WO1998038771A2 - Flow control in switches - Google Patents
Flow control in switches Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO1998038771A2 WO1998038771A2 PCT/SE1998/000355 SE9800355W WO9838771A2 WO 1998038771 A2 WO1998038771 A2 WO 1998038771A2 SE 9800355 W SE9800355 W SE 9800355W WO 9838771 A2 WO9838771 A2 WO 9838771A2
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- data packets
- selector
- ingress
- queue
- buffers
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L49/00—Packet switching elements
- H04L49/30—Peripheral units, e.g. input or output ports
- H04L49/3081—ATM peripheral units, e.g. policing, insertion or extraction
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L49/00—Packet switching elements
- H04L49/20—Support for services
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L49/00—Packet switching elements
- H04L49/25—Routing or path finding in a switch fabric
- H04L49/253—Routing or path finding in a switch fabric using establishment or release of connections between ports
- H04L49/254—Centralised controller, i.e. arbitration or scheduling
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L49/00—Packet switching elements
- H04L49/30—Peripheral units, e.g. input or output ports
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L12/00—Data switching networks
- H04L12/54—Store-and-forward switching systems
- H04L12/56—Packet switching systems
- H04L12/5601—Transfer mode dependent, e.g. ATM
- H04L2012/5638—Services, e.g. multimedia, GOS, QOS
- H04L2012/5646—Cell characteristics, e.g. loss, delay, jitter, sequence integrity
- H04L2012/5651—Priority, marking, classes
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L12/00—Data switching networks
- H04L12/54—Store-and-forward switching systems
- H04L12/56—Packet switching systems
- H04L12/5601—Transfer mode dependent, e.g. ATM
- H04L2012/5678—Traffic aspects, e.g. arbitration, load balancing, smoothing, buffer management
- H04L2012/5679—Arbitration or scheduling
Definitions
- the present invention relates, on the one hand, to a method of controlling the flow of data packets within a switching unit intended for and adapted to serve a plurality of subscribers that have varying requirements, such as the transmission of speech, video and/or data signals.
- the present invention also relates to a switching unit adapted to function in accordance with the method.
- An inventive switching unit includes, among other things, a plurality of ingress-selector stages allocated to a respective subscriber, a plurality of egress-selector stages allocated to a respective subscriber, and a selector core.
- the switching unit also includes a plurality of queue buffers related to respective ingress-selector stages, at least one output buffer related to respective egress-selector stages, and a flow control unit.
- information carrying data packets can be stored temporarily in queue buffers related to an ingress- selector stage allocated to the first subscriber, whereafter the data packet can be transferred to and thereafter stored in one of the output buffers, via the selector core, and then finally transferred to the second subscriber from the output W - - 2 -
- the flow control unit is adapted to control the flow of the data packet between the queue buffers and the output buffers.
- the present invention finds particular application in ATM switching units that operate with standardized data packets or data cells, although it will be understood that the invention is not restricted specifically to use with ATM switching units, and that it can also be applied with other types of switching units that operate with some type of standardized data packet.
- Examples of different priority levels are real-time related traffic, such as the transmission of sound and pictures in real time, which can be considered to be highly prioritized traffic, and traffic that can wait when the switching unit is heavily loaded, such as the transmission of data files or electronic mail, which can be considered to constitute traffic of lower priority.
- buffer coverage By the extent of buffer coverage is meant how much of a buffer is covered or occupied, and therewith also how much of a buffer is available or free. Examples of different types of devices and methods associated with this technology are described and illustrated in the following publications.
- This publication describes an ATM system that includes ingress-stage related buffers and egress-stage related buffers, and means for controlling the flow of data cells between these buffers.
- the flow control is based on a system disclosed in the following publication. - A -
- This publication describes an ATM switching unit where the buffer memory, related to input ingress stages orders a given bandwidth, or transfer capacity, for traffic to different egress stages before data transmission takes place, in order to establish whether or not sufficient capacity is available to receive data in the egress stages.
- the system includes a queue arrangement for different bandwidth queries, where queries are placed in a queue, or in line, during periods when capacity is insufficient. When sufficient capacity is available, available capacity is released in accordance with a predetermined order in relation to the queue arrangement .
- This publication describes an ATM switching unit which is adapted to divide data cells into different priority levels or service classes. Each data cell is allocated destination-related information, a certain delay-class and a certain loss- class. A number of logic queues are related to the ingress side of the switching unit, and the incoming data cells are placed in different queues in accordance with destination and in accordance with delay-class and loss-class respectively.
- the extent of the coverage in different buffers decides whether data cells of different delay classes can be transferred from the ingress-side to the egress-side or not.
- EP-A2-0 526 104 In the case of very high loads, it is permissible to lose certain data cells in accordance with the loss-class allocated thereto.
- This publication describes an ATM switching unit that is intended to handle data cells having a number of different priority levels.
- Each egress stage is allocated a number of queues, one for each priority level. Each queue is allowed to consume the whole of its buffer memory. In the event of further incoming data cells for which no space is found in the buffer memories, the length of the queues is summated for each egress stage individually, and a comparison is made to determine which egress stage has the largest number of buffered data cells.
- This publication describes an ATM switching unit in which data cells are stored in different buffers in accordance with their destination.
- a number of different queue buffers are used to handle a time delay control. Overload control is made possible by virtue of data-cell loss control when an egress stage is overloaded, this control being based on the number of data cells waiting in the queue buffers.
- a data packet transfer switching unit intended to serve a number of subscribers and including a number of ingress-selector stages allocated to respective subscribers, a number of egress-selector stages allocated to respective subscribers, a selector core, a number of queue buffers related to respective ingress-selector stages, a number of output buffers, at least one related to respective egress-selector stages, and a flow control unit, whereby information carrying data packets from a first subscriber to a second subscriber can be stored temporarily in queue buffers related to an ingress-selector stage allocated to said first subscriber, whereafter the data packets can be transferred to and thereafter stored in one of the output buffers via the selector core, and finally transferred to the other subscriber from the output buffer via an egress-selector stage allocated to the second subscriber, wherein the flow control unit is adapted to control the flow of data packets between the queue buffers and the output buffers, it will be seen that a problem resides in realizing the possibilities that can be afforded
- a technical problem is one of finding a solution to the problem of enabling the capacity of the selector core to be utilized to a very large extent, without needing to utilize techniques that permit certain data packets to be lost.
