US8396129B2 - Apparatus and method for single-pass, gradient-based motion compensated image rate conversion - Google Patents
Apparatus and method for single-pass, gradient-based motion compensated image rate conversion Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US8396129B2 US8396129B2 US11/965,947 US96594707A US8396129B2 US 8396129 B2 US8396129 B2 US 8396129B2 US 96594707 A US96594707 A US 96594707A US 8396129 B2 US8396129 B2 US 8396129B2
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- image
- motion vector
- mipmap
- motion
- map
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active, expires
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04N—PICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
- H04N7/00—Television systems
- H04N7/01—Conversion of standards, e.g. involving analogue television standards or digital television standards processed at pixel level
- H04N7/0135—Conversion of standards, e.g. involving analogue television standards or digital television standards processed at pixel level involving interpolation processes
- H04N7/014—Conversion of standards, e.g. involving analogue television standards or digital television standards processed at pixel level involving interpolation processes involving the use of motion vectors
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
- G09G—ARRANGEMENTS OR CIRCUITS FOR CONTROL OF INDICATING DEVICES USING STATIC MEANS TO PRESENT VARIABLE INFORMATION
- G09G5/00—Control arrangements or circuits for visual indicators common to cathode-ray tube indicators and other visual indicators
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
- G09G—ARRANGEMENTS OR CIRCUITS FOR CONTROL OF INDICATING DEVICES USING STATIC MEANS TO PRESENT VARIABLE INFORMATION
- G09G5/00—Control arrangements or circuits for visual indicators common to cathode-ray tube indicators and other visual indicators
- G09G5/14—Display of multiple viewports
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
- G09G—ARRANGEMENTS OR CIRCUITS FOR CONTROL OF INDICATING DEVICES USING STATIC MEANS TO PRESENT VARIABLE INFORMATION
- G09G2320/00—Control of display operating conditions
- G09G2320/10—Special adaptations of display systems for operation with variable images
- G09G2320/106—Determination of movement vectors or equivalent parameters within the image
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
- G09G—ARRANGEMENTS OR CIRCUITS FOR CONTROL OF INDICATING DEVICES USING STATIC MEANS TO PRESENT VARIABLE INFORMATION
- G09G2340/00—Aspects of display data processing
- G09G2340/04—Changes in size, position or resolution of an image
- G09G2340/0407—Resolution change, inclusive of the use of different resolutions for different screen areas
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
- G09G—ARRANGEMENTS OR CIRCUITS FOR CONTROL OF INDICATING DEVICES USING STATIC MEANS TO PRESENT VARIABLE INFORMATION
- G09G2340/00—Aspects of display data processing
- G09G2340/10—Mixing of images, i.e. displayed pixel being the result of an operation, e.g. adding, on the corresponding input pixels
Definitions
- FIG. 7 illustrates an exemplary and more detailed block diagram of an image interpolator of the integrated circuit of FIG. 4 ;
- downscalers 506 , 510 - 514 generate mipmaps A/ 2 , A/ 4 , A/ 8 and A/ 16 .
- the alpha-numeric reference numerals not only differentiate the mipmaps but also indicate the degree to which each mipmap is downscaled with respect to the first image A.
- the second plurality 504 of serially-coupled downscalers includes 4 downscalers 508 , 516 - 520 .
- Downscalers 508 , 516 - 520 are also each downscale by 2 downscalers.
- downscalers 508 , 516 - 520 are downscale by n downscalers, where n is any suitable value.
- motion detector 412 generates a motion factor map 416 based on the smallest pair of mipmaps from the at least two pairs of mipmaps 416 (e.g., A/ 16 and B/ 16 ).
- Motion detector 412 uses any suitable algorithm to detect “enough” motion between the smallest pair of mipmaps such that object may be determined to be moving, non-moving, or somewhere in-between moving and non-moving with respect to the first and second source images, A and B. In other words, motion detector 412 detects a degree of motion between the first and second source images, A and B.
- motion detector 412 applies the following formulae to determine each value within the motion factor map.
Abstract
A mipmap generator generates pairs of mipmaps that are each of a lower resolution that its respective source image. A single-pass, gradient-based motion vector generator generates an image motion vector map having values that represent the motion trajectories for pixels in the first and second source images. An image interpolator generates an interpolated image based on the source images and the image motion vector map. A motion detector generates a motion factor map based on a pair of mipmaps from those generated by the mipmap generator that represents a detected degree of motion between the first and second source images. The blending module generates a blended, upconverted new image using the motion factor map, the interpolated image and one of the first and second motion maps.
Description
The present disclosure generally relates to image rate conversion, and more particularly, to motion compensation image rate upconversion.
It is known to use a variety of devices to display images to a user. As used herein, an image may be a field (e.g., such as in the context of an interlaced image) or a frame (such as in the context of a deinterlaced or progressive image). Televisions, media players (e.g., DVD players), computing devices (e.g., stationary desktop computers), mobile devices (e.g., cellular phones, personal digital assistants, etc.) are each capable of displaying sequences of images (video and/or graphics) to a user. In the context of video, image sequences are generally created using a fixed image rate (a.k.a. frame or field rate, when dealing with frames or fields, specifically). For example, many telecine processes record video (e.g., movies) in real time, i.e., having a image (or frame) rate of 24 Hz. When the video is intended to be displayed on a display device that has a refresh rate that does not match and is faster than the image rate of the source video, the display device must create new images for insertion into the destination (i.e., the output) video stream. For example, many standard television sets in North America refresh at 30 frames per second while many standard computer monitors (e.g., an LCD display) refresh at 60 Hz (and may be as high as 120 Hz).
When a movie having a 24 Hz frame rate is displayed on a display having a refresh rate of 60 Hz, the source sequence of images must be “upconverted” to 60 Hz. The most common method is to simply repeat a previously known frame at a predetermined point in time. This is often accomplished using a 3:2 pulldown where a first image “2n” is repeated three times and a second image “2n+1” is repeated 2 times in a sample and hold process. FIG. 1 illustrates an example of a sample and hold process for a generic upconversion (not specifically an upconversion from 24 Hz to 60 Hz). As shown, the top row represents a source sequence of images including images A, B and C and has a first image rate such that image A is displayed at time TS1, image B is displayed at TS2 and image C is displayed at TS3. The lower “row” of images displays the sequence of upsampled images for a display that has a higher refresh rate or image rate. Thus, upconversion is required for display. The destination sequence of images has a second image rate that is higher or faster than the first image rate such that in this generic example, the first image A is displayed on the display at time TO1 and is repeated at TO2. Subsequently, image B is displayed at time TO3 and again at TO4. Image C is displayed at time TO5, etc.
As is known, sample and hold upconversions such as the 3:2 pulldown create annoying artifacts called motion judder effects in areas where objects move with respect to consecutive images in the source image sequence. In other words, the motion of objects in consecutive images is not smooth in prior art sample and hold upconversions. As a result, the human eye has difficulty focusing on it.
To mitigate against these annoying judder effects, a variety of techniques have been established. The first group of techniques use non-motion compensation such as linear interpolation between two original images. These techniques, however, fail because motion judder is still perceived by the human eye. The second group of techniques are motion compensation based. These techniques attempt to display a moving object in the correct spatial position in the upconverted new image. For example, FIG. 2 shows this concept where an object in a first image A is initially displayed in a first location 202 moves to a new location 204 in second image B, where frames A and B are from the source sequence of images. The upconverted new image Z is designed to place the object in the correct location 206 along the motion trajectory 208.
A first type of motion compensation upconversion is the block matching method that is akin to motion estimation in MPEG, a type of video compression algorithm. Accordingly, block matching techniques are often affiliated with video compression engines. The block matching method takes a first image and a second image of a source sequence and looks for similar blocks within the images. The detection of similar blocks indicates that motion of pixels associated with these blocks. The block matching method, however: (1) is not accurate at the sub-pixel level without using expensive processing resources; (2) is expensive to avoid error; and (3) requires recursive algorithms. As is recognized, if an object moves a non-integer number of pixels (e.g., 2.5 pixel motion), the block matching method requires a pair of upscalers to convert, to a certain degree, subpixel resolution to pixel resolution and then performs the block matching to obtain the amount of motion (in integer pixels) in the upscaled pixel resolution, which corresponds to the subpixel resolution (with fractional pixel) in the original un-upscaled image. Additionally, in order to avoid any error in detection of motion, expensive and recursive processing is required to ensure that the allegedly similar blocks in the second frame were moved from the first frame. In other words, the block matching methods require expensive and recursive processing algorithms to properly “match” the moved blocks. Because block matching methods are not always accurate at the sub-pixel level and because they require expensive and recursive algorithms to implement to avoid error, block matching methods are not desirable.
Another type of motion compensation upconversion is the phase plane correlation method that detections motion in the phase-domain and therefore requires fourier transforms on the images and inverse fourier transforms (e.g., using FFTs and iFFTs) to properly identify and verify motion in images. Because implementation of fourier transforms is computationally expensive, phase plane correlation methods are not desirable.
Yet another type of motion compensation is the optical flow method that measures motion vectors over two consecutive fields using gradient-based and recursive algorithms (in the x, y and t dimensions) to optimize the pixel motion vectors. This method for upconversion is expensive to implement due to its recursive nature. Consequently, the optical flow method of the prior art is also not desirable.
Therefore a need exists to upconvert a source sequence of images to create a destination or output sequence of images having a higher image rate than the source sequence of images while avoiding the expensive collateral consequences of prior art methods.
The invention will be more readily understood in view of the following description when accompanied by the below figures and wherein like reference numerals represent like elements.
