|Numéro de publication||US7946576 B2|
|Type de publication||Octroi|
|Numéro de demande||US 12/027,695|
|Date de publication||24 mai 2011|
|Date de dépôt||7 févr. 2008|
|Date de priorité||23 févr. 2004|
|État de paiement des frais||Payé|
|Autre référence de publication||CN1661636A, CN103258369A, US20050183926, US20080128241|
|Numéro de publication||027695, 12027695, US 7946576 B2, US 7946576B2, US-B2-7946576, US7946576 B2, US7946576B2|
|Inventeurs||David C. Deaville, Bob Mackenzie, Carl A. Phillips, Kenneth B. Wood|
|Cessionnaire d'origine||Mei, Inc.|
|Exporter la citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Citations de brevets (22), Référencé par (1), Classifications (31), Événements juridiques (7)|
|Liens externes: USPTO, Cession USPTO, Espacenet|
This application is a divisional of U.S. Ser. No. 10/784,733, filed on Feb. 23, 2004.
Document acceptor assemblies, such as those used in the vending and gaming industries, typically store accepted banknotes or other documents in a cassette. A stacking mechanism may be incorporated in the assembly to facilitate storage of the documents in the cassette.
Various types of stackers are known, including piston-type stackers. It is generally desirable for the system to obtain confirmation that an accepted document has been stored properly in the cassette. One way to accomplish that is to verify the piston has completed its full stroke cycle and has returned to its home position. A linear or rotary encoder may be provided for that purpose. Unfortunately, the addition of such components may add substantially to the cost of the document stacker.
Another technique relies only on signals from the home sensor to determine whether the piston has completed its full stroke cycle. Although systems incorporating that technique may be simpler and less costly, they are unable to differentiate between different situations that may cause stalling of the stacker. For example, the stacker may stall either because the cassette is full or because the stacker mechanism is jammed. Preferably, an automated system should handle those situations differently because the former situation is the result of normal operation, whereas the latter situation should be detected as a fault.
More generally, it would be helpful to be able to detect various abnormal events during operation of a document stacker and to distinguish those events from expected, normal events.
The invention relates to techniques that may be used in connection with a document stacker. The techniques may facilitate the determination of whether an abnormal event has occurred during a stacking operation.
In one aspect, a method includes sensing electric signals from the actuator during a document stacking operation and determining whether an abnormal event has occurred based on the sensed signals.
In another aspect, an apparatus includes a document stacker that has a cassette to store documents, a piston to push a document into the cassette, an actuator to control movement of the piston, and first circuitry to sense electric signals from the actuator. Additional circuitry is coupled to the actuator to control its operation. The additional circuitry also is coupled to the first circuitry to obtain signals indicative of how the actuator is functioning during a document stacking operation. The additional circuitry is adapted to determine whether an abnormal event has occurred based on the signals indicative of how the actuator is functioning.
In various implementations, one or more of the following features may be present. For example, determining whether an abnormal event has occurred may include comparing one or more values derived from the sensed values to at least one reference value. The sensed values may be indicative of the actuator load (e.g., current). In some cases, the reference value may be adjusted based on previously sensed values of actuator load.
Determining whether an abnormal event has occurred may include comparing an amount of time that has elapsed between specified sensed values of actuator load to a predetermined amount of time. In some implementations, an amount of time that has elapsed from a specified point in the stacking operation to a peak value of actuator load may be identified. Determining whether an abnormal event has occurred then may be based on the identified amount of time. In other implementations, an amount of time that has elapsed from a specified point in the stacking operation to a predetermined threshold value of actuator load may be identified. Determining whether an abnormal event has occurred then may be based on the identified amount of time.
In some implementations, determining whether an abnormal event has occurred may include comparing an actual profile of the actuator load with an expected profile. Alternatively, the actuator load may be integrated for a specified period of time during a document stacking operation to obtain an integrated value. Determining whether an abnormal event has occurred may be based on the integrated value.
Determining whether an abnormal event has occurred may be based on combinations of the foregoing techniques.
The techniques may be particularly advantageous, for example, in determining whether a document cassette is full or the stacker is jammed.
When the techniques are incorporated into a document acceptor, the techniques may include receiving a document in the document acceptor, determining whether the document is considered to be valid, transporting the document from the acceptor to the stacker, and storing the document in the cassette.
Other features and advantages will be readily apparent from the following detailed description, the accompanying drawings and the claims.
The validator 12 determines whether inserted currency documents are acceptable. As used herein, currency documents may include, but are not limited to, banknotes, bills, security documents, paper currency and the like that may be used as legal tender in exchange for goods or service, and that may be inserted into a currency acceptor for validation and storage in return for goods or services.
Banknotes may be inserted one at a time into the validator 12 at entrance 16. From the entrance 16, the banknote 38 is transported through the validator 12 to the validator's banknote output by pairs of pulleys or rollers and belts that grip the side edges of the banknote and that may be driven by a motor and drive train according to known techniques.
As the banknote is transported through the validator 12, the banknote may be tested by a group of sensors to ascertain its validity and denomination. Output signals from the sensors may be processed by logic circuits in the validator 12 to determine whether the banknote is acceptable. Any of various known techniques using optical, magnetic, inductive or other types of sensors may be used to test the banknote. A banknote which is unacceptable may be ejected back out through the entrance 16.
An acceptable banknote is transported into an interconnection region 18 in which the validator 12 and stacker 14 are connected together. The interconnection region 18 establishes a smooth uninterrupted path for a banknote to follow when leaving the validator 12 and entering the stacker 14. The accepted banknote is transported from the stacker's entrance into a pre-storage channel 20. In a fashion somewhat analogous to the way that a picture frame holds a picture, the channel 20 “frames” the banknote at its side edges and holds it stiff prior to stacking. The piston-type stacker 14, described in greater detail below, pushes the accepted banknote into a cassette 22 where it is stored until removed by service personnel. The cassette is designed to be readily removed or opened by service personnel so that stacked banknotes can be removed.
As shown in
An optical switch 40 is provided for detecting the presence of a flag 42 that indicates when the piston 28 is in the home position (i.e., when the piston is not obstructing the pre-storage document channel 20). The flag 42 may be formed, for example, as a protrusion from the backside of the piston 28.
A sensor is provided to sense electrical signals from the motor during a document stacking operation. In a particular implementation, as shown in
The control system 204 may include a microprocessor 206 to control when the motor 36 is turned on or off in response to signals from the optical sensor 40 and the motor current sensor 200. As discussed below, the microprocessor 206 also can measure the passage of time using, for example, an interrupt software routine driven by a clock signal.
During the initial stage of the stacking state, power is applied to the motor 36, and an eccentric begins to rotate, thereby lifting the piston 28. As illustrated in
A DC motor (such as motor 36) with a substantially fixed input voltage draws a current that is approximately proportional to the mechanical load placed upon it. For example, during the transition from the home position to the initial stacking stage of
When the piston 28 is fully extended as shown in
Next, the piston 28 reverses direction and travels in the opposite direction as illustrated by
Under different circumstances, such as when the cassette 22 is substantially full. the expected values of motor current may vary significantly from the values indicated by curve 50. An example of the motor current profile when the cassette 22 is substantially full is indicated by curve 62 (
In some situations, the pre-storage document channel 20 may become obstructed by an object other than a genuine, acceptable document. Curve 70 (
The controller 206 is adapted to determine whether an abnormal event has occurred based on signals sensed from the actuator (e.g., the motor 36) during a document stacking operation. Thus, the controller 206 is adapted to detect various abnormal events and to differentiate them from normal or legitimate events based, for example, on expected profiles of motor current.
For example, during the time window corresponding to the transition from the state shown in
In various implementations, one or more values indicative of the motor's actual operation may be compared to one or more reference values to determine whether the motor and, therefore, the stacker, is operating properly. For example, determining whether an abnormal event has occurred may include comparing an amount of time that has elapsed between specified sensed values to a predetermined amount of time. The amount of time that has elapsed from a specified point in the stacking operation to a peak value of actuator current may be identified, and determining whether an abnormal event has occurred may be based on the identified amount of time. Alternatively, the amount of time that has elapsed from a specified point in the stacking operation to a predetermined threshold value of actuator current may be identified, and determining whether an abnormal event has occurred may be based on the identified amount of time.
In yet other implementations, determining whether an abnormal event has occurred may include comparing an actual profile of the actuator current with an expected profile. In some cases, the actuator current may be integrated over a specified period of time during a document stacking operation to obtain an integrated value. Determining whether an abnormal event has occurred may be based on the integrated value, for example, by comparing the integrated value to a previously stored reference value. In some implementations, the reference value may be periodically adjusted based, for example, on previously sensed values of actuator current. The reference values and expected current profiles may be stored, for example, in memory 208 associated with the control system 204 (see
In a particular implementation, when the stacker 14 enters the stacking state and power is applied to the motor 36, the controller 206 initiates the algorithm of
In the particular implementation of
If the piston 28 successfully returns to its home position within a pre-determined time (see block 114), then the document is presumed to have been stacked in the cassette 22, and the customer is given credit for the transaction (block 118). On the other hand, if the piston 28 does not return to its home position within the predetermined time, the transaction is cancelled (block 120), and credit is not given to the customer. New adaptive baseline values (VAR THRESHOLD) may be determined following selected machine events (block 116). Such events may include, for example, successful stacking of a document, resetting of the machine, or installation of a new cassette.
Various aspects of the system may be implemented in hardware, software or a combination of hardware and software. Circuitry, including dedicated or general purpose machines, such as computer systems and processors, may be adapted to execute machine-readable instructions to implement the techniques described above. Computer-executable instructions for implementing the techniques can be stored, for example, as encoded information on a computer-readable medium such as a magnetic floppy disk, magnetic tape, or compact disc read only memory (CD-ROM). In one particular implementation, the computer-readable medium includes non-volatile electronic memory such a PROM, EPROM or FLASH. Algorithms also may be implemented, for example, through use of a programmable gate array.
The foregoing implementations, including the motor current profiles, are intended as examples only and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention.
The techniques may be employed in connection with stackers other than piston-type stackers, including, for example, stackers in which banknotes are wrapped around a drum or in which banknotes are rolled onto a stack. The techniques also may used with stackers using actuators other than DC motors, including, for example, actuators for stepper motors, AC motors and brushless motors. In some cases, signals other than current, including, for example, the phase lag may be used to measure the actuator load.
Other implementations are within the scope of the claims.
|Brevet cité||Date de dépôt||Date de publication||Déposant||Titre|
|US4678072||1 oct. 1984||7 juil. 1987||Nippon Coinco Kabushiki Kaisha||Bill validating and accumulating device|
|US4765607||8 mars 1985||23 août 1988||Mars, Incorporated||Stacker apparatus|
|US5209335||8 nov. 1991||11 mai 1993||Mars Incorporated||Security arrangement for use with a lockable, removable cassette|
|US5282611 *||6 juil. 1992||1 févr. 1994||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Sheet sorter having non-sorting mode with support expanding capability|
|US5709293||10 mars 1995||20 janv. 1998||Kabushiki Kaisha Nippon Conlux||Bill processing device|
|US5709525||2 août 1995||20 janv. 1998||Pitney Bowes Inc.||Envelope stacker|
|US5756985 *||15 août 1996||26 mai 1998||Coin Acceptors, Inc.||Cash box system for bill validator|
|US5782469||9 juil. 1996||21 juil. 1998||Esselte Meto International Gmbh||Stacking device for card-shaped products|
|US5836577||4 févr. 1997||17 nov. 1998||Laurel Bank Machines Co., Ltd.||Bill handling machine|
|US5982126||4 déc. 1995||9 nov. 1999||Multimatic, Inc||Power closure panel control apparatus|
|US6076648||13 août 1997||20 juin 2000||Kabushiki Kaisha Nippon Conlux||Bill processing device|
|US6199856 *||6 janv. 1999||13 mars 2001||Robert Clauser||Flexible media stacking and accumulating device|
|US6398000||11 févr. 2000||4 juin 2002||Cummins-Allison Corp.||Currency handling system having multiple output receptacles|
|US6495981||12 févr. 2001||17 déc. 2002||Johnson Controls Technology Company||Motorized actuator with a variable stall level|
|US6598871||12 juil. 2001||29 juil. 2003||Nippon Conlux Co., Ltd.||Paper-like-piece handling apparatus|
|US6827347||4 avr. 2002||7 déc. 2004||Kabushiki Kaisha Nippon Conlux||Sheet container|
|US20040207151 *||9 mars 2004||21 oct. 2004||Diebold Self-Service Systems Division Of Diebold, Incorporated||Cash dispensing automated banking machine deposit accepting system and method|
|DE2321654A1||28 avr. 1973||14 nov. 1974||Nat Rejectors Gmbh||Transportvorrichtung fuer banknoten|
|EP0720132B1||22 déc. 1995||14 juil. 1999||NCR International, Inc.||A transaction terminal|
|JPH11116098A||Titre non disponible|
|WO2002066350A1||18 févr. 2002||29 août 2002||Ronald Alec Cottrell||A sheet stacking hopper|
|WO2002083537A1||4 avr. 2002||24 oct. 2002||Nippon Conlux Co Ltd||Sheet container|
|Brevet citant||Date de dépôt||Date de publication||Déposant||Titre|
|US8167301 *||20 févr. 2009||1 mai 2012||Universal Entertainment Corporation||Paper sheet handling device|
|Classification aux États-Unis||271/176, 388/903, 271/180, 194/206, 361/23, 271/177, 318/434|
|Classification internationale||B65H29/00, G07F7/04, B65H43/00, G07D11/00, B65H31/00, B65H43/06|
|Classification coopérative||Y10S388/903, B65H2511/52, B65H2301/421, B65H43/06, G07F7/04, G07D11/0039, B65H2701/1912, B65H29/00, B65H31/00, B65H2515/30, B65H2511/528, B65H2513/50, B65H2513/511|
|Classification européenne||G07D11/00E2, B65H31/00, B65H43/06, G07F7/04, B65H29/00|
|11 févr. 2008||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: MARS INCORPORATED, VIRGINIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:DEAVILLE, DAVID C.;MACKENZIE, BOB;PHILLIPS, CARL A.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:020489/0609
Effective date: 20040412
|5 mars 2008||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: MEI, INC., PENNSYLVANIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MARS, INCORPORATED;REEL/FRAME:020604/0578
Effective date: 20060619
|22 févr. 2012||AS||Assignment|
Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:MEI, INC.;REEL/FRAME:027742/0962
Owner name: CITIBANK JAPAN LTD., AS SECURITY AGENT, JAPAN
Effective date: 20120214
|23 août 2013||AS||Assignment|
Effective date: 20130823
Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:CITIBANK JAPAN LTD.;REEL/FRAME:031074/0602
Owner name: MEI, INC., PENNSYLVANIA
|27 août 2013||AS||Assignment|
Effective date: 20130822
Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:MEI, INC.;REEL/FRAME:031095/0513
Owner name: GOLDMAN SACHS BANK USA, AS COLLATERAL AGENT, NEW Y
|11 déc. 2013||AS||Assignment|
Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY COLLATERAL RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME 031095/0513;ASSIGNOR:GOLDMAN SACHS BANK USA, AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:031796/0123
Effective date: 20131211
Owner name: MEI, INC., PENNSYLVANIA
|29 oct. 2014||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4