WO1982004479A1 - Method and apparatus for reducing repetitive noise entering the ear - Google Patents
Method and apparatus for reducing repetitive noise entering the ear Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO1982004479A1 WO1982004479A1 PCT/GB1982/000176 GB8200176W WO8204479A1 WO 1982004479 A1 WO1982004479 A1 WO 1982004479A1 GB 8200176 W GB8200176 W GB 8200176W WO 8204479 A1 WO8204479 A1 WO 8204479A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- ear
- noise
- source
- waveform
- generator
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G10—MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
- G10K—SOUND-PRODUCING DEVICES; METHODS OR DEVICES FOR PROTECTING AGAINST, OR FOR DAMPING, NOISE OR OTHER ACOUSTIC WAVES IN GENERAL; ACOUSTICS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G10K11/00—Methods or devices for transmitting, conducting or directing sound in general; Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general
- G10K11/16—Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general
- G10K11/175—Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general using interference effects; Masking sound
- G10K11/178—Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general using interference effects; Masking sound by electro-acoustically regenerating the original acoustic waves in anti-phase
- G10K11/1787—General system configurations
- G10K11/17879—General system configurations using both a reference signal and an error signal
- G10K11/17883—General system configurations using both a reference signal and an error signal the reference signal being derived from a machine operating condition, e.g. engine RPM or vehicle speed
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G10—MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
- G10K—SOUND-PRODUCING DEVICES; METHODS OR DEVICES FOR PROTECTING AGAINST, OR FOR DAMPING, NOISE OR OTHER ACOUSTIC WAVES IN GENERAL; ACOUSTICS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G10K11/00—Methods or devices for transmitting, conducting or directing sound in general; Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general
- G10K11/16—Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general
- G10K11/175—Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general using interference effects; Masking sound
- G10K11/178—Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general using interference effects; Masking sound by electro-acoustically regenerating the original acoustic waves in anti-phase
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61F—FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
- A61F11/00—Methods or devices for treatment of the ears or hearing sense; Non-electric hearing aids; Methods or devices for enabling ear patients to achieve auditory perception through physiological senses other than hearing sense; Protective devices for the ears, carried on the body or in the hand
- A61F11/06—Protective devices for the ears
- A61F11/14—Protective devices for the ears external, e.g. earcaps or earmuffs
- A61F11/145—Protective devices for the ears external, e.g. earcaps or earmuffs electric, e.g. for active noise reduction
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G10—MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
- G10K—SOUND-PRODUCING DEVICES; METHODS OR DEVICES FOR PROTECTING AGAINST, OR FOR DAMPING, NOISE OR OTHER ACOUSTIC WAVES IN GENERAL; ACOUSTICS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G10K11/00—Methods or devices for transmitting, conducting or directing sound in general; Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general
- G10K11/16—Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general
- G10K11/175—Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general using interference effects; Masking sound
- G10K11/178—Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general using interference effects; Masking sound by electro-acoustically regenerating the original acoustic waves in anti-phase
- G10K11/1781—Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general using interference effects; Masking sound by electro-acoustically regenerating the original acoustic waves in anti-phase characterised by the analysis of input or output signals, e.g. frequency range, modes, transfer functions
- G10K11/17821—Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general using interference effects; Masking sound by electro-acoustically regenerating the original acoustic waves in anti-phase characterised by the analysis of input or output signals, e.g. frequency range, modes, transfer functions characterised by the analysis of the input signals only
- G10K11/17823—Reference signals, e.g. ambient acoustic environment
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G10—MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
- G10K—SOUND-PRODUCING DEVICES; METHODS OR DEVICES FOR PROTECTING AGAINST, OR FOR DAMPING, NOISE OR OTHER ACOUSTIC WAVES IN GENERAL; ACOUSTICS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G10K11/00—Methods or devices for transmitting, conducting or directing sound in general; Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general
- G10K11/16—Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general
- G10K11/175—Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general using interference effects; Masking sound
- G10K11/178—Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general using interference effects; Masking sound by electro-acoustically regenerating the original acoustic waves in anti-phase
- G10K11/1783—Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general using interference effects; Masking sound by electro-acoustically regenerating the original acoustic waves in anti-phase handling or detecting of non-standard events or conditions, e.g. changing operating modes under specific operating conditions
- G10K11/17837—Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general using interference effects; Masking sound by electro-acoustically regenerating the original acoustic waves in anti-phase handling or detecting of non-standard events or conditions, e.g. changing operating modes under specific operating conditions by retaining part of the ambient acoustic environment, e.g. speech or alarm signals that the user needs to hear
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G10—MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
- G10K—SOUND-PRODUCING DEVICES; METHODS OR DEVICES FOR PROTECTING AGAINST, OR FOR DAMPING, NOISE OR OTHER ACOUSTIC WAVES IN GENERAL; ACOUSTICS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G10K11/00—Methods or devices for transmitting, conducting or directing sound in general; Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general
- G10K11/16—Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general
- G10K11/175—Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general using interference effects; Masking sound
- G10K11/178—Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general using interference effects; Masking sound by electro-acoustically regenerating the original acoustic waves in anti-phase
- G10K11/1785—Methods, e.g. algorithms; Devices
- G10K11/17853—Methods, e.g. algorithms; Devices of the filter
- G10K11/17854—Methods, e.g. algorithms; Devices of the filter the filter being an adaptive filter
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G10—MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
- G10K—SOUND-PRODUCING DEVICES; METHODS OR DEVICES FOR PROTECTING AGAINST, OR FOR DAMPING, NOISE OR OTHER ACOUSTIC WAVES IN GENERAL; ACOUSTICS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G10K2210/00—Details of active noise control [ANC] covered by G10K11/178 but not provided for in any of its subgroups
- G10K2210/10—Applications
- G10K2210/108—Communication systems, e.g. where useful sound is kept and noise is cancelled
- G10K2210/1081—Earphones, e.g. for telephones, ear protectors or headsets
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G10—MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
- G10K—SOUND-PRODUCING DEVICES; METHODS OR DEVICES FOR PROTECTING AGAINST, OR FOR DAMPING, NOISE OR OTHER ACOUSTIC WAVES IN GENERAL; ACOUSTICS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G10K2210/00—Details of active noise control [ANC] covered by G10K11/178 but not provided for in any of its subgroups
- G10K2210/10—Applications
- G10K2210/121—Rotating machines, e.g. engines, turbines, motors; Periodic or quasi-periodic signals in general
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G10—MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
- G10K—SOUND-PRODUCING DEVICES; METHODS OR DEVICES FOR PROTECTING AGAINST, OR FOR DAMPING, NOISE OR OTHER ACOUSTIC WAVES IN GENERAL; ACOUSTICS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G10K2210/00—Details of active noise control [ANC] covered by G10K11/178 but not provided for in any of its subgroups
- G10K2210/30—Means
- G10K2210/301—Computational
- G10K2210/3011—Single acoustic input
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G10—MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
- G10K—SOUND-PRODUCING DEVICES; METHODS OR DEVICES FOR PROTECTING AGAINST, OR FOR DAMPING, NOISE OR OTHER ACOUSTIC WAVES IN GENERAL; ACOUSTICS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G10K2210/00—Details of active noise control [ANC] covered by G10K11/178 but not provided for in any of its subgroups
- G10K2210/30—Means
- G10K2210/301—Computational
- G10K2210/3032—Harmonics or sub-harmonics
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G10—MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
- G10K—SOUND-PRODUCING DEVICES; METHODS OR DEVICES FOR PROTECTING AGAINST, OR FOR DAMPING, NOISE OR OTHER ACOUSTIC WAVES IN GENERAL; ACOUSTICS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G10K2210/00—Details of active noise control [ANC] covered by G10K11/178 but not provided for in any of its subgroups
- G10K2210/50—Miscellaneous
- G10K2210/509—Hybrid, i.e. combining different technologies, e.g. passive and active
Definitions
- This invention relates to an improved arrangement for the active cancellation of repetitive noise at the location of the ears of a person operating in an environ- ent where there is at least a substantial background of such noise.
