US7893366B2 - Method of weigh batching for selected batch formula and batch size - Google Patents
Method of weigh batching for selected batch formula and batch size Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US7893366B2 US7893366B2 US12/032,934 US3293408A US7893366B2 US 7893366 B2 US7893366 B2 US 7893366B2 US 3293408 A US3293408 A US 3293408A US 7893366 B2 US7893366 B2 US 7893366B2
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- batch
- ingredient
- weigh
- formulae
- ingredients
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active, expires
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01G—WEIGHING
- G01G13/00—Weighing apparatus with automatic feed or discharge for weighing-out batches of material
- G01G13/02—Means for automatically loading weigh pans or other receptacles, e.g. disposable containers, under control of the weighing mechanism
- G01G13/12—Arrangements for compensating for material suspended at cut-off, i.e. for material which is still falling from the feeder when the weigher stops the feeder
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01G—WEIGHING
- G01G19/00—Weighing apparatus or methods adapted for special purposes not provided for in the preceding groups
- G01G19/22—Weighing apparatus or methods adapted for special purposes not provided for in the preceding groups for apportioning materials by weighing prior to mixing them
- G01G19/34—Weighing apparatus or methods adapted for special purposes not provided for in the preceding groups for apportioning materials by weighing prior to mixing them with electrical control means
Definitions
- the present invention relates to the field of automatic weighing devices, and more particularly to a weighing device for ingredients combined in a batch.
- the computer will observe the additional weight that fell after the conveying device was deactivated and use this as a “free fall” weight that will be stored in a computer memory or other data storage device and then utilized and subtracted from the desired final target weight for that ingredient when it is used subsequently.
- the end result is that the system will then, on subsequent operations of this ingredient's conveying mechanism, pre-actively deactivate motion early—thus allowing for the estimated predetermined mid air ingredient free fall weight to accumulate on the scale and the desired final weight of the ingredient to be more closely achieved.
- some weighing systems will alter the speed of the conveying device as the desired target weight is approached. This allows an ingredient to be delivered at a very high speed rate to a scale platform during the initial weigh-up of an ingredient, but as the target weigh is approached, the system will set the speed at a much slower rate which will further improve accuracy because the system is delivering ingredient to the scale platform at a much slower rate during final ingredient cut off.
- FIG. 1 is a schematic view illustrating variations in free fall weights for the same ingredient in different batch formulae.
- the present invention provides a method of weigh batching for batch formulae using a number of ingredients conveyed to a weigh hopper by a number of different conveyers. Free fall weights and conveyor delivery speeds for each of the ingredients and each of the conveyors used to convey each ingredient are stored in a control system memory. The stored information is used to prepare batches of various formulated products optimizing both the weigh up time and the ingredient weight accuracy.
- This invention dramatically improves upon any prior practices in the weigh batching art by improving upon the final accuracy by utilizing a method whereby these free fall weights and conveying device delivery speeds are stored in the control systems memory or other data storage in a multi dimensional data storage table by ingredient and by each conveyor that can be used to convey that ingredient.
- each ingredient may use different conveyors that may be used in different formula types, as that ingredient is used in a formula id, and as that ingredient is used in a final batch size, the exact “free fall” weights are stored in memory for every combination of these variations.
- the ideal free fall weight and motor speed combinations for each different situation is stored in memory and recalled for use versus the previous industry practice of just one for each ingredient.
- both the initial high speed setting and the final low speed setting can be altered and stored by ingredient, as the ingredient is conveyed in a particular conveyor, used in a formula type, as the ingredient is used in a formula id, and as the ingredient is used in a final batch size.
- the conveying device may have started at a conveying speed delivery rate of say 100 pounds per second with 50 pounds of free fall, when only 10 pounds of that same ingredient was needed. This would have forced the control system to try and deactivate the conveying mechanism before any weight would have even touched the weighing platform.
