology Corporation Binary-tree multiplexing scheduling
US7499467B2 (en) 2001-06-13 2009-03-03 Interdigital Technology Corporation Binary-tree multiplexing scheduling
US20090141698A1 (en) * 2001-06-13 2009-06-04 Interdigital Technology Corporation Binary-tree multiplexing scheduling
US6947983B2 (en) * 2001-06-22 2005-09-20 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for exploiting likelihood in filter rule enforcement
US20020198981A1 (en) * 2001-06-22 2002-12-26 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for exploiting likelihood in filter rule enforcement
US20030009474A1 (en) * 2001-07-05 2003-01-09 Hyland Kevin J. Binary search trees and methods for establishing and operating them
US7027446B2 (en) 2001-07-18 2006-04-11 P-Cube Ltd. Method and apparatus for set intersection rule matching
US20030018693A1 (en) * 2001-07-18 2003-01-23 P-Cube Ltd. Method and apparatus for set intersection rule matching
US7246102B2 (en) * 2001-12-21 2007-07-17 Agere Systems Inc. Method of improving the lookup performance of three-type knowledge base searches
US20030120621A1 (en) * 2001-12-21 2003-06-26 Mcdaniel Betty A. Method of improving the lookup performance of tree-type knowledge base searches
US20030204584A1 (en) * 2002-04-26 2003-10-30 P-Cube Ltd. Apparatus and method for pattern matching in text based protocol
US7254632B2 (en) 2002-04-26 2007-08-07 P-Cube Ltd. Apparatus and method for pattern matching in text based protocol
US9858595B2 (en) 2002-05-23 2018-01-02 Gula Consulting Limited Liability Company Location-based transmissions using a mobile communication device
US10489449B2 (en) 2002-05-23 2019-11-26 Gula Consulting Limited Liability Company Computer accepting voice input and/or generating audible output
US8606314B2 (en) 2002-05-23 2013-12-10 Wounder Gmbh., Llc Portable communications device and method
US7035995B2 (en) * 2002-12-11 2006-04-25 Lsi Logic Corporation Method and apparatus for performing a high speed binary search in time critical environments
US20040117596A1 (en) * 2002-12-11 2004-06-17 Henry Russell J. Method and apparatus for performing a high speed binary search in time critical environments
WO2005006123A3 (en) * 2003-06-27 2005-03-10 Emulex Design & Mfg Corp Sparse and non-sparse data management method and system
US7010548B2 (en) * 2003-06-27 2006-03-07 Emulex Design & Manufacturing Corporation Sparse and non-sparse data management method and system
WO2005006123A2 (en) * 2003-06-27 2005-01-20 Emulex Design & Manufacturing Corporation Sparse and non-sparse data management method and system
US20040267692A1 (en) * 2003-06-27 2004-12-30 Emulex Corporation Sparse and non-sparse data management method and system
US7817582B2 (en) * 2003-07-08 2010-10-19 International Business Machines Corporation Path controller, path control method, and program therefor
US20080259933A1 (en) * 2003-07-08 2008-10-23 Masakuni Okada Path Controller, Path Control Method, and Program Therefor
US11204906B2 (en) 2004-02-09 2021-12-21 Robert T. And Virginia T. Jenkins As Trustees Of The Jenkins Family Trust Dated Feb. 8, 2002 Manipulating sets of hierarchical data
US10255311B2 (en) 2004-02-09 2019-04-09 Robert T. Jenkins Manipulating sets of hierarchical data
US9177003B2 (en) 2004-02-09 2015-11-03 Robert T. and Virginia T. Jenkins Manipulating sets of heirarchical data
US8037102B2 (en) 2004-02-09 2011-10-11 Robert T. and Virginia T. Jenkins Manipulating sets of hierarchical data
US10733234B2 (en) 2004-05-28 2020-08-04 Robert T. And Virginia T. Jenkins as Trustees of the Jenkins Family Trust Dated Feb. 8. 2002 Method and/or system for simplifying tree expressions, such as for pattern matching
US9646107B2 (en) * 2004-05-28 2017-05-09 Robert T. and Virginia T. Jenkins as Trustee of the Jenkins Family Trust Method and/or system for simplifying tree expressions such as for query reduction
US11314709B2 (en) 2004-10-29 2022-04-26 Robert T. and Virginia T. Jenkins Method and/or system for tagging trees
US10380089B2 (en) 2004-10-29 2019-08-13 Robert T. and Virginia T. Jenkins Method and/or system for tagging trees
US11314766B2 (en) 2004-10-29 2022-04-26 Robert T. and Virginia T. Jenkins Method and/or system for manipulating tree expressions
US9043347B2 (en) 2004-10-29 2015-05-26 Robert T. and Virginia T. Jenkins Method and/or system for manipulating tree expressions
US8626777B2 (en) 2004-10-29 2014-01-07 Robert T. Jenkins Method and/or system for manipulating tree expressions
US9430512B2 (en) 2004-10-29 2016-08-30 Robert T. and Virginia T. Jenkins Method and/or system for manipulating tree expressions
US10325031B2 (en) 2004-10-29 2019-06-18 Robert T. And Virginia T. Jenkins As Trustees Of The Jenkins Family Trust Dated Feb. 8, 2002 Method and/or system for manipulating tree expressions
US11615065B2 (en) 2004-11-30 2023-03-28 Lower48 Ip Llc Enumeration of trees from finite number of nodes
