WO1993013577A1 - Apparatus and method for controlling an extinction ratio of a laser diode over temperature - Google Patents

Apparatus and method for controlling an extinction ratio of a laser diode over temperature Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO1993013577A1
WO1993013577A1 PCT/US1992/011157 US9211157W WO9313577A1 WO 1993013577 A1 WO1993013577 A1 WO 1993013577A1 US 9211157 W US9211157 W US 9211157W WO 9313577 A1 WO9313577 A1 WO 9313577A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
voltage
laser
light source
magnitude
logical
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US1992/011157
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
William L. Geller
Original Assignee
Raynet Corporation
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Raynet Corporation filed Critical Raynet Corporation
Priority to JP5511863A priority Critical patent/JPH07502627A/en
Priority to PCT/US1992/011157 priority patent/WO1993013577A1/en
Priority to KR1019940702062A priority patent/KR940704073A/en
Priority to EP93902712A priority patent/EP0617852B1/en
Priority to AU34186/93A priority patent/AU672188B2/en
Priority to DE69224534T priority patent/DE69224534T2/en
Priority to US08/244,983 priority patent/US5502298A/en
Publication of WO1993013577A1 publication Critical patent/WO1993013577A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04BTRANSMISSION
    • H04B10/00Transmission systems employing electromagnetic waves other than radio-waves, e.g. infrared, visible or ultraviolet light, or employing corpuscular radiation, e.g. quantum communication
    • H04B10/50Transmitters
    • H04B10/564Power control
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01SDEVICES USING THE PROCESS OF LIGHT AMPLIFICATION BY STIMULATED EMISSION OF RADIATION [LASER] TO AMPLIFY OR GENERATE LIGHT; DEVICES USING STIMULATED EMISSION OF ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION IN WAVE RANGES OTHER THAN OPTICAL
    • H01S5/00Semiconductor lasers
    • H01S5/06Arrangements for controlling the laser output parameters, e.g. by operating on the active medium
    • H01S5/068Stabilisation of laser output parameters
    • H01S5/0683Stabilisation of laser output parameters by monitoring the optical output parameters
    • H01S5/06832Stabilising during amplitude modulation
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04BTRANSMISSION
    • H04B10/00Transmission systems employing electromagnetic waves other than radio-waves, e.g. infrared, visible or ultraviolet light, or employing corpuscular radiation, e.g. quantum communication
    • H04B10/50Transmitters
    • H04B10/501Structural aspects
    • H04B10/503Laser transmitters
    • H04B10/504Laser transmitters using direct modulation
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01SDEVICES USING THE PROCESS OF LIGHT AMPLIFICATION BY STIMULATED EMISSION OF RADIATION [LASER] TO AMPLIFY OR GENERATE LIGHT; DEVICES USING STIMULATED EMISSION OF ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION IN WAVE RANGES OTHER THAN OPTICAL
    • H01S5/00Semiconductor lasers
    • H01S5/04Processes or apparatus for excitation, e.g. pumping, e.g. by electron beams
    • H01S5/042Electrical excitation ; Circuits therefor
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01SDEVICES USING THE PROCESS OF LIGHT AMPLIFICATION BY STIMULATED EMISSION OF RADIATION [LASER] TO AMPLIFY OR GENERATE LIGHT; DEVICES USING STIMULATED EMISSION OF ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION IN WAVE RANGES OTHER THAN OPTICAL
    • H01S5/00Semiconductor lasers
    • H01S5/06Arrangements for controlling the laser output parameters, e.g. by operating on the active medium
    • H01S5/068Stabilisation of laser output parameters
    • H01S5/0683Stabilisation of laser output parameters by monitoring the optical output parameters
    • H01S5/06835Stabilising during pulse modulation or generation