- the method described in this invention would have instead allowed the user to define a high speed conveying rate of (as an example) 100 pounds per second for that ingredient when the formula type, formula and batch size where such that 1000 pounds was required in the batch; but when the formula type, formula, and batch size was 10 pounds, the system could have been configured to start at a rate of say 1 pound per second and then move to a slower speed during the final delivery of the ingredient of say 0.1 pounds per second and a free fall 0.1 pound.
- the method practiced in this invention will instead allow the user to store these free fall weights and ingredient conveyor high and low speed rates by ingredient and for each of the various conveyors and changes that can cause variation in pile height and amount of ingredient included in the batch including formula type, formula, and batch size.
- the user is allowed to define in a control system set up screen to what amount of accuracy the free fall compensation and speed control accuracy data storage is desired.
- the method as practiced by the invention will not only automatically smarten itself by changing free fall weights by a defined percentage as better experience in weigh up is obtained, but the method will also allow the user to allow the system to automatically alter ingredient speeds to optimize both the weigh up speed of the batch and also the final accuracy. This is achieved by having the computer control system automatically change the high speed settings stored in the multi-dimensional table to maximize weigh up time and automatically change the low speed setting stored in the multi-dimensional data table to maximize weigh up accuracy.
- the defaults are stored in the upper most level and then will roll down into the greater detail level as elected by the user in the set up screen as batches are weighed up and experience is realized in levels of different conveyors, formula types, different formulas and different batch sizes of that formula.
- the end result of practicing the invention as described above is a system that is much more accurate than traditional weigh batching methods and a system that is weighing up as quickly as possible while still maximizing accuracy.
Abstract
A method of weigh batching for batch formulae using a number of ingredients conveyed to a weigh hopper by a number of different conveyers. Free fall weights and conveyor delivery speeds for each of the ingredients and each of the conveyors used to convey each ingredient are stored in a control system memory. The stored information is used to prepare batches of various formulated products optimizing both the weigh up time and the ingredient weight accuracy.
Description
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/890,726 filed Feb. 20, 2007 entitled “Weigh Batching”, which is incorporated herein by reference.
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to the field of automatic weighing devices, and more particularly to a weighing device for ingredients combined in a batch.
2. Description of Related Art
In the batch weighing field, accuracy of a mixture is often affected by the material in mid-air that falls onto the weighing platform after the conveying device is deactivated. Since most weigh batching devices tend to deactivate after an ingredient weight is determined on the scale, the end result is an “over shoot” of the desired target weights to be included of an ingredient caused by the mid-air ingredients to fall onto the scale and add additional weight. Also, traditional systems are often continuously trading off the improvement in speed obtained by an ingredient being conveyed into a batch at a high rate, and improvements in weigh-up accuracy achieved by conveying an ingredient very slowly.
In the batch weighing field, a method of auto free fall adjustment has been the widely used method of improving the accuracy of a weighing up ingredients in a weigh batching system. This widely used industry method utilizes a concept whereby the conveying device delivering material to the weigh platform is deactivated by the control system in advance of the desired weight for an ingredient being actually achieved on the scale. This then allows the material in mid air to continue to fall and the weight of this “mid air” material to be accumulated in the total weight of the batch. After the material falls on to the scale, the computer will observe the additional weight that fell after the conveying device was deactivated and use this as a “free fall” weight that will be stored in a computer memory or other data storage device and then utilized and subtracted from the desired final target weight for that ingredient when it is used subsequently. The end result is that the system will then, on subsequent operations of this ingredient's conveying mechanism, pre-actively deactivate motion early—thus allowing for the estimated predetermined mid air ingredient free fall weight to accumulate on the scale and the desired final weight of the ingredient to be more closely achieved.
In addition to a weighing device deactivating a conveyor earlier by a “free fall or pre-act weight”, some weighing systems will alter the speed of the conveying device as the desired target weight is approached. This allows an ingredient to be delivered at a very high speed rate to a scale platform during the initial weigh-up of an ingredient, but as the target weigh is approached, the system will set the speed at a much slower rate which will further improve accuracy because the system is delivering ingredient to the scale platform at a much slower rate during final ingredient cut off.
There has existed a need for a new and improved automatic weighing device that can better compensate for variations in the manner by which ingredients are combined in a batch.