Generally, one embodiment of the present disclosure provides an integrated circuit that has a mipmap generator, a single-pass gradient-based motion vector generator and an image interpolator for use in generating an interpolated image based on the first and second source image. The mipmap generator generates pairs of mipmaps that each are of a lower resolution that its respective source image. The single-pass, gradient-based motion vector generator generates an image motion vector map having values that represent the motion trajectories for pixels in the first and second source images. Lastly, the image interpolator generates the interpolated image based on the source images and the image motion vector map. In one embodiment, the interpolated image may be used as an upconverted image in a destination sequence of images. In one embodiment, the mipmap generator is not part of the integrated circuit. In another embodiment, the image interpolator is not part of the integrated circuit.
In one embodiment, a motion detector generates a motion factor map based on a pair of mipmaps from those generated by the mipmap generator. The motion factor map represents a detected degree of motion between the first and second source images. Using the motion factor map, the interpolated image and one of the first and second motion maps, a blending module generates a blended upconverted new image. In one embodiment, the blended upconverted new image is used as the upconverted image in the destination sequence of images.
Accordingly, unlike the expensive and recursive schemes of the prior art, one embodiment of the present disclosure provides a single-pass image motion vector generator. Additionally, unlike other upconverted prior art solutions, the present disclosure significantly reduces unwanted judder artifacts.
In the following detailed description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding the present disclosure. It will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art, however, that these specific details need not be used to practice the present disclosure. In other instances, well-known structures, interfaces and processes have not been shown or described in detail in order not to unnecessarily obscure the present invention.
As is further recognized the video processing unit 302 may be part of any number of computing devices such as, but not limited to, televisions, media players (e.g., DVD players, set-top boxes), computing devices (e.g., stationary desktop computers), mobile devices (e.g., cellular phones, personal digital assistants, etc.), etc., that are each capable of displaying sequences of images (video and/or graphics) to a user.
In one embodiment, the source sequence of images 304 may correspond to interlaced images (i.e., fields). In one embodiment, video processing unit 302 includes or is coupled to a deinterlacer that first deinterlaces the interlaced images to form deinterlaced frames for the video processing unit 302 to operate upon. In another embodiment, the source sequence of images 304 may correspond to progressive frames or deinterlaced frames. Video processing unit 302 may, in another embodiment, include any other number of components such as, but not limited to, a noise reducer, a video enhances, a video scaler, a frame converter, etc. In one embodiment, video processing unit 302 is a baseband video processing unit. In another embodiment, the source sequence of images 304 is modulated using any suitable modulation scheme and the video processing unit 302 includes a demodulator. It is further recognized that the destination sequence of images 306 may be an interlaced sequence of images, a deinterlaced sequence of images, or a progressive sequence of images. Similarly, destination sequence of images 306 may be modulated or demodulated, as desired. One having ordinary skill in the art, will recognized that video processing unit 302 may be modified or otherwise adopted to conform to any type of sequence of images such that it is adaptable to any type of system.
In another embodiment, video processing unit 302 is coupled to memory 314 (which may, in one embodiment, be the same as source 308) for storage of the destination sequence of images 306. For instance, memory 314 may be a frame buffer that is coupled to a display, wherein the information stored in the frame buffer is used to produces images on the display.
The single-pass, gradient-based motion vector generator 408 receives the at least two pairs of mipmaps and generates an image motion vector map 418 therefrom, wherein the image motion vector map represents the trajectory of motion for pixels in the first and second source images A, B. In one embodiment the trajectory of motion can be visualized as illustrated by FIG. 2 , element 208.
In one embodiment, IC 400 includes motion detector 412 and blending module 414. Motion detector generates a motion factor map 416 based on a pair of mipmaps from the at least two pairs of mipmaps. The motion factor map 416 represents a detected degree of motion between the first and second source images A, B. In other words, the motion factor map 416, indicates whether the motion is sufficiently perceivable for the human eye such that it must be accounted for in the upconverted image for the destination sequence of images 306. As used herein and for the sake of clarity, the “terms motion factor map 416” and “image motion vector map 418” are different terms with different meanings. Based on the motion factor map 416, the interpolated image 402 and the second image B, the blending module 414 generates a blended upconverted new image 404 for the destination sequence of images 306. As explained below, the motion factor map 416 affects the contribution of at least one of: the interpolated image 402 and the second image B to the blended upconverted new image 404.
Although IC 400 is illustrated as having mipmap generator 406 as a component thereof, it is contemplated that IC 400 may exclude mipmap generator 406. In one embodiment, mipmap generator 406 may be external to IC 400. In another embodiment, the single-pass, gradient-based motion vector generator 408 may be configured to generate the image motion vector map based on the first source image (i.e., A) and based on the second source image (i.e., B), or any other suitable source images. In other words, the single-pass, gradient-based motion vector generator 408 may contain logic similar to mipmap generator 406, or single-pass, gradient-based motion vector generator 408 may be configured to generate the image motion vector map 418 based on any suitable images or pairs of images that relate to the source sequence of images (i.e., A and B).
In the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 5 , the first plurality 502 of serially-coupled downscalers includes 4 downscalers 506, 510-514. Downscalers 506, 510-514 are each downscale by 2 downscalers. That is, each downscaler takes an image and reduces its resolution (and size) by two in both the vertical and horizontal directions. In other embodiments, downscalers 506, 510-514 are downscale by n downscalers, where n is any suitable value. In yet another embodiment, downscalers 506, 510-514 are not identical downscalers and each of the downscalers 506, 510-514 downscale by any suitable value. In the illustrated embodiment, downscalers 506, 510-514 generate mipmaps A/2, A/4, A/8 and A/16. The alpha-numeric reference numerals not only differentiate the mipmaps but also indicate the degree to which each mipmap is downscaled with respect to the first image A. Similarly, the second plurality 504 of serially-coupled downscalers includes 4 downscalers 508, 516-520. Downscalers 508, 516-520 are also each downscale by 2 downscalers. In other embodiments, downscalers 508, 516-520 are downscale by n downscalers, where n is any suitable value. In yet another embodiment, downscalers 508, 516-520 are not identical downscalers and each of the downscalers 508, 516-520 downscale by any suitable value. In the illustrated embodiment, downscalers 508, 516-520 generate mipmaps B/2, B/4, B/8 and B/16. The alpha-numeric reference numerals not only differentiate the mipmaps but also indicate the degree to which each mipmap is downscaled with respect to the first image B.
The single-pass, gradient-based motion vector generator 408 includes at least two gradient-based mipmap motion vector generators 522 and 524, wherein each generates a mipmap motion vector map, e.g., mipmap (“MM”) MM2 motion vector map 530 and MM4 motion vector map 532, based on a respective pair of mipmaps, e.g., A/2 and B/2, and A/4 and B/4. Each of the mipmap motion vector maps represents the trajectory of motion for pixels in the respective pair of mipmaps (e.g., A/2 and B/2, and A/4 and B/4). For example, each value in the mipmap motion vector map has two components: an x and a y component that indicates the vertical and/or horizontal direction of motion, if any. In the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 5 , the single-pass, gradient-based motion vector generator 408 includes two additional gradient-based mipmap motion vector generators 526 and 528 (i.e., one gradient-based mipmap motion vector generator per each pair of mipmaps generated by the mipmap generator 406). Gradient-based mipmap motion vector generators 526 and 528 generate MM8 motion vector map 534 based on (and representing the trajectory of motion of pixel values in) A/8 and B/8, and MM16 motion vector map 536 (and representing the trajectory of motion of pixel values in) based on A/16 and B/16, respectively.
Each of the gradient-based mipmap motion vector generators 522-528 operate in an identical manner, but on differently sized mipmaps. Accordingly a detailed algorithm is provided below with respect to the gradient-based mipmap motion vector generator 522. It is recognized that each other gradient-based mipmap motion vector generator (e.g., 524-528) operates, in one embodiment, in the same manner.
The detailed algorithm used by gradient-based mipmap motion vector generator 522 in one embodiment of the present disclosure requires the construction of a first order horizontal gradient map and a first order vertical gradient map for each of the mipmaps input to the gradient-based mipmap motion vector generator 522, e.g., A/2 and B/2. Each value in the first order horizontal gradient map represents the difference between the sum of the current pixel values in A/2 and B/2 and the sum of the left (or right) neighboring horizontal pixel values in A/2 and B/2. In contrast, each value in the first order vertical gradient map represents the difference between the sum of the current pixel values in A/2 and B/2 and the sum of the upper (or lower) neighboring horizontal pixel values in A/2 and B/2. In other words, C=each value in the first order horizontal gradient map represents the difference between the current pixel values and the left (or right) neighboring horizontal pixel values in the averaged image of A/2 and B/2, while each value in the first order vertical gradient map represents the difference between the current pixel values and the upper (or lower) neighboring vertical pixel values in the averaged image of A/2 and B/2. The gradient-based mipmap motion vector generator 522 generates a first order time gradient map by taking the difference between the mipmap associated with the first source image A (e.g., A/2) and the mipmap associated with the second source image B (e.g., B/2).
With the first order gradient maps (horizontal, vertical and time), the gradient-based mipmap motion vector generator 522 then generates second order gradient maps by element by element multiplication between the appropriate maps. For instance, the second order horizontal gradient map with respect to the horizontal is the result of the first order horizontal gradient map “dot-multiplied” by itself. “Dot-multiplied” or dot-multiplication refers to element multiplication. The second order vertical gradient map with respect to the vertical is the result of the first order vertical gradient map dot-multiplied by itself. The second order horizontal gradient map with respect to time is the result of the first order horizontal gradient map “dot-multiplied” by the first order time gradient map. The second order vertical gradient map with respect to time is the result of the first order vertical gradient map “dot-multiplied” by the first order time gradient map. The second order horizontal gradient map with respect to the vertical is the result of the first order horizontal gradient map “dot-multiplied” by the first order vertical gradient map.
