WO2003085819A2 - Linearity improvement of gilbert mixers - Google Patents

Linearity improvement of gilbert mixers Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2003085819A2
WO2003085819A2 PCT/EP2003/003472 EP0303472W WO03085819A2 WO 2003085819 A2 WO2003085819 A2 WO 2003085819A2 EP 0303472 W EP0303472 W EP 0303472W WO 03085819 A2 WO03085819 A2 WO 03085819A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
transistor
input
mixer
amplifier
stage
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/EP2003/003472
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
WO2003085819A3 (en
Inventor
Sven Mattisson
Magnus Wiklung
Original Assignee
Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ)
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from US10/383,370 external-priority patent/US6891423B2/en
Application filed by Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) filed Critical Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ)
Priority to EP03727274.7A priority Critical patent/EP1490961B1/en
Priority to AU2003233952A priority patent/AU2003233952A1/en
Publication of WO2003085819A2 publication Critical patent/WO2003085819A2/en
Publication of WO2003085819A3 publication Critical patent/WO2003085819A3/en

Links

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H03ELECTRONIC CIRCUITRY
    • H03DDEMODULATION OR TRANSFERENCE OF MODULATION FROM ONE CARRIER TO ANOTHER
    • H03D7/00Transference of modulation from one carrier to another, e.g. frequency-changing
    • H03D7/14Balanced arrangements
    • H03D7/1425Balanced arrangements with transistors
    • H03D7/1441Balanced arrangements with transistors using field-effect transistors
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H03ELECTRONIC CIRCUITRY
    • H03DDEMODULATION OR TRANSFERENCE OF MODULATION FROM ONE CARRIER TO ANOTHER
    • H03D7/00Transference of modulation from one carrier to another, e.g. frequency-changing
    • H03D7/14Balanced arrangements
    • H03D7/1425Balanced arrangements with transistors
    • H03D7/1433Balanced arrangements with transistors using bipolar transistors
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H03ELECTRONIC CIRCUITRY
    • H03DDEMODULATION OR TRANSFERENCE OF MODULATION FROM ONE CARRIER TO ANOTHER
    • H03D7/00Transference of modulation from one carrier to another, e.g. frequency-changing
    • H03D7/14Balanced arrangements
    • H03D7/1425Balanced arrangements with transistors
    • H03D7/1458Double balanced arrangements, i.e. where both input signals are differential
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H03ELECTRONIC CIRCUITRY
    • H03DDEMODULATION OR TRANSFERENCE OF MODULATION FROM ONE CARRIER TO ANOTHER
    • H03D7/00Transference of modulation from one carrier to another, e.g. frequency-changing
    • H03D7/14Balanced arrangements
    • H03D7/1425Balanced arrangements with transistors
    • H03D7/1491Arrangements to linearise a transconductance stage of a mixer arrangement