- Another technical problem resides in realizing the possibi- lities of providing a flow control, via a method and/or a control unit, for controlling the total flow of data packets through the selector core at each time interval, and for also controlling the flow of data packets permitted to pass through the selector core within the capacity afforded additionally to the high priority traffic, such as real-time related traffic.
- Another technical problem is one of realizing the possibilities that are afforded by a method based on solely permitting a flow of data packets between queue buffers and output buffers in response to, and always in response to, an order delivered from a flow control unit.
- Another technical problem is one of realizing the possibilities that are afforded when the flow control unit includes an order issuing unit and when respective ingress- selector stages include an order receiving unit, wherewith the flow of data packets between the queue buffers and the output buffers can be controlled through the medium of an order from the order issuing unit to the order receiving units.
- a further technical problem is one of realizing which information is required to compile an order when available capacity can be utilized optimally, or at least almost optimally.
- Yet another technical problem is one of realizing how the various requirements of each queue buffer for transferring data packets within following time intervals shall be placed in relation to each other and presented in a simple and effective manner, and particularly how this can be presented when said queue buffers are allocated different priority levels and divided into subordinate priority-related queue buffers.
- the queue buffers include subordinated priority-related queue buffers, where first subordinated queue buffers are related to a first priority level that is a highest priority level, such as real-time related traffic, and a second subordinated queue buffer is related to a second priority level that is a lower priority level, such as traffic of lower priority than real-time related traffic, and so on through a number of available priority levels, it will be seen that a further technical problem is one of realizing how the various requirements of each subordinated queue buffer for transferring data packets within subsequent time intervals and the priority levels of respective data packets can be represented within this presentation.
- Another technical problem is one of realizing how the need to send a specific number of data packets wthin following time intervals and also the priority status of said data packets can be represented within this presentation.
- Another technical problem is one of realizing how this information can be presented in matrix form in a three-dimensional matrix, a total status matrix for all included subordinate queue buffers that represent different priority levels, and the advantages afforded hereby.
- Another technical problem is one of realizing how such a three-dimensional matrix can be compressed to solely two dimensions while retaining the information necessary for compiling an order that provides optimized control of the data packet flow.
- a further technical problem is one of realizing how an order that indicates to each buffer the number of data packets that may be transferred during subsequent time intervals shall be designed in an effective and simple manner.
- Another technical problem is one of realizing how the order to send a specific number of data packets within subsequent time intervals can be represented within this presentation.
- a technical problem is one of realizing how the number of data packets which, in accordance with an order, are able to be transferred from respective ingress-selector stages during a time interval while being controlled so as not to exceed the maximum possible number of bits that can be transferred from an ingress-selector stage to the selector core during a chosen time interval .
- Another technical problem is one of realizing how the number of data packets that are able to be transferred to an output buffer from input buffers belonging to different ingress- selector stages in accordance with an order can be controlled so as not to exceed the total number of data packets that can be accommodated in an output buffer.
- a technical problem is one of realizing how the number of data packets that are able to be transferred to respective egress-selector stages during a time interval in accordance with an order can be controlled so as not to exceed the maximum possible number of bits that can be transferred from the selector core to an egress-selector stage during a time interval .
- Another technical problem is one of realizing how an order matrix shall be constructed for maximum utilization of the transfer capacity between respective ingress-selector stages and the selector core while taking into consideration that the number of queue buffers that include buffered data packets related to an ingress-selector stage can be much smaller than the number of queue buffers that include buffered data packets related to another ingress-selector stage.
- a further technical problem is one of realizing how this consideration can be taken into account when forming an order matrix in the case when respective queue buffers include a plurality of subordinated priority-related queue buffers.
- Another technical problem is one of realizing how the flow of information in a network that is intended to be coupled to a number of nodes, where a number of nodes are connected to each other either directly or indirectly, whereby information- carrying data packets from one or more first nodes can be transferred to a second node, where a flow control unit is adapted to control the flow of data packets between the nodes, can be controlled so as to optimize the transfer capacity between the nodes, particularly when traffic is of a burst character and/or when traffic of different service classes or priority levels occurs between the nodes.
- the present invention takes as its starting point a method of controlling the flow of data packets within a switching unit of the kind defined in the first paragraph of this document.
- the invention proposes in particular that the transfer of data packets from queue buffers to output buffers is controlled by the flow control unit by virtue of permitting such transfer subsequent to receiving an order from the flow control unit, and to effect said transfer totally in accordance with said order.
- one such order is compiled on the basis of information that includes the instantaneous need to send data packets from the queue buffers to the output buffers, and on the basis of information relating to the instantaneous extent of the coverage of said output buffers.
- the information will also include the number of data packets that are stored in the queue buffers at that moment in time, and to which output buffer respective buffered data packets are intended to be transferred.
- Respective queue buffers are thus given an order as to how many data packets shall be transferred during subsequent time intervals, this order being based on, and in consideration of, the extent of the coverage of the other output buffers and the need to transfer data packets from respective queue buffers, therewith enabling the flow control to be effected without application of the technique in which the application of lost data packets is permitted.
- the number of queue buffers related to respective ingress-selector stages corresponds to the number of egress-selector stages.
- the information concerning the queue buffers related to respective ingress-selector stages is compiled in vector form in a so-called status vector, and that a status matrix is structured from the status vectors from all ingress-selector stages.
- the number of rows in a status matrix will thus correspond to the number of output buffers, and the number of columns will correspond to the total number of ingress-selector stages, where respective columns are comprised of a status vector which is adapted to represent each associated ingress-selector stage, and respective rows are adapted to each represent its output buffer.
- respective positions in a column of a status matrix are adapted to represent the number of data packets buffered in a queue buffer related to the ingress-selector stage belonging to said column and intended for transfer to the output buffer that is represented by the row belonging to said position during a next-following time interval.
- Each position within a status matrix is allocated a specific number of data bits that represent at least the maximum possible number of data packets that can be transferred within a time interval.
- the data bits in a position allotted to the queue buffer represent the maximum possible number of data packets that can be transferred.
- a so-called three packet interval implies a time interval which is corresponded by the time taken to transfer three data packets from an ingress- selector stage to the selector core.