- the method and apparatus to which this invention relates has the advantage that because the cancellation only affects noise synchronised to the source (or sources) of the background noise, the bulk of the low frequency spectrum which is not synchronised remains unaffected, thus allowing good speech intelligibility, or improved audibility of sounds unsynchronised to the noise source, in the presence of low frequency machinery- induced noise.
- warnings and sounds not related to the machinery will be substantially unaffected and their audibility can thus be enhanced by the method and apparatus described herein.
- British Patent Specification 1577322 discloses a method of reducing the amplitude of sound vibrations received at a selected location from a source of recurring noise which employs a waveform generator producing a synthesised waveform capable of being used to generate a cancelling sound in the location for the noise entering that location and uses a triggering signal, derived from the source, to accurately relate the generation of the cancelling sound to the noise it is wished to cancel.
- This prior specification (the entire disclosure of which is herein incorporated by reference) forms the basis for the present invention.
- a method of discriminating between a desired signal fed to an ear of a hearer and an inter- fering background noise in the hearer's ear, derived from a source of repetitive noise signals comprises feeding a cancelling waveform to an acoustic transducer adjacent to the hearer's ear, and adjusting the cancelling waveform to optimise the efficiency of cancellation obtained in the hearer's ear, which method is characterised in that the noise-cancelling waveform is synchronised to the source of repetitive noise to selectively cancel that component cf the sound reaching the hearer's ear which is derived from the said source.
- an open-backed headset is employed so that the repetitive background noise and the signal which the hearer wishes to hear are both airborne to the hearer's ear and the background noise is more strongly attenuated than the signal by an acoustic transducer carried in the headset.
- acoustic transducer carried in the headset.
- each transducer is fed with its own cancelling waveform derived from a separate waveform generator.
- the two generators can, however, receive common synchron- ising trigger signals from the noise source.
- a closed-back headset is employed, the required signal being fed electrically to an acoustic transducer adjacent to the ear.
- Some background noise from the source of repetitive noise (particularly the lower frequency components) leaks around the seal between the headset and the wearer's head, but this can be selectively cancelled by feeding the appropri ⁇ ate noise cancelling waveform to the transducer with the required signal.
- a headset is again employed, but here the noise signal is arriving with the required signal to the acoustic transducer in the headset.
- an appropriate cancelling waveform synchronised with the noise is fed to the transducer to selectively eliminate the arriving noise signal and permit the hearer to more clearly discern the required non-synchronised signal.
- a separate waveform generator can be synchronised respectively to each source, and the outputs from the separate generators can be fed to a common transducer for the or each ear.
- apparatus for improving the audibility of incident sound to a person operating in an environment where there is a substantial background noise in the person's ear coming from a source of repetitive noise comprises an adaptable waveform generator, a first electro-acoustic transducer receiving a synthesised cancelling waveform from the generator and generating a cancelling noise to at least partly null the background noise in the person's ear, a second electro-acoustic transducer to sense the partially nulled background noise, and adaptive means to modify the output of the generator on the basis of
- the electrical output signal from the second transducer to minimise the nulled background noise, and means to feed a triggering signal derived from the source to the waveform generator is characterised in that the electro- acoustic transducers are mounted in a means holding the transducers adjacent to an ear of said person without substantially impeding the audibility of said incident sound to said ear.
- the head mounting means preferably includes two ear pieces, one for each ear of the wearer, each equipped with said first and second transducers.
- the means to feed the triggering signal can be opti ⁇ cal, ultra-sonic or electrical (e.g. by wire or inductive loop) and suitably the apparatus is portable by the person (e.g. it can be incorporated in the head-mounting means).
- the waveform generator can be of the type described in the aforementioned British Patent Specification 1577322.
- Figure 1 schematically shows one form of apparatus accordingto the invention for reducing airborne background noise from a single source of repetitive noise in one ear of a hearer
- Figure 2 shows how the system of Figure 1 can be mo d ifie d to cancel the noise from two sources of repeti ⁇ tive noise
- a source of synchronising pulses 5 is associated with the source 1 and feeds triggering pulses 6 to an adaptive waveform generator 7.
- the source 5 can be, for example an electrical transducer associated with a toothed flywheel of an engine, and the pulses 6 can be transmitted by a wire, by an optical (e.g. infra-red) link, ultrasonically or via an inductive loop to the generator 7.
- the generator 7 can be of the kind described in British Patent Specification 1577322.
- the person 3 wears a head-set 8 having an open ear- phone 9 over his right ear, which earphone 9 permits both the noise field 2 and the sound 4 to enter through it to the ear covered thereby.
- a speaker 10 Within the earphone 9 is a speaker 10 and a closely adjacent microphone 11.
- a signal 12 from the microphone 11 is fed back to an adaptive means 13 forming a part of the generator 7.
- the arrangement of the components 7, 10, 11, 13 is such that the output from the generator 7 is adjusted from time-to-time to ensure that the output from the speaker 10 nulls the noise field 2 in the ear (i.e. the adaption algorithm is programmed to minimise the microphone signal from the vicinity of the earphone cavity).
