US9046885B2 - Method for ascertaining functional parameters for a control unit - Google Patents
Method for ascertaining functional parameters for a control unit Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US9046885B2 US9046885B2 US13/510,100 US201013510100A US9046885B2 US 9046885 B2 US9046885 B2 US 9046885B2 US 201013510100 A US201013510100 A US 201013510100A US 9046885 B2 US9046885 B2 US 9046885B2
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- functional parameters
- response
- recited
- weighting
- control unit
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related, expires
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B19/00—Programme-control systems
- G05B19/02—Programme-control systems electric
- G05B19/04—Programme control other than numerical control, i.e. in sequence controllers or logic controllers
- G05B19/042—Programme control other than numerical control, i.e. in sequence controllers or logic controllers using digital processors
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B19/00—Programme-control systems
- G05B19/02—Programme-control systems electric
- G05B19/04—Programme control other than numerical control, i.e. in sequence controllers or logic controllers
- G05B19/042—Programme control other than numerical control, i.e. in sequence controllers or logic controllers using digital processors
- G05B19/0426—Programming the control sequence
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F02—COMBUSTION ENGINES; HOT-GAS OR COMBUSTION-PRODUCT ENGINE PLANTS
- F02D—CONTROLLING COMBUSTION ENGINES
- F02D41/00—Electrical control of supply of combustible mixture or its constituents
- F02D41/02—Circuit arrangements for generating control signals
- F02D41/14—Introducing closed-loop corrections
- F02D41/1401—Introducing closed-loop corrections characterised by the control or regulation method
- F02D41/1406—Introducing closed-loop corrections characterised by the control or regulation method with use of a optimisation method, e.g. iteration
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F02—COMBUSTION ENGINES; HOT-GAS OR COMBUSTION-PRODUCT ENGINE PLANTS
- F02D—CONTROLLING COMBUSTION ENGINES
- F02D41/00—Electrical control of supply of combustible mixture or its constituents
- F02D41/24—Electrical control of supply of combustible mixture or its constituents characterised by the use of digital means
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F02—COMBUSTION ENGINES; HOT-GAS OR COMBUSTION-PRODUCT ENGINE PLANTS
- F02D—CONTROLLING COMBUSTION ENGINES
- F02D41/00—Electrical control of supply of combustible mixture or its constituents
- F02D41/24—Electrical control of supply of combustible mixture or its constituents characterised by the use of digital means
- F02D41/2406—Electrical control of supply of combustible mixture or its constituents characterised by the use of digital means using essentially read only memories
- F02D41/2425—Particular ways of programming the data
- F02D41/2429—Methods of calibrating or learning
- F02D41/2432—Methods of calibration
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B13/00—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion
- G05B13/02—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric
- G05B13/04—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric involving the use of models or simulators
- G05B13/042—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric involving the use of models or simulators in which a parameter or coefficient is automatically adjusted to optimise the performance
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B17/00—Systems involving the use of models or simulators of said systems
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B2219/00—Program-control systems
- G05B2219/20—Pc systems
- G05B2219/23—Pc programming
- G05B2219/23117—Lookup table, interpolation between points
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a method for ascertaining functional parameters for a control unit, and such a control unit.
- control unit functions that are executed in the control units used, have to be designed according to requirements with respect to target variables and evaluation criteria of the manufacturer and the end customer, via functional parameters.
- control unit functions offer the possibility of determining fixed settings, using a set of parameters, and in many cases also using a plurality of sets of parameters, via constants, characteristics curves and characteristics maps.
- complexity of the functions, and consequently also the number of characteristics maps increase steadily.
- Function specialists who in the most favorable case know the effect of each parameter, are thus able to design the functions according to the requirements of the customer.
- a plurality of functional parameters, functional characteristics curves and functional characteristics maps are able to be reduced for the user to weighting characteristics maps that are a function of one or a few operating points.
- the application takes place as a specification of the target variables and criteria, or rather their weightings. Consequently, the user does not have to be a function specialist in order to implement the desired requirements on the system. Furthermore, it is not required that the user know the functional parameters.
- the example method in accordance with the present invention makes possible an application by the direct specification of objective target variables or criteria to a function in the control unit.
- the example embodiment of the present invention makes possible an application via setting target variables, and in this context, the concentration applies to the target variables and not the functional parameters. This leads to a reduction in the complexity for the user, particularly since no function specialist is required for coordination.