Gradient-based mipmap motion vector generator 522 then optionally removes noise in each of the second order gradient maps by convolving each second order gradient map with an appropriate filter. For example, a filter represented by a matrix of suitable size having all 1's for values may be convolved with each of the second order gradient maps to generate noise-reduced second order gradient maps.
Finally, based on the noise-reduced second order gradient maps (or if noise reduction is not performed, based on the second order gradient maps), the gradient-based mipmap motion vector generator 522 generates, for each element in the mipmap motion vector map (e.g., MM2 motion vector map 530) motion vector components for the horizontal and vertical using any suitable algorithm. In one embodiment, the following formulae are used:
MVx=−Gxt/Gxx when Gxx is not 0; otherwise 0;
Mvy=−Gyt/Gyy when Gyy is not 0; otherwise 0.
The variable “Gmn” represents the noise-reduced “m” second order gradient map with respect to “n” wherein if “m” or “n” are set to: “x”, this refers to the horizontal; “y”, this refers to the vertical; “t”, this refers to time. The variable “MVx” represents the motion vector value for the “x” or horizontal component for a particular value in the overall MM motion vector map (e.g., MM2 motion vector map); and the variable “MVy” represents the motion vector value for the “y” or vertical component for a particular value in the overall MM motion vector map (e.g., MM2 motion vector map). As is recognized, MVx and Mvy show the motion trajectory; motion vector values are signed numbers showing the actual direction of motion. The larger the absolute value of each of these variables, the larger the motion.
MVx=−Gxt/Gxx when Gxx is not 0; otherwise 0;
Mvy=−Gyt/Gyy when Gyy is not 0; otherwise 0.
The variable “Gmn” represents the noise-reduced “m” second order gradient map with respect to “n” wherein if “m” or “n” are set to: “x”, this refers to the horizontal; “y”, this refers to the vertical; “t”, this refers to time. The variable “MVx” represents the motion vector value for the “x” or horizontal component for a particular value in the overall MM motion vector map (e.g., MM2 motion vector map); and the variable “MVy” represents the motion vector value for the “y” or vertical component for a particular value in the overall MM motion vector map (e.g., MM2 motion vector map). As is recognized, MVx and Mvy show the motion trajectory; motion vector values are signed numbers showing the actual direction of motion. The larger the absolute value of each of these variables, the larger the motion.
Although described above with respect to the specific formulae provided, it is recognized that any other suitable formulae or algorithm may be used to construct single-pass, gradient based mipmap motion vector maps.
Returning back to FIG. 5 , the single-pass, gradient-based motion vector generator 408 further includes motion vector selector 538. Motion vector selector generates the image motion vector map 418 based on each of the mipmap motion vector maps (530-536, in this embodiment).
Upscaler 618 of the plurality 602 of upscalers receives the final mipmap motion vector map 620 and generates the image motion vector map 418 after upscaling the final mipmap motion vector map 620 to a sized commensurate with the first and second source images A, B. In one embodiment, upscaler 618 also multiplies each value within the final mipmap motion vector map 620 by the same value upon which upscaler 618 upscales the final mipmap motion vector 620. Image motion vector map 418 indicates the motion vectors for each element of source images A and B.
Returning to FIGS. 4 and 5 , motion detector 412, generates a motion factor map 416 based on the smallest pair of mipmaps from the at least two pairs of mipmaps 416 (e.g., A/16 and B/16). Motion detector 412 uses any suitable algorithm to detect “enough” motion between the smallest pair of mipmaps such that object may be determined to be moving, non-moving, or somewhere in-between moving and non-moving with respect to the first and second source images, A and B. In other words, motion detector 412 detects a degree of motion between the first and second source images, A and B. In one embodiment, motion detector 412 applies the following formulae to determine each value within the motion factor map.
Min(1, absdiff(A16, B16)/threshold_value).
Wherein: the operator “Min(m,n)” returns the smaller value of m and n; the operator “absdiff(m,n)” returns the absolute value difference between m and n; and the variable “threshold_value” is set to any suitable value to detect the appropriate degree of motion. In one embodiment, “threshold_value”=8. Thereafter, the result of the above formulae is enlarged (i.e., upscaled) to generator the motion factor map such that themotion vector map 416 has the same size as A, B. In this embodiment, that enlargement value is 16. In this embodiment, each value of the motion factor map is between 0 and 1. When equal to 0, the value of the motion factor map indicates that this area of the first image A is a non-moving area. When equal to 1, the value of the motion factor map indicates that this is a motion area. Intermediate areas indicate an intermediate degree of motion.
Min(1, absdiff(A16, B16)/threshold_value).
Wherein: the operator “Min(m,n)” returns the smaller value of m and n; the operator “absdiff(m,n)” returns the absolute value difference between m and n; and the variable “threshold_value” is set to any suitable value to detect the appropriate degree of motion. In one embodiment, “threshold_value”=8. Thereafter, the result of the above formulae is enlarged (i.e., upscaled) to generator the motion factor map such that the
Returning to FIG. 4 , blending module 414 generates the blended upconverted new image based on the interpolated image 402, a source image (A or B) and the motion factor map 416, wherein each value of the motion factor map 416 indicates the contribution of at least one of: the interpolated image 402 and the source image (A or B) to the blended, upconverted new image 404. While any suitable blending formulae may be used, one example capable of blending the interpolated image 402 with the second image B is:
Blended, upconverted new image=(Motion factor map 416).*(Interpolated image 402−second image B)+Second image B.
Blended, upconverted new image=(
As illustrated, block 1104 may include blocks 1106-1110 where, e.g., each of the mipmap motion vector maps that are smaller than the largest mipmap motion vector map are upscaled to a size commensurate with the largest mipmap motion vector map. Next, the motion vectors in each of the mipmap motion vector maps are filtered to generate a final mipmap motion vector map. Finally, the final mipmap motion vector map is upscaled to generate the image motion vector map. In one embodiment, the method of blocks 1106-1110 may be implemented using the upscalers 602 and the motion selector module 604 of FIG. 6 as discussed above.
Among other advantages, the above method and apparatus enables upconversion of a source sequence of images to create a destination sequence of images having a higher image rate while avoiding the expense of the prior art and the adverse judder artifacts of the prior art. As recognized, either interpolated image 402 or blended upconverted new image 404 may be used as an upconverted new image in the destination sequence of images. The above method and apparatus may be implemented in dedicated hardware to avoid using complex programmable shaders. However, it is recognized that any suitable logic may be used to implement the above method and apparatus. Other advantages will be recognized by one of ordinary skill in the art. It will also be recognized that the above description describes mere examples and that other embodiments are envisioned and covered by the appended claims. It is therefore contemplated that the present invention cover any and all modifications, variations or equivalents that fall within the spirit and scope of the basic underlying principles disclosed above and claimed herein.
For example, in one embodiment, an integrated circuit is provided that includes a single-pass, gradient-based motion vector generator 408 and a mipmap generator 406. The single-pass, gradient-based motion vector generator 408 is operative to generate the image motion vector map 418 based on at least two pairs of mipmaps that, in turn, are based on a first source image and a second source images. For example, the first mipmap of each pair of mipmaps is a downsized version of the first source image and the second mipmap of each pair of mipmaps is a downsized version of the second source image. In this embodiment, the single-pass, gradient-based motion vector generator 408 is coupled to the mipmap generator 406 and generates the image motion vector map 418. As is recognized, the image motion vector map 418 may be used for, among other things, interpolating an image such as interpolated image 402.
Claims (24)
1. An integrated circuit comprising:
a gradient-based motion vector generator operative to generate an image motion vector map based on a first source image and a second source image, wherein the image motion vector map represents the trajectory of motion for pixels in the first and second source images;
an image interpolator operative to generate an interpolated image based on the first and second source images by interpolating pixel values along the trajectories of the image motion vector map; and
a mipmap generator operative to generate at least two pairs of mipmaps based on the first source image and the second source image, wherein a first mipmap of each pair of mipmaps is a downsized version of the first source image, wherein a second mipmap of each pair of mipmaps is a downsized version of the second source image, and wherein the gradient-based motion vector generator is operative to generate the image motion vector map based on the at least two pairs of mipmaps.
2. The integrated circuit of claim 1 , further comprising:
a motion detector operative to generate a motion factor map based on a pair of mipmaps from the at least two pairs of mipmaps, wherein the motion factor map represents a detected degree of motion between the first and second source images; and
a blending module operative to generate a blended upconverted new image based on the interpolated image, the motion factor map and one of the first and the second source images, wherein the motion factor map affects the contribution of at least one of: the interpolated image and the one of the first and second source images to the blended upconverted new image.
3. The integrated circuit of claim 1 , wherein the mipmap generator comprises:
a first plurality of serially-coupled downscalers associated with the first source image, operative to generate the first mipmaps of each of the at least two pairs of mipmaps and wherein the first downscaler of the first plurality generates a mipmap based on the first source image, and wherein each other downscaler of the first plurality generates a mipmap based on a previously generated mipmap from the first plurality; and
a second plurality of serially-coupled downscalers associated with the second source image, operative to generate the second mipmaps of each of the at least two pairs of mipmaps and wherein the first downscaler of the second plurality generates a mipmap based on the second source image, and wherein each other downscaler of the second plurality generates a mipmap based on a previously generated mipmap from the second plurality.