Definitions

  • This invention is directed generally to radio communication systems, and more particularly to improved linearity in radio communication systems that use Gilbert mixers.
  • a mixer In radio communication systems, a mixer is used to up-convert a baseband signal to a higher frequency (e.g., radio frequency (RF)) signal for ease of transmission.
  • the mixer can also down-convert a high frequency signal to baseband for ease of signal processing.
  • RF radio frequency
  • the reader is referred to "Radio-Frequency Microelectronic Circuits for Telecommunication Applications," Yannis E. Papananos, ISBN 0-7923 -S641-S, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 1999.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a circuit diagram for an exemplary Gilbert mixer 100 that can be used to down-convert a high frequency (e.g., RF) signal.
  • the Gilbert mixer 100 is composed of two main sections: an amplifier 102 for receiving and amplifying the RF signal, and a mixer core 104 for mixing the RF signal with the LO signal to produce the IF signal.
  • the amplifier 102 includes two transistors Q ⁇ and Q2 connected as a typical single stage (i.e., one transistor stage) amplifier.
  • the source terminal of each transistor Q ⁇ and Q2 is connected to a common ground V a via a respective one of the feedback resistors Re-
  • the gate terminals of the two transistors Q ⁇ and Q2 form the RF input port 106 through which the RF input signal is received.
  • the RF input signal is then provided to the mixer core 104 via the drain terminals of the two transistors Q ⁇ and Q2,
  • the above single stage arrangement is also known as a "local feedback" arrangement because of the direct influence of the transistor output i e on the transistor input v & :
  • the mixer core 104 includes fours transistors 0-Q6 connected as a typical mixer circuit.
  • the source terminals of transistors Q3 & 04 are connected to the drain terminal of transistor Ql.
  • the source terminals of transistors Q5 & Q ⁇ are connected to the s drain terminal of transistor Q2,
  • the gate terminals of transistors Q4 & QS are connected together and form one end of the LO input port 108.
  • the other end of the LO input port 108 is formed by the common gate terminals of transistors Q2 & Q6,
  • the drain terminals of transistors Q3 & Q5 and Q4 & Q6 together form the IF output port 110.
  • Pull-up resistors R connect the drain terminals of the transistors Q3-Q6 to the power supply.
  • FIG. 2 is s an exemplary graph showing the relationship between the RF input voltage (VRF) and output voltage (V ⁇ F) for the Gilbert mixer 100.
  • VRF RF input voltage
  • V ⁇ F output voltage
  • an increase in the amount of feedback results in an increase in the linearity of the mixer.
  • the resistors R E provide feedback to the amplifier 102
  • Increasing the resistance of the feedback resistors R E will have the effect of increasing the linearity of the Gilbert mixer 100
  • UMTS Universal Mobile Telecommunications System
  • modern radio communication systems such as UMTS require a larger linear operating range in the mixer. This increased linearity requirement is stretching the capability of most existmg Gilbert mixer designs.
  • the local feedback arrangement of the single stage amplifier of existing Gilbert mixer designs cannot provide sufficient feedback to produce the linearity required by some modern radio communication systems when low supply voltages are employed. Therefore, it is desirable to provide a Gilbert mixer that is capable of performing with a higher linearity than that of existing Gilbert mixers. In particular, it is desirable to provide a Gilbert mixer having an improved amplifier feedback that can produce the increased linearity required by modern radio communication systems.
  • the present invention is directed to method and system for providing an improved linearity Gilbert mixer.
  • the Gilbert mixer of the present invention includes a conventional mixer core coupled to a high linearity, multistage amplifier.
  • the multistage amplifier includes two or more transistor stages connected together in a global feedback arrangement.
  • the global feedback provides a greater loop gain for the amplifier than the local feedback arrangement, thereby increasing the linearity of the amplifier.
  • having more than one transistor stage in the amplifier serves to increase the isolation of the RF input signal from the LO input signal.
  • several mixer cores may be driven from the same source while sharing the feedback mechanism.
  • the invention is directed to a mixer circuit.
  • the mixer circuit comprises a mixer core configured to receive an input signal and to mix the input signal with a local oscillator signal to produce a mixed output signal.
  • the mixer circuit further comprises a multistage amplifier coupled to the mixer core and capable of amplifying the input signal, the multistage amplifier including at least a first transistor stage and a second transistor stage.
  • a global feedback network connects the first transistor stage and the second transistor stage and is configured to provide feedback from the first transistor stage to the second transistor stage.
  • the invention is directed to a method of improving linearity in a mixer circuit.
  • the mixer circuit includes a mixer core configured to receive an input signal and to mix the input signal with a local oscillator signal to produce a mixed output signal.
  • the method comprises the coupling a multistage amplifier to the mixer core, wherein the multistage amplifier is capable of amplifying the input signal and includes at least a first transistor stage and a second transistor stage.
  • the method further comprises connecting a global feedback network between the first transistor stage and the second transistor stage.
  • the feedback network is configured to provide feedback from the first transistor stage to the second transistor stage.
  • the invention is directed to a radio communication system capable of down-converting a high frequency signal or up-converting a baseband signal.
  • the system comprises a mixer circuit having a mixer core configured to receive an input signal and to mix the , input signal with a local oscillator signal to produce a mixed output signal.
  • a multistage amplifier is coupled to the mixer core and is capable of amplifying the input signal.
  • the multistage amplifier includes at least a first transistor stage and a second transistor stage.
  • a global feedback network connects the first transistor stage and the second transistor stage, and is configured to provide feedback from the first transistor stage to the second transistor stage.
  • the invention is directed to a Gilbert mixer having a mixer core configured to receive an input signal and to mix the input signal with a local oscillator signal to produce a mixed output signal.
  • An amplifier is coupled to the mixer core and is capable of amplifying the input signal.
  • the amplifier includes at least a first transistor stage and a second transistor stage.
  • a global feedback network connects the first transistor stage and the second transistor stage. The feedback network is configured to provide feedback from the first transistor stage to the second transistor stage.
  • the invention is directed to a multiphase mixer having at least a first phase mixer core and a second phase mixer core.
  • An amplifier is coupled to the first phase mixer core and the second phase mixer core.
  • the amplifier comprises- a first stage having separate drivers for driving each mixer core a second stage for receiving an input signal.
  • a separate global feedback network connects each driver of the first transistor stage to the second transistor stage of the amplifier.
  • Each feedback network is configured to provide feedback from the first transistor stage to the second transistor stage.
  • Figure 1 is a schematic diagram of a typical Gilbert mixer
