WO2002011101A2 - A computer-based training system and method - Google Patents
A computer-based training system and method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2002011101A2 WO2002011101A2 PCT/IB2001/001380 IB0101380W WO0211101A2 WO 2002011101 A2 WO2002011101 A2 WO 2002011101A2 IB 0101380 W IB0101380 W IB 0101380W WO 0211101 A2 WO0211101 A2 WO 0211101A2
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- information
- trainee
- database
- training
- question
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
- G09B—EDUCATIONAL OR DEMONSTRATION APPLIANCES; APPLIANCES FOR TEACHING, OR COMMUNICATING WITH, THE BLIND, DEAF OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; DIAGRAMS
- G09B7/00—Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers
- G09B7/02—Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers of the type wherein the student is expected to construct an answer to the question which is presented or wherein the machine gives an answer to the question presented by a student
Definitions
- THIS invention relates to a training system and method, in particular a computer-based training system and method.
- Traditional computer-based training systems comprise a curriculum containing all of the information that a trainee is required to know. In order to qualify, the trainee's knowledge is tested by means of predetermined questions that are related to the information in the curriculum.
- a computer- based training system comprising:
- a screening database containing screening information relating to the training information and/or the question information
- a database controller connected to the databases and being arranged to generate presentation information from at least one database
- a trainee interface connected to the database controller for providing a trainee access to the presentation information
- presentation information is generated according to a response from the trainee to the screening information.
- the presentation information is automatically regenerated according to a response from the trainee to the screening information and/or the question information.
- the presentation information includes training information and question information.
- the presentation information includes screening information.
- the system includes a plurality of successive levels, wherein each level includes a curriculum database, a question database and a screening database.
- the presentation information for a level is generated according a response from the trainee to the screening information and/or question information for that level in combination with the screening information and/or question information from the previous level.
- the computer-based training system comprises a template database including a plurality of templates for the presentation information.
- the system includes a result database, the result database comprising the response of the trainee to the screening information and/or question information.
- a computer- based training method comprising the steps of:
- the method includes the step of reselecting the training information and/or question information based on the response from the trainee.
- the method comprises the step of reselecting the screening information based on the response from the trainee.
- the method includes the step of defining a plurality of successive levels, such that each level includes a curriculum database, a question database and a screening database.
- the method includes the steps of selecting the screening information and/or training information and/or question information for a level according to a response from the trainee to the screening information and/or question information for that level in combination with the screening information and/or question information from the previous level.
- the method includes the step of defining a template for the selected information from a template database.
- the method includes the step of generating a result database, the result database containing the response of the trainee to the screening information and/or question information.
- Figure 1 shows a block diagram of a computer-based training system according to the invention
- Figure 2 shows a simplified flow diagram of a computer-based training method according to a first aspect of the invention
- Figure 3a shows the steps involved in assigning a course to a trainee, for use in a computer-based training method according to a second aspect of the invention.
- Figure 3b shows a detailed flow diagram of the computer-based training method according to the second aspect of the invention.
- FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of a computer-based training system 10 for training a trainee.
- the computer-based training system comprises a curriculum database 12 containing training information.
- the database is located on a stand-alone computer, but it should be understood that the database could be located on a local area network ("LAN"), a wide area network (“WAN”), or system which can be accessed via an Internet web site.
- the training information is selected and entered into the database 12 in any one or more of the following formats text, audio, video, websites, web pages, intranets, Macromedia FlashTM animations, PowerPointTM presentations, ExcelTM charts, images of any format and VISIO flow diagrams.
- the training system 10 of the present invention includes a number of levels.
- the description relates to a single level, but it should be understood that the description applies to each level.
- a level is assigned to each content item of the information. This level can be any numerical value, and thus the number of levels is unlimited.
- the level to which the trainee needs to be trained must be specified.
- the level can be specified either by the trainee, as will become clear with reference to Figure 2, or by a third party, such as a training facilitator, as will be explained in further detail with reference to Figures 3a and 3b. This will ensure that only the content items associated with the specified level will be presented to the trainee. This eliminates training the trainee on material that is not relevant to the training at hand.
- each trainee's job specification is taken into account.
- the marketing director receives level 1 training, the sales staff receive level 2 training, the help desk staff receive level 3 training and the technicians receive level 4 training.
- the training information covering the entire product gets developed or built once, and contains all the product information. Therefore the development cost gets reduced, while adding the flexibility of making multiple levels of training available. If in the future one of the help desk staff decides to become a technician, all that is required is to assign level 4 training to the staff member, and the knowledge transfer will happen. In addition, if the product changes slightly, updating the material on the course is simple, as all the material is contained in a database, and is therefore easy to update without the need for programmers.
- the computer-based training system comprises further a question database 14 located on the stand-alone computer.
- the question database contains question information in the form of a number of questions that test the trainee's knowledge and understanding of the training information in the curriculum database.
