|Numéro de publication||US9167109 B2|
|Type de publication||Octroi|
|Numéro de demande||US 13/856,761|
|Date de publication||20 oct. 2015|
|Date de dépôt||4 avr. 2013|
|Date de priorité||15 juil. 1997|
|Numéro de publication||13856761, 856761, US 9167109 B2, US 9167109B2, US-B2-9167109, US9167109 B2, US9167109B2|
|Cessionnaire d'origine||Google Inc.|
|Exporter la citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Citations de brevets (2029), Citations hors brevets (146), Classifications (89)|
|Liens externes: USPTO, Cession USPTO, Espacenet|
The present application is a CONTINUATION of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/104,021, filed May 10, 2011, which is a CONTINUATION of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/758,730, filed Apr. 12, 2012, now issued U.S. Pat. No. 7,961,249, which is a CONTINUATION of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/045,442, filed Jan. 31, 2005, now issued U.S. Pat. No. 7,701,506, which is a CONTINUATION of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/112,786, filed Jan. 10, 1998, now issued U.S. Pat. No. 6,879,341, which claims priority to Australian Application No. PO7991, filed on Jul. 15, 1997 and Australian Application No. PO8504, filed Aug. 11, 1997. The above-identified applications are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. With respect to the present application, any disclaimer of claim scope made in the parent application or any predecessor or related application is hereby rescinded.
The present invention relates to digital image processing and in particular discloses Camera System Containing a VLIW Vector Processor.
Further the present invention relates to an image processing method and apparatus and, in particular, discloses a Digital Instant Camera with Image Processing Capability.
The present invention further relates to the field of digital camera technology and, particularly, discloses a digital camera having an integral color printer.
Traditional camera technology has for many years relied upon the provision of an optical processing system which relies on a negative of an image which is projected onto a photosensitive film which is subsequently chemically processed so as to “fix” the film and to allow for positive prints to be produced which reproduce the original image. Such an image processing technology, although it has become a standard, can be unduly complex, as expensive and difficult technologies are involved in full color processing of images. Recently, digital cameras have become available. These cameras normally rely upon the utilization of a charged coupled device (CCD) to sense a particular image. The camera normally includes storage media for the storage of the sensed scenes in addition to a connector for the transfer of images to a computer device for subsequent manipulation and printing out.
Such devices are generally inconvenient in that all images must be stored by the camera and printed out at some later stage. Hence, the camera must have sufficient storage capabilities for the storing of multiple images and, additionally, the user of the camera must have access to a subsequent computer system for the downloading of the images and printing out by a computer printer or the like.
Further, digital camera devices have only limited on board processing capabilities which can only perform limited manipulation of sensed image. The main function of the on board processing capability is to store the sensed image. As it may be desirable to carry out extensive modification of an image, the capabilities of such digital camera devices are considered inadequate.
The present invention relates to the provision of a digital camera system having significant on-board computational capabilities for the manipulation of images.
In accordance with a first aspect of the present invention, there is provided a digital camera system comprising a sensing means for sensing an image; modification means for modifying the sensed image in accordance with modification instructions input into the camera; and an output means for outputting the modified image; wherein the modification means includes a series of processing elements arranged around a central crossbar switch. Preferably, the processing elements include an Arithmetic Logic Unit (ALU) acting under the control of a microcode store wherein the microcode store comprises a writeable control store. The processing elements can include an internal input and output FIFO for storing pixel data utilized by the processing elements and the modification means is interconnected to a read and write FIFO for reading and writing pixel data of images to the modification means.
Each of the processing elements can be arranged in a ring and each element is also separately connected to its nearest neighbours. The ALU accepts a series of inputs interconnected via an internal crossbar switch to a series of core processing units within the ALU and includes a number of internal registers for the storage of temporary data. The core processing units can include at least one of a multiplier, an adder and a barrel shifter.
The processing elements are further connected to a common data bus for the transfer of pixel data to the processing elements and the data bus is interconnected to a data cache which acts as an intermediate cache between the processing elements and a memory store for storing the images.
Notwithstanding any other forms that may fall within the scope of the present invention, preferred forms of the invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
The digital image processing camera system constructed in accordance with the preferred embodiment is as illustrated in
The camera 1 can include an optional color display 5 for the display of the image being sensed by the sensor 2. When a simple image is being displayed on the display 5, the button 6 can be depressed resulting in the printed image 8 being output by the camera unit 1. A series of cards, herein after known as “Artcards” 9 contain, on one surface encoded information and on the other surface, contain an image distorted by the particular effect produced by the Artcard 9. The Artcard 9 is inserted in an Artcard reader 10 in the side of camera 1 and, upon insertion, results in output image 8 being distorted in the same manner as the distortion appearing on the surface of Artcard 9. Hence, by means of this simple user interface a user wishing to produce a particular effect can insert one of many Artcards 9 into the Artcard reader 10 and utilize button 19 to take a picture of the image 3 resulting in a corresponding distorted output image 8.
The camera unit 1 can also include a number of other control button 13, 14 in addition to a simple LCD output display 15 for the display of informative information including the number of printouts left on the internal print roll on the camera unit. Additionally, different output formats can be controlled by CHP switch 17.
Turning now to
Artcam Central Processor 31
The Artcam central processor 31 provides many functions which form the ‘heart’ of the system. The ACP 31 is preferably implemented as a complex, high speed, CMOS system on-a-chip. Utilising standard cell design with some full custom regions is recommended. Fabrication on a 0.25 micron CMOS process will provide the density and speed required, along with a reasonably small die area.
The functions provided by the ACP 31 include:
1. Control and digitization of the area image sensor 2. A 3D stereoscopic version of the ACP requires two area image sensor interfaces with a second optional image sensor 4 being provided for stereoscopic effects.
2. Area image sensor compensation, reformatting, and image enhancement.
3. Memory interface and management to a memory store 33.
4. Interface, control, and analog to digital conversion of an Artcard reader linear image sensor 34 which is provided for the reading of data from the Artcards 9.
5. Extraction of the raw Artcard data from the digitized and encoded Artcard image.
6. Reed-Solomon error detection and correction of the Artcard encoded data. The encoded surface of the Artcard 9 includes information on how to process an image to produce the effects displayed on the image distorted surface of the Artcard 9. This information is in the form of a script, hereinafter known as a “Vark script”. The Vark script is utilised by an interpreter running within the ACP 31 to produce the desired effect.
7. Interpretation of the Vark script on the Artcard 9.
8. Performing image processing operations as specified by the Vark script.
9. Controlling various motors for the paper transport 36, zoom lens 38, autofocus 39 and Artcard driver 37.
10. Controlling a guillotine actuator 40 for the operation of a guillotine 41 for the cutting of photographs 8 from print roll 42.
11. Half-toning of the image data for printing.
12. Providing the print data to a print-head 44 at the appropriate times.
13. Controlling the print head 44.
14. Controlling the ink pressure feed to print-head 44.
15. Controlling optional flash unit 56.
16. Reading and acting on various sensors in the camera, including camera orientation sensor 46, autofocus 47 and Artcard insertion sensor 49.
17. Reading and acting on the user interface buttons 6, 13, 14.
18. Controlling the status display 15.
19. Providing viewfinder and preview images to the color display 5.
20. Control of the system power consumption, including the ACP power consumption via power management circuit 51.
21. Providing external communications 52 to general purpose computers (using part USB).
22. Reading and storing information in a printing roll authentication chip 53.
23. Reading and storing information in a camera authentication chip 54.
24. Communicating with an optional mini-keyboard 57 for text modification.
Quartz Crystal 58
A quartz crystal 58 is used as a frequency reference for the system clock. As the system clock is very high, the ACP 31 includes a phase locked loop clock circuit to increase the frequency derived from the crystal 58.
Area Image Sensor 2
The area image sensor 2 converts an image through its lens into an electrical signal. It can either be a charge coupled device (CCD) or an active pixel sensor (APS)CMOS image sector. At present, available CCD's normally have a higher image quality, however, there is currently much development occurring in CMOS imagers. CMOS imagers are eventually expected to be substantially cheaper than CCD's have smaller pixel areas, and be able to incorporate drive circuitry and signal processing. They can also be made in CMOS fabs, which are transitioning to 12″ wafers. CCD's are usually built in 6″ wafer fabs, and economics may not allow a conversion to 12″ fabs. Therefore, the difference in fabrication cost between CCD's and CMOS imagers is likely to increase, progressively favoring CMOS imagers. However, at present, a CCD is probably the best option.
The Artcam unit will produce suitable results with a 1,500×1,000 area image sensor. However, smaller sensors, such as 750×500, will be adequate for many markets. The Artcam is less sensitive to image sensor resolution than are conventional digital cameras. This is because many of the styles contained on Artcards 9 process the image in such a way as to obscure the lack of resolution. For example, if the image is distorted to simulate the effect of being converted to an impressionistic painting, low source image resolution can be used with minimal effect. Further examples for which low resolution input images will typically not be noticed include image warps which produce high distorted images, multiple miniature copies of the of the image (eg. passport photos), textural processing such as bump mapping for a base relief metal look, and photo-compositing into structured scenes.
This tolerance of low resolution image sensors may be a significant factor in reducing the manufacturing cost of an Artcam unit 1 camera. An Artcam with a low cost 750×500 image sensor will often produce superior results to a conventional digital camera with a much more expensive 1,500×1,000 image sensor.
Optional Stereoscopic 3D Image Sensor 4
The 3D versions of the Artcam unit 1 have an additional image sensor 4, for stereoscopic operation. This image sensor is identical to the main image sensor. The circuitry to drive the optional image sensor may be included as a standard part of the ACP chip 31 to reduce incremental design cost. Alternatively, a separate 3D Artcam ACP can be designed. This option will reduce the manufacturing cost of a mainstream single sensor Artcam.
Print Roll Authentication Chip 53
A small chip 53 is included in each print roll 42. This chip replaced the functions of the bar code, optical sensor and wheel, and ISO/ASA sensor on other forms of camera film units such as Advanced Photo Systems film cartridges.
The authentication chip also provides other features:
1. The storage of data rather than that which is mechanically and optically sensed from APS rolls
2. A remaining media length indication, accurate to high resolution.
3. Authentication Information to prevent inferior clone print roll copies.
The authentication chip 53 contains 1024 bits of Flash memory, of which 128 bits is an authentication key, and 512 bits is the authentication information. Also included is an encryption circuit to ensure that the authentication key cannot be accessed directly.
The Artcam unit 1 can utilize any color print technology which is small enough, low enough power, fast enough, high enough quality, and low enough cost, and is compatible with the print roll. Relevant printheads will be specifically discussed hereinafter.
The specifications of the ink jet head are:
Image type Bi-level, dithered Color CMY Process Color Resolution 1600 dpi Print head length ‘Page-width’ (100 mm) Print speed 2 seconds per photo
Optional Ink Pressure Controller (not Shown)
The function of the ink pressure controller depends upon the type of ink jet print head 44 incorporated in the Artcam. For some types of ink jet, the use of an ink pressure controller can be eliminated, as the ink pressure is simply atmospheric pressure. Other types of print head require a regulated positive ink pressure. In this case, the in pressure controller consists of a pump and pressure transducer.
Other print heads may require an ultrasonic transducer to cause regular oscillations in the ink pressure, typically at frequencies around 100 KHz. In the case, the ACP 31 controls the frequency phase and amplitude of these oscillations.
Paper Transport Motor 36
The paper transport motor 36 moves the paper from within the print roll 42 past the print head at a relatively constant rate. The motor 36 is a miniature motor geared down to an appropriate speed to drive rollers which move the paper. A high quality motor and mechanical gears are required to achieve high image quality, as mechanical rumble or other vibrations will affect the printed dot row spacing.
Paper Transport Motor Driver 60
The motor driver 60 is a small circuit which amplifies the digital motor control signals from the APC 31 to levels suitable for driving the motor 36.
Paper Pull Sensor
A paper pull sensor 50 detects a user's attempt to pull a photo from the camera unit during the printing process. The APC 31 reads this sensor 50, and activates the guillotine 41 if the condition occurs. The paper pull sensor 50 is incorporated to make the camera more ‘foolproof’ in operation. Were the user to pull the paper out forcefully during printing, the print mechanism 44 or print roll 42 may (in extreme cases) be damaged. Since it is acceptable to pull out the ‘pod’ from a Polaroid type camera before it is fully ejected, the public has been ‘trained’ to do this. Therefore, they are unlikely to heed printed instructions not to pull the paper.
The Artcam preferably restarts the photo print process after the guillotine 41 has cut the paper after pull sensing.
The pull sensor can be implemented as a strain gauge sensor, or as an optical sensor detecting a small plastic flag which is deflected by the torque that occurs on the paper drive rollers when the paper is pulled. The latter implementation is recommendation for low cost.
Paper Guillotine Actuator 40
The paper guillotine actuator 40 is a small actuator which causes the guillotine 41 to cut the paper either at the end of a photograph, or when the paper pull sensor 50 is activated.
The guillotine actuator 40 is a small circuit which amplifies a guillotine control signal from the APC tot the level required by the actuator 41.
The Artcard 9 is a program storage medium for the Artcam unit. As noted previously, the programs are in the form of Vark scripts. Vark is a powerful image processing language especially developed for the Artcam unit. Each Artcard 9 contains one Vark script, and thereby defines one image processing style.
Preferably, the VARK language is highly image processing specific. By being highly image processing specific, the amount of storage required to store the details on the card are substantially reduced. Further, the ease with which new programs can be created, including enhanced effects, is also substantially increased. Preferably, the language includes facilities for handling many image processing functions including image warping via a warp map, convolution, color lookup tables, posterizing an image, adding noise to an image, image enhancement filters, painting algorithms, brush jittering and manipulation edge detection filters, tiling, illumination via light sources, bump maps, text, face detection and object detection attributes, fonts, including three dimensional fonts, and arbitrary complexity pre-rendered icons. Further details of the operation of the Vark language interpreter are contained hereinafter.
Hence, by utilizing the language constructs as defined by the created language, new affects on arbitrary images can be created and constructed for inexpensive storage on Artcard and subsequent distribution to camera owners. Further, on one surface of the card can be provided an example illustrating the effect that a particular VARK script, stored on the other surface of the card, will have on an arbitrary captured image.
By utilizing such a system, camera technology can be distributed without a great fear of obsolescence in that, provided a VARK interpreter is incorporated in the camera device, a device independent scenario is provided whereby the underlying technology can be completely varied over time. Further, the VARK scripts can be updated as new filters are created and distributed in an inexpensive manner, such as via simple cards for card reading.
The Artcard 9 is a piece of thin white plastic with the same format as a credit card (86 mm long by 54 mm wide). The Artcard is printed on both sides using a high resolution ink jet printer. The inkjet printer technology is assumed to be the same as that used in the Artcam, with 1600 dpi (63 dpmm) resolution. A major feature of the Artcard 9 is low manufacturing cost. Artcards can be manufactured at high speeds as a wide web of plastic film. The plastic web is coated on both sides with a hydrophilic dye fixing layer. The web is printed simultaneously on both sides using a ‘pagewidth’ color ink jet printer. The web is then cut and punched into individual cards. On one face of the card is printed a human readable representation of the effect the Artcard 9 will have on the sensed image. This can be simply a standard image which has been processed using the Vark script stored on the back face of the card.
On the back face of the card is printed an array of dots which can be decoded into the Vark script that defines the image processing sequence. The print area is 80 mm×50 mm, giving a total of 15,876,000 dots. This array of dots could represent at least 1.89 Mbytes of data. To achieve high reliability, extensive error detection and correction is incorporated in the array of dots. This allows a substantial portion of the card to be defaced, worn, creased, or dirty with no effect on data integrity. The data coding used is Reed-Solomon coding, with half of the data devoted to error correction. This allows the storage of 967 Kbytes of error corrected data on each Artcard 9.
Linear Image Sensor 34
The Artcard linear sensor 34 converts the aforementioned Artcard data image to electrical signals. As with the area image sensor 2, 4, the linear image sensor can be fabricated using either CCD or APS CMOS technology. The active length of the image sensor 34 is 50 mm, equal to the width of the data array on the Artcard 9. To satisfy Nyquist's sampling theorem, the resolution of the linear image sensor 34 must be at least twice the highest spatial frequency of the Artcard optical image reaching the image sensor. In practice, data detection is easier if the image sensor resolution is substantially above this. A resolution of 4800 dpi (189 dpmm) is chosen, giving a total of 9,450 pixels. This resolution requires a pixel sensor pitch of 5.3 μm. This can readily be achieved by using four staggered rows of 20 μm pixel sensors.
The linear image sensor is mounted in a special package which includes a LED 65 to illuminate the Artcard 9 via a light-pipe (not shown).
The Artcard reader light-pipe can be a molded light-pipe which has several function:
1. It diffuses the light from the LED over the width of the card using total internal reflection facets.
2. It focuses the light onto a 16 μm wide strip of the Artcard 9 using an integrated cylindrical lens.
3. It focuses light reflected from the Artcard onto the linear image sensor pixels using a molded array of microlenses.
The operation of the Artcard reader is explained further hereinafter.
Artcard Reader Motor 37
The Artcard reader motor propels the Artcard past the linear image sensor 34 at a relatively constant rate. As it may not be cost effective to include extreme precision mechanical components in the Artcard reader, the motor 37 is a standard miniature motor geared down to an appropriate speed to drive a pair of rollers which move the Artcard 9. The speed variations, rumble, and other vibrations will affect the raw image data as circuitry within the APC 31 includes extensive compensation for these effects to reliably read the Artcard data.
The motor 37 is driven in reverse when the Artcard is to be ejected.
Artcard Motor Driver 61
The Artcard motor driver 61 is a small circuit which amplifies the digital motor control signals from the APC 31 to levels suitable for driving the motor 37.
Card Insertion Sensor 49
The card insertion sensor 49 is an optical sensor which detects the presence of a card as it is being inserted in the card reader 34. Upon a signal from this sensor 49, the APC 31 initiates the card reading process, including the activation of the Artcard reader motor 37.
Card Eject Button 16
A card eject button 16 (
Card Status Indicator 66
A card status indicator 66 is provided to signal the user as to the status of the Artcard reading process. This can be a standard bi-color (red/green) LED. When the card is successfully read, and data integrity has been verified, the LED lights up green continually. If the card is faulty, then the LED lights up red.
If the camera is powered from a 1.5 V instead of 3V battery, then the power supply voltage is less than the forward voltage drop of the greed LED, and the LED will not light. In this case, red LEDs can be used, or the LED can be powered from a voltage pump which also powers other circuits in the Artcam which require higher voltage.
64 Mbit DRAM 33
To perform the wide variety of image processing effects, the camera utilizes 8 Mbytes of memory 33. This can be provided by a single 64 Mbit memory chip. Of course, with changing memory technology increased Dram storage sizes may be substituted.
High speed access to the memory chip is required. This can be achieved by using a Rambus DRAM (burst access rate of 500 Mbytes per second) or chips using the new open standards such as double data rate (DDR) SDRAM or Synclink DRAM.
Camera Authentication Chip
The camera authentication chip 54 is identical to the print roll authentication chip 53, except that it has different information stored in it. The camera authentication chip 54 has three main purposes:
1. To provide a secure means of comparing authentication codes with the print roll authentication chip;
2. To provide storage for manufacturing information, such as the serial number of the camera;
3. To provide a small amount of non-volatile memory for storage of user information.
The Artcam includes an optional color display 5 and small status display 15. Lowest cost consumer cameras may include a color image display, such as a small TFT LCD 5 similar to those found on some digital cameras and camcorders. The color display 5 is a major cost element of these versions of Artcam, and the display 5 plus back light are a major power consumption drain.
Status Display 15
The status display 15 is a small passive segment based LCD, similar to those currently provided on silver halide and digital cameras. Its main function is to show the number of prints remaining in the print roll 42 and icons for various standard camera features, such as flash and battery status.
Color Display 5
The color display 5 is a full motion image display which operates as a viewfinder, as a verification of the image to be printed, and as a user interface display. The cost of the display 5 is approximately proportional to its area, so large displays (say 4″ diagonal) unit will be restricted to expensive versions of the Artcam unit. Smaller displays, such as color camcorder viewfinder TFT's at around 1″, may be effective for mid-range Artcams.
Zoom Lens (not Shown)
The Artcam can include a zoom lens. This can be a standard electronically controlled zoom lens, identical to one which would be used on a standard electronic camera, and similar to pocket camera zoom lenses. A referred version of the Artcam unit may include standard interchangeable 35 mm SLR lenses.
Autofocus Motor 39
The autofocus motor 39 changes the focus of the zoom lens. The motor is a miniature motor geared down to an appropriate speed to drive the autofocus mechanism.
Autofocus Motor Driver 63
The autofocus motor driver 63 is a small circuit which amplifies the digital motor control signals from the APC 31 to levels suitable for driving the motor 39.
Zoom Motor 38
The zoom motor 38 moves the zoom front lenses in and out. The motor is a miniature motor geared down to an appropriate speed to drive the zoom mechanism.
Zoom Motor Driver 62
The zoom motor driver 62 is a small circuit which amplifies the digital motor control signals from the APC 31 to levels suitable for driving the motor.
The ACP 31 contains a universal serial bus (USB) interface 52 for communication with personal computers. Not all Artcam models are intended to include the USB connector. However, the silicon area required for a USB circuit 52 is small, so the interface can be included in the standard ACP.
Optional Keyboard 57
The Artcam unit may include an optional miniature keyboard 57 for customizing text specified by the Artcard. Any text appearing in an Artcard image may be editable, even if it is in a complex metallic 3D font. The miniature keyboard includes a single line alphanumeric LCD to display the original text and edited text. The keyboard may be a standard accessory.
The ACP 31 contains a serial communications circuit for transferring data to and from the miniature keyboard.
The Artcam unit uses a battery 48. Depending upon the Artcam options, this is either a 3V Lithium cell, 1.5 V AA alkaline cells, or other battery arrangement.
Power Management Unit 51
Power consumption is an important design constraint in the Artcam. It is desirable that either standard camera batteries (such as 3V lithium batters) or standard AA or AAA alkaline cells can be used. While the electronic complexity of the Artcam unit is dramatically higher than 35 mm photographic cameras, the power consumption need not be commensurately higher. Power in the Artcam can be carefully managed with all unit being turned off when not in use.
The most significant current drains are the ACP 31, the area image sensors 2,4, the printer 44 various motors, the flash unit 56, and the optional color display 5 dealing with each part separately:
1. ACP: If fabricated using 0.25 μm CMOS, and running on 1.5V, the ACP power consumption can be quite low. Clocks to various parts of the ACP chip can be quite low. Clocks to various parts of the ACP chip can be turned off when not in use, virtually eliminating standby current consumption. The ACP will only fully used for approximately 4 seconds for each photograph printed.
2. Area image sensor: power is only supplied to the area image sensor when the user has their finger on the button.
3. The printer power is only supplied to the printer when actually printing. This is for around 2 seconds for each photograph. Even so, suitably lower power consumption printing should be used.
4. The motors required in the Artcam are all low power miniature motors, and are typically only activated for a few seconds per photo.
5. The flash unit 45 is only used for some photographs. Its power consumption can readily be provided by a 3V lithium battery for a reasonably battery life.
6. The optional color display 5 is a major current drain for two reasons: it must be on for the whole time that the camera is in use, and a backlight will be required if a liquid crystal display is used. Cameras which incorporate a color display will require a larger battery to achieve acceptable batter life.
Flash Unit 56
The flash unit 56 can be a standard miniature electronic flash for consumer cameras.
Overview of the ACP 31
As stated previously, the DRAM Interface 81 is responsible for interfacing between other client portions of the ACP chip and the RAMBUS DRAM. In effect, each module within the DRAM Interface is an address generator.
There are three logical types of images manipulated by the ACP. They are:
Print Image—the Output Image format printed by the Artcam
These images are typically different in color space, resolution, and the output & input color spaces which can vary from camera to camera. For example, a CCD image on a low-end camera may be a different resolution, or have different color characteristics from that used in a high-end camera. However all internal image formats are the same format in terms of color space across all cameras.
In addition, the three image types can vary with respect to which direction is ‘up’. The physical orientation of the camera causes the notion of a portrait or landscape image, and this must be maintained throughout processing. For this reason, the internal image is always oriented correctly, and rotation is performed on images obtained from the CCD and during the print operation.
CPU Core (CPU) 72
The ACP 31 incorporates a 32 bit RISC CPU 72 to run the Vark image processing language interpreter and to perform Artcam's general operating system duties. A wide variety of CPU cores are suitable: it can be any processor core with sufficient processing power to perform the required core calculations and control functions fast enough to met consumer expectations. Examples of suitable cores are: MIPS R4000 core from LSI Logic, StrongARM core. There is no need to maintain instruction set continuity between different Artcam models. Artcard compatibility is maintained irrespective of future processor advances and changes, because the Vark interpreter is simply re-compiled for each new instruction set. The ACP 31 architecture is therefore also free to evolve. Different ACP 31 chip designs may be fabricated by different manufacturers, without requiring to license or port the CPU core. This device independence avoids the chip vendor lock-in such as has occurred in the PC market with Intel. The CPU operates at 100 MHz, with a single cycle time of 10 ns. It must be fast enough to run the Vark interpreter, although the VLIW Vector Processor 74 is responsible for most of the time-critical operations.
Program Cache 72
Although the program code is stored in on-chip Flash memory 70, it is unlikely that well packed Flash memory 70 will be able to operate at the 10 ns cycle time required by the CPU. Consequently a small cache is required for good performance. 16 cache lines of 32 bytes each are sufficient, for a total of 512 bytes. The program cache 72 is defined in the chapter entitled Program cache 72.
Data Cache 76
A small data cache 76 is required for good performance. This requirement is mostly due to the use of a RAMbus DRAM, which can provide high-speed data in bursts, but is inefficient for single byte accesses. The CPU has access to a memory caching system that allows flexible manipulation of CPU data cache 76 sizes. A minimum of 16 cache lines (512 bytes) is recommended for good performance.
CPU Memory Model
An Artcam's CPU memory model consists of a 32 MB area. It consists of 8 MB of physical RDRAM off-chip in the base model of Artcam, with provision for up to 16 MB of off-chip memory. There is a 4 MB Flash memory 70 on the ACP 31 for program storage, and finally a 4 MB address space mapped to the various registers and controls of the ACP 31. The memory map then, for an Artcam is as follows:
Base Artcam DRAM
Program memory (on ACP 31 in Flash memory 70)
Reserved for extension of program memory
ACP 31 registers and memory-mapped I/O
A straightforward way of decoding addresses is to use address bits 23-24:
The ACP 31 contains a 4 Mbyte Flash memory 70 for storing the Artcam program. It is envisaged that Flash memory 70 will have denser packing coefficients than masked ROM, and allows for greater flexibility for testing camera program code. The downside of the Flash memory 70 is the access time, which is unlikely to be fast enough for the 100 MHz operating speed (10 ns cycle time) of the CPU. A fast Program Instruction cache 77 therefore acts as the interface between the CPU and the slower Flash memory 70.
Program Cache 72
A small cache is required for good CPU performance. This requirement is due to the slow speed Flash memory 70 which stores the Program code. 16 cache lines of 32 bytes each are sufficient, for a total of 512 bytes. The Program cache 72 is a read only cache. The data used by CPU programs comes through the CPU Memory Decoder 68 and if the address is in DRAM, through the general Data cache 76. The separation allows the CPU to operate independently of the VLIW Vector Processor 74. If the data requirements are low for a given process, it can consequently operate completely out of cache.
Finally, the Program cache 72 can be read as data by the CPU rather than purely as program instructions. This allows tables, microcode for the VLIW etc to be loaded from the Flash memory 70. Addresses with bit 24 set and bit 23 clear are satisfied from the Program cache 72.
CPU Memory Decoder 68
The CPU Memory Decoder 68 is a simple decoder for satisfying CPU data accesses. The Decoder translates data addresses into internal ACP register accesses over the internal low speed bus, and therefore allows for memory mapped I/O of ACP registers. The CPU Memory Decoder 68 only interprets addresses that have bit 24 set and bit 23 clear. There is no caching in the CPU Memory Decoder 68.
DRAM Interface 81
The DRAM used by the Artcam is a single channel 64 Mbit (8 MB) RAMbus RDRAM operating at 1.6 GB/sec. RDRAM accesses are by a single channel (16-bit data path) controller. The RDRAM also has several useful operating modes for low power operation. Although the Rambus specification describes a system with random 32 byte transfers as capable of achieving a greater than 95% efficiency, this is not true if only part of the 32 bytes are used. Two reads followed by two writes to the same device yields over 86% efficiency. The primary latency is required for bus turn-around going from a Write to a Read, and since there is a Delayed Write mechanism, efficiency can be further improved. With regards to writes, Write Masks allow specific subsets of bytes to be written to. These write masks would be set via internal cache “dirty bits”. The upshot of the Rambus Direct RDRAM is a throughput of >1 GB/sec is easily achievable, and with multiple reads for every write (most processes) combined with intelligent algorithms making good use of 32 byte transfer knowledge, transfer rates of >1.3 GB/sec are expected. Every 10 ns, 16 bytes can be transferred to or from the core.
Data Cache 76
The ACP 31 contains a dedicated CPU instruction cache 77 and a general data cache 76. The Data cache 76 handles all DRAM requests (reads and writes of data) from the CPU, the VLIW Vector Processor 74, and the Display Controller 88. These requests may have very different profiles in terms of memory usage and algorithmic timing requirements. For example, a VLIW process may be processing an image in linear memory, and lookup a value in a table for each value in the image. There is little need to cache much of the image, but it may be desirable to cache the entire lookup table so that no real memory access is required. Because of these differing requirements, the Data cache 76 allows for an intelligent definition of caching.
Although the Rambus DRAM interface 81 is capable of very high-speed memory access (an average throughput of 32 bytes in 25 ns), it is not efficient dealing with single byte requests. In order to reduce effective memory latency, the ACP 31 contains 128 cache lines. Each cache line is 32 bytes wide. Thus the total amount of data cache 76 is 4096 bytes (4 KB). The 128 cache lines are configured into 16 programmable-sized groups. Each of the 16 groups must be a contiguous set of cache lines. The CPU is responsible for determining how many cache lines to allocate to each group. Within each group cache lines are filled according to a simple Least Recently Used algorithm. In terms of CPU data requests, the Data cache 76 handles memory access requests that have address bit 24 clear. If bit 24 is clear, the address is in the lower 16 MB range, and hence can be satisfied from DRAM and the Data cache 76. In most cases the DRAM will only be 8 MB, but 16 MB is allocated to cater for a higher memory model Artcam. If bit 24 is set, the address is ignored by the Data cache 76.
All CPU data requests are satisfied from Cache Group 0. A minimum of 16 cache lines is recommended for good CPU performance, although the CPU can assign any number of cache lines (except none) to Cache Group 0. The remaining Cache Groups (1 to 15) are allocated according to the current requirements. This could mean allocation to a VLIW Vector Processor 74 program or the Display Controller 88. For example, a 256 byte lookup table required to be permanently available would require 8 cache lines. Writing out a sequential image would only require 2-4 cache lines (depending on the size of record being generated and whether write requests are being Write Delayed for a significant number of cycles). Associated with each cache line byte is a dirty bit, used for creating a Write Mask when writing memory to DRAM. Associated with each cache line is another dirty bit, which indicates whether any of the cache line bytes has been written to (and therefore the cache line must be written back to DRAM before it can be reused). Note that it is possible for two different Cache Groups to be accessing the same address in memory and to get out of sync. The VLIW program writer is responsible to ensure that this is not an issue. It could be perfectly reasonable, for example, to have a Cache Group responsible for reading an image, and another Cache Group responsible for writing the changed image back to memory again. If the images are read or written sequentially there may be advantages in allocating cache lines in this manner. A total of 8 buses 182 connect the VLIW Vector Processor 74 to the Data cache 76. Each bus is connected to an I/O Address Generator. (There are 2 I/O Address Generators 189, 190 per Processing Unit 178, and there are 4 Processing Units in the VLIW Vector Processor 74. The total number of buses is therefore 8.)
In any given cycle, in addition to a single 32 bit (4 byte) access to the CPU's cache group (Group 0), 4 simultaneous accesses of 16 bits (2 bytes) to remaining cache groups are permitted on the 8 VLIW Vector Processor 74 buses. The Data cache 76 is responsible for fairly processing the requests. On a given cycle, no more than 1 request to a specific Cache Group will be processed. Given that there are 8 Address Generators 189, 190 in the VLIW Vector Processor 74, each one of these has the potential to refer to an individual Cache Group. However it is possible and occasionally reasonable for 2 or more Address Generators 189, 190 to access the same Cache Group. The CPU is responsible for ensuring that the Cache Groups have been allocated the correct number of cache lines, and that the various Address Generators 189, 190 in the VLIW Vector Processor 74 reference the specific Cache Groups correctly.
The Data cache 76 as described allows for the Display Controller 88 and VLIW Vector Processor 74 to be active simultaneously. If the operation of these two components were deemed to never occur simultaneously, a total 9 Cache Groups would suffice. The CPU would use Cache Group 0, and the VLIW Vector Processor 74 and the Display Controller 88 would share the remaining 8 Cache Groups, requiring only 3 bits (rather than 4) to define which Cache Group would satisfy a particular request.