4. The integrated circuit of claim 1 , wherein the gradient-based motion vector generator comprises:
at least two gradient-based mipmap motion vector generators, wherein each is operative to generate a mipmap motion vector map based on a respective pair of mipmaps, wherein each mipmap motion vector map represents the trajectory of motion for pixels in the respective pair of mipmaps;
a motion vector selector operative to generate the image motion vector map based on each of the mipmap motion vector maps.
5. The integrated circuit of claim 4 , wherein the motion vector selector comprises:
a plurality of upscalers, where one or more of the at least one upscalers are operative to upscale each of the mipmap motion vector maps that are smaller than the largest mipmap motion vector map to a size commensurate with the largest mipmap motion vector map; and
a motion selector module operatively operative to filter motion vectors in each of the: largest mipmap motion vector map from the at least two gradient-based mipmap motion vector generators and one or more of the upscaled mipmap motion vector maps to generate a final mipmap motion vector map,
wherein another upscaler of the plurality of upscalers is operative to upscale the final mipmap motion vector map and to generate the image motion vector map,
wherein each upscaler of the plurality of upscalers is operative to upscale and multiply each motion vector value associated with each of the mipmap motion vector maps and with the final mipmap motion vector map by an equal value such that the image motion vector map has the same size as the first and second images.
6. The integrated circuit of claim 5 , wherein the motion selector module is one of a median filter and a mean filter.
7. The integrated circuit of claim 1 , wherein the first and second source images are consecutive images in an original sequence of images having a first image rate defined in part by having a first period between consecutive images and wherein the image interpolator comprises:
a motion vector trajectory interpolator operative to generate a raw interpolated image based on the first and second source images and by interpolating pixel values for the raw interpolated image along the trajectory of motion for pixels in the first and second images at a time less than the first period; and
a smoothing filter operative to smooth the raw interpolated image and to generate the interpolated image.
8. The integrated circuit of claim 2 , wherein the blending module is operative to:
subtract each value in the first or second source image from each value in the interpolated image to generate a difference map;
multiply each value in the difference map by the motion factor map to generate a compensated difference map; and
add each value in the compensated difference map to the first or second source image to generate the upconverted new image.
9. The integrated circuit of claim 1 , wherein the integrated circuit is one of:
a baseband video processing unit; and
part of a baseband video processing unit.
10. The integrated circuit of claim 1 , wherein the first and second source images are consecutive images in an original sequence of images having a first image rate defined in part by having a first period between consecutive images and wherein the interpolated image represents an upconverted image for use in an upconverted image sequence having a different image rate than the first image rate.
11. The integrated circuit of claim 2 , wherein the first and second source images are consecutive images in an original sequence of images having a first image rate defined in part by having a first period between consecutive images and wherein the blended upconverted new image represents an upconverted image for use in an upconverted image sequence having a different image rate than the first image rate.
12. A method for generating an upconverted new image, comprising:
generating, using a gradient-based motion vector generator, an image motion vector map based on the first source image and the second source image, wherein the image motion vector map represents the trajectory of motion for pixels in the first and second source images;
generating an interpolated image based on the first and second source images by interpolating pixel values along the trajectories of the image motion vector map; and
generating at least two pairs of mipmaps based on the first source image and the second source image, wherein a first mipmap of each pair of mipmaps is a downsized version of the first source image, wherein a second mipmap of each pair of mipmaps is a downsized version of the second source image, and wherein the gradient-based motion vector generator is operative to generate the image motion vector map based on the at least two pairs of mipmaps.
13. The method of claim 12 , further comprising:
generating a motion factor map based on a pair of mipmaps from the at least two pairs of mipmaps, wherein the motion factor map represents a detected degree of motion between the first and second source images; and
generating a blended upconverted new image based on the interpolated image, the motion factor map and one of the first and second source images, wherein the motion factor map affects the contribution of at least one of: the interpolated image and the one of the first and second source images to the blended upconverted new image.
14. The method of claim 12 , wherein generating at least two pairs of mipmaps based on the first source image and the second source image comprises:
serially downscaling the first source image to generate the first mipmaps of each of the at least two pairs of mipmaps; and
serially downscaling the second source image to generate the second mipmaps of each of the at least two pairs of mipmaps.
15. The method of claim 12 , wherein generating, using the gradient-based motion vector generator, an image motion vector map based on the at least two pairs of mipmaps comprises:
generating, using at least two gradient-based mipmap motion vector generators, at least two mipmap motion vector maps based on a respective pair of mipmaps, wherein each mipmap motion vector map represents the trajectory of motion for pixels in the respective pair of mipmaps; and
generating the image motion vector map based on each of the mipmap motion vector maps.
16. The method of claim 15 , wherein generating the image motion vector map based on each of the mipmap motion vector maps comprises:
upscaling each of the mipmap motion vector maps that are smaller than the largest mipmap motion vector map to a size commensurate with the largest mipmap motion vector map;
filtering motion vectors in each of the largest mipmap motion vector map from the at least two gradient-based mipmap motion vector generators and one or more of the upscaled mipmap motion vector maps to generate a final mipmap motion vector map; and
upscaling the final mipmap motion vector map to generate the image motion vector map
wherein upscaling each of the mipmap motion vector maps and the final mipmap motion vector map comprises upscaling and multiplying each motion vector value associated with each of the mipmap motion vector maps and with the final mipmap motion vector map by an equal value such that the image motion vector map has the same size as the first and second images.
17. The method of claim 16 , wherein the filtering of motion vectors in each of the mipmap motion vector maps to generate the final mipmap motion vector map comprises applying one of a median filter and a mean filter to each of the mipmap motion vector maps.
18. The method of claim 12 , wherein the first and second source images are consecutive images in an original sequence of images having a first image rate defined in part by having a first period between consecutive images and wherein generating the interpolated image based on the first and second source images by interpolating pixel values along the trajectories of image motion vector map comprises:
generating a raw interpolated image based on the first and second source images by interpolating pixel values for the raw interpolated image along the trajectory of motion for pixels in the first and second images at a time less than the first period; and
smoothing the raw interpolated image to generate the interpolated image.
19. The method of claim 13 , wherein generating a blended upconverted new image based on the interpolated image, the first or second source image and the motion factor map comprises:
subtracting each value in the second source image from each value in the interpolated image to generate a difference map;
multiplying each value in the difference map by the motion factor map to generate a compensated difference map; and
adding each value in the compensated difference map to the first or second source image to generate the upconverted new image.
20. The method of claim 12 , wherein the first and second source images are consecutive images in an original sequence of images having a first image rate defined in part by having a first period between consecutive images and wherein the interpolated image represents an upconverted image for use in an upconverted image sequence having a different image rate than the first image rate.
21. The method of claim 13 , wherein the first and second source images are consecutive images in an original sequence of images having a first image rate defined in part by having a first period between consecutive images and wherein the blended upconverted new image represents an upconverted image for use in an upconverted image sequence having a different image rate than the first image rate.
22. A video processing device comprising:
a mipmap generator operative to generate at least two pairs of mipmaps based on a first source image and a second source image, wherein the first and second source images are consecutive images in an original sequence of images having a first image rate defined in part by having a first period between consecutive images and wherein a first mipmap of each pair of mipmaps is a downsized version of the first source image and wherein a second mipmap of each pair of mipmaps is a downsized version of the second source image;
at least two gradient-based mipmap motion vector generators, wherein each is operative to generate a mipmap motion vector map based on a respective pair of mipmaps, wherein each mipmap motion vector map represents the trajectory of motion for pixels in the respective pair of mipmaps;
a motion vector selector operative to generate an image motion vector map based in part on filtering motion vectors in each of the mipmap motion vector maps using a median filter, wherein the image motion vector map represents the trajectory of motion for pixels in the first and second source images; and
an image interpolator operative to generate an interpolated image based on the first and second source images by interpolating pixel values along the trajectories of the image motion vector map at a time less than the first period.
23. The video processing device of claim 22 , further comprising:
a motion detector operative to generate a motion factor map based on the smallest pair mipmaps from the at least two pairs of mipmaps, wherein the motion factor map represents a detected degree of motion between the first and second source images; and
a blending module operative to generate a blended upconverted new image based on the interpolated image, the motion factor map and one of the first and second source images, wherein the motion factor map affects the contribution of at least one of: the interpolated image and the second source image to the blended upconverted new image,
wherein the blending module is operative to:
subtract each value in the first or second source image from each value in the interpolated image to generate a difference map,
multiply each value in the difference map by the motion factor map to generate a compensated difference map, and
add each value in the compensated difference map to the first or second source image to generate the upconverted new image.