- the question information allows for regular testing, and for final examination, of the trainee.
- the question database could be located on a LAN, a WAN, or system which can be accessed via an internet web-site. Again, the question information is selected and entered into the database in any one or more of the formats indicated above.
- the computer-based training system comprises further a screening database 16 located on the stand-alone computer.
- the screening database contains screening information in the form of a number of questions that test the trainee's knowledge and understanding of the training information in the curriculum database. This is also referred to in the specification as a pre-training knowledge assessment. These questions may be the same as the questions in the question database 14, but will typically include additional questions.
- the screening database could be located on a LAN, a WAN, or system which can be accessed via an Internet web-site. Again, the screening information is selected and entered into the database in any one or more of the formats indicated above. The information in the three databases can be entered by a typist and accordingly, a programmer is not required to upgrade or maintain the system.
- the computer-based training system comprises further a database controller 18 in the form of a CPU on the stand-alone computer.
- the three databases are all located on the stand-alone computer but, as indicated above, the three databases could be located at separate locations.
- the database controller is adapted to generate presentation information 20 from at least one database.
- the computer-based training system comprises also a trainee interface 22 in the form of a video monitor and a keyboard connected to the stand-alone computer.
- the trainee interface provides a trainee with access to the presentation information 20.
- the trainee interface also allows the trainee to select a template from a template database 24.
- the template allows the trainee to structure the format of the presentation information by allowing the trainee to vary the font, the colours and the layout of the presented material.
- a course for the purpose of the present invention, is defined as a selection of items from a curriculum, the curriculum corresponding to the entire material for a particular product, for example.
- the way that tests are created, both for the pre-training knowledge assessment as well as the actual course test, is by means of assigning questions to content items.
- the material that is entered into the system is entered as content items, the sum of the content items defining the curriculum, with levels associated to the content items.
- the questions can be assigned to one or many of the testing routines covering, for example, the pre-training knowledge assessment component or routine, the various content items i.e. chapter, section and module, as well as the curriculum as a whole.
- the tests are automatically generated by the system 10.
- the trainee will need to answer the questions presented and the results of the test are recorded. Additional training occurs per trainee based on the outcome of the tests, with the material that is associated with the questions that the trainee gets wrong being represented to the trainee until he or she passes the tests based on the predefined pass rate. This will be explained with reference to the following example.
- a curriculum contains 10 content items at a certain level. Each content item has a question associated with it, and each question is assigned to the screening, or pre-training knowledge assessment, as well as the final exam.
- the system 10 Before the student starts the training at the said level, the system 10 generates a screening, or pre-training knowledge assessment, test. If the student gets all the questions right, he or she will not see any training material at all, and will be presented with the final exam. If he answers two of the questions incorrectly during the final exam, he will be presented with two content items, and thereafter be tested again on the two content items that he has just failed. This process continues until he gets all the questions right, assuming, of course, that the pass rate is 100%.
- the screening or pre-training knowledge evaluation is used to evaluate the trainee's current knowledge regarding the subject or course that is being trained.
- the level of training that the trainee will receive will be dependent on the level of training that the facilitator assigns to the trainee, or that he or she has chosen for themselves.
- the screening will be done at that level to evaluate the trainee's current knowledge at the level assigned, and the outcome of the evaluation/screening used to automatically create a unique training program for the student based on the level as well as his current knowledge.
- the entire process is automated and controlled by the controller 18.
- the controller 18 automatically and completely manages and controls the system 10.
- the first step, shown in Figure 3a, is for a course to be assigned to a trainee.
- a course for the purpose of the present invention, is defined as a selection of items from a curriculum, the curriculum corresponding to the entire material for a particular product, for example. This procedure involves the sub-steps of selecting students or trainees, selecting and assigning a corresponding level for each student, selecting an appropriate template from the template database 24 and then saving the newly defined course in a dedicated database table.
- the screening information for that level is provided from the screening database 16 to the trainee, in the format according to the selected template. As described above, this allows for an evaluation of the existing knowledge of the trainee.
- presentation information in the form of training information is automatically selected from the curriculum database 12 and presented to the trainee for review.
- further presentation information in the form of question information related to the training information is automatically selected from the question database 14, based on the existing knowledge of the trainee.
- the question information tests the new level of knowledge and understanding of the trainee.
- the method comprises further the step of reselecting the training information and question information based on the response from the trainee, the reselected training information being based on the material covered by the questions that he or she failed.
- the trainee is only retested on information that has not been absorbed.
- the method may comprise the step of also reselecting the screening information based on the response from the trainee.
- This iterative process is then repeated for the material i.e. chapter/section/module until the trainee has reached a minimum level of competence and may move on to the next chapter/section/module.
- the initial step of selecting the training information and question information for the relevant material is conducted based on the response from the trainee to the screening information, in combination with the response to the screening information and question information from the previous chapter/section/module.
- the method comprises further the step of generating a result database, containing the response of the trainee to the screening information and/or question information.
- a report on the progress of the trainee may be generated from the result database.
- the trainee works through the unique training program, and at the end of each chapter or section, the software will retest the knowledge of the trainee on the information that was presented during the chapter or section.
- the test results will be used to identify the areas in which the trainee has not yet grasped the information presented, and will be used to automatically create another unique training program based on the trainee's new knowledge for the chapter or section. This process is iterative, and the trainee will be presented with the same information until the desired level of knowledge and understanding is reached.
- the system of the present invention is flexible in that when a training course is assigned to a student, the level is selected, thereby ensuring the minimum level is reached. Therefore the minimum level is the level that is selected by the facilitator when the course is assigned to the student. Also, it is important to note that the student will enter the training at the required level, and complete the assigned training at that level. If a further level is to be assigned to the student, the facilitator can do this, and the student will have a new course that needs to be completed.
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
AU2001276590A AU2001276590A1 (en) | 2000-08-02 | 2001-08-02 | A computer-based training system and method |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
ZA200003918 | 2000-08-02 | ||
ZA2000/3918 | 2000-08-02 |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2002011101A2 true WO2002011101A2 (en) | 2002-02-07 |
WO2002011101A3 WO2002011101A3 (en) | 2002-05-16 |
Family
ID=25588848
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB2001/001380 WO2002011101A2 (en) | 2000-08-02 | 2001-08-02 | A computer-based training system and method |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
AU (1) | AU2001276590A1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2002011101A2 (en) |
Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5310349A (en) * | 1992-04-30 | 1994-05-10 | Jostens Learning Corporation | Instructional management system |
US5727950A (en) * | 1996-05-22 | 1998-03-17 | Netsage Corporation | Agent based instruction system and method |
GB2321120A (en) * | 1996-10-23 | 1998-07-15 | Samsung Electronics Co Ltd | Remote education via an internet |
-
2001
- 2001-08-02 WO PCT/IB2001/001380 patent/WO2002011101A2/en active Application Filing
- 2001-08-02 AU AU2001276590A patent/AU2001276590A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5310349A (en) * | 1992-04-30 | 1994-05-10 | Jostens Learning Corporation | Instructional management system |
US5727950A (en) * | 1996-05-22 | 1998-03-17 | Netsage Corporation | Agent based instruction system and method |
GB2321120A (en) * | 1996-10-23 | 1998-07-15 | Samsung Electronics Co Ltd | Remote education via an internet |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
AU2001276590A1 (en) | 2002-02-13 |
WO2002011101A3 (en) | 2002-05-16 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US5788504A (en) | Computerized training management system | |
Paiva et al. | Intelligent tutorial system based on personalized system of instruction to teach or remind mathematical concepts | |
US6039575A (en) | Interactive learning system with pretest | |
US20040076941A1 (en) | Online curriculum handling system including content assembly from structured storage of reusable components | |
US20060199163A1 (en) | Dynamic teaching method | |
WO2009089475A1 (en) | Customized learning and assessment of student based on psychometric models | |
Melo | The 4C/ID-Model in Physics Education: Instructional Design of a Digital Learning Environment to Teach Electrical Circuits. | |
CN1717677A (en) | Computer-aided education systems and methods | |
Stefansson | The tutor-web: An educational system for classroom presentation, evaluation and self-study | |
Alabdulhadi et al. | Systematic literature review of STEM self-study related ITSs | |
Bröker et al. | Competences of undergraduate computer science students | |
Buzzi et al. | Designing an accessible web app to teach piano to students with autism | |
Pisan et al. | Submit! a web-based system for automatic program critiquing | |
Chemerys et al. | Analysis of ergonomic indicators and compliance with the principles of the instructional design of education courses in adaptive learning systems | |
Shih et al. | Mathematics intelligent tutoring system for learning multiplication and division of fractions based on diagnostic teaching | |
Windschitl | A practical guide for incorporating computer-based simulations into science instruction | |
Grobe | Conquering computer cowardice | |
WO2002011101A2 (en) | A computer-based training system and method | |
Sugrue | Performance‐based instructional design for E‐learning | |
Abdullah et al. | Using simulated students to evaluate an adaptive testing system | |
Gerlach et al. | Algorithms in education | |
Tosti et al. | The management of instruction | |
Hummel et al. | Options for technology-assisted IEPs | |
Spector | Modeling User Interactions with Instructional Design Software. | |
Weber et al. | Software evaluation for special needs: Preparing the preservice teacher from an inservice perspective |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EC EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VN YU ZA ZW |
|
AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG |
|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application | ||
AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: A3 Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EC EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VN YU ZA ZW |
|
AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: A3 Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG |
|
DFPE | Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101) | ||
REG | Reference to national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: 8642 |
|
122 | Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase | ||
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase in: |
Ref country code: JP |