- control unit function it is possible to develop a control unit function or to broaden existing control unit functions, so that they apply themselves autonomously.
- the functional targets are specified by the applicator or customer in development via one or more weighting characteristics maps of the target variables and criteria.
- the function learns the internal functional parameters required for this.
- FIG. 1 shows a schematic representation of an example embodiment of the method described.
- FIG. 2 shows an additional example embodiment of the method.
- FIG. 1 shows a method sequence which directly carries out parameter variations, such as functional parameters, on a target system or system 10 , and in which system 10 is operated at different operating points. From the system response, criteria from system 10 are computed in a step 12 . From the computed criteria and the specified target variables, a mathematical model, for instance, or a criteria model 14 is then formed which sets up the dependencies of the target variables and the criteria on the parameters.
- a mathematical model for instance, or a criteria model 14 is then formed which sets up the dependencies of the target variables and the criteria on the parameters.
- an optimizer 16 is able to optimize model 14 on the latter and ascertain the optimum functional parameters 20 , and make these available to the actual functions of control unit 22 and update them again and again, the optimizer 16 being able to take into account the development of system responses and the criteria computed on the system responses, for instance, by a gradient observation or a gradient evaluation.
- system 10 initially runs using starting parameters of the control unit function.
- system 10 is operated at any operating point using the set functional parameters 20 , supplying output variables on which criteria are computed.
- the criteria model or response model 14 is set up using these criteria.
- Optimizer 16 ascertains the optimum parameters having specified weighting in the measured range of response model 14 and changes the corresponding functional parameters using the results.
- system 10 uses functional parameters at the beginning, which were specified or taken over, for example. However, these are not usually coordinated with system 10 , that is, they are not optimal for system 10 .
- a response model 14 is usually nonexistent. However, a response model 14 of a similar system 10 may be stored.
- System 10 is then operated at different operating points and, in the process, it learns its own response at different operating points.
- optimizer 16 of the function specifies parameter combinations, which represent a prognosis of optimizer 16 with regard to an improvement of response model 14 . Consequently, parameter combinations are tried that are supposed to improve the response of system 10 .
- Response model 14 is broadened by the criteria and the parameter combination. Using the broadened parameter combination and the associated criteria, a new broadened response model 14 is computed.
- Optimizer 16 uses response model 14 , and checks whether the parameter specification has led to the improvement or the worsening of the response of system 10 . Because of this, optimizer 16 gradually ascertains the combination of parameters at which the optimal response of system 10 with regard to the criteria sets in or comes about. This takes place in an iterative sequence, in which response model 14 grows until the optimal response has been found. This is performed for each operating point.
- Optimizer 16 ascertains in each case the optimal parameter of response model 14 in the measured range, and outputs a prognosis on whether a further improvement of the response is able to be achieved. It is the task of optimizer 16 to value the criteria of response model 14 according to the specification from the weighting characteristics maps.
- the specification to optimizer 16 may be a summed criterion of weightings, for which optimizer 16 finds only one solution of the parameters.
- the function may be designed so that optimizer 16 supplies a plurality of functional parameters 20 via a multi-target optimization, and the choice of functional parameters takes place via the weighting of the criteria from a memory or a model of optimal parameters.
- the weighting criteria may be shifted at any time after the learning of criteria model 14 .
- Functional parameters 20 become effective immediately. The user is able to apply this, in this manner, without having to know functional parameters 20 .
- a switching over of phases may take place via the data of the learned operating response.
- the weightings may be changed at any time, for example, by switching over different weighting characteristics maps or by regulation directly on the weightings.
- FIG. 2 shows a similar sequence to that in FIG. 1 , the difference being that parameters are not being varied directly on a system 30 , but via an intermediate model 32 , so as to avoid perceivable effects of the variations.
- Intermediate model 32 replaces system 30 , and is adjusted to system 30 under definable circumstances by identification, optimization and by other computations (block 35 ).
- Criteria from intermediate model 32 are computed from the response of intermediate model 32 .
- a mathematical model, for instance, or a criteria model 36 is then formed which sets up the dependencies of the target variables and the criteria on the parameters.
- An optimizer 38 is then able to optimize on this model 36 , by the specification of weighting criteria and from a weighting characteristics map 40 , and ascertain the optimal functional parameters 42 , and provide these to the actual control unit functions 44 and repeatedly update them.
- the optimization may also be computed during hunting of the control unit.