- the data bits in one position are two in number, since two data bits can represent up to three data packets.
- Two data bits may also represent a shorter time interval, for instance a time interval that accommodates two data packets, a so-called two packet interval .
- the selectable duration of the time interval is thus quantized to be n-one packet interval, where n is a positive integer and the packet interval is the time taken to send one data packet. It is also assumed that all data packets forwarded through the switching unit have a size or bit length that does not exceed a chosen largest permitted size or bit length.
- each position may represent one data packet, therewith enabling a so-called single packet interval to be used.
- time interval will depend, among other things, on the length of time required to collect necessary information transfer the information from respective ingress- selector stages to the flow control unit, to combine the information and compile an order, to send the order from the flow control unit, and to receive the order in respective queue buffers.
- the time required in this respect sets the limit for a smallest possible time interval.
- Shorter time intervals place a greater demand on the requisite bandwidth in the transmission of the information to be sent to and from the flow control unit. Longer time intervals give a lower bandwidth requirement, but also result in a system that has longer delays and slower feedbacks.
- the present invention proposes the compilation of a priority- related status vector for each priority level and thereto related subordinated queue buffers related to respective ingress-selector stages.
- a first priority level could be corresponded by data packets of the highest priority, such as data packets intended to forward data in real time, while a second priority level may correspond to data packets whose priority is lower than the priority level of the first priority level, such as data packets with which a given waiting time is permitted.
- a status matrix related to an ingress-selector stage is composed of the priority-related status vectors for respective ingress-selector stages, where respective positions in a column belonging to a status matrix related to an ingress-selector stage are adapted to represent the number of data packets that are buffered within a subordinated queue buffer by the priority level to which the priority-related status vector is related, these data packets being intended for transfer to the output buffer to which the subordinated queue buffer is related, during a next-following time interval.
- the status matrices related to the ingress-selector stage are used to form a three- dimensional status matrix.
- the present invention proposes that a two-dimensional matrix is formed in accordance with the case where the queue buffers do not include subordinate prio- rity-related queue buffers, but where respective positions in a column belonging to one such status matrix are adapted to represent the number of data packets found buffered within a subordinate priority-related queue buffer related to the ingress-selected stage belonging to said column, intended for transfer to the output buffer that is represented by rows belonging to said positions during a next-following time interval, and to which priority level these data packets belong.
- each position within the status matrix shall be adapted to include a specific number of data bits, where the bit number is adapted to represent at least the maximum possible number of data packets that can be transferred within a time interval, and the number of available priority levels represented by subordinate priority-related queue buffers.
- the present invention proposes that information located in respective positions shall be related to the subordinate priority-related queue buffer that represents the highest priority level of the subordinate priority-related queue buffers that contain at least one buffered data packet.
- this order is compiled in matrix form in a so-called order matrix, where the number of rows corresponds to the total number of output buffers, and where the number of columns corresponds to the total number of ingress-selector stages.
- respective columns may each be intended for a respective ingress-selector stage, and respective rows may each be intended for a respective second output buffer.
- respective positions in an order matrix column may be adapted to represent the number of data packets to be transferred from a queue buffer, related to the ingress-selector stage belonging to said column, to the output buffer that is represented by the row belonging to said position during a next-following time interval.
- each position in the order matrix includes a specific number of data bits, this number being adapted to be able to represent at least the maximum possible number of data packets that can be transferred within a time interval.
- the order matrix is compiled so that the sum of the number of data bits in all positions in respective rows belonging to the order matrix is equal to, or less than the maximum possible number of data packets that can be stored in an output buffer.
- the order matrix is compiled so that the sum of the number of data bits in all positions in respective rows belonging to the order matrix are equal to, or less than, the maximum possible number of data packets that can be transferred from the selector core to respective egress-selector stages during a time interval.
- respective queue buffers include a plurality of subordinated priority-related queue buffers
- the order matrix is adapted to give priority to the transfer of data packets from a subordinated queue buffer related to a high priority level, over the transfer of data packets from a subordinated queue buffer related to a lower priority level, and wherein when handling subordinated queue buffers of the same priority level, the order matrix is adapted to give priority to the transfer of data packets from an ingress- selector stage that has data packets buffered in a few subordinated priority-related queue buffers over the transfer of data packets from an ingress-selector stage that has data packets buffered in a plurality of subordinated priority- related queue buffers.
- the aforedescribed method illustrates the principle of how status matrices and order matrices are compiled and sent to and from the flow controlling unit, and is described as though these matrices were compiled in their entirety prior to being sent. It will be understood, however, that in practice the status matrices may very well be sent to the flow controlling unit as the matrix is being compiled, and that the flow controlling unit processes information from the partially compiled status matrix as soon as it arrives, and thus begins to compile the order matrix while still receiving the status matrix, and that the order matrix is sent to receiving ingress-selector stages as the order matrix is being compiled. Thus, parts of the order matrix may begin to arrive at the ingress-selector stages whilst the status matrix is still being compiled, and sent from the ingress-selector stages to the flow controlling unit.
- the invention also relates to a switch unit adapted to function in accordance with the aforesaid method and based on the switch unit defined in the introduction.
- the switching unit is adapted so that the requisite flow control unit will include an order issuing unit, that respective ingress-selector stages will include an order receiving unit, and that the flow of data packets between queue buffers and output buffers can be controlled through the medium of an order sent by the order issuing unit to respective order receiving units, where a data packet transfer is permitted solely upon receipt of the order from the order issuing unit and executed totally in accordance with said order.
- respective ingress-selector stages will include an information-collecting unit which functions to collect information relating to the instantaneous or current status of those queue buffers belonging to respective ingress-selector stages, that the flow control unit will include a coverage evaluating unit adapted to establish the current extent of the coverage of respective output buffers, and that the flow control unit will also include an information receiving unit that functions to receive the information collected by respective information collecting units.
- the order issuing unit will function to compile and send the order, on the basis of the information collected and the extent of said coverage, and that respective order receiving units are operable to receive transmitted orders during a time interval and to execute said order during a following time interval.
- Respective information collecting units are adapted to compile information with this content and in a manner described in the aforesaid method.
- the information receiving unit is also adapted to compile a status matrix on the basis of the information collected by respective information collecting unit in accordance with said method.
