| Numéro de publication | US8170912 B2 | | Type de publication | Octroi | | Numéro de demande | 10/721,117 | | Date de publication | 1 mai 2012 | | Date de dépôt | 25 nov. 2003 | | Date de priorité | 25 nov. 2003 | | Autre référence de publication | | |
| Inventeurs | | | Cessionnaire d'origine | | |
| Classification aux États-Unis | | | Classification internationale | | | Classification coopérative | | | Classification européenne | G06Q 30/02 G06Q 30/0257 G06Q 30/0241 G06Q 30/0601 | |
| Références | | | |
| Liens externes | | |
Database structure and front end US 8170912 B2 In one embodiment, a method of analyzing online advertising information includes the steps of receiving consumer data from client computers, creating a database based on the consumer data, receiving user selected values from a front end, and extracting data from the database based on the user selected values. The front end may have a selection area with user selectable values that change depending on an initially selected value. In one embodiment, the database comprises an online analytical processing (OLAP) database.
1. A method of analyzing online advertising information, the method comprising:
receiving consumer data from a plurality of client computers;
creating, in a computer, a database based on the consumer data, wherein the database comprises a plurality of hierarchy tables configured to store at least some of the consumer data, each hierarchy table comprising at least one fact associated with at least one dimension, wherein the plurality of hierarchy tables are arranged such that at least one of the plurality of hierarchy tables has a highest number of dimensions and a second of the plurality of hierarchy tables has a lowest number of dimensions;
receiving user selected values from a front end, the front end having an interface displaying a selection area with user selectable values that change depending on an initially selected value;
extracting data from the plurality of hierarchy tables within the database based on the user selected values;
receiving alert conditions from a user using the front end, the alert conditions comprising dimensions and facts; and
alerting the user when the consumer data meets the alert conditions.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein the consumer data comprises a number of impressions of an advertisement.
3. The method of claim 1 wherein the consumer data comprises a number of clicks on an advertisement.
4. The method of claim 1 wherein the database comprises an online analytical processing (OLAP) database.
5. A computer-readable storage medium comprising code, the code executable by a processor to perform a method, the method comprising:
executing a front end for a database, the database comprising a plurality of hierarchy tables, wherein the plurality of hierarchy tables are arranged in a hierarchy topology with a lowest level hierarchy table of the plurality of hierarchy tables comprising facts associated with a highest number of dimensions and a highest level hierarchy table of the plurality of hierarchy tables comprising facts associated with a single dimension;
displaying an interface of the front end, the interface comprising:
a first selection area for selecting a first value from a first set of values; and
a second area for selecting a second value from a second set of values, the second set of values being automatically displayed by the front end in the second selection area based on the first value, wherein the first and second values refer to a first dimension associated with at least one hierarchy table of the plurality of hierarchy tables within the a database;
receiving alert conditions from a user using the front end, the alert conditions comprising dimensions and facts; and
alerting the user when consumer data in the database meets the alert conditions.
6. The front end of claim 5 wherein the database comprises an online analytical processing (OLAP) database.
7. The front end of claim 5 wherein the first set of values are obtained from the at least one hierarchy table of an online analytical processing (OLAP) database.
8. The front end of claim 5 wherein the first set of values and the second set of values comprise at least one dimension of an online analytical processing (OLAP) database.
9. The front end of claim 5 wherein the database comprises consumer data collected by a client program in a client computer.
10. The front end of claim 9 wherein the consumer data comprise a number of impressions of an advertisement.
11. The front end of claim 9 wherein the consumer data comprises a number of mouse clicks on an advertisement.
12. A method of generating a report, the method comprising:
receiving, in a computer, a plurality of selected dimensions of a database from a front end, the front end having an interface displaying selection areas that are driven by a plurality of hierarchy tables of the database, wherein the plurality of hierarchy tables are arranged in a hierarchy topology with a lowest level hierarchy table of the plurality of hierarchy tables comprising facts associated with a highest number of dimensions and a highest level hierarchy table of the plurality of hierarchy tables comprising facts associated with a single dimension;
determining a first hierarchy table among the plurality of hierarchy tables of the database, the first hierarchy table comprising facts associated with all of the selected dimensions;
extracting data from the first hierarchy table to generate extracted data;
filtering the extracted data using filter parameters received from the front end to generate filtered data;
providing the filtered data to a client computer running the front end;
receiving alert conditions from a user using the front end, the alert conditions comprising dimensions and facts; and
alerting the user when consumer data in the database meets the alert conditions.
13. The method of claim 12 wherein filtering the extracted data includes performing conditional operations on the extracted data.
14. The method of claim 12 wherein the first hierarchy table includes data obtained from client programs monitoring a consumer online activity.
15. The method of claim 14 wherein the consumer online activity includes clicking on an advertisement.
16. The method of claim 12 wherein each of the plurality of hierarchy tables contains at least one dimension related to online advertising.
17. The method of claim 12 wherein the first hierarchy table includes a fact relating to a number of impressions of an advertisement.
18. The method of claim 12 wherein the first hierarchy table includes a fact relating to a number of clicks on an advertisement.
19. The method of claim 12 further comprising displaying at least some of the filtered data on the client computer.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to databases, and more particularly, but not exclusively, to database structure and front ends.
2. Description of the Background Art
Large public computer networks, such as the Internet, allow advertisers to reach a worldwide audience twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week. This has made large public networks a cost-effective medium for marketing and selling products (e.g., goods and services). On the Internet, for example, advertising revenues allow companies to distribute free software or provide free access to websites. Needless to say, advertising helps fuel the Internet economy.
In order to provide relevant advertisements to consumers, companies engaged in online advertising maintain databases of advertising-related data. Such databases need to be accessed by sales and marketing personnel as they are the ones who typically plan and implement advertising campaigns. Unfortunately, some sales and marketing personnel are non-technical, and thus have difficulty working with the database. Front ends, which are application programs for interfacing with databases, may be provided to assist non-technical users in accessing the database. However, conventional front ends get harder to use as the number of selection choices for the database increases.
A database for storing online advertising-related data can grow very quickly because of the large number of consumers on the Internet. If a database is not structured properly, accessing the database may take longer as more data are stored in it. As a result, reports generated from the database may also take longer. This may discourage sales and marketing personnel from generating reports, and may keep some reports from being generated on time.
From the foregoing, an improved database structure and front end are generally desirable.
SUMMARY In one embodiment, a method of analyzing online advertising information includes the steps of receiving consumer data from client computers, creating a database based on the consumer data, receiving user selected values from a front end, and extracting data from the database based on the user selected values. The front end may have a selection area with user selectable values that change depending on an initially selected value. In one embodiment, the database comprises an online analytical processing (OLAP) database.
These and other features of the present invention will be readily apparent to persons of ordinary skill in the art upon reading the entirety of this disclosure, which includes the accompanying drawings and claims.
DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS FIG. 1 shows a schematic diagram of an example computer that may be used in embodiments of the present invention.
FIG. 2 shows a schematic diagram of a computing environment in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 3 shows a schematic diagram of an OLAP database and a front end program in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 4 shows a screenshot of an example layout screen in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 5 shows a screenshot of an example filter screen in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 6 shows a screenshot of an example report displayed in a report screen in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 7 shows a screenshot of an example screen for a scheduler.
FIG. 8 shows a screenshot of an example screen for an alerts.
FIG. 9 shows a flow diagram of a method of generating a report in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
The use of the same reference label in different drawings indicates the same or like components.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION In the present disclosure, numerous specific details are provided such as examples of apparatus, components, and methods to provide a thorough understanding of embodiments of the invention. Persons of ordinary skill in the art will recognize, however, that the invention can be practiced without one or more of the specific details. In other instances, well-known details are not shown or described to avoid obscuring aspects of the invention.
Being computer-related, it can be appreciated that the components disclosed herein may be implemented in hardware, software, or a combination of hardware and software (e.g., firmware). Software components may be in the form of computer-readable program code stored in a computer-readable storage medium, such as memory, mass storage device, or removable storage device. For example, a computer-readable storage medium may comprise computer-readable program code for performing the function of a particular component. Likewise, computer memory may be configured to include one or more components, which may then be executed by a processor. Components may be implemented separately in multiple modules or together in a single module.
Embodiments of the present invention are described herein in the context of advertising delivery over the Internet. It should be understood, however, that embodiments of the present invention may be generally employed to build databases and front ends for databases.
Embodiments of the present invention employ a message delivery program in communication with a message server. Message delivery programs and message servers are also disclosed in the following commonly-assigned disclosures, which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety: U.S. application Ser. No. 10/152,204, filed on May 21, 2002, and U.S. application Ser. No. 10/289,123, filed on Nov. 5, 2002.
Referring now to FIG. 1, there is shown a schematic diagram of an example computer that may be used in embodiments of the present invention. Depending on its configuration, the computer shown in the example of FIG. 1 may be employed as a client computer or a server computer. The computer of FIG. 1 may have less or more components to meet the needs of a particular application. As shown in FIG. 1, the computer may include a processor 101, such as those from the Intel Corporation or Advanced Micro Devices, for example. The computer may have one or more buses 103 coupling its various components. The computer may include one ore more input devices 102 (e.g., keyboard, mouse), a computer-readable storage medium (CRSM) 105 (e.g., floppy disk, CD-ROM), a CRSM reader 104 (e.g., floppy drive, CD-ROM drive), a display monitor 109 (e.g., cathode ray tube, flat panel display), a communications interface 106 (e.g., network adapter, modem) for coupling to a network, one or more data storage devices 107 (e.g., hard disk drive, optical drive, FLASH memory), and a main memory 108 (e.g., RAM). Software embodiments may be stored in a computer-readable storage medium 105 for reading into a data storage device 107 or main memory 108. In the example of FIG. 1, main memory 108 may be configured to include a front end program 220, which is further discussed below. A front end program 220 may be executed by processor 101.
