US5589843A - Antenna system with tapered aperture antenna and microstrip phase shifting feed network - Google Patents

Antenna system with tapered aperture antenna and microstrip phase shifting feed network Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US5589843A
US5589843A US08/365,590 US36559094A US5589843A US 5589843 A US5589843 A US 5589843A US 36559094 A US36559094 A US 36559094A US 5589843 A US5589843 A US 5589843A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
antenna
linear arrays
radiating elements
linear
array
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US08/365,590
Inventor
Sheldon K. Meredith
Pitt W. Arnold
Warren F. Hunt
Kevin J. Connolly
Kevin M. Gaukel
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Radio Frequency Systems Inc
Original Assignee
Radio Frequency Systems Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Radio Frequency Systems Inc filed Critical Radio Frequency Systems Inc
Priority to US08/365,590 priority Critical patent/US5589843A/en
Assigned to RADIO FREQUENCY SYSTEMS, INC. reassignment RADIO FREQUENCY SYSTEMS, INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: ARNOLD, PITT W., GAUKEL, KEVIN J., MEREDITH, SHELDON K.
Assigned to RADIO FREQUENCY SYSTEMS, INC. reassignment RADIO FREQUENCY SYSTEMS, INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: CONNOLLY, KEVIN J., HUNT, WARREN F.
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US5589843A publication Critical patent/US5589843A/en
Assigned to RADIO FREQUENCY SYSTEMS, INC. reassignment RADIO FREQUENCY SYSTEMS, INC. MERGER AND NAME CHANGE Assignors: ALCATEL NA CABLE SYSTEMS, INC., RADIO FREQUENCY SYSTEMS, INC.
Assigned to CREDIT SUISSE AG reassignment CREDIT SUISSE AG SECURITY AGREEMENT Assignors: ALCATEL LUCENT
Assigned to ALCATEL LUCENT reassignment ALCATEL LUCENT RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: CREDIT SUISSE AG
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01QANTENNAS, i.e. RADIO AERIALS
    • H01Q21/00Antenna arrays or systems
    • H01Q21/06Arrays of individually energised antenna units similarly polarised and spaced apart
    • H01Q21/061Two dimensional planar arrays
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01QANTENNAS, i.e. RADIO AERIALS
    • H01Q21/00Antenna arrays or systems
    • H01Q21/06Arrays of individually energised antenna units similarly polarised and spaced apart
    • H01Q21/22Antenna units of the array energised non-uniformly in amplitude or phase, e.g. tapered array or binomial array
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01QANTENNAS, i.e. RADIO AERIALS
    • H01Q9/00Electrically-short antennas having dimensions not more than twice the operating wavelength and consisting of conductive active radiating elements
    • H01Q9/04Resonant antennas
    • H01Q9/16Resonant antennas with feed intermediate between the extremities of the antenna, e.g. centre-fed dipole