- One alternative is to compute this method outside of the control unit software, and using a tool having an intersection with the control unit, thus to transmit the settings to the experimental object.
- the results of the adjustment are then available directly in the control unit, or have to be transferred, via the tool, to the control unit, after the adjustment.
- control unit software does not have to be changed. It should be noted, however, that it is possible that various setups or regulations cannot be implemented using the weightings. In addition, an additional tool has to be available for the application and also to the customer.
Abstract
Description
- 1. Rapid learning of
functional parameters 20 and application by coordinating weighting characteristics maps 18. - 2. Slow adjustment of
functional parameters 20 over the lifetime.
Claims (18)
Applications Claiming Priority (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE102009054905 | 2009-12-17 | ||
DE102009054905.6 | 2009-12-17 | ||
DE102009054905A DE102009054905A1 (en) | 2009-12-17 | 2009-12-17 | Method for determining functional parameters for a control device |
PCT/EP2010/068750 WO2011082908A1 (en) | 2009-12-17 | 2010-12-02 | Method for determining function parameters for a control unit |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20120283848A1 US20120283848A1 (en) | 2012-11-08 |
US9046885B2 true US9046885B2 (en) | 2015-06-02 |
Family
ID=43599019
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US13/510,100 Expired - Fee Related US9046885B2 (en) | 2009-12-17 | 2010-12-02 | Method for ascertaining functional parameters for a control unit |
Country Status (8)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US9046885B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP2513727A1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP2013513877A (en) |
KR (1) | KR20120104249A (en) |
CN (1) | CN102652292B (en) |
DE (1) | DE102009054905A1 (en) |
IN (1) | IN2012DN03268A (en) |
WO (1) | WO2011082908A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
BR112019018599B1 (en) * | 2017-03-10 | 2024-03-12 | Cummins Inc | APPARATUS, SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR OPTIMIZING A PERFORMANCE VARIABLE FOR AN ENGINE SYSTEM |
DE102017211209A1 (en) * | 2017-06-30 | 2019-01-03 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Method and device for adjusting at least one parameter of an actuator control system, actuator control system and data set |
CN111492321B (en) | 2017-12-18 | 2023-07-18 | 西门子股份公司 | Method for replacing traditional programmable logic controller |
DE102022104648A1 (en) | 2022-02-25 | 2023-08-31 | Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule (RWTH) Aachen, Körperschaft des öffentlichen Rechts | AUTOMATED FUNCTIONAL CALIBRATION |
Citations (31)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4922428A (en) * | 1986-12-10 | 1990-05-01 | Nissan Motor Company, Limited | System and method for automatically controlling cruising speed of vehicles |
JPH0535309A (en) | 1991-07-30 | 1993-02-12 | Toshiba Corp | Model prediction control device |
JPH06249007A (en) | 1993-02-26 | 1994-09-06 | Toyota Motor Corp | Driving force control device for vehicle |
US5347446A (en) * | 1991-02-08 | 1994-09-13 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Model predictive control apparatus |
US5457625A (en) * | 1994-04-13 | 1995-10-10 | The M. W. Kellogg Company | Maximizing process production rates using permanent constraints |
US5559690A (en) * | 1992-06-10 | 1996-09-24 | Pavilion Technologies, Inc. | Residual activation neural network |
DE19858584A1 (en) | 1998-12-18 | 2000-06-21 | Bosch Gmbh Robert | Procedure for controlling a drive unit of vehicle has, with determination of motor-adjusting parameters, optimization criteria considered which change during travel cycle according to external and/or internal influences |
DE10020448A1 (en) | 2000-04-26 | 2001-10-31 | Daimler Chrysler Ag | Operation optimization method for internal combustion engine, involves adjusting regulating variables based on dependency of target values on them and setting characteristic diagrams of controller accordingly |
US20020087221A1 (en) * | 1999-01-12 | 2002-07-04 | Keeler James David | Residual activation neural network |
US20030139826A1 (en) * | 2002-01-23 | 2003-07-24 | Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Control system for plant |
US20030144747A1 (en) * | 2001-11-21 | 2003-07-31 | Metso Paper Automation Oy | Method and controller to control a process |
US20030187564A1 (en) * | 2002-03-26 | 2003-10-02 | Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Control system for plant |
US20030187522A1 (en) * | 2002-03-29 | 2003-10-02 | Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Control system for plant |
US20030229408A1 (en) * | 2002-06-06 | 2003-12-11 | Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Control system for plant |
