WO1999040692A9 - Orbit/covariance estimation and analysis (ocean) determination for satellites - Google Patents

Orbit/covariance estimation and analysis (ocean) determination for satellites

Info

Publication number
WO1999040692A9
WO1999040692A9 PCT/US1999/002290 US9902290W WO9940692A9 WO 1999040692 A9 WO1999040692 A9 WO 1999040692A9 US 9902290 W US9902290 W US 9902290W WO 9940692 A9 WO9940692 A9 WO 9940692A9
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
file
parameters
satellites
satellite
velocity
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US1999/002290
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
WO1999040692A1 (en
Inventor
Jay W Middour
Robert R Dasenbrock
Peter J Melvin
Henry M Pickard
Patrick W Binning
Original Assignee
Us Navy
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Us Navy filed Critical Us Navy
Priority to AU28668/99A priority Critical patent/AU2866899A/en
Publication of WO1999040692A1 publication Critical patent/WO1999040692A1/en
Publication of WO1999040692A9 publication Critical patent/WO1999040692A9/en

Links

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B64AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
    • B64GCOSMONAUTICS; VEHICLES OR EQUIPMENT THEREFOR
    • B64G1/00Cosmonautic vehicles
    • B64G1/22Parts of, or equipment specially adapted for fitting in or to, cosmonautic vehicles
    • B64G1/24Guiding or controlling apparatus, e.g. for attitude control
    • B64G1/242Orbits and trajectories
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B64AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
    • B64GCOSMONAUTICS; VEHICLES OR EQUIPMENT THEREFOR
    • B64G3/00Observing or tracking cosmonautic vehicles
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01SRADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S11/00Systems for determining distance or velocity not using reflection or reradiation
    • G01S11/02Systems for determining distance or velocity not using reflection or reradiation using radio waves
    • G01S11/10Systems for determining distance or velocity not using reflection or reradiation using radio waves using Doppler effect
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01SRADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S5/00Position-fixing by co-ordinating two or more direction or position line determinations; Position-fixing by co-ordinating two or more distance determinations
    • G01S5/02Position-fixing by co-ordinating two or more direction or position line determinations; Position-fixing by co-ordinating two or more distance determinations using radio waves
    • G01S5/0269Inferred or constrained positioning, e.g. employing knowledge of the physical or electromagnetic environment, state of motion or other contextual information to infer or constrain a position
    • G01S5/02695Constraining the position to lie on a curve or surface
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04BTRANSMISSION
    • H04B7/00Radio transmission systems, i.e. using radiation field
    • H04B7/14Relay systems
    • H04B7/15Active relay systems
    • H04B7/185Space-based or airborne stations; Stations for satellite systems
    • H04B7/1851Systems using a satellite or space-based relay
    • H04B7/18519Operations control, administration or maintenance

