Recherche Images Maps Play YouTube Actualités Gmail Drive Plus »
Connexion
Les utilisateurs de lecteurs d'écran peuvent cliquer sur ce lien pour activer le mode d'accessibilité. Celui-ci propose les mêmes fonctionnalités principales, mais il est optimisé pour votre lecteur d'écran.

Brevets

  1. Recherche avancée dans les brevets
Numéro de publicationUS8170225 B2
Type de publicationOctroi
Numéro de demandeUS 12/030,806
Date de publication1 mai 2012
Date de dépôt13 févr. 2008
Date de priorité14 févr. 2007
Autre référence de publicationEP1959158A1, US20080197550
Numéro de publication030806, 12030806, US 8170225 B2, US 8170225B2, US-B2-8170225, US8170225 B2, US8170225B2
InventeursPeter Heiland
Cessionnaire d'origineIntegrated Dynamics Engineering Gmbh
Exporter la citationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
Liens externes: USPTO, Cession USPTO, Espacenet
Method for adapting a vibration isolation system
US 8170225 B2
Résumé
The invention relates to a method for adapting a vibration isolation system as well as to an arrangement with a vibration isolation system. By constructive measures in the environment of the vibration isolation system, particularly plane-parallel surfaces areas are avoided and thereby disturbing environmental influences are reduced.
Images(4)
Previous page
Next page
Revendications(10)
1. A method for adapting a vibration isolation system, the method comprising:
providing the vibration isolation system, wherein the vibration isolation system is a low-frequency adjusted, active vibration isolation system for lithography,
determining the environment, into which the vibration isolation system is or will be installed,
determining constructive measures for the vibration isolation system or the environment to reduce environmental influences on the basis of the determined environment, and
carrying out constructive measures at the vibration isolation system or at the environment.
2. The method for adapting the vibration isolation system according to claim 1, wherein determining the environment, into which the vibration isolation system is or will be installed, comprises determining sound sources, vibration sources or resonance volumes.
3. The method for adapting the vibration isolation system according to claim 1, wherein carrying out constructive measures comprises controlling loudspeakers being arranged in the environment for active sound isolation.
4. The method for adapting the vibration isolation system according to claim 1, wherein carrying out constructive measures comprises eliminating plane-parallel surface areas.
5. An arrangement with an adapted vibration isolation system produced in accordance with the method of claim 1, wherein matter surrounding the adapted vibration isolation system is at least in sections provided with sound-insulating material.
6. An arrangement with an adapted vibration isolation system produced in accordance with the method of claim 1, wherein matter surrounding the adapted vibration isolation system is at least in sections structured.
7. An adapted vibration isolation system produced in accordance with the method of claim 1, wherein at least one component of the adapted vibration isolation system has a surface being structured for reducing air flow resistance.
8. An arrangement with an adapted vibration isolation system produced in accordance with the method of claim 1, wherein in the environment of the adapted vibration isolation system, at least one loudspeaker is arranged, which is connected with an active control.
9. An adapted vibration isolation system produced in accordance with the method of claim 1, wherein the adapted vibration isolation system has a base table, wherein at least in sections, the base table has structurings.
10. An adapted vibration isolation system produced in accordance with the method of claim 1, wherein at least 50% of the surface area of the lower side of the base table is structured.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The invention relates to a method for adapting a vibration isolation system as well as to a vibration isolation system.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Vibration isolation systems are known. Thus for example, DE 698 17 750 T2 (Inventors Erik Loopstra, Peter Heiland) shows a vibration isolation system, which is designed for supporting a lithography device. Therein, the load to be supported, which typically comprises a table and components like production equipment placed thereon, is mounted on air bearings.

For improving the vibration isolation, so-called active vibration isolation systems provide sensors and actuators, by which a selective counteracting control is made possible. In doing so, actuators of the vibration isolation system are energized and act against vibrations, which may act on to the system from exterior or may be generated by the load to be supported.

Especially in the semiconductor industry, with increasing miniaturisation of the components, the requirements for such vibration isolation systems are steadily increasing.

