| Référence |
|---|
| 1 | | Bos Philip et al., Field-Sequential Stereoscopic Viewing Systems Using Passive Glasses, Tektronix, Inc., Beaverton, OR, 5 pages. |
| 2 | | Case No. CV10 2327 GHK PJWx-Answer to First Amended Complaint and Counterclaims, Nov. 24, 2010. |
| 3 | | Case No. CV10 2327 GHK PJWx-Answer, Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims of Defendants and Counterclaimants Li-Tek Corporation Company and Dongguan Li Wang Electronics and Plastics Co. Ltd to First Amended Complaint, Jan. 3, 2011. |
| 4 | | Case No. CV10 2327 GHK PJWx-Defendants Li-Tek Corporation and Dongguan Li Wang Electronics and Plastics Co. Ltd's Answer, Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims to Plaintiff's First Amended Petition, Dec. 23, 2010. |
| 5 | | Case No. CV10 2327 GHK PJWx-First Amended Answer and Counterclaims to First Amended Complaint, Jan. 7, 2011. |
| 6 | | Case No. CV10 2327 GHK PJWx-First Amended Complaint for Damages and Injunctive Relief, and Demand for Jury Trial, Jul. 8, 2010. |
| 7 | | Case No. CV10 2327 GHK PJWx-Original Complaint for Damages and Injunctive Relief, and Demand for Jury Trial, Mar. 30, 2010. |
| 8 | | Case No. CV10 2327 GHK PJWx-Plaintiff's Answer to GDC Defendant's Second Amended Answer and Counterclaims to First Amended Complaint, Jan. 20, 2011. |
| 9 | | Case No. CV10 2327 GHK PJWx-Second Amended Answer and Counterclaims to First Amended Complaint, Jan. 13, 2011. |
| 10 | | Correspondence dated Mar. 16, 2011 from S. Dang to M. Fowler re Plaintiffs' Identification of Trade Secrets. |
| 11 | | Defendant Li-Tek Corporation Company's First Set of Interrogatories to Plaintiffs X6D Limited, X6D USA Inc., and XPand, Inc. |
| 12 | | Defendant Li-Tek Corporation Company's First Set of Requests for Production of Documents and Things to Plaintiffs X6D Limited, X6D USA Inc., and XPand, Inc. |
| 13 | | Defendants Li-Tek Corporation and Dongguan Li Wang Electronics and Plastics Co. Ltd's Initial Disclosures Pursuant to Federal rule of Procedure 26(a)(1). |
| 14 | | GDC Defendants and Counterclaimants' Responses and Objections to X6D's First Set of Requests for Production of Documents. |
| 15 | | GDC Technology (USA) LLC's First Set of Requests for Prodcution of Documents and Things to X6D. |
| 16 | | GDC Technology Limited's First Set of Interrogatories to X6D. |
| 17 | | GDC Technology USA LLC's First Set of Interrogatories to X6D. |
| 18 | | Initial Disclosures of the GDC Defendants and Counerclaimants Pursuant to Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. |
| 19 | | Objections and Responses to Plaintiffs' First Set of Interrogatories to Defendants Li-Tek Corporation Company; and Dongguan Li Wang Electronics and Plastics Co., Ltd. |
| 20 | | Objections and Responses to Plaintiffs' First Set of Requests for Production of Documents to Defendants Li-Tek Corporation Company; and Dongguan Li Wang Electronics and Plastics Co., Ltd. |
| 21 | | Pending U.S. Appl. No. 29/314,421 entitled "Cart for 3D Glasses", filed Mar. 30, 2009. |
| 22 | | Pending U.S. Appl. No. 29/314,965 entitled "Cart for 3D Glasses", filed May 13, 2009. |
| 23 | | Pending U.S. Appl. No. 29/330,444 entitled "Improved Emitter for Viewing 3D With shutter Glasses", filed Jan. 7, 2009. |
| 24 | | Petition to Make Special Under 37 CFR 1.102(d) on the Basis of Actual Infringement, Filed Mar. 26, 2010. |
| 25 | | Plaintiffs' First Set of Interrogatories to Defendants Li-Tek Corporation Company; and Dongguan Li Wang Electronics and Plastics Co., Ltd. |
| 26 | | Plaintiffs' First Set of Interrogatories to the GDC Defendants. |
| 27 | | Plaintiffs' First Set of Requests for Production of Documents (Nos. 1-80) to the GDC Defendants. |
| 28 | | Plaintiffs' First Set of Requests for Production of Documents (Nos. 1-91) to Defendants Li-Tek Corporation Company; and Dongguan Li Wang Electronics and Plastics Co., Ltd. |
| 29 | | Plaintiffs' Initial Disclosures Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1). |
| 30 | | Responses and Objections of the GDC Defendants and Counterclaimants to X6D's First Set of Interrogatories. |
| 31 | | USPTO Office Communication dated Dec. 19, 2006 re U.S. Appl. No. 10/252,215, filed Sep. 23, 2002. |