Definitions

  • the present invention is directed to antenna systems having antenna arrays and feed mechanisms for use therewith, particularly where such antenna systems are used for cellular communications, personal communication systems, and other high frequency applications.
  • ERP effective radiated power
  • the antenna in order to have high ERP while reducing the absolute power into the antenna, the antenna must necessarily have a high gain factor.
  • the physical aperture that is the height and width of the antenna, must increase and the antenna's beam as defined by the solid cone angle, must necessarily occupy fewer steradians.
  • an antenna might have a vertical beamwidth of 4°, while the horizontal beamwidth may be 30°. These beamwidths thus define the antenna's radiating beam solid cone angle. Typically the smaller the beam solid cone angle, the higher the gain of the antenna.
  • a Butler-matrix feed Such a matrix consists of a phasing network with N inputs and N outputs, where N can be any integer number greater than one. This phasing network serves to take each of the N inputs and divide the signal amongst the N output ports with each output port having a fixed phase offset with respect to the other output ports. By properly adjusting the phases between adjacent antennas, the output lobe from the antenna can be electrically steered to the left or fight in a controlled fashion.
  • a discussion of the Butler-matrix feed is presented in "Antenna Engineering Handbook", Second Edition, Richard C. Johnsen and Henry Jasick, McGraw-Hill Book Company. pp. 20-56 through 20-60.
  • the Butler-matrix feed approach greatly reduces the problems associated with the visual appearance of a plurality of antennas, with the concomitant reduction in wind loading, as well as some cost savings with regard to mounting space.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates four sets of four co-linear arrays of radiating elements, yielding a 4 ⁇ 4 panel of radiating elements.
  • the beamwidths, sidelobe levels and grating lobes of an antenna comprising N co-linear arrays of N radiating elements driven by an N beam Butler-matrix feed are defined by the physics of the overall antenna system.
  • the spacing between the co-linear arrays of radiating elements (in wavelengths of the radiating or received energy) drive the grating lobes while the sidelobes are driven by the spacial Fourier transform of the antenna aperture width and the radiating element spacing within each of the co-linear arrays.
  • the sidelobes are approximately 7 dB below the main lobe.
  • A-7 dB sidelobe is a significant problem for cellular communications due to the fact that it does not provide the azimuthal beam pattern required for land mobile radio system operation.
  • the essence of the present invention is to decrease the sidelobe levels to below -10 dB by reducing the number of co-linear radiating elements at the outer edges of the multi-co-linear array antenna and to drive the resulting ant Butler-matrix network feed.
  • the absolute gain of the antenna decreases slightly because the physical aperture is slightly smaller.
  • space tapering The reduction of the number of co-linear elements for the co-linear arrays toward and at the edges of the antenna is sometimes referred to as space tapering.
  • space tapering is highly desirable with regard to the reduction of sidelobe levels. It has been experimentally found that for four co-linear arrays having respectively 2, 4, 4, 2 radiating elements, the sidelobe levels decrease from -7 dB to approximately -12 dB or lower. Such an arrangement results in a 5 dB improvement over that which is achievable with standard 4 ⁇ 4 array antennas and meets the initial requirements of the land mobile radio industry.
  • a primary inventive aspect of the present invention is the use of a microstrip implemented Butler-matrix feed network in combination with an antenna using space tapering in order to achieve a high gain antenna with reduced sidelobe levels which is particularly advantageous for use in land mobile radio applications, including cellular radio communications and PCS communications.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a prior art Butler-matrix feed network comprising N inputs and N outputs, where N is equal to 8.
  • FIG. 2 is a diagrammatic representation of a prior art antenna with four co-linear arrays, in which each co-linear array comprises four radiating elements.
  • FIG. 3 is a diagrammatic representation of an embodiment of an antenna system according to the present invention, illustrating a space-tapered antenna, comprising four co-linear arrays, wherein the outermost co-linear arrays each have two radiating elements, and wherein the inner arrays each have four radiating elements, a 4-way Butler matrix feed network forming part of the antenna system; and radio receiver(s) and/or transmitter(s) connected to the Butler matrix feed network, the receiver(s) and/or transmitter(s) not forming part of the antenna system.
  • FIG. 4 is a planar view of a printed circuit board microstrip implementation of the 4-way Butler matrix feed network shown in FIG. 3.
  • FIG. 5 illustrates the azimuthal electromagnetic radiation (energy) patterns of the four electronically steerable beams that can be generated with the antenna system shown in FIG. 3, wherein the azimuthal patterns of all four beams shown in a composite representation.
  • FIG. 6 is a perspective view of a space-tapered antenna for use in an antenna system according to the present invention, the antenna comprising eight co-linear arrays of radiating elements, respectively having 2, 3, 4, 5, 5, 4, 3 and 2 elements per array.
  • FIG. 7 is a microstrip printed circuit board layout of an 8-way Butler matrix feed network for use with the antenna shown in FIG. 6.
  • FIG. 8 is the azimuthal composite radiation pattern of an antenna system using the antenna shown in FIG. 6 with a Butler matrix feed network shown in FIG. 7.
  • FIG. 9 is a front view of a four co-linear array antenna for use at PCS frequencies.
  • FIG. 10 is a front view of a four co-linear array antenna that radiates with dual polarization and in which the main lobe azimuthal angles are approximately the same for both polarizations.
  • FIG. 11 is an illustration of the vertical dipole assembly used for the antenna shown in FIG. 10 as well as for the antennas shown in FIGS. 3, 6 and 9.
  • FIG. 12 is an illustration of the horizontal dipole assembly used in the dual-polarization antenna shown in FIG. 10.
  • the present invention is directed to an improved antenna system 20 which comprises two major components; namely, a space tapered multi-beam antenna 24 and a Butler-matrix feed network 28.
  • the embodiment of the antenna shown in FIG. 3 comprises four co-linear arrays 26 of associated electromagnetic radiating elements 30. These radiating elements are typically dipole elements, although other types of radiating element can be used.
  • the 4-way Butler matrix feed network 28 has four antenna ports 29 and four radio receiver/transmitter ports 31.
  • the antenna ports 29 are each connected to one co-linear array 26 by cables 35 and connectors 27 associated with each array, while the receiver/transmitter ports 31 are connected to radio receiver and/or radio transmitter equipment 37 by cables 41.
  • Cables 35 are equal phase cables so as not to introduce any phase change with respect to the signals carried thereover relative to the other cables 35. Cables 41 need not be equal phase cables since any phase changes introduced by these cables is not relevant to the electronic beam(s) being used.
  • the radio receiver/transmitter equipment is shown generally in FIG. 3, since the specific type of equipment used in an actual installation can vary widely.