These and other attributes of the invention will become more clear upon a thorough study of the following description of the best mode for carrying out the invention, particularly when reviewed in conjunction with the drawings, wherein:
Briefly stated, the present invention provides a method of weigh batching for batch formulae using a number of ingredients conveyed to a weigh hopper by a number of different conveyers. Free fall weights and conveyor delivery speeds for each of the ingredients and each of the conveyors used to convey each ingredient are stored in a control system memory. The stored information is used to prepare batches of various formulated products optimizing both the weigh up time and the ingredient weight accuracy.
This invention dramatically improves upon any prior practices in the weigh batching art by improving upon the final accuracy by utilizing a method whereby these free fall weights and conveying device delivery speeds are stored in the control systems memory or other data storage in a multi dimensional data storage table by ingredient and by each conveyor that can be used to convey that ingredient. Thus, as each ingredient may use different conveyors that may be used in different formula types, as that ingredient is used in a formula id, and as that ingredient is used in a final batch size, the exact “free fall” weights are stored in memory for every combination of these variations. Thus, the ideal free fall weight and motor speed combinations for each different situation is stored in memory and recalled for use versus the previous industry practice of just one for each ingredient.
From the free fall weight improvement portion of the improvement, the reason this improvement is significant is that different formulas will have different size piles upon the scale when the ingredient is added. (see FIG. 1 , a1 versus a2) Thus, even though a free fall weight might have been precisely determined and stored the last time the ingredient was used, because this time the pile height is different—the total accumulated weight will be different from the ideal target weight by the difference in the weight of the ingredient contained in the height the ingredient has to fall (see FIG. 1 , a3).
From the conveyor setting portion of this inventions improvement, both the initial high speed setting and the final low speed setting can be altered and stored by ingredient, as the ingredient is conveyed in a particular conveyor, used in a formula type, as the ingredient is used in a formula id, and as the ingredient is used in a final batch size. As an example of this, if one formula calls for an inclusion of 1000 pounds of an ingredient and the next formula calls for only 10 pounds of that same ingredient, without the addition of the method described in this invention, the conveying device may have started at a conveying speed delivery rate of say 100 pounds per second with 50 pounds of free fall, when only 10 pounds of that same ingredient was needed. This would have forced the control system to try and deactivate the conveying mechanism before any weight would have even touched the weighing platform.
The method described in this invention would have instead allowed the user to define a high speed conveying rate of (as an example) 100 pounds per second for that ingredient when the formula type, formula and batch size where such that 1000 pounds was required in the batch; but when the formula type, formula, and batch size was 10 pounds, the system could have been configured to start at a rate of say 1 pound per second and then move to a slower speed during the final delivery of the ingredient of say 0.1 pounds per second and a free fall 0.1 pound.
The method practiced in this invention will instead allow the user to store these free fall weights and ingredient conveyor high and low speed rates by ingredient and for each of the various conveyors and changes that can cause variation in pile height and amount of ingredient included in the batch including formula type, formula, and batch size. The user is allowed to define in a control system set up screen to what amount of accuracy the free fall compensation and speed control accuracy data storage is desired.
In order to automate the configuration of the system, the method as practiced by the invention will not only automatically smarten itself by changing free fall weights by a defined percentage as better experience in weigh up is obtained, but the method will also allow the user to allow the system to automatically alter ingredient speeds to optimize both the weigh up speed of the batch and also the final accuracy. This is achieved by having the computer control system automatically change the high speed settings stored in the multi-dimensional table to maximize weigh up time and automatically change the low speed setting stored in the multi-dimensional data table to maximize weigh up accuracy.
To aid in user set up, the defaults are stored in the upper most level and then will roll down into the greater detail level as elected by the user in the set up screen as batches are weighed up and experience is realized in levels of different conveyors, formula types, different formulas and different batch sizes of that formula.
The end result of practicing the invention as described above is a system that is much more accurate than traditional weigh batching methods and a system that is weighing up as quickly as possible while still maximizing accuracy.
