WO2000019166A1 - Multidimensional sensing system for atomic force miscroscopy - Google Patents

Multidimensional sensing system for atomic force miscroscopy Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2000019166A1
WO2000019166A1 PCT/US1999/022175 US9922175W WO0019166A1 WO 2000019166 A1 WO2000019166 A1 WO 2000019166A1 US 9922175 W US9922175 W US 9922175W WO 0019166 A1 WO0019166 A1 WO 0019166A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
afm
cantilever
light beam
propagation
tip
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US1999/022175
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
WO2000019166A9 (en
Inventor
Vladimir Mancevski
Original Assignee
Xidex Corporation
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Xidex Corporation filed Critical Xidex Corporation
Priority to AU64000/99A priority Critical patent/AU6400099A/en
Publication of WO2000019166A1 publication Critical patent/WO2000019166A1/en
Publication of WO2000019166A9 publication Critical patent/WO2000019166A9/en

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01QSCANNING-PROBE TECHNIQUES OR APPARATUS; APPLICATIONS OF SCANNING-PROBE TECHNIQUES, e.g. SCANNING PROBE MICROSCOPY [SPM]
    • G01Q20/00Monitoring the movement or position of the probe
    • G01Q20/02Monitoring the movement or position of the probe by optical means

Definitions

  • the present invention relates generally to the field of position measurement using optical sensors and, more particularly, to a noncontact position measurement system using continuous position sensitive detectors (PSDs) for determining the absolute position and orientation of a local region of interest on the surface of an atomic force microscope (AFM) cantilever.
  • PSDs continuous position sensitive detectors
  • AFM atomic force microscope
  • a typical atomic force microscope (AFM) 100 operates as shown in Figure 1.
  • AFM 100 probes the surface of a sample 10 with a sharp tip 12, which is a few microns long and less than 100 Angstroms in diameter.
  • Tip 12 is located at the free end of a cantilever 14 that is typically 100 to 200 microns long. Forces between the tip 12 and the sample 10 surface cause the cantilever 12 to bend or deflect.
  • a detector 16 measures the cantilever 12 deflection as the tip is scanned over sample, or as sample 10 is scanned under tip 12. The measured cantilever deflections allow a computer to generate a map of surface topography.
  • AFMs detect the position of the cantilever with optical techniques.
  • a laser beam 22 bounces off the top surface of the cantilever 24 onto a bi-cell or quadrant cell position detector 26.
  • the position of the beam 25 on the laser beam on ' the bi-cell or quadrant cell detector 26 shifts.
  • a current imbalance occurs indicating off center position.
  • the feedback system that controls the vertical position of the tip, 27 typically operates in either constant height mode, constant force mode or one of several vibrating cantilever techniques.
  • constant -height mode the spatial variation of the cantilever deflection can be used directly to generate the topographic data set because the height of the scanner is fixed as it scans.
  • constant - force mode the feedback circuit moves the scanner 28 up and down in the z (i.e., vertical) direction, responding to the topography by keeping the cantilever 24 deflection constant. In this case, the image is generated from the motion of scanner 28.
  • the feedback circuit 29 detects changes in vibration amplitude or phase as tip 12 comes near the sample 10 surface.
  • the bi-cell or quadrant cell position detectors 26 used to sense cantilever 24 position consist of two or four discrete elements on a single substrate. When a light beam 25 is centered on the cells, output currents from each element are equal, indicating centering or nulling. As the beam 25 moves, a current imbalance occurs indicating off- center position.
  • Bi-cell and quadrant cell detectors 26 require use of a laser beam 22 with an intensity distribution that is constant both spatially uniform and temporally uniform. This is because a nonuniformly shaped or time varying intensity distribution would introduce unwanted bias errors in the output of bi-cell or quadrant cell detector 26. Bi-cell and quadrant cell detectors 26 also require precise alignment and centering of the beam 25 on the bi-cell or quadrant cell detector.
  • FIGURE 3 is a schematic of the noncontact position measurement system 200 previously disclosed in BUSH- VISHNIAC 1 and BUSH-VISHNIAC 2.
  • This system combines optical and computational components to perform high- precision, six degree-of-freedom, (6-DOF) single-sided, noncontact position measurements.
  • 6-DOF six degree-of-freedom,
  • For in-plane measurements reflective optical targets 30 are provided on a target object 32 whose position and orientation is to be sensed.
  • light beams 36 are directed toward the optical targets 30, producing reflected beams 34. Electrical signals are produced, indicating the points of intersection of the reflected beams and the position detectors 38.
  • the signals are transformed to provide measurements of translation along, and rotation around, three nonparallel axes which define the space in which the target object moves.
  • the system comprises two sections, out-of-plane and in-plane. Each section has its own assembly of light sources, reflectors, and sensors.
  • the arbitrarily selected reference plane serves as a reference for motion measurement. This reference plane contains the x and y axes of the three-axis set (x, y and z) which defines the space in which the sensed object moves.
  • the position and/or the motion of the target object are derived from kinematical transformations based on information supplied by the components illustrated in FIGURE 3.
  • Position measurements of multiple light beams irradiating a single two-dimensional lateral -effect detector which can be made simultaneously through time, frequency, or wavelength multiplexing.
  • the main advantage of multiplexing is that the number of detectors required in the existing system can be reduced, and the signal processing circuitry can be simultaneously simplified. The resulting system will be more compact, and alignment difficulties will be largely eliminated. Further, the effect of environmental variations is minimized as the number of detectors is reduced.
  • AFM sensing systems 100 provide only the vertical, z, coordinate (or, in one known instance, the horizontal, x, and vertical, z, coordinates), of the cantilever with respect to an absolute reference frame, while relying on the output of a scanning stage for the x and y (or, just the Y) coordinate and providing no information at all about angular orientation of cantilever 24.
  • the present invention provides a multidimensional sensing system for atomic force microscopy (AFM) that substantially eliminates or reduces disadvantages and problems associated with previously developed systems and methods used for AFM.
  • AFM atomic force microscopy
  • the present invention provides a multi -dimensional scanning probe microscopy tool or six degree of freedom atomic force microscope (6-DOF AFM) .
  • This multi -dimensional scanning probe microscopy tool includes an AFM cantilever coupled to an AFM tip wherein the AFM tip deflects the cantilever in response to topographical changes on a sample.
  • the AFM cantilever is illuminated by a light beam generated by a light source. This light beam is either collimated or focused.
  • the light is reflected by the top surface of the AFM cantilever towards a detector placed in the path of the reflected light beam.
  • the detector produces an output containing data representing the position and orientation of the AFM cantilever as 3 translations and 3 orientations. This output is processed by a data acquisition system to produce a representation of the topographical changes of the sample.
  • the present invention provides an important technical advantage in that the present invention eliminates the need for precise alignment and centering of the laser beam.
  • a continuous PSD is capable of monitoring the position of a light beam on its surface without the need for precise alignment and centering, as is required when bi-cell or quadrant cell position detectors are used.
  • the present invention provides another important technical advantage in that the present invention eliminates the need to maintain spatial and temporal uniformity of the laser beam.
  • Use of continuous PSDs eliminates the need to maintain spatial and temporal uniformity of the laser beam, as is required when bi-cell or quadrant cell position detectors are used. This is because continuous position-sensitive detectors (PSDs) , unlike Bi-cell and quadrant cell detectors, are inherently insensitive to spatial and temporal variations in the laser beam intensity distribution.
  • PSDs continuous position-sensitive detectors
  • the present invention provides yet another important technical advantage in that the present invention eliminates the need for the laser beam spot to illuminate both halves or all four quadrants of the PSD aperture.
  • This feature enables use of a smaller laser beam spot which, in turn, enables operation over larger ranges, since the smaller spot can traverse larger regions of the PSD surface without part of its intensity distribution falling outside the PSD aperture.
  • the present invention enables sensing of the position and orientation of an AFM cantilever and direct measurement of cantilever position and orientation coordinates in all six degrees of freedom without reliance on the output of a scanning stage to determine any of these measured coordinates.
  • Cantilever position and orientation measurements are provided relative to an absolute reference frame fixed with respect to the structure of the AFM.
  • a technical advantage provided by the present invention is the ability to sense the position and orientation of an object in multidimensional space.
  • Yet another technical advantage provided by one embodiment of the present invention is the ability to repair a workpiece or remove a defect from a workpiece such as a photolithography mask used in semiconductor manufacture .
  • Another key advantage of the present invention is the ability to examine re-entrant features with an AFM tip.
  • a sensing system of the present invention monitors AFM cantilever as it twists
  • the sensing system can accommodate large twist angles that can enable the AFM tip to access re-entrant features. This eliminates the need to access re-entrant features with boot-shaped tips that are very fragile, expensive, and blunt at the end of the boot.
  • the present invention is ideal for a variety of uses, including material characterization, chemical -mechanical planarization monitoring, precision surface profiling and critical dimension metrology.
  • Yet another feature of the present invention is to completely decouple position sensing of an AFM from the mechanical actuator which positions the AFM tip, enabling the present invention to measure at even better resolutions than the ability to position the mechanical actuator itself. Furthermore the present invention may do so while the actuator is in motion. Nonlinearities of the mechanical actuator have no effect on the accuracy of the system. This enables real-time, on-the-fly recording of the AFM cantilever tip position at randomly selected positions.
  • FIGURE 1 illustrates a typical AFM
  • FIGURE 2 depicts how an AFM detects position
  • FIGURE 3 is a schematic of a previously disclosed noncontact measurement system
  • FIGURE 4 illustrates one embodiment of a 6-DOF AFM of the present invention
  • FIGURE 5 presents a second embodiment of a 6-DOF AFM of the present invention.
  • FIGURE 6 provides a representation of two laser beams focused on a cantilever surface
  • FIGURE 7 shows an alternative embodiment of the present invention that utilizes the cantilever edge as a reflective mark.
  • FIGURE 8A illustrates a standard semiconductor calibration grating used as an AFM sample;
  • FIGURE 8B illustrates a linear displacement magnifier strategically positioned between cantilever and PSD.
  • FIGURE 9 presents a CD AFM metrology tool provided by the present invention.
  • FIGURE 10 provides a top view of the CD AFM metrology tool provided by the present invention.
  • FIGURE 11 provides a perspective view of the CD AFM metrology tool provided by the present invention.
  • FIGURE 12 presents an actuation mechanism coupled to a cantilever in a AFM of the present invention
  • FIGURE 13 illustrates an AFM cantilever with a fiducial surface
  • FIGURE 14 illustrates the method of computation of cantilever absolute position and orientation in one embodiment of the present invention
  • FIGURE 15 illustrates the sensor actuator concept of operation of a CD AFM of the present invention
  • FIGURE 16 illustrates a sensing system of the present invention that can access re-entrant features
  • FIGURES 17 and 18 illustrate the results of AFM imaging with different x and y step issues
  • FIGURE 19 illustrates the ability of the present invention to measure absolute linear and angular measurements that are tied to a reference frame
  • FIGURE 20 illustrates the use of large beams to perform absolute scans over the diameter of the laser beam
  • FIGURES 21 and 22 illustrate cosine errors due to bending and tilt
  • FIGURES 23 and 24 illustrate adaptation of the present invention designed for mask repair
  • FIGURE 25 illustrates cantilever position and orientation relative to an absolute reference frame fixed with respect to the structure of the AFM
  • FIGURE 26 shows how various embodiments of sensing system of the present invention are capable of simultaneous multi -dimensional sensing
  • FIGURE 27 illustrates a method of scanning contact holes or vias with the system of the present invention.
  • FIGURE 28 illustrates a procedure for automated tip changing and self alignment.
  • the present invention provides a Six Degree-of-Freedom (6-DOF) Atomic Force Microscope (AFM) tools for use in microelectronics manufacturing that overcome limitations inherent in the sensing and control system architectures of existing lower degree-of-freedom AFMs.
  • 6-DOF Six Degree-of-Freedom
  • AFM Atomic Force Microscope
  • This 6-DOF sensing system is capable of measuring all six absolute degrees of freedom of a body in space, such as a deflecting AFM cantilever.
  • the present invention is ideal for a variety of uses, including material characterization, chemical -mechanical planarization monitoring, precision surface profiling and critical dimension metrology.
  • the sensing system of the present invention may be completely decoupled from the actuator, enabling it to measure at even better resolutions than the actuator itself, and do so while the actuator is in motion.
  • the present invention is capable of simultaneous multi -dimensional sensing, as opposed to one- dimensional or several -step multi-dimensional sensing currently performed with existing AFMs.
  • the simple, robust design of the present invention is readily adaptable to multi-cantilever operation.
  • the sensing system of the present invention may be completely decoupled from the mechanical actuator (stages, PZTs, etc.).
  • the cantilever displacements x, y, and z and the cantilever pitch, tilt and yaw angles ⁇ , ⁇ and ⁇ are determined independently of actuator motion. Nonlinearities of the PZT or the stage will have no effect on the accuracy of the system. This enables real-time, on- the-fly recording of the AFM cantilever tip position at randomly selected x and y positions.
  • the present invention uses continuous position- sensitive detectors (PSDs) in lieu of bi-cell or quadrant cell position detectors, with adaptations of a noncontact position measurement system and other component technology innovations that enable sensing of the position and orientation of an AFM cantilever relative to an absolute reference frame.
  • PSDs position-sensitive detectors
  • a first embodiment of the present invention utilizes only the out-of-plane section of the existing 6-DOF sensing system concept . Height z and orientation in pitch and tilt of the AFM cantilever are determined simultaneously for each given x and y coordinate of the sample.
  • a second embodiment utilizes the entire existing 6-DOF sensing system concept, including both the out-of-plane and in-plane sections. Position in x, y and z and orientation in pitch, tilt, and yaw of the AFM cantilever are determined simultaneously for each unknown x and y displacement of the sample.
  • the first embodiment of the present invention utilizes only the out-of-plane section of the 6-DOF sensing system and therefore can only monitor out-of-plane positions and orientations for a given x and y.
  • two-dimensional PSD sensor 40, laser diodes 42, and the AFM cantilever 44 are fixed to a ground reference 41, whereas sample 45 is moved under AFM tip 46 in x and y directions with a PZT actuator and a coarse motion stage 48.
  • This configuration relies on already existing external sensors (interferometric, capacitive, etc.) to direct the PZT actuator in the x and y directions.
  • the collimated light beams 50 from laser diodes 42 are pointed toward top surface 52 of AFM cantilever 44 where they bounce off as light beams 54 intercepted by PSD 40.
