USRE38270E1 - Multiple level undo/redo mechanism - Google Patents

Multiple level undo/redo mechanism Download PDF

Info

Publication number
USRE38270E1
USRE38270E1 US09/376,933 US37693399A USRE38270E US RE38270 E1 USRE38270 E1 US RE38270E1 US 37693399 A US37693399 A US 37693399A US RE38270 E USRE38270 E US RE38270E
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
redo
undo
command
application program
facility
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US09/376,933
Inventor
Satoshi Nakajima
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Microsoft Technology Licensing LLC
Original Assignee
Microsoft Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Microsoft Corp filed Critical Microsoft Corp
Priority to US09/376,933 priority Critical patent/USRE38270E1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of USRE38270E1 publication Critical patent/USRE38270E1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Assigned to MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, LLC reassignment MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, LLC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: MICROSOFT CORPORATION
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F3/00Input arrangements for transferring data to be processed into a form capable of being handled by the computer; Output arrangements for transferring data from processing unit to output unit, e.g. interface arrangements
    • G06F3/01Input arrangements or combined input and output arrangements for interaction between user and computer
    • G06F3/048Interaction techniques based on graphical user interfaces [GUI]
    • G06F3/0481Interaction techniques based on graphical user interfaces [GUI] based on specific properties of the displayed interaction object or a metaphor-based environment, e.g. interaction with desktop elements like windows or icons, or assisted by a cursor's changing behaviour or appearance
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F9/00Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units
    • G06F9/06Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units using stored programs, i.e. using an internal store of processing equipment to receive or retain programs
    • G06F9/44Arrangements for executing specific programs
    • G06F9/451Execution arrangements for user interfaces