  • Figure 2 is chart showing the linearity of the typical Gilbert mixer
  • FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of a Gilbert mixer according to embodiments of the invention.
  • Figure 4 is a schematic diagram of an exemplary quadrature mixer according to embodiments of the invention.
  • resistors described herein can be some other form of impedance such as capacitive (C), resistive (R), inductive (L), RC, RL, and the like
  • the invention is capable of being implemented with any suitable type of transistor (e.g., BJT, MOS, P-MOS, N-MOS, NPN, PNP, etc.), using any suitable feedback mechanism (e.g., capacitive, resistive, inductive, RC, RL, etc.), and using any suitable biasing scheme (e.g., current source, bootstrap, resistors, LC, etc:).
  • Embodiments of the invention provide an improved Gilbert mixer.
  • the Gilbert mixer of the invention includes a conventional mixer core coupled to a high linearity, multistage amplifier.
  • the multistage amplifier includes two or more transistor stages connected together in a global feedback arrangement.
  • the global feedback provides a greater closed-loop gain for the amplifier than the local feedback arrangement, thereby increasing the linearity of the amplifier,
  • a fundamental limitation of the local feedback arrangement shown in Figure 1 is that the amount of feedback is dependent on the voltage drop across the feedback resistor R £ .
  • the amount of feedback can be measured in terms of the loop gain L, a simplified expression for which can be given by:
  • g m the transconductance of the transistor (e.g., Q ⁇ or Q2) and R B is the feedback resistor.
  • the transconductance g m is dependent on the collector current l c of the transistor Q 1 or Q2 and the thermal voltage V ⁇ ( «25mV at room temperature) of the transistors.
  • the loop gain L is limited by the voltage V s across the feedback resistor R ⁇ .
  • the local feedback arrangement is, by design, a single stage arrangement (i.e., one transistor stage), the isolation of the RF input signal from the LO input signal may not be sufficiently high for modern radio communication systems such as UMTS.
  • a global feedback arrangement is used for the amplifier.
  • the Gilbert mixer 300 of the present invention like the Gilbert mixer 100 of Figure 1, includes an amplifier 302 and a mixer core 304.
  • the mixer core 304 is a typical mixer circuit that is substantially identical to the mixer core 104 shown in Figure 1.
  • the amplifier 302, on the other hand, is a multistage amplifier design that constitutes a substantial departure from existing Gilbert mixer amplifier designs.
  • the amplifier 302 of the present invention includes at least one additional transistor stage, QMl and QM2, connected to the existing transistors Ql and Q2,
  • the source terminals of the second stage transistors QMl and QM2 are connected to the common ground V; S .
  • the drain terminals of the second stage transistors QMl and QM2 are connected to the gate terminals of the first stage transistors Ql and Q2, respectively.
  • Pull-up resistors R e connect the drain terminals of the second stage transistors QMl and QMl to the power supply y.
  • the gate terminals of the second stage transistors QMl and QM2 now form the RF input port 306, (The LO input port 308 and the IF output port 310 are formed in substantially the same manner as their counterparts in Figure 1.)
  • Pull-up resistors Ri connect the gate terminals of the second stage transistors QMl and QMl to the power supply Vdd.
  • feedback resistors R F connect the source terminals of the first stage transistors Ql and Q2 to the gate terminals of the second stage transistors QMl and QMl, respectively.
  • the feedback resistors Rp help define a global feedback across both stages of the multistage amplifier 302.
  • Equation (5) the feedback signal R E iJ R E + RF) is defined in terms of a current, whereas in Equation (1), the feedback signal ijie is defined in terms of a voltage.
  • the loop gain is high (i.e., I»10), i t will become very small and the gain may be approximated as:
  • the combined loop gain for these two transistors may be defined as L- ⁇ iAi, where ⁇ i is the transfer function of the current feedback-network and is, in this case, determined by the network of R s and R F (assuming the loop gain L to be high when the gate of QMl is a virtual ground):
  • At (RF //RM x g nm x (&// At) x . g "' , (8)
  • QM may represent one or more transistors in cascade.
  • the invention has been described with respect to a down- convert application, the principles and teaching herein are equally applicable to up-convert applications.
  • FIG. 4 illustrates an embodiment of the of the invention wherein the Gilbert mixer 300 is used to implement a quadrature mixer 400
  • the exemplary quadrature mixer 400 includes a mixer stage 402, a splitter stage 404, and a low noise amplifier (LNA) stage 406,
  • LNA low noise amplifier
  • the mixer stage 402 includes an in-phase mixer core 408a and 408b, each of which is connected to a multistage amplifier
  • the in-phase mixer core 408a for example, is connected to a multistage amplifier comprising transistors Q1A which drives the in-phase mixer core, Q1B which drives the quadrature mixer core, and QMl which connects the RF input to the inputs of QlA and Q1B.
  • the quadrature mixer core 408b is connected to a multistage amplifier comprising Q2B which drives the in-phase mixer core 408a, Q2A which drives the quadrature mixer core 408b, and QM2 which connects the RF input to the inputs of Q2B and Q2A.
  • the drain terminals of QMl and QM2 are connected to the gate terminals of QlA & Q1B and Q2B & Q2A, respectively.
  • the gate terminals of QMl and QMl are connected to the source terminals of QlA & Q1B and Q2B & Q2A, respectively, through a global feedback network comprising resistors R PA and Rm, respectively.
  • the global feedback network may also include a capacitive element C connected between the resistors R FA and R m and the gate terminals of QMl and QMl.
  • Pull-up resistors R connect the drain terminals of each transistor in the splitter section 404 to a common power supply V di as shown.
  • pull-down resistors R connect the source terminals of the drive transistors QlA, 1B, Q2B, and Q2A to a common ground F w .
  • the source terminals of the feedback transistors QMl and QM2, on the other hand, are connected directly to ground.
  • the RF input signal is split evenly between QlA and QlA, while the feedback signals are provided by R FA and R m> which in turn recombine the feedback signals at the input of QMl.
  • R FA and R m> which in turn recombine the feedback signals at the input of QMl.
  • the gain balance is set by the splitting ratio or gain ratio at the inputs of QlA and Q1B (and also Q2B and Q2A) and by the ratio R FA /R FB -
  • it is desirable to split the input RF signal substantially evenly i.e., make the gains of QlA and Q1B (and also Q2B and Q2A) substantially equal to each other, as well as R FA substantially equal to Rm, but other configurations are possible.
  • the input RF signal may not be evenly split between the driving transistors such that the splitting ratio may be different for Ql & Q1B relative to Q2B & Q2A.
  • the preceding paragraphs describe a quadrature mixer arrangement
  • it is possible to use an alternative phase relationship between the two mixer cores including the same phase and opposing phase.
  • it is also possible to accommodate more phases by adding an appropriate number of transistors, feedback resistors and mixer cores.
  • the total available phase angle may then be evenly or substantially evenly distributed amongst the available mixer cores (e.g., 360 degrees/number of mixer cores) so that all mixer cores are offset by the same phase angle.
  • only some of the mixer cores may be offset by the same phase angle, while other mixer cores are offset by different phase angles.

