WO2001073690A2 - System and method for georeferencing digital raster maps - Google Patents

System and method for georeferencing digital raster maps Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2001073690A2
WO2001073690A2 PCT/US2001/010154 US0110154W WO0173690A2 WO 2001073690 A2 WO2001073690 A2 WO 2001073690A2 US 0110154 W US0110154 W US 0110154W WO 0173690 A2 WO0173690 A2 WO 0173690A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
map
point
raster
georeferencing
point pair
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2001/010154
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
WO2001073690A3 (en
Inventor
Dan Martin Scott
Darin Wayne Higgins
Original Assignee
Provar Inc.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=24144361&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=WO2001073690(A2) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Provar Inc. filed Critical Provar Inc.
Priority to AU2001245995A priority Critical patent/AU2001245995A1/en
Publication of WO2001073690A2 publication Critical patent/WO2001073690A2/en
Publication of WO2001073690A3 publication Critical patent/WO2001073690A3/en

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06TIMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T17/00Three dimensional [3D] modelling, e.g. data description of 3D objects
    • G06T17/05Geographic models

Definitions

  • s is an estimator for the amount of error to be expected between actual and predicted latitude and longitude values.
  • equation (8) does not have a unique solution unless two or m re points are contained in A. Generally speaking, then it requires two points to determine a georeferencing function from the family of rotational linear transformations. When there are three points or more, it is possible to compute a standard deviation of error, s using the formula:

Abstract

The preferred embodiment provides a system and method for georeferencing digital raster maps by associating specific points on the raster map with corresponding points on a georeferenced vector map or another georeferenced raster map. According to the preferred embodiment, a raster map and a corresponding vector map are simultaneously displayed to a user. The user then locates a common geographic point or feature on each map, and marks each of them as a unique point-pair. When the user has marked at least two point-pairs, the system then computes a georeferencing function, based on the pixel-coordinates of the points marked on the raster map and the corresponding geographic coordinates of the points on the vector map. Thereafter the geographic coordinates of any point on the map may be easily computed. The preferred embodiment provides that as more point-pairs are identified, the georeferencing function is modified for increased accuracy.

Description

SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR GEOREFERENCING DIGITAL
RASTER MAPS
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS:
This application contains some specification and figures in common with concurrently filed, copending applications "System and Method for
Performing Flood Zone Certifications" (09/537,161) filed March 29, 2000 and "System and Method for Synchronizing Raster And Vector Map Images" (09/537,162) filed March 29, 2000 which are hereby incorporated by reference.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Technical Field:
The present invention generally relates to geographic map processing and in particular to a system and method for associating digital raster maps with known geographic features. Still more particularly, the present invention relates to a system and method for associating specific points on digital raster maps with a geographic coordinate system.
Description of the Related Art
A digital raster map is a computerized map image that resembles a conventional paper map in that it presents an image of the mapped area, but has no additional underlying data associated with the features of the map. A raster map is typically created by scanning a conventional paper map, and is a grid-based map composed of pixels (or dots) of color or black & white. Each pixel in the grid has can be referenced by the pixel coordinates, and has only one value, which indicates the color of that pixel. Raster images are commonly referred to as "bit mapped."
A vector map uses lines and polygons, rather than pixels, to describe an image. Unlike a raster map, in which the map image is simply stored as a grid of pixels, when a vector map is displayed, it is drawn from a set of underlying data. The vector map is created through the placements of nodes on a plane and connecting those nodes with lines. Vector lines can be attributed with tables of data such as elevations, values, names or other information relative to the line. Vector data can be displayed in three dimensions if the lines are attributed with z values, modified or changed relative to user need, or layered to allow for turning off and on the viewing of different information.
Because of their feature attribution properties, they are particularly useful for displaying geographic data. Vector maps are used to display boundaries or lines that denote the position and extent of features, such as county boundaries or lines denoting stream and river systems. It is also very easy to view or manipulate the data underlying a vector map, for example to view or change the elevation of a feature.
Also because vector maps are commonly drawn from a geographic data set describing the area shown, they are very easily, and generally inherently, georeferenced. Georeferencing is the process of relating source coordinates to referenced geographic coordinates., which are typically in standard latitude/longitude. An image or a vector file is georeferenced to be used within a mapping/geographic environment. In a vector map, the data from which the map is drawn will typically already include a geographic coordinate set.
Modern GIS systems normally make use of digital vector based map information. However, a vast legacy of paper-based map information exists. It is very expensive and time consuming to convert all of the information on these paper maps over to a digital vector format. In many cases the scope and expense of such conversions render them completely impractical. However, even when a complete conversion to digital vector-based format is not possible, it is still possible to obtain some of the benefits of computerized map systems, first by converting the paper maps to digital raster maps (by scanning them), and then by georeferencing the raster image. After georeferencing, there should be a clear relationship between the pixel coordinates in the raster map, and the geographic coordinates of the feature represented by that pixel. It would be desirable to provide a system and method for georeferencing a raster map by associating points on that map with corresponding points on a previously-georeferenced vector map, or with reference points designated in the raster map which have known latitude and longitude.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is therefore one object of the present invention to provide improved geographic map processing.
It is another object of the present invention to provide an improved system and method for associating digital raster maps with known geographic features.
It is yet another object of the present invention to provide an improved system and method for associating specific points on digital raster maps with a geographic coordinate system.
The foregoing objects are achieved as is now described. The preferred embodiment provides a system and method for georeferencing digital raster maps by associating specific points on the raster map with corresponding points on a georeferenced vector map or another georeferenced raster map. According to the preferred embodiment, a raster map and a corresponding vector map are simultaneously displayed to a user. The user then locates a common geographic point or feature on each map, and marks each of them as a unique point-pair. When the user has marked at least two point-pairs, the system then computes a georeferencing function, based on the pixel- coordinates of the points marked on the raster map and the corresponding geographic coordinates of the points on the vector map. Thereafter the geographic coordinates of any point on the map may be easily computed. The preferred embodiment provides that as more point-pairs are identified, the georeferencing function is modified for increased accuracy.
The above as well as additional objectives, features, and advantages of the present invention will become apparent in the following detailed written description. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The novel features believed characteristic of the invention are set forth in the appended claims. The invention itself however, as well as a preferred mode of use, further objects and advantages thereof, will best be understood by reference to the following detailed description of an illustrative embodiment when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Figure 1 depicts a data processing system in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention;
Figure 2 is an image of an exemplary raster map, in accordance with the preferred embodiment;
Figure 3 is an image of an exemplary vector map, corresponding to the raster map of Figure 2, in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention; and
Figure 4 is a flowchart of a process in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
With reference now to the figures, and in particular with reference to Figure 1, a block diagram of a data processing system in which a preferred embodiment of the present invention may be implemented is depicted. Data processing system 100 includes processor 102 and associated L2 Cache 104, which in the exemplary embodiment is connected in turn to a system bus 106. System memory 108 is connected to system bus 106, and may be read from and written to by processor 102.
Also connected to system bus 106 is 1/0 bus bridge 110. In the exemplary embodiment, data processing system 100 includes graphics adapter
118 connected to bus 106, receiving user interface information for display 120. Peripheral devices such as nonvolatile storage 114, which may be a hard disk drive, and keyboard/pointing device 116, which may include a conventional mouse, a trackball, or the like, are connected to 1/0 bus 112.
The exemplary embodiment shown in Figure 1 is provided solely for the purposes of explaining the invention and those skilled in the art will recognize that numerous variations are possible, both in form and function. For instance, data processing system 100 might also include a compact disk read only memory (CD-ROM) or digital video disk (DVD) drive, a sound card and audio speakers, and numerous other optional components. All such variations are believed to be within the spirit and scope of the present invention. Data processing system 100 is provided solely as an example for the purposes of explanation and is not intended to imply architectural limitations.
The preferred embodiment provides a system and method for georeferencing digital raster maps by associating specific points on the raster map with corresponding points on a georeferenced vector map or another georeferenced raster map. According to the preferred embodiment, a raster map and a corresponding vector map are simultaneously displayed to a user. The user then locates a common geographic point or feature on each map, and marks each of them as a unique point pair. When the user has marked at least two point-pairs, the system then computes a georeferencing function, based on the pixel-coordinates of the points marked on the raster map and the corresponding geographic coordinates of the points on the vector map. Thereafter the geographic coordinates of any point on the map may be easily computed. The preferred embodiment provides that as more point-pairs are identified, the georeferencing function is modified for increased accuracy.
Figure 2 is an exemplary raster map, in accordance with the preferred embodiment. This exemplary map shows a scanned image from a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) paper map. This raster image shows a land area with flood zone indications, but would, in a computer system, contain no underlying data regarding the area shown.
Figure 3 is an exemplary vector map, corresponding to the raster map of Figure 2, in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention. This map shows the same area as the map in Figure 2, but is created by a computer system from a database describing the locations of features such as the streets shown. Typically, each feature shown on a vector map such as this will already be georeferenced, in that the geographic coordinates of each feature will also be recorded in the underlying data
A digital map image is considered georeferenced if a pair of mathematical functions, f, and g, have been defined that can be used to convert back and forth between the coordinates of the map image (as defined by the pixels of the image) and the corresponding longitude and latitude of the location of that point. That is, f and g do the following:
1. If (x, y) represents a location on the digital map image, then f(x, y) =(Lon, Lat) represents the longitude and latitude of the corresponding physical location.
2. If (Lon, Lat) represents a physical location that lies within the region covered by the map, then g (Lon, Lat) = (x, y) represents the point on the digital map image that corresponds to that longitude and latitude.
Here, x and y represent the natural internal coordinate system of the map image. Typically, as described above, a digital raster map image uses the pixels of its image as a natural coordinate matrix. However, in most cases, a vector-based map image uses longitude and latitude as its internal coordinate system; if so, it can be considered to be trivially georeferenced already. Therefore, the functions f ( ) and g ( ) above are non-trivial georeferencing functions required to convert back and forth between coordinate systems.
Following is a description of a georeferencing process in accordance with the preferred embodiment:
First, the raster map to be georeferenced (referred to as Mapl) is displayed on a computer monitor in conjunction with another previously georeferenced map (referred to as Map2) (step 400). Typically, Map2 will be a vector map, but could also be another raster map, for which georeferencing functions are already known. Mapl and Map2 can be independently manipulated for rotation, position and scale. The user will manipulate the maps until the region shown in Mapl is contained within the region shown by
Map2.
Next, pairs of points representing identical geographic locations on Mapl and Map2 are identified, and the user uses a keyboard, mouse, or other pointing device to mark these point-pairs (step 405). For each point-pair, one point is marked on Mapl and the other point is marked at the corresponding location on Map2. Examples of common georeferencing point-pairs include street intersections, places where rivers cross roads, mountain peaks, building locations, and other readily identifiable map features. If any points on Mapl have points of known longitude and latitude already marked on the map, then a georeferencing point-pair can be obtained by marking that point on Mapl and moving to the point with identical latitude and longitude on Map2 and marking it as the other half of the point-pair. Alternatively, once the known points are marked with the known latitude and longitude, they can be used to determine the georeferencing functions without requiring a corresponding mark on Map2.
After a point-pair is marked, the x-y point on Mapl is assigned the corresponding latitude and longitude of its matching point on Map2 (step
410).
When two georeferencing point-pairs are marked, the system will compute georeference functions for Mapl based on a linear transformation that allows an arbitrary rotation and predefined scaling, between the x-y domain and the latitude- longitude domain (step 415).
To improve accuracy and allow increased generality, more georeferencing point-pairs will frequently be desired. To facilitate the process of gathering these additional georeferencing point-pairs, Mapl and Map2 are now selectively synchronized. This means that as either map is zoomed, panned, scrolled, or otherwise caused to display a different region, then the other map automatically does the same. This greatly increases the ease with which georeferencing point-pairs can be identified and marked on the maps, since when the user of the system locates an identifiable feature on one map, the other map will automatically be showing very nearly the same location on the other map.
Thereafter, when the user marks a georeferencing point on one of the maps, then the system automatically marks the corresponding point on the other map, based on its current georeferencing function (step 420). The user can then make corrections to the location of a point marked by the system in this way (step 425). The user may enter as many point-pairs as are desired; each additional point-pair will increase the accuracy of the georeferencing process.
When three or more georeferencing point-pairs are determined, the system computes georeference functions for Mapl based on a completely general linear transformation between the x-y domain and the latitude- longitude domain.
When four or more georeferencing point-pairs are determined, the general linear georeferencing functions are over-determined. This means that more than the required amount of information to compute the general linear georeferencing functions is available, but that it is not, in general, completely consistent. The system use the extra information contained in the additional georeferencing points to provide validation checks to protect against the possibility that some of the data points may be inaccurate (step 430). Points that deviate excessively with respect to a calculated standard error are presumed to be inaccurate and are omitted from the calculation of the georeferencing functions. Note that as new point are added, the system also rechecks points previously marked as inconsistent, to determine if those points should now be considered when recomputing the georeferencing functions.
The additional point-pairs allow the system to compute the general linear georeferencing functions which best fit the combination of all the available georeferencing point-pairs, so that the active georeferencing functions are revised with each new point-pair (step 435). According to the preferred embodiment, this is done by using a "least square" parameter fitting operation.
The user may then proceed o enter the next point-pair (step 440) . When the user is finished, the system stores the active georeferencing functions with the raster-map (step is 445). At this time, the raster map is considered fully georeferenced. When accessed at any future time, the system may simply retrieve the georeferencing functions, and apply them to find the latitude and longitude of any point on the raster map.
The process of determining he georeferencing function set from a set of point-pairs is believed to be within the ability of one of ordinary skill in the art. The specific approach used by the system an method of the preferred embodiment is discussed below.
At any given point in the georeferencing process a set of points P , has been specified. Let i e P denote one of the points of P . Associated value xt , yt , Lat j and Lont refer to the* and y coordinates of the point on the bitmap, and the latitude and longitude of the point on the earth's surface. We also define A c P to be the subset of "active" points, i.e. points which are currently being used in the calculation of the georeferencing functions.
Assume that we have selected a parametric family of functions F. Functions in this family map from (x,y) to(∑on,Lat). Any function / e calF has components f (x,y) = Lon, and f2(x, y) = Lat . From within this family we seek the specific function / , which (in a sense to be defined below) comes closest to making the following system of equations true:
f(xi >yt) = (Loni > Latι ) for i e A
Once determined, / will b the georeferencing function which is used to compute corresponding latitude and longitude values, (Lon, Lat) for any point, (x,y) on the bitmap. There are any number of possible ways to define the function that "comes closest to making (1) true." We shall follow a "least squares" approach also known in mathematics as an L_ approach. This approach seeks to find the function, / , which minimizes the sum of the squared differences between the actual and the predicted values of latitude and longitude. In other words, from among all the functions/ e F , /is the one which minimizes:
SSE = ∑[( _(xi,yi)-Loni)2
Figure imgf000014_0001
(2)
Among various alternative methods for choosing the function / are choosing it so t ht it minimizes the sum of absolute errors (rather than squared errors, or so that it minimizes the largest error. Other criteria are also possible.
In what follows we shall describe methods for computing georeferencing functions based on both a "rotational linear" parametric family of functions and a "general linear" family of functions. A knowledgeable practitioner will readily perceive that this approach may be easily generalized to other parametric families of functions. Obvious candidates include nonlinear parametric families of functions arising from the projection of the earth's surface onto a flat map.
The General Linear Case: In the general linear case, we let F be the set of all possible linear transformations which map from (x,y) to (Lon, Lat) . Thus
Figure imgf000014_0002
for some choice of parameters άn , άu , a__ , ά22, b_ , and b2. If the region covered by the map to be georeferenced is not too large, then this family of functions will contain a suitable function , / whose total error is quite small. In the case where the map to be georeferenced covers a larger area than this, then the curvature of the earth must be taken into account and E is not a suitable family of functions. In such a case, nonlinear functions must be used as mentioned above. We shall not pursue that case further, since it is a straightforward extension of the procedures used in the linear case.
To find/ we seek the parameters which minimize
SSE = ∑ (anx, + auy, + b: - Lont f + (a21χ. + a22y{ + b2 - Lot, f The ieA parameter values which minimize this expression are found by solving the following two independent systems of linear equations:
Figure imgf000015_0001
(5b)
Figure imgf000015_0002
Figure imgf000015_0003
These systems can be easily solve by well known methods, such as Gaussian Elimination, or LU factorization. The solutions yield the desired values of άn , άl2 , ά21 , ά22, , and b2. It should be noted that equations (5a) and (5b) do not have a unique solution unless three or more non-colinear points are contained in A . Generally speaking, then, it requires 3 points to choose a georeferencing function from the family of general linear transformations. When there are four points or more, it is possible to compute a standard deviation of errors using the formula:
∑ [ά_Λ + auyt + bx - Lo^ j + 2lxt +b2 - Lati J s = ieA
(6)
» -3
s is an estimator for the amount of error to be expected between actual and predicted latitude and longitude values.
Note that the inverse georeferencing function, / that maps from
(Lon, Lat) to (x,y) is readily obtained now, by inverting the function / . Having done this, it is possible to compute a similar standard deviation of error for / which is an estimate of error as measured in the bitmap coordinates.
The Rotational Linear Case: In the, so called, rotational linear case, we let Ebe the set of all possible linear transformations which map from
(x,y)io (Lon, Lat) and which also allow for a known scale change caused by the difference in distance per degree of latitude and per degree of longitude at any point not on the equator. Thus
Figure imgf000016_0001
for some
choice of parameters β , β2 , β3 , and β4 , where γ =cos Eαt) is computed from the estimated latitude of the map to be georeferenced. Clearly, this is a special case of the more general linear transform described above, where we take
au = βι /y^u = -&>α2i = -A»
α22 = -A A = /V A = &•
In theory, if the region covered by the map to be georeferenced is not too large, then this family of functions will contain a suitable function,
/ whose total error is quite small. In the case where the map to be georeferenced covers a larger area than this, then the curvature of the earth must be taken into account and F is not a suitable family of functions. In such a case, nonlinear functions must be used as noted above. In practice, the general linear transform will yield results which are somewhat superior to the rotational linear transform due to the former's innate ability to use arbitrary scaling factors. These arbitrary scaling factors might compensate, for example, for scaling flaws in the digital scanner used to scan in the maps. The primary advantage of the rotational linear transform is that it can be computed with only two reference points (unlike the general linear transform which requires three reference points).
To find /we seek, as before, the parameters which minimize SSE as defined in equation (4).
The parameter values which minimize this expression are found by solving the following system of linear equations:
Figure imgf000018_0001
r∑Lont ieA
∑Lat, ieA γ∑XtLσn, -∑y^Lat, ieA ieA
- ∑ -^n. -∑x.Eαt,. ieA ieA
These systems can easily solved by well known methods, such as Gaussian Elimination, or LU factorization. The solutions yield the desire values of βx , β_, β_, and β which in turn yield the desired values for ά x ,
Figure imgf000018_0002
It should be noted that equation (8) does not have a unique solution unless two or m re points are contained in A. Generally speaking, then it requires two points to determine a georeferencing function from the family of rotational linear transformations. When there are three points or more, it is possible to compute a standard deviation of error, s using the formula:
Figure imgf000018_0003
s is an estimator for the amount of error to be expected between actual and predicted latitude and longitude values.
Note that the inverse georeferencing function / that maps from
(Lon, Lat) to (x,y) is readily obtained now, by inverting the function / . Having done this, it is possible to compute a similar standard deviation of error for f~l which is an estimate of error as measured in the bitmap coordinates.
Automatic Error Detection and Handling When individual points are being assigned x, y, Lon, and Lat values, there is always a potential for error. To reduce the risk of incorrect georeferencing resulting from such errors, certain error handling procedures are built into the georeferencing process. The fundamental concern is that of detecting a "bad" point and then removing it from the set of active points, A Note that removing point from A will not delete the information associate, with that point, but it will cause the georeferencing parameters to be completely uninfluenced by that point. We o not wish to remove the point entirely, since it may be determined at a later stage of the georeferencing, that the point was not really bad at all, and should be-used in the georeferencing calculation. This will be clarified shortly.
Detecting Bad Points The following steps outline the bad point detection process using the general linear transform approach to georeferencing.
1. Begin by placing all existing points into the active set, A
2. If there are fewer than five active points then you are done, Otherwise, for each of the currently active points in turn, move it (call it point k for the sake of convenience) temporarily out of the active set, and then calculate the resulting inverse georeferencing function (call it g^') and its corresponding SSEk . Also, calculate the difference between the predicted value and the actual value
A = ^{Lon k>Lat k)~ {χ k>yk - Make a note of the values, δkand %cg •
Return point k to the active set (and move on to the next value of k .
3. From among the results found in step 2 above, find the point, k, with the largest value of yccπ )cxandδk which also
satisfies /ocp )c andδk)c2, where c , andc2 are some constants which are
set according to the general level of accuracy to be expected on the particular type of map which is being georeferenced, the current number of active points, and the dots per inch of the scanned image. If there is such a point then mark it as bad (by removing it from the active set) and return to step 2 above. Otherwise you are done.
There are several things to note about this procedure. One is that it allowing the value of c, and c2 to change with the number of active points, makes it possible for the georeferencing system and method to utilize points which it might originally determine bad or inconsistent after a large enough sample of points has been gathered to make it clear that a lesser level of accuracy is all that can be achieved on this map. Another observation is that using this procedure it is impossible to reduce the number of active points down to less than four (unless you started with less than 4 in which case this procedure does not apply at all). This scheme means that as each new point is added, all points determined so far are considered, even those which had previously been marked bad. Thus early "misjudgements" on the part of the system can be corrected later, in light of new point information.
The same bad point detection process, can also be implemented using the rotational linear transform approach. In this case the method is capable of reducing the number of active points down as low as three (rather than four for the general linear transform approach outlined above). This can be useful when dealing with small sets of active points.
When the system is georeferencing raster map images that cover a large enough area so that the (nonlinear) curvature of the earth is a source of significant error, the system can calculate nonlinear georeferencing functions whose form corresponds to the map projection that was used to create Mapl.
A specific example of the operation and application of the preferred georeferencing method may be shown with reference to the "Flood Zone Determination" business. The Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) publishes a library of tens of thousands of paper maps showing various types of flood zones and their locations in the United States. A flood zone determination on a property is frequently done in the following way:
1. The address of the property is examined, and the
location of the property is determined (perhaps through the
use of a geocoding system, or b examining an available
street map).
2. A map analyst attempts to determine which of the
many thousands of FEMA flood maps will contain this
property.
3. The map analyst goes to a map storage area and
retrieves the desired map, often examining several maps
before making a final selection. 4. Having retrieved the paper map, the map analyst
next determines where, precisely, the property is located on
the map.
5. Finally, the map analyst examines flood zone
notations on the map at the property's location in order to
determine its flood-zone status.
When performed using paper maps, the above process is difficult and quite time consuming . A database of scanned raster map images, alone, can be used to reduce the time and effort expended on step 3 above. However, georeferenced raster map images can also be used to eliminate virtually all work from steps 2 and 4 above. Since those are generally the most time consuming steps under the current process, the value of georeferenced flood maps is considerable.
Using georeferenced flood map raster images, steps 2 and 4 above, are replaced by:
2. A computer system combines the pre-designated outlines of the raster map and the georeferencing information to obtain a polygon expressed in terms of latitude and longitude that outlines the region included in each flood map. Then the system determines which of the polygons contain the address in question, which is done using a "point-in-polygon" algorithm. At the conclusion of this process, the computer system has identified a map panel (or perhaps a small number of map panels) that contains the address. 4. Since the latitude and longitude of the property are known (by virtue of a geocoding phase), the computer system can use the georeferencing of the map panels to locate the property on each of the panels found above, thus largely eliminating any need for he map analyst to scan the flood map for the address location
Therefore, it is easily seen that by using georeferenced raster maps instead of paper maps, the process of determining flood zones is substantially automated and much more efficient.
It is important to note that while the present invention has been described in the context of a fully functional data processing system and/or network, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the mechanism of the present invention is capable of being distributed in the form of a computer usable medium of instructions in a variety of forms, and that the present invention applies equally regardless of the particular type of signal bearing medium used to actually carry out the distribution. Examples of computer usable mediums include: nonvolatile, hard-coded type mediums such as read only memories (ROMs) or erasable, electrically programmable read only memories (EEPROMs), recordable type mediums such as floppy disks, hard disk drives and CD-ROMs, an transmission type mediums such as digital and analog communication links.
While the invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to a preferred embodiment, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and detail may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.

Claims

WHAT IS CLAIMED IS:
1. A method for georeferencing a raster map image, comprising the steps of: displaying a raster map and a georeferenced map; . identifying at least two geographically corresponding points on the raster map and on the georeferenced map; associating an image coordinate of each point on the raster map with a geographic coordinate of the corresponding point on the goereferenced map; determining a functional relationship between the image coordinates and the geographic coordinates; and thereafter, for each additional corresponding points identified on the raster map and the georeferenced map, revising the functional relationship between the image coordinates and the geographic coordinates according to the additional corresponding points, and disregarding any points which are substantially inconsistent with the functional relationship.
2. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of: using the functional relationship to determine the geographic coordinates of features on the raster map.
3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising the step of: storing the functional relationship with the raster map.
4. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of: when the raster map is manipulated by a user, manipulating the georeferenced map accordingly.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein the geographic coordinates are latitude and longitude.
6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the raster map and the georeferenced map are displayed on the same computer display.
7. The method of claim 1, wherein the corresponding points are marked by a user after visually determining geographically corresponding points.
8. The method of claim 1, wherein the functional relationship is represented by a set of general linear functions.
9. A computer system, having at least a processor connected to communicate with a readable and writeable memory, comprising: means for displaying a raster map and a georeferenced map; means for identifying at least two geographically corresponding points on the raster map and on the georeferenced map; means for associating an image coordinate of the each point on the raster map with a geographic coordinate of the corresponding point on the georeferenced map; means for determimng a functional relationship between the image coordinates and the geographic coordinates; and for each additional corresponding points identified on the raster map and the georeferenced map, means for revising the functional relationship between the image coordinates and the geographic coordinates according to the additional corresponding points, and means for disregarding any points which are substantially inconsistent with the functional relationship.
10. The system of claim 9, further comprising: means for using the functional relationship to determine the geographic coordinates of features on the raster map.
11. The system of claim 9, further comprising: means for storing the functional relationship with the raster map.
12. The system of claim 9, further comprising: means for, when the raster map is manipulated by a user, manipulating the georeferenced map accordingly.
13. The system of claim 9, wherein the geographic coordinates are latitude and longitude.
14. The system of claim 9, wherein the raster map and the georeferenced map are displayed on the same computer display.
15. The system of claim 9, wherein the corresponding points are marked by a user after visually determining geographically corresponding points.
16. The system of claim 9, wherein the functional relationship is represented by a set of general linear functions.
17. A method of georeferencing a raster map, comprising: receiving a display of a first map and a second map, the first map being a digital raster map, the second map being a previously georeferenced map; receiving a manipulation of the first map such that the first map and the second map are approximately aligned; displaying the first map and the second map; receiving a selection of a point pair point on the first map; and receiving a selection of a corresponding point pair point on the second map.
18. The method of claim 1 wherein the second map is a vector map.
19. The method of claim 1 wherein the second map is a digital raster map.
20. The method of claim 1 wherein the point pair point on the first map has a known longitude and latitude.
21. The method of claim 1 further comprising creating a georeferencing function.
22. The method of claim 5 wherein the georeferencing function is a linear transformation.
23. The method of claim 1 further comprising selectively synchronizing, responsive to a user command, the first map and the second map.
24. The method of claim 1 further comprising receiving a mark on the first map at a location, and reproducing the mark on the second map at a corresponding location.
25. The method of claim 5 wherein georeferencing uses at least three point pairs to complete the georeferencing function for the first map based on a linear transformation.
26. The method of claim 5 further comprising using at least four point pairs to complete the georeferencing function for the first map, based on a linear transformation, and further comprising executing a validation check.
27. The method of claim 10 further comprising rejecting a point pair when the point pair deviates a pre-determined amount from a predetermined standard error.
28. The method of claim 11 wherein the predetermined standard error uses a "least square" parameter fitting operation.
29. The method of claim 1 further comprising : receiving a selection of a point pair on the first map, and receiving a selection of a point pair on the second map.
30. A method in a computer system for georeferencing a raster map, comprising: providing for display a first map and a second map, the first map being a digital raster map, and the second map being a previously georeferenced map; the fist map being substantially similar to the second map when displayed; receiving an entry identifying a first point pair point on the first map; receiving an entry identifying a second point pair point on the second map, the second point pair point having approximately the same location on the second map as the first point pair point has on the first map; assigning a point pair point on the first map a longitude coordinate and a latitude coordinate, the longitude coordinate and the latitude coordinate of the first point pair point being identical to a longitude point and a latitude point associated with a point pair point on the second map.
31. The method of claim 14 further comprising creating the georeferencing function.
32. The method of claim 14 further comprising receiving a mark on the first map at a location, and reproducing the mark on the second map at a corresponding location.
33. The method of claim 14 further comprising using at least four point pairs to compute a georeferencing function for the first map based on a linear transformation, and further comprising executing a validation check.
34. The method of claim 17 further comprising rejecting a point pair when the point pair deviates a predetermined amount from a predetermined standard error.
35. A computer readable medium whose contents enable the georeferencing of a raster map, by: providing for display a first map and a second map, the first map being a digital raster map, and the second map being a previously georeferenced map; the fist map being substantially similar to the second map when displayed; receiving an entry identifying a first point pair point on the first map; receiving an entry identifying a second point pair point on the second map, the second point pair point having approximately the same location on the second map as the first point pair point has on the first map; assigning a point pair point on the first map a longitude coordinate and a latitude coordinate, the longitude coordinate and the latitude coordinate of the first point pair point being identical to a longitude point and a latitude point associated with a point pair point on the second map.
36. The method of claim 19 further comprising: using at least four point pairs to compute a georeferencing function for the first map based on a linear transformation; further comprising executing a validation check; and rejecting a point pair when the point pair deviates a predetermined amount from a predetermined standard error.
37. A method of georeferencing a raster map, comprising; receiving a display of a first map and a second map, the first map being a digital raster map, the second map being a previously georeferenced map; receiving a manipulation of the first map such that the first map and the second map are approximately aligned; displaying the first map and the second map; receiving a selection of a point pair point on the first map; and receiving a selection of a corresponding point pair point on the second map.
38. The method of claim 1 further comprising verifying that the point pair point on the first map is correctly associated with the point pair point on the second map.
39. The method of claim 1 wherein aligning places the first map within the second map.
40. The method of claim 1 further comprising the act of providing a longitude and latitude to the point pair point on the second map.
41. The method of claim 1 wherein the point pair point on the second map has a known longitude and latitude.
42. The method of claim 1 further comprising generating a georeferencing function.
43. The method of claim 1 further comprising providing an identification of a plurality of point pair points.
44. The method of claim 1 further comprising the act of marking a point on the first map, the point on the first map being automatically reproduced on the second map.
45. The method of claim 8 further comprising correcting the reproduced mark.
46. The method of claim 1 further comprising selecting a predefined georeferencing function to associate a point on the first map with a point on the second map.
47. A computer readable medium whose contents transform a computer system into a raster map georeferencing system, by enabling: receiving a display of a first map and a second map, the first map being a digital raster map, the second map being a previously georeferenced map; manipulating the first map such that the first map and the second map are approximately aligned; selecting a point pair point on the first map; and selecting a corresponding point pair point on the second map.
48. The computer readable medium of claim 11 wherein the contents of the computer readable medium are also capable of verifying that the point pair point on the first map is correctly associated with the point pair point on the second map.
49. The computer readable medium of claim 11 , wherein the contents of the computer readable medium are also capable of incorporating a plurality of point pair points.
50. The computer readable medium of claim 11 wherein the contents of the computer readable medium are also capable of allowing a user to mark a point on the first map, the point on the first map being automatically reproduced on the second map.
51. The computer readable medium of claim 11 wherein the contents of the computer readable medium are also capable of providing a longitude and latitude to the point pair point on the second map.
52. A computer memory containing a data structure capable of enabling the georeferencing of a raster map, by: receiving a display of a first map and a second map, the first map being a digital raster map, the second map being a previously georeferenced map; receiving a manipulation of the first map such that the first map and the second map are approximately aligned; displaying the first map and the second map; receiving a selection of a point pair point on the first map; and receiving a selection of a corresponding point pair point on the second map.
53. The computer memory of claim 16 wherein the computer memory maintains code that verifies that the point pair point on the first map is correctly associated with the point pair point on the second map.
54. The computer memory of claim 16, wherein the computer maintains code that supports the providing of a parality of point pair points.
55. The computer memory of claim 16 wherein the computer memory maintains code for marking a point on the first map, the point on the first map being automatically reproduced on the second map.
56. The computer memory of claim 16 wherein the computer memory maintains code that provides longitude and latitude to the point pair point on the second map
57. A system that enables the georeferencing of a digital raster map, comprising: a processing platform for executing code capable of georeferencing a digital raster map; and a storage platform for storing at least a digital raster map, the storage platform coupled to the processing platform.
58. The system of claim 1 further comprising a user interaction device coupled to the processing platform.
59. The system of claim 1 wherein the processing platform is enabled to georeference a digital raster map based on a second map that is already georeferenced.
60. The system of claim 1 wherein the processing platform is a microprocessor.
61. The system of claim 1 wherein the map processing platform is a application service provider.
62. The system of claim 1 wherein the map processing platform is located remotely from a user of the processing platform.
63. The system of claim 1 wherein the storage platform comprises cashed memory.
64. The system of claim 1 wherein the storage platform comprises system memory.
65. The system of claim 1 wherein the storage platform comprises non-cashed volatile storage.
66. The system of claim 2 wherein the user interaction device comprises at least a display device.
67. The system of claim 1 where in the processing platform is coupled to the storage platform via a network.
68. The system of claim 11 wherein the network is the internet.
69. The system of claim 1 wherein the storage platform maintains a parality of digital raster maps.
70. The system of claim 13 wherein the storage platform maintains a database of georeferencing functions that associate a digital raster map location with a georeferenced location in a second map.
71. The system of claim 1 wherein the storage platform maintains code that enables the georeferencing of a raster map, by: receiving a display of a first map and a second map, the first map being a digital raster map, the second map being a previously georeferenced map; receiving a manipulation of the first map such that the first map and the second map are approximately aligned; displaying the first map and the second map; receiving a selection of a point pair point on the first map; and receiving a selection of a corresponding point pair point on the second map.
72. A data signal comprising a data structure capable of georeferencing a raster map, by: providing for display a first map and a second map, the first map being a digital raster map, and the second map being a previously georeferenced map; and assigning a point pair point on the first map a longitude coordinate and a latitude coordinate of a point pair point on the second map.
73. The method of claim 16 further comprising creating a georeferencing function.
74. The method of claim 16 further comprising receiving a mark on the first map at a location and reproducing the mark on the second map at a corresponding location.
75. The method of claim 16 further comprising using at least four point pairs to complete the georeferencing function for the map based on a linear transformation, and further comprising executing a validation check.
76. The method of claim 19 further comprising rej ecting a point pair when the point pair deviates a pre-determined amount from a predetermined standard error.
PCT/US2001/010154 2000-03-29 2001-03-29 System and method for georeferencing digital raster maps WO2001073690A2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU2001245995A AU2001245995A1 (en) 2000-03-29 2001-03-29 System and method for georeferencing digital raster maps

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US53784900A 2000-03-29 2000-03-29
US09/537,849 2000-03-29

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2001073690A2 true WO2001073690A2 (en) 2001-10-04
WO2001073690A3 WO2001073690A3 (en) 2002-03-14

Family

ID=24144361

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2001/010154 WO2001073690A2 (en) 2000-03-29 2001-03-29 System and method for georeferencing digital raster maps

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (3) US7167187B2 (en)
AU (1) AU2001245995A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2001073690A2 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2003031913A1 (en) * 2001-10-05 2003-04-17 Honeywell International Inc. System and method for geographically referencing an improvement image
EP2716077A4 (en) * 2011-06-01 2015-05-27 Google Inc Systems and methods for collecting and providing map images

Families Citing this family (69)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7148898B1 (en) * 2000-03-29 2006-12-12 Sourceprose Corporation System and method for synchronizing raster and vector map images
US20050159882A1 (en) * 2000-03-29 2005-07-21 Howard John W. System and method for performing flood zone certicifications
US6631326B1 (en) 2000-03-29 2003-10-07 Sourceprose Corporation System and method for performing flood zone certifications
WO2001073690A2 (en) 2000-03-29 2001-10-04 Provar Inc. System and method for georeferencing digital raster maps
US7333820B2 (en) 2001-07-17 2008-02-19 Networks In Motion, Inc. System and method for providing routing, mapping, and relative position information to users of a communication network
US7082365B2 (en) * 2001-08-16 2006-07-25 Networks In Motion, Inc. Point of interest spatial rating search method and system
US7486958B2 (en) * 2001-09-05 2009-02-03 Networks In Motion, Inc. System and method for maintaining an online point-of-interest directory
US7271742B2 (en) 2002-03-01 2007-09-18 Networks In Motion, Inc. Method and apparatus for sending, retrieving and planning location relevant information
US8918073B2 (en) 2002-03-28 2014-12-23 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Wireless telecommunications location based services scheme selection
US8290505B2 (en) 2006-08-29 2012-10-16 Telecommunications Systems, Inc. Consequential location derived information
US7565155B2 (en) 2002-04-10 2009-07-21 Networks In Motion Method and system for dynamic estimation and predictive route generation
US8666397B2 (en) 2002-12-13 2014-03-04 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Area event handling when current network does not cover target area
WO2004074778A1 (en) * 2003-02-14 2004-09-02 Networks In Motion, Inc. Method and system for saving and retrieving spatial related information
US7636901B2 (en) * 2003-06-27 2009-12-22 Cds Business Mapping, Llc System for increasing accuracy of geocode data
AU2004302220A1 (en) * 2003-08-08 2005-02-17 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Method and system for collecting synchronizing and reporting telecommunication call events and work flow related information
US20080126535A1 (en) 2006-11-28 2008-05-29 Yinjun Zhu User plane location services over session initiation protocol (SIP)
US8326537B2 (en) * 2004-01-20 2012-12-04 Westerngeco L.L.C. Survey design using earth observation data
US20060041375A1 (en) * 2004-08-19 2006-02-23 Geographic Data Technology, Inc. Automated georeferencing of digitized map images
CA2583458C (en) * 2004-10-01 2016-02-23 Networks In Motion, Inc. Method and system for enabling an off board navigation solution
WO2006096773A2 (en) 2005-03-07 2006-09-14 Networks In Motion, Inc. Method and system for identifying and defining geofences
EP1917544A2 (en) * 2005-08-23 2008-05-07 R.A. Smith & Associates, Inc. High accuracy survey-grade gis system
DE102005046735B4 (en) * 2005-09-29 2019-01-24 Intel Deutschland Gmbh Method for the computer-aided determination of a position in a map, navigation device and mobile telephone
TWI443547B (en) * 2005-12-07 2014-07-01 Telecomm Systems Inc Method and system for a user input solution for a limited telecommunication device
US8942483B2 (en) 2009-09-14 2015-01-27 Trimble Navigation Limited Image-based georeferencing
US8208605B2 (en) 2006-05-04 2012-06-26 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Extended efficient usage of emergency services keys
US8655595B1 (en) 2006-10-17 2014-02-18 Corelogic Solutions, Llc Systems and methods for quantifying flood risk
US7917292B1 (en) 2006-10-17 2011-03-29 Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Systems and methods for flood risk assessment
US8649567B1 (en) 2006-11-17 2014-02-11 Corelogic Solutions, Llc Displaying a flood change map with change designators
US8542884B1 (en) 2006-11-17 2013-09-24 Corelogic Solutions, Llc Systems and methods for flood area change detection
US8077927B1 (en) 2006-11-17 2011-12-13 Corelogic Real Estate Solutions, Llc Updating a database with determined change identifiers
US8538918B1 (en) 2006-12-05 2013-09-17 Corelogic Solutions, Llc Systems and methods for tracking parcel data acquisition
WO2008072249A2 (en) * 2006-12-15 2008-06-19 Mango D.S.P. Ltd System, apparatus and method for flexible modular programming for video processors
US8368695B2 (en) * 2007-02-08 2013-02-05 Microsoft Corporation Transforming offline maps into interactive online maps
US7877202B1 (en) 2007-04-16 2011-01-25 AT&T Intellectual Property, II LP Method and system for automated ticket geocoding and estimating positional errors
FI20070373L (en) * 2007-05-14 2008-11-15 Whatamap Com Oy Procedure for tying an irregular map to a known coordinate system by means of reference points
US8099238B2 (en) 2007-11-14 2012-01-17 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Stateful, double-buffered dynamic navigation voice prompting
US8965681B2 (en) * 2008-09-03 2015-02-24 Global Relief Technologies, Inc. Field device communications
US8897541B2 (en) * 2009-09-14 2014-11-25 Trimble Navigation Limited Accurate digitization of a georeferenced image
US9324003B2 (en) 2009-09-14 2016-04-26 Trimble Navigation Limited Location of image capture device and object features in a captured image
DE112010003865T5 (en) * 2009-09-30 2013-01-31 Trimble Navigation Limited Visual organization of information by associated geospatial data
US9497581B2 (en) * 2009-12-16 2016-11-15 Trimble Navigation Limited Incident reporting
EP2572269A1 (en) 2010-05-21 2013-03-27 TeleCommunication Systems, Inc. Personal wireless navigation system
US9213905B2 (en) 2010-10-25 2015-12-15 Trimble Navigation Limited Automatic obstacle location mapping
US9846848B2 (en) 2010-10-25 2017-12-19 Trimble Inc. Exchanging water allocation credits
US8768667B2 (en) 2010-10-25 2014-07-01 Trimble Navigation Limited Water erosion management incorporating topography, soil type, and weather statistics
US8855937B2 (en) 2010-10-25 2014-10-07 Trimble Navigation Limited Crop characteristic estimation
US10115158B2 (en) 2010-10-25 2018-10-30 Trimble Inc. Generating a crop recommendation
US20120101784A1 (en) 2010-10-25 2012-04-26 Trimble Navigation Limited Wide-area agricultural monitoring and prediction
US9058633B2 (en) 2010-10-25 2015-06-16 Trimble Navigation Limited Wide-area agricultural monitoring and prediction
US8682321B2 (en) 2011-02-25 2014-03-25 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Mobile internet protocol (IP) location
US8671741B2 (en) 2011-06-29 2014-03-18 Trimble Navigation Limited Extendable moisture content sensing system
WO2013048551A1 (en) 2011-09-30 2013-04-04 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Unique global identifier for minimizing prank 911 calls
EP2807455A4 (en) 2012-01-26 2015-08-12 Telecomm Systems Inc Natural navigational guidance
US9544260B2 (en) 2012-03-26 2017-01-10 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Rapid assignment dynamic ownership queue
US9307372B2 (en) 2012-03-26 2016-04-05 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. No responders online
US9064341B2 (en) 2012-06-05 2015-06-23 Apple Inc. Method, system and apparatus for rendering a map according to hybrid map data
US8930139B2 (en) 2012-06-21 2015-01-06 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Dynamically varied map labeling
WO2014028712A1 (en) 2012-08-15 2014-02-20 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Device independent caller data access for emergency calls
US9456301B2 (en) 2012-12-11 2016-09-27 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Efficient prisoner tracking
US8983047B2 (en) 2013-03-20 2015-03-17 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Index of suspicion determination for communications request
US9213474B2 (en) 2013-06-21 2015-12-15 Baker Hughes Incorporated System and method for displaying well data
US9408034B2 (en) 2013-09-09 2016-08-02 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Extended area event for network based proximity discovery
US9516104B2 (en) 2013-09-11 2016-12-06 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. Intelligent load balancer enhanced routing
US9479897B2 (en) 2013-10-03 2016-10-25 Telecommunication Systems, Inc. SUPL-WiFi access point controller location based services for WiFi enabled mobile devices
US10028426B2 (en) 2015-04-17 2018-07-24 360 Yield Center, Llc Agronomic systems, methods and apparatuses
EP3682193A4 (en) * 2017-09-13 2021-06-02 Project Concern International System and method for identifying and assessing topographical features using satellite data
US11295041B2 (en) * 2020-06-26 2022-04-05 Autodesk, Inc. Multi-body component optimization
CN112837604B (en) * 2020-09-21 2024-03-12 中国地质调查局发展研究中心 Method and device for determining geographic coordinates of target point in map
EP4288169A1 (en) * 2021-02-02 2023-12-13 Tinymobilerobots APS A method for interactively providing waypoints to a mobile robot for use in the marking of a geometric figure on a ground surface

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0454129A2 (en) * 1990-04-26 1991-10-30 Honeywell Inc. System for generating a texture mapped perspective view
EP0619554A2 (en) * 1993-03-17 1994-10-12 International Business Machines Corporation A method for geo-registration of imported bit-mapped spatial data
US5422989A (en) * 1992-11-23 1995-06-06 Harris Corporation User interface mechanism for interactively manipulating displayed registered images obtained from multiple sensors having diverse image collection geometries
WO1997049027A1 (en) * 1996-06-20 1997-12-24 Ames Research Laboratories Method and apparatus for generating digital map images of a uniform format

Family Cites Families (115)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4254467A (en) * 1979-06-04 1981-03-03 Xerox Corporation Vector to raster processor
US4458330A (en) * 1981-05-13 1984-07-03 Intergraph Corporation Banded vector to raster converter
JPH0690596B2 (en) 1985-04-30 1994-11-14 日本電装株式会社 Electronic map display
US4899136A (en) * 1986-04-28 1990-02-06 Xerox Corporation Data processor having a user interface display with metaphoric objects
US5113517A (en) * 1986-04-28 1992-05-12 Xerox Corporation Concurrent display of data from two different processors each having different display font and user interface for controlling transfer of converted font data therebetween
US4852183A (en) * 1986-05-23 1989-07-25 Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha Pattern recognition system
US4885706A (en) 1988-02-03 1989-12-05 Pate Systems, Inc. Computer aided flood control modeling and management system
US5018210A (en) 1988-03-25 1991-05-21 Texas Instruments Incorporated Pattern comparator with substage illumination and polygonal data representation
US4876651A (en) * 1988-05-11 1989-10-24 Honeywell Inc. Digital map system
JP2993673B2 (en) 1989-01-27 1999-12-20 株式会社日立製作所 Electronic file device
WO1990014627A1 (en) 1989-05-15 1990-11-29 Bennett Mark J Method for generating maps
US5233335A (en) * 1989-06-22 1993-08-03 Hughes Aircraft Company Symbol/raster generator for CRT display
JPH03233689A (en) * 1990-02-09 1991-10-17 Fuji Xerox Co Ltd Outline data drawing device
US5050222A (en) 1990-05-21 1991-09-17 Eastman Kodak Company Polygon-based technique for the automatic classification of text and graphics components from digitized paper-based forms
US5124915A (en) * 1990-05-29 1992-06-23 Arthur Krenzel Computer-aided data collection system for assisting in analyzing critical situations
US5396582A (en) * 1991-02-06 1995-03-07 Hewlett-Packard Company Raster to vector conversion system and method therefor
US5323317A (en) * 1991-03-05 1994-06-21 Hampton Terry L Method and apparatus for determining runoff using remote geographic sensing
WO1993000647A2 (en) 1991-06-21 1993-01-07 Unitech Research, Inc. Real time three dimensional geo-referenced digital orthophotograph-based positioning, navigation, collision avoidance and decision support system
US5487139A (en) * 1991-09-10 1996-01-23 Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation Method and system for generating a raster display having expandable graphic representations
NL9200071A (en) * 1992-01-15 1993-08-02 Stichting Science Park Maastri DEVICE FOR DETERMINING THE TOPOGRAPHY OF A CURVED SURFACE.
DE69332918D1 (en) * 1992-01-24 2003-06-05 Canon Kk Device and method for extracting edge data and for encoding image data with this edge data
US5247356A (en) * 1992-02-14 1993-09-21 Ciampa John A Method and apparatus for mapping and measuring land
US5428546A (en) * 1992-10-16 1995-06-27 Mobile Information Systems Method and apparatus for tracking vehicle location
US5758313A (en) * 1992-10-16 1998-05-26 Mobile Information Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for tracking vehicle location
US5321613A (en) * 1992-11-12 1994-06-14 Coleman Research Corporation Data fusion workstation
US5414462A (en) 1993-02-11 1995-05-09 Veatch; John W. Method and apparatus for generating a comprehensive survey map
US5638501A (en) 1993-05-10 1997-06-10 Apple Computer, Inc. Method and apparatus for displaying an overlay image
US5631970A (en) 1993-05-21 1997-05-20 Hsu; Shin-Yi Process for identifying simple and complex objects from fused images and map data
JP3042945B2 (en) * 1993-07-07 2000-05-22 富士通株式会社 Image extraction device
DE4332945A1 (en) 1993-09-28 1995-03-30 Bosch Gmbh Robert Positioning and navigation device with satellite support
US5623679A (en) 1993-11-19 1997-04-22 Waverley Holdings, Inc. System and method for creating and manipulating notes each containing multiple sub-notes, and linking the sub-notes to portions of data objects
US5623681A (en) * 1993-11-19 1997-04-22 Waverley Holdings, Inc. Method and apparatus for synchronizing, displaying and manipulating text and image documents
US5467271A (en) * 1993-12-17 1995-11-14 Trw, Inc. Mapping and analysis system for precision farming applications
EP0660083B1 (en) * 1993-12-27 2000-09-27 Aisin Aw Co., Ltd. Vehicular information display system
US5699244A (en) 1994-03-07 1997-12-16 Monsanto Company Hand-held GUI PDA with GPS/DGPS receiver for collecting agronomic and GPS position data
US5592375A (en) 1994-03-11 1997-01-07 Eagleview, Inc. Computer-assisted system for interactively brokering goods or services between buyers and sellers
JP4044971B2 (en) * 1994-03-17 2008-02-06 株式会社日立製作所 Search method using image information
US5640468A (en) * 1994-04-28 1997-06-17 Hsu; Shin-Yi Method for identifying objects and features in an image
US5715331A (en) * 1994-06-21 1998-02-03 Hollinger; Steven J. System for generation of a composite raster-vector image
DE4421784A1 (en) * 1994-06-22 1996-01-04 Henkel Kgaa Scatterable carpet cleaner
US6321158B1 (en) 1994-06-24 2001-11-20 Delorme Publishing Company Integrated routing/mapping information
US5848373A (en) * 1994-06-24 1998-12-08 Delorme Publishing Company Computer aided map location system
JP3193240B2 (en) * 1994-09-08 2001-07-30 株式会社東芝 Image processing device
US5719949A (en) * 1994-10-31 1998-02-17 Earth Satellite Corporation Process and apparatus for cross-correlating digital imagery
US5581259A (en) 1994-11-03 1996-12-03 Trimble Navigation Limited Life for old maps
US5596494A (en) 1994-11-14 1997-01-21 Kuo; Shihjong Method and apparatus for acquiring digital maps
EP0793831B1 (en) 1994-11-21 2002-12-04 Oracle Corporation Method and apparatus for multidimensional database using binary hyperspatial code
CA2137492C (en) * 1994-12-07 1998-07-28 Lenny Kwok-Ming Hon System for and method of providing delta-versioning of the contents of pcte file objects
US5668594A (en) 1995-01-03 1997-09-16 Intel Corporation Method and apparatus for aligning and synchronizing a remote video signal and a local video signal
US5682525A (en) 1995-01-11 1997-10-28 Civix Corporation System and methods for remotely accessing a selected group of items of interest from a database
US5734756A (en) 1995-02-01 1998-03-31 Scanvec Co. Ltd. Methods and apparatus for reproducing a gray scale raster represented elongate graphic image including vectorizing a skeleton of the image by determining a midpoint between two detected endpoints of the image
US5987173A (en) 1995-03-27 1999-11-16 Nippon Steel Corporation Interactive drawing recognition processing method and apparatus thereof
US5844570A (en) * 1995-05-02 1998-12-01 Ames Research Laboratories Method and apparatus for generating digital map images of a uniform format
US5904727A (en) 1995-05-17 1999-05-18 Mobile Information Systems, Inc. Graphical fleet management methods
US6236907B1 (en) * 1995-05-30 2001-05-22 Ag-Chem Equipment Co., Inc. System and method for creating agricultural decision and application maps for automated agricultural machines
US5878356A (en) * 1995-06-14 1999-03-02 Agrometrics, Inc. Aircraft based infrared mapping system for earth based resources
US5699255A (en) * 1995-10-18 1997-12-16 Trimble Navigation Limited Map transmission for in-vehicle navigation system with dynamic scale/detail adjustment
US5966469A (en) * 1995-10-26 1999-10-12 Hyundai Electronics Industries Co., Ltd. Sequential polygon approximation apparatus for contour and method thereof
US5930474A (en) 1996-01-31 1999-07-27 Z Land Llc Internet organizer for accessing geographically and topically based information
DE19607737A1 (en) * 1996-02-29 1997-09-04 Siemens Matsushita Components Electric capacitor
US6650998B1 (en) * 1996-03-11 2003-11-18 At&T Corp. Information Search System for enabling a user of a user terminal to search a data source
US6577714B1 (en) 1996-03-11 2003-06-10 At&T Corp. Map-based directory system
US5978804A (en) * 1996-04-11 1999-11-02 Dietzman; Gregg R. Natural products information system
US5659318A (en) * 1996-05-31 1997-08-19 California Institute Of Technology Interferometric SAR processor for elevation
US5929865A (en) 1996-06-14 1999-07-27 International Business Machines Corporation Method of sorting two-dimensional graphic images for converting into raster lines
US6487305B2 (en) * 1996-06-19 2002-11-26 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. Ltd. Deformed map automatic generation system including automatic extraction of road area from a block map and shape deformation of at least one road area drawn in the map
US5929842A (en) * 1996-07-31 1999-07-27 Fluke Corporation Method and apparatus for improving time variant image details on a raster display
US6006161A (en) * 1996-08-02 1999-12-21 Aisin Aw Co., Ltd. Land vehicle navigation system with multi-screen mode selectivity
US6202023B1 (en) * 1996-08-22 2001-03-13 Go2 Systems, Inc. Internet based geographic location referencing system and method
US5771169A (en) 1996-08-29 1998-06-23 Case Corporation Site-specific harvest statistics analyzer
US5892909A (en) * 1996-09-27 1999-04-06 Diffusion, Inc. Intranet-based system with methods for co-active delivery of information to multiple users
US5842148A (en) * 1996-10-07 1998-11-24 Jcp Geologists, Inc. Method of evaluating and classifying living structures for estimating potential damage thereto from physical disturbances
US5884219A (en) * 1996-10-10 1999-03-16 Ames Maps L.L.C. Moving map navigation system
US5966135A (en) * 1996-10-30 1999-10-12 Autodesk, Inc. Vector-based geographic data
US5944769A (en) 1996-11-08 1999-08-31 Zip2 Corporation Interactive network directory service with integrated maps and directions
US6084989A (en) * 1996-11-15 2000-07-04 Lockheed Martin Corporation System and method for automatically determining the position of landmarks in digitized images derived from a satellite-based imaging system
US5902347A (en) * 1996-11-19 1999-05-11 American Navigation Systems, Inc. Hand-held GPS-mapping device
US5938709A (en) * 1996-11-22 1999-08-17 Case Corporation Panning display of GPS field maps
US5969723A (en) * 1997-01-21 1999-10-19 Mcdonnell Douglas Corporation Method for incorporating high detail normal vector information into polygonal terrain databases and image display system which implements this method
US5937014A (en) * 1997-03-27 1999-08-10 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson Self-synchronizing equalization techniques and systems
US5961572A (en) * 1997-04-01 1999-10-05 Bellsouth Intellectual Property Corporation System and method for identifying the geographic region of a geographic area which contains a geographic point associated with a location
US5999878A (en) 1997-04-11 1999-12-07 Navigation Technologies Corp. System and method for acquiring geographic data for forming a digital database of road geometry in a geographic region
JPH1124628A (en) * 1997-07-07 1999-01-29 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd Gradation display method for plasma display panel
US5969728A (en) * 1997-07-14 1999-10-19 Cirrus Logic, Inc. System and method of synchronizing multiple buffers for display
DE19730306C2 (en) 1997-07-15 1999-05-20 Deutsch Zentr Luft & Raumfahrt Method for synchronizing navigation measurement data with SAR radar data and device for carrying out this method
US5987136A (en) * 1997-08-04 1999-11-16 Trimble Navigation Ltd. Image authentication patterning
US6144920A (en) * 1997-08-29 2000-11-07 Denso Corporation Map displaying apparatus
US5966697A (en) * 1997-10-30 1999-10-12 Clearcommerce Corporation System and method for secure transaction order management processing
US6044324A (en) * 1997-12-03 2000-03-28 Rockwell Collins, Inc. System approach to stand-alone soil sampling
US6008756A (en) 1998-02-17 1999-12-28 Rockwell Collins, Inc. System approach to recording and mapping sensor/actuator data for use in filed map generation
US5974423A (en) 1998-03-09 1999-10-26 Margolin; Jed Method for converting a digital elevation database to a polygon database
JP3512630B2 (en) 1998-04-13 2004-03-31 インクリメント・ピー株式会社 Map information providing system and method
US6504571B1 (en) * 1998-05-18 2003-01-07 International Business Machines Corporation System and methods for querying digital image archives using recorded parameters
EP1099203B1 (en) * 1998-07-17 2003-09-17 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Method for detecting a vehicle traffic status and system for detecting said traffic status
US6218965B1 (en) 1998-07-30 2001-04-17 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Moving map composer (MMC)
US6058351A (en) * 1998-09-10 2000-05-02 Case Corporation Management zones for precision farming
IL142574A (en) 1998-10-13 2004-03-28 Integrated Systems Res Corp System and method for vehicle fleet tracking
DE59913286D1 (en) * 1998-12-31 2006-05-18 Westfaelische Ferngas Ag GEOREFERENCED TEST SYSTEM
JP2000222214A (en) 1999-02-01 2000-08-11 Hitachi Ltd Geographical information display controller
US6565610B1 (en) * 1999-02-11 2003-05-20 Navigation Technologies Corporation Method and system for text placement when forming maps
US6119069A (en) * 1999-03-01 2000-09-12 Case Corporation System and method for deriving field boundaries using alpha shapes
JP2001047524A (en) * 1999-06-03 2001-02-20 Ricoh Co Ltd Manufacture of plastic optical element, manufacturing device therefor and plastic optical element manufactured using manufacturing method for plastic optical element
US6307573B1 (en) * 1999-07-22 2001-10-23 Barbara L. Barros Graphic-information flow method and system for visually analyzing patterns and relationships
US6122593A (en) * 1999-08-03 2000-09-19 Navigation Technologies Corporation Method and system for providing a preview of a route calculated with a navigation system
US6505146B1 (en) * 1999-09-24 2003-01-07 Monsanto Company Method and system for spatial evaluation of field and crop performance
JP2001124568A (en) * 1999-10-29 2001-05-11 Pioneer Electronic Corp Apparatus and method for displaying map
US6377210B1 (en) * 2000-02-25 2002-04-23 Grey Island Systems, Inc. Automatic mobile object locator apparatus and method
WO2001073690A2 (en) 2000-03-29 2001-10-04 Provar Inc. System and method for georeferencing digital raster maps
US6631326B1 (en) * 2000-03-29 2003-10-07 Sourceprose Corporation System and method for performing flood zone certifications
US7148898B1 (en) 2000-03-29 2006-12-12 Sourceprose Corporation System and method for synchronizing raster and vector map images
US7038681B2 (en) * 2000-03-29 2006-05-02 Sourceprose Corporation System and method for georeferencing maps
US20020035432A1 (en) 2000-06-08 2002-03-21 Boguslaw Kubica Method and system for spatially indexing land
US6574561B2 (en) * 2001-03-30 2003-06-03 The University Of North Florida Emergency management system
US20020145617A1 (en) * 2001-04-06 2002-10-10 Kennard Robert M. Methods of marketing maps depicting the location of real property and geographic characteristics in the vicinity thereof
US20020147613A1 (en) * 2001-04-10 2002-10-10 Kennard Robert M. Methods of marketing summary maps depicting the location of real property and certain traits in the vicinity thereof

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0454129A2 (en) * 1990-04-26 1991-10-30 Honeywell Inc. System for generating a texture mapped perspective view
US5422989A (en) * 1992-11-23 1995-06-06 Harris Corporation User interface mechanism for interactively manipulating displayed registered images obtained from multiple sensors having diverse image collection geometries
EP0619554A2 (en) * 1993-03-17 1994-10-12 International Business Machines Corporation A method for geo-registration of imported bit-mapped spatial data
WO1997049027A1 (en) * 1996-06-20 1997-12-24 Ames Research Laboratories Method and apparatus for generating digital map images of a uniform format

Non-Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
FANGJU WANG: "INTEGRATING GIS'S AND REMOTE SENSING IMAGE ANALYSIS SYSTEMS BY UNIFYING KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION SCHEMES" IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, IEEE INC. NEW YORK, US, vol. 29, no. 4, 1 July 1991 (1991-07-01), pages 656-664, XP000258539 ISSN: 0196-2892 *
FUKUNAGA K ET AL: "IMAGE REGISTRATION USING AN IMAGE GRAPH AND ITS APPLICATION TO MAP MATCHING" IEE PROCEEDINGS E. COMPUTERS & DIGITAL TECHNIQUES, INSTITUTION OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERS. STEVENAGE, GB, vol. 138, no. 2, 1 March 1991 (1991-03-01), pages 79-84, XP000223912 ISSN: 1350-2387 *
ROUX ET AL: "Automatic registration of SPOT images and digitized maps" PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IMAGE PROCESSING (ICIP) LAUSANNE, SEPT. 16 - 19, 1996, NEW YORK, IEEE, US, vol. 1, 16 September 1996 (1996-09-16), pages 625-628, XP010202735 ISBN: 0-7803-3259-8 *

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2003031913A1 (en) * 2001-10-05 2003-04-17 Honeywell International Inc. System and method for geographically referencing an improvement image
US7003138B2 (en) 2001-10-05 2006-02-21 Honeywell International Inc. System and method for geographically referencing an improvement image
EP2716077A4 (en) * 2011-06-01 2015-05-27 Google Inc Systems and methods for collecting and providing map images

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20010033290A1 (en) 2001-10-25
US20010033292A1 (en) 2001-10-25
WO2001073690A3 (en) 2002-03-14
AU2001245995A1 (en) 2001-10-08
US20010033291A1 (en) 2001-10-25
US7190377B2 (en) 2007-03-13
US7167187B2 (en) 2007-01-23

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7167187B2 (en) System and method for georeferencing digital raster maps using a georeferencing function
US7038681B2 (en) System and method for georeferencing maps
US6842698B2 (en) System and method for performing flood zone certifications
US7636901B2 (en) System for increasing accuracy of geocode data
US20030052896A1 (en) System and method for synchronizing map images
US7283909B1 (en) Overlaying orthorectified aerial images with map information tied to a state plane coordinate system
US8368695B2 (en) Transforming offline maps into interactive online maps
US20100299370A1 (en) Method and apparatus for combining a first partition from a first digital map database and a second partition from a second digital map database
US20020147613A1 (en) Methods of marketing summary maps depicting the location of real property and certain traits in the vicinity thereof
US20020145617A1 (en) Methods of marketing maps depicting the location of real property and geographic characteristics in the vicinity thereof
US20050159882A1 (en) System and method for performing flood zone certicifications
JP2859004B2 (en) Graphic processing unit
Cetl et al. A comparison of address geocoding techniques–case study of the city of Zagreb, Croatia
WO2005092072A2 (en) Orthorectified aerial images overlayed with spcs map information
Gibson Conversion Is Out, Measurement Is In-Are We Beginning the Surveying and Mapping Era of GIS?
Höhn et al. Georeferencing of place markers in digitized early maps by using similar maps as data source
Lembo Jr A comparison of traditional and advanced transformation techniques used to improve the positional accuracy of digital tax maps
Shamsi et al. A Computer Mapping Program for Sewer Systems.
Mathur et al. Base Map Updates Using GIS and Remote Sensing
Pinkham Investigation into the placement and connection of permanent survey marks for cadastral surveys
d'Alge et al. Input procedures for TM-Landsat photographic products into a GIS environment
Dove GIS-assisted spatial data management for Corps of Engineers real estate activities: spatial data conversion options
Pulsifer Ortho-image production for a small municipality GIS using a standard digital frame camera and low cost software
AU2004234414A1 (en) Feature set transformation

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AE AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY CA CH CN CU CZ DE DK EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MD MG MK MN MW MX NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT UA UG UZ VN YU ZA ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): AE AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY CA CH CN CU CZ DE DK EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MD MG MK MN MW MX NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT UA UG UZ VN YU ZA ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

REG Reference to national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: 8642

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase
NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: JP