  • the outermost co-linear arrays each comprise two radiating elements, while the innermost arrays (denoted 1L and 1R) each comprise four radiating elements.
  • the spacing between adjacent elements 30 in a co-linear array is preferably approximately ⁇ , where ⁇ is the wavelength of the electromagnetic energy to be received or transmitted.
  • the spacing between adjacent co-linear arrays, such as between arrays A and B, is typically approximately ⁇ /2 (0.47 ⁇ for the embodiment shown in FIG. 3).
  • the Butler-matrix feed network 28 has N antenna ports 29 and N receiver/transmitter equipment ports 3l, where N is equal to the number of co-linear arrays of the associated antenna.
  • each radiating element 30 is, in this preferred embodiment, a dipole radiating element.
  • Energy is radiated or received from these dipole elements by means of a feed strap 43 having a centrally located connector 27.
  • the dipole elements are spaced from each adjacent dipole element of the same array by a distance approximately equal to ⁇ .
  • the feed strap includes portions 45 extending beyond the lowermost and uppermost dipole element, with the end of these portions connected to the electrically conductive back plate 47 of the antenna.
  • Such a feed strap configuration is known in the art as a Bogner type feed (see U.S. Pat. No. 4,086,598).
  • the Butler matrix feed network 28 for use with the antenna shown in FIG. 3 is best seen in FIG. 4.
  • This implementation uses a planar microstrip design with no crossovers and is fabricated from a printed circuit board 39 having a dielectric substrate made of low loss ceramic material, such as glass epoxy.
  • Butler matrix antenna ports 29 are designated 2L, 1L, 1R, and 2R, corresponding to their respective connection to co-linear array 2L, 1L, 1R and 2R.
  • the receiver/transmitter ports 31 are designated 2L, 1L, 1R and 2R.
  • Each antenna and receiver/transmitter port comprises an associated coaxial connector.
  • FIG. 5 illustrates the radiation pattern generated with the antenna system shown in FIG. 3 for a frequency of 859 MHz (0.859 GHz).
  • the radiation pattern is a composite showing all four radiation beam patterns generated when the 2L, 1L, 1R and 2R Butler matrix receiver/transmitter ports 31 are respectively used.
  • the antenna will have a main lobe 32, designated 2L.
  • this main lobe has a beam peak of 3.6 dB at -46.76° and a beamwidth of 33.93°.
  • FIG. 6 illustrates a second embodiment of an antenna used in an antenna system according to the present invention which comprises eight co-linear arrays 26 identified by the notation 4L, 3L, 2L, 1L, 1R, 2R, 3R and 4R, where the L and R stand for left and right respectively.
  • the overall structure of this antenna is similar to that for the four co-linear array antenna shown in FIG. 3 but that the number of radiating elements is, from the 4L array to the 4R array, respectively 2, 3, 4, 5, 5, 4, 3,2.
  • FIG. 7 illustrates the layout of the microstrip printed circuit board implementation of a Butler matrix feed network 28 used for connection with the antenna 24 shown in FIG. 6. Again, this printed circuit board shows no crossovers and is fabricated from a similar material as that shown in FIG. 4.
  • the ports 29 are identified with the 4L, 3L, 2L, 1L, 1R, 2R, 3R, 4R notation corresponding to the co-linear array connections with the ports 31 for connection to the radio receiver(s) and/or transmitter(s) having a similar notation.
  • the resulting main lobes and primary sidelobes of the antenna system using the antennas of FIG. 6 with the Butler matrix feed network of FIG. 7 is shown in composite representation in FIG. 8 for an operating frequency of 859 MHz (0.859 GHz).
  • antenna 24 shown in FIG. 6 is driven by a transmission signal presented at port 31 of the Butler matrix at the 4L location, the main lobe of energy transmission is at main lobe 32-4L.
  • the main lobe of the antenna shown in FIG. 6 would be directed as shown by main lobe 32-4L if the 4L port 31 is connected to a receiver.
  • the electronic steerability of the antenna with respect to the Butler matrix feed network is similar to that illustrated with regard to the four co-linear array antenna and four-way Butler matrix feed network shown in FIGS. 3-5, except that the beamwidths for the eight co-linear array antenna system, are narrower by approximately one-half. Again, due to the space tapering of the antenna as driven by the Butler matrix feed network, sidelobe levels are significantly less than if the eight co-linear array antenna used the same number of radiating elements for each co-linear array.
  • the number of radiating elements for the antenna shown in FIG. 3 varies from 2 to 4, back to 2 and for the eight co-linear array antenna shown in FIG. 6, varies from 2 to 5, back to 2, other number of radiating elements can be employed with a corresponding effect on the antenna gain while still maintaining significant sidelobe attenuation as compared to a co-linear array antenna using a fixed number of radiating elements for each co-linear array.
  • the number of radiating elements for the four co-linear array antenna could be 1, 2, 2, 1 or 3, 4, 4, 3, or 1, 3, 3, 1, as long as the number of radiating elements toward the side periphery of the antenna is monotonically less than the number of elements toward the middle of the antenna.
  • FIG. 9 illustrates a four co-linear array antenna similar to that shown in FIG. 3 but specifically designed for operation at personal communication system (PCS) frequencies of the order of 1.8 GHz.
  • PCS personal communication system
  • the number of radiating elements from 2L to 2R are respectively 4, 8, 8, 4.
  • the radiating elements 30 are dipoles.
  • FIG. 10 shows another embodiment of an antenna for use in the present antenna system invention in which the antenna comprises two sets of four co-linear arrays of radiating elements (26 and 26') for operation in both the vertical and horizontal orientations respectively.
  • FIG. 10 Details of the vertical dipole assembly are shown in FIG. 10 which correspond to the dipole assemblies shown for the antennas illustrated in FIGS. 3, 6 and 9, while the horizontal dipole assembly 30' is shown in FIG. 12. It is there seen that the active side 49 and the passive side 51 of these radiating elements are directed downward toward the back plane 47 of the antenna. The angle of the active and passive sides of the radiating element is approximately 59° as shown by arrow 53.
  • this downward angle for the active and passive sides of the horizontal dipole radiating elements is to achieve an azimuthal steerable angle commensurate with that of the vertical dipole assemblies.
  • the arrangement shown in FIGS. 10, 11 and 12 achieves an azimuthal steerable angle of approximately 100°, whereas if the horizontal radiating elements were co-linear with respect to each other, the azimuthal steerable angle for the horizontal polarization radiating pattern would be less than 90°.
  • an antenna system which incorporates a space tapered antenna design comprising a plurality of co-linear arrays of radiating elements, with the number of radiating elements increasing monotonically from the side periphery of the antenna toward the co-linear arrays at the middle of the antenna, which when driven by or receiving information via a phase array feed network, such as a Butler matrix feed network, is steerable over a wide azimuthal angle so as to obtain significantly improved sidelobe attenuation as compared to antenna systems using a plurality of co-linear arrays of radiating elements with a fixed number of radiating elements per co-linear array.
  • a phase array feed network such as a Butler matrix feed network

Landscapes

  • Variable-Direction Aerials And Aerial Arrays (AREA)

Abstract

An improved antenna system for use at high frequencies such as cellular communication and PCS frequencies, having a steerable, multi co-linear array antenna in which the number of radiating elements per co-linear array increases monotonically from the periphery of the antenna to the middle of the antenna, and wherein the antenna is connected to a Butler matrix feed network, thereby providing steerability of the radiation pattern associated with the antenna. The improved antenna system achieves significantly lower sidelobe generation as compared to antenna systems using multiple co-linear arrays of radiating elements in which the number of radiating elements per co-linear array is constant. The Butler matrix feed network is implemented via a microstrip fabricated printed circuit board without crossovers.

Description

TECHNICAL FIELD
The present invention is directed to antenna systems having antenna arrays and feed mechanisms for use therewith, particularly where such antenna systems are used for cellular communications, personal communication systems, and other high frequency applications.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
In the cellular communication art, land mobile radio networks transmit and receive high frequency signals (greater than 800 MHz) via antennas located at land mobile sites. In order to maximize the geographic area for coverage of the signal, the effective radiated power (ERP) must be maximized. The ERP is the product of the power input to the antenna times the gain factor of the antenna; that is, the solid angle direction of the transmission and reception path of the antenna.
It is known in the art that in order to have high ERP while reducing the absolute power into the antenna, the antenna must necessarily have a high gain factor. In order to increase the gain of an antenna, the physical aperture, that is the height and width of the antenna, must increase and the antenna's beam as defined by the solid cone angle, must necessarily occupy fewer steradians. Thus for instance, an antenna might have a vertical beamwidth of 4°, while the horizontal beamwidth may be 30°. These beamwidths thus define the antenna's radiating beam solid cone angle. Typically the smaller the beam solid cone angle, the higher the gain of the antenna.
For cellular communication applications, it is generally required, depending upon the location of the land mobile radio site, to cover 360° of azimuth while the vertical beamwidth may only be 4° in order to effectively cover a geographic area. However, in order to cover 360° of azimuth and maintain high gain, it is typically necessary to use twelve antennas with 30° of horizontal beamwidth each. Of course the cost of such antennas and the availability of mounting space for such antennas present significant difficulties. Furthermore, this number of antennas can present wind loading problems at the antenna tower, as well as provide a detrimental visual appearance.
The use of narrow, azimuthal-beam antennas has been quite limited with respect to the land mobile radio industry. One fairly early method of producing multiple antenna patterns out of a common aperture has been employed using a technique called a Butler-matrix feed. Such a matrix consists of a phasing network with N inputs and N outputs, where N can be any integer number greater than one. This phasing network serves to take each of the N inputs and divide the signal amongst the N output ports with each output port having a fixed phase offset with respect to the other output ports. By properly adjusting the phases between adjacent antennas, the output lobe from the antenna can be electrically steered to the left or fight in a controlled fashion. Each of the N inputs creates a different set of phase shifts on the N outputs and therefore results in N distinct "beams" from a common aperture. FIG. 1 illustrates an example of this phase shifting arrangement for eight inputs and eight outputs (N=8). A discussion of the Butler-matrix feed is presented in "Antenna Engineering Handbook", Second Edition, Richard C. Johnsen and Henry Jasick, McGraw-Hill Book Company. pp. 20-56 through 20-60.
Since it is not necessary to have separate antenna apertures to make all of the required antenna beams, the Butler-matrix feed approach greatly reduces the problems associated with the visual appearance of a plurality of antennas, with the concomitant reduction in wind loading, as well as some cost savings with regard to mounting space. One approach for an antenna driven by such a Butler-matrix is shown in FIG. 2, which illustrates four sets of four co-linear arrays of radiating elements, yielding a 4×4 panel of radiating elements.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The beamwidths, sidelobe levels and grating lobes of an antenna comprising N co-linear arrays of N radiating elements driven by an N beam Butler-matrix feed are defined by the physics of the overall antenna system. Thus the spacing between the co-linear arrays of radiating elements (in wavelengths of the radiating or received energy) drive the grating lobes while the sidelobes are driven by the spacial Fourier transform of the antenna aperture width and the radiating element spacing within each of the co-linear arrays. For four vertically polarized co-linear arrays of radiating elements at 0.5 wavelength horizontal spacing (between adjacent arrays), the sidelobes are approximately 7 dB below the main lobe. Even if the number of co-linear elements per array is increased vertically, such as to 8, such an arrangement does not change the sidelobe level relative to the main lobe. A-7 dB sidelobe is a significant problem for cellular communications due to the fact that it does not provide the azimuthal beam pattern required for land mobile radio system operation.
It has been shown through use of Monte Carlo analysis programs conducted at U.S. West New Vector Group in Bellevue, Wash. that -10 dB sidelobe levels are the maximum levels which can be adequately tolerated for such land mobile radio system operation. Thus, the standard arrangement of an antenna with four co-linear arrays of four radiating elements each, connected to a Butler-matrix feed is not suitable for such communication. Although attenuation of the power levels associated with the exterior beams of the four array antenna is possible in order to reduce the sidelobe levels, such an arrangement is not practical due to heat dissipation if non-active elements are to be used at the antenna site.
The essence of the present invention is to decrease the sidelobe levels to below -10 dB by reducing the number of co-linear radiating elements at the outer edges of the multi-co-linear array antenna and to drive the resulting ant Butler-matrix network feed. In such an arrangement, the absolute gain of the antenna decreases slightly because the physical aperture is slightly smaller.
The reduction of the number of co-linear elements for the co-linear arrays toward and at the edges of the antenna is sometimes referred to as space tapering. Such space tapering is highly desirable with regard to the reduction of sidelobe levels. It has been experimentally found that for four co-linear arrays having respectively 2, 4, 4, 2 radiating elements, the sidelobe levels decrease from -7 dB to approximately -12 dB or lower. Such an arrangement results in a 5 dB improvement over that which is achievable with standard 4×4 array antennas and meets the initial requirements of the land mobile radio industry.
Thus a primary inventive aspect of the present invention is the use of a microstrip implemented Butler-matrix feed network in combination with an antenna using space tapering in order to achieve a high gain antenna with reduced sidelobe levels which is particularly advantageous for use in land mobile radio applications, including cellular radio communications and PCS communications.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
For fuller understanding of the nature and objects of the present invention, reference is made to the following detailed description taken in combination with the following drawings in which:
FIG. 1 illustrates a prior art Butler-matrix feed network comprising N inputs and N outputs, where N is equal to 8.
FIG. 2 is a diagrammatic representation of a prior art antenna with four co-linear arrays, in which each co-linear array comprises four radiating elements.
FIG. 3 is a diagrammatic representation of an embodiment of an antenna system according to the present invention, illustrating a space-tapered antenna, comprising four co-linear arrays, wherein the outermost co-linear arrays each have two radiating elements, and wherein the inner arrays each have four radiating elements, a 4-way Butler matrix feed network forming part of the antenna system; and radio receiver(s) and/or transmitter(s) connected to the Butler matrix feed network, the receiver(s) and/or transmitter(s) not forming part of the antenna system.
FIG. 4 is a planar view of a printed circuit board microstrip implementation of the 4-way Butler matrix feed network shown in FIG. 3.
FIG. 5 illustrates the azimuthal electromagnetic radiation (energy) patterns of the four electronically steerable beams that can be generated with the antenna system shown in FIG. 3, wherein the azimuthal patterns of all four beams shown in a composite representation.
FIG. 6 is a perspective view of a space-tapered antenna for use in an antenna system according to the present invention, the antenna comprising eight co-linear arrays of radiating elements, respectively having 2, 3, 4, 5, 5, 4, 3 and 2 elements per array.
FIG. 7 is a microstrip printed circuit board layout of an 8-way Butler matrix feed network for use with the antenna shown in FIG. 6.
FIG. 8 is the azimuthal composite radiation pattern of an antenna system using the antenna shown in FIG. 6 with a Butler matrix feed network shown in FIG. 7.
FIG. 9 is a front view of a four co-linear array antenna for use at PCS frequencies.
FIG. 10 is a front view of a four co-linear array antenna that radiates with dual polarization and in which the main lobe azimuthal angles are approximately the same for both polarizations.
FIG. 11 is an illustration of the vertical dipole assembly used for the antenna shown in FIG. 10 as well as for the antennas shown in FIGS. 3, 6 and 9.
FIG. 12 is an illustration of the horizontal dipole assembly used in the dual-polarization antenna shown in FIG. 10.
BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION
As best seen in FIG. 3, the present invention is directed to an improved antenna system 20 which comprises two major components; namely, a space tapered multi-beam antenna 24 and a Butler-matrix feed network 28. The embodiment of the antenna shown in FIG. 3 comprises four co-linear arrays 26 of associated electromagnetic radiating elements 30. These radiating elements are typically dipole elements, although other types of radiating element can be used. The 4-way Butler matrix feed network 28 has four antenna ports 29 and four radio receiver/transmitter ports 31. The antenna ports 29 are each connected to one co-linear array 26 by cables 35 and connectors 27 associated with each array, while the receiver/transmitter ports 31 are connected to radio receiver and/or radio transmitter equipment 37 by cables 41. Cables 35 are equal phase cables so as not to introduce any phase change with respect to the signals carried thereover relative to the other cables 35. Cables 41 need not be equal phase cables since any phase changes introduced by these cables is not relevant to the electronic beam(s) being used. The radio receiver/transmitter equipment is shown generally in FIG. 3, since the specific type of equipment used in an actual installation can vary widely.
As also seen in FIG. 3, the outermost co-linear arrays (denoted 2L and 2R where L=left and R=right) each comprise two radiating elements, while the innermost arrays (denoted 1L and 1R) each comprise four radiating elements. The spacing between adjacent elements 30 in a co-linear array is preferably approximately λ, where λ is the wavelength of the electromagnetic energy to be received or transmitted. The spacing between adjacent co-linear arrays, such as between arrays A and B, is typically approximately λ/2 (0.47λ for the embodiment shown in FIG. 3).
In general, the Butler-matrix feed network 28 has N antenna ports 29 and N receiver/transmitter equipment ports 3l, where N is equal to the number of co-linear arrays of the associated antenna.
As seen in FIG. 3, each radiating element 30 is, in this preferred embodiment, a dipole radiating element. Energy is radiated or received from these dipole elements by means of a feed strap 43 having a centrally located connector 27. The dipole elements are spaced from each adjacent dipole element of the same array by a distance approximately equal to λ. The feed strap includes portions 45 extending beyond the lowermost and uppermost dipole element, with the end of these portions connected to the electrically conductive back plate 47 of the antenna. Such a feed strap configuration is known in the art as a Bogner type feed (see U.S. Pat. No. 4,086,598).
The Butler matrix feed network 28 for use with the antenna shown in FIG. 3 is best seen in FIG. 4. This implementation uses a planar microstrip design with no crossovers and is fabricated from a printed circuit board 39 having a dielectric substrate made of low loss ceramic material, such as glass epoxy.
Butler matrix antenna ports 29 are designated 2L, 1L, 1R, and 2R, corresponding to their respective connection to co-linear array 2L, 1L, 1R and 2R. Similarly, the receiver/transmitter ports 31 are designated 2L, 1L, 1R and 2R. Each antenna and receiver/transmitter port comprises an associated coaxial connector.
FIG. 5 illustrates the radiation pattern generated with the antenna system shown in FIG. 3 for a frequency of 859 MHz (0.859 GHz). The radiation pattern is a composite showing all four radiation beam patterns generated when the 2L, 1L, 1R and 2R Butler matrix receiver/transmitter ports 31 are respectively used. For example, if the 2L port 31 is driven by a transmitter or if energy is to be received by a receiver at this port, the antenna will have a main lobe 32, designated 2L. As seen in FIG. 5, this main lobe has a beam peak of 3.6 dB at -46.76° and a beamwidth of 33.93°. Sidelobe 34 (2L) associated with this main lobe is at 71.75° and has a peak value of -8.26 dB, which is -11.86 dB less than the main lobe peak value. The data for all the main lobes and the highest associated sidelobes are presented in Table 1.
              TABLE 1                                                     
______________________________________                                    
          BEAM PEAK                                                       
          POSITION    BEAM WIDTH                                          
MAIN LOBE (DEGREES)   (DEGREES)                                           
______________________________________                                    
2 L       -46.76      33.93                                               
1 L       -15.51      30.27                                               
1 R       15.89       30.06                                               
2 R       47.02       33.47                                               
______________________________________                                    
                      DIFFERENCE BETWEEN                                  
SIDELOBE  BEAM PEAK   MAIN LOBE PEAK AND                                  
(HIGHEST) POSITION    SIDELOBE PEAK                                       
______________________________________                                    
2 L       71.75       (dB)          -11.86                                
1 L       -71.00      (dB)          -19.41                                
1 L       29.00       (dB)          -14.61                                
1 R       -29.75      (dB)          -12.61                                
1 R       71.75       (dB)          -21.29                                
2 R       -68.25      (dB)          -10.68                                
______________________________________                                    
FIG. 6 illustrates a second embodiment of an antenna used in an antenna system according to the present invention which comprises eight co-linear arrays 26 identified by the notation 4L, 3L, 2L, 1L, 1R, 2R, 3R and 4R, where the L and R stand for left and right respectively. As can be seen in FIG. 6, the overall structure of this antenna is similar to that for the four co-linear array antenna shown in FIG. 3 but that the number of radiating elements is, from the 4L array to the 4R array, respectively 2, 3, 4, 5, 5, 4, 3,2.
FIG. 7 illustrates the layout of the microstrip printed circuit board implementation of a Butler matrix feed network 28 used for connection with the antenna 24 shown in FIG. 6. Again, this printed circuit board shows no crossovers and is fabricated from a similar material as that shown in FIG. 4. The ports 29 are identified with the 4L, 3L, 2L, 1L, 1R, 2R, 3R, 4R notation corresponding to the co-linear array connections with the ports 31 for connection to the radio receiver(s) and/or transmitter(s) having a similar notation.
The resulting main lobes and primary sidelobes of the antenna system using the antennas of FIG. 6 with the Butler matrix feed network of FIG. 7 is shown in composite representation in FIG. 8 for an operating frequency of 859 MHz (0.859 GHz). Thus if antenna 24 shown in FIG. 6 is driven by a transmission signal presented at port 31 of the Butler matrix at the 4L location, the main lobe of energy transmission is at main lobe 32-4L. Similarly, the main lobe of the antenna shown in FIG. 6 would be directed as shown by main lobe 32-4L if the 4L port 31 is connected to a receiver. Thus the electronic steerability of the antenna with respect to the Butler matrix feed network is similar to that illustrated with regard to the four co-linear array antenna and four-way Butler matrix feed network shown in FIGS. 3-5, except that the beamwidths for the eight co-linear array antenna system, are narrower by approximately one-half. Again, due to the space tapering of the antenna as driven by the Butler matrix feed network, sidelobe levels are significantly less than if the eight co-linear array antenna used the same number of radiating elements for each co-linear array.
It should be noted that although the number of radiating elements for the antenna shown in FIG. 3 varies from 2 to 4, back to 2 and for the eight co-linear array antenna shown in FIG. 6, varies from 2 to 5, back to 2, other number of radiating elements can be employed with a corresponding effect on the antenna gain while still maintaining significant sidelobe attenuation as compared to a co-linear array antenna using a fixed number of radiating elements for each co-linear array. Thus for example, the number of radiating elements for the four co-linear array antenna could be 1, 2, 2, 1 or 3, 4, 4, 3, or 1, 3, 3, 1, as long as the number of radiating elements toward the side periphery of the antenna is monotonically less than the number of elements toward the middle of the antenna.
FIG. 9 illustrates a four co-linear array antenna similar to that shown in FIG. 3 but specifically designed for operation at personal communication system (PCS) frequencies of the order of 1.8 GHz. Here the number of radiating elements from 2L to 2R are respectively 4, 8, 8, 4. Again, the radiating elements 30 are dipoles.
FIG. 10 shows another embodiment of an antenna for use in the present antenna system invention in which the antenna comprises two sets of four co-linear arrays of radiating elements (26 and 26') for operation in both the vertical and horizontal orientations respectively. Details of the vertical dipole assembly are shown in FIG. 10 which correspond to the dipole assemblies shown for the antennas illustrated in FIGS. 3, 6 and 9, while the horizontal dipole assembly 30' is shown in FIG. 12. It is there seen that the active side 49 and the passive side 51 of these radiating elements are directed downward toward the back plane 47 of the antenna. The angle of the active and passive sides of the radiating element is approximately 59° as shown by arrow 53. The purpose for this downward angle for the active and passive sides of the horizontal dipole radiating elements is to achieve an azimuthal steerable angle commensurate with that of the vertical dipole assemblies. The arrangement shown in FIGS. 10, 11 and 12 achieves an azimuthal steerable angle of approximately 100°, whereas if the horizontal radiating elements were co-linear with respect to each other, the azimuthal steerable angle for the horizontal polarization radiating pattern would be less than 90°.
Thus what has been described is an antenna system which incorporates a space tapered antenna design comprising a plurality of co-linear arrays of radiating elements, with the number of radiating elements increasing monotonically from the side periphery of the antenna toward the co-linear arrays at the middle of the antenna, which when driven by or receiving information via a phase array feed network, such as a Butler matrix feed network, is steerable over a wide azimuthal angle so as to obtain significantly improved sidelobe attenuation as compared to antenna systems using a plurality of co-linear arrays of radiating elements with a fixed number of radiating elements per co-linear array.
It is thus seen that the objects set forth above and those made apparent from the preceding description are efficiently attained and, since certain changes may be made in the above construction without departing from the scope of the invention, it is intended that all matter contained in the above description are shown in the accompanying drawings, shall be interpreted as illustrative and not in a limiting sense.
It is also to be understood that the following claims are intended to cover all the generic and specific features of the invention herein described, and all statements of the scope of the invention which, as a matter of language, might be said to fall therebetween.

Claims (15)

Having described the invention, what is claimed is:
1. An antenna system (20), comprising:
A) a space-tapered multi-beam antenna (24) having:
1) N co-linear arrays (26) with innermost co-Linear arrays and outer co-linear arrays, each co-linear array having at least one electromagnetic radiating element (30), where N is an integer greater than 2, and wherein the number of radiating elements monotonically increases from the outermost co-linear arrays toward the innermost co-linear arrays to form a monotonically increasing co-linear array,
2) means (43) for connecting each radiating element within a co-linear array to all other radiating elements in the same array, and
3) an electrically conductive backplane onto which the co-linear arrays are positioned with respect thereto;
B) a microstrip fabricated phase array feed network (28) having N radio receiver/transmitter ports (31) for connection to receiver or transmitter equipment, and N antenna ports (29), each antenna port for connection to one of the N co-linear arrays (26), the phase array feed network having means for phase shifting any outgoing signal at one of the receiver/transmitter ports with respect to each of the N antenna ports, and vice versa, so as to electronically steer the radiating pattern of the antenna to any one of the N main lobes; and
C) means (35) for interconnecting the antenna port (29) to the means (43) for connecting the radiating elements in each co-linear array;
whereby the antenna system radiation pattern for each of the N main lobes has one or more sidelobes that each are attenuated with respect to the corresponding main lobe by an amount greater than the sidelobes generated by an N co-linear array antenna with a fixed number of radiating elements per co-linear array.
2. An antenna system as defined in claim 1, wherein the radiating elements are dipoles.
3. An antenna system as defined in claim 2, wherein the phase array feed network is a Butler matrix feed network.
4. An antenna system as defined in claim 3, wherein the Butler matrix feed network is fabricated on a printed circuit board without crossovers.
5. An antenna system as defined in claim 4, wherein the substrate of the printed circuit board is fabricated from a low loss dielectric material.
6. An antenna system as defined in claim 5, wherein the low loss dielectric material is glass epoxy.
7. An antenna system as defined in claim 6, wherein N is 4 and wherein the number of radiating elements per co-linear array from outermost array to innermost array is respectively 2 and 4.
8. An antenna system as defined in claim 6, wherein N is 8 and wherein the number of radiating elements per co-linear array from outermost array to innermost array is respectively 2, 3, 4 and 5.
9. An improved antenna system as defined in claim 1, having a first set of N co-linear arrays, wherein the radiating elements of the first set of co-linear arrays are in a first orientation, and having a second set of N co-linear arrays, wherein the radiating elements of the second set of co-linear arrays are in a second, orthogonal orientation with respect to the radiating element of the first set of N co-linear arrays, so as to generate radiation patterns in both the vertical and horizontal orientations.
10. An antenna system, comprising:
A) a space-tapered multi-beam antenna (24) having:
1) N co-linear arrays (26), each co-linear array having at least one electromagnetic radiating element (30), where N is an integer greater than 2, the number of radiating elements monotonically increasing from the outermost co-linear arrays toward the innermost co-linear arrays, having a first set of N co-linear arrays, the radiating elements of the first set of co-linear arrays being in a first orientation, and having a second set of N co-linear arrays, the radiating elements of the second set of co-linear arrays being in a second, orthogonal orientation with respect to the radiating element of the first set of N co-linear arrays, so as to generate radiation patterns in both the vertical and horizontal orientations, the radiating elements of the first and second sets of co-linear arrays being dipoles having an active side and a passive side and wherein the radiating elements of the second set of N co-linear arrays have active and passive sides that are angled downward toward the backplane of the antenna, so as to obtain a steerable azimuthal angle commensurate with the steerable azimuthal angle of the radiating elements of the first set of co-linear arrays,
2) means (43) for connecting each radiating element within a co-linear array to all other radiating elements in the same array, and
3) an electrically conductive backplane onto which the co-linear arrays are positioned with respect thereto;
B) a microstrip fabricated phase array feed network (28) having N radio receiver/transmitter ports (31) for connection to receiver or transmitter equipment, and N antenna ports (29), each antenna port for connection to one of the N co-linear arrays (26), the microstrip fabricated phase array feed network (28) having means for phase shifting any outgoing signal at one of the receiver/transmitter ports with respect to each of the N antenna ports, and vice versa, so as to electronically steer the radiating pattern of the antenna to any one of the N main lobes; and
C) means (35) for interconnecting the antenna port (29) to the means (43) for connecting the radiating elements in each co-linear array;
whereby the antenna system radiation pattern for each of the N main lobes has one or more sidelobes that each are attenuated with respect to the corresponding main lobe by an amount greater than the sidelobes generated by an N co-linear array antenna with a fixed number of radiating elements per co-linear array.
11. An antenna system as defined in claim 10, wherein the active and passive sides are angled downward toward the backplane of the antenna at an angle (53) of approximately -59 degrees.
12. An antenna system as defined in claim 1, wherein the co-linear arrays are spaced apart by approximately λ/2, where λ is the operating frequency of the antenna.
13. An antenna system as defined in claim 12, wherein the radiating elements within each co-linear array with more than one radiating element are spaced apart by approximately λ.
14. An antenna for generating electronically steerable beams in both the vertical and horizontal orientations, with commensurate azimuthal angles, comprising:
A) a first set of N co-linear arrays (26), each co-linear array having at least one electromagnetic radiating element (30), each radiating element positioned in a first, vertical polarization orientation, where N is an integer greater than 2, and wherein the number of radiating elements monotonically increases from the outermost co-linear arrays to the innermost co-linear arrays;
B) a second set of N co-linear arrays (26'), each co-linear array having at least one electromagnetic radiating element (30), each radiating element positioned in a second, horizontal polarization orientation that is orthogonal with respect to the radiating elements of the first set of co-linear arrays;
C) means (43) for connecting each radiating element within a co-linear array to all other radiating elements in the same array; and
D) an electrically conductive backplane onto which the co-linear arrays are positioned with respect thereto; and
wherein the radiating elements of the first and second sets of co-linear arrays are dipoles having an active side (49) and a passive side (51), wherein the active and passive sides of the radiating elements of the first set of co-linear arrays are co-linear with respect to each other, and wherein the active and passive sides of the radiating elements of the second set of co-linear arrays are each angled downward toward the backplane of the antenna.
15. An improved antenna system as defined in claim 14, wherein the active and passive sides of the horizontal radiating elements are angled downward toward the backplane of the antenna at an angle (53) of approximately -59 degrees.
US08/365,590 1994-12-28 1994-12-28 Antenna system with tapered aperture antenna and microstrip phase shifting feed network Expired - Lifetime US5589843A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US08/365,590 US5589843A (en) 1994-12-28 1994-12-28 Antenna system with tapered aperture antenna and microstrip phase shifting feed network

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US08/365,590 US5589843A (en) 1994-12-28 1994-12-28 Antenna system with tapered aperture antenna and microstrip phase shifting feed network

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US5589843A true US5589843A (en) 1996-12-31

Family

ID=23439493

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US08/365,590 Expired - Lifetime US5589843A (en) 1994-12-28 1994-12-28 Antenna system with tapered aperture antenna and microstrip phase shifting feed network

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US5589843A (en)

Cited By (34)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1997039494A1 (en) * 1996-04-12 1997-10-23 Allen Telecom Inc. Antenna having improved front-to-back ratio
EP0855760A2 (en) * 1997-01-22 1998-07-29 Radio Frequency Systems, Inc Microstrip collinear antenna
US5929823A (en) * 1997-07-17 1999-07-27 Metawave Communications Corporation Multiple beam planar array with parasitic elements
US5969689A (en) * 1997-01-13 1999-10-19 Metawave Communications Corporation Multi-sector pivotal antenna system and method
US5982337A (en) * 1998-02-20 1999-11-09 Marconi Aerospace Systems Inc. Cellular antennas for stratosphere coverage of multi-band annular earth pattern
US6034649A (en) * 1998-10-14 2000-03-07 Andrew Corporation Dual polarized based station antenna
US6072432A (en) * 1997-05-02 2000-06-06 Radio Frequency Systems, Inc. Hybrid power tapered/space tapered multi-beam antenna
US6072439A (en) * 1998-01-15 2000-06-06 Andrew Corporation Base station antenna for dual polarization
WO2000036705A1 (en) * 1998-12-17 2000-06-22 Metawave Communications Corporation Dual mode switched beam antenna
US6188373B1 (en) 1996-07-16 2001-02-13 Metawave Communications Corporation System and method for per beam elevation scanning
US6201511B1 (en) * 1997-04-18 2001-03-13 Ericsson Inc. Composite antenna for duplexer-free duplex operation terminals and method
US6285336B1 (en) 1999-11-03 2001-09-04 Andrew Corporation Folded dipole antenna
US6317099B1 (en) 2000-01-10 2001-11-13 Andrew Corporation Folded dipole antenna
US6317100B1 (en) * 1999-07-12 2001-11-13 Metawave Communications Corporation Planar antenna array with parasitic elements providing multiple beams of varying widths
US6353410B1 (en) * 1999-03-19 2002-03-05 Radio Frequency Systems, Inc. Space tapered antenna having compressed spacing or feed network phase progression, or both
US6448930B1 (en) 1999-10-15 2002-09-10 Andrew Corporation Indoor antenna
WO2003019717A2 (en) * 2001-08-23 2003-03-06 Metawave Communications Corporation Dual mode switched beam antenna
US20030227420A1 (en) * 2002-06-05 2003-12-11 Andrew Corporation Integrated aperture and calibration feed for adaptive beamforming systems
US6731904B1 (en) 1999-07-20 2004-05-04 Andrew Corporation Side-to-side repeater
US6885343B2 (en) 2002-09-26 2005-04-26 Andrew Corporation Stripline parallel-series-fed proximity-coupled cavity backed patch antenna array
US6934511B1 (en) 1999-07-20 2005-08-23 Andrew Corporation Integrated repeater
WO2006120397A1 (en) * 2005-05-12 2006-11-16 Qinetiq Limited Electrically steerable phased array antenna system
US20090278759A1 (en) * 2006-09-11 2009-11-12 Kmw Inc. Dual-Band Dual-Polarized Base Station Antenna for Mobile Communication
US7623868B2 (en) 2002-09-16 2009-11-24 Andrew Llc Multi-band wireless access point comprising coextensive coverage regions
US20100029197A1 (en) * 1999-07-20 2010-02-04 Andrew Llc Repeaters for wireless communication systems
US20130038504A1 (en) * 2011-08-08 2013-02-14 Stanley W. Livingston Continuous current rod antenna
US8558746B2 (en) 2011-11-16 2013-10-15 Andrew Llc Flat panel array antenna
US8866687B2 (en) 2011-11-16 2014-10-21 Andrew Llc Modular feed network
US9160049B2 (en) 2011-11-16 2015-10-13 Commscope Technologies Llc Antenna adapter
US9196950B1 (en) 2012-12-11 2015-11-24 Siklu Communication ltd. Systems and methods for vibration amelioration in a millimeter-wave communication network
GB2532206A (en) * 2014-11-06 2016-05-18 Bluwireless Tech Ltd Antennas
WO2017040830A1 (en) * 2015-09-04 2017-03-09 Elwha Llc Tunable metamaterial systems and methods
EP3758141A1 (en) * 2019-06-24 2020-12-30 CommScope Technologies LLC Base station antenna
US11641055B2 (en) 2020-09-01 2023-05-02 Commscope Technologies Llc Base station antennas having staggered linear arrays with improved phase center alignment between adjacent arrays