Definitions

  • the present invention relates generally to data processing systems and, more particularly, to a mechanism for providing a multiple level undo/redo capability in operating systems and application programs.
  • a single-level undo mechanism is provided by software packages, such as the Microsoft Word, version 5.0, word processing package, which is sold by Microsoft Corporation of Redmond, Washington.
  • the single level undo mechanism allows a user command to be undone (i.e., the effects of the sand are reversed) after the command has already been performed.
  • the undo command is typically performed by selecting a menu item that lists the undo command as an option. The user is limited to a single level of undoing of commands and, thus, can only reverse the most recently executed command.
  • a method is practiced in a data processing system having memory means and at least one processor that is responsive to user commands.
  • a log of user commands that were executed by the processor is stored in the memory means.
  • a first user command stored in a log is undone so as to reverse the effect of the first user command.
  • a next user command stored in the log is undone so as to reverse the effect of the next sequential user command.
  • a log of at least two user commands is stored in the memory means.
  • User commands stored in the log are undone so as to reverse the effects of at least two user commands.
  • At least two of the undone user commands are then redone so as to again execute those commands.
  • a list of a plurality of user commands is stored in the memory means in a sequence ranging from a selected user command that has been executed by a processor to a most recently executed user command.
  • the effects of all of the user commands stored in a sequence of the list are undone so as to return the processor to reverse the effects of the user commands in the sequence.
  • a list of a plurality of user commands is stored in the memory means.
  • the list includes user commands that have been undone.
  • the user commands that have been undone are again executed by the processor.
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a data processing system for practicing a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating a command element object that is used in the preferred embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIGS. 3a, 3 b and 3 c illustrate elements of a user interface for implementing the multiple-level undo/redo mechanism of the preferred embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 4a is a flowchart illustrating the steps performed when a user enters a command in the preferred embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 4b is a diagram illustrating the state of the list of command element objects after commands are added in the preferred embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 4c diagram illustrating the list of command elements objects when a deletion of an element on the list is performed in the preferred embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 5a is a flowchart illustrating the steps performed in an undo operation in the preferred embodiment of the present invention
  • FIG. 5b is a diagram illustrating a list of command element objects when undo operations are performed in the preferred embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 6a is a flowchart illustrating the steps performed when a redo operation is performed in the preferred embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 6b is a diagram illustrating the list of command element objects when a redo operation is performed in the preferred embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 7a is a flowchart illustrating the steps performed when an undo “All the Way” operation is performed in the preferred embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 7b is a diagram illustrating the list of command element objects when an undo “All the Way” operation is performed in the preferred embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 8a is a flowchart illustrating the steps performed when a redo “All the Way” operation is performed in the preferred embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 8b is a diagram illustrating the list of command element objects when a redo “All the Way” operation is performed in the preferred embodiment of the present invention.
  • the preferred embodiment of the present invention provides a mechanism for performing multiple-level undo/redo operations in an application program.
  • the mechanism keeps a log of user commands and maintains a current position in the log to monitor a current state of the application program.
  • the log is used by the mechanism to facilitate multiple-level undo operations and multiple-level redo operations.
  • FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of a data processing system 10 suitable for implementing the preferred embodiment of the present invention.
  • the data processing system 10 includes a central processing unit (CPU) 12 and a memory 14 .
  • the memory 14 holds application programs 22 , an operating system 24 and other items.
  • the data processing system 10 also includes a keyboard 16 , a mouse 18 and a video display 20 .
  • the data processing system 10 shown in FIG. 1 is a conventional single processor system. Nevertheless, it should be appreciated that the present invention may also be implemented in a distributed system or in other environments.
  • the preferred embodiment of the present invention is designed for use in an object-oriented programming environment.
  • the operating system 24 is an object-oriented operating system.
  • the present invention is not limited to use in an object-oriented operating system. Instead, it may also be implemented in other embodiments.
  • the object-oriented operating system 24 supports the use of “objects” in the data processing system 10 .
  • An object may be viewed as a combination of data members and, member functions.
  • the data members are attributes that are stored in data structures, and the member functions are functions that act upon these attributes.
  • the notion of an object is exploited in the multiple-level undo/redo mechanism of the preferred embodiment of the present invention in that certain aspects of this mechanism are implemented as objects.
  • An interface is a group of schematically-related functions that are organized into a named unit. Each interface may be uniquely identified by its identifier. Interfaces have no instantiation, that is an interface definition does not include code for implementing the functions that are specified in the interface. Interfaces specify a set of signatures for functions. An object may “support” an interface. When an object supports an interface, the object provides code for the function specified by the interface. The code supplied by the object, however, must comply with the signatures specified by the interface.
  • the multiple-level undo/redo mechanism of the preferred embodiment of the present invention supports the ability for an application program to maintain a command log of user commands.
  • the data held in the command log and functions for maintaining the data are encapsulated into a command log object.
  • the command log object includes a list 30 (see FIG. 4b) of command element objects and a cursor 32 .
  • the list 30 of command element objects is a sequential list of command element objects specifying user commands.
  • the cursor 32 specifies a current position that corresponds with the last applied (i.e., last exceed) command on the list 30 of command element objects.
  • the command element object 40 includes a field 44 that specifies the nature of the command and a V-pointer 42 .
  • the V-pointer 42 points to a V-table 46 (i.e., having a virtual table such as found in the C++ programming language) having entries for the operations that may be performed on the command element object 40 .
  • These operations include an undo operation, a redo operation and a merge operation, for which respective entries 48 a, 48 b and 48 c are provided.
  • Entries 48 a, 48 b and 48 c point to sections of code 50 a, 50 b and 50 c for implementing their associated operations.
  • the undo operation undoes the command at the current cursor position.
  • the redo operation performs the next operation on the list 30 (FIG. 4 b).
  • the merge operation merges command log element objects, if possible.
  • the command log object does not need to know about the implementation of the code 50 a, 50 b and 50 c for implementing operations on the command element objects 40 .
  • the details of this code 50 a, 50 b and 50 c are the concern of the command element objects 40 . As such, the command log object can be implemented more easily since it does not need to concern itself with such details.
  • the command log object and the command element object 40 are created by the application program 22 (FIG. 1 ).
  • the operating system 24 provides a multi-level undo/redo facility to support multiple undo/redo operations for the application program. Part of this mechanism is a user interface.
  • the user interface displays buttons 51 and 53 (FIG. 3a) that may be activated to cause execution of undo and redo commands, respectively.
  • the undo button 51 and the redo button 53 may be activated multiple times to perform multiple undos or redos consecutively. The user is not limited to undoing only a most recent command or redoing a most recently undone command.
  • a context menu 55 is provided for the undo button 51 when activated (see FIG. 3 b).
  • a similar context menu 57 (FIG.
  • the context menus 55 (FIG. 3b) and 57 (FIG. 3c) provide two options: “Last Applied” and “All The Way.” These options cause either only a single last applied command to be undone/redone or the commands to be undone/redone.
  • FIG. 4a is a flowchart illustrating the steps performed by the preferred embodiment of the present invention when a user enters a new command.
  • FIG. 4a will be described in conjunction with the diagram of FIG. 4 b.
  • FIG. 4b depicts an example of the list 30 of command element objects.
  • a user enters a command (step 52 in FIG. 4 a).
  • the list 30 is initially empty.
  • the user then enters command “a”.
  • the multiple level undo/redo mechanism of the preferred embodiment checks whether there are any commands on the list before the cursor 32 (step 54 in FIG. 4 a). If there are no commands on the list before the cursor 32 , such as in the case shown in FIG.
  • the list 30 of command element objects is built.
  • an instance of a command element object 40 (FIG. 2) is created; the new command element object is appended to the front of the list; and the cursor position is updated.
  • step 54 of FIG. 4a it is determined that there are commands on the list 30 that are situated before the cursor 32 , all the commands on the list that are before the cursor are deleted (step 56 in FIG. 4 a).
  • FIG. 4c shows an example of such a deletion.
  • initially list 30 of command log elements includes entries 68 , 70 and 72 for commands “a”, “b” and “c”, respectively, as shown in FIG. 4 c.
  • the cursor 32 points to entry 70 for command “b”.
  • a user enters command “d”.
  • step 54 of FIG. 4a it is determined that entry 72 for command “c” is positioned before the cursor on list 30 .
  • entry 72 is deleted in step 56 of FIG. 4 a.
  • an entry 73 for command “d” is added to the front of the list 30 (see step 58 in FIG. 4 a), and the cursor 32 (FIG. 4c) is updated to point to entry 73 (see step 60 in FIG. 4 a).
  • FIG. 5a is a flowchart of the steps performed when an undo command is requested.
  • FIG. 5b is a diagram illustrating the state of the list 30 of command element objects after multiple undo commands are performed on the list. The steps of FIG. 5a will be described in conjunction with the diagram of FIG. 5 b.
  • a user requests an undo operation by activating the undo button 51 (FIG. 3b) provided in the user interface.
  • the undo button 51 FIG. 3b
  • a context menu 55 is displayed after the button 51 is activated and the context menu provides the user with the option of undoing only the most recent command (i.e., the “Last Applied” option).
  • the user selects the “Last Applied” option on the context menu 55 (step 74 in FIG. 5 a).
  • the command pointed to by the cursor 32 is undone by executing code 50 a (FIG. 2) that is provided in the command element object (step 76 ) for undoing the command.
  • the cursor 32 is decremented to point to the next successive entry on the list 30 of command element objects.
  • the user activates the undo button 51 multiple times to repeat the above-described steps.
  • FIG. 5b shows an example of successive undo operations.
  • a list of command element objects includes entries 80 , 82 and 84 for commands “a”, “b” and “c”, respectively.
  • cursor 32 points to entry 84 .
  • command “c” is undone and the cursor 32 is moved to point to entry 82 for command “b”.
  • command “b” is also undone, and the cursor is moved to point to entry 80 for command “a”.
  • FIG. 6a is a flowchart of the steps performed for a since redo operation of a most recently undone command.
  • the process begins with a user requesting a redo operation of the most recently undone command.
  • the user activates the redo button 53 (FIG. 3c) from the user interface and then chooses the “Last Applied” option from the context menu 57 (step 86 in FIG. 6 a).
  • the command immediately in front of the current cursor position on list 30 is then performed (step 88 ), and the cursor is incremented (step 90 ).
  • the redo code 50 b is executed on the command element object 40 that was most recently undone.
  • the user activates the redo button 53 multiple times to repeat the steps of FIG. 6 a.
  • FIG. 6b shows an example of the effect of a redo command.
  • a list 30 includes entries 92 and 94 for commands “a” and “b”, respectively.
  • Cursor 32 points to entry 92 for command “a”.
  • command “b” is again performed and the cursor 32 is incremented to point to entry 94 for command “b”.
  • FIG. 7a is a flowchart of the steps performed for a undo “All the Way” operation.
  • a user requests that an undo “All the Way” operation be performed (Step 96 in FIG. 7 a).
  • the user requests such a command by activating the undo button 51 (FIG. 3b) and then selecting the “All the Way” option on the context menu 55 .
  • All user commands from the current command to the initial command are reversed (step 98 in FIG. 7 a).
  • the cursor is moved to point to before the initial command on list 30 (step 100 ).
  • FIG. 7b shows an example of the effect of an undo “All the Way” operation.
  • a list 30 of command element objects 30 includes entries 102 , 104 and 106 for commands “a”, “b” and “c”, respectively.
  • the cursor 32 points to entry 106 for command “c”.
  • commands “c”, “b” and “a” are sequentially undone, and the cursor 32 is decremented to point to before the first entry on the list 30 .
  • FIG. 8a is a flowchart of the steps performed for such an operation.
  • the user requests that the redo “All the Way” operation be performed (step 108 in FIG. 8 a).
  • the user selects the operation through the user interface.
  • the user activates the redo button 53 and then selects the “All the Way” option from the context menu 57 (FIG. 3 c).
  • the commands that are positioned in front of the cursor 32 on the list are performed (step 110 in FIG. 8 a).
  • the cursor position is incremented to point to the front of the list (step 112 ).
  • FIG. 8b shows an example that illustrates the effect of the redo “All the Way” operation.
  • a list 30 of command element objects includes entries 114 , 116 and 118 for commands “a”, “b” and “c”, respectively.
  • the cursor 32 points to entry 114 for command “a.”
  • commands “b” and “c” have been sequentially executed, and the cursor position is incremented to point to entry 118 for command “c”.

Abstract

A multiple-level undo/redo mechanism is provided in an operating system and is available to application programs run on the operating system. The dating system provides a mechanism for keeping a log of user commands and providing a cursor to a position within the log. Each command may be encapsulated into an object that supports an interface for performing undo/redo operations. Similarly, the log may be encapsulated into an object that supports operations that facilitate a multiple-level undo/redo. A user may perform a single undo/redo operation, multiple successive undo/redo operations or complete undo/redo operations.

Description

TECHNICAL FIELD
The present invention relates generally to data processing systems and, more particularly, to a mechanism for providing a multiple level undo/redo capability in operating systems and application programs.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
A single-level undo mechanism is provided by software packages, such as the Microsoft Word, version 5.0, word processing package, which is sold by Microsoft Corporation of Redmond, Washington. The single level undo mechanism allows a user command to be undone (i.e., the effects of the sand are reversed) after the command has already been performed. The undo command is typically performed by selecting a menu item that lists the undo command as an option. The user is limited to a single level of undoing of commands and, thus, can only reverse the most recently executed command.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In accordance with a first aspect of the present invention, a method is practiced in a data processing system having memory means and at least one processor that is responsive to user commands. In this method, a log of user commands that were executed by the processor is stored in the memory means. A first user command stored in a log is undone so as to reverse the effect of the first user command. Subsequently, a next user command stored in the log is undone so as to reverse the effect of the next sequential user command.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, a log of at least two user commands is stored in the memory means. User commands stored in the log are undone so as to reverse the effects of at least two user commands. At least two of the undone user commands are then redone so as to again execute those commands.
In accordance with a further aspect of the present invention, a list of a plurality of user commands is stored in the memory means in a sequence ranging from a selected user command that has been executed by a processor to a most recently executed user command. The effects of all of the user commands stored in a sequence of the list are undone so as to return the processor to reverse the effects of the user commands in the sequence.
In accordance with still another aspect of the present invention, a list of a plurality of user commands is stored in the memory means. The list includes user commands that have been undone. The user commands that have been undone are again executed by the processor.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a data processing system for practicing a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating a command element object that is used in the preferred embodiment of the present invention.
FIGS. 3a, 3b and 3c illustrate elements of a user interface for implementing the multiple-level undo/redo mechanism of the preferred embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 4a is a flowchart illustrating the steps performed when a user enters a command in the preferred embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 4b is a diagram illustrating the state of the list of command element objects after commands are added in the preferred embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 4c diagram illustrating the list of command elements objects when a deletion of an element on the list is performed in the preferred embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 5a is a flowchart illustrating the steps performed in an undo operation in the preferred embodiment of the present invention
FIG. 5b is a diagram illustrating a list of command element objects when undo operations are performed in the preferred embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 6a is a flowchart illustrating the steps performed when a redo operation is performed in the preferred embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 6b is a diagram illustrating the list of command element objects when a redo operation is performed in the preferred embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 7a is a flowchart illustrating the steps performed when an undo “All the Way” operation is performed in the preferred embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 7b is a diagram illustrating the list of command element objects when an undo “All the Way” operation is performed in the preferred embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 8a is a flowchart illustrating the steps performed when a redo “All the Way” operation is performed in the preferred embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 8b is a diagram illustrating the list of command element objects when a redo “All the Way” operation is performed in the preferred embodiment of the present invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The preferred embodiment of the present invention provides a mechanism for performing multiple-level undo/redo operations in an application program. The mechanism keeps a log of user commands and maintains a current position in the log to monitor a current state of the application program. The log is used by the mechanism to facilitate multiple-level undo operations and multiple-level redo operations.
FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of a data processing system 10 suitable for implementing the preferred embodiment of the present invention. The data processing system 10 includes a central processing unit (CPU) 12 and a memory 14. The memory 14 holds application programs 22, an operating system 24 and other items. The data processing system 10 also includes a keyboard 16, a mouse 18 and a video display 20. The data processing system 10 shown in FIG. 1 is a conventional single processor system. Nevertheless, it should be appreciated that the present invention may also be implemented in a distributed system or in other environments.
The preferred embodiment of the present invention is designed for use in an object-oriented programming environment. For purposes of the discussion below, it is assumed that the operating system 24 is an object-oriented operating system. Those skilled in the art will appreciate, however, that the present invention is not limited to use in an object-oriented operating system. Instead, it may also be implemented in other embodiments.
The object-oriented operating system 24 supports the use of “objects” in the data processing system 10. An object may be viewed as a combination of data members and, member functions. The data members are attributes that are stored in data structures, and the member functions are functions that act upon these attributes. The notion of an object is exploited in the multiple-level undo/redo mechanism of the preferred embodiment of the present invention in that certain aspects of this mechanism are implemented as objects.
An interface is a group of schematically-related functions that are organized into a named unit. Each interface may be uniquely identified by its identifier. Interfaces have no instantiation, that is an interface definition does not include code for implementing the functions that are specified in the interface. Interfaces specify a set of signatures for functions. An object may “support” an interface. When an object supports an interface, the object provides code for the function specified by the interface. The code supplied by the object, however, must comply with the signatures specified by the interface.
The multiple-level undo/redo mechanism of the preferred embodiment of the present invention supports the ability for an application program to maintain a command log of user commands. The data held in the command log and functions for maintaining the data are encapsulated into a command log object. The command log object includes a list 30 (see FIG. 4b) of command element objects and a cursor 32. The list 30 of command element objects is a sequential list of command element objects specifying user commands. The cursor 32 specifies a current position that corresponds with the last applied (i.e., last exceed) command on the list 30 of command element objects.
Each command entered by a user during the course of execution of an application program 24 generates an associated command element object 40, like that shown in FIG. 2. The command element object 40 includes a field 44 that specifies the nature of the command and a V-pointer 42. The V-pointer 42 points to a V-table 46 (i.e., having a virtual table such as found in the C++ programming language) having entries for the operations that may be performed on the command element object 40. These operations include an undo operation, a redo operation and a merge operation, for which respective entries 48a, 48b and 48c are provided. Entries 48a, 48b and 48c point to sections of code 50a, 50b and 50c for implementing their associated operations. The undo operation undoes the command at the current cursor position. The redo operation performs the next operation on the list 30 (FIG. 4b). The merge operation merges command log element objects, if possible.
The command log object does not need to know about the implementation of the code 50a, 50b and 50c for implementing operations on the command element objects 40. The details of this code 50a, 50b and 50c are the concern of the command element objects 40. As such, the command log object can be implemented more easily since it does not need to concern itself with such details.
The command log object and the command element object 40 are created by the application program 22 (FIG. 1). The operating system 24 provides a multi-level undo/redo facility to support multiple undo/redo operations for the application program. Part of this mechanism is a user interface. The user interface displays buttons 51 and 53 (FIG. 3a) that may be activated to cause execution of undo and redo commands, respectively. The undo button 51 and the redo button 53 may be activated multiple times to perform multiple undos or redos consecutively. The user is not limited to undoing only a most recent command or redoing a most recently undone command. A context menu 55 is provided for the undo button 51 when activated (see FIG. 3b). A similar context menu 57 (FIG. 3c) is provided for the redo button. The context menus 55 (FIG. 3b) and 57 (FIG. 3c) provide two options: “Last Applied” and “All The Way.” These options cause either only a single last applied command to be undone/redone or the commands to be undone/redone.
The four operations provided by the multiple-level undo/redo mechanism of the preferred embodiment of the present invention are perhaps best explained by way of example. As such, examples will be provided below along with the steps performed by the preferred embodiment for each of the respective four operation types.
FIG. 4a is a flowchart illustrating the steps performed by the preferred embodiment of the present invention when a user enters a new command. FIG. 4a will be described in conjunction with the diagram of FIG. 4b. FIG. 4b depicts an example of the list 30 of command element objects. Initially, a user enters a command (step 52 in FIG. 4a). In the example of FIG. 4b, the list 30 is initially empty. Suppose that the user then enters command “a”. The multiple level undo/redo mechanism of the preferred embodiment then checks whether there are any commands on the list before the cursor 32 (step 54 in FIG. 4a). If there are no commands on the list before the cursor 32, such as in the case shown in FIG. 4b, the command is added to the front of the list 30 (step 58 in FIG. 4a), and the cursor is moved to point to the front of the list (step 60). Thus, as shown in FIG. 4b, after command “a” is entered, an entry 64 (i.e., an entry for a command element object for command “a”) is added to the front of the list 30 and the cursor 32 is moved to point to entry 64. Suppose that the user now enters another command “b”, (hence, repeating step 52 of FIG. 4a). Steps 54, 58 and 60 of FIG. 4a are then repeated so that an entry 66 (FIG. 4b) is added to the front of the list 30 before the entry 64 for command “a”. Cursor 32 is updated to point to entry 66 for command “b”.
In the above-described fashion, the list 30 of command element objects is built. In terms of the object model described above, each time a user enters a command, an instance of a command element object 40 (FIG. 2) is created; the new command element object is appended to the front of the list; and the cursor position is updated.
If in step 54 of FIG. 4a it is determined that there are commands on the list 30 that are situated before the cursor 32, all the commands on the list that are before the cursor are deleted (step 56 in FIG. 4a). FIG. 4c shows an example of such a deletion. Suppose that initially list 30 of command log elements includes entries 68, 70 and 72 for commands “a”, “b” and “c”, respectively, as shown in FIG. 4c. The cursor 32 points to entry 70 for command “b”. Subsequently, a user enters command “d”. In step 54 of FIG. 4a, it is determined that entry 72 for command “c” is positioned before the cursor on list 30. Hence, entry 72 is deleted in step 56 of FIG. 4a. Further, an entry 73 for command “d” is added to the front of the list 30 (see step 58 in FIG. 4a), and the cursor 32 (FIG. 4c) is updated to point to entry 73 (see step 60 in FIG. 4a).
Once a user has built a list 30 of command element objects, such as described above, the user may execute an undo command. FIG. 5a is a flowchart of the steps performed when an undo command is requested. FIG. 5b is a diagram illustrating the state of the list 30 of command element objects after multiple undo commands are performed on the list. The steps of FIG. 5a will be described in conjunction with the diagram of FIG. 5b. Initially, a user requests an undo operation by activating the undo button 51 (FIG. 3b) provided in the user interface. As was described above, a context menu 55 is displayed after the button 51 is activated and the context menu provides the user with the option of undoing only the most recent command (i.e., the “Last Applied” option). Suppose that the user selects the “Last Applied” option on the context menu 55 (step 74 in FIG. 5a). The command pointed to by the cursor 32 is undone by executing code 50a (FIG. 2) that is provided in the command element object (step 76) for undoing the command. In addition, the cursor 32 is decremented to point to the next successive entry on the list 30 of command element objects. To perform multiple-level undo operations, the user activates the undo button 51 multiple times to repeat the above-described steps.
FIG. 5b shows an example of successive undo operations. Suppose that initially a list of command element objects includes entries 80, 82 and 84 for commands “a”, “b” and “c”, respectively. Further suppose that cursor 32 points to entry 84. When a user subsequently requests an undo operation, command “c” is undone and the cursor 32 is moved to point to entry 82 for command “b”. If the user makes an additional undo operation request, command “b” is also undone, and the cursor is moved to point to entry 80 for command “a”.
A user may also request a single redo operation. FIG. 6a is a flowchart of the steps performed for a since redo operation of a most recently undone command. The process begins with a user requesting a redo operation of the most recently undone command. The user activates the redo button 53 (FIG. 3c) from the user interface and then chooses the “Last Applied” option from the context menu 57 (step 86 in FIG. 6a). The command immediately in front of the current cursor position on list 30 is then performed (step 88), and the cursor is incremented (step 90). In terms of the object model discussed above with reference to FIG. 2, the redo code 50b is executed on the command element object 40 that was most recently undone. To perform multiple-level redo operations, the user activates the redo button 53 multiple times to repeat the steps of FIG. 6a.
FIG. 6b shows an example of the effect of a redo command. Initially, a list 30 includes entries 92 and 94 for commands “a” and “b”, respectively. Cursor 32 points to entry 92 for command “a”. When the user enters a redo command, command “b” is again performed and the cursor 32 is incremented to point to entry 94 for command “b”.
The user has the additional option of undoing all commands on the list 30 of command element objects. FIG. 7a is a flowchart of the steps performed for a undo “All the Way” operation. Initially, a user requests that an undo “All the Way” operation be performed (Step 96 in FIG. 7a). The user requests such a command by activating the undo button 51 (FIG. 3b) and then selecting the “All the Way” option on the context menu 55. All user commands from the current command to the initial command are reversed (step 98 in FIG. 7a). In addition, the cursor is moved to point to before the initial command on list 30 (step 100).
FIG. 7b shows an example of the effect of an undo “All the Way” operation. Initially, a list 30 of command element objects 30 includes entries 102, 104 and 106 for commands “a”, “b” and “c”, respectively. The cursor 32 points to entry 106 for command “c”. After the user has requested the undo “All the Way” operation, commands “c”, “b” and “a” are sequentially undone, and the cursor 32 is decremented to point to before the first entry on the list 30.
A user may, likewise, request that the redo operation be perform “All the Way” to redo all of the commands on the list that are situated in front of the current cursor position. FIG. 8a is a flowchart of the steps performed for such an operation. Initially, the user requests that the redo “All the Way” operation be performed (step 108 in FIG. 8a). As with the other operations, the user selects the operation through the user interface. In particular, the user activates the redo button 53 and then selects the “All the Way” option from the context menu 57 (FIG. 3c). After the selection has been made, the commands that are positioned in front of the cursor 32 on the list are performed (step 110 in FIG. 8a). In addition, the cursor position is incremented to point to the front of the list (step 112).
FIG. 8b shows an example that illustrates the effect of the redo “All the Way” operation. Initially, a list 30 of command element objects includes entries 114, 116 and 118 for commands “a”, “b” and “c”, respectively. The cursor 32 points to entry 114 for command “a.” After the redo “All the Way” operation is performed, commands “b” and “c” have been sequentially executed, and the cursor position is incremented to point to entry 118 for command “c”.
While the present invention has been described with reference to a preferred embodiment thereof, those skilled in the art will, nevertheless, appreciate that various changes in form and detail may be made without departing from the present invention as defined by the appended claims.

