WO1995031997A1 - Model for testing immunogenicity of peptides - Google Patents
Model for testing immunogenicity of peptides Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO1995031997A1 WO1995031997A1 PCT/US1994/005697 US9405697W WO9531997A1 WO 1995031997 A1 WO1995031997 A1 WO 1995031997A1 US 9405697 W US9405697 W US 9405697W WO 9531997 A1 WO9531997 A1 WO 9531997A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- peptide
- model
- drl
- class
- binding
- Prior art date
Links
- 108090000765 processed proteins & peptides Proteins 0.000 title claims abstract description 135
- 102000004196 processed proteins & peptides Human genes 0.000 title claims abstract description 36
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 title claims description 5
- 230000005847 immunogenicity Effects 0.000 title description 7
- 230000027455 binding Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 37
- 230000028993 immune response Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 12
- 230000006957 competitive inhibition Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 3
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 13
- 150000001413 amino acids Chemical group 0.000 claims description 12
- 229960005486 vaccine Drugs 0.000 claims description 9
- 241001465754 Metazoa Species 0.000 claims description 8
- 125000002924 primary amino group Chemical group [H]N([H])* 0.000 claims description 7
- 230000005764 inhibitory process Effects 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000012216 screening Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000002131 composite material Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000010438 heat treatment Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000002401 inhibitory effect Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 235000001014 amino acid Nutrition 0.000 claims 6
- QNAYBMKLOCPYGJ-REOHCLBHSA-N L-alanine Chemical compound C[C@H](N)C(O)=O QNAYBMKLOCPYGJ-REOHCLBHSA-N 0.000 claims 2
- 235000004279 alanine Nutrition 0.000 claims 2
- 210000001744 T-lymphocyte Anatomy 0.000 abstract description 9
- 230000002163 immunogen Effects 0.000 abstract description 5
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 abstract description 4
- 238000000159 protein binding assay Methods 0.000 abstract description 3
- 238000003556 assay Methods 0.000 abstract description 2
- 238000005094 computer simulation Methods 0.000 abstract 1
- 238000002255 vaccination Methods 0.000 abstract 1
- 108700018351 Major Histocompatibility Complex Proteins 0.000 description 17
- 230000020382 suppression by virus of host antigen processing and presentation of peptide antigen via MHC class I Effects 0.000 description 17
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 14
- KDXKERNSBIXSRK-UHFFFAOYSA-N Lysine Natural products NCCCCC(N)C(O)=O KDXKERNSBIXSRK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 9
- 239000004472 Lysine Substances 0.000 description 9
- 229910052739 hydrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 8
- 239000001257 hydrogen Substances 0.000 description 8
- 101710154606 Hemagglutinin Proteins 0.000 description 7
- 101710093908 Outer capsid protein VP4 Proteins 0.000 description 7
- 101710135467 Outer capsid protein sigma-1 Proteins 0.000 description 7
- 101710176177 Protein A56 Proteins 0.000 description 7
- 239000000185 hemagglutinin Substances 0.000 description 7
- 206010022000 influenza Diseases 0.000 description 7
- 239000000427 antigen Substances 0.000 description 6
- 108091007433 antigens Proteins 0.000 description 6
- 102000036639 antigens Human genes 0.000 description 6
- 102000008949 Histocompatibility Antigens Class I Human genes 0.000 description 5
- 108010088652 Histocompatibility Antigens Class I Proteins 0.000 description 5
- 125000004429 atom Chemical group 0.000 description 5
- 125000003178 carboxy group Chemical group [H]OC(*)=O 0.000 description 5
- 239000013078 crystal Substances 0.000 description 5
- 241001529936 Murinae Species 0.000 description 4
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000002209 hydrophobic effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 102000004169 proteins and genes Human genes 0.000 description 4
- 108090000623 proteins and genes Proteins 0.000 description 4
- OUYCCCASQSFEME-UHFFFAOYSA-N tyrosine Natural products OC(=O)C(N)CC1=CC=C(O)C=C1 OUYCCCASQSFEME-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 101100129088 Caenorhabditis elegans lys-2 gene Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 101100315627 Caenorhabditis elegans tyr-3 gene Proteins 0.000 description 3
- HVLSXIKZNLPZJJ-TXZCQADKSA-N HA peptide Chemical compound C([C@@H](C(=O)N[C@@H](CC(O)=O)C(=O)N[C@@H](C(C)C)C(=O)N1[C@@H](CCC1)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC(O)=O)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC=1C=CC(O)=CC=1)C(=O)N[C@@H](C)C(O)=O)NC(=O)[C@H]1N(CCC1)C(=O)[C@@H](N)CC=1C=CC(O)=CC=1)C1=CC=C(O)C=C1 HVLSXIKZNLPZJJ-TXZCQADKSA-N 0.000 description 3
- ROHFNLRQFUQHCH-YFKPBYRVSA-N L-leucine Chemical compound CC(C)C[C@H](N)C(O)=O ROHFNLRQFUQHCH-YFKPBYRVSA-N 0.000 description 3
- OUYCCCASQSFEME-QMMMGPOBSA-N L-tyrosine Chemical compound OC(=O)[C@@H](N)CC1=CC=C(O)C=C1 OUYCCCASQSFEME-QMMMGPOBSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000011534 incubation Methods 0.000 description 3
- 101100289888 Caenorhabditis elegans lys-5 gene Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 101000878459 Escherichia coli CS3 fimbrial subunit A Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 101000878462 Escherichia coli CS5 fimbrial subunit Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 101710145752 Serine recombinase gin Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 229940024606 amino acid Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 125000000539 amino acid group Chemical group 0.000 description 2
- 230000000890 antigenic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 210000003719 b-lymphocyte Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 210000004027 cell Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000003780 insertion Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000037431 insertion Effects 0.000 description 2
- 125000001493 tyrosinyl group Chemical group [H]OC1=C([H])C([H])=C(C([H])=C1[H])C([H])([H])C([H])(N([H])[H])C(*)=O 0.000 description 2
- 101710125089 Bindin Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 241000588724 Escherichia coli Species 0.000 description 1
- 108010000916 Fimbriae Proteins Proteins 0.000 description 1
- DHMQDGOQFOQNFH-UHFFFAOYSA-N Glycine Natural products NCC(O)=O DHMQDGOQFOQNFH-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000004471 Glycine Substances 0.000 description 1
- 241000282412 Homo Species 0.000 description 1
- ONIBWKKTOPOVIA-BYPYZUCNSA-N L-Proline Chemical compound OC(=O)[C@@H]1CCCN1 ONIBWKKTOPOVIA-BYPYZUCNSA-N 0.000 description 1
- AGPKZVBTJJNPAG-WHFBIAKZSA-N L-isoleucine Chemical compound CC[C@H](C)[C@H](N)C(O)=O AGPKZVBTJJNPAG-WHFBIAKZSA-N 0.000 description 1
- QIVBCDIJIAJPQS-VIFPVBQESA-N L-tryptophane Chemical compound C1=CC=C2C(C[C@H](N)C(O)=O)=CNC2=C1 QIVBCDIJIAJPQS-VIFPVBQESA-N 0.000 description 1
- ROHFNLRQFUQHCH-UHFFFAOYSA-N Leucine Natural products CC(C)CC(N)C(O)=O ROHFNLRQFUQHCH-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 241000124008 Mammalia Species 0.000 description 1
- 206010028980 Neoplasm Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 102000007079 Peptide Fragments Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010033276 Peptide Fragments Proteins 0.000 description 1
- ONIBWKKTOPOVIA-UHFFFAOYSA-N Proline Natural products OC(=O)C1CCCN1 ONIBWKKTOPOVIA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000012300 Sequence Analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- QIVBCDIJIAJPQS-UHFFFAOYSA-N Tryptophan Natural products C1=CC=C2C(CC(N)C(O)=O)=CNC2=C1 QIVBCDIJIAJPQS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000006035 Tryptophane Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002253 acid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000006978 adaptation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004075 alteration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003466 anti-cipated effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 208000027697 autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome due to CTLA4 haploinsuffiency Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 238000005284 basis set Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004166 bioassay Methods 0.000 description 1
- 125000002915 carbonyl group Chemical group [*:2]C([*:1])=O 0.000 description 1
- 238000002659 cell therapy Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013375 chromatographic separation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012875 competitive assay Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013270 controlled release Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012217 deletion Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000037430 deletion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229940079593 drug Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 239000003814 drug Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000688 enterotoxigenic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011067 equilibration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000012634 fragment Substances 0.000 description 1
- ZDXPYRJPNDTMRX-UHFFFAOYSA-N glutamine Natural products OC(=O)C(N)CCC(N)=O ZDXPYRJPNDTMRX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 125000000404 glutamine group Chemical group N[C@@H](CCC(N)=O)C(=O)* 0.000 description 1
- 125000003630 glycyl group Chemical group [H]N([H])C([H])([H])C(*)=O 0.000 description 1
- 238000003306 harvesting Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000004408 hybridoma Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 125000004435 hydrogen atom Chemical group [H]* 0.000 description 1