Definitions

  • This invention pertains generally to a device and method for determining the position, velocity, and other parameters for a satellite and more specifically to an apparatus and method for determining the positions, velocities and other parameters of a multiple of satellites, or celestial bodies.
  • the object of this invention is to provide an apparatus and method for estimating the positions, velocities, and other parameters of one or more satellites and other celestial bodies simultaneously .
  • OCEAN orbit/covariance estimation and analysis
  • the invention is an effective, and accurate device for orbit determination of larger scale satellite networks.
  • OCEAN utilizes ground station observations collected from satellites passing overhead and estimates the positions, velocities, and other parameters of multiple satellites. Satellite parameters include coefficient of drag, solar radiation reflecting coefficient, orbit decay rate, and timing and frequency biases.
  • Biases are to an output display. It also may be used to estimate parameters for other elements, such as the locations of ground stations and measurement biases.
  • the technique utilizes recorded observations (e.g., range, Doppler) and measurements from various sources as inputs to a weighted least squares batch estimation algorithm used in an iterative fashion to estimate each parameter, with or without a priori knowledge of the errors involved with each observed parameter. The process is completed once the residual, the difference between the estimated parameter and the observed parameter, satisfies the tolerance defined by the user.
  • OCEAN can also generate a predicted trajectory (i.e., ephemeris) for the satellite (s) from a specified initial time to a final time.
  • ephemeris a predicted trajectory for the satellite (s) from a specified initial time to a final time.
  • the resulting ephemerides and complete processing history can be output for display in a predefined file format chosen by the user.
  • Figure 1 shows the satellite trajectories necessary to
  • FIG. 2 shows a flowchart summarizing the setup procedure
  • FIG. 3 shows a flowchart graphically depicting the weighted
  • Figure 4 shows the angular errors associated with a nadir
  • Figure 5 shows the angular errors associated with a nadir
  • Figure 6 shows antenna tracking for nadir-pointing higher
  • Figure 7 shows an operational view of an Orbit/Covariance
  • Figure 8 shows a graphical presentation of the use of the
  • Figure 9 shows an index filter application.
  • Figure 10 shows collapsing a matrix
  • This invention is an Orbit/Covariance Estimation and Analysis (OCEAN) system for estimating the positions, velocities, and othe: parameters of multiple satellites and celestial bodies.
  • OCEAN consists of a technique for processing simultaneous orbit determination solutions for a multiple satellites within a computer and a prototype implementation of the design in modern, structured FORTRAN ® computer code for display on an x-y plotter, visual display, or printer. It may also be used to estimate parameters for other elements, such as the locations of ground stations and measurement biases.
  • the apparatus uses recorded observations (e.g., range, Doppler) and measurements from various sources as inputs to a weighted least squares batch estimation algorithm. The algorithm is used in an iterative fashion to estimate each parameter, with or without a priori knowledge of th.
  • the process is completed once the residual, the difference between the estimated parameter and observed parameter, satisfies a tolerance defined b. the user.
  • the OCEAN system can also generate a predicted trajectory (i.e., ephemeris) for the satellite (s) from a specified initial time to a final time.
  • the resulting ephemerides are output in a predetermined file format chosen by the user.
  • the apparatus is completely configured using a data base which determines the specific parameters to be used for each new orbit determination problem.
  • the goal of the batch least squares orbit determination algorithm is to estimate a given state vector at some specified time, which is usually at the beginning or end of a data arc. It is common to include the spacecraft's position and velocity as a part of the state, however, it is also possible to estimate such parameters as ground station locations, measurement model biases, satellite coefficient of drag, etc.
  • trajectory 17, X depends uptn the exactness of the dynamical
  • the "best" trajectory 17 is solved for using the
  • a reference or nominal trajectory 12, X " must be used as the starting point as the basis of the
  • the batch least squares algorithm estimates the difference between the nominal, X * , and the best estimate trajectories, X, 12 and 17, respectively. This is also called the
  • the estimation process uses the information contained in the measurements, such as range cr Doppler shift, as shown in Figure
  • Each measurement has a
  • this initial estimation epoch The accumulation at t- of all sensitivities from all measurements along with the accumulation o the residuals between the theoretical and actual measurements allows the error in the state at t to be estimated.
  • the equatio used in the accumulation and estimation are called the normal equations. If the user specifies a final epoch at which to repor the state, then the solved for state must be propagated to this epoch, t f .
  • ⁇ (t,,t.- ⁇ ) A(X*,t 1 ) ⁇ (t ll t 1 . : ) (3)
  • Eqs . 1 and 2 can be numerically integrated from one measurement to the next.
  • Eq . 2 can be computed analytically or se i- analytically . This is done for the state transition matrix.
  • the advantage of the analytical technique is an increase in speed of execution; however, the approximations used in these techniques sometimes causes divergence or an increase in the number of iterations required to converge. Note that the nominal trajectory, X " , 12 is used in each equation.
  • the key to the orbit determination is through the observation- state relationship. This, as its name implies, connects the observations to the defined state.
  • a theoretical model is developed for each measurement type. When an actual measurement is taken, there is a difference or error between the actual and modeled measurements. Since the model uses the state in its computation, the observations and states are related by
  • the weight, W, for each observation is inversely proportional to the observation noise squared, ⁇ - . It is assumed that the observation error, e, is random with zero mean and specified covariance. In this case, the weight is equal to the inverse of the expected value of the observation error squared.
  • R E[e_e ⁇ ] (7) and p is the number of measurements at time t_ .
  • Batch estimation involves calculating the partial derivatives of the theoretical observation, G, with respect to the state variables, X, evaluated along the nominal reference trajectory 12,
  • This (pxn) matrix is called the measurement sensitivity matri and is labeled H •
  • H dx The H matrix is evaluated at the measurement time t_. It ⁇ ust be mapped back to the initial time, t , since the goal is to estimate the state at time t-. This is performed by multiplying H by the ⁇ matrix obtained from Eq. 3 evaluated from t_ to t-.
  • H ⁇ H_ ⁇ (t . ,t ) (10)
  • the sensitivity matrix for measurement, i, evaluated at t H ) is combined with R "1 of Eq.6 and accumulated for each observation in the following manner.
  • the H matrix is combined with R and the residual, y, for each observation to form the L matrix.
  • R will be of dimension p x p whereas in the latter case R will be of dimension m x m.
  • the estimate of the error, x is then used to update the nominal trajectory, X ' , at time, t-, to provide the best estimate of the state, X, at time t : .
  • the test for convergence is satisfied when the difference between the root-mean-square (rms) values of two successive batch iterations is less than the observation noise, ⁇ , or some user defined value.
  • the rms is the sum of the square of the residuals divided by the total number of observations, N, while the residual is the difference between the actual and theoretical observation evaluated along the nominal trajectory.
  • a nominal estimate of the state, X * :: , at the initial time, t I , an initial covariance matrix, P :: , and an estimate epoch, t : and a final epoch, t_-, and an estimate of noise, ⁇ .
  • the OCEAN software allows new measurement models to be incorporated into the program by inserting a subprogram describing the measurement as a function of the state variables.
  • a standard interface is used to pass state variable information to the measurement subprogram and receive predicted measurements and sensitivities from the subprogram.
  • the state vector represents those parameters of the dynamical problem that a user may wish to estimate or consider. Each parameter is assigned an element within the state error. Table 2
  • ground station parameters and miscellaneous parameters.
  • the program can be configured at compile time for the maximum allowable number of satellites 16 and ground stations 15, each of these will be configured at compile time for the maximum allowable number of satellites 16 and ground stations 15, each of these will be configured at compile time for the maximum allowable number of satellites 16 and ground stations 15, each of these will be configured at compile time for the maximum allowable number of satellites 16 and ground stations 15, each of these will be configured at compile time for the maximum allowable number of satellites 16 and ground stations 15, each of these will be configured at compile time for the maximum allowable number of satellites 16 and ground stations 15, each of these will be configured at compile time for the maximum allowable number of satellites 16 and ground stations 15, each of these will be configured at compile time for the maximum allowable number of satellites 16 and ground stations 15, each of these will be configured at compile time for the maximum allowable number of satellites 16 and ground stations 15, each of these will be configured at compile time for the maximum allowable number of satellites 16 and ground stations 15, each of these
  • Each ground station 15 may have multiple antennas. For each
  • ground stations 15 is easily accomplished, if ' desired.
  • the OCEAN software provides a variety of optional output coordinate frames and time scales:
  • TAI International Atomic time
  • OCEAN makes use of several existing computer s These programs are listed below along with their source well known to those skilled in the art.
  • Biases for each measurement type selected can be estimated. single bias can be estimated for the entire data span, or pass b-_ pass biases can be estimated. Biases may be estimated fcr satellite 16, ground station 15 or by link (satellite-station
  • OCEAN software processes six classes of tracking types: angles, absolute range, relative range, range rate, integrated Doppler, and intersatellite range data. There are additional variations in each of these classes to account for idiosyncrasies in actual tracking systems which are currently in use. However, these six broad classes of tracking types accommodate most available tracking systems.
  • Each of these classes of tracking types is modeled with respect to the orbit of the satellite (s) , the orientation of the Earth and the location of the tracking station on the earth. These models are necessarily a function of polar motion and ⁇ UTI1.
  • These measurements contain error sources due to mis-modeled or unmodeled physical effects, as well as time and/or frequency measuring devices associated with the satellite and/or the tracking station. These error terms are estimated in OCEAN 10 alone or in combination. The errors are modeled as a constant or a piecewise constant of time.
  • Antenna offsets are used to compensate for the difference between the location the signal is received at the satellite 16 and
  • the program to be configured to correct the tracking observations for the effects of an antenna offset.
  • FIGURES 4 and 5 demonstrate the angular error associated with
  • the ground station 15 is depicted in the three
  • AOS Acquisition of Signal
  • MaxEl maximum elevation
  • LOS Loss of Signal
  • phase center of the satellite 16 antenna is different than the
  • the secondary effect of antenna offsets are active vs. passive tracking by the satellite 16 antenna. If the antenna can be
  • the antenna offset effect is reduced. This effect is usually small and is not applied in OCEAN. All antennas are considered passive and fixed in orientation with respect to the satellite 16.
  • curvature of the earth 13 reduces the angular error due to
  • Two antenna models are used in OCEAN.
  • One is a generic model based on a nadir-pointing satellite 16 rotated by a roll-pitch-yaw
  • the state transition matrix (STM) relates the state at one time to the state at another time.
  • the STM can be computed in this program one of two ways: (1) using an analytical two-body approximation for the satellite 16 dynamical equations of motion;
  • Integration of the variational equations provides a method for reducing the amount of approximation and linearization and allows the estimation of such parameters as coefficient of drag and reflectivity coefficient. This may improve the rate of convergence .