24. An integrated circuit comprising:
a mipmap generator operative to generate at least two pairs of mipmaps based on a first source image and a second source image, wherein a first mipmap of each pair of mipmaps is a downsized version of the first source image, wherein a second mipmap of each pair of mipmaps is a downsized version of the second source image; and
a single-pass, gradient-based motion vector generator operative to generate an image motion vector map based on the at least two pairs of mipmaps, wherein the image motion vector map represents the trajectory of motion for pixels in the first and second source image.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/965,947 US8396129B2 (en) | 2007-12-28 | 2007-12-28 | Apparatus and method for single-pass, gradient-based motion compensated image rate conversion |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/965,947 US8396129B2 (en) | 2007-12-28 | 2007-12-28 | Apparatus and method for single-pass, gradient-based motion compensated image rate conversion |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20090167778A1 US20090167778A1 (en) | 2009-07-02 |
US8396129B2 true US8396129B2 (en) | 2013-03-12 |
Family
ID=40797680
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/965,947 Active 2031-12-07 US8396129B2 (en) | 2007-12-28 | 2007-12-28 | Apparatus and method for single-pass, gradient-based motion compensated image rate conversion |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US8396129B2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (16)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP2557795A4 (en) * | 2010-04-06 | 2015-07-08 | Samsung Electronics Co Ltd | Method and apparatus for video encoding and method and apparatus for video decoding |
TWI412278B (en) * | 2010-05-03 | 2013-10-11 | Himax Tech Ltd | Film-mode frame rate up conversion system and method |
TWI419570B (en) * | 2011-01-03 | 2013-12-11 | Novatek Microelectronics Corp | Multimedia device and motion compensation method thereof |
US20130293550A1 (en) * | 2012-05-07 | 2013-11-07 | Business Intelligence Solutions Safe B.V. | Method and system for zoom animation |
US9811884B2 (en) * | 2012-07-16 | 2017-11-07 | Flir Systems, Inc. | Methods and systems for suppressing atmospheric turbulence in images |
US9288484B1 (en) | 2012-08-30 | 2016-03-15 | Google Inc. | Sparse coding dictionary priming |
US9300906B2 (en) | 2013-03-29 | 2016-03-29 | Google Inc. | Pull frame interpolation |
US9286653B2 (en) | 2014-08-06 | 2016-03-15 | Google Inc. | System and method for increasing the bit depth of images |
US9153017B1 (en) | 2014-08-15 | 2015-10-06 | Google Inc. | System and method for optimized chroma subsampling |
US10152772B2 (en) | 2016-01-18 | 2018-12-11 | Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | Techniques for sampling sub-pixels of an image |
US11611773B2 (en) * | 2018-04-06 | 2023-03-21 | Qatar Foundation For Education, Science And Community Development | System of video steganalysis and a method for the detection of covert communications |
US11025842B2 (en) | 2019-04-05 | 2021-06-01 | Apple Inc. | Binner circuit for image signal processor |
US11024006B2 (en) * | 2019-04-22 | 2021-06-01 | Apple Inc. | Tagging clipped pixels for pyramid processing in image signal processor |
US11076151B2 (en) | 2019-09-30 | 2021-07-27 | Ati Technologies Ulc | Hierarchical histogram calculation with application to palette table derivation |
US11915337B2 (en) | 2020-03-13 | 2024-02-27 | Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | Single pass downsampler |
US11271984B1 (en) * | 2021-03-29 | 2022-03-08 | International Business Machines Corporation | Reduced bandwidth consumption via generative adversarial networks |
Citations (98)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4472732A (en) | 1981-04-10 | 1984-09-18 | Ampex Corporation | System for spatially transforming images |
US4631750A (en) | 1980-04-11 | 1986-12-23 | Ampex Corporation | Method and system for spacially transforming images |
US4669100A (en) | 1981-11-30 | 1987-05-26 | U.S. Philips Corporation | Charge-coupled device having a buffer electrode |
US4680628A (en) | 1984-01-04 | 1987-07-14 | Itek Corporation | Realtime digital diagnostic image processing system |
US4740842A (en) | 1985-02-12 | 1988-04-26 | U.S. Philips Corporation | Video signal processing circuit for processing an interlaced video signal |
US4750057A (en) | 1985-12-30 | 1988-06-07 | Eastman Kodak Company | De-interlacing circuit for simultaneous readout of paired fields |
US4800436A (en) | 1986-03-04 | 1989-01-24 | U.S. Philips Corp. | Television system with improved temporal resolution on display of a television signal |
US4868655A (en) | 1987-11-09 | 1989-09-19 | Etat Francais Represente Par Le Ministre Delegue Des Postes Et Telecommunications (Centre National D'etudes Des Telecommunications) | Method and apparatus for processing picture signals having interlaced field scanning |
US4881125A (en) | 1988-10-14 | 1989-11-14 | General Instrument Corporation | Progressive scan display of video derived from film |
US4908874A (en) | 1980-04-11 | 1990-03-13 | Ampex Corporation | System for spatially transforming images |
US4941045A (en) | 1988-10-11 | 1990-07-10 | Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. | Method and apparatus for improving vertical definition of a television signal by scan conversion |
US4947251A (en) | 1987-12-02 | 1990-08-07 | Blaupunkt-Werke Gmbh | Suppression of flicker effects in a television receiver |
US4982280A (en) | 1989-07-18 | 1991-01-01 | Yves C. Faroudja | Motion sequence pattern detector for video |
US4989090A (en) | 1989-04-05 | 1991-01-29 | Yves C. Faroudja | Television scan line doubler including temporal median filter |
US4992982A (en) | 1987-10-20 | 1991-02-12 | U.S. Philips Corporation | SPS type charge coupled device memory suitable for processing video information with increased speed |
US4998153A (en) | 1987-10-28 | 1991-03-05 | U.S. Philips Corporation | Charge-coupled device |
US5014119A (en) | 1989-08-25 | 1991-05-07 | Faroudja Y C | Horizontal and vertical transition level enhancement within television system |
US5046164A (en) | 1989-09-18 | 1991-09-03 | Rca Licensing Corporation | Interstitial line generator for an interlace to non-interlace scan converter |
US5055927A (en) | 1988-09-13 | 1991-10-08 | Deutsche Thomson-Brandt Gmbh | Dual channel video signal transmission system |
US5101403A (en) | 1989-03-30 | 1992-03-31 | Alcatel Cit | Apparatus for processing signalling messages in an asynchronous time division telecommunications network |
US5128791A (en) | 1990-08-13 | 1992-07-07 | Bell Communications Research, Inc. | Multi-channel HDTV system |
US5134480A (en) | 1990-08-31 | 1992-07-28 | The Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New York | Time-recursive deinterlace processing for television-type signals |
US5144429A (en) | 1988-06-21 | 1992-09-01 | U.S. Philips Corporation | High definition television transmission and reception system with an improved motion estimator and with reduced data throughput |
US5151783A (en) | 1991-06-05 | 1992-09-29 | Faroudja Y C | Digital television with enhancement |
US5159451A (en) | 1991-03-19 | 1992-10-27 | Faroudja Y C | Field memory expansible line doubler for television receiver |
US5191576A (en) | 1988-11-18 | 1993-03-02 | L'Etat Francais and Telediffusion de France S.A. | Method for broadcasting of digital data, notably for radio broadcasting at high throughput rate towards mobile receivers, with time frequency interlacing and analog synchronization |
US5193004A (en) | 1990-12-03 | 1993-03-09 | The Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New York | Systems and methods for coding even fields of interlaced video sequences |
US5233421A (en) | 1992-04-30 | 1993-08-03 | Thomson Consumer Electronics, Inc. | Video memory system with double multiplexing of video and motion samples in a field memory for motion adaptive compensation of processed video signals |
US5237414A (en) | 1992-03-02 | 1993-08-17 | Faroudja Y C | Video enhancer with separate processing of high and low level transitions |
US5289305A (en) | 1991-02-08 | 1994-02-22 | The Grass Valley Group, Inc. | Progressive scan architecture for video special effects |
US5305104A (en) | 1992-07-27 | 1994-04-19 | The Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New York | Digitally assisted motion compensated deinterlacing for enhanced definition television |
US5327240A (en) | 1991-12-24 | 1994-07-05 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Methods, systems and apparatus for providing improved definition video |
US5351083A (en) | 1991-10-17 | 1994-09-27 | Sony Corporation | Picture encoding and/or decoding system |
US5408270A (en) | 1993-06-24 | 1995-04-18 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Advanced television system |
US5428398A (en) | 1992-04-10 | 1995-06-27 | Faroudja; Yves C. | Method and apparatus for producing from a standard-bandwidth television signal a signal which when reproduced provides a high-definition-like video image relatively free of artifacts |
US5436663A (en) | 1992-12-22 | 1995-07-25 | U.S. Philips Corporation | Device for encoding digital signals representing television pictures |
US5467138A (en) | 1994-01-18 | 1995-11-14 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Field to frame video pixel data generation |
EP0690617A2 (en) | 1994-06-30 | 1996-01-03 | Eastman Kodak Company | Method for controllably deinterlacing sequential lines of video data fields based upon pixel signals associated with four successive interlaced video fields |
US5488421A (en) | 1993-06-05 | 1996-01-30 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Interlaced-to-progressive scanning converter with a double-smoother and a method therefor |
US5488419A (en) | 1992-03-13 | 1996-01-30 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Video compression coding and decoding with automatic sub-pixel frame/field motion compensation |