US9411841B2 (en) 2004-11-30 2016-08-09 Robert T. And Virginia T. Jenkins As Trustees Of The Jenkins Family Trust Dated Feb. 8, 2002 Enumeration of trees from finite number of nodes
US9077515B2 (en) 2004-11-30 2015-07-07 Robert T. and Virginia T. Jenkins Method and/or system for transmitting and/or receiving data
US10411878B2 (en) 2004-11-30 2019-09-10 Robert T. Jenkins Method and/or system for transmitting and/or receiving data
US9425951B2 (en) 2004-11-30 2016-08-23 Robert T. and Virginia T. Jenkins Method and/or system for transmitting and/or receiving data
US9842130B2 (en) 2004-11-30 2017-12-12 Robert T. And Virginia T. Jenkins As Trustees Of The Jenkins Family Trust Dated Feb. 8, 2002 Enumeration of trees from finite number of nodes
US11418315B2 (en) 2004-11-30 2022-08-16 Robert T. and Virginia T. Jenkins Method and/or system for transmitting and/or receiving data
US10725989B2 (en) 2004-11-30 2020-07-28 Robert T. Jenkins Enumeration of trees from finite number of nodes
US8612461B2 (en) 2004-11-30 2013-12-17 Robert T. and Virginia T. Jenkins Enumeration of trees from finite number of nodes
US9002862B2 (en) 2004-11-30 2015-04-07 Robert T. and Virginia T. Jenkins Enumeration of trees from finite number of nodes
US11281646B2 (en) 2004-12-30 2022-03-22 Robert T. and Virginia T. Jenkins Enumeration of rooted partial subtrees
US8316059B1 (en) 2004-12-30 2012-11-20 Robert T. and Virginia T. Jenkins Enumeration of rooted partial subtrees
US9330128B2 (en) 2004-12-30 2016-05-03 Robert T. and Virginia T. Jenkins Enumeration of rooted partial subtrees
US9646034B2 (en) 2004-12-30 2017-05-09 Robert T. and Virginia T. Jenkins Enumeration of rooted partial subtrees
US10803126B1 (en) 2005-01-13 2020-10-13 Robert T. and Virginia T. Jenkins Method and/or system for sorting digital signal information
US10068003B2 (en) 2005-01-31 2018-09-04 Robert T. and Virginia T. Jenkins Method and/or system for tree transformation
US11100137B2 (en) 2005-01-31 2021-08-24 Robert T. Jenkins Method and/or system for tree transformation
US11663238B2 (en) 2005-01-31 2023-05-30 Lower48 Ip Llc Method and/or system for tree transformation
US8615530B1 (en) 2005-01-31 2013-12-24 Robert T. and Virginia T. Jenkins as Trustees for the Jenkins Family Trust Method and/or system for tree transformation
US11243975B2 (en) 2005-02-28 2022-02-08 Robert T. and Virginia T. Jenkins Method and/or system for transforming between trees and strings
US9563653B2 (en) 2005-02-28 2017-02-07 Robert T. and Virginia T. Jenkins Method and/or system for transforming between trees and strings
US10140349B2 (en) 2005-02-28 2018-11-27 Robert T. Jenkins Method and/or system for transforming between trees and strings
US8443339B2 (en) 2005-02-28 2013-05-14 Robert T. and Virginia T. Jenkins Method and/or system for transforming between trees and strings
US10713274B2 (en) 2005-02-28 2020-07-14 Robert T. and Virginia T. Jenkins Method and/or system for transforming between trees and strings
US20060206513A1 (en) * 2005-03-08 2006-09-14 International Business Machines Corporation Method for speed-efficient and memory-efficient construction of a trie
US9020961B2 (en) 2005-03-31 2015-04-28 Robert T. and Virginia T. Jenkins Method or system for transforming between trees and arrays
US10394785B2 (en) 2005-03-31 2019-08-27 Robert T. and Virginia T. Jenkins Method and/or system for transforming between trees and arrays
US10055438B2 (en) 2005-04-29 2018-08-21 Robert T. and Virginia T. Jenkins Manipulation and/or analysis of hierarchical data
US7899821B1 (en) 2005-04-29 2011-03-01 Karl Schiffmann Manipulation and/or analysis of hierarchical data
US11194777B2 (en) 2005-04-29 2021-12-07 Robert T. And Virginia T. Jenkins As Trustees Of The Jenkins Family Trust Dated Feb. 8, 2002 Manipulation and/or analysis of hierarchical data
US11100070B2 (en) 2005-04-29 2021-08-24 Robert T. and Virginia T. Jenkins Manipulation and/or analysis of hierarchical data
US7664112B2 (en) * 2006-01-06 2010-02-16 Fujitsu Limited Packet processing apparatus and method
US20070160052A1 (en) * 2006-01-06 2007-07-12 Fujitsu Limited Packet processing apparatus and method
US8334787B2 (en) 2007-10-25 2012-12-18 Trilliant Networks, Inc. Gas meter having ultra-sensitive magnetic material retrofitted onto meter dial and method for performing meter retrofit
US8725274B2 (en) 2007-11-25 2014-05-13 Trilliant Networks, Inc. Energy use control system and method
US8144596B2 (en) * 2007-11-25 2012-03-27 Trilliant Networks, Inc. Communication and message route optimization and messaging in a mesh network
US8171364B2 (en) 2007-11-25 2012-05-01 Trilliant Networks, Inc. System and method for power outage and restoration notification in an advanced metering infrastructure network
US8370697B2 (en) 2007-11-25 2013-02-05 Trilliant Networks, Inc. System and method for power outage and restoration notification in an advanced metering infrastructure network