  • Light beams 50 do not have to be parallel to each other. Care must be taken to assure that light spot 55 from light beams 50 fits on cantilever 44.
  • the PZT actuator moves the sample 45 under the AFM tip 46 to a precise x and y location.
  • AFM tip 46 will force the AFM cantilever 44 to deflect as it encounters topographic changes on sample 45.
  • the present invention need not be limited to topographical changes as the AFM tip 46 may sense chemical, electrical, optical or magnetic variations at the sample. These minute deflections will cause light beams 50 to alter their paths to produce light beams 54. These changes are detected by two-dimensional PSD 40. Information about the displacement of the light spots on the surface of the PSD 40 is then used to determine the out-of-plane position z and the pitch and tilt orientations of the cantilever 44.
  • This AFM configuration can fully and simultaneously determine the vertical position and out-of-plane orientation of AFM cantilever 44.
  • Information about the vertical deflection in z is readily available, either to be displayed as a topography map (in constant height operation) or to provide a predetermined feedback signal to the PZT that will rapidly lift the AFM tip back to its original deflection, keeping a constant force to the cantilever 44 (constant force operation) .
  • This first embodiment is suitable for fast-scan multi -dimensional measurements, and also for multi -cantilever operation.
  • FIGURE 5 represents the second embodiment of the present invention.
  • Two-dimensional PSD 60, wide beam light emitting diode (LED) laser 62 and samples 64 are fixed to ground reference 61.
  • Laser diodes 66 and the AFM cantilever 68 are fixed to the PZT tube 70.
  • PZT tube 70 scans AFM tip 72 above sample 64 in the x and y directions and, if necessary, adjusts its vertical displacement, z.
  • the laser diodes 66 are fixed to the bottom of PZT tube 70 so that laser diodes 66 can move together with cantilever 68 in the X-Y plane parallel to sample 64 to keep the collimated light beams 74 on the surface of the cantilever 68 at all times. Care must be taken that light spots 76 from light beams 74 fit on cantilever 68. Care must also be taken that laser diodes 66 do not twist while moving with PZT tube 70. This maintains a constant slope for light beam 74. In the alternative, a larger cantilever area with the size of the scan may accommodate light spots 76 by keeping them within cantilever 68 surface 78 during the scan.
  • Collimated light beams 74 from laser diodes 66 are pointed towards top surface 78 of AFM cantilever 68 where collimated light beams 74 are reflected off surface 78 and are intercepted by PSD 60 as light beams 86 and 80.
  • This part of sensing system 400 is responsible for determining the out-of-plane position and orientation.
  • cantilever 68 is equipped with two reflective marks 82 on a nonreflective background. Collimated light 88 from the wide beam LED 62 illuminates reflective marks 82 on cantilever 68, where the light beam reflections 86 created by reflective marks 82 bounce toward PSD or PSDs 60. Care must be taken that wide beam 88 covers reflective marks 82 at all times during scanning of cantilever 68. Since the AFM scanning ranges are typically 10 - 100 ⁇ m, this task can be readily accomplished.
  • PZT tube 70 first moves AFM tip 72 above sample 64 to an unknown x and y location. As AFM tip 72 encounters topographic changes, AFM cantilever 68 will be deflected. These minute deflections will cause light beams 86 and 80 to alter their paths and move light spots 87 on two- dimensional PSD 60 to new two-dimensional locations. These changes are then detected by two-dimensional PSD 60, and used to determine the out-of-plane position z and the pitch and tilt orientations of the cantilever. The X-Y motion and deflection of AFM cantilever 68 also cause a deflection of the light beams 86 created by the reflective marks 82.
  • Two-dimensional PSD 60 will then detect the displacement of the light spots on the surface of PSD 60, and use that information to determine the in-plane positions x and y and the yaw orientation of the cantilever. Therefore all three positions and all three orientations can be determined simultaneously .
  • this embodiment is that the full position and orientation of AFM cantilever 68 can be determined directly and simultaneously from information provided by the PSD 60 without prior knowledge of how the cantilever arrived in its final position.
  • this second embodiment of the sensing system for a scanning probe microscopy tool of the present invention is insensitive to any system imperfections, such as the PZT nonlinearities and nonorthogonality between the sample and the PZT axis. This enables real-time, in-flight recording of the AFM cantilever tip 72 at randomly selected x and y positions.
  • Complete decoupling of the actuator from the sensing system means that the sensing system for a scanning probe microscopy tool can measure at even better resolutions than the actuator itself, and do so while the actuator is in motion.
  • the basic modes of operation of the sensing system for a scanning probe microscopy tool of the present invention can be contact, non-contact, and attractive-repulsive.
  • contact mode with constant-height operation AFM tip 72 will scan above sample 64 surface while the position and orientation of cantilever tip are determined.
  • contact mode with constant-force operation information about the vertical deflection z of cantilever is used to drive the laser beam to its original position, keeping the cantilever force constant.
  • the limits where the constant -height mode must switch to a constant-force mode due to large topography changes have yet to be determined.
  • the laser beam(s) that monitor the AFM cantilever can be moved, in constant-force mode, closer to the center of the PSD where the AFM can again be operated in constant-height mode.
  • the sensing system for a scanning probe microscopy tool can also be used in non-contact mode, where the cantilever is excited at its resonant frequency as it is scanned above the sample. Changes in sample topography will alter the amplitude and the phase of the cantilever which will be detected by the PSD. Similarly, the sensing system for a scanning probe microscopy tool can be used in an attractive-repulsive mode of operation where the cantilever is excited at its resonant frequency with a much larger amplitude.
  • cantilever 68 provides the unique capability to detect lateral forces while scanning in either the x or y directions. This is particularly important for material characterization studies. It also provides the capability to precisely detect the exact vertical deflection vs. the x and y location, whereas many AFMs have an error component in x and y due to cantilever's deflection in z. This problem has appeared, for example, when imaging adhesion forces on proteins with an AFM. Cantilever 68 selected for the present invention must have size, shape, and other physical properties consistent with cantilevers used in the AFM industry. The present invention also requires that AFM cantilever 68 serve as a reflective surface.
  • Rectangularly shaped cantilevers 35 um wide and 350 ⁇ m long, are used in one embodiment of the present invention.
  • the reflective sides are coated with Aluminum, making them highly reflective.
  • the present invention need not be limited by this shape, size and coating for the cantilever.
  • FIGURE 5 provides a representation of two laser beams 50 focused on cantilever surface 52.
  • a cantilever 68 with two reflective marks 82 is shown in the second embodiment of FIGURE 5.
  • Reflective marks 82 provide a means to use the cantilever itself for measuring in-plane motion instead of relying on the sample stage.
  • One reflective mark allows the detection of in-plane cantilever displacements (x and y) as shown in FIGURE 6.
  • Two reflective marks allows the detection of the in-plane rotation (cantilever's yaw angle ⁇ ) .
  • Reflective marks 82 each have a diameter smaller then the width of cantilever 68 and are placed close to the free end of the cantilever, side by side along its length, as shown in FIGURE 6.
  • Cantilever edge 90 itself can be used in lieu of a reflective mark to define a reflective region 92.
  • the single reflection from cantilever surface 78 depicted by the rectangular region 92 shown in FIGURE 7 enabled the detection of both in-plane cantilever displacements x and y. This may also be achieved by having two reflective strips along the length of the cantilever 68 separated by a non-reflective strip. Fabrication of such reflective strips is less complicated and less expensive then fabrication of two reflective dots within the cantilever. In addition, because such reflective strips are larger in size, the reflective strips produce more intense reflected light then the reflective marks. Increasing intensity reflected from the cantilever improves the signal-to-noise ratio of detection electronics.
  • the focused light beams (used for the out-of-plane measurement) will also use one of the reflective strips as the reflective surface needed to monitor the cantilever's out-of-plane displacement.
  • the sensing system for a scanning probe microscopy tool sensing system of the present invention required changing the beam shapes.
  • the diameter of narrow-beam laser 50 had to be less than the cantilever width. Therefore, a focused laser beam having a diameter less than the width of the cantilever at its focal distance may be used.
  • a focused laser beam can function similarly to a narrow collimated beam for purposes of determining the out-of-plane components.
  • the transformation equations used to compute the absolute position and orientation of the cantilever based on PSD outputs may need to be modified to take account of beam shape effects when focused beams are used instead of collimated beams.
  • optical elements placed in the path of propagation of the light beam incident on the surface.
  • This optical element may be an optical lenses, beam splitter, mirror, filters or other optical element known to those skilled in the art that improves the intensity, directionality, uniformity and focus of the light beam.
  • an optical element may be placed in the second path of propagation of the light beam incident on the aperture of the PSD to enhance the signal to noise ratio or resolution of the output of the PSD.
  • One embodiment of the present invention specifically uses lasers specified as having 18 ⁇ m beam diameter at 100 ⁇ m focal distance.
  • the 100 ⁇ m focal length provides adequate space for positioning the laser mounts, stage, PSD mounts and other components.
  • Optics may be modified to change the focal length of a laser. Modifying these focal lengths allows the laser casings to be positioned next to each other and focused at the same spot on the cantilever. Excessive beam diameter cause unwanted reflections from the edges of the cantilever.
  • the quality of the laser light is improved and the signal to noise ratio significantly increased.
  • a better focused laser beam provides a reflected beam with higher light intensity. This higher light intensity improves the signal to noise ratio of the system.
  • the diameter of the wide beam laser 88 must be large enough to allow the reflective marks 82 to displace within the beam for at least 100 ⁇ m, which corresponds to the range required for of a typical AFM scan. Otherwise, the reflective mark 82 or strip would fall outside the region illuminated by beam 88. If reflective mark or strip 82 is 35 by 35 ⁇ m, the wide beam should be approximately 100 ⁇ m to allow for 30 ⁇ m scans while keeping the reflective regions within the aperture of the collimated beam.
  • One specific embodiment of the present invention uses a pseudo- collimated wide-beam laser light that is commercially available.
  • This laser light has a diameter of 100 microns and depth of focus of 2 mm.
  • the pseudo-collimated light was produced by using a focused light beam with a large depth of focus.
  • Continuous-position PSDs are robust with respect to laser beam's shape, intensity variation over the beam profile, temporal intensity variation, and the position of the laser beam with respect to the physical center of the PSD when compared to split PSDs.
  • Surface-mounted, tetra- lateral, two-dimensional (5 x 5 mm) PSDs may be used in embodiments of the present invention.
  • the required surface area of the PSD depends on the diameter and divergence of the beam reflected from the reflective region on cantilever. This is because the incident light spot must fit within the PSD aperture.
  • the distance between the PSD and the cantilever also plays a role.
  • the laser beam may be larger than the cantilever, resulting in the reflection from the cantilever edges producing a reflected light beam with a very irregular, non-continuous shape.
  • a major challenge overcome by the present invention in the use of multiple lasers with an AFM cantilever is the difficulty of aligning the reflected laser beams with the PSDs.
  • Split PSDs used with most AFMs cannot overcome this difficulty because multiple laser beams would have to be aligned with the centers of the split PSDs so as to allow the laser beam to illuminate all four quadrants, while maintaining uniform beam shape and intensity.
  • Continuous position PSDs do not have this disadvantage because they can accommodate a laser beam with arbitrary shape and non- uniform intensity.
  • a continuous position PSD can also be positioned away from the centroid of the incident beam, as long as this does not cause the beam to fall outside the PSD aperture.
  • Embodiments of the present invention may use both AC and DC modulated lasers.
  • the constant (DC) laser beam intensity produced a more stable signal in relation to drift and noise, but it also increased the sensitivity of the PSD signal to variations in environmental lighting conditions and to the quality of the laser.
  • the AC scheme approach should shift the electronic signals to frequency bands where the noise floor is lower, thereby further improving signal-to-noise-ratio and, with it, overall system resolution.
  • Phase lock loop amplifiers are ordinarily used when superior signal recovery capability is required. However, embodiments of the present invention may use a sensing system for a scanning probe microscopy tool without using phase lock loop amplifiers. If phase lock loop amplifiers are used, several phase lock loop amplifiers are needed to process the signals from two PSDs. Embodiments of the present invention demonstrate the ability to achieve nm- scale resolution without using phase lock loop amplifiers. A more refined resolution and repeatability may be achieved with the use of phase lock loop amplifiers in the circuit.
  • a piezoelectric transducer (PZT) Stage is capable of moving either the sample or the AFM cantilever in the x, y and z directions.
  • Typical PZT stages are available from Piezosystem Jena, with 80 ⁇ m range in x and y, and 9 ⁇ m in z.
  • the function of the data acquisition system (DAQ) is to acquire the signals from the PSD signal processing circuits. These signals are digitally filtered to parse the acquired data into frequency components, average the signals, normalize the signals, display and store the experimental data, and provide analog output to drive the PZT stage in all three axes.
  • a package such as National Instruments' Lab-View software and data acquisition hardware may be used in the DAQ.
  • the measurements may be taken on-demand or during continuous sampling.
  • the results may be processed by passing the PSD output signal through a Fourier transform and discarding all frequency components except the residual DC signal . Each data point represents a sample average of this DC signal, acquired at a sampling rate of 10 KHz per channel. This number of samples is empirically based on minimizing the observed standard deviation. However, the present invention need not be limited by this method of sampling.
  • a calibration grating may be used as an AFM sample.
  • a standard semiconductor calibration grating with pyramidal ridges, 1.8 ⁇ m high and 3 ⁇ m apart , with their faces aligned at 70° with respect one another is shown in FIGURE 8A.
  • the simple, robust design of a sensing system for a scanning probe microscopy tool will make it readily adaptable to multi -cantilever operation. Because the continuous PSD is better for alignment and centering, it is more suitable for monitoring the position of many light beams, where each is from a different cantilever.
  • a single continuous PSD can be used to monitor more than one light beam from more than one than one cantilever.
  • the sample In a multi - probe application the sample will be displaced by a piezoelectrically actuated stage in the same x and y step under each AFM cantilever tip.
  • a separate sensing system will be used to instantaneously determine the z position, or the z position plus the orientation, of each individual cantilever. This information about position and orientation can be used to independently control the height and orientation of each cantilever.
  • AFM architectures that can be implemented with the multidimensional sensing system.