- This status matrix may be a two- dimensional matrix or a three-dimensional matrix, all in accordance with the various method embodiments described.
- the number of queue buffers related to respective ingress-selector stages will correspond to the number of egress-selector stages, thereby enabling the switching unit to function in accordance with said method.
- respective queue buffers will be adapted to include a number of subordinated priority-related queue buffers, that respective subordinated queue buffers will be adapted to forward data packets that are allocated a specific priority level, that a first subordinated queue buffer will be adapted to forward data packets of a first priority level, that a second subordinated queue buffer will be adapted to forward data packets of a second priority level, and so on, wherewith the total number of subordinated queue buffers corresponds to the number of different priority levels that can be handled by the switching unit.
- the order issuing unit functions to compile the order in matrix form, in a so-called order matrix in accordance with the aforesaid method.
- Switching units may be constructed in different ways, and when respective queue buffers are placed physically in the ingress- selector stages to which the queue buffer is related, the order issuing unit is adapted to compile the order matrix so that the sum of the number of data bits in all positions in respective columns belonging to said order matrix is equal to, or smaller than, the maximum possible number of data packets that can be transferred from respective ingress-selector stages to the selector core during a time interval .
- the order issuing unit is also adapted to compile the order matrix so that the sum of the number of data bits in all positions in respective rows belonging to said order matrix is equal to or smaller than the maximum possible number of data packets that can be stored in an output buffer.
- the order issuing unit is adapted to compile the order matrix so that the sum of the number of data bits in all positions in respective rows belonging to said order matrix is equal to or smaller than the maximum possible number of data packets that can be transferred from the selector core to respective egress-selector stages during a time interval .
- the order issuing unit is also adapted to give priority to the transfer of data packets from an ingress-selector stage in which data packets are buffered in a few queue buffers, and primarily the transfer of data packets from an ingress- selector stage that has data packets buffered in a plurality of queue buffers, when compiling order matrices.
- the order issuing unit functions to give priority to the transfer of data packets from a subordinated queue buffer related to a higher priority level over the transfer of data packets from a subordinated queue buffer related to a lower priority level, when compiling the order matrices.
- the order issuing unit is adapted to give priority to the transfer of data packets from an ingress-selector stage that has data packets buffered in a few subordinated priority-related queue buffers over the transfer of data packets from an ingress selector stage that has data packets buffered in a plurality of subordinated priority-related queue buffers.
- Those advantages that are primarily obtained with a method and a switching unit according to the present invention reside in the possibility of effectively controlling the flow of data packets in a relatively simple and cost-effective manner without needing to utilize methods that accept lost data packets, and enabling the coverage capacity afforded by the selector unit alongside high priority traffic, such as realtime traffic, to be used in a higher degree.
- the inventive method enables the flow control unit to know precisely what number of data packets are on route to the selector core from respective ingress-selector stages and from said selector core to respective egress-selector stages.
- the size of the output buffers can thus be minimized. For instance, a one-packet interval will enable the use of output buffers that have a storage capacity of one data package, which is difficult to achieve, if not impossible to achieve, with known methods.
- Figure 1 is a highly schematic and very simplified illustration of a known switching unit that has two ingress-selector and egress-selector stages, and, e.g., subscribers connected thereto;
- FIG. 2 is a more detailed, schematic illustration of a switching unit supplemented with the inventive devices
- Figure 3 illustrates a first embodiment of a status matrix, a two-dimensional status matrix
- Figure 4 shows an example of a status matrix related to an ingress-selector stage and including three different priority levels
- Figure 5 illustrates a second embodiment of a status matrix, a three-dimensional status matrix
- Figure 6 illustrates an example of a queue buffer that includes three mutually different, subordinated priority-related queue buffers
- Figure 7 illustrates one example of an order matrix
- Figure 8 is a schematic illustration of a switching unit, where a plurality of ingress-selector and egress-selector stages are not included in a flow control according to the invention.
- Figure 9 illustrates an example of a network that has a number of mutually coacting nodes.
- the present invention relates both to a method of controlling the flow of data packets through a switching unit, and to a switching unit that functions in accordance with said method.
- Figure 1 is a schematic illustration of the fundamental units of a switching unit A that is intended to serve a plurality of subscribers B, C and that includes a plurality of subscriber- allocated ingress-selector stages 11, 12, a plurality of subscriber-allocated egress-selector stages 21, 22, and a selector core 3.
- a subscriber which is exemplified in Figure 1 in the form of a telephone handset, although it will be understood that reference to a subscriber implies equipment connected to the switching unit, which, in practice, may include everything from an individual subscriber, such as a data server or a company internal telephone exchange, to a plurality of individual subscribers (telephone handsets) that share a respective ingress-selector stage and an egress- selector stage. More generally, it can be said that all equipment that utilizes data packets of a specific format can be connected and form a subscriber. Traffic from these subscribers is concentrated to the traffic that enters or leaves a switching unit, or a combination thereof.
- Figure 2 illustrates an inventive switching unit that includes a plurality of queue buffers 111, 112, ..., lln related to respective ingress-selector stages 11, 12, ..., In, and a plurality of output buffers 21B, 22B, ... , 2nB of which at least one is related to respective egress-selector stages 21, 22, ... , 2n.
- different queue buffers 111, 112, ..., lln are placed physically in connection with an ingress-selector stage 11, and the various output buffers 21B, 22B, ... , 2nB, are placed physically in connection with the selector core 3.
- the switching unit may also include other buffers that do not influence the application of the present invention.
- the number (n) of queue buffers related to respective ingress- selector stages 11, 12, ..., In is corresponded by the number of egress-selector stages 21, 22, ..., 2n.
- the switching unit also includes a flow control unit 4.
- information carrying data packets from a first subscriber B to a second subscriber C can be stored temporarily in queue buffers 111 related to an ingress- selector stage 11 allocated to the first subscriber B, whereafter these data packets can be transferred to and thereafter stored in one of the output buffers 21B through the selector core 3 and then transferred to the second subscriber C from the output buffer 21B, via an egress-selector stage 21 allocated to the second subscriber.
- the egress-selector stages also include buffers that are required for controlling the flow of data packets from respective egress-selector stages to respective connected subscribers . The present invention is not concerned with this transfer of data packets, and will not therefore be shown or described.
- this transfer capacity may be in the order of 155 Mbit/s.