FIG. 2 shows a schematic diagram of a computing environment in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. In the example of FIG. 2, websites 112 (i.e., 112-1, 112-2, . . . ) comprise web servers accessible over the Internet. A website 112 may provide news, search engines, forums, audio and video streaming, e-mail service, and so on. A website 112 may provide information by way of web pages.
A client computer 130 may comprise a computer operated by a consumer navigating on the Internet. A client computer 130 may comprise a personal computer running the Microsoft Windows™ operating system, for example. Depending on the application, a client computer 130 may also be a portable or hand-held device, such as a laptop computer, a personal digital assistant, a digital mobile telephone, and so on. A client computer 130 may include a web browser 132 to allow a consumer to view web pages on websites on the Internet. A web browser 132 may be a commercially available web browser, such as the Microsoft Internet Explorer™ web browser. A web browser 132 allows a client computer 130 to receive one or more web pages from among available websites 112.
A client computer 130 may include a message delivery program 160. A message delivery program 160 may initiate the displaying of a presentation vehicle 162 to display an advertisement 166. Presentation vehicle 162 may be a browser window or a custom window. For example, presentation vehicle 162 may be a pop-up or a pop-under window. In one embodiment, a message delivery program 160 is downloadable from a message server computer 163.
A message delivery program 160 may be downloaded in conjunction with the downloading of another computer program. For example, a message delivery program 160 may be downloaded to a client computer 130 along with a utility program 167 that is provided to the consumer free of charge or at a reduced cost. A utility program 167 may be an e-wallet or an appointment calendar, for example. A utility program 167 may be provided to a consumer in exchange for the right to deliver advertisements to the consumer via a message delivery program 160. In essence, revenue from advertisements delivered to the consumer helps defray the cost of creating and maintaining the utility program 167.
In one embodiment, a message delivery program 160 is a client-side program that monitors the online activity of a consumer across several websites, and reports its observations to a message server 163. It is to be noted that the mechanics of monitoring a consumer's online activity, such as determining where a consumer is navigating to, what a consumer is typing on a web page, when a consumer activates a mouse or a keyboard, when a consumer clicks on an advertisement, and the like, is, in general, known in the art and not further described here. For example, a message delivery program 160 may listen for event notifications from a web browser 132 as part of its monitoring function. A message delivery program 160 may protect the consumer's privacy by maintaining the consumer's anonymity (e.g., by using a machine 1 b to refer to the consumer) and encrypting sensitive information, such as credit card numbers.
In one embodiment, a message delivery program 160 monitors a web browser 132 for the uniform resource locator (URL) of websites visited by the consumer. A message delivery program 160 also keeps track of the number of impressions (i.e., displaying) of an advertisement 166 in the client computer 130, as well as the number of times the consumer clicked on an advertisement 166. A message delivery program 160 may periodically provide a data packet 168 containing its observations to a message server 163. Data provided by a message delivery program 160 to a message server 163 are also referred to as “consumer data.” Consumer data thus include information on the websites visited by a consumer, URLs of web pages viewed by the consumer, the number of impressions of advertisements in the consumer's client computer, and the number of times the consumer clicked on advertisements.
A client-side program, such as a message delivery program 160, allows for web-wide monitoring of consumer online activities. Unlike a website, which can only monitor consumer behavior on the website or related websites, a message delivery program 160 can advantageously collect consumer data across multiple, un-related websites. Consumer data collected by a message server 163 from a large number of message delivery programs 160 are thus good indicators of consumer need, as well as the effectiveness of an advertising campaign.
A message server 163 may comprise a server computer in communication with a message delivery program 160. Note that a message server 163 typically works in conjunction with a plurality of client computers 130, each having a message delivery program 160; only one client computer 130 is shown in FIG. 2 for clarity of illustration. Message server 163 may include a data warehouse 171 for storing consumer data received from client computers 130. Data warehouse 171 may be a commercially available database, such as those of the type available from the Oracle Corporation of Redwood Shores, Calif. In one embodiment, a message server 163 includes an online analytical processing (OLAP) database 174, which may also be of the type available from the Oracle Corporation. An OLAP database 174 contains a subset of consumer data from a data warehouse 171, as well as advertising data, such as advertiser names, contracts with advertisers, advertising campaigns, and so on. As will be more apparent below, an OLAP database 174 may be structured to allow for the use of hierarchical tables that better organize advertising data and facilitate data access.
Still referring to FIG. 2, a message server 163 may include a procedure 175. In one embodiment, a procedure 175 comprises computer-readable program code for receiving dimensions and facts from a front end program 220, querying an OLAP database 174 based on the received dimensions and facts, filtering the result of the query based on the received dimensions, and providing the filtered result to the front end program 220. The terms “dimensions” and “facts,” which are used herein in the context of an OLAP database cube, are further discussed below.
A client computer 210 may be in communication with a message server 163. In one embodiment, a client computer 210 comprises a personal computer running the Microsoft Windows™ operating system. A client computer 210 may include a front end program 220. A front end program 220 may comprise computer-readable program code for accepting dimensions and facts from a user, providing the dimensions and facts to a procedure 175, receiving a filtered result from the procedure 175, and presenting a corresponding report to the user. A front end program 220 may communicate with a procedure 175 using client-server protocol. A client computer 210 may also include productivity programs 222, such as the Microsoft Excel™ spreadsheet, Microsoft Power Point™ presentation program, Microsoft Word™ word processing program. A front end program 220 may be employed in conjunction with productivity programs 222 to display and analyze reports that are based on data extracted by a procedure 175 from an OLAP database 174.
Turning now to FIG. 3, there is shown a schematic diagram of an OLAP database 174 and a front end program 220 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. As shown in FIG. 3, an OLAP database 174 may comprise hierarchy tables 340 (i.e., 340-1, 340-2, . . . ), a dimensions control table 342, and a hierarchy control table 344. Hierarchy tables 340 may comprise a database table configured to have dimensions and facts, with each fact being associated with a single dimension or combination of dimensions. Hierarchy tables 340 are arranged in a hierarchical topology, with the lowest level hierarchy table 340 having the most number of dimensions, the next higher level hierarchy table 340 having less dimensions than the lowest hierarchy table 340, the next higher level hierarchy table 340 having less dimensions than the next hierarchy table 340, and so on. That is, the hierarchy tables 340 may be configured as follows:
-
- (1) First level (lowest level) hierarchy table:
- Dimension1, Dimension2, . . . Dimensionn; Fact1, Fact2, . . . Factk.
- (2) Second level hierarchy table:
- Dimension1, Dimension2, . . . Dimensionn-1; Fact1, Fact2, . . . Factk.
- (3) Third level hierarchy table:
- Dimension1, Dimension2, . . . Dimensionn-2; Fact1, Fact2, . . . Factk
and so on. Note that a second level hierarchy table may have one less dimension than the first level hierarchy table, while a third level hierarchy table may have one less dimension than the second level hierarchy table. Further note that the number of facts in each hierarchy table does not necessarily have to be different.
The hierarchical levels allow for faster data access in a level “n” compared to a level “n−1”. That is, data can be accessed faster in the higher levels. The idea is to minimize the number of rows by eliminating dimensions successively. The elimination of dimensions results in smaller tables, which results in faster data access.
In one embodiment, the dimensions and facts in hierarchy tables 340 relate to online advertising. The dimensions may include advertisements, campaigns, contracts, and other advertising data. As a further example, each advertisement may belong to one or more advertising campaigns, with each advertising campaign being associated with one or more contracts, and so on. The facts may include impressions (i.e., displaying of an advertisement) and clicks on impressions. Thus, for each particular value of advertisement, campaigns, contracts, or combinations thereof there may be a corresponding impressions value and clicks value. For example, a particular advertisement for a particular advertising campaign may have 2,000 impressions. As another example, a particular advertising campaign with an associated contract may have resulted in 4,000 impressions and 1,000 clicks on the impressions. Of course, the number and type of dimensions and facts, and their corresponding values, may vary to meet the needs of specific applications.
Each hierarchy table 340 may be structured to have the facts for a particular combination of dimensions. As a particular example, assuming an exhaustive list of dimensions consists of advertisement, advertising campaign, and contract, a first (lowest) level hierarchy table 340 will include facts (e.g., impressions, clicks, or both) for the dimensions advertisement, advertising campaign, contract, or combinations thereof; a second level hierarchy table 340 will include facts for the dimensions advertisement, advertising campaign, or combinations thereof; and so on. That is, for a particular number of dimensions, there will be a hierarchy table 340 with the corresponding facts. In one embodiment, hierarchy tables 340 are manually populated using data from a data warehouse 171. Hierarchy tables 340 may also be populated using a script, for example. As can be appreciated, extracting data from a hierarchy table is generally faster than extracting data from an entire database. Hierarchy tables 340 thus provide a database structure that advantageously allows for relatively fast data access. We need to communicate that the front end is “thought” about the exhaustive list of all dimensions and facts, the relationship between each dimension (i.e. the hierarchy), the table names of each level of aggregation and the dimensions available in each aggregate table, the type of each dimension i.e. free form, tree or list box by using control tables.
In one embodiment, a dimension in an OLAP database 174 may be one of three kinds of dimensions namely, “pull-down,” “tree,” or “free-form.” A pull-down dimension may have a value that is selectable from a pull-down menu. For example, assuming “advertisement” is a pull-down dimension, the values “Ad1” for a first advertisement or “Ad2” for a second advertisement may be selected in a pull-down menu for “advertisement.” A tree dimension may have a value that is selectable from a hierarchical tree structure. For example, assuming “category” is a tree dimension, the values “automotive” for web pages relating to automotives or “travel” for travel-related web pages may be selected in a tree structure for “category.” In the tree structure, the value “hotel” may be included as branching off the value “travel.” A free-form dimension may have a value that may entered without choosing from available selections. For example, assuming “revenue” is a free-form dimension, a user may enter any revenue amount for “revenue.”