JTAG Interface 85
A standard JTAG (Joint Test Action Group) Interface is included in the ACP 31 for testing purposes. Due to the complexity of the chip, a variety of testing techniques are required, including BIST (Built In Self Test) and functional block isolation. An overhead of 10% in chip area is assumed for overall chip testing circuitry. The test circuitry is beyond the scope of this document.
USB Serial Port Interface 52
This is a standard USB serial port, which is connected to the internal chip low speed bus, thereby allowing the CPU to control it.
Keyboard Interface 65
This is a standard low-speed serial port, which is connected to the internal chip low speed bus, thereby allowing the CPU to control it. It is designed to be optionally connected to a keyboard to allow simple data input to customize prints.
Authentication Chip Serial Interfaces 64
These are 2 standard low-speed serial ports, which are connected to the internal chip low speed bus, thereby allowing the CPU to control them. The reason for having 2 ports is to connect to both the on-camera Authentication chip, and to the print-roll Authentication chip using separate lines. Only using 1 line may make it possible for a clone print-roll manufacturer to design a chip which, instead of generating an authentication code, tricks the camera into using the code generated by the authentication chip in the camera.
Parallel Interface 67
The parallel interface connects the ACP 31 to individual static electrical signals. The CPU is able to control each of these connections as memory-mapped I/O via the low speed bus The following table is a list of connections to the parallel interface:
Connection Direction Pins Paper transport stepper motor Out 4 Artcard stepper motor Out 4 Zoom stepper motor Out 4 Guillotine motor Out 1 Flash trigger Out 1 Status LCD segment drivers Out 7 Status LCD common drivers Out 4 Artcard illumination LED Out 1 Artcard status LED (red/green) In 2 Artcard sensor In 1 Paper pull sensor In 1 Orientation sensor In 2 Buttons In 4 TOTAL 36
VLIW Input and Output FIFOs 78, 79
The VLIW Input and Output FIFOs are 8 bit wide FIFOs used for communicating between processes and the VLIW Vector Processor 74. Both FIFOs are under the control of the VLIW Vector Processor 74, but can be cleared and queried (e.g. for status) etc by the CPU.
VLIW Input FIFO 78
A client writes 8-bit data to the VLIW Input FIFO 78 in order to have the data processed by the VLIW Vector Processor 74. Clients include the Image Sensor Interface, Artcard Interface, and CPU. Each of these processes is able to offload processing by simply writing the data to the FIFO, and letting the VLIW Vector Processor 74 do all the hard work. An example of the use of a client's use of the VLIW Input FIFO 78 is the Image Sensor Interface (ISI 83). The ISI 83 takes data from the Image Sensor and writes it to the FIFO. A VLIW process takes it from the FIFO, transforming it into the correct image data format, and writing it out to DRAM. The ISI 83 becomes much simpler as a result.
VLIW Output FIFO 79
The VLIW Vector Processor 74 writes 8-bit data to the VLIW Output FIFO 79 where clients can read it. Clients include the Print Head Interface and the CPU. Both of these clients is able to offload processing by simply reading the already processed data from the FIFO, and letting the VLIW Vector Processor 74 do all the hard work. The CPU can also be interrupted whenever data is placed into the VLIW Output FIFO 79, allowing it to only process the data as it becomes available rather than polling the FIFO continuously. An example of the use of a client's use of the VLIW Output FIFO 79 is the Print Head Interface (PHI 62). A VLIW process takes an image, rotates it to the correct orientation, color converts it, and dithers the resulting image according to the print head requirements. The PHI 62 reads the dithered formatted 8-bit data from the VLIW Output FIFO 79 and simply passes it on to the Print Head external to the ACP 31. The PHI 62 becomes much simpler as a result.
VLIW Vector Processor 74
To achieve the high processing requirements of Artcam, the ACP 31 contains a VLIW (Very Long Instruction Word) Vector Processor. The VLIW processor is a set of 4 identical Processing Units (PU e.g 178) working in parallel, connected by a crossbar switch 183. Each PU e.g 178 can perform four 8-bit multiplications, eight 8-bit additions, three 32-bit additions, I/O processing, and various logical operations in each cycle. The PUs e.g 178 are microcoded, and each has two Address Generators 189, 190 to allow full use of available cycles for data processing. The four PUs e.g 178 are normally synchronized to provide a tightly interacting VLIW processor. Clocking at 200 MHz, the VLIW Vector Processor 74 runs at 12 Gops (12 billion operations per second). Instructions are tuned for image processing functions such as warping, artistic brushing, complex synthetic illumination, color transforms, image filtering, and compositing. These are accelerated by two orders of magnitude over desktop computers.
As shown in more detail in
Each PU e.g 178 consists of an ALU 188 (containing a number of registers & some arithmetic logic for processing data), some microcode RAM 196, and connections to the outside world (including other ALUs). A local PU state machine runs in microcode and is the means by which the PU e.g 178 is controlled. Each PU e.g 178 contains two I/O Address Generators 189, 190 controlling data flow between DRAM (via the Data cache 76) and the ALU 188 (via Input FIFO and Output FIFO). The address generator is able to read and write data (specifically images in a variety of formats) as well as tables and simulated FIFOs in DRAM. The formats are customizable under software control, but are not microcoded. Data taken from the Data cache 76 is transferred to the ALU 188 via the 16-bit wide Input FIFO. Output data is written to the 16-bit wide Output FIFO and from there to the Data cache 76. Finally, all PUs e.g 178 share a single 8-bit wide VLIW Input FIFO 78 and a single 8-bit wide VLIW Output FIFO 79. The low speed data bus connection allows the CPU to read and write registers in the PU e.g 178, update microcode, as well as the common registers shared by all PUs e.g 178 in the VLIW Vector Processor 74. Turning now to
Each PU e.g 178 contains a microcode RAM 196 to hold the program for that particular PU e.g 178. Rather than have the microcode in ROM, the microcode is in RAM, with the CPU responsible for loading it up. For the same space on chip, this tradeoff reduces the maximum size of any one function to the size of the RAM, but allows an unlimited number of functions to be written in microcode. Functions implemented using microcode include Vark acceleration, Artcard reading, and Printing. The VLIW Vector Processor 74 scheme has several advantages for the case of the ACP 31:
Size and Content
The CPU loaded microcode RAM 196 for controlling each PU e.g 178 is 128 words, with each word being 96 bits wide. A summary of the microcode size for control of various units of the PU e.g 178 is listed in the following table:
Branching (microcode control)
With 128 instruction words, the total microcode RAM 196 per PU e.g 178 is 12,288 bits, or 1.5 KB exactly. Since the VLIW Vector Processor 74 consists of 4 identical PUs e.g 178 this equates to 6,144 bytes, exactly 6 KB. Some of the bits in a microcode word are directly used as control bits, while others are decoded. See the various unit descriptions that detail the interpretation of each of the bits of the microcode word.
Synchronization Between PUs e.g 178
Each PU e.g 178 contains a 4 bit Synchronization Register 197. It is a mask used to determine which PUs e.g 178 work together, and has one bit set for each of the corresponding PUs e.g 178 that are functioning as a single process. For example, if all of the PUs e.g 178 were functioning as a single process, each of the 4 Synchronization Register 197s would have all 4 bits set. If there were two asynchronous processes of 2 PUs e.g 178 each, two of the PUs e.g 178 would have 2 bits set in their Synchronization Register 197s (corresponding to themselves), and the other two would have the other 2 bits set in their Synchronization Register 197s (corresponding to themselves).
The Synchronization Register 197 is used in two basic ways:
The CPU is responsible for loading the microcode RAM 196 and loading the execution address for the first instruction (usually 0). When the CPU starts executing microcode, it begins at the specified address.
Execution of microcode only occurs when all the bits of the Synchronization Register 197 are also set in the Common Synchronization Register 197. The CPU therefore sets up all the PUs e.g 178 and then starts or stops processes with a single write to the Common Synchronization Register 197.
This synchronization scheme allows multiple processes to be running asynchronously on the PUs e.g 178, being stopped and started as processes rather than one PU e.g 178 at a time.
Suspending Execution within a Process
In a given cycle, a PU e.g 178 may need to read from or write to a FIFO (based on the opcode of the current microcode instruction). If the FIFO is empty on a read request, or full on a write request, the FIFO request cannot be completed. The PU e.g 178 will therefore assert its SuspendProcess control signal 198. The SuspendProcess signals from all PUs e.g 178 are fed back to all the PUs e.g 178. The Synchronization Register 197 is ANDed with the 4 SuspendProcess bits, and if the result is non-zero, none of the PU e.g 178's register WriteEnables or FIFO strobes will be set. Consequently none of the PUs e.g 178 that form the same process group as the PU e.g 178 that was unable to complete its task will have their registers or FIFOs updated during that cycle. This simple technique keeps a given process group in synchronization. Each subsequent cycle the PU e.g 178's state machine will attempt to re-execute the microcode instruction at the same address, and will continue to do so until successful. Of course the Common Synchronization Register 197 can be written to by the CPU to stop the entire process if necessary. This synchronization scheme allows any combinations of PUs e.g 178 to work together, each group only affecting its co-workers with regards to suspension due to data not being ready for reading or writing.
Control and Branching
During each cycle, each of the four basic input and calculation units within a PU e.g 178's ALU 188 (Read, Adder/Logic, Multiply/Interpolate, and Barrel Shifter) produces two status bits: a Zero flag and a Negative flag indicating whether the result of the operation during that cycle was 0 or negative. Each cycle one of those 4 status bits is chosen by microcode instructions to be output from the PU e.g 178. The 4 status bits (1 per PU e.g 178's ALU 188) are combined into a 4 bit Common Status Register 200. During the next cycle, each PU e.g 178's microcode program can select one of the bits from the Common Status Register 200, and branch to another microcode address dependant on the value of the status bit.
Each PU e.g 178's ALU 188 contains a number of input and calculation units. Each unit produces 2 status bits—a negative flag and a zero flag. One of these status bits is output from the PU e.g 178 when a particular unit asserts the value on the 1-bit tri-state status bit bus. The single status bit is output from the PU e.g 178, and then combined with the other PU e.g 178 status bits to update the Common Status Register 200. The microcode for determining the output status bit takes the following form:
Select unit whose status bit is to be output
00 = Adder unit
01 = Multiply/Logic unit
10 = Barrel Shift unit
11 = Reader unit
0 = Zero flag
1 = Negative flag
Within the ALU 188, the 2-bit Select Processor Block value is decoded into four 1-bit enable bits, with a different enable bit sent to each processor unit block. The status select bit (choosing Zero or Negative) is passed into all units to determine which bit is to be output onto the status bit bus.
Branching Within Microcode
Each PU e.g 178 contains a 7 bit Program Counter (PC) that holds the current microcode address being executed. Normal program execution is linear, moving from address N in one cycle to address N+1 in the next cycle. Every cycle however, a microcode program has the ability to branch to a different location, or to test a status bit from the Common Status Register 200 and branch. The microcode for determining the next execution address takes the following form:
# Bits Description 2 00 = NOP (PC = PC + 1) 01 = Branch always 10 = Branch if status bit clear 11 = Branch if status bit set 2 Select status bit from status word 7 Address to branch to (absolute address, 00-7F) 11 TOTAL
Four specialized 32 bit registers hold the results of the 4 main processing blocks:
In addition there are two internal crossbar switches 213 m 214 for data transport. The various process blocks are further expanded in the following sections, together with the microcode definitions that pertain to each block. Note that the microcode is decoded within a block to provide the control signals to the various units within.
Data Transfers Between PUs e.g 178
Each PU e.g 178 is able to exchange data via the external crossbar. A PU e.g 178 takes two inputs and outputs two values to the external crossbar. In this way two operands for processing can be obtained in a single cycle, but cannot be actually used in an operation until the following cycle.
This block is illustrated in
# Bits Description 1 0 = NOP 1 = Load In1 from crossbar 3 Select Input 1 from external crossbar 1 0 = NOP 1 = Load In2 from crossbar 3 Select Input 2 from external crossbar 8 TOTAL
Complementing In is Out 208. The Out block is illustrated in more detail in
0 = NOP
1 = Load Register
Select Register to load [Out1 or Out2]
[In1, In2, Out1, Out2, D0, D1, D2, D3, M, L, S, R, K1, K2, 0, 1]
Local Registers and Data Transfers within ALU 188
As noted previously, the ALU 188 contains four specialized 32-bit registers to hold the results of the 4 main processing blocks:
The CPU has direct access to these registers, and other units can select them as inputs via Crossbar2 214. Sometimes it is necessary to delay an operation for one or more cycles. The Registers block contains four 32-bit registers D0-D3 to hold temporary variables during processing. Each cycle one of the registers can be updated, while all the registers are output for other units to use via Crossbar1 213 (which also includes In1, In2, Out1 and Out2). The CPU has direct access to these registers. The data loaded into the specified register can be one of D0-D3 (selected from Crossbar1 213) one of M, L, S, and R (selected from Crossbar2 214), one of 2 programmable constants, or the fixed values 0 or 1. The Registers block 215 is illustrated in more detail in
# Bits Description 1 0 = NOP 1 = Load Register 2 Select Register to load [D0-D3] 4 Select input [In1, In2, Out1, Out2, D0, D1, D2, D3, M, L, S, R, K1, K2, 0, 1] 7 TOTAL
Crossbar1 213 is illustrated in more detail in
Crossbar2 214 is illustrated in more detail in
Data Transfers Between PUs e.g 178 and DRAM or External Processes
The Read process block 202 of
# Bits Description 2 00 = NOP 01 = Read from VLIW Input FIFO 78 10 = Read from Local FIFO 1 11 = Read from Local FIFO 2 1 How many significant bits 0 = 8 bits (pad with 0 or sign extend) 1 = 16 bits (only valid for Local FIFO reads) 1 0 = Treat data as unsigned (pad with 0) 1 = Treat data as signed (sign extend when reading from FIFO)r 2 How much to shift data left by: 00 = 0 bits (no change) 01 = 8 bits 10 = 16 bits 11 = 24 bits 4 Which bytes of R to update (hi to lo order byte) Each of the 4 bits represents 1 byte WriteEnable on R 10 TOTAL
The Write process block is able to write to either the common VLIW Output FIFO 79 or one of the two local Output FIFOs each cycle. Note that since only 1 FIFO is written to in a given cycle, only one 16-bit value is output to all FIFOs, with the low 8 bits going to the VLIW Output FIFO 79. The microcode controls which of the FIFOs gates in the value. The process of data selection can be seen in more detail in
00 = NOP
01 = Write VLIW Output FIFO 79
10 = Write local Output FIFO 1
11 = Write local Output FIFO 2
Select Output Value [Out1 or Out2]
Select part of Output Value to write
(32 bits = 4 bytes ABCD)
000 = 0D
001 = 0D
010 = 0B
011 = 0A
100 = CD
101 = BC
110 = AB
111 = 0
Each ALU 188 has two computational process blocks, namely an Adder/Logic process block 204, and a Multiply/Interpolate process block 205. In addition there is a Barrel Shifter block to provide help to these computational blocks. Registers from the Registers block 215 can be used for temporary storage during pipelined operations.
The Barrel Shifter process block 206 is shown in more detail in
# Bits Description 3 000 = NOP 001 = Shift Left (unsigned) 010 = Reserved 011 = Shift Left (signed) 100 = Shift right (unsigned, no rounding) 101 = Shift right (unsigned, with rounding) 110 = Shift right (signed, no rounding) 111 = Shift right (signed, with rounding) 2 Select Input to barrel shift: 00 = Multiply/Interpolate result 01 = M 10 = Adder/Logic result 11 = L 5 # bits to shift 1 Ceiling of 255 1 Floor of 0 (signed data) 12 TOTAL
The Adder/Logic process block is shown in more detail in
# Bits Description 4 0000 = A + B (carry in = 0) 0001 = A + B (carry in = carry out of previous operation) 0010 = A + B + 1 (carry in = 1) 0011 = A + 1 (increments A) 0100 = A − B − 1 (carry in = 0) 0101 = A − B (carry in = carry out of previous operation) 0110 = A − B (carry in = 1) 0111 = A − 1 (decrements A) 1000 = NOP 1001 = ABS(A − B) 1010 = MIN(A, B) 1011 = MAX(A, B) 1100 = A AND B (both A & B can be inverted, see below) 1101 = A OR B (both A & B can be inverted, see below) 1110 = A XOR B (both A & B can be inverted, see below) 1111 = A (A can be inverted, see below) 1 If logical operation: 0 = A = A 1 = A = NOT(A) If Adder operation: 0 = A is unsigned 1 = A is signed 1 If logical operation: 0 = B = B 1 = B = NOT(B) If Adder operation 0 = B is unsigned 1 = B is signed 4 Select A [In1, In2, Out1, Out2, D0, D1, D2, D3, M, L, S, R, K1, K2, K3, K4] 4 Select B [In1, In2, Out1, Out2, D0, D1, D2, D3, M, L, S, R, K1, K2, K3, K4] 14 TOTAL
The Multiply/Interpolate process block is shown in more detail in
0000 = (A10 * B10) + V
0001 = (A0 * B0) + (A1 * B1) + V
0010 = (A10 * B10) − V
0011 = V − (A10 * B10)
0100 = Interpolate A0, B0 by f0
0101 = Interpolate A0, B0 by f0, A1, B1 by f1
0110 = Interpolate A0, B0 by f0, A1, B1 by f1, A2, B2 by f2
0111 = Interpolate A0, B0 by f0, A1, B1 by f1, A2, B2 by f2, A3, B3 by f3
1000 = Interpolate 16 bits stage 1 [M = A10 * f10]
1001 = Interpolate 16 bits stage 2 [M = M + (A10 * f10)]
1010 = Tri-linear interpolate A by f stage 1
[M = A0f0 + A1f1 + A2f2 + A3f3]
1011 = Tri-linear interpolate A by f stage 2
[M = M + A0f0 + A1f1 + A2f2 + A3f3]
1100 = Bi-linear interpolate A by f stage 1 [M = A0f0 + A1f1]
1101 = Bi-linear interpolate A by f stage 2 [M = M + A0f0 + A1f1]
1110 = Bi-linear interpolate A by f complete
[M = A0f0 + A1f1 + A2f2 + A3f3]
1111 = NOP
Select A [In1, In2, Out1, Out2, D0, D1, D2, D3, M, L, S, R, K1, K2, K3, K4]
Select B [In1, In2, Out1, Out2, D0, D1, D2, D3, M, L, S, R, K1, K2, K3, K4]
Select V [In1, In2, Out1, Out2, D0, D1, D2, D3, K1, K2, K3, K4, Adder
result, M, 0, 1]
Treat A as signed
Treat B as signed
Treat V as signed
Select basis for f
[In1, In2, Out1, Out2, D0, D1, D2, D3, K1, K2, K3, K4, X, X, X, X]
Select interpolation f generation from P1 or P2
Pn is interpreted as # fractional bits in f
If Pn = 0, f is range 0 . . . 255 representing 0 . . . 1
The same 4 bits are used for the selection of V and f, although the last 4 options for V don't generally make sense as f values. Interpolating with a factor of 1 or 0 is pointless, and the previous multiplication or current result is unlikely to be a meaningful value for f.
I/O Address Generators 189, 190
The I/O Address Generators are shown in more detail in
Each of the I/O Address Generators 189, 190 has its own bus connection to the Data cache 76, making 2 bus connections per PU e.g 178, and a total of 8 buses over the entire VLIW Vector Processor 74. The Data cache 76 is able to service 4 of the maximum 8 requests from the 4 PUs e.g 178 each cycle. The Input and Output FIFOs are 8 entry deep 16-bit wide FIFOs. The various types of address generation (Image Iterators and Table I/O) are described in the subsequent sections.
The I/O Address Generator has a set of registers for that are used to control address generation. The addressing mode also determines how the data is formatted and sent into the local Input FIFO, and how data is interpreted from the local Output FIFO. The CPU is able to access the registers of the I/O Address Generator via the low speed bus. The first set of registers define the housekeeping parameters for the I/O Generator:
A write to this register halts any operations, and writes 0s to
all the data registers of the I/O Generator. The input and
output FIFOs are not cleared.
A write to this register restarts the counters according to the
current setup. For example, if the I/O Generator is a Read
Iterator, and the Iterator is currently halfway through the
image, a write to Go will cause the reading to begin at the
start of the image again. While the I/O Generator is
performing, the Active bit of the Status register will be set.
A write to this register stops any current activity and clears
the Active bit of the Status register. If the Active bit is
already cleared, writing to this register has no effect.
A write to this register continues the I/O Generator from the
current setup. Counters are not reset, and FIFOs are not
cleared. A write to this register while the I/O Generator is
active has no effect.
0 = Don't clear FIFOs on a write to the Go bit.
1 = Do clear FIFOs on a write to the Go bit.
The Status Register has the Following Values
Register Name # bits Description Active 1 0 = Currently inactive 1 = Currently active Reserved 7 —
Several registers are used to control the caching mechanism, specifying which cache group to use for inputs, outputs etc. See the section on the Data cache 76 for more information about cache groups.
Defines cache group to read data from
Defines which cache group to write data to,
and in the case of the ImagePyramidLookup
I/O mode, defines the cache to use for
reading the Level Information Table.
Image Iterators=Sequential Automatic Access to Pixels
The primary image pixel access method for software and hardware algorithms is via Image Iterators. Image iterators perform all of the addressing and access to the caches of the pixels within an image channel and read, write or read & write pixels for their client. Read Iterators read pixels in a specific order for their clients, and Write Iterators write pixels in a specific order for their clients. Clients of Iterators read pixels from the local Input FIFO or write pixels via the local Output FIFO.
Read Image Iterators read through an image in a specific order, placing the pixel data into the local Input FIFO. Every time a client reads a pixel from the Input FIFO, the Read Iterator places the next pixel from the image (via the Data cache 76) into the FIFO.
Write Image Iterators write pixels in a specific order to write out the entire image. Clients write pixels to the Output FIFO that is in turn read by the Write Image Iterator and written to DRAM via the Data cache 76.
Typically a VLIW process will have its input tied to a Read Iterator, and output tied to a corresponding Write Iterator. From the PU e.g 178 microcode program's perspective, the FIFO is the effective interface to DRAM. The actual method of carrying out the storage (apart from the logical ordering of the data) is not of concern. Although the FIFO is perceived to be effectively unlimited in length, in practice the FIFO is of limited length, and there can be delays storing and retrieving data, especially if several memory accesses are competing. A variety of Image Iterators exist to cope with the most common addressing requirements of image processing algorithms. In most cases there is a corresponding Write Iterator for each Read Iterator. The different Iterators are listed in the following table:
Vertical Strip Read
Vertical Strip Write
The 4 Bit Address Mode Register is Used to Determine the Iterator Type:
0 = This addressing mode is an Iterator
2 to 0
001 = Sequential Iterator
010 = Box [read only]
100 = Vertical Strip
remaining bit patterns are reserved
The Access Specific Registers are Used as Follows:
Flags used for reading and writing
Determines the size in X of Box Read.
Valid values are 3, 5, and 7.
Determines the size in Y of Box Read.
Valid values are 3, 5, and 7.
Offset between one pixel center and
the next during a Box Read only.
Usual value is 1, but other useful
values include 2, 4, 8 . . . See
Box Read for more details.
The Flags register (AccessSpecific1) contains a number of flags used to determine factors affecting the reading and writing of data. The Flags register has the following composition:
Label #bits Description ReadEnable 1 Read data from DRAM WriteEnable 1 Write data to DRAM [not valid for Box mode] PassX 1 Pass X (pixel) ordinate back to Input FIFO PassY 1 Pass Y (row) ordinate back to Input FIFO Loop 1 0 = Do not loop through data 1 = Loop through data Reserved 11 Must be 0
Notes on ReadEnable and WriteEnable:
In most cases, the source and destination images are different, and are represented by 2 I/O Address Generators 189, 190. However it can be valid to have the source image and destination image to be the same, since a given input pixel is not read more than once. In that case, then the same Iterator can be used for both input and output, with both the ReadEnable and WriteEnable registers set appropriately. For maximum efficiency, 2 different cache groups should be used—one for reading and the other for writing. If data is being created by a VLIW process to be written via a Sequential Write Iterator, the PassX and PassY flags can be used to generate coordinates that are then passed down the Input FIFO. The VLIW process can use these coordinates and create the output data appropriately.
Box Read Iterator
The Box Read Iterator is used to present pixels in an order most useful for performing operations such as general-purpose filters and convolve. The Iterator presents pixel values in a square box around the sequentially read pixels. The box is limited to being 1, 3, 5, or 7 pixels wide in X and Y (set XBoxSize and YBoxSize—they must be the same value or 1 in one dimension and 3, 5, or 7 in the other). The process is shown in
BoxOffset: This special purpose register is used to determine a sub-sampling in terms of which input pixels will be used as the center of the box. The usual value is 1, which means that each pixel is used as the center of the box. The value “2” would be useful in scaling an image down by 4:1 as in the case of building an image pyramid. Using pixel addresses from the previous diagram, the box would be centered on pixel 0, then 2, 8, and 10. The Box Read Iterator requires access to a maximum of 14 (2×7) cache lines. While pixels are presented from one set of 7 lines, the other cache lines can be loaded from memory.
Box Write Iterator
There is no corresponding Box Write Iterator, since the duplication of pixels is only required on input. A process that uses the Box Read Iterator for input would most likely use the Sequential Write Iterator for output since they are in sync. A good example is the convolver, where N input pixels are read to calculate 1 output pixel. The process flow is as illustrated in
Vertical-Strip Read and Write Iterators
In some instances it is necessary to write an image in output pixel order, but there is no knowledge about the direction of coherence in input pixels in relation to output pixels. An example of this is rotation. If an image is rotated 90 degrees, and we process the output pixels horizontally, there is a complete loss of cache coherence. On the other hand, if we process the output image one cache line's width of pixels at a time and then advance to the next line (rather than advance to the next cache-line's worth of pixels on the same line), we will gain cache coherence for our input image pixels. It can also be the case that there is known ‘block’ coherence in the input pixels (such as color coherence), in which case the read governs the processing order, and the write, to be synchronized, must follow the same pixel order.
The order of pixels presented as input (Vertical-Strip Read), or expected for output (Vertical-Strip Write) is the same. The order is pixels 0 to 31 from line 0, then pixels 0 to 31 of line 1 etc for all lines of the image, then pixels 32 to 63 of line 0, pixels 32 to 63 of line 1 etc. In the final vertical strip there may not be exactly 32 pixels wide. In this case only the actual pixels in the image are presented or expected as input. This process is illustrated in
process that requires only a Vertical-Strip Write Iterator will typically have a way of mapping input pixel coordinates given an output pixel coordinate. It would access the input image pixels according to this mapping, and coherence is determined by having sufficient cache lines on the ‘random-access’ reader for the input image. The coordinates will typically be generated by setting the PassX and PassY flags on the VerticalStripWrite Iterator, as shown in the process overview illustrated in
It is not meaningful to pair a Write Iterator with a Sequential Read Iterator or a Box read Iterator, but a Vertical-Strip Write Iterator does give significant improvements in performance when there is a non trivial mapping between input and output coordinates.
It can be meaningful to pair a Vertical Strip Read Iterator and Vertical Strip Write Iterator. In this case it is possible to assign both to a single ALU 188 if input and output images are the same. If coordinates are required, a further Iterator must be used with PassX and PassY flags set. The Vertical Strip Read/Write Iterator presents pixels to the Input FIFO, and accepts output pixels from the Output FIFO. Appropriate padding bytes will be inserted on the write. Input and output require a minimum of 2 cache lines each for good performance.
Table I/O Addressing Modes
It is often necessary to lookup values in a table (such as an image). Table I/O addressing modes provide this functionality, requiring the client to place the index/es into the Output FIFO. The I/O Address Generator then processes the index/es, looks up the data appropriately, and returns the looked-up values in the Input FIFO for subsequent processing by the VLIW client.
1D, 2D and 3D tables are supported, with particular modes targeted at interpolation. To reduce complexity on the VLIW client side, the index values are treated as fixed-point numbers, with AccessSpecific registers defining the fixed point and therefore which bits should be treated as the integer portion of the index. Data formats are restricted forms of the general Image Characteristics in that the PixelOffset register is ignored, the data is assumed to be contiguous within a row, and can only be 8 or 16 bits (1 or 2 bytes) per data element. The 4 bit Address Mode Register is used to determine the I/O type:
1 = This addressing mode is Table I/O
2 to 0
000 = 1D Direct Lookup
001 = 1D Interpolate (linear)
010 = DRAM FIFO
011 = Reserved
100 = 2D Interpolate (bi-linear)
101 = Reserved
110 = 3D Interpolate (tri-linear)
111 = Image Pyramid Lookup
The access specific registers are:
General flags for reading and
writing. See below for more
Number of fractional bits in X
Number of fractional bits in Y
Number of fractional bits in Z
(low 8 bits/next
12 or 24 bits))
FractX, FractY, and FractZ are used to generate addresses based on indexes, and interpret the format of the index in terms of significant bits and integer/fractional components. The various parameters are only defined as required by the number of dimensions in the table being indexed. A 1D table only needs FractX, a 2D table requires FractX and FractY. Each Fract_ value consists of the number of fractional bits in the corresponding index. For example, an X index may be in the format 5:3. This would indicate 5 bits of integer, and 3 bits of fraction. FractX would therefore be set to 3. A simple 1D lookup could have the format 8:0, i.e. no fractional component at all. FractX would therefore be 0. ZOffset is only required for 3D lookup and takes on two different interpretations. It is described more fully in the 3D-table lookup section. The Flags register (AccessSpecific1) contains a number of flags used to determine factors affecting the reading (and in one case, writing) of data. The Flags register has the following composition:
Read data from DRAM
Write data to DRAM [only valid for 1D direct
0 = 8 bit data
1 = 16 bit data
Must be 0
With the exception of the 1D Direct Lookup and DRAM FIFO, all Table I/O modes only support reading, and not writing. Therefore the ReadEnable bit will be set and the WriteEnable bit will be clear for all I/O modes other than these two modes. The 1D Direct Lookup supports 3 modes:
The different modes are described in the 1D Direct Lookup section below. The DRAM FIFO mode supports only 1 mode:
This mode is described in the DRAM FIFO section below. The DataSize flag determines whether the size of each data elements of the table is 8 or 16 bits. Only the two data sizes are supported. 32 bit elements can be created in either of 2 ways depending on the requirements of the process:
A direct lookup is a simple indexing into a 1 dimensional lookup table. Clients can choose between 3 access modes by setting appropriate bits in the Flags register:
A client passes the fixed-point index X into the Output FIFO, and the 8 or 16-bit value at Table[Int(X)] is returned in the Input FIFO. The fractional component of the index is completely ignored. If the index is out of bounds, the DuplicateEdge flag determines whether the edge pixel or ConstantPixel is returned. The address generation is straightforward:
The 8 or 16-bit data value at the resultant address is placed into the Input FIFO. Address generation takes 1 cycle, and transferring the requested data from the cache to the Output FIFO also takes 1 cycle (assuming a cache hit). For example, assume we are looking up values in a 256-entry table, where each entry is 16 bits, and the index is a 12 bit fixed-point format of 8:4. FractX should be 4, and DataSize 1. When an index is passed to the lookup, we shift right 4 bits, then add the result shifted left 1 bit to ImageStart.
A client passes the fixed-point index X into the Output FIFO followed by the 8 or 16-bit value that is to be written to the specified location in the table. A complete transfer takes a minimum of 2 cycles. 1 cycle for address generation, and 1 cycle to transfer the data from the FIFO to DRAM. There can be an arbitrary number of cycles between a VLIW process placing the index into the FIFO and placing the value to be written into the FIFO. Address generation occurs in the same way as Read Only mode, but instead of the data being read from the address, the data from the Output FIFO is written to the address. If the address is outside the table range, the data is removed from the FIFO but not written to DRAM.
A client passes the fixed-point index X into the Output FIFO, and the 8 or 16-bit value at Table[Int(X)] is returned in the Input FIFO. The next value placed into the Output FIFO is then written to Table[Int(X)], replacing the value that had been returned earlier. The general processing loop then, is that a process reads from a location, modifies the value, and writes it back. The overall time is 4 cycles:
There is no specific read/write mode where a client passes in a flag saying “read from X” or “write to X”. Clients can simulate a “read from X” by writing the original value, and a “write to X” by simply ignoring the returned value. However such use of the mode is not encouraged since each action consumes a minimum of 3 cycles (the modify is not required) and 2 data accesses instead of 1 access as provided by the specific Read and Write modes.
This is the same as a Direct Lookup in Read mode except that two values are returned for a given fixed-point index X instead of one. The values returned are Table[Int(X)], and Table[Int(X)+1]. If either index is out of bounds the DuplicateEdge flag determines whether the edge pixel or ConstantPixel is returned. Address generation is the same as Direct Lookup, with the exception that the second address is simply Address1+1 or 2 depending on 8 or 16 bit data. Transferring the requested data to the Output FIFO takes 2 cycles (assuming a cache hit), although two 8-bit values may actually be returned from the cache to the Address Generator in a single 16-bit fetch.