US20030229407A1 (en) * | 2002-06-06 | 2003-12-11 | Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Control system for plant |
US20040006420A1 (en) * | 2002-02-22 | 2004-01-08 | Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Control system for plant |
US20040035393A1 (en) * | 2002-08-22 | 2004-02-26 | Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Control system for throttle valve actuating device |
US20040049296A1 (en) * | 2002-09-05 | 2004-03-11 | Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Control system for plant |
US20040049299A1 (en) * | 2002-09-11 | 2004-03-11 | Wilhelm Wojsznis | Integrated model predictive control and optimization within a process control system |
US20040117766A1 (en) * | 2002-09-11 | 2004-06-17 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Integrated model predictive control and optimization within a process control system |
US20050035676A1 (en) * | 2003-08-11 | 2005-02-17 | Rahman Khwaja M. | Gearless wheel motor drive system |
JP2006072733A (en) | 2004-09-02 | 2006-03-16 | Fujitsu Ten Ltd | Model prediction controller and control method |
US7110834B2 (en) * | 1996-05-06 | 2006-09-19 | Pavilion Technologies, Inc. | Kiln thermal and combustion control |
US7194318B2 (en) * | 2003-01-31 | 2007-03-20 | Fakhruddin T Attarwala | Integrated optimization and control using modular model predictive controller |
US20070168057A1 (en) * | 2005-12-05 | 2007-07-19 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Multi-objective predictive process optimization with concurrent process simulation |
US20100100248A1 (en) * | 2005-09-06 | 2010-04-22 | General Electric Company | Methods and Systems for Neural Network Modeling of Turbine Components |
US20100168989A1 (en) * | 2007-04-09 | 2010-07-01 | Hau Zhao | Control Method and Device For Engine |
US20100198364A1 (en) * | 2009-02-05 | 2010-08-05 | Shih-Chin Chen | Configurable Multivariable Control System |
US7826909B2 (en) * | 2006-12-11 | 2010-11-02 | Fakhruddin T Attarwala | Dynamic model predictive control |
US8224476B2 (en) * | 2010-05-31 | 2012-07-17 | Honeywell Asca Inc. | Closed-loop monitoring and identification of CD alignment for papermaking processes |
US8326505B2 (en) * | 2006-10-13 | 2012-12-04 | Stmicroelectronics S.R.L. | System and method for self-adaptive control of an electromechanical brake |
-
2009
- 2009-12-17 DE DE102009054905A patent/DE102009054905A1/en not_active Withdrawn
-
2010
- 2010-12-02 CN CN201080057323.4A patent/CN102652292B/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2010-12-02 KR KR1020127015469A patent/KR20120104249A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2010-12-02 IN IN3268DEN2012 patent/IN2012DN03268A/en unknown
- 2010-12-02 US US13/510,100 patent/US9046885B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2010-12-02 WO PCT/EP2010/068750 patent/WO2011082908A1/en active Application Filing
- 2010-12-02 EP EP10788302A patent/EP2513727A1/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2010-12-02 JP JP2012543589A patent/JP2013513877A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (51)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4922428A (en) * | 1986-12-10 | 1990-05-01 | Nissan Motor Company, Limited | System and method for automatically controlling cruising speed of vehicles |
US5347446A (en) * | 1991-02-08 | 1994-09-13 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Model predictive control apparatus |
JPH0535309A (en) | 1991-07-30 | 1993-02-12 | Toshiba Corp | Model prediction control device |
US5559690A (en) * | 1992-06-10 | 1996-09-24 | Pavilion Technologies, Inc. | Residual activation neural network |
JPH06249007A (en) | 1993-02-26 | 1994-09-06 | Toyota Motor Corp | Driving force control device for vehicle |
US5457625A (en) * | 1994-04-13 | 1995-10-10 | The M. W. Kellogg Company | Maximizing process production rates using permanent constraints |
US7110834B2 (en) * | 1996-05-06 | 2006-09-19 | Pavilion Technologies, Inc. | Kiln thermal and combustion control |
DE19858584A1 (en) | 1998-12-18 | 2000-06-21 | Bosch Gmbh Robert | Procedure for controlling a drive unit of vehicle has, with determination of motor-adjusting parameters, optimization criteria considered which change during travel cycle according to external and/or internal influences |
US20020087221A1 (en) * | 1999-01-12 | 2002-07-04 | Keeler James David | Residual activation neural network |
DE10020448A1 (en) | 2000-04-26 | 2001-10-31 | Daimler Chrysler Ag | Operation optimization method for internal combustion engine, involves adjusting regulating variables based on dependency of target values on them and setting characteristic diagrams of controller accordingly |
US20030144747A1 (en) * | 2001-11-21 | 2003-07-31 | Metso Paper Automation Oy | Method and controller to control a process |
US20030139826A1 (en) * | 2002-01-23 | 2003-07-24 | Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Control system for plant |
US7231265B2 (en) * | 2002-01-23 | 2007-06-12 | Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Control system for plant |
US20040006420A1 (en) * | 2002-02-22 | 2004-01-08 | Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Control system for plant |
US6990403B2 (en) * | 2002-02-22 | 2006-01-24 | Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Control system for plant |
US20030187564A1 (en) * | 2002-03-26 | 2003-10-02 | Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Control system for plant |
US6859717B2 (en) * | 2002-03-26 | 2005-02-22 | Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Control system for plant |
US20030187522A1 (en) * | 2002-03-29 | 2003-10-02 | Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Control system for plant |
US6816776B2 (en) * | 2002-03-29 | 2004-11-09 | Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Control system for plant |
US20030229408A1 (en) * | 2002-06-06 | 2003-12-11 | Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Control system for plant |
US20030229407A1 (en) * | 2002-06-06 | 2003-12-11 | Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Control system for plant |
US7050865B2 (en) * | 2002-06-06 | 2006-05-23 | Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Control system for plant |
US6839598B2 (en) * | 2002-06-06 | 2005-01-04 | Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Control system for plant using an identified model parameter vector |
US6848420B2 (en) * | 2002-08-22 | 2005-02-01 | Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Control system for throttle valve actuating device |
US20040035393A1 (en) * | 2002-08-22 | 2004-02-26 | Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Control system for throttle valve actuating device |
US20040049296A1 (en) * | 2002-09-05 | 2004-03-11 | Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Control system for plant |
US7251536B2 (en) * | 2002-09-05 | 2007-07-31 | Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Control system for plant |
US20040117766A1 (en) * | 2002-09-11 | 2004-06-17 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Integrated model predictive control and optimization within a process control system |
US7376472B2 (en) * | 2002-09-11 | 2008-05-20 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Integrated model predictive control and optimization within a process control system |
US20040049295A1 (en) * | 2002-09-11 | 2004-03-11 | Wilhelm Wojsznis | Constraint and limit feasibility handling in a process control system optimizer |
US20040049300A1 (en) * | 2002-09-11 | 2004-03-11 | Dirk Thiele | Configuration and viewing display for an integrated model predictive control and optimizer function block |
US7337022B2 (en) * | 2002-09-11 | 2008-02-26 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Constraint and limit feasibility handling in a process control system optimizer |
US7050863B2 (en) * | 2002-09-11 | 2006-05-23 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Integrated model predictive control and optimization within a process control system |
US20040049299A1 (en) * | 2002-09-11 | 2004-03-11 | Wilhelm Wojsznis | Integrated model predictive control and optimization within a process control system |
US7330767B2 (en) * | 2002-09-11 | 2008-02-12 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Configuration and viewing display for an integrated model predictive control and optimizer function block |
US7194318B2 (en) * | 2003-01-31 | 2007-03-20 | Fakhruddin T Attarwala | Integrated optimization and control using modular model predictive controller |
US7262536B2 (en) * | 2003-08-11 | 2007-08-28 | General Motors Corporation | Gearless wheel motor drive system |
US20080030155A1 (en) * | 2003-08-11 | 2008-02-07 | Patel Nitinkumar R | Gearless wheel motor drive system |
US20050035676A1 (en) * | 2003-08-11 | 2005-02-17 | Rahman Khwaja M. | Gearless wheel motor drive system |
US7592766B2 (en) * | 2003-08-11 | 2009-09-22 | Gm Global Technology Operations, Inc. | Gearless wheel motor drive system |
US20090295316A1 (en) * | 2004-07-29 | 2009-12-03 | Gm Global Technology Operations, Inc. | Gearless wheel motor drive system |
JP2006072733A (en) | 2004-09-02 | 2006-03-16 | Fujitsu Ten Ltd | Model prediction controller and control method |
US20100100248A1 (en) * | 2005-09-06 | 2010-04-22 | General Electric Company | Methods and Systems for Neural Network Modeling of Turbine Components |
US8065022B2 (en) * | 2005-09-06 | 2011-11-22 | General Electric Company | Methods and systems for neural network modeling of turbine components |
US20070168057A1 (en) * | 2005-12-05 | 2007-07-19 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Multi-objective predictive process optimization with concurrent process simulation |
US8055358B2 (en) * | 2005-12-05 | 2011-11-08 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Multi-objective predictive process optimization with concurrent process simulation |
US8326505B2 (en) * | 2006-10-13 | 2012-12-04 | Stmicroelectronics S.R.L. | System and method for self-adaptive control of an electromechanical brake |
US7826909B2 (en) * | 2006-12-11 | 2010-11-02 | Fakhruddin T Attarwala | Dynamic model predictive control |
US20100168989A1 (en) * | 2007-04-09 | 2010-07-01 | Hau Zhao | Control Method and Device For Engine |
US20100198364A1 (en) * | 2009-02-05 | 2010-08-05 | Shih-Chin Chen | Configurable Multivariable Control System |
US8224476B2 (en) * | 2010-05-31 | 2012-07-17 | Honeywell Asca Inc. | Closed-loop monitoring and identification of CD alignment for papermaking processes |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
International Search Report, PCT International Application No. PCT/EP2010/068750, dated Apr. 28, 2011. |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN102652292A (en) | 2012-08-29 |
CN102652292B (en) | 2015-11-25 |
EP2513727A1 (en) | 2012-10-24 |
DE102009054905A1 (en) | 2011-06-22 |
WO2011082908A1 (en) | 2011-07-14 |
JP2013513877A (en) | 2013-04-22 |
IN2012DN03268A (en) | 2015-10-23 |
US20120283848A1 (en) | 2012-11-08 |
KR20120104249A (en) | 2012-09-20 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US9046885B2 (en) | Method for ascertaining functional parameters for a control unit | |
US8155857B2 (en) | Method and engine control unit for controlling an internal combustion engine | |
US10493625B2 (en) | System for generating sets of control data for robots | |
CN113874865A (en) | Method and device for determining model parameters of a control strategy of a technical system by means of a Bayesian optimization method | |
US10784717B2 (en) | Method, device, and system for controlling power supply | |
US10303132B2 (en) | Control device, control method, and control program | |
KR102382047B1 (en) | Automatic learning tuning system of motor controller using PSO | |
KR20200081407A (en) | Method and apparatus for operating an actuator control system, computer program and machine readable storage medium | |
CN109976153B (en) | Method and device for controlling unmanned equipment and model training and electronic equipment | |
US10906482B2 (en) | Real-time performance tuning | |
EP3945226A1 (en) | Gear-shift control data generation method, gear-shift control device, and gear-shift control system | |
CN113939775A (en) | Method and device for determining a regulation strategy for a technical system | |
JP3711976B2 (en) | Conformity value generation device, conformity procedure control program, and conformity value generation program | |
US9309825B2 (en) | Method and device for adapting adaptation values for the control of injectors in an engine system having multiple injection types | |
US8041511B2 (en) | Method for optimizing calibration maps for an algorithm of estimation of a control quantity of an internal combustion engine | |
CN114285909B (en) | Scanning method, device, system, computer device and medium for magnetic resonance equipment | |
CN110027539A (en) | For controlling the device and method of the operation of engine | |
CN115561724A (en) | Cognitive radar target recognition effect online evaluation method and device and computer equipment | |
JP2003521773A (en) | How to find the optimal set point for machines and processes | |
CN113445573A (en) | Water pump parameter self-learning method, system, equipment and computer readable storage medium | |
US20120310385A1 (en) | Device for ascertaining control unit parameters | |
US20120296614A1 (en) | Method for setting function parameters | |
EP2524309A1 (en) | Method and system for updating of software | |
CN111022306B (en) | Method and device for controlling a fluid pump | |
US7158868B2 (en) | Method and device for consistent bidirectional analysis of engine characteristics map data |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: ROBERT BOSCH GMBH, GERMANY Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:JOHANNABER, MARTIN;BOUMANS, MARCUS;BOSSLER, MARKUS;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20120523 TO 20120604;REEL/FRAME:028622/0106 |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 4TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1551); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: MAINTENANCE FEE REMINDER MAILED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: REM.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
LAPS | Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED FOR FAILURE TO PAY MAINTENANCE FEES (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: EXP.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
STCH | Information on status: patent discontinuation |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362 |
|
FP | Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee |
Effective date: 20230602 |