Citations (18)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3474447A (en) * 1968-05-02 1969-10-21 Raytheon Co Electronically scanned tacan antenna
US3701157A (en) * 1971-06-03 1972-10-24 Us Air Force Helicopter uhf antenna system for satellite communications
US3836970A (en) * 1971-06-08 1974-09-17 Siemens Ag Antenna array for aircraft navigation system
US3858218A (en) * 1973-04-03 1974-12-31 Hazeltine Corp Antenna system for radiating doppler coded pattern, using sequential modal excitation
US3997900A (en) * 1975-03-12 1976-12-14 The Singer Company Four beam printed antenna for Doopler application
US4032922A (en) * 1976-01-09 1977-06-28 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Multibeam adaptive array
US4062019A (en) * 1976-04-02 1977-12-06 Rca Corporation Low cost linear/circularly polarized antenna
US4063243A (en) * 1975-05-27 1977-12-13 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Conformal radar antenna
US4231040A (en) * 1978-12-11 1980-10-28 Motorola, Inc. Simultaneous multiple beam antenna array matrix and method thereof
US4316192A (en) * 1979-11-01 1982-02-16 The Bendix Corporation Beam forming network for butler matrix fed circular array
US4495502A (en) * 1982-01-27 1985-01-22 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air Force Multiple loop sidelobe canceller
US4596986A (en) * 1983-08-29 1986-06-24 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Sidelobe canceller with adaptive antenna subarraying using a weighted Butler matrix
US4633257A (en) * 1983-11-14 1986-12-30 Sanders Associates, Inc. Acquisition system employing circular array
US4882588A (en) * 1986-12-22 1989-11-21 Hughes Aircraft Company Steerable beam antenna system using butler matrix
US4905014A (en) * 1988-04-05 1990-02-27 Malibu Research Associates, Inc. Microwave phasing structures for electromagnetically emulating reflective surfaces and focusing elements of selected geometry
US5115248A (en) * 1989-09-26 1992-05-19 Agence Spatiale Europeenne Multibeam antenna feed device
US5255004A (en) * 1991-09-09 1993-10-19 Cubic Defense Systems, Inc. Linear array dual polarization for roll compensation
US5353032A (en) * 1992-05-05 1994-10-04 Alcatel Italia S.P.A. Circuit including a phase shifter for generating signals for electronically scanned antennas

Patent Citations (18)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3474447A (en) * 1968-05-02 1969-10-21 Raytheon Co Electronically scanned tacan antenna
US3701157A (en) * 1971-06-03 1972-10-24 Us Air Force Helicopter uhf antenna system for satellite communications
US3836970A (en) * 1971-06-08 1974-09-17 Siemens Ag Antenna array for aircraft navigation system
US3858218A (en) * 1973-04-03 1974-12-31 Hazeltine Corp Antenna system for radiating doppler coded pattern, using sequential modal excitation
US3997900A (en) * 1975-03-12 1976-12-14 The Singer Company Four beam printed antenna for Doopler application
US4063243A (en) * 1975-05-27 1977-12-13 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Conformal radar antenna
US4032922A (en) * 1976-01-09 1977-06-28 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Multibeam adaptive array
US4062019A (en) * 1976-04-02 1977-12-06 Rca Corporation Low cost linear/circularly polarized antenna
US4231040A (en) * 1978-12-11 1980-10-28 Motorola, Inc. Simultaneous multiple beam antenna array matrix and method thereof
US4316192A (en) * 1979-11-01 1982-02-16 The Bendix Corporation Beam forming network for butler matrix fed circular array
US4495502A (en) * 1982-01-27 1985-01-22 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air Force Multiple loop sidelobe canceller
US4596986A (en) * 1983-08-29 1986-06-24 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Sidelobe canceller with adaptive antenna subarraying using a weighted Butler matrix
US4633257A (en) * 1983-11-14 1986-12-30 Sanders Associates, Inc. Acquisition system employing circular array
US4882588A (en) * 1986-12-22 1989-11-21 Hughes Aircraft Company Steerable beam antenna system using butler matrix
US4905014A (en) * 1988-04-05 1990-02-27 Malibu Research Associates, Inc. Microwave phasing structures for electromagnetically emulating reflective surfaces and focusing elements of selected geometry
US5115248A (en) * 1989-09-26 1992-05-19 Agence Spatiale Europeenne Multibeam antenna feed device
US5255004A (en) * 1991-09-09 1993-10-19 Cubic Defense Systems, Inc. Linear array dual polarization for roll compensation
US5353032A (en) * 1992-05-05 1994-10-04 Alcatel Italia S.P.A. Circuit including a phase shifter for generating signals for electronically scanned antennas