As shown in FIG. 3, an OLAP database 174 may include a dimensions control table 342. A dimensions control table 342 may comprise an exhaustive list of all dimensions and facts in all hierarchy tables 340, templates for constructing queries for each dimension, and a dimension look-up table. The dimension look-up table is employed in embodiments where the hierarchy tables 340 refer to dimensions using identifiers other than the dimensions' actual names (e.g., using “d2345” in a hierarchy table 340 to refer to a dimension “advertisement”). The dimension look-up table allows for translation of an identifier to actual name, and vice versa. A dimensions control table 342 may also have information on the kind of each dimension (e.g., whether a dimension is a pull-down, tree, or free-form) and conditional operators that may be used for a particular dimension.
An OLAP database 174 may also include a hierarchy control table 344. A hierarchy control table 344 may comprise information indicative of the data structure of the OLAP database 174. In one embodiment, a hierarchy control table 344 identifies each hierarchy table 340, the hierarchical order of the hierarchy tables 340, and the dimensions included in each hierarchy table 340. A hierarchy control table 344 may thus be consulted to identify the highest level hierarchy table 340 containing a particular set of dimensions and filters. Note that the highest level hierarchy table containing a particular set of dimensions and filters would advantageously have the least number of rows among hierarchy tables that also contain the set of dimensions and filters.
The general role of the front end is to optimally obtain that slice of the OLAP cube that contains all the data that the user is interested in viewing and displaying that slice of the OLAP cube in exactly the format that the user wishes to view. The filter page allows the user to slice the OLAP cube using criteria on the dimensions. The layout page allows the user to specify the format of the report.
Still referring to FIG. 3, a front end program 220 may comprise a user interface 360, a scheduler 374, and an alerts 376. In one embodiment, a front end program 220 is implemented using the Microsoft Visual Basic For Applications™ (VBA) programming language. A user interface 360 may comprise computer-readable program code for allowing a user to enter selection criteria and generate a report in accordance with the selection criteria. The selection criteria may be values for dimensions and facts. A user interface 360 may comprise a layout screen 362, a filter screen 363, and a report screen 364.
A layout screen 362 allows a user to select dimensions and facts of interest. The selected dimensions and facts will be the basis of a subsequently run report. Generally speaking, a layout screen 362 allows the user to specify the format of the report. FIG. 4 shows a screenshot of an example layout screen 362 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. In the example of FIG. 4, an exhaustive list of all available dimensions and facts in hierarchy tables 340 is displayed in a window 410. The user may select one or more available dimensions and facts from the window 410 for inclusion in selection areas 402, 404, 406, and 408. In the example of FIG. 4, selection areas 402, 406, and 408 only accept one or more dimensions, while selection area 404 only accepts facts. User interface 360 enforces the rules on which item in window 410 can be placed in which selection area (i.e., dimensions can only go to selection areas 402, 406, and 408; facts can only go to selection area 404). In accordance with standard OLAP terminology, dimensions in selection area 402 are also referred to as “column edge dimensions,” dimensions in selection area 406 are also referred to as “row edge dimensions,” and dimensions in selection area 408 are also referred to as “page edge dimensions.” In the example of FIG. 4, the user has selected “ByDay” as a column edge dimension, “campaign” as a row edge dimension, “advertiser” as a page edge dimension, and “impressions,” clicks”, and “CTR” as facts. “CTR” stands for click-through-rate, and is a calculated fact obtained by dividing the number of impressions with the number of clicks. Click-through-rate is a measure of the effectiveness of an advertisement. User interface 360 may also employ visual cues to assist users in working with items in window 410.
A filter screen 363 accepts dimensions that will be used as filters to the dimensions and facts selected in a layout screen 362. The general role of a front end program 220 is to optimally obtain that slice of an OLAP cube that contains all the data that the user is interested in viewing, and displaying that slice of the OLAP cube in exactly the format that the user wishes to view. In that regard, a filter screen 363 allows the user to slice the OLAP cube using filters on the dimensions. FIG. 5 shows a screenshot of an example filter screen 363 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. In the example of FIG. 5, selection areas 502, 504, 506, 508, 510, and 512 are table-driven in that they accept dimensions that are selectable based on information from control tables in the OLAP database 174. For example, once the user selects a dimension for selection area 508, a front end program 220 may consult a dimensions control table 342 to determine the kind of the selected dimension and the conditional operators that may be used for the selected dimension. The front end program 220 may consult a hierarchy control table 344 to determine which hierarchy table 340 to use and to perform translations between the identifier and actual name of a dimension. Dimensions that serve as possible values for the selected dimension are then displayed by a user interface 360 in selection area 512. In the example of FIG. 5, the user is requesting a report for the dimensions specified in a layout screen 362, but limited to a “category” that is “equal” to a category selected from “Automative,” “Business,” . . . etc. The user is further limiting the report to the “current month” between “Oct. 1, 2003” and “Oct. 31, 2003.” Note that once the user selects a “date range,” the selectable values for “start date” and “end date” will be set based on the data available from the OLAP database 174. Similarly, once the user selects “category” in selection area 508, the conditional operators to choose from in selection area 510 and the categories to choose from in selection area 512 are set based on data in the OLAP database 174. As can be appreciated, this advantageously allows addition of more dimensions in the OLAP database 174 without necessarily having to increase the number of selection windows in the user interface 360.
In one embodiment, a front end program 220 has minimal processing load to allow it to adapt to a changing OLAP database 174 and to allow it to be more portable to other databases. Accordingly, in one embodiment, a front end program 220 works in a client-server relationship with an OLAP database 174 and is driven by tables in the OLAP database 174. This advantageously obviates the need for hard coding of available dimensions in the front end program 220 and offloads the processing burden to the OLAP database 174 (which may be running in a relatively fast server computer). For example, the front end program 220 may receive a dimensions control table 342 and display the exhaustive list of dimensions and facts in the dimensions control table 342 in window 410 (see FIG. 4).
As a further example, the values selectable from selection areas 510 and 512 are based on a value selected by a user in selection area 508 (see FIG. 5). The valid values to be displayed in selection areas 510 and 512 may be determined from a dimensions control table 342 and a hierarchy control table 344.
A front end program that offloads the majority of processing to a server computer is especially important in online advertising. Unlike in mail order or catalog advertising applications, advertisement delivery over the Internet is essentially free in that an advertiser can send additional advertisements without incurring substantial additional cost. This results in a relatively large volume of impression data. A front end program 220 advantageously allows a client computer to access large amounts of data by using a back end server to do the “heavy lifting.” This will have the desirable effect of scalability by essentially scaling the back end as opposed to being reliant on client computer resources (which in many ways are outside the control of the programmer). This also allows for robust programming and the ability to retrieve data even with relatively old or low capacity client computers.
A report screen 364 provides a report based on the dimensions and facts selected by a user in a layout screen 362 as filtered by the dimensions the user selected in a filter screen 363. A front end program 220 may provide the selected dimensions and facts to a procedure 175 in a message server 163 (see FIG. 2). The procedure 175 may then query an OLAP database 174, filter the result of the query using the dimensions selected in the filter screen 363, and provide the result to the front end program 220. The result may be viewed in a report screen 364. FIG. 6 shows a screenshot of an example report 600 displayed in a report screen 364 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. In the example of FIG. 6, the report screen 364 shows the impressions, clicks, and CTR for the advertiser “Accucard.” A user may select a different view of the report by selecting another view in the navigation window 604. The dimensions and facts for a report may be saved as a “view.” As will be further explained below, save views may be rerun to take advantage of new data in an OLAP database 174. The dimensions for the report may be further configured by specifying new dimensions. An OLAP database 174 may have to be re-queried if the saved view does not include the data for the new dimensions, or if the user elects to rerun the view.
In the example of FIG. 6, new values for the dimension “ByDay” may be selected from a pull-down menu 602. A report may also be pivoted to show a different view. For example, a report may be pivoted by replacing one dimension with another.
A scheduler 374 may comprise computer-readable program code for scheduling report generation. Scheduler 374 may run reports based on a previously saved view, which comprise dimensions and facts selected by a user in a layout screen 362 and a filter screen 363. A scheduler 374 may be configured to generate a report at a certain frequency, for a certain period of time. A scheduler 374 may also be configured to save the generated reports in a format supported by productivity programs 222 (e.g., saved in Excel format), and email the generated report to the user. The mechanics of converting data formats and emailing are, in general, known in the art and not further described here. FIG. 7 shows a screenshot of an example screen 710 for a scheduler 374.
An alerts 376 may comprise computer-readable program code for alerting a user about changes in the data stored in an OLAP database 174. An alerts 376 may run a report based on dimensions and facts selected by a user in a layout screen 362 as filtered by dimensions the user selected in a filter screen 363. Thereafter, the alerts 376 may compare the generated report to the alert conditions specified by the user. If the result meets the alert conditions, the alerts 376 may so inform the user. FIG. 8 shows a screenshot of an example screen for an alerts 376. In the example of FIG. 8, the user has requested to be alerted in the event the number of impressions for a specified set of dimensions (not shown) have decreased by 10% in a rolling 7-day average. As can be appreciated, an alerts 376 may be employed to automatically watch for trends.
Turning to FIG. 9, there is shown a flow diagram of a method of generating a report in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. In step 902, a procedure for an OLAP database receives dimensions selected by a user. The dimensions may relate to online advertising. The dimensions may be selected by making selections or entering values in a front end program for the OLAP database.