Although only an exemplary embodiment of the invention has been described in detail above, those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that many modifications are possible without materially departing from the novel teachings and advantages of this invention. Accordingly, all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of this invention as defined in the following claims.
Having thereby described the subject matter of the present invention, it should be apparent that many substitutions, modifications, and variations of the invention are possible in light of the above teachings. It is therefore to be understood that the invention as taught and described herein is only to be limited to the extent of the breadth and scope of the appended claims.
Claims (3)
1. A method of weigh batching for batch formulae prepared with a plurality of ingredients conveyed to a weigh hopper by a plurality of conveyors, the method comprising the steps of:
storing a plurality of batch formulae in a control system memory, each of the plurality of formulae having a plurality of ingredients;
storing free fall weights and conveyor delivery speeds for each of the plurality of ingredients and for each of the plurality of conveyors used to convey each ingredient as each ingredient is used in each of the plurality of batch formulae and a plurality of batch formulae batch sizes; and
utilizing stored information for the batch formulae, free fall weights and conveyor delivery speeds to prepare batches of formulated products of a selected one of the plurality of batch formulae in a selected one of the plurality of batch formulae batch sizes.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein the conveyor delivery speeds include high speed settings for optimizing weigh up time, and low speed settings for optimizing ingredient weight accuracy.
3. The method of claim 2 , further including the step of modifying the stored free fall weights by a predetermined percentage based on actual weights of ingredients used in prior batches of formulated products.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US12/032,934 US7893366B2 (en) | 2007-02-20 | 2008-02-18 | Method of weigh batching for selected batch formula and batch size |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US89072607P | 2007-02-20 | 2007-02-20 | |
US12/032,934 US7893366B2 (en) | 2007-02-20 | 2008-02-18 | Method of weigh batching for selected batch formula and batch size |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20080201006A1 US20080201006A1 (en) | 2008-08-21 |
US7893366B2 true US7893366B2 (en) | 2011-02-22 |
Family
ID=39707359
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US12/032,934 Active 2028-08-21 US7893366B2 (en) | 2007-02-20 | 2008-02-18 | Method of weigh batching for selected batch formula and batch size |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US7893366B2 (en) |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20110192654A1 (en) * | 2010-02-09 | 2011-08-11 | Brandt Robert O | Precision dynamic measurement apparatus |
US11448547B2 (en) * | 2019-08-02 | 2022-09-20 | Bourgault Industries Ltd. | Container weighing system method and apparatus |
Families Citing this family (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7893366B2 (en) * | 2007-02-20 | 2011-02-22 | Gaalswyk Mark K | Method of weigh batching for selected batch formula and batch size |
CN110231080B (en) * | 2019-07-08 | 2020-12-22 | 安徽科技学院 | Finished product weighing device based on fertilizer production |
Citations (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3685602A (en) * | 1971-05-28 | 1972-08-22 | Gerald C Mayer | Automatic batch weigher |
US3708026A (en) * | 1971-07-01 | 1973-01-02 | Blh Electronics | Digital batching |
US4222448A (en) * | 1979-06-29 | 1980-09-16 | Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation | Automatic batch weighing system |
US4961887A (en) * | 1988-08-11 | 1990-10-09 | Southwire Company | Batch control system and process for insulating a metallic rod |
US5340211A (en) * | 1986-02-26 | 1994-08-23 | Micro Chemical, Inc. | Programmable apparatus and method for delivering microingredient feed additives by weight |
US6441322B1 (en) * | 1999-11-24 | 2002-08-27 | The Procter & Gamble Company | Method for controlling an amount of material delivered during a material transfer |
US20080145466A1 (en) * | 1999-07-29 | 2008-06-19 | Beane Glenn L | Method, system, and computer program for controlling a hydraulic press |
US20080201006A1 (en) * | 2007-02-20 | 2008-08-21 | Gaalswyk Mark K | Weigh batching |
