WO2003081432A1 - Method for utilizing a fragile watermark for enhanced security - Google Patents

Method for utilizing a fragile watermark for enhanced security Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2003081432A1
WO2003081432A1 PCT/US2002/012677 US0212677W WO03081432A1 WO 2003081432 A1 WO2003081432 A1 WO 2003081432A1 US 0212677 W US0212677 W US 0212677W WO 03081432 A1 WO03081432 A1 WO 03081432A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
image
printed image
information
original
signal strength
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2002/012677
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Claude Zeller
Donald G. Mackay
William Kilmartin
William A. Brosseau
James Euchner
Robert A. Cordery
Original Assignee
Pitney Bowes Inc.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Pitney Bowes Inc. filed Critical Pitney Bowes Inc.
Priority to AU2002307474A priority Critical patent/AU2002307474A1/en
Publication of WO2003081432A1 publication Critical patent/WO2003081432A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T1/00—General purpose image data processing
    • G06T1/0021—Image watermarking
    • G06T1/0042—Fragile watermarking, e.g. so as to detect tampering
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06K—GRAPHICAL DATA READING; PRESENTATION OF DATA; RECORD CARRIERS; HANDLING RECORD CARRIERS
    • G06K19/00—Record carriers for use with machines and with at least a part designed to carry digital markings
    • G06K19/06—Record carriers for use with machines and with at least a part designed to carry digital markings characterised by the kind of the digital marking, e.g. shape, nature, code
    • G06K19/06009—Record carriers for use with machines and with at least a part designed to carry digital markings characterised by the kind of the digital marking, e.g. shape, nature, code with optically detectable marking
    • G06K19/06037—Record carriers for use with machines and with at least a part designed to carry digital markings characterised by the kind of the digital marking, e.g. shape, nature, code with optically detectable marking multi-dimensional coding
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06K—GRAPHICAL DATA READING; PRESENTATION OF DATA; RECORD CARRIERS; HANDLING RECORD CARRIERS
    • G06K7/00—Methods or arrangements for sensing record carriers, e.g. for reading patterns
    • G06K7/10—Methods or arrangements for sensing record carriers, e.g. for reading patterns by electromagnetic radiation, e.g. optical sensing; by corpuscular radiation
    • G06K7/14—Methods or arrangements for sensing record carriers, e.g. for reading patterns by electromagnetic radiation, e.g. optical sensing; by corpuscular radiation using light without selection of wavelength, e.g. sensing reflected white light
    • G06K7/1404—Methods for optical code recognition
    • G06K7/1408—Methods for optical code recognition the method being specifically adapted for the type of code
    • G06K7/1417—2D bar codes
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T2201/00—General purpose image data processing
    • G06T2201/005—Image watermarking
    • G06T2201/0051—Embedding of the watermark in the spatial domain