US5517247A (en) | 1992-10-05 | 1996-05-14 | Deutsche Thomson-Brandt Gmbh | Method and apparatus for converting a video input signal of progressive scan form to an interlaced video output signal of doubled field rate and employing progressive scan to progressive scan interpolation for reduction of visual artifacts |
US5532750A (en) | 1994-04-05 | 1996-07-02 | U.S. Philips Corporation | Interlaced-to-sequential scan conversion |
EP0739129A2 (en) | 1995-04-21 | 1996-10-23 | Eastman Kodak Company | A system and method for creating high-quality stills from interlaced video images |
US5596371A (en) | 1995-02-02 | 1997-01-21 | Dwin Electronics Inc. | Film-mode video line-doubler motion detectors |
US5600731A (en) | 1991-05-09 | 1997-02-04 | Eastman Kodak Company | Method for temporally adaptive filtering of frames of a noisy image sequence using motion estimation |
US5602654A (en) | 1995-01-06 | 1997-02-11 | National Science Council | Contour-sensitive, single-field deinterlacing method |
US5619272A (en) | 1992-12-30 | 1997-04-08 | Thomson-Csf | Process for deinterlacing the frames of a moving image sequence |
US5621470A (en) | 1992-12-18 | 1997-04-15 | Sid-Ahmed; Maher A. | Interpixel and interframe interpolation of television pictures with conversion from interlaced to progressive scanning |
US5621481A (en) | 1993-04-08 | 1997-04-15 | Sony Corporation | Motion vector detecting apparatus for determining interframe, predictive error as a function of interfield predictive errors |
US5627555A (en) | 1993-04-14 | 1997-05-06 | Rca Thomson Licensing Corporation | Line flicker suppression by adaptive de-interlacing |
US5661525A (en) | 1995-03-27 | 1997-08-26 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Method and apparatus for converting an interlaced video frame sequence into a progressively-scanned sequence |
US5682205A (en) | 1994-08-19 | 1997-10-28 | Eastman Kodak Company | Adaptive, global-motion compensated deinterlacing of sequential video fields with post processing |
US5689305A (en) | 1994-05-24 | 1997-11-18 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | System for deinterlacing digitally compressed video and method |
US5724098A (en) | 1992-12-25 | 1998-03-03 | Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha | Interframe coding method and apparatus utilizing a filter controller and an adaptive filter |
US5754248A (en) | 1996-04-15 | 1998-05-19 | Faroudja; Yves C. | Universal video disc record and playback employing motion signals for high quality playback of non-film sources |
US5774593A (en) | 1995-07-24 | 1998-06-30 | University Of Washington | Automatic scene decomposition and optimization of MPEG compressed video |
US5784115A (en) | 1996-12-31 | 1998-07-21 | Xerox Corporation | System and method for motion compensated de-interlacing of video frames |
US5793435A (en) | 1996-06-25 | 1998-08-11 | Tektronix, Inc. | Deinterlacing of video using a variable coefficient spatio-temporal filter |
US5844614A (en) | 1995-01-09 | 1998-12-01 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Video signal decoding apparatus |
US5864369A (en) | 1997-06-16 | 1999-01-26 | Ati International Srl | Method and apparatus for providing interlaced video on a progressive display |
US5929913A (en) | 1993-10-28 | 1999-07-27 | Matsushita Electrical Industrial Co., Ltd | Motion vector detector and video coder |
US5936670A (en) | 1995-09-20 | 1999-08-10 | U.S. Philips Corporation | Method and device for decoding coded digital video signals |
US5943099A (en) | 1996-01-27 | 1999-08-24 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Interlaced-to-progressive conversion apparatus and method using motion and spatial correlation |
US5995154A (en) | 1995-12-22 | 1999-11-30 | Thomson Multimedia S.A. | Process for interpolating progressive frames |
US6037986A (en) | 1996-07-16 | 2000-03-14 | Divicom Inc. | Video preprocessing method and apparatus with selective filtering based on motion detection |
US6118486A (en) | 1997-09-26 | 2000-09-12 | Sarnoff Corporation | Synchronized multiple format video processing method and apparatus |
US6118488A (en) | 1998-08-31 | 2000-09-12 | Silicon Integrated Systems Corporation | Method and apparatus for adaptive edge-based scan line interpolation using 1-D pixel array motion detection |
US6121978A (en) | 1998-01-07 | 2000-09-19 | Ati Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for graphics scaling |
US6141056A (en) | 1997-08-08 | 2000-10-31 | Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. | System for conversion of interlaced video to progressive video using horizontal displacement |
US6188437B1 (en) | 1998-12-23 | 2001-02-13 | Ati International Srl | Deinterlacing technique |
US6192079B1 (en) * | 1998-05-07 | 2001-02-20 | Intel Corporation | Method and apparatus for increasing video frame rate |
US6208350B1 (en) | 1997-11-04 | 2001-03-27 | Philips Electronics North America Corporation | Methods and apparatus for processing DVD video |
US6239842B1 (en) | 1998-12-18 | 2001-05-29 | Oplus Technologies Ltd. | Method of de-interlacing video signals using a mixed mode spatial and temporal approximation technique |
US6266092B1 (en) | 1998-05-12 | 2001-07-24 | Genesis Microchip Inc. | Method and apparatus for video line multiplication with enhanced sharpness |
US6330032B1 (en) | 1999-09-30 | 2001-12-11 | Focus Enhancements, Inc. | Motion adaptive de-interlace filter |
US6340990B1 (en) | 1998-03-31 | 2002-01-22 | Applied Intelligent Systems Inc. | System for deinterlacing television signals from camera video or film |
US6370198B1 (en) | 1997-04-07 | 2002-04-09 | Kinya Washino | Wide-band multi-format audio/video production system with frame-rate conversion |
US20020054236A1 (en) | 2000-09-08 | 2002-05-09 | Wredenhagen Finn G. | Method and apparatus for motion adaptive deinterlacing |
US6392706B1 (en) | 1998-09-30 | 2002-05-21 | Victor Company Of Japan, Ltd. | Apparatus and method of moving picture format conversion |
EP1207693A2 (en) | 1998-04-03 | 2002-05-22 | Miranda Technologies Inc. | Edge direction detector |
US20020075412A1 (en) | 2000-12-14 | 2002-06-20 | Tang Che Wing | Method and apparatus for eliminating motion artifacts from video |
US6414719B1 (en) | 2000-05-26 | 2002-07-02 | Sarnoff Corporation | Motion adaptive median filter for interlace to progressive scan conversion |
US20020101535A1 (en) | 2001-01-29 | 2002-08-01 | Swan Philip L. | Method and apparatus for de-interlacing/re-interlacing video by a graphics processor |
US6437828B1 (en) | 1997-09-30 | 2002-08-20 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Line-quadrupler in home theater uses line-doubler of AV-part and scaler in graphics controller of PC-part |
US6456329B1 (en) | 1999-04-19 | 2002-09-24 | Sarnoff Corporation | De-interlacing of video signals |
US6459455B1 (en) | 1999-08-31 | 2002-10-01 | Intel Corporation | Motion adaptive deinterlacing |
US6459454B1 (en) | 2001-05-14 | 2002-10-01 | Webtv Networks, Inc. | Systems for adaptively deinterlacing video on a per pixel basis |
US6473460B1 (en) | 2000-03-31 | 2002-10-29 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Method and apparatus for calculating motion vectors |
US6487304B1 (en) | 1999-06-16 | 2002-11-26 | Microsoft Corporation | Multi-view approach to motion and stereo |
US6549240B1 (en) | 1997-09-26 | 2003-04-15 | Sarnoff Corporation | Format and frame rate conversion for display of 24Hz source video |
US6570624B2 (en) | 2000-09-08 | 2003-05-27 | Avid Technology, Inc. | Interpolation of a sequence of images using motion analysis |
US20030156301A1 (en) | 2001-12-31 | 2003-08-21 | Jeffrey Kempf | Content-dependent scan rate converter with adaptive noise reduction |
EP1515543A2 (en) | 2003-09-11 | 2005-03-16 | ATI Technologies Inc. | Method and de-interlacing apparatus that employs recursively generated motion history maps |
EP1596595A1 (en) | 2004-05-03 | 2005-11-16 | ATI Technologies Inc. | Apparatus and method for image rendering |
US6970206B1 (en) | 2000-04-20 | 2005-11-29 | Ati International Srl | Method for deinterlacing interlaced video by a graphics processor |
US6975359B2 (en) * | 2002-04-25 | 2005-12-13 | Trident Microsystems, Inc. | Method and system for motion and edge-adaptive signal frame rate up-conversion |
US7218355B2 (en) | 2002-09-04 | 2007-05-15 | Darien K. Wallace | Deinterlacer using block-based motion detection |
US7558320B2 (en) * | 2003-06-13 | 2009-07-07 | Microsoft Corporation | Quality control in frame interpolation with motion analysis |
-
2007
- 2007-12-28 US US11/965,947 patent/US8396129B2/en active Active
Patent Citations (102)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4908874A (en) | 1980-04-11 | 1990-03-13 | Ampex Corporation | System for spatially transforming images |
US4631750A (en) | 1980-04-11 | 1986-12-23 | Ampex Corporation | Method and system for spacially transforming images |
US4472732A (en) | 1981-04-10 | 1984-09-18 | Ampex Corporation | System for spatially transforming images |
US4669100A (en) | 1981-11-30 | 1987-05-26 | U.S. Philips Corporation | Charge-coupled device having a buffer electrode |
US4680628A (en) | 1984-01-04 | 1987-07-14 | Itek Corporation | Realtime digital diagnostic image processing system |
US4740842A (en) | 1985-02-12 | 1988-04-26 | U.S. Philips Corporation | Video signal processing circuit for processing an interlaced video signal |
US4750057A (en) | 1985-12-30 | 1988-06-07 | Eastman Kodak Company | De-interlacing circuit for simultaneous readout of paired fields |
US4800436A (en) | 1986-03-04 | 1989-01-24 | U.S. Philips Corp. | Television system with improved temporal resolution on display of a television signal |
US4992982A (en) | 1987-10-20 | 1991-02-12 | U.S. Philips Corporation | SPS type charge coupled device memory suitable for processing video information with increased speed |
US4998153A (en) | 1987-10-28 | 1991-03-05 | U.S. Philips Corporation | Charge-coupled device |
US4868655A (en) | 1987-11-09 | 1989-09-19 | Etat Francais Represente Par Le Ministre Delegue Des Postes Et Telecommunications (Centre National D'etudes Des Telecommunications) | Method and apparatus for processing picture signals having interlaced field scanning |
US4947251A (en) | 1987-12-02 | 1990-08-07 | Blaupunkt-Werke Gmbh | Suppression of flicker effects in a television receiver |
US5144429A (en) | 1988-06-21 | 1992-09-01 | U.S. Philips Corporation | High definition television transmission and reception system with an improved motion estimator and with reduced data throughput |
US5055927A (en) | 1988-09-13 | 1991-10-08 | Deutsche Thomson-Brandt Gmbh | Dual channel video signal transmission system |
US4941045A (en) | 1988-10-11 | 1990-07-10 | Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. | Method and apparatus for improving vertical definition of a television signal by scan conversion |
US4881125A (en) | 1988-10-14 | 1989-11-14 | General Instrument Corporation | Progressive scan display of video derived from film |
US5191576A (en) | 1988-11-18 | 1993-03-02 | L'Etat Francais and Telediffusion de France S.A. | Method for broadcasting of digital data, notably for radio broadcasting at high throughput rate towards mobile receivers, with time frequency interlacing and analog synchronization |
US5101403A (en) | 1989-03-30 | 1992-03-31 | Alcatel Cit | Apparatus for processing signalling messages in an asynchronous time division telecommunications network |
US4989090A (en) | 1989-04-05 | 1991-01-29 | Yves C. Faroudja | Television scan line doubler including temporal median filter |
US4982280A (en) | 1989-07-18 | 1991-01-01 | Yves C. Faroudja | Motion sequence pattern detector for video |
US5014119A (en) | 1989-08-25 | 1991-05-07 | Faroudja Y C | Horizontal and vertical transition level enhancement within television system |
US5046164A (en) | 1989-09-18 | 1991-09-03 | Rca Licensing Corporation | Interstitial line generator for an interlace to non-interlace scan converter |
US5128791A (en) | 1990-08-13 | 1992-07-07 | Bell Communications Research, Inc. | Multi-channel HDTV system |
US5134480A (en) | 1990-08-31 | 1992-07-28 | The Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New York | Time-recursive deinterlace processing for television-type signals |
US5193004A (en) | 1990-12-03 | 1993-03-09 | The Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New York | Systems and methods for coding even fields of interlaced video sequences |
US5289305A (en) | 1991-02-08 | 1994-02-22 | The Grass Valley Group, Inc. | Progressive scan architecture for video special effects |
US5159451A (en) | 1991-03-19 | 1992-10-27 | Faroudja Y C | Field memory expansible line doubler for television receiver |
US5600731A (en) | 1991-05-09 | 1997-02-04 | Eastman Kodak Company | Method for temporally adaptive filtering of frames of a noisy image sequence using motion estimation |
US5151783A (en) | 1991-06-05 | 1992-09-29 | Faroudja Y C | Digital television with enhancement |
US5351083A (en) | 1991-10-17 | 1994-09-27 | Sony Corporation | Picture encoding and/or decoding system |
US5327240A (en) | 1991-12-24 | 1994-07-05 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Methods, systems and apparatus for providing improved definition video |
US5237414A (en) | 1992-03-02 | 1993-08-17 | Faroudja Y C | Video enhancer with separate processing of high and low level transitions |
US5488419A (en) | 1992-03-13 | 1996-01-30 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Video compression coding and decoding with automatic sub-pixel frame/field motion compensation |
US5428398A (en) | 1992-04-10 | 1995-06-27 | Faroudja; Yves C. | Method and apparatus for producing from a standard-bandwidth television signal a signal which when reproduced provides a high-definition-like video image relatively free of artifacts |
US5233421A (en) | 1992-04-30 | 1993-08-03 | Thomson Consumer Electronics, Inc. | Video memory system with double multiplexing of video and motion samples in a field memory for motion adaptive compensation of processed video signals |
US5305104A (en) | 1992-07-27 | 1994-04-19 | The Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New York | Digitally assisted motion compensated deinterlacing for enhanced definition television |
US5517247A (en) | 1992-10-05 | 1996-05-14 | Deutsche Thomson-Brandt Gmbh | Method and apparatus for converting a video input signal of progressive scan form to an interlaced video output signal of doubled field rate and employing progressive scan to progressive scan interpolation for reduction of visual artifacts |
US5621470A (en) | 1992-12-18 | 1997-04-15 | Sid-Ahmed; Maher A. | Interpixel and interframe interpolation of television pictures with conversion from interlaced to progressive scanning |
US5436663A (en) | 1992-12-22 | 1995-07-25 | U.S. Philips Corporation | Device for encoding digital signals representing television pictures |
US5724098A (en) | 1992-12-25 | 1998-03-03 | Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha | Interframe coding method and apparatus utilizing a filter controller and an adaptive filter |
US5619272A (en) | 1992-12-30 | 1997-04-08 | Thomson-Csf | Process for deinterlacing the frames of a moving image sequence |
US5621481A (en) | 1993-04-08 | 1997-04-15 | Sony Corporation | Motion vector detecting apparatus for determining interframe, predictive error as a function of interfield predictive errors |
US5627555A (en) | 1993-04-14 | 1997-05-06 | Rca Thomson Licensing Corporation | Line flicker suppression by adaptive de-interlacing |
US5488421A (en) | 1993-06-05 | 1996-01-30 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Interlaced-to-progressive scanning converter with a double-smoother and a method therefor |
US5508746A (en) | 1993-06-24 | 1996-04-16 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Advanced television system |
US5408270A (en) | 1993-06-24 | 1995-04-18 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Advanced television system |
US5929913A (en) | 1993-10-28 | 1999-07-27 | Matsushita Electrical Industrial Co., Ltd | Motion vector detector and video coder |
US5467138A (en) | 1994-01-18 | 1995-11-14 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Field to frame video pixel data generation |
US5532750A (en) | 1994-04-05 | 1996-07-02 | U.S. Philips Corporation | Interlaced-to-sequential scan conversion |
US5689305A (en) | 1994-05-24 | 1997-11-18 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | System for deinterlacing digitally compressed video and method |
US5521644A (en) | 1994-06-30 | 1996-05-28 | Eastman Kodak Company | Mechanism for controllably deinterlacing sequential lines of video data field based upon pixel signals associated with four successive interlaced video fields |
EP0690617A2 (en) | 1994-06-30 | 1996-01-03 | Eastman Kodak Company | Method for controllably deinterlacing sequential lines of video data fields based upon pixel signals associated with four successive interlaced video fields |
US5682205A (en) | 1994-08-19 | 1997-10-28 | Eastman Kodak Company | Adaptive, global-motion compensated deinterlacing of sequential video fields with post processing |
US5602654A (en) | 1995-01-06 | 1997-02-11 | National Science Council | Contour-sensitive, single-field deinterlacing method |
US5844614A (en) | 1995-01-09 | 1998-12-01 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Video signal decoding apparatus |
US5596371A (en) | 1995-02-02 | 1997-01-21 | Dwin Electronics Inc. | Film-mode video line-doubler motion detectors |
US5661525A (en) | 1995-03-27 | 1997-08-26 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Method and apparatus for converting an interlaced video frame sequence into a progressively-scanned sequence |
EP0739129A2 (en) | 1995-04-21 | 1996-10-23 | Eastman Kodak Company | A system and method for creating high-quality stills from interlaced video images |
US5774593A (en) | 1995-07-24 | 1998-06-30 | University Of Washington | Automatic scene decomposition and optimization of MPEG compressed video |
US5936670A (en) | 1995-09-20 | 1999-08-10 | U.S. Philips Corporation | Method and device for decoding coded digital video signals |
US5995154A (en) | 1995-12-22 | 1999-11-30 | Thomson Multimedia S.A. | Process for interpolating progressive frames |
US5943099A (en) | 1996-01-27 | 1999-08-24 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Interlaced-to-progressive conversion apparatus and method using motion and spatial correlation |
US5754248A (en) | 1996-04-15 | 1998-05-19 | Faroudja; Yves C. | Universal video disc record and playback employing motion signals for high quality playback of non-film sources |
US5793435A (en) | 1996-06-25 | 1998-08-11 | Tektronix, Inc. | Deinterlacing of video using a variable coefficient spatio-temporal filter |
US6037986A (en) | 1996-07-16 | 2000-03-14 | Divicom Inc. | Video preprocessing method and apparatus with selective filtering based on motion detection |
US5784115A (en) | 1996-12-31 | 1998-07-21 | Xerox Corporation | System and method for motion compensated de-interlacing of video frames |
US6370198B1 (en) | 1997-04-07 | 2002-04-09 | Kinya Washino | Wide-band multi-format audio/video production system with frame-rate conversion |
US5864369A (en) | 1997-06-16 | 1999-01-26 | Ati International Srl | Method and apparatus for providing interlaced video on a progressive display |
US6141056A (en) | 1997-08-08 | 2000-10-31 | Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. | System for conversion of interlaced video to progressive video using horizontal displacement |
US6118486A (en) | 1997-09-26 | 2000-09-12 | Sarnoff Corporation | Synchronized multiple format video processing method and apparatus |
US6549240B1 (en) | 1997-09-26 | 2003-04-15 | Sarnoff Corporation | Format and frame rate conversion for display of 24Hz source video |
US6437828B1 (en) | 1997-09-30 | 2002-08-20 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Line-quadrupler in home theater uses line-doubler of AV-part and scaler in graphics controller of PC-part |