- 230000001900 immune effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003053 immunization Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002649 immunization Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000016784 immunoglobulin production Effects 0.000 description 1
- AGPKZVBTJJNPAG-UHFFFAOYSA-N isoleucine Natural products CCC(C)C(N)C(O)=O AGPKZVBTJJNPAG-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229960000310 isoleucine Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 125000003588 lysine group Chemical group [H]N([H])C([H])([H])C([H])([H])C([H])([H])C([H])([H])C([H])(N([H])[H])C(*)=O 0.000 description 1
- 210000002540 macrophage Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001404 mediated effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 244000000010 microbial pathogen Species 0.000 description 1
- 239000003094 microcapsule Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000004005 microsphere Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 108091005601 modified peptides Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 238000003032 molecular docking Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000329 molecular dynamics simulation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000302 molecular modelling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012900 molecular simulation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000036961 partial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229940023041 peptide vaccine Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 238000002360 preparation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011321 prophylaxis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002285 radioactive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008707 rearrangement Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002829 reductive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009877 rendering Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000717 retained effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002864 sequence alignment Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004088 simulation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004467 single crystal X-ray diffraction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000002784 stomach Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000002560 therapeutic procedure Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229960004799 tryptophan Drugs 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C07—ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C07K—PEPTIDES
- C07K14/00—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof
- C07K14/005—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof from viruses
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C07—ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C07K—PEPTIDES
- C07K14/00—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof
- C07K14/195—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof from bacteria
- C07K14/24—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof from bacteria from Enterobacteriaceae (F), e.g. Citrobacter, Serratia, Proteus, Providencia, Morganella, Yersinia
- C07K14/245—Escherichia (G)
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C07—ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C07K—PEPTIDES
- C07K14/00—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof
- C07K14/435—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof from animals; from humans
- C07K14/705—Receptors; Cell surface antigens; Cell surface determinants
- C07K14/70503—Immunoglobulin superfamily
- C07K14/70539—MHC-molecules, e.g. HLA-molecules
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N33/00—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
- G01N33/48—Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers
- G01N33/50—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing
- G01N33/53—Immunoassay; Biospecific binding assay; Materials therefor
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
- A61K39/00—Medicinal preparations containing antigens or antibodies
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N2760/00—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA ssRNA viruses negative-sense
- C12N2760/00011—Details
- C12N2760/16011—Orthomyxoviridae
- C12N2760/16022—New viral proteins or individual genes, new structural or functional aspects of known viral proteins or genes
Definitions
- This invention relates to a means of predicting potential of a peptide for eliciting immune response.
- MHC major histocompatibility complex
- this invention provides a method for preliminary screening of peptides for ability to elicit an immune response.
- Structural homology techniques were used to model a receptor (the Class II MHC is exemplified) . This model makes it possible to preliminarily screen peptides for antigenic properties. By modifying the peptide to "fit" into the receptor it is possible to identify methods of rendering non-immunogenic peptides immunogenic.
- the preliminary screening of peptides for immunogenicity comprises the steps of (1) creating a molecular model of a recepto followed by minimizing the model created, 2) modeling a peptide to be tested and minimizing the model of the peptide, then testing th fit of the model of the peptide into the model of the receptor to produce a composite minimized receptor/minimized peptide model. Upon finding an acceptable fit, the peptide may then be screened b a binding assay for actual binding to Class II MHC as a further te for immunogenicity.
- the peptide when the model of the peptide can not fitted into the model of the receptor, the peptide will lack immunogenicity. While not all peptide models which can be made to "fit" into to model of the receptor will be effective as immunogen the screening methods of the invention may make it possible to avo undue biological testing of inappropriate peptides. By using the model, it is also possible to alter peptides to accommodate the receptor. Hence, the invention has both predictive and drug desig applications .
- Fig. 1 shows the HLA-aw68 c ⁇ and ot 2 domains with DRl a l and /?, domains.
- Figs. 2-30 are a printout of the minimized coordinates of the receptor.
- Figs. 31 and 32 shows the effects of various peptides inhibiting the binding of labeled hemagglutinin in a competitive binding assay.
- the peptides produced according to the present invention may used alone or chemically bound to another peptide and/or carrier i order to elicit an immune response.
- An immune response is elicite by administering a peptide to an animal in an effective dose and b an effective route of administration.
- the peptide will administered with an immunologically acceptable carrier.
- the rout of administration, dosages, times between multiple administrations will be based on the particular peptide and are standard operation of those skilled in the art.
- a vaccine may be formed with the peptide and any known immunological carrier and may be administered prophylactically or therapeutically.
- the immune response may be elicited for a number of reasons other than for prophylaxis or therapy such as increasing antibody production for the harvesting of antibodies, or increasing specific B-cell or T- cell concentration for the production of hybridomas or cellular therapy.
- the choice of host animals is limited only to those capable of an immune response. Preferred hosts are mammals, more preferred ar humans .
- the vaccine may contain plural peptides with each peptide corresponding to the same or different antigens.
- the peptides may be used unbound or they may be chemically bound to another peptide or an unrelated protein or other molecule.
- a preferred vaccine preparation contains a plurality of peptides chemically bound to a larger more immunogenic peptide.
- the peptide may be adsorbed, bound or encapsulated in a biodegradeable microsphere, microcapsule, larger carrier or a combination of these.
- the carrier may have a slow or controlled release property thereby releasing the peptide under appropriate conditions and times for enhanced immunization. This is particularly important when administering the peptide orally where stomach acid can degrade the peptide.
- Another embodiment of the present invention is to modify the amino acid sequence of a peptide to enhance its immunogenicity. This is done by modifying the natural peptide sequence to bind to the Class II MHC receptor DRl with superior binding affinity for a Class II MHC receptor DRl than the natural peptide sequence. This modified peptide is considered a synthetic peptide. Alternatively, the sequence may be modified to have a greater inhibition of HA (306-318) binding to a Class II MHC receptor DRl.
- amino acid changes are acceptable in the formation of a synthetic peptide.
- the changes may be for similar types of amino acids such as leucine for isoleucine or they may be for diverse types such as tyrosine for lysine.
- the structural homology model for the DRl Class II MHC was constructed using the QUANTA molecular modeling package (vision 3.2, Molecular Simulations, Inc., Burlington, MA) with the CHARMM and Protein Design modules . After alignment of the sequences as described below, gaps and loops were energy minimized using 100 steps of steepest descents minimization followed by 100 steps of adopted basis set Newton-Rapheson (ABNR) minimization. Large gaps were closed using a fragment database from a selected set of high-resolution crystal structures. The resulting structure was minimized in vacuo using 1000 steps of steepest descents followed b an additional 1000 steps of ABNR minimization. A distance related electrostatic function was used in all calculations with a dielectric constant of 1.0.
- Non-bound parameter lists were updated every 20 steps with a cutoff distance of 15.OA.