- the unit 14 covering the left ear can be a conventional passive ear defender which strongly attenuates both the field 2 and the sound 4. Normally however, better detection of the sound 4 is obtained if the unit 14 is also an open earphone also provided with a feedback loop like the loop 7, 10, 11, 13.
- the loop 7, 10, 11, 13 can be used for supplying cancelling signals to the left ear, but in practice since the sound field 2 is different in the two ears, better results are obtained with a separate feedback loop for each ear, although the two loops can be synchronised with the same trigger pulses 6.
- FIG. 2 illustrates a similar system to that shown in Figure 1 and similar reference numerals have been used to designate similar components.
- a second source 1' contributes to the noise field and a second adaptive waveform generator 7' is provided triggered by pulses 6' from the source 1*.
- the waveforms from the generators 7 and 7' are here shown summed by an electronic summer 15 prior to being fed to the speaker 10 but an alternative method is to employ suitable soft ⁇ ware in the generator 7 and to connect the generator 7' directly to the generator 7.
- the person 3 can be mobile and the active ear-defender can then be battery-powered, and mounted, for example, on a head ⁇ set 8 or carried in a pocket.
- the synchronisation or triggering pulses 6 can be transmitted to the heat-set in a variety of ways.
- the synchronisation system used can be common to a number of ear-defenders, e.g. in the case of a passenger-carrying vehicle or, as in the case of engine test cells, the transmission could be suffic- iently localised so that the person's receiving unit would "lock on" at the most relevant local synchronisation signal.
- the source of noise is particu ⁇ larly regular
- an acoustic transducer in a headset may be being used to receive electrical signals which contain a desired signal superimposed on a back ⁇ ground signal of a repetitive nature.
- the background signal can be acted on by a cancelling electrical waveform so that the acoustic signal reaching the ear(s) of the headset wearer is substantially only the desired signal.
- Figure 3 illustrates a further extension of the invention which would improve, for example, clear speech communication over a radio link (e.g. when using the active ear-defender shown in Figure 1 or Figure 2). Since the level of speech needed to communicate within, say the cockpit of an aircraft will be lower when the people therein are speaking to one another using the active ear-defenders, than it would be if they were not, the amplitude of the speech will be correspondingly lower, and the radio communication may be impaired because the signal 16 from a microphone 17 would be contaminated by the repetitive noise field.
- a radio link e.g. when using the active ear-defender shown in Figure 1 or Figure 2.
- the signal 18 from an adaptive waveform generator 7" would then be added to the microphone signal 16, in a summer 19, the adaptive means 13" being programmed to adapt the generator 7" such that the two summed signals 16 and 18 produce a minimum of those parts of the summed signals which are synchronised to the source 1", but leave any unsynchron- ised (speech) signal unaffected.
- the output 20 from the summer 19 would then be fed to a communications system
- the cancelling noise need not be generated by a conventional headphone but any transducer capable of producing sufficient power could be used.
- the transducer could be, for example, a loudspeaker mounted In a head ⁇ rest or ducted to the vicinity of the head.
Abstract
Apparatus for improving the audibility of incident sound (4) to a person (3) operating in an environment where there is a substantial background noise field (2) coming from a source (1) of repetitive noise, comprises an adaptable waveform generator (7), a first electro-acoustic transducer (10) receiving a synthesised cancelling waveform from the generator (7) and generating a cancelling noise to at least partly null the background noise, a second electro-acoustic transducer (11) to sense the partially nulled background noise, and adaptive means (13) to modify the output of the generator (7) on the basis of the electrical output signal from the second transducer to minimise the nulled background noise, and means (5) to feed a triggering signal (6) derived from the source to the waveform generator. The electro-acoustic transducers (10, 11) can be mounted in a means (8) holding the transducers adjacent to an ear of said person without substantially impeding the arrival of said incident sound (4) to said ear.
Description
_ i _
Method and apparatus for reducing repetitive noise entering the ear
Technical Field
This invention relates to an improved arrangement for the active cancellation of repetitive noise at the location of the ears of a person operating in an environ- ent where there is at least a substantial background of such noise. The method and apparatus to which this invention relates has the advantage that because the cancellation only affects noise synchronised to the source (or sources) of the background noise, the bulk of the low frequency spectrum which is not synchronised remains unaffected, thus allowing good speech intelligibility, or improved audibility of sounds unsynchronised to the noise source, in the presence of low frequency machinery- induced noise. Thus warnings and sounds not related to the machinery will be substantially unaffected and their audibility can thus be enhanced by the method and apparatus described herein.
Background Art
British Patent Specification 1577322 discloses a method of reducing the amplitude of sound vibrations received at a selected location from a source of recurring noise which employs a waveform generator producing a synthesised waveform capable of being used to generate a cancelling sound in the location for the noise entering that location and uses a triggering signal, derived from the source, to accurately relate the generation of the cancelling sound to the noise it is wished to cancel. This prior specification (the entire disclosure of which is herein incorporated by reference) forms the basis for the present invention.
It is also known from Wheeler and Halliday's pub¬ lished representation (entitled "An active noise reduction
system for aircrew helmets - flight trials in strike aircraft") presented at Birkbeck College, London, on 16th February 1981, to mount an active noise reduction system in a passive ear defender to cancel the acoustic noise field detected inside an ear defender. However this known arrangement is incapable of distinguishing between components of the noise field and is thus of limited use and is not effective at all for improving the audibility of random signals appearing in a high background of repetitive noise signals.
Brief Statements of Invention
According to one aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of discriminating between a desired signal fed to an ear of a hearer and an inter- fering background noise in the hearer's ear, derived from a source of repetitive noise signals, which method comprises feeding a cancelling waveform to an acoustic transducer adjacent to the hearer's ear, and adjusting the cancelling waveform to optimise the efficiency of cancellation obtained in the hearer's ear, which method is characterised in that the noise-cancelling waveform is synchronised to the source of repetitive noise to selectively cancel that component cf the sound reaching the hearer's ear which is derived from the said source.
In one embodiment, an open-backed headset is employed so that the repetitive background noise and the signal which the hearer wishes to hear are both airborne to the hearer's ear and the background noise is more strongly attenuated than the signal by an acoustic transducer carried in the headset. Normally of course separate acoustic transducers will be provided for each ear and suitably each transducer is fed with its own cancelling waveform derived from a separate waveform generator. The two generators can, however, receive common synchron- ising trigger signals from the noise source.
. / OM
In a second embodiment, a closed-back headset is employed, the required signal being fed electrically to an acoustic transducer adjacent to the ear. Some background noise from the source of repetitive noise (particularly the lower frequency components) leaks around the seal between the headset and the wearer's head, but this can be selectively cancelled by feeding the appropri¬ ate noise cancelling waveform to the transducer with the required signal.