In step 904, the procedure checks a hierarchy control table for the highest level hierarchy table (referred to as “relevant hierarchy table”) containing all of the selected dimensions. In step 906, the procedure may consult a dimensions control table to get the name of the relevant hierarchy table. In step 908, the procedure creates a query to extract dimensions and facts from the hierarchy table. A general algorithm to construct a SQL query is shown in Table 1:
| TABLE 1 |
| |
| 1) |
Construct a where clause using the filters set. |
| |
a. |
Convert each of the filter elements into Ids (identifications) |
| |
|
using the lookup tables. In the aggregate tables, the filter values |
| |
|
are stored as Ids. This allows for a compact storage of long |
| |
|
descriptive names. Hence the query string for the OLAP table |
| |
|
itself has to be constructed using Ids rather than the descriptive |
| |
|
elements that the user sets in the filter. |
| |
b. |
Construct a where clause with the converted filter ID values |
| |
i. |
Use the OR condition to choose for ID values within each |
| |
|
line |
| |
ii. |
Use the AND condition to choose across different |
| |
|
dimensions e.g. (dim1 = value1 or dim1 = value2) and |
| |
|
(dim2 = value3 or dim3 = value4) |
| 2) |
Construct the select statement using the dimensions and facts in the |
| |
layout |
| 3) |
Construct the group by statement using the dimensions in the layout |
| 4) |
Construct the order by statement using the default sort order for each |
| |
dimension in the layout. The default sort order is stored in the |
| |
dimension lookup table. |
| 5) |
Construct the from statement using the table name that contains the |
| |
highest level of aggregation that contains all the dimensions and facts |
| |
that are called for in the filters and in the layout. |
| |
In step 910, the procedure may enforce filter rules on the result of the query. The filter rules may be based on dimensions selected by the user in a filter screen of the front end program. In one embodiment, the result of a query is filtered by applying a “where condition” and a “select statement.” The “where condition” may specify the data to be extracted from the relevant hierarchy table. For example, the pseudo code:
-
- select from “relevant_hierarchy_table”;
- where advertiser=5 and messagetype=7;
extracts facts for the dimension advertiser with a value of “5” (“5” may refer to a specific advertiser, such as Vendor, Inc.) and the dimension message_type with a value of “7” (again, “7” may refer to a specific message type, such as a pop-up) from the relevant hierarchy table.
The procedure may forward the filtered result of the OLAP database query to the front end program, which then formats the result for presentation to the user as a report.
While specific embodiments of the present invention have been provided, it is to be understood that these embodiments are for illustration purposes and not limiting. Many additional embodiments will be apparent to persons of ordinary skill in the art reading this disclosure.
| Brevet cité | Date de dépôt | Date de publication | Déposant | Titre |
|---|
| US4977594 | 16 févr. 1989 | 11 déc. 1990 | Electronic Publishing Resources, Inc. | Database usage metering and protection system and method | | US5247517 | 2 sept. 1992 | 21 sept. 1993 | Novell, Inc. | Method and apparatus for analyzing networks | | US5315580 | 26 août 1991 | 24 mai 1994 | Hewlett-Packard Company | Network monitoring device and system | | US5446919 | 9 oct. 1991 | 29 août 1995 | 24/7 Real Media, Inc. | Communication system and method with demographically or psychographically defined audiences | | US5481741 | 22 sept. 1993 | 2 janv. 1996 | National Instruments Corporation | Method and apparatus for providing attribute nodes in a graphical data flow environment | | US5608850 | 14 avr. 1994 | 4 mars 1997 | Xerox Corporation | Transporting a display object coupled to a viewpoint within or between navigable workspaces | | US5617526 | 13 déc. 1994 | 1 avr. 1997 | Microsoft Corporation | Operating system provided notification area for displaying visual notifications from application programs | | US5627886 | 15 sept. 1995 | 6 mai 1997 | Electronic Data Systems Corporation | System and method for detecting fraudulent network usage patterns using real-time network monitoring | | US5638443 | 23 nov. 1994 | 10 juin 1997 | Xerox Corporation | System for controlling the distribution and use of composite digital works | | US5642484 | 13 mai 1994 | 24 juin 1997 | Captive Communications, Inc. | Pump top advertisement distribution and display system with performance and sales information feedback | | US5675510 | 7 juin 1995 | 7 oct. 1997 | Pc Meter L.P. | Computer use meter and analyzer | | US5682525 | 11 janv. 1995 | 28 oct. 1997 | Civix Corporation | System and methods for remotely accessing a selected group of items of interest from a database | | US5706502 | 25 mars 1996 | 6 janv. 1998 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Internet-enabled portfolio manager system and method | | US5708709 | 8 déc. 1995 | 13 janv. 1998 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | System and method for managing try-and-buy usage of application programs | | US5708780 | 7 juin 1995 | 13 janv. 1998 | Open Market, Inc. | Internet server access control and monitoring systems | | US5710918 | 7 juin 1995 | 20 janv. 1998 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method for distributed task fulfillment of web browser requests | | US5712979 | 20 sept. 1995 | 27 janv. 1998 | Infonautics Corporation | Method and apparatus for attaching navigational history information to universal resource locator links on a world wide web page | | US5715453 | 31 mai 1996 | 3 févr. 1998 | International Business Machines Corporation | Web server mechanism for processing function calls for dynamic data queries in a web page | | US5717860 | 20 sept. 1995 | 10 févr. 1998 | Infonautics Corporation | Method and apparatus for tracking the navigation path of a user on the world wide web | | US5717923 | 3 nov. 1994 | 10 févr. 1998 | Intel Corporation | Method and apparatus for dynamically customizing electronic information to individual end users | | US5724521 | 3 nov. 1994 | 3 mars 1998 | Intel Corporation | Method and apparatus for providing electronic advertisements to end users in a consumer best-fit pricing manner | | US5724567 | 25 avr. 1994 | 3 mars 1998 | Apple Computer, Inc. | System for directing relevance-ranked data objects to computer users | | US5734863 | 17 août 1994 | 31 mars 1998 | National Instruments Corporation | Method and apparatus for providing improved type compatibility and data structure organization in a graphical data flow diagram | | US5745681 | 11 janv. 1996 | 28 avr. 1998 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Stateless shopping cart for the web | | US5751956 | 21 févr. 1996 | 12 mai 1998 | Infoseek Corporation | Method and apparatus for redirection of server external hyper-link references | | US5754938 | 31 oct. 1995 | 19 mai 1998 | Pinpoint Incorporated | Pseudonymous server for system for customized electronic identification of desirable objects | | US5758111 | 20 juil. 1995 | 26 mai 1998 | Fujitsu Limited | Data processing apparatus for executing data processing using windows displayed on a display apparatus | | US5761662 | 8 mai 1997 | 2 juin 1998 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Personalized information retrieval using user-defined profile | | US5787253 | 28 mai 1996 | 28 juil. 1998 | The Ag Group | Apparatus and method of analyzing internet activity | | US5794210 | 11 déc. 1995 | 11 août 1998 | Cybergold, Inc. | Attention brokerage | | US5794259 | 25 juil. 1996 | 11 août 1998 | Lextron Systems, Inc | Apparatus and methods to enhance web browsing on the internet | | US5796952 | 21 mars 1997 | 18 août 1998 | Dot Com Development, Inc. | Method and apparatus for tracking client interaction with a network resource and creating client profiles and resource database | | US5809242 | 19 avr. 1996 | 15 sept. 1998 | Juno Online Services, L.P. | Electronic mail system for displaying advertisement at local computer received from remote system while the local computer is off-line the remote system | | US5812642 | 12 juil. 1995 | 22 sept. 1998 | Leroy; David J. | Audience response monitor and analysis system and method | | US5812769 | 20 sept. 1995 | 22 sept. 1998 | Infonautics Corporation | Method and apparatus for redirecting a user to a new location on the world wide web using relative universal resource locators | | US5819047 | 30 août 1996 | 6 oct. 1998 | At&T Corp | Method for controlling resource usage by network identities | | US5819092 | 6 oct. 1997 | 6 oct. 1998 | Vermeer Technologies, Inc. | Online service development tool with fee setting capabilities | | US5822526 | 3 juin 1996 | 13 oct. 1998 | Microsoft Corporation | System and method for maintaining and