- Non-bonded calculations were performed using a shifted potential function between 11.OA and 14.OA.
- An extended atom set was used with only polar hydrogen atoms specifically placed. There were no explicit hydrogen bond energy calculations performed.
- HA peptide (the influenza hemagglutinin 307-319 T-cell epitope) was labeled with 125 I . The labeled HA peptides were then allowed to interact with purified DRl molecules during incubation to allow formation of peptide/DRl complexes. After incubation, the peptide/DRl composition was exposed to a native gel for chromatographic separation or passed through a spun column to separate labeled peptide/DRl complex and free labelled peptide.
- the structural homology model was created, the reference molecule being the crystal structure of HLA-aw68.
- the HLA-aw68 coordinates and subsequent sequence were obtained from the entry 2HLA in the Brookhaven Protein Data Bank released January 15, 1991, which is incorporated herein by reference.
- the sequence for the DRl molecule was for the c ⁇ domain was reported by Klein and for the ⁇ domain, the study reported by Todd et al . (Nature 329, 599 (1987)) .
- Both helices hav been observed to be discontinuous in the Class I molecules and are similar in the DRl model.
- the domain helix is long and curves from residues 49 ⁇ to 76 ⁇ without significant disruption. It is essentially a single continuous helix.
- the ⁇ 2 helical region is broken into two separate helices as with the Class I molecules.
- a short helix (52-63) is separated from a longer helix (68-94) by a deformed region without secondary structure. This deformation is more pronounced in the DRl model as opposed to the Class I molecules due to an insertion.
- Influenza Hemagglutinin Peptide with DRl The amino acid residues 307-319 of influenza hemagglutinin (Pro-Lys- Tyr-Val-Lys-Gln-Asn-Thr-Leu-Lys-Leu-Ala-Thr) make up a well-documented linear T-cell epitope which has been shown to be HLA-DRl restricted. With the demonstration that the influenza hemagglutinin epitope (referred to as the HA peptide) binds DRl, it was chosen to be modeled into the binding cleft.
- the peptide was initially inserted into the cleft so that Leu 11 HA was in the vicinity of the hydrophobic pocket . This allowed Asn 7 to be near the middle charged and polar groups of the cleft. The remaining residue of the motif (Lys 2) was near the vicinity of the remaining charged and polar residues at the end of the cleft. The only adjustment to the starting conformation was a slight rearrangement of the terminal peptide proline and Tyr 3 to alleviat obvious bad contacts.
- the binding of the HA-YK peptide (Ala-Ala-Tyr-Ala-Ala-Ala- Ala-Ala-Ala-Lys-Ala-Ala) to the DRl model was tested.
- the lysine would then be in position to interact with the hydrophilic groups in the other half of the cleft.
- the resulting peptide orientation is the opposite that used for the HA and the CS (defined below) peptides. With the peptide oriented as described, the final docking position for the peptide was unclear.
- the hydrophobic pocket is quite large, and, at least in this model, could accommodate the peptide tyrosine in a number of positions by sliding the peptide lengthwise through the cleft.
- repositioning the peptide also repositions the lysine.
- the preferred orientation of the peptide appears to be with the lysine inside the binding cleft region.
- the suspected T-cell epitope for CS3 pilus subunit 63-78 was modeled with the DRl molecule.
- the peptide was inserted with lysine inside the cleft in the hydrophilic region. This placed the Thr 5 in the center of the binding cleft and the tryptophane (residue 8) near the hydrophobic region.
- the resulting minimized model had ten interactions between the peptide and the protein, three interactions with the peptide backbone and five with the peptide side chains. The remaining two were with the amino termina of the peptide. All of the interactions were in either the first three residues, His 10 or Glu 11 in the peptide. No interactions were observed in the center of the cleft or residues four through nine.
- a peptide identified as CFA/1 colonization factor antigen
- CFA/1 colonization factor antigen
- the peptides chosen to dock in the DRl model are shown in Tab 1.
- the peptides were docked manually in several orientations into the DRl model.
- the peptides were then tested in biological bindin assays with the following results:
- the binding energy was calculated as the difference between t final DRl and peptide complex and the sum of the energies for the minimized DR and peptide models individually.
- the data is shown i Table II. Table I I
- Colonization factor antigen IV is an antigen on the surface of many enterotoxigenic E. coli one component of which is CS6.
- CS6 has two major subunits and a number of minor subunits.
- Several peptides from CS6 have been sequenced and assayed for potential inhibition of radiolabeled HA (306-318) /DRl complex as a measure of immunogenicity. The sequences of the subunits are shown in Table III.
Abstract
Assay methods for determining whether a peptide is likely to be immunogenic are based on a computer modeling of binding to a Class II MHC DR1 receptor. This is confirmed by competitive inhibition binding assays. The peptides are useful for eliciting an immune response for vaccination or the production of antibodies or T-cells.
Description
MODEL FOR TESTING IMMUNOGENICITY OF PEPTIDES
Government Interest The invention described herein may be manufactured, licensed and used by or for governmental purposes without the payment of any royalties to us thereon.
Cross Reference This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Patent application Serial No. 08/064,559, filed May 21, 1993, and the present application incorporates U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 08/064,559 in its entirety by reference.
Field of the Invention:
This invention relates to a means of predicting potential of a peptide for eliciting immune response.
Background of the Invention: Among the numerous steps required for an immunological response to occur is the presentation of the antigen by macrophages to the B-cell or T-cell. This presentation is mediated by the Class I and Class II major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules on the surface of the cell. The MHC molecules hold antigens in the form of the peptide fragments and together with the receptor molecule on the T-cells, form a macromolecular complex that induces a response in the T-cell. Therefore, a necessary step in an immune response is the binding of the antigen to the MHC.
Recent single crystal X-ray structures of human and murine Class I MHC's have been reported. Analysis of these crystal structures have shown that antigenic peptides lie in the so-called binding cleft for presentation to the T-cell. This cleft is formed by aϊ and a2 domains and by β-strands from each domain forming the floor. Furthermore, the sequence polymorphism among Class I molecules can result in alterations of the surface of the cleft forming different pockets. Peptide side chains may insert into these pockets. Thus, different pockets may interact with different side chains. This implies the mechanism for the peptide specificity of Class I MHC's. Peptides bound to the Class I MHC's in the crystal structures were found to have both the amino and carboxy termini tightly held by the MHC. There were few interactions near the middle of the cleft. Hence the bound peptide is allowed to bend slightly in the center. The observed binding mode helped to explain the apparent partial specificity of peptide sequence and the allowed variation in peptide length found among peptides isolated from Class I MHC's.
The precise mode of binding of peptides to Class II MHC molecules is less clear. While a single crystal X-ray diffraction structure for the HLA-DRl MHC has been shown, the coordinates have remained unavailable. However, currently available theoretical and experimental results help form a hypothesis that the binding of a peptide to Class II MHC is similar to that observed with Class I. First, it is noted that the Class II binding cleft is structurally similar to
that of Class I . This was concluded based upon a sequence analysis of 26 Class I and 54 Class II amino acid sequences.
Unlike with Class I molecules, self-peptides isolated from murine I-Ab and I-Eb, from murine I-Ad and from human HLA-DRl molecules were found to be varied in size (13 to 25 residues long) . The peptides isolated from the murine I-Ab and I-Eb molecules had heterogenous carboxy termini while those from I-Ad and HLA-DRl had ragged termini at both ends. The varying lengths indicate that the amino and carboxy termini of the peptides were not critical for the binding. One or both termini may protrude from the binding site and be available for further processing. The residues critical for binding were proposed to be at the ends of the peptide as opposed to the center.
Summary of the Invention:
It is the purpose of this invention to provide a method for preliminary screening of peptides for ability to elicit an immune response. Structural homology techniques were used to model a receptor (the Class II MHC is exemplified) . This model makes it possible to preliminarily screen peptides for antigenic properties. By modifying the peptide to "fit" into the receptor it is possible to identify methods of rendering non-immunogenic peptides immunogenic. The preliminary screening of peptides for immunogenicity comprises the steps of (1) creating a molecular model of a recepto followed by minimizing the model created, 2) modeling a peptide to be tested and minimizing the model of the peptide, then testing th
fit of the model of the peptide into the model of the receptor to produce a composite minimized receptor/minimized peptide model. Upon finding an acceptable fit, the peptide may then be screened b a binding assay for actual binding to Class II MHC as a further te for immunogenicity.
It has been found that when the model of the peptide can not fitted into the model of the receptor, the peptide will lack immunogenicity. While not all peptide models which can be made to "fit" into to model of the receptor will be effective as immunogen the screening methods of the invention may make it possible to avo undue biological testing of inappropriate peptides. By using the model, it is also possible to alter peptides to accommodate the receptor. Hence, the invention has both predictive and drug desig applications .
Brief Description of the Figures:
Fig. 1 shows the HLA-aw68 c^ and ot2 domains with DRl al and /?, domains.
Figs. 2-30 are a printout of the minimized coordinates of the receptor.
Figs. 31 and 32 shows the effects of various peptides inhibiting the binding of labeled hemagglutinin in a competitive binding assay.
Detailed Description of the Invention:
In order to understand and better predict peptide interaction with Class II MHC's and as an aid for synthetic peptide vaccine design, a structural homology model of HLA-DRl molecule was made
using the Class I HLA-aw68 as a reference molecule. For purposes o this analysis, numerous conserved residues were aligned leading to proposed three-dimensional model for the Class II structure very similar to that of Class I . This model retained the overall conformation of a Class I MHC and agreed with a considerable amount of the published data. Furthermore, peptides shown to bind to DRl were docked in the binding cleft of the model and analyzed. The results agree with the experimental binding data presented here. Hence, it is shown that the structural homology model reported here is useful for screening Class II MHC functionality.
It had been hypothesized that few peptide residues may be required for binding to DRl . By substituting residues into the influenza hemagglutinin 307-319 T-cell epitope (HA) it had been determined that a single tyrosine at 308 was required for binding. A synthetic peptide with the tyrosine at position 308 and a lysine at 315 was found to bind DRl as well as the native peptide. Hence, it was concluded that few peptide residues determine the high affinity binding to DRl .
The peptides produced according to the present invention may used alone or chemically bound to another peptide and/or carrier i order to elicit an immune response. An immune response is elicite by administering a peptide to an animal in an effective dose and b an effective route of administration. Typically the peptide will administered with an immunologically acceptable carrier. The rout of administration, dosages, times between multiple administrations will be based on the particular peptide and are standard operation of those skilled in the art.
Of particular interest are peptides from pathogenic microorganisms and neoplasms. In such an example, a vaccine may be formed with the peptide and any known immunological carrier and may be administered prophylactically or therapeutically. The immune response may be elicited for a number of reasons other than for prophylaxis or therapy such as increasing antibody production for the harvesting of antibodies, or increasing specific B-cell or T- cell concentration for the production of hybridomas or cellular therapy. The choice of host animals is limited only to those capable of an immune response. Preferred hosts are mammals, more preferred ar humans .
The vaccine may contain plural peptides with each peptide corresponding to the same or different antigens. The peptides may be used unbound or they may be chemically bound to another peptide or an unrelated protein or other molecule. A preferred vaccine preparation contains a plurality of peptides chemically bound to a larger more immunogenic peptide.
The peptide may be adsorbed, bound or encapsulated in a biodegradeable microsphere, microcapsule, larger carrier or a combination of these. The carrier may have a slow or controlled release property thereby releasing the peptide under appropriate conditions and times for enhanced immunization. This is particularly important when administering the peptide orally where stomach acid can degrade the peptide.
Another embodiment of the present invention is to modify the amino acid sequence of a peptide to enhance its immunogenicity. This is done by modifying the natural peptide sequence to bind to
the Class II MHC receptor DRl with superior binding affinity for a Class II MHC receptor DRl than the natural peptide sequence. This modified peptide is considered a synthetic peptide. Alternatively, the sequence may be modified to have a greater inhibition of HA (306-318) binding to a Class II MHC receptor DRl.
Many amino acid changes are acceptable in the formation of a synthetic peptide. The changes may be for similar types of amino acids such as leucine for isoleucine or they may be for diverse types such as tyrosine for lysine.
Materials and Methods :
The structural homology model for the DRl Class II MHC was constructed using the QUANTA molecular modeling package (vision 3.2, Molecular Simulations, Inc., Burlington, MA) with the CHARMM and Protein Design modules . After alignment of the sequences as described below, gaps and loops were energy minimized using 100 steps of steepest descents minimization followed by 100 steps of adopted basis set Newton-Rapheson (ABNR) minimization. Large gaps were closed using a fragment database from a selected set of high-resolution crystal structures. The resulting structure was minimized in vacuo using 1000 steps of steepest descents followed b an additional 1000 steps of ABNR minimization. A distance related electrostatic function was used in all calculations with a dielectric constant of 1.0. Non-bound parameter lists were updated every 20 steps with a cutoff distance of 15.OA. Non-bonded calculations were performed using a shifted potential function between 11.OA and 14.OA. An extended atom set was used with only
polar hydrogen atoms specifically placed. There were no explicit hydrogen bond energy calculations performed.
All peptides were initially modeled using QUANTA in an extend chain conformation and subjected to 500 steps of ABNR minimization. The resulting structures remained essentially in extended chain conformations. Individual peptides were manually docked in severa different orientations into the binding cleft region of the minimized DRl structure. The resulting bimolecular complex was subjected to 5000 steps of steepest descents minimization with non-bonded interactions updated every five steps. After minimization, bound peptides remained essentially in extended chai conformations. The lowest energy complexes for each peptide were selected for further analysis.
The selected peptide and DRl complexes and the minimized DRl model were subjected to the following molecular dynamics regimen:
300 steps of heating to 300°K, 600 steps of equilibration at 300°K, and 1100 steps of production dynamics. During this simulation, th DRl Cc. atoms were constrained in their starting positions. All non-bonded interaction parameters were as stated for the minimization procedure. The lowest energy structure during the course of the production dynamics was selected and subjected to th 5000 step minimization procedure described previously with the Cα restraints removed. The resulting structures were used for the binding energy calculations and for hydrogen bonding analysis. Hydrogen bonds were determined using the QUANTA default parameters. Maximum allowed distances were 2.5A between a hydroge and the acceptor atom and 3.3A between the donor and acceptor atom
The minimum angle allowed between any set of atoms forming a hydrogen bond was 90°.
Competitive Inhibition Binding Assay: HA peptide (the influenza hemagglutinin 307-319 T-cell epitope) was labeled with 125I . The labeled HA peptides were then allowed to interact with purified DRl molecules during incubation to allow formation of peptide/DRl complexes. After incubation, the peptide/DRl composition was exposed to a native gel for chromatographic separation or passed through a spun column to separate labeled peptide/DRl complex and free labelled peptide. When unlabeled peptides were added before incubation of labeled HA peptides and DRl, and if the unlabelled peptides had capacity for binding to DRl simultaneous with 125I-HA, there was a resultant decrease in radioactive signal associated with the DRl . The extent of this decrease directly related to the binding capacity of the unlabeled unknown peptide.
Structural Homology Model for the DRl Molecule: The structural homology model was created, the reference molecule being the crystal structure of HLA-aw68. The HLA-aw68 coordinates and subsequent sequence were obtained from the entry 2HLA in the Brookhaven Protein Data Bank released January 15, 1991, which is incorporated herein by reference. The sequence for the DRl molecule was for the c^ domain was reported by Klein and for the β domain, the study reported by Todd et al . (Nature 329, 599 (1987)) .
The sequence alignment is based on Brown et al . (Nature 332, 845 (1988) ) . The complete alignment and numbering scheme for both
are seen in Figure 1. The Class II, /3, and Class I a2 domains regions were conserved with some variations at the ends where the two MHC's have different loop regions. The fourth B-strand in the domain of HLA-aw68 (residues 30-38) is disrupted in the DRl model. Only three residues are in a β-sheet conformation, probably due to the inserted glycine at position 28 before the strand and the large deletion in the loop region immediately after the strand. Th two alpha-helical regions are clearly maintained. Both helices hav been observed to be discontinuous in the Class I molecules and are similar in the DRl model. The domain helix is long and curves from residues 49α to 76α without significant disruption. It is essentially a single continuous helix. However, the α2 helical region is broken into two separate helices as with the Class I molecules. A short helix (52-63) is separated from a longer helix (68-94) by a deformed region without secondary structure. This deformation is more pronounced in the DRl model as opposed to the Class I molecules due to an insertion.
Influenza Hemagglutinin Peptide with DRl: The amino acid residues 307-319 of influenza hemagglutinin (Pro-Lys- Tyr-Val-Lys-Gln-Asn-Thr-Leu-Lys-Leu-Ala-Thr) make up a well-documented linear T-cell epitope which has been shown to be HLA-DRl restricted. With the demonstration that the influenza hemagglutinin epitope (referred to as the HA peptide) binds DRl, it was chosen to be modeled into the binding cleft.
The peptide was initially inserted into the cleft so that Leu 11 HA was in the vicinity of the hydrophobic pocket . This allowed Asn 7 to be near the middle charged and polar groups of the cleft.
The remaining residue of the motif (Lys 2) was near the vicinity of the remaining charged and polar residues at the end of the cleft. The only adjustment to the starting conformation was a slight rearrangement of the terminal peptide proline and Tyr 3 to alleviat obvious bad contacts.
After the energy minimization of the bimolecular complex, the total energy was reduced to 483 kcal/mol . This reduction in energy was accomplished by alleviation of several bad contacts and also be formation of several hydrogen bonds. The sticking feature of this mode is lack of hydrogen bonds in the carboxy terminal half of the peptide. Only one hydrogen bond is identified between the backbone carbonyl group of Leu 9 and the side chain of the JSJ Asn 77. In contrast, the amino terminal half has eleven identified interactions. Four of these interaction involve the peptide backbone residues Tyr 3, Val 4, and Gin 6. The remainder involve the side chains of Lys 2, Tyr 3, Lys 5 and Gin 6. Interestingly, Lys 5 is involved in more interactions (three) than Lys 2 (only 2) . No interactions were observed as anticipated with Asn 7. Instead, it was the glutamine at position 6 donating a hydrogen bond to the Asn 62. No interactions were observed for the amino and carboxy termini.
HA-YK Peptide with DRl:
The binding of the HA-YK peptide (Ala-Ala-Tyr-Ala-Ala-Ala- Ala-Ala-Ala-Lys-Ala-Ala) to the DRl model was tested. In aligning the peptide in the cleft, it was deemed logical to insert the tyrosine residue into the hydrophobic region of the binding cleft. The lysine would then be in position to interact with the
hydrophilic groups in the other half of the cleft. The resulting peptide orientation is the opposite that used for the HA and the CS (defined below) peptides. With the peptide oriented as described, the final docking position for the peptide was unclear. The hydrophobic pocket is quite large, and, at least in this model, could accommodate the peptide tyrosine in a number of positions by sliding the peptide lengthwise through the cleft. However, repositioning the peptide also repositions the lysine. There were primarily two positions for the lysine: one with the lysine inside the cleft and the second with it outside. Of the two positions, th former was the lower in energy by 46 kcal/mol and had the greater number of interactions with the protein- (11 vs. 7) . Thus, the preferred orientation of the peptide appears to be with the lysine inside the binding cleft region.
CS3 subunit Pilin Peptide with DRl:
The suspected T-cell epitope for CS3 pilus subunit 63-78 (Ser-Lys-Asn-Gly-Thr-Val-Thr-Trp-Ala-His-Glu-Thr-Asn-Asn-Ser-Ala) was modeled with the DRl molecule. The peptide was inserted with lysine inside the cleft in the hydrophilic region. This placed the Thr 5 in the center of the binding cleft and the tryptophane (residue 8) near the hydrophobic region. The resulting minimized model had ten interactions between the peptide and the protein, three interactions with the peptide backbone and five with the peptide side chains. The remaining two were with the amino termina of the peptide. All of the interactions were in either the first three residues, His 10 or Glu 11 in the peptide. No interactions
were observed in the center of the cleft or residues four through nine.
CFA/1 with DRl:
A peptide identified as CFA/1 (colonization factor antigen) (Val-Gly-Lys-Asn-Ile-Thr-Val-Thr-Ala-Ser-Val-Asp-Pro) was prepared and an attempt was made to "fit" the molecule into the cleft of th DRl. The lysine at position 3 prevented insertion of the peptide.
Results:
The peptides chosen to dock in the DRl model are shown in Tab 1. The peptides were docked manually in several orientations into the DRl model. The peptides were then tested in biological bindin assays with the following results:
Table I
Peptide Molecular Model Binding in the predicted binding bioassay
HA (influenza Yes Yes hemagglutinin)
HA-YK (synthetic Yes Yes peptide)
CS3 Pilin subunit Yes Yes
CFA/1 No No
Quantitative measurement of the inhibition of CS3 63-78 and H 306-318 as compared to controls is shown in Fig. 31.
The binding energy was calculated as the difference between t final DRl and peptide complex and the sum of the energies for the minimized DR and peptide models individually. The data is shown i Table II.
Table I I
Peptide Protein Residues Sequence Binding
Energy
(kcal/mol)
HA Influenza 306-318 PKYVKQNTLKLAT -283 hemagglutinin
HA-YK synthetic AAYAAAAAAKAA -216 peptide
CS3 CS3 pilin 63-78 SKNGTVTWAHETNNSA -245 subunit
CS6α and CS6β with DRl
Colonization factor antigen IV (CFA/IV is an antigen on the surface of many enterotoxigenic E. coli one component of which is CS6. CS6 has two major subunits and a number of minor subunits. Several peptides from CS6 have been sequenced and assayed for potential inhibition of radiolabeled HA (306-318) /DRl complex as a measure of immunogenicity. The sequences of the subunits are shown in Table III.
Table III
Peptide Amino Acid Residues Sequence
CS6α6 63-75 DEYGLGRLVNTAD
CS6C.7 80-92 IIYQIVDEKGKKK
CS6α8 111-123 LNYTSGEKKISPG
CS6S1 3-15 WQYKSLDVNVNIE
CS6S2 42-54 QLYTVEMTIPAGV
CS6β3 112-124 TSYTFSAIYTGGE
CS6S4 123-135 GEYPNSGYSSGTY
CS6S5 133-145 GTYAGHLTVSFYS
These peptides were assayed for inhibition of radioactively labeled HA(306-318) /DRl. The results are demonstrated in Fig. 32
The foregoing description of the specific embodiments reveal the general nature of the invention so that others can, by applying current knowledge, readily modify and/or adapt for various applications such specific embodiments without departing from the generic concept, and, therefore, such adaptations and modifications should and are intended to be comprehended within the meaning and range of equivalents of the disclosed embodiments. It is to be understood that the phraseology or terminology employed herein is for the purpose of description and not of limitation. All references mentioned in this application are incorporated by reference.
Claims
1. A method of preliminarily screening peptides for immunogenicit comprising the steps of: 1) creating a molecular model of receptor DRl Class II MHC and minimizing the model of the DRl;
2) modeling a peptide to be tested and minimizing the model of the peptide; and
3) testing fit of model obtained in step 2 into the model obtained in step 1 to produce a composite receptor/peptide model.
2. A computerized model comprising a model of the DRl molecule having fitted in a cleft therein a model of a peptide.
3. A method of claim 1 wherein, additionally, the receptor/peptid model is subjected to computer-simulated heating.
4. A method of claim 1 further comprising, assaying the peptide b competitive inhibition binding to a Class II MHC receptor DRl.
5. A minimized peptide capable of binding to a Class II MHC receptor DRl and inhibiting the binding of HA (306-318) .
6. A synthetic peptide, wherein the amino acid sequence of the minimized peptide according to claim 5 has been modified to have a superior binding affinity for a Class II MHC receptor DRl to form a least a portion of the synthetic peptide.
7. A synthetic peptide, wherein the amino acid sequence of the minimized peptide according to claim 5, has been modified to have greater inhibition of HA (306-318) binding to a Class II MHC receptor DRl to form at least a portion of the synthetic peptide.
8. A synthetic peptide according to claim 6, wherein an amino aci has been modified from a charged amino acid to an uncharged amino acid.
9. A synthetic peptide according to claim 7, wherein an amino aci has been modified from a charged amino acid to an uncharged amino acid.
10. A synthetic peptide according to claim 8, wherein said uncharged amino acid is alanine.
11. A synthetic peptide according to claim 9, wherein said uncharged amino acid is alanine.
12. A minimized peptide according to claim 5, wherein the sequence is selected from the group consisting of PKYVKQNTLKLAT, AAYAAAAAAK and SKNGTVTWAHETNNSA.
13. A minimized peptide according to claim 5, wherein the sequenc is contained in a CFA.
14. A minimized peptide according to claim 13, wherein the sequenc is selected from the group consisting of DEYGLGRLVNTAD, IIYQIVDEKGKKK, LNYTSGEKKISPG, WQYKSLDVNVNIE, QLYTVEMTIPAGV, TSYTFSAIYTGGE, GEYPNSGYSSGTY and GTYAGHLTVSFYS.
15. A vaccine comprising: a minimized peptide according to claim 5; and an immunologically acceptable carrier.
16. A vaccine comprising: a synthetic peptide according to claim 6; and an immunologically acceptable carrier.
17. A vaccine comprising: a synthetic peptide according to claim 7; and an immunologically acceptable carrier.
18. A method of eliciting an immune response in an animal comprising administering said animal with the vaccine according to claim 15.
19. A method of eliciting an immune response in an animal comprising administering said animal with the vaccine according to claim 16.
20. A method of eliciting an immune response in an animal comprising administering said animal with the vaccine according to claim 17.
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US1994/005697 WO1995031997A1 (en) | 1994-05-20 | 1994-05-20 | Model for testing immunogenicity of peptides |
AU72429/94A AU7242994A (en) | 1994-05-20 | 1994-05-20 | Model for testing immunogenicity of peptides |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US1994/005697 WO1995031997A1 (en) | 1994-05-20 | 1994-05-20 | Model for testing immunogenicity of peptides |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO1995031997A1 true WO1995031997A1 (en) | 1995-11-30 |
Family
ID=22242593
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US1994/005697 WO1995031997A1 (en) | 1994-05-20 | 1994-05-20 | Model for testing immunogenicity of peptides |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
AU (1) | AU7242994A (en) |
WO (1) | WO1995031997A1 (en) |
Cited By (42)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2000005249A2 (en) * | 1998-07-23 | 2000-02-03 | The President And Fellows Of Harvard College | Synthetic peptides and methods of use for autoimmune disease therapies |
EP1098902A1 (en) * | 1998-07-23 | 2001-05-16 | Yeda Research And Development Co. Ltd. | Treatment of autoimmune conditions with copolymer 1 and related copolymers and peptides |
EP1128839A1 (en) * | 1998-11-12 | 2001-09-05 | Yeda Research And Development Company, Ltd. | Pharmaceutical compositions comprising synthetic peptide copolymers and methods for preventing and treating gvhd and hvgd |
US6800287B2 (en) | 1998-09-25 | 2004-10-05 | Yeda Research And Development Co., Ltd. | Copolymer 1 related polypeptides for use as molecular weight markers and for therapeutic use |
US6800285B2 (en) | 2000-06-20 | 2004-10-05 | Moses Rodriguez | Treatment of central nervous system diseases by antibodies against glatiramer acetate |
US7022663B2 (en) | 2000-02-18 | 2006-04-04 | Yeda Research And Development Co., Ltd. | Oral, nasal and pulmonary dosage formulations of copolymer 1 |
US7033582B2 (en) | 2000-06-05 | 2006-04-25 | Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd. | Use of glatiramer acetate (copolymer 1) in the treatment of central nervous system disorders |
US7053043B1 (en) | 1999-07-23 | 2006-05-30 | Yeda Research And Development Co.Ltd. | Pharmaceutical compositions comprising synthetic peptide copolymers and methods for preventing and treating GVHD and HVGD |
US7425332B2 (en) | 1998-07-23 | 2008-09-16 | Yeda Research And Development Co., Ltd. | Treatment of autoimmune conditions with Copolymer 1 and related Copolymers |
US7429374B2 (en) | 2001-12-04 | 2008-09-30 | Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd. | Process for the measurement of the potency of glatiramer acetate |
US7666592B2 (en) | 2004-02-18 | 2010-02-23 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Methods for concurrent identification and quantification of an unknown bioagent |
US7956175B2 (en) | 2003-09-11 | 2011-06-07 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Compositions for use in identification of bacteria |
US7964343B2 (en) | 2003-05-13 | 2011-06-21 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Method for rapid purification of nucleic acids for subsequent analysis by mass spectrometry by solution capture |
US8017358B2 (en) | 2001-03-02 | 2011-09-13 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Method for rapid detection and identification of bioagents |
US8026084B2 (en) | 2005-07-21 | 2011-09-27 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Methods for rapid identification and quantitation of nucleic acid variants |
US8057993B2 (en) | 2003-04-26 | 2011-11-15 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Methods for identification of coronaviruses |
US8073627B2 (en) | 2001-06-26 | 2011-12-06 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | System for indentification of pathogens |
US8084207B2 (en) | 2005-03-03 | 2011-12-27 | Ibis Bioscience, Inc. | Compositions for use in identification of papillomavirus |
US8097416B2 (en) | 2003-09-11 | 2012-01-17 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Methods for identification of sepsis-causing bacteria |
US8148163B2 (en) | 2008-09-16 | 2012-04-03 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Sample processing units, systems, and related methods |
US8158354B2 (en) | 2003-05-13 | 2012-04-17 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Methods for rapid purification of nucleic acids for subsequent analysis by mass spectrometry by solution capture |
US8158936B2 (en) | 2009-02-12 | 2012-04-17 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Ionization probe assemblies |
US8163895B2 (en) | 2003-12-05 | 2012-04-24 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Compositions for use in identification of orthopoxviruses |
US8173957B2 (en) | 2004-05-24 | 2012-05-08 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Mass spectrometry with selective ion filtration by digital thresholding |
US8182992B2 (en) | 2005-03-03 | 2012-05-22 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Compositions for use in identification of adventitious viruses |
US8214154B2 (en) | 2001-03-02 | 2012-07-03 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Systems for rapid identification of pathogens in humans and animals |
US8268565B2 (en) | 2001-03-02 | 2012-09-18 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Methods for identifying bioagents |
US8298760B2 (en) | 2001-06-26 | 2012-10-30 | Ibis Bioscience, Inc. | Secondary structure defining database and methods for determining identity and geographic origin of an unknown bioagent thereby |
US8343500B2 (en) | 2000-08-21 | 2013-01-01 | Apitope Technology (Bristol) Limited | Peptide composition |
US8407010B2 (en) | 2004-05-25 | 2013-03-26 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Methods for rapid forensic analysis of mitochondrial DNA |
US8534447B2 (en) | 2008-09-16 | 2013-09-17 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Microplate handling systems and related computer program products and methods |
US8546082B2 (en) | 2003-09-11 | 2013-10-01 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Methods for identification of sepsis-causing bacteria |
US8550694B2 (en) | 2008-09-16 | 2013-10-08 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Mixing cartridges, mixing stations, and related kits, systems, and methods |
US8563250B2 (en) | 2001-03-02 | 2013-10-22 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Methods for identifying bioagents |
US8822156B2 (en) | 2002-12-06 | 2014-09-02 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Methods for rapid identification of pathogens in humans and animals |
US8871471B2 (en) | 2007-02-23 | 2014-10-28 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Methods for rapid forensic DNA analysis |
US8950604B2 (en) | 2009-07-17 | 2015-02-10 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Lift and mount apparatus |
US9149473B2 (en) | 2006-09-14 | 2015-10-06 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Targeted whole genome amplification method for identification of pathogens |
US9194877B2 (en) | 2009-07-17 | 2015-11-24 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Systems for bioagent indentification |
US9598724B2 (en) | 2007-06-01 | 2017-03-21 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Methods and compositions for multiple displacement amplification of nucleic acids |
US9873906B2 (en) | 2004-07-14 | 2018-01-23 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Methods for repairing degraded DNA |
US9890408B2 (en) | 2009-10-15 | 2018-02-13 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Multiple displacement amplification |
-
1994
- 1994-05-20 AU AU72429/94A patent/AU7242994A/en not_active Abandoned
- 1994-05-20 WO PCT/US1994/005697 patent/WO1995031997A1/en active Application Filing
Non-Patent Citations (5)
Cited By (75)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2000005249A2 (en) * | 1998-07-23 | 2000-02-03 | The President And Fellows Of Harvard College | Synthetic peptides and methods of use for autoimmune disease therapies |
WO2000005249A3 (en) * | 1998-07-23 | 2000-10-05 | Harvard College | Synthetic peptides and methods of use for autoimmune disease therapies |
EP1098902A1 (en) * | 1998-07-23 | 2001-05-16 | Yeda Research And Development Co. Ltd. | Treatment of autoimmune conditions with copolymer 1 and related copolymers and peptides |
US7425332B2 (en) | 1998-07-23 | 2008-09-16 | Yeda Research And Development Co., Ltd. | Treatment of autoimmune conditions with Copolymer 1 and related Copolymers |
EP1098902A4 (en) * | 1998-07-23 | 2002-07-24 | Yeda Res & Dev | Treatment of autoimmune conditions with copolymer 1 and related copolymers and peptides |
US7279172B2 (en) | 1998-07-23 | 2007-10-09 | Yeda Research And Development Co., Ltd. | Treatment of autoimmune conditions with copolymer 1 and related copolymers |
US7566767B2 (en) | 1998-07-23 | 2009-07-28 | President And Fellows Of Harvard College | Synthetic peptides and methods of use for autoimmune disease therapies |
US7615359B2 (en) | 1998-09-25 | 2009-11-10 | Yeda Research And Development Co., Ltd. | Copolymer 1 related polypeptides for use as molecular weight markers and for therapeutic use |
US8399211B2 (en) | 1998-09-25 | 2013-03-19 | Yeda Research And Development Co., Ltd. | Copolymer 1 related polypeptides for use as molecular weight markers and for therapeutic use |
US6800287B2 (en) | 1998-09-25 | 2004-10-05 | Yeda Research And Development Co., Ltd. | Copolymer 1 related polypeptides for use as molecular weight markers and for therapeutic use |
US7074580B2 (en) | 1998-09-25 | 2006-07-11 | Yeda Research And Development Co., Ltd. | Copolymer 1 related polypeptides for use as molecular weight markers and for therapeutic use |
US7163802B2 (en) | 1998-09-25 | 2007-01-16 | Yeda Research And Development Co., Ltd. | Copolymer 1 related polypeptides for use as molecular weight markers and for therapeutic use |
EP1128839A4 (en) * | 1998-11-12 | 2002-10-09 | Yeda Res & Dev | Pharmaceutical compositions comprising synthetic peptide copolymers and methods for preventing and treating gvhd and hvgd |
EP1128839A1 (en) * | 1998-11-12 | 2001-09-05 | Yeda Research And Development Company, Ltd. | Pharmaceutical compositions comprising synthetic peptide copolymers and methods for preventing and treating gvhd and hvgd |
US7053043B1 (en) | 1999-07-23 | 2006-05-30 | Yeda Research And Development Co.Ltd. | Pharmaceutical compositions comprising synthetic peptide copolymers and methods for preventing and treating GVHD and HVGD |
US7022663B2 (en) | 2000-02-18 | 2006-04-04 | Yeda Research And Development Co., Ltd. | Oral, nasal and pulmonary dosage formulations of copolymer 1 |
US7033582B2 (en) | 2000-06-05 | 2006-04-25 | Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd. | Use of glatiramer acetate (copolymer 1) in the treatment of central nervous system disorders |
US6800285B2 (en) | 2000-06-20 | 2004-10-05 | Moses Rodriguez | Treatment of central nervous system diseases by antibodies against glatiramer acetate |
US8961986B2 (en) | 2000-08-21 | 2015-02-24 | Apitope Technology (Bristol) Limited | Peptide composition |
US8343500B2 (en) | 2000-08-21 | 2013-01-01 | Apitope Technology (Bristol) Limited | Peptide composition |
US8802372B2 (en) | 2001-03-02 | 2014-08-12 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Methods for rapid forensic analysis of mitochondrial DNA and characterization of mitochondrial DNA heteroplasmy |
US8815513B2 (en) | 2001-03-02 | 2014-08-26 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Method for rapid detection and identification of bioagents in epidemiological and forensic investigations |
US8017358B2 (en) | 2001-03-02 | 2011-09-13 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Method for rapid detection and identification of bioagents |
US9752184B2 (en) | 2001-03-02 | 2017-09-05 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Methods for rapid forensic analysis of mitochondrial DNA and characterization of mitochondrial DNA heteroplasmy |
US8563250B2 (en) | 2001-03-02 | 2013-10-22 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Methods for identifying bioagents |
US8214154B2 (en) | 2001-03-02 | 2012-07-03 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Systems for rapid identification of pathogens in humans and animals |
US9416424B2 (en) | 2001-03-02 | 2016-08-16 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Methods for rapid identification of pathogens in humans and animals |
US8268565B2 (en) | 2001-03-02 | 2012-09-18 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Methods for identifying bioagents |
US8265878B2 (en) | 2001-03-02 | 2012-09-11 | Ibis Bioscience, Inc. | Method for rapid detection and identification of bioagents |
US8921047B2 (en) | 2001-06-26 | 2014-12-30 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Secondary structure defining database and methods for determining identity and geographic origin of an unknown bioagent thereby |
US8073627B2 (en) | 2001-06-26 | 2011-12-06 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | System for indentification of pathogens |
US8380442B2 (en) | 2001-06-26 | 2013-02-19 | Ibis Bioscience, Inc. | Secondary structure defining database and methods for determining identity and geographic origin of an unknown bioagent thereby |
US8298760B2 (en) | 2001-06-26 | 2012-10-30 | Ibis Bioscience, Inc. | Secondary structure defining database and methods for determining identity and geographic origin of an unknown bioagent thereby |
US7923215B2 (en) | 2001-12-04 | 2011-04-12 | Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd. | Process for the measurement of the potency of glatiramer acetate |
US8389228B2 (en) | 2001-12-04 | 2013-03-05 | Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd. | Process for the measurement of the potency of glatiramer acetate |
US7429374B2 (en) | 2001-12-04 | 2008-09-30 | Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd. | Process for the measurement of the potency of glatiramer acetate |
US8822156B2 (en) | 2002-12-06 | 2014-09-02 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Methods for rapid identification of pathogens in humans and animals |
US9725771B2 (en) | 2002-12-06 | 2017-08-08 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Methods for rapid identification of pathogens in humans and animals |
US8057993B2 (en) | 2003-04-26 | 2011-11-15 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Methods for identification of coronaviruses |
US7964343B2 (en) | 2003-05-13 | 2011-06-21 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Method for rapid purification of nucleic acids for subsequent analysis by mass spectrometry by solution capture |
US8476415B2 (en) | 2003-05-13 | 2013-07-02 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Methods for rapid purification of nucleic acids for subsequent analysis by mass spectrometry by solution capture |
US8158354B2 (en) | 2003-05-13 | 2012-04-17 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Methods for rapid purification of nucleic acids for subsequent analysis by mass spectrometry by solution capture |
US8097416B2 (en) | 2003-09-11 | 2012-01-17 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Methods for identification of sepsis-causing bacteria |
US7956175B2 (en) | 2003-09-11 | 2011-06-07 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Compositions for use in identification of bacteria |
US8013142B2 (en) | 2003-09-11 | 2011-09-06 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Compositions for use in identification of bacteria |
US8546082B2 (en) | 2003-09-11 | 2013-10-01 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Methods for identification of sepsis-causing bacteria |
US8163895B2 (en) | 2003-12-05 | 2012-04-24 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Compositions for use in identification of orthopoxviruses |
US7666592B2 (en) | 2004-02-18 | 2010-02-23 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Methods for concurrent identification and quantification of an unknown bioagent |
US9447462B2 (en) | 2004-02-18 | 2016-09-20 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Methods for concurrent identification and quantification of an unknown bioagent |
US8187814B2 (en) | 2004-02-18 | 2012-05-29 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Methods for concurrent identification and quantification of an unknown bioagent |
US9449802B2 (en) | 2004-05-24 | 2016-09-20 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Mass spectrometry with selective ion filtration by digital thresholding |
US8987660B2 (en) | 2004-05-24 | 2015-03-24 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Mass spectrometry with selective ion filtration by digital thresholding |
US8173957B2 (en) | 2004-05-24 | 2012-05-08 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Mass spectrometry with selective ion filtration by digital thresholding |
US8407010B2 (en) | 2004-05-25 | 2013-03-26 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Methods for rapid forensic analysis of mitochondrial DNA |
US9873906B2 (en) | 2004-07-14 | 2018-01-23 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Methods for repairing degraded DNA |
US8084207B2 (en) | 2005-03-03 | 2011-12-27 | Ibis Bioscience, Inc. | Compositions for use in identification of papillomavirus |
US8182992B2 (en) | 2005-03-03 | 2012-05-22 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Compositions for use in identification of adventitious viruses |
US8026084B2 (en) | 2005-07-21 | 2011-09-27 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Methods for rapid identification and quantitation of nucleic acid variants |
US8551738B2 (en) | 2005-07-21 | 2013-10-08 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Systems and methods for rapid identification of nucleic acid variants |
US9149473B2 (en) | 2006-09-14 | 2015-10-06 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Targeted whole genome amplification method for identification of pathogens |
US8871471B2 (en) | 2007-02-23 | 2014-10-28 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Methods for rapid forensic DNA analysis |
US9598724B2 (en) | 2007-06-01 | 2017-03-21 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Methods and compositions for multiple displacement amplification of nucleic acids |
US9023655B2 (en) | 2008-09-16 | 2015-05-05 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Sample processing units, systems, and related methods |
US9027730B2 (en) | 2008-09-16 | 2015-05-12 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Microplate handling systems and related computer program products and methods |
US8609430B2 (en) | 2008-09-16 | 2013-12-17 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Sample processing units, systems, and related methods |
US8550694B2 (en) | 2008-09-16 | 2013-10-08 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Mixing cartridges, mixing stations, and related kits, systems, and methods |
US8534447B2 (en) | 2008-09-16 | 2013-09-17 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Microplate handling systems and related computer program products and methods |
US8148163B2 (en) | 2008-09-16 | 2012-04-03 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Sample processing units, systems, and related methods |
US8252599B2 (en) | 2008-09-16 | 2012-08-28 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Sample processing units, systems, and related methods |
US9165740B2 (en) | 2009-02-12 | 2015-10-20 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Ionization probe assemblies |
US8796617B2 (en) | 2009-02-12 | 2014-08-05 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Ionization probe assemblies |
US8158936B2 (en) | 2009-02-12 | 2012-04-17 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Ionization probe assemblies |
US9194877B2 (en) | 2009-07-17 | 2015-11-24 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Systems for bioagent indentification |
US8950604B2 (en) | 2009-07-17 | 2015-02-10 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Lift and mount apparatus |
US9890408B2 (en) | 2009-10-15 | 2018-02-13 | Ibis Biosciences, Inc. | Multiple displacement amplification |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
AU7242994A (en) | 1995-12-18 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
WO1995031997A1 (en) | Model for testing immunogenicity of peptides | |
US6641813B1 (en) | Methods and reagents for diagnosis of autoantibodies | |
Pruksakorn et al. | Conserved T and B cell epitopes on the M protein of group A streptococci. Induction of bactericidal antibodies. | |
Briand et al. | Application and limitations of the multiple antigen peptide (MAP) system in the production and evaluation of anti-peptide and anti-protein antibodies | |
Ganglberger et al. | Allergen mimotopes for 3‐dimensional epitope search and induction of antibodies inhibiting human IgE | |
US5807552A (en) | Compositions for conferring immunogenicity to a substance and uses thereof | |
Haber et al. | Modifications in the heterogeneity of the antibody response | |
US20030003440A1 (en) | Novel CCR5 epitope and antibodies against it | |
EP0429816A1 (en) | Vaccine composition with non-immunosuppresive T-cell epitope component | |
SK11295A3 (en) | Conjugates of poorly immunogenic antigens and synthetic peptide carriers and vaccines comprising them | |
Olive et al. | A lipid core peptide construct containing a conserved region determinant of the group A streptococcal M protein elicits heterologous opsonic antibodies | |
Beachey et al. | Protective and nonprotective epitopes of chemically synthesized peptides of the NH2-terminal region of type 6 streptococcal M protein. | |
US6939546B2 (en) | Model for testing immunogenicity of peptides | |
EP0640101B1 (en) | Methods and reagents for diagnosis of autoantibodies | |
Kraus et al. | Vimentin-cross-reactive epitope of type 12 streptococcal M protein | |
Oshima et al. | Profile of the regions of acetylcholine receptor α chain recognized by T-lymphocytes and by antibodies in EAMG-susceptible and non-susceptible mouse strains after different periods of immunization with the receptor | |
JP3910635B2 (en) | Methods for increasing HDL cholesterol levels | |
Senpuku et al. | Immunogenicity of peptides coupled with multiple T‐cell epitopes of a surface protein antigen of Streptococcus mutans | |
Maillère et al. | Probing immunogenicity of a T cell epitope by L-alanine and D-amino acid scanning | |
Partidos et al. | Mimotopes of viral antigens and biologically important molecules as candidate vaccines and potential immunotherapeutics | |
US20030007973A1 (en) | Methods and compositions for manipulation of the immune response using anti-metallothionein antibody | |
Scherf et al. | Immune response in mouse and malaria‐exposed humans to peptides derived from Pfl1‐1, a highly repetitive megadalton protein of Plasmodium falciparum | |
Stupp et al. | Further studies on the immunogenicity of D-amino acid polymers | |
Thrasyvoulides et al. | Antibodies cross-reacting with thyroglobulin and thyroid peroxidase are induced by immunization of rabbits with an immunogenic thyroglobulin 20mer peptide | |
AU757334B2 (en) | Specific binding proteins for treating canine allergy |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT AU BB BG BR CA CH CZ DE DK ES FI GB HU JP KP KR LK LU MG MN MW NL NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SK UA US |
|
AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN ML MR NE SN TD TG |
|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application | ||
122 | Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase | ||
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: CA |
|
REG | Reference to national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: 8642 |