Cited By (53)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1997039494A1 (en) * 1996-04-12 1997-10-23 Allen Telecom Inc. Antenna having improved front-to-back ratio
US6188373B1 (en) 1996-07-16 2001-02-13 Metawave Communications Corporation System and method for per beam elevation scanning
US5969689A (en) * 1997-01-13 1999-10-19 Metawave Communications Corporation Multi-sector pivotal antenna system and method
EP0855760A2 (en) * 1997-01-22 1998-07-29 Radio Frequency Systems, Inc Microstrip collinear antenna
EP0855760A3 (en) * 1997-01-22 1998-08-05 Radio Frequency Systems, Inc Microstrip collinear antenna
AU740174C (en) * 1997-01-22 2004-05-06 Radio Frequency Systems Inc. Antenna having double-sided printed circuit board with collinear, alternating and opposing radiating elements and microstrip transmission line
US5963168A (en) * 1997-01-22 1999-10-05 Radio Frequency Systems, Inc. Antenna having double-sided printed circuit board with collinear, alternating and opposing radiating elements and microstrip transmission lines
AU740174B2 (en) * 1997-01-22 2001-11-01 Radio Frequency Systems Inc. Antenna having double-sided printed circuit board with collinear, alternating and opposing radiating elements and microstrip transmission line
US6201511B1 (en) * 1997-04-18 2001-03-13 Ericsson Inc. Composite antenna for duplexer-free duplex operation terminals and method
US6072432A (en) * 1997-05-02 2000-06-06 Radio Frequency Systems, Inc. Hybrid power tapered/space tapered multi-beam antenna
US5929823A (en) * 1997-07-17 1999-07-27 Metawave Communications Corporation Multiple beam planar array with parasitic elements
US6072439A (en) * 1998-01-15 2000-06-06 Andrew Corporation Base station antenna for dual polarization
US5982337A (en) * 1998-02-20 1999-11-09 Marconi Aerospace Systems Inc. Cellular antennas for stratosphere coverage of multi-band annular earth pattern
US6034649A (en) * 1998-10-14 2000-03-07 Andrew Corporation Dual polarized based station antenna
WO2000036705A1 (en) * 1998-12-17 2000-06-22 Metawave Communications Corporation Dual mode switched beam antenna
US6198434B1 (en) 1998-12-17 2001-03-06 Metawave Communications Corporation Dual mode switched beam antenna
US6583760B2 (en) 1998-12-17 2003-06-24 Metawave Communications Corporation Dual mode switched beam antenna
US6353410B1 (en) * 1999-03-19 2002-03-05 Radio Frequency Systems, Inc. Space tapered antenna having compressed spacing or feed network phase progression, or both
US6317100B1 (en) * 1999-07-12 2001-11-13 Metawave Communications Corporation Planar antenna array with parasitic elements providing multiple beams of varying widths
US6745003B1 (en) 1999-07-20 2004-06-01 Andrew Corporation Adaptive cancellation for wireless repeaters
US6934511B1 (en) 1999-07-20 2005-08-23 Andrew Corporation Integrated repeater
US8358970B2 (en) 1999-07-20 2013-01-22 Andrew Corporation Repeaters for wireless communication systems
US8010042B2 (en) 1999-07-20 2011-08-30 Andrew Llc Repeaters for wireless communication systems
US20100029197A1 (en) * 1999-07-20 2010-02-04 Andrew Llc Repeaters for wireless communication systems
US6731904B1 (en) 1999-07-20 2004-05-04 Andrew Corporation Side-to-side repeater
US8971796B2 (en) 1999-07-20 2015-03-03 Andrew Llc Repeaters for wireless communication systems
US8630581B2 (en) 1999-07-20 2014-01-14 Andrew Llc Repeaters for wireless communication systems
US6448930B1 (en) 1999-10-15 2002-09-10 Andrew Corporation Indoor antenna
US6285336B1 (en) 1999-11-03 2001-09-04 Andrew Corporation Folded dipole antenna
US6317099B1 (en) 2000-01-10 2001-11-13 Andrew Corporation Folded dipole antenna
WO2003019717A3 (en) * 2001-08-23 2003-09-18 Metawave Comm Corp Dual mode switched beam antenna
WO2003019717A2 (en) * 2001-08-23 2003-03-06 Metawave Communications Corporation Dual mode switched beam antenna
US20030227420A1 (en) * 2002-06-05 2003-12-11 Andrew Corporation Integrated aperture and calibration feed for adaptive beamforming systems
US7623868B2 (en) 2002-09-16 2009-11-24 Andrew Llc Multi-band wireless access point comprising coextensive coverage regions
US6885343B2 (en) 2002-09-26 2005-04-26 Andrew Corporation Stripline parallel-series-fed proximity-coupled cavity backed patch antenna array
WO2006120397A1 (en) * 2005-05-12 2006-11-16 Qinetiq Limited Electrically steerable phased array antenna system
US20080191940A1 (en) * 2005-05-12 2008-08-14 Qinetiq Limited Electrically Steerable Phased Array Antenna System
US7609205B2 (en) 2005-05-12 2009-10-27 Qinetiq Limited Electrically steerable phased array antenna system
US8199063B2 (en) * 2006-09-11 2012-06-12 Kmw Inc. Dual-band dual-polarized base station antenna for mobile communication
US20090278759A1 (en) * 2006-09-11 2009-11-12 Kmw Inc. Dual-Band Dual-Polarized Base Station Antenna for Mobile Communication
US20130038504A1 (en) * 2011-08-08 2013-02-14 Stanley W. Livingston Continuous current rod antenna
US8665173B2 (en) * 2011-08-08 2014-03-04 Raytheon Company Continuous current rod antenna
US8558746B2 (en) 2011-11-16 2013-10-15 Andrew Llc Flat panel array antenna
US8866687B2 (en) 2011-11-16 2014-10-21 Andrew Llc Modular feed network
US9160049B2 (en) 2011-11-16 2015-10-13 Commscope Technologies Llc Antenna adapter
US9196950B1 (en) 2012-12-11 2015-11-24 Siklu Communication ltd. Systems and methods for vibration amelioration in a millimeter-wave communication network
GB2532206A (en) * 2014-11-06 2016-05-18 Bluwireless Tech Ltd Antennas
WO2017040830A1 (en) * 2015-09-04 2017-03-09 Elwha Llc Tunable metamaterial systems and methods
EP3758141A1 (en) * 2019-06-24 2020-12-30 CommScope Technologies LLC Base station antenna
US11108169B2 (en) 2019-06-24 2021-08-31 Commscope Technologies Llc Base station antenna
US11600931B2 (en) 2019-06-24 2023-03-07 Commscope Technologies Llc Base station antenna
US11641055B2 (en) 2020-09-01 2023-05-02 Commscope Technologies Llc Base station antennas having staggered linear arrays with improved phase center alignment between adjacent arrays
US11909103B2 (en) 2020-09-01 2024-02-20 Commscope Technologies Llc Base station antennas having staggered linear arrays with improved phase center alignment between adjacent arrays

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5589843A (en) Antenna system with tapered aperture antenna and microstrip phase shifting feed network
US11469497B2 (en) Dual-beam sector antenna and array
US11670865B2 (en) Butler-based quasi-omni MIMO antenna
US11917427B2 (en) Multi-beam base station antennas having wideband radiating elements
US7212163B2 (en) Circular polarized array antenna
US8237619B2 (en) Dual beam sector antenna array with low loss beam forming network
CN107785665B (en) Mixed structure dual-frequency dual-beam three-column phased array antenna
US9379438B1 (en) Fragmented aperture for the Ka/K/Ku frequency bands
US11677139B2 (en) Base station antennas having arrays of radiating elements with 4 ports without usage of diplexers
CN112332111B (en) Double circular polarization expandable active subarray
WO2002041450A1 (en) Dual-beam antenna aperture
KR20070088696A (en) An antenna arrangement and a method relating thereto
US6072432A (en) Hybrid power tapered/space tapered multi-beam antenna
CN112186369A (en) Three-beam dual-polarized array antenna
Cantrell et al. Wideband array antenna concept
US11563271B2 (en) Antenna array with ABFN circuitry
EP2290744B1 (en) Closed shape beam forming network
US6353410B1 (en) Space tapered antenna having compressed spacing or feed network phase progression, or both
US20230395974A1 (en) Mixed element beam forming antenna
US20240128638A1 (en) Twin-beam antennas having hybrid couplers
Dominguez et al. Multi-Beam Electronically Steerable Antenna Array concepts for an X-Band Deep Space Gateway Data Link
Kelly et al. Microstrip Array for Troposcatter Communications

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: RADIO FREQUENCY SYSTEMS, INC., NEW JERSEY

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:MEREDITH, SHELDON K.;GAUKEL, KEVIN J.;ARNOLD, PITT W.;REEL/FRAME:007383/0252

Effective date: 19950220

Owner name: RADIO FREQUENCY SYSTEMS, INC., NEW JERSEY

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:HUNT, WARREN F.;CONNOLLY, KEVIN J.;REEL/FRAME:007383/0248

Effective date: 19950214

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 8

AS Assignment

Owner name: RADIO FREQUENCY SYSTEMS, INC., CONNECTICUT

Free format text: MERGER AND NAME CHANGE;ASSIGNORS:RADIO FREQUENCY SYSTEMS, INC.;ALCATEL NA CABLE SYSTEMS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:015370/0553

Effective date: 20040624

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 12

AS Assignment

Owner name: CREDIT SUISSE AG, NEW YORK

Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:LUCENT, ALCATEL;REEL/FRAME:029821/0001

Effective date: 20130130

Owner name: CREDIT SUISSE AG, NEW YORK

Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:ALCATEL LUCENT;REEL/FRAME:029821/0001

Effective date: 20130130

AS Assignment

Owner name: ALCATEL LUCENT, FRANCE

Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:CREDIT SUISSE AG;REEL/FRAME:033868/0001

Effective date: 20140819