It is particularly a matter of low-frequency adjusted (<1 Hz) vibration isolation systems to be used in the lithography, with steppers, immersion systems and the like, particularly also such which have a very low horizontal stiffness.

According to methods known from practical experience for designing vibration isolation systems, the features of the system are characterized independently from external conditions by measuring certain system parameters and features with defined mechanical scenarios. The feature being most important for a vibration isolation system is the isolation, thus the transfer function between floor vibration and mass vibration.

But also, impacts of sound waves on material are known (Casimir effect, see “An acoustic Casimir effect”, Andres Larraza and Bruce Denardo, Phys. Lett. A 348, 151-155 !998)), which are of importance for vibration isolation systems.

These impacts are not or not sufficiently taken into consideration in case of known vibration isolation systems and of methods for designing vibration isolation systems respectively.

OBJECTS OF THE INVENTION

It is an object of the invention to provide a method for adapting a vibration isolation system, with which the isolation effect is improved.

Particularly, it is an object of the invention to reduce vibrations induced by environmental noise.

It is a further object of the invention to reduce perturbing effects, such as occurring from amplification of induced vibrations by adjoining walls.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The object of the invention is already achieved by a method for adapting a vibration isolation system as well as by a vibration isolation system according to one of the independent claims.

Pursuant to a method according to the invention for adapting a vibration isolation system, the environment, into which the vibration isolation system is or will be brought, is identified. In doing so, particularly, shape, material, mass and/or distance of the compounds, like walls, floors or sound sources, surrounding the vibration isolation system are determined.

On base of the determined boundary conditions, constructive measures for the vibration isolation system and/or the environment to reduce environmental impacts are identified and carried out. Therefore, the environment is taken into account, when designing the vibration isolation system. In doing so, the constructive measures may relate to the vibration isolation system as well as to the environment.

Particularly, it is provided to furnish the compounds surrounding the vibration isolation system, especially walls, at least in sections with soundproof material. By doing so, resonance effects, which affect the properties of the vibration isolation system, may be reduced.

When doing so, resonance volumes, which are particularly generated by plane-parallel surface areas, are detected and appropriate measures such as structuring the walls or furnishing with sound-proof material are carried out, in order to eliminate the resonance volumes.

It became clear that in a lot of cases the very application of a structure, for example a comb-shaped structure, is sufficient to reduce resonance effects to a level, which does not cause a noteworthy affect on the vibration isolation system.

Furthermore, the constructive measures comprise the elimination of plane-parallel surface-areas in the room itself and/or between the vibration isolation system and the room. It became clear that particularly a resonance volume, which is formed between the lower side of a vibration isolated mounted table and the floor, causes perturbing effects. Such a resonance volume may be eliminated in a particularly easy manner by structuring the floor and/or the table to be mounted vibration isolated.

It is further provided to furnish at least one component of the vibration isolation system with a structured surface for reducing any flow resistance. By doing so, particularly disturbances caused by air motions, for example by air conditioning, may be reduced. It is particularly provided to structure the base stage, on which for example a component to be isolated is arranged.

Furthermore, for reducing the disturbances by sound, it is provided that at least one loudspeaker is arranged in the surrounding of the vibration isolation system, which loudspeaker has an active control. Preferably, the active control is connected with at least one vibration sensor, which detects vibrations of a load to be isolated. By doing so, sound waves due to vibrations of the systems may be reduced by means of the active control of the loudspeaker.

Additionally or alternatively, the active control may be designed for reducing environmental sound.

Furthermore, the number of plane-parallel surface areas, which may cause resonance effects, may be reduced by roundings and/or openings in the base stage or in further components of the vibration isolation system.

It can be measured that the behaviour of vibration isolation systems depends on the surrounding geometry. Particularly, the isolation effect may be affected, if unfavourable factors of “external” components or items exist. Therefore, it became clear that a vibration isolation system is not exclusively characterized by factors inherent to the system. In fact, it depends on how the moving masses and surface areas act with respect to each other. A system near to a wall will act in another manner than one in a large room. But also the arrangement of surface areas of the vibration isolation system itself, relatively to fixed surface areas may induce forces (Casimir effect) in case of a noisy environment (semi-conductor production plants).

In case of motions of a system, the air space 5 between the base mass and the floor becomes larger and smaller depending how and with which frequency the system moves. If base mass and floor are plane-parallel, outwards only the path to the edge of the mass is left to the air. The construction of the lower side of the base mass has decisive influence on the air flow direction and intensity. When doing so, one should better stay with sound particle velocity variations or pressure variations and the analogy to acoustics. But the likeness of flow obtrude itself due to the low frequencies (<300 Hz).

Therefore, in the usual case of plane-parallel surface areas (base mass and floor), the property of the surface areas, as well as their distance from each other as well as the borders matter. In analogy to a Helmholtz resonator in acoustics (with which air oscillates in a bottleneck and the volume of the bottle acts as stiffness), here the frictional losses at the surface areas, as well as the involved volumes (at the exit surface areas and in the interior) may lead to an additional stiffness, which considerably affects the isolation properties of the system. Though, clear resonance-like effects may arise, which destroy or considerably lower the isolation effect. If the distance of the surface areas is large compared to the surface area itself, this effect becomes less meaningful. By using constructive measures in the base mass, this effect may be avoided. Additional openings in the middle of the surfaces or lowering the flow resistance. minimize the impact of this effect.

In other cases, the volume of the mass to be isolated itself is the source of air displacements. Since those masses may be quite voluminous, the masses of air moved together with the mass to be isolated are also not small. Therefore, the constructive forms in the surrounding of the system (and of the moved mass) become more important, because they may hinder the air flow.

This effect as well as the effect mentioned above may also be argued by means of the radiation resistance. If one imagines the plane-parallel tables and the mass of the system respectively (the assembly) to be a source of acoustic radiation, this sees a radiation impedance. This affects the source so that the source is affected in its movement. Therefore, it can be shown by means of this argumentation that the behaviour of the system may be influenced by constructive design of the environment.

So for example,

    • a) the surrounding walls may be designed with acoustically effective sound-insulating material so that the radiation resistance is similar to the resistance in the free field,
    • b) the surrounding walls may specifically formed in such a manner that the flow resistance is minimized, for example by curved surface area parts with low cw value,
    • c) it may be made sure by means of loudspeaker arrangements that the air flow is supported or stopped by means of active diaphragms. Such an active impedance adaptation is for example described in the following citations, whose content of disclosure is integrated by reference:
      • D. Guicking and M. Wenzel: Adaptive Filter Concept for Active Control of Acoustic Wall Impedance. ASME Paper 86-WA/NCA-28, December 1986 (3 p.)
      • M. Wenzel and D. Guicking: Konzept zur aktiven Reflexionsfaktorregelung mit adaptiven Digitalfiltern. In: Fortschritte der Akustik, DAGA '87 (Aachen). DPG-GmbH, Bad Honnef 1987, S. 505-508

Furthermore, the invention relates to minimizing the Casimir effect by constructive changes of surface areas against each other to minimize the directed induction of forces.

When qualifying and designing vibration isolation systems, the environment is involved.

The invention shows constructive measures around an existing isolation system (or in its proximate vicinity), which measures lead to the result that the feedback effect on it is minimized by

    • 1. doing sound insulation measures at the surrounding walls
    • 2. by favoring the air flow by means of forming the walls and the wall elements accordingly,
    • 3. by actively influencing the acoustic impedance of the environment by active methods (e.g. speaker).

Or by a vibration isolation system, taking into account the above mentioned measures.

Furthermore, the invention shows constructive measure to lower force induction in case of noisy environments (Casimir effect), by minimizing plane-parallel surface areas with the environment.

Particularly, the invention relates to:

    • 1. sound absorbing arrangements with porous, flow resistance afflicted, low-frequent effective absorbing substrates at the walls of the environment,
    • 2. coated wall surface areas, which favour the air flow and have a low cW value,
    • 3. speaker arrangements at the walls, which arrangements may influence the flow behaviour by control,
    • 4. minimizing surface areas being plane-parallel with the environment by rounding, inserting of openings etc.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 depicts a first schematic diagram of the assembly of vibration isolation system 10.

FIG. 2 depicts a second schematic diagram of the assembly of vibration isolation system 10.

FIG. 3 depicts vibration isolation system 10 in a first environment.

FIG. 4 depicts vibration isolation system 10 in a second environment.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The invention shall be explained in more detail by means of the drawings FIG. 1 to FIG. 4 referring to schematically depicted embodiments.

FIG. 1 schematically shows the assembly of a vibration isolation system 10. The vibration isolation system 10 comprises a base mass 1, which is vibration isolated mounted on the floor 3 by vibration isolators 4. On the base mass 1, a machine 2 to be supported is arranged. Particularly due to the base mass 1 being oriented plane-parallelly to the floor 3, resonance effects may arise in the air between the base mass 1 and the floor.

With the vibration isolation system 10 according to FIG. 2, the lower side of the base mass 1 provides roundings 6, by which the plane-parallel arrangement is avoided. By doing so, resonance effects are avoided to a large extent.

With the vibration isolation system 10 according to FIG. 3, the walls of the environment are provided with a sound insulation 6.

In FIG. 4, the walls (not shown) of the environment of the vibration isolation system are provided with loudspeakers, which are connected to an active control 8. The active control 8 is, inter alia, connected to a sensor for detecting vibrations of the base mass. Thus, also sound waves caused by vibrations of the base mass are reduced by the active control. Thus, also disturbing reflexions of sound waves at the walls may be counteracted.