Abstract

Method and system are disclosed for providing an improved linearity Gilbert mixer. The Gilbert mixer of the ivention includes a convenional mixer core coupled to a high linearity multiusage amplifier. The multiusage amplier includes two or more transistor stage connected together in a global arragement. The global feedback provides a greater loop gain for the amplifier that the local fedback arragement, thereby increasing the linearity of the amplier. In addition, having more than one transistor stage in the amplifier serves to increase the isolation of the RF input signal from the LO input signal. Furthermore, by providing parallel output stages in the multistage amplifier, several mixer cores may be driven from the source while sharing the feedback mechanism.

Description

LINEARITY IMPROVEMENT OF GILBERT MLXERS
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Field of the Invention
This invention is directed generally to radio communication systems, and more particularly to improved linearity in radio communication systems that use Gilbert mixers.
Description of the Related Art
In radio communication systems, a mixer is used to up-convert a baseband signal to a higher frequency (e.g., radio frequency (RF)) signal for ease of transmission. The mixer can also down-convert a high frequency signal to baseband for ease of signal processing. Various types of mixers exist, including unbalanced, single and double balanced, and the four-quadrant or Gilbert mixer. For general information regarding the various types of mixers, the reader is referred to "Radio-Frequency Microelectronic Circuits for Telecommunication Applications," Yannis E. Papananos, ISBN 0-7923 -S641-S, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 1999.
The Gilbert mixer is commonly used because this mixer design provides reasonable conversion gain (i.e., intermediate frequency (IF) output power with respect to RF input power), good image rejection at the RF and local oscillator (LO) ports, and a differential IF output. Figure 1 illustrates a circuit diagram for an exemplary Gilbert mixer 100 that can be used to down-convert a high frequency (e.g., RF) signal. As can be seen, the Gilbert mixer 100 is composed of two main sections: an amplifier 102 for receiving and amplifying the RF signal, and a mixer core 104 for mixing the RF signal with the LO signal to produce the IF signal.
The amplifier 102 includes two transistors Q\ and Q2 connected as a typical single stage (i.e., one transistor stage) amplifier. The source terminal of each transistor Q\ and Q2 is connected to a common ground Va via a respective one of the feedback resistors Re- The gate terminals of the two transistors Q\ and Q2 form the RF input port 106 through which the RF input signal is received. The RF input signal is then provided to the mixer core 104 via the drain terminals of the two transistors Q\ and Q2, The above single stage arrangement is also known as a "local feedback" arrangement because of the direct influence of the transistor output ie on the transistor input v&:
Figure imgf000003_0001
The mixer core 104 includes fours transistors 0-Q6 connected as a typical mixer circuit. The source terminals of transistors Q3 & 04 are connected to the drain terminal of transistor Ql. Likewise, the source terminals of transistors Q5 & Qβ are connected to the s drain terminal of transistor Q2, The gate terminals of transistors Q4 & QS are connected together and form one end of the LO input port 108. The other end of the LO input port 108 is formed by the common gate terminals of transistors Q2 & Q6, The drain terminals of transistors Q3 & Q5 and Q4 & Q6 together form the IF output port 110. Pull-up resistors R connect the drain terminals of the transistors Q3-Q6 to the power supply. o Operation of the Gilbert mixer 100 is as follows. In the absence of any voltage difference between the gates of transistors Q\ and Q2, the drain currents ie of these two transistors are essentially equal. Thus, a voltage applied to the LO input port 108 results in no difference at the IF output port 110, Should a small DC offset voltage be present at the RF input port 106 (e.g., due to a mismatch in the transistors Q\ and Q2 this will only 5 result in a small feed through of the LO signal to the IF output port 110, which will typically be blocked by an IF filter (not shown). Conversely, if an RF signal is applied to the RF input port 106, but no voltage difference is applied to the LO input port 108, the IF output port 110 will again be balanced. A small offset voltage (due to mismatch in transistors Q1-Q6) may cause some RF signal feed through to the IF output port 110. As 0 before, however, this will be rejected by the IF filter. Thus, it is only when a signal is supplied to both the LO input port 108 and the RF input port 106 that a signal appears at the IF output port 110.
A problem with Gilbert mixers in general is that the amplifier 102 does not achieve a sufficiently high range of linearity for modern radio communication systems. Figure 2 is s an exemplary graph showing the relationship between the RF input voltage (VRF) and output voltage (VΓF) for the Gilbert mixer 100. As can be seen, there is essentially a linear relationship between the V∞ and the Vp signals for a certain operating range, generally between points 200 and 202. This response is due primarily to the linear transcondυctance of the amplifier 102 over that operating range. Outside this operating range, however, the 0 Gilbert mixer 100 becomes increasingly nonlinear, The size of the linear operating range depends mostly on the operating points of Ql and Q2 as well as the feedback provided to the amplifier 102. Generally, an increase in the amount of feedback results in an increase in the linearity of the mixer. In Figure 1, for example, the resistors RE provide feedback to the amplifier 102, Increasing the resistance of the feedback resistors RE will have the effect of increasing the linearity of the Gilbert mixer 100, While the above described Gilbert mixer design can provide sufficient linearity for older systems, modern radio communication systems such as UMTS (Universal Mobile Telecommunications System) have much greater linearity requirement due to the newer modulation techniques used in combination with a reduced supply voltage. That is, modern radio communication systems such as UMTS require a larger linear operating range in the mixer. This increased linearity requirement is stretching the capability of most existmg Gilbert mixer designs. Specifically, the local feedback arrangement of the single stage amplifier of existing Gilbert mixer designs cannot provide sufficient feedback to produce the linearity required by some modern radio communication systems when low supply voltages are employed. Therefore, it is desirable to provide a Gilbert mixer that is capable of performing with a higher linearity than that of existing Gilbert mixers. In particular, it is desirable to provide a Gilbert mixer having an improved amplifier feedback that can produce the increased linearity required by modern radio communication systems.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Briefly, the present invention is directed to method and system for providing an improved linearity Gilbert mixer. The Gilbert mixer of the present invention includes a conventional mixer core coupled to a high linearity, multistage amplifier. The multistage amplifier includes two or more transistor stages connected together in a global feedback arrangement. The global feedback provides a greater loop gain for the amplifier than the local feedback arrangement, thereby increasing the linearity of the amplifier. In addition, having more than one transistor stage in the amplifier serves to increase the isolation of the RF input signal from the LO input signal. Furthermore, by providing parallel output stages in the multistage amplifier, several mixer cores may be driven from the same source while sharing the feedback mechanism. In general, in one aspect, the invention is directed to a mixer circuit. The mixer circuit comprises a mixer core configured to receive an input signal and to mix the input signal with a local oscillator signal to produce a mixed output signal. The mixer circuit further comprises a multistage amplifier coupled to the mixer core and capable of amplifying the input signal, the multistage amplifier including at least a first transistor stage and a second transistor stage. A global feedback network connects the first transistor stage and the second transistor stage and is configured to provide feedback from the first transistor stage to the second transistor stage.
In general, in another aspect, the invention is directed to a method of improving linearity in a mixer circuit. The mixer circuit includes a mixer core configured to receive an input signal and to mix the input signal with a local oscillator signal to produce a mixed output signal. The method comprises the coupling a multistage amplifier to the mixer core, wherein the multistage amplifier is capable of amplifying the input signal and includes at least a first transistor stage and a second transistor stage. The method further comprises connecting a global feedback network between the first transistor stage and the second transistor stage. The feedback network is configured to provide feedback from the first transistor stage to the second transistor stage.
In general, in yet another aspect, the invention is directed to a radio communication system capable of down-converting a high frequency signal or up-converting a baseband signal. The system comprises a mixer circuit having a mixer core configured to receive an input signal and to mix the, input signal with a local oscillator signal to produce a mixed output signal. A multistage amplifier is coupled to the mixer core and is capable of amplifying the input signal. The multistage amplifier includes at least a first transistor stage and a second transistor stage. A global feedback network connects the first transistor stage and the second transistor stage, and is configured to provide feedback from the first transistor stage to the second transistor stage.
In general, in still another aspect, the invention is directed to a Gilbert mixer having a mixer core configured to receive an input signal and to mix the input signal with a local oscillator signal to produce a mixed output signal. An amplifier is coupled to the mixer core and is capable of amplifying the input signal. The amplifier includes at least a first transistor stage and a second transistor stage. A global feedback network connects the first transistor stage and the second transistor stage. The feedback network is configured to provide feedback from the first transistor stage to the second transistor stage.
In general, in yet another aspect, the invention is directed to a multiphase mixer having at least a first phase mixer core and a second phase mixer core. An amplifier is coupled to the first phase mixer core and the second phase mixer core. The amplifier comprises- a first stage having separate drivers for driving each mixer core a second stage for receiving an input signal. A separate global feedback network connects each driver of the first transistor stage to the second transistor stage of the amplifier. Each feedback network is configured to provide feedback from the first transistor stage to the second transistor stage.
It should be emphasized that the term comprises/comprising, when used in this specification, is taken to specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps, or components, but does not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, components, or groups thereof,
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
A better understanding of the invention may be had by reference to the following detailed description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Figure 1 is a schematic diagram of a typical Gilbert mixer; Figure 2 is chart showing the linearity of the typical Gilbert mixer;
Figure 3 is a schematic diagram of a Gilbert mixer according to embodiments of the invention; and
Figure 4 is a schematic diagram of an exemplary quadrature mixer according to embodiments of the invention,
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
Following is a detailed description of the invention with reference to the drawings wherein reference numerals for the same or similar elements are carried forward. It should be noted that the transistors shown in the drawings are intended to be general in nature and do not indicate a preference for a particular type of transistor. Likewise, the equations provided herein are intended to be general in nature and do not indicate a preference for a particular type of transistor. In addition, all resistors described herein can be some other form of impedance such as capacitive (C), resistive (R), inductive (L), RC, RL, and the like, In general, the invention is capable of being implemented with any suitable type of transistor (e.g., BJT, MOS, P-MOS, N-MOS, NPN, PNP, etc.), using any suitable feedback mechanism (e.g., capacitive, resistive, inductive, RC, RL, etc.), and using any suitable biasing scheme (e.g., current source, bootstrap, resistors, LC, etc:).
Embodiments of the invention provide an improved Gilbert mixer. The Gilbert mixer of the invention includes a conventional mixer core coupled to a high linearity, multistage amplifier. The multistage amplifier includes two or more transistor stages connected together in a global feedback arrangement. The global feedback provides a greater closed-loop gain for the amplifier than the local feedback arrangement, thereby increasing the linearity of the amplifier,
A fundamental limitation of the local feedback arrangement shown in Figure 1 is that the amount of feedback is dependent on the voltage drop across the feedback resistor R£. The amount of feedback can be measured in terms of the loop gain L, a simplified expression for which can be given by:
L =g Rs, (2) where gm is the transconductance of the transistor (e.g., Q\ or Q2) and RB is the feedback resistor. Specifically, for bi-polar junction transistors (BJT), the transconductance gm is dependent on the collector current lc of the transistor Q 1 or Q2 and the thermal voltage Vτ («25mV at room temperature) of the transistors. Thus, g„ can be expressed as: g» = IJVτ (3)
The equation for the loop gain L then becomes:
L - (IcRε)/Vτ= VEIVr (4) As can be seen from Equation (4), the loop gain L is limited by the voltage Vs across the feedback resistor Rε. A feedback factor F may be defined to indicate the amount of feedback provided to the amplifier in terms of the loop gain L, where F = 1 + L. Improving the feedback factor F results in improvement of the linearity of the Gilbert mixer. However, the amount improvement is limited due to the limitation on L by the voltage Vs across the feedback resistor RE. For example, assuming that in a typical case, VE - 0.5V, then the feedback factor is limited to a maximum of F « 21. Similar results may be derived for other transistor types (e.g., MOS, etc.).
Furthermore, because the local feedback arrangement is, by design, a single stage arrangement (i.e., one transistor stage), the isolation of the RF input signal from the LO input signal may not be sufficiently high for modern radio communication systems such as UMTS.
Therefore, in accordance with embodiments of the invention, instead of a local feedback arrangement, a global feedback arrangement is used for the amplifier. Referring now to Figure 3, a Gilbert mixer 300 according to embodiments of the invention is shown. The Gilbert mixer 300 of the present invention, like the Gilbert mixer 100 of Figure 1, includes an amplifier 302 and a mixer core 304. The mixer core 304 is a typical mixer circuit that is substantially identical to the mixer core 104 shown in Figure 1. The amplifier 302, on the other hand, is a multistage amplifier design that constitutes a substantial departure from existing Gilbert mixer amplifier designs. As alluded to above, the amplifier 302 of the present invention includes at least one additional transistor stage, QMl and QM2, connected to the existing transistors Ql and Q2, The source terminals of the second stage transistors QMl and QM2 are connected to the common ground V;S. The drain terminals of the second stage transistors QMl and QM2 are connected to the gate terminals of the first stage transistors Ql and Q2, respectively. Pull-up resistors Re connect the drain terminals of the second stage transistors QMl and QMl to the power supply y. The gate terminals of the second stage transistors QMl and QM2 now form the RF input port 306, (The LO input port 308 and the IF output port 310 are formed in substantially the same manner as their counterparts in Figure 1.) Pull-up resistors Ri, connect the gate terminals of the second stage transistors QMl and QMl to the power supply Vdd. In accordance with embodiments of the invention, feedback resistors RF connect the source terminals of the first stage transistors Ql and Q2 to the gate terminals of the second stage transistors QMl and QMl, respectively. The feedback resistors Rp help define a global feedback across both stages of the multistage amplifier 302. Kirchoff s law applied to the node connecting Rh RP, the gate of O 1 and the RF input ( („) results in the following: iit -REiJ(RB + Rp) (5) Note that in Equation (5), the feedback signal REiJ RE + RF) is defined in terms of a current, whereas in Equation (1), the feedback signal ijie is defined in terms of a voltage. When the loop gain is high (i.e., I»10), it will become very small and the gain may be approximated as:
Figure imgf000009_0001
Operation of the amplifier 302 will now be described with respect to transistors QMl and Ql (which will be substantially the same for transistors QMl and Q2). The combined loop gain for these two transistors may be defined as L- βiAi, where βi is the transfer function of the current feedback-network and is, in this case, determined by the network of Rs and RF (assuming the loop gain L to be high when the gate of QMl is a virtual ground):
Figure imgf000009_0002
and the open-loop current gain At for Ql and QMl can be expressed as:
At = (RF //RM x gnm x (&// At) x . g"' , (8)
where Rn mi R>m denote the input impedance looking into the input node of Ql and QMl, respectively, and Rς is the biasing impedance to the collector of QMl. From Equation (7), it can be seen that the additional loop gain LM, provided by QMl is:
Lm i_ (9)
This additional gain may be rewritten as fl Ei, where Am = RF //R )*g R lRn) (10) and represents the gain of QMl viewed as a transimpedance amplifier, and ^Hg iε) is simply the feedback factor for Ql (recall that the feedback factor for a one stage amplifier was defined above as F=l+L), Thus, with the proper selection of resistors, it is possible to obtain a gain that is larger than the gain obtained from single stage amplifiers such as, for example, the amplifier shown in Figure 1 , Therefore, with the use of a multistage amplifier in the Gilbert mixer, the requirement of higher linearity is easier to fulfill. Moreover, with a multistage amplifier, the isolation of the RF input signal from the LO input signal is improved as well,
It should be noted that, although a two-stage amplifier has been described, in the general case, for a multi-stage amplifier, QM may represent one or more transistors in cascade. Furthermore, although the invention has been described with respect to a down- convert application, the principles and teaching herein are equally applicable to up-convert applications.
Figure 4 illustrates an embodiment of the of the invention wherein the Gilbert mixer 300 is used to implement a quadrature mixer 400, The exemplary quadrature mixer 400 includes a mixer stage 402, a splitter stage 404, and a low noise amplifier (LNA) stage 406, For a more complete description of these stages, reference is made to U.S. Utility Patent Application Serial No. 10/383,370, entitled "Quadrature Switching Mixer," filed on March 6, 2003, which is incorporated herein.
As can be seen, the mixer stage 402 includes an in-phase mixer core 408a and 408b, each of which is connected to a multistage amplifier, The in-phase mixer core 408a, for example, is connected to a multistage amplifier comprising transistors Q1A which drives the in-phase mixer core, Q1B which drives the quadrature mixer core, and QMl which connects the RF input to the inputs of QlA and Q1B. Likewise, the quadrature mixer core 408b is connected to a multistage amplifier comprising Q2B which drives the in-phase mixer core 408a, Q2A which drives the quadrature mixer core 408b, and QM2 which connects the RF input to the inputs of Q2B and Q2A. The drain terminals of QMl and QM2 are connected to the gate terminals of QlA & Q1B and Q2B & Q2A, respectively. The gate terminals of QMl and QMl are connected to the source terminals of QlA & Q1B and Q2B & Q2A, respectively, through a global feedback network comprising resistors RPA and Rm, respectively. In some embodiments, the global feedback network may also include a capacitive element C connected between the resistors RFA and Rm and the gate terminals of QMl and QMl. Pull-up resistors R connect the drain terminals of each transistor in the splitter section 404 to a common power supply Vdi as shown. Similarly, pull-down resistors R connect the source terminals of the drive transistors QlA, 1B, Q2B, and Q2A to a common ground Fw. The source terminals of the feedback transistors QMl and QM2, on the other hand, are connected directly to ground. In operation, by connecting the gates of QlA and Q1B to the drain of QMl, the RF input signal is split evenly between QlA and QlA, while the feedback signals are provided by RFA and Rm> which in turn recombine the feedback signals at the input of QMl. A similar result is obtained with respect to Q2B, Q2A and QM2. With this arrangement, the RF signal is evenly distributed to both mixer cores while a common global feedback is preserved. The gain balance is set by the splitting ratio or gain ratio at the inputs of QlA and Q1B (and also Q2B and Q2A) and by the ratio RFA/RFB- In general, it is desirable to split the input RF signal substantially evenly, i.e., make the gains of QlA and Q1B (and also Q2B and Q2A) substantially equal to each other, as well as RFA substantially equal to Rm, but other configurations are possible. For example, in some embodiments, the input RF signal may not be evenly split between the driving transistors such that the splitting ratio may be different for Ql & Q1B relative to Q2B & Q2A.
Although, the preceding paragraphs describe a quadrature mixer arrangement, in some embodiments, it is possible to use an alternative phase relationship between the two mixer cores, including the same phase and opposing phase. In other embodiments, it is also possible to accommodate more phases by adding an appropriate number of transistors, feedback resistors and mixer cores. The total available phase angle may then be evenly or substantially evenly distributed amongst the available mixer cores (e.g., 360 degrees/number of mixer cores) so that all mixer cores are offset by the same phase angle. Alternatively, only some of the mixer cores may be offset by the same phase angle, while other mixer cores are offset by different phase angles.
Thus, while particular embodiments and applications of the present invention have been illustrated and described, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to the precise construction and compositions disclosed herein, and that modifications and variations may be made to the foregoing without departing from the scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims.