In a third embodiment, a headset is again employed, but here the noise signal is arriving with the required signal to the acoustic transducer in the headset. Once again an appropriate cancelling waveform synchronised with the noise is fed to the transducer to selectively eliminate the arriving noise signal and permit the hearer to more clearly discern the required non-synchronised signal.
Where there is more than one source of repetitive noise contributing to the background noise, a separate waveform generator can be synchronised respectively to each source, and the outputs from the separate generators can be fed to a common transducer for the or each ear.
According to a further aspect of the invention, apparatus for improving the audibility of incident sound to a person operating in an environment where there is a substantial background noise in the person's ear coming from a source of repetitive noise, comprises an adaptable waveform generator, a first electro-acoustic transducer receiving a synthesised cancelling waveform from the generator and generating a cancelling noise to at least partly null the background noise in the person's ear, a second electro-acoustic transducer to sense the partially nulled background noise, and adaptive means to modify the output of the generator on the basis of
- fRlX
the electrical output signal from the second transducer to minimise the nulled background noise, and means to feed a triggering signal derived from the source to the waveform generator, is characterised in that the electro- acoustic transducers are mounted in a means holding the transducers adjacent to an ear of said person without substantially impeding the audibility of said incident sound to said ear.
The head mounting means preferably includes two ear pieces, one for each ear of the wearer, each equipped with said first and second transducers.
The means to feed the triggering signal can be opti¬ cal, ultra-sonic or electrical (e.g. by wire or inductive loop) and suitably the apparatus is portable by the person (e.g. it can be incorporated in the head-mounting means).
The waveform generator can be of the type described in the aforementioned British Patent Specification 1577322.
Brief Description of Drawings The invention will now be further described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:-
Figure 1 schematically shows one form of apparatus accordingto the invention for reducing airborne background noise from a single source of repetitive noise in one ear of a hearer,
Figure 2 shows how the system of Figure 1 can be modified to cancel the noise from two sources of repeti¬ tive noise, and
Figure 3 shews an add-on feature to the apparatus
«$ JRE
OMH
of Figure 1 for improving speech transmission from a listener in an environment of high background repetitive noise.
Description of Specific Embodiments Referring to Figure 1, a source 1 of recurring noise
(e.g. an engine) generates a high background noise field
2 in an environment which includes a person 3 wishing to hear an incident sound 4 which is not related to the noise field 2.
A source of synchronising pulses 5 is associated with the source 1 and feeds triggering pulses 6 to an adaptive waveform generator 7. The source 5 can be, for example an electrical transducer associated with a toothed flywheel of an engine, and the pulses 6 can be transmitted by a wire, by an optical (e.g. infra-red) link, ultrasonically or via an inductive loop to the generator 7. The generator 7 can be of the kind described in British Patent Specification 1577322.
The person 3 wears a head-set 8 having an open ear- phone 9 over his right ear, which earphone 9 permits both the noise field 2 and the sound 4 to enter through it to the ear covered thereby. Within the earphone 9 is a speaker 10 and a closely adjacent microphone 11. A signal 12 from the microphone 11 is fed back to an adaptive means 13 forming a part of the generator 7. The arrangement of the components 7, 10, 11, 13 is such that the output from the generator 7 is adjusted from time-to-time to ensure that the output from the speaker 10 nulls the noise field 2 in the ear (i.e. the adaption algorithm is programmed to minimise the microphone signal from the vicinity of the earphone cavity). The means for achieving this are clearly described in the aforesaid specification and need not be further detailed here. Since the output from the generator 7 is related in time
in an appropriate way with the repetitive bursts of noise from the source 1, very high attenuation of the noise field 2 (e.g. 30 dB or better) is possible, but since the sound 4 is not so synchronised and will have a totally different frequency spectrum from the noise field 2, little attenuation of the sound 4 will normally arise with the active attenuation feedback loop 7, 10, 11, 13, so that the sound 4 passes substantially unaffected into the ear and can now be clearly heard, since the sound field 2 has been greatly reduced in the right ear of the person 3.
If only the right ear is provided with the loop 7, 10, 11, 13, the unit 14 covering the left ear can be a conventional passive ear defender which strongly attenuates both the field 2 and the sound 4. Normally however, better detection of the sound 4 is obtained if the unit 14 is also an open earphone also provided with a feedback loop like the loop 7, 10, 11, 13. The loop 7, 10, 11, 13 can be used for supplying cancelling signals to the left ear, but in practice since the sound field 2 is different in the two ears, better results are obtained with a separate feedback loop for each ear, although the two loops can be synchronised with the same trigger pulses 6.
Figure 2 illustrates a similar system to that shown in Figure 1 and similar reference numerals have been used to designate similar components. In Figure 2 a second source 1' contributes to the noise field and a second adaptive waveform generator 7' is provided triggered by pulses 6' from the source 1*. The waveforms from the generators 7 and 7' are here shown summed by an electronic summer 15 prior to being fed to the speaker 10 but an alternative method is to employ suitable soft¬ ware in the generator 7 and to connect the generator 7' directly to the generator 7.
In many cases it will be desirable for the person 3 to be mobile and the active ear-defender can then be battery-powered, and mounted, for example, on a head¬ set 8 or carried in a pocket. The synchronisation or triggering pulses 6 can be transmitted to the heat-set in a variety of ways. The synchronisation system used can be common to a number of ear-defenders, e.g. in the case of a passenger-carrying vehicle or, as in the case of engine test cells, the transmission could be suffic- iently localised so that the person's receiving unit would "lock on" at the most relevant local synchronisation signal.
In some cases, where the source of noise is particu¬ larly regular, it may be possible to generate the source of synchronisation by a phase-locking technique, from the acoustic or vibrational signal sensed in the acoustic or vibration field of the source of repetitive noise.
Modifications of the system shown in Figure 1 are possible. Many acoustic environments (such as a ship's engine-room) contain repetitive noise in the presence of a significant amplitude of high-frequency noise. •This could be attenuated by conventional passive ear- defenders, used in conjunction with the system described herein, or with defenders which produce less pressure on the ears since the seal between the ear-defender and the head (essential for passive attenuation of low fre¬ quency) will be much less critical when augmented by an active system which is particularly effective at these lower frequencies. Alternatively, or in addition, a direct feed-back method (c.f. Olsen's original work) could be combined with the system described herein, such that for example, the direct feed-back system attenuates the mid-band frequencies, the passive system operates at the highest audio frequencies, and the "repetitive" system here described operates at the lowest frequencies.
OMPI
In another arrangement, an acoustic transducer in a headset may be being used to receive electrical signals which contain a desired signal superimposed on a back¬ ground signal of a repetitive nature. Using the method of the invention, the background signal can be acted on by a cancelling electrical waveform so that the acoustic signal reaching the ear(s) of the headset wearer is substantially only the desired signal.
Figure 3 illustrates a further extension of the invention which would improve, for example, clear speech communication over a radio link (e.g. when using the active ear-defender shown in Figure 1 or Figure 2). Since the level of speech needed to communicate within, say the cockpit of an aircraft will be lower when the people therein are speaking to one another using the active ear-defenders, than it would be if they were not, the amplitude of the speech will be correspondingly lower, and the radio communication may be impaired because the signal 16 from a microphone 17 would be contaminated by the repetitive noise field. The signal 18 from an adaptive waveform generator 7" would then be added to the microphone signal 16, in a summer 19, the adaptive means 13" being programmed to adapt the generator 7" such that the two summed signals 16 and 18 produce a minimum of those parts of the summed signals which are synchronised to the source 1", but leave any unsynchron- ised (speech) signal unaffected. The output 20 from the summer 19 would then be fed to a communications system
(not shown) for onward transmission.
The cancelling noise need not be generated by a conventional headphone but any transducer capable of producing sufficient power could be used. The transducer could be, for example, a loudspeaker mounted In a head¬ rest or ducted to the vicinity of the head.
Claims
1. A method of discriminating between a desired signal fed to an ear of a hearer and an interfering back¬ ground noise in the hearer's ear, derived from a source of repetitive noise signals, which method comprises feed- ing a cancelling waveform to an acoustic transducer adjac¬ ent to the hearer's ear, and adjusting the cancelling waveform to optimise the efficiency of cancellation obtained in the hearer's ear, characterised in that the noise-cancelling waveform is synchronised to the source of repetitive noise to selectively cancel that component of the sound reaching the hearer's ear which is derived from the said source.
2. A method as claimed in claim 1, characterised in that separate acoustic transducers are provided for each ear and each transducer is fed with its own cancell¬ ing waveform derived from a separate waveform generator, the two generators receiving common synchronising trigger signals.
3. A method as claimed in claim 1 or claim 2, characterised in that the transducer is carried by a head-mounted member of the open-backed type.
4. A method as claimed in any preceding claim, characterised in that there is more than one source of repetitive noise contributing to the background noise, and a separate waveform generator synchronised respective¬ ly to each source is provided, the outputs from the separ¬ ate generators being fed to a common acoustic transducer for the or each ear.
5. A method as claimed in claim 1 or claim 2, characterised in that the interfering background noise would appear as a component of the electrical signal
BAD I reaching the acoustic transducer, but is selectively nulled by said noise-cancelling waveform and- therefore does not so significantly affect the output of the trans¬ ducer as would otherwise be the case.
6. Apparatus for Improving the audibility of inci¬ dent sound, to a person operating in an environment where there is a substantial background noise in the person's ear coming from a source of repetitive noise, comprising an adaptable waveform generator, a first electro-acoustic transducer receiving a synthesised cancelling waveform from the generator and generating a cancelling noise to at least partly null the background noise, a second electro-acoustic transducer to sense the partially nulled background noise In the person's ear, and adaptive means to modify the output of the generator on the basis of the electrical output signal from the second transducer to minimise the nulled background noise, and means to feed a triggering signal derived from the source to the waveform generator, characterised in that the electro- acoustic transducers are mounted in a means holding the transducers adjacent to an ear of said person without substantially impeding the audibility of said incident sound to said ear.
7. Apparatus as claimed In claim 6, characterised in that the mounting means includes two ear pieces, one for each ear of the wearer, each ear piece being equipped with said first and second transducers.
8. Apparatus as claimed in claim 6 or claim 7, characterised in that the apparatus is portable and the triggering signal is fed from the source to the apparatus by an optical, ultra-sonic or electrical link.
9. Apparatus as claimed In any of claims 6 to 8, characterised in that the waveform generator is of the type described in British Patent 1577322.
10. Apparatus as claimed in any of claims 6 t 9, characterised in that a third electro-acoustic trans ducer is provided for picking up speech signals fro the said person and generating an electrical output there from, the electrical output from said third electro acoustic transducer being operated on by the output fro said waveform generator to selectively reduce the effec of the repetitive noise coming from said source without significantly affecting the component of said output resulting from said speech signals.
BADORIGINAL
Priority Applications (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
AT82901725T ATE17410T1 (en) | 1981-06-12 | 1982-06-11 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR REDUCING REPEATING NOISE ENTERING THE EARS. |
DE8282901725T DE3268382D1 (en) | 1981-06-12 | 1982-06-11 | Method and apparatus for reducing repetitive noise entering the ear |
NO830419A NO157478C (en) | 1981-06-12 | 1983-02-09 | PROCEDURE. TO DISCRIMINATION BETWEEN ET Want ACOUSTIC SIGNAL THAT IS FED TO A OERE PAA EN LISTENS AND A FORSTYRRENDEBAKGRUNNSSTOEY In LISTENING'S OERE AND DEVICE FOR IMPROVING HOERBARHETEN OF Want SOUND that reaches a person when THIS WORK IN AN ENVIRONMENT WHERE IT IS SIGNIFICANT BAKGRUNNSSTOEY In PERSON OERE. |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
GB8118022810612 | 1981-06-12 | ||
GB8118022 | 1981-06-12 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO1982004479A1 true WO1982004479A1 (en) | 1982-12-23 |
Family
ID=10522457
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB1982/000176 WO1982004479A1 (en) | 1981-06-12 | 1982-06-11 | Method and apparatus for reducing repetitive noise entering the ear |
Country Status (7)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US4654871A (en) |
EP (1) | EP0081516B1 (en) |
AU (1) | AU550700B2 (en) |
DE (1) | DE3268382D1 (en) |
GB (1) | GB2104754B (en) |
WO (1) | WO1982004479A1 (en) |
ZA (1) | ZA824145B (en) |
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
FR2523658A1 (en) * | 1982-03-17 | 1983-09-23 | Deutsche Forsch Luft Raumfahrt | LOW NOISE TURBOMACHINE |
WO1991013429A1 (en) * | 1990-02-21 | 1991-09-05 | Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc. | Noise reducing system |
FR2674346A1 (en) * | 1991-03-19 | 1992-09-25 | Thomson Csf | NOISE SUBTRACTION PROCESS FOR UNDERWATER VEHICLE. |
EP2161717A1 (en) * | 2008-09-08 | 2010-03-10 | Deutsche Thomson OHG | Method for attenuating or suppressing a noise signal for a listener wearing a specific kind of headphone or earphone, the corresponding headphone or earphone, and a related loudspeaker system |
Families Citing this family (90)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB2126837B (en) * | 1982-08-19 | 1986-07-23 | British Aerospace | Noise suppression |
GB2199466A (en) * | 1986-11-08 | 1988-07-06 | G L Communications Limited | Monitoring loudspeakers |
CA1299725C (en) * | 1987-07-20 | 1992-04-28 | Robert Christopher Twiney | Noise reduction systems |
US4947435A (en) * | 1988-03-25 | 1990-08-07 | Active Noise & Vibration Tech | Method of transfer function generation and active noise cancellation in a vibrating system |
US4977600A (en) * | 1988-06-07 | 1990-12-11 | Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc. | Sound attenuation system for personal seat |
US5046103A (en) * | 1988-06-07 | 1991-09-03 | Applied Acoustic Research, Inc. | Noise reducing system for voice microphones |
CA1319394C (en) * | 1988-09-16 | 1993-06-22 | Paul Friedlander | Active attenuation system for medical patients |
US4930113A (en) * | 1989-03-30 | 1990-05-29 | Halliburton Geophysical Services, Inc. | Suppression of air-coupled noise produced by seismic vibrators |
US5033082A (en) * | 1989-07-31 | 1991-07-16 | Nelson Industries, Inc. | Communication system with active noise cancellation |
US5001763A (en) * | 1989-08-10 | 1991-03-19 | Mnc Inc. | Electroacoustic device for hearing needs including noise cancellation |
US5313945A (en) * | 1989-09-18 | 1994-05-24 | Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc. | Active attenuation system for medical patients |
JP2748626B2 (en) * | 1989-12-29 | 1998-05-13 | 日産自動車株式会社 | Active noise control device |
US5046874A (en) * | 1990-03-13 | 1991-09-10 | St Clair James S | Impact printer print head with active sound pressure attenuation means |
US5327506A (en) * | 1990-04-05 | 1994-07-05 | Stites Iii George M | Voice transmission system and method for high ambient noise conditions |
US5182774A (en) * | 1990-07-20 | 1993-01-26 | Telex Communications, Inc. | Noise cancellation headset |
US5233540A (en) * | 1990-08-30 | 1993-08-03 | The Boeing Company | Method and apparatus for actively reducing repetitive vibrations |
US5245552A (en) * | 1990-10-31 | 1993-09-14 | The Boeing Company | Method and apparatus for actively reducing multiple-source repetitive vibrations |
US5172416A (en) * | 1990-11-14 | 1992-12-15 | Nelson Industries, Inc. | Active attenuation system with specified output acoustic wave |
US5396561A (en) * | 1990-11-14 | 1995-03-07 | Nelson Industries, Inc. | Active acoustic attenuation and spectral shaping system |
US5255321A (en) * | 1990-12-05 | 1993-10-19 | Harman International Industries, Inc. | Acoustic transducer for automotive noise cancellation |
US5224168A (en) * | 1991-05-08 | 1993-06-29 | Sri International | Method and apparatus for the active reduction of compression waves |
JP3114074B2 (en) * | 1991-06-21 | 2000-12-04 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Medical diagnostic equipment |
US6850252B1 (en) * | 1999-10-05 | 2005-02-01 | Steven M. Hoffberg | Intelligent electronic appliance system and method |
KR100189961B1 (en) * | 1992-04-09 | 1999-06-01 | 윤종용 | Noise elimination apparatus |
US5699436A (en) * | 1992-04-30 | 1997-12-16 | Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc. | Hands free noise canceling headset |
US5251263A (en) * | 1992-05-22 | 1993-10-05 | Andrea Electronics Corporation | Adaptive noise cancellation and speech enhancement system and apparatus therefor |
WO1993025167A1 (en) * | 1992-06-05 | 1993-12-23 | Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc. | Active selective headset |
US5277184A (en) * | 1992-09-30 | 1994-01-11 | Messana Russell C | MRI sound system transducer and headset |
US5732143A (en) * | 1992-10-29 | 1998-03-24 | Andrea Electronics Corp. | Noise cancellation apparatus |
GB2272129A (en) * | 1992-11-03 | 1994-05-04 | Ian George Abdee | Noise reducing headset converter |
US5844996A (en) * | 1993-02-04 | 1998-12-01 | Sleep Solutions, Inc. | Active electronic noise suppression system and method for reducing snoring noise |
US5444786A (en) * | 1993-02-09 | 1995-08-22 | Snap Laboratories L.L.C. | Snoring suppression system |
US5526421A (en) * | 1993-02-16 | 1996-06-11 | Berger; Douglas L. | Voice transmission systems with voice cancellation |
US5361303A (en) * | 1993-04-01 | 1994-11-01 | Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc. | Frequency domain adaptive control system |
US5481615A (en) * | 1993-04-01 | 1996-01-02 | Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc. | Audio reproduction system |
AU7355594A (en) * | 1993-06-23 | 1995-01-17 | Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc. | Variable gain active noise cancellation system with improved residual noise sensing |
US7103188B1 (en) | 1993-06-23 | 2006-09-05 | Owen Jones | Variable gain active noise cancelling system with improved residual noise sensing |
US5375174A (en) * | 1993-07-28 | 1994-12-20 | Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc. | Remote siren headset |
US5502770A (en) * | 1993-11-29 | 1996-03-26 | Caterpillar Inc. | Indirectly sensed signal processing in active periodic acoustic noise cancellation |
US5524058A (en) * | 1994-01-12 | 1996-06-04 | Mnc, Inc. | Apparatus for performing noise cancellation in telephonic devices and headwear |
US5652799A (en) * | 1994-06-06 | 1997-07-29 | Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc. | Noise reducing system |
US5418858A (en) * | 1994-07-11 | 1995-05-23 | Cooper Tire & Rubber Company | Method and apparatus for intelligent active and semi-active vibration control |
US5510743A (en) * | 1994-07-14 | 1996-04-23 | Panasonic Technologies, Inc. | Apparatus and a method for restoring an A-level clipped signal |
US5815582A (en) * | 1994-12-02 | 1998-09-29 | Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc. | Active plus selective headset |
FR2732807B1 (en) * | 1995-04-04 | 1997-05-16 | Technofirst | PERSONAL ACTIVE SOUND ATTENUATION METHOD AND DEVICE, SEAT PROVIDED WITH THE CORRESPONDING DEVICE, AND ACTIVE SOUND ATTENUATION SPACE OBTAINED |
US5675658A (en) * | 1995-07-27 | 1997-10-07 | Brittain; Thomas Paige | Active noise reduction headset |
US6035047A (en) * | 1996-05-08 | 2000-03-07 | Lewis; Mark Henry | System to block unwanted sound waves and alert while sleeping |
US6078672A (en) | 1997-05-06 | 2000-06-20 | Virginia Tech Intellectual Properties, Inc. | Adaptive personal active noise system |
US6259792B1 (en) * | 1997-07-17 | 2001-07-10 | Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | Waveform playback device for active noise cancellation |
WO1999005998A1 (en) * | 1997-07-29 | 1999-02-11 | Telex Communications, Inc. | Active noise cancellation aircraft headset system |
US6434239B1 (en) * | 1997-10-03 | 2002-08-13 | Deluca Michael Joseph | Anti-sound beam method and apparatus |
AU3078099A (en) * | 1998-03-11 | 1999-09-27 | Acentech, Inc. | Personal sound masking system |
US6888945B2 (en) | 1998-03-11 | 2005-05-03 | Acentech, Inc. | Personal sound masking system |
US6160893A (en) * | 1998-07-27 | 2000-12-12 | Saunders; William Richard | First draft-switching controller for personal ANR system |
US6363345B1 (en) | 1999-02-18 | 2002-03-26 | Andrea Electronics Corporation | System, method and apparatus for cancelling noise |
US6704428B1 (en) * | 1999-03-05 | 2004-03-09 | Michael Wurtz | Automatic turn-on and turn-off control for battery-powered headsets |
AU4468200A (en) * | 1999-04-19 | 2000-11-02 | Resound Corporation | Anti-feedback, full-duplex headset |
US6480610B1 (en) | 1999-09-21 | 2002-11-12 | Sonic Innovations, Inc. | Subband acoustic feedback cancellation in hearing aids |
US6594367B1 (en) | 1999-10-25 | 2003-07-15 | Andrea Electronics Corporation | Super directional beamforming design and implementation |
EP1372355B1 (en) * | 1999-12-09 | 2006-10-25 | Azoteq (Pty) Ltd. | Speech distribution system |
US6757395B1 (en) | 2000-01-12 | 2004-06-29 | Sonic Innovations, Inc. | Noise reduction apparatus and method |
US7088828B1 (en) * | 2000-04-13 | 2006-08-08 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for providing privacy for a user of an audio electronic device |
WO2001096984A2 (en) * | 2000-06-14 | 2001-12-20 | Sleep Solutions, Inc. | Secure test and test result delivery system |
US20020141599A1 (en) * | 2001-04-03 | 2002-10-03 | Philips Electronics North America Corp. | Active noise canceling headset and devices with selective noise suppression |
US6622647B2 (en) | 2001-06-26 | 2003-09-23 | Depoy Martin L. | Active noise cancellation for a torpedo seeker head |
US6717537B1 (en) | 2001-06-26 | 2004-04-06 | Sonic Innovations, Inc. | Method and apparatus for minimizing latency in digital signal processing systems |
US7277722B2 (en) * | 2001-06-27 | 2007-10-02 | Intel Corporation | Reducing undesirable audio signals |
US20030016833A1 (en) * | 2001-07-19 | 2003-01-23 | Siemens Vdo Automotive, Inc. | Active noise cancellation system utilizing a signal delay to accommodate noise phase change |
US7215766B2 (en) | 2002-07-22 | 2007-05-08 | Lightspeed Aviation, Inc. | Headset with auxiliary input jack(s) for cell phone and/or other devices |
US7367422B2 (en) * | 2004-05-21 | 2008-05-06 | Brookstone Purchasing. Inc. | System and method for providing passive noise reduction |
CA2621916C (en) * | 2004-09-07 | 2015-07-21 | Sensear Pty Ltd. | Apparatus and method for sound enhancement |
US7383106B1 (en) * | 2005-05-31 | 2008-06-03 | Coonse Jr Lester C | Active noise control system for aircraft, and method for enhancing pilot situational awareness |
EP1770685A1 (en) * | 2005-10-03 | 2007-04-04 | Maysound ApS | A system for providing a reduction of audiable noise perception for a human user |
US7248705B1 (en) * | 2005-12-29 | 2007-07-24 | Van Hauser Llc | Noise reducing headphones with sound conditioning |
US7891354B2 (en) * | 2006-09-29 | 2011-02-22 | Nellcor Puritan Bennett Llc | Systems and methods for providing active noise control in a breathing assistance system |
US8210174B2 (en) * | 2006-09-29 | 2012-07-03 | Nellcor Puritan Bennett Llc | Systems and methods for providing noise leveling in a breathing assistance system |
JP5352952B2 (en) * | 2006-11-07 | 2013-11-27 | ソニー株式会社 | Digital filter circuit, digital filter program and noise canceling system |
US20080187147A1 (en) * | 2007-02-05 | 2008-08-07 | Berner Miranda S | Noise reduction systems and methods |
US9558732B2 (en) * | 2007-08-15 | 2017-01-31 | Iowa State University Research Foundation, Inc. | Active noise control system |
SE532379C2 (en) * | 2008-03-26 | 2009-12-29 | 3M Svenska Ab | Hearing protection including processing devices for treating repeatable and non-repeatable noise |
US9020158B2 (en) * | 2008-11-20 | 2015-04-28 | Harman International Industries, Incorporated | Quiet zone control system |
US8135140B2 (en) | 2008-11-20 | 2012-03-13 | Harman International Industries, Incorporated | System for active noise control with audio signal compensation |
US8718289B2 (en) * | 2009-01-12 | 2014-05-06 | Harman International Industries, Incorporated | System for active noise control with parallel adaptive filter configuration |
US8189799B2 (en) * | 2009-04-09 | 2012-05-29 | Harman International Industries, Incorporated | System for active noise control based on audio system output |
US8199924B2 (en) * | 2009-04-17 | 2012-06-12 | Harman International Industries, Incorporated | System for active noise control with an infinite impulse response filter |
US8077873B2 (en) * | 2009-05-14 | 2011-12-13 | Harman International Industries, Incorporated | System for active noise control with adaptive speaker selection |
US9837066B2 (en) | 2013-07-28 | 2017-12-05 | Light Speed Aviation, Inc. | System and method for adaptive active noise reduction |
CN105580187B (en) * | 2013-09-25 | 2019-03-01 | 富士胶片株式会社 | Solid electrolyte composition, battery electrode sheet and solid state secondary battery using it |
US10325584B2 (en) | 2014-12-10 | 2019-06-18 | Stmicroelectronics S.R.L. | Active noise cancelling device and method of actively cancelling acoustic noise |
US10720141B1 (en) | 2018-12-28 | 2020-07-21 | X Development Llc | Tympanic membrane measurement |
Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE2401523A1 (en) * | 1974-01-14 | 1975-07-24 | Norbert Dipl Ing Hesselmann | Protector for human hearing - has active receiver, converter and reproduction system for each ear |
FR2351466A1 (en) * | 1976-05-13 | 1977-12-09 | Sound Attenuators Ltd | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR REDUCING THE AMPLITUDE OF UNDESIRABLE VIBRATIONS |
DE2925134A1 (en) * | 1979-06-22 | 1981-01-08 | Sennheiser Electronic | Ear protecting muffs - have microphone sound reproducer and amplifier to regulate sound reaching ear |
Family Cites Families (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2972018A (en) * | 1953-11-30 | 1961-02-14 | Rca Corp | Noise reduction system |
GB1530814A (en) * | 1977-06-20 | 1978-11-01 | British Aircraft Corp Ltd | Hearing protection devices |
-
1982
- 1982-06-11 WO PCT/GB1982/000176 patent/WO1982004479A1/en active IP Right Grant
- 1982-06-11 US US06/719,034 patent/US4654871A/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1982-06-11 EP EP82901725A patent/EP0081516B1/en not_active Expired
- 1982-06-11 GB GB08216992A patent/GB2104754B/en not_active Expired
- 1982-06-11 AU AU85255/82A patent/AU550700B2/en not_active Expired
- 1982-06-11 ZA ZA824145A patent/ZA824145B/en unknown
- 1982-06-11 DE DE8282901725T patent/DE3268382D1/en not_active Expired
Patent Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE2401523A1 (en) * | 1974-01-14 | 1975-07-24 | Norbert Dipl Ing Hesselmann | Protector for human hearing - has active receiver, converter and reproduction system for each ear |
FR2351466A1 (en) * | 1976-05-13 | 1977-12-09 | Sound Attenuators Ltd | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR REDUCING THE AMPLITUDE OF UNDESIRABLE VIBRATIONS |
DE2925134A1 (en) * | 1979-06-22 | 1981-01-08 | Sennheiser Electronic | Ear protecting muffs - have microphone sound reproducer and amplifier to regulate sound reaching ear |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
VDI Zeitschrift, Vol. 119, No. 7, April 1977 (Dusseldorf, DE) N. HESSELMANN: "Aktive Larmminderung durch Schallinterferenz im Rahmen des Personlichen Schallschutzes", pages 351-354, see page 352, left-hand column, last paragraph to the end of the Article; figures 2, 4, 5 * |
Cited By (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
FR2523658A1 (en) * | 1982-03-17 | 1983-09-23 | Deutsche Forsch Luft Raumfahrt | LOW NOISE TURBOMACHINE |
WO1991013429A1 (en) * | 1990-02-21 | 1991-09-05 | Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc. | Noise reducing system |
AU639761B2 (en) * | 1990-02-21 | 1993-08-05 | Noise Cancellation Technologies, Inc. | Noise reducing system |
FR2674346A1 (en) * | 1991-03-19 | 1992-09-25 | Thomson Csf | NOISE SUBTRACTION PROCESS FOR UNDERWATER VEHICLE. |
WO1992016853A1 (en) * | 1991-03-19 | 1992-10-01 | Thomson-Csf | Noise subtraction method for submarine vehicule |
EP2161717A1 (en) * | 2008-09-08 | 2010-03-10 | Deutsche Thomson OHG | Method for attenuating or suppressing a noise signal for a listener wearing a specific kind of headphone or earphone, the corresponding headphone or earphone, and a related loudspeaker system |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP0081516B1 (en) | 1986-01-08 |
GB2104754B (en) | 1985-04-24 |
DE3268382D1 (en) | 1986-02-20 |
AU8525582A (en) | 1983-01-04 |
AU550700B2 (en) | 1986-03-27 |
EP0081516A1 (en) | 1983-06-22 |
ZA824145B (en) | 1983-04-27 |
GB2104754A (en) | 1983-03-09 |
US4654871A (en) | 1987-03-31 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP0081516B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for reducing repetitive noise entering the ear | |
US20030228019A1 (en) | Method and system for reducing noise | |
US8229740B2 (en) | Apparatus and method for protecting hearing from noise while enhancing a sound signal of interest | |
EP0516695B1 (en) | Noise reducing system | |
US5046103A (en) | Noise reducing system for voice microphones | |
CN107249371B (en) | Active noise control for helmets | |
US5699436A (en) | Hands free noise canceling headset | |
US5526421A (en) | Voice transmission systems with voice cancellation | |
US5652799A (en) | Noise reducing system | |
ATE144066T1 (en) | ELECTROACOUSTIC ARRANGEMENT FOR NOISE CANCELING HEARING AIDS | |
CN109565626B (en) | Acoustic open type earphone with active noise reduction function | |
DE69934575D1 (en) | GENERATION OF CALIBRATION SIGNALS FOR ADAPTIVE RADIATION | |
EP3673482B1 (en) | Noise cancellation headphone | |
Håkansson et al. | Noise Canceling Headsets for Speech Communication | |
RU22038U1 (en) | HEADPHONE WITH ACTIVE NOISE REDUCTION SYSTEM | |
AU2011203477B2 (en) | Hearing Protector and Communications Apparatus for Use in High Noise Environments | |
NO157478B (en) | PROCEDURE. FOR DISCRIMINATION BETWEEN A WANTED Acoustic SIGNAL TO BE ADDED TO AN EYE ON A LISTENER AND AN INTERFERENCE. BACKGROUND NOISE IN THE LISTENERS 'EARNINGS, AS WELL. FOR IMPROVEMENT. OF THE HEARABILITY OF THE WANTED SOUND REMAINS TO A PERSON .. | |
Veit | Headsets with Active Noise Compensation for Sound Engineers and Cameramen | |
JP2000505260A (en) | Feedback cancellation system for voice interface garments | |
AU2005282209A1 (en) | Apparatus and method for sound enhancement |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AK | Designated states |
Designated state(s): AU JP NO US |
|
AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Designated state(s): AT CH DE FR LU NL SE |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 1982901725 Country of ref document: EP |
|
WWP | Wipo information: published in national office |
Ref document number: 1982901725 Country of ref document: EP |
|
WWG | Wipo information: grant in national office |
Ref document number: 1982901725 Country of ref document: EP |