- the flow of input data to an ingress-selector stage will never exceed 155 Mbit/s because a part of the incoming data packet must sometimes be buffered, for instance due to the extent of the coverage in the output buffers 21B, 22B, ... , 2nB, which per se constitute a limitation.
- the need to transfer data packets from the various queue buffers can exceed the available capacity, meaning that further data packets must be buffered.
- the transfer capacity from the selector core 3 to respective egress-selector stages 21, 22, ..., 2n is limited in the same way.
- the purpose of the flow control unit 4 is to ensure that the available capacity through the selector core 3 and over the connections 311, 312, ..., 31n; 321, 322, ..., 32n between respective ingress-selector and egress-selector stages and the selector core is utilized as optimally as possible.
- the flow control unit 4 is thus adapted to control the flow of data packets between the queue buffers and the output buffers.
- the flow control unit 4 includes an order issuing unit 41, and respective ingress-selector stages 11, 12, ..., 2n includes an order receiving unit 113, 123, ..., In3.
- the flow control unit 4 functions by virtue of controlling the flow of data packets between the queue buffers 111, 112, ..., lln and the output buffers 21B, 22B, ... , 2nB through the medium of an order issued to the order receiving units 112, 123, ..., In3 from the order issuing unit 41.
- Respective ingress-selector stages 11, 12, ..., In include an information collecting unit 114, 124, ..., In4 which functions to collect information relating to the current status of the queue buffers 111, 112, ..., lln belonging to respective ingress-selector stages 11.
- the flow control unit 4 also includes a unit 42 which evaluates the extent of coverage and which functions to establish the current extent of coverage of respective output buffers 21B, 22B, ..., 2nB.
- the flow control unit 4 also includes an information receiving unit 43 which functions to receive the information collected by respective information collecting units 114, 124, ln4.
- the order issuing unit 41 functions to compile and send an order on the basis of the collected information relating to the status of the queue buffers and the status of the output buffers, whereafter respective order receiving units 113, 123, ... , ln3 function to receive and carry out the order .
- the information collected by respective information collecting units 114, 124, ..., In4 includes the number of data packets that are currently stored in respective queue buffers 111, 112, ..., lln.
- One effective way of compiling the information is to design respective information collecting units 114, 124, ..., In4 to compile said information in vector form, in a so-called queue buffer status vector.
- the information receiving unit 42 then compiles a status matrix from the status vectors.
- Figure 3 shows an example of how a status matrix "sm" can be compiled.
- the number of rows (eight rows in Figure 3 ) in a status matrix "sm” corresponds to the number of output buffers 21B, 22B, ... , 2nB related to respective egress-selector stages 21, 22, ..., 2n, while the number of columns ( eight columns in Figure 3 ) corresponds to the total number of ingress-selector stages 11, 12, ..., In.
- respective columns kl, k2, ..., k8 are comprised of a status vector and are each intended to represent a respective ingress-selector stage 11, 12, ..., In, whereas respective rows rl, r2, ..., r8 are each intended to represent a respective output buffer 21B, 22B, ...2nB.
- One position kl, rl in a column kl belonging to the status matrix "sm" is intended to represent the number of data packets buffered in a queue buffer 111 related to the column kl belonging to the ingress-selector stage 11 intended for the transfer of data packets to the output buffers 21B that is represented by the position belonging to row rl, during a coming time interval.
- the information in position sm75 (row 7, column 5 ) corresponds to the number of data packets that can be transferred from a queue buffer related to ingress-selector stage number 5 to the output buffer related to egress-selector stage number 7 during coming time intervals.
- Each position in the status matrix "sm" includes a specific number of data bits, this number being able to represent at least the maximum possible number of data packets that can be transferred within a time interval.
- the number of data bits will thus be at least two.
- Two data bits can also be used in a so-called two- packet interval.
- the data bits in respective positions will be at least one in number .
- the aforedescribed embodiment is based on the assumption that all data packets are allocated one and the same priority level. However, it is not unusual to divide traffic into a number of different priority levels.
- respective queue buffers will include two or more subordinated priority-related queue buffers, where respective subordinated priority-related queue buffers are adapted to forward data packets that have a specific priority level or status.
- Figure 4 illustrates an example in which respective information collecting units 114, 124, ..., In4 are adapted to compile priority-related status vectors pi, p2, p3 , one for each subordinated queue buffer.
- This example concerns traffic having three different priority levels that can be managed by the subordinated priority-related queue buffers.
- Respective information collecting units 114 are also adapted to compile from the priority-related status vectors pi, p2, p3 a status matrix "ism" related to ingress-selector stages, where each column pi, p2, p3 represents one priority level and row rl, r2, ..., r8 represents a queue buffer 111, 112, ..., lln with associated priority levels.
- Respective positions in a column of the status matrix "ism” related to said ingress-selector stages are intended to represent the current number of data packets buffered in a queue buffer 111, 112, ..., lln by the priority level to which the priority-related status vector pi, p2, p3 is related, belonging to the queue buffer 111, 112, ..., lln related to the row rl, r2, ..., r8 and intended for transferring data packets to the output buffer to which this queue buffer is related, during a coming time interval.
- the information receiving unit 43 functions to compile a three-dimensional status matrix "3dsm” from the status matrices "ism” related to the ingress-selector stages; see Figure 5.
- Respective positions in the three-dimensional status matrix "3dsm" are also in this case allocated a specific number of data bits, this number being able to represent at least the maximum possible number of data packets that dan be transferred within one time interval.
- the information in position 3dsm212 corresponds to the current number of data packets buffered in a queue buffer subordinated to queue buffer 121 related to ingress-selector stage 12 number 2 having priority level 2 and intended for transfer to egress- selector stage 21 via output buffer 21B.
- Figure 3 can also be considered to illustrate a further possible embodiment that can be used when respective queue buffers include a plurality of different subordinated priority-related buffers.
- respective positions in a column kl , k2, ..., k8 belonging to a typical two-dimensional status matrix "sm" are adapted to represent the number of data packets buffered in a subordinate queue buffer of a given priority level, related to the ingress-selector stages 11, 12, ..., In belonging to said column, these data packets being intended for transfer to the output buffer 21B, 22B, ..., 2nB represented by the row rl, r2, ..., r8 belonging to this position during a coming time interval, and to which priority levels pi, p2, p3 the data packets belong.