Claims

CLAIMSWhat is claimed is:
1. A mixer circuit, comprising: s a mixer core configured to receive an input signal, and to mix said input signal with a local oscillator signal to produce a mixed output signal; a multistage amplifier coupled to said mixer core capable of amplifying said input signal, said multistage amplifier including at least a first transistor stage and a second transistor stage; and 0 a global feedback network connecting said first transistor stage and said second transistor stage, said feedback network configured to provide feedback from said first transistor stage to said second transistor stage.
2. The mixer circuit according to claim 1, wherein said second transistor stage s of said amplifier comprises a first transistor grounded to a common ground, an output of said first transistor connected to an input of said first transistor stage, and an input of said first transistor connected to said global feedback network, wherein said input of said first transistor forms an input of said amplifier, and pull-up impedances connect said input and said output of said first transistor to a common power supply. 0
3. The mixer circuit according to claim 2, wherein said second transistor stage of said amplifier further comprises a second transistor grounded to a common ground, an output of said second transistor connected to an input of said first transistor stage, and an input of said second transistor connected to said global feedback network, wherein said 5 input of said second transistor forms an input of said amplifier, and pull-up impedances connect said input and said output of said second transistor to a common power supply.
π
4. The mixer circuit according to claim 3, wherein said global feedback network includes a pull-down impedance connecting said first transistor stage to a common ground and a feedback impedance connecting said first transistor stage to said respective
; input of said first transistor and said second transistor, said feedback impedance and said pull-down impedance selected to provide a desired loop gain for said amplifier.
5. The mixer circuit according to claim 1, wherein said mixer circuit is used to down-convert a high frequency signal or up-convert a baseband signal in a radio a communication system.
6. The mixer circuit according to claim 1, wherein said mixer circuit is a Gilbert mixer, and said mixer core is a conventional mixer core.
s 7, A method of improving linearity in a mixer circuit, said mixer circuit including a mixer core configured to receive an input signal, and to mix said input signal with a local oscillator signal to produce a mixed output signal, said method comprising: coupling a multistage amplifier to said mixer core, said multistage amplifier capable of amplifying said input signal and including at least a first transistor stage and a second o transistor stage; and connecting a global feedback network between said first transistor stage and said second transistor stage, said feedback network configured to provide feedback from said first transistor stage to said second transistor stage.
!5 8. The method according to claim 7, wherein said second transistor stage of said amplifier comprises a first transistor grounded to a common ground, an output of said first transistor connected to an input of said first transistor stage, and an input of said first transistor connected to said global feedback network, wherein said input of said first transistor forms an input of said amplifier, and pull-up impedances connect said input and so said output of said first transistor to a common power supply.
9. The method according to claim 8, wherein said second transistor stage of said amplifier further comprises a second transistor grounded to a common ground, an output of said second transistor connected to an input of said first transistor stage, and an input of said second transistor connected to said global feedback network, wherein said input of said second transistor forms an input of said amplifier, and pull-up impedances connect said input and said output of said second transistor to a common power supply.
10. The method according to claim 9, wherein said global feedback network includes a pull-down impedance connecting said first transistor stage to a common- ground and a feedback impedance connecting said first transistor stage to said respective input of said first transistor and said second transistor, said feedback impedance and said pull-down impedance selected to provide a desired loop gain for said amplifier.
11, The method according to claim 7, further comprising down-converting a high frequency signal or up-converting a baseband signal with improved linearity using said mixer circuit.
12, The method according to claim 7, wherein said mixer circuit is a Gilbert mixer, and said mixer core is a conventional mixer core,
13, A radio communication system capable of down-converting a high frequency signal or up-converting a baseband signal, comprising: a mixer circuit; a mixer core in said mixer circuit configured to receive an input signal, and to mix said input signal with a local oscillator signal to produce a mixed output signal; a multistage amplifier coupled to said mixer core capable of amplifying said input signal, said multistage amplifier including at least a first transistor stage and a second transistor stage; and a global feedback network connecting said first transistor stage and said second transistor stage, said feedback network configured to provide feedback from said first transistor stage to said second transistor stage.
14. Tha-system according to claim 13, wherein said second transistor stage of said amplifier comprises a first transistor grounded to a common ground, an output of said first transistor connected to an input of said first transistor stage, and an input of said first transistor connected to said global feedback network, wherein said input of said first transistor forms an input of said amplifier, and pull-up impedances connect said input and said output of said first transistor to a common power supply,
15. The system according to claim 14, wherein said second transistor stage of said amplifier further comprises a second transistor grounded to a common ground, an output of said second transistor connected to an input of said first transistor stage, and an input of said second transistor connected to said global feedback network, wherein said input of said second transistor forms an input of said amplifier, and pull-up impedances connect said input and said output of said second transistor to a common power supply.
16. The system according to claim 15, wherein said global feedback network includes a pull-down impedance connecting said first transistor stage to a common- ground and a feedback impedance connecting said first transistor stage to said respective input of said first transistor and said second transistor, said feedback impedance and said pull-down impedance selected to provide a desired loop gain for said amplifier.
17, The system according to claim 13, wherein said mixer circuit is a Gilbert mixer, and said mixer core is a conventional mixer core.
18. In a Gilbert mixer having a mixer core configured to receive an input signal and to mix said input signal with a local oscillator signal to produce a mixed output signal, and an amplifier coupled to said mixer core capable of amplifying said input signal, said amplifier including at least a first transistor stage, the improvements comprising: a second transistor stage in said amplifier; and a global feedback network connecting said first transistor stage and said second transistor stage of said amplifier, said feedback network configured to provide feedback from said first transistor stage to said second transistor stage.
19. The Gilbert mixer according to claim 18, wherein said second transistor stage of said amplifier comprises a first transistor grounded to a common ground, an output of said first transistor connected to an input of said first transistor stage, and an input of said first transistor connected to said global feedback network, wherein said input of said first transistor forms an input of said amplifier, and pull-up impedances connect said input and said output of said first transistor to a common power supply.
20. The Gilbert mixer according to claim 19, wherein said second transistor stage of said amplifier further comprises a second transistor grounded to a common ground, an output of said second transistor connected to an input of said first transistor stage, and an input of said second transistor connected to said global feedback network, wherein said input of said second transistor forms an input of said amplifier, and pull-up impedances connect said input and said output of said second transistor to a common power supply.
21. The Gilbert mixer according to claim the 20, wherein said global feedback network includes a pull-down impedance connecting said first transistor stage to a common ground and a feedback impedance connecting said first transistor stage to said respective input of said first transistor and said second transistor, said feedback impedance and said pull-down impedance selected to provide a desired loop gain for said amplifier,
22, The Gilbert mixer according to claim 18, wherein said Gilbert mixer is used to down-convert a high frequency signal or up-convert a baseband signal in a radio communication system,
23, A multiphase mixer having at least a first phase mixer core and a second phase mixer core and an amplifier coupled to said first phase mixer core and said second phase mixer core, said amplifier comprising: a first stage having separate drivers for driving each mixer core; a second stage for receiving an input signal; and a separate global feedback network connecting each driver of said first transistor stage to said second transistor stage of said amplifier, each feedback network configured to provide feedback from said first transistor stage to said second transistor stage.
24. The multiphase mixer of claim 23, wherein said second phase mixer core is in quadrature phase with respect to said first phase mixer core.
25, The multiphase mixer of claim 23, wherein the total available phase angle is evenly distributed amongst all mixer cores.
26. The multiphase mixer of claim 23, some mixer cores have phase angles that are identical.
27. The multiphase mixer according to claim 23, wherein said second transistor stage of said amplifier comprises a first transistor grounded to a common ground, an output of said first transistor connected to an input of each driver of said first transistor stage, and an input of said first transistor connected to said global feedback network, wherein said input of said first transistor forms an input of said amplifier, and pull-up impedances connect said input and said output of said first transistor to a common power supply.
28. The multiphase mixer according to claim 27, wherein said second transistor stage of said amplifier further comprises a second transistor grounded to a common ground, an output of said second transistor connected to an input of said drivers of said first transistor stage, and an input of said second transistor connected to said global feedback network, wherein said input of said second transistor forms an input of said amplifier, and pull-up impedances connect said input and said output of said second transistor to a common power supply.
29, The multiphase mixer according to claim the 28, wherein said global feedback network includes a pull-down impedance connecting said first transistor stage to a common ground and a feedback impedance connecting said first transistor stage to said respective input of said first transistor and said second transistor, said feedback impedance and said pull-down impedance selected to provide a desired loop gain for said amplifier.
30, The multiphase mixer according to claim 23, wherein said quadrature mixer is used to down-convert a high frequency signal or up-convert a baseband signal in a radio communication system.
31. The multiphase mixer according to claim 23, wherein a splitting ratio of said driver for said first phase mixer core and said driver for said second phase mixer core is substantially equal to one.
32. The multiphase mixer according to claim 31, wherein a splitting ratio for other drivers for said first and second phase mixer cores is substantially not equal to one.
PCT/EP2003/003472 2002-04-04 2003-04-03 Linearity improvement of gilbert mixers WO2003085819A2 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP03727274.7A EP1490961B1 (en) 2002-04-04 2003-04-03 Linearity improvement of gilbert mixers
AU2003233952A AU2003233952A1 (en) 2002-04-04 2003-04-03 Linearity improvement of gilbert mixers