Citations de brevets
Brevet cité Date de dépôt Date de publication Déposant Titre
US2994400 *29 déc. 19551 août 1961Heller AaronAnechoic tank lining
US3132715 *18 mai 196212 mai 1964Ferranti LtdNoise reducing enclosures
US4146112 *31 oct. 197727 mars 1979General Electric CompanySound reducing baffle for electrical apparatus
US4527371 *15 juin 19829 juil. 1985Ifm-Akustikbyran AbFor damping vibrations in a structure
US4733750 *11 févr. 198729 mars 1988Kohler Co.Acoustic enclosure for marine engine generator set
US5117642 *14 déc. 19902 juin 1992Kabushiki Kaisha ToshibaLow noise refrigerator and noise control method thereof
US5130948 *16 mars 199014 juil. 1992Gunther LaukienMethod and apparatus for reducing acoustic emission from submerged submarines
US5135079 *28 févr. 19914 août 1992Kabushiki Kaisha ToshibaNoise prevention apparatus for a cable winch elevator
US5151018 *31 juil. 199029 sept. 1992Copeland CorporationSound attenuation chamber
US5251863 *12 août 199212 oct. 1993Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc.Active force cancellation system
US5331567 *22 août 199119 juil. 1994The University Of Colorado Foundation, Inc.Pyramidal absorber having multiple backing layers providing improved low frequency response
US5407330 *14 sept. 199318 avr. 1995Mangar International LimitedAir pump apparatus with vibration and sound reducing housing means
US5414775 *26 mai 19939 mai 1995Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc.Noise attenuation system for vibratory feeder bowl
US5502869 *27 oct. 19942 avr. 1996Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc.High volume, high performance, ultra quiet vacuum cleaner
US55085183 mai 199516 avr. 1996International Business Machines CorporationLithography tool with vibration isolation
US5692053 *8 oct. 199225 nov. 1997Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc.For canceling a noise disturbance
US5710533 *31 juil. 199520 janv. 1998General Electric CompanyElectrical transformer with reduced fan noise
US5734246 *16 mai 199531 mars 1998The Aerospace CorporationFor changing attitude of a payload relative to a support to a position
US5811821 *9 août 199622 sept. 1998Park Scientific InstrumentsSingle axis vibration reducing system
US5823467 *1 avr. 199720 oct. 1998Mcdonnell Douglas CorpPassive damping wedge
US5881990 *11 juil. 199716 mars 1999Isuzu Ceramics Research Institute Co., Ltd.Vibration and sound isolation device for a cogeneration system with an engine
US59179193 déc. 199629 juin 1999Rosenthal; FelixMethod and apparatus for multi-channel active control of noise or vibration or of multi-channel separation of a signal from a noisy environment
US600298726 mars 199714 déc. 1999Nikon CorporationMethods to control the environment and exposure apparatus
US6119808 *19 août 199819 sept. 2000Steedman; James B.Transportable acoustic screening chamber for testing sound emitters
US6132183 *23 nov. 199817 oct. 2000Carrier CorporationCompressor mounting
US6226075 *6 juil. 19981 mai 2001Asm LithographySupporting device provided with a gas spring with a gas bearing, and lithographic device provided with such supporting devices
US6371240 *23 mai 200016 avr. 2002Austin Acoustic Systems, Inc.Anechoic chamber
US6375147 *13 sept. 199923 avr. 2002General Electric CompanyVibration isolation apparatus for MR imaging system
US6449934 *19 mai 200017 sept. 2002Ransomes America CorporationElectric riding mower with motor generator set and noise abatement
US645028828 juil. 200017 sept. 2002Nikon CorporationAir-conditioning apparatus, partition and exposure apparatus
US64779087 juil. 200012 nov. 2002Canon Kabushiki KaishaPedestal with vibration sensor, and exposure apparatus having the same
US6543741 *26 déc. 20018 avr. 2003Carrier CorporationVibration isolation for a transversely mounted compressor
US6810989 *15 nov. 20002 nov. 2004Bosch Rexroth AgSystem for insulating the sound emanating from a motor/pump unit
US6825635 *22 mars 200230 nov. 2004Canon Kabushiki KaishaVibration isolator, device manufacturing apparatus and method, semiconductor manufacturing plant and method of maintaining device manufacturing apparatus
US6845841 *5 juil. 200225 janv. 2005Aluralex AcousticsAcoustic isolator
US7726452 *2 juin 20051 juin 2010Technical Manufacturing CorporationSystems and methods for active vibration damping
US7783055 *30 nov. 200624 août 2010Silentium Ltd.Soundproof climate controlled rack
US7942379 *17 mai 200717 mai 2011Integrated Dynamics Engineering GmbhActive vibration isolation system with a combined position actuator
US200300584177 nov. 200227 mars 2003Nikon CorporationEnvironmental control chamber
US20030168574 *12 juil. 200111 sept. 2003Katsuhide WatanabeVibration isolation apparatus using magnetic levitation devices
US20040079173 *28 oct. 200229 avr. 2004The Curators Of The University Of MissouriTorque ripple sensor and mitigation mechanism
US20070235276 *5 avr. 200711 oct. 2007Integrated Dynamics Engineering GmbhActive vibration isolation system
US20070284794 *5 juin 200713 déc. 2007Integrated Dynamics Engineering GmbhActive vibration isolation system which is more effective against seismic vibration
US20080106015 *5 nov. 20078 mai 2008Aisin Seiki Kabushiki KaishaActive vibration reduction system
JP2001023881A Titre non disponible
Citations hors brevets
Référence
1"European Office Action for International Application No. EP 08002729.5-1264", May 26, 2011, Publisher: European Patent Office, Published in: EP.
Classifications
Classification aux États-Unis381/71.1, 381/71.3, 181/207, 248/638
Classification internationaleF16F15/03, G10K11/178, G10K1/00, F16F15/00, G10K11/16
Classification coopérativeG03F7/709, F16F15/02
Classification européenneF16F15/02, G03F7/70P6F
Événements juridiques
DateCodeÉvénementDescription
1 mai 2008ASAssignment
Owner name: INTEGRATED DYNAMICS ENGINEERING GMBH, GERMANY
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:HEILAND, PETER;REEL/FRAME:020888/0634
Effective date: 20080317