  • the state transition matrix used by OCEAN is a hybrid set of coordinates that contains both state information for the satellite in J2000.0 coordinates and information for the stations in CTS coordinates. At each new observation time, the state and state transition matrix are computed. The satellite parameters are integrated to the observation time while the station locations remain fixed in CTS coordinates. The result is a consistent state, STM, and observation sensitivities in J2000.0/CTS hybrid coordinates .
  • the state vector at the estimation epoch (See, Table 2) is a
  • the sensitivity matrix must be converted to a hybrid J2000.0/CTS set of coordinates. This is accomplished using the state transition matrix.
  • the hybrid state transition matrix maps the state at one epoch to the state at another epoch.
  • the first part of the hybrid STM, ⁇ ;:;;.: _-; :: ; . - (t. , t- ) maps the partial derivatives from the observation epoch t. to the estimation epoch t 0 .
  • the second part :Z : x . xz s (t . ,t;) maps the partial derivatives from J2000.0 to CTS for the station 15 states using the matrice
  • H- _-;- . - . - : ⁇ : H :: --. : J; - ⁇ . , ⁇ :OC; . 0/J::O:.: (t_,t : ) ⁇ ;: - . - ⁇ : ; (t ,t : ) (23:
  • this matrix is not the identity matrix.
  • Partial derivatives are required to compute the sensitivities of the measurements with respect to the states.
  • the partial derivatives for each measurement type are well known to those skilled in the art .
  • the measurement sensitivities are saved from one measurement to the next measurement by satellite 16 to allow OCEAN to process multiple satellites 16 simultaneously.
  • the preprocessed data file 19 is used and an orbital solution
  • OCEAN 24 program are the Weighted Least Squares Orbit Determinaticr.
  • OCEAN 24 may be run in either the
  • the data base allows each sub process of OCEAN 24 to be configured independently of all other
  • an override file is provided to independently override any data base setting for each subprocess .
  • statistical data editing is controlled by the program according to database command settings. None of these activities require operator intervention.
  • the user sets the statistical data editing settings interactively.
  • the installation file and Database file.
  • other files may be required by a process.
  • the WLS-OD 36 process requires an estimaticn
  • the first required file for all processes is the installatio file.
  • This file contains an input list consisting of keywords and file names that are used to configure the system, as shown in Table
  • An optional file means the filename may be requested depending on how the user has configured the system. For example, if the user wishes to record a residual file during the WLS-OZ 36
  • file is an Input or Output file (I/O) and the type of interface used to specify the filename, either through the PNAMES.DAT file o: specified by the user during runtime.
  • I/O Input or Output file
  • DAT file o specified by the user during runtime.
  • the installation file 46 is read and the filenames are stored in memory immediately following the start of execution of OCEAN 24.
  • the output file 48 is opened, if the output filename keyword appeared and was valid in installation file.
  • the program checks to see if a supplemental file is specified at the end of the database. If so, the program loads the supplemental database . Subsequent supplemental databases may be loaded by a supplemental file (e.g., supplemental file 1 may load supplemental file 2.)
  • the program checks to see if a supplemental override file is specified at the end of the override file 54.
  • Supplemental override file 1 may load supplemental override file 2.
  • Database File BASE_FILE Contains commands used to configure system Override File OV_FILE Contains commands used to override the database Supplemental SUP_DIR Lists directory containing
  • Leap Second TAIUTC_FILE Lists dates when a leap second was
  • Output Files OUT_FILES Contains a history of results from an OCEAN 24 run.
  • the program loads the TAIUTC, Mark3 , and burn files 56 into memory.
  • the program then requests the user to select which process to run 58.
  • the program requests the user to specify the input OIC filename 62.
  • the program requests the user to specify the ephemeris filename, if the system was configured to create one 66.
  • the program then sets the active burns, opens the solar panel orientation file, and opens the attitude files, if OCEAN 24 is configured to use them 68.
  • the system is configured and the Create Ephemeris 38 process executes until the ephemeris has been created 72.
  • the ephemeris file is opened and written.
  • PN Filename specified in PNAMES.DAT
  • the program requests the user to specify the input r the WLS-OD 36 process
  • the program requests the user to specify the input OIC filename.
  • the file is then loaded 74.
  • the program requests the user to specify the residual filename, if the system was configured to create one 78.
  • the observation file 76 is then loaded and analyzed 78.
  • the user selects which satellites and ground stations to use 82 and 84, respectively.
  • the program requests the user to specify the fitted and predicted OIC output filenames 78.
  • the program requests the user to specify the epr.emeris filename 78, if the system was configured tc create one .
  • the program requests the user to specify the estimation and covariance files 78.
  • the program sets the active burns, opens the solar panel orientation files, and opens the attitude files, if OCEAN 24 is configured to use them 92.
  • the estimation and covariance files are then loaded, read, and analyzed 86 and 88.
  • the system is configured 92 and the WLS-OD 36 estimation process executes until the solution has converged 94.
  • the ephemeris file is opened and written 98.
  • the program requests the user to specify the input data to be stored in the OIC.
  • This is satellite orbital state data in the form of Cartesian positions and velocities 102.
  • the system is configured and the Make OIC 42 process executes until the configured data has been stored in the appropriate variables 102.
  • the OIC file is opened and written 104.
  • the program requests the user to specify either supplemental files to be loaded or specific database or override commands which replace current values in the database or override variables, respectively 106.
  • the system is configured.
  • Each process can be configured via the database and override files as the user desires.
  • the minimum configuration consists of only the bare minimum files that are required to run the process.
  • the normal oonfiguration consists of those files a user would normally use on a daily basis that may provide accurate but not necessarily precise results.
  • the enhanced configuration consists of all possible files that would enhance the solution and may provide precise results. Table 5 shows the configuration for
  • the OCEAN software prototype is preferably written in Standard FORTRAN 77/90 ® , however, the same algorithms could be realized using any scientific computer language that will achieve the same outputs. All file interfaces are ASCII text to ensure ease of readability and portability between computer platforms.
  • the OCEAN prototype has been run on Digital VAX ® and Alpha ® computers under the OpenV_-'S ® operating system. As it can be seen in the foregoing, the system architecture consists of a single TABLE 4: MINIMUM, NORMAL, AND ENHANCED CONFIGURATIONS BY PROCESS
  • the source code consists of a main executive program with a series of subroutines located under it.
  • the subroutines have been nested with each subsequent level of subroutines playing a supporting role to the calling level of subroutines .
  • the maximum size of a given orbit determination problem is determined by the number of satellites, ground stations, measurement types, and states to be estimated. Global parameter statements used throughout the program allow the maximum problem size to be extended without the need to reprogram any FORTRAN code.
  • the OCEAN technique is data base driven. Most parameters involved in an orbit determination and prediction problem may be set through the data base without rebuilding the executable module. Logical scripts are used throughout the data base to establish processing strategies including designating the estimation parameters, establishing editing procedures, and determining convergence criteria. A primary, configuration controlled, data base is maintained to support multiple software installations. Each individual installation may substitute any item in the primary file using a site-specific override file. Communication between the orbit determination and orbit prediction segments of the program is through the OCEAN initial condition OIC file which contains all the information necessary for the orbit predictor to recreate the ephemeris and covariance computed by the orbit determination segment.
  • the OIC includes: satellite position, velocity, drag, and solar pressure coefficients with covariance; satellite physical parameters including mass and area; Earth orientation parameters including polar motion angles and Greenwich hour angle. Timing information for the current and historical accumulation of leap seconds is provided by a single file.
  • the OCEAN processing algorithm permits any number of satellite orbits to be computed simultaneously.
  • the full program "state' which includes all relevant parameters for each satellite, ground station, and measurement model involved in a particular problem is assembled by the program at execution time.
  • the full state as seen in Table 2, contains all the information on the satellites,
  • ground station ground station
  • measurement model biases used in an orbit determination problem.
  • the OCEAN program operates using multiple dimension array pointer variables. These pointer variables point to where in the full state a specific variable lies and whether the state is constant/estimated/oonsidered (C/E/C) . Constant values do not change, estimated values are computed from observations, and considered values have covariance affect the results of estimated parameters by limiting the amount an estimated parameter is update and providing error information.
  • C/E/C constant/estimated/oonsidered
  • index array contains a corresponding element for each full state element and indicates, like the substrate pointer arrays, if the state is C/E/C.
  • the full parameter list can be filtered 124 or
  • the index array is applied to the full state using the filter resulting in the C/E/C state. If the index contains a "0" it is considered a constant , a "1" fo an estimated parameter, and a "2" for a consider parameter.
  • Satellite 16 and ground stations 15 are grouped in separate
  • ground station 15 pointer is defined in a single FORTRAN ® include
  • OCEAN uses a similar filter procedure to collapse matrices. Nonzero values of the index array 122 would indicate if elements of
  • the large matrix 131 should be retained when collapsing the large
  • the index array is formed using a combination of the satellite 16 and ground station 15 pointer variables.
  • the minimum inputs required by the OCEAN program for any orbit determination problem are the Data Base, estimation file, an Initial Condition File, and an Observation File.
  • the Data Base file contains the force model, describes the satellite 16 and
  • the estimation file selects the
  • the Initial Condition file provides satellite 16 position and velocity used to create a
  • the Observation file contains measurements preprocesse into one of the OCEAN observation formats. For precision applications, external data is also required. The Earth Orientation must be obtained to precisely determine the orientatio of the Earth 13. OCEAN accepts input from the United States Naval
  • a number of orbit products are produced by the C ⁇ .-__ program. Absolute orbit determination can be done simultaneously for any number of satellites. Relative navigation algorithms can be applied for pairs of satellites 16. Fitted and predicted
  • products can be produced automatically with no user interaction o manually using interactive commands from the user.
  • the OCEAN program addresses requirements speoifto to multiple satellite 16 orbit determinations, i.e., full cross covariance
  • Enhanced fault isolation is achieved through simultaneous solutions when the entire network is considered as a whole. For example, component errors may become observable when multiple observations across multiple tracking links are combined.
  • Critical to the design of this technique is the prevision for configuring all aspects of the problem from a data base.
  • This implementation allows a single computer code to be applied to a wide variety of orbit determination problems without the need for modification of the computer instructions. Instead the database file is modified to adapt the code to a particular problem.
  • the data base allows independent configurations for orbit determination and orbit prediction processes.
  • Input data may independently routed to these processes from various sources such as the data base, data base override, or external file. Every dat base value may be altered using an application specific override file. Using this override function, a processing site may modify its processing while still maintaining the original data base configuration .