Applications Claiming Priority (6)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US37032202P 2002-04-04 2002-04-04
US60/370,322 2002-04-04
US10/383,370 US6891423B2 (en) 2002-04-04 2003-03-06 Quadrature switching mixer with reduced leakage
US10/383,370 2003-03-06
US10/400,114 2003-03-26
US10/400,114 US7054609B2 (en) 2002-04-04 2003-03-26 Linearity improvement of Gilbert mixers

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2003085819A2 true WO2003085819A2 (en) 2003-10-16
WO2003085819A3 WO2003085819A3 (en) 2004-02-19

Family

ID=28795008

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/EP2003/003472 WO2003085819A2 (en) 2002-04-04 2003-04-03 Linearity improvement of gilbert mixers

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (1) US7054609B2 (en)
EP (1) EP1490961B1 (en)
CN (1) CN100550603C (en)
AU (1) AU2003233952A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2003085819A2 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN111987995A (en) * 2019-05-24 2020-11-24 核工业西南物理研究院 Comb signal source based on mixing modulation feedback loop

Families Citing this family (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7672659B2 (en) * 2002-04-04 2010-03-02 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) Mixer with feedback
US7107025B2 (en) * 2003-04-25 2006-09-12 Broadcom Corporation High gain, highly linear mixer
JP2005269232A (en) * 2004-03-18 2005-09-29 Renesas Technology Corp Frequency mixer
US7529529B2 (en) * 2005-03-04 2009-05-05 Intel Corporation Low noise, high-linearity RF front end receiver
ATE512498T1 (en) * 2006-08-09 2011-06-15 St Ericsson Sa SIGNAL PROCESSOR WITH A FREQUENCY CONVERTER
US7640002B2 (en) * 2006-09-14 2009-12-29 Infineon Technologies Ag RF amplifier
DE102006043902B4 (en) * 2006-09-19 2016-09-22 Intel Deutschland Gmbh Current transformers, frequency mixers and frequency mixing techniques
CN101154922B (en) * 2006-09-29 2010-05-12 锐迪科微电子(上海)有限公司 Down frequency conversion mixer
EP2028760B1 (en) * 2007-08-22 2020-06-17 Semiconductor Components Industries, LLC A low side driver
US7907928B2 (en) 2007-11-07 2011-03-15 Micron Technology, Inc. High speed, wide frequency-range, digital phase mixer and methods of operation
US8089309B2 (en) * 2009-06-26 2012-01-03 Bae Systems Information And Electronic Systems Integration Inc. Transimpedance amplifier input stage mixer
CN102096073B (en) * 2010-12-16 2013-03-20 重庆西南集成电路设计有限责任公司 Multi-channel multi-mode satellite navigation radio-frequency integrated circuit
US8593206B2 (en) 2011-04-12 2013-11-26 Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd. Up-conversion mixer having a reduced third order harmonic
US8838058B2 (en) * 2011-05-09 2014-09-16 Bae Systems Information And Electronic Systems Integration Inc. Extending the upper frequency limit of a communications radio
CN102394566B (en) * 2011-09-16 2014-07-09 复旦大学 Gilbert cell mixer with automatic optimal bias and harmonic wave control