administering email address names in a network | | US5832502 | 2 juil. 1996 | 3 nov. 1998 | Microsoft Corporation | Conversation index builder | | US5835087 | 31 oct. 1995 | 10 nov. 1998 | Pinpoint Incorporated | System for generation of object profiles for a system for customized electronic identification of desirable objects | | US5835722 | 27 juin 1996 | 10 nov. 1998 | Logon Data Corporation | System to control content and prohibit certain interactive attempts by a person using a personal computer | | US5848396 | 26 avr. 1996 | 8 déc. 1998 | Freedom Of Information, Inc. | Method and apparatus for determining behavioral profile of a computer user | | US5854897 | 27 déc. 1996 | 29 déc. 1998 | Quantum Systems, Inc. | Network communications marketing system | | US5872850 | 31 mars 1997 | 16 févr. 1999 | Microsoft Corporation | System for enabling information marketplace | | US5875296 | 28 janv. 1997 | 23 févr. 1999 | International Business Machines Corporation | Distributed file system web server user authentication with cookies | | US5883955 | 7 juin 1995 | 16 mars 1999 | Digital River, Inc. | On-line try before you buy software distribution system | | US5887133 | 15 janv. 1997 | 23 mars 1999 | Health Hero Network | System and method for modifying documents sent over a communications network | | US5893118 | 22 janv. 1997 | 6 avr. 1999 | Novell, Inc. | Method for managing globally distributed software components | | US5898434 | 22 août 1994 | 27 avr. 1999 | Apple Computer, Inc. | User interface system having programmable user interface elements | | US5901287 | 24 juil. 1996 | 4 mai 1999 | The Sabre Group Inc. | Information aggregation and synthesization system | | US5905492 | 6 déc. 1996 | 18 mai 1999 | Microsoft Corporation | Dynamically updating themes for an operating system shell | | US5918014 | 26 déc. 1996 | 29 juin 1999 | Athenium, L.L.C. | Automated collaborative filtering in world wide web advertising | | US5920697 | 11 juil. 1996 | 6 juil. 1999 | Microsoft Corporation | Method of automatic updating and use of routing information by programmable and manual routing information configuration based on least lost routing | | US5923845 | 26 juil. 1996 | 13 juil. 1999 | Nec Corporation | Integrated electronic information system | | US5930700 | 27 nov. 1996 | 27 juil. 1999 | Bell Communications Research, Inc. | System and method for automatically screening and directing incoming calls | | US5933811 | 20 août 1996 | 3 août 1999 | Paul D. Angles | System and method for delivering customized advertisements within interactive communication systems | | US5937037 | 28 janv. 1998 | 10 août 1999 | Broadpoint Communications, Inc. | Communications system for delivering promotional messages | | US5943478 | 4 avr. 1997 | 24 août 1999 | Flash Communications, Inc. | System for immediate popup messaging across the internet | | US5948061 | 29 oct. 1996 | 7 sept. 1999 | Double Click, Inc. | Method of delivery, targeting, and measuring advertising over networks | | US5958015 | 29 oct. 1996 | 28 sept. 1999 | Abirnet Ltd. | Network session wall passively listening to communication session, with use of access rules, stops further communication between network devices by emulating messages to the devices | | US5959621 | 6 déc. 1996 | 28 sept. 1999 | Microsoft Corporation | System and method for displaying data items in a ticker display pane on a client computer | | US5961593 | 22 janv. 1997 | 5 oct. 1999 | Lucent Technologies, Inc. | System and method for providing anonymous personalized browsing by a proxy system in a network | | US5963915 | 21 févr. 1996 | 5 oct. 1999 | Infoseek Corporation | Secure, convenient and efficient system and method of performing trans-internet purchase transactions | | US5978836 | 28 juil. 1997 | 2 nov. 1999 | Solectron Corporation | Workflow systems and methods | | US5987606 | 19 mars 1997 | 16 nov. 1999 | Bascom Global Internet Services, Inc. | Method and system for content filtering information retrieved from an internet computer network | | US5991735 | 11 août 1998 | 23 nov. 1999 | Be Free, Inc. | Computer program apparatus for determining behavioral profile of a computer user | | US5995597 | 21 janv. 1997 | 30 nov. 1999 | Woltz; Robert Thomas | E-mail processing system and method | | US5996011 | 25 mars 1997 | 30 nov. 1999 | Unified Research Laboratories, Inc. | System and method for filtering data received by a computer system | | US5999740 | 29 sept. 1997 | 7 déc. 1999 | International Computers Limited | Updating mechanism for software | | US6006252 | 25 sept. 1997 | 21 déc. 1999 | Wolfe; Mark A. | System and method for communicating information relating to a network resource | | US6009410 | 16 oct. 1997 | 28 déc. 1999 | At&T Corporation | Method and system for presenting customized advertising to a user on the world wide web | | US6011537 | 27 janv. 1998 | 4 janv. 2000 | Palus A1 Llc | System for delivering and simultaneously displaying primary and secondary information, and for displaying only the secondary information during interstitial space | | US6014502 | 10 oct. 1997 | 11 janv. 2000 | Juno Online Services Lp | Electronic mail system with advertising | | US6014638 | 29 mai 1996 | 11 janv. 2000 | America Online, Inc. | System for customizing computer displays in accordance with user preferences | | US6014711 | 29 août 1997 | 11 janv. 2000 | Nortel Networks Corporation | Apparatus and method for providing electronic mail relay translation services | | US6026368 | 17 juil. 1995 | 15 févr. 2000 | 24/7 Media, Inc. | On-line interactive system and method for providing content and advertising information to a targeted set of viewers | | US6026933 | 11 sept. 1998 | 22 févr. 2000 | Cosco, Inc. | Step stool | | US6029141 | 27 juin 1997 | 22 févr. 2000 | Amazon.Com, Inc. | Internet-based customer referral system | | US6029195 | 5 déc. 1997 | 22 févr. 2000 | Pinpoint Incorporated | System for customized electronic identification of desirable objects | | US6047327 | 16 févr. 1996 | 4 avr. 2000 | Intel Corporation | System for distributing electronic information to a targeted group of users | | US6052709 | 23 déc. 1997 | 18 avr. 2000 | Bright Light Technologies, Inc. | Apparatus and method for controlling delivery of unsolicited electronic mail | | US6052730 | 9 janv. 1998 | 18 avr. 2000 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Method for monitoring and/or modifying web browsing sessions | | US6065056 | 13 août 1998 | 16 mai 2000 | Logon Data Corporation | System to control content and prohibit certain interactive attempts by a person using a personal computer | | US6067561 | 7 févr. 1997 | 23 mai 2000 | Hughes Electronics Corporation | Electronic mail notification system and method within a hybrid network that transmits notifications via a continuous, high-speed channel | | US6070140 | 12 nov. 1998 | 30 mai 2000 | Muse Green Investments LLC | Speech recognizer | | US6073105 | 13 juin 1997 | 6 juin 2000 | Tele-Publishing, Inc. | Interactive personals online network method and apparatus | | US6073241 | 29 août 1996 | 6 juin 2000 | C/Net, Inc. | Apparatus and method for tracking world wide web browser requests across distinct domains using persistent client-side state | | US6076166 | 17 janv. 1997 | 13 juin 2000 | Philips Electronics North America Corporation | Personalizing hospital intranet web sites | | US6078916 | 12 mars 1998 | 20 juin 2000 | Culliss; Gary | Method for organizing information | | US6088731 | 24 avr. 1998 | 11 juil. 2000 | Associative Computing, Inc. | Intelligent assistant for use with a local computer and with the internet | | US6101510 | 29 janv. 1997 | 8 août 2000 | Microsoft Corporation | Web browser control for incorporating web browser functionality into application programs | | US6108637 | 3 sept. 1996 | 22 août 2000 | Engage Technologies, Inc. | Content display monitor | | US6108691 | 17 avr. 1998 | 22 août 2000 | Switchboard, Inc. | Directory with options for access to and display of email addresses | | US6108799 | 12 mars 1998 | 22 août 2000 | International Business Machines Corporation | Automated sample creation of polymorphic and non-polymorphic marcro viruses | | US6112215 | 24 sept. 1998 | 29 août 2000 | International Business Machines Corporation | Database or repetitively used data entries displayable for selection and entry on a variety of user interactive interfaces from sources independent of said database | | US6115680 | 7 juin 1996 | 5 sept. 2000 | Media Metrix, Inc. | Computer use meter and analyzer | | US6119098 | 14 oct. 1997 | 12 sept. 2000 | Laurent Gautier | System and method for targeting and distributing advertisements over a distributed network | | US6122632 | 21 juil. 1997 | 19 sept. 2000 | Convergys Customer Management Group Inc. | Electronic message management system | | US6128663 | 10 févr. 1998 | 3 oct. 2000 | Invention Depot, Inc. | Method and apparatus for customization of information content provided to a requestor over a network using demographic information yet the user remains anonymous to the server | | US6694322 | 29 juin 2001 | 17 févr. 2004 | Alphablox Corporation | Caching scheme for multi-dimensional data | | US7610213 | 12 mai 2004 | 27 oct. 2009 | International Business Machines Corporation | Apparatus and method for monitoring progress of customer generated trouble tickets |