Abstract

The orbit/covariance estimation and analysis (OCEAN) technique (24) utilizes ground station observations (15) collected from satellites (16) passing overhead and estimates the positions, velocities, and other parameters of multiple satellites. It also estimates parameters for other elements, such as the locations of ground stations (15) and measurement biases. The technique utilizes recorded observations (e.g., range, Doppler) and measurements from various sources (28) as inputs to a weighted least squares batch estimation algorithm used in iterative fashion to estimate each parameter, with or without a priori knowledge of the errors involved with each observed parameter. Using the results of the estimation process or a predefined initial condition file, the OCEAN program (24) can also generate a predicted trajectory (i.e., ephemeris) (38) for the satellite(s) (16) from a specified initial time to a final time. The resulting ephemerides can be output in a predefined file format chosen by the user.

Description

ORBIT/COVARIANCE ESTIMATION AND ANALYSIS (OCEAN) DETERMINATION FOR SATELLITES
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/073,881, filed on February 6, 1998.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Field of the Invention
This invention pertains generally to a device and method for determining the position, velocity, and other parameters for a satellite and more specifically to an apparatus and method for determining the positions, velocities and other parameters of a multiple of satellites, or celestial bodies.
Description of the Related Prior Art
Highly automated, accurate, and reliable orbit determination processing is required for large scale satellite networks. Reliable automatic processing reduces the cost of operating a satellite network by reducing the need for expert orbit determination .
Several general purpose orbit determination and prediction techniques exist today, however, none of these techniques automatically processes raw tracking data and process as finished orbit products and analyses using Batch Least Squares; simultaneously compute orbits and covariance for complex networks of multiple satellites, using multiple ground stations with various tracking measurement types; computes relative satellite trajectories in which one satellite orbit is determined very accurately with respect to another satellite orbit; identifies calibration anomalies in tracking network components by combining tracking measurements; and incorporates state-of-the-art dynamical models that allow rapid update to newer models when they become available. Because of this the following difficulties arise; in the absence of robust automatic operations, skilled orbit analysts must intervene to cull bad observations by manually examining observation errors; most existing orbit determination techniques are designed to process one satellite at a time, requiring large- scale satellite networks to be processed serially. Relative navigation requirements are typically addressed by custom program techniques on a case-by-case basis. Also, calibration anomalies have typically been identified by a parametric series of orbit determination computations where sets of parameters are held constant or estimated in a brute force attempt to isolate error sources; and the roots of most orbit determination techniques available today can be traced back to the beginning of the space age. The codes within these techniques are often undocumented, hard to read, and harder to update. Large expenditures are often incurred when model updates are required.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The object of this invention is to provide an apparatus and method for estimating the positions, velocities, and other parameters of one or more satellites and other celestial bodies simultaneously .
These and other objectives are achieved by the orbit/covariance estimation and analysis (OCEAN) which consists of a design of a technique for processing simultaneous orbit determination solutions for a multiple of satellites and implementation of the design in modern, structured FORTRAN computer code. The invention is an effective, and accurate device for orbit determination of larger scale satellite networks. OCEAN utilizes ground station observations collected from satellites passing overhead and estimates the positions, velocities, and other parameters of multiple satellites. Satellite parameters include coefficient of drag, solar radiation reflecting coefficient, orbit decay rate, and timing and frequency biases.
Biases are to an output display. It also may be used to estimate parameters for other elements, such as the locations of ground stations and measurement biases. The technique utilizes recorded observations (e.g., range, Doppler) and measurements from various sources as inputs to a weighted least squares batch estimation algorithm used in an iterative fashion to estimate each parameter, with or without a priori knowledge of the errors involved with each observed parameter. The process is completed once the residual, the difference between the estimated parameter and the observed parameter, satisfies the tolerance defined by the user.
Using the results of the estimation process or a predefined initial condition file, OCEAN can also generate a predicted trajectory (i.e., ephemeris) for the satellite (s) from a specified initial time to a final time. The resulting ephemerides and complete processing history can be output for display in a predefined file format chosen by the user.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Figure 1 shows the satellite trajectories necessary to
establish the estimated nominal trajectory.
Figure 2 shows a flowchart summarizing the setup procedure
for the batch algorithm.
Figure 3 shows a flowchart graphically depicting the weighted
least squares algorithm.
Figure 4 shows the angular errors associated with a nadir
pointing satellite with the antennas offset from the center of the mass in a fixed position.
Figure 5 shows the angular errors associated with a nadir
pointing satellite with the antennas pointed toward te ground station.
Figure 6 shows antenna tracking for nadir-pointing higher
altitude satellite.
Figure 7 shows an operational view of an Orbit/Covariance
Estimation and Analysis (OCEAN) system.
Figure 8 shows a graphical presentation of the use of the
external files for each process in the OCEAN program. Figure 9 shows an index filter application.
Figure 10 shows collapsing a matrix.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
This invention is an Orbit/Covariance Estimation and Analysis (OCEAN) system for estimating the positions, velocities, and othe: parameters of multiple satellites and celestial bodies. OCEAN consists of a technique for processing simultaneous orbit determination solutions for a multiple satellites within a computer and a prototype implementation of the design in modern, structured FORTRAN® computer code for display on an x-y plotter, visual display, or printer. It may also be used to estimate parameters for other elements, such as the locations of ground stations and measurement biases. The apparatus uses recorded observations (e.g., range, Doppler) and measurements from various sources as inputs to a weighted least squares batch estimation algorithm. The algorithm is used in an iterative fashion to estimate each parameter, with or without a priori knowledge of th.
errors involved with each observed parameter. The process is completed once the residual, the difference between the estimated parameter and observed parameter, satisfies a tolerance defined b. the user. Using the results of the estimation process or a predefined initial condition file, the OCEAN system can also generate a predicted trajectory (i.e., ephemeris) for the satellite (s) from a specified initial time to a final time. The resulting ephemerides are output in a predetermined file format chosen by the user. The apparatus is completely configured using a data base which determines the specific parameters to be used for each new orbit determination problem.
The goal of the batch least squares orbit determination algorithm is to estimate a given state vector at some specified time, which is usually at the beginning or end of a data arc. It is common to include the spacecraft's position and velocity as a part of the state, however, it is also possible to estimate such parameters as ground station locations, measurement model biases, satellite coefficient of drag, etc.
In the OCEAN system, as shown in Figure 1, the satellite 16
follows an actual trajectory, X, 11; this represents absolute
truth, which would be known if the physical world were perfectly modeled. However, only the best possible estimate of trajectory 17 can be determined through orbit determination. This "best"
trajectory 17, X, depends uptn the exactness of the dynamical
model and on the quality of the measurements (e.g., ranger, Doppler, etc.) . The "best" trajectory 17 is solved for using the
orbit determination process. A reference or nominal trajectory 12, X", must be used as the starting point as the basis of the
solution. The batch least squares algorithm estimates the difference between the nominal, X*, and the best estimate trajectories, X, 12 and 17, respectively. This is also called the
estimated error in the nominal trajectory, x< 18.
Therefore, at the initial time, t , the best estimate is defined as
X- = X* + x:. (1)
The estimation process uses the information contained in the measurements, such as range cr Doppler shift, as shown in Figure
1, of a satellite's actual trajectory 11 taken by a ground station
15 to provide an updated trajectory. Each measurement has a
sensitivity to the errors in the actual trajectory 11 with respect
to an a priori satellite 16 state (position, velocity, typically)
at an initial epoch, tc . These sensitivities provide a measure of the statistical error or covar ance associated with the best trajectory 17. The sensitivity, or estimate error in nominal
trajectory 18, at the time of each measurement must be mapped, to
this initial estimation epoch. The accumulation at t- of all sensitivities from all measurements along with the accumulation o the residuals between the theoretical and actual measurements allows the error in the state at t to be estimated. The equatio used in the accumulation and estimation are called the normal equations. If the user specifies a final epoch at which to repor the state, then the solved for state must be propagated to this epoch, tf.
The problem of orbit determination and prediction is linearized to simplify the estimation process and the equations involved. One important equation is the observations-state relationship equation. The linearization process and this equatio are described below as are the a priori weights and covariances,
the linearization of the observation- state relationship, and the state error estimation and update, and, finally the test for convergence .
Notation is important when describing the algorithm. The equations herein follow the following notation shown in Table 1.
The estimation algorithm requires the user to follow a setup procedure prior to execution. First the system must be configured Figure 2 shows a flowchart summarizing the setup procedure. This
includes configuring the propagator, orbit Table 1 NOTATIONS USED IN ALGORITHM
( ) - Best Estimate at time t
* - Nominal
( ) - Time Derivative
(),s - Ground Station t:; - Epoch of Initial Condition t- - Epoch of Estimated State t: - Time of First Measurement t: - Time of Last (1th) Measurement determination parameters, specifying file names, and setting up such things as the epoch for estimation, the final epoch to which the final estimate is propagated, etc. The initial state and associated covariance also must be initialized. Following the setup, the user must choose those states to be estimated. The differential correction or estimation algorithm is invoked. This provides the best estimate solution and associated covariance.
These are then propagated to the final epoch. A summary report is then published which lists important information used in the estimation problem.
The problem of orbit determination and prediction is inherently nonlinear, so the equations of motion must be linearized for the batch algorithm. The nominal state, X", can be integrated directly; however, the state transition matrix, Φ, must be integrated using the linearized state variable relations. This is accomplished by taking the partial derivatives of the differential equations governing the equations of motion, labeled F, with respect to the state variables. The partial derivative matrix is labeled the A matrix. These form the variational equations.
X = F(X*,t) (2)
Φ(t,,t.-ι) = A(X*,t1)Φ(tllt1.:) (3)
dF ( X ' , t,) A ( X t , ) = - dx Eqs . 1 and 2 can be numerically integrated from one measurement to the next. In OCEAN, Eq . 2 can be computed analytically or se i- analytically . This is done for the state transition matrix. The advantage of the analytical technique is an increase in speed of execution; however, the approximations used in these techniques sometimes causes divergence or an increase in the number of iterations required to converge. Note that the nominal trajectory, X" , 12 is used in each equation.
The key to the orbit determination is through the observation- state relationship. This, as its name implies, connects the observations to the defined state. A theoretical model is developed for each measurement type. When an actual measurement is taken, there is a difference or error between the actual and modeled measurements. Since the model uses the state in its computation, the observations and states are related by
Y_ = G_ (X_,t_)+e_ (5) where
Y_ = p x 1 vector of observations at t_
G^ = p x 1 vector of theoretical observations as a function of the states at t ex = p x 1 vector of observation errors at t p = number of observations at t
For example, in satellite application, if both a range, o, and range rate, p, measurements were taken at time t_ then the vectors are defined as:
Figure imgf000011_0001
γ(x-x,s)"+ (y-y_s)~ + (z-z- r -r . (f-f, /o
Figure imgf000012_0001
r-r. (r-r,_
Figure imgf000012_0002
The weight, W, for each observation is inversely proportional to the observation noise squared, σ- . It is assumed that the observation error, e, is random with zero mean and specified covariance. In this case, the weight is equal to the inverse of the expected value of the observation error squared.
Figure imgf000012_0003
where
R = E[e_e\] (7) and p is the number of measurements at time t_ .
Each observation, Y, is compared to the theoretical observation, G, one measurement at a time. The difference between the two values is called the residual, labeled with a lower case y residual = Y. - G(X*,t_) = y_ (8)
Batch estimation involves calculating the partial derivatives of the theoretical observation, G, with respect to the state variables, X, evaluated along the nominal reference trajectory 12,
X* . This (pxn) matrix is called the measurement sensitivity matri and is labeled H
θG(X*, t.
H dx The H matrix is evaluated at the measurement time t_. It ~ust be mapped back to the initial time, t , since the goal is to estimate the state at time t-. This is performed by multiplying H by the Φ matrix obtained from Eq. 3 evaluated from t_ to t-.
H^ = H_Φ(t.,t ) (10)
The sensitivity matrix for measurement, i, evaluated at t H ) is combined with R"1 of Eq.6 and accumulated for each observation in the following manner.
Figure imgf000013_0001
where 1 is the total number of measurements. This matrix is the inverse of the covariance matrix, P. "- = P = |HT R~Η|~- ;i2)
Likewise, the H matrix is combined with R and the residual, y, for each observation to form the L matrix.
-Σ T y,
The H matrix can be accumulated in a matrix of dimension x n, where p is the maximum number of measurements at the time t , or each measurement sensitivity can be placed in a separate row withi the matrix resulting in a final dimension of m x n, where m = pxl and 1 is the total number of measurements. In the former case, R will be of dimension p x p whereas in the latter case R will be of dimension m x m.
Using Eqs. 11 and 13, the batch algorithm provides an estimate of the error, x, in the nominal trajectory. x = M":L (14)
Therefore, the full form of Eq.13 is x = |HrW~:H|~:HTR~:y (15) or x = |HTR":H|~:HTWy. (16)
The estimate of the error, x, is then used to update the nominal trajectory, X', at time, t-, to provide the best estimate of the state, X, at time t:. Repeating Eq.l
X; = X" : + x: . If the batch algorithm is exercised again, then the best estimate of the trajectory becomes the nominal.
X- = X. (17)
This can be performed iteratively until convergence.
The test for convergence is satisfied when the difference between the root-mean-square (rms) values of two successive batch iterations is less than the observation noise, σ, or some user defined value. In this case, the rms is the sum of the square of the residuals divided by the total number of observations, N, while the residual is the difference between the actual and theoretical observation evaluated along the nominal trajectory. residual = Y_ - G(X\t = y. (18)
Figure imgf000014_0001
irms. ~ rms-. < σ → convergence (20! The weighted least squares algorithm (WLS) is implemented in the OCEAN prototype as listed sequentially below and can be found graphically in Figure 3.
Given: A nominal estimate of the state, X* ::, at the initial time, tI=, an initial covariance matrix, P::, and an estimate epoch, t: and a final epoch, t_-, and an estimate of noise, σ.
1. Initialize: weights and covariance matrices. Null M matrix, L matrix.
2. Propagate covariance matrix and state from t;: to t;.
3. Set t._; = 0.
4. Read next (first) observation at time t; .
5. Integrate nominal trajectory and state transition matrix from t..: to t, .
6. Calculate sensitivity matrix H_ at t..
7. Map E ._ to time t: and label it H.
8. Calculate theoretical observation, G.
9. Calculate residual, y.
10. Edit data. Check elevation constraint and bad residual limit. If low elevation or bad residual, goto 4.
11. Accumulate residuals.
12. Accumulate normal equations (evaluate M, and L matrices) .
13. More observations? If last observation, goto 14. Else set Ti_: = t. and goto 4.
14. Solve normal equations and estimate error in the state, x.
15. Update nominal state X* by adding x.
16. Compute rms .
17. Test convergence using rms. If not converged, goto 1. If converged, stop.
The OCEAN software allows new measurement models to be incorporated into the program by inserting a subprogram describing the measurement as a function of the state variables. A standard interface is used to pass state variable information to the measurement subprogram and receive predicted measurements and sensitivities from the subprogram.
The state vector represents those parameters of the dynamical problem that a user may wish to estimate or consider. Each parameter is assigned an element within the state error. Table 2
lists the state elements, variable names, a description of the state, and default units. The user may choose to estimate any state simply by setting an appropriate estimation flag corresponding to that state. Therefore, any number of states may be estimated.
Referring again to Figure 1, the current state vector is
comprised of satellite parameters ground station 15 locations,
ground station parameters, and miscellaneous parameters. The program can be configured at compile time for the maximum allowable number of satellites 16 and ground stations 15, each of these will
be discussed below. For each satellite 16, eleven parameters can be
estimated. They are: three states corresponding to the satellite's 16 position; three states corresponding to the satellites 16
velocity; a coefficient of drag; a decay state; a reflectivity coefficient; and two states for frequency offset and drift of the satellite's 16 clock, if required.
Each ground station 15 may have multiple antennas. For each
ground station 15, the position of each antenna, and the
frequency bias for all antennas at a site can be estimated. It is assumed that any other antennas at the given site are known well in relation to each other, so estimating one ground station 12 implies
improvement in knowledge of all antennas. Treating individual TAB: TABLE OF ESTIMATED PARAMETER
Figure imgf000017_0001
:ABLE 2 (CONT) :
Figure imgf000018_0001
TABLE 2 : ; CONT
Figure imgf000019_0001
antennas as if one ground station 15 as a plurality of
ground stations 15 is easily accomplished, if 'desired.
All of the underlying orbital calculations performed in the software are made in the Mean Equator and equinox of J2000.0 coordinate frame. The internal time scale for all computation is International Atomic Time 7AI.. It is convenient to carry out the trajectory integration in this coordinate frame and time scale; however, depending on the application, the state o: the satellite 16 may be referenced to other coordinate frames and
time scales. For example, most satellite 16 tracking measurements
are referenced to an Earth 13 fixed coordinate frame
and to Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) .
The OCEAN software provides a variety of optional output coordinate frames and time scales:
Coordinate Frames :
1. Mean Equator and Equinox of 2000.0
2. Mean Ecliptic and Equinox of J2000.0
3. Mean Ecliptic and Equinox of Date
4. True Ecliptic and Equinox of Date
5. Mean Equator and equinox of Date 6. True Equator and equinox of Date 7. Instantaneous Terrestrial System 'rotating cr inertial velocity)
8. Conventional Terrestrial System rotating cr inertial velocity)
9. Mean Equator and Equinox of B195C . Z
Time Scales :
1. International Atomic time (TAI)
2. Coordinated Universal Time (UTC)
3. Global Positioning System Time
4. Universal Time (UTl)
5. Barycentric Time (TDB)
6. Terrestrial Time (TT)
The difference between UTC and the fundamental time (TAI) changes as leap seconds are added. To account for ; software uses an external file containing the past and future second additions. In this way, the software can operate srr.cc through leap second events. The predicted and historical differences between UTl and TAI are also used by the software automatically account for changes in the Earth 13 rotation.
To accomplish these coordinate transformations and variations, and to enhance the overall modeling capabili software, OCEAN makes use of several existing computer s These programs are listed below along with their source well known to those skilled in the art.
Program Source
DE200 Planetary Ephemeris Jet propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena,
CA USNO Planetary Ephemeris US Naval Observatory, Washington, DC USNO Earth Nutation US Naval Observatory, Washington, DC SGP4 Orbit Propagator US Space Command, Colorado Springs,
CO PPT2 Orbit Propagator US Naval Space Command, Dahlgren, VA
Biases for each measurement type selected can be estimated. single bias can be estimated for the entire data span, or pass b-_ pass biases can be estimated. Biases may be estimated fcr satellite 16, ground station 15 or by link (satellite-station
pair) . Some equations used in OCEAN make use of the transformation matrix which defines the rotation from the CTS to the Inertial J2000.0 system. This transformation includes the effects of precession, nutation, polar motion, and ΔUT1. These corrections can be combined into a single 6 x 6 matrix . This process is well known to those skilled in the art. The polar motion and ΔUT1 coefficients are automatically incorporated into the orbit estimation file input. The Greenwich hour angle (GHA) rotation matrix, however, differs for position and velocity vectors. The effects of the transport theorem, which relates inertial to rotating reference frames, must be used when evaluating the velocity terms. Note the precession, nutation, and polar motion corrections have angular rates associated with them that can be accounted for by using the transport theorem, but rates are small enough to be considered negligible.
OCEAN software processes six classes of tracking types: angles, absolute range, relative range, range rate, integrated Doppler, and intersatellite range data. There are additional variations in each of these classes to account for idiosyncrasies in actual tracking systems which are currently in use. However, these six broad classes of tracking types accommodate most available tracking systems.
Each of these classes of tracking types is modeled with respect to the orbit of the satellite (s) , the orientation of the Earth and the location of the tracking station on the earth. These models are necessarily a function of polar motion and ΔUTI1.
These measurements contain error sources due to mis-modeled or unmodeled physical effects, as well as time and/or frequency measuring devices associated with the satellite and/or the tracking station. These error terms are estimated in OCEAN 10 alone or in combination. The errors are modeled as a constant or a piecewise constant of time.
Antenna offsets are used to compensate for the difference between the location the signal is received at the satellite 16 and
the center of mass of the satellite 16. This correction becomes
especially important for signals that arrive at antennas that are far from the center of mass, for satellites 16 with large amplitude
attitude changes, and for highly accurate passive ranging techniques such as satellite 16 laser ranging. The database allows
the program to be configured to correct the tracking observations for the effects of an antenna offset.
FIGURES 4 and 5 demonstrate the angular error associated with
a nadir or fixed pointing satellite 16 with a receive antenna
offset from the center of the mass. In Figure 4 the antenna is
fixed while in Figure 5 the antenna points toward the ground
station 15. The ground station 15 is depicted in the three
different phases as it tracks the satellite 16. The phases are
Acquisition of Signal (AOS) , the maximum elevation (MaxEl) , and the Loss of Signal (LOS) . Note the range from the station 15 to the
phase center of the satellite 16 antenna is different than the
range from the station 15 to the satellite 16 center of mass. It
is the position and velocity of the center of mass that is estimated in the WLS-OD problem.
The secondary effect of antenna offsets are active vs. passive tracking by the satellite 16 antenna. If the antenna can be
pointed toward the target, in this case the ground station 12, then
the antenna offset effect is reduced. This effect is usually small and is not applied in OCEAN. All antennas are considered passive and fixed in orientation with respect to the satellite 16.
Note the curvature of the Earth 13 is not taken into account
in Figures 4 and 5. For a nadir pointing satellite 16, the
curvature of the earth 13 reduces the angular error due to
geometry. The higher the altitude of the satellite 16 the lower
the error at low elevations. Figure 6 demonstrates this effect.
Note the angular difference between the line of sight vector from the station 15 to the satellite 16 and the nadir pointing antenna
is lower (i.e., the line of sight vector and the antenna are more collinear) for the HEO satellite than the LEO. The macro models in OCEAN automatically incorporate the curvature effect.
Two antenna models are used in OCEAN. One is a generic model based on a nadir-pointing satellite 16 rotated by a roll-pitch-yaw
series of attitude angles and the second model is based on the TOPEX satellite.
The state transition matrix (STM) relates the state at one time to the state at another time. The STM can be computed in this program one of two ways: (1) using an analytical two-body approximation for the satellite 16 dynamical equations of motion;
and (2) integrating the variational equations. When estimating ground station 15 parameters such as the station 15 location,
transformations of the STM from CTS to inertial coordinates are modeled, as discussed below.
Integration of the variational equations provides a method for reducing the amount of approximation and linearization and allows the estimation of such parameters as coefficient of drag and reflectivity coefficient. This may improve the rate of convergence .
The state transition matrix used by OCEAN is a hybrid set of coordinates that contains both state information for the satellite in J2000.0 coordinates and information for the stations in CTS coordinates. At each new observation time, the state and state transition matrix are computed. The satellite parameters are integrated to the observation time while the station locations remain fixed in CTS coordinates. The result is a consistent state, STM, and observation sensitivities in J2000.0/CTS hybrid coordinates .
The state vector at the estimation epoch (See, Table 2) is a
hybrid J2000.0/CTS state, where the satellite 16 coordinates are
stored on J2000.0 and the station 15 location are stored in CTS
coordinates. When the partial derivatives are computed, the station 15 CTS coordinates in the state are transformed to J2000.0
coordinates at the observation epoch t.. Since the partials form the sensitivity matrix and since the sensitivity matrix is used to update the state, the sensitivity matrix must be converted to a hybrid J2000.0/CTS set of coordinates. This is accomplished using the state transition matrix.
The hybrid state transition matrix maps the state at one epoch to the state at another epoch. In this application, the first part of the hybrid STM, Φ;:;;.: _-;::;.- (t. , t- ) maps the partial derivatives from the observation epoch t. to the estimation epoch t0. The second part :Z: x . xzs (t.,t;) maps the partial derivatives from J2000.0 to CTS for the station 15 states using the matrice
formulation of Eqs. 21 and 22. ::.::.: = (CT'"'C=" = ) ~ C3"ΛC?"x= Ϊ , (21) x - : c ~-c- C""" "C" 'x — + C - " Cr"x - : 22 1
Therefore, Eq . 11 can be rewritten more explicitly as
H- _-;-.-.- :τ: = H ::--.: J;-^.:OC;.0/J::O:.: (t_,t:;:- .-■: ;(t ,t:) (23:
where
φ.;::- -:---.. :(t.,t:) = Φ;::-".c/cτ5(t1,t::7: ^(t^.t ) Φ=τs _-::::.: (t- , t- ) (24)
Note the interior STM Φ=TS/=TΞ (t_ , t ] which transforms CTS coordinates from time t: to time t. is simply the identity matrix i: the ground station 15 is assumed to be stationary. if the station
has movement then this matrix is not the identity matrix.
Partial derivatives are required to compute the sensitivities of the measurements with respect to the states. The partial derivatives for each measurement type are well known to those skilled in the art .
Since the integrated doppler measurement is actually a range difference between two successive measurements, the partial derivatives of the two successive measurements for a given satellite 16 are differenced. The sensitivity matrix elements mus:
also be mapped to the estimation epoch before differencing using the state transition matrix at each respective measurement time
ΔR(t ) drange(t.) crange(t-_-)
Φ(t.,t:) Φ(t,.lft-) (25) state(t-) δstate(t-) estate (t..,)
For this data type the measurement sensitivities are saved from one measurement to the next measurement by satellite 16 to allow OCEAN to process multiple satellites 16 simultaneously.
In a preferred embodiment, as shown in Figure 7 provides an
operational overview of the OCEAN system 10. In general, a ground
station 15 collects observations of a satellite 16 passing
overhead. The raw observations or data 14 are sent to a central
processing facility 22 where OCEAN 24 resides. The OCEAN 24 off¬
line utility program 26 called Preprocess processes the raw data 14
into files 19 usable by OCEAN 24. Outside agencies 28 also provide
files 29 to be used by OCEAN 24. OCEAN 24 is then executed either
autom.atically or manually by a user or consumer/mission operations 34. The preprocessed data file 19 is used and an orbital solution
for the satellites 16 involved in the problem is generated and
passed to either the consumer 34 or to the OCEAN 24 off-line
utilities 32 for further analysis. The main processes within the
OCEAN 24 program are the Weighted Least Squares Orbit Determinaticr.
(WLS-OD) routine 36, the Create Ephemeris (CE) routine 38, Make
OCEAN Initial Condition (OIC) routine 42, and the Modify Database
(MDB; routine 44.
As previously stated, OCEAN 24 may be run in either the
operational (i.e., automatic) or manual mode. In both the automatic and manual modes, OCEAN 24 execution is driven largely b
the values in its data base. The data base allows each sub process of OCEAN 24 to be configured independently of all other
subprocesses . Additionally, an override file is provided to independently override any data base setting for each subprocess . In the automatic mode, statistical data editing is controlled by the program according to database command settings. None of these activities require operator intervention.
In the manual mode, the user executes OCEAN 24 interactively
to examine and analyze different processing strategies. In the manual mode, the user sets the statistical data editing settings interactively.
If OCEAN 24 is run interactively, then OCEAN 24 will output
messages or information to the screen (not shown) . Some messages require user responses and OCEAN 24 will act on them accordingly.
This process continues until OCEAN 24 ends a specific process and
prompts the user for the next action.
Before OCEAN 24 can perform the functions WLS-OD 36, CE 38,
OIC 42, and MDB 44, all the system 10 parameters required by each
function must be correctly initialized. This includes selecting the satellites 16 and ground stations 15 involved in the problem,
choosing the states to be estimated, and configuring all remaining parameters that are necessary for successful completion of the selected process . There are two files needed by OCEAN 24 to
configure the system for all processes: the installation file and Database file. In addition, other files may be required by a process. For example, the WLS-OD 36 process requires an estimaticn
file and a covariance file.
The first required file for all processes is the installatio file. This file contains an input list consisting of keywords and file names that are used to configure the system, as shown in Table
3.
The database f ile is always required However , not all of the files listed in Table 3 are needed in all cases. In addition to
those that are needed and specified in the installation file, ther. are additional files or filenames that are specified by the user. Table 4 lists all the required or optional files for each
process. An optional file means the filename may be requested depending on how the user has configured the system. For example, if the user wishes to record a residual file during the WLS-OZ 36
process and has configured the database properly, OCEAN 24 will
prompt the user for the filename, otherwise no request for a residual filename will occur. Table 4 also lists if the
file is an Input or Output file (I/O) and the type of interface used to specify the filename, either through the PNAMES.DAT file o: specified by the user during runtime.
Referring now to Figure 8. During an execution of the OCEAN
24 software, the files are used in the following manner for all
processes :
1. The installation file 46 is read and the filenames are stored in memory immediately following the start of execution of OCEAN 24.
2. The output file 48 is opened, if the output filename keyword appeared and was valid in installation file.
3. The database file 52 is read.
4. The program checks to see if a supplemental file is specified at the end of the database. If so, the program loads the supplemental database . Subsequent supplemental databases may be loaded by a supplemental file (e.g., supplemental file 1 may load supplemental file 2.)
5. The program then loads the override file 54.
6. The program checks to see if a supplemental override file is specified at the end of the override file 54.
If so, the program loads the supplemental override file. Subsequent supplemental override files may be loaded by a supplemental file (e.g., Supplemental override file 1 may load supplemental override file 2.)
Table 3
Type of File Keyword Description
Database File BASE_FILE Contains commands used to configure system Override File OV_FILE Contains commands used to override the database Supplemental SUP_DIR Lists directory containing
Directory supplemental database files
Leap Second TAIUTC_FILE Lists dates when a leap second was
File added
Mark 3 File MK3_FILE Contains polar motion and Delta UTl data Burn File BURN_FILE Lists all burns that have been applied to a spacecraft Solar Panel SP_FILE Contains solar panel attitude
File information
Attitude ATT_DIR Lists directory containing
Directory attitude files
Output Files OUT_FILES Contains a history of results from an OCEAN 24 run.
7. The program loads the TAIUTC, Mark3 , and burn files 56 into memory.
8. The program then requests the user to select which process to run 58.
9. The program requests the user to specify the input OIC filename 62.
10. The user then selects which satellites and ground stations to use 64.
11. The program requests the user to specify the ephemeris filename, if the system was configured to create one 66.
12. The program then sets the active burns, opens the solar panel orientation file, and opens the attitude files, if OCEAN 24 is configured to use them 68.
13. The system is configured and the Create Ephemeris 38 process executes until the ephemeris has been created 72.
14. The ephemeris file is opened and written.
15. The program then returns to step 8 above. The sequence of operation then differs by process. TABLE 4 : MATRIX OF FILE INTERFACE REQUIREMENTS BY PROCESS
Figure imgf000030_0001
Legend: I O = Input/Output
Int = Interface
Opt = Optional
PN = Filename specified in PNAMES.DAT
Req = Required
Usr = Filename specified by the User
♦ = File generated by OCEAN t = File generated by the Preprocessor r the Create Ephemeris 38 process,
10. The program requests the user to specify the input r the WLS-OD 36 process,
9. The program requests the user to specify the input OIC filename. The file is then loaded 74. observation filename 76.
11. The program requests the user to specify the residual filename, if the system was configured to create one 78.
12. The observation file 76 is then loaded and analyzed 78.
13. The user then selects which satellites and ground stations to use 82 and 84, respectively.
14. The program requests the user to specify the fitted and predicted OIC output filenames 78.
15. The program requests the user to specify the epr.emeris filename 78, if the system was configured tc create one .
16. The program requests the user to specify the estimation and covariance files 78.
17. The program then sets the active burns, opens the solar panel orientation files, and opens the attitude files, if OCEAN 24 is configured to use them 92.
18. The estimation and covariance files are then loaded, read, and analyzed 86 and 88.
19. The system is configured 92 and the WLS-OD 36 estimation process executes until the solution has converged 94.
20. The fitted and predicted (estimated and final) CIC files are open and written 101.
21. The ephemeris file is opened and written 98.
22. The program returns to step 8 above.
r the Make OIC 42 process,
9. The program requests the user to specify the input data to be stored in the OIC. This is satellite orbital state data in the form of Cartesian positions and velocities 102.
10. The system is configured and the Make OIC 42 process executes until the configured data has been stored in the appropriate variables 102. 11. The OIC file is opened and written 104.
12. The program returns to step 8 above. For the Modify Database 44 process,
9. The program requests the user to specify either supplemental files to be loaded or specific database or override commands which replace current values in the database or override variables, respectively 106.
10. The system is configured.
11. The program returns to step 8 above.
Each process can be configured via the database and override files as the user desires. There are three configurations that demonstrate possible modes of running a process: the minimum, normal, and enhanced configurations. The minimum configuration consists of only the bare minimum files that are required to run the process. The normal oonfiguration consists of those files a user would normally use on a daily basis that may provide accurate but not necessarily precise results. The enhanced configuration consists of all possible files that would enhance the solution and may provide precise results. Table 5 shows the configuration for
each process. Note that the residual file is listed as Optional for the WLS-OD 36 process since it does not enhance the orbit but
merely provides more data used to analyze the solution.
The OCEAN software prototype is preferably written in Standard FORTRAN 77/90®, however, the same algorithms could be realized using any scientific computer language that will achieve the same outputs. All file interfaces are ASCII text to ensure ease of readability and portability between computer platforms. The OCEAN prototype has been run on Digital VAX® and Alpha® computers under the OpenV_-'S® operating system. As it can be seen in the foregoing, the system architecture consists of a single TABLE 4: MINIMUM, NORMAL, AND ENHANCED CONFIGURATIONS BY PROCESS
Figure imgf000033_0001
Legend: Oρ( = Optional
executive program with multiple processes, each performing a unique but interrelated function. The source code consists of a main executive program with a series of subroutines located under it. The subroutines have been nested with each subsequent level of subroutines playing a supporting role to the calling level of subroutines .
The maximum size of a given orbit determination problem is determined by the number of satellites, ground stations, measurement types, and states to be estimated. Global parameter statements used throughout the program allow the maximum problem size to be extended without the need to reprogram any FORTRAN code.
The OCEAN technique is data base driven. Most parameters involved in an orbit determination and prediction problem may be set through the data base without rebuilding the executable module. Logical scripts are used throughout the data base to establish processing strategies including designating the estimation parameters, establishing editing procedures, and determining convergence criteria. A primary, configuration controlled, data base is maintained to support multiple software installations. Each individual installation may substitute any item in the primary file using a site-specific override file. Communication between the orbit determination and orbit prediction segments of the program is through the OCEAN initial condition OIC file which contains all the information necessary for the orbit predictor to recreate the ephemeris and covariance computed by the orbit determination segment. The OIC includes: satellite position, velocity, drag, and solar pressure coefficients with covariance; satellite physical parameters including mass and area; Earth orientation parameters including polar motion angles and Greenwich hour angle. Timing information for the current and historical accumulation of leap seconds is provided by a single file.
The OCEAN processing algorithm permits any number of satellite orbits to be computed simultaneously. The full program "state' which includes all relevant parameters for each satellite, ground station, and measurement model involved in a particular problem is assembled by the program at execution time. The full state, as seen in Table 2, contains all the information on the satellites,
ground station, and measurement model biases used in an orbit determination problem. There are substates for each satellite and ground station. These substates, along with the measurement bias substate, are used as building blocks to create the full state.
The OCEAN program operates using multiple dimension array pointer variables. These pointer variables point to where in the full state a specific variable lies and whether the state is constant/estimated/oonsidered (C/E/C) . Constant values do not change, estimated values are computed from observations, and considered values have covariance affect the results of estimated parameters by limiting the amount an estimated parameter is update and providing error information.
Now referring to Figure 9, the full state 121 ("state" column
in Table 2) may be examined to see if it is C/E/C by using the
pointer or by using the full state index array 122. The full stat
index array contains a corresponding element for each full state element and indicates, like the substrate pointer arrays, if the state is C/E/C. The full parameter list can be filtered 124 or
separated using the full array index. The index array is applied to the full state using the filter resulting in the C/E/C state. If the index contains a "0" it is considered a constant , a "1" fo an estimated parameter, and a "2" for a consider parameter.
Satellite 16 and ground stations 15 are grouped in separate
pointer variables and changing state sizing procedure. In the software, the number of parameters allowed in each satellite 16 an
ground station 15 pointer is defined in a single FORTRAN® include
file called the PARAMETER . INC file. Therefore, an additional parameter can be added without requiring significant changes throughout the entire source code.
OCEAN uses a similar filter procedure to collapse matrices. Nonzero values of the index array 122 would indicate if elements of
the large matrix 131 should be retained when collapsing the large
matrix into a smaller matrix 132. In Figure 10, the first, fifth,
and sixth elements of the index are nonzero so the corresponding elements in the full matrix are extracted to form the collapsed matrix. The index array is formed using a combination of the satellite 16 and ground station 15 pointer variables.
The minimum inputs required by the OCEAN program for any orbit determination problem are the Data Base, estimation file, an Initial Condition File, and an Observation File. The Data Base file contains the force model, describes the satellite 16 and
ground station 15 parameters. The estimation file selects the
parameters that will be estimated. The Initial Condition file provides satellite 16 position and velocity used to create a
reference trajectory for the differential correction or filter processes. The Observation file contains measurements preprocesse into one of the OCEAN observation formats. For precision applications, external data is also required. The Earth Orientation must be obtained to precisely determine the orientatio of the Earth 13. OCEAN accepts input from the United States Naval
Observatory (USNO) Earth Orientation bulletins. Additional data is included through the external files for vehicle thrusting, attitude, and solar panel orientation. Weather data can also be input for selected observation types. Finally, an external file interface is provided to obtain solar flux and geomagnetic index" data for the Jacchia atmospheric density model, a motel well know to those skilled in the art.
A number of orbit products are produced by the C Ξ.-__ program. Absolute orbit determination can be done simultaneously for any number of satellites. Relative navigation algorithms can be applied for pairs of satellites 16. Fitted and predicted
ephemerides are produced for both absolute and relative solutions. Bias estimates for all tracking observation model oc-ponents, and ground station 15 location errors are computed and reported. Thes
products can be produced automatically with no user interaction o manually using interactive commands from the user.
The OCEAN program addresses requirements speoifto to multiple satellite 16 orbit determinations, i.e., full cross covariance,
relative navigation, and anomaly identification. Enhanced fault isolation is achieved through simultaneous solutions when the entire network is considered as a whole. For example, component errors may become observable when multiple observations across multiple tracking links are combined.
Critical to the design of this technique is the prevision for configuring all aspects of the problem from a data base. This implementation allows a single computer code to be applied to a wide variety of orbit determination problems without the need for modification of the computer instructions. Instead the database file is modified to adapt the code to a particular problem.
The data base allows independent configurations for orbit determination and orbit prediction processes. Input data may independently routed to these processes from various sources such as the data base, data base override, or external file. Every dat base value may be altered using an application specific override file. Using this override function, a processing site may modify its processing while still maintaining the original data base configuration .
Although the invention has been described in relation to the exemplary embodiment thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that other variations and modifications can be affected in the preferred embodiment without detracting from the scope and spirit of the invention as set forth in the claims.

Claims

WHAT IS CLAIMED IS:
1. A system for determining the position, velocity and other parameters of one or more satellites comprising: means for receiving emissions from the one or more satellites; means for computing an estimated position, velocity, and other parameters of one or more satellites or other celestial bodies, simultaneously; and means for displaying the computed position, velocity, and other parameters of the one or more satellites or celestial bodies.
2. a system, as in Claim 1, further comprising a means for storing information on the estimated position, velocity, and other parameters of one or more satellites or other celestial bodies.
3. A system, as in Claim 1, wherein the means for computing an estimated position, velocity, and other parameters of one or more satellites cr other celestial bodies, simultaneously is a computer.
4. A system, as in Claim 1, wherein the means displaying the computed position, velocity, and other parameters of the one or more satellites or celestial bodies is an x-y plotter.
5. A system, as in Claim 1, wherein the means displaying the computed position, velocity, and other parameters of the one or more satellites or celestial bodies is visual display.
6. A system, as in Claim 1, wherein the means displaying the computed position, velocity, and other parameters of the one or more satellites or celestial bodies is a printer.
7. A system, as in Claim 1, wherein the e_tssions received are electromagnetic .
8. A system, as in Claim 1, wherein the e~╬╣ssions received are optical .
9. A system for determining the position, velocity and other parameters of one or more satellites comprising: means for receiving emissions from at least one satellite; means for computing an estimated position, velocity and other parameters for one or more satellites, ground stations, and measurement types, simultaneously; means for automatically resizing a problem when compiling a computer source code without the need for r -coding the computer source code; means for adding new measurement types and state para .eters ; and means for displaying a computed position, velocity, and other parameters of one or more satellites, ground stations, and measurement types .
10. A system, as in Claim 9, wherein the means for automatically resizing a problem when compiling a computer source code without the need for re-coding the computer source code is comprised of: a set of parameters to set global limits on allowable numbers of satellites, ground stations, measurement types, and parameters to estimate; and selection of an index array to form an overall system state and a collapsed state comprised of the estimate parameters of collapsed covariance and collapsed state transition matrices.
11. A system, as in Claim 9, wherein the means for adding new measurement types and state parameters is comprised of pointer arrays for satellite sub-states, ground stations substates, and measurement bias substates .
12. A system, as in Claim 9, wherein the means for computing an estimated position, velocity and other parameters for a plurality of satellites, ground stations, and measurement types simultaneously is a computer.
13. A system of computations for determining the position, velocity and other parameters of one or more satellites comprising : a read of a site-specific installation file for directory and naming of information for external files; a selection of a processing mode of the system; by a weighted last squares batch estimation, determine the satellites orbit; configuration of process parameters using a set of key words found in a data base file and override files; identify for each parameter a source from which to obtain the parameters value; read initial condition file to obtain an initial, estimation of the one or more satellites state vector and covariance; read in an observation file; analyze the observation file; read in an estimation configuration file to determine which parameters are to be estimated or held fixed; create a problem state and index array to collapse states and matrices ; set up pointer arrays to locate relevant information; read in covariance override file tc change any desired covariance terms recovered from the initial condition file; process, sequentially, observations m the observation file; configure process parameters using a set of key words found i a data base and the override files; create an initial condition file; read in the initial condition file to obtain an initial estimation of the one or more satellites state vectors and covariance; produce an ephemeris file; configure process parameters using a set of key words found i data base and override files; read in initial satellite sates in terms of mean orbital elements, or osculating Cartesian coordinates; and create an initial condition file compatible with the foregoin processes for orbit determination and prediction.
14. A system, as in Claim 13, wherein reading of a site-specific installation file for directory and naming of information for external files, said external files are comprised of database and override files, solar flux data files; leap second data file, and Earth orientation data file.
15. A system, as in Claim 13, wherein the read of a site-specific installation file for directory includes a data base file, overrid files, solar flux data file, leap second data file, and Earth orientation data file.
16. A system, as in Claim 13, wherein the parameter to be identified consists of an internal default, data base file, override file, initial condition file, or external file.
17. A system, as in Claim 13, wherein the information read in and analyzed in the observation file is comprised of: observations present, satellites present, ground stations present; and number of tracking passes by the satellite, ground station, and satellite ground station combination.
18. A system, as in Claim 13, wherein the element of sequential processing of observations in the observation file is comprised of : find a time and type of each measurement along with the satellites and ground stations involved in making the measurement; propagate the relevant satellites to a time of measurement, starting with an initial guess of satellite states; propagate the relevant satellites to a time of measurement; predict, theoretically, what observation should be have been made using an appropriate measurement model; determine type of bias to apply and correct theoretical measurement using pointer arrays ; compute the differential error between the observation and theoretical values; accept or discard the difference measurement based on editing criteria defined by the data base; compute sensitivity matrix of the initial condition to the error; collapse the sensitivity matrix using index arrays; update normal equations with the product of the sensitivity matrix and the error, continue for all observations in the observation file; invert normal equations to obtain an improved estimate of the initial state; update statistics of observation errors; repeat the sensitivity computation over all states using an updated statistics of the observation errors; repeat the update computation for the state, terminate this process when the magnitude of the update is less than a value defined in the data base; produce an initial condition file with improved satellite states and their covariance; produce an ephemeris file with start time, stop time, and granularity defined by the data base file; produce a covariance file with start time, stop time, and granularity defined by the data base file; produce detailed processing output file including a full configuration for the current problem, ad for each iteration of the sensitivity computation, value of the state update, observation statistics by satellite, station, and satellite-station pair, and updated ending criteria; and create a measurement model bias report including the estimate value and covariance for every model bias estimated, and difference simulation biases containing common satellite and/or ground stations .
19. A method for determining the position, velocity, and other parameters of one or more satellites comprising the steps: receiving emissions from the one or more satellites; computing an estimated position, velocity, and other parameters of one or more satellites or other celestial bodies, simultaneously; and displaying the computed position, velocity, and other parameters of the one or more satellites or celestial bodies.
20. A system which allows independent configuration of program elements comprising: a database setting orbit determination and orbit prediction program parameters separately; and a database that allows program parameter values to be retrieved independently from default values, standard files, override files, or external sources.
21. A method for automatically resizing a problem at a beginning of execution without the need for re-coding a computer program comprising the steps of: setting global limits on allowable numbers of ground stations, satellites, measurement types, and parameters to estimate by the use of a set of parameters; selecting an index array indicating which states are to be held fixed or estimated; and applying the index array to form an overall system state and a collapsed state consisting of the estimate parameters.
22. A method for determining the position, velocity, and other parameters of one or more satellites comprising the steps: receiving emissions from at least one satellite; computing an estimated position, velocity and other parameters for one or more satellites, ground stations, and measurement types, simultaneously; resizing, ΓÇó automatically, a problem when compiling a computer source code without the need for re-coding the computer source code ; adding new measurement types and state parameters; and displaying a computed position, velocity, and other parameter_ of one or more satellites, ground stations, and measurement types.
23. A method for computations for determining the position, velocity and other parameters of one or more satellites is comprised of : reading a site-specific installation file for directory and naming of information for external files; selecting a processing mode of the system; determining satellite orbit by a weighted last squares batch estimation; configuring process parameters using a set of key words found in a data base file and override files; identifying for each parameter a source from which to obtain the parameters value; reading an initial condition file to obtain an initial, estimation of the one or more satellites state vector and covariance ; reading in an observation file; analyzing the observation file; reading in an estimation configuration file to determine whic: parameters are to be estimated or held fixed; creating a problem state and index array to collapse states and matrices; setting up pointer arrays to locate relevant information; reading in covariance override file to change any desired covariance terms recovered from the initial condition file; process ing , sequent ial ly , observat ions in the observat ion f ile ; configuring process parameters using a set of key words four.: in a data base and the override files; creating an initial condition file; reading in the initial condition file to obtain an initial estimation of the one or more satellites state vectors and covariance ; producing an ephemeris file; configuring process parameters using a set of key words four.: in data base and override files; reading in initial satellite sates in terms of mean orbital elements, or osculating Cartesian coordinates; and creating an initial condition file compatible with the foregoing processes for orbit determination and prediction.
PCT/US1999/002290 1998-02-06 1999-02-02 Orbit/covariance estimation and analysis (ocean) determination for satellites WO1999040692A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU28668/99A AU2866899A (en) 1998-02-06 1999-02-02 Orbit/covariance estimation and analysis (ocean) determination for satellites

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US7388198P 1998-02-06 1998-02-06
US60/073,881 1998-02-06

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1999040692A1 WO1999040692A1 (en) 1999-08-12
WO1999040692A9 true WO1999040692A9 (en) 1999-10-21

Family

ID=22116361

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US1999/002290 WO1999040692A1 (en) 1998-02-06 1999-02-02 Orbit/covariance estimation and analysis (ocean) determination for satellites

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (1) US6085128A (en)
AU (1) AU2866899A (en)
WO (1) WO1999040692A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (40)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6233507B1 (en) * 1998-01-28 2001-05-15 Douglas H. May Eccentric conformance, satellite-position determination module
WO2000033030A1 (en) * 1998-12-02 2000-06-08 Samsung Electronics Company, Limited Method for determining the co-ordinates of a satellite
US6859769B1 (en) * 1999-01-26 2005-02-22 Analytical Graphics, Inc. Method and apparatus for creating elements and systems for description of position and motion of bodies in three-dimensional space to support orbital maneuver analysis
US7443340B2 (en) * 2001-06-06 2008-10-28 Global Locate, Inc. Method and apparatus for generating and distributing satellite tracking information
US20070200752A1 (en) 2001-06-06 2007-08-30 Global Locate, Inc. Method and apparatus for maintaining integrity of long-term orbits in a remote receiver
US8358245B2 (en) * 2001-06-06 2013-01-22 Broadcom Corporation Method and system for extending the usability period of long term orbit (LTO)
US8090536B2 (en) * 2001-06-06 2012-01-03 Broadcom Corporation Method and apparatus for compression of long term orbit data
US6651000B2 (en) 2001-07-25 2003-11-18 Global Locate, Inc. Method and apparatus for generating and distributing satellite tracking information in a compact format
US20060136350A1 (en) * 2004-11-26 2006-06-22 Jackson George G Space time continuum intercept detection system
KR100809425B1 (en) * 2006-09-29 2008-03-05 한국전자통신연구원 Precise orbit determination system and method thereof
US8493267B2 (en) 2006-11-10 2013-07-23 Qualcomm Incorporated Method and apparatus for position determination with extended SPS orbit information
US8260540B2 (en) 2007-04-27 2012-09-04 Sirf Technology, Inc. Systems and methods of communication in an assisted navigation system
US7725259B2 (en) * 2007-05-03 2010-05-25 Raytheon Company Trajectory estimation system for an orbiting satellite
US7925167B1 (en) 2007-10-31 2011-04-12 Kozubal Marek J Satellite downlink via patterns of uncollimated light
US9366763B2 (en) * 2009-02-04 2016-06-14 Qualcomm Incorporated Method and apparatus for position determination with hybrid SPS orbit data
US8386099B2 (en) * 2010-02-05 2013-02-26 Applied Defense Solutions Method and apparatus for initial orbit determination using high-precision orbit propagation and maneuver modeling
WO2012021760A2 (en) * 2010-08-12 2012-02-16 The Government Of The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Improved orbit covariance estimation and analysis (ocean) system and method
GB2483713B (en) * 2010-09-20 2016-04-06 St Microelectronics Res & Dev Signal verification
US9019155B2 (en) 2012-05-03 2015-04-28 Raytheon Company Global positioning system (GPS) and doppler augmentation (GDAUG) and space location inertial navigation geopositioning system (SPACELINGS)
US9365303B2 (en) * 2012-05-03 2016-06-14 Raytheon Company Position and elevation acquisition for orbit determination
RU2506207C1 (en) * 2012-05-22 2014-02-10 Федеральное государственное унитарное предприятие "Центральный научно-исследовательский институт машиностроения" (ФГУП ЦНИИмаш) Spacecraft flight control support
US9075126B2 (en) 2012-06-28 2015-07-07 Raytheon Company Ground location inertial navigation geopositioning system (groundlings)
RU2509041C1 (en) * 2012-12-19 2014-03-10 Сергей Васильевич Стрельников Method of defining spacecraft orbit
RU2520714C1 (en) * 2013-02-05 2014-06-27 Сергей Васильевич Стрельников Method of defining spacecraft orbit
RU2526401C1 (en) * 2013-05-07 2014-08-20 Открытое акционерное общество "Российская корпорация ракетно-космического приборостроения и информационных систем" (ОАО "Российские космические системы") Method for radar doppler angular measurements of spacecraft and system for realising said method
RU2525343C1 (en) * 2013-05-27 2014-08-10 Открытое акционерное общество "Российская корпорация ракетно-космического приборостроения и информационных систем" (ОАО "Российские космические системы") Method for simultaneous determination of six motion parameters of spacecraft when making trajectory measurements and system for realising said method
RU2542836C2 (en) * 2013-07-09 2015-02-27 Открытое акционерное общество "Корпорация космических систем специального назначения "Комета" Method of determination of state vector of passive space object
RU2531433C1 (en) * 2013-07-16 2014-10-20 Федеральное государственное унитарное предприятие "Центральный научно-исследовательский институт машиностроения" (ФГУП ЦНИИмаш) Method to determine parameters of space object orbit
US10215850B2 (en) 2014-08-06 2019-02-26 Raytheon Company Orbital determination (OD) of geosynchronous satellites
CN105510901B (en) * 2016-01-30 2018-11-13 武汉大学 Optical satellite image time-varying error calibrating method and system based on more calibration fields
RU2652603C1 (en) * 2017-06-20 2018-04-27 федеральное государственное казенное военное образовательное учреждение высшего образования "Военная академия связи имени Маршала Советского Союза С.М. Буденного" Министерства обороны Российской Федерации Method of determining parameters of artificial satellite orbit of the earth
US11242162B2 (en) 2018-03-27 2022-02-08 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Methods and apparatus for in-situ measurements of atmospheric density
US10884138B2 (en) * 2018-06-21 2021-01-05 Eagle Technology, Llc Satellite automatic identification system (AIS) for tracking a plurality of maritime vessels and related methods
CN110687825B (en) * 2019-09-25 2023-07-07 中国科学院微小卫星创新研究院 Satellite single-machine simulation system and method
CN111427001A (en) * 2020-03-19 2020-07-17 上海卫星工程研究所 Target positioning method suitable for pointing satellite by ground survey station antenna
CN111427003A (en) * 2020-03-19 2020-07-17 上海卫星工程研究所 Pointing guidance system of ground survey station antenna to satellite
CN111427004A (en) * 2020-03-19 2020-07-17 上海卫星工程研究所 Coordinate conversion method suitable for pointing of ground survey station antenna to satellite
KR102140000B1 (en) * 2020-05-13 2020-07-31 한국 천문 연구원 Method of Satellite Precise Orbit Determination using parallactic refraction scale factor estimation
CN112505734B (en) * 2020-10-16 2023-09-29 中国人民解放军63921部队 Satellite orbit adjustment correction method based on inter-satellite link closed loop residual error detection
CN116395148B (en) * 2023-03-20 2023-09-15 银河航天(北京)网络技术有限公司 Satellite and rocket separation control system and control method

Family Cites Families (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3795911A (en) * 1961-02-02 1974-03-05 C Hammack Method and apparatus for automatically determining position-motion state of a moving object
US4114155A (en) * 1976-07-30 1978-09-12 Cincinnati Electronics Corporation Position determining apparatus and method
US4870422A (en) * 1982-03-01 1989-09-26 Western Atlas International, Inc. Method and system for determining position from signals from satellites
US4667203A (en) * 1982-03-01 1987-05-19 Aero Service Div, Western Geophysical Method and system for determining position using signals from satellites
US4912475A (en) * 1987-03-20 1990-03-27 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Techniques for determining orbital data
US4736247A (en) * 1987-05-04 1988-04-05 The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration Range and range rate system
US4883244A (en) * 1987-12-23 1989-11-28 Hughes Aircraft Company Satellite attitude determination and control system with agile beam sensing
US5041833A (en) * 1988-03-28 1991-08-20 Stanford Telecommunications, Inc. Precise satellite ranging and timing system using pseudo-noise bandwidth synthesis
US5390125A (en) * 1990-02-05 1995-02-14 Caterpillar Inc. Vehicle position determination system and method
US5141308A (en) * 1991-08-12 1992-08-25 Danckwerth Thomas M Semiconductor laser pulse compression radar system
DE4135034C2 (en) * 1991-10-23 1995-04-13 Deutsche Forsch Luft Raumfahrt Device for controlling the orbit of at least two co-positioned geostationary satellites
JPH06186317A (en) * 1992-04-23 1994-07-08 Mitsubishi Electric Corp Position measurement system using artificial satellite
US5430657A (en) * 1992-10-20 1995-07-04 Caterpillar Inc. Method and apparatus for predicting the position of a satellite in a satellite based navigation system
US5570096A (en) * 1995-03-24 1996-10-29 Interferometrics, Inc. Method and system for tracking satellites to locate unknown transmitting accurately
US5828336A (en) * 1996-03-29 1998-10-27 The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration Robust real-time wide-area differential GPS navigation

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US6085128A (en) 2000-07-04
WO1999040692A1 (en) 1999-08-12
AU2866899A (en) 1999-08-23

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6085128A (en) Orbit/covariance estimation and analysis (OCEAN) determination for satellites
Orton et al. A Bayesian approach to tracking multiple targets using sensor arrays and particle filters
US20120046863A1 (en) Orbit covariance, estimation and analysis tool
US6295021B1 (en) Techniques for monitoring and controlling yaw attitude of a GPS satellite
Marsh et al. An improved model of the Earth's gravitational field: GEM-T1
Marcos et al. Precision low Earth orbit determination using atmospheric density calibration
Petrova et al. Lunar-Based Measurements of the Moon’s Physical Libration: Methods and Accuracy Estimates
Barbarella et al. Monitoring of the Italian GNSS geodetic reference frame
Watkins Tracking station coordinates and their temporal evolution as determined from laser ranging to the LAGEOS satellite
Beaussier et al. In orbit performance of the Cactus accelerometer (D5B spacecraft)
Swift et al. History of satellite orbit determination at NSWCDD
Bock A VLBI variance-covariance analysis interactive computer program
Wagner et al. Goddard trajectory determination subsystem: Mathematical specifications
Pons AUTONOMOUS, LANDMARK-BASED OPTICAL NAVIGATION FOR LUNAR MISSIONS
Kuchynka et al. Uncertainties in GPS-based operational orbit determination of Copernicus Sentinel satellites
Campo Development of data processing methods for Space Surveillance and Tracking
Kantsiper A systematic approach to station-keeping of constellations of satellites
SWIFT DAHLGREN DIVISION NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER
Schnell Quality aspects of short duration VLBI observations for UT1 determinations
Bass et al. Analysis and Programming for Research in the Physics of the Upper Atmosphere
Häusler Venus Express Radio Science Experiment VeRa
Yanez et al. SENSOR DATA FUSION ANALYSIS FOR HEO SPACE DEBRIS USING BAS 3 E
Jazwinski et al. Low thrust interplanetary trajectory open loop error analysis, volume 1 Final report
Chao et al. IV&V of three astrodynamics functions of the Satellite Tool Kit
Klosko et al. NASA Technical Management Report (533Q)

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY CA CH CN CU CZ DE DK EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MD MG MK MN MW MX NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT UA UG UZ VN YU ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW SD SZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: C2

Designated state(s): AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY CA CH CN CU CZ DE DK EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MD MG MK MN MW MX NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT UA UG UZ VN YU ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: C2

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW SD SZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

COP Corrected version of pamphlet

Free format text: PAGES 1-38, DESCRIPTION, REPLACED BY NEW PAGES 1-36; PAGES 39-48, CLAIMS, REPLACED BY NEW PAGES 37-45; PAGES 1/7-7/7, DRAWINGS, REPLACED BY NEW PAGES 1/7-7/7; DUE TO LATE TRANSMITTAL BY THE RECEIVING OFFICE

REG Reference to national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: 8642

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: KR

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase