WO2001001309A1 - Method and apparatus for tenant screening - Google Patents
Method and apparatus for tenant screening Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2001001309A1 WO2001001309A1 PCT/US2000/017746 US0017746W WO0101309A1 WO 2001001309 A1 WO2001001309 A1 WO 2001001309A1 US 0017746 W US0017746 W US 0017746W WO 0101309 A1 WO0101309 A1 WO 0101309A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- lessee
- potential
- leasing agent
- website
- potential lessee
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce
- G06Q30/02—Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
Definitions
- This invention relates generally to screening of tenants who are seeking to lease a property. More particularly, this invention relates to screening tenants via a computer network.
- a credit check actually benefits both the potential tenant and the leasing agent/building owner. In the case of an apartment lease, it confirms to the leasing agent that the tenant is able to pay. Furthermore, it prevents the tenant from getting into a lease that the tenant might likely be unable to afford. Thus, a credit check prevents the potential tenant from getting involved in an unrealistic lease that could eventually damage the potential tenant's credit rating.
- the present invention provides a method and apparatus that facilitates an efficient screening of a potential lessee such as a prospective apartment renter.
- the method of screening is comprised of providing a website which a leasing agent can access.
- the leasing agent is then permitted to access this website and allowed to supply lessee information that identifies the potential lessee.
- the lessee information is used to determine whether said potential lessee is acceptable.
- the leasing agent can be advised in real time whether the lessee is acceptable.
- a probable geographic region can be determined that corresponds with a recent credit territory of the potential lessee. This is beneficial in that a credit bureau can be selected that corresponds with the credit territory of the potential lessee. Yet another aspect allows for the leasing agent to be alerted when it is learned that the potential lessee is allegedly associated with fraudulent activity.
- Another aspect allows a scoring model to be provided to the website for use in evaluating whether the potential lessee is acceptable.
- An apparatus for screening a potential lessee can be utilized to provide screening services.
- This apparatus can be comprised of a server that is connectable to a computer network.
- a computer network interface interfaces the server to a leasing agent.
- a computer network interface interfaces the server with a financial information database.
- a scoring model of the lessor is accessible by the server.
- An apparatus for use in screening a potential lessee by a leasing agent is comprised of an input/output device that is operable for interfacing with a computer network that is connectable to a lessee approval website.
- a data storage device is coupled to the input/output device.
- an address that identifies the lessee approval website is stored on the data storage device.
- a potential lessee can be screened more quickly than by existing systems. Furthermore, a potential lessee can be screened more accurately by permitting implementation of the correct scoring model for a leasing agent/lessor.
- the appropriate database for a lessee can be utilized based on the geographic region where the potential lessee has a credit history.
- Figure 1 shows a configuration in which a leasing agent accesses the lessee approval website server over the internet and in which the credit bureau database is also accessible via the internet.
- Figures 2a-2e show a flow diagram for conducting a screening of a potential lessee.
- Figure 1 shows a tenant screening apparatus, generally designated 100.
- the apparatus is comprised of a series of input/output devices, such as computers 110-120, a computer network, such as the Internet 130, a server, such as lessee approval website server 140, and a financial information database, such as credit bureau database 150.
- the series of computers 110-120 are configured such that they are operable for interfacing with the computer network. It is preferred that computers be utilized as the input/output devices; however, it is also envisioned that other devices could be substituted for the computers. Furthermore, a series of computers is shown to demonstrate that one computer is located at each leasing office that is connected to the system. However, it should be understood that it is not necessary that more than one computer be utilized, since a single leasing agent might be connected to the system.
- the computers 110-120 are shown as connectable to a computer network such as Internet 130.
- the current preferred embodiment is to utilize a modem arrangement for connecting to a global communications network such as the Internet 130. However, it should be understood that a variety of other networks such as LAN, WAN, ATM, etc. might be utilized as well. Similarly, other modes of connecting to these various networks could also be utilized.
- a computer such as Lessee Approval Website Server 140 is also coupled to the computer network.
- Lessee Approval Website Server 140 facilitates the approval process for a prospective tenant.
- the Lessee Approval Website Server 140 acts as a server for a tenant approval website that is presented to the Internet 130.
- computers 110-120 can be connected to the website.
- information about a prospective tenant can be submitted to the website for processing, as explained below.
- An information database is coupled to the computer server according to the preferred embodiment of the invention.
- Figure 1 shows Credit Bureau Database 150 connected to the Lessee Approval Website Server 140. This allows Credit Bureau Database 150 to transfer information to Lessee Approval Website Server 140.
- a simple telephone connection 160 is utilized in Figure 1 to interface the Lessee Approval Website Server 140 and the Credit Bureau Database 150.
- the information database in the preferred embodiment is shown to be a financial database storing credit history information, it is envisioned that many other types of databases could be utilized in making a tenant approval decision. For example, one might want to know whether a prospective tenant has a criminal history. In such a case, a criminal history database could be utilized. Similarly, other pertinent databases that are deemed relevant to a tenant approval could be utilized as well.
- the Lessee Approval Website Server 140 is shown as connectable to the Credit Bureau Database 150 via telephone line 160, it should be understood that other interface arrangements could be utilized as well. For example, the Lessee Approval Website Server 140 could communicate with the Credit Bureau Database via Internet 130. Or, a direct connection to the database could be utilized. In the preferred embodiment of the invention, the Lessee Approval
- Website Server 140 determines whether a prospective tenant is satisfactory. To make this determination, a scoring model 170 of the lessor is stored on the server 140.
- "Scoring model” is intended to mean the characteristics and associated weight given to the characteristics that are important to a leasing agent. For example, such characteristics might include a scaling factor associated with the potential lessee's gross income, whether the potential lessee broke an earlier lease, how many bad credit entries the potential lessee has on his credit report, etc. No particular scoring model is preferred as it may be particular to each lessor or group of lessors whose properties or applicant populations have similar characteristics.
- the scoring model is stored on the server, although it could also be stored elsewhere and transferred to the server when necessary.
- computer 110 is used by the leasing agent in order to connect to a lessee approval website established on the Internet 130 by the Lessee Approval Website Server 170.
- the computer 110 is coupled to a data storage device, such as hard disk drive 111.
- an address 112 that identifies the lessee approval website is stored on the data storage device.
- the address is accessed by an internet browser that allows the computer 110 to access the website of the Lessee Approval Website Server 170.
- An example of such an address is "https://www.screening.saferent.com”.
- HTTPS is intended to mean a secure website.
- the Lessee Approval Website Server 140 provides a tenant approval website that is accessible by a leasing agent 204.
- leasing agent is intended to mean any entity who takes part in offering a lease for a leased property, e.g., a landlord, landlord's everyday representative, building owner, etc.
- a scoring model is also provided to the lessee approval website for a particular leased property 208. The scoring model can be transferred each time the website is accessed or stored on the server after the initial access.
- “website” is considered to be a location accessible via a global communication network.
- the leasing agent is permitted to access it 212. This can occur, for example, by way of the leasing agent logging into the website with a username and password 216.
- the leasing agent is queried as to the number of applicants and co-signers (if any) to be screened 220. For example, if more than one potential lessee is applying to rent an apartment, then the leasing agent will want to screen all of the prospective tenants, i.e., potential lessees.
- a co-signor is involved in the lease, such as a parent of a young tenant who has very little credit history, then the co-signor' s credit history should be checked as well.
- a "potential lessee” shall be considered to mean any entity who shall be financially responsible for the terms of a lease or adults who will actually occupy the leased property. For example, adult tenants who occupy the leased property will be considered potential lessees and those who act in a co- signor capacity may also be considered as potential lessees.
- the server can generate a waiver document for use by the leasing agent in order to get an acknowledgment or consent by the potential lessee(s) 224.
- "Acknowledgment” is intended to mean that the potential lessee assents in some fashion, e.g., by signature, mark, electronically indicating assent, etc.
- the leasing agent could simply keep blank forms on hand rather than requiring the server to generate a new form each time.
- the leasing agent is prompted to confirm that the potential lessee(s) consented to have their background information checked 252. This helps to insure that the leasing agent does not inadvertently initiate a background check before the person being investigated consents.
- the leasing agent will be asked to confirm that an investigation of the potential lessee's credit information was authorized.
- the leasing agent provides confirmation that the potential lessee consented 256.
- the leasing agent then obtains lessee information from the potential lessee(s) 228.
- "Lessee information” is intended to mean information that allows one to identify a potential lessee. Such information could include some of the following: social security number, name, address, etc.
- the lessee approval website server then confirms the identification information with the leasing agent 260. This act can be conducted by redisplaying the information input by the leasing agent to allow the leasing agent to proof the information and detect any input errors.
- the lessee approval website server can then determine a probable geographical region that corresponds with the recent credit territory of the potential lessee 264.
- "Credit territory” should be understood to mean a geographical area in which someone recently lived or worked or did business so as to establish a credit history. In a preferred embodiment, this is determined by using the credit bureau database that has the most thorough information for a geographic region where the leased property is located. This assumes that when prospective tenants lease a property, they lease a property that neighbors their prior location. Alternatively, other scenarios could be utilized to determine the best geographical database. For example, instead of keying off of the leased property location, the prior address of the prospective tenant could be utilized. Once the geographical region is determined, a credit bureau is selected that corresponds with the geographical region 268.
- “Credit bureau” is intended to mean a financial record keeping organization that keeps financial information about entities. For example, some existing credit bureaus at the time this patent was filed include Experian, Equifax, and Trans Union. Also, when businesses act as potential lessees, credit bureaus can include Dun and Bradstreet and other similar data gathering organizations. Typically, the credit bureau will be the credit bureau that appears to contain the best information for that particular geographic region. Once a credit bureau is selected, a search is begun for any records that correspond with the potential lessee information 272.
- Possible matches is intended to mean any matches (or none) that occur when identification information is used to gather potential credit reports for an entity under consideration. For example, when the name SSN 100-20-3000 is supplied to a credit bureau, the credit bureau can provide possible matches of all the various individual name and address pairs that the credit bureau is tracking who live in the United States.
- a check of fraudulent activity can be made for the potential lessees.
- a service known as TracePlus provided by TRans Union This service will generate a report based on a social security number. In this way, the leasing agent is alerted if any alleged fraudulent activity appears on its records for that social security number 300. Alternatively, other similar checks could be conducted through other databases, as well.
- the leasing agent then reviews the possible name and address pair matches. First, the leasing agent identifies the name and address pairs that appear to be a correct match for an applicant 284. Then, the leasing agent reviews the list to make see if all applicants matched 288. If all applicants match then the approval process continues.
- the leasing agent is allowed to resupply lessee information to the lessee approval website for an unmatched applicant 289. If the entered information is different from the first try, then a second search is conducted using the new data. The search is then conducted in a selected credit bureau database 291. The results of the search are then provided to the leasing agent as possible matches from the credit bureau that correspond with the applicant, i.e. potential lessee 293. Again, as noted above, a fraud check is conducted based on the applicant information and the leasing agent is alerted if a potential lessee is allegedly associated with fraudulent activity 295. Once again, the leasing agent is allowed to choose a correct match from the list of possible matches returned by the search 297.
- the approval process can continue. Alternatively, if a match is not found for at least one of the applicants (or none), then the leasing agent can be prompted as to whether he/she wants to try to approve the remaining applicants to carry the lease 301. If the leasing agent does not want to try and approve the remaining applicants to carry the lease, then an adverse action letter is prepared 303 and the program terminated. Alternatively, if the leasing agent does want to try and approve the remaining applicants to carry the lease, then the process continues.
- the full records identified by the leasing agent are obtained from the credit bureau database in order to retrieve the full financial data about the potential lessee 304.
- "Financial data" is intended to mean information about the financial status or history of an entity such as a credit history of the entity.
- the leasing agent is next prompted for the rent amount 316.
- the leasing agent is prompted for the potential lessee's gross income 320.
- the leasing agent is asked to reconfirm that the determination is being made for permissible purposes 324, for example under the criteria established by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.
- the leasing agent is asked to reconfirm that all of the information is correct 328.
- the scoring model supplied by or on behalf of the leasing agent is utilized to assess the potential lessee(s) 332. If the conclusion is that the results from the scoring model are too indefinite 336, then a suggestion may be made to the leasing agent that further searching should be conducted by other means 340. If the determination is that the applicants should be rejected 344, then the leasing agent is notified that the potential lessees are not acceptable under the scoring model 348. Furthermore, since the applicants are being rejected based on a credit bureau report, an adverse action letter is prepared for the leasing agent 352 that identifies the credit bureau which supplied the credit information.
- Real time is intended to mean a matter of minutes, e.g., about ten (10) minutes or less. It is not intended to mean immediate notification. Yet, it is intended to mean a time period of only a few minutes, e.g., for about ten minutes or less. Hence, it is advantageous when compared to existing systems that require a time period much greater than a few minutes.
- the potential lessees are notified by the leasing agent whether they passed the background check 368. Furthermore, the leasing agent is logged out automatically from the website to avoid any unauthorized searches by third parties 364.
- the program could also be written to grade the applicant on a scale, e.g., A-F. This scale could also correspond to 0.000- 0.999. Then, the landlord or building owner could establish additional requirements that should be met for various grades of applicants. For example, a "D-" applicant might be required to undergo a criminal background check. Similarly, a "D” applicant might be offered only a month-month lease. Alternatively, a "C” applicant might be required to supply 1.5 times the standard deposit. All of these options could be supplied as part of the scoring model as well. This embodiment is demonstrated in Figure 2e.
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CA002414677A CA2414677A1 (en) | 1999-06-29 | 2000-06-27 | Method and apparatus for tenant screening |
AU56413/00A AU5641300A (en) | 1999-06-29 | 2000-06-27 | Method and apparatus for tenant screening |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US34365999A | 1999-06-29 | 1999-06-29 | |
US09/343,659 | 1999-06-29 |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2001001309A1 true WO2001001309A1 (en) | 2001-01-04 |
WO2001001309A9 WO2001001309A9 (en) | 2002-07-25 |
Family
ID=23347045
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2000/017746 WO2001001309A1 (en) | 1999-06-29 | 2000-06-27 | Method and apparatus for tenant screening |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
AU (1) | AU5641300A (en) |
CA (1) | CA2414677A1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2001001309A1 (en) |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2013150332A1 (en) * | 2012-04-01 | 2013-10-10 | Rhys Lewis | A tenant screening method and system using personality assessment |
CN105069366A (en) * | 2015-07-06 | 2015-11-18 | 无锡天脉聚源传媒科技有限公司 | Account registration and management method and device |
Citations (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5239462A (en) * | 1992-02-25 | 1993-08-24 | Creative Solutions Groups, Inc. | Method and apparatus for automatically determining the approval status of a potential borrower |
US5262941A (en) * | 1990-03-30 | 1993-11-16 | Itt Corporation | Expert credit recommendation method and system |
US5611052A (en) * | 1993-11-01 | 1997-03-11 | The Golden 1 Credit Union | Lender direct credit evaluation and loan processing system |
US5696907A (en) * | 1995-02-27 | 1997-12-09 | General Electric Company | System and method for performing risk and credit analysis of financial service applications |
US5774882A (en) * | 1992-03-12 | 1998-06-30 | Keen; Regina D. | Credit approval system |
US5797133A (en) * | 1994-08-31 | 1998-08-18 | Strategic Solutions Group, Inc | Method for automatically determining the approval status of a potential borrower |
US5870721A (en) * | 1993-08-27 | 1999-02-09 | Affinity Technology Group, Inc. | System and method for real time loan approval |
US6023687A (en) * | 1997-12-16 | 2000-02-08 | Capital One Financial Corporation | Method for creating and managing a lease agreement |
-
2000
- 2000-06-27 WO PCT/US2000/017746 patent/WO2001001309A1/en active Application Filing
- 2000-06-27 AU AU56413/00A patent/AU5641300A/en not_active Abandoned
- 2000-06-27 CA CA002414677A patent/CA2414677A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5262941A (en) * | 1990-03-30 | 1993-11-16 | Itt Corporation | Expert credit recommendation method and system |
US5239462A (en) * | 1992-02-25 | 1993-08-24 | Creative Solutions Groups, Inc. | Method and apparatus for automatically determining the approval status of a potential borrower |
US5774882A (en) * | 1992-03-12 | 1998-06-30 | Keen; Regina D. | Credit approval system |
US5870721A (en) * | 1993-08-27 | 1999-02-09 | Affinity Technology Group, Inc. | System and method for real time loan approval |
US5611052A (en) * | 1993-11-01 | 1997-03-11 | The Golden 1 Credit Union | Lender direct credit evaluation and loan processing system |
US5797133A (en) * | 1994-08-31 | 1998-08-18 | Strategic Solutions Group, Inc | Method for automatically determining the approval status of a potential borrower |
US5696907A (en) * | 1995-02-27 | 1997-12-09 | General Electric Company | System and method for performing risk and credit analysis of financial service applications |
US6023687A (en) * | 1997-12-16 | 2000-02-08 | Capital One Financial Corporation | Method for creating and managing a lease agreement |
Non-Patent Citations (5)
Title |
---|
DATABASE DIALOG GALE GROUP NE 1 January 1900 (1900-01-01), XP002933850, Database accession no. 01431089 * |
DATABASE DIALOG GALE GROUP PR 1 January 1900 (1900-01-01), XP002933851, Database accession no. 04594309 * |
The LION Company, June 1994, Units, p96, Dialog file 16: Gale Group PROMPT(r), Dialog accession no. 03395636 * |
www.wdia.com/catagory_ts.htm: Tenant Pre-Screening by NCI; www.wdia/whonci.htm: Who is NCI?, XP002933852 * |
XX; 1 January 1989 (1989-01-01), GARFINKEL S: "SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS OTHER TELLING INFORMATION", XP002933853 * |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2013150332A1 (en) * | 2012-04-01 | 2013-10-10 | Rhys Lewis | A tenant screening method and system using personality assessment |
CN105069366A (en) * | 2015-07-06 | 2015-11-18 | 无锡天脉聚源传媒科技有限公司 | Account registration and management method and device |
CN105069366B (en) * | 2015-07-06 | 2018-10-26 | 无锡天脉聚源传媒科技有限公司 | A kind of Account Logon and management method and device |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
AU5641300A (en) | 2001-01-31 |
WO2001001309A9 (en) | 2002-07-25 |
CA2414677A1 (en) | 2001-01-04 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US8086525B2 (en) | Methods and systems for providing risk ratings for use in person-to-person transactions | |
US10580724B2 (en) | Applicant screening | |
US7925518B2 (en) | System and method for payment of medical claims | |
US5323315A (en) | Computer system for monitoring the status of individual items of personal property which serve as collateral for securing financing | |
TWI232387B (en) | System and method for facilitating information collection, storage, and distribution | |
US10643217B2 (en) | Debit-based identity theft monitoring and prevention | |
US8285613B1 (en) | System and method for managing consumer information | |
US20060143056A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for insuring multiple unit dwellings | |
US20030229580A1 (en) | Method for establishing or improving a credit score or rating for a business | |
US20070288360A1 (en) | Systems and methods for determining whether candidates are qualified for desired situations based on credit scores | |
US20140330674A1 (en) | Certified offer service for domain names | |
US20090254476A1 (en) | Method and system for managing personal and financial information | |
US20020016727A1 (en) | Systems and methods for interactive innovation marketplace | |
US20010051885A1 (en) | System and methods for requesting, qualifying, approving and confirming reservation contracts | |
US20020010601A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for insuring multiple unit dwellings | |
US20130275176A1 (en) | Risk assessment of a supplier of an organization | |
US8380589B2 (en) | Methods and apparatus for real estate foreclosure bid computation and presentation | |
US20030208362A1 (en) | Integrated screening system and method for tenants and rental applicants | |
US20020052765A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for insuring multiple unit dwellings | |
US20180211327A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for insuring multiple unit dwellings | |
WO2001001309A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for tenant screening | |
US20060143054A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for insuring multiple unit dwellings | |
US20200273112A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for insuring multiple unit dwellings | |
US20060080155A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for insuring multiple unit dwellings | |
JP2006085397A (en) | Automatic loan examination system, method and program for rental apartment housing loan |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY BZ CA CH CN CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VN YU ZA ZW |
|
AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GW ML MR NE SN TD TG |
|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application | ||
DFPE | Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101) | ||
REG | Reference to national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: 8642 |
|
AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: C2 Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY BZ CA CH CN CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VN YU ZA ZW |
|
AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: C2 Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GW ML MR NE SN TD TG |
|
COP | Corrected version of pamphlet |
Free format text: PAGES 1/6-6/6, DRAWINGS, REPLACED BY NEW PAGES 1/6-6/6; DUE TO LATE TRANSMITTAL BY THE RECEIVING OFFICE |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2414677 Country of ref document: CA |
|
122 | Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase | ||
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: JP |