- respective status matrix positions include a specific number of data bits which are able to represent at least the maximum possible number of data packets that can be transferred within a time interval, and also the number of priority levels available to the subordinated priority-related queue buffers.
- respective positions will include four data bits, i.e. two for representing up to three transferrable data packets and two for denoting one of the three possible priority levels. It will be seen from this that it is possible to denote four different priority levels.
- the information in respective positions will be related to the subordinated priority-related queue buffer that represents the highest priority level of the subordinated priority-related queue buffers that contain at least one buffered data packet in one queue buffer.
- Figure 6 shows an example of a queue buffer 111 that includes three different subordinated priority-related queue buffers lllpl, lllp2, lllp3.
- the buffered data packets are marked with a cross in Figure 6, from which it will be seen that no data packets are currently buffered in priority level one, two data packets are currently buffered in priority level two, and four data packets are currently buffered in priority level three.
- Figure 6 shows a principle construction of a queue buffer with subordinated priority-related queue buffers by way of explanation.
- These queue buffers can be formed in different ways. For instance, the various subordinated priority-related queue buffers can be given different sizes, since the need to buffer data cells will probably vary with different priority levels.
- the information in the position that represents a queue buffer according to Figure 6 may thus be "1010", wherein “10” represents two transferrable data packets, and “10” denotes that these are allocated priority level two.
- the two-dimensional status matrix "sm" will thus only contain information relating to those data packets that are buffered in a subordinated priority-related queue buffer of the highest priority level. Information relating to buffered data packets of lower priority levels is thus unavailable when compiling the order. However, since data packets of higher priority level always take precedence over data packets of lower priority levels, this information is not required when compiling the order.
- the order issuing unit 4 is adapted to compile an order in matrix form, a so-called order matrix "om", this matrix being shown in Figure 7.
- the number of rows in an order matrix "om" corresponds to the total number of output buffers and the number of columns corresponds to the total number of ingress-selector stages, where respective columns kl , k2, ..., k8 are each intended for a respective ingress-selector stage 11, 12, ..., In, and where respective rows rl, r2, ..., r8 are each intended for a respective output buffer 21B, 22B, ..., 2nB .
- the order matrix shown in Figure 7 is adapted to serve eight ingress-selector stages and eight egress-selector stages.
- a position in a column belonging to the order matrix represents the number of data packets that, in accordance with the order, shall be transferred from a queue buffer related to the column-associated ingress-selector stage 11, 12, ..., In to the output buffer 21B, 22B, ..., 2nB that is represented by the row rl, r2, ..., r8 belonging to said position, during a next-following time interval.
- An order matrix position includes a number of data bits that are able to represent at least the maximum possible number of data packets that can be transferred within a time interval .
- respective queue buffers represent a plurality of subordinated priority-related queue buffers
- the order in respective positions in the order matrix "om" solely concerns those data packets that belong to the highest priority level, i.e. that queue buffer of the subordinated, priority-related queue buffers that contains buffered data packets and that represents the highest priority level .
- one such criterion is that the order issuing unit is adapted to compile the order matrix "om" so that the sum of the number of data bits in all positions in respective columns kl, k2, ..., k8 of the order matrix is equal to or smaller than the maximum possible number of data packets that can be transferred from respective ingress-selector stages 11, 12, ..., In to the selector core 3 during a time interval .
- the order issuing unit When respective output buffers are placed physically in the egress-selector stage to which a respective buffer is related, another criterion is that the order issuing unit will be adapted to compile the order matrix "om" so that the sum of the number of data bits in all positions in respective rows rl, r2, ..., r8 of the order matrix will be equal to or smaller than the maximum possible number of data packets that can be transferred from the selector core 3 to respective egress-selector stages 21, 22, ..., 2n during a time interval.
- the sum of the number of data bits in all positions in respective rows rl, r2, ..., r3 may not exceed the number of data packets that can be accommodated in an output buffer 21B, 22B, ... , 2nB.
- a further criterion is that when the order matrix "om" is compiled, the order issuing unit 4 will give priority to the transfer of data packets from an ingress-selector stage that has data packets buffered in a few queue buffers over the transfer of data packets from an ingress-selector stage that has data packets buffered in a plurality of queue buffers.
- the order issuing unit when compiling the order matrix "om", will give priority to the transfer of data packets from a subordinated queue buffer related to a higher priority level over the transfer of data packets from a subordinated queue buffer related to a lower priority level, and, when dealing with subordinated queue buffers of the same priority level, will give priority to the transfer of data packets from an ingress-selector stage that has data packets buffered in a plurality of subordinated priority-related queue buffers over the transfer of data packets from an ingress-selector stage that has data packets buffered in a plurality of subordinated priority-related queue buffers .
- the time interval used will depend on different factors. Some of the factors included in this respect are the time required to compile the status matrix "sm”, "3dsm”, the time needed to transfer information from respective information collecting units 114, 124, ..., In4 to the information receiving unit 43, the time taken to compile the order matrix "om” and then send the order matrix from the order issuing unit 41 to respective order receiving units 113, 123, ..., In3.
- the flow control unit 4 can be implemented in different ways, for instance with the use of a simple processor and associated software, a specially designed integrated circuit and associated software, or solely a specially designed integrated circuit where all functions are implemented with hardware, in the absence of software.
- queue buffers may be comprised of separate physical buffers and/or various logic buffers within a common physical buffer.
- queue buffers will constitute physical buffers on circuit boards belonging to respective ingress-selector stages, whereas subordinated priority-related queue buffers can be comprised of different logic buffers within a physically implemented queue buffer.
- An ingress-selector stage and an egress-selector stage will normally form two parts of a common selector stage in a switching unit, even though these stages have been shown as two separate units in the Figures for the sake of simplicity.
- the above description deals with the manner in which different units operate in accordance with a certain method. This method may also be applied with hardware of a slightly different construction or configuration.
- the present invention thus also relates to a method for managing data packet flow in accordance with the above description.
- One method according to the present invention is mainly based on the second queue buffers solely transferring information in accordance with an order received from the flow control unit.
- the method is also based on the principle construction of a status matrix and an order matrix, where the status matrix is used as a basis for the later compiled order matrix, in accordance with the above description.