A special case of a read/write 1D table is a DRAM FIFO. It is often necessary to have a simulated FIFO of a given length using DRAM and associated caches. With a DRAM FIFO, clients do not index explicitly into the table, but write to the Output FIFO as if it was one end of a FIFO and read from the Input FIFO as if it was the other end of the same logical FIFO. 2 counters keep track of input and output positions in the simulated FIFO, and cache to DRAM as needed. Clients need to set both ReadEnable and WriteEnable bits in the Flags register.
An example use of a DRAM FIFO is keeping a single line history of some value. The initial history is written before processing begins. As the general process goes through a line, the previous line's value is retrieved from the FIFO, and this line's value is placed into the FIFO (this line will be the previous line when we process the next line). So long as input and outputs match each other on average, the Output FIFO should always be full. Consequently there is effectively no access delay for this kind of FIFO (unless the total FIFO length is very small—say 3 or 4 bytes, but that would defeat the purpose of the FIFO).
2 Dimensional Tables
A 2 dimensional direct lookup is not supported. Since all cases of 2D lookups are expected to be accessed for bi-linear interpolation, a special bi-linear lookup has been implemented.
This kind of lookup is necessary for bi-linear interpolation of data from a 2D table. Given fixed-point X and Y coordinates (placed into the Output FIFO in the order Y, X), 4 values are returned after lookup. The values (in order) are:
The order of values returned gives the best cache coherence. If the data is 8-bit, 2 values are returned each cycle over 2 cycles with the low order byte being the first data element. If the data is 16-bit, the 4 values are returned in 4 cycles, 1 entry per cycle. Address generation takes 2 cycles. The first cycle has the index (Y) barrel-shifted right FractY bits being multiplied by RowOffset, with the result added to ImageStart. The second cycle shifts the X index right by FractX bits, and then either the result (in the case of 8 bit data) or the result shifted left 1 bit (in the case of 16 bit data) is added to the result from the first cycle. This gives us address Adr=address of Table[Int(X), Int(Y)]:
We keep a copy of Adr in AdrOld for use fetching subsequent entries.
The following 2 tables show the method of address calculation for 8 and 16 bit data sizes:
Calculation while fetching 2 × 8-bit data entries from Adr
Adr = Adr + RowOffset
<preparing next lookup>
Calculation while fetching 1 × 16-bit data entry from Adr
Adr = Adr + 2
Adr = AdrOld + RowOffset
Adr = Adr + 2
<preparing next lookup>
In both cases, the first cycle of address generation can overlap the insertion of the X index into the FIFO, so the effective timing can be as low as 1 cycle for address generation, and 4 cycles of return data. If the generation of indexes is 2 steps ahead of the results, then there is no effective address generation time, and the data is simply produced at the appropriate rate (2 or 4 cycles per set).
3 Dimensional Lookup
Since all cases of 2D lookups are expected to be accessed for tri-linear interpolation, two special tri-linear lookups have been implemented. The first is a straightforward lookup table, while the second is for tri-linear interpolation from an Image Pyramid.
This type of lookup is useful for 3D tables of data, such as color conversion tables. The standard image parameters define a single XY plane of the data—i.e. each plane consists of ImageHeight rows, each row containing RowOffset bytes. In most circumstances, assuming contiguous planes, one XY plane will be ImageHeight×RowOffset bytes after another. Rather than assume or calculate this offset, the software via the CPU must provide it in the form of a 12-bit ZOffset register. In this form of lookup, given 3 fixed-point indexes in the order Z, Y, X, 8 values are returned in order from the lookup table:
The order of values returned gives the best cache coherence. If the data is 8-bit, 2 values are returned each cycle over 4 cycles with the low order byte being the first data element. If the data is 16-bit, the 4 values are returned in 8 cycles, 1 entry per cycle. Address generation takes 3 cycles. The first cycle has the index (Z) barrel-shifted right FractZ bits being multiplied by the 12-bit ZOffset and added to ImageStart. The second cycle has the index (Y) barrel-shifted right FractY bits being multiplied by RowOffset, with the result added to the result of the previous cycle. The second cycle shifts the X index right by FractX bits, and then either the result (in the case of 8 bit data) or the result shifted left 1 bit (in the case of 16 bit data) is added to the result from the second cycle. This gives us address Adr=address of Table[Int(X), Int(Y), Int(Z)]:
We keep a copy of Adr in AdrOld for use fetching subsequent entries.
The following 2 tables show the method of address calculation for 8 and 16 bit data sizes:
Calculation while fetching 2 × 8-bit data entries from Adr
Adr = Adr + RowOffset
Adr = AdrOld + ZOffset
Adr = Adr + RowOffset
<preparing next lookup>
Calculation while fetching 1 × 16-bit data entries from Adr
Adr = Adr + 2
Adr = AdrOld + RowOffset
Adr = Adr + 2
Adr, AdrOld = AdrOld + Zoffset
Adr = Adr + 2
Adr = AdrOld + RowOffset
Adr = Adr + 2
<preparing next lookup>
In both cases, the cycles of address generation can overlap the insertion of the indexes into the FIFO, so the effective timing for a single one-off lookup can be as low as 1 cycle for address generation, and 4 cycles of return data. If the generation of indexes is 2 steps ahead of the results, then there is no effective address generation time, and the data is simply produced at the appropriate rate (4 or 8 cycles per set).
Image Pyramid Lookup
During brushing, tiling, and warping it is necessary to compute the average color of a particular area in an image. Rather than calculate the value for each area given, these functions make use of an image pyramid. The description and construction of an image pyramid is detailed in the section on Internal Image Formats in the DRAM interface 81 chapter of this document. This section is concerned with a method of addressing given pixels in the pyramid in terms of 3 fixed-point indexes ordered: level (Z), Y, and X. Note that Image Pyramid lookup assumes 8 bit data entries, so the DataSize flag is completely ignored. After specification of Z, Y, and X, the following 8 pixels are returned via the Input FIFO:
The 8 pixels are returned as 4×16 bit entries, with X and X+1 entries combined hi/lo. For example, if the scaled (X, Y) coordinate was (10.4, 12.7) the first 4 pixels returned would be: (10, 12), (11, 12), (10, 13) and (11, 13). When a coordinate is outside the valid range, clients have the choice of edge pixel duplication or returning of a constant color value via the DuplicateEdgePixels and ConstantPixel registers (only the low 8 bits are used). When the Image Pyramid has been constructed, there is a simple mapping from level 0 coordinates to level Z coordinates. The method is simply to shift the X or Y coordinate right by Z bits. This must be done in addition to the number of bits already shifted to retrieve the integer portion of the coordinate (i.e. shifting right FractX and FractY bits for X and Y ordinates respectively). To find the ImageStart and RowOffset value for a given level of the image pyramid, the 24-bit ZOffset register is used as a pointer to a Level Information Table. The table is an array of records, each representing a given level of the pyramid, ordered by level number. Each record consists of a 16-bit offset ZOffset from ImageStart to that level of the pyramid (64-byte aligned address as lower 6 bits of the offset are not present), and a 12 bit ZRowOffset for that level. Element 0 of the table would contain a ZOffset of 0, and a ZRowOffset equal to the general register RowOffset, as it simply points to the full sized image. The ZOffset value at element N of the table should be added to ImageStart to yield the effective ImageStart of level N of the image pyramid. The RowOffset value in element N of the table contains the RowOffset value for level N. The software running on the CPU must set up the table appropriately before using this addressing mode. The actual address generation is outlined here in a cycle by cycle description:
ZAdr = ShiftRight(Z, FractZ) +
ZInt = ShiftRight(Z, FractZ)
ZAdr += 2
YInt = ShiftRight(Y, FractY)
ZAdr += 2
YInt = ShiftRight(YInt, ZInt)
Adr = ZOffset + ImageStart
ZAdr += 2
Adr += ZrowOffset * YInt
XInt = ShiftRight(X, FractX)
Adr += ShiftRight(XInt, ZInt)
ZOffset += ShiftRight(XInt, 1)
Adr += ZrowOffset
ZOffset += ImageStart
Adr = (ZAdr * ShiftRight(Yint, 1)) +
Adr += Zadr
< Cycle 0 for next retrieval>
The address generation as described can be achieved using a single Barrel Shifter, 2 adders, and a single 16×16 multiply/add unit yielding 24 bits. Although some cycles have 2 shifts, they are either the same shift value (i.e. the output of the Barrel Shifter is used two times) or the shift is 1 bit, and can be hard wired. The following internal registers are required: ZAdr, Adr, ZInt, YInt, XInt, ZRowOffset, and ZImageStart. The Int registers only need to be 8 bits maximum, while the others can be up to 24 bits. Since this access method only reads from, and does not write to image pyramids, the CacheGroup2 is used to lookup the Image Pyramid Address Table (via ZAdr). CacheGroup1 is used for lookups to the image pyramid itself (via Adr). The address table is around 22 entries (depending on original image size), each of 4 bytes. Therefore 3 or 4 cache lines should be allocated to CacheGroup2, while as many cache lines as possible should be allocated to CacheGroup1. The timing is 8 cycles for returning a set of data, assuming that Cycle 8 and Cycle 0 overlap in operation—i.e. the next request's Cycle 0 occurs during Cycle 8. This is acceptable since Cycle 0 has no memory access, and Cycle 8 has no specific operations.
Generation of Coordinates Using VLIW Vector Processor 74
Some functions that are linked to Write Iterators require the X and/or Y coordinates of the current pixel being processed in part of the processing pipeline. Particular processing may also need to take place at the end of each row, or column being processed. In most cases, the PassX and PassY flags should be sufficient to completely generate all coordinates. However, if there are special requirements, the following functions can be used. The calculation can be spread over a number of ALUs, for a single cycle generation, or be in a single ALU 188 for a multi-cycle generation.
Generate Sequential [X, Y]
When a process is processing pixels in sequential order according to the Sequential Read Iterator (or generating pixels and writing them out to a Sequential Write Iterator), the following process can be used to generate X, Y coordinates instead of PassX/PassY flags as shown in
The coordinate generator counts up to ImageWidth in the X ordinate, and once per ImageWidth pixels increments the Y ordinate. The actual process is illustrated in
The following registers are used to hold temporary variables:
X (starts at 0 each line)
Y (starts at 0)
The requirements are summarized as follows:
Generate Vertical Strip [X, Y]
When a process is processing pixels in order to write them to a Vertical Strip Write Iterator, and for some reason cannot use the PassX/PassY flags, the process as illustrated in
The following registers are used to hold temporary variables:
StartX (starts at 0, and is incremented by 32 once per
EndX (starts at 32 and is incremented by 32 to a maximum of
ImageWidth) once per vertical strip)
The requirements are summarized as follows:
The calculations that occur once per vertical strip (2 additions, one of which has an associated MIN) are not included in the general timing statistics because they are not really part of the per pixel timing. However they do need to be taken into account for the programming of the microcode for the particular function.
Image Sensor Interface (ISI 83)
The Image Sensor Interface (ISI 83) takes data from the CMOS Image Sensor and makes it available for storage in DRAM. The image sensor has an aspect ratio of 3:2, with a typical resolution of 750×500 samples, yielding 375K (8 bits per pixel). Each 2×2 pixel block has the configuration as shown in
If the rotation is 0 degrees, then step 1 merely writes the Photo Image out to the final Photo Image location and step 2 is not performed. If the rotation is other than 0 degrees, the image is written out to a temporary area (for example into the Print Image memory area), and then rotated during step 2 into the final Photo Image location. Step 1 is very simple microcode, taking data from the VLIW Input FIFO 78 and writing it to a Sequential Write Iterator. Step 2's rotation is accomplished by using the accelerated Vark Affine Transform function. The processing is performed in 2 steps in order to reduce design complexity and to re-use the Vark affine transform rotate logic already required for images. This is acceptable since both steps are completed in approximately 0.03 seconds, a time imperceptible to the operator of the Artcam. Even so, the read process is sensor speed bound, taking 0.02 seconds to read the full frame, and approximately 0.01 seconds to rotate the image.
The orientation is important for converting between the sensed Photo Image and the internal format image, since the relative positioning of R, G, and B pixels changes with orientation. The processed image may also have to be rotated during the Print process in order to be in the correct orientation for printing. The 3D model of the Artcam has 2 image sensors, with their inputs multiplexed to a single ISI 83 (different microcode, but same ACP 31). Since each sensor is a frame store, both images can be taken simultaneously, and then transferred to memory one at a time.
Display Controller 88
When the “Take” button on an Artcam is half depressed, the TFT will display the current image from the image sensor (converted via a simple VLIW process). Once the Take button is fully depressed, the Taken Image is displayed. When the user presses the Print button and image processing begins, the TFT is turned off. Once the image has been printed the TFT is turned on again. The Display Controller 88 is used in those Artcam models that incorporate a flat panel display. An example display is a TFT LCD of resolution 240×160 pixels. The structure of the Display Controller 88 is illustrated in
240×160×3×30=3.5 MB per second
This data rate is low compared to the rest of the system. However it is high enough to cause VLIW programs to slow down during the intensive image processing. The general principles of TFT operation should reflect this.
Image Data Formats
As stated previously, the DRAM Interface 81 is responsible for interfacing between other client portions of the ACP chip and the RAMBUS DRAM. In effect, each module within the DRAM Interface is an address generator.
There are three logical types of images manipulated by the ACP. They are:
Print Image—the Output Image format printed by the Artcam
These images are typically different in color space, resolution, and the output & input color spaces which can vary from camera to camera. For example, a CCD image on a low-end camera may be a different resolution, or have different color characteristics from that used in a high-end camera. However all internal image formats are the same format in terms of color space across all cameras.
In addition, the three image types can vary with respect to which direction is ‘up’. The physical orientation of the camera causes the notion of a portrait or landscape image, and this must be maintained throughout processing. For this reason, the internal image is always oriented correctly, and rotation is performed on images obtained from the CCD and during the print operation.
CCD Image Organization
Although many different CCD image sensors could be utilised, it will be assumed that the CCD itself is a 750×500 image sensor, yielding 375,000 bytes (8 bits per pixel). Each 2×2 pixel block having the configuration as depicted in
A CCD Image as stored in DRAM has consecutive pixels with a given line contiguous in memory. Each line is stored one after the other. The image sensor Interface 83 is responsible for taking data from the CCD and storing it in the DRAM correctly oriented. Thus a CCD image with rotation 0 degrees has its first line G, R, G, R, G, R . . . and its second line as B, G, B, G, B, G . . . . If the CCD image should be portrait, rotated 90 degrees, the first line will be R, G, R, G, R, G and the second line G, B, G, B, G, B . . . etc.
Pixels are stored in an interleaved fashion since all color components are required in order to convert to the internal image format.
It should be noted that the ACP 31 makes no assumptions about the CCD pixel format, since the actual CCDs for imaging may vary from Artcam to Artcam, and over time. All processing that takes place via the hardware is controlled by major microcode in an attempt to extend the usefulness of the ACP 31.
Internal Image Organization
Internal images typically consist of a number of channels. Vark images can include, but are not limited to:
L, a and b correspond to components of the Lab color space, α is a matte channel (used for compositing), and Δ is a bump-map channel (used during brushing, tiling and illuminating).
The VLIW processor 74 requires images to be organized in a planar configuration. Thus a Lab image would be stored as 3 separate blocks of memory:
one block for the L channel,
one block for the a channel, and
one block for the b channel
Within each channel block, pixels are stored contiguously for a given row (plus some optional padding bytes), and rows are stored one after the other.
In the 8 MB-memory model, the final Print Image after all processing is finished, needs to be compressed in the chrominance channels. Compression of chrominance channels can be 4:1, causing an overall compression of 12:6, or 2:1.
Other than the final Print Image, images in the Artcam are typically not compressed. Because of memory constraints, software may choose to compress the final Print Image in the chrominance channels by scaling each of these channels by 2:1. If this has been done, the PRINT Vark function call utilised to print an image must be told to treat the specified chrominance channels as compressed. The PRINT function is the only function that knows how to deal with compressed chrominance, and even so, it only deals with a fixed 2:1 compression ratio.
Although it is possible to compress an image and then operate on the compressed image to create the final print image, it is not recommended due to a loss in resolution. In addition, an image should only be compressed once—as the final stage before printout. While one compression is virtually undetectable, multiple compressions may cause substantial image degradation.
Clip Image Organization
Clip images stored on Artcards have no explicit support by the ACP 31. Software is responsible for taking any images from the current Artcard and organizing the data into a form known by the ACP. If images are stored compressed on an Artcard, software is responsible for decompressing them, as there is no specific hardware support for decompression of Artcard images.
Image Pyramid Organization
During brushing, tiling, and warping processes utilised to manipulate an image it is often necessary to compute the average color of a particular area in an image. Rather than calculate the value for each area given, these functions make use of an image pyramid. As illustrated in
Print Image Organization
The entire processed image is required at the same time in order to print it. However the Print Image output can comprise a CMY dithered image and is only a transient image format, used within the Print Image functionality. However, it should be noted that color conversion will need to take place from the internal color space to the print color space. In addition, color conversion can be tuned to be different for different print rolls in the camera with different ink characteristics e.g. Sepia output can be accomplished by using a specific sepia toning Artcard, or by using a sepia tone print-roll (so all Artcards will work in sepia tone).
As noted previously there are 3 color spaces used in the Artcam, corresponding to the different image types.
The ACP has no direct knowledge of specific color spaces. Instead, it relies on client color space conversion tables to convert between CCD, internal, and printer color spaces:
Removing the color space conversion from the ACP 31 allows:
The Artcard Interface (AI) takes data from the linear image Sensor while an Artcard is passing under it, and makes that data available for storage in DRAM. The image sensor produces 11,000 8-bit samples per scanline, sampling the Artcard at 4800 dpi. The AI is a state machine that sends control information to the linear sensor, including LineSync pulses and PixelClock pulses in order to read the image. Pixels are read from the linear sensor and placed into the VLIW Input FIFO 78. The VLIW is then able to process and/or store the pixels. The AI has only a few registers:
The number of pixels in a sensor line (approx 11,000)
The Print Head Interface's Status Register
The number of bytes remaining in the current line
A write to this register resets the AI, stops any
scanning, and loads all registers with 0.
A write to this register with a non-zero value sets
the Scanning bit of the Status register, and
causes the Artcard Interface Scan cycle to start.
A write to this register with 0 stops the scanning
process and clears the Scanning bit in the
The Scan cycle causes the AI to transfer NumPixels
bytes from the sensor to the VLIW Input FIFO 78,
producing the PixelClock signals appropriately.
Upon completion of NumPixels bytes, a LineSync
pulse is given and the Scan cycle restarts.
The PixelsRemaining register holds the number of
pixels remaining to be read on the current scanline.
Note that the CPU should clear the VLIW Input FIFO 78 before initiating a Scan. The Status register has bit interpretations as follows:
Bit Name Bits Description Scanning 1 If set, the AI is currently scanning, with the number of pixels remaining to be transferred from the current line recorded in PixelsRemaining. If clear, the AI is not currently scanning, so is not transferring pixels to the VLIW Input FIFO 78.
Artcard Interface (AI) 87
The Artcard Interface (AI) 87 is responsible for taking an Artcard image from the Artcard Reader 34, and decoding it into the original data (usually a Vark script). Specifically, the AI 87 accepts signals from the Artcard scanner linear CCD 34, detects the bit pattern printed on the card, and converts the bit pattern into the original data, correcting read errors.
With no Artcard 9 inserted, the image printed from an Artcam is simply the sensed Photo Image cleaned up by any standard image processing routines. The Artcard 9 is the means by which users are able to modify a photo before printing it out. By the simple task of inserting a specific Artcard 9 into an Artcam, a user is able to define complex image processing to be performed on the Photo Image.
With no Artcard inserted the Photo Image is processed in a standard way to create the Print Image. When a single Artcard 9 is inserted into the Artcam, that Artcard's effect is applied to the Photo Image to generate the Print Image.
When the Artcard 9 is removed (ejected), the printed image reverts to the Photo Image processed in a standard way. When the user presses the button to eject an Artcard, an event is placed in the event queue maintained by the operating system running on the Artcam Central Processor 31. When the event is processed (for example after the current Print has occurred), the following things occur:
If the current Artcard is valid, then the Print Image is marked as invalid and a ‘Process Standard’ event is placed in the event queue. When the event is eventually processed it will perform the standard image processing operations on the Photo Image to produce the Print Image.
The motor is started to eject the Artcard and a time-specific ‘Stop-Motor’ Event is added to the event queue.
Inserting an Artcard
When a user inserts an Artcard 9, the Artcard Sensor 49 detects it notifying the ACP 72. This results in the software inserting an ‘Artcard Inserted’ event into the event queue. When the event is processed several things occur:
The current Artcard is marked as invalid (as opposed to ‘none’).
The Print Image is marked as invalid.
The Artcard motor 37 is started up to load the Artcard
The Artcard Interface 87 is instructed to read the Artcard
The Artcard Interface 87 accepts signals from the Artcard scanner linear CCD 34, detects the bit pattern printed on the card, and corrects errors in the detected bit pattern, producing a valid Artcard data block in DRAM.
Reading Data from the Artcard CCD—General Considerations
As illustrated in
Phase 1. Detect data area on Artcard
Phase 2. Detect bit pattern from Artcard based on CCD pixels, and write as bytes.
Phase 3. Descramble and XOR the byte-pattern
Phase 4. Decode data (Reed-Solomon decode)
As illustrated in
An Artcard 9 may be slightly warped due to heat damage, slightly rotated (up to, say 1 degree) due to differences in insertion into an Artcard reader, and can have slight differences in true data rate due to fluctuations in the speed of the reader motor 37. These changes will cause columns of data from the card not to be read as corresponding columns of pixel data. As illustrated in
Finally, the Artcard 9 should be read in a reasonable amount of time with respect to the human operator. The data on the Artcard covers most of the Artcard surface, so timing concerns can be limited to the Artcard data itself. A reading time of 1.5 seconds is adequate for Artcard reading.
The Artcard should be loaded in 1.5 seconds. Therefore all 16,000 columns of pixel data must be read from the CCD 34 in 1.5 second, i.e. 10,667 columns per second. Therefore the time available to read one column is 1/10667 seconds, or 93,747 ns. Pixel data can be written to the DRAM one column at a time, completely independently from any processes that are reading the pixel data.
The time to write one column of data (9450/2 bytes since the reading can be 4 bits per pixel giving 2×4 bit pixels per byte) to DRAM is reduced by using 8 cache lines. If 4 lines were written out at one time, the 4 banks can be written to independently, and thus overlap latency reduced. Thus the 4725 bytes can be written in 11,840 ns (4725/128*320 ns). Thus the time taken to write a given column's data to DRAM uses just under 13% of the available bandwidth.
Decoding an Artcard
A simple look at the data sizes shows the impossibility of fitting the process into the 8 MB of memory 33 if the entire Artcard pixel data (140 MB if each bit is read as a 3×3 array) as read by the linear CCD 34 is kept. For this reason, the reading of the linear CCD, decoding of the bitmap, and the un-bitmap process should take place in real-time (while the Artcard 9 is traveling past the linear CCD 34), and these processes must effectively work without having entire data stores available.
When an Artcard 9 is inserted, the old stored Print Image and any expanded Photo Image becomes invalid. The new Artcard 9 can contain directions for creating a new image based on the currently captured Photo Image. The old Print Image is invalid, and the area holding expanded Photo Image data and image pyramid is invalid, leaving more than 5 MB that can be used as scratch memory during the read process. Strictly speaking, the 1 MB area where the Artcard raw data is to be written can also be used as scratch data during the Artcard read process as long as by the time the final Reed-Solomon decode is to occur, that 1 MB area is free again. The reading process described here does not make use of the extra 1 MB area (except as a final destination for the data).
It should also be noted that the unscrambling process requires two sets of 2 MB areas of memory since unscrambling cannot occur in place. Fortunately the 5 MB scratch area contains enough space for this process.
Turning now to
Phase 1. Detect data area on Artcard
Phase 2. Detect bit pattern from Artcard based on CCD pixels, and write as bytes.
Phase 3. Descramble and XOR the byte-pattern
Phase 4. Decode data (Reed-Solomon decode)
The four phases are described in more detail as follows:
Phase 1. As the Artcard 9 moves past the CCD 34 the AI must detect the start of the data area by robustly detecting special targets on the Artcard to the left of the data area. If these cannot be detected, the card is marked as invalid. The detection must occur in real-time, while the Artcard 9 is moving past the CCD 34.
If necessary, rotation invariance can be provided. In this case, the targets are repeated on the right side of the Artcard, but relative to the bottom right corner instead of the top corner. In this way the targets end up in the correct orientation if the card is inserted the “wrong” way. Phase 3 below can be altered to detect the orientation of the data, and account for the potential rotation.
Phase 2. Once the data area has been determined, the main read process begins, placing pixel data from the CCD into an ‘Artcard data window’, detecting bits from this window, assembling the detected bits into bytes, and constructing a byte-image in DRAM. This must all be done while the Artcard is moving past the CCD.
Phase 3. Once all the pixels have been read from the Artcard data area, the Artcard motor 37 can be stopped, and the byte image descrambled and XORed. Although not requiring real-time performance, the process should be fast enough not to annoy the human operator. The process must take 2 MB of scrambled bit-image and write the unscrambled/XORed bit-image to a separate 2 MB image.
Phase 4. The final phase in the Artcard read process is the Reed-Solomon decoding process, where the 2 MB bit-image is decoded into a 1 MB valid Artcard data area. Again, while not requiring real-time performance it is still necessary to decode quickly with regard to the human operator. If the decode process is valid, the card is marked as valid. If the decode failed, any duplicates of data in the bit-image are attempted to be decoded, a process that is repeated until success or until there are no more duplicate images of the data in the bit image.
The four phase process described requires 4.5 MB of DRAM. 2 MB is reserved for Phase 2 output, and 0.5 MB is reserved for scratch data during phases 1 and 2. The remaining 2 MB of space can hold over 440 columns at 4725 byes per column. In practice, the pixel data being read is a few columns ahead of the phase 1 algorithm, and in the worst case, about 180 columns behind phase 2, comfortably inside the 440 column limit.
A description of the actual operation of each phase will now be provided in greater detail.
Phase 1—Detect Data Area on Artcard
This phase is concerned with robustly detecting the left-hand side of the data area on the Artcard 9. Accurate detection of the data area is achieved by accurate detection of special targets printed on the left side of the card. These targets are especially designed to be easy to detect even if rotated up to 1 degree.
As shown in
At the worst rotation of 1 degree, a 1 column shift occurs every 57 pixels. Therefore in a 590 pixel sized band, we cannot place any part of our symbol in the top or bottom 12 pixels or so of the band or they could be detected in the wrong band at CCD read time if the card is worst case rotated.
Therefore, if the black part of the rectangle is 57 pixels high (19 dots) we can be sure that at least 9.5 black pixels will be read in the same column by the CCD (worst case is half the pixels are in one column and half in the next). To be sure of reading at least 10 black dots in the same column, we must have a height of 20 dots. To give room for erroneous detection on the edge of the start of the black dots, we increase the number of dots to 31, giving us 15 on either side of the white dot at the target's local coordinate (15, 15). 31 dots is 91 pixels, which at most suffers a 3 pixel shift in column, easily within the 576 pixel band.
Thus each target is a block of 31×31 dots (93×93 pixels) each with the composition:
15 columns of 31 black dots each (45 pixel width columns of 93 pixels).
1 column of 15 black dots (45 pixels) followed by 1 white dot (3 pixels) and then a further 15 black dots (45 pixels)
15 columns of 31 black dots each (45 pixel width columns of 93 pixels)
Targets are detected by reading columns of pixels, one column at a time rather than by detecting dots. It is necessary to look within a given band for a number of columns consisting of large numbers of contiguous black pixels to build up the left side of a target. Next, it is expected to see a white region in the center of further black columns, and finally the black columns to the left of the target center.
Eight cache lines are required for good cache performance on the reading of the pixels. Each logical read fills 4 cache lines via 4 sub-reads while the other 4 cache-lines are being used. This effectively uses up 13% of the available DRAM bandwidth.
As illustrated in
The columns of input pixels are processed one at a time until either all the targets are found, or until a specified number of columns have been processed. To process a column, the pixels are read from DRAM, passed through a filter 245 to detect a 0 or 1, and then run length encoded 246. The bit value and the number of contiguous bits of the same value are placed in FIFO 247. Each entry of the FIFO 249 is in 8 bits, 7 bits 250 to hold the run-length, and 1 bit 249 to hold the value of the bit detected.
The run-length encoder 246 only encodes contiguous pixels within a 576 pixel (192 dot) region.
The top 3 elements in the FIFO 247 can be accessed 252 in any random order. The run lengths (in pixels) of these entries are filtered into 3 values: short, medium, and long in accordance with the following table:
Used to detect white dot.
RunLength < 16
Used to detect runs of black above or
16 <= RunLength < 48
below the white dot in the center of the
Used to detect run lengths of black to
RunLength >= 48
the left and right of the center dot in
Looking at the top three entries in the FIFO 247 there are 3 specific cases of interest:
S1 = white long
We have detected a black column of the
S2 = black long
target to the left of or to the right of
S3 = white medium/
the white center dot.
S1 = white long
If we've been processing a series of
S2 = black medium
columns of Case 1s, then we have
S3 = white short
probably detected the white dot in this
Previous 8 columns
column. We know that the next entry will
were Case 1
be black (or it would have been included
in the white S3 entry), but the number of
black pixels is in question. Need to verify
by checking after the next FIFO advance
(see Case 3).
Prev = Case 2
We have detected part of the white dot.
S3 = black med
We expect around 3 of these, and then
some more columns of Case 1.
Preferably, the following information per region band is kept:
16 bits (15:1)
16 bits (15:1)
7 bytes (rounded to 8 bytes for easy
Given a total of 7 bytes. It makes address generation easier if the total is assumed to be 8 bytes. Thus 16 entries requires 16*8=128 bytes, which fits in 4 cache lines. The address range should be inside the scratch 0.5 MB DRAM area since other phases make use of the remaining 4 MB data area.
When beginning to process a given pixel column, the register value S2StartPixel 254 is reset to 0. As entries in the FIFO advance from S2 to S1, they are also added 255 to the existing S2StartPixel value, giving the exact pixel position of the run currently defined in S2. Looking at each of the 3 cases of interest in the FIFO, S2StartPixel can be used to determine the start of the black area of a target (Cases 1 and 2), and also the start of the white dot in the center of the target (Case 3). An algorithm for processing columns can be as follows:
TargetDetected[0-15] := 0
BlackDetectCount[0-15] := 0
WhiteDetectCount[0-15] := 0
TargetRow[0-15] := 0
TargetColumn[0-15] := 0
PrevColStartPixel[0-15] := 0
CurrentColumn := 0
If (CurrentColumn <= LastValidColumn)
The steps involved in the processing a column (Process Column) are as follows:
S2StartPixel := 0
FIFO := 0
BlackDetectCount := 0
WhiteDetectCount := 0
ThisColumnDetected := FALSE
PrevCaseWasCase2 := FALSE
If (! TargetDetected[Target]) & (! ColumnDetected[Target])
PrevCaseWasCase2 := Case=2
The processing for each of the 3 (Process Cases) cases is as follows:
BlackDetectCount[target] < 8 Δ := ABS(S2StartPixel − OR PrevColStartPixel[Target]) WhiteDetectCount[Target] = 0 If (0<=Δ< 2) BlackDetectCount[Target]++ (max value =8) Else BlackDetectCount[Target] := 1 WhiteDetectCount[Target] := 0 EndIf PrevColStartPixel[Target] := S2StartPixel ColumnDetected[Target] := TRUE BitDetected = 1 BlackDetectCount[target] >= 8 PrevColStartPixel[Target] := S2StartPixel WhiteDetectCount[Target] != 0 ColumnDetected[Target] := TRUE BitDetected = 1 TargetDetected[Target] := TRUE TargetColumn[Target] := CurrentColumn − 8 − (WhiteDetectCount[Target]/2)
No special processing is recorded except for setting the ‘PrevCaseWasCase2’ flag for identifying Case 3 (see Step 3 of processing a column described above)
PrevCaseWasCase2 = TRUE
If (WhiteDetectCount[Target] < 2)
BlackDetectCount[Target] >= 8
S2StartPixel + (S2RunLength/2)
Δ := ABS(S2StartPixel −
If (0<=Δ< 2)
WhiteDetectCount[Target] := 1
ThisColumnDetected := TRUE
BitDetected = 0
At the end of processing a given column, a comparison is made of the current column to the maximum number of columns for target detection. If the number of columns allowed has been exceeded, then it is necessary to check how many targets have been found. If fewer than 8 have been found, the card is considered invalid.
After the targets have been detected, they should be processed. All the targets may be available or merely some of them. Some targets may also have been erroneously detected.
This phase of processing is to determine a mathematical line that passes through the center of as many targets as possible. The more targets that the line passes through, the more confident the target position has been found. The limit is set to be 8 targets. If a line passes through at least 8 targets, then it is taken to be the right one.
It is all right to take a brute-force but straightforward approach since there is the time to do so (see below), and lowering complexity makes testing easier. It is necessary to determine the line between targets 0 and 1 (if both targets are considered valid) and then determine how many targets fall on this line. Then we determine the line between targets 0 and 2, and repeat the process. Eventually we do the same for the line between targets 1 and 2, 1 and 3 etc. and finally for the line between targets 14 and 15. Assuming all the targets have been found, we need to perform 15+14+13+ . . . =90 sets of calculations (with each set of calculations requiring 16 tests=1440 actual calculations), and choose the line which has the maximum number of targets found along the line. The algorithm for target location can be as follows:
TargetA := 0
MaxFound := 0
BestLine := 0
While (TargetA < 15)
If (TargetA is Valid)
TargetB:= TargetA + 1
While (TargetB<= 15)
If (TargetB is valid)
CurrentLine := line between TargetA and TargetB
TargetC := 0;
While (TargetC <= 15)
If (TargetC valid AND TargetC on line AB)
If (TargetsHit > MaxFound)
MaxFound := TargetsHit
BestLine := CurrentLine
If (MaxFound < 8)
Card is Invalid
Store expected centroids for rows based on BestLine
As illustrated in
To calculate Δrow & Δcolumn:
Then we calculate the position of Target0:
And compare (row, column) against the actual rowTarget0 and columnTarget0. To move from one expected target to the next (e.g. from Target0 to Target1), we simply add Δrow and Δcolumn to row and column respectively. To check if each target is on the line, we must calculate the expected position of Target0, and then perform one add and one comparison for each target ordinate.
At the end of comparing all 16 targets against a maximum of 90 lines, the result is the best line through the valid targets. If that line passes through at least 8 targets (i.e. MaxFound>=8), it can be said that enough targets have been found to form a line, and thus the card can be processed. If the best line passes through fewer than 8, then the card is considered invalid.
The resulting algorithm takes 180 divides to calculate Δrow and Δcolumn, 180 multiply/adds to calculate target0 position, and then 2880 adds/comparisons. The time we have to perform this processing is the time taken to read 36 columns of pixel data=3,374,892 ns. Not even accounting for the fact that an add takes less time than a divide, it is necessary to perform 3240 mathematical operations in 3,374,892 ns. That gives approximately 1040 ns per operation, or 104 cycles. The CPU can therefore safely perform the entire processing of targets, reducing complexity of design.
Update Centroids Based on Data Edge Border and Clockmarks
Step 0: Locate the Data Area
From Target 0 (241 of
Since the fixed pixel offset from Target0 to the data area is related to the distance between targets (192 dots between targets, and 24 dots between Target0 and the data area 243), simply add Δrow/8 to Target0's centroid column coordinate (aspect ratio of dots is 1:1). Thus the top co-ordinate can be defined as:
Next Δrow and Δcolumn are updated to give the number of pixels between dots in a single column (instead of between targets) by dividing them by the number of dots between targets:
We also set the currentColumn register (see Phase 2) to be −1 so that after step 2, when phase 2 begins, the currentColumn register will increment from −1 to 0.
Step 1: Write Out the Initial Centroid Deltas (Δ) and Bit History
This simply involves writing setup information required for Phase 2.
This can be achieved by writing 0s to all the Δrow and Δcolumn entries for each row, and a bit history. The bit history is actually an expected bit history since it is known that to the left of the clock mark column 276 is a border column 277, and before that, a white area. The bit history therefore is 011, 010, 011, 010 etc.
Step 2: Update the Centroids Based on Actual Pixels Read.
The bit history is set up in Step 1 according to the expected clock marks and data border. The actual centroids for each dot row can now be more accurately set (they were initially 0) by comparing the expected data against the actual pixel values. The centroid updating mechanism is achieved by simply performing step 3 of Phase 2.
Phase 2—Detect Bit Pattern from Artcard Based on Pixels Read, and Write as Bytes.
Since a dot from the Artcard 9 requires a minimum of 9 sensed pixels over 3 columns to be represented, there is little point in performing dot detection calculations every sensed pixel column. It is better to average the time required for processing over the average dot occurrence, and thus make the most of the available processing time. This allows processing of a column of dots from an Artcard 9 in the time it takes to read 3 columns of data from the Artcard. Although the most likely case is that it takes 4 columns to represent a dot, the 4th column will be the last column of one dot and the first column of a next dot. Processing should therefore be limited to only 3 columns.
As the pixels from the CCD are written to the DRAM in 13% of the time available, 83% of the time is available for processing of 1 column of dots i.e. 83% of (93,747*3)=83% of 281,241 ns=233,430 ns.
In the available time, it is necessary to detect 3150 dots, and write their bit values into the raw data area of memory. The processing therefore requires the following steps:
For each column of dots on the Artcard:
Step 0: Advance to the next dot column
Step 1: Detect the top and bottom of an Artcard dot column (check clock marks)
Step 2: Process the dot column, detecting bits and storing them appropriately
Step 3: Update the centroids
Since we are processing the Artcard's logical dot columns, and these may shift over 165 pixels, the worst case is that we cannot process the first column until at least 165 columns have been read into DRAM. Phase 2 would therefore finish the same amount of time after the read process had terminated. The worst case time is: 165*93,747 ns=15,468,255 ns or 0.015 seconds.
Step 0: Advance to the Next Dot Column
In order to advance to the next column of dots we add Δrow and Δcolumn to the dotColumnTop to give us the centroid of the dot at the top of the column. The first time we do this, we are currently at the clock marks column 276 to the left of the bit image data area, and so we advance to the first column of data. Since Δrow and Δcolumn refer to distance between dots within a column, to move between dot columns it is necessary to add Δrow to columndotColumnTop and Δcolumn to rowdotColumnTop.
To keep track of what column number is being processed, the column number is recorded in a register called CurrentColumn. Every time the sensor advances to the next dot column it is necessary to increment the CurrentColumn register. The first time it is incremented, it is incremented from −1 to 0 (see Step 0 Phase 1). The CurrentColumn register determines when to terminate the read process (when reaching maxColumns), and also is used to advance the DataOut Pointer to the next column of byte information once all 8 bits have been written to the byte (once every 8 dot columns). The lower 3 bits determine what bit we're up to within the current byte. It will be the same bit being written for the whole column.
Step 1: Detect the Top and Bottom of an Artcard Dot Column.
In order to process a dot column from an Artcard, it is necessary to detect the top and bottom of a column. The column should form a straight line between the top and bottom of the column (except for local warping etc.). Initially dotColumnTop points to the clock mark column 276. We simply toggle the expected value, write it out into the bit history, and move on to step 2, whose first task will be to add the Δrow and Δcolumn values to dotColumnTop to arrive at the first data dot of the column.
Step 2: Process an Artcard's Dot Column
Given the centroids of the top and bottom of a column in pixel coordinates the column should form a straight line between them, with possible minor variances due to warping etc.
Assuming the processing is to start at the top of a column (at the top centroid coordinate) and move down to the bottom of the column, subsequent expected dot centroids are given as:
This gives us the address of the expected centroid for the next dot of the column. However to account for local warping and error we add another Δrow and Δcolumn based on the last time we found the dot in a given row. In this way we can account for small drifts that accumulate into a maximum drift of some percentage from the straight line joining the top of the column to the bottom.
We therefore keep 2 values for each row, but store them in separate tables since the row history is used in step 3 of this phase.
For each row we need to read a Δrow and Δcolumn to determine the change to the centroid. The read process takes 5% of the bandwidth and 2 cache lines:
76*(3150/32)+2*3150=13,824 ns=5% of bandwidth
Once the centroid has been determined, the pixels around the centroid need to be examined to detect the status of the dot and hence the value of the bit. In the worst case a dot covers a 4×4 pixel area. However, thanks to the fact that we are sampling at 3 times the resolution of the dot, the number of pixels required to detect the status of the dot and hence the bit value is much less than this. We only require access to 3 columns of pixel columns at any one time.
In the worst case of pixel drift due to a 1% rotation, centroids will shift 1 column every 57 pixel rows, but since a dot is 3 pixels in diameter, a given column will be valid for 171 pixel rows (3*57). As a byte contains 2 pixels, the number of bytes valid in each buffered read (4 cache lines) will be a worst case of 86 (out of 128 read).
Once the bit has been detected it must be written out to DRAM. We store the bits from 8 columns as a set of contiguous bytes to minimize DRAM delay. Since all the bits from a given dot column will correspond to the next bit position in a data byte, we can read the old value for the byte, shift and OR in the new bit, and write the byte back. The read/shift&OR/write process requires 2 cache lines.
We need to read and write the bit history for the given row as we update it. We only require 3 bits of history per row, allowing the storage of 2 rows of history in a single byte. The read/shift&OR/write process requires 2 cache lines.
The total bandwidth required for the bit detection and storage is summarised in the following table:
Read centroid Δ 5% Read 3 columns of pixel data 19% Read/Write detected bits into byte buffer 10% Read/Write bit history 5% TOTAL 39%
Detecting a Dot
The process of detecting the value of a dot (and hence the value of a bit) given a centroid is accomplished by examining 3 pixel values and getting the result from a lookup table. The process is fairly simple and is illustrated in
The algorithm for updating the centroid uses the distance of the centroid from the center of the middle pixel 291 in order to select 3 representative pixels and thus decide the value of the dot:
Pixel 1: the pixel containing the centroid
Pixel 2: the pixel to the left of Pixel 1 if the centroid's X coordinate (column value) is <½, otherwise the pixel to the right of Pixel 1.
Pixel 3: the pixel above pixel 1 if the centroid's Y coordinate (row value) is <½, otherwise the pixel below Pixel 1.
As shown in
Step 3: Update the Centroid Δs for Each Row in the Column
The idea of the Δs processing is to use the previous bit history to generate a ‘perfect’ dot at the expected centroid location for each row in a current column. The actual pixels (from the CCD) are compared with the expected ‘perfect’ pixels. If the two match, then the actual centroid location must be exactly in the expected position, so the centroid Δs must be valid and not need updating. Otherwise a process of changing the centroid Δs needs to occur in order to best fit the expected centroid location to the actual data. The new centroid Δs will be used for processing the dot in the next column.
Updating the centroid Δs is done as a subsequent process from Step 2 for the following reasons:
to reduce complexity in design, so that it can be performed as Step 2 of Phase 1 there is enough bandwidth remaining to allow it to allow reuse of DRAM buffers, and to ensure that all the data required for centroid updating is available at the start of the process without special pipelining.
The centroid Δ are processed as Δcolumn Δrow respectively to reduce complexity.
Although a given dot is 3 pixels in diameter, it is likely to occur in a 4×4 pixel area. However the edge of one dot will as a result be in the same pixel as the edge of the next dot. For this reason, centroid updating requires more than simply the information about a given single dot.
From this we can say that a maximum of 5 pixel columns and rows are required. It is possible to simplify the situation by taking the cases of row and column centroid Δs separately, treating them as the same problem, only rotated 90 degrees.
Taking the horizontal case first, it is necessary to change the column centroid Δs if the expected pixels don't match the detected pixels. From the bit history, the value of the bits found for the Current Row in the current dot column, the previous dot column, and the (previous-1)th dot column are known. The expected centroid location is also known. Using these two pieces of information, it is possible to generate a 20 bit expected bit pattern should the read be ‘perfect’. The 20 bit bit-pattern represents the expected A values for each of the 5 pixels across the horizontal dimension. The first nibble would represent the rightmost pixel of the leftmost dot. The next 3 nibbles represent the 3 pixels across the center of the dot 310 from the previous column, and the last nibble would be the leftmost pixel 317 of the rightmost dot (from the current column).
If the expected centroid is in the center of the pixel, we would expect a 20 bit pattern based on the following table:
The pixels to the left and right of the center dot are either 0 or D depending on whether the bit was a 0 or 1 respectively. The center three pixels are either 000 or DFD depending on whether the bit was a 0 or 1 respectively. These values are based on the physical area taken by a dot for a given pixel. Depending on the distance of the centroid from the exact center of the pixel, we would expect data shifted slightly, which really only affects the pixels either side of the center pixel. Since there are 16 possibilities, it is possible to divide the distance from the center by 16 and use that amount to shift the expected pixels.
Once the 20 bit 5 pixel expected value has been determined it can be compared against the actual pixels read. This can proceed by subtracting the expected pixels from the actual pixels read on a pixel by pixel basis, and finally adding the differences together to obtain a distance from the expected Δ values.
This process is carried out for the expected centroid and once for a shift of the centroid left and right by 1 amount in Δcolumn. The centroid with the smallest difference from the actual pixels is considered to be the ‘winner’ and the Δcolumn updated accordingly (which hopefully is ‘no change’). As a result, a Δcolumn cannot change by more than 1 each dot column.
The process is repeated for the vertical pixels, and Δrow is consequentially updated.
There is a large amount of scope here for parallelism. Depending on the rate of the clock chosen for the ACP unit 31 these units can be placed in series (and thus the testing of 3 different Δ could occur in consecutive clock cycles), or in parallel where all 3 can be tested simultaneously. If the clock rate is fast enough, there is less need for parallelism.
It is necessary to read the old Δ of the Δs, and to write them out again. This takes 10% of the bandwidth:
2*(76(3150/32)+2*3150)=27,648 ns=10% of bandwidth
It is necessary to read the bit history for the given row as we update its Δs. Each byte contains 2 row's bit histories, thus taking 2.5% of the bandwidth:
76((3150/2)/32)+2*(3150/2)=4,085 ns=2.5% of bandwidth
In the worst case of pixel drift due to a 1% rotation, centroids will shift 1 column every 57 pixel rows, but since a dot is 3 pixels in diameter, a given pixel column will be valid for 171 pixel rows (3*57). As a byte contains 2 pixels, the number of bytes valid in cached reads will be a worst case of 86 (out of 128 read). The worst case timing for 5 columns is therefore 31% bandwidth.
5*(((9450/(128*2))*320)*128/86)=88, 112 ns=31% of bandwidth.
The total bandwidth required for the updating the centroid A is summarised in the following table:
Read/Write centroid Δ 10% Read bit history 2.5% Read 5 columns of pixel data 31% TOTAL 43.5%
Memory Usage for Phase 2:
The 2 MB bit-image DRAM area is read from and written to during Phase 2 processing. The 2 MB pixel-data DRAM area is read.
The 0.5 MB scratch DRAM area is used for storing row data, namely:
Centroid array 24 bits (16:8) * 2 * 3150 = 18,900 byes Bit History array 3 bits * 3150 entries (2 per byte) = 1575 bytes
Phase 3—Unscramble and XOR the Raw Data
A linear feedback shift register is used to determine the relationship between the position within a symbol block eg. 334 and what code word eg. 355 it came from. This works as long as the same seed is used when generating the original Artcard images. The XOR of bytes from alternative source lines with 0xAA and 0x55 respectively is effectively free (in time) since the bottleneck of time is waiting for the DRAM to be ready to read/write to non-sequential addresses.
The timing of the unscrambling XOR process is effectively 2 MB of random byte-reads, and 2 MB of random byte-writes i.e. 2*(2 MB*76 ns+2 MB*2 ns)=327,155,712 ns or approximately 0.33 seconds. This timing assumes no caching.
Phase 4—Reed Solomon Decode
This phase is a loop, iterating through copies of the data in the bit image, passing them to the Reed-Solomon decode module until either a successful decode is made or until there are no more copies to attempt decode from.
The Reed-Solomon decoder used can be the VLIW processor, suitably programmed or, alternatively, a separate hardwired core such as LSI Logic's L64712. The L64712 has a throughput of 50 Mbits per second (around 6.25 MB per second), so the time may be bound by the speed of the Reed-Solomon decoder rather than the 2 MB read and 1 MB write memory access time (500 MB/sec for sequential accesses). The time taken in the worst case is thus 2/6.25 s=approximately 0.32 seconds. Of course, other artcard formats are possible.
Phase 5 Running the Vark Script
The overall time taken to read the Artcard 9 and decode it is therefore approximately 2.15 seconds. The apparent delay to the user is actually only 0.65 seconds (the total of Phases 3 and 4), since the Artcard stops moving after 1.5 seconds.
Once the Artcard is loaded, the Artvark script must be interpreted, Rather than run the script immediately, the script is only run upon the pressing of the ‘Print’ button 13 (
As noted previously, the VLIW processor 74 is a digital processing system that accelerates computationally expensive Vark functions. The balance of functions performed in software by the CPU core 72, and in hardware by the VLIW processor 74 will be implementation dependent. The goal of the VLIW processor 74 is to assist all Artcard styles to execute in a time that does not seem too slow to the user. As CPUs become faster and more powerful, the number of functions requiring hardware acceleration becomes less and less. The VLIW processor has a microcoded ALU sub-system that allows general hardware speed up of the following time-critical functions.
1) Image access mechanisms for general software processing
2) Image convolver.
3) Data driven image warper
4) Image scaling
5) Image tessellation
6) Affine transform
7) Image compositor
8) Color space transform
9) Histogram collector
10) Illumination of the Image
11) Brush stamper
12) Histogram collector
13) CCD image to internal image conversion
14) Construction of image pyramids (used by warper & for brushing)
The following table summarizes the time taken for each Vark operation if implemented in the ALU model. The method of implementing the function using the ALU model is described hereinafter.
1500 * 1000 image
Speed of Operation
1 cycle per output pixel
k/3 cycles per output pixel
(k = kernel size)
3 × 3 convolve
5 × 5 convolve
7 × 7 convolve
8 cycles per pixel
2 cycles per pixel
⅓ cycle per pixel
Image sub-pixel Translate
1 cycle per output pixel
Color lookup replace
½ cycle per pixel
Color space transform
8 cycles per pixel
Convert CCD image to
4 cycles per output pixel
internal image (including
color convert & scale)
Construct image pyramid
1 cycle per input pixel
2 cycles per input pixel
2 cycles per output pixel
2 cycles per output pixel
(scaled in X only)
2 cycles per output pixel
Brush rotate/translate and
4-8 cycles per output pixel
0.015 s to 0.030 s
0.060 s to 0.120 s
to for 4 channels
Cycles per pixel
(bm) = bumpmap
For example, to convert a CCD image, collect histogram & perform lookup-color replacement (for image enhancement) takes: 9+2+0.5 cycles per pixel, or 11.5 cycles. For a 1500×1000 image that is 172,500,000, or approximately 0.2 seconds per component, or 0.6 seconds for all 3 components. Add a simple warp, and the total comes to 0.6+0.36, almost 1 second.
A convolve is a weighted average around a center pixel. The average may be a simple sum, a sum of absolute values, the absolute value of a sum, or sums truncated at 0.
The image convolver is a general-purpose convolver, allowing a variety of functions to be implemented by varying the values within a variable-sized coefficient kernel. The kernel sizes supported are 3×3, 5×5 and 7×7 only.
Turning now to
A Coefficient Kernel 346 is a lookup table in DRAM. The kernel is arranged with coefficients in the same order as the Box Read Iterator 342. Each coefficient entry is 8 bits. A simple Sequential Read Iterator can be used to index into the kernel 346 and thus provide the coefficients. It simulates an image with ImageWidth equal to the kernel size, and a Loop option is set so that the kernel would continuously be provided.
One form of implementation of the convolve process on an ALU unit is as illustrated in
Kernel size (9, 25, or 49)
The control logic is used to count down the number of multiply/adds per pixel. When the count (accumulated in Latch2) reaches 0, the control signal generated is used to write out the current convolve value (from Latch1) and to reset the count. In this way, one control logic block can be used for a number of parallel convolve streams.
Each cycle the multiply ALU can perform one multiply/add to incorporate the appropriate part of a pixel. The number of cycles taken to sum up all the values is therefore the number of entries in the kernel. Since this is compute bound, it is appropriate to divide the image into multiple sections and process them in parallel on different ALU units.
On a 7×7 kernel, the time taken for each pixel is 49 cycles, or 490 ns. Since each cache line holds 32 pixels, the time available for memory access is 12,740 ns. ((32−7+1)×490 ns). The time taken to read 7 cache lines and write 1 is worse case 1,120 ns (8*140 ns, all accesses to same DRAM bank). Consequently it is possible to process up to 10 pixels in parallel given unlimited resources. Given a limited number of ALUs it is possible to do at best 4 in parallel. The time taken to therefore perform the convolution using a 7×7 kernel is 0.18375 seconds (1500*1000*490 ns/4=183,750,000 ns).
On a 5×5 kernel, the time taken for each pixel is 25 cycles, or 250 ns. Since each cache line holds 32 pixels, the time available for memory access is 7,000 ns. ((32−5+1)×250 ns). The time taken to read 5 cache lines and write 1 is worse case 840 ns (6*140 ns, all accesses to same DRAM bank). Consequently it is possible to process up to 7 pixels in parallel given unlimited resources. Given a limited number of ALUs it is possible to do at best 4. The time taken to therefore perform the convolution using a 5×5 kernel is 0.09375 seconds (1500*1000*250 ns/4=93,750,000 ns).
On a 3×3 kernel, the time taken for each pixel is 9 cycles, or 90 ns. Since each cache line holds 32 pixels, the time available for memory access is 2,700 ns. ((32−3+1)×90 ns). The time taken to read 3 cache lines and write 1 is worse case 560 ns (4*140 ns, all accesses to same DRAM bank). Consequently it is possible to process up to 4 pixels in parallel given unlimited resources. Given a limited number of ALUs and Read/Write Iterators it is possible to do at best 4. The time taken to therefore perform the convolution using a 3×3 kernel is 0.03375 seconds (1500*1000*90 ns/4=33,750,000 ns).
Consequently each output pixel takes kernelsize/3 cycles to compute. The actual timings are summarised in the following table:
Time taken Time to process Time to Process Kernel to calculate 1 channel at 3 channels at size output pixel 1500 × 1000 1500 × 1000 3 × 3 (9) 3 cycles 0.045 seconds 0.135 seconds 5 × 5 (25) 8⅓ cycles 0.125 seconds 0.375 seconds 7 × 7 (49) 16⅓ cycles 0.245 seconds 0.735 seconds
Compositing is to add a foreground image to a background image using a matte or a channel to govern the appropriate proportions of background and foreground in the final image. Two styles of compositing are preferably supported, regular compositing and associated compositing. The rules for the two styles are:
Regular composite: new Value=Foreground+(Background−Foreground)a Associated composite: new value=Foreground+(1−a)Background
The difference then, is that with associated compositing, the foreground has been pre-multiplied with the matte, while in regular compositing it has not. An example of the compositing process is as illustrated in
The alpha channel has values from 0 to 255 corresponding to the range 0 to 1.
A regular composite is implemented as:
The division by X/255 is approximated by 257X/65536. An implementation of the compositing process is shown in more detail in
Since 4 Iterators are required, the composite process takes 1 cycle per pixel, with a utilization of only half of the ALUs. The composite process is only run on a single channel. To composite a 3-channel image with another, the compositor must be run 3 times, once for each channel.
The time taken to composite a full size single channel is 0.015 s (1500*1000*1*10 ns), or 0.045 s to composite all 3 channels.
To approximate a divide by 255 it is possible to multiply by 257 and then divide by 65536. It can also be achieved by a single add (256*x+x) and ignoring (except for rounding purposes) the final 16 bits of the result.
As shown in
The composite process is only run on a single channel. To composite one 3-channel image with another, the compositor must be run 3 times, once for each channel. As the a channel is the same for each composite, it must be read each time. However it should be noted that to transfer (read or write) 4×32 byte cache-lines in the best case takes 320 ns. The pipeline gives an average of 1 cycle per pixel composite, taking 32 cycles or 320 ns (at 100 MHz) to composite the 32 pixels, so the a channel is effectively read for free. An entire channel can therefore be composited in:
1500/32*1000*320 ns=15,040,000 ns=0.015 seconds.
The time taken to composite a full size 3 channel image is therefore 0.045 seconds.
Construct Image Pyramid
Several functions, such as warping, tiling and brushing, require the average value of a given area of pixels. Rather than calculate the value for each area given, these functions preferably make use of an image pyramid. As illustrated previously in
An image pyramid is constructed from an original image, and consumes ⅓ of the size taken up by the original image (¼+ 1/16+ 1/64+ . . . ). For an original image of 1500×1000 the corresponding image pyramid is approximately ½ MB
The image pyramid can be constructed via a 3×3 convolve performed on 1 in 4 input image pixels advancing the center of the convolve kernel by 2 pixels each dimension. A 3×3 convolve results in higher accuracy than simply averaging 4 pixels, and has the added advantage that coordinates on different pyramid levels differ only by shifting 1 bit per level.
The construction of an entire pyramid relies on a software loop that calls the pyramid level construction function once for each level of the pyramid.
The timing to produce 1 level of the pyramid is 9/4*¼ of the resolution of the input image since we are generating an image ¼ of the size of the original. Thus for a 1500×1000 image:
Timing to produce level 1 of pyramid= 9/4*750*500=843, 750 cycles
Timing to produce level 2 of pyramid= 9/4*375*250=210, 938 cycles
Timing to produce level 3 of pyramid= 9/4*188*125=52, 735 cycles
The total time is ¾ cycle per original image pixel (image pyramid is ⅓ of original image size, and each pixel takes 9/4 cycles to be calculated, i.e. ⅓* 9/4=¾). In the case of a 1500×1000 image is 1,125,000 cycles (at 100 MHz), or 0.011 seconds. This timing is for a single color channel, 3 color channels require 0.034 seconds processing time.
General Data Driven Image Warper
The ACP 31 is able to carry out image warping manipulations of the input image. The principles of image warping are well-known in theory. One thorough text book reference on the process of warping is “Digital Image Warping” by George Wolberg published in 1990 by the IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, Calif. The warping process utilizes a warp map which forms part of the data fed in via Artcard 9. The warp map can be arbitrarily dimensioned in accordance with requirements and provides information of a mapping of input pixels to output pixels. Unfortunately, the utilization of arbitrarily sized warp maps presents a number of problems which must be solved by the image warper.
In order to determine the actual value and output image pixel should take so as to avoid aliasing effects, adjacent output image pixels should be examined to determine a region of input image pixels 367 which will contribute to the final output image pixel value. In this respect, the image pyramid is utilised as will become more apparent hereinafter.
The image warper performs several tasks in order to warp an image.
As noted previously, in a data driven warp, there is the need for a warp map that describes, for each output pixel, the center of a corresponding input image map. Instead of having a single warp map as previously described, containing interleaved x and y value information, it is possible to treat the X and Y coordinates as separate channels.
Consequently, preferably there are two warp maps: an X warp map showing the warping of X coordinates, and a Y warp map, showing the warping of the Y coordinates. As noted previously, the warp map 365 can have a different spatial resolution than the image they being scaled (for example a 32×32 warp-map 365 may adequately describe a warp for a 1500×1000 image 366). In addition, the warp maps can be represented by 8 or 16 bit values that correspond to the size of the image being warped.
There are several steps involved in producing points in the input image space from a given warp map:
1. Determining the corresponding position in the warp map for the output pixel
2. Fetch the values from the warp map for the next step (this can require scaling in the resolution domain if the warp map is only 8 bit values)
3. Bi-linear interpolation of the warp map to determine the actual value
4. Scaling the value to correspond to the input image domain
The first step can be accomplished by multiplying the current X/Y coordinate in the output image by a scale factor (which can be different in X & Y). For example, if the output image was 1500×1000, and the warp map was 150×100, we scale both X & Y by 1/10.
Fetching the values from the warp map requires access to 2 Lookup tables. One Lookup table indexes into the X warp-map, and the other indexes into the Y warp-map. The lookup table either reads 8 or 16 bit entries from the lookup table, but always returns 16 bit values (clearing the high 8 bits if the original values are only 8 bits).
The next step in the pipeline is to bi-linearly interpolate the looked-up warp map values.
Finally the result from the bi-linear interpolation is scaled to place it in the same domain as the image to be warped. Thus, if the warp map range was 0-255, we scale X by 1500/255, and Y by 1000/255.
The interpolation process is as illustrated in
Xscale (scales 0-ImageWidth to 0-WarpmapWidth)
Yscale (scales 0-ImageHeight to 0-WarpmapHeight)
XrangeScale (scales warpmap range (eg 0-255) to
YrangeScale (scales warpmap range (eg 0-255) to
The following lookup table is used:
Lookup Size Details LU1 and WarpmapWidth × Warpmap lookup. LU2 WarpmapHeight Given [X, Y] the 4 entries required for bi-linear interpolation are returned. Even if entries are only 8 bit, they are returned as 16 bit (high 8 bits 0). Transfer time is 4 entries at 2 bytes per entry. Total time is 8 cycles as 2 lookups are used.
The points from the warp map 365 locate centers of pixel regions in the input image 367. The distance between input image pixels of adjacent output image pixels will indicate the size of the regions, and this distance can be approximated via a span calculation.
Preferably, the points are processed in a vertical strip output order, P0 is the previous point on the same line within a strip, and when P1 is the first point on line within a strip, then PO refers to the last point in the previous strip's corresponding line. P2 is the previous line's point in the same strip, so it can be kept in a 32-entry history buffer. The basic of the calculate span process are as illustrated in
The following DRAM FIFO is used:
8 ImageWidth bytes.
P2 history/lookup (both X & Y in same
[ImageWidth × 2
entries at 32 bits per
P1 is put into the FIFO and taken out
again at the same pixel on the following
row as P2.
Transfer time is 4 cycles
(2 × 32 bits, with 1 cycle per 16 bits)
Since a 32 bit precision span history is kept, in the case of a 1500 pixel wide image being warped 12,000 bytes temporary storage is required.
Calculation of the span 364 uses 2 Adder ALUs (1 for span calculation, 1 for looping and counting for P0 and P2 histories) takes 7 cycles as follows:
A = ABS(P1x − P2x)
Store P1x in P2x history
B = ABS(P1x − P0x)
Store P1x in P0x history
A = MAX(A, B)
B = ABS(P1y − P2y)
Store P1y in P2y history
A = MAX(A, B)
B = ABS(P1y − P0y)
Store P1y in P0y history
A = MAX(A, B)
The history buffers 365, 366 are cached DRAM. The ‘Previous Line’ (for P2 history) buffer 366 is 32 entries of span-precision. The ‘Previous Point’ (for P0 history). Buffer 365 requires 1 register that is used most of the time (for calculation of points 1 to 31 of a line in a strip), and a DRAM buffered set of history values to be used in the calculation of point 0 in a strip's line.
32 bit precision in span history requires 4 cache lines to hold P2 history, and 2 for P0 history. P0's history is only written and read out once every 8 lines of 32 pixels to a temporary storage space of (ImageHeight*4) bytes. Thus a 1500 pixel high image being warped requires 6000 bytes temporary storage, and a total of 6 cache lines.
Having determined the center and span of the area from the input image to be averaged, the final part of the warp process is to determine the value of the output pixel. Since a single output pixel could theoretically be represented by the entire input image, it is potentially too time-consuming to actually read and average the specific area of the input image contributing to the output pixel. Instead, it is possible to approximate the pixel value by using an image pyramid of the input image.
If the span is 1 or less, it is necessary only to read the original image's pixels around the given coordinate, and perform bi-linear interpolation. If the span is greater than 1, we must read two appropriate levels of the image pyramid and perform tri-linear interpolation. Performing linear interpolation between two levels of the image pyramid is not strictly correct, but gives acceptable results (it errs on the side of blurring the resultant image).
As shown in
The image pyramid address mode issued to generate addresses for pixel coordinates at (x, y) on pyramid level s & s+1. Each level of the image pyramid contains pixels sequential in x. Hence, reads in x are likely to be cache hits.
Reasonable cache coherence can be obtained as local regions in the output image are typically locally coherent in the input image (perhaps at a different scale however, but coherent within the scale). Since it is not possible to know the relationship between the input and output images, we ensure that output pixels are written in a vertical strip (via a Vertical-Strip Iterator) in order to best make use of cache coherence.
Tri-linear interpolation can be completed in as few as 2 cycles on average using 4 multiply ALUs and all 4 adder ALUs as a pipeline and assuming no memory access required. But since all the interpolation values are derived from the image pyramids, interpolation speed is completely dependent on cache coherence (not to mention the other units are busy doing warp-map scaling and span calculations). As many cache lines as possible should therefore be available to the image-pyramid reading. The best speed will be 8 cycles, using 2 Multiply ALUs.
The output pixels are written out to the DRAM via a Vertical-Strip Write Iterator that uses 2 cache lines. The speed is therefore limited to a minimum of 8 cycles per output pixel. If the scaling of the warp map requires 8 or fewer cycles, then the overall speed will be unchanged. Otherwise the throughput is the time taken to scale the warp map. In most cases the warp map will be scaled up to match the size of the photo.
Assuming a warp map that requires 8 or fewer cycles per pixel to scale, the time taken to convert a single color component of image is therefore 0.12 s (1500*1000*8 cycles*10 ns per cycle).
The histogram collector is a microcode program that takes an image channel as input, and produces a histogram as output. Each of a channel's pixels has a value in the range 0-255. Consequently there are 256 entries in the histogram table, each entry 32 bits—large enough to contain a count of an entire 1500×1000 image.
As shown in
The microcode has two passes: an initialization pass which sets all the counts to zero, and then a “count” stage that increments the appropriate counter for each pixel read from the image. The first stage requires the Address Unit and a single Adder ALU, with the address of the histogram table 377 for initialising.
A = Base address
Adder Unit 1
Write 0 to
Out1 = A
A + (Adder1.Out1 << 2)
A = A − 1
Rest of processing
Rest of processing
The second stage processes the actual pixels from the image, and uses 4 Adder ALUs:
A = 0
A = −1
Out1 = A
A = Adder1.Out1
A = Adr.Out1
A = A + 1
Out1 = Read 4 bytes from:
A = pixel
Z = pixel −
(A + (Adder1.Out1 << 2))
Out1 = A
Out1 = A
Out1 = A
Write Adder4.Out1 to:
A = Adder3.Out1
(A + (Adder2.Out << 2)
Write Adder4.Out1 to:
(A + (Adder2.Out << 2)
The Zero flag from Adder2 cycle 2 is used to stay at microcode address 2 for as long as the input pixel is the same. When it changes, the new count is written out in microcode address 3, and processing resumes at microcode address 2. Microcode address 4 is used at the end, when there are no more pixels to be read.
Stage 1 takes 256 cycles, or 2560 ns. Stage 2 varies according to the values of the pixels. The worst case time for lookup table replacement is 2 cycles per image pixel if every pixel is not the same as its neighbor. The time taken for a single color lookup is 0.03 s (1500×1000×2 cycle per pixel×10 ns per cycle=30,000,000 ns). The time taken for 3 color components is 3 times this amount, or 0.09 s.
Color transformation is achieved in two main ways:
As illustrated in
8 bits per entry
Table indexed by the 8 highest significant
bits of X.
Resultant 8 bits treated as fixed point 0:8
The total process requires 2 Sequential Read Iterators and 2 Sequential Write iterators. The 2 New Color Tables require 8 cache lines each to hold the 256 bytes (256 entries of 1 byte).
The average time for lookup table replacement is therefore ½ cycle per image pixel. The time taken for a single color lookup is 0.0075 s (1500×1000×½ cycle per pixel×10 ns per cycle=7,500,000 ns). The time taken for 3 color components is 3 times this amount, or 0.0225 s. Each color component has to be processed one after the other under control of software.
Color Space Conversion
Color Space conversion is only required when moving between color spaces. The CCD images are captured in RGB color space, and printing occurs in CMY color space, while clients of the ACP 31 likely process images in the Lab color space. All of the input color space channels are typically required as input to determine each output channel's component value. Thus the logical process is as illustrated 385 in
Simply, conversion between Lab, RGB, and CMY is fairly straightforward. However the individual color profile of a particular device can vary considerably. Consequently, to allow future CCDs, inks, and printers, the ACP 31 performs color space conversion by means of tri-linear interpolation from color space conversion lookup tables.
Color coherence tends to be area based rather than line based. To aid cache coherence during tri-linear interpolation lookups, it is best to process an image in vertical strips. Thus the read 386-388 and write 389 iterators would be Vertical-Strip Iterators.
Tri-Linear Color Space Conversion
For each output color component, a single 3D table mapping the input color space to the output color component is required. For example, to convert CCD images from RGB to Lab, 3 tables calibrated to the physical characteristics of the CCD are required:
To convert from Lab to CMY, 3 tables calibrated to the physical characteristics of the ink/printer are required:
The 8-bit input color components are treated as fixed-point numbers (3:5) in order to index into the conversion tables. The 3 bits of integer give the index, and the 5 bits of fraction are used for interpolation. Since 3 bits gives 8 values, 3 dimensions gives 512 entries (8×8×8). The size of each entry is 1 byte, requiring 512 bytes per table.
The Convert Color Space process can therefore be implemented as shown in
8 × 8 × 8 entries
Convert[X, Y, Z]
Table indexed by the 3 highest bits of X, Y,
8 bits per entry
8 entries returned from Tri-linear index
Resultant 8 bits treated as fixed point 8:0
Transfer time is 8 entries at 1 byte per
Tri-linear interpolation returns interpolation between 8 values. Each 8 bit value takes 1 cycle to be returned from the lookup, for a total of 8 cycles. The tri-linear interpolation also takes 8 cycles when 2 Multiply ALUs are used per cycle. General tri-linear interpolation information is given in the ALU section of this document. The 512 bytes for the lookup table fits in 16 cache lines.
The time taken to convert a single color component of image is therefore 0.105 s (1500*1000*7 cycles*10 ns per cycle). To convert 3 components takes 0.415 s. Fortunately, the color space conversion for printout takes place on the fly during printout itself, so is not a perceived delay.
If color components are converted separately, they must not overwrite their input color space components since all color components from the input color space are required for converting each component.
Since only 1 multiply unit is used to perform the interpolation, it is alternatively possible to do the entire Lab→CMY conversion as a single pass. This would require 3 Vertical-Strip Read Iterators, 3 Vertical-Strip Write Iterators, and access to 3 conversion tables simultaneously. In that case, it is possible to write back onto the input image and thus use no extra memory. However, access to 3 conversion tables equals ⅓ of the caching for each, that could lead to high latency for the overall process.
Prior to compositing an image with a photo, it may be necessary to rotate, scale and translate it. If the image is only being translated, it can be faster to use a direct sub-pixel translation function. However, rotation, scale-up and translation can all be incorporated into a single affine transform.
A general affine transform can be included as an accelerated function. Affine transforms are limited to 2D, and if scaling down, input images should be pre-scaled via the Scale function. Having a general affine transform function allows an output image to be constructed one block at a time, and can reduce the time taken to perform a number of transformations on an image since all can be applied at the same time.
A transformation matrix needs to be supplied by the client—the matrix should be the inverse matrix of the transformation desired i.e. applying the matrix to the output pixel coordinate will give the input coordinate.
A 2D matrix is usually represented as a 3×3 array:
Since the 3rd column is always[0, 0, 1] clients do not need to specify it. Clients instead specify a, b, c, d, e, and f.
Given a coordinate in the output image (x, y) whose top left pixel coordinate is given as (0, 0), the input coordinate is specified by: (ax+cy+e, bx+dy+f). Once the input coordinate is determined, the input image is sampled to arrive at the pixel value. Bi-linear interpolation of input image pixels is used to determine the value of the pixel at the calculated coordinate. Since affine transforms preserve parallel lines, images are processed in output vertical strips of 32 pixels wide for best average input image cache coherence.
Three Multiply ALUs are required to perform the bi-linear interpolation in 2 cycles. Multiply ALUs 1 and 2 do linear interpolation in X for lines Y and Y+1 respectively, and Multiply ALU 3 does linear interpolation in Y between the values output by Multiply ALUs 1 and 2.
As we move to the right across an output line in X, 2 Adder ALUs calculate the actual input image coordinates by adding ‘a’ to the current X value, and ‘b’ to the current Y value respectively. When we advance to the next line (either the next line in a vertical strip after processing a maximum of 32 pixels, or to the first line in a new vertical strip) we update X and Y to pre-calculated start coordinate values constants for the given block
The process for calculating an input coordinate is given in
Once we have the input image coordinates, the input image must be sampled. A lookup table is used to return the values at the specified coordinates in readiness for bilinear interpolation. The basic process is as indicated in
Bilinear Image lookup [X, Y]
Table indexed by the integer part of X and Y.
4 entries returned from Bilinear index address unit,
2 per cycle.
8 bits per
Each 8 bit entry treated as fixed point 8:0
Transfer time is 2 cycles (2 16 bit entries in FIFO
hold the 4 8 bit entries)
The affine transform requires all 4 Multiply Units and all 4 Adder ALUs, and with good cache coherence can perform an affine transform with an average of 2 cycles per output pixel. This timing assumes good cache coherence, which is true for non-skewed images. Worst case timings are severely skewed images, which meaningful Vark scripts are unlikely to contain.
The time taken to transform a 128×128 image is therefore 0.00033 seconds (32,768 cycles). If this is a clip image with 4 channels (including a channel), the total time taken is 0.00131 seconds (131,072 cycles).
A Vertical-Strip Write Iterator is required to output the pixels. No Read Iterator is required. However, since the affine transform accelerator is bound by time taken to access input image pixels, as many cache lines as possible should be allocated to the read of pixels from the input image. At least 32 should be available, and preferably 64 or more.
Scaling is essentially a re-sampling of an image. Scale up of an image can be performed using the Affine Transform function. Generalized scaling of an image, including scale down, is performed by the hardware accelerated Scale function. Scaling is performed independently in X and Y, so different scale factors can be used in each dimension.
The generalized scale unit must match the Affine Transform scale function in terms of registration. The generalized scaling process is as illustrated in
Where the following constants are set by software:
Number of input pixels that contribute to an output pixel in X
The following registers are used to hold temporary variables:
Amount of input pixel remaining unused (starts at 1 and
Amount of input pixels remaining to contribute to current
output pixel (starts at K1 and decrements)
Next pixel (in X)
Accumulator for output pixel (unscaled)
Pixel Scaled in X (output)
The Scale in Y process is illustrated in
Number of input pixels that contribute to an output pixel in Y
The following registers are used to hold temporary variables:
Amount of input pixel remaining unused (starts at 1 and
Amount of input pixels remaining to contribute to current
output pixel (starts at K1 and decrements)
Next pixel (in Y)
Pixel Scaled in Y (output)
The following DRAM FIFOs are used:
Lookup Size Details FIFO1 ImageWidthOUT entries 1 row of image pixels already scaled 8 bits per entry in X 1 cycle transfer time FIFO2 ImageWidthOUT entries 1 row of image pixels already scaled 16 bits per entry in X 2 cycles transfer time (1 byte per cycle)
Tessellation of an image is a form of tiling. It involves copying a specially designed “tile” multiple times horizontally and vertically into a second (usually larger) image space. When tessellated, the small tile forms a seamless picture. One example of this is a small tile of a section of a brick wall. It is designed so that when tessellated, it forms a full brick wall. Note that there is no scaling or sub-pixel translation involved in tessellation.
The most cache-coherent way to perform tessellation is to output the image sequentially line by line, and to repeat the same line of the input image for the duration of the line. When we finish the line, the input image must also advance to the next line (and repeat it multiple times across the output line).
An overview of the tessellation function is illustrated 390 in
At the end of processing a line, a small software routine updates the Sequential Read Iterator's StartLine and EndLine registers before restarting the microcode and the Sequential Read Iterator (which clears the FIFO and repeats line 2 of the tile). The Write Iterators 393-395 are not updated, and simply keep on writing out to their respective parts of the output image. The net effect is that the tile has one line repeated across an output line, and then the tile is repeated vertically too.
This process does not fully use the memory bandwidth since we get good cache coherence in the input image, but it does allow the tessellation to function with tiles of any size. The process uses 1 Adder ALU. If the 3 Write Iterators 393-395 each write to ⅓ of the image (breaking the image on tile sized boundaries), then the entire tessellation process takes place at an average speed of ⅓ cycle per output image pixel. For an image of 1500×1000, this equates to 0.005 seconds (5,000,000 ns).
Before compositing an image with a background, it may be necessary to translate it by a sub-pixel amount in both X and Y. Sub-pixel transforms can increase an image's size by 1 pixel in each dimension. The value of the region outside the image can be client determined, such as a constant value (e.g. black), or edge pixel replication. Typically it will be better to use black.
The sub-pixel translation process is as illustrated in
It can also be represented as a form of interpolation:
Implementation of a single (on average) cycle interpolation engine using a single Multiply ALU and a single Adder ALU in conjunction is straightforward. Sub-pixel translation in both X & Y requires 2 interpolation engines.
In order to sub-pixel translate in Y, 2 Sequential Read Iterators 400, 401 are required (one is reading a line ahead of the other from the same image), and a single Sequential Write Iterator 403 is required.
The first interpolation engine (interpolation in Y) accepts pairs of data from 2 streams, and linearly interpolates between them. The second interpolation engine (interpolation in X) accepts its data as a single 1 dimensional stream and linearly interpolates between values. Both engines interpolate in 1 cycle on average.
Each interpolation engine 405, 406 is capable of performing the sub-pixel translation in 1 cycle per output pixel on average. The overall time is therefore 1 cycle per output pixel, with requirements of 2 Multiply ALUs and 2 Adder ALUs.
The time taken to output 32 pixels from the sub-pixel translate function is on average 320 ns (32 cycles). This is enough time for 4 full cache-line accesses to DRAM, so the use of 3 Sequential Iterators is well within timing limits.
The total time taken to sub-pixel translate an image is therefore 1 cycle per pixel of the output image. A typical image to be sub-pixel translated is a tile of size 128*128. The output image size is 129*129. The process takes 129*129*10 ns=166,410 ns.
The Image Tiler function also makes use of the sub-pixel translation algorithm, but does not require the writing out of the sub-pixel-translated data, but rather processes it further.
The high level algorithm for tiling an image is carried out in software. Once the placement of the tile has been determined, the appropriate colored tile must be composited. The actual compositing of each tile onto an image is carried out in hardware via the microcoded ALUs. Compositing a tile involves both a texture application and a color application to a background image. In some cases it is desirable to compare the actual amount of texture added to the background in relation to the intended amount of texture, and use this to scale the color being applied. In these cases the texture must be applied first.
Since color application functionality and texture application functionality are somewhat independent, they are separated into sub-functions.
The number of cycles per 4-channel tile composite for the different texture styles and coloring styles is summarised in the following table:
Constant Pixel color color Replace texture 4 4.75 25% background + tile texture 4 4.75 Average height algorithm 5 5.75 Average height algorithm with feedback 5.75 6.5
Tile Coloring and Compositing
A tile is set to have either a constant color (for the whole tile), or takes each pixel value from an input image. Both of these cases may also have feedback from a texturing stage to scale the opacity (similar to thinning paint).
The steps for the 4 cases can be summarised as:
Each of the 4 cases is treated separately, in order to minimize the time taken to perform the function. The summary of time per color compositing style for a single color channel is described in the following table:
No feedback Feedback from texture from texture Tiling color style (cycles per pixel) (cycles per pixel) Tile has constant color per pixel 1 2 Tile has per pixel color from 1.25 2 input image
In this case, the tile has a constant color, determined by software. While the ACP 31 is placing down one tile, the software can be determining the placement and coloring of the next tile.
The color of the tile can be determined by bi-linear interpolation into a scaled version of the image being tiled. The scaled version of the image can be created and stored in place of the image pyramid, and needs only to be performed once per entire tile operation. If the tile size is 128×128, then the image can be scaled down by 128:1 in each dimension.
When there is no feedback from the texturing of a tile, the tile is simply placed at the specified coordinates. The tile color is used for each pixel's color, and the opacity for the composite comes from the tile's sub-pixel translated opacity channel. In this case color channels and the texture channel can be processed completely independently between tiling passes.
The overview of the process is illustrated in
Compositing can be performed using 1 Multiply ALU and 1 Adder ALU in an average time of 1 cycle per composite. Requirements are therefore 3 Multiply ALUs and 3 Adder ALUs. 4 Sequential Iterators 413-416 are required, taking 320 ns to read or write their contents. With an average number of cycles of 1 per pixel to sub-pixel translate and composite, there is sufficient time to read and write the buffers.
When there is feedback from the texturing of a tile, the tile is placed at the specified coordinates. The tile color is used for each pixel's color, and the opacity for the composite comes from the tile's sub-pixel translated opacity channel scaled by the feedback parameter. Thus the texture values must be calculated before the color value is applied.
The overview of the process is illustrated in
Compositing 422 can be performed using 1 Multiply ALU and 1 Adder ALU in an average time of 1 cycle per composite. Requirements are therefore 4 Multiply ALUs and all 4 Adder ALUs. Although the entire process can be accomplished in 1 cycle on average, the bottleneck is the memory access, since 5 Sequential Iterators are required. With sufficient buffering, the average time is 1.25 cycles per pixel.
Color from Input Image
One way of coloring pixels in a tile is to take the color from pixels in an input image. Again, there are two possibilities for compositing: with and without feedback from the texturing.
In this case, the tile color simply comes from the relative pixel in the input image. The opacity for compositing comes from the tile's opacity channel sub-pixel shifted.
The overview of the process is illustrated in
Compositing 426 can be performed using 1 Multiply ALU and 1 Adder ALU in an average time of 1 cycle per composite. Requirements are therefore 3 Multiply ALUs and 3 Adder ALUs. Although the entire process can be accomplished in 1 cycle on average, the bottleneck is the memory access, since 5 Sequential Iterators are required. With sufficient buffering, the average time is 1.25 cycles per pixel.
In this case, the tile color still comes from the relative pixel in the input image, but the opacity for compositing is affected by the relative amount of texture height actually applied during the texturing pass. This process is as illustrated in
Sub-pixel translation 431 of a tile can be accomplished using 2 Multiply ALUs and 2 Adder ALUs in an average time of 1 cycle per output pixel. The output from the sub-pixel translation is the mask to be scaled 431 according to the feedback read from the Feedback Sequential Read Iterator 432. The feedback is passed to a Scaler (1 Multiply ALU) 431.
Compositing 434 can be performed using 1 Multiply ALU and 1 Adder ALU in an average time of 1 cycle per composite.
Requirements are therefore all 4 Multiply ALUs and 3 Adder ALUs. Although the entire process can be accomplished in 1 cycle on average, the bottleneck is the memory access, since 6 Sequential Iterators are required. With sufficient buffering, the average time is 1.5 cycles per pixel.
Each tile has a surface texture defined by its texture channel. The texture must be sub-pixel translated and then applied to the output image. There are 3 styles of texture compositing:
In addition, the Average height algorithm can save feedback parameters for color compositing.
The time taken per texture compositing style is summarised in the following table:
Cycles per pixel Cycles per pixel (no feedback from (feedback from Tiling color style texture) texture) Replace texture 1 — 25% background + tile 1 — texture value Average height algorithm 2 2
In this instance, the texture from the tile replaces the texture channel of the image, as illustrated in
The time taken for replace texture compositing is 1 cycle per pixel. There is no feedback, since 100% of the texture value is always applied to the background. There is therefore no requirement for processing the channels in any particular order.
25% Background+Tile's Texture
In this instance, the texture from the tile is added to 25% of the existing texture value. The new value must be greater than or equal to the original value. In addition, the new texture value must be clipped at 255 since the texture channel is only 8 bits. The process utilised is illustrated in
Sub-pixel translation 440 of a tile's texture can be accomplished using 2 Multiply ALUs and 2 Adder ALUs in an average time of 1 cycle per output pixel. The output from this sub-pixel translation 440 is fed to an adder 441 where it is added to ¼ 442 of the background texture value. Min and Max functions 444 are provided by the 2 adders not used for sub-pixel translation and the output written to a Sequential Write Iterator 445.
The time taken for this style of texture compositing is 1 cycle per pixel. There is no feedback, since 100% of the texture value is considered to have been applied to the background (even if clipping at 255 occurred). There is therefore no requirement for processing the channels in any particular order.
Average Height Algorithm
In this texture application algorithm, the average height under the tile is computed, and each pixel's height is compared to the average height. If the pixel's height is less than the average, the stroke height is added to the background height. If the pixel's height is greater than or equal to the average, then the stroke height is added to the average height. Thus background peaks thin the stroke. The height is constrained to increase by a minimum amount to prevent the background from thinning the stroke application to 0 (the minimum amount can be 0 however). The height is also clipped at 255 due to the 8-bit resolution of the texture channel.
There can be feedback of the difference in texture applied versus the expected amount applied. The feedback amount can be used as a scale factor in the application of the tile's color.
In both cases, the average texture is provided by software, calculated by performing a bi-level interpolation on a scaled version of the texture map. Software determines the next tile's average texture height while the current tile is being applied. Software must also provide the minimum thickness for addition, which is typically constant for the entire tiling process.
With no feedback, the texture is simply applied to the background texture, as shown in
4 Sequential Iterators are required, which means that if the process can be pipelined for 1 cycle, the memory is fast enough to keep up.
Sub-pixel translation 450 of a tile's texture can be accomplished using 2 Multiply ALUs and 2 Adder ALUs in an average time of 1 cycle per output pixel. Each Min & Max function 451,452 requires a separate Adder ALU in order to complete the entire operation in 1 cycle. Since 2 are already used by the sub-pixel translation of the texture, there are not enough remaining for a 1 cycle average time.
The average time for processing 1 pixel's texture is therefore 2 cycles. Note that there is no feedback, and hence the color channel order of compositing is irrelevant.
This is conceptually the same as the case without feedback, except that in addition to the standard processing of the texture application algorithm, it is necessary to also record the proportion of the texture actually applied. The proportion can be used as a scale factor for subsequent compositing of the tile's color onto the background image. A flow diagram is illustrated in
16 bits per entry
Table indexed by N (range 0-255)
Resultant 16 bits treated as fixed point
Each of the 256 entries in the software provided 1/N table 460 is 16 bits, thus requiring 16 cache lines to hold continuously.
Sub-pixel translation 461 of a tile's texture can be accomplished using 2 Multiply ALUs and 2 Adder ALUs in an average time of 1 cycle per output pixel. Each Min 462 & Max 463 function requires a separate Adder ALU in order to complete the entire operation in 1 cycle. Since 2 are already used by the sub-pixel translation of the texture, there are not enough remaining for a 1 cycle average time.
The average time for processing 1 pixel's texture is therefore 2 cycles. Sufficient space must be allocated for the feedback data area (a tile sized image channel). The texture must be applied before the tile's color is applied, since the feedback is used in scaling the tile's opacity.
CCD Image Interpolator
Images obtained from the CCD via the ISI 83 (
Several processes need to be performed on the CCD captured image in order to transform it into a useful form for processing:
The entire channel of an image is required to be available at the same time in order to allow warping. In a low memory model (8 MB), there is only enough space to hold a single channel at full resolution as a temporary object. Thus the color conversion is to a single color channel. The limiting factor on the process is the color conversion, as it involves tri-linear interpolation from RGB to the internal color space, a process that takes 0.026 ns per channel (750×500×7 cycles per pixel×10 ns per cycle=26,250,000 ns).
It is important to perform the color conversion before scaling of the internal color space image as this reduces the number of pixels scaled (and hence the overall process time) by a factor of 4.
The requirements for all of the transformations may not fit in the ALU scheme. The transformations are therefore broken into two phases:
Phase 1: Up-interpolation of low-sample rate color components in CCD image (interpreting correct orientation of pixels)
Color conversion from RGB to the internal color space
Writing Out the Image in a Planar Format
Phase 2: Scaling of the internal space image from 750×500 to 1500×1000
Separating out the scale function implies that the small color converted image must be in memory at the same time as the large one. The output from Phase 1 (0.5 MB) can be safely written to the memory area usually kept for the image pyramid (1 MB). The output from Phase 2 can be the general expanded CCD image. Separation of the scaling also allows the scaling to be accomplished by the Affine Transform, and also allows for a different CCD resolution that may not be a simple 1:2 expansion.
Phase 1: Up-interpolation of low-sample rate color components.
Each of the 3 color components (R, G, and B) needs to be up interpolated in order for color conversion to take place for a given pixel. We have 7 cycles to perform the interpolation per pixel since the color conversion takes 7 cycles.
Interpolation of G is straightforward and is illustrated in
Each pixel therefore contains one component from the CCD, and the other 2 up-interpolated. When one component is being bi-linearly interpolated, the other is being linearly interpolated. Since the interpolation factor is a constant 0.5, interpolation can be calculated by an add and a shift 1 bit right (in 1 cycle), and bi-linear interpolation of factor 0.5 can be calculated by 3 adds and a shift 2 bits right (3 cycles). The total number of cycles required is therefore 4, using a single multiply ALU.
Color space conversion from RGB to Lab is achieved using the same method as that described in the general Color Space Convert function, a process that takes 8 cycles per pixel. Phase 1 processing can be described with reference to
The up-interpolate of the RGB takes 4 cycles (1 Multiply ALU), but the conversion of the color space takes 8 cycles per pixel (2 Multiply ALUs) due to the lookup transfer time.
Scaling the Image
This phase is concerned with up-interpolating the image from the CCD resolution (750×500) to the working photo resolution (1500×1000). Scaling is accomplished by running the Affine transform with a scale of 1:2. The timing of a general affine transform is 2 cycles per output pixel, which in this case means an elapsed scaling time of 0.03 seconds.
Print Head 44
Loading a Segment for Printing
Before anything can be printed, each of the 8 segments in the Print Head must be loaded with 6 rows of data corresponding to the following relative rows in the final output image:
Row 0=Line N, Yellow, even dots 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, . . . .
Row 1=Line N+8, Yellow, odd dots 1, 3, 5, 7, . . . .
Row 2=Line N+10, Magenta, even dots 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, . . . .
Row 3=Line N+18, Magenta, odd dots 1, 3, 5, 7, . . . .
Row 4=Line N+20, Cyan, even dots 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, . . . .
Row 5=Line N+28, Cyan, odd dots 1, 3, 5, 7, . . . .
Each of the segments prints dots over different parts of the page. Each segment prints 750 dots of one color, 375 even dots on one row, and 375 odd dots on another. The 8 segments have dots corresponding to positions:
Each dot is represented in the Print Head segment by a single bit. The data must be loaded 1 bit at a time by placing the data on the segment's BitValue pin, and clocked in to a shift register in the segment according to a BitClock. Since the data is loaded into a shift register, the order of loading bits must be correct. Data can be clocked in to the Print Head at a maximum rate of 10 MHz.
Once all the bits have been loaded, they must be transferred in parallel to the Print Head output buffer, ready for printing. The transfer is accomplished by a single pulse on the segment's ParallelXferClock pin.
Controlling the Print
In order to conserve power, not all the dots of the Print Head have to be printed simultaneously. A set of control lines enables the printing of specific dots. An external controller, such as the ACP, can change the number of dots printed at once, as well as the duration of the print pulse in accordance with speed and/or power requirements.
Each segment has 5 NozzleSelect lines, which are decoded to select 32 sets of nozzles per row. Since each row has 375 nozzles, each set contains 12 nozzles. There are also 2 BankEnable lines, one for each of the odd and even rows of color. Finally, each segment has 3 ColorEnable lines, one for each of C, M, and Y colors. A pulse on one of the ColorEnable lines causes the specified nozzles of the color's specified rows to be printed. A pulse is typically about 2 s in duration.
If all the segments are controlled by the same set of NozzleSelect, BankEnable and ColorEnable lines (wired externally to the print head), the following is true:
If both odd and even banks print simultaneously (both BankEnable bits are set), 24 nozzles fire simultaneously per segment, 192 nozzles in all, consuming 5.7 Watts.
If odd and even banks print independently, only 12 nozzles fire simultaneously per segment, 96 in all, consuming 2.85 Watts.
Print Head Interface 62
The Print Head Interface 62 connects the ACP to the Print Head, providing both data and appropriate signals to the external Print Head. The Print Head Interface 62 works in conjunction with both a VLIW processor 74 and a software algorithm running on the CPU in order to print a photo in approximately 2 seconds.
An overview of the inputs and outputs to the Print Head Interface is shown in
The VLIW Output FIFO contains the dithered bi-level C, M, and Y 6000×9000 resolution print image in the correct order for output to the 8 DataBits. The ParallelXferClock is connected to each of the 8 segments on the print head, so that on a single pulse, all segments transfer their bits at the same time. Finally, the NozzleSelect, BankEnable and ColorEnable lines are connected to each of the 8 segments, allowing the Print Head Interface to control the duration of the C, M, and Y drop pulses as well as how many drops are printed with each pulse. Registers in the Print Head Interface allow the specification of pulse durations between 0 and 6 μs, with a typical duration of 2 μs.
Printing an Image
There are 2 phases that must occur before an image is in the hand of the Artcam user:
1. Preparation of the image to be printed
2. Printing the prepared image
Preparation of an image only needs to be performed once. Printing the image can be performed as many times as desired.
Prepare the Image
Preparing an image for printing involves:
1. Convert the Photo Image into a Print Image
2. Rotation of the Print Image (internal color space) to align the output for the orientation of the printer
3. Up-interpolation of compressed channels (if necessary)
4. Color conversion from the internal color space to the CMY color space appropriate to the specific printer and ink
At the end of image preparation, a 4.5 MB correctly oriented 1000×1500 CMY image is ready to be printed.
Convert Photo Image to Print Image
The conversion of a Photo Image into a Print Image requires the execution of a Vark script to perform image processing. The script is either a default image enhancement script or a Vark script taken from the currently inserted Artcard. The Vark script is executed via the CPU, accelerated by functions performed by the VLIW Vector Processor.
Rotate the Print Image
The image in memory is originally oriented to be top upwards. This allows for straightforward
Vark processing. Before the image is printed, it must be aligned with the print roll's orientation. The re-alignment only needs to be done once. Subsequent Prints of a Print Image will already have been rotated appropriately.
The transformation to be applied is simply the inverse of that applied during capture from the CCD when the user pressed the “Image Capture” button on the Artcam. If the original rotation was 0, then no transformation needs to take place. If the original rotation was +90 degrees, then the rotation before printing needs to be −90 degrees (same as 270 degrees). The method used to apply the rotation is the Vark accelerated Affine Transform function. The Affine Transform engine can be called to rotate each color channel independently. Note that the color channels cannot be rotated in place. Instead, they can make use of the space previously used for the expanded single channel (1.5 MB).
Up Interpolate and Color Convert
The Lab image must be converted to CMY before printing. Different processing occurs depending on whether the a and b channels of the Lab image is compressed. If the Lab image is compressed, the a and b channels must be decompressed before the color conversion occurs. If the Lab image is not compressed, the color conversion is the only necessary step. The Lab image must be up interpolated (if the a and b channels are compressed) and converted into a CMY image. A single VLIW process combining scale and color transform can be used.
The method used to perform the color conversion is the Vark accelerated Color Convert function. The Affine Transform engine can be called to rotate each color channel independently. The color channels cannot be rotated in place. Instead, they can make use of the space previously used for the expanded single channel (1.5 MB).
Print the Image
Printing an image is concerned with taking a correctly oriented 1000×1500 CMY image, and generating data and signals to be sent to the external Print Head. The process involves the CPU working in conjunction with a VLIW process and the Print Head Interface.
The resolution of the image in the Artcam is 1000×1500. The printed image has a resolution of 6000×9000 dots, which makes for a very straightforward relationship: 1 pixel=6×6=36 dots. As shown in
The image should be printed in approximately 2 seconds. For 9000 rows of dots this implies a time of 222 μs time between printing each row. The Print Head Interface must generate the 6000 dots in this time, an average of 37 ns per dot. However, each dot comprises 3 colors, so the Print Head Interface must generate each color component in approximately 12 ns, or 1 clock cycle of the ACP (10 ns at 100 MHz). One VLIW process is responsible for calculating the next line of 6000 dots to be printed. The odd and even C, M, and Y dots are generated by dithering input from 6 different 1000×1500 CMY image lines. The second VLIW process is responsible for taking the previously calculated line of 6000 dots, and correctly generating the 8 bits of data for the 8 segments to be transferred by the Print Head Interface to the Print Head in a single transfer.
A CPU process updates registers in the first VLIW process 3 times per print line (once per color component=27000 times in 2 seconds0, and in the 2nd VLIW process once every print line (9000 times in 2 seconds). The CPU works one line ahead of the VLIW process in order to do this.
Finally, the Print Head Interface takes the 8 bit data from the VLIW Output FIFO, and outputs it unchanged to the Print Head, producing the BitClock signals appropriately. Once all the data has been transferred a ParallelXferClock signal is generated to load the data for the next print line. In conjunction with transferring the data to the Print Head, a separate timer is generating the signals for the different print cycles of the Print Head using the NozzleSelect, ColorEnable, and BankEnable lines a specified by Print Head Interface internal registers.
The CPU also controls the various motors and guillotine via the parallel interface during the print process.
Generate C, M, and Y Dots
The input to this process is a 1000×1500 CMY image correctly oriented for printing. The image is not compressed in any way. As illustrated in
The process is run 3 times, once for each of the 3 color components. The process consists of 2 sub-processes run in parallel—one for producing even dots, and the other for producing odd dots. Each sub-process takes one pixel from the input image, and produces 3 output dots (since one pixel=6 output dots, and each sub-process is concerned with either even or odd dots). Thus one output dot is generated each cycle, but an input pixel is only read once every 3 cycles.
The original dither cell is a 64×64 cell, with each entry 8 bits. This original cell is divided into an odd cell and an even cell, so that each is still 64 high, but only 32 entries wide. The even dither cell contains original dither cell pixels 0, 2, 4 etc., while the odd contains original dither cell pixels 1, 3, 5 etc. Since a dither cell repeats across a line, a single 32 byte line of each of the 2 dither cells is required during an entire line, and can therefore be completely cached. The odd and even lines of a single process line are staggered 8 dot lines apart, so it is convenient to rotate the odd dither cell's lines by 8 lines. Therefore the same offset into both odd and even dither cells can be used. Consequently the even dither cell's line corresponds to the even entries of line L in the original dither cell, and the even dither cell's line corresponds to the odd entries of line L+8 in the original dither cell.
The process is run 3 times, once for each of the color components. The CPU software routine must ensure that the Sequential Read Iterators for odd and even lines are pointing to the correct image lines corresponding to the print heads. For example, to produce one set of 18,000 dots (3 sets of 6000 dots):
The dither cell data however, does not need to be updated for each color component. The dither cell for the 3 colors becomes the same, but offset by 2 dot lines for each component.
The Dithered Output is written to a Sequential Write Iterator, with odd and even dithered dots written to 2 separate outputs. The same two Write Iterators are used for all 3 color components, so that they are contiguous within the break-up of odd and even dots.
While one set of dots is being generated for a print line, the previously generated set of dots is being merged by a second VLIW process as described in the next section.
Generate Merged 8 bit Dot Output
This process, as illustrated in
The Sequential Read Iterators point to the line of previously generated dots, with the Iterator registers set up to limit access to a single color component. The distance between subsequent pixels is 375, and the distance between one line and the next is given to be 1 byte. Consequently 8 entries are read for each “line”. A single “line” corresponds to the 8 bits to be loaded on the print head. The total number of “lines” in the image is set to be 375. With at least 8 cache lines assigned to the Sequential Read Iterator, complete cache coherence is maintained. Instead of counting the 8 bits, 8 Microcode steps count implicitly.
The generation process first reads all the entries from the even dots, combining 8 entries into a single byte which is then output to the VLIW Output FIFO. Once all 3000 even dots have been read, the 3000 odd dots are read and processed. A software routine must update the address of the dots in the odd and even Sequential Read Iterators once per color component, which equates to 3 times per line. The two VLIW processes require all 8 ALUs and the VLIW Output FIFO. As long as the CPU is able to update the registers as described in the two processes, the VLIW processor can generate the dithered image dots fast enough to keep up with the printer.
Data Card Reader
The CCD reader includes a bottom substrate 516, a top substrate 514 which comprises a transparent molded plastic. In between the two substrates is inserted the linear CCD array 34 which comprises a thin long linear CCD array constructed by means of semi-conductor manufacturing processes.
A number of refinements of the above arrangement are possible. For example, the sensing devices on the linear CCD 34 may be staggered. The corresponding microlenses 34 can also be correspondingly formed as to focus light into a staggered series of spots so as to correspond to the staggered CCD sensors.
To assist reading, the data surface area of the Artcard 9 is modulated with a checkerboard pattern as previously discussed with reference to
It will be evident that an Artcard printer can be provided as for the printing out of data on storage Artcard. Hence, the Artcard system can be utilized as a general form of information distribution outside of the Artcam device. An Artcard printer can prints out Artcards on high quality print surfaces and multiple Artcards can be printed on same sheets and later separated. On a second surface of the Artcard 9 can be printed information relating to the files etc. stored on the Artcard 9 for subsequent storage.
Hence, the Artcard system allows for a simplified form of storage which is suitable for use in place of other forms of storage such as CD ROMs, magnetic disks etc. The Artcards 9 can also be mass produced and thereby produced in a substantially inexpensive form for redistribution.
Software Modules—Artcam Application 902
The Artcam Application implements the high-level functionality of the Artcam device. This normally involves capturing an image, applying an artistic effect to the image, and then printing the image. In a camera-oriented Artcam device, the image is captured via the Camera Manager 903. In a printer-oriented Artcam device, the image is captured via the Network Manager 904, perhaps as the result of the image being “squirted” by another device.
Artistic effects are found within the unified file system managed by the File Manager 905. An artistic effect consist of a script file and a set of resources. The script is interpreted and applied to the image via the Image Processing Manager 906. Scripts are normally shipped on ArtCards known as Artcards. By default the application uses the script contained on the currently mounted Artcard. The image is printed via the Printer Manager 908.
When the Artcam device starts up, the bootstrap process starts the various manager processes before starting the application. This allows the application to immediately request services from the various managers when it starts.
On initialization the application 902 registers itself as the handler for the events listed below. When it receives an event, it performs the action described in the table.
Perform any automatic pre-capture setup via the Camera
Manager. This includes auto-focussing, auto-adjusting
exposure, and charging the flash. This is normally initiated
by the user pressing the Take button halfway.
Capture an image via the Camera Manager.
Capture an image in self-timed mode via the Camera
Update the Camera Manager to use the next flash mode.
Update the Status Display to show the new flash mode.
Print the current image via the Printer Manager. Apply an
artistic effect to the image via the Image Processing
Manager if there is a current script. Update the remaining
prints count on the Status Display (see Print Roll Inserted
Apply an artistic effect to the current image via the Image
Processing Manager if there is a current script, but don't
print the image.
Eject the currently inserted ArtCards via the File Manager.
Calculate the number of prints remaining based on the Print
Manager's remaining media length and the Camera
Manager's aspect ratio. Update the remaining prints count
on the Status display.
Update the Status Display to indicate there is no print roll
Where the camera includes a display, the application also constructs a graphical user interface via the User Interface Manager 910 which allows the user to edit the current date and time, and other editable camera parameters. The application saves all persistent parameters in flash memory.
Real-Time Microkernel 911
The Real-Time Microkernel schedules processes preemptively on the basis of interrupts and process priority. It provides integrated inter-process communication and timer services, as these are closely tied to process scheduling. All other operating system functions are implemented outside the microkernel.
Camera Manager 903
The Camera Manager provides image capture services. It controls the camera hardware embedded in the Artcam. It provides an abstract camera control interface which allows camera parameters to be queried and set, and images captured. This abstract interface decouples the application from details of camera implementation. The Camera Manager utilizes the following input/output parameters and commands:
shutter speed range
classic, HDTV, panoramic
focus control mode
multi-point auto, single-point auto, manual
exposure control mode
auto, aperture priority, shutter priority, manual
auto, auto with red-eye removal, fill, off
view scene mode
return value domains
The Camera Manager runs as an asynchronous event-driven process. It contains a set of linked state machines, one for each asynchronous operation. These include auto focussing, charging the flash, counting down the self-timer, and capturing the image. On initialization the Camera Manager sets the camera hardware to a known state. This includes setting a normal focal distance and retracting the zoom. The software structure of the Camera Manager is illustrated in
Lock Focus 913
Lock Focus automatically adjusts focus and exposure for the current scene, and enables the flash if necessary, depending on the focus control mode, exposure control mode and flash mode. Lock Focus is normally initiated in response to the user pressing the Take button halfway. It is part of the normal image capture sequence, but may be separated in time from the actual capture of the image, if the user holds the take button halfway depressed. This allows the user to do spot focusing and spot metering.
Capture Image 914
Capture Image captures an image of the current scene. It lights a red-eye lamp if the flash mode includes red-eye removal, controls the shutter, triggers the flash if enabled, and senses the image through the image sensor. It determines the orientation of the camera, and hence the captured image, so that the image can be properly oriented during later image processing. It also determines the presence of camera motion during image capture, to trigger deblurring during later image processing.
Self-Timed Capture 915
Self-Timed Capture captures an image of the current scene after counting down a 20 s timer. It gives the user feedback during the countdown via the self-timer LED. During the first 15 s it can light the LED. During the last 5 s it flashes the LED.
View Scene 917
View Scene periodically senses the current scene through the image sensor and displays it on the color LCD, giving the user an LCD-based viewfinder.
Auto Focus 918
Auto Focus changes the focal length until selected regions of the image are sufficiently sharp to signify that they are in focus. It assumes the regions are in focus if an image sharpness metric derived from specified regions of the image sensor is above a fixed threshold. It finds the optimal focal length by performing a gradient descent on the derivative of sharpness by focal length, changing direction and stepsize as required. If the focus control mode is multi-point auto, then three regions are used, arranged horizontally across the field of view. If the focus control mode is single-point auto, then one region is used, in the center of the field of view. Auto Focus works within the available focal length range as indicated by the focus controller. In fixed-focus devices it is therefore effectively disabled.
Auto Flash 919
Auto Flash determines if scene lighting is dim enough to require the flash. It assumes the lighting is dim enough if the scene lighting is below a fixed threshold. The scene lighting is obtained from the lighting sensor, which derives a lighting metric from a central region of the image sensor. If the flash is required, then it charges the flash.
Auto Exposure 920
The combination of scene lighting, aperture, and shutter speed determine the exposure of the captured image. The desired exposure is a fixed value. If the exposure control mode is auto, Auto Exposure determines a combined aperture and shutter speed which yields the desired exposure for the given scene lighting. If the exposure control mode is aperture priority, Auto Exposure determines a shutter speed which yields the desired exposure for the given scene lighting and current aperture. If the exposure control mode is shutter priority, Auto Exposure determines an aperture which yields the desired exposure for the given scene lighting and current shutter speed. The scene lighting is obtained from the lighting sensor, which derives a lighting metric from a central region of the image sensor.
Auto Exposure works within the available aperture range and shutter speed range as indicated by the aperture controller and shutter speed controller. The shutter speed controller and shutter controller hide the absence of a mechanical shutter in most Artcam devices.
If the flash is enabled, either manually or by Auto Flash, then the effective shutter speed is the duration of the flash, which is typically in the range 1/1000 s to 1/10000 s.
Image Processing Manager 906 (
The Image Processing Manager provides image processing and artistic effects services. It utilises the VLIW Vector Processor embedded in the Artcam to perform high-speed image processing. The Image Processing Manager contains an interpreter for scripts written in the Vark image processing language. An artistic effect therefore consists of a Vark script file and related resources such as fonts, clip images etc. The software structure of the Image Processing Manager is illustrated in more detail in
Convert and Enhance Image 921
The Image Processing Manager performs image processing in the device-independent CIE LAB color space, at a resolution which suits the reproduction capabilities of the Artcam printer hardware. The captured image is first enhanced by filtering out noise. It is optionally processed to remove motion-induced blur. The image is then converted from its device-dependent RGB color space to the CIE LAB color space. It is also rotated to undo the effect of any camera rotation at the time of image capture, and scaled to the working image resolution. The image is further enhanced by scaling its dynamic range to the available dynamic range.
Detect Faces 923
Faces are detected in the captured image based on hue and local feature analysis. The list of detected face regions is used by the Vark script for applying face-specific effects such as warping and positioning speech balloons.
Vark Image Processing Language Interpreter 924
Vark consists of a general-purpose programming language with a rich set of image processing extensions. It provides a range of primitive data types (integer, real, boolean, character), a range of aggregate data types for constructing more complex types (array, string, record), a rich set of arithmetic and relational operators, conditional and iterative control flow (if-then-else, while-do), and recursive functions and procedures. It also provides a range of image-processing data types (image, clip image, matte, color, color lookup table, palette, dither matrix, convolution kernel, etc.), graphics data types (font, text, path), a set of image-processing functions (color transformations, compositing, filtering, spatial transformations and warping, illumination, text setting and rendering), and a set of higher-level artistic functions (tiling, painting and stroking).
A Vark program is portable in two senses. Because it is interpreted, it is independent of the CPU and image processing engines of its host. Because it uses a device-independent model space and a device-independent color space, it is independent of the input color characteristics and resolution of the host input device, and the output color characteristics and resolution of the host output device.
The Vark Interpreter 924 parses the source statements which make up the Vark script and produces a parse tree which represents the semantics of the script. Nodes in the parse tree correspond to statements, expressions, sub-expressions, variables and constants in the program. The root node corresponds to the main procedure statement list.
The interpreter executes the program by executing the root statement in the parse tree. Each node of the parse tree asks its children to evaluate or execute themselves appropriately. An if statement node, for example, has three children—a condition expression node, a then statement node, and an else statement node. The if statement asks the condition expression node to evaluate itself, and depending on the boolean value returned asks the then statement or the else statement to execute itself. It knows nothing about the actual condition expression or the actual statements.
While operations on most data types are executed during execution of the parse tree, operations on image data types are deferred until after execution of the parse tree. This allows imaging operations to be optimized so that only those intermediate pixels which contribute to the final image are computed. It also allows the final image to be computed in multiple passes by spatial subdivision, to reduce the amount of memory required.
During execution of the parse tree, each imaging function simply returns an imaging graph—a graph whose nodes are imaging operators and whose leaves are images—constructed with its corresponding imaging operator as the root and its image parameters as the root's children. The image parameters are of course themselves image graphs. Thus each successive imaging function returns a deeper imaging graph.
After execution of the parse tree, an imaging graph is obtained which corresponds to the final image. This imaging graph is then executed in a depth-first manner (like any expression tree), with the following two optimizations: (1) only those pixels which contribute to the final image are computed at a given node, and (2) the children of a node are executed in the order which minimizes the amount of memory required. The imaging operators in the imaging graph are executed in the optimized order to produce the final image. Compute-intensive imaging operators are accelerated using the VLIW Processor embedded in the Artcam device. If the amount of memory required to execute the imaging graph exceeds available memory, then the final image region is subdivided until the required memory no longer exceeds available memory.
For a well-constructed Vark program the first optimization is unlikely to provide much benefit per se. However, if the final image region is subdivided, then the optimization is likely to provide considerable benefit. It is precisely this optimization, then, that allows subdivision to be used as an effective technique for reducing memory requirements. One of the consequences of deferred execution of imaging operations is that program control flow cannot depend on image content, since image content is not known during parse tree execution. In practice this is not a severe restriction, but nonetheless must be borne in mind during language design.
The notion of deferred execution (or lazy evaluation) of imaging operations is described by Guibas and Stolfi (Guibas, L. J., and J. Stolfi, “A Language for Bitmap Manipulation”, ACM Transactions on Graphics, Vol. 1, No. 3, July 1982, pp. 191-214). They likewise construct an imaging graph during the execution of a program, and during subsequent graph evaluation propagate the result region backwards to avoid computing pixels which do not contribute to the final image. Shantzis additionally propagates regions of available pixels forwards during imaging graph evaluation (Shantzis, M. A., “A Model for Efficient and Flexible Image Computing”, Computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series, 1994, pp. 147-154). The Vark Interpreter uses the more sophisticated multi-pass bi-directional region propagation scheme described by Cameron (Cameron, S., “Efficient Bounds in Constructive Solid Geometry”, IEEE Computer Graphics & Applications, Vol. 11, No. 3, May 1991, pp. 68-74). The optimization of execution order to minimise memory usage is due to Shantzis, but is based on standard compiler theory (Aho, A. V., R. Sethi, and J. D. Ullman, “Generating Code from DAGs”, in Compilers: Principles, Techniques, and Tools, Addison-Wesley, 1986, pp. 557-567). The Vark Interpreter uses a more sophisticated scheme than Shantzis, however, to support variable-sized image buffers. The subdivision of the result region in conjunction with region propagation to reduce memory usage is also due to Shantzis.
Printer Manager 908 (
The Printer Manager provides image printing services. It controls the Ink Jet printer hardware embedded in the Artcam. It provides an abstract printer control interface which allows printer parameters to be queried and set, and images printed. This abstract interface decouples the application from details of printer implementation and includes the following variables:
media is present
media has fixed page size
remaining media length
fixed page size
return value domains
The Printer Manager runs as an asynchronous event-driven process. It contains a set of linked state machines, one for each asynchronous operation. These include printing the image and auto mounting the print roll. The software structure of the Printer Manager is illustrated in
Print Image 930
Print Image prints the supplied image. It uses the VLIW Processor to prepare the image for printing. This includes converting the image color space to device-specific CMY and producing half-toned bi-level data in the format expected by the print head.
Between prints, the paper is retracted to the lip of the print roll to allow print roll removal, and the nozzles can be capped to prevent ink leakage and drying. Before actual printing starts, therefore, the nozzles are uncapped and cleared, and the paper is advanced to the print head. Printing itself consists of transferring line data from the VLIW processor, printing the line data, and advancing the paper, until the image is completely printed. After printing is complete, the paper is cut with the guillotine and refracted to the print roll, and the nozzles are capped. The remaining media length is then updated in the print roll.
Auto Mount Print Roll 131
Auto Mount Print Roll responds to the insertion and removal of the print roll. It generates print roll insertion and removal events which are handled by the application and used to update the status display. The print roll is authenticated according to a protocol between the authentication chip embedded in the print roll and the authentication chip embedded in Artcam. If the print roll fails authentication then it is rejected. Various information is extracted from the print roll. Paper and ink characteristics are used during the printing process. The remaining media length and the fixed page size of the media, if any, are published by the Print Manager and are used by the application.
User Interface Manager 910 (
The User Interface Manager is illustrated in more detail if
File Manager 905 (
The File Manager provides file management services. It provides a unified hierarchical file system within which the file systems of all mounted volumes appear. The primary removable storage medium used in the Artcam is the ArtCards. A ArtCards is printed at high resolution with blocks of bi-level dots which directly representserror-tolerant Reed-Solomon-encoded binary data. The block structure supports append and append-rewrite in suitable read-write ArtCards devices (not initially used in Artcam). At a higher level a ArtCards can contain an extended append-rewriteable ISO9660 CD-ROM file system. The software structure of the File Manager, and the ArtCards Device Controller in particular, can be as illustrated in
Network Manager 904 (
The Network Manager provides “appliance” networking services across various interfaces including infra-red (IrDA) and universal serial bus (USB). This allows the Artcam to share captured images, and receive images for printing.
Clock Manager 907 (
The Clock Manager provides date and time-of-day clock services. It utilises the battery-backed real-time clock embedded in the Artcam, and controls it to the extent that it automatically adjusts for clock drift, based on auto-calibration carried out when the user sets the time.
When the system is idle it enters a quiescent power state during which only periodic scanning for input events occurs. Input events include the press of a button or the insertion of a ArtCards. As soon as an input event is detected the Artcam device re-enters an active power state. The system then handles the input event in the usual way.
Even when the system is in an active power state, the hardware associated with individual modules is typically in a quiescent power state. This reduces overall power consumption, and allows particularly draining hardware components such as the printer's paper cutting guillotine to monopolise the power source when they are operating. A camera-oriented Artcam device is, by default, in image capture mode. This means that the camera is active, and other modules, such as the printer, are quiescent. This means that when non-camera functions are initiated, the application must explicitly suspend the camera module. Other modules naturally suspend themselves when they become idle.
|Brevet cité||Date de dépôt||Date de publication||Déposant||Titre|
|US1960667||1 août 1931||29 mai 1934||Hutt George A||Device for stacking sheet material|
|US2506035||22 mars 1945||2 mai 1950||Parker Pen Co||Writing instrument|
|US3223409||4 févr. 1963||14 déc. 1965||Siemens Ag||Stack-forming conveyor device for data cards|
|US3518417||19 janv. 1967||30 juin 1970||Philips Corp||Flash-lamp holder|
|US3573437||4 juin 1968||6 avr. 1971||Wyle Laboratories||Bi-directional card reading system|
|US3663801||7 juil. 1969||16 mai 1972||Ltd Ciba||Method and apparatus for evaluating color-coded information|
|US3701098||15 juin 1971||24 oct. 1972||Scanner||Device for machine reading of information without manipulation of the information carrier|
|US3731062||21 mai 1971||1 mai 1973||Binary Systems Inc||Optical card reader drive|
|US3735350||6 juil. 1971||22 mai 1973||J Lemelson||Code scanning system|
|US3737629||9 juin 1971||5 juin 1973||Addressograph Multigraph||Optical code reader|
|US3748939||11 août 1971||31 juil. 1973||Borden Inc||Traversing film cutter|
|US3760162||9 nov. 1970||18 sept. 1973||Smiths Industries Ltd||Photoelectric readers|
|US3774014||20 mars 1972||20 nov. 1973||Pitney Bowes Alpex||Printed code scanning system|
|US3778541||3 sept. 1971||11 déc. 1973||Itek Corp||System for analyzing multicolored scenes|
|US3843132||19 avr. 1973||22 oct. 1974||D Ferguson||Board game move recording system|
|US3852572||3 janv. 1973||3 déc. 1974||Sodeco Compteurs De Geneve||Identity card reader|
|US3857019||5 mars 1973||24 déc. 1974||Honeywell Inf Systems||Card reader data logic with position indication and error detection|
|US3866217||26 déc. 1972||11 févr. 1975||Currier Smith Corp||Monitoring transmission link by comparing pseudorandom signals|
|US3893173||11 janv. 1974||1 juil. 1975||Hewlett Packard Co||Miniaturized magnetic card reader/recorder for use in hand-held calculator|
|US3896691||9 avr. 1973||29 juil. 1975||Granger Maurice||Device for the simultaneous dispensing and severing of webs of wound material|
|US3914877||8 avr. 1974||28 oct. 1975||Marion E Hines||Image scrambling technique|
|US3916420||6 mai 1974||28 oct. 1975||Ncr Co||Printer and display system|
|US3943563||8 avr. 1974||9 mars 1976||Lemelson Jerome H||System and method for recording and reproducing video information on a card|
|US3946398||29 juin 1970||23 mars 1976||Silonics, Inc.||Method and apparatus for recording with writing fluids and drop projection means therefor|
|US3956756||28 mars 1974||11 mai 1976||Imperial Chemical Industries, Inc.||Pattern printing apparatus|
|US3967286||26 déc. 1974||29 juin 1976||Facit Aktiebolag||Ink supply arrangement for ink jet printers|
|US3970803||14 févr. 1975||20 juil. 1976||Cbs Inc.||Printed sound track system|
|US3971065||5 mars 1975||20 juil. 1976||Eastman Kodak Company||Color imaging array|
|US4000239||30 nov. 1973||28 déc. 1976||Teijin Limited||Process for spinning naphthalate polyester fibers|
|US4034845||29 sept. 1975||12 juil. 1977||Ferag Ag||Apparatus for stacking printed products continuously arriving from conveyor means, especially products arriving in an imbricated formation|
|US4045802||27 juil. 1976||30 août 1977||Ricoh Company, Ltd.||Ink ejection printing apparatus comprising automatically actuated ejection orifice cap|
|US4048617||3 juil. 1975||13 sept. 1977||Recognition Equipment Incorporated||Retrace data elimination|
|US4074324||14 juil. 1975||14 févr. 1978||Barrett Jon S||Instant electronic camera|
|US4088981||12 nov. 1975||9 mai 1978||Citibank N.A.||Automated data entry and display system|
|US4092654||13 sept. 1976||30 mai 1978||Alasia Alfred Victor||Encoding system|
|US4161749||30 mars 1978||17 juil. 1979||Polaroid Corporation||Printer for producing print of an electronically recorded image|
|US4172641||23 févr. 1978||30 oct. 1979||Heyer William T||Phototypesetter|
|US4173401||15 mai 1978||6 nov. 1979||Eastman Kodak Company||Apparatus for displaying alphanumeric information coded on a film cartridge|
|US4177514||22 nov. 1977||4 déc. 1979||General Electric Company||Graph architecture information processing system|
|US4181940||28 févr. 1978||1 janv. 1980||Westinghouse Electric Corp.||Multiprocessor for providing fault isolation test upon itself|
|US4200867||3 avr. 1978||29 avr. 1980||Hill Elmer D||System and method for painting images by synthetic color signal generation and control|
|US4213694||31 mai 1977||22 juil. 1980||International Business Machines Corporation||Copy production machines|
|US4224628||31 août 1978||23 sept. 1980||The Valeron Corporation||General purpose combined alphanumeric/graphics printer|
|US4234214||16 août 1978||18 nov. 1980||Governor & Company Of The Bank Of England||Document carrying a legible code, and method and apparatus for producing same|
|US4244006||23 août 1978||6 janv. 1981||Nippon Hoso Kyokai||Control device for television camera|
|US4253476||31 juil. 1978||3 mars 1981||Shigeo Sato||Tobacco filter and method of removing impurities from tobacco smoke|
|US4258387||17 oct. 1979||24 mars 1981||Lemelson Jerome H||Video telephone|
|US4262284||26 juin 1978||14 avr. 1981||Stieff Lorin R||Self-monitoring seal|
|US4262301||22 oct. 1979||14 avr. 1981||Polaroid Corporation||Electronic imaging camera|
|US4270853||21 mars 1979||2 juin 1981||West Electric Company, Ltd.||Sound-recording instant-printing film and camera therefor|
|US4275413||3 juil. 1979||23 juin 1981||Takashi Sakamoto||Linear interpolator for color correction|
|US4282535||24 oct. 1979||4 août 1981||Siemens Aktiengesellschaft||Circuit arrangement for the operation of recording nozzles in ink mosaic recording devices|
|US4317138||11 févr. 1980||23 févr. 1982||Exxon Research & Engineering Co.||Method and apparatus for facsimile sheet handling|
|US4342051||24 avr. 1980||27 juil. 1982||Matsushita Electric Industrial Company, Limited||Method of and system for reproducing or transmitting half-tone images|
|US4372694||7 janv. 1981||8 févr. 1983||Ing. C. Olivetti & Co., S.P.A.||Electronic pocket calculator|
|US4383458||3 mars 1981||17 mai 1983||Dainippon Screen Seizo Kabushiki Kaisha||Film cutter|
|US4384272||22 sept. 1980||17 mai 1983||Minolta Camera Kabushiki Kaisha||Image reading apparatus|
|US4394730||16 oct. 1980||19 juil. 1983||Tokyo Shibaura Denki Kabushiki Kaisha||Multi-processor system employing job-swapping between different priority processors|
|US4402150||11 mai 1981||6 sept. 1983||Polaroid Corporation||Verification device|
|US4414316||5 sept. 1980||8 nov. 1983||Rexham Corporation||Composite lenticular screen sheet|
|US4429320||17 sept. 1980||31 janv. 1984||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Ink jet recording apparatus|
|US4429938||6 janv. 1982||7 févr. 1984||Midland-Ross Corporation||Locking device for interfitting members|
|US4434503||29 juil. 1980||28 févr. 1984||Minolta Camera Kabushiki Kaisha||Image information output apparatus|
|US4436439||26 août 1981||13 mars 1984||Epson Corporation||Small printer|
|US4454517||26 mai 1982||12 juin 1984||Tokyo Shibaura Denki Kabushiki Kaisha||Printing apparatus with coacting printer head movement and paper advancement|
|US4455609||10 sept. 1981||19 juin 1984||Nippon Electric Co., Ltd.||Apparatus for realtime fast reconstruction and display of dose distribution|
|US4463359||24 mars 1980||31 juil. 1984||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Droplet generating method and apparatus thereof|
|US4463362||7 juin 1982||31 juil. 1984||Ncr Corporation||Ink control baffle plates for ink jet printer|
|US4472038||23 déc. 1981||18 sept. 1984||Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd.||Photographic camera|
|US4488563||29 avr. 1982||18 déc. 1984||Mitsubishi Acetate Co., Ltd.||Filter plug|
|US4494862||28 sept. 1981||22 janv. 1985||Minolta Camera Kabushiki Kaisha||Computerized information processing system equipped with copying apparatus|
|US4494864||13 août 1979||22 janv. 1985||The Three Dimensional Photography Corp.||Apparatus for stereoscopic photography|
|US4500183||6 janv. 1983||19 févr. 1985||Olympus Optical Co., Ltd.||Film cassette and a photographing device using the same|
|US4500919||4 mai 1982||19 févr. 1985||Massachusetts Institute Of Technology||Color reproduction system|
|US4511907||19 oct. 1983||16 avr. 1985||Nec Corporation||Color ink-jet printer|
|US4518235||6 févr. 1984||21 mai 1985||James D. Sorg||Collapsible disposable camera|
|US4521014||30 sept. 1982||4 juin 1985||Sitrick David H||Video game including user visual image|
|US4523235||11 janv. 1982||11 juin 1985||Jan Rajchman||Electronic microcopier apparatus|
|US4528575||28 déc. 1981||9 juil. 1985||Fujitsu Limited||Ink jet printing head|
|US4531740||22 juin 1983||30 juil. 1985||Cynex Manufacturing Corporation||Remote control system for a video computer game|
|US4534142||23 juin 1981||13 août 1985||Jens Drefahl||Roof covering|
|US4544184||7 juil. 1983||1 oct. 1985||Freund Precision, Inc.||Tamper-proof identification card and identification system|
|US4546434||26 mars 1982||8 oct. 1985||Gioello Debbie A||Method for designing apparel|
|US4550967||8 déc. 1982||5 nov. 1985||Allied Corporation||Electrical connector member|
|US4558326||6 sept. 1983||10 déc. 1985||Konishiroku Photo Industry Co., Ltd.||Purging system for ink jet recording apparatus|
|US4567529||5 juin 1984||28 janv. 1986||Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.||Image sensor|
|US4574351||3 mars 1983||4 mars 1986||International Business Machines Corporation||Apparatus for compressing and buffering data|
|US4580721||4 févr. 1983||8 avr. 1986||Imperial Chemical Industries Plc||Fluid container|
|US4581710||24 mai 1983||8 avr. 1986||International Business Machines (Ibm)||Method of editing dot pattern data for character and/or image representations|
|US4591900||12 déc. 1983||27 mai 1986||Rca Corporation||Encoding pattern for single chip CCD camera processing scheme|
|US4592938||25 mars 1985||3 juin 1986||Mobil Oil Corporation||Method of producing an internally reinforced thermoplastic film and film and articles produced therefrom|
|US4596039||30 déc. 1983||17 juin 1986||International Business Machines Corporation||Method for converting an image from a run end or run length representation to a bit map|
|US4632585||13 mars 1985||30 déc. 1986||Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba||Image forming apparatus|
|US4639738||12 avr. 1985||27 janv. 1987||Eastman Kodak Company||Ink level detection system for ink jet printing apparatus|
|US4639769||1 avr. 1985||27 janv. 1987||Eastman Kodak Company||Modifying color digital images|
|US4640529||16 sept. 1985||3 févr. 1987||Katz Marcella M||Flexible non-distortable handcraft sheet material and method of applying printed designs thereto|
|US4641980||2 oct. 1985||10 févr. 1987||Fujitsu Limited||Printer with pivotable print head attached to medium carrier moveable through a casing opening|
|US4652935||25 févr. 1986||24 mars 1987||Kokusai Denshin Denwa Kabushiki Kaisha||Graded facsimile image signal coding system|
|US4665556||9 févr. 1984||12 mai 1987||Hitachi, Ltd.||Image signal processor|
|US4667208||31 oct. 1985||19 mai 1987||Hitachi, Ltd.||Control system for a color printer|
|US4672453||9 juil. 1985||9 juin 1987||Nec Corporation||Contact type image sensor and driving method therefor|
|US4681430||27 août 1986||21 juil. 1987||Hewlett-Packard Company||Method for focusing projection printer|
|US4683477||29 août 1986||28 juil. 1987||Eastman Kodak Company||Ink jet print head|
|US4688105||10 mai 1985||18 août 1987||Bloch Arthur R||Video recording system|
|US4689642||27 mars 1985||25 août 1987||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Ink-jet recording head with an elastic ink tank in a sealed casing held at a partial vacuum and having a breakable seal|
|US4689683||18 mars 1986||25 août 1987||Edward Efron||Computerized studio for motion picture film and television production|
|US4692394||22 janv. 1985||8 sept. 1987||Drexler Technology Corporation||Method of forming a personal information card|
|US4703332||5 nov. 1986||27 oct. 1987||Ing. C. Olivetti & C., S.P.A.||Ink jet print head and printer|
|US4706130||29 janv. 1987||10 nov. 1987||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Image recording apparatus utilizing light emitting diodes with pixel shape correction|
|US4707713||12 nov. 1985||17 nov. 1987||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Image recording apparatus|
|US4710873||9 mars 1984||1 déc. 1987||Marvin Glass & Associates||Video game incorporating digitized images of being into game graphics|
|US4724307||29 avr. 1986||9 févr. 1988||Gtech Corporation||Marked card reader|
|US4724395||29 déc. 1986||9 févr. 1988||Polaroid Corporation||Median filter for reconstructing missing color samples|
|US4727245||14 oct. 1986||23 févr. 1988||Mars, Inc.||Portable data scanner with removable modular printer|
|US4728978||4 mars 1987||1 mars 1988||Minolta Camera Kabushiki Kaisha||Photographic camera|
|US4734565||6 mai 1987||29 mars 1988||Drexler Technology Corporation||Read-only optical card and system|
|US4734713||18 avr. 1986||29 mars 1988||Kabushiki Kaisha Sato||Thermal printer|
|US4740269||10 oct. 1986||26 avr. 1988||Oesterreichische Nationalbank||Process and apparatus for applying authenticating coding to value-carrying paper|
|US4741327||14 avr. 1987||3 mai 1988||Olympus Optical Co., Ltd.||Endoscope having bent circuit board|
|US4745544||12 déc. 1985||17 mai 1988||Texas Instruments Incorporated||Master/slave sequencing processor with forced I/O|
|US4746920||28 mars 1986||24 mai 1988||Tandem Computers Incorporated||Method and apparatus for clock management|
|US4754487||16 juil. 1986||28 juin 1988||Image Recall Systems, Inc.||Picture storage and retrieval system for various limited storage mediums|
|US4762986||6 mars 1987||9 août 1988||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Automatic focussing system including in-focus position prediction means|
|US4763153||10 mars 1987||9 août 1988||Minolta Camera Kabushiki Kaisha||Control device for use in a camera system|
|US4769764||11 août 1986||6 sept. 1988||Isaac Levanon||Modular computer system with portable travel unit|
|US4771295||1 juil. 1986||13 sept. 1988||Hewlett-Packard Company||Thermal ink jet pen body construction having improved ink storage and feed capability|
|US4771342||6 oct. 1987||13 sept. 1988||Emf Partners, Ltd.||Method and apparatus for enhancing video-recorded images to film grade quality|
|US4783700||9 juin 1987||8 nov. 1988||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Image sensor unit and image reading apparatus having the unit|
|US4783823||18 sept. 1986||8 nov. 1988||Omron Tateisi Electronics, Co.||Card identifying method and apparatus|
|US4786820||20 janv. 1988||22 nov. 1988||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Apparatus for parallel-processing image data|
|US4788563||13 mai 1987||29 nov. 1988||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Recording apparatus|
|US4791443||22 janv. 1988||13 déc. 1988||Eastman Kodak Company||Photographic processor with auxiliary power supply|
|US4796038||28 mars 1988||3 janv. 1989||Ateq Corporation||Laser pattern generation apparatus|
|US4796087||1 juin 1987||3 janv. 1989||Jacques Guichard||Process for coding by transformation for the transmission of picture signals|
|US4804831||24 oct. 1986||14 févr. 1989||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Focus detecting apparatus independent of object image contrast|
|US4809345||29 août 1986||28 févr. 1989||Hitachi, Ltd.||Method of and apparatus for enlarging/reducing two-dimensional images|
|US4819395||2 juil. 1987||11 avr. 1989||Shimizu Construction Co., Ltd.||Textile reinforced structural components|
|US4821208||14 oct. 1986||11 avr. 1989||Technology, Inc.||Display processors accommodating the description of color pixels in variable-length codes|
|US4829324||23 déc. 1987||9 mai 1989||Xerox Corporation||Large array thermal ink jet printhead|
|US4833599||20 avr. 1987||23 mai 1989||Multiflow Computer, Inc.||Hierarchical priority branch handling for parallel execution in a parallel processor|
|US4835388||7 avr. 1987||30 mai 1989||The Harshaw Chemical Company||Thermoluminescence dosimetry card reader heating assembly|
|US4837628||14 juil. 1987||6 juin 1989||Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba||Electronic still camera for recording still picture on memory card with mode selecting shutter release|
|US4841375||14 avr. 1987||20 juin 1989||Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba||Image-resolution conversion apparatus for converting a pixel-density of image data|
|US4845767 *||3 nov. 1988||4 juil. 1989||Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.||Image signal processor|
|US4845770||18 nov. 1987||4 juil. 1989||Oki Electric Industry Co., Ltd.||Method and apparatus for processing embossed card|
|US4853967||6 avr. 1988||1 août 1989||International Business Machines Corporation||Method for automatic optical inspection analysis of integrated circuits|
|US4860375||10 mars 1986||22 août 1989||Environmental Research Inst. Of Michigan||High speed cellular processing system|
|US4861031||18 avr. 1988||29 août 1989||Simms Cosmian E||Card wrestling game|
|US4862208||19 déc. 1988||29 août 1989||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Information transmitting device for camera|
|US4864494||21 mars 1986||5 sept. 1989||Computerized Data Ssytems For Mfg., Inc.||Software usage authorization system with key for decrypting/re-encrypting/re-transmitting moving target security codes from protected software|
|US4868676||19 mars 1987||19 sept. 1989||Shapr Kabushiki Kaisha||Manual copying apparatus|
|US4875048||29 août 1988||17 oct. 1989||Hitachi, Ltd.||Two-step parallel analog to digital converter|
|US4875074||25 mars 1988||17 oct. 1989||Brother Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha||Image recording apparatus|
|US4875173||15 avr. 1986||17 oct. 1989||Minolta Camera Kabushiki Kaisha||Image enlarging method and device|
|US4882702||16 mai 1988||21 nov. 1989||Allen-Bradley Company, Inc.||Programmable controller with I/O expansion module located in one of I/O module positions for communication with outside I/O modules|
|US4887161||27 mai 1988||12 déc. 1989||Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd.||Memory cartridge and digital electronic still video camera in which said memory cartridge is freely loadable/unloadable|
|US4890832||22 avr. 1988||2 janv. 1990||Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha||Compact electronic apparatus with removable processing units|
|US4896029||31 mars 1989||23 janv. 1990||United Parcel Service Of America, Inc.||Polygonal information encoding article, process and system|
|US4897719||19 mars 1987||30 janv. 1990||Hugh Griffin||Image pre-processing sub-system|
|US4897724||20 juil. 1988||30 janv. 1990||U.S. Philips Corporation||Apparatus and method for reproducing digitized video pictures, with inclined plane error restoration|
|US4902880||30 sept. 1988||20 févr. 1990||Peripheral Dynamics, Inc.||Card reader system and method with printing and verification capability|
|US4903132||26 sept. 1988||20 févr. 1990||Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha||Electronic still camera with slow-in, fast out memory addressing|
|US4904100||5 déc. 1988||27 févr. 1990||Eastman Kodak Company||Cartridge and printer system for using roll print media|
|US4905029||28 sept. 1988||27 févr. 1990||Kelley Scott A||Audio still camera system|
|US4914452||6 mai 1988||3 avr. 1990||Ricoh Company, Ltd.||Ink sheet/recording paper cassette|
|US4937676||10 févr. 1989||26 juin 1990||Polariod Corporation||Electronic camera system with detachable printer|
|US4942470 *||5 juil. 1989||17 juil. 1990||Nec Corporation||Real time processor for video signals|
|US4943820||13 oct. 1989||24 juil. 1990||Larock Warren D||Portable camera support|
|US4947262||14 avr. 1989||7 août 1990||Casio Computer Co., Ltd.||Hand-held manually sweeping printing apparatus|
|US4949189||20 oct. 1989||14 août 1990||Eastman Kodak Company||Two-sided document scanning apparatus|
|US4949391||8 mai 1987||14 août 1990||Everex Ti Corporation||Adaptive image acquisition system|
|US4952967||25 oct. 1988||28 août 1990||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Timer-assisted photographing mode control device for camera|
|US4954910||26 sept. 1988||4 sept. 1990||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Recorder displaying recording sheet quantity available on remaining web sheet supply|
|US4956656||8 mars 1989||11 sept. 1990||Minolta Camera Kabushiki Kaisha||Control device for use in a camera having a consecutive picture taking mode and a single picture taking mode|
|US4961088||20 avr. 1989||2 oct. 1990||Xerox Corporation||Monitor/warranty system for electrostatographic reproducing machines using replaceable cartridges|
|US4964066||22 févr. 1990||16 oct. 1990||Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha||Device for editing and displaying data recorded on specialized sheets or records|
|US4965596||8 févr. 1989||23 oct. 1990||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Ink jet recording apparatus with waste ink distribution paths to plural cartridges|
|US4975969||22 oct. 1987||4 déc. 1990||Peter Tal||Method and apparatus for uniquely identifying individuals by particular physical characteristics and security system utilizing the same|
|US4977459||21 mars 1990||11 déc. 1990||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Ink-jet recording apparatus with mechanism for automatically regulating a recording head|
|US4979838||24 juil. 1989||25 déc. 1990||Ncr Corporation||Receipt cutting mechanism for dot matrix printer|
|US4980856||14 oct. 1987||25 déc. 1990||Brother Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha||IC memory cartridge and a method for providing external IC memory cartridges to an electronic device extending end-to-end|
|US4983996||22 mai 1990||8 janv. 1991||Casio Computer Co., Ltd.||Data recording apparatus for still camera|
|US4985848||14 sept. 1987||15 janv. 1991||Visual Information Technologies, Inc.||High speed image processing system using separate data processor and address generator|
|US4987030||4 oct. 1988||22 janv. 1991||Toray Industries, Inc.||High-tenacity conjugated fiber and process for preparation thereof|
|US4990005||12 oct. 1988||5 févr. 1991||Brother Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha||Printer that prints a table of information about printing effects using the selected printing effects|
|US4991205||15 juin 1987||5 févr. 1991||Lemelson Jerome H||Personal identification system and method|
|US4993405||25 avr. 1990||19 févr. 1991||Olympus Optical Co., Ltd.||Imaging apparatus|
|US4999647||28 déc. 1989||12 mars 1991||Eastman Kodak Company||Synchronous stimulation for long array continuous ink jet printer|
|US5005998||4 nov. 1988||9 avr. 1991||Victor Company Of Japan, Ltd.||Cartridge for a printer system|
|US5006929||6 mars 1990||9 avr. 1991||Rai Radiotelevisione Italiana||Method for encoding and transmitting video signals as overall motion vectors and local motion vectors|
|US5009626||25 juil. 1988||23 avr. 1991||Katz Marcella M||Human lifelike dolls, mannequins and humanoids and pet animal dolls and methods of individualizing and personalizing same|
|US5012349||26 juin 1987||30 avr. 1991||Fay Stefan G De||Method and portable device for detection, storage and for eventual processing and reproduction of graphic symbols appearing on any type of carrier|
|US5016037||1 nov. 1988||14 mai 1991||Minolta Camera Co., Ltd.||Flash photographing system|
|US5016112||21 août 1989||14 mai 1991||Sony Corporation||Combined video recorder and camera with superimposition of video and data|
|US5018072||13 mars 1990||21 mai 1991||Hitachi, Ltd.||Optically readable mail system with general and receiver specific information|
|US5020926||8 juin 1990||4 juin 1991||Sejus Corporation||Printer mounting arrangement|
|US5021892||26 déc. 1989||4 juin 1991||Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha||Image processing device of multifunctional type|
|US5026042||22 janv. 1990||25 juin 1991||Xerox Corporation||Sheet feeder for copiers and printers|
|US5028997||5 nov. 1990||2 juil. 1991||Elbex Video Kabushiki Kaisha||Television camera apparatus|
|US5031049||14 août 1990||9 juil. 1991||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Automatic object image follow-up device|
|US5032922||2 juil. 1990||16 juil. 1991||Xerox Corporation||Platen accessory for portable copier|
|US5035325||16 juil. 1990||30 juil. 1991||Dai Nippon Insatsu Kabushiki Kaisha||Cassette for thermal transfer printing film|
|US5035929||13 juin 1989||30 juil. 1991||Dimensional Images, Inc.||Three dimensional picture|
|US5036472||8 déc. 1988||30 juil. 1991||Hallmark Cards, Inc.||Computer controlled machine for vending personalized products or the like|
|US5040006||17 sept. 1990||13 août 1991||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Camera|
|US5043561||24 août 1989||27 août 1991||Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba||Fare collection system using a boarding ticket and additional money card|
|US5043748||1 oct. 1990||27 août 1991||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Recording apparatus|
|US5049898||13 juil. 1990||17 sept. 1991||Hewlett-Packard Company||Printhead having memory element|
|US5051838||22 juin 1989||24 sept. 1991||Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd.||Portable electronic copying machine|
|US5053814||23 déc. 1987||1 oct. 1991||Minolta Camera Kabushiki Kaisha||Image forming apparatus|
|US5055997||9 oct. 1990||8 oct. 1991||U.S. Philips Corporation||System with plurality of processing elememts each generates respective instruction based upon portions of individual word received from a crossbar switch|
|US5058856||8 mai 1991||22 oct. 1991||Hewlett-Packard Company||Thermally-actuated microminiature valve|
|US5065170||22 juin 1990||12 nov. 1991||Xerox Corporation||Ink jet printer having a staggered array printhead|
|US5067713||29 mars 1990||26 nov. 1991||Technical Systems Corp.||Coded playing cards and apparatus for dealing a set of cards|
|US5081575||3 mai 1989||14 janv. 1992||Oryx Corporation||Highly parallel computer architecture employing crossbar switch with selectable pipeline delay|
|US5091966||31 juil. 1990||25 févr. 1992||Xerox Corporation||Adaptive scaling for decoding spatially periodic self-clocking glyph shape codes|
|US5097282||21 déc. 1990||17 mars 1992||Minolta Camera Kabushiki Kaisha||Automatic focusing apparatus|
|US5097285||21 nov. 1990||17 mars 1992||Nikon Corporation||Camera with self-timer|
|US5101096||11 oct. 1989||31 mars 1992||Hitachi, Ltd.||Optical recording sheet and method and apparatus for reproducing the same|
|US5103311||1 oct. 1990||7 avr. 1992||U.S. Philips Corporation||Data processing module and video processing system incorporating same|
|US5107100||8 nov. 1990||21 avr. 1992||Symbol Technologies, Inc.||Portable scanner with on-board keyboard, display, transceiver and printer|
|US5107276||24 août 1990||21 avr. 1992||Xerox Corporation||Thermal ink jet printhead with constant operating temperature|
|US5107290||5 juin 1990||21 avr. 1992||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Camera|
|US5111288||8 oct. 1991||5 mai 1992||Diamond Electronics, Inc.||Surveillance camera system|
|US5111419||11 avr. 1988||5 mai 1992||Central Institute For The Deaf||Electronic filters, signal conversion apparatus, hearing aids and methods|
|US5115888||4 févr. 1991||26 mai 1992||Howard Schneider||Self-serve checkout system|
|US5119115||25 juin 1990||2 juin 1992||Ing. C. Olivetti & C. S.P.A.||Thermal ink jet print head with removable ink cartridge|
|US5119179||14 sept. 1990||2 juin 1992||Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba||Video signal processing circuit for extracting a chroma signal from a luminous signal|
|US5121139||29 avr. 1991||9 juin 1992||Tektronix, Inc.||Compact ink jet printer having a drum drive mechanism|
|US5121209||1 oct. 1990||9 juin 1992||Rca Licensing Corporation||Sharpness control for a television image|
|US5121349||25 juil. 1990||9 juin 1992||Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha||Digital noise generator|
|US5124692||13 avr. 1990||23 juin 1992||Eastman Kodak Company||Method and apparatus for providing rotation of digital image data|
|US5132798||3 déc. 1990||21 juil. 1992||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Special effect apparatus with power control|
|US5134495||7 nov. 1990||28 juil. 1992||Dp-Tek, Inc.||Resolution transforming raster-based imaging system|
|US5135095||6 mai 1991||4 août 1992||Skidata Computerhandelsgesellschaft M.B.H.||Portable hand device for machine processing of data carried on a data carrier|
|US5138459||20 nov. 1990||11 août 1992||Personal Computer Cameras, Inc.||Electronic still video camera with direct personal computer (pc) compatible digital format output|
|US5144340||14 août 1991||1 sept. 1992||Minolta Camera Kabushiki Kaisha||Inkjet printer with an electric curtain force|
|US5144423||11 déc. 1990||1 sept. 1992||At&T Bell Laboratories||Hdtv encoder with forward estimation and constant rate motion vectors|
|US5146328||15 juil. 1991||8 sept. 1992||Fuji Xerox Corporation, Ltd.||Color signal network system|
|US5146592||24 janv. 1989||8 sept. 1992||Visual Information Technologies, Inc.||High speed image processing computer with overlapping windows-div|
|US5148288||29 août 1990||15 sept. 1992||Savitar, Inc.||Standardized color calibration of electronic imagery|
|US5148534||3 avr. 1991||15 sept. 1992||International Business Machines Corp.||Hardware cartridge representing verifiable, use-once authorization|
|US5151726||5 mai 1989||29 sept. 1992||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Camera or printer capable of automatically changing print size|
|US5153532||24 mai 1989||6 oct. 1992||Honeywell Inc.||Noise generator using combined outputs of two pseudo-random sequence generators|
|US5153738||20 mai 1991||6 oct. 1992||Xerox Corporation||Scanner with single source mechanical power|
|US5154956||11 janv. 1990||13 oct. 1992||Lamco Ltd., Inc.||Non-curling pressure-sensitive adhesive labels with release liners|
|US5155502||11 janv. 1990||13 oct. 1992||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Ink-jet cartridge|
|US5160577||30 juil. 1991||3 nov. 1992||Deshpande Narayan V||Method of fabricating an aperture plate for a roof-shooter type printhead|
|US5160943||19 déc. 1988||3 nov. 1992||Esselte Meto International Produktions Gmbh||Printing systems|
|US5160945||10 mai 1991||3 nov. 1992||Xerox Corporation||Pagewidth thermal ink jet printhead|
|US5161037||10 oct. 1990||3 nov. 1992||Fuji Xerox Corporation, Ltd.||Image processing system and method for processing documents in accordance with a job control sheet|
|US5163762||7 août 1990||17 nov. 1992||Brother Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha||Driving circuit for solenoid head of a printer|
|US5164827||22 août 1991||17 nov. 1992||Sensormatic Electronics Corporation||Surveillance system with master camera control of slave cameras|
|US5164831||15 mars 1990||17 nov. 1992||Eastman Kodak Company||Electronic still camera providing multi-format storage of full and reduced resolution images|
|US5172423||11 sept. 1991||15 déc. 1992||Crosfield Electronics Ltd.||Methods and apparatus for defining contours in colored images|
|US5175808||12 sept. 1989||29 déc. 1992||Pixar||Method and apparatus for non-affine image warping|
|US5179389||26 janv. 1990||12 janv. 1993||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Ink jet recording with head driving condition regulation|
|US5179936||30 avr. 1987||19 janv. 1993||Intelligent Medical Systems, Inc.||Disposable speculum with membrane bonding ring|
|US5181254||14 déc. 1990||19 janv. 1993||Westinghouse Electric Corp.||Method for automatically identifying targets in sonar images|
|US5182548||10 janv. 1990||26 janv. 1993||Silicon Graphics, Inc.||Method and apparatus for painting on a computer|
|US5184169||19 avr. 1991||2 févr. 1993||Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd.||Photography mode input systems|
|US5184907||30 avr. 1991||9 févr. 1993||Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha||Portable printer for printing on a flat sheet|
|US5189520||25 févr. 1991||23 févr. 1993||Sony Corporation||Video camera modular accessory apparatus|
|US5189529||30 nov. 1989||23 févr. 1993||Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd.||Reduction/enlargement processing system for an image processing apparatus|
|US5191640||26 déc. 1990||2 mars 1993||Xerox Corporation||Method for optimal discrete rendering of images|
|US5191647||7 févr. 1991||2 mars 1993||Minolta Camera Kabushiki Kaisha||Image data processing system|
|US5200598||29 juin 1989||6 avr. 1993||Rencontre Stephen C||Optical reader|
|US5204944||28 juil. 1989||20 avr. 1993||The Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New York||Separable image warping methods and systems using spatial lookup tables|
|US5206919||24 avr. 1991||27 avr. 1993||Sony Broadcast & Communications Limited||Image signal processing with digital filtering to minimize aliasing caused by image manipulation|
|US5208610||31 juil. 1991||4 mai 1993||Hewlett-Packard Company||Pen carriage for an ink-jet printer|
|US5212021||21 févr. 1992||18 mai 1993||Duracell Inc.||Energy pack and individual battery cell cartridge|
|US5216490||3 août 1990||1 juin 1993||Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc.||Bridge electrodes for microelectromechanical devices|
|US5220352||29 oct. 1991||15 juin 1993||Minolta Camera Kabushiki Kaisha||Thermal transfer recording device|
|US5220400||1 juin 1990||15 juin 1993||Texas Instruments Incorporated||Container inspection system|
|US5221833||27 déc. 1991||22 juin 1993||Xerox Corporation||Methods and means for reducing bit error rates in reading self-clocking glyph codes|
|US5222229||9 mars 1990||22 juin 1993||International Business Machines||Multiprocessor system having synchronization control mechanism|
|US5224179||30 déc. 1991||29 juin 1993||At&T Bell Laboratories||Image skeletonization method|
|US5225294||16 juin 1992||6 juil. 1993||Fh Group||Non-rechargeable battery pack|
|US5226125||17 nov. 1989||6 juil. 1993||Keith Balmer||Switch matrix having integrated crosspoint logic and method of operation|
|US5230027||5 sept. 1991||20 juil. 1993||Nec Corporation||Image processor and automated optical inspection system using the same|
|US5231455||17 août 1992||27 juil. 1993||Phoenix Precision Graphics, Inc.||Air jet cleaner for one pump color imager|
|US5235428||3 déc. 1992||10 août 1993||Sony Corporation||Auto-focus system for video camera|
|US5235686||20 déc. 1990||10 août 1993||Texas Instruments Incorporated||Computer system having mixed macrocode and microcode|
|US5237402||30 juil. 1991||17 août 1993||Polaroid Corporation||Digital image processing circuitry|
|US5237686||14 sept. 1992||17 août 1993||Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha||Multiprocessor type time varying image encoding system and image processor with memory bus control table for arbitration priority|
|US5239292||1 août 1991||24 août 1993||Crosfield Electronics Ltd.||Computer graphics system electronically simulating painting on canvas|
|US5240238||24 déc. 1991||31 août 1993||Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.||Cassette used for electrophotographic process engine|
|US5241165||3 mars 1989||31 août 1993||Drexler Technology Corporation||Erasable optical wallet-size data card|
|US5241372||26 nov. 1991||31 août 1993||Sony Corporation||Video image processing apparatus including convolution filter means to process pixels of a video image by a set of parameter coefficients|
|US5243174||5 mars 1991||7 sept. 1993||The Gift Certificate Center, Inc.||Method and apparatus for generating gift certificates|
|US5243370||30 août 1988||7 sept. 1993||Dan Slater||Camera stabilizer|
|US5243381||4 janv. 1993||7 sept. 1993||Xerox Corporation||Method for compiling multiple jobs with job reference sheets|
|US5245365||6 mars 1992||14 sept. 1993||Compaq Computer Corporation||Ink-jet printer with user replaceable printing system cartridge|
|US5247611||22 avr. 1991||21 sept. 1993||Emtek Health Care Systems, Inc.||Spreadsheet cell having multiple data fields|
|US5260735||19 juin 1992||9 nov. 1993||Minolta Camera Kabushiki Kaisha||Camera system|
|US5265033||23 sept. 1991||23 nov. 1993||Atm Communications International, Inc.||ATM/POS based electronic mail system|
|US5266781||15 août 1991||30 nov. 1993||Datacard Corporation||Modular card processing system|
|US5267021||3 avr. 1992||30 nov. 1993||The Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New York||Multiresolution digital television broadcast system|
|US5267334||21 janv. 1993||30 nov. 1993||Apple Computer, Inc.||Encoding/decoding moving images with forward and backward keyframes for forward and reverse display|
|US5270808||1 mars 1993||14 déc. 1993||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Color image processing with adjustment of computed recording color to match original color|
|US5275877||25 avr. 1991||4 janv. 1994||Edison Polymer Innovation Corporation||Self reinforced thermoplastic composite laminate|
|US5276472||19 nov. 1991||4 janv. 1994||Eastman Kodak Company||Photographic film still camera system with audio recording|
|US5276521||30 déc. 1992||4 janv. 1994||Olympus Optical Co., Ltd.||Solid state imaging device having a constant pixel integrating period and blooming resistance|
|US5278608||19 mai 1992||11 janv. 1994||Eastman Kodak Company||Electronically printed depth photography system with improved viewing range|
|US5278657||27 mai 1992||11 janv. 1994||Sony Corporation||Camera apparatus selectively operable as a fully electronic slit camera|
|US5280160||9 juin 1993||18 janv. 1994||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Recording and reproducing method and apparatus compensating for predicted deviation based on detected relative skewing of recording medium|
|US5280620||14 janv. 1993||18 janv. 1994||U.S. Philips Corporation||Coupling network for a data processor, including a series connection of a cross-bar switch and an array of silos|
|US5282044||10 sept. 1991||25 janv. 1994||Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd.||Camera shake correction system|
|US5282051||29 juil. 1991||25 janv. 1994||Xerox Corporation||Apparatus and method for performing resolution conversion on image data with auto correlation|
|US5288980||25 juin 1992||22 févr. 1994||Kingsley Library Equipment Company||Library check out/check in system|
|US5288986||17 sept. 1992||22 févr. 1994||Motorola, Inc.||Binary code matrix having data and parity bits|
|US5291227||11 mai 1992||1 mars 1994||Ricoh Company, Ltd.||Ink jet printer having improved paper transport mechanism|
|US5291243||5 févr. 1993||1 mars 1994||Xerox Corporation||System for electronically printing plural-color tamper-resistant documents|
|US5294782||27 sept. 1991||15 mars 1994||Khyber Technologies Corporation||Integrated portable device for point of sale transactions|
|US5297217||21 août 1992||22 mars 1994||Eastman Kodak Company||Tile-oriented technique for collectively performing image rotation scaling and digital halftone screening|
|US5297289||31 oct. 1989||22 mars 1994||Rockwell International Corporation||System which cooperatively uses a systolic array processor and auxiliary processor for pixel signal enhancement|
|US5300958||28 févr. 1992||5 avr. 1994||Hewlett-Packard Company||Method and apparatus for automatically cleaning the printhead of a thermal inkjet cartridge|
|US5300976||16 avr. 1993||5 avr. 1994||Goldstar Co., Ltd.||Movie camera system having view finding and projecting operations|
|US5301043||19 mars 1993||5 avr. 1994||Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd.||Image reading apparatus in which an original image is automatically fed to a turntable|
|US5307470||27 nov. 1989||26 avr. 1994||Nec Corporation||Microcomputer having EEPROM provided with detector for detecting data write request issued before data write operation responsive to preceding data write request is completed|
|US5315316||4 janv. 1993||24 mai 1994||Hewlett-Packard Company||Method and apparatus for summing temperature changes to detect ink flow|
|US5317146||10 nov. 1992||31 mai 1994||Oki Electric Industry Co., Ltd.||Read head incorporating an image pick-up function|
|US5318370||17 nov. 1992||7 juin 1994||Varitronic Systems, Inc.||Cartridge with data memory system and method regarding same|
|US5319462||13 août 1992||7 juin 1994||Sanyo Electric Co., Ltd.||Automatic focusing apparatus for automatically adjusting focus in response to video signal by fuzzy inference|
|US5322594||20 juil. 1993||21 juin 1994||Xerox Corporation||Manufacture of a one piece full width ink jet printing bar|
|US5323203||10 déc. 1991||21 juin 1994||Olympus Optical Co., Ltd.||Wireless remote control apparatus for camera|
|US5325493||30 mars 1993||28 juin 1994||Hewlett-Packard Company||System for distributing command/data packets tagged by their unit identifier for parallel processing by a ready processing unit and recombination|
|US5327260||24 nov. 1992||5 juil. 1994||Ricoh Company, Ltd.||Image processing apparatus for smoothing edges of image|
|US5328281||18 sept. 1992||12 juil. 1994||Seiko Epson Corporation||Recording medium feed mechanism for a printer and method of medium feed control|
|US5334920||7 juin 1991||2 août 1994||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Recording apparatus|
|US5335170||4 sept. 1992||2 août 1994||Comtec Information Systems, Inc.||Modular system for inventory control|
|US5336004||14 oct. 1993||9 août 1994||Seikosha Co., Ltd.||Dot printer|
|US5336874||20 févr. 1992||9 août 1994||Alps Electric Co., Ltd.||Bar code reader with error detection and decode control|
|US5337361||1 juin 1992||9 août 1994||Symbol Technologies, Inc.||Record with encoded data|
|US5339102||12 nov. 1992||16 août 1994||Xerox Corporation||Capping carriage for ink jet printer maintenance station|
|US5339170||31 déc. 1991||16 août 1994||Xerox Corporation||Image processing system and method employing hybrid filtering to provide improved reconstruction of continuous tone images from halftone screen-structured images|
|US5339396||10 sept. 1993||16 août 1994||Hitachi, Ltd.||Interconnection network and crossbar switch for the same|
|US5343031||31 déc. 1992||30 août 1994||Teiryo Sangyo Co., Ltd.||Method of decoding a two-dimensional code symbol mark|
|US5343309||12 août 1992||30 août 1994||Xerox Corporation||Image processing system and method employing adaptive filtering to provide improved reconstruction of continuous tone images from halftone images including those without a screen structure|
|US5343386||10 sept. 1992||30 août 1994||Imageware Software, Inc.||Apparatus for making electronically-produced postcards and method of operating same|
|US5344248||23 avr. 1991||6 sept. 1994||Esselte Meto International Produktions Gmbh||Framework for portable printers|
|US5345288||2 juil. 1992||6 sept. 1994||Asahi Kogaku Kabushiki Kaisha||Electronically controlled camera with automatic release mode and interval time setting|
|US5345505||5 mars 1993||6 sept. 1994||Pires H George||Coding system for a data signal|
|US5347403||10 sept. 1992||13 sept. 1994||Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd.||Apparatus and method for recording and reading information|
|US5351071||7 sept. 1990||27 sept. 1994||Hitachi, Ltd.||Thermal printer|
|US5351095||24 août 1990||27 sept. 1994||Thomson Consumer Electronics||Method and device for estimating and hierarchically coding the motion of sequences of images|
|US5356971||28 juin 1993||18 oct. 1994||Nof Corporation||Thermosetting powder coating material|
|US5359387||6 juil. 1992||25 oct. 1994||Ray Hicks||Photographic process utilizing combined print and order form|
|US5361366||17 déc. 1990||1 nov. 1994||Hitachi, Ltd.||Computer equipped with serial bus-connected plural processor units providing internal communications|
|US5363134||20 mai 1992||8 nov. 1994||Hewlett-Packard Corporation||Integrated circuit printhead for an ink jet printer including an integrated identification circuit|
|US5363209||5 nov. 1993||8 nov. 1994||Xerox Corporation||Image-dependent sharpness enhancement|
|US5363212||13 mai 1992||8 nov. 1994||Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd.||Marker dot detecting device for color image recording apparatus|
|US5365312||25 juil. 1988||15 nov. 1994||Mannesmann Ag||Arrangement for printer equipment for monitoring reservoirs that contain printing medium|
|US5369261||12 févr. 1992||29 nov. 1994||Shamir; Harry||Multi-color information encoding system|
|US5373322||30 juin 1993||13 déc. 1994||Eastman Kodak Company||Apparatus and method for adaptively interpolating a full color image utilizing chrominance gradients|
|US5374995||22 mars 1993||20 déc. 1994||Eastman Kodak Company||Method and apparatus for enhancing sharpness of a sequence of images subject to continuous zoom|
|US5376561||24 avr. 1992||27 déc. 1994||Kopin Corporation||High density electronic circuit modules|
|US5381172||5 déc. 1991||10 janv. 1995||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Ink jet head cartridge, ink tank cartridge using degradeable plastic as part of construction or package thereof and ink jet apparatus having fitting part for the cartridges|
|US5384609||16 avr. 1993||24 janv. 1995||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Integrated camera-tripod system|
|US5384899||16 avr. 1991||24 janv. 1995||Scitex Corporation Ltd.||Apparatus and method for emulating a substrate|
|US5392365||23 déc. 1991||21 févr. 1995||Eastman Kodak Company||Apparatus for detecting text edges in digital image processing|
|US5393152||19 août 1993||28 févr. 1995||Brother Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha||Printing device having opening and shutting mechanism|
|US5396286||4 juin 1993||7 mars 1995||Sony Corporation||Video signal processing apparatus|
|US5398063||6 nov. 1991||14 mars 1995||Olympus Optical Co., Ltd.||Focusing position detecting device incorporated in a microscope|
|US5398131||13 août 1992||14 mars 1995||Hall; Dennis R.||Stereoscopic hardcopy methods|
|US5398315||30 déc. 1992||14 mars 1995||North American Philips Corporation||Multi-processor video display apparatus|
|US5399850||28 déc. 1992||21 mars 1995||Kyocera Corporation||Document reading apparatus, having a body unit for holding apparatus components|
|US5402527||23 avr. 1993||28 mars 1995||Xerox Corporation||Apparatus and method for determining the page description language in which a print job is written|
|US5404460||28 janv. 1994||4 avr. 1995||Vlsi Technology, Inc.||Method for configuring multiple identical serial I/O devices to unique addresses through a serial bus|
|US5408669||5 juil. 1994||18 avr. 1995||Dell Usa, L.P.||Computer system for sensing a cable-connected peripheral and for supplying power thereto|
|US5408746||30 avr. 1993||25 avr. 1995||Hewlett-Packard Company||Datum formation for improved alignment of multiple nozzle members in a printer|
|US5410620||9 févr. 1993||25 avr. 1995||Teiryo Sangyo Co., Ltd.||Digital data reader of digital data recording sheet|
|US5410649||29 juin 1992||25 avr. 1995||Texas Instruments Incorporated||Imaging computer system and network|
|US5412197||26 juil. 1994||2 mai 1995||United Parcel Service Of America, Inc.||Method and apparatus for decoding bar code symbols using gradient signals|
|US5412402||6 mars 1991||2 mai 1995||Quantel Limited||Electronic graphic systems|
|US5412410||4 janv. 1993||2 mai 1995||Xerox Corporation||Ink jet printhead for continuous tone and text printing|
|US5414529||13 mai 1992||9 mai 1995||Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd.||Image combining in image processing apparatus|
|US5418565||15 févr. 1994||23 mai 1995||Eastman Kodak Company||CFA compatible resolution reduction in a single sensor electronic camera|
|US5418585||21 mars 1994||23 mai 1995||Eastman Kodak Company||Method and apparatus for preventing unauthorized recycling of single-use camera and permitting authorized reuse of the camera|
|US5419543||22 juil. 1993||30 mai 1995||Tokyo Electric Co., Ltd.||Paper feeding apparatus for printer|
|US5420409||18 oct. 1993||30 mai 1995||Welch Allyn, Inc.||Bar code scanner providing aural feedback|
|US5420607||6 avr. 1994||30 mai 1995||Miller; Robert F.||Electronic paintbrush and color palette|
|US5420635||28 août 1992||30 mai 1995||Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd.||Video camera, imaging method using video camera, method of operating video camera, image processing apparatus and method, and solid-state electronic imaging device|
|US5420697||22 févr. 1993||30 mai 1995||Tuli; Raja S.||Portable facsimile/thermal printer utilizing a multi-purpose single roller|
|US5420940||22 févr. 1994||30 mai 1995||Hughes Training, Inc.||CGSI pipeline performance improvement|
|US5426762||7 avr. 1993||20 juin 1995||Nintendo Co., Ltd.||System for determining a truth of software in an information processing apparatus|
|US5428423||17 nov. 1993||27 juin 1995||Clark; John R.||Photographic printed cards and apparatus and method of making same|
|US5430518||8 oct. 1992||4 juil. 1995||Asahi Kogaku Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha||Remote control camera|
|US5430525||27 nov. 1991||4 juil. 1995||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Image processing apparatus|
|US5430861||9 août 1993||4 juil. 1995||Finn; Charles||Computer using optically encoded virtual memory|
|US5432577||14 févr. 1991||11 juil. 1995||Asahi Kogaku Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha||Electronically controlled camera with interval time setting|
|US5432896||31 janv. 1991||11 juil. 1995||Axa Corporation||Watercolor simulation in computer graphics|
|US5432914||21 mai 1991||11 juil. 1995||Goldstar Co., Ltd.||Scanner interface system for transferring data to main and secondary processing units|
|US5434618||7 juin 1994||18 juil. 1995||Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd.||Electronic still camera operable with a removably mounted storage medium|
|US5434621||12 oct. 1993||18 juil. 1995||Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.||Object tracking method for automatic zooming and the apparatus therefor|
|US5436657||3 mai 1994||25 juil. 1995||Ricoh Company, Ltd.||Electronic still camera for recording and regenerating image data and sound data|
|US5438359||15 sept. 1993||1 août 1995||Asahi Kogaku Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha||Electronic camera system using IC memory card|
|US5438430||25 sept. 1992||1 août 1995||Xerox Corporation||Paper user interface for image manipulations such as cut and paste|
|US5438431||20 mai 1993||1 août 1995||Ostromoukhov; Victor B.||Method and apparatus for generating digital halftone images using a rotated dispersed dither matrix|
|US5441251||1 juil. 1993||15 août 1995||Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd.||Sheet article containing cassette and system|
|US5442188||22 avr. 1992||15 août 1995||Gould Instruments Systems, Inc.||Strip chart recorder paper attribute detector and monitor|
|US5442387||23 juin 1993||15 août 1995||Tektronix, Inc.||Apparatus for supplying phase change ink to an ink jet printer|
|US5442567||30 avr. 1993||15 août 1995||Small; Maynard E.||Apparatus and method for electronically dispensing personalized greeting cards and gifts|
|US5443320||21 mai 1993||22 août 1995||International Business Machines Corporation||Information processing system with printing function|
|US5444230||30 nov. 1993||22 août 1995||Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company||Solid state optical reader with bi-directional protocol|
|US5444468||27 nov. 1991||22 août 1995||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Image forming apparatus with means for correcting image density unevenness|
|US5444543||26 mai 1993||22 août 1995||Ricoh Company, Ltd.||Method and apparatus for detecting a closed-loop area of an image|
|US5448280||21 nov. 1994||5 sept. 1995||Tohoku Ricoh Co., Ltd.||Rewriteable card, printing apparatus for printing the card and a method of judging the life of the same|
|US5450365||17 mai 1994||12 sept. 1995||Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd.||Memory card control device|
|US5452033||6 juin 1994||19 sept. 1995||Eastman Kodak Company||Single use photographic film package and camera|
|US5456539||25 mai 1993||10 oct. 1995||Duplex Printer, Inc.||Printer with dual opposing printheads|
|US5457515||11 janv. 1994||10 oct. 1995||Quad/Tech, Inc.||Method for forming a graphic image web|
|US5457554||26 avr. 1993||10 oct. 1995||Faris; Sadeg M.||3-D printing technology based on selective reflecting polarizing media|
|US5459819||22 avr. 1994||17 oct. 1995||Eastman Kodak Company||System for custom imprinting a variety of articles with images obtained from a variety of different sources|
|US5461440||10 févr. 1994||24 oct. 1995||Olympus Optical Co., Ltd.||Photographing image correction system|
|US5462375||29 avr. 1994||31 oct. 1995||Oki Electric Industry Co., Ltd.||Printer and data processing apparatus having printing unit|
|US5463470||8 oct. 1992||31 oct. 1995||Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd.||Methods of collecting photometric image data and determining light exposure by extracting feature image data from an original image|
|US5465163||5 mars 1992||7 nov. 1995||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Image processing method and apparatus for processing oversized original images and for synthesizing multiple images|
|US5465213||12 juil. 1993||7 nov. 1995||Ross; Harvey M.||System and method of manufacturing a single book copy|
|US5466918||29 oct. 1993||14 nov. 1995||Eastman Kodak Company||Method and apparatus for image compression, storage, and retrieval on magnetic transaction cards|
|US5467118||21 déc. 1993||14 nov. 1995||Hewlett-Packard Company||Ink cartridge for a hard copy printing or plotting apparatus|
|US5469211||5 mai 1994||21 nov. 1995||Sony Corporation||Video camera|
|US5471324||5 avr. 1994||28 nov. 1995||Xerox Corporation||Color printer calibration with improved color mapping linearity|
|US5471592||21 juin 1994||28 nov. 1995||Texas Instruments Incorporated||Multi-processor with crossbar link of processors and memories and method of operation|
|US5472143||29 sept. 1993||5 déc. 1995||Boehringer Ingelheim International Gmbh||Atomising nozzle and filter and spray generation device|
|US5473352||21 juin 1994||5 déc. 1995||Brother Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha||Image forming device having sheet conveyance device|
|US5475279||23 mars 1995||12 déc. 1995||Ngk Insulators, Ltd.||Piezoelectric/electrostrictive actuator having integral ceramic base member and film-type piezoelectric/electrostrictive element (S)|
|US5475318||29 oct. 1993||12 déc. 1995||Robert B. Marcus||Microprobe|
|US5477012||3 avr. 1992||19 déc. 1995||Sekendur; Oral F.||Optical position determination|
|US5477042||1 juin 1993||19 déc. 1995||Metamedia Corporation||2-D bar code scanner/decoder having a redundancy canceller|
|US5477264||29 mars 1994||19 déc. 1995||Eastman Kodak Company||Electronic imaging system using a removable software-enhanced storage device|
|US5477546||15 juil. 1992||19 déc. 1995||Hitachi, Ltd.||Teleconference terminal equipment and teleconference module|
|US5479015||18 août 1994||26 déc. 1995||Grumman Aerospace Corporation||Multi-image detector assembly|
|US5479515||11 mai 1994||26 déc. 1995||Welch Allyn, Inc.||One-dimensional bar code symbology and method of using same|
|US5482375||18 nov. 1994||9 janv. 1996||Mobil Oil Corporation||Tubular plastic end stops bonded to plastic zipper|
|US5482389||25 nov. 1994||9 janv. 1996||Westerex International, Division Of Capitol Circuits||Paper feed driven cutter mechanism of an electronic printer|
|US5483335||5 avr. 1994||9 janv. 1996||Tobias; Reginald||Multiplex spectroscopy|
|US5483379||13 mai 1992||9 janv. 1996||Svanberg; Sune||Image registering in color at low light intensity|
|US5485504||30 déc. 1994||16 janv. 1996||Alcatel N.V.||Hand-held radiotelephone with video transmission and display|
|US5488223||13 sept. 1994||30 janv. 1996||Intermec Corporation||System and method for automatic selection of printer control parameters|
|US5489935||30 déc. 1993||6 févr. 1996||Consilium Overseas Limited||Laser printer power saver|
|US5489945||13 sept. 1994||6 févr. 1996||Eastman Kodak Company||Timing logic system and method for selectably controlling a high resolution charge coupled device image sensor of the type having two line pixel registers to provide a high resolution mode and alternatively a television resolution mode of picture imaging|
|US5489995||6 juil. 1994||6 févr. 1996||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Contact type image sensor, producing method of the same, and information processing apparatus|
|US5493332||28 févr. 1994||20 févr. 1996||Photometrics, Ltd.||Modular electronic imaging system which accepts replacement solid state images|
|US5493335||30 juin 1993||20 févr. 1996||Eastman Kodak Company||Single sensor color camera with user selectable image record size|
|US5493409||14 oct. 1994||20 févr. 1996||Minolta Camera Kabushiki Kaisha||Still video camera having a printer capable of printing a photographed image in a plurality of printing modes|
|US5493684 *||6 avr. 1994||20 févr. 1996||Advanced Micro Devices||Power management architecture including a power management messaging bus for conveying an encoded activity signal for optimal flexibility|
|US5495097||14 sept. 1993||27 févr. 1996||Symbol Technologies, Inc.||Plurality of scan units with scan stitching|
|US5495568||27 déc. 1993||27 févr. 1996||Beavin; William C.||Computerized clothing designer|
|US5497498||28 sept. 1993||5 mars 1996||Giga Operations Corporation||Video processing module using a second programmable logic device which reconfigures a first programmable logic device for data transformation|
|US5499108||9 déc. 1992||12 mars 1996||Visioneer Communications, Inc.||Document-driven scanning input device communicating with a computer|
|US5502485||23 juin 1994||26 mars 1996||Nikon Corporation||Camera which compresses digital image data in correspondence with the focus control or the stop value of the camera|
|US5502529||14 févr. 1995||26 mars 1996||Eastman Kodak Company||Method of recycling single-use camera|
|US5502577||25 avr. 1995||26 mars 1996||Xerox Corporation||Paper user interface for image manipulations such as cut and paste|
|US5504821||31 mars 1994||2 avr. 1996||Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.||Color converting apparatus for performing a three-dimensional color conversion of a colored picture in a color space with a small capacity of memory|
|US5506603||28 févr. 1994||9 avr. 1996||Fujitsu Ltd.||Method and device for airbrushing|
|US5506620||21 oct. 1994||9 avr. 1996||Sony Corporation||Recording/reproducing apparatus for providing indications of abnormal states|
|US5510820||22 avr. 1992||23 avr. 1996||Lexmark International, Inc.||Device for ink refill of a reservoir in a print cartridge|
|US5510857||26 mai 1995||23 avr. 1996||Array Microsystems, Inc.||Motion estimation coprocessor|
|US5512924||1 févr. 1994||30 avr. 1996||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Jet apparatus having an ink jet head and temperature controller for that head|
|US5512951||11 janv. 1995||30 avr. 1996||Sony Corporation||Auto-focusing apparatus|
|US5512962||5 juil. 1995||30 avr. 1996||Nec Corporation||Motion vector detecting apparatus for moving picture|
|US5513117||26 juil. 1995||30 avr. 1996||Small; Maynard E.||Apparatus and method for electronically dispensing personalized greeting cards and gifts|
|US5513922||23 sept. 1994||7 mai 1996||Esselte Meto International Gmbh||Printer having a removable control panel|
|US5514860||3 oct. 1994||7 mai 1996||Pitney Bowes Inc.||Document authentication system utilizing a transparent label|
|US5515101||24 mars 1994||7 mai 1996||Minolta Co., Ltd.||Title generator for a video camera|
|US5515104||2 déc. 1993||7 mai 1996||Hudson Soft Co. Ltd.||Camera having color correction coefficients set in accordance with a combination of photographic parameters|
|US5517222||14 févr. 1995||14 mai 1996||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Ink jet recording apparatus having rotary drum with ink receptor|
|US5517241||21 oct. 1993||14 mai 1996||Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd.||EEPROM memory card for an electronic still camera|
|US5517265||9 janv. 1995||14 mai 1996||Eastman Kodak Company||Method and apparatus for preventing unauthorized recycling of single-use camera and permitting authorized reuse of the camera|
|US5520470||24 févr. 1995||28 mai 1996||Telxon Corporation||Portable printer for handheld computer|
|US5521372||27 oct. 1995||28 mai 1996||Xerox Corporation||Framing codes for robust synchronization and addressing of self-clocking glyph codes|
|US5521663||22 juil. 1994||28 mai 1996||Norris, Iii; Wyamn J.||Sound system for still film photography|
|US5521710||12 avr. 1994||28 mai 1996||Xerox Corporation||Method of applying electronically stored labels from a source job to a destination job in a printing system|
|US5523780||22 juin 1993||4 juin 1996||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Ink jet recording apparatus and ink cartridge mountable on said apparatus|
|US5524194||10 févr. 1995||4 juin 1996||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Data communication apparatus|
|US5528339||26 août 1994||18 juin 1996||Eastman Kodak Company||Color image reproduction of scenes with color enhancement and preferential tone mapping|
|US5529279||24 août 1994||25 juin 1996||Hewlett-Packard Company||Thermal isolation structures for microactuators|
|US5531431||5 avr. 1995||2 juil. 1996||Fujitsu Isotec Limited||Paper feeder for portable printer|
|US5533170||22 nov. 1994||2 juil. 1996||Etec Systems, Inc.||Rasterizer for a pattern generation apparatus|
|US5533172||16 déc. 1993||2 juil. 1996||Xerox Corporation||Method of printing a print job with a print file|
|US5534864||3 févr. 1993||9 juil. 1996||Hitachi, Ltd.||Pipelined analog-to-digital converter|
|US5534900||11 sept. 1991||9 juil. 1996||Seiko Epson Corporation||Ink-jet recording apparatus|
|US5534923||29 juin 1995||9 juil. 1996||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Video camera apparatus|
|US5534962||9 janv. 1995||9 juil. 1996||Eastman Kodak Company||Method and apparatus for preventing unauthorized recycling of single-use camera and permitting authorized reuse of the camera|
|US5535371||22 juin 1994||9 juil. 1996||Dell Usa, L.P.||Portable computer with automatic adaption to different device types on a standard port|
|US5537075||14 déc. 1994||16 juil. 1996||Sony Corporation||Semiconductor integrated circuit having isolated supply paths for circuit blocks|
|US5537144||23 sept. 1993||16 juil. 1996||Revfo, Inc.||Electro-optical display system for visually displaying polarized spatially multiplexed images of 3-D objects for use in stereoscopically viewing the same with high image quality and resolution|
|US5537294||1 juin 1994||16 juil. 1996||The Whitaker Corporation||Printed circuit card having a contact clip for grounding a printed circuit board found therein|
|US5539194||19 mai 1995||23 juil. 1996||Norand Corporation||Modular hand-held data entry system|
|US5539456||29 sept. 1994||23 juil. 1996||Aiwa Co., Ltd.||Video camera and camera system with white balance control|
|US5541653||10 mars 1995||30 juil. 1996||Sri International||Method and appartus for increasing resolution of digital color images using correlated decoding|
|US5541654||8 juin 1995||30 juil. 1996||Litton Systems, Inc.||Focal plane array imaging device with random access architecture|
|US5542487||22 févr. 1995||6 août 1996||Norand Corporation||Portable compact multi-function printer with cartridge paper supply|
|US5543941||31 mai 1994||6 août 1996||Research Corporation Technologies, Inc.||Method and apparatus for halftone rendering of a gray image using a blue noise mask|
|US5547501||5 mai 1995||20 août 1996||Kansai Paint Co., Ltd.||Method for formation of invisible marking and method for reading of invisible marking|
|US5549740||21 juin 1995||27 août 1996||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Liquid composition, ink set and image forming method and apparatus using the composition and ink set|
|US5550935||13 avr. 1995||27 août 1996||Eastman Kodak Company||Method for multiframe Wiener restoration of noisy and blurred image sequences|
|US5550938||21 déc. 1993||27 août 1996||Omron Corporation||Cordless image scanner|
|US5552837||1 mars 1995||3 sept. 1996||Gemstar Development Corporation||Remote controller for scanning data and controlling a video system|
|US5553172||29 nov. 1994||3 sept. 1996||Casio Computer Co., Ltd.||Electronic image pickup apparatus having movable focus screen and movable mirror and which is capable of miniaturization|
|US5553220||7 sept. 1993||3 sept. 1996||Cirrus Logic, Inc.||Managing audio data using a graphics display controller|
|US5553864||22 mai 1992||10 sept. 1996||Sitrick; David H.||User image integration into audiovisual presentation system and methodology|
|US5554432||2 mars 1994||10 sept. 1996||The Phscologram Venture, Inc.||Press polymerization of lenticular images|
|US5555061||26 sept. 1994||10 sept. 1996||Nikon Corporation||Camera with improved positioning of vibration detecting sensors therein|
|US5555428||10 mars 1995||10 sept. 1996||Hughes Aircraft Company||Activity masking with mask context of SIMD processors|
|US5555496||6 mai 1994||10 sept. 1996||Mary T. Tackbary||Method and apparatus for communicating with a card distribution center for management, selection, and delivery of social expression cards|
|US5557310||22 juil. 1994||17 sept. 1996||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Ink container with ring-shaped ink absorbing member|
|US5557324||29 oct. 1992||17 sept. 1996||The Johns Hopkins University||Polorization viewer|
|US5557332 *||8 mai 1995||17 sept. 1996||Sony Corporation||Apparatus and method for reproducing a prediction-encoded video signal|
|US5559714||10 mai 1993||24 sept. 1996||Hallmark Cards, Incorporated||Method and apparatus for display sequencing personalized social occasion products|
|US5559932||27 janv. 1995||24 sept. 1996||Hitachi, Ltd.||Printer and computer system with detachable built-in printer|
|US5561604||22 oct. 1990||1 oct. 1996||Hallmark Cards, Incorporated||Computer controlled system for vending personalized products|
|US5563643||3 janv. 1994||8 oct. 1996||Xerox Corporation||Ink jet printhead and ink supply manifold assembly having ink passageway sealed therebetween|
|US5563722||26 févr. 1992||8 oct. 1996||Norris; Christopher||Method and apparatus for assembling a photographic album|
|US5565900||4 févr. 1994||15 oct. 1996||Hewlett-Packard Company||Unit print head assembly for ink-jet printing|
|US5566290||28 avr. 1993||15 oct. 1996||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Multi-media device|
|US5566906||10 sept. 1993||22 oct. 1996||Ricoh Company, Ltd.||Decurling device for a rolled recording paper|
|US5570130||6 févr. 1995||29 oct. 1996||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Detachable memory with starting block address selected in accordance with detected television programming standard|
|US5570435||28 déc. 1994||29 oct. 1996||Xerox Corporation||Segmentation of text styles|
|US5572310||24 janv. 1996||5 nov. 1996||Hewlett-Packard Company||Universal media size dial|
|US5572596||2 sept. 1994||5 nov. 1996||David Sarnoff Research Center, Inc.||Automated, non-invasive iris recognition system and method|
|US5572632||7 oct. 1994||5 nov. 1996||Laser Master Corporation||Universal frame buffer for a rendering device|
|US5572635||3 juin 1992||5 nov. 1996||Hitachi, Ltd.||Method for changing a natural image based on a light environment in the natural image|
|US5574485||13 oct. 1994||12 nov. 1996||Xerox Corporation||Ultrasonic liquid wiper for ink jet printhead maintenance|
|US5576783||21 oct. 1994||19 nov. 1996||Lee; Sung||Recording and reproducing a 3-dimensional image|
|US5579116||20 juil. 1994||26 nov. 1996||Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd.||Video printer and printing method in use with the same|
|US5579445||17 déc. 1993||26 nov. 1996||Xerox Corporation||Image resolution conversion method that employs statistically generated multiple morphological filters|
|US5581773||12 mai 1992||3 déc. 1996||Glover; Michael A.||Massively parallel SIMD processor which selectively transfers individual contiguously disposed serial memory elements|
|US5583971||2 nov. 1994||10 déc. 1996||Image Technology International, Inc.||Filmless method and apparatus for producing 3-D photographs|
|US5586166||18 août 1995||17 déc. 1996||Alcatel N.V||Chip card|
|US5586207||29 nov. 1993||17 déc. 1996||Northern Telecom Limited||Methods and assemblies for packaging opto-electronic devices and for coupling optical fibers to the packaged devices|
|US5587740||17 août 1995||24 déc. 1996||Brennan; James M.||Digital photo kiosk|
|US5591192||1 févr. 1995||7 janv. 1997||Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.||Surgical penetration instrument including an imaging element|
|US5591956||15 mai 1995||7 janv. 1997||Welch Allyn, Inc.||Two dimensional data encoding structure and symbology for use with optical readers|
|US5592167||19 oct. 1994||7 janv. 1997||Exar Corporation||Analog-digital converter using current controlled voltage reference|
|US5592237 *||4 nov. 1994||7 janv. 1997||Infimed, Inc.||High resolution image processor with multiple bus architecture|
|US5592312||17 avr. 1995||7 janv. 1997||Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd.||Method for transforming color signals|
|US5592597||14 févr. 1994||7 janv. 1997||Parametric Technology Corporation||Real-time image generation system for simulating physical paint, drawing media, and feature modeling with 3-D graphics|
|US5593236||6 nov. 1995||14 janv. 1997||Bobry; Howard H.||Hand-held sweep electronic printer with compensation for non-linear movement|
|US5594500||14 juin 1995||14 janv. 1997||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Image pickup apparatus|
|US5598202||13 mars 1995||28 janv. 1997||Gerber Scientific Products, Inc.||Method and apparatus for printing a graphic on fabric|
|US5598242||4 déc. 1994||28 janv. 1997||Nikon Corporation||Vibration compensation mode selection apparataus and associated visual display for a camera|
|US5599231||31 oct. 1994||4 févr. 1997||Nintendo Co., Ltd.||Security systems and methods for a videographics and authentication game/program fabricating device|
|US5600402||4 mai 1995||4 févr. 1997||Kainen; Daniel B.||Method and apparatus for producing three-dimensional graphic images using a lenticular sheet|
|US5600563||23 sept. 1992||4 févr. 1997||Onkor Ltd.||System for printing social expression cards|
|US5602377||1 mars 1995||11 févr. 1997||Metanetics Corporation||Bar code dataform scanning and labeling apparatus and method|
|US5602412||15 août 1995||11 févr. 1997||Nikon Corporation||Imaging device which adjusts the ratio of color excitation values produced by an image pickup element in accordance with an exit pupil position and the size of an aperture|
|US5602574||31 août 1994||11 févr. 1997||Hewlett-Packard Company||Matrix pen arrangement for inkjet printing|
|US5604537||1 mars 1995||18 févr. 1997||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Imaging apparatus having an automatic focusing means|
|US5606347||7 juin 1995||25 févr. 1997||Texas Instruments Incorporated||Devices systems and methods for flexible format data storage|
|US5606420||17 nov. 1995||25 févr. 1997||Minolta Camera Kabushiki Kaisha||Camera system including a camera section and a reproduction section separately attachable to the camera section|
|US5608437||13 nov. 1992||4 mars 1997||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Ink container and ink jet recording apparatus using same|
|US5610761||28 déc. 1994||11 mars 1997||Minolta Co., Ltd.||Telescope having mechanism for automatically returning optical system to a reference dioptric power|
|US5613146||7 juin 1995||18 mars 1997||Texas Instruments Incorporated||Reconfigurable SIMD/MIMD processor using switch matrix to allow access to a parameter memory by any of the plurality of processors|
|US5613175||31 août 1995||18 mars 1997||Xerox Corporation||Anisotropic imaging member|
|US5613415||12 mai 1995||25 mars 1997||Nec Corporation||Paper cutting apparatus|
|US5615123||2 avr. 1991||25 mars 1997||Creatacard, Inc.||System for creating and producing custom card products|
|US5615384||29 août 1995||25 mars 1997||International Business Machines Corporation||Personal communicator having improved zoom and pan functions for editing information on touch sensitive display|
|US5615393||15 juil. 1996||25 mars 1997||Elonex I.P. Holdings Ltd.||Computer system having a cordless keyboard and an induction coil in a plug-in electronic card module|
|US5619030||13 mai 1996||8 avr. 1997||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Control apparatus for image blur prevention employing an angular velocity and an image field sensor|
|US5619590||6 oct. 1994||8 avr. 1997||Eastman Kodak Company||System for electronic image signal processing to provide a tonescale corrected full resolution luminance and two half resolution chrominance signals|
|US5619622||16 déc. 1994||8 avr. 1997||Xerox Corporation||Raster output interface for a printbar|
|US5619737||7 févr. 1996||8 avr. 1997||Eastman Kodak Company||Encodement-on-film recording apparatus utilizes flash components in a camera|
|US5620269||17 janv. 1995||15 avr. 1997||Hewlett-Packard Company||Print media transport apparatus for moving print media through a printer from a high volume input tray accessory|
|US5621445||13 oct. 1994||15 avr. 1997||Hewlett-Packard Company||Apparatus for refilling ink cartridges|
|US5621524||10 avr. 1996||15 avr. 1997||Hitachi Koki Co., Ltd.||Method for testing ink-jet recording heads|
|US5621545||8 déc. 1993||15 avr. 1997||Motta; Ricardo J.||Image production using color error diffusion|
|US5621864||3 sept. 1996||15 avr. 1997||Engineered Data Products., Inc.||Label generation apparatus|
|US5621868||15 avr. 1994||15 avr. 1997||Sony Corporation||Generating imitation custom artwork by simulating brush strokes and enhancing edges|
|US5623581||22 janv. 1996||22 avr. 1997||Apbi Interactive Kiosk Systems||Direct view interactive photo kiosk and image forming process for same|
|US5624732||22 nov. 1994||29 avr. 1997||Meiwa Gravure Co., Ltd.||Bright printed sheet|
|US5625669||23 juin 1994||29 avr. 1997||Telemac Cellular Corporation||Mobile phone with internal call accounting controls|
|US5625770||9 déc. 1994||29 avr. 1997||Ricoh Company, Ltd.||File system for filing documents, using a catalog card having a plurality of marks thereon|
|US5633667||4 nov. 1994||27 mai 1997||Seiko Epson Corporation||Ink cartridge for printer|
|US5633678||20 déc. 1995||27 mai 1997||Eastman Kodak Company||Electronic still camera for capturing and categorizing images|
|US5634730||6 nov. 1995||3 juin 1997||Bobry; Howard H.||Hand-held electronic printer|
|US5638103||5 juin 1995||10 juin 1997||Dai Nippon Printing Co., Ltd.||Method for recording and reproducing information, apparatus therefor and recording medium|
|US5640002||15 août 1995||17 juin 1997||Ruppert; Jonathan Paul||Portable RF ID tag and barcode reader|
|US5640203||15 févr. 1995||17 juin 1997||Asahi Kogaku Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha||Recording operation control device|
|US5640627||31 juil. 1995||17 juin 1997||Asahi Kogaku Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha||Display device in a camera finder|
|US5642226||18 janv. 1995||24 juin 1997||Rosenthal; Bruce A.||Lenticular optical system|
|US5644341||7 déc. 1994||1 juil. 1997||Seiko Epson Corporation||Ink jet head drive apparatus and drive method, and a printer using these|
|US5644410||12 mai 1995||1 juil. 1997||Canon Kabushiki Kaisha||Image sensing apparatus|
|US5644431||13 avr. 1994||1 juil. 1997||University Of Arkansas, N.A.||Directional image transmission sheet and method of making same|
|US5644557||16 déc. 1994||1 juil. 1997||Olympus Optical Co., Ltd.||Audio data recording system for recording voice data as an optically readable code on a recording medium for recording still image data photographed by a camera|
|US5644647||17 sept. 1990||1 juil. 1997||Eastman Kodak Company||User-interactive reduction of scene balance failures|
|US5646658||15 févr. 1994||8 juil. 1997||Francotyp-Postalia Ag & Co.||Modular ink jet printer head|
|US5646752||15 sept. 1995||8 juil. 1997||Canon Information Systems, Inc.||Color image processing apparatus which uses private tags to alter a predefined color transformation sequence of a device profile|
|US5647484||31 mai 1996||15 juil. 1997||Fleming; Daniel J.||Laptop computer encasement device adapted for printer|
|US5649031||31 mars 1993||15 juil. 1997||Hitachi, Ltd.||Image information processor for producing high-quality output image|
|US5652618 *||17 mai 1996||29 juil. 1997||Minolta Camera Kabushiki Kaisha||Image reproducing apparatus|
|US5652918||10 mai 1995||29 juil. 1997||Nikon Corporation||Image blur suppression device for an optical camera|
|US5655164||6 juil. 1995||5 août 1997||Tsai; Irving||Still film sound photography method and apparatus|
|US5657237||20 déc. 1994||12 août 1997||Electrex S.R.L.||Instrument and method for the digital electronic measurement of periodic electrical quantities|
|US5661506||10 nov. 1994||26 août 1997||Sia Technology Corporation||Pen and paper information recording system using an imaging pen|
|US5663552||29 mars 1996||2 sept. 1997||Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.||Portable information terminal apparatus having image processing function|
|US5664013||7 juin 1995||2 sept. 1997||Compaq Computer Corporation||Embedded notepad system for a cellular telephone|
|US5665249||17 oct. 1994||9 sept. 1997||Xerox Corporation||Micro-electromechanical die module with planarized thick film layer|
|US5666141||8 juil. 1994||9 sept. 1997||Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha||Ink jet head and a method of manufacturing thereof|
|US5666226||24 mai 1994||9 sept. 1997||Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha||Optical apparatus|
|US5666411||13 janv. 1994||9 sept. 1997||Mccarty; Johnnie C.||System for computer software protection|
|US5666516||16 déc. 1993||9 sept. 1997||International Business Machines Corporation||Protected programmable memory cartridge having selective access circuitry|
|US5670935 *||22 mai 1995||23 sept. 1997||Donnelly Corporation||Rearview vision system for vehicle including panoramic view|
|US5673073||14 mars 1996||30 sept. 1997||Hewlett-Packard Company||Syringe for filling print cartridge and establishing correct back pressure|
|US5677715||6 déc. 1994||14 oct. 1997||Xerox Corporation||Pivoting cap actuating assembly for printheads|
|US5677716||30 avr. 1993||14 oct. 1997||Hewlett-Packard Company||Maximum-diagonal print mask and multipass printing modes, for high quality and high throughput with liquid-base inks|
|US5678001||5 avr. 1996||14 oct. 1997||Nagel; Ralph||Computerized game teaching method|
|US5678081||5 oct. 1995||14 oct. 1997||Fuji Photo Optical Co., Ltd.||Photographic camera having a picture size switching device|
|US5679456||19 juil. 1994||21 oct. 1997||Toray Industries, Inc.||Fiber reinforced thermoplastic resin structure, process for production of same, and extruder for production of same|
|US5679943||7 juin 1995||21 oct. 1997||Norand Corporation||Hand-held terminal with display screens, interactive screens, magnetic credit card readers, scanners, printers and handlers|
|US5680533||31 oct. 1994||21 oct. 1997||Nintendo Co., Ltd.||Videographics program/video game fabricating system and method|
|US5682191||24 janv. 1994||28 oct. 1997||Iris Graphics Inc.||Ink jet printing apparatus having modular components|
|US5687304||22 nov. 1996||11 nov. 1997||Parametric Technology Corporation||Real-time image generation system for simulating physical paint, drawing media, and feature modeling with 3-D graphics|
|US5688056||14 juin 1994||18 nov. 1997||Gemplus Card International||Method for controlling a printer in order to obtain postages|
|US5689740||30 juin 1995||18 nov. 1997||Nikon Corporation||Focus detection device|
|US5691768||7 juil. 1995||25 nov. 1997||Lucent Technologies, Inc.||Multiple resolution, multi-stream video system using a single standard decoder|
|US5692225||30 août 1994||25 nov. 1997||Eastman Kodak Company||Voice recognition of recorded messages for photographic printers|
|US5696892||7 juin 1995||9 déc. 1997||The Walt Disney Company||Method and apparatus for providing animation in a three-dimensional computer generated virtual world using a succession of textures derived from temporally related source images|
|US5696913||7 juin 1995||9 déc. 1997||Texas Instruments Incorporated||Unique processor identifier in a multi-processing system having plural memories with a unified address space corresponding to each processor|
|US5697006||6 juin 1995||9 déc. 1997||Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd.||Method and apparatus for recording stereoscopic images and lenticular recording material used therefor|
|US5699102||15 oct. 1990||16 déc. 1997||Eastman Kodak Company||Non-impact copier/printer system communicating rosterized, printer independant data|
|US5699491||15 juin 1995||16 déc. 1997||Canon Information Systems, Inc.||Printer driver having gamut-mapped colors|
|US5703961||29 déc. 1994||30 déc. 1997||Worldscape L.L.C.||Image transformation and synthesis methods|
|US5706049||30 nov. 1995||6 janv. 1998||Eastman Kodak Company||Camera that records an active image area identifier with an image|
|US5706870||6 mai 1996||13 janv. 1998||Procubed Corp.||Kit and method for refilling ink cartridges|
|US5708518||11 avr. 1995||13 janv. 1998||Research Corporation Technologies, Inc.||Method and apparatus for halftone rendering of a gray scale image using a blue noise mask|