Family Cites Families (31)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3864751A (en) * 1973-10-04 1975-02-04 Ibm Induced bias magnetoresistive read transducer
US4639806A (en) * 1983-09-09 1987-01-27 Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha Thin film magnetic head having a magnetized ferromagnetic film on the MR element
US4663685A (en) * 1985-08-15 1987-05-05 International Business Machines Magnetoresistive read transducer having patterned longitudinal bias
EP0341531A3 (en) * 1988-05-11 1991-05-15 Licentia Patent-Verwaltungs-GmbH Controllable wide band amplifier
JP2628742B2 (en) * 1989-03-10 1997-07-09 株式会社日立製作所 Electromagnetic fuel injection valve
DE59009672D1 (en) * 1989-06-09 1995-10-26 Telefunken Microelectron Circuit arrangement for frequency conversion.
GB9017418D0 (en) 1990-08-08 1990-09-19 Gen Electric Co Plc Half frequency mixer
US5155724A (en) * 1990-09-26 1992-10-13 Rockwell International Corporation Dual mode diplexer/multiplexer
DE69209873T2 (en) * 1991-03-01 1996-10-17 Toshiba Kawasaki Kk Multiplier circuit
US5410743A (en) * 1993-06-14 1995-04-25 Motorola, Inc. Active image separation mixer
JPH07111484A (en) * 1993-08-20 1995-04-25 Hitachi Ltd Radio communication equipment
US5570056A (en) * 1995-06-07 1996-10-29 Pacific Communication Sciences, Inc. Bipolar analog multipliers for low voltage applications
US5589791A (en) * 1995-06-09 1996-12-31 Analog Devices, Inc. Variable gain mixer having improved linearity and lower switching noise
DE19523433C2 (en) 1995-06-28 1998-04-23 Telefunken Microelectron Circuit arrangement for frequency conversion
FR2746228A1 (en) * 1996-03-13 1997-09-19 Philips Electronics Nv SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE INCLUDING A RING MIXER
US5859558A (en) 1997-04-11 1999-01-12 Raytheon Company Low voltage analog front end
US6037825A (en) * 1997-11-04 2000-03-14 Nortel Networks Corporation Tree mixer operable in class A, B or AB
US6054889A (en) * 1997-11-11 2000-04-25 Trw Inc. Mixer with improved linear range
FI107657B (en) 1998-03-11 2001-09-14 Nokia Mobile Phones Ltd Coupling to control the impedance of a differential active component
DE19819092C2 (en) 1998-04-29 2001-02-01 Cell Gmbh Q Receiver for high-frequency, vector-modulated signals
GB2341502B (en) 1998-09-08 2003-01-22 Mitel Semiconductor Ltd Image reject mixer circuit arrangements
US6226509B1 (en) * 1998-09-15 2001-05-01 Nortel Networks Limited Image reject mixer, circuit, and method for image rejection
JP3204233B2 (en) * 1998-11-30 2001-09-04 日本電気株式会社 Frequency-voltage conversion circuit, receiver, and method of controlling frequency-voltage conversion characteristics
US7072636B2 (en) * 1999-03-25 2006-07-04 Zenith Electronics Corporation Printed circuit doubly balanced mixer for upconverter
GB2334163B (en) * 1999-06-10 2001-02-21 Mitel Semiconductor Ltd Variable transconductance amplifier
US6429697B1 (en) * 1999-10-05 2002-08-06 Analog Devices, Inc. Multi-stage, low-offset, fast-recovery, comparator system and method
FI108584B (en) 2000-03-24 2002-02-15 Nokia Corp Method for generating an intermediate frequency signal in a mixer and a mixer
JP3510556B2 (en) * 2000-03-30 2004-03-29 Nec化合物デバイス株式会社 Image rejection mixer and receiver using the same
FR2807896A1 (en) * 2000-04-18 2001-10-19 Koninkl Philips Electronics Nv LOW NOISE FREQUENCY CONVERTER WITH HIGH IMAGE FREQUENCY REJECTION
US6693980B1 (en) * 2000-09-18 2004-02-17 Telasic Communications, Inc. Wideband fast-hopping receiver front-end and mixing method
AU2002246874A1 (en) * 2001-01-02 2002-08-06 Intersil Americas Inc. Precision automatic gain control circuit

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
None

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN111987995A (en) * 2019-05-24 2020-11-24 核工业西南物理研究院 Comb signal source based on mixing modulation feedback loop

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US7054609B2 (en) 2006-05-30
CN1659778A (en) 2005-08-24
WO2003085819A3 (en) 2004-02-19
US20030236083A1 (en) 2003-12-25
CN100550603C (en) 2009-10-14
EP1490961A2 (en) 2004-12-29
EP1490961B1 (en) 2015-03-11
AU2003233952A1 (en) 2003-10-20

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7054609B2 (en) Linearity improvement of Gilbert mixers
US7602227B2 (en) Differential amplifier circuit and mixer circuit having improved linearity
JP4542629B2 (en) Method and apparatus for selecting from a plurality of mixers
US7973587B2 (en) Transconductor having high linearity and programmable gain and mixer using the same
US6230001B1 (en) Active commutated double balanced mixer
US6100759A (en) Low noise, integrated AC differential amplifier
US20060128341A1 (en) Current driven polyphase filters and method of operation
JPH10233625A (en) Image exclusion mixer circuit device
US6906601B2 (en) Variable phase shifter and a system using variable phase shifter
US6798268B2 (en) Single-ended differential circuit using complementary devices
US6242963B1 (en) Differential mixer with improved linearity
EP2110947B1 (en) Variable gain RF amplifier
US6429721B1 (en) Mixer with stepped gain and constant common mode DC output bias voltage
US7027792B1 (en) Topology for a single ended input dual balanced mixer
EP1537651B1 (en) System and method for establishing a bias current using a feedback loop
US6029060A (en) Mixer with current mirror load
CA2216584A1 (en) Low distortion large swing frequency down converter filter amplifier circuit
US6437631B2 (en) Analog multiplying circuit and variable gain amplifying circuit
US6531920B1 (en) Differential amplifier circuit
US5963858A (en) Method and apparatus for mixing signals
US7613440B2 (en) Mixer circuit
WO2004021562A2 (en) System and method for establishing the input impedance of an amplifier in a stacked configuration
JP2002305429A (en) Conversion circuit
JPH04207226A (en) Input/output circuit
JP2002016453A (en) Radio frequency amplifier and tuner

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EC EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NI NO NZ OM PH PL PT RO RU SC SD SE SG SK SL TJ TM TN TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VC VN YU ZA ZM ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZM ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LU MC NL PT RO SE SI SK TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2003727274

Country of ref document: EP

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 20038128861

Country of ref document: CN

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 2003727274

Country of ref document: EP

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: JP

WWW Wipo information: withdrawn in national office

Country of ref document: JP