- first subordinated queue buffer that represents a first priority level which, in turn, is the highest priority level
- first subordinated queue buffer that represents a first priority level which, in turn, is the highest priority level
- a highest priority level has been exemplified as real-time related traffic.
- the present invention can equally as well be applied in a switching unit constructed for data packet transfer where real-time related traffic does not occur at all, or only in exceptional circumstances, such as with so- called data-routers, for instance, such routers being adapted to control traffic within a local area network.
- Figure 8 shows the functioning of one or more ingress-selector stages and egress- selector stages that are not included by the flow control as described here.
- Figure 8 is a schematic illustration of an exemplifying embodiment that includes a selector core 3 having eight ingress-selector stages il, i2, ..., i7, i8 and eight egress- selector stages el, e2, ..., e7, i8.
- Six ingress-selector stages and egress-selector stages il, i2, ..., i6; el, e2, ... , e6 are included by a flow control according to the present invention.
- the other two ingress-selector stages i7, i8 and egress-selector stages e7, e8 are not included by said flow control.
- a subscriber may subscribe to a service that includes a given transfer capacity or bandwidth, which need not necessarily seize the entire capacity of an ingress- selector stage or egress-selector stage that is always at the disposal of the subscriber irrespective of other traffic through the switching unit and which need not therefore be included by the flow control . Necessary resources in output buffers and respective egress-selector stages must then also be reserved for such a subscriber.
- Figure 9 shows a network "N" which is intended to be interconnected with several nodes Nl , N2, N3, N4, N5, N6 , N7, where these nodes are connected to each other either directly or indirectly.
- the application of the present invention in a network is illustrated by a traffic situation in which information- carrying data packets shall be transferred from one or more first nodes Nl , N2, N3 to a second node N7, in the illustrated case via the node N4.
- a flow control unit Fl functions to control the flow of data packets between all nodes Nl , N2, ..., N7, and in this specific traffic situation especially the nodes Nl, N2, N3 and N7.
- Each node includes buffers of some kind in which information- carrying data packets are stored until they can be transferred to the next node.
- nodes and associated buffers can be likened to the components in the application of a switching unit, such as the aforedescribed unit.
- buffers Bl in the first node Nl can be likened to the queue buffers 111, 112, ..., lln that are related to ingress-selector stage 11
- buffers B2 in the first node N2 can be likened to queue buffers 121, 122, ..., 12n that are related to ingress-selector stage 12
- buffers B3 in the first node N3 can be likened to queue buffers 131, 132, ..., 13n that are related to ingress-selector stage 13
- buffers B4 in the node N4 can be likened to output buffer 21B in the selector core 3
- node N7 can be likened to egress- selector stage 21.
- this flow control can also be based on the transfer of data packets being permitted solely in response to an order from the flow control unit Fl and effected totally in accordance with said order.
- Such an order may appropriately be compiled on the basis of information that includes the current need to send data packets from the first nodes Nl, N2, N3 to the second node N7.
- the flow control unit Fl may be allocated a position in a server or router in the network.
- One or more nodes may also include a flow control unit, irrespective of whether the node or nodes functions as a router or not.
- a flow control unit Fl is allocated a position in the node N4.
- the matrices will obtain the formats 1x3 or 3x1.
- the matrix format can thus be changed with each new traffic situation.
- the first nodes are comprised of three nodes Nl , N2 , N3 and in which the second node is comprised of a node N7. It will be understood that in another situation, the nodes Nl and N4 may constitute first nodes that shall transfer information to a second node. for instance node N2.
- the nodes that constitute first and second nodes respectively, and the number of first nodes in such a relationship, will change continuously in accordance with current traffic situations.
- a node within a network a node can constitute both a first node Nl , with the intention of sending information to a second node N3 , and a second Nl, with the intention of receiving information from several first nodes N2, N4, in one and the same traffic situation. It will also be evident that all communication between the nodes may be bi-directional. Thus, the picture of first and second nodes respectively becomes highly complex in a network that includes a plurality of nodes. The afore-given example has therefore been greatly simplified, with the intention of illustrating the inventive concept.
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
AU66427/98A AU6642798A (en) | 1997-02-27 | 1998-02-27 | A control method for a switching unit and a switching unit adapted to function in accordance with the method |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
SE9700714A SE9700714L (en) | 1997-02-27 | 1997-02-27 | Method of controlling the data packet flow in a switch unit and a switch unit adapted to operate according to the method |
SE9700714-0 | 1997-02-27 |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO1998038771A2 true WO1998038771A2 (en) | 1998-09-03 |
WO1998038771A3 WO1998038771A3 (en) | 1998-12-03 |
Family
ID=20405963
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/SE1998/000355 WO1998038771A2 (en) | 1997-02-27 | 1998-02-27 | Flow control in switches |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
AU (1) | AU6642798A (en) |
SE (1) | SE9700714L (en) |
WO (1) | WO1998038771A2 (en) |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO1998052326A2 (en) * | 1997-05-13 | 1998-11-19 | Nokia Networks Oy | A method for packet switched data transmission |
EP0993153A1 (en) * | 1998-10-05 | 2000-04-12 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Packet forwarding apparatus with a flow detection table |
Citations (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4475192A (en) * | 1982-02-16 | 1984-10-02 | At&T Bell Laboratories | Data packet flow control scheme for switching networks |
US4616359A (en) * | 1983-12-19 | 1986-10-07 | At&T Bell Laboratories | Adaptive preferential flow control for packet switching system |
EP0249035A2 (en) * | 1986-06-13 | 1987-12-16 | International Business Machines Corporation | Adaptive session-level pacing |
EP0603916A2 (en) * | 1992-12-25 | 1994-06-29 | Nec Corporation | Packet switching system using idle/busy status of output buffers |
US5511070A (en) * | 1992-05-20 | 1996-04-23 | Xerox Corporation | Reservation ring mechanism for controlling contention in a broadband ISDN fast packet switch suitable for use in a local area network |
US5517495A (en) * | 1994-12-06 | 1996-05-14 | At&T Corp. | Fair prioritized scheduling in an input-buffered switch |
