WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM AND A METHOD OF
OPERATING A WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
This invention relates to a wireless communication system and a method of operating
a wireless communication system.
The invention concerns wireless communication systems having distributed antenna
arrangements, as may be deployed, for example, to provide coverage in an indoor
environment, such as an office.
In a WCDMA system, the power levels transmitted by mobile users are subjected to
constant power control (PC) by their closest base station. This creates a problem,
because the PC dynamic range limits the minimum power that a mobile user can
transmit. Thus, if the mobile user is operating at this minimum power level and is
close to the base station, the signal strength received at the base station may well be
too high in relation to receiver sensitivity. If another mobile user is located much
further away from the base station, at the boundary of the cell, for example, the signal
levels received from both mobile users may differ by an amount exceeding the linear
dynamic range of the base station even if the more distant mobile user is operating at
the maximum available power level. This results in either distortion of the stronger
signal, which may degrade the performance of all users in the cell, or adjustment of
the dynamic range of the base station to accommodate linear operation in response to
the higher strength signals. However, an adjustment of dynamic range is generally
undesirable because the noise floor of the receiver will then increase and so mobile
users producing weak signals (e.g. users at the cell edge) will be lost from coverage.
This leads to cell shrinkage and potential system degradation. Similar considerations
also apply in the case of mobile users operating on adjacent channels. Although such
users derive some protection from operation of the receiver's adjacent channel
rejection ratio, the aforementioned problems may be even greater because the power
control imposed on one channel is independent of the power control imposed on an
adjacent channel.
In general, the described problems are expected to be greatest, for both co-channel and
adjacent-channel mobile users, for in-building scenarios where there are likely to be
users located very close to an indoor base station antenna whose signals will mask
those of more distant users.
When a distributed antenna arrangement is deployed to provide coverage in an indoor
environment, the signal produced by each mobile user is received by a plurality of
discrete antenna elements distributed around a building.
The inventors have discovered that characteristics of a distributed antenna
arrangement can be exploited to eliminate or reduce the aforementioned signal
blocking.
In effect, improvement may be accomplished by deselecting any antenna element
encountering a signal that is too strong for the required dynamic range of the base
station.
According to one aspect of the invention there is provided a wireless communication
system including a base station and an antenna arrangement having a plurality of
distributed antenna elements each capable of supplying an antenna signal to the base
station for processing, wherein at least one said antenna element can be deselected by
selectively excluding the respective antenna signal or antenna signals from processing
by the base station.
According to another aspect of the invention there is provided a method of operating
a wireless communication system including a base station and an antenna arrangement
having a plurality of distributed antenna elements each capable of supplying an
antenna signal to the base station for processing, the method including deselecting at
least one said antenna element by selectively excluding the respective antenna signal
or antenna signals from processing by the base station.
Although deselection of one or more antenna element reduces the effectiveness of the
overall distributed antenna arrangement when operating in normal conditions, it serves
to avoid the catastrophic impact of receiver signal blocking and will only compromise
coverage in a localised region around the or each deselected antenna element.
An embodiment of a wireless communication system according to the invention is
described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings of
which:
Figure 1 illustrates a distributed antenna arrangement of which the individual antenna
elements (DAE) are connected to a base station in the form of a CDMA receiver and
receive signals from a single mobile user (MS),
Figure 2 illustrates deployment of two distributed antenna arrangements in a building,
Figure 3 shows test results obtained using one of the distributed antenna arrangements
having eight antenna elements, and
Figure 4 shows test results obtained using another of the distributed antenna
arrangements having six antenna elements.
Referring to Figure 1, the mobile user (MS) is very close to one of the antenna
elements DAE1. Thus, the corresponding antenna signal received at the base station
will tend to mask antenna signals produced by mobile users that are more distant from
the antenna elements. This is illustrated by the following example.
The minimum output power P^ that can be transmitted by a mobile user (MS) is
typically -44dBm. At close range e.g. 5m from a nearby antenna element (DAE1) the
free space path loss at 2 GHz is approximately 52.4 dB. Assuming an indoor DAE
effective gain (Gain^) of 2.5dBi and an effective MS gain (Gain - f OdBd
(=2.15dBi) the received signal strength (Rx) at the antenna element and consequently
at the central base station location (assuming that additional cable losses are overcome
by a low noise amplifier) is:
Rχ =EIRPMS-PathLoss +Gain ^ = -91 5dBm
where EIRPMS is the effective isotropic radiated power of the MS given by:
EIRPMS=Pτχ+GainMS
Hitherto, it has been customary to reduce the gain of the base station amplifier so as
to operate in the linear region in response to higher signal strength, and so in this
example the maximum level would need to be adjusted to - 91.75dBm. Since the
required signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio requirement (SINR) for e.g. VOICE
SERVICE is approximately -18dB, the required receiver sensitivity at the base station,
RxSens would become -109.75dBm (i.e. -91.75dBm-18dB) which, of course, is much
higher than the original receiver sensitivity of approximately -121.1 dBm for which
only thermal noise levels are considered and no blocking effects are present.
Therefore, mobile users producing weaker signals would be lost from coverage.
By contrast, in accordance with this embodiment of the invention, the nearby antenna
element DAE1 is deselected by excluding its antenna signal from processing by the
base station, thereby enabling the receiver sensitivity to be maintained at a relatively
low level.
Wireless communication systems having active and passive distributed antenna
arrangements may differ somewhat in their modes of operation.
In the case of an active distributed antenna arrangement, each antenna element has a
receiver (or at least a low noise amplifier) which can detect the received signal level.
The base station monitors the detected signal levels and deselects any antenna element
at which the detected signal level exceeds a preset threshold value commensurate with
a required dynamic range.
In the case of a passive distributed antenna arrangement, the base station monitors the
level of a resultant signal formed by combining the individual antenna signals. If the
resultant signal exceeds a preset threshold level, the base station would deselect
antenna elements sequentially, one-by-one, until the resultant signal is sufficiently
small.
This can be accomplished faster by subdividing the elements into two groups,
examining the combined signal in each group, then subdividing the group with the
higher combined signal and repeating the process until a single element is obtained.
This reduces the number of steps from N, where N is the number of elements, to less
then or equal to:
1 +ce//[log2(N)]
where ceil[.] represents the next highest integer.
Quantification of performance of a system according to the invention in which one or
more antenna element can be deselected to avoid the blocking effect in the uplink due
to a nearby user producing a very strong signal which can potentially mask the weaker
signals of other users near the edge of the cell is now illustrated with reference to a
particular implementation shown in Figures 2 to 4.
Referring to Figure 2, two distributed antenna arrangements having eight and six
antenna elements respectively were deployed to provide coverage in a 13-storey
building. The building includes a number of offices with different dimensions and is
considered to be typical of an office environment. The average floor distances were
assumed to be 4 metres, whereas attenuations of 4 dB/wall and 15dB/floor were
assumed, as discussed, for example, in "Antennas and Propagation for Wireless
Communication Systems", Simon R. Saunders, Wiley & Sons, 1999 and "Radio
Coverage in buildings" J.M. Keenan et al, Br Telecom Journal, Vol 8, No 1, pp 19 -
24, January 1990. The propagation model proposed in the latter reference was used
for the analysis which follows. The antennas were located on the ceilings of the
different stories at either point A or point B shown in Figure 2, chosen to give best
coverage for a given number of antennas. With the arrangement including six antenna
elements only point A was used to locate the antennas. However, when eight antenna
elements were deployed, it was possible to locate the additional elements (7th and 8th)
at point B, on different floors of the building to obtain better coverage. The radiation
pattern of the antennas was a typical indoor omni-directional one, providing coverage
mainly downwards but with significant upward pointing lobes as well. Antenna gains
of the antenna elements were 2 dBi, whereas the antenna gain of the mobile station
was 0 dBd with maximum transmitted power of 21 dBm. Power control dynamic
range of 65 dB has been assumed providing a minimum transmitting power of -44
dBm (i.e. 21dBm-65dB). The analysis presented here is based on active distributed
antenna systems, for which an increase of the noise levels by an amount equal to
101og(N)> where N is the number of antenna elements occurs in the uplink.
As described in "CDMA Systems Engineering Handbook", J. S. Lee et al, 1998 the
maximum number of video (R = 144 Kbps) users that can be accommodated by a W-
CDMA system is approximately 13, as given by the following capacity equation:
Λ „. = +1
*" v.( MEb/No]Mm
where M^x is the maximum number of users of a W-CDMA system, W is the W-
CDMA chip rate, R is the bit rate of the service, v is the voice activity factor (v = 1
for video users), f is the inter-cell interference factor (other cell-to-home-cell
interference), and [Eb/No]MIN is the minimum signal energy per bit over the noise
spectral density that is required to meet a predefined quality of service (QoS).
Inter-cell interference factor values, f, between the interval 0.4-0.6 have been
proposed. However, due to improved isolation of buildings to the outdoor
environment the inter-cell interference factor was assumed to be 0.2, as proposed in
"Estimation of Capacity and required transmission power of WCDMA downlink
based on a downlink pole equation", K. Sipila et al, IEEE Vehicular Technology
Conference, Spring 2000, Tokyo, Vol 2, pp 1002-1005. The outage probabilities of
the deployed distributed antenna arrangement having eight antenna elements are
represented in Figure 3 by the dashed starred line 1. It is seen that for a coverage
requirement of 95% (or 5% outage) the maximum number of users has been reached.
The effect of a nearby user is shown by lines 2, 3, 4 and 5 for different distances 1.5,
2, 3 and 4 metres respectively from the closest antenna element. This shows that
without deselection, capacity reductions may be significant for distances up to 4
metres away from the antenna element. With a user standing at 1.5 metres away from
the antenna element, the capacity has more than halved (6 users instead of 13)
compared to when no blocking effects are present, whereas the capacity increases as
the user moves away from the affected antenna element.
The effect of deselecting the antenna element receiving the strongest signal, can be
seen with the solid starred lines 6,7. Each line corresponds to a different scenario
where one antenna element is deselected at a time. Based on a uniform user
distribution, it is seen that the differences regarding which antenna element is
deselected are not significant, provided that the deselected antenna element is the one
that receives the strongest signal. Degradation in terms of coverage and capacity is
small, since it is still possible to accommodate 12 users instead of 13, when no
blocking effects are present.
Figure 4 illustrates the effect of deselection using a distributed antenna arrangement
having six antenna elements. In this case, without deselection, the effect of a user
being very close to one of the antenna elements can be detrimental, since at distances
less than 2 metres it is not possible to provide coverage to any user at 95% of the
locations. By de-selecting the antenna element which receives the strongest signal
these detrimental effects are alleviated, as shown by the solid starred lines 6,7 of
Figure 4.