Definitions

  • the subject invention relates to a method for printing images that contain information and, more particularly, to a method that detects when the printed images containing information are copied.
  • a typical postal indicia includes fixed elements such as city name, state, a graphic, meter serial number, etc., and variable information such as date, postage amount, an encrypted number, etc.
  • Postal indicia have been printed by flat bed printers and rotary printers without encryption and by ink jet printers with encryption. The improvements to photocopying, printing and scanning equipment have made it easier to commit fraud by copying postal indicia.
  • IBIP Information-Based Indicia
  • Some disadvantages of the IBIP system, and other similar systems operating on the same principals, are that they are fully effective only if all images entering the system are scanned and analyzed, looking for duplicates in a database. If only a small number of images are processed, then the likelihood of finding duplicates is diminished, and the effectiveness of the system is reduced. For example, if the counterfeit rate is 1/1000 and only one of every one thousand images is scanned, then the odds of finding a single copy is 1/1000 * 1/1000 or one in a million.
  • the invention overcomes the disadvantages of the prior art by providing a method that makes it more difficult to copy images.
  • the invention provides a method that detects when an image is copied in order to reduce the production of fraudulent images.
  • the invention allows an inspector to conduct an analysis of an image with a simple set of tools on site without the need to check a remote database through a network to look for duplicate images. This minimizes the infrastructure and cost required to implement the system.
  • a local inspection can be made by scanning an image and decoding it with relatively inexpensive tools available on site.
  • the invention accomplishes the foregoing by producing a fragile watermark image that produces a noticeable and measurable loss of information when it is reproduced.
  • the loss of information is due to effects associated with scanning and printing processes.
  • FIG. 1-A is a drawing of a fragile watermark embedded in an image.
  • Fig. 1-B is a drawing of a copy of Fig. 1-A.
  • Fig. 2-A is a drawing showing a non-printed bit map image file magnified view of portion 20 of image 11.
  • Fig. 2-B is a drawing showing magnified view portion of 20 of image 11 printed with an ink jet printing device from an image file generated by scanning the original print.
  • Fig. 3 is a graph of copy detection vs. signal strength.
  • Postal image 11 represents a postal image.
  • Postal image 11 includes graphic material in the form of an eagle 12, a permit number 13, a city, state 14, an indication of the class of postage 15, an indication that the postage has been paid 16, the weight of the mail piece 17, and the country 18.
  • Black and white pixels 19 are embedded in image 11.
  • Eagle 12 has a portion 20.
  • the digital form of image 11 will suffer no loss of information when reproduced in digital format.
  • Fig. 1-B is a drawing of a copy of Fig. 1-A.
  • Fig. 2-A is a drawing showing a non-printed bit map image file magnified view of portion 20 of image 11.
  • Fig. 2-B is a drawing showing magnified view portion of 20 of image 11 after printing the image file shown in Fig. 2-A.
  • Portion 20 of Fig. 2-B has been printed with an ink jet printing device and scanned. It can be seen that the printed image is an approximation of the original and has been distorted by the way in which the ink and paper interact and the ability of the printer to accurately position the drops of ink used to create the image.
  • the amount of distortion is a function of the resolution of the printer, the size of the ink drops, and the way in which the ink spreads when it contacts the paper due to capillary and surface forces. These forces are associated with the fluid and physical properties of the ink and paper and are present in all ink- based printing systems.
  • Fig. 3 is a graph of images produced on different envelope materials versus signal strength. The signal strength is calculated from the amount of information read from the watermark. Letters at the bottom of the graph indicate five different envelope types used in the test (A,B,C,E,L).
  • Envelope type A is a white wove, 24 pound low ink absorbing envelope, and envelope type B is a white wove, 24 pound high ink absorbing envelope.
  • Envelope type C is a 24 pound smooth finish envelope and envelope type E is a 32 pound 90 clasp envelope.
  • Envelope type L is recycled white paper.
  • the total loss of information associated with the copy process is the combined loss from the scanning and printing process.
  • Signal value is a watermark quality metric calculated from the total information received by decoding a watermark. This information loss can be represented as a change in "signal strength".
  • An example of a maximum signal strength is shown by line 25 as the non- printed bit map digital file. Trace 26 indicates the signal strength of an original printed watermark, and trace 27 indicates the signal strength of a copy of the original watermark.
  • the data show a significant decrease in the signal value of the watermark between the original and the copy (-56% to -100%). The substantial change in signal value makes it possible to discriminate between a copy and an original to accurately identify copies.
  • the envelopes selected for the measurement represent a range of paper types found in the mailing environment and demonstrate the feasibility of the invention used in applications where there is little control over the types of paper used to record images.
  • the information loss associated with the printing process may be identified by using a high quality scanner (to minimize scanning losses) to scan a printed representation of the watermark. This scanned image is then decoded, and the information content of the watermark recorded and represented by a signal strength measurement.
  • the loss of information due to printing the "original image” is the difference between the bitmap signal strength and the original print signal strength (trace 25 and trace 26). The above table shows this difference is between
  • An implementation of the fragile watermark into images printed on documents that have value, such postal indicia, could include, but is not limited to, the use of the
  • Embedder is a software program used to take an original image and embed a fragile watermark into a composite image.
  • the embedding process uses a mathematical transformation of the original image file to produce a pattern of pixels that can be decoded later with special reader software.
  • Embedding software provides the ability to embed information with different degrees of redundancy. More redundant information makes a watermark easier to detect and decode; less redundancy makes a watermark more difficult to recognize and decode.
  • Scanning hardware Scanning hardware or an image capture device is required to record the printed watermark in a digital format.
  • the digital representation of the printed watermark is imported into the reader software package where it is processed and decoded.
  • Hand-held, portable scanning devices similar to bar code readers are well suited for this application. These devices use CCD arrays similar to those found in digital cameras to capture and store an image in memory.
  • Other devices that could be used to record digital representations of printed fragile watermarks include flat bed scanners, digital cameras, laser scanning devices, and linear CCD arrays mounted in in-line processing equipment.
  • Reading software is used to process the image by decoding the information in the watermark and providing a signal value as output, indicating the quality of the watermark and the integrity of the embedded information. This signal value is a measure of the fraction of information that can be decoded. High signal indicates less loss of information (original image); low signal value indicates a copy (more lost, or unrecoverable information).
  • Decoding software provides the capability to establish a signal threshold above which an image is considered to be an original, and below which it is determined to be a copy (figure #3). The above specification describes a new and improved method for increasing the security of a document by being able to detect when an image is copied. It is realized that the above description may indicate to those skilled in the art additional ways in which the principles of this invention may be used without departing from the spirit. Therefore, it is intended that this invention be limited only by the scope of the appended claims.