US9621457B2 (en) 2008-09-04 2017-04-11 Trilliant Networks, Inc. System and method for implementing mesh network communications using a mesh network protocol
US8699377B2 (en) 2008-09-04 2014-04-15 Trilliant Networks, Inc. System and method for implementing mesh network communications using a mesh network protocol
US8804950B1 (en) 2008-09-30 2014-08-12 Juniper Networks, Inc. Methods and apparatus for producing a hash value based on a hash function
US9413660B1 (en) 2008-09-30 2016-08-09 Juniper Networks, Inc. Methods and apparatus to implement except condition during data packet classification
US8139591B1 (en) * 2008-09-30 2012-03-20 Juniper Networks, Inc. Methods and apparatus for range matching during packet classification based on a linked-node structure
US8571034B2 (en) 2008-09-30 2013-10-29 Juniper Networks, Inc. Methods and apparatus related to packet classification associated with a multi-stage switch
US8675648B1 (en) 2008-09-30 2014-03-18 Juniper Networks, Inc. Methods and apparatus for compression in packet classification
US8798057B1 (en) 2008-09-30 2014-08-05 Juniper Networks, Inc. Methods and apparatus to implement except condition during data packet classification
US8289182B2 (en) 2008-11-21 2012-10-16 Trilliant Networks, Inc. Methods and systems for virtual energy management display
US8111697B1 (en) 2008-12-31 2012-02-07 Juniper Networks, Inc. Methods and apparatus for packet classification based on multiple conditions
US9189822B2 (en) 2009-03-11 2015-11-17 Trilliant Networks, Inc. Process, device and system for mapping transformers to meters and locating non-technical line losses
US8319658B2 (en) 2009-03-11 2012-11-27 Trilliant Networks, Inc. Process, device and system for mapping transformers to meters and locating non-technical line losses
US9084120B2 (en) 2010-08-27 2015-07-14 Trilliant Networks Inc. System and method for interference free operation of co-located transceivers
US9013173B2 (en) 2010-09-13 2015-04-21 Trilliant Networks, Inc. Process for detecting energy theft
US8832428B2 (en) 2010-11-15 2014-09-09 Trilliant Holdings Inc. System and method for securely communicating across multiple networks using a single radio
US9282383B2 (en) 2011-01-14 2016-03-08 Trilliant Incorporated Process, device and system for volt/VAR optimization
US8970394B2 (en) 2011-01-25 2015-03-03 Trilliant Holdings Inc. Aggregated real-time power outages/restoration reporting (RTPOR) in a secure mesh network
US8856323B2 (en) 2011-02-10 2014-10-07 Trilliant Holdings, Inc. Device and method for facilitating secure communications over a cellular network
US9041349B2 (en) 2011-03-08 2015-05-26 Trilliant Networks, Inc. System and method for managing load distribution across a power grid
US20140188875A1 (en) * 2011-05-10 2014-07-03 Tao Hong Method for measuring coefficient of contacts of online social network
US9208438B2 (en) 2011-08-02 2015-12-08 Cavium, Inc. Duplication in decision trees
US10229139B2 (en) 2011-08-02 2019-03-12 Cavium, Llc Incremental update heuristics
US9866540B2 (en) 2011-08-02 2018-01-09 Cavium, Inc. System and method for rule matching in a processor
US9344366B2 (en) 2011-08-02 2016-05-17 Cavium, Inc. System and method for rule matching in a processor
US9183244B2 (en) 2011-08-02 2015-11-10 Cavium, Inc. Rule modification in decision trees
US9137340B2 (en) 2011-08-02 2015-09-15 Cavium, Inc. Incremental update
US9596222B2 (en) 2011-08-02 2017-03-14 Cavium, Inc. Method and apparatus encoding a rule for a lookup request in a processor
US10277510B2 (en) 2011-08-02 2019-04-30 Cavium, Llc System and method for storing lookup request rules in multiple memories
US9001787B1 (en) 2011-09-20 2015-04-07 Trilliant Networks Inc. System and method for implementing handover of a hybrid communications module
US10083200B2 (en) 2013-03-14 2018-09-25 Cavium, Inc. Batch incremental update
US9430511B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2016-08-30 Cavium, Inc. Merging independent writes, separating dependent and independent writes, and error roll back
US9195939B1 (en) * 2013-03-15 2015-11-24 Cavium, Inc. Scope in decision trees
US9595003B1 (en) 2013-03-15 2017-03-14 Cavium, Inc. Compiler with mask nodes
US10229144B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2019-03-12 Cavium, Llc NSP manager
US10460250B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2019-10-29 Cavium, Llc Scope in decision trees
US9544402B2 (en) 2013-12-31 2017-01-10 Cavium, Inc. Multi-rule approach to encoding a group of rules
US9275336B2 (en) 2013-12-31 2016-03-01 Cavium, Inc. Method and system for skipping over group(s) of rules based on skip group rule
US9667446B2 (en) 2014-01-08 2017-05-30 Cavium, Inc. Condition code approach for comparing rule and packet data that are provided in portions
US10333696B2 (en) 2015-01-12 2019-06-25 X-Prime, Inc. Systems and methods for implementing an efficient, scalable homomorphic transformation of encrypted data with minimal data expansion and improved processing efficiency