US7527078B2 (en) * | 2005-10-13 | 2009-05-05 | Fluid Management, Llc | Apparatuses for dispensing materials volumetrically and gravimetrically based on a stored formula and methods of dispensing formulas using the same |
-
2008
- 2008-02-18 US US12/032,934 patent/US7893366B2/en active Active
Patent Citations (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3685602A (en) * | 1971-05-28 | 1972-08-22 | Gerald C Mayer | Automatic batch weigher |
US3708026A (en) * | 1971-07-01 | 1973-01-02 | Blh Electronics | Digital batching |
US4222448A (en) * | 1979-06-29 | 1980-09-16 | Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation | Automatic batch weighing system |
US5340211A (en) * | 1986-02-26 | 1994-08-23 | Micro Chemical, Inc. | Programmable apparatus and method for delivering microingredient feed additives by weight |
US4961887A (en) * | 1988-08-11 | 1990-10-09 | Southwire Company | Batch control system and process for insulating a metallic rod |
US20080145466A1 (en) * | 1999-07-29 | 2008-06-19 | Beane Glenn L | Method, system, and computer program for controlling a hydraulic press |
US6441322B1 (en) * | 1999-11-24 | 2002-08-27 | The Procter & Gamble Company | Method for controlling an amount of material delivered during a material transfer |
US7527078B2 (en) * | 2005-10-13 | 2009-05-05 | Fluid Management, Llc | Apparatuses for dispensing materials volumetrically and gravimetrically based on a stored formula and methods of dispensing formulas using the same |
US20080201006A1 (en) * | 2007-02-20 | 2008-08-21 | Gaalswyk Mark K | Weigh batching |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20110192654A1 (en) * | 2010-02-09 | 2011-08-11 | Brandt Robert O | Precision dynamic measurement apparatus |
US8299374B2 (en) * | 2010-02-09 | 2012-10-30 | Brandt Robert O | Precision dynamic measurement apparatus |
US11448547B2 (en) * | 2019-08-02 | 2022-09-20 | Bourgault Industries Ltd. | Container weighing system method and apparatus |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20080201006A1 (en) | 2008-08-21 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7893366B2 (en) | Method of weigh batching for selected batch formula and batch size | |
US4534428A (en) | Vibratory feeder control for a weighing system | |
US4553616A (en) | Combinatorial weighing apparatus having memory for storing weighing conditions | |
CN101711723B (en) | Apparatus for dosing powdery or granulated materials in capsules or the like | |
US20070144792A1 (en) | Method for automatically feeding a combination weigher | |
JP6668643B2 (en) | Control method of belt conveyor system | |
US4385670A (en) | Method for filling packaging containers by weight | |
US6797055B2 (en) | Combination weighing apparatus with two different modes, one mode where all hoppers are involved in a combinational calculation and another mode where combinational calculation is carried out only on a first group of weighing hoppers and where a second group of hoppers may be discharged or not based on a weight independent criteria | |
CA2586827C (en) | Weigh batching | |
CN110088580A (en) | Combined metering device | |
US2141296A (en) | Weighing machine | |
JP2017100791A (en) | Powder feed device | |
CN106687395B (en) | Material delivery system, order fulfillment system and its method for supplying working cell | |
EP0105756A2 (en) | Combinatorial weighing apparatus and method | |
CN107708961B (en) | Method for preparing material conversion in extrusion equipment for film making machine | |
JP4676837B2 (en) | Combination scale | |
EP1421352B1 (en) | A method and an apparatus for batching items | |
EP3093629A1 (en) | System and method for dispensing products | |
US10520350B2 (en) | Controlled batch distribution | |
JP6245197B2 (en) | Raw material level control method, raw material blending method, raw material level control device and raw material blending device | |
US11009386B2 (en) | Combination weighing device and combination weighing method with reduced residual waste | |
JP4043377B2 (en) | Weighing device | |
GB910435A (en) | Dispensing machine | |
CN112298675A (en) | Batching system and batching method for particle material subpackaging dynamic formula | |
JP3815783B2 (en) | Combination weighing method and apparatus |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 8TH YR, SMALL ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M2552) Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 12TH YR, SMALL ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M2553); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: SMALL ENTITY Year of fee payment: 12 |