Abstract

A method that detects when an image is copied or scanned in order to reduce the production of fraudulent images. The invention allows an inspector to conduct an analysis of an image with a simple set of tools on site without the need to check a remote database through a network and look for duplicate images. This minimizes the infrastructure and cost required to implement the system. A local inspection can be made by scanning an image and decoding it with relatively inexpensive tools available on site. The invention accomplishes the foregoing by producing a fragile watermark image that produces a noticeable and measurable loss of invention when it is reproduced. The loss of information is due to effects associated with scanning and printing processes.

Description

METHOD FOR UTILIZING A FRAGILE WATERMARK FOR ENHANCED
SECURITY
This Application claims the benefit of the filing date of U.S. Provisional Application Number 60/283,565 filed April 13, 2001 , which is owned by the assignee of the present Application.
Cross Reference To Related Applications Reference is made to commonly assigned copending U.S. patent application number 10/087,518 filed herewith entitled "Method For Embedding Information In An Image" in the names of Claude Zeller, Robert A. Cordery, Donald G. Mackay and William A. Brosseau; and application number 10/087,492 filed herewith entitled "Method For Reading Information That Has Been Embedded In An Image" in the names of Robert A. Cordery, Claude Zeller, Donald G. Mackay and William A. Brosseau.
Field Of The Invention The subject invention relates to a method for printing images that contain information and, more particularly, to a method that detects when the printed images containing information are copied.
Background of the Invention Images such as postal indicia have been printed by postage meters to evidence that the appropriate postage has been affixed to the mailpiece. A typical postal indicia includes fixed elements such as city name, state, a graphic, meter serial number, etc., and variable information such as date, postage amount, an encrypted number, etc. Postal indicia have been printed by flat bed printers and rotary printers without encryption and by ink jet printers with encryption. The improvements to photocopying, printing and scanning equipment have made it easier to commit fraud by copying postal indicia.
Currently, ticketing companies are giving purchasers the option of printing their electronic tickets at home, using ordinary paper, a personal computer printer and an Internet connection. One of the problems in allowing people to print tickets at home is how to ensure that the tickets are not counterfeited. One of the solutions suggested to solve the foregoing problem is to print an encrypted bar code on the ticket. Unfortunately, a ticket printed on ordinary paper with an encrypted bar code can be photocopied, and the seller of the ticket will be unable to distinguish between the original, genuine ticket and the photocopied ticket.
Many other types of value documents are currently being utilized. Unfortunately, it is anticipated that as sophisticated image processing equipment becomes more prevalent, the incidence of counterfeiting will increase. Currently, the United States Postal Service is embedding information in a two-dimensional bar code called an Information-Based Indicia (IBIP). The process of finding copies of an IBIP involve scanning a mailpiece containing an IBIP; decoding the unique IBIP with bar code reading software; connecting a system to a data base in order to locate an identical IBIP image; and determining whether or not the scanned image is a duplicate, i.e., copy of a paid for IBIP or a unique IBIP, i.e. a paid for IBIP. Some disadvantages of the IBIP system, and other similar systems operating on the same principals, are that they are fully effective only if all images entering the system are scanned and analyzed, looking for duplicates in a database. If only a small number of images are processed, then the likelihood of finding duplicates is diminished, and the effectiveness of the system is reduced. For example, if the counterfeit rate is 1/1000 and only one of every one thousand images is scanned, then the odds of finding a single copy is 1/1000 * 1/1000 or one in a million. Summary Of The Invention
This invention overcomes the disadvantages of the prior art by providing a method that makes it more difficult to copy images. The invention provides a method that detects when an image is copied in order to reduce the production of fraudulent images. The invention allows an inspector to conduct an analysis of an image with a simple set of tools on site without the need to check a remote database through a network to look for duplicate images. This minimizes the infrastructure and cost required to implement the system. A local inspection can be made by scanning an image and decoding it with relatively inexpensive tools available on site. The invention accomplishes the foregoing by producing a fragile watermark image that produces a noticeable and measurable loss of information when it is reproduced.
The loss of information is due to effects associated with scanning and printing processes.
Brief Description Of The Drawings Fig. 1-A is a drawing of a fragile watermark embedded in an image.
Fig. 1-B is a drawing of a copy of Fig. 1-A.
Fig. 2-A is a drawing showing a non-printed bit map image file magnified view of portion 20 of image 11.
Fig. 2-B is a drawing showing magnified view portion of 20 of image 11 printed with an ink jet printing device from an image file generated by scanning the original print.
Fig. 3 is a graph of copy detection vs. signal strength.
Detailed Description of Preferred Embodiments Of The Invention
Referring now to the drawings in detail, and more particularly to Fig. 1 , the reference character 11 represents a postal image. Postal image 11 includes graphic material in the form of an eagle 12, a permit number 13, a city, state 14, an indication of the class of postage 15, an indication that the postage has been paid 16, the weight of the mail piece 17, and the country 18. Black and white pixels 19 are embedded in image 11. Eagle 12 has a portion 20. The digital form of image 11 will suffer no loss of information when reproduced in digital format. Fig. 1-B is a drawing of a copy of Fig. 1-A.
Fig. 2-A is a drawing showing a non-printed bit map image file magnified view of portion 20 of image 11.