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO1994001828A1 (en) 1994-01-20
AU4661793A (en) 1994-01-31
US5574910A (en) 1996-11-12

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5463777A (en) System for segmenting data packets to form binary decision trees which determine filter masks combined to filter the packets for forwarding
US9672234B2 (en) Database and database processing methods
US5983223A (en) Method and apparatus for determining a longest matching prefix from a dictionary of prefixes
US6553002B1 (en) Apparatus and method for routing data packets through a communications network
US6564211B1 (en) Fast flexible search engine for longest prefix match
US7684400B2 (en) Logarithmic time range-based multifield-correlation packet classification
US6775737B1 (en) Method and apparatus for allocating and using range identifiers as input values to content-addressable memories
US7383244B2 (en) Longest prefix match (LPM) algorithm implementation for a network processor
US6526055B1 (en) Method and apparatus for longest prefix address lookup
US7139753B2 (en) Full match (FM) search algorithm implementation for a network processor
US7403494B2 (en) Method for generating nodes in multiway search tree and search method using the same
US6792423B1 (en) Hybrid longest prefix match and fixed match searches
US20040254909A1 (en) Programming routes and access control lists in comparison tree data structures and their use such as in performing lookup operations
US20050149513A1 (en) Compressed prefix tree structure and method for traversing a compressed prefix tree
US20040100956A1 (en) Packet search device, packet processing search method used for the same, and program for the same
US6735600B1 (en) Editing protocol for flexible search engines
US7386548B2 (en) Method and data structure for performing regular expression searches in a fixed length word language
GB2386716A (en) A method of improving the lookup performance of tree-type knowledge base searches
CN107431660B (en) Search device, search method, and recording medium
US6549521B1 (en) Methods of managing dynamic decision trees
US6516319B1 (en) Parallelized processing device for processing search keys based upon tree structure
JP2004194343A (en) System and method for path compression optimization in pipeline type hardware bitmap type multi-bit trie algorithm network search engine
US6925503B2 (en) Method and system for performing a longest prefix match search
CN109408517A (en) Multidimensional search method, apparatus, equipment and the readable storage medium storing program for executing of rule
Mikawa et al. Run-based trie involving the structure of arbitrary bitmask rules

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: BAY NETWORKS, INC., CALIFORNIA

Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:WELLFLEET COMMUNICATIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:007644/0437

Effective date: 19941020

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

CC Certificate of correction
FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

AS Assignment

Owner name: NORTEL NETWORKS NA INC., CALIFORNIA

Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:BAY NETWORKS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:010531/0249

Effective date: 19990429

AS Assignment

Owner name: NORTEL NETWORKS CORPORATION, CANADA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:NORTEL NETWORKS NA INC.;REEL/FRAME:010832/0045

Effective date: 20000508

AS Assignment

Owner name: NORTEL NETWORKS LIMITED, CANADA

Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:NORTEL NETWORKS CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:011195/0706

Effective date: 20000830

Owner name: NORTEL NETWORKS LIMITED,CANADA

Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:NORTEL NETWORKS CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:011195/0706

Effective date: 20000830

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 8

REMI Maintenance fee reminder mailed
FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 12

AS Assignment

Owner name: ROCKSTAR BIDCO, LP, NEW YORK

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:NORTEL NETWORKS LIMITED;REEL/FRAME:027164/0356

Effective date: 20110729

AS Assignment

Owner name: ROCKSTAR CONSORTIUM US LP, TEXAS

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:ROCKSTAR BIDCO, LP;REEL/FRAME:034086/0173

Effective date: 20120509