  • Different embodiments of the invention include different positions and orientations of the lasers and the PSDs with respect to each other, and with respect to the AFM cantilever.
  • Another embodiment involves the number of the lasers and PSDs. Using multiplexing schemes, one could reduce the number of PSDs so that one PSD monitors more then one laser light.
  • Another embodiment utilizes beam-splitters that enable a single laser beam to illuminate different sensed bodies, of which one or more are AFM cantilevers (two AFM cantilevers or an AFM cantilever and a reference body) .
  • Still another variation uses a single reflected laser beam that illuminates more then one PSD. This approach is effective in reducing the number of lasers .
  • Another embodiment uses mirrors to manipulate the laser beam to reach an AFM cantilever when direct pointing from a laser is hard, or to divert the light beam path to improve the sensing.
  • a curved mirror that intersects the second path of propagation of the light beam could be used as a linear magnifier.
  • An in-plane light beam that is strategically positioned between the cantilever and the PSD will translate linear beam displacements into magnified angular displacements which can be detected by the PSD with a greater precision, than if they were not translated.
  • FIGURE 8B illustrates a linear displacement magnifier strategically positioned between cantilever and PSD.
  • An additional embodiment of an AFM sensor-actuator uses only one or more fiducial surfaces to detect all 6 degrees-of-freedom of a body in space, including an AFM cantilever.
  • This embodiment departs from the previously described approach where the out-of-plane sensing and the in-plane sensing are done separately with different types of laser beam light (narrow beam collimated, wide beam collimated, focused) .
  • the combination of reflective surface and fiducial surface is replaced by a fiducial surface.
  • this AFM sensor-actuator configuration can be used for variety of applications suitable for AFMs, such as roughness measurement, inspection of chemical - mechanical -planarization (CMP) wafer processes, the present invention is well suited for critical dimension atomic force microscopy (CD AFM) .
  • CD AFM metrology involves sudden topography changes and vertical or re-entrant sidewalls
  • CD AFM metrology is the most challenging application for an AFM based tool.
  • FIGURE 9 presents a side view of this CD AFM architecture configuration.
  • the architecture consists of two collimated laser beams and four PSDs.
  • FIGURE 10 shows the side view and therefore only one laser 110 and the corresponding pair of PSDs (PSD 1 112 and PSD 3 114) .
  • a second laser and a second pair of PSDs are behind the first laser-PSD set.
  • FIGURE 10 provides a top view of the entire sensing system.
  • FIGURE 11 shows the perspective view of the sensing system but does not show the secondary PSDs (PSD 3 114 and PSD 4 116) that detect the laser beams 122 and 124 reflected off the primary PSDs (PSD 1 112 and PSD 2 118) .
  • FIGURE 13 presents a cantilever suitable for this embodiment.
  • Use of one fiducial and three PSDs allows detection of five absolute degrees-of- freedom (the sixth one, yaw about the z axis, is not determined using only one fiducial) .
  • use of four PSDs provides sensing redundancy.
  • Use of second fiducial requires four PSDs and will allow determination of the yaw, but also adds an extra necessary complexity in constructing a sensing system.
  • yaw of standard AFM cantilever is not important, and therefore the presented embodiment does not include this but may be incorporated.
  • a collimated laser beam from laser 110 is pointed toward an AFM cantilever 120 with fiducial surface 121.
  • Fiducial surface 121 reflects a primary reflected beam 111 towards a PSD 112.
  • PSD 1 112 and PSD 3 114 With the help of beam-splitters one can split the reflected laser beam towards PSD 1 112 and PSD 3 114.
  • the principle is the same for a second laser 132 and PSDs 2 118 and 4 116.
  • the primary PSDs 112 and 118 function as a mirror that reflects the primary reflected laser beam 111 towards the secondary PSDs 112 and 118.
  • Available off-the-shelf PSDs reflect enough light to achieve the second laser beam bounce. Additional coatings can further improve the quality of the secondary reflected light 122 and 124.
  • the electronic processing for the primary and secondary PSDs must account for the different laser beam intensity of the primary and secondary laser beam.
  • the use of secondary reflected laser beam replaces the need for an extra laser. Without the secondary reflected laser beam one would need four lasers.
  • a pair of primary and secondary PSDs in principle enables the detection of the directionality of the laser beam, which is not possible with a single PSD.
  • fiducial surface 121 reflects the laser beams to a new position on the surface of the four PSDs.
  • a cantilever twist ( ⁇ ) around its axis as shown in FIGURE 12 would create a laser beam trace on the surface of the PSD in a shape of an arch 134 shown in FIGURE 11, and a z displacement would produce up-down trace 136.
  • the output from the PSDs is the two-dimensional position of the laser spot 138 on the surface 140 of the PSD.
  • An electrical current output from the PSDs is electronically and then digitally processed.
  • the eight PSD outputs are part of a set of eight independent nonlinear equations with five unknowns. Simultaneous solution of the decoupled equations, or numerical solution of the coupled equations produces the absolute position and orientation of the AFM cantilever as illustrated in FIGURE 14.
  • FIGURES 9, 12 and 15 show the functioning of the actuating system for a CD metrology application.
  • the sample is attached to a coarse XY stage 140 that is used to position the sample 142 (semiconductor wafer with ICs) under the AFM tip 144.
  • AFM cantilever 120 is approached with the help of a z approach stage 146 that has as large a range (on the order of 100 mm) and as needed twisted in ⁇ (with the help of the angular approach stage 148) as to allow tip 144 to reach undercut features.
  • Angular approach stage 148 is mounted atop the XYZ PZT stage 146 that is used for scanning AFM tip 144 across sample 142.
  • a 3-D PZT driver that is used to drive (vibrate) the cantilever 120 is attached to the angular approach stage 148.
  • the cantilever is attached to the PZT driver module.
  • This actuation system allows AFM tip 144 to be positioned with respect to a feature on sample 142. Because the sensing system monitors AFM cantilever 120 as it twists, the sensing system can accommodate large twist angles that can enable tip 144 to access re-entrant features 150 as shown in FIGURE 17. The only other way to currently access reentrant features is with boot -shaped tips that are very fragile, expensive, and blunt at the end of the boot.
  • the present invention also allows operating the cantilever and the tip in the x, y, and z directions.
  • the 3-D capability of the CD AFM of the present invention enables a new AFM scanning strategy where the raster step in y can be altered for faster AFM imaging and better inspection of profiles in y direction that might have been omitted if one did not have information about the y direction and scanned with constant y raster step as illustrated by the results presented in FIGURES 17 and 18. It is also possible to scan in the XY direction.
  • FIGURE 19 illustrates this capability which is not possible with existing AFMs.
  • Tracking of cantilever 120 directly with the sensing system also enables XY measurements independent of the scanning stage.
  • the XY measurements are provided by an external sensor.
  • CD AFM of the present invention is the elimination of the cosine errors due to cantilever bending and tilt, vertical tip and sample alignment, and x and y orthogonality error. These errors occur when the sensing system measures coupling of the displacements. Since all coordinates are determined simultaneously, measurements are decoupled.
  • FIGURES 21 and 22 illustrate cosine errors due bending and tilt.
  • sensing system Other configurations possible with the sensing system include special adaptations designed for mask repair, as shown in FIGURES 23 and 24.
  • FIGURES 23 and 24 A micro-machining tool or, in one embodiment, a mask repair tool is illustrated in FIGURES 23 and 24.
  • the AFM tip 202 may be used to either perform a quality assurance check on the profile of the mask structures 204 or remove a defect from the mask 206 or repair a defect on a mask structure 204 on mask 206.
  • the AFM tip 202 is coupled to AFM cantilever 208 which is positioned by a mechanical stage 210.
  • Mechanical stage 210 consists of at least one laser source 212 and a PZT actuator stage 214 coupled directly to AFM cantilever 208.
  • Motion of AFM tip 202 through mechanical stage 210 cantilever is controlled by a computer control system 216.
  • This computer control system 216 will contain software to process data on workpiece or mask 206 to determine the location of defects 218 on mask 206 and coordinate the removal and/or repair of defects 218 from the workpiece.
  • Laser sources 212 contained within mechanical stage 210 provide collimated laser beams to measure out-of-plane and in-plane movements of AFM cantilever 208 as described in earlier embodiments.
  • a knowledge of the geometry of how AFM tip 202 is coupled to AFM cantilever 206 allows one to determine the position of AFM tip 202 from a knowledge of the position of AFM cantilever 206.
  • the present invention may use laser sources 212 to provide a laser beam 218 which is reflected from a surface, wherein the surface may be the top surface of cantilever 206, towards PSDs 220.
  • the system will utilize at least one PSD 220 to determine a variable describing the location and orientation of AFM cantilever 206.
  • the present invention may determine the x coordinate, y coordinate and z coordinate, as well as the pitch angle, yaw angle and tilt angle or any combination of these variables associated with the position and orientation of the AFM cantilever from the reflected beams onto continuous PSD 220 apertures.
  • PSDs may be continuous PSDs, however need not necessarily be continuous PSDs.
  • PSD 220 provides an output signal to a signal processing system 222 which will then determine the location of AFM tip 202 from the outputs of PSDs 220. This information is supplied to control system 216 to reposition the AFM tip 202 as needed or desired to execute a repair strategy.
  • AFM tip 202 may be used to mechanically agitate or remove a defect from an object.
  • AFM tip 202 may be used to repair an object on the workpiece or mask 206, as described in FIGURES 23 and 24. In a further embodiment, AFM tip 202 may be used to deposit a material to repair a structure on the workpiece or mask 206.
  • Cantilever position and orientation measurements are provided relative to an absolute reference frame fixed with respect to the structure of the AFM as shown in FIGURE 25. This is in contrast to conventional AFM sensing systems that provide only the vertical, z, coordinate (or, in one known instance, only the horizontal, x, and vertical, z, coordinates) , of the cantilever with respect to an absolute reference frame.
  • Conventional AFM sensing systems rely on the output of a scanning stage for the x and y (or, just the Y) coordinate and providing no information at all about the cantilever's angular orientation.
  • FIGURE 27 Various embodiments of the sensing system for a scanning probe microscopy tool of the present invention are capable of simultaneous multi -dimensional sensing, as opposed to one-dimensional or several-step multidimensional sensing currently performed with existing AFMs as illustrated in Figure 26.
  • the present invention provides a method of scanning contact holes and vias as shown in FIGURE 27.
  • cantilever 120 is tilted so as to allow access of tip 144 to one sector of the curved sidewall of hole or via 160.
  • Tip 144 is scanned in XY and rastered in z.
  • Cantilever 144 is then tilted in the other direction so as to allow access of the tip to another sector of the curved sidewall.
  • Tip 144 is again scanned in XY and rastered in z.
  • the results of the scans are combined to provide contour lines 162 describing the surface of hole or via 160.
  • FIGURE 28 illustrates how the multidimensional sensing system adapted to an AFM can be used for automated tip changing.
  • the multidimensional sensing system uses PSD outputs, x 'PSD and y 'PSD , to calibrate new cantilever orientation angles, ⁇ and ⁇ , after a tip change.
  • the XYZ stage then reapproaches the sample and resumes scanning.
  • Position in x, y and z and orientation in pitch, tilt, and yaw of the AFM cantilever are determined simultaneously for each unknown x and y displacement of the sample.
  • the present invention provides an important technical advantage in that the present invention eliminates the need for precise alignment and centering of the laser beam.
  • a continuous PSD is capable of monitoring the position of a light beam on its surface without the need for precise alignment and centering, as is required when bi-cell or quadrant cell position detectors are used.
  • the present invention provides another important technical advantage in that the present invention eliminates the need to maintain spatial and temporal uniformity of the laser beam.
  • Use of continuous PSDs eliminates the need to maintain spatial and temporal uniformity of the laser beam, as is required when bi-cell or quadrant cell position detectors are used. This is because continuous position-sensitive detectors (PSDs) , unlike Bi-cell and quadrant cell detectors, are inherently insensitive to spatial and temporal variations in the laser beam intensity distribution.
  • PSDs continuous position-sensitive detectors
  • the present invention provides yet another important technical advantage in that the present invention eliminates the need for the laser beam spot to illuminate both halves or all four quadrants of the PSD aperture.
  • Use of continuous PSDs eliminates the need for the laser beam spot to illuminate both halves or all four quadrants of the PSD aperture. This feature enables use of a smaller laser beam spot which, in turn, enables operation over larger ranges, since the smaller spot can traverse larger regions of the PSD surface without part of its intensity distribution falling outside the PSD aperture.
  • continuous PSDs instead of bi-cell or quadrant cell position detectors eliminates the need to maintain spatial and temporal uniformity of the laser beam. This is because continuous position-sensitive detectors (PSDs), unlike Bi-cell and quadrant cell detectors, are inherently insensitive to spatial and temporal variations in the laser beam intensity distribution.
  • PSDs continuous position-sensitive detectors
  • Using continuous PSDs also means the laser beam spot is not required to illuminate both halves or all four quadrants of the PSD aperture. This feature enables use of a smaller laser beam spot which, in turn, enables operation over larger ranges, since the smaller spot can traverse larger regions of the PSD surface without part of its intensity distribution falling outside the PSD aperture.
  • the present invention enables sensing of the position and orientation of an AFM cantilever.
  • Present invention allows direct measurement of cantilever position and orientation coordinates in all six degrees of freedom without reliance on the output of a scanning stage to determine any of these measured coordinates.
  • Cantilever position and orientation measurements are provided relative to an absolute reference frame fixed with respect to the structure of the AFM.
  • a technical advantage provided by the present invention is the ability to sense the position and orientation of an object in multidimensional space.
  • Yet another technical advantage provided by one embodiment of the present invention is the ability to repair a workpiece or remove a defect from a workpiece such as a photolithography mask used in semiconductor manufacture .
  • Another key advantage of the present invention is the ability to examine re-entrant features with an AFM tip. Because a sensing system of the present invention monitors AFM cantilever as it twists, the sensing system can accommodate large twist angles that can enable the AFM tip to access re-entrant features. This eliminates the need to access re-entrant features with boot-shaped tips that are very fragile, expensive, and blunt at the end of the boot.
  • the present invention is ideal for a variety of uses, including material characterization, chemical -mechanical planarization monitoring, precision surface profiling and critical dimension metrology.
  • Yet another feature of the present invention is to completely decouple position sensing of an AFM from the mechanical actuator which positions the AFM tip, enabling the present invention to measure at even better resolutions than the ability to position the mechanical actuator itself. Furthermore the present invention may do so while the actuator is in motion. Nonlinearities of the mechanical actuator have no effect on the accuracy of the system. This enables real-time, on-the-fly recording of the AFM cantilever tip position at randomly selected positions.

Abstract

A multi-dimensional scanning probe microscopy tool is provided by the present invention. This multi-dimensional scanning probe microscopy tool includes an atomic force microscope (AFM) cantilever (68) coupled to a tip (72), wherein the tip (72) deflects the cantilever (68) in response to an interaction with a sample (64). The cantilever (68) is illuminated by a collimated light beam (74,88) generated by a collimated light source (66, 62). The collimated light (74, 88) is reflected by the top surface of the cantilever (78) towards a position sensitive detector (PSD) (60) placed in the path of the reflected collimated light beam (80, 86). The PSD (60) produces an output containing data representing a deflection of the cantilever (68). This output is processed by a data acquisition and control system to produce a representation of the interaction with the sample.

Description

MULTIDIMENSIONAL SENSING SYSTEM FOR ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY
RELATED APPLICATIONS
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/101,963 filed on 26 September 1998. Additionally, this application incorporates by reference the prior U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/101,963 filed on 26 September 1998 entitled "Multidimensional Sensing System for Atomic Force Microscopy" to Vladimir Mancevski . This application also incorporates by reference U.S. Patent No. 5,367,373 entitled "Noncontact Position Measurement Systems Using Optical Sensors" to Ilene J. Busch-Vishniac, et al . and issued on 22 November 1994, hereinafter "BUSH-VISHNIAC 1", and U.S. Patent No. 5,552,883 entitled "Noncontact Position Measurement Systems Using Optical Sensors" to Ilene J. Busch-Vishniac, et al . and issued 3 September 1996, hereinafter "BUSH-VISHNIAC 2."
TECHNICAL FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates generally to the field of position measurement using optical sensors and, more particularly, to a noncontact position measurement system using continuous position sensitive detectors (PSDs) for determining the absolute position and orientation of a local region of interest on the surface of an atomic force microscope (AFM) cantilever. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
A typical atomic force microscope (AFM) 100 operates as shown in Figure 1. AFM 100 probes the surface of a sample 10 with a sharp tip 12, which is a few microns long and less than 100 Angstroms in diameter. Tip 12 is located at the free end of a cantilever 14 that is typically 100 to 200 microns long. Forces between the tip 12 and the sample 10 surface cause the cantilever 12 to bend or deflect. A detector 16 measures the cantilever 12 deflection as the tip is scanned over sample, or as sample 10 is scanned under tip 12. The measured cantilever deflections allow a computer to generate a map of surface topography.
Currently available AFMs detect the position of the cantilever with optical techniques. In the most common scheme, shown in FIGURE 2, a laser beam 22 bounces off the top surface of the cantilever 24 onto a bi-cell or quadrant cell position detector 26. As cantilever 24 bends, the position of the beam 25 on the laser beam on ' the bi-cell or quadrant cell detector 26 shifts. As beam 22 shifts, a current imbalance occurs indicating off center position.
The feedback system that controls the vertical position of the tip, 27 typically operates in either constant height mode, constant force mode or one of several vibrating cantilever techniques. In constant -height mode, the spatial variation of the cantilever deflection can be used directly to generate the topographic data set because the height of the scanner is fixed as it scans. In constant - force mode, the feedback circuit moves the scanner 28 up and down in the z (i.e., vertical) direction, responding to the topography by keeping the cantilever 24 deflection constant. In this case, the image is generated from the motion of scanner 28. When vibrating cantilever techniques are used, the feedback circuit 29 detects changes in vibration amplitude or phase as tip 12 comes near the sample 10 surface. The bi-cell or quadrant cell position detectors 26 used to sense cantilever 24 position consist of two or four discrete elements on a single substrate. When a light beam 25 is centered on the cells, output currents from each element are equal, indicating centering or nulling. As the beam 25 moves, a current imbalance occurs indicating off- center position. Bi-cell and quadrant cell detectors 26 require use of a laser beam 22 with an intensity distribution that is constant both spatially uniform and temporally uniform. This is because a nonuniformly shaped or time varying intensity distribution would introduce unwanted bias errors in the output of bi-cell or quadrant cell detector 26. Bi-cell and quadrant cell detectors 26 also require precise alignment and centering of the beam 25 on the bi-cell or quadrant cell detector. FIGURE 3 is a schematic of the noncontact position measurement system 200 previously disclosed in BUSH- VISHNIAC 1 and BUSH-VISHNIAC 2. This system combines optical and computational components to perform high- precision, six degree-of-freedom, (6-DOF) single-sided, noncontact position measurements. For in-plane measurements, reflective optical targets 30 are provided on a target object 32 whose position and orientation is to be sensed. For out-of-plane measurements, light beams 36 are directed toward the optical targets 30, producing reflected beams 34. Electrical signals are produced, indicating the points of intersection of the reflected beams and the position detectors 38. The signals are transformed to provide measurements of translation along, and rotation around, three nonparallel axes which define the space in which the target object moves. The system comprises two sections, out-of-plane and in-plane. Each section has its own assembly of light sources, reflectors, and sensors. The arbitrarily selected reference plane serves as a reference for motion measurement. This reference plane contains the x and y axes of the three-axis set (x, y and z) which defines the space in which the sensed object moves. The position and/or the motion of the target object are derived from kinematical transformations based on information supplied by the components illustrated in FIGURE 3. Position measurements of multiple light beams irradiating a single two-dimensional lateral -effect detector which can be made simultaneously through time, frequency, or wavelength multiplexing. The main advantage of multiplexing is that the number of detectors required in the existing system can be reduced, and the signal processing circuitry can be simultaneously simplified. The resulting system will be more compact, and alignment difficulties will be largely eliminated. Further, the effect of environmental variations is minimized as the number of detectors is reduced.
It is desirable to use a detector 26 that is capable of monitoring the position of a light beam 25 on its surface without the need for precise alignment and centering. Conventional AFM sensing systems 100 provide only the vertical, z, coordinate (or, in one known instance, the horizontal, x, and vertical, z, coordinates), of the cantilever with respect to an absolute reference frame, while relying on the output of a scanning stage for the x and y (or, just the Y) coordinate and providing no information at all about angular orientation of cantilever 24.
It would be desirable to measure all six degrees of freedom without reliance on the output of a scanning stage to determine any of these measured coordinates .
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention provides a multidimensional sensing system for atomic force microscopy (AFM) that substantially eliminates or reduces disadvantages and problems associated with previously developed systems and methods used for AFM.
More specifically, the present invention provides a multi -dimensional scanning probe microscopy tool or six degree of freedom atomic force microscope (6-DOF AFM) . This multi -dimensional scanning probe microscopy tool includes an AFM cantilever coupled to an AFM tip wherein the AFM tip deflects the cantilever in response to topographical changes on a sample. The AFM cantilever is illuminated by a light beam generated by a light source. This light beam is either collimated or focused. The light is reflected by the top surface of the AFM cantilever towards a detector placed in the path of the reflected light beam. The detector produces an output containing data representing the position and orientation of the AFM cantilever as 3 translations and 3 orientations. This output is processed by a data acquisition system to produce a representation of the topographical changes of the sample.
The present invention provides an important technical advantage in that the present invention eliminates the need for precise alignment and centering of the laser beam. A continuous PSD is capable of monitoring the position of a light beam on its surface without the need for precise alignment and centering, as is required when bi-cell or quadrant cell position detectors are used. The present invention provides another important technical advantage in that the present invention eliminates the need to maintain spatial and temporal uniformity of the laser beam. Use of continuous PSDs eliminates the need to maintain spatial and temporal uniformity of the laser beam, as is required when bi-cell or quadrant cell position detectors are used. This is because continuous position-sensitive detectors (PSDs) , unlike Bi-cell and quadrant cell detectors, are inherently insensitive to spatial and temporal variations in the laser beam intensity distribution.
The present invention provides yet another important technical advantage in that the present invention eliminates the need for the laser beam spot to illuminate both halves or all four quadrants of the PSD aperture. Use of continuous PSDs, which do not have halves or quadrants, eliminates the need for the laser beam spot to illuminate both halves or all four quadrants of the detector aperture. This feature enables use of a smaller laser beam spot which, in turn, enables operation over larger ranges, since the smaller spot can traverse larger regions of the PSD surface without part of its intensity distribution falling outside the PSD aperture.
The present invention enables sensing of the position and orientation of an AFM cantilever and direct measurement of cantilever position and orientation coordinates in all six degrees of freedom without reliance on the output of a scanning stage to determine any of these measured coordinates. Cantilever position and orientation measurements are provided relative to an absolute reference frame fixed with respect to the structure of the AFM. A technical advantage provided by the present invention is the ability to sense the position and orientation of an object in multidimensional space. Yet another technical advantage provided by one embodiment of the present invention is the ability to repair a workpiece or remove a defect from a workpiece such as a photolithography mask used in semiconductor manufacture .
Another key advantage of the present invention is the ability to examine re-entrant features with an AFM tip.
Because a sensing system of the present invention monitors AFM cantilever as it twists, the sensing system can accommodate large twist angles that can enable the AFM tip to access re-entrant features. This eliminates the need to access re-entrant features with boot-shaped tips that are very fragile, expensive, and blunt at the end of the boot. The present invention is ideal for a variety of uses, including material characterization, chemical -mechanical planarization monitoring, precision surface profiling and critical dimension metrology. Yet another feature of the present invention is to completely decouple position sensing of an AFM from the mechanical actuator which positions the AFM tip, enabling the present invention to measure at even better resolutions than the ability to position the mechanical actuator itself. Furthermore the present invention may do so while the actuator is in motion. Nonlinearities of the mechanical actuator have no effect on the accuracy of the system. This enables real-time, on-the-fly recording of the AFM cantilever tip position at randomly selected positions.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
For a more complete understanding of the present invention and the advantages thereof, reference is now made to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which like reference numerals indicate like features and wherein:
FIGURE 1 illustrates a typical AFM; FIGURE 2 depicts how an AFM detects position; FIGURE 3 is a schematic of a previously disclosed noncontact measurement system;
FIGURE 4 illustrates one embodiment of a 6-DOF AFM of the present invention;
FIGURE 5 presents a second embodiment of a 6-DOF AFM of the present invention.
FIGURE 6 provides a representation of two laser beams focused on a cantilever surface;
FIGURE 7 shows an alternative embodiment of the present invention that utilizes the cantilever edge as a reflective mark. FIGURE 8A illustrates a standard semiconductor calibration grating used as an AFM sample;
FIGURE 8B illustrates a linear displacement magnifier strategically positioned between cantilever and PSD. FIGURE 9 presents a CD AFM metrology tool provided by the present invention;
FIGURE 10 provides a top view of the CD AFM metrology tool provided by the present invention;
FIGURE 11 provides a perspective view of the CD AFM metrology tool provided by the present invention;
FIGURE 12 presents an actuation mechanism coupled to a cantilever in a AFM of the present invention;
FIGURE 13 illustrates an AFM cantilever with a fiducial surface; FIGURE 14 illustrates the method of computation of cantilever absolute position and orientation in one embodiment of the present invention;
FIGURE 15 illustrates the sensor actuator concept of operation of a CD AFM of the present invention; FIGURE 16 illustrates a sensing system of the present invention that can access re-entrant features;
FIGURES 17 and 18 illustrate the results of AFM imaging with different x and y step issues;
FIGURE 19 illustrates the ability of the present invention to measure absolute linear and angular measurements that are tied to a reference frame;
FIGURE 20 illustrates the use of large beams to perform absolute scans over the diameter of the laser beam;
FIGURES 21 and 22 illustrate cosine errors due to bending and tilt; FIGURES 23 and 24 illustrate adaptation of the present invention designed for mask repair;
FIGURE 25 illustrates cantilever position and orientation relative to an absolute reference frame fixed with respect to the structure of the AFM;
FIGURE 26 shows how various embodiments of sensing system of the present invention are capable of simultaneous multi -dimensional sensing;
FIGURE 27 illustrates a method of scanning contact holes or vias with the system of the present invention; and
FIGURE 28 illustrates a procedure for automated tip changing and self alignment.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION Preferred embodiments of the present invention are illustrated in the FIGURES, like numerals being used to refer to like and corresponding parts of the various drawings .
The present invention provides a Six Degree-of-Freedom (6-DOF) Atomic Force Microscope (AFM) tools for use in microelectronics manufacturing that overcome limitations inherent in the sensing and control system architectures of existing lower degree-of-freedom AFMs. However, the present invention need not be limited to use in microelectronics manufacturing. This 6-DOF sensing system is capable of measuring all six absolute degrees of freedom of a body in space, such as a deflecting AFM cantilever.
The present invention is ideal for a variety of uses, including material characterization, chemical -mechanical planarization monitoring, precision surface profiling and critical dimension metrology. The sensing system of the present invention may be completely decoupled from the actuator, enabling it to measure at even better resolutions than the actuator itself, and do so while the actuator is in motion. The present invention is capable of simultaneous multi -dimensional sensing, as opposed to one- dimensional or several -step multi-dimensional sensing currently performed with existing AFMs. The simple, robust design of the present invention is readily adaptable to multi-cantilever operation. The sensing system of the present invention may be completely decoupled from the mechanical actuator (stages, PZTs, etc.). Therefore, the cantilever displacements x, y, and z and the cantilever pitch, tilt and yaw angles ψ, φ and θ, are determined independently of actuator motion. Nonlinearities of the PZT or the stage will have no effect on the accuracy of the system. This enables real-time, on- the-fly recording of the AFM cantilever tip position at randomly selected x and y positions.
The present invention uses continuous position- sensitive detectors (PSDs) in lieu of bi-cell or quadrant cell position detectors, with adaptations of a noncontact position measurement system and other component technology innovations that enable sensing of the position and orientation of an AFM cantilever relative to an absolute reference frame.
A first embodiment of the present invention utilizes only the out-of-plane section of the existing 6-DOF sensing system concept . Height z and orientation in pitch and tilt of the AFM cantilever are determined simultaneously for each given x and y coordinate of the sample. A second embodiment utilizes the entire existing 6-DOF sensing system concept, including both the out-of-plane and in-plane sections. Position in x, y and z and orientation in pitch, tilt, and yaw of the AFM cantilever are determined simultaneously for each unknown x and y displacement of the sample.
The first embodiment of the present invention utilizes only the out-of-plane section of the 6-DOF sensing system and therefore can only monitor out-of-plane positions and orientations for a given x and y. As shown in FIGURE 4, two-dimensional PSD sensor 40, laser diodes 42, and the AFM cantilever 44 are fixed to a ground reference 41, whereas sample 45 is moved under AFM tip 46 in x and y directions with a PZT actuator and a coarse motion stage 48. This configuration relies on already existing external sensors (interferometric, capacitive, etc.) to direct the PZT actuator in the x and y directions. The collimated light beams 50 from laser diodes 42 are pointed toward top surface 52 of AFM cantilever 44 where they bounce off as light beams 54 intercepted by PSD 40. Light beams 50 do not have to be parallel to each other. Care must be taken to assure that light spot 55 from light beams 50 fits on cantilever 44.
The principle of operation of this embodiment of the present invention is as follows. First, the PZT actuator moves the sample 45 under the AFM tip 46 to a precise x and y location. AFM tip 46 will force the AFM cantilever 44 to deflect as it encounters topographic changes on sample 45. However, the present invention need not be limited to topographical changes as the AFM tip 46 may sense chemical, electrical, optical or magnetic variations at the sample. These minute deflections will cause light beams 50 to alter their paths to produce light beams 54. These changes are detected by two-dimensional PSD 40. Information about the displacement of the light spots on the surface of the PSD 40 is then used to determine the out-of-plane position z and the pitch and tilt orientations of the cantilever 44. This AFM configuration can fully and simultaneously determine the vertical position and out-of-plane orientation of AFM cantilever 44. Information about the vertical deflection in z is readily available, either to be displayed as a topography map (in constant height operation) or to provide a predetermined feedback signal to the PZT that will rapidly lift the AFM tip back to its original deflection, keeping a constant force to the cantilever 44 (constant force operation) . This first embodiment is suitable for fast-scan multi -dimensional measurements, and also for multi -cantilever operation.
A second embodiment utilizes 6-DOF sensing system, including both out-of-plane and in-plane sections. FIGURE 5 represents the second embodiment of the present invention. Two-dimensional PSD 60, wide beam light emitting diode (LED) laser 62 and samples 64 are fixed to ground reference 61. Laser diodes 66 and the AFM cantilever 68 are fixed to the PZT tube 70. PZT tube 70 scans AFM tip 72 above sample 64 in the x and y directions and, if necessary, adjusts its vertical displacement, z. The laser diodes 66 are fixed to the bottom of PZT tube 70 so that laser diodes 66 can move together with cantilever 68 in the X-Y plane parallel to sample 64 to keep the collimated light beams 74 on the surface of the cantilever 68 at all times. Care must be taken that light spots 76 from light beams 74 fit on cantilever 68. Care must also be taken that laser diodes 66 do not twist while moving with PZT tube 70. This maintains a constant slope for light beam 74. In the alternative, a larger cantilever area with the size of the scan may accommodate light spots 76 by keeping them within cantilever 68 surface 78 during the scan. Collimated light beams 74 from laser diodes 66 are pointed towards top surface 78 of AFM cantilever 68 where collimated light beams 74 are reflected off surface 78 and are intercepted by PSD 60 as light beams 86 and 80. This part of sensing system 400 is responsible for determining the out-of-plane position and orientation.
For the in-plane part of the sensing system 400, cantilever 68 is equipped with two reflective marks 82 on a nonreflective background. Collimated light 88 from the wide beam LED 62 illuminates reflective marks 82 on cantilever 68, where the light beam reflections 86 created by reflective marks 82 bounce toward PSD or PSDs 60. Care must be taken that wide beam 88 covers reflective marks 82 at all times during scanning of cantilever 68. Since the AFM scanning ranges are typically 10 - 100 μm, this task can be readily accomplished.
PZT tube 70 first moves AFM tip 72 above sample 64 to an unknown x and y location. As AFM tip 72 encounters topographic changes, AFM cantilever 68 will be deflected. These minute deflections will cause light beams 86 and 80 to alter their paths and move light spots 87 on two- dimensional PSD 60 to new two-dimensional locations. These changes are then detected by two-dimensional PSD 60, and used to determine the out-of-plane position z and the pitch and tilt orientations of the cantilever. The X-Y motion and deflection of AFM cantilever 68 also cause a deflection of the light beams 86 created by the reflective marks 82. Two-dimensional PSD 60 will then detect the displacement of the light spots on the surface of PSD 60, and use that information to determine the in-plane positions x and y and the yaw orientation of the cantilever. Therefore all three positions and all three orientations can be determined simultaneously .
The significance of this embodiment is that the full position and orientation of AFM cantilever 68 can be determined directly and simultaneously from information provided by the PSD 60 without prior knowledge of how the cantilever arrived in its final position. This means that this second embodiment of the sensing system for a scanning probe microscopy tool of the present invention is insensitive to any system imperfections, such as the PZT nonlinearities and nonorthogonality between the sample and the PZT axis. This enables real-time, in-flight recording of the AFM cantilever tip 72 at randomly selected x and y positions. Complete decoupling of the actuator from the sensing system means that the sensing system for a scanning probe microscopy tool can measure at even better resolutions than the actuator itself, and do so while the actuator is in motion. The basic modes of operation of the sensing system for a scanning probe microscopy tool of the present invention can be contact, non-contact, and attractive-repulsive. In contact mode with constant-height operation, AFM tip 72 will scan above sample 64 surface while the position and orientation of cantilever tip are determined. In contact mode with constant-force operation, information about the vertical deflection z of cantilever is used to drive the laser beam to its original position, keeping the cantilever force constant. The limits where the constant -height mode must switch to a constant-force mode due to large topography changes have yet to be determined. The laser beam(s) that monitor the AFM cantilever can be moved, in constant-force mode, closer to the center of the PSD where the AFM can again be operated in constant-height mode.
The sensing system for a scanning probe microscopy tool can also be used in non-contact mode, where the cantilever is excited at its resonant frequency as it is scanned above the sample. Changes in sample topography will alter the amplitude and the phase of the cantilever which will be detected by the PSD. Similarly, the sensing system for a scanning probe microscopy tool can be used in an attractive-repulsive mode of operation where the cantilever is excited at its resonant frequency with a much larger amplitude.
The ability to determine the orientation of cantilever 68 provides the unique capability to detect lateral forces while scanning in either the x or y directions. This is particularly important for material characterization studies. It also provides the capability to precisely detect the exact vertical deflection vs. the x and y location, whereas many AFMs have an error component in x and y due to cantilever's deflection in z. This problem has appeared, for example, when imaging adhesion forces on proteins with an AFM. Cantilever 68 selected for the present invention must have size, shape, and other physical properties consistent with cantilevers used in the AFM industry. The present invention also requires that AFM cantilever 68 serve as a reflective surface. Rectangularly shaped cantilevers, 35 um wide and 350 μm long, are used in one embodiment of the present invention. The reflective sides are coated with Aluminum, making them highly reflective. However, the present invention need not be limited by this shape, size and coating for the cantilever.
In the first embodiment of the sensing system for a scanning probe microscopy tool of the present invention, two separate laser beams 50 were focused on surface S2 of cantilever 44, either on top of each other, or next to each other along the length of cantilever 44. FIGURE 5 provides a representation of two laser beams 50 focused on cantilever surface 52.
A cantilever 68 with two reflective marks 82 is shown in the second embodiment of FIGURE 5. Reflective marks 82 provide a means to use the cantilever itself for measuring in-plane motion instead of relying on the sample stage. One reflective mark allows the detection of in-plane cantilever displacements (x and y) as shown in FIGURE 6. Two reflective marks allows the detection of the in-plane rotation (cantilever's yaw angle θ) . Reflective marks 82 each have a diameter smaller then the width of cantilever 68 and are placed close to the free end of the cantilever, side by side along its length, as shown in FIGURE 6. Cantilever edge 90 itself can be used in lieu of a reflective mark to define a reflective region 92. This alternative embodiment for detecting in-plane motion shown in FIGURE 7.
The single reflection from cantilever surface 78 depicted by the rectangular region 92 shown in FIGURE 7 enabled the detection of both in-plane cantilever displacements x and y. This may also be achieved by having two reflective strips along the length of the cantilever 68 separated by a non-reflective strip. Fabrication of such reflective strips is less complicated and less expensive then fabrication of two reflective dots within the cantilever. In addition, because such reflective strips are larger in size, the reflective strips produce more intense reflected light then the reflective marks. Increasing intensity reflected from the cantilever improves the signal-to-noise ratio of detection electronics. In the reflective strip design, the focused light beams (used for the out-of-plane measurement) will also use one of the reflective strips as the reflective surface needed to monitor the cantilever's out-of-plane displacement. The sensing system for a scanning probe microscopy tool sensing system of the present invention required changing the beam shapes. In the first embodiment of the present invention, the diameter of narrow-beam laser 50 had to be less than the cantilever width. Therefore, a focused laser beam having a diameter less than the width of the cantilever at its focal distance may be used. A focused laser beam can function similarly to a narrow collimated beam for purposes of determining the out-of-plane components. The transformation equations used to compute the absolute position and orientation of the cantilever based on PSD outputs may need to be modified to take account of beam shape effects when focused beams are used instead of collimated beams.
The optical properties of the light beam or laser at the surface of the cantilever or other object whose position and orientation in space is to be sensed, may be enhanced with optical elements placed in the path of propagation of the light beam incident on the surface. This optical element may be an optical lenses, beam splitter, mirror, filters or other optical element known to those skilled in the art that improves the intensity, directionality, uniformity and focus of the light beam. Similarly, an optical element may be placed in the second path of propagation of the light beam incident on the aperture of the PSD to enhance the signal to noise ratio or resolution of the output of the PSD.
One embodiment of the present invention specifically uses lasers specified as having 18 μm beam diameter at 100 μm focal distance. The 100 μm focal length provides adequate space for positioning the laser mounts, stage, PSD mounts and other components. Optics may be modified to change the focal length of a laser. Modifying these focal lengths allows the laser casings to be positioned next to each other and focused at the same spot on the cantilever. Excessive beam diameter cause unwanted reflections from the edges of the cantilever. With a smaller laser beam, the quality of the laser light is improved and the signal to noise ratio significantly increased. In addition, a better focused laser beam provides a reflected beam with higher light intensity. This higher light intensity improves the signal to noise ratio of the system. Unwanted effects of the cantilever edges on the quality of the reflected laser beam provide that smoother edges, or reflective strips that do not extend out to the edges of the cantilever, will provide a higher quality reflected beam. In the in-plane AFM implementation, shown as FIGURE 5, the diameter of the wide beam laser 88 must be large enough to allow the reflective marks 82 to displace within the beam for at least 100 μm, which corresponds to the range required for of a typical AFM scan. Otherwise, the reflective mark 82 or strip would fall outside the region illuminated by beam 88. If reflective mark or strip 82 is 35 by 35 μm, the wide beam should be approximately 100 μm to allow for 30 μm scans while keeping the reflective regions within the aperture of the collimated beam. One specific embodiment of the present invention uses a pseudo- collimated wide-beam laser light that is commercially available. This laser light has a diameter of 100 microns and depth of focus of 2 mm. The pseudo-collimated light was produced by using a focused light beam with a large depth of focus.
Continuous-position PSDs are robust with respect to laser beam's shape, intensity variation over the beam profile, temporal intensity variation, and the position of the laser beam with respect to the physical center of the PSD when compared to split PSDs. Surface-mounted, tetra- lateral, two-dimensional (5 x 5 mm) PSDs may be used in embodiments of the present invention.
The required surface area of the PSD depends on the diameter and divergence of the beam reflected from the reflective region on cantilever. This is because the incident light spot must fit within the PSD aperture. When using focused rather than collimated light beams, the distance between the PSD and the cantilever also plays a role. At some focal distances, the laser beam may be larger than the cantilever, resulting in the reflection from the cantilever edges producing a reflected light beam with a very irregular, non-continuous shape.
At certain distances from the cantilever, most but not all of the light intensity distribution of the reflected laser beams may fall within the PSD apertures. Using larger PSDs enables the present invention to capture the entire intensity distribution. However, based on the physics of these devices, a larger PSD area would result in decreased device resolution. Achieving high resolution is an important objective. The split PSDs typically used in conventional AFMs cannot detect anything from this type of reflected laser light. The fact that the present invention is able to obtain a degraded, but still meaningful measurement demonstrates that the present invention is robust in relation to intensity variations over the beam profile.
A major challenge overcome by the present invention in the use of multiple lasers with an AFM cantilever is the difficulty of aligning the reflected laser beams with the PSDs. Split PSDs used with most AFMs cannot overcome this difficulty because multiple laser beams would have to be aligned with the centers of the split PSDs so as to allow the laser beam to illuminate all four quadrants, while maintaining uniform beam shape and intensity. Continuous position PSDs do not have this disadvantage because they can accommodate a laser beam with arbitrary shape and non- uniform intensity. In addition, a continuous position PSD can also be positioned away from the centroid of the incident beam, as long as this does not cause the beam to fall outside the PSD aperture.
Embodiments of the present invention may use both AC and DC modulated lasers. The constant (DC) laser beam intensity produced a more stable signal in relation to drift and noise, but it also increased the sensitivity of the PSD signal to variations in environmental lighting conditions and to the quality of the laser. The AC scheme approach should shift the electronic signals to frequency bands where the noise floor is lower, thereby further improving signal-to-noise-ratio and, with it, overall system resolution.
Phase lock loop amplifiers are ordinarily used when superior signal recovery capability is required. However, embodiments of the present invention may use a sensing system for a scanning probe microscopy tool without using phase lock loop amplifiers. If phase lock loop amplifiers are used, several phase lock loop amplifiers are needed to process the signals from two PSDs. Embodiments of the present invention demonstrate the ability to achieve nm- scale resolution without using phase lock loop amplifiers. A more refined resolution and repeatability may be achieved with the use of phase lock loop amplifiers in the circuit. A piezoelectric transducer (PZT) Stage is capable of moving either the sample or the AFM cantilever in the x, y and z directions. Typical PZT stages are available from Piezosystem Jena, with 80 μm range in x and y, and 9 μm in z. The function of the data acquisition system (DAQ) is to acquire the signals from the PSD signal processing circuits. These signals are digitally filtered to parse the acquired data into frequency components, average the signals, normalize the signals, display and store the experimental data, and provide analog output to drive the PZT stage in all three axes. A package such as National Instruments' Lab-View software and data acquisition hardware may be used in the DAQ. The measurements may be taken on-demand or during continuous sampling. The results may be processed by passing the PSD output signal through a Fourier transform and discarding all frequency components except the residual DC signal . Each data point represents a sample average of this DC signal, acquired at a sampling rate of 10 KHz per channel. This number of samples is empirically based on minimizing the observed standard deviation. However, the present invention need not be limited by this method of sampling.
A calibration grating may be used as an AFM sample. A standard semiconductor calibration grating with pyramidal ridges, 1.8 μm high and 3 μm apart , with their faces aligned at 70° with respect one another is shown in FIGURE 8A.
The simple, robust design of a sensing system for a scanning probe microscopy tool will make it readily adaptable to multi -cantilever operation. Because the continuous PSD is better for alignment and centering, it is more suitable for monitoring the position of many light beams, where each is from a different cantilever. A single continuous PSD can be used to monitor more than one light beam from more than one than one cantilever. In a multi - probe application the sample will be displaced by a piezoelectrically actuated stage in the same x and y step under each AFM cantilever tip. A separate sensing system will be used to instantaneously determine the z position, or the z position plus the orientation, of each individual cantilever. This information about position and orientation can be used to independently control the height and orientation of each cantilever.
The embodiments previously described are not the only possible AFM architectures that can be implemented with the multidimensional sensing system. Different embodiments of the invention include different positions and orientations of the lasers and the PSDs with respect to each other, and with respect to the AFM cantilever. Another embodiment involves the number of the lasers and PSDs. Using multiplexing schemes, one could reduce the number of PSDs so that one PSD monitors more then one laser light. Another embodiment utilizes beam-splitters that enable a single laser beam to illuminate different sensed bodies, of which one or more are AFM cantilevers (two AFM cantilevers or an AFM cantilever and a reference body) . Still another variation uses a single reflected laser beam that illuminates more then one PSD. This approach is effective in reducing the number of lasers .
Another embodiment uses mirrors to manipulate the laser beam to reach an AFM cantilever when direct pointing from a laser is hard, or to divert the light beam path to improve the sensing. A curved mirror that intersects the second path of propagation of the light beam could be used as a linear magnifier. An in-plane light beam that is strategically positioned between the cantilever and the PSD will translate linear beam displacements into magnified angular displacements which can be detected by the PSD with a greater precision, than if they were not translated. FIGURE 8B illustrates a linear displacement magnifier strategically positioned between cantilever and PSD.
An additional embodiment of an AFM sensor-actuator uses only one or more fiducial surfaces to detect all 6 degrees-of-freedom of a body in space, including an AFM cantilever. This embodiment departs from the previously described approach where the out-of-plane sensing and the in-plane sensing are done separately with different types of laser beam light (narrow beam collimated, wide beam collimated, focused) . The combination of reflective surface and fiducial surface is replaced by a fiducial surface. Although this AFM sensor-actuator configuration can be used for variety of applications suitable for AFMs, such as roughness measurement, inspection of chemical - mechanical -planarization (CMP) wafer processes, the present invention is well suited for critical dimension atomic force microscopy (CD AFM) . As CD AFM metrology involves sudden topography changes and vertical or re-entrant sidewalls, CD AFM metrology is the most challenging application for an AFM based tool.
FIGURE 9 presents a side view of this CD AFM architecture configuration. The architecture consists of two collimated laser beams and four PSDs. FIGURE 10 shows the side view and therefore only one laser 110 and the corresponding pair of PSDs (PSD 1 112 and PSD 3 114) . A second laser and a second pair of PSDs are behind the first laser-PSD set. FIGURE 10 provides a top view of the entire sensing system. FIGURE 11 shows the perspective view of the sensing system but does not show the secondary PSDs (PSD 3 114 and PSD 4 116) that detect the laser beams 122 and 124 reflected off the primary PSDs (PSD 1 112 and PSD 2 118) . Lasers 110 and 111 and PSDs 112, 114, 116 and 118 are all fixed to absolute reference frame 126 and the cantilever 120 is attached to an actuation mechanism 130 shown in FIGURE 12. FIGURE 13 presents a cantilever suitable for this embodiment. Use of one fiducial and three PSDs allows detection of five absolute degrees-of- freedom (the sixth one, yaw about the z axis, is not determined using only one fiducial) . However, use of four PSDs provides sensing redundancy. Use of second fiducial requires four PSDs and will allow determination of the yaw, but also adds an extra necessary complexity in constructing a sensing system. For AFM applications, yaw of standard AFM cantilever is not important, and therefore the presented embodiment does not include this but may be incorporated.
The principle of operation is as follows. A collimated laser beam from laser 110 is pointed toward an AFM cantilever 120 with fiducial surface 121. Fiducial surface 121 reflects a primary reflected beam 111 towards a PSD 112. With the help of beam-splitters one can split the reflected laser beam towards PSD 1 112 and PSD 3 114. The principle is the same for a second laser 132 and PSDs 2 118 and 4 116. In the presented architecture the primary PSDs 112 and 118 function as a mirror that reflects the primary reflected laser beam 111 towards the secondary PSDs 112 and 118. Available off-the-shelf PSDs reflect enough light to achieve the second laser beam bounce. Additional coatings can further improve the quality of the secondary reflected light 122 and 124. In any case, the electronic processing for the primary and secondary PSDs must account for the different laser beam intensity of the primary and secondary laser beam. The use of secondary reflected laser beam replaces the need for an extra laser. Without the secondary reflected laser beam one would need four lasers. A pair of primary and secondary PSDs in principle enables the detection of the directionality of the laser beam, which is not possible with a single PSD.
As cantilever 120 moves to a different position and orientation under the flood of collimated laser beam 110, fiducial surface 121 reflects the laser beams to a new position on the surface of the four PSDs. For example, a cantilever twist (Ψ) around its axis as shown in FIGURE 12 would create a laser beam trace on the surface of the PSD in a shape of an arch 134 shown in FIGURE 11, and a z displacement would produce up-down trace 136. The output from the PSDs is the two-dimensional position of the laser spot 138 on the surface 140 of the PSD. An electrical current output from the PSDs is electronically and then digitally processed. The eight PSD outputs are part of a set of eight independent nonlinear equations with five unknowns. Simultaneous solution of the decoupled equations, or numerical solution of the coupled equations produces the absolute position and orientation of the AFM cantilever as illustrated in FIGURE 14.
FIGURES 9, 12 and 15 show the functioning of the actuating system for a CD metrology application. The sample is attached to a coarse XY stage 140 that is used to position the sample 142 (semiconductor wafer with ICs) under the AFM tip 144. AFM cantilever 120 is approached with the help of a z approach stage 146 that has as large a range (on the order of 100 mm) and as needed twisted in Ψ (with the help of the angular approach stage 148) as to allow tip 144 to reach undercut features. Angular approach stage 148 is mounted atop the XYZ PZT stage 146 that is used for scanning AFM tip 144 across sample 142. A 3-D PZT driver that is used to drive (vibrate) the cantilever 120 is attached to the angular approach stage 148. The cantilever is attached to the PZT driver module. This actuation system allows AFM tip 144 to be positioned with respect to a feature on sample 142. Because the sensing system monitors AFM cantilever 120 as it twists, the sensing system can accommodate large twist angles that can enable tip 144 to access re-entrant features 150 as shown in FIGURE 17. The only other way to currently access reentrant features is with boot -shaped tips that are very fragile, expensive, and blunt at the end of the boot. The present invention also allows operating the cantilever and the tip in the x, y, and z directions. This enables one to determine all components of a 3-D vector normal to the surface, the length of which is equal to the distance from tip 144 to the surface of sample 142 and the XYZ position of the corresponding point on the sample surface. The 3-D capability of the CD AFM of the present invention enables a new AFM scanning strategy where the raster step in y can be altered for faster AFM imaging and better inspection of profiles in y direction that might have been omitted if one did not have information about the y direction and scanned with constant y raster step as illustrated by the results presented in FIGURES 17 and 18. It is also possible to scan in the XY direction.
Since the PSDs of the sensor-actuator system always track the reflected laser beams from the cantilever 120. The present invention enables measurement of absolute linear and angular measurements tied to a fixed reference frame. FIGURE 19 illustrates this capability which is not possible with existing AFMs.
Tracking of cantilever 120 directly with the sensing system also enables XY measurements independent of the scanning stage. In existing AFMs the XY measurements are provided by an external sensor.
Use of large collimated beams and use of a fiducial surface enables absolute scans over the diameter of the laser beam, 1 to 5 mm as shown in FIGURE 20. Existing AFMs do not even have an absolute reference frame and cannot scan more then lOOμmwithout saturating the sensing system.
Yet another advantage of the CD AFM of the present invention is the elimination of the cosine errors due to cantilever bending and tilt, vertical tip and sample alignment, and x and y orthogonality error. These errors occur when the sensing system measures coupling of the displacements. Since all coordinates are determined simultaneously, measurements are decoupled. FIGURES 21 and 22 illustrate cosine errors due bending and tilt.
Other configurations possible with the sensing system include special adaptations designed for mask repair, as shown in FIGURES 23 and 24.
A micro-machining tool or, in one embodiment, a mask repair tool is illustrated in FIGURES 23 and 24. In this embodiment, the AFM tip 202 may be used to either perform a quality assurance check on the profile of the mask structures 204 or remove a defect from the mask 206 or repair a defect on a mask structure 204 on mask 206. In this embodiment, the AFM tip 202 is coupled to AFM cantilever 208 which is positioned by a mechanical stage 210.
Mechanical stage 210 consists of at least one laser source 212 and a PZT actuator stage 214 coupled directly to AFM cantilever 208.
Motion of AFM tip 202 through mechanical stage 210 cantilever is controlled by a computer control system 216. This computer control system 216 will contain software to process data on workpiece or mask 206 to determine the location of defects 218 on mask 206 and coordinate the removal and/or repair of defects 218 from the workpiece. Laser sources 212 contained within mechanical stage 210 provide collimated laser beams to measure out-of-plane and in-plane movements of AFM cantilever 208 as described in earlier embodiments.
A knowledge of the geometry of how AFM tip 202 is coupled to AFM cantilever 206 allows one to determine the position of AFM tip 202 from a knowledge of the position of AFM cantilever 206. The present invention may use laser sources 212 to provide a laser beam 218 which is reflected from a surface, wherein the surface may be the top surface of cantilever 206, towards PSDs 220. The system will utilize at least one PSD 220 to determine a variable describing the location and orientation of AFM cantilever 206. The present invention may determine the x coordinate, y coordinate and z coordinate, as well as the pitch angle, yaw angle and tilt angle or any combination of these variables associated with the position and orientation of the AFM cantilever from the reflected beams onto continuous PSD 220 apertures. These PSDs may be continuous PSDs, however need not necessarily be continuous PSDs. PSD 220 provides an output signal to a signal processing system 222 which will then determine the location of AFM tip 202 from the outputs of PSDs 220. This information is supplied to control system 216 to reposition the AFM tip 202 as needed or desired to execute a repair strategy. In one embodiment of the present invention, AFM tip 202 may be used to mechanically agitate or remove a defect from an object. In another embodiment, AFM tip 202 may be used to repair an object on the workpiece or mask 206, as described in FIGURES 23 and 24. In a further embodiment, AFM tip 202 may be used to deposit a material to repair a structure on the workpiece or mask 206.
Cantilever position and orientation measurements are provided relative to an absolute reference frame fixed with respect to the structure of the AFM as shown in FIGURE 25. This is in contrast to conventional AFM sensing systems that provide only the vertical, z, coordinate (or, in one known instance, only the horizontal, x, and vertical, z, coordinates) , of the cantilever with respect to an absolute reference frame. Conventional AFM sensing systems rely on the output of a scanning stage for the x and y (or, just the Y) coordinate and providing no information at all about the cantilever's angular orientation. Various embodiments of the sensing system for a scanning probe microscopy tool of the present invention are capable of simultaneous multi -dimensional sensing, as opposed to one-dimensional or several-step multidimensional sensing currently performed with existing AFMs as illustrated in Figure 26. The present invention provides a method of scanning contact holes and vias as shown in FIGURE 27. Here cantilever 120 is tilted so as to allow access of tip 144 to one sector of the curved sidewall of hole or via 160. Tip 144 is scanned in XY and rastered in z. Cantilever 144 is then tilted in the other direction so as to allow access of the tip to another sector of the curved sidewall. Tip 144 is again scanned in XY and rastered in z. The results of the scans are combined to provide contour lines 162 describing the surface of hole or via 160.
FIGURE 28 illustrates how the multidimensional sensing system adapted to an AFM can be used for automated tip changing. The multidimensional sensing system uses PSD outputs, x 'PSD and y 'PSD , to calibrate new cantilever orientation angles, ψ and φ, after a tip change. The XYZ stage then reapproaches the sample and resumes scanning.
Position in x, y and z and orientation in pitch, tilt, and yaw of the AFM cantilever are determined simultaneously for each unknown x and y displacement of the sample. The present invention provides an important technical advantage in that the present invention eliminates the need for precise alignment and centering of the laser beam. A continuous PSD is capable of monitoring the position of a light beam on its surface without the need for precise alignment and centering, as is required when bi-cell or quadrant cell position detectors are used.
The present invention provides another important technical advantage in that the present invention eliminates the need to maintain spatial and temporal uniformity of the laser beam. Use of continuous PSDs eliminates the need to maintain spatial and temporal uniformity of the laser beam, as is required when bi-cell or quadrant cell position detectors are used. This is because continuous position-sensitive detectors (PSDs) , unlike Bi-cell and quadrant cell detectors, are inherently insensitive to spatial and temporal variations in the laser beam intensity distribution.
The present invention provides yet another important technical advantage in that the present invention eliminates the need for the laser beam spot to illuminate both halves or all four quadrants of the PSD aperture. Use of continuous PSDs eliminates the need for the laser beam spot to illuminate both halves or all four quadrants of the PSD aperture. This feature enables use of a smaller laser beam spot which, in turn, enables operation over larger ranges, since the smaller spot can traverse larger regions of the PSD surface without part of its intensity distribution falling outside the PSD aperture.
Also, use of continuous PSDs instead of bi-cell or quadrant cell position detectors eliminates the need to maintain spatial and temporal uniformity of the laser beam. This is because continuous position-sensitive detectors (PSDs), unlike Bi-cell and quadrant cell detectors, are inherently insensitive to spatial and temporal variations in the laser beam intensity distribution. Using continuous PSDs also means the laser beam spot is not required to illuminate both halves or all four quadrants of the PSD aperture. This feature enables use of a smaller laser beam spot which, in turn, enables operation over larger ranges, since the smaller spot can traverse larger regions of the PSD surface without part of its intensity distribution falling outside the PSD aperture. The present invention enables sensing of the position and orientation of an AFM cantilever. Present invention allows direct measurement of cantilever position and orientation coordinates in all six degrees of freedom without reliance on the output of a scanning stage to determine any of these measured coordinates. Cantilever position and orientation measurements are provided relative to an absolute reference frame fixed with respect to the structure of the AFM. A technical advantage provided by the present invention is the ability to sense the position and orientation of an object in multidimensional space.
Yet another technical advantage provided by one embodiment of the present invention is the ability to repair a workpiece or remove a defect from a workpiece such as a photolithography mask used in semiconductor manufacture .
Another key advantage of the present invention is the ability to examine re-entrant features with an AFM tip. Because a sensing system of the present invention monitors AFM cantilever as it twists, the sensing system can accommodate large twist angles that can enable the AFM tip to access re-entrant features. This eliminates the need to access re-entrant features with boot-shaped tips that are very fragile, expensive, and blunt at the end of the boot. The present invention is ideal for a variety of uses, including material characterization, chemical -mechanical planarization monitoring, precision surface profiling and critical dimension metrology. Yet another feature of the present invention is to completely decouple position sensing of an AFM from the mechanical actuator which positions the AFM tip, enabling the present invention to measure at even better resolutions than the ability to position the mechanical actuator itself. Furthermore the present invention may do so while the actuator is in motion. Nonlinearities of the mechanical actuator have no effect on the accuracy of the system. This enables real-time, on-the-fly recording of the AFM cantilever tip position at randomly selected positions.
Although the present invention has been described in detail herein with reference to the illustrative embodiments, it should be understood that the description is by way of example only and is not to be construed in a limiting sense. It is to be further understood, therefore, that numerous changes in the details of the embodiments of this invention and additional embodiments of this invention will be apparent to, and may be made by, persons of ordinary skill in the art having reference to this description. It is contemplated that all such changes and additional embodiments are within the spirit and true scope of this invention as claimed below.

Claims

WHAT IS CLAIMED IS:
1. A scanning probe microscopy tool, comprising: a cantilever coupled to a tip wherein said tip deflects said cantilever in response to interactions with a sample; a mechanical actuator to move said tip relative to said sample; at least one light source to generate at least one light beam wherein said at least one light beam has a first path of propagation that intersects with a top surface of said cantilever and is reflected along a second path of propagation; at least one PSD placed in said second path of propagation of said light beam wherein said PSD produces an output containing data representing a deflection of said cantilever; and a data acquisition and control system to process said output and produce a representation of said tip interactions with said sample.
2. The scanning probe microscopy tool of Claim 1, wherein said cantilever has a rectangular shape and is provided with a reflective coating to alter said first path of propagation of said light beam to said second path of propagation.
3. The scanning probe microscopy tool of Claim 2, further comprising: at least one reflective mark on said top surface of said cantilever, wherein an image of said reflective mark on said PSD allows said output to contain data representation of motion of said cantilever.
4. The scanning probe microscopy tool of Claim 3, wherein said at least one reflective mark comprises an edge of said cantilever.
5. The scanning probe microscopy tool of Claim 3, wherein said at least one reflective mark comprises a reflective strip.
6. The scanning probe microscopy tool of Claim 1, wherein said at least one PSD is a continuous PSD.
7. The scanning probe microscopy tool of Claim 1, wherein said at least one collimated light beam is DC modulated or AC modulated.
8. The scanning probe microscopy tool of Claim 1, wherein said mechanical actuator comprises a piezoelectric scanner that moves said sample relative to said tip.
9. The scanning probe microscopy tool of Claim 1, wherein said mechanical actuator comprises a PZT stage that moves said cantilever coupled to said tip relative to said sample .
10. The scanning probe microscopy tool of Claim 1, wherein said mechanical actuator comprises: a piezoelectric scanner that moves said sample relative to said tip; and a PZT stage that moves said cantilever coupled to said tip relative to said sample.
11. The scanning probe microscopy tool of Claim 9, wherein said PZT stage is operated in an open-loop mode of operation.
12. The scanning probe microscopy tool of Claim 1, wherein said interactions between said tip and said sample comprise a physical contact between said tip and said sample .
13. The scanning probe microscopy tool of Claim 1, wherein said interactions between said tip and said sample comprise an electrical interaction between said tip and said sample.
14. The scanning probe microscopy tool of Claim 1, wherein said interactions between said tip and said sample comprise a chemical interaction between said tip and said sample .
15. The scanning probe microscopy tool of Claim 1, wherein said interactions between said tip and said sample comprise an optical interaction between said tip and said sample .
16. The scanning probe microscopy tool of Claim 1, wherein said interactions between said tip and said sample comprise a magnetic interaction between said tip and said sample .
17. The scanning probe microscopy tool of Claim 1, wherein said light beam is a collimated light beam.
18. The scanning probe microscopy tool of Claim 1, wherein said light beam is a focused light beam.
19. The scanning probe microscopy tool of Claim 1, wherein said light beam is a disperse light beam.
20. The scanning probe microscopy tool of Claim 1, further comprising at least one reflective mark on said top surface of said cantilever, wherein an image of said reflective mark on said PSD allows said output to contain data representation of motion of said cantilever.
21. The scanning probe microscopy tool of Claim 1, wherein said tip is an AFM tip and said cantilever is an AFM cantilever.
22. The scanning probe microscopy tool of Claim 1, further comprising: at least one optical element in said first path of propagation of said light beam.
23. The scanning probe microscopy tool of Claim 1, further comprising: at least one optical element in said second path of propagation of said light beam.
24. The scanning probe microscopy tool of Claim 1, further comprising: at least one optical element in said first path of propagation of said light beam; and at least one optical element in said second path of propagation of said light beam.
25. The scanning probe microscopy tool of Claim 22, wherein said optical element is selected from the group consisting of optical lenses, beam splitter and filters in order to enhance properties of said light beam at said surface of said cantilever.
26. The scanning probe microscopy tool of Claim 23, wherein said optical element is selected from the group consisting of optical lenses, beam splitter and filters in order to enhance properties of said light beam at said aperture of said PSD.
27. The scanning probe microscopy tool of Claim 24, wherein said optical element is selected from the group consisting of optical lenses, beam splitter and filters in order to enhance properties of said light beam at said surface of said cantilever and said aperture of said PSD.
28. A profilometer for sensing topographical features of a sample using an AFM, comprising: an AFM cantilever coupled to an AFM tip wherein said AFM tip deflects said cantilever in response to topographical changes on a sample; a system to move said AFM tip relative to said sample; at least one collimated light source to generate at least one collimated light beam wherein said at least one collimated light beam has a first path of propagation that intersects with a top surface of said AFM cantilever to produce a second path of propagation; at least one PSD placed in said second path of propagation of said collimated light beam wherein said PSD produces an output containing data representing a deflection of said AFM cantilever; and a data acquisition and control system to process said output and produce a representation of said topographical changes of said sample.
29. The profilometer of Claim 28, wherein said cantilever has a rectangular shape and is provided with a reflective coating to alter said first path of propagation of said collimated light beam to said second path of propagation.
30. The profilometer of Claim 29, wherein said reflective coating is an aluminum coating.
31. The profilometer of Claim 29, wherein said reflective coating is a fiducial surface.
32. The profilometer of Claim 28, further comprising: at least one reflective mark on said top surface of said AFM cantilever, wherein an image of said reflective mark on said PSD allows said output to contain data representation of in-plane motion of said AFM cantilever.
33. The profilometer of Claim 28, wherein said at least one reflective mark comprises an edge of said cantilever.
34. The profilometer of Claim 28, wherein said at least one reflective mark comprises a reflective strip.
35. A sensing system of scanning probe microscopy tools capable of determining a position and orientation of an object, comprising: at least one light source to generate at least one collimated light beam wherein said at least one collimated light beam has a first path of propagation that intersects with a surface of the object to produce a second path of propagation; at least one continuous PSD placed in said second path of propagation of said light beam wherein said continuous PSD produces an output containing data representative of the position and orientation of the object; and a data acquisition system to process said output to determine the position and orientation of the object.
36. The sensing system of scanning probe microscopy tools of Claim 35, further comprising: at least one reflective mark on said surface of the object, wherein an image of said reflective mark on said continuous PSD allows said output to contain data representative of in-plane motion of the object.
37. The sensing system of scanning probe microscopy tools of Claim 35, wherein the object is provided with a reflective coating to reflect said first path of propagation of said collimated light beam to said second path of propagation.
38. The sensing system of scanning probe microscopy tools of Claim 37, wherein said reflective coating is an aluminum coating.
39. The sensing system of scanning probe microscopy tools of Claim 37, wherein said reflective coating is a fiducial surface.
40. The sensing system of scanning probe microscopy tools of Claim 35, wherein the object is an AFM cantilever.
41. The sensing system of scanning probe microscopy tools of Claim 40, wherein said AFM cantilever is coupled to an AFM tip, and wherein said data acquisition system determines the position and orientation of said AFM tip from data describing a relationship of said AFM tip to said AFM cantilever.
42. The sensing system of scanning probe microscopy tools of Claim 40, wherein said data acquisition and control system determines at least one variable describing a physical location of the object from said output, wherein said at least one variable is selected from the group consisting of an x coordinate, y coordinate, z coordinate, pitch angle, tilt angle and yaw angle.
43. A micro-machining tool comprising: an AFM cantilever coupled to an AFM tip; and a mechanical actuator to move said AFM cantilever coupled to said AFM tip relative to a workpiece wherein said AFM tip is used to manipulate said workpiece.
44. The micro-machining tool of Claim 43, wherein said AFM tip is used to remove a defect from said workpiece.
45. The micro-machining tool of Claim 43, wherein said AFM tip is used to repair a defect from said workpiece.
46. The micro-machining tool of Claim 43, further comprising: an inspection system coupled detect defects within said workpiece; a coordinate sensing system coupled to said AFM cantilever wherein said coordinate sensing system comprises : at least one light source to generate at least one light beam wherein said at least one light beam has a first path of propagation that intersects with a top surface of said AFM cantilever to produce a second path of propagation; at least one PSD placed in said second path of propagation of said light beam wherein said PSD produces an output containing data representing a location of said AFM cantilever; and a data acquisition system to process said output and determine a coordinate position of said AFM tip; a control system coupled to said inspection system, said coordinate sensing system, and said mechanical actuator, operable to direct said AFM tip to a specific location on said workpiece.
47. The micro-machining tool of Claim 43, wherein said workpiece is a photolithography mask.
48. The micro-machining tool of Claim 43, wherein said AFM tip is used to deposit material on said workpiece.
49. A method for sensing interactions between a sample and an AFM tip comprising the steps of: placing a sample in proximity to an AFM tip, wherein said AFM tip deflects an AFM cantilever coupled to said AFM tip; generating a light beam from a light source, wherein said light beam has a first path of propagation which intersects a top surface of said AFM cantilever; reflecting said light beam along a second path of propagation which intersects at least one PSD; outputting a signal from said at least one PSD representative of a location of a light spot from said light beam within an aperture of said PSD, to a data acquisition and control system; and determining the interactions between the sample and said AFM tip with said data acquisition and control system.
50. The method of Claim 49, further comprising the step of providing relative motion between said AFM tip and the sample.
51. The method of Claim 50, wherein the step of providing relative motion between said AFM tip and the sample comprises moving a PZT stage coupled to said AFM cantilever relative to said sample.
52. The method of Claim 50, wherein the step of providing relative motion between said AFM tip and the sample comprises using a piezoelectric scanner to move said sample relative to said AFM tip.
53. The method of Claim 50, wherein the step of providing relative motion between said AFM tip and the sample comprises: moving a PZT stage coupled to said AFM cantilever relative to said sample; using a piezoelectric scanner to move said sample relative to said AFM tip; and monitoring movements of said PZT stage and said piezoelectric scanner, wherein said movements are provided to said data acquisition and control system, wherein said data acquisition and control system uses information of said movements to generate a representation of the interactions between said AFM tip and the sample.
54. The method of Claim 50, further comprising the step of monitoring said relative motion, wherein said data acquisition and control system uses information of said relative motion to generate a representation of topographical features of the sample.
55. The method of Claim 49, wherein said step of determining the interactions between the sample and said AFM tip from said signal with said data acquisition and control system further comprises the steps of: determining at least one variable describing a physical location of said AFM cantilever, wherein said at least one variable is selected from the group consisting of an x coordinate, y coordinate, z coordinate, pitch angle, tilt angle and yaw angle; and determining a physical location of said AFM tip from a physical relationship coupling said AFM tip to said AFM cantilever.
56. The method of Claim 49, wherein said step of determining the interactions between the sample and said AFM tip from said signal with said data acquisition and control system further comprises the steps of: determining a physical location of said AFM cantilever; and determining a physical location of said AFM tip from a physical relationship coupling said AFM tip to said AFM cantilever.
57. A sensing system of scanning probe microscopy tools capable of determining a position and orientation of an object in multidimensional space with a continuous PSD, comprising: at least one light source to generate at least one light beam wherein said at least one light beam has a first path of propagation that intersects with a surface of the object to produce a second path of propagation; at least one continuous PSD placed in said second path of propagation of said light beam wherein said at least one continuous PSD produces an output containing data representative of a location of an intersection of said second path of propagation the an aperture of said at least one continuous PSD; and a data acquisition and control system to process said output to determine at least one variable describing a physical location of the object from said output, wherein said at least one variable is selected from the group consisting of an x coordinate, y coordinate, z coordinate, pitch angle, tilt angle and yaw angle.
58. A method for sensing topographical features of a sample using an AFM comprising the steps of: providing relative motion between a AFM tip and the sample; deflecting an AFM cantilever as said AFM tip encounters topographical changes on a surface of the sample; directing at least one collimated light beam onto a top surface of said AFM cantilever, wherein said at least one collimated light beam is reflected by said top surface onto an aperture of at least one continuous PSD as a light spot; determining at least one variable describing a physical location of said AFM cantilever, wherein said at least one variable is selected from the group consisting of an x coordinate, y coordinate, z coordinate, pitch angle, tilt angle and yaw angle from an output of said at least one PSD, wherein said output represents a displacement of said light spot within said aperture of said at least one PSD; and processing said output to produce a representation of said topographical changes of the sample.
59. The method of Claim 58, further comprising the step of providing relative motion comprises moving a PZT stage coupled to said AFM cantilever relative to said sample.
60. The method of Claim 59, wherein the step of providing relative motion comprises using a piezoelectric scanner to move said sample relative to said AFM tip.
61. A CD AFM metrology tool comprising: an AFM cantilever coupled to an AFM tip wherein said AFM tip deflects said cantilever in response to topographical changes on a sample; a system to move said AFM tip relative to said sample; at least one collimated laser source to generate at least one collimated laser beam wherein said at least one collimated laser beam has a first path of propagation that intersects with a top surface of said AFM cantilever to produce a second path of propagation, and wherein said at least one collimated laser source is fixed to an absolute reference frame; at least one primary continuous PSD placed in said second path of propagation of said collimated laser beam wherein said PSD produces an output containing data representing a deflection of said AFM cantilever and wherein said at least one primary continuous PSD is fixed to said absolute reference frame; at least one secondary continuous PSD fixed to said absolute reference frame, wherein said at least one secondary continuous PSD detects said laser beams reflected off said at least one primary PSDs; and a data acquisition and control system to process an output of said at least one primary PSD and said at least one secondary PSD said output and produce a representation of said topographical changes of said sample.
62. The CD AFM metrology tool of Claim 61, wherein said AFM cantilever has a fiducial surface.
63. The CD AFM metrology tool of Claim 61, wherein said output of said at least one primary PSD and said at least one secondary PSD said output contains data representative of at least one variable describing a physical location of said AFM cantilever, wherein said at least one variable is selected from the group consisting of an x coordinate, y coordinate, z coordinate, pitch angle, tilt angle and yaw angle.
64. A sensing system of scanning probe microscopy tools capable of determining a position and orientation of an object in multidimensional space, comprising: at least one light source to generate at least one light beam wherein said at least one collimated light beam has a first path of propagation that intersects with a surface of the object to produce a second path of propagation; at least one continuous PSD placed in said second path of propagation of said light beam wherein said continuous PSD produces an output containing data representative of the position and orientation of the object; and a data acquisition and control system to process said output to determine at least one variable describing a physical location of the object from said output, wherein said at least one variable is selected from the group consisting of an x coordinate, y coordinate, z coordinate, pitch angle, tilt angle and yaw angle.
65. A sensing system of scanning probe microscopy tools capable of determining a position and orientation of an object in multidimensional space, comprising: at least one light source to generate at least one light beam wherein said at least one collimated light beam has a first path of propagation that intersects with a surface of the object to produce a second path of propagation; at least one continuous PSD placed in said second path of propagation of said light beam wherein said continuous PSD produces an output containing data representative of the position and orientation of the object; at least one reflective mark on said surface of the object, wherein an image of said reflective mark on said continuous PSD allows said output to contain data representation of in-plane motion of the object; and a data acquisition and control system to process said output to determine at least one variable describing a physical location of the object from said output, wherein said at least one variable is selected from the group consisting of an x coordinate, y coordinate, z coordinate, pitch angle, tilt angle and yaw angle.
66. A sensing system of scanning probe microscopy tools capable of determining a position and orientation of an object in multidimensional space, comprising: at least one light source to generate at least one light beam wherein said at least one collimated light beam has a first path of propagation that intersects with a surface of the object to produce a second path of propagation; at least one continuous PSD placed in said second path of propagation of said light beam wherein said continuous PSD produces an output containing data representative of the position and orientation of the object, wherein said output of said continuous PSD contains data representation of out-of-plane motion of the object; and a data acquisition and control system to process said output to determine at least one variable describing a physical location of the object from said output, wherein said at least one variable is selected from the group consisting of an x coordinate, y coordinate, z coordinate, pitch angle, tilt angle and yaw angle.
67. A sensing system of scanning probe microscopy tools capable of determining a position and orientation of an object in multidimensional space, comprising: at least one light source to generate at least one light beam wherein said at least one collimated light beam has a first path of propagation that intersects with a surface of the object to produce a second path of propagation; a reflective surface placed in said second path of propagation of said light beam to redirect said light beam along a third path of propagation; at least one continuous PSD placed in said third path of propagation of said light beam wherein said continuous PSD produces an output containing data representative of a location of a point of intersection between said third path of propagation of said light beam and an aperture of said at least one continuous PSD; and a data acquisition and control system to process said output to determine at least one variable describing a physical location of the object from said output, wherein said at least one variable is selected from the group consisting of an x coordinate, y coordinate, z coordinate, pitch angle, tilt angle and yaw angle.
68. The sensing system of Claim 67, wherein said reflective surface is a curved surface.
69. The sensing system of Claim 67, wherein said reflective surface is a flat surface.
70. A sensing system of scanning probe microscopy tools capable of determining a position and orientation of an object in multidimensional space, comprising: at least one light source to generate at least one light beam wherein said at least one collimated light beam has a first path of propagation that intersects with a surface of the object to produce a second path of propagation; at least one quadrant cell detector placed in said second path of propagation of said light beam wherein said at least one quadrant cell detector produces an output containing data representative of the position and orientation of the object; and a data acquisition and control system to process said output to determine at least one variable describing a physical location of the object from said output, wherein said at least one variable is selected from the group consisting of an x coordinate, y coordinate, z coordinate, pitch angle, tilt angle and yaw angle.
PCT/US1999/022175 1998-09-26 1999-09-24 Multidimensional sensing system for atomic force miscroscopy WO2000019166A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU64000/99A AU6400099A (en) 1998-09-26 1999-09-24 Multidimensional sensing system for atomic force miscroscopy

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10196398P 1998-09-26 1998-09-26
US60/101,963 1998-09-26

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2000019166A1 true WO2000019166A1 (en) 2000-04-06
WO2000019166A9 WO2000019166A9 (en) 2002-08-22

Family

ID=22287406

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US1999/022175 WO2000019166A1 (en) 1998-09-26 1999-09-24 Multidimensional sensing system for atomic force miscroscopy

Country Status (2)

Country Link
AU (1) AU6400099A (en)
WO (1) WO2000019166A1 (en)

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1189240A1 (en) * 2000-09-13 2002-03-20 Europäisches Laboratorium Für Molekularbiologie (Embl) Multi-probe measuring device and method of use
US6545492B1 (en) 1999-09-20 2003-04-08 Europaisches Laboratorium Fur Molekularbiologie (Embl) Multiple local probe measuring device and method
WO2012115653A1 (en) * 2011-02-25 2012-08-30 Agilent Technologies, Inc. Atomic force microscopy controller and method
CN102825602A (en) * 2012-08-21 2012-12-19 华北电力大学(保定) PSD (Position Sensitive Detector)-based industrial robot self-calibration method and device
CN107505610A (en) * 2017-07-19 2017-12-22 中国科学院空间应用工程与技术中心 Six-freedom degree pose measuring method and device
WO2018177685A1 (en) * 2017-03-31 2018-10-04 Carl Zeiss Smt Gmbh Apparatus and method for a scanning probe microscope

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4935634A (en) * 1989-03-13 1990-06-19 The Regents Of The University Of California Atomic force microscope with optional replaceable fluid cell
US5436448A (en) * 1992-01-10 1995-07-25 Hitachi, Ltd. Surface observing apparatus and method
US5440920A (en) * 1994-02-03 1995-08-15 Molecular Imaging Systems Scanning force microscope with beam tracking lens

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4935634A (en) * 1989-03-13 1990-06-19 The Regents Of The University Of California Atomic force microscope with optional replaceable fluid cell
US5436448A (en) * 1992-01-10 1995-07-25 Hitachi, Ltd. Surface observing apparatus and method
US5440920A (en) * 1994-02-03 1995-08-15 Molecular Imaging Systems Scanning force microscope with beam tracking lens

Cited By (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7312619B2 (en) 1999-09-20 2007-12-25 Europaisches Laboratorium Fur Molekularbiologie (Embl) Multiple local probe measuring device and method
US6798226B2 (en) 1999-09-20 2004-09-28 Europäisches Laboratorium für Molekularbiologie (EMBL) Multiple local probe measuring device and method
US6943574B2 (en) 1999-09-20 2005-09-13 Europaisches Laboratorium Fur Molekularbiologie (Embl) Multiple local probe measuring device and method
US7098678B2 (en) 1999-09-20 2006-08-29 Europaisches Laboratorium Fur Molekularbiologie (Embl) Multiple local probe measuring device and method
US6545492B1 (en) 1999-09-20 2003-04-08 Europaisches Laboratorium Fur Molekularbiologie (Embl) Multiple local probe measuring device and method
US6583411B1 (en) 2000-09-13 2003-06-24 Europaisches Laboratorium Für Molekularbiologie (Embl) Multiple local probe measuring device and method
EP1189240A1 (en) * 2000-09-13 2002-03-20 Europäisches Laboratorium Für Molekularbiologie (Embl) Multi-probe measuring device and method of use
US9229027B2 (en) 2011-02-25 2016-01-05 Keysight Technologies, Inc. Atomic force microscopy controller and method
WO2012115653A1 (en) * 2011-02-25 2012-08-30 Agilent Technologies, Inc. Atomic force microscopy controller and method
CN102825602A (en) * 2012-08-21 2012-12-19 华北电力大学(保定) PSD (Position Sensitive Detector)-based industrial robot self-calibration method and device
WO2018177685A1 (en) * 2017-03-31 2018-10-04 Carl Zeiss Smt Gmbh Apparatus and method for a scanning probe microscope
TWI675206B (en) * 2017-03-31 2019-10-21 德商卡爾蔡司Smt有限公司 Apparatus and method for a scanning probe microscope
US11237185B2 (en) 2017-03-31 2022-02-01 Carl Zeiss Smt Gmbh Apparatus and method for a scanning probe microscope
US11796563B2 (en) 2017-03-31 2023-10-24 Carl Zeiss Smt Gmbh Apparatus and method for a scanning probe microscope
CN107505610A (en) * 2017-07-19 2017-12-22 中国科学院空间应用工程与技术中心 Six-freedom degree pose measuring method and device

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2000019166A9 (en) 2002-08-22
AU6400099A (en) 2000-04-17

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20030233870A1 (en) Multidimensional sensing system for atomic force microscopy
US20020104963A1 (en) Multidimensional sensing system for atomic force microscopy
US5298975A (en) Combined scanning force microscope and optical metrology tool
US7493794B2 (en) Method of calibrating a caliper AFM
US5870490A (en) Apparatus for extracting pattern features
JP2501282B2 (en) Surface profile inspection method and apparatus using atomic force scanning microscope
US7478552B2 (en) Optical detection alignment/tracking method and apparatus
US6884981B2 (en) Diffractive optical position detector
JP7029469B2 (en) Equipment and methods for scanning probe microscopes
KR0146261B1 (en) Three dimension measuring probe
US9134340B2 (en) Method of investigating a sample surface
US7333191B2 (en) Scanning probe microscope and measurement method using the same
EP0843175B1 (en) Scanning probe microscope and signal processing apparatus
JP2001116869A (en) Sample inspection and/or process device
WO2000019166A1 (en) Multidimensional sensing system for atomic force miscroscopy
KR102646539B1 (en) scanning probe microscope
US6941823B1 (en) Apparatus and method to compensate for stress in a microcantilever
JP2020520443A (en) Scanning probe system to control tilt angle of probe tip
US6745617B2 (en) Scanning probe microscope
KR20030015220A (en) Methods and apparatus for atomic force microscopy
JPH04162337A (en) Electron beam device
JP3473937B2 (en) Scanning probe microscope and its scanning method
KR20220079877A (en) Methods for Imaging Surfaces Using a Scanning Probe Microscope
KR100298301B1 (en) Scanning probe with built-in sensor for sensing bending state and apparatus for measuring the bending state by using the same
JP2003057005A (en) Stage position measuring instrument for scanning electromicroscope or the like

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref country code: AU

Ref document number: 1999 64000

Kind code of ref document: A

Format of ref document f/p: F

AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AU CN JP KR

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: C2

Designated state(s): AU CN JP KR

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: C2

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE

COP Corrected version of pamphlet

Free format text: PAGES 1/25-25/25, DRAWINGS, REPLACED BY NEW PAGES 1/19-19/19; DUE TO LATE TRANSMITTAL BY THE RECEIVING OFFICE