Fig. 2-B is a drawing showing magnified view portion of 20 of image 11 after printing the image file shown in Fig. 2-A. Portion 20 of Fig. 2-B has been printed with an ink jet printing device and scanned. It can be seen that the printed image is an approximation of the original and has been distorted by the way in which the ink and paper interact and the ability of the printer to accurately position the drops of ink used to create the image. The amount of distortion is a function of the resolution of the printer, the size of the ink drops, and the way in which the ink spreads when it contacts the paper due to capillary and surface forces. These forces are associated with the fluid and physical properties of the ink and paper and are present in all ink- based printing systems. In particular, it can be seen how the ink tends to fill in small areas that were blank (white) in the original bit map representation of the image. This image distortion leads to a loss of information when the image is decoded. Other non-ink based printing systems experience similar image degradation that leads to information loss due to process variables. An example of the foregoing is the static charge properties of toner, photoconductors, and paper as well as toner transfer and control in laser printing and copier processes.
There is also a loss of information associated with the scanning process due to the way light is reflected and absorbed by the ink and paper and the optical and detector characteristics of the scanner. The scanner measures and records the average reflectance value at each pixel location within the image. The quality of the scanned and recorded image is a function of the resolution at which the image is scanned and the accuracy of the scanning device and detector measuring the reflected light. Fig. 3 is a graph of images produced on different envelope materials versus signal strength. The signal strength is calculated from the amount of information read from the watermark. Letters at the bottom of the graph indicate five different envelope types used in the test (A,B,C,E,L). Envelope type A is a white wove, 24 pound low ink absorbing envelope, and envelope type B is a white wove, 24 pound high ink absorbing envelope. Envelope type C is a 24 pound smooth finish envelope and envelope type E is a 32 pound 90 clasp envelope. Envelope type L is recycled white paper.
To make a copy of the original image 11 , it is necessary to first scan, then reprint, image 11. The total loss of information associated with the copy process is the combined loss from the scanning and printing process. Signal value is a watermark quality metric calculated from the total information received by decoding a watermark. This information loss can be represented as a change in "signal strength". An example of a maximum signal strength is shown by line 25 as the non- printed bit map digital file. Trace 26 indicates the signal strength of an original printed watermark, and trace 27 indicates the signal strength of a copy of the original watermark. The data show a significant decrease in the signal value of the watermark between the original and the copy (-56% to -100%). The substantial change in signal value makes it possible to discriminate between a copy and an original to accurately identify copies. Signal Strength Measurements
Figure imgf000008_0001
The envelopes selected for the measurement represent a range of paper types found in the mailing environment and demonstrate the feasibility of the invention used in applications where there is little control over the types of paper used to record images.
The information loss associated with the printing process may be identified by using a high quality scanner (to minimize scanning losses) to scan a printed representation of the watermark. This scanned image is then decoded, and the information content of the watermark recorded and represented by a signal strength measurement. In Fig. 3, the loss of information due to printing the "original image" is the difference between the bitmap signal strength and the original print signal strength (trace 25 and trace 26). The above table shows this difference is between
48% and 62%. An implementation of the fragile watermark into images printed on documents that have value, such postal indicia, could include, but is not limited to, the use of the
following system elements. Embedder: An embedder is a software program used to take an original image and embed a fragile watermark into a composite image. The embedding process uses a mathematical transformation of the original image file to produce a pattern of pixels that can be decoded later with special reader software. Embedding software provides the ability to embed information with different degrees of redundancy. More redundant information makes a watermark easier to detect and decode; less redundancy makes a watermark more difficult to recognize and decode.
Scanning hardware: Scanning hardware or an image capture device is required to record the printed watermark in a digital format. The digital representation of the printed watermark is imported into the reader software package where it is processed and decoded. Hand-held, portable scanning devices similar to bar code readers are well suited for this application. These devices use CCD arrays similar to those found in digital cameras to capture and store an image in memory. Other devices that could be used to record digital representations of printed fragile watermarks include flat bed scanners, digital cameras, laser scanning devices, and linear CCD arrays mounted in in-line processing equipment.
Decoding (reading) software: Reading software is used to process the image by decoding the information in the watermark and providing a signal value as output, indicating the quality of the watermark and the integrity of the embedded information. This signal value is a measure of the fraction of information that can be decoded. High signal indicates less loss of information (original image); low signal value indicates a copy (more lost, or unrecoverable information). Decoding software provides the capability to establish a signal threshold above which an image is considered to be an original, and below which it is determined to be a copy (figure #3). The above specification describes a new and improved method for increasing the security of a document by being able to detect when an image is copied. It is realized that the above description may indicate to those skilled in the art additional ways in which the principles of this invention may be used without departing from the spirit. Therefore, it is intended that this invention be limited only by the scope of the appended claims.

Claims

What is claimed is:
1. A method for embedding information in an image so that the image will have different information when the image is reproduced by a scanning or printing process, the method comprising the steps of: embedding digital information in an image; printing the embedded digital information and the image to produce a original printed image; scanning the original printed image to obtain a digital image of the embedded information and the image; determining the signal strength of the original image; and comparing the signal strength of a printed image with the signal strength of the original printed image to determine whether or not the printed image is a copy of the original printed image.
2. The method claimed in claim 1 , wherein the image is a postal indicia.
3. The method claimed in claim 1 , wherein the image is a graphic.
4. The method claimed in claim 1 , wherein a bit map file is created for the original printed image.
5. The method claimed in claim 1 , wherein the comparing step further including
the step of: measuring the signal strength of the original printed image to set a threshold value for the original printed image and copies of the original printed image.
6. The method claimed in claim 5, whereby if the signal strength of a printed image is greater than the threshold value the printed image is the original printed image.
7. The method claimed in claim 5, whereby if the signal strength of a printed image is less than the threshold value the printed image is not the original printed image.
PCT/US2002/012677 2001-04-13 2002-04-11 Method for utilizing a fragile watermark for enhanced security WO2003081432A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU2002307474A AU2002307474A1 (en) 2001-04-13 2002-04-11 Method for utilizing a fragile watermark for enhanced security

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US28356501P 2001-04-13 2001-04-13
US60/283,565 2001-04-13
US10/087,314 2002-03-01
US10/087,314 US20020176114A1 (en) 2001-04-13 2002-03-01 Method for utilizing a fragile watermark for enhanced security

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2003081432A1 true WO2003081432A1 (en) 2003-10-02

Family

ID=26776837

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2002/012677 WO2003081432A1 (en) 2001-04-13 2002-04-11 Method for utilizing a fragile watermark for enhanced security

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (1) US20020176114A1 (en)
AU (1) AU2002307474A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2003081432A1 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2007113563A1 (en) * 2006-04-05 2007-10-11 Brand New Co. (306) Ltd Ballot security system
EP1801692B1 (en) 2004-01-06 2015-06-10 Thomson Licensing Improved techniques for detecting, analyzing and using visible authentication patterns

Families Citing this family (27)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8144368B2 (en) * 1998-01-20 2012-03-27 Digimarc Coporation Automated methods for distinguishing copies from original printed objects
US6728390B2 (en) * 1995-05-08 2004-04-27 Digimarc Corporation Methods and systems using multiple watermarks
US6850626B2 (en) 1998-01-20 2005-02-01 Digimarc Corporation Methods employing multiple watermarks
US20030130954A1 (en) * 1998-07-31 2003-07-10 Carr J. Scott Postal applications including digital watermarks
US6692030B1 (en) * 2000-07-21 2004-02-17 Verify First Technologies, Inc. Security document with nano-pattern
US6760464B2 (en) * 2000-10-11 2004-07-06 Digimarc Corporation Halftone watermarking and related applications
US7246239B2 (en) * 2001-01-24 2007-07-17 Digimarc Corporation Digital watermarks for checking authenticity of printed objects
US6512837B1 (en) 2000-10-11 2003-01-28 Digimarc Corporation Watermarks carrying content dependent signal metrics for detecting and characterizing signal alteration
US7607016B2 (en) * 2001-04-20 2009-10-20 Digimarc Corporation Including a metric in a digital watermark for media authentication
US8094869B2 (en) 2001-07-02 2012-01-10 Digimarc Corporation Fragile and emerging digital watermarks
US7728048B2 (en) 2002-12-20 2010-06-01 L-1 Secure Credentialing, Inc. Increasing thermal conductivity of host polymer used with laser engraving methods and compositions
US7054461B2 (en) * 2002-02-15 2006-05-30 Pitney Bowes Inc. Authenticating printed objects using digital watermarks associated with multidimensional quality metrics
US7519819B2 (en) 2002-05-29 2009-04-14 Digimarc Corporatino Layered security in digital watermarking
US7254772B2 (en) * 2002-07-30 2007-08-07 Xerox Corporation Systems and methods for visually representing the aging and/or expiration of electronic documents
US7130444B2 (en) * 2002-11-12 2006-10-31 Eastman Kodak Company Method of authenication for steganographic signals undergoing degradations
ATE491190T1 (en) 2003-04-16 2010-12-15 L 1 Secure Credentialing Inc THREE-DIMENSIONAL DATA STORAGE
US7625613B2 (en) * 2003-10-15 2009-12-01 Verify First Technologies, Inc. Copy-resistant security paper
US7657750B2 (en) * 2003-11-24 2010-02-02 Pitney Bowes Inc. Watermarking method with print-scan compensation
US7446891B2 (en) * 2003-11-24 2008-11-04 Pitney Bowes Inc. Fragile watermark for detecting printed image copies
US7995246B2 (en) * 2003-11-24 2011-08-09 Pitney Bowes Inc. Detecting printed image copies using phase-space-encoded fragile watermark
US7668334B2 (en) * 2004-07-02 2010-02-23 Digimarc Corp Conditioning imagery to better receive steganographic encoding
US20060020802A1 (en) * 2004-07-23 2006-01-26 Pitney Bowes Incorporated Tonal compensation for graphic security features
US7551751B2 (en) 2004-08-30 2009-06-23 Pitney Bowes Inc. Watermarking images with wavepackets encoded by intensity and/or phase variations
US7643181B2 (en) * 2004-12-14 2010-01-05 Pitney Bowes Inc. Method and system for printing an original image and for determining if a printed image is an original or has been altered
US7483175B2 (en) 2005-09-16 2009-01-27 Pitney Bowes Inc. Method and system for printing secure value documents and non-secure documents utilizing the same printing device
US8527285B2 (en) * 2006-06-28 2013-09-03 Pitney Bowes Inc. Postage printing system for printing both postal and non-postal documents
US7839538B2 (en) 2006-12-18 2010-11-23 Pitney Bowes Inc. Method and system for applying an image-dependent dynamic watermark to postal indicia

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5825892A (en) * 1996-10-28 1998-10-20 International Business Machines Corporation Protecting images with an image watermark
US6317115B1 (en) * 1993-12-09 2001-11-13 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha System, apparatus and method in which a high resolution image editor is connected to a host computer for processing low resolution image data
US6332194B1 (en) * 1998-06-05 2001-12-18 Signafy, Inc. Method for data preparation and watermark insertion

Family Cites Families (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6345104B1 (en) * 1994-03-17 2002-02-05 Digimarc Corporation Digital watermarks and methods for security documents
US6636615B1 (en) * 1998-01-20 2003-10-21 Digimarc Corporation Methods and systems using multiple watermarks
US6728390B2 (en) * 1995-05-08 2004-04-27 Digimarc Corporation Methods and systems using multiple watermarks
US5635694A (en) * 1995-09-27 1997-06-03 Xerox Corporation System and method for embedding machine coded destination information into a postal mark
US5829895A (en) * 1995-12-27 1998-11-03 Pitney Bowes Inc. Method for printing an image indicative of value such as a postal indicia
GB2321620A (en) * 1997-01-29 1998-08-05 Neopost Ltd Method and apparatus for printing and prevention of copying of postage indicia
US6212504B1 (en) * 1998-01-12 2001-04-03 Unisys Corporation Self-authentication of value documents using encoded indices
US6424954B1 (en) * 1998-02-17 2002-07-23 Neopost Inc. Postage metering system
US6359998B1 (en) * 1998-04-23 2002-03-19 3Com Corporation Method and apparatus for wavelet-based digital watermarking
US5946414A (en) * 1998-08-28 1999-08-31 Xerox Corporation Encoding data in color images using patterned color modulated image regions
US6415983B1 (en) * 1999-02-26 2002-07-09 Canada Post Corporation Unique identifier bar code on stamps and apparatus and method for monitoring stamp usage with identifier bar codes
JP3607521B2 (en) * 1999-03-24 2005-01-05 株式会社東芝 Digital watermark embedding device, digital watermark detection device, digital information distribution device, and storage medium
US6493110B1 (en) * 2000-04-05 2002-12-10 Gregory B. Roberts System and method for bar code rendering and recognition

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6317115B1 (en) * 1993-12-09 2001-11-13 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha System, apparatus and method in which a high resolution image editor is connected to a host computer for processing low resolution image data
US5825892A (en) * 1996-10-28 1998-10-20 International Business Machines Corporation Protecting images with an image watermark
US6332194B1 (en) * 1998-06-05 2001-12-18 Signafy, Inc. Method for data preparation and watermark insertion

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1801692B1 (en) 2004-01-06 2015-06-10 Thomson Licensing Improved techniques for detecting, analyzing and using visible authentication patterns
WO2007113563A1 (en) * 2006-04-05 2007-10-11 Brand New Co. (306) Ltd Ballot security system

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20020176114A1 (en) 2002-11-28
AU2002307474A1 (en) 2003-10-08

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20020176114A1 (en) Method for utilizing a fragile watermark for enhanced security
US7136502B2 (en) Printing media and methods employing digital watermarking
US8467566B2 (en) Method for detecting fraud in a printed image
KR100433590B1 (en) Ticket issuing method, ticket issuing system and ticket collating method
US7197644B2 (en) Systems and methods for providing hardcopy secure documents and for validation of such documents
JP4366916B2 (en) Document confirmation system, document confirmation method, and document confirmation program
JP5283744B2 (en) Method and apparatus for creating and subsequently verifying authentic printed articles
US8335342B2 (en) Protecting printed items intended for public exchange with information embedded in blank document borders
EP1672593B1 (en) Method and system for printing an original image and for determining if a printed image is an original or has been altered
USRE45828E1 (en) Method for determining a printer's signature and the number of dots per inch printed in a document to provide proof that the printer printed a particular document
US20070136213A1 (en) Inline system to detect and show proof of indicia fraud
US20030219145A1 (en) System and method for authentication of a workpiece using three dimensional shape recovery
US20030063772A1 (en) System and method for authentication and tracking of a workpiece that includes an optically active medium
US8023696B2 (en) Printing media and methods employing digital watermarking
US20100128290A1 (en) Embedding information in document blank border space
US20080174101A1 (en) Counterfeit deterrence using dispersed miniature security marks
US8373895B2 (en) Prevention of unauthorized copying or scanning
US11363164B2 (en) Method and system for automatically verifying the authenticity of documents
EP1544790B1 (en) Method and system for generating characterizing information descriptive of a selected text block
US6612684B2 (en) Method for determining a printer's signature to provide proof that the printer printed a particular document
US20040081319A1 (en) Check verification and authentication process and apparatus

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EC EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT TZ UA UG UZ VN YU ZA ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZM ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
REG Reference to national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: 8642

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase
NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: JP

WWW Wipo information: withdrawn in national office

Country of ref document: JP