EP0715436A2 (en) * | 1994-12-02 | 1996-06-05 | AT&T Corp. | ATM buffer memory priority controller |
EP0719012A2 (en) * | 1994-12-19 | 1996-06-26 | Alcatel Data Networks | Traffic management and congestion control for packet-based network |
US5535197A (en) * | 1991-09-26 | 1996-07-09 | Ipc Information Systems, Inc. | Shared buffer switching module |
US5550815A (en) * | 1994-12-30 | 1996-08-27 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Apparatus and method for reducing data losses in a growable packet switch |
-
1997
- 1997-02-27 SE SE9700714A patent/SE9700714L/en not_active Application Discontinuation
-
1998
- 1998-02-27 WO PCT/SE1998/000355 patent/WO1998038771A2/en active Application Filing
- 1998-02-27 AU AU66427/98A patent/AU6642798A/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4475192A (en) * | 1982-02-16 | 1984-10-02 | At&T Bell Laboratories | Data packet flow control scheme for switching networks |
US4616359A (en) * | 1983-12-19 | 1986-10-07 | At&T Bell Laboratories | Adaptive preferential flow control for packet switching system |
EP0249035A2 (en) * | 1986-06-13 | 1987-12-16 | International Business Machines Corporation | Adaptive session-level pacing |
US5535197A (en) * | 1991-09-26 | 1996-07-09 | Ipc Information Systems, Inc. | Shared buffer switching module |
US5511070A (en) * | 1992-05-20 | 1996-04-23 | Xerox Corporation | Reservation ring mechanism for controlling contention in a broadband ISDN fast packet switch suitable for use in a local area network |
EP0603916A2 (en) * | 1992-12-25 | 1994-06-29 | Nec Corporation | Packet switching system using idle/busy status of output buffers |
EP0715436A2 (en) * | 1994-12-02 | 1996-06-05 | AT&T Corp. | ATM buffer memory priority controller |
US5517495A (en) * | 1994-12-06 | 1996-05-14 | At&T Corp. | Fair prioritized scheduling in an input-buffered switch |
EP0719012A2 (en) * | 1994-12-19 | 1996-06-26 | Alcatel Data Networks | Traffic management and congestion control for packet-based network |
US5550815A (en) * | 1994-12-30 | 1996-08-27 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Apparatus and method for reducing data losses in a growable packet switch |
Non-Patent Citations (2)
Title |
---|
IBM TECHNICAL DISCLOSURE BULLETIN, Volume 30, No. 3, August 1997, (Armonk, New York), "A New Couting Window Pacing Scheme", pages 1143-45. * |
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMMUNICATIONS, Volume 40, No. 2, February 1992, (USA), K. ENG et al., "A Growble Packet (ATM) Switch Architecture: Design Principles and Applications". * |
Cited By (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO1998052326A2 (en) * | 1997-05-13 | 1998-11-19 | Nokia Networks Oy | A method for packet switched data transmission |
WO1998052326A3 (en) * | 1997-05-13 | 1999-02-18 | Nokia Telecommunications Oy | A method for packet switched data transmission |
US6229802B1 (en) | 1997-05-13 | 2001-05-08 | Nokia Networks Oy | Method for packet switched data transmission |
EP0993153A1 (en) * | 1998-10-05 | 2000-04-12 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Packet forwarding apparatus with a flow detection table |
US6768738B1 (en) | 1998-10-05 | 2004-07-27 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Packet forwarding apparatus with a flow detection table |
US7408935B2 (en) | 1998-10-05 | 2008-08-05 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Packet forwarding apparatus with a flow detection table |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO1998038771A3 (en) | 1998-12-03 |
AU6642798A (en) | 1998-09-18 |
SE9700714L (en) | 1998-08-28 |
SE9700714D0 (en) | 1997-02-27 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US5577035A (en) | Apparatus and method of processing bandwidth requirements in an ATM switch | |
JP2837651B2 (en) | Communications system | |
CA2119205C (en) | Improvements in or relating to asynchronous transfer mode communication systems | |
US5119370A (en) | Switching node for a communications switching network | |
US7457895B2 (en) | Dynamic memory allocation between inbound and outbound buffers in a protocol handler | |
CN100401791C (en) | Buffer management for supporting QoS ensuring and data stream control in data exchange | |
US20030035371A1 (en) | Means and apparatus for a scaleable congestion free switching system with intelligent control | |
EP0676878A1 (en) | Efficient point to point and multi point routing mechanism for programmable packet switching nodes in high speed data transmission networks | |
CN101299721B (en) | Method for switching message of switching network, and switching device | |
JPH06224941A (en) | System for controlling network-access | |
JPH08237279A (en) | Traffic controller | |
JPH10285187A (en) | Distributed buffering system for atm switch | |
JPH07147590A (en) | Programmable high performance data communication adaptor for high-speed packet transmission network | |
US6345040B1 (en) | Scalable scheduled cell switch and method for switching | |
US6574232B1 (en) | Crossbar switch utilizing broadcast buffer and associated broadcast buffer management unit | |
JP3115813B2 (en) | Communication method | |
US20080273546A1 (en) | Data switch and a method of switching | |
US6172963B1 (en) | Flow control for switching | |
CA2213423C (en) | Method for shared memory management in network nodes | |
JPH0783361B2 (en) | Ring packet communication network | |
EP2164196B1 (en) | Packet multiplexing apparatus | |
WO1998038771A2 (en) | Flow control in switches | |
US7187675B2 (en) | Method and a system for controlling service times of copied multicast cells in input modules of an asynchronous switching node | |
EP1198098B1 (en) | Switching arrangement and method with separated output buffers | |
CA1333818C (en) | Switching node for a communications switching network |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY CA CH CN CU CZ DE DK EE ES FI GB GE GH GM GW HU ID IL IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MD MG MK MN MW MX NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT UA UG US UZ VN YU ZW |
|
AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW SD SZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN ML MR NE SN TD TG |
|
DFPE | Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101) | ||
AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: A3 Designated state(s): AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY CA CH CN CU CZ DE DK EE ES FI GB GE GH GM GW HU ID IL IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MD MG MK MN MW MX NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT UA UG US UZ VN YU ZW |
|
AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: A3 Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW SD SZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN ML MR NE SN TD TG |
|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application | ||
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 09380153 Country of ref document: US |
|
REG | Reference to national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: 8642 |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: JP Ref document number: 1998537583 Format of ref document f/p: F |
|
122 | Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase |