WO1984004593A1 - Porosimeter and methods of assessing porosity - Google Patents
Porosimeter and methods of assessing porosity Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO1984004593A1 WO1984004593A1 PCT/GB1984/000170 GB8400170W WO8404593A1 WO 1984004593 A1 WO1984004593 A1 WO 1984004593A1 GB 8400170 W GB8400170 W GB 8400170W WO 8404593 A1 WO8404593 A1 WO 8404593A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- gas
- pressure
- sample
- sample holder
- porosimeter
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N15/00—Investigating characteristics of particles; Investigating permeability, pore-volume, or surface-area of porous materials
- G01N15/08—Investigating permeability, pore-volume, or surface area of porous materials
- G01N15/088—Investigating volume, surface area, size or distribution of pores; Porosimetry
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N15/00—Investigating characteristics of particles; Investigating permeability, pore-volume, or surface-area of porous materials
- G01N15/08—Investigating permeability, pore-volume, or surface area of porous materials
- G01N15/082—Investigating permeability by forcing a fluid through a sample
Definitions
- This invention relates to poro ⁇ imeters and to methods of assessing porosity.
- the object of the test is to gain information about the maximum pore size and the distribution of pore sizes in a porous material under test.
- the material is saturated with test liquid, held in a holder and subjected to progressively increasing pressure of a test gas.
- the initial breakthrough of gas through the wet filter is noted by a bubble point detector and thereafter the relationship between pressure applied and flow through the material is observed using a pressure gauge and a rotameter downstream of the material and directly impelled by the flow of gas.
- the preferred Fluorinert liquid is known as FC43 having a nominal boiling point of 174°C, a viscosity of 2.6 cs, a vapour pressure at 25°C of 0.3 mmHg and a surface tension at the same temperature of 16 dynes per cm. Chemically, the liquid is a clear colourless perfluorcarbon fluid.
- a motorised drive for the inlet flow regulator whereby to achieve a linear increase of pressure applied to the sample at a pre-selected rate which could be determined by the nature of the test material but will usually be independent of it, at least within a certain ranges of such pore sizes.
- the wet curve In the test method, it is preferred to take the wet curve first in a single sample holder and then repeat the run with the same sample in the same place to obtain the "dry" curve. In this way it is certain that an identical sample is giving the two curves (a comparison between which gives the necessary data) and that no contamination or the like will enter the system as a result of its being opened up between the test.
- the ASTM assumes that the dry test vrill be taken first or else that two samples will be in the system.
- the method of the invention may also include a calibration step performed before subjecting the sample to the test and which consists in running the gas through the system and first calibrating the pressure scale of the recorder against a pressure gauge coupled into the line and then disconnecting the pressure input to the recorder and calibrating the flow-rate scale against a flow meter coupled into the line.
- the calibration may include the steps of returning the pressure and flow back to zero and recalibrating the zero of the recorder, for as often as is necessary. However, neither the pressure gauge nor the flow meter will be used in normal operation during running of the tests.
- Fig. 1 is a diagrammatic view taken from ASTM F316-80 of the test apparatus as recommended and used until the present invention.
- Fig. 2 is a similar diagram of the apparatus according to the present invention!
- Fig. 3 is a sketch perspective view of the apparatus as mounted for use.
- Fig. 1 shows a pressure source 1 with a pressure regulator 2 operated by a manual control 3.
- the pressure output from the regulator is seen on a gauge 4 and passes to a sample holder 5 between the two parts of which a sample is mounted, the sample having been moistened by any one of water, petroleum distillate, de-natured alcohol or mineral oil, all of a specified characteristics.
- an oil trap 6 Following the passage of gas through the sample is an oil trap 6 and the duct is initially coupled up after that to a so-called bubble point detector 7, wherein output if any being caused to bubble through liquid or to a rotameter 8 which is directly impelled by the flow of liquid.
- the initial breakthrough of gas 'through the sample is noted by observation of the bubble point detector which sets a zero for a graph which is then drawn by manual correlation of the pressure gauge against the flow rate downstream of the sample as measured by the rotameter 8.
- a pressure regulator 20 such as a Schrader regulator preceded by a filter 21 between it and a source of compressed gas 22, usually compressed air is driven from a synchronous motor (not shown) through belting or other drive train and a ratchet clutch 23. It can be returned to zero by manual intervention on the part 24 of the clutch nearer to the regulator 20.
- a pressure gauge 20 such as a Schrader regulator preceded by a filter 21 between it and a source of compressed gas 22, usually compressed air is driven from a synchronous motor (not shown) through belting or other drive train and a ratchet clutch 23. It can be returned to zero by manual intervention on the part 24 of the clutch nearer to the regulator 20.
- two pressure gauges 26,27 which can be brought into communication with the line through respective valves. The pressure gauges are used for calibration only and they ar ⁇ sensitive in different ranges of pressure, only one being used for any given calibration.
- transducers 28,29 for pressure and flow-rate respectively.
- the pressure transducer may be of any known type but we have used one of the stressed metal film (also known as bonded foil strain gauge) type which gives an out put to an X Y recorder 30 having a pen 31 drivable over graph paper 32 in either or both of the X Y directions in accordance with respective inputs.
- the other input is derived from a flow-rate transducer 29 and we prefer to use a thermal mass flow meter since it is devoid of moving parts.
- these devices are sensing both pressure and flow-rate in the ducting upstream of the sample 31 which is mounted in a standard holder 32 and which optionally may be followed by the standard liquid trap 33 and by a two-way valve 34 which can divert flow either to a standard bubble point detector 35 or to standard flow meters 36,37. Which of these two is connected to the line is selected by respective valves.
- Theflow meters 36,37 which are of the type which is impelled by the flow of gas are used only in calibration of the device.
- the bubble point detector is however used to manually note the initial point of the breakthrough of the gas at which time a tick or similar mark is made manually, on the graph paper in the recorder 30 as a safeguard for extra accuracy in determining the origin of the curve which will be obtained.
- calibration is first carried out without a sample in the holder. Gas is run through the system at a pressure similar to the maximum which vrill be expected to be used in the following test.
- One or other of the pressure gauges 26,27 is selected and the output from pressure transducer 28 only is fed to the recorder 30.
- the correlation between the position of the pen and the reading on the pressure gauges made and if necessary the zeros are then calibrated, with recalibration at.the high pressure and so on.
- calibration of the flow- rate is carried out by taking the output from flow-rate transducer 29 only to the recorder and comparing the other reading of the pen with the reading achieved by one of the two direct-impelled flow meters 3 ⁇ or 37 which may be appropriate to the expected maximum fl ⁇ w during the test.
- the pressure gauges and the flow meters are switched out of the system.
- the valve 34 is switched over so that the bubble detector is in the circuit, a standard sample which may be for example a filter paper, a sintered micro-filter, a blotting paper, a geological material or any other materia of v/hich it is wished to know the porosity, is saturated in Fluorinert FC43 and placed in the holder.
- the automati drive 23 is coupled to the pressure regulator so there is an automatic and predetermined increase in the pressure applied to the sample and the test is run, achieving a wet curve graph. The test is continued until that line becomes substantially straight, showing substantially complete drying of the sample. The pressure is then returned tozero and the run repeated with the sample still in the holder to obtain the dry curve which is substantially a straight line.
- the two curves are plotted on the same piece of graph paper 32 automatically by the recorder 30 and are then removed for the necessary interpretation.
Abstract
A porosimeter comprises a gas supply, a gas pressure regulator (20) for the gas supply, a sample holder (32) having an inlet and an outlet, said inlet being connected to the gas pressure regulator, a gas pressure sensor (28) connected to the gas pressure regulator for measuring the pressure of a gas supplied to the sample holder, and a gas flow sensor (29) wherein the gas flow sensor is disposed to measure the gas flow between said gas pressure regulator and said sample holder. Both pressure and flow-rate readings are taken directly from the respective sensors to an automatic recorder (30) which draws mechanically the output in the form of a graph, or may feed them to, for example, an integrating computer.
Description
POROSIMETER AND METHODS OF ASSESSING POROSITY
This invention relates to poroεimeters and to methods of assessing porosity.
A widely accepted standard apparatus and method for testing porosity is to be seen in ASTM F 316-80.
The object of the test. is to gain information about the maximum pore size and the distribution of pore sizes in a porous material under test. The material is saturated with test liquid, held in a holder and subjected to progressively increasing pressure of a test gas. The initial breakthrough of gas through the wet filter is noted by a bubble point detector and thereafter the relationship between pressure applied and flow through the material is observed using a pressure gauge and a rotameter downstream of the material and directly impelled by the flow of gas.
This test method is highly dependant on the manual skill and dexterity and the intellectual ability of the operator requiring as it does the simultaneous operation of the inlet pressure regulator and observation of the pressure gauge and the flow rate. Thereafter these readings have to be converted manually by drawing graphs and these are then interpreted.
Despite these drawbacks this method is one of the accepted methods of testing porosity.
We have examined this and have in the present invention provided substantial improvements in various respects andin particular from the point of view of avoiding reliance upon manual skill.
In our apparatus and method we use a pressure gauge and flow meter only in an initial calibration which need not be done in the presence of the material to be tested. We further site our flow-rate sensor upstream of (the material to be tested. In operation, we take both pressure and flow-rate readings directly from the respective sensors to an automatic recorder which draws mechanically the output in the form of a graph, or may feed them to, for example, an integrating computer.
The siting of the flow-rate sensor upstream of the material to be tested is of great importance since that sensor works at a higher pressure on that side of the test material than it would on the downstream side and furthermore the positioning avoids any contamination of that sensor by the test liquid being swept.from the material. In the American Standard, a liquid trap is provided behind or downstream of the material but is not totally successful in preventing access of liquid into the subsequent stages of the apparatus which therefore can affect the accuracy of the flow meter.
"We further improve the process by standardising the test liquid. Those mentioned in the American Standard are water, petroleum distillate, de-natured alcohol or mineral oil. We find that various characteristics of volatility,
surface tension or reactivity will not allow any one of those materials tb be used over a wide range of materials to be tested. We have selected a liquid which is of the widest possible applicability, having very low surface tension and vapour pressure and in particular very low reactivity for the fibrous materials which are likely to form the materials under test. This material is known as Fluorinert (Registered Trade Mark) which is recommended by its makers Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing as a cooling liquid for electronic components and devices. The preferred Fluorinert liquid is known as FC43 having a nominal boiling point of 174°C, a viscosity of 2.6 cs, a vapour pressure at 25°C of 0.3 mmHg and a surface tension at the same temperature of 16 dynes per cm. Chemically, the liquid is a clear colourless perfluorcarbon fluid.
To relieve the operator further of the need for manual intervention we may provide a motorised drive for the inlet flow regulator whereby to achieve a linear increase of pressure applied to the sample at a pre-selected rate which could be determined by the nature of the test material but will usually be independent of it, at least within a certain ranges of such pore sizes.
In the test method, it is preferred to take the wet curve first in a single sample holder and then repeat the run with the same sample in the same place to obtain the "dry" curve. In this way it is certain that an identical sample is giving the two curves (a comparison between which
gives the necessary data) and that no contamination or the like will enter the system as a result of its being opened up between the test. The ASTM assumes that the dry test vrill be taken first or else that two samples will be in the system.
The method of the invention may also include a calibration step performed before subjecting the sample to the test and which consists in running the gas through the system and first calibrating the pressure scale of the recorder against a pressure gauge coupled into the line and then disconnecting the pressure input to the recorder and calibrating the flow-rate scale against a flow meter coupled into the line. The calibration may include the steps of returning the pressure and flow back to zero and recalibrating the zero of the recorder, for as often as is necessary. However, neither the pressure gauge nor the flow meter will be used in normal operation during running of the tests.
In the accompanying drawings:
Fig. 1 is a diagrammatic view taken from ASTM F316-80 of the test apparatus as recommended and used until the present invention; and
Fig. 2 is a similar diagram of the apparatus according to the present invention! and
Fig. 3 is a sketch perspective view of the apparatus as mounted for use.
Fig. 1 shows a pressure source 1 with a pressure regulator 2 operated by a manual control 3. The pressure output from the regulator is seen on a gauge 4 and passes to a sample holder 5 between the two parts of which a sample is mounted, the sample having been moistened by any one of water, petroleum distillate, de-natured alcohol or mineral oil, all of a specified characteristics. Following the passage of gas through the sample is an oil trap 6 and the duct is initially coupled up after that to a so-called bubble point detector 7, wherein output if any being caused to bubble through liquid or to a rotameter 8 which is directly impelled by the flow of liquid. The initial breakthrough of gas 'through the sample is noted by observation of the bubble point detector which sets a zero for a graph which is then drawn by manual correlation of the pressure gauge against the flow rate downstream of the sample as measured by the rotameter 8.
In the present invention in contrast, as seen in Figs. 2 and 3, a pressure regulator 20 such as a Schrader regulator preceded by a filter 21 between it and a source of compressed gas 22, usually compressed air is driven from a synchronous motor (not shown) through belting or other drive train and a ratchet clutch 23. It can be returned to zero by manual intervention on the part 24 of the clutch nearer to the regulator 20. Next in the line 25 leading from the regulator are two pressure gauges 26,27 which can be brought into communication with the line through respective valves.
The pressure gauges are used for calibration only and they arά sensitive in different ranges of pressure, only one being used for any given calibration. Next in the line are transducers 28,29 for pressure and flow-rate respectively. The pressure transducer may be of any known type but we have used one of the stressed metal film (also known as bonded foil strain gauge) type which gives an out put to an X Y recorder 30 having a pen 31 drivable over graph paper 32 in either or both of the X Y directions in accordance with respective inputs. The other input is derived from a flow-rate transducer 29 and we prefer to use a thermal mass flow meter since it is devoid of moving parts. It can be seen that these devices are sensing both pressure and flow-rate in the ducting upstream of the sample 31 which is mounted in a standard holder 32 and which optionally may be followed by the standard liquid trap 33 and by a two-way valve 34 which can divert flow either to a standard bubble point detector 35 or to standard flow meters 36,37. Which of these two is connected to the line is selected by respective valves. Theflow meters 36,37 which are of the type which is impelled by the flow of gas are used only in calibration of the device. The bubble point detector is however used to manually note the initial point of the breakthrough of the gas at which time a tick or similar mark is made manually, on the graph paper in the recorder 30 as a safeguard for extra accuracy in determining the origin of the curve which will be obtained.
In operation, calibration is first carried out without a sample in the holder. Gas is run through the system at a pressure similar to the maximum which vrill be expected to be used in the following test. One or other of the pressure gauges 26,27 is selected and the output from pressure transducer 28 only is fed to the recorder 30. The correlation between the position of the pen and the reading on the pressure gauges made and if necessary the zeros are then calibrated, with recalibration at.the high pressure and so on. Similarly, calibration of the flow- rate is carried out by taking the output from flow-rate transducer 29 only to the recorder and comparing the other reading of the pen with the reading achieved by one of the two direct-impelled flow meters 3β or 37 which may be appropriate to the expected maximum flσw during the test. When calibration has been achieved the pressure gauges and the flow meters are switched out of the system.
The valve 34 is switched over so that the bubble detector is in the circuit, a standard sample which may be for example a filter paper, a sintered micro-filter, a blotting paper, a geological material or any other materia of v/hich it is wished to know the porosity, is saturated in Fluorinert FC43 and placed in the holder. The automati drive 23 is coupled to the pressure regulator so there is an automatic and predetermined increase in the pressure applied to the sample and the test is run, achieving a wet curve graph. The test is continued until that line becomes
substantially straight, showing substantially complete drying of the sample. The pressure is then returned tozero and the run repeated with the sample still in the holder to obtain the dry curve which is substantially a straight line. The two curves are plotted on the same piece of graph paper 32 automatically by the recorder 30 and are then removed for the necessary interpretation.
It is apparent that once the output signals have been reduced to an electrical form as they are here, the results could be taken out to means such as a computer which would interpret them immediately in terms of for example pore size and distribution.
It can be seen that we have considerably improved and rendered more reliable the method and apparatus proposed in the ASTM by removing very largely the reliance on manual dexterity and skill, by rearranging the circuitry shown in that ASTM in order to improve the performance and reliability of the whole and by standardising our test liquid used to wet the material under test.
Claims
1. A porosimeter comprising a gas supply, a gas pressure regulator for the gas supply, a sample holder having an inlet and an outlet, said inlet being connected to the gas pressure regulator, a gas pressure sensor connected to the gas pressure regulator for measuring the pressure of gas supplied to the sample holder and a gas flow sensor wherein the gas flow sensor is disposed to measure the gas flow between said gas pressure regulator and said sample holder.
2. A porosimeter according to Claim 1, wherein said gas pressure regulator is controlled automatically to regulate the pressure of the gas supplied to the sample holder inlet in a predetermined manner.
3. A porosimeter according to Claim 1 or Claim 2, wherein at least one gas pressure gauge is provided to calibrate the output from said gas pressure sensor, said gas pressure gauge being capable of isolation from the flow of gas between said regulator and said sample holder inlet.
4. A porosimeter according to any one of the preceding Claims, wherein gas flow meters are provided to calibrate the output from said gas flow sensor said gas flow meters being capable of isolation from the flow of gas through said sample holder.
5. A porosimeter according to Claim 4, wherein said gas flow meters are connected to the outlet of said sample holder.
6. A porosimeter according to any one of the preceding Claims, wherein the output from said gas flow and gas pressure sensors is processed electronically.
7. A porosimeter according to Claim 6, wherein the output from said sensors is recorded by a chart recorder.
8. A porosimeter according to Claim 6 or Claim
7, wherein the output from said sensors is electronically processed to determine the. pore size and distribution of samples tested.
9. A method of assessing porosity comprising first saturating a sample with fluid, placing the sample in the sample holder of a porosimeter according to any one of the preceding Claims, increasing the pressure of gas supplied to the sample holder until the sample is substantially free of said liquid and then reducing the pressure to a lower value and increasing it again with the sample still in place.
10. A method of assessing porosity comprising allowing gas to flow through an apparatus according to Claims 3 and 4 in the absence of any sample, calibrating the output from said sensors using said pressure gauge and flow meter, thereafter isolating said gauge and meter from the gas flow, reducing the gas flow to an Initial value, placing a sample saturated in liquid in said sample holder, increasing the pressure of gas supplied to the sample holder until the sample is substantially free of said liquid and then reducing the pressure to a lower value and increasing it again with the sample still in place.
11. A method according to Claim 9 or Claim 10, wherei the liquid used to saturate the sample is an inert perfluorocarbon fluid.
12. A method according to any one of Claims 9 to11, wherein the liquid used has a boiling point of
174°C, a viscosity of 2.6cs, a vapour pressure at 25°C of a 0.3 mm Hg and a surface tension at 25°C of 16 dynes per cm.
13. A porosimeter substantially as herein described with reference to Figure 2.
14. A method of assessing porosity substantially as herein described with reference to Figure 2.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE8484902209T DE3475956D1 (en) | 1983-05-17 | 1984-05-17 | Porosimeter and methods of assessing porosity |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
GB838313635A GB8313635D0 (en) | 1983-05-17 | 1983-05-17 | Porosimeter |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO1984004593A1 true WO1984004593A1 (en) | 1984-11-22 |
Family
ID=10542895
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB1984/000170 WO1984004593A1 (en) | 1983-05-17 | 1984-05-17 | Porosimeter and methods of assessing porosity |
Country Status (7)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US4718270A (en) |
EP (1) | EP0143837B2 (en) |
JP (1) | JPS60501331A (en) |
AU (1) | AU2968784A (en) |
DE (1) | DE3475956D1 (en) |
GB (1) | GB8313635D0 (en) |
WO (1) | WO1984004593A1 (en) |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO1995032412A1 (en) * | 1994-05-25 | 1995-11-30 | Pall Corporation | System and method for testing the integrity of porous elements |
DE4302137C2 (en) * | 1993-01-27 | 1999-09-02 | Micro Perforation Engineering | Method and device for optical porosity measurement on a running web |
Families Citing this family (79)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4864845A (en) * | 1987-09-29 | 1989-09-12 | Board Of Regents University Of Texas System | Electronic field permeameter |
US5157960A (en) * | 1990-02-06 | 1992-10-27 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Method and apparatus for transient measurement of gas permeability in closed-cell foam insulation |
US5133219A (en) * | 1991-02-28 | 1992-07-28 | Micromeritics Instrument Corporation | Dynamically balanced, differential gas adsorption appartaus |
US5219388A (en) * | 1992-01-17 | 1993-06-15 | University Of Florida | Method and apparatus for testing water permeability of concrete |
WO1994011721A1 (en) * | 1992-11-06 | 1994-05-26 | Pall Corporation | System and method for testing the integrity of porous elements |
US5442950A (en) * | 1993-10-18 | 1995-08-22 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Method and apparatus for determining properties of reservoir rock |
US5425265A (en) * | 1993-12-20 | 1995-06-20 | Jaisinghani; Rajan A. | Apparatus and method for measuring the capillary pressure distribution of porous materials |
US20040232076A1 (en) * | 1996-12-20 | 2004-11-25 | Fufang Zha | Scouring method |
NZ336455A (en) * | 1996-12-20 | 2001-04-27 | Usf Filtration & Separations | A method for cleaning porous membranes using a gas bubble system |
AUPO709797A0 (en) * | 1997-05-30 | 1997-06-26 | Usf Filtration And Separations Group Inc. | Predicting logarithmic reduction values |
US6641733B2 (en) * | 1998-09-25 | 2003-11-04 | U. S. Filter Wastewater Group, Inc. | Apparatus and method for cleaning membrane filtration modules |
FR2773882B1 (en) * | 1998-01-22 | 2000-03-10 | Tabacs & Allumettes Ind | PERMEAMETER WITH WIDE MEASURING RANGE |
US6422063B1 (en) * | 1998-08-11 | 2002-07-23 | Ramaswamy C. Anantheswaran | Rapid method to experimentally measure the gas permeability of micro-perforated films |
AU5855799A (en) * | 1998-08-28 | 2000-03-21 | Centre For Advanced Technologies Technokom | Apparatus and method for determining porosity |
AUPP985099A0 (en) * | 1999-04-20 | 1999-05-13 | Usf Filtration And Separations Group Inc. | Membrane filtration manifold system |
AUPQ680100A0 (en) * | 2000-04-10 | 2000-05-11 | Usf Filtration And Separations Group Inc. | Hollow fibre restraining system |
AUPR064800A0 (en) * | 2000-10-09 | 2000-11-02 | Usf Filtration And Separations Group Inc. | Improved membrane filtration system |
AUPR094600A0 (en) * | 2000-10-23 | 2000-11-16 | Usf Filtration And Separations Group Inc. | Fibre membrane arrangement |
AUPR143400A0 (en) * | 2000-11-13 | 2000-12-07 | Usf Filtration And Separations Group Inc. | Modified membranes |
KR100372908B1 (en) * | 2000-11-22 | 2003-02-15 | 광주과학기술원 | Method and apparatus of measuring a membrane pore size distribution using fractional rejection of solutes with certain molecular masses |
AUPR421501A0 (en) | 2001-04-04 | 2001-05-03 | U.S. Filter Wastewater Group, Inc. | Potting method |
AUPR584301A0 (en) * | 2001-06-20 | 2001-07-12 | U.S. Filter Wastewater Group, Inc. | Membrane polymer compositions |
AUPR692401A0 (en) * | 2001-08-09 | 2001-08-30 | U.S. Filter Wastewater Group, Inc. | Method of cleaning membrane modules |
AUPR774201A0 (en) * | 2001-09-18 | 2001-10-11 | U.S. Filter Wastewater Group, Inc. | High solids module |
US6655192B2 (en) | 2001-10-10 | 2003-12-02 | Borgwarner Inc. | Permeameter-porosimeter |
EP1312408B1 (en) * | 2001-11-16 | 2006-07-19 | US Filter Wastewater Group, Inc. | Method of cleaning membranes |
US7247238B2 (en) * | 2002-02-12 | 2007-07-24 | Siemens Water Technologies Corp. | Poly(ethylene chlorotrifluoroethylene) membranes |
AUPS300602A0 (en) * | 2002-06-18 | 2002-07-11 | U.S. Filter Wastewater Group, Inc. | Methods of minimising the effect of integrity loss in hollow fibre membrane modules |
ATE542593T1 (en) * | 2002-10-10 | 2012-02-15 | Siemens Industry Inc | MEMBRANE FILTER AND BACKWASHING METHOD THEREOF |
AU2002953111A0 (en) * | 2002-12-05 | 2002-12-19 | U. S. Filter Wastewater Group, Inc. | Mixing chamber |
US6845651B2 (en) * | 2003-04-21 | 2005-01-25 | Porous Materials, Inc. | Quick BET method and apparatus for determining surface area and pore distribution of a sample |
AU2003903507A0 (en) | 2003-07-08 | 2003-07-24 | U. S. Filter Wastewater Group, Inc. | Membrane post-treatment |
NZ545206A (en) | 2003-08-29 | 2009-03-31 | Siemens Water Tech Corp | Backwash |
WO2005046849A1 (en) | 2003-11-14 | 2005-05-26 | U.S. Filter Wastewater Group, Inc. | Improved module cleaning method |
US8758621B2 (en) | 2004-03-26 | 2014-06-24 | Evoqua Water Technologies Llc | Process and apparatus for purifying impure water using microfiltration or ultrafiltration in combination with reverse osmosis |
US20050229679A1 (en) * | 2004-04-16 | 2005-10-20 | Porous Materials, Inc. | Automated clamp-on sample chamber for flow porometry and a method of using same |
JP2007535398A (en) | 2004-04-22 | 2007-12-06 | シーメンス ウォーター テクノロジース コーポレイション | Filtration device including membrane bioreactor and treatment tank for digesting organic substances, and waste liquid treatment method |
CA2571498A1 (en) * | 2004-07-02 | 2006-01-12 | U.S. Filter Wastewater Group, Inc. | Gas transfer membrane |
JP2008505197A (en) | 2004-07-05 | 2008-02-21 | シーメンス・ウォーター・テクノロジーズ・コーポレーション | Hydrophilic membrane |
NZ588094A (en) * | 2004-08-20 | 2012-04-27 | Siemens Water Tech Corp | Potting head for hollow fibre filter module |
AU2005282211B2 (en) * | 2004-09-07 | 2011-04-21 | Evoqua Water Technologies Llc | Reduction of backwash liquid waste |
WO2006029456A1 (en) | 2004-09-14 | 2006-03-23 | Siemens Water Technologies Corp. | Methods and apparatus for removing solids from a membrane module |
WO2006029465A1 (en) | 2004-09-15 | 2006-03-23 | Siemens Water Technologies Corp. | Continuously variable aeration |
US7591950B2 (en) * | 2004-11-02 | 2009-09-22 | Siemens Water Technologies Corp. | Submerged cross-flow filtration |
CN101065177B (en) * | 2004-11-02 | 2011-07-27 | 西门子水技术公司 | Submerged cross-flow filtration |
ES2365928T3 (en) * | 2004-12-03 | 2011-10-13 | Siemens Industry, Inc. | POST-MEMBRANE TREATMENT. |
ATE549076T1 (en) | 2004-12-24 | 2012-03-15 | Siemens Industry Inc | CLEANING IN MEMBRANE FILTRATION SYSTEMS |
WO2006066350A1 (en) | 2004-12-24 | 2006-06-29 | Siemens Water Technologies Corp. | Simple gas scouring method and apparatus |
US9675938B2 (en) | 2005-04-29 | 2017-06-13 | Evoqua Water Technologies Llc | Chemical clean for membrane filter |
WO2006135966A1 (en) * | 2005-06-20 | 2006-12-28 | Siemens Water Technologies Corp. | Cross linking treatment of polymer membranes |
WO2007006104A1 (en) | 2005-07-14 | 2007-01-18 | Siemens Water Technologies Corp. | Monopersulfate treatment of membranes |
KR20080045231A (en) | 2005-08-22 | 2008-05-22 | 지멘스 워터 테크놀로지스 코포레이션 | An assembly for water filtration using a tube manifold to minimise backwash |
WO2007044442A2 (en) * | 2005-10-05 | 2007-04-19 | Siemens Water Technologies Corp. | Method and system for treating wastewater |
WO2007044345A2 (en) | 2005-10-05 | 2007-04-19 | Siemens Water Technologies Corp. | Method and apparatus for treating wastewater |
WO2007044415A2 (en) | 2005-10-05 | 2007-04-19 | Siemens Water Technologies Corp. | Method and apparatus for treating wastewater |
US7430895B2 (en) * | 2005-11-18 | 2008-10-07 | International Business Machines Corporation | Apparatus and method for inspecting quality of molded foam parts |
US7455765B2 (en) | 2006-01-25 | 2008-11-25 | Siemens Water Technologies Corp. | Wastewater treatment system and method |
JP2009543675A (en) * | 2006-07-14 | 2009-12-10 | シーメンス・ウォーター・テクノロジーズ・コーポレーション | Improved membrane monopersulfate treatment |
US8293098B2 (en) | 2006-10-24 | 2012-10-23 | Siemens Industry, Inc. | Infiltration/inflow control for membrane bioreactor |
EP2129629A1 (en) | 2007-04-02 | 2009-12-09 | Siemens Water Technologies Corp. | Improved infiltration/inflow control for membrane bioreactor |
US9764288B2 (en) | 2007-04-04 | 2017-09-19 | Evoqua Water Technologies Llc | Membrane module protection |
CA3058737C (en) | 2007-05-29 | 2022-04-26 | Fufang Zha | Membrane cleaning with pulsed airlift pump |
EP2331242B1 (en) | 2008-07-24 | 2018-09-05 | Evoqua Water Technologies LLC | Frame system for membrane filtration modules |
JP2012500117A (en) | 2008-08-20 | 2012-01-05 | シーメンス ウォーター テクノロジース コーポレイション | Improving backwash energy efficiency of membrane filtration systems. |
AU2010101488B4 (en) | 2009-06-11 | 2013-05-02 | Evoqua Water Technologies Llc | Methods for cleaning a porous polymeric membrane and a kit for cleaning a porous polymeric membrane |
WO2011079062A1 (en) * | 2009-12-21 | 2011-06-30 | Siemens Industry, Inc. | Charged porous polymeric membranes and their preparation |
US9914097B2 (en) | 2010-04-30 | 2018-03-13 | Evoqua Water Technologies Llc | Fluid flow distribution device |
CN103118766B (en) | 2010-09-24 | 2016-04-13 | 伊沃夸水处理技术有限责任公司 | The fluid of membrane filtration system controls manifold |
HUE058060T2 (en) | 2011-09-30 | 2022-07-28 | Rohm & Haas Electronic Mat | Isolation valve |
EP2763776B1 (en) | 2011-09-30 | 2021-07-28 | Rohm & Haas Electronic Materials Singapore Pte. Ltd | Improved filtration module assembly |
CN104394965B (en) | 2012-06-28 | 2016-11-23 | 伊沃夸水处理技术有限责任公司 | encapsulating method |
EP2895257A1 (en) | 2012-09-14 | 2015-07-22 | Evoqua Water Technologies LLC | A polymer blend for membranes |
AU2013231145B2 (en) | 2012-09-26 | 2017-08-17 | Evoqua Water Technologies Llc | Membrane potting methods |
GB2520871B (en) | 2012-09-26 | 2020-08-19 | Evoqua Water Tech Llc | Membrane securement device |
AU2013101765A4 (en) | 2012-09-27 | 2016-10-13 | Evoqua Water Technologies Llc | Gas Scouring Apparatus for Immersed Membranes |
US10427102B2 (en) | 2013-10-02 | 2019-10-01 | Evoqua Water Technologies Llc | Method and device for repairing a membrane filtration module |
JP6496012B2 (en) | 2014-08-27 | 2019-04-03 | ダブリュ.エル.ゴア アンド アソシエーツ,ゲゼルシャフト ミット ベシュレンクテル ハフツングW.L. Gore & Associates, Gesellschaft Mit Beschrankter Haftung | Waterproof and water vapor permeable laminate |
CN107847869B (en) | 2015-07-14 | 2021-09-10 | 罗门哈斯电子材料新加坡私人有限公司 | Aeration device for a filtration system |
CN112304841B (en) * | 2020-09-24 | 2023-04-25 | 中国石油大学(华东) | Rock pore structure simulation test system and simulation test method |
Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE1063832B (en) * | 1956-01-14 | 1959-08-20 | Waldhof Zellstoff Fab | Gas or air permeability tester |
GB2018436A (en) * | 1977-11-04 | 1979-10-17 | Cigarette Components Ltd | Porosity measurement |
GB2084741A (en) * | 1980-10-07 | 1982-04-15 | Sasib Spa | Electropneumatical testing of the air permeability of cigarettes |
EP0064159A2 (en) * | 1981-05-02 | 1982-11-10 | Huschke, Bruno, Ing.-grad. | Testing device for filters, especially for sterilized filters |
Family Cites Families (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2861451A (en) * | 1954-11-29 | 1958-11-25 | Sheffield Corp | Fluid leakage gauging device |
US2842958A (en) * | 1956-01-27 | 1958-07-15 | Pure Oil Co | Apparatus for measuring flow characteristics of porous specimens by displacement |
US3504422A (en) * | 1968-01-19 | 1970-04-07 | Bell Aerospace Corp | Method of making a depth-type filter media |
DE2434736C3 (en) * | 1974-07-19 | 1980-06-19 | Hauni-Werke Koerber & Co Kg, 2050 Hamburg | Method and arrangement for testing the wrapping of rod-shaped articles in the tobacco-processing industry |
US4191046A (en) * | 1977-07-01 | 1980-03-04 | British-American Tobacco Company Limited | Permeability meters |
US4198853A (en) * | 1977-11-04 | 1980-04-22 | American Filtrona Corporation | Porosity measurement |
US4198854A (en) * | 1978-12-07 | 1980-04-22 | Philip Morris Incorporated | Method and apparatus for measuring porosity |
US4213327A (en) * | 1979-01-11 | 1980-07-22 | General Motors Corporation | Flow bench |
GB2095411B (en) * | 1981-02-09 | 1985-06-12 | Filtrona Ltd | Paper porosity |
DE3111318C2 (en) * | 1981-03-23 | 1983-03-17 | B.A.T. Cigaretten-Fabriken Gmbh, 2000 Hamburg | Method for determining the tensile resistance and / or the gas permeability of a test object as well as a device for carrying out such a method |
JPS5965241A (en) * | 1982-10-06 | 1984-04-13 | Shokubai Kasei Kogyo Kk | Small pore-distribution analyzing apparatus |
US4506542A (en) * | 1983-04-22 | 1985-03-26 | Chandler Engineering Company | Apparatus and procedure for relative permeability measurements |
-
1983
- 1983-05-17 GB GB838313635A patent/GB8313635D0/en active Pending
-
1984
- 1984-05-17 EP EP84902209A patent/EP0143837B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1984-05-17 US US06/694,555 patent/US4718270A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1984-05-17 DE DE8484902209T patent/DE3475956D1/en not_active Expired
- 1984-05-17 WO PCT/GB1984/000170 patent/WO1984004593A1/en active IP Right Grant
- 1984-05-17 AU AU29687/84A patent/AU2968784A/en not_active Abandoned
- 1984-05-17 JP JP59502311A patent/JPS60501331A/en active Granted
Patent Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE1063832B (en) * | 1956-01-14 | 1959-08-20 | Waldhof Zellstoff Fab | Gas or air permeability tester |
GB2018436A (en) * | 1977-11-04 | 1979-10-17 | Cigarette Components Ltd | Porosity measurement |
GB2084741A (en) * | 1980-10-07 | 1982-04-15 | Sasib Spa | Electropneumatical testing of the air permeability of cigarettes |
EP0064159A2 (en) * | 1981-05-02 | 1982-11-10 | Huschke, Bruno, Ing.-grad. | Testing device for filters, especially for sterilized filters |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
Messtechnik, vol. 76, No. 12, December 1968, W. FISCHER et al.: "Eine Methode zur Ermittlung der Porengrossenverteilung", pages 309-313, see pages 310-311 * |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5576480A (en) * | 1992-11-06 | 1996-11-19 | Pall Corporation | System and method for testing the integrity of porous elements |
DE4302137C2 (en) * | 1993-01-27 | 1999-09-02 | Micro Perforation Engineering | Method and device for optical porosity measurement on a running web |
WO1995032412A1 (en) * | 1994-05-25 | 1995-11-30 | Pall Corporation | System and method for testing the integrity of porous elements |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP0143837B2 (en) | 1992-08-05 |
DE3475956D1 (en) | 1989-02-09 |
GB8313635D0 (en) | 1983-06-22 |
AU2968784A (en) | 1984-12-04 |
EP0143837B1 (en) | 1989-01-04 |
JPS60501331A (en) | 1985-08-15 |
EP0143837A1 (en) | 1985-06-12 |
US4718270A (en) | 1988-01-12 |
JPH058772B2 (en) | 1993-02-03 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US4718270A (en) | Porosimeter and methods of assessing porosity | |
US6854318B2 (en) | Method and apparatus of nondestructive testing a sealed product for leaks | |
Pye et al. | Measurement of gas permeability of polymers. I. Permeabilities in constant volume/variable pressure apparatus | |
US4555934A (en) | Method and apparatus for nonsteady state testing of permeability | |
US5832409A (en) | Automated gas permeameter | |
US3950136A (en) | Method and device for taking gas samples | |
US3968675A (en) | Method and apparatus for preparing a mass spectrometer leak detector system for operation | |
GB2161607A (en) | Automatic volumetric sorption analyzer | |
US4974453A (en) | Method and apparatus for nitrogen oxide determination | |
US4008601A (en) | Fluidic partial pressure sensor | |
US6450009B1 (en) | Method and device for measuring gas permeability through a porous membrane-like material | |
US7665375B2 (en) | Flow splitter for a solid particle counting system | |
US3939695A (en) | Apparatus for detecting leaks | |
US3499315A (en) | Contamination determination in a fluid system | |
US3893332A (en) | Leakage test system | |
EP2185946B1 (en) | Device for determination of radon diffusion coefficient | |
JPH02190743A (en) | Gas density measuring apparatus | |
GB2140163A (en) | Porosimeter and methods of assessing porosity | |
US4663962A (en) | Method and a device for detecting leakage of a tube section | |
US4462248A (en) | Automatic pressure/flow device | |
US4019379A (en) | Pneumatic roughness measurer | |
JPS5533628A (en) | Testing and inspecting device of flow meter | |
Eischens et al. | Proposed standard test method for measurement of pneumatic permeability of partially saturated porous materials by flowing air | |
JPH0465967B2 (en) | ||
RU2186365C2 (en) | Procedure determining porosity parameters o materials |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AK | Designated states |
Designated state(s): AT AU CH DE DK JP NL NO SE US |
|
AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE FR GB LU NL SE |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 1984902209 Country of ref document: EP |
|
WWP | Wipo information: published in national office |
Ref document number: 1984902209 Country of ref document: EP |
|
REG | Reference to national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: 8642 |
|
WWG | Wipo information: grant in national office |
Ref document number: 1984902209 Country of ref document: EP |