US6208350B1 (en) | 1997-11-04 | 2001-03-27 | Philips Electronics North America Corporation | Methods and apparatus for processing DVD video |
US6121978A (en) | 1998-01-07 | 2000-09-19 | Ati Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for graphics scaling |
US6340990B1 (en) | 1998-03-31 | 2002-01-22 | Applied Intelligent Systems Inc. | System for deinterlacing television signals from camera video or film |
EP1207693A2 (en) | 1998-04-03 | 2002-05-22 | Miranda Technologies Inc. | Edge direction detector |
US6192079B1 (en) * | 1998-05-07 | 2001-02-20 | Intel Corporation | Method and apparatus for increasing video frame rate |
US6266092B1 (en) | 1998-05-12 | 2001-07-24 | Genesis Microchip Inc. | Method and apparatus for video line multiplication with enhanced sharpness |
US6118488A (en) | 1998-08-31 | 2000-09-12 | Silicon Integrated Systems Corporation | Method and apparatus for adaptive edge-based scan line interpolation using 1-D pixel array motion detection |
US6392706B1 (en) | 1998-09-30 | 2002-05-21 | Victor Company Of Japan, Ltd. | Apparatus and method of moving picture format conversion |
US6239842B1 (en) | 1998-12-18 | 2001-05-29 | Oplus Technologies Ltd. | Method of de-interlacing video signals using a mixed mode spatial and temporal approximation technique |
US6188437B1 (en) | 1998-12-23 | 2001-02-13 | Ati International Srl | Deinterlacing technique |
US6456329B1 (en) | 1999-04-19 | 2002-09-24 | Sarnoff Corporation | De-interlacing of video signals |
US6487304B1 (en) | 1999-06-16 | 2002-11-26 | Microsoft Corporation | Multi-view approach to motion and stereo |
US6459455B1 (en) | 1999-08-31 | 2002-10-01 | Intel Corporation | Motion adaptive deinterlacing |
US6330032B1 (en) | 1999-09-30 | 2001-12-11 | Focus Enhancements, Inc. | Motion adaptive de-interlace filter |
US6473460B1 (en) | 2000-03-31 | 2002-10-29 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Method and apparatus for calculating motion vectors |
US6970206B1 (en) | 2000-04-20 | 2005-11-29 | Ati International Srl | Method for deinterlacing interlaced video by a graphics processor |
US6414719B1 (en) | 2000-05-26 | 2002-07-02 | Sarnoff Corporation | Motion adaptive median filter for interlace to progressive scan conversion |
US20020054236A1 (en) | 2000-09-08 | 2002-05-09 | Wredenhagen Finn G. | Method and apparatus for motion adaptive deinterlacing |
US6570624B2 (en) | 2000-09-08 | 2003-05-27 | Avid Technology, Inc. | Interpolation of a sequence of images using motion analysis |
US20020075412A1 (en) | 2000-12-14 | 2002-06-20 | Tang Che Wing | Method and apparatus for eliminating motion artifacts from video |
US20020101535A1 (en) | 2001-01-29 | 2002-08-01 | Swan Philip L. | Method and apparatus for de-interlacing/re-interlacing video by a graphics processor |
US6690427B2 (en) | 2001-01-29 | 2004-02-10 | Ati International Srl | Method and system for de-interlacing/re-interlacing video on a display device on a computer system during operation thereof |
US6459454B1 (en) | 2001-05-14 | 2002-10-01 | Webtv Networks, Inc. | Systems for adaptively deinterlacing video on a per pixel basis |
US20030156301A1 (en) | 2001-12-31 | 2003-08-21 | Jeffrey Kempf | Content-dependent scan rate converter with adaptive noise reduction |
US6975359B2 (en) * | 2002-04-25 | 2005-12-13 | Trident Microsystems, Inc. | Method and system for motion and edge-adaptive signal frame rate up-conversion |
US7218355B2 (en) | 2002-09-04 | 2007-05-15 | Darien K. Wallace | Deinterlacer using block-based motion detection |
US7558320B2 (en) * | 2003-06-13 | 2009-07-07 | Microsoft Corporation | Quality control in frame interpolation with motion analysis |
EP1515543A2 (en) | 2003-09-11 | 2005-03-16 | ATI Technologies Inc. | Method and de-interlacing apparatus that employs recursively generated motion history maps |
US20050078214A1 (en) | 2003-09-11 | 2005-04-14 | Wong Daniel W. | Method and de-interlacing apparatus that employs recursively generated motion history maps |
EP1596595A1 (en) | 2004-05-03 | 2005-11-16 | ATI Technologies Inc. | Apparatus and method for image rendering |
Non-Patent Citations (23)
Title |
---|
A. Murat Tekalp, "Digital Video Processing," Chapter 16-Standards Conversion, pp. 302-330-1995. |
A. Murat Tekalp, "Digital Video Processing," Chapter 16—Standards Conversion, pp. 302-330—1995. |
ATI Technologies, White Paper Radeon Digital Video, from www.ati.com, Jun. 14, 2000, pp. 1-20. |
Bakker, P. et al.; Edge preserving orientation adaptive filtering; IEEE; 1999; pp. 535-540. |
Bock, A.M., Motion-adaptive standards conversion between formats of similar field rates, Signal Processing Image Communication, Jul. 31, 1993, pp. 275-280. |
De Haan, Gerard et al., Deinterlacing-An Overview; IEEE, Sep. 1998, vol. 86, No. 9, pp. 1839-1857. |
De Haan, Gerard et al., Deinterlacing—An Overview; IEEE, Sep. 1998, vol. 86, No. 9, pp. 1839-1857. |
European Search Report dated Mar. 28, 2006 for EP Application No. EP04255496, pp. 1-3. |
European Search Report for EP Application No. EP05252564, Aug. 29, 2005. |
Hilman, Kevin et al.; Using Motion-Compensated Frame-Rate Conversion for the Correction of 3:2 Pulldown Artifacts in Video Sequences; IEEE; vol. 10, No. 6, Sep. 2000; pp. 869-877. |
ISO/IEC DIS 13818-2 Draft International Standard Information Technology-Generic coding of moving pictures and associated audio information-Part 2 Video, May 10, 1994, pp. 1-1. |
ISO/IEC DIS 13818-2 Draft International Standard Information Technology—Generic coding of moving pictures and associated audio information—Part 2 Video, May 10, 1994, pp. 1-1. |
Jensen, Kris et al.; Subpixel Edge Localization and the Interpolation of Still Images; IEEE; vol. 4, No. 3; Mar. 1995; pp. 285-295. |
Le Gall; Compression Standard for Multimedia Applications; Association for Computing Machinery; vol. 34, No. 4; pp. 47-58, Apr. 1991. |
Li, Xin et al.; New Edge-Directed Interpolation; IEEE; vol. 10, No. 10, Oct. 2001; pp. 1521-1527. |
Martinez, Dennis M. et al.; Spatial Interpolation of Interlaced Television Pictures; IEEE; 1989; pp. 1886-1889. |
Tai, S.C. et al.; A Motion and Edge Adaptive Deinterlacing Algorithm; IEEE Int'l Conf. on Multimedia and Expo; 2004; pp. 659-662. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/467,978, entitled Method and Apparatus for Interpolating Image Information, filed Aug. 29, 2006. |
Weinand, Lars, Neue Mainstream-Klasse; Radeon 9000 (RV250), from Tom's Hardware Guide (online), Jul. 18, 2002, pp. 1-6. |
Weinand, Lars, TV-Tuner and Videoschnitt: Ati All-In-Wonder RADEON 8500DV; from Tom's Hardware Guide (online); Dec. 11, 2001, pp. 1-2. |
Woods, John, W., et al., Hierarchical Motion Compensated De-interlacing; SPIE, Nov. 11, 1991, pp. 805-810. |
Yoshida, Junko, Phillips new chip said to remove LCD TV artifacts; EE Times, Jul. 8, 2003, pp. 1-2, www.eetimes.com/sys/OEG20030708S0017. |
Zhao, M. et al.; Intra-field de-interlacing with advanced up-scaling methods; IEEE 2004; pp. 315-319. |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20090167778A1 (en) | 2009-07-02 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US8396129B2 (en) | Apparatus and method for single-pass, gradient-based motion compensated image rate conversion | |
JP5534299B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for dealing with periodic structures in motion compensation | |
US8817878B2 (en) | Method and system for motion estimation around a fixed reference vector using a pivot-pixel approach | |
EP2080362A2 (en) | Systems and methods for a motion compensated picture rate converter | |
JP2003174628A (en) | Pixel data selection device for motion compensated interpolation and method thereof | |
US20090279609A1 (en) | Motion-compensated processing of image signals | |
EP1931136B1 (en) | Block-based line combination algorithm for de-interlacing | |
US8692933B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for buffering anchor frames in motion compensation systems | |
KR20080008952A (en) | Methods and systems of deinterlacing using super resolution technology | |
JP2009521863A (en) | Method and apparatus for progressive scanning of interlaced video | |
US8704945B1 (en) | Motion adaptive deinterlacer | |
TWI471010B (en) | A motion compensation deinterlacing image processing apparatus and method thereof | |
Jung et al. | An effective de-interlacing technique using two types of motion information | |
WO2007116370A1 (en) | 1d motion compensated dynamic frame insertion | |
US8233085B1 (en) | Method and system for interpolating a pixel value of a pixel located at an on-screen display | |
US9491473B2 (en) | Motion compensated de-interlacing and noise reduction | |
JP4232869B2 (en) | Conversion unit and apparatus, and image processing apparatus | |
JP4910579B2 (en) | Image signal processing apparatus, image signal processing method, and program | |
KR101144435B1 (en) | Methods of edge-based deinterlacing using weight and image processing devices using the same | |
Park et al. | Adaptive weighting scheme for edge-based line interpolation | |
Tsai et al. | Overlapped block-based adaptive bilateral motion estimation | |
KR100728914B1 (en) | Deintelacing apparatus using attribute of image and method thereof | |
KR100588902B1 (en) | Video deinterlace apparatus and method | |
US8170370B2 (en) | Method and apparatus of processing interlaced video data to generate output frame by blending deinterlaced frames | |
JPH08186802A (en) | Interpolation picture element generating method for interlace scanning image |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: ATI TECHNOLOGIES ULC, CANADA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:WEI, JEFF X.;REEL/FRAME:021293/0516 Effective date: 20080227 |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 8TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1552); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Year of fee payment: 8 |