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to an apparatus for controlling an output of a laser diode over temperature so as to control and optimally maintain constant its extinction ratio, and a method for initially setting HIGH and LOW outputs of the laser diode so as to have a desired extinction ratio.
  • FIG 1 illustrates various characteristic curves for a laser diode whereby current I versus power P is graphed, the three curves illustrating data for a laser diode at three distinct temperatures.
  • a pedestal bias current 4 of the laser diode increases with temperature.
  • One method of controlling an output of a laser diode is to incorporate a thermoelectric cooler into a laser package so as to keep the diode at a constant temperature so that its pedestal bias current remains constant.
  • thermoelectric cooler designs tend to increase the laser cost, and decreases reliability of the laser diode since any failure in the thermoelectric cooler device or its circuitry will result in the applied bias current being inappropriate as the temperature of the laser diode varies.
  • first means for comparing the first voltage magnitude to a first preset voltage value representative of a preset desired modulation current while the light source is transmitting the continuous logical 1 and then adjusting the modulation current of the light source in response to the first means comparison to maintain the first voltage magnitude in close proximity to the first preset value;
  • second means for comparing the second voltage magnitude to a second preset voltage value representative of a preset desired bias current while the light source is transmitting the continuous logical 0 and then adjusting the bias current of the light source in response to this second means comparison to maintain the second voltage magnitude in close proximity to the second preset value;
  • the first and second detecting means detecting the first and second voltage magnitudes and the first and second comparing means adjusting the modulation and bias currents respectively over time at a frequency which is sufficiently large so as to maintain an extinction ratio of the light source relatively constant as an efficiency of the light source varies over time.
  • a method for optimally initially setting the HIGH and LOW levels of a laser diode preferably comprising the steps of:
  • FIG I illustrates several current versus power characteristic curves of a laser at various temperatures and shows bias and modulation current values
  • FIG 2 illustrates a preferred frame preamble and clock times for se with the present invention
  • FIG 3 illustrates a schematic of one embodiment of the invention or maintaining an extinction ratio of a laser constant
  • FIG 4 illustrates a switch modulator shown in FIG 3
  • FIGs 5A and 5B together illustrate a preferred circuit implementation of the schematic illustrated in FIG 3;
  • FIG 6 illustrates a plurality of optical network units connected to a host digital terminal which includes a laser controlled according to the invention.
  • a circuit for independently monitoring a pedestal bias output power Pi (FIG 1) of a laser periodically over time, independently monitoring a HIGH power output P1+P2 of the laser over time, and independently increasing or decreasing these powers over time so that an extinction ratio of the laser is maintained constant and the laser LOW power is kept at its pedestal point.
  • a pedestal bias output power Pi FOG 1
  • the extinction ratio N is defined as the HIGH laser output power P1+P2 divided by the LOW laser output power Pi. For N greater than 10, the extinction ratio is approximated by P2/P 1 .
  • a control circuit is proposed for use for information frames 61 which preferably include training pulses 62, 63, the training pulses comprising several successive binary LOWs followed by several successive binary HIGHs, preferably the successive LOWs and HIGHs each comprising a byte or more of bandwidth (typically 8 bits, or 10 bits for 4B5B coding of 8 bit bytes).
  • this LOW-HIGH training pulse is transmitted once per frame.
  • the laser power output is strobed by clock CLl and measured and compared to a preset dynamic LOW power reference value. If the measured LOW power is below the preset dynamic LOW power reference value, a bias current I ⁇ to the laser is incrementally increased.
  • the pedestal bias current is incrementally decreased. It is readily evident that if this done repetitively, the bias current supplied to the laser can be readily adjusted so as to keep the bias current at the laser pedestal threshold regardless of the speed with which the pedestal may move as induced by laser aging or more commonly due to temperature variations. According to a preferred embodiment, as indicated, this measurement and comparison is done once per frame, and at a frame rate of 8 KHz, 8,000 bias current adjustments per second are achievable. Accordingly, the bias current will toggle about the LOW power reference value.
  • the laser power is again strobed by clock CL2, measured, and compared to another preset dynamic HIGH power reference value and when the strobed and measured power is below the preset HIGH reference value a modulation current IM to the laser is increased and whenever it is above the preset HIGH reference value the modulation current IM is decreased.
  • the modulation current will also toggle about a desired level.
  • both the HIGH power output and LOW power output are independently measured and compared repetitively over time keeping these values relatively constant so as to maintain the laser extinction ratio constant.
  • FIG 3 illustrates a schematic illustration of one preferred embodiment of the invention.
  • laser diode LASC to be controlled has its anode connected to junction A which in turn is connected in parallel to -first and second current sources IM and I ⁇ .
  • the laser diode anode is connected to the current source IM through a switch MOD having a data input TxD which completes a path between the anode and the current source IM only during HIGH output frame periods of the laser.
  • Light emitted by the laser diode is monitored, preferably via a back facet of the laser diode, by a monitor diode connected to a bias voltage 8.
  • a current output of an anode B of the monitor diode is converted to a voltage by a transimpedance amplifier 9 which is connected to first and second control circuits 32, 31.
  • Each control circuit includes a comparator 12, 14, a flip-flop 16, 18, having clock inputs CL2 and CLl respectively, and a current integrator 20, 22.
  • the control loop 31 is connected to the constant current source I ⁇ , and the control loop 32 is connected to the other constant current source I .
  • switch MOD In operation, during the LOW training pulse, switch MOD is open so anode A is connected to only the pedestal current source I ⁇ . Current from the laser output anode B is converted to a voltage by the amplifier 9 and presented to the comparator 14. Upon being strobed by CLl by the flip-flop 18, the comparator puts out a HIGH or LOW pulse depending on whether or not the amplifier voltage is above or below the threshold VR/N. This pulse is utilize by the integrator 22 to either decrease or increase a value of I ⁇ so as to maintain the LOW power output of the laser constant and toggling about the dynamic reference established by VR/N.
  • switch MOD is closed so that the laser LASC anode A is connected to both the current source IM and I ⁇ .
  • An output of the laser LASC is monitored by the monitor diode, and a current from its anode B is again converted to a voltage by the amplifier 9 and presented to the comparators 12, 14.
  • the flip-flop 16 Upon being strobed by CL2, the flip-flop 16 causes the voltage at comparator 12 to be compared to the predetermined HIGH reference voltage VR, and the resultant comparison is inputted to the integrator 20 to adjust IM up or down to keep the HIGH laser output toggling about its reference value.
  • the reference voltages VR and VR N of the comparators 12, 14 readily result in a laser extinction ratio which is approximately equal to N.
  • the laser control circuit of the present invention is very easy to optimize and set prior to being used for transmitting information.
  • the reference voltages V r and V r /N are maintained in a fixed ratio by being connected to a voltage divider network, i.e. a pair of resistors in series, as is well understood in the art, and accordingly by simply adjusting an input voltage to the voltage divider network one can easily adjust both the LOW power output and the HIGH power output of the laser simultaneously without varying the laser extinction ratio.
  • the laser output can be optimized so as to achieve the desired extinction ratio N.
  • Prior art lasers typically require multiple adjustments for setting a bias power and a HIGH power.
  • An example of a preferred voltage divider network is illustrated in FIG 5B by resistors R96, R97 which form a voltage divider network for reference voltages inputted to comparators 12, 14.
  • FIG 4 shows one preferred embodiment of the switch MOD, the switch comprising first and second transistors 40, 41, a current source IM being connected to their common anodes, and their cathodes being connected to the laser LASC being modulated, as shown.
  • transistor 41 is enabled so that the laser LASC is biased by the threshold current I ⁇ and the modulation current IM, and when a LOW pulse is to be generated by the laser LASC the transistor 41 is disabled so that the anode A of the laser is only connected to the pedestal current I ⁇ .
  • FIGs 5A and 5B illustrate a detailed preferred electrical schematic of a circuit according to the invention.
  • elements in FIG 5A and 5B which perform the functions referred to in FIG 3 are identified by identical reference symbols in each of these figures.
  • a voltage converter 50 is provided for converting the TxD voltages from +5V and 0V to 0V and -5V respectively. These converted voltages are then inputted to the switch MOD which selectively connects the laser anode with the constant current IM as described during HIGH periods.
  • An output B of the monitor laser is connected to the transimpedance amplifier 9 which is then connected to first and second feedback paths 32, 31 each having a comparator, flip-flop, and integrator, as previously described.
  • Feedback loop 31 which includes the comparator 14, flip-flop 18, and integrator 22, controls the pedestal current I ⁇ , and the comparator 12, flip-flop 16, and integrator 20 of the feedback loop 32 control the modulation current IM- AS is evident by examining FIG 5B, N equals the resistance of R96 divided by the resistance of R97.
  • FIG 6 illustrates a preferred use for the invention, this figure showing a host digital terminal 71 connected to a plurality of optical network units 72 via at least one optical fiber 73 which preferably transports bidirectional traffic.
  • a splitter/combiner 74 splits a signal originating from the host digital terminal from the fiber 73 to a plurality of additional fibers 75 for transmission to each optical network unit, and conversely signals from each optical network unit 72 are combined at the point 74 so as to be transported to the host digital terminal via the fiber 73.
  • high receiver sensitivity for each optical network unit is enhanced by maintaining an extinction ratio of a laser transmitting from the host digital terminal at a relatively high level, preferably above 10.

Abstract

A circuit for controlling an extinction ratio of a laser whose temperature can change over time includes first and second feedback loops which monitor a LOW output power of the laser during a first frame training pulse and a HIGH laser output power during a second frame training pulse. The LOW power output is compared to a preset dynamic LOW power reference, and a LOW bias current applied to the laser is incrementally increased or decreased so as to keep this LOW power output toggling about this LOW reference. Similarly, the HIGH power output is compared to a HIGH power reference, and a modulation current for the laser is incrementally increased or decreased to keep the HIGH laser output power toggling about this HIGH reference. Preferably, the training pulse is sent once per frame thus enabling both the LOW and HIGH laser output powers to be kept constant regardless of whatever dynamic variables may change over time thus keeping the laser extinction ratio constant.

Description

APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING AN EXTINCTION RATIO OF A LASER DIODE OVER TEMPERATURE
Background of the Invention
The present invention relates to an apparatus for controlling an output of a laser diode over temperature so as to control and optimally maintain constant its extinction ratio, and a method for initially setting HIGH and LOW outputs of the laser diode so as to have a desired extinction ratio.
Various control circuits have been proposed in the prior art for maintaining an output of a laser diode. FIG 1 illustrates various characteristic curves for a laser diode whereby current I versus power P is graphed, the three curves illustrating data for a laser diode at three distinct temperatures. As is evident and known, a pedestal bias current 4 of the laser diode increases with temperature. One method of controlling an output of a laser diode is to incorporate a thermoelectric cooler into a laser package so as to keep the diode at a constant temperature so that its pedestal bias current remains constant.
Accordingly, an extinction ratio of the laser diode, defined as the ratio between its HIGH power output divided by its LOW power output can easily be maintained constant. A disadvantage of such proposals is that thermoelectric cooler designs tend to increase the laser cost, and decreases reliability of the laser diode since any failure in the thermoelectric cooler device or its circuitry will result in the applied bias current being inappropriate as the temperature of the laser diode varies.
Circuits have also been proposed whereby a LOW pedestal power is monitored successively over time for the laser diode and incrementally increased or decreased in response to comparison to a preset dynamic threshold. One such circuit is described by Geller, USP 5,036,189, assigned to the assignee of the present invention, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference Though the Geller circuit readily establishes and maintains an appropriate LOW pedestal bias current, it does not control the HIGH power output of the laser.. Referring back to FIG 1, since a slope of the current versus power output of a laser changes over temperature, for a constant modulation current IM, the laser extinction ratio (the ratio between the laser HIGH power divided by the laser LOW power) will change over time. If the extinction ratio becomes too small, increased noise results at an optical receiver detecting an output of the laser which results in undesirable bit errors.
It has also been proposed to utilize circuitry which maintains the average laser modulation power constant over time. Such circuits also suffer from a disadvantage that the laser output extinction ratio will change with temperature. Specifically, referring to FIG 1, curve 3 illustrates how such circuitry works on an output of the laser and illustrates that noise detected by the receiver when the laser emits a . LOW output is undesirably high, i.e. greater than the power output at the laser threshold pedestal.
Summary of the Invention with Objects
It is an object of the present invention to eliminate the above noted drawbacks in laser design and provide an apparatus whereby an extinction ratio of a laser output is maintained constant over various temperatures.
It is a further object of the invention to provide a laser whereby its LOW bias power is monitored and adjusted over time to maintain the laser at a predetermined pedestal bias output threshold value, and independently monitor the HIGH output level of the laser and keep that output at another predetermined value, periodically over time, so as to achieve stability over temperature. These and other objects of the invention are achieved by a circuit for controlling an extinction ratio of an output of a laser which is not maintained at a constant temperature, comprising:
first means for detecting a first magnitude of a voltage representative of a magnitude of an intensity of optical radiation emitted by a light source while the light source is transmitting a continuous logical 1, the logical 1 being transmitted sufficiently long to achieve a stabilized constant value for the first voltage magnitude which is detected;
second means for detecting a second magnitude of a voltage representative of a magnitude of an intensity of optical radiation emitted by the light source while the light source is transmitting a continuous logical 0, the logical 0 being transmitted sufficiently long to achieve a stabilized constant value for the second voltage magnitude;
first means for comparing the first voltage magnitude to a first preset voltage value representative of a preset desired modulation current while the light source is transmitting the continuous logical 1 and then adjusting the modulation current of the light source in response to the first means comparison to maintain the first voltage magnitude in close proximity to the first preset value;
second means for comparing the second voltage magnitude to a second preset voltage value representative of a preset desired bias current while the light source is transmitting the continuous logical 0 and then adjusting the bias current of the light source in response to this second means comparison to maintain the second voltage magnitude in close proximity to the second preset value;
the first and second detecting means detecting the first and second voltage magnitudes and the first and second comparing means adjusting the modulation and bias currents respectively over time at a frequency which is sufficiently large so as to maintain an extinction ratio of the light source relatively constant as an efficiency of the light source varies over time.
According to another aspect of the invention, a method is disclosed for optimally initially setting the HIGH and LOW levels of a laser diode, the method preferably comprising the steps of:
setting a first voltage level representative of a magnitude of optical radiation emitted by a laser transmitting a logical 1 substantially equal to a first reference level;
setting a second voltage level representative of a magnitude of optical radiation emitted by the laser transmitting a logical 0 substantially equal to a second reference level;
simultaneously adjusting the first and second reference levels while maintaining a ratio therebetween constant until a desired laser power output is obtained.
These and other objects will be further described by reference to the following detailed description and drawings.
Brief Description of the Drawings
FIG I illustrates several current versus power characteristic curves of a laser at various temperatures and shows bias and modulation current values;
FIG 2 illustrates a preferred frame preamble and clock times for se with the present invention;
FIG 3 illustrates a schematic of one embodiment of the invention or maintaining an extinction ratio of a laser constant; FIG 4 illustrates a switch modulator shown in FIG 3; and
FIGs 5A and 5B together illustrate a preferred circuit implementation of the schematic illustrated in FIG 3;
FIG 6 illustrates a plurality of optical network units connected to a host digital terminal which includes a laser controlled according to the invention.
Detailed Description of the Preferred Embodiments
According to the invention, a circuit is provided for independently monitoring a pedestal bias output power Pi (FIG 1) of a laser periodically over time, independently monitoring a HIGH power output P1+P2 of the laser over time, and independently increasing or decreasing these powers over time so that an extinction ratio of the laser is maintained constant and the laser LOW power is kept at its pedestal point.
As indicated, the extinction ratio N is defined as the HIGH laser output power P1+P2 divided by the LOW laser output power Pi. For N greater than 10, the extinction ratio is approximated by P2/P1.
Referring to FIG 2, a control circuit is proposed for use for information frames 61 which preferably include training pulses 62, 63, the training pulses comprising several successive binary LOWs followed by several successive binary HIGHs, preferably the successive LOWs and HIGHs each comprising a byte or more of bandwidth (typically 8 bits, or 10 bits for 4B5B coding of 8 bit bytes). According to a preferred embodiment, this LOW-HIGH training pulse is transmitted once per frame. At an appropriate instant near an end of the successive binary LOW period, the laser power output is strobed by clock CLl and measured and compared to a preset dynamic LOW power reference value. If the measured LOW power is below the preset dynamic LOW power reference value, a bias current Iβ to the laser is incrementally increased. Similarly, any time the strobed and measured power is above the preset dynamic LOW power reference value, the pedestal bias current is incrementally decreased. It is readily evident that if this done repetitively, the bias current supplied to the laser can be readily adjusted so as to keep the bias current at the laser pedestal threshold regardless of the speed with which the pedestal may move as induced by laser aging or more commonly due to temperature variations. According to a preferred embodiment, as indicated, this measurement and comparison is done once per frame, and at a frame rate of 8 KHz, 8,000 bias current adjustments per second are achievable. Accordingly, the bias current will toggle about the LOW power reference value.
In addition, similarly at an appropriate instant near an end of the successive binary HIGH training pulse period, the laser power is again strobed by clock CL2, measured, and compared to another preset dynamic HIGH power reference value and when the strobed and measured power is below the preset HIGH reference value a modulation current IM to the laser is increased and whenever it is above the preset HIGH reference value the modulation current IM is decreased.
Accordingly, the modulation current will also toggle about a desired level. Hence both the HIGH power output and LOW power output are independently measured and compared repetitively over time keeping these values relatively constant so as to maintain the laser extinction ratio constant.
FIG 3 illustrates a schematic illustration of one preferred embodiment of the invention. Referring to this figure, laser diode LASC to be controlled has its anode connected to junction A which in turn is connected in parallel to -first and second current sources IM and Iβ. The laser diode anode is connected to the current source IM through a switch MOD having a data input TxD which completes a path between the anode and the current source IM only during HIGH output frame periods of the laser. Light emitted by the laser diode is monitored, preferably via a back facet of the laser diode, by a monitor diode connected to a bias voltage 8. A current output of an anode B of the monitor diode is converted to a voltage by a transimpedance amplifier 9 which is connected to first and second control circuits 32, 31. Each control circuit includes a comparator 12, 14, a flip-flop 16, 18, having clock inputs CL2 and CLl respectively, and a current integrator 20, 22. The control loop 31 is connected to the constant current source Iβ, and the control loop 32 is connected to the other constant current source I .
In operation, during the LOW training pulse, switch MOD is open so anode A is connected to only the pedestal current source Iβ. Current from the laser output anode B is converted to a voltage by the amplifier 9 and presented to the comparator 14. Upon being strobed by CLl by the flip-flop 18, the comparator puts out a HIGH or LOW pulse depending on whether or not the amplifier voltage is above or below the threshold VR/N. This pulse is utilize by the integrator 22 to either decrease or increase a value of Iβ so as to maintain the LOW power output of the laser constant and toggling about the dynamic reference established by VR/N.
During the HIGH training pulse, switch MOD is closed so that the laser LASC anode A is connected to both the current source IM and Iβ. An output of the laser LASC is monitored by the monitor diode, and a current from its anode B is again converted to a voltage by the amplifier 9 and presented to the comparators 12, 14. Upon being strobed by CL2, the flip-flop 16 causes the voltage at comparator 12 to be compared to the predetermined HIGH reference voltage VR, and the resultant comparison is inputted to the integrator 20 to adjust IM up or down to keep the HIGH laser output toggling about its reference value.
As can be appreciated, the reference voltages VR and VR N of the comparators 12, 14 readily result in a laser extinction ratio which is approximately equal to N. According to another aspect of the invention, the laser control circuit of the present invention is very easy to optimize and set prior to being used for transmitting information. Specifically, according to the invention, the reference voltages Vr and Vr/N are maintained in a fixed ratio by being connected to a voltage divider network, i.e. a pair of resistors in series, as is well understood in the art, and accordingly by simply adjusting an input voltage to the voltage divider network one can easily adjust both the LOW power output and the HIGH power output of the laser simultaneously without varying the laser extinction ratio. Hence, with a single adjustment, the laser output can be optimized so as to achieve the desired extinction ratio N. Prior art lasers typically require multiple adjustments for setting a bias power and a HIGH power. An example of a preferred voltage divider network is illustrated in FIG 5B by resistors R96, R97 which form a voltage divider network for reference voltages inputted to comparators 12, 14.
FIG 4 shows one preferred embodiment of the switch MOD, the switch comprising first and second transistors 40, 41, a current source IM being connected to their common anodes, and their cathodes being connected to the laser LASC being modulated, as shown. During periods of HIGH output pulses for the laser LASC, transistor 41 is enabled so that the laser LASC is biased by the threshold current Iβ and the modulation current IM, and when a LOW pulse is to be generated by the laser LASC the transistor 41 is disabled so that the anode A of the laser is only connected to the pedestal current Iβ.
FIGs 5A and 5B illustrate a detailed preferred electrical schematic of a circuit according to the invention. For ease of illustration, elements in FIG 5A and 5B which perform the functions referred to in FIG 3 are identified by identical reference symbols in each of these figures. Referring to FIG 5A, since it is preferred to have a cathode of the laser LASC connected to ground and since TXD data is assumed to be received from an electrical bus at levels of +5V and OV, a voltage converter 50 is provided for converting the TxD voltages from +5V and 0V to 0V and -5V respectively. These converted voltages are then inputted to the switch MOD which selectively connects the laser anode with the constant current IM as described during HIGH periods. An output B of the monitor laser is connected to the transimpedance amplifier 9 which is then connected to first and second feedback paths 32, 31 each having a comparator, flip-flop, and integrator, as previously described. Feedback loop 31 which includes the comparator 14, flip-flop 18, and integrator 22, controls the pedestal current Iβ, and the comparator 12, flip-flop 16, and integrator 20 of the feedback loop 32 control the modulation current IM- AS is evident by examining FIG 5B, N equals the resistance of R96 divided by the resistance of R97.
FIG 6 illustrates a preferred use for the invention, this figure showing a host digital terminal 71 connected to a plurality of optical network units 72 via at least one optical fiber 73 which preferably transports bidirectional traffic. A splitter/combiner 74 splits a signal originating from the host digital terminal from the fiber 73 to a plurality of additional fibers 75 for transmission to each optical network unit, and conversely signals from each optical network unit 72 are combined at the point 74 so as to be transported to the host digital terminal via the fiber 73. With such an architecture, high receiver sensitivity for each optical network unit is enhanced by maintaining an extinction ratio of a laser transmitting from the host digital terminal at a relatively high level, preferably above 10.
Though the invention has been described by reference to certain preferred embodiments thereof, it should be understood that various modifications can be made thereto without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, and accordingly the invention is to be limited only by the appended claims.

Claims

What is claimed is:
1. An apparatus for controlling an extinction ratio of a light source, comprising:
first means for detecting a first magnitude of a voltage representative of a magnitude of an intensity of optical radiation emitted by a light source while the light source is transmitting a continuous logical 1, the logical 1 being transmitted sufficiently long to achieve a stabilized constant value for the first voltage magnitude which is detected;
second means for detecting a second magnitude of a voltage representative of a magnitude of an intensity of optical radiation emitted by the light source while the light source is transmitting a continuous logical 0, the logical 0 being transmitted sufficiently long to achieve a stabilized constant value for the second voltage magnitude;
first means for comparing the first voltage magnitude to a first preset voltage value representative of a preset desired modulation current while the light source is transmitting the continuous logical 1 and then adjusting the modulation current of the light source in response to the first means comparison to maintain the first voltage magnitude in close proximity to the first preset value;
second means for comparing the second voltage magnitude to a second preset voltage value representative of a preset desired bias current while the light source is transmitting the continuous logical 0 and then adjusting the bias current of the light source in response to this second means comparison to maintain the second voltage magnitude in close proximity to the second preset value; the first and second detecting means detecting the first and second voltage magnitudes and the first and second comparing means adjusting the modulation and bias currents respectively over time at a frequency which is sufficiently large so as to maintain an extinction ratio of the light source relatively constant as an efficiency of the light source varies over time.
2. The apparatus of claim 1, the frequency being sufficiently small so as to allow an accurate measurement of the first and second voltage magnitudes when such magnitudes are lower than magnitudes detected in a preceding detection cycle.
3. The apparatus of claim 2 or 3, the frequency being less than 0.9 times a frame transmission frequency.
4. The apparatus of any one of the preceding claims, the logical 1 being transmitted for a length of time corresponding to at least 8 bits, the logical 0 being transmitted for a length of time equal to at least 8 bits.
5. The apparatus of any one of the preceding claims, the first and second comparing means increasing the modulation and bias currents when their respective voltage magnitudes are below the first and second preset voltage values respectively and decreasing the modulation and bias currents when their voltage magnitudes are above the first and second preset voltage values respectively.
6. The apparatus of any one of the preceding claims, the light source comprising a digital data modulated laser which emits optical energy in recurrent frames within a time division multiplexed optical communications network, the continuous logical 1 and the continuous logical 0 comprising a non-data carrying training pulse at least 6 bits in length, the training pulse being embedded within select ones of the frames.
7. The apparatus of any one of the preceding claims, the first and second detecting means comprising a current-to-voltage converter which converts a current representative of the radiation output to a voltage, and first and second comparators for comparing a LOW voltage to a LOW voltage reference value and for comparing a HIGH voltage to a HIGH voltage reference value, reference voltage inputs of the first and second comparators being connected to a voltage source and a resistive voltage divider network to set the extinction ratio.
8. The apparatus of claim 10, the first and second comparing means further including first and second flip-flops for strobing the first and second comparators at times corresponding to the logical 0 and 1 transmissions respectively.
9- A method of setting HIGH and LOW outputs of a digital laser light source, comprising:
setting a first voltage level representative of a magnitude of optical radiation emitted by a laser transmitting a logical 1 substantially equal to a first reference level;
setting a second voltage level representative of a magnitude of optical radiation emitted by the laser transmitting a logical 0 substantially equal to a second reference level;
simultaneously adjusting the first and second reference levels while maintaining a ratio therebetween constant until a desired laser power output is obtained.
10. The method of claim 9, the ratio between the first and second reference levels being maintained by a resistive voltage divider.
PCT/US1992/011157 1991-12-20 1992-12-21 Apparatus and method for controlling an extinction ratio of a laser diode over temperature WO1993013577A1 (en)

Priority Applications (7)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP5511863A JPH07502627A (en) 1991-12-20 1992-12-21 Device and method for controlling the extinction ratio of a semiconductor laser over time
PCT/US1992/011157 WO1993013577A1 (en) 1991-12-20 1992-12-21 Apparatus and method for controlling an extinction ratio of a laser diode over temperature
KR1019940702062A KR940704073A (en) 1991-12-20 1992-12-21 APARATUS AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING AN EXTINCTION RATIO OF A LASER DIODE OVER TEMPERATURE
EP93902712A EP0617852B1 (en) 1991-12-20 1992-12-21 Apparatus and method for controlling an extinction ratio of a laser diode over temperature
AU34186/93A AU672188B2 (en) 1991-12-20 1992-12-21 Apparatus and method for controlling an extinction ratio of a laser diode over temperature
DE69224534T DE69224534T2 (en) 1991-12-20 1992-12-21 DEVICE AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING THE TEMPERATURE DEPENDENCY OF THE ON / OFF RATIO OF A LASER DIODE
US08/244,983 US5502298A (en) 1992-12-21 1992-12-21 Apparatus and method for controlling an extinction ratio of a laser diode over temperature

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US81119791A 1991-12-20 1991-12-20
US07/811,197 1991-12-20
PCT/US1992/011157 WO1993013577A1 (en) 1991-12-20 1992-12-21 Apparatus and method for controlling an extinction ratio of a laser diode over temperature

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1993013577A1 true WO1993013577A1 (en) 1993-07-08

Family

ID=26785255

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US1992/011157 WO1993013577A1 (en) 1991-12-20 1992-12-21 Apparatus and method for controlling an extinction ratio of a laser diode over temperature

Country Status (2)

Country Link
KR (1) KR940704073A (en)
WO (1) WO1993013577A1 (en)

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2000004655A1 (en) * 1998-07-15 2000-01-27 Maxim Integrated Products, Inc. Local control for burst mode optical transmitters
GB2397689B (en) * 2003-01-10 2007-02-28 Agilent Technologies Inc Calibration of laser systems
WO2007059258A1 (en) * 2005-11-21 2007-05-24 Intel, Corporation Controlling optical power and extincation ratio of a semiconductor laser
US7400662B2 (en) 2005-01-26 2008-07-15 Avago Technologies Fiber Ip Pte Ltd Calibration of laser systems
US7869478B2 (en) 2005-12-12 2011-01-11 Electronics And Telecommunications Research Institute Apparatus and method for maintaining constant extinction ratio of laser diode
GB2541291A (en) * 2016-07-08 2017-02-15 Hilight Semiconductor Ltd Laser power controller
US10749605B2 (en) 2016-07-08 2020-08-18 Hilight Semiconductor Limited Laser power controller

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4985896A (en) * 1985-03-29 1991-01-15 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Laser driving device
US4995105A (en) * 1989-09-18 1991-02-19 Xerox Corporation Adaptive laser diode driver circuit for laser scanners
EP0428016A2 (en) * 1989-11-13 1991-05-22 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Laser diode modulation current control
US5036189A (en) * 1990-04-03 1991-07-30 Raynet Corporation Thermal control for laser diode used in outside plant communications terminal

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4985896A (en) * 1985-03-29 1991-01-15 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Laser driving device
US4995105A (en) * 1989-09-18 1991-02-19 Xerox Corporation Adaptive laser diode driver circuit for laser scanners
EP0428016A2 (en) * 1989-11-13 1991-05-22 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Laser diode modulation current control
US5036189A (en) * 1990-04-03 1991-07-30 Raynet Corporation Thermal control for laser diode used in outside plant communications terminal

Non-Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
PATENT ABSTRACTS OF JAPAN vol. 1, no. 213 (E-422)25 July 1986 & JP,A,61 052 042 ( HITACHI LTD ) *
PATENT ABSTRACTS OF JAPAN vol. 13, no. 109 (E-727)15 March 1989 & JP,A,63 280 482 ( NEC CORP ) *
PATENT ABSTRACTS OF JAPAN vol. 8, no. 167 (E-258)2 August 1984 & JP,A,59 063 787 ( FUJITSU KK ) *

Cited By (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2000004655A1 (en) * 1998-07-15 2000-01-27 Maxim Integrated Products, Inc. Local control for burst mode optical transmitters
US6188498B1 (en) * 1998-07-15 2001-02-13 Maxim Integrated Products, Inc. Local control for burst mode optical transmitters
GB2397689B (en) * 2003-01-10 2007-02-28 Agilent Technologies Inc Calibration of laser systems
US7400662B2 (en) 2005-01-26 2008-07-15 Avago Technologies Fiber Ip Pte Ltd Calibration of laser systems
WO2007059258A1 (en) * 2005-11-21 2007-05-24 Intel, Corporation Controlling optical power and extincation ratio of a semiconductor laser
GB2445513A (en) * 2005-11-21 2008-07-09 Intel Corp Controlling optical power and extincation ratio of a semiconductor laser
US7869478B2 (en) 2005-12-12 2011-01-11 Electronics And Telecommunications Research Institute Apparatus and method for maintaining constant extinction ratio of laser diode
GB2541291A (en) * 2016-07-08 2017-02-15 Hilight Semiconductor Ltd Laser power controller
GB2541291B (en) * 2016-07-08 2018-06-20 Hilight Semiconductor Ltd Laser power controller
US10205532B2 (en) 2016-07-08 2019-02-12 Hilight Semiconductor Limited Laser power controller
US10749605B2 (en) 2016-07-08 2020-08-18 Hilight Semiconductor Limited Laser power controller

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
KR940704073A (en) 1994-12-12

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5502298A (en) Apparatus and method for controlling an extinction ratio of a laser diode over temperature
US7519093B2 (en) Laser driver circuit and system
US4709416A (en) Laser bias current stabilization for burst mode fiber optic communication system
US4355395A (en) Injection lasers
US5268916A (en) Laser bias and modulation circuit
US7158551B2 (en) Driver circuit and driving method for semiconductor laser
EP0539038B1 (en) Optical transmitters
GB1563944A (en) Imjection lasers
US20020093714A1 (en) Optical transmitter and optical transmitting apparatus using the same
US7245828B2 (en) Extinction ratio determination using duty cycle modulation
US20030218585A1 (en) Light-emitting element drive apparatus
US4876442A (en) Laser control circuit
EP0523188B1 (en) Thermal control for laser diode used in outside plant communications terminal
WO1993013577A1 (en) Apparatus and method for controlling an extinction ratio of a laser diode over temperature
US5091797A (en) Method and apparatus for modulation current regulation for laser diodes
EP0617852B1 (en) Apparatus and method for controlling an extinction ratio of a laser diode over temperature
US20020163945A1 (en) Modulation current compensation of laser for controlled extinction ratio using dither signal
US20030141876A1 (en) Circuit and method for measuring extinction ratio and controlling a laser diode transmitter based thereon
JP3647966B2 (en) Light intensity control device
JPH0548182A (en) Laser diode optical output control device
WO1992017007A1 (en) Method and control circuit for controlling a laser diode transmitter
JPH04304689A (en) Optical transmitter
JPH05299735A (en) Optical transmitter
JPH10190575A (en) Automatic optical output control circuit
JPH06232483A (en) Light emitting element and drive circuit therefor

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AU CA JP KR US

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE

DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 1993902712

Country of ref document: EP

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2126323

Country of ref document: CA

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 08244983

Country of ref document: US

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 1993902712

Country of ref document: EP

WWG Wipo information: grant in national office

Ref document number: 1993902712

Country of ref document: EP