Claims (12)

I claim:
1. In a computer system having a video display and running an operating system and an application program, a method comprising the computer-implemented steps of:
providing a multiple level undo/redo facility in the operating system;
creating a command element object by the application program for each associated command that is executed in the application program, each command element object including a pointer to a V-table that has at least one entry that holds a pointer to code for undoing or performing the command associated with the command element object;
linking the command element objects together in a sequential list ordered according to when the associated commands were executed;
encapsulating the sequential list of lined command element objects in a command log object that is provided by the application program;
with the undo/redo facility, displaying an activatable undo/redo user interface element in a window on the video display, wherein the window is provided by the application program; and
in response to a user activating the undo/redo facility, with the undo/redo facility calling the code that is pointed to by an entry in a V-table that is pointed to by a pointer in a selected one of command element objects in the sequential list to undo or redo the command associated with the selected command element.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein the undo/redo user interface element is an undo user interface element and the entry in the V-table pointed to by the pointer in the selected command element object holds a pointer to code for undoing the command that is associated with the selected command element object.
3. The method of claim 1 wherein the undo/redo user interface element is a redo user interface element and the entry in the V-table pointed to by the pointer in the selected command element object holds a pointer to code for performing the command that is associated with the selected command element object.
4. In a computer system that has a video display and that runs an operating system and an application program, wherein the application program provides a command element object for each associated command that is executed in the application program and each command element object including a pointer to a V-table that has at least one entry that holds a pointer for undoing or redoing the command associated with the command element object and wherein the application program encapsulates a sequential list of the command element objects that are linked and ordered according to when the associated command were executed in a command log object, a computer-readable storage medium holding instructions for:
providing a multiple level undo/redo facility in the operating system;
with the undo/redo facility, displaying an activatable undo/redo user interface element in a window on the video display, where the window is provided by the application program; and
in response to a user activating the undo/redo user interface element, with the undo/redo facility calling the code that is pointed to by the entry in the V-table pointed to by a pointer in a selected one of command element objects in the sequential list to undo or redo the associated command.
5. In a computer system having a video display and running both an operating system and an application program, a method comprising the steps of:
providing a multiple level undo/redo facility in the operating system;
displaying an activatable undo-all user interface element by the undo/redo facility in a window provided by the application program or on the video display and which is opened when accessing the interface element of the undo/redo facility;
where a user has caused multiple commands of the application program to be executed undoing effects of executing the commands, in response to the user activating the undo-all user interface element, by the undo/redo facility calling code in the application program for undoing the commands.
6. In a computer system having a video display and running both an operating system and an application program, a computer-readable storage medium holding instructions for performing a method comprising the steps of:
providing a multiple level undo/redo facility in the operating system;
displaying an activatable undo-all user interface element by the undo/redo facility in a window provided by the application program on the video display and which is opened when accessing the interface element of the undo/redo facility;
where a user has caused multiple commands of the application program to be executed, undoing effects of executing the commands in response to the uses activating the undo-all user interface element, by the undo/redo facility calling code in the application program for undoing the commands.
7. In a computer system having a video display and running both an operating system and an application program, a method comprising the steps of:
providing a multiple level undo/redo facility in the operating system;
with the undo/redo facility, displaying an activatable redo-all user interface for causing all commands of the application program, that have been undone to be again executed, in a window provided by the application program on the video display and which is opened when accessing the interface element of the undo/redo facility; and
where a user has undone multiple commands, executing the undone commands in response to the user activating the redo-all user interface element, by the undo/redo facility calling code for performing the commands in the application program.
8. In a computer system having a video display and running both an operating system and an application program, a computer-readable storage medium holding instructions for performing a method comprising the steps of:
providing a multiple level undo/redo facility in the operating system;
with the undo/redo facility, displaying an activatable redo-all user interface for causing all commands of the application program, that have been undone to be again executed, in a window provided by the application program on the video display and which is opened when accessing the interface element of the undo/redo facility; and
where a user has undone multiple commands, executing the undone commands in response to the user activating the redo-all user interface element, by the undo/redo facility calling code for performing the commands in the application program.
9. In a computer system that has a display and that runs an operating system and an application program, wherein the application program provides a command element object for each associated command that is executed in the application program and wherein the operating system provides a multiple level undo/redo facility, a computer-readable storage medium on which are stored computer-executable instructions for implementing within the application program a method which is comprised of:
a step for creating in the application program a list of command element objects which are sequentially ordered corresponding to the order of the commands executed in the application program, each command element object in said list having associated with it a means for selectively activating the undo/redo facility in the operating system;
a step for accessing the undo/redo facility in order to display an activatable undo/redo user interface element in a window on the display, wherein the window is provided by the application program; and
a step for using said interface element to select any command element object in said list and in response to said selection, the undo/redo facility undoing or redoing as directed by a user either one or all the commands for all command element objects in said list, as selected.
10. In a computer system that has a display and that runs an operating system and an application program, wherein the application program provides a command element object for each associated command that is executed in the application program and wherein the operating system provides a multiple level undo/redo facility, a method comprised of:
a step for creating in the application program a list of command element objects which are sequentially ordered corresponding to the order of the commands executed in the application program, each command element object in said list having associated with it a means for selectively activating the undo/redo facility in the operating system;
a step for accessing the undo/redo facility in order to display an activatable undo/redo user interface element in a window on the display, wherein the window is provided by the application program; and
a step for using said interface element to select any command element object in said list and in response to said selection, the undo/redo facility undoing or redoing as directed by a user either one or all the commands for all command element objects in said list, as selected.
11. In a computer system that has a display and that runs an operating system and an application program, wherein the application program provides a command element object for each associated command that is executed in the application program and wherein the operating system provides a multiple level undo/redo facility, a computer-readable storage medium on which are stored computer-executable instructions for implementing within the application program a method which is comprised of:
the step for creating in the application program a list of command element objects which are sequentially ordered corresponding to the order of the commands executed in the application program, each command element object in said list comprising a pointer to computer-executable code for selectively undoing or redoing the command associated with that command element object;
the act of specifying a cursor position that corresponds to one of the command element objects so that any command element objects associated with commands executed in the application program prior to the time for the command associated with the specified cursor position are identified by virtue of the cursor position;
based on the specified cursor position, the act of deleting from said list any command element objects that have already been undone at the time a new command is executed by the user in the application program, and thereafter performing the act of appending to the front of said list a new command element object for the newly executed command in the application program, and moving the cursor position to that newly appended command element object;
a step for accessing the undo/redo facility in order to display an activatable undo/redo user interface element in a window on the display, wherein the window is provided by the application program; and
a step for using said interface element to select any command element object in said list and in response to said selection, the undo/redo facility undoing or redoing as directed by a user either one or all the commands for all command element objects in said list, as selected.
12. In a computer system that has a display and that runs an operating system and an application program, wherein the application program provides a command element object for each associated command that is executed in the application program and wherein the operating system provides a multiple level undo/redo facility, a method comprised of;
the step for creating in the application program a list of command element objects which are sequentially ordered corresponding to the order of the commands executed in the application program, each command element object in said list comprising a pointer to computer-executable code for selectively undoing or redoing the command associated with that command element object;
the act of specifying a cursor position that corresponds to one of the command element objects so that any command element objects associated with commands executed in the application program prior to the time for the command associated with the specified cursor position are identified by virtue of the cursor position;
based on the specified cursor position, the act of deleting from said list any command element objects that have already been undone at the time a new command is executed by the user in the application program, and thereafter performing the act of appending to the front of said list a new command element object for the newly executed command in the application program and moving the cursor position to that newly appended command element object;
a step for accessing the undo/redo facility in order to display an activatable undo/redo user interface element in a window on the display, wherein the window is provided by the application program; and
a step for using said interface element to select any command element object in said list and in response to said selection, the undo/redo facility undoing or redoing as directed by a user either one or all commands for all command element objects in said list, as selected.
US09/376,933 1993-04-22 1999-08-18 Multiple level undo/redo mechanism Expired - Lifetime USRE38270E1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09/376,933 USRE38270E1 (en) 1993-04-22 1999-08-18 Multiple level undo/redo mechanism

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US08/052,036 US5659747A (en) 1993-04-22 1993-04-22 Multiple level undo/redo mechanism
US09/376,933 USRE38270E1 (en) 1993-04-22 1999-08-18 Multiple level undo/redo mechanism

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US08/052,036 Reissue US5659747A (en) 1993-04-22 1993-04-22 Multiple level undo/redo mechanism

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
USRE38270E1 true USRE38270E1 (en) 2003-10-07

Family

ID=21975015

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US08/052,036 Ceased US5659747A (en) 1993-04-22 1993-04-22 Multiple level undo/redo mechanism
US09/376,933 Expired - Lifetime USRE38270E1 (en) 1993-04-22 1999-08-18 Multiple level undo/redo mechanism

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US08/052,036 Ceased US5659747A (en) 1993-04-22 1993-04-22 Multiple level undo/redo mechanism

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (2) US5659747A (en)
EP (1) EP0621528B1 (en)
JP (2) JP3723236B2 (en)
CA (1) CA2121107C (en)
DE (1) DE69427423T2 (en)

Cited By (23)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20040267877A1 (en) * 2003-06-24 2004-12-30 Microsoft Corporation System-wide selective action management
US20050193376A1 (en) * 1999-11-24 2005-09-01 Guy Harrison Systems and methods for monitoring a computing environment
US20060053126A1 (en) * 2003-12-05 2006-03-09 International Business Machines Corporation Creating a program module or script from selected actions of an action history record
US20070064011A1 (en) * 2005-09-19 2007-03-22 Lexmark International, Inc. Method for performing image editing
US20070088729A1 (en) * 2005-10-14 2007-04-19 International Business Machines Corporation Flexible history manager for manipulating data and user actions
US20080109831A1 (en) * 2006-11-06 2008-05-08 Robert Edward Lee System and Method for a Non-Sequential Undo Mechanism
US7979245B1 (en) 2006-05-17 2011-07-12 Quest Software, Inc. Model-based systems and methods for monitoring computing resource performance
US20110248942A1 (en) * 2010-04-13 2011-10-13 Sony Corporation Image pick-up apparatus, detection-frame adjustment method, and program
US8175863B1 (en) 2008-02-13 2012-05-08 Quest Software, Inc. Systems and methods for analyzing performance of virtual environments
US8185598B1 (en) 2006-11-03 2012-05-22 Quest Software, Inc. Systems and methods for monitoring messaging systems
US8701084B1 (en) * 2006-12-29 2014-04-15 The Mathworks, Inc. Preview of auto-fix changes to software code
US8700996B2 (en) 1998-08-28 2014-04-15 Corel Corporation Real time preview
US9215142B1 (en) 2011-04-20 2015-12-15 Dell Software Inc. Community analysis of computing performance
US9274758B1 (en) 2015-01-28 2016-03-01 Dell Software Inc. System and method for creating customized performance-monitoring applications
US9479414B1 (en) 2014-05-30 2016-10-25 Dell Software Inc. System and method for analyzing computing performance
US9557879B1 (en) 2012-10-23 2017-01-31 Dell Software Inc. System for inferring dependencies among computing systems
US9996577B1 (en) 2015-02-11 2018-06-12 Quest Software Inc. Systems and methods for graphically filtering code call trees
US10187260B1 (en) 2015-05-29 2019-01-22 Quest Software Inc. Systems and methods for multilayer monitoring of network function virtualization architectures
US10200252B1 (en) 2015-09-18 2019-02-05 Quest Software Inc. Systems and methods for integrated modeling of monitored virtual desktop infrastructure systems
US10230601B1 (en) 2016-07-05 2019-03-12 Quest Software Inc. Systems and methods for integrated modeling and performance measurements of monitored virtual desktop infrastructure systems
US10291493B1 (en) 2014-12-05 2019-05-14 Quest Software Inc. System and method for determining relevant computer performance events
US10333820B1 (en) 2012-10-23 2019-06-25 Quest Software Inc. System for inferring dependencies among computing systems
US11005738B1 (en) 2014-04-09 2021-05-11 Quest Software Inc. System and method for end-to-end response-time analysis

Families Citing this family (71)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5659747A (en) * 1993-04-22 1997-08-19 Microsoft Corporation Multiple level undo/redo mechanism
US5692143A (en) * 1994-12-30 1997-11-25 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for recalling desktop states in a data processing system
US6167455A (en) 1995-05-05 2000-12-26 Apple Computer, Inc. Method and system for synchronous operation of linked command objects
US6178464B1 (en) * 1996-05-10 2001-01-23 Apple Computer, Inc. System and method for canceling a computer request
US5890181A (en) * 1996-11-14 1999-03-30 Kurzwell Applied Intelligence, Inc. System and method for remotely grouping contents of an action history stack
JPH10254719A (en) 1997-03-14 1998-09-25 Canon Inc Information processor and information processing method
US6748524B1 (en) * 1997-04-30 2004-06-08 Gateway, Inc. Display and recordation of non-volatile memory changes
US6016553A (en) * 1997-09-05 2000-01-18 Wild File, Inc. Method, software and apparatus for saving, using and recovering data
US7062497B2 (en) * 1998-01-22 2006-06-13 Adobe Systems Incorporated Maintaining document state history
US6505212B2 (en) * 1998-02-04 2003-01-07 Interwoven Inc System and method for website development
US6732293B1 (en) 1998-03-16 2004-05-04 Symantec Corporation Method, software and apparatus for recovering and recycling data in conjunction with an operating system
US6523134B2 (en) * 1998-09-18 2003-02-18 International Business Machines Corporation Selective undo
US7055055B1 (en) 1999-04-23 2006-05-30 Symantec Corporation Write cache flushing method for reducing data corruption
AU6081200A (en) * 1999-07-09 2001-01-30 Eric D. Schneider Optimized disk storage defragmentation with swapping capabilities
US7051055B1 (en) 1999-07-09 2006-05-23 Symantec Corporation Optimized disk storage defragmentation with swapping capabilities
AU6575400A (en) * 1999-07-15 2001-02-05 Alcatel Transaction recovery system
US6711715B1 (en) * 1999-08-27 2004-03-23 Microsoft Corporation Method and system for efficient storage and restoration of display state data
US7509420B2 (en) 2000-02-18 2009-03-24 Emc Corporation System and method for intelligent, globally distributed network storage
US6826711B2 (en) 2000-02-18 2004-11-30 Avamar Technologies, Inc. System and method for data protection with multidimensional parity
US6704730B2 (en) 2000-02-18 2004-03-09 Avamar Technologies, Inc. Hash file system and method for use in a commonality factoring system
US7062648B2 (en) * 2000-02-18 2006-06-13 Avamar Technologies, Inc. System and method for redundant array network storage
US7194504B2 (en) * 2000-02-18 2007-03-20 Avamar Technologies, Inc. System and method for representing and maintaining redundant data sets utilizing DNA transmission and transcription techniques
US7657887B2 (en) 2000-05-17 2010-02-02 Interwoven, Inc. System for transactionally deploying content across multiple machines
US6810398B2 (en) 2000-11-06 2004-10-26 Avamar Technologies, Inc. System and method for unorchestrated determination of data sequences using sticky byte factoring to determine breakpoints in digital sequences
FR2819959A1 (en) * 2001-01-22 2002-07-26 Canon Kk METHOD FOR CANCELING A REMOTELY EXECUTED OPERATION ON A SERVER STATION
US7734958B1 (en) 2001-07-05 2010-06-08 At&T Intellectual Property Ii, L.P. Method and apparatus for a programming language having fully undoable, timed reactive instructions
US7203866B2 (en) * 2001-07-05 2007-04-10 At & T Corp. Method and apparatus for a programming language having fully undoable, timed reactive instructions
KR100447398B1 (en) * 2002-03-22 2004-09-04 엘지전자 주식회사 A method of local undo function at editing mode
US7631120B2 (en) 2004-08-24 2009-12-08 Symantec Operating Corporation Methods and apparatus for optimally selecting a storage buffer for the storage of data
US7725760B2 (en) 2003-09-23 2010-05-25 Symantec Operating Corporation Data storage system
US7904428B2 (en) 2003-09-23 2011-03-08 Symantec Corporation Methods and apparatus for recording write requests directed to a data store
US7730222B2 (en) 2004-08-24 2010-06-01 Symantec Operating System Processing storage-related I/O requests using binary tree data structures
US7991748B2 (en) 2003-09-23 2011-08-02 Symantec Corporation Virtual data store creation and use
US7287133B2 (en) 2004-08-24 2007-10-23 Symantec Operating Corporation Systems and methods for providing a modification history for a location within a data store
US7239581B2 (en) 2004-08-24 2007-07-03 Symantec Operating Corporation Systems and methods for synchronizing the internal clocks of a plurality of processor modules
US7577806B2 (en) 2003-09-23 2009-08-18 Symantec Operating Corporation Systems and methods for time dependent data storage and recovery
US7296008B2 (en) 2004-08-24 2007-11-13 Symantec Operating Corporation Generation and use of a time map for accessing a prior image of a storage device
US7827362B2 (en) 2004-08-24 2010-11-02 Symantec Corporation Systems, apparatus, and methods for processing I/O requests
US7409587B2 (en) 2004-08-24 2008-08-05 Symantec Operating Corporation Recovering from storage transaction failures using checkpoints
US7577807B2 (en) 2003-09-23 2009-08-18 Symantec Operating Corporation Methods and devices for restoring a portion of a data store
US7818718B2 (en) * 2003-09-30 2010-10-19 Sap Ag Undoing user actions in a client program
US20050138306A1 (en) * 2003-12-19 2005-06-23 Panchbudhe Ankur P. Performance of operations on selected data in a storage area
US20080046809A1 (en) * 2004-11-12 2008-02-21 Justsystems Corporation Data Processing Device and Data Processing Method
US7949665B1 (en) 2004-11-19 2011-05-24 Symantec Corporation Rapidly traversing disc volumes during file content examination
US7580954B1 (en) * 2005-04-12 2009-08-25 Apple Inc. Random access action list for digital signal data editing
CN101313279A (en) 2005-10-14 2008-11-26 塞门铁克操作公司 Technique for timeline compression in a data store
EP1780637A1 (en) * 2005-10-25 2007-05-02 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft method for undoing actions via a graphical user interface
US20070192383A1 (en) * 2006-01-31 2007-08-16 Microsoft Corporation Extension specified undo transactions
US8051043B2 (en) 2006-05-05 2011-11-01 Hybir Inc. Group based complete and incremental computer file backup system, process and apparatus
US8127278B2 (en) * 2006-09-28 2012-02-28 Sap Ag System and method for extending legacy applications with undo/redo functionality
US8332827B2 (en) 2006-12-01 2012-12-11 Murex S.A.S. Produce graph oriented programming framework with scenario support
US8191052B2 (en) 2006-12-01 2012-05-29 Murex S.A.S. Producer graph oriented programming and execution
US7865872B2 (en) * 2006-12-01 2011-01-04 Murex S.A.S. Producer graph oriented programming framework with undo, redo, and abort execution support
US8307337B2 (en) * 2006-12-01 2012-11-06 Murex S.A.S. Parallelization and instrumentation in a producer graph oriented programming framework
US7900142B2 (en) * 2007-01-15 2011-03-01 Microsoft Corporation Selective undo of editing operations performed on data objects
JP2008269281A (en) * 2007-04-20 2008-11-06 Meidensha Corp Software development support system, development support method and program
US9898173B2 (en) * 2008-10-07 2018-02-20 Adobe Systems Incorporated User selection history
US20110106776A1 (en) * 2009-11-03 2011-05-05 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Incremental implementation of undo/redo support in legacy applications
US20110107246A1 (en) * 2009-11-03 2011-05-05 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Undo/redo operations for multi-object data
CA2684540A1 (en) 2009-11-05 2011-05-05 Ibm Canada Limited - Ibm Canada Limitee Navigation through historical stored interactions associated with a multi-user view
WO2011123924A1 (en) * 2010-04-08 2011-10-13 Robert Alexander Mccarter A personal financial planning system and method with a novel undo system and method
JP5694686B2 (en) 2010-05-24 2015-04-01 キヤノン株式会社 Image processing apparatus, image processing method, and program
US8533593B2 (en) * 2011-04-19 2013-09-10 Autodesk, Inc Hierarchical display and navigation of document revision histories
US8533594B2 (en) * 2011-04-19 2013-09-10 Autodesk, Inc. Hierarchical display and navigation of document revision histories
US8533595B2 (en) * 2011-04-19 2013-09-10 Autodesk, Inc Hierarchical display and navigation of document revision histories
US8874525B2 (en) 2011-04-19 2014-10-28 Autodesk, Inc. Hierarchical display and navigation of document revision histories
US9146914B1 (en) * 2012-02-17 2015-09-29 Google Inc. System and method for providing a context sensitive undo function
EP2631747B1 (en) 2012-02-24 2016-03-30 BlackBerry Limited Method and apparatus for providing a user interface on a device that indicates content operators
EP2631760A1 (en) 2012-02-24 2013-08-28 Research In Motion Limited Method and apparatus for providing a user interface on a device enabling selection of operations to be performed in relation to content
US9348512B2 (en) * 2012-08-08 2016-05-24 Nuance Communications, Inc. Methods for facilitating text entry
US10698561B2 (en) * 2017-06-12 2020-06-30 Google Llc Intelligent command batching in an augmented and/or virtual reality environment

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4905181A (en) * 1987-04-20 1990-02-27 Wang Laboratories, Inc. Interactive system with state manager subsystem
US5095421A (en) * 1989-08-17 1992-03-10 International Business Machines Corporation Transaction processing facility within an operating system environment
US5287501A (en) * 1991-07-11 1994-02-15 Digital Equipment Corporation Multilevel transaction recovery in a database system which loss parent transaction undo operation upon commit of child transaction
US5481710A (en) * 1992-09-16 1996-01-02 International Business Machines Corporation Method of and system for providing application programs with an undo/redo function
US5519862A (en) * 1993-02-26 1996-05-21 Taligent, Inc. Concurrent processing apparatus with incremental command objects
US5530864A (en) * 1992-12-23 1996-06-25 Taligent Command object system for an object-oriented software platform

Family Cites Families (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS62249271A (en) * 1986-04-23 1987-10-30 Ricoh Co Ltd Document editing device
JPH02240762A (en) * 1989-03-14 1990-09-25 Canon Inc Information processor
JPH03294960A (en) * 1990-04-13 1991-12-26 Casio Comput Co Ltd Data editing device
JPH04290161A (en) * 1991-03-19 1992-10-14 Fujitsu Ltd Editing system
JP2993528B2 (en) * 1991-05-18 1999-12-20 富士通株式会社 Text management and restoration method
JPH05324555A (en) * 1992-05-20 1993-12-07 Mutoh Ind Ltd Already executed operation canceller
JPH05324556A (en) * 1992-05-20 1993-12-07 Mutoh Ind Ltd Already executed operation canceller
US5659747A (en) * 1993-04-22 1997-08-19 Microsoft Corporation Multiple level undo/redo mechanism

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4905181A (en) * 1987-04-20 1990-02-27 Wang Laboratories, Inc. Interactive system with state manager subsystem
US5095421A (en) * 1989-08-17 1992-03-10 International Business Machines Corporation Transaction processing facility within an operating system environment
US5287501A (en) * 1991-07-11 1994-02-15 Digital Equipment Corporation Multilevel transaction recovery in a database system which loss parent transaction undo operation upon commit of child transaction
US5481710A (en) * 1992-09-16 1996-01-02 International Business Machines Corporation Method of and system for providing application programs with an undo/redo function
US5530864A (en) * 1992-12-23 1996-06-25 Taligent Command object system for an object-oriented software platform
US5519862A (en) * 1993-02-26 1996-05-21 Taligent, Inc. Concurrent processing apparatus with incremental command objects

Non-Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Kurlander, David, Editable Graphical Histories, 1988, p. 127-134.* *
Microedge Inc., "Reference Manual SlickEdit", 1992, p. 1-4,38-39,438,499-501.
Mohan et al., Aries-RRH: Restricted Repeating of History in the Aries Transaction Recovery Method, 1991, p. 718-727.* *
Rosenberg, Jerry M., Dictionary of Computers, Information Processing and Telecommunications, 2nd Ed., 1987, p. 434.
Vitter, Jeffrey Scott, "US&R: A New Framework for Redoing", IEEE, vol. 1(4):, 1984, p. 39-52.
Wang et al., "An Event-Object Recovery Model For Object Oriented User Interfaces", 4th Annual Symposium On User Interface Software & Technology, Nov. 1991, p. 107-115.

Cited By (35)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8700996B2 (en) 1998-08-28 2014-04-15 Corel Corporation Real time preview
US9092119B2 (en) 1998-08-28 2015-07-28 Corel Software LLC Real time preview
US20050193376A1 (en) * 1999-11-24 2005-09-01 Guy Harrison Systems and methods for monitoring a computing environment
US8181154B2 (en) 1999-11-24 2012-05-15 Quest Software, Inc. Systems and methods for monitoring a computing environment
US8555244B2 (en) 1999-11-24 2013-10-08 Dell Software Inc. Systems and methods for monitoring a computing environment
US7784027B2 (en) * 1999-11-24 2010-08-24 Quest Software, Inc. Systems and methods for monitoring a computing environment
US20110047496A1 (en) * 1999-11-24 2011-02-24 Quest Software, Inc. Systems and methods for monitoring a computing environment
US20040267877A1 (en) * 2003-06-24 2004-12-30 Microsoft Corporation System-wide selective action management
US7290002B2 (en) * 2003-06-24 2007-10-30 Microsoft Corporation System-wide selective action management
US20060053126A1 (en) * 2003-12-05 2006-03-09 International Business Machines Corporation Creating a program module or script from selected actions of an action history record
US20070064011A1 (en) * 2005-09-19 2007-03-22 Lexmark International, Inc. Method for performing image editing
US7321372B2 (en) 2005-09-19 2008-01-22 Lexmark International, Inc. Method for performing image editing
US20070088729A1 (en) * 2005-10-14 2007-04-19 International Business Machines Corporation Flexible history manager for manipulating data and user actions
US7979245B1 (en) 2006-05-17 2011-07-12 Quest Software, Inc. Model-based systems and methods for monitoring computing resource performance
US8175862B1 (en) 2006-05-17 2012-05-08 Quest Software, Inc. Model-based systems and methods for monitoring resources
US8892415B2 (en) 2006-05-17 2014-11-18 Dell Software Inc. Model-based systems and methods for monitoring resources
US8185598B1 (en) 2006-11-03 2012-05-22 Quest Software, Inc. Systems and methods for monitoring messaging systems
US20080109831A1 (en) * 2006-11-06 2008-05-08 Robert Edward Lee System and Method for a Non-Sequential Undo Mechanism
US8627268B2 (en) 2006-11-06 2014-01-07 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for a non-sequential undo mechanism
US8701084B1 (en) * 2006-12-29 2014-04-15 The Mathworks, Inc. Preview of auto-fix changes to software code
US8364460B2 (en) 2008-02-13 2013-01-29 Quest Software, Inc. Systems and methods for analyzing performance of virtual environments
US8175863B1 (en) 2008-02-13 2012-05-08 Quest Software, Inc. Systems and methods for analyzing performance of virtual environments
US9275172B2 (en) 2008-02-13 2016-03-01 Dell Software Inc. Systems and methods for analyzing performance of virtual environments
US20110248942A1 (en) * 2010-04-13 2011-10-13 Sony Corporation Image pick-up apparatus, detection-frame adjustment method, and program
US9215142B1 (en) 2011-04-20 2015-12-15 Dell Software Inc. Community analysis of computing performance
US9557879B1 (en) 2012-10-23 2017-01-31 Dell Software Inc. System for inferring dependencies among computing systems
US10333820B1 (en) 2012-10-23 2019-06-25 Quest Software Inc. System for inferring dependencies among computing systems
US11005738B1 (en) 2014-04-09 2021-05-11 Quest Software Inc. System and method for end-to-end response-time analysis
US9479414B1 (en) 2014-05-30 2016-10-25 Dell Software Inc. System and method for analyzing computing performance
US10291493B1 (en) 2014-12-05 2019-05-14 Quest Software Inc. System and method for determining relevant computer performance events
US9274758B1 (en) 2015-01-28 2016-03-01 Dell Software Inc. System and method for creating customized performance-monitoring applications
US9996577B1 (en) 2015-02-11 2018-06-12 Quest Software Inc. Systems and methods for graphically filtering code call trees
US10187260B1 (en) 2015-05-29 2019-01-22 Quest Software Inc. Systems and methods for multilayer monitoring of network function virtualization architectures
US10200252B1 (en) 2015-09-18 2019-02-05 Quest Software Inc. Systems and methods for integrated modeling of monitored virtual desktop infrastructure systems
US10230601B1 (en) 2016-07-05 2019-03-12 Quest Software Inc. Systems and methods for integrated modeling and performance measurements of monitored virtual desktop infrastructure systems

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE69427423D1 (en) 2001-07-19
EP0621528A1 (en) 1994-10-26
JP2005310116A (en) 2005-11-04
CA2121107C (en) 2004-06-15
DE69427423T2 (en) 2001-09-27
EP0621528B1 (en) 2001-06-13
US5659747A (en) 1997-08-19
JPH076135A (en) 1995-01-10
JP3723236B2 (en) 2005-12-07
CA2121107A1 (en) 1994-10-23

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
USRE38270E1 (en) Multiple level undo/redo mechanism
US5220675A (en) Method and system for customizing a user interface in an integrated environment
US5613058A (en) Method and system for in-place interaction with contained objects
US5862395A (en) Customizable user interfaces for programmed computer systems
CA2037750C (en) Hierarchical inter-panel process flow control
EP0529844B1 (en) Method and apparatus for deriving object type
EP0425415B1 (en) Process and apparatus for preserving data integrity of a database
US5832268A (en) System and method for supporting complex objects in an object oriented computing environment
JP3613401B2 (en) Method and system for naming and linking objects
JPH10333800A (en) Docking and floating of menu/tool bar
JPH08137646A (en) Method and system for displaying dialogue box
JPH0574094B2 (en)
JPH07129401A (en) Method of using business process object in object-oriented calculation environment
US20030081007A1 (en) Object oriented explorer type environment
JPH10333897A (en) Inquiry selection for program development environment
JPH11119963A (en) Method and system relating to automatic persistence of control in window environment
US5655154A (en) Method and system for sharing utilities between operating systems
JP2735780B2 (en) Method and apparatus for managing window environment in object-oriented programming system
GB2281643A (en) Checking user interface input data.
Ehmke PROMETHEUS: a system for programming graphical user interfaces
KR20000018731A (en) Order word manager and a program carrying out method
WO1990009000A1 (en) Execution sequencing
JPH03214322A (en) Computer system
WO2002041140A2 (en) Graphical user interface enabling entry of non trivial parameters

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
CC Certificate of correction
FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 8

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 12

AS Assignment

Owner name: MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, LLC, WASHINGTON

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MICROSOFT CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:034766/0001

Effective date: 20141014