| Référence |
|---|
| 1 | ACM Portal USPTO Search, "Communications of the ACM: vol. 52, Issue 1", Association for Computing Machinery, dated Jan. 2009, 1 page. | | 2 | Ad Close, Webpage [online]. C/net Downloads.com [retrieved on Oct. 4, 2001]. Retrieved from the Internet . | | 3 | Ad Close, Webpage [online]. C/net Downloads.com [retrieved on Oct. 4, 2001]. Retrieved from the Internet <URL http//download.cnet.com/downloads/0-10059-100-915154.html>. | | 4 | Ad Muncher, Webpage [online]. C/net Downloads.com [retrieved on Oct. 4, 2001]. Retrieved from the Internet . | | 5 | Ad Muncher, Webpage [online]. C/net Downloads.com [retrieved on Oct. 4, 2001]. Retrieved from the Internet <URL:http//download.cnet.com/downloads/0-33567-18-100-2750044.html>. | | 6 | AdDelete, Webpage [online]. C/net Download.com [retrieved on Oct. 4, 2001]. Retrieved from the Internet . | | 7 | AdDelete, Webpage [online]. C/net Download.com [retrieved on Oct. 4, 2001]. Retrieved from the Internet <URL:http//download.cnet.com/downloads/0-10059-100-7003126.html>. | | 8 | Adextinguisher-Introduction and News Sections. Webpage [online][retrieved on Oct. 4, 2001]. Retrieved from the Internet URL:http//adext.magenet.net.html. | | 9 | Adextinguisher—Introduction and News Sections. Webpage [online][retrieved on Oct. 4, 2001]. Retrieved from the Internet URL:http//adext.magenet.net.html. | | 10 | AdPurger, Webpage [online]. C/net Downloads.com [retrieved on Oct. 4, 2001]. Retrieved from the Internet . | | 11 | AdPurger, Webpage [online]. C/net Downloads.com [retrieved on Oct. 4, 2001]. Retrieved from the Internet <URL:http//download.cnet.com/downloads/0-10068-100-5067717.html>. | | 12 | AdsOff, Webpage [online]. C/net Downloads.com [retrieved on Oct. 3, 2001]. Retrieved from the Internet . | | 13 | AdsOff, Webpage [online]. C/net Downloads.com [retrieved on Oct. 3, 2001]. Retrieved from the Internet <URL:http//download.cnet.com/downloads/0-10059-100-9 12651.html>. | | 14 | AdSubract SE, Webpage [online]. C/net Downloads.com [retrieved on Oct. 4, 2001]. Retrieved from the Internet . | | 15 | AdSubract SE, Webpage [online]. C/net Downloads.com [retrieved on Oct. 4, 2001]. Retrieved from the Internet <URL:http//download.cnet.com/downloads/0-3356727-100-5963713.html>. | | 16 | Advertising Killer, Webpage [online]. C/net Downloads.com [retrieved on Oct. 3, 2001]. Retrieved from the Internet . | | 17 | Advertising Killer, Webpage [online]. C/net Downloads.com [retrieved on Oct. 3, 2001]. Retrieved from the Internet <URL.http//download.cnet.com/downloads/0-10059-100-1539520.html>. | | 18 | Advisory Action dated Nov. 19, 2008 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/015,583, 3 pages. | | 19 | Aggarwal, Charu C. et al. 2001. Intelligent Crawling on the World Wide Web with Arbitrary Predicates. ACM, pp. 96-105. | | 20 | AllGone, Webpage [online]. C/net Downloads.com [retrieved on Oct. 4, 2001]. Retrieved from the Internet . | | 21 | AllGone, Webpage [online]. C/net Downloads.com [retrieved on Oct. 4, 2001]. Retrieved from the Internet <URL:http//download.cnet.com/downloads/0-10068-100-2915974.html>. | | 22 | AnalogX Pow, Webpage [online]. C/net Downloads.com [retrieved on Oct. 3, 2001]. Retrieved from the Internet . | | 23 | AnalogX Pow, Webpage [online]. C/net Downloads.com [retrieved on Oct. 3, 2001]. Retrieved from the Internet <URL:http//download.cnet.com/downloads-0-3356748-100-915372.html>. | | 24 | BackWeb Technologies Ltd., BackWEB User's Guide, 1997, [48 pgs.]. | | 25 | BackWeb User's Guide, about 1997/1998, pp. 1-48. | | 26 | Bae, Sung Min, et al., "Fuzzy Web Ad Selector", IEEE Intelligent Systems, vol. 18 Issue 6, Nov./Dec. 2003, pp. 62-69. | | 27 | Banner Zapper, Webpage [online]. C/net Downloads.com [retrieved on Oct. 4, 2001]. Retrieved from the Internet . | | 28 | Banner Zapper, Webpage [online]. C/net Downloads.com [retrieved on Oct. 4, 2001]. Retrieved from the Internet <URL:http//download.cnet.com/downloads/0-3356727-100-6384611.html>. | | 29 | BanPopup, Webpage [online]. C/net Downloads.com [retrieved on Oct. 4, 2001]. Retrieved from the Internet . | | 30 | BanPopup, Webpage [online]. C/net Downloads.com [retrieved on Oct. 4, 2001]. Retrieved from the Internet <URL:http//download.cnet.com/downloads/0-10059-100-6901908.html>. | | 31 | Black List. Webpage [online]. C/net Downloads.com [retrieved on Oct. 4, 2001]. Retrieved from the Internet . | | 32 | Black List. Webpage [online]. C/net Downloads.com [retrieved on Oct. 4, 2001]. Retrieved from the Internet <URL.http/download cnet.com/downloads/0-10059-100-902347 html>. | | 33 | Broder, Alan J., "Data Mining the Internet and Privacy", WEBKDD '99, LNAI 1836, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, (c) 2000, pp. 56-73. | | 34 | Bucklin, Randolph E., et al., "Choice and the Internet: From Clickstream to Research Stream", Marketing Letters, vol. 13, No. 3, Aug. 2002, pp. 245-258. | | 35 | Claria-Company Information-Corporate Review, webpage [online], retrieved on Mar. 3, 2005, retrieved from the internet: . | | 36 | Claria—Company Information—Corporate Review, webpage [online], retrieved on Mar. 3, 2005, retrieved from the internet: <URL:http://www.claria.com/companyinfo.html>. | | 37 | Close Popup 4.0, Webpage [online]. Take A Hike Software [retrieved on Oct. 4, 2001]. Retrieved from the Internet . | | 38 | Close Popup 4.0, Webpage [online]. Take A Hike Software [retrieved on Oct. 4, 2001]. Retrieved from the Internet <URL:http//www.ryanware.com/close—popup.html>. | | 39 | Close Popup, Webpage [online]. C/net Downloads.com [retrieved on Oct. 4, 2001]. Retrieved from the Internet . | | 40 | Close Popup, Webpage [online]. C/net Downloads.com [retrieved on Oct. 4, 2001]. Retrieved from the Internet <URL:http//download.cnet.com/downloads/0-10059-100-905799.html>. | | 41 | CobraSoft PopStop, Webpage (online). C/net Downloads.com [retrieved on Oct. 4, 2001]. Retrieved from the Internet . | | 42 | CobraSoft PopStop, Webpage (online). C/net Downloads.com [retrieved on Oct. 4, 2001]. Retrieved from the Internet <URL:http//download cnet.com/downloads/0-10058-100-6926765.html>. | | 43 | Compare Prices and Read Reviews on AdsOff! Epenions.com. Webpage [online]; Jan. 21, 2001. Obtained from corresponding International Application PCT Search Report. | | 44 | Copernic, Copernic: Software to Search, Find, and Manage Information, Copernic Technologies, Inc. 2004, 2 pgs. (retrieved on Apr. 6, 2004). Retrieved from the Internet. | | 45 | Copernic, Copernic: Software to Search, Find, and Manage Information, Copernic Technologies, Inc. 2004, 2 pgs. (retrieved on Apr. 6, 2004). Retrieved from the Internet<URL:http://www.copernic.com/en/index.html>. | | 46 | CrushPop 2000, Webpage [online]. www.32bit.com [retrieved on Oct. 4, 2001]. Retrieved from the Internet . | | 47 | CrushPop 2000, Webpage [online]. www.32bit.com [retrieved on Oct. 4, 2001]. Retrieved from the Internet <URL.http//32bit.com/software/listings/Internet/Special/180P/13794.html>. | | 48 | Definition of "close button", Microsoft Press Computer Dictionary, 3rd ed. (Redmond WA: Microsoft Press, 1997). | | 49 | Dialog file 15 #00936299 by Rosemary Cafasso "Multidimensional DB on Comeback Trail" Computerworld V28n43 pp. 69, Oct. 24, 1994. | | 50 | Diligenti, Michelangelo et al. 2004. A Unified Probalistic Framework for Web Page Scoring Systems. IEEE, vol. 16, No. 1. Jan. 2004, pp. 4-16. | | 51 | Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of Jul. 12, 2002 concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector (Directive on privacy and electronic communications), Official Journal L 201, Jul. 31, 2002 p. 0037-0047 (downloaded. | | 52 | DOGPILE, Dogpile Web Search Home Page, InfoSpace, Inc. 2004, p. 1 of 1, (retrieved on Apr. 1, 2004). Retrieved from the Internet: . | | 53 | DOGPILE, Dogpile Web Search Home Page, InfoSpace, Inc. 2004, p. 1 of 1, (retrieved on Apr. 1, 2004). Retrieved from the Internet: <URL:http://www.dogpile.com.html>. | | 54 | DoubleClick products (17 total pgs); Webpage [online] [retrieved on Jun. 11, 2003]; Retrieved from the Internet: . | | 55 | DoubleClick products (17 total pgs); Webpage [online] [retrieved on Jun. 11, 2003]; Retrieved from the Internet: <URL:http://www.doubleclick.com>. | | 56 | Eick, Stephen G., "Visual Analysis of Website Browsing Patterns", Visual Interfaces to Digital Libraries, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, (c) 2002, pp. 65-77. | | 57 | Eirinaki, Magdalini, et al., "Web Mining for Web Personalization", ACM Transactions on Internet Technology (TOIT), vol. 3, Issue 1, Feb. 2003, pp. 1-27. | | 58 | EPO Communication in European Appln. No. 04795209, mailed Feb. 17, 2011 [160 pages]. | | 59 | EPO Communication in European Appln. No. 04795209, mailed Feb. 17, 2011 [4 pages]. | | 60 | EPO File History of EP 2004795209, downloaded from European Patent Office on Apr. 13, 2011 [164 pgs.]. | | 61 | Favela, Jesus et al. 1997. Image-Retrieval Agent: Integrating Image Content and Text. IEE, vol. 1.14, pp. 36-39. | | 62 | Fenstermacher, Kurt D., et al., "Client-Side Monitoring for Web Mining", Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol. 54, Issue 7, May 2003, pp. 625-637. | | 63 | Fenstermacher, Kurt D., et al., "Mining Client-Side Activity for Personalization", WECWIS 2002, (c) 2002, pp. 205-212. | | 64 | Final Office Action dated Mar. 26, 2010 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/207,590, 8 pages. | | 65 | Final Rejection dated May 21, 2008 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/015,583, 8 pages. | | 66 | Friedman, Batya, et al., "Informed Consent in the Mozilla Browser: Implementing Value-Sensitive Design", HICSS-35 '02, Jan. 2002, pp. 10-19. | | 67 | Fu, Xiaobin, et al., "Mining Navigation History for Recommendation", IUI 2000, New Orleans, LA, (c) 2000, pp. 106-112. | | 68 | Google search for "define: close button", Mar. 2, 2007. | | 69 | Google Search, "Result Search Query Build Search Engine Index Using Gather Consumer Navigate Search", http://scholar.google.com/scholar, dated Apr. 7, 2010, 3 pages. | | 70 | Gralla, Preston, How the Internet Works, Special Edition, Ziff-Davis Press, Emeryville, CA, (c) 1997, pp. 254 and 266-271. | | 71 | Greening, Dan R., "Tracking Users: What Marketers Really Want to Know", Web Techniques, Jul. 1999, downloaded from: www.webtechniques.com/archives/1999/07/, pp. 1-9. | | 72 | Hancock, Wayland, "A new way to get information from the Internet," American Agent & Broker, Nov. 1997, 69, 11, pp. 65-66 [2 pgs.]. | | 73 | Hancock, Wayland, A New Way To Get Information From The Internet, American Agent & Broker; Nov. 1997; 69, 11; ABI/INFORM Global, pp. 64 & 66. | | 74 | Heller, Laura, "Target gets mod in Manhattan", DSNRetailing Today, v40 n16, Aug. 20, 2001: 2, 37. | | 75 | Hongyu Liu et al., "Focused Crawling by Learning HMM from User's Topic-Specific Browsing" Proceedings of the IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI '04) 0/7695-2100-2/04. | | 76 | Hun, Ke et al. 2003. A Probabilistic Model for Intelligent Web Crawlers. IEEE, pp. 278-282. | | 77 | InterMute, Webpage [online]. C/net Downloads.com [retrieved on Oct. 3, 2001]. Retrieved from the Internet . | | 78 | InterMute, Webpage [online]. C/net Downloads.com [retrieved on Oct. 3, 2001]. Retrieved from the Internet <URL:http//download.cnet.com/downloads/0-10059-100-906599.html>. | | 79 | International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Search Authority for Intl. Appl. No. PCT/US05/45722 mailed Jan. 19, 2007. | | 80 | International Search Report in EP Appln. No. 05802579.2-1527, dated May 2, 2008. | | 81 | International Search Report in PCT Appln. No. PCT/US04/09918, mailed Mar. 10, 2005 [3 pages]. | | 82 | International Search Report in PCT Appln. No. PCT/US2004/07714, mailed Mar. 31, 2005 [1 page]. | | 83 | International Search Report in PCT Appln. No. PCT/US2005/035352, mailed Sep. 11, 2007. | | 84 | Internet Citation: "Gator.com offers one-click shopping at over 5,000 e-commerce site today"; Jun. 14, 1999; XP002145278; Date retrieved: Jun. 28, 2001. URL:http://www.gator.com/company/press/pr061499b.html. | | 85 | Ishitani, Lucila, et al., "Masks: Bringing Anonymity and Personalization Together", IEEE Security & Privacy, vol. 1, Issue 3, May/Jun. 2003, pp. 18-23. | | 86 | Japanese Patent Office, Official Action issued Dec. 17, 2010, mailed Dec. 27, 2010 in Japanese Patent Application No. 2007-528053 (non-official translation), 7 pgs. | | 87 | KIPO, Official Action in Korean Patent Appln. No. 10-2006-7008977. | | 88 | Kiyomitsu, Hidenari, et al., "Web Reconfiguration by Spatio-Temporal Page Personalization Rules Based on Access Histories", Applications and the Internet, San Diego, CA, Jan. 8-12, 2001, pp. 75-82. | | 89 | Klemm, Reinhard P., "WebCompanion: A Friendly Client-Side Web Prefetching Agent", IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol. 11, No. 4, Jul./Aug. 1999, pp. 577-594. | | 90 | Kourbatov, Opening a Window, Jul. 8, 2000, plublished by www.javascripter.net, whole document. | | 91 | Kurohashi, Sadao, et al. 1997. The Method for Detecting Important Descriptions of a Word Based on its Density Distribution in Text. Information Processing Society of Japan. vol. 38, Issue No. 4 (Apr. 15, 1997), pp. 845-854. | | 92 | Langheinrich, M., et al. "Unintrusive Customization Techniques for Web Advertising," NEC Corporation, C&C Media Research Laboratories, Kanagawa, Japan, Computer Networks, vol. 31, No. 11, pp. 1259-1272, May, 1999 (in Conf. Proc. 8th Int'l WWW Conf., Toronta, Canada, May 11-14, 1999). | | 93 | Lee, Ching-Cheng, et al., "Category-Based Web Personalization System", COMPSAC 2001, Oct. 8-12, 2001, pp. 621-625. | | 94 | Leuski, Anton et al. 2000. Lighthouse: Showing The Way To Relevant Information. IEEE, Oct. 2000, pp. 125-129. | | 95 | Liu, Jian-Guo, et al., "Web Mining for Electronic Business Application", PDCAT 2003, Aug. 27-29, 2003, pp. 872-876. | | 96 | Liu, Jian-Guo, et al., "Web Usage Mining for Electronic Business Applications", Machine Learning and Cybernetics, Shanghai, China, Aug. 2004, pp. 1314-1318. | | 97 | Lu, Hongjun, et al., "Extending a Web Browser with Client-Side Mining", APWeb 2003, LNCS 2642, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, (c) 2003, pp. 166-177. | | 98 | Luxenburger, Julia, et al., "Query-Log Based Authority Analysis for Web Information Search", WISE 2004, LNCS 3306, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, Nov. 1, 2004, pp. 90-101. | | 99 | Marcebra Net, Webpage [online]. C/net Downloads.com [retrieved on Oct. 4, 2001]. Retrieved from the Internet . | | 100 | Marcebra Net, Webpage [online]. C/net Downloads.com [retrieved on Oct. 4, 2001]. Retrieved from the Internet <URL:http//download.cnet.com/downloads/0-3364666-100-5210875.html>. | | 101 | Metacrawler, Web Search Home Page-MetaCrawler, InfoSpace, Inc. 2004, p. 1 of 1 (retrieved on Apr. 6, 2004), Retrieved from the internet: . | | 102 | Metacrawler, Web Search Home Page—MetaCrawler, InfoSpace, Inc. 2004, p. 1 of 1 (retrieved on Apr. 6, 2004), Retrieved from the internet: <URL:http://www.metacrawler.com.html>. | | 103 | Mobasher, Bamshad, et al., "Automatic Personalization Based on Web Usage Mining", Communications of the ACM, vol. 43, Issue 8, Aug. 2000, pp. 142-151. | | 104 | Mr. KillAd. Webpage [online]. C/net Downloads.com [retrieved on Oct. 4, 2001]. Retrieved from the Internet . | | 105 | Mr. KillAd. Webpage [online]. C/net Downloads.com [retrieved on Oct. 4, 2001]. Retrieved from the Internet <URL:http//download.cnet.com/downloads/0-10059-100-895339 html>. | | 106 | Nagger, Webpage [online]. C/net Downloads.com [retrieved on Oct. 4, 2001]. Retrieved from the Internet . | | 107 | Nagger, Webpage [online]. C/net Downloads.com [retrieved on Oct. 4, 2001]. Retrieved from the Internet <URL:http//download.cnet.com/downloads/0-3356748-100-2497932 html>. | | 108 | Netcaster Developer's Guide, Netscape Communicator, Sep. 25, 1997, pp. 1-112. | | 109 | Netscape Communications Corp., Netcaster Developer's Guide, Netscape Communicator, Sep. 25, 1997 [112 pgs.]. | | 110 | Nilsson, B. A., and Robb, J., "Invasion of the Webcasters," PC World, vol. 15, No. 9 (Sep. 1997) p. 204-216 [9 pgs.]. | | 111 | Nilsson, B.A., Invasion of the Webcasters, PC World, Sep. 1997, pp. 205-216. | | 112 | NoAds 2000.6.30.1, Webpage [online] south bay software [retrieved on Oct. 4, 2001]. Retrieved from the Internet . | | 113 | NoAds 2000.6.30.1, Webpage [online] south bay software [retrieved on Oct. 4, 2001]. Retrieved from the Internet <URL:http//www.southbaypc.com/NoAds.html>. | | 114 | Non-Final Rejection dated Dec. 20, 2006 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/015,583, 8 pages. | | 115 | Non-Final Rejection dated Jul. 20, 2009 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/015,583, 7 pages. | | 116 | NoPops 1.1, Webpage [online]. WebAttack.com [retrieved on Oct. 4, 2001]. Retrieved from the Internet . | | 117 | NoPops 1.1, Webpage [online]. WebAttack.com [retrieved on Oct. 4, 2001]. Retrieved from the Internet <URL:http//www.webattack.com/get/nopops.shtml>. | | 118 | Office Action mailed Apr. 25, 2006 from U.S. Appl. No. 10/700,820, filed Nov. 4, 2003. | | 119 | Office Action mailed Dec. 26, 2006 from U.S. Appl. No. 10/700,820, filed Nov. 4, 2003. | | 120 | Office Action mailed Jul. 27, 2005 from U.S. Appl. No. 10/056,932, filed Jan. 25, 2002. | | 121 | Office Action mailed Jun. 22, 2009 from U.S. Appl. No. 11/207,590, filed Aug. 19, 2005. | | 122 | Office Action mailed Mar. 18, 2005 from U.S. Appl. No. 10/056,932, filed Jan. 25, 2002. | | 123 | Office Action mailed May 24, 2007 from U.S. Appl. No. 10/700,820, filed Nov. 4, 2003. | | 124 | Office Action mailed May 7, 2004 from U.S. Appl. No. 10/056,932, filed Jan. 25, 2002. | | 125 | Office Action mailed Oct. 10, 2007 from U.S. Appl. No. 11/207,590, filed Aug. 19, 2005. | | 126 | Office Action mailed Oct. 16, 2008 from U.S. Appl. No. 11/207,590, filed Aug. 19, 2005. | | 127 | Office Action mailed Oct. 19, 2007 from U.S. Appl. No. 11/207,589, filed Aug. 19, 2005. | | 128 | Office Action mailed Sep. 13, 2006 from U.S. Appl. No. 10/700,820, filed Nov. 4, 2003. | | 129 | Office Action mailed Sep. 16, 2004 from U.S. Appl. No. 10/056,932, filed Jan. 25, 2002. | | 130 | Office Action mailed Sep. 5, 2003 from U.S. Appl. No. 10/056,932, filed Jan. 25, 2002. | | 131 | Otsuka, Shingo, et al. 2004. The Analysis of Users Behavior Using Global Web Access Logs. IPSJ SIG Technical Report, vol. 2004 No. 71 (Jul. 13, 2004), pp. 17-24. | | 132 | Paepcke, Andreas, et al., "Beyond Document Similarity: Understanding Value-Based Search and Browsing Technologies", ACM SIGMOD Record, vol. 29, Issue 1, Mar. 2000, pp. 80-92. | | 133 | Paganelli, Leila, et al., "Intelligent Analysis of User Interactions with Web Applications", IUI '02, San Francisco, CA, Jan. 13-16, 2002, pp. 111-118. | | 134 | Paraben's AdStopper, Webpage [online]. C/net Downloads.com [retrieved on Oct. 4, 2001]. Retrieved from the Internet <URL:http//download.cnet.com/downloads/0-10059-100-2643648.html>. | | 135 | Park, Joon S., et al., "Secure Cookies on the Web", IEEE Internet Computing, vol. 4, Issue 4, Jul./Aug. 2000, pp. 36-44. | | 136 | Payton, D., et al. 1999. Dynamic collaborator discovery in information intensive environments. ACM Comput. Surv. 31, 2es, Article 8 (Jun. 1999), pp. 1-8. | | 137 | PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Jan. 9, 2008, for International Application No. PCT/US06/023386. | | 138 | PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb 9, 2007, for International Application No. PCT/US07/061944. | | 139 | PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 26, 2007, for International Application No. PCT/US06/025102. | | 140 | PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 28, 2006, for International Application No. PCT/US06/025103. | | 141 | PCT International Search Report for application No. PCT/US02/35981, 3 sheets; mailed Apr. 4, 2003. | | 142 | PCT International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US03/34015. (3 sheets). | | 143 | PCT International Search Report for PCT/US03/13985 mailed Aug. 8, 2003; total of 1 sheet. | | 144 | PCT International Search Report re: International Application No. PCT/US05/29615 dated Feb. 20, 2006. | | 145 | Pierrakos, Dimitrios, et al., "Web Usage Mining as a Tool for Personalization: A Survey", User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, vol. 13, No. 4, (c) 2003, pp. 311-372. | | 146 | Pierre Maret, et al.; Multimedia Information Interchange: Web Forms Meet Data Servers; Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Multimedia Computing and Systems; vol. 2, Jun. 7-11, 1999, pp. 499-505; XP000964627; Florence, Italy. | | 147 | Popki Popup Closer 1.4, Webpage [online]. WebAttack.com [retrieved on Oct. 4, 2001]. Retrieved from the Internet <URL:http//www.webattack.com/get/popki.shtml>. | | 148 | PopKill, Webpage [online]. C/net Downloads.com [retrieved on Oct. 4, 2001]. Retrieved from the Internet <URL:http//download.cnet.com/downloads/0-10059-100-6967054.html>. | | 149 | PopNot, Webpage [online]. C/net Downloads.com [retrieved on Oct. 4, 2001]. Retrieved from the Internet <URL http//download.cnet.com/downloads/0-10059-100-5112702.html>. | | 150 | PopUp Eraser, Webpage [online]. C/net Downloads.com [retrieved on Oct. 4, 2001]. Retrieved from the Internet <URL:http//download.cnet.com/downloads/0-10059-100-6322841.html>. | | 151 | Popup Hunter, Webpage [online]. C/net Downloads.com [retrieved on Oct. 4, 2001]. Retrieved from the Internet <URL:http//download.cnet.com/downloads/0-10059-100-1451171.html>. | | 152 | PopUp Killer, Webpage [online]. C/net Downloads.com [retrieved on Oct. 3, 2001]. Retrieved from the Internet URL.http//download.cnet.com/downloads/0-10059-100-7253644 html>. | | 153 | Popup Smasher, Webpage [online]. C/net Downloads.com [retrieved on Oct. 4, 2001]. Retrieved from the Internet <URL:http/download.cnet.com/downloads/0-3364664-100-7209048.html>. | | 154 | Pop-up stopper, Webpage [online]. C/net Downloads.com [retrieved on Oct. 3, 2001]. Retrieved from the Internet <URL:http//download.cnet.com/downloads/0-10059-100-6803957.sub.—html&-gt;. | | 155 | PopupDummy, Webpage [online]. C/net Downloads.com [retrieved on Oct. 4, 2001]. Retrieved from the Internet <URL:http//download.cnet.com/downloads/0-10059-100-6943327.html>. | | 156 | Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC Directive) Regulations 2003 (PECR), No. 2426, Electronic Communication, Sep. 2003. | | 157 | Ready, Kevin et al., "Plug-n-Play Java Script" (Indianapolis, IN: New Riders Publishing, 1996): 19-22, 39, 40 and 43-45. | | 158 | Restriction Requirement dated Oct. 31, 2007 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/015,583, 6 pages. | | 159 | Schonberg, Edith, et al., "Measuring Success", Communications of the ACM, vol. 43, Issue 8, Aug. 2000, pp. 53-57. | | 160 | Shahabi, Cyrus, et al., "Efficient and Anonymous Web-Usage Mining for Web Personalization", INFORMS Journal on Computing, vol. 15, No. 2, Spring 2003, pp. 123-148. | | 161 | Shopping with WhenUShop, Webpage [on-line]; WhenU.com [retrieved on Mar. 19, 2002]. Retrieved from the Internet: URL:http://www.whenu.com. | | 162 | SideStep, The Traveler's Search Engine; Webpage (online) (retrieved on Oct. 7, 2004); retrieved from the Internet: <URL:http://www.sidestep.com/main.html. | | 163 | Soumen Chakrabarti et al., "Focused Crawling: A New Approach to Top-Specific Web Resource Discovery" Computer Networks 31 (1999), pp. 1623-1640. | | 164 | Srivastava, Jaideep, et al., "Web Usage Mining: Discovery and Applications of Usage Patterns from Web Data", SIGKDD Explorations, vol. 1. Issue 2, Jan. 2000, pp. 12-23. | | 165 | Surf In Peace 2.01, Webpage [online]. WebAttack.com [retrieved on Oct. 4, 2001]. Retrieved from the Internet <URL:http//www.webattack.com/get/sip.shtml>. | | 166 | U.S. Appl. No. 09/993,887, filed Nov. 27, 2001, by Jax B. Cowden, et al. | | 167 | U.S. Appl. No. 09/993,888, filed Nov. 27, 2001, by Mark E. Pennell, et al. | | 168 | U.S. Appl. No. 09/993,904, filed Nov. 27, 2001, by Jax B. Cowden, et al. | | 169 | U.S. Appl. No. 09/993,906, filed Nov. 27, 2001, by Jax B. Cowden, et al. | | 170 | U.S. Appl. No. 11/207,590—Jul. 5, 2011 PTO Office Action. | | 171 | U.S. Appl. No. 11/427,243—May 10, 2011 PTO Office Action. | | 172 | Uehara, Satoru, et al., "An Implementation of Electronic Shopping Cart on the Web System Using component-Object Technology", Proc. of the 6th International Conf./ on Object-Oriented Real-Time Dependable Systems, Jan. 8-10, 2001, pp. 77-84. | | 173 | Ultraseek Server Detailed Feature List, http://software.infoseek.com/products/ultraseek/ultrafeatures.htm, Accessed from Apr. 1998 archive from http://web.archive.org/web/19980419092128/http://software.infoseek.com/products/. | | 174 | Visual Search ToolBar—Graphically Enhance Search Results, 2004 Viewpoint Corporation; Webpage [online] [retrieved on Oct. 7, 2004]; retrieved from the Internet: <URL:http://www.viewpoint.com/pub/toolbar/download.html. | | 175 | Web Magician, Webpage [online]. RocketDownLoad.com [retrieved on Oct. 4, 2001]. Retrieved from the Internet <URL:http/www.rocketdownload.com/Details/Inte/webmag.html>. | | 176 | Wenyin, Liu, et al., "Ubiquitous Media Agents: A Framework for Managing Personally Accumulated Multimedia Files", Multimedia Systems, vol. 9, No. 2, Aug. 2003, pp. 144-156. | | 177 | www.conversionruler.com/faq.php, Feb. 4, 2003. | | 178 | Xu, Cheng-Zhong, et al., "A Keyword-Based Semantic Prefetching Approach in Internet News Services", IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol. 16, Issue 5, May 2004, pp. 601-611. | | 179 | Zaiane, Osmar R., et al., "Discovering Web Access Patterns and Trends by Applying OLAP and Data Mining Technology on Web Logs", IEEE International Forum on Research and Technology Advances in Digital Libraries, Santa Barbara, CA, Apr. 22-24, 1998, pp. 19-29. | | 180 | Zero Popup, Webpage [online]. C/net Downloads.com [retrieved on Oct. 4, 2001]. Retrieved from the Internet <URL:http//download.cnet.com/downloads/0-3356748-100-7163307.html>. |
| Brevet citant | Date de dépôt | Date de publication | Déposant | Titre |
|---|
| US8386497 | 10 sept. 2010 | 26 févr. 2013 | Business Objects Software Limited | Query generation based on hierarchical filters | | US20120066247 | 10 sept. 2010 | 15 mars 2012 | Business Objects Software Limited | Query generation based on hierarchical filters |
|