WO2004051793A2 - Small signal threshold and proportional gain distributed digital communications - Google Patents

Small signal threshold and proportional gain distributed digital communications Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2004051793A2
WO2004051793A2 PCT/US2003/038354 US0338354W WO2004051793A2 WO 2004051793 A2 WO2004051793 A2 WO 2004051793A2 US 0338354 W US0338354 W US 0338354W WO 2004051793 A2 WO2004051793 A2 WO 2004051793A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
dynamic range
signal level
signal
fair share
threshold
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2003/038354
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
WO2004051793A3 (en
Inventor
Donald R. Bauman
Philip M. Wala
Jerry E. Toms
Original Assignee
Adc Telecommunications, Inc.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=32396995&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=WO2004051793(A2) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Adc Telecommunications, Inc. filed Critical Adc Telecommunications, Inc.
Priority to EP03809206A priority Critical patent/EP1570585A2/en
Priority to AU2003302570A priority patent/AU2003302570A1/en
Publication of WO2004051793A2 publication Critical patent/WO2004051793A2/en
Publication of WO2004051793A3 publication Critical patent/WO2004051793A3/en

Links

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04WWIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W52/00Power management, e.g. TPC [Transmission Power Control], power saving or power classes
    • H04W52/04TPC
    • H04W52/38TPC being performed in particular situations
    • H04W52/42TPC being performed in particular situations in systems with time, space, frequency or polarisation diversity

Definitions

  • the present invention relates generally to communications and particularly to gain control of signals in a distributed antenna system.
  • cellular communication systems cover most major metropolitan areas as well as major highways through remote areas.
  • Cellular systems permit individuals with cellular handsets to communicate with base stations that are connected to the public switched telephone network (PSTN) or some other communication network.
  • PSTN public switched telephone network
  • holes where the signal from the base stations cannot reach.
  • the holes can be in tunnels, valleys, city streets between tall buildings, or any other location where a radio frequency (RF) signal is blocked.
  • RF radio frequency
  • the embodiments of the present invention encompass a method for proportional gain distribution in a system comprising a plurality of distributed antennas.
  • a sampling function senses a signal level at each of the plurality of distributed antennas.
  • Each of the plurality of signal levels are compared with a dynamic range fair share threshold.
  • Each signal level that is greater than the dynamic range fair share threshold is attenuated with a gain factor that is determined in response to a remaining portion of the total system dynamic range after attenuation of other signal levels.
  • Each signal level that is less than or equal to the dynamic range fair share threshold are attenuated with a unity gain factor.
  • Figure 1 shows a block diagram of one embodiment of a distributed digital antenna system of the present invention.
  • Figure 2 shows a block diagram of another embodiment of a distributed digital antenna system of the present invention.
  • Figure 3 shows a block diagram of one embodiment of a remote unit in accordance with the system of Figure 1.
  • Figure 4 shows a block diagram of one embodiment of a remote unit in accordance with the system of Figure 2.
  • Figure 5 shows a block diagram of one embodiment of a system having distributed summation and gain control with head end common attenuation.
  • Figure 6 shows a block diagram of one embodiment of a system having distributed summation and gain control with localized common attenuation.
  • Figure 7 shows a block diagram of one embodiment of a system having distributed summation and gain control with localized input attenuation.
  • Figure 8 shows a block diagram of one embodiment of a system having distributed summation and gain control with head end common attenuation.
  • Figure 9 shows a block diagram of one embodiment of a system having distributed summation and gain control with head end common attenuation.
  • Figure 10 shows a block diagram of one embodiment of a method for fair and balanced gain control in a distributed summation and gain control system of the present invention.
  • Figure 11 shows a flowchart of one embodiment of the fair and balanced attenuation method of the present invention.
  • the embodiments of the present invention retain the original system dynamic range.
  • a signal level threshold prevents small but valid signals from being attenuated to the point of being useless while the unused dynamic range is redistributed to signals that require the additional dynamic range.
  • the embodiments of the present invention refer to fiber optics as a communications medium between remote units and the host unit.
  • the communications medium connecting the remote units to the host unit can take any form including a laser through an air interface, an RF signal over coaxial cable, or an RF signal through an air interface.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a block diagram of one embodiment of a distributed digital antenna system of the present invention.
  • the system has a base station (100) that communicates over an RF link using an antenna (110).
  • the base station communicates over the RF link using any appropriate air interface standard.
  • the air interface standard comprises one of Advanced Mobile Phone System (AMPS), code division multiple access (CDMA), time division multiple access (TDMA), Global System for Mobile communications (GSM), or any other appropriate air interface standard.
  • AMPS Advanced Mobile Phone System
  • CDMA code division multiple access
  • TDMA time division multiple access
  • GSM Global System for Mobile communications
  • the RF link is made up of a forward link over which the base station
  • the base station (100) transmits to a subscriber unit (150).
  • the subscriber unit (150) transmits back to the base station (100) over a reverse link.
  • the subscriber unit (150) is either a mobile station or a fixed station such as in a wireless local loop system.
  • the base station (100) has the transmitters and receivers that enable the subscriber unit (150) to communicate with the public switched telephone network (PSTN) (130).
  • PSTN public switched telephone network
  • the base station links the subscriber unit (150) to other subscriber units that are communicating with other base stations.
  • the base station (100) is connected to the PSTN through a mobile switching center that handles the switching of calls with multiple base stations.
  • a host unit (101) is connected to the base station (100) through an RF link (115).
  • this link (115) is a coaxial cable.
  • Other embodiments use other types of connections such as an air interface or an optical fiber carrying digital RF signals.
  • the host unit (101) is responsible for converting the RF signal from the base station (100) to an optical signal for transmission over an optical medium.
  • the host unit (101) also converts a received optical signal to an RF signal for transmission to the base station (100). In other embodiments, the host unit (101) performs additional functions.
  • One or more remote units ( 105 - 108) are connected to the host unit
  • the remote units (105 - 108) are placed in locations that require additional signal coverage due to a lack of coverage by the base station (100).
  • the remote units (105 - 108) communicate with subscriber units in a particular remote unit's coverage area over an RF link provided by the remote unit antennas (135 - 138).
  • alternate embodiments use other quantities of remote units. If only a small geographic area requires coverage, as few as one remote unit (105) is used. If a highway in a remote area requires additional coverage, more than four remote units are typically used.
  • the embodiment of Figure 1 uses a separate fiber optic line for each direction of communication.
  • Each fiber carries a different wavelength.
  • the fiber optic line (120) from the host unit (101) to the remote units (105 - 108) carries a wavelength of ⁇ i.
  • the fiber optic line (125) from the remote units (105 - 108) to the host unit (101) carries a wavelength of ⁇ 2 .
  • each fiber carries the same wavelength.
  • the fiber optic line (125) from the remote units (105 - 108) carries a digital optical signal comprising the sum of the received signals from each of the remote units (105 - 108). The generation of this summation signal from the remote units is discussed subsequently.
  • Figure 2 illustrates a block diagram of another embodiment of a distributed digital antenna system of the present invention. This system is similar to the embodiment of Figure 1 except that the remote units (205 - 208) are connected to the host unit (201) over a single optical medium (220).
  • the system of Figure 2 has a base station (200) that communicates over an RF link using an antenna (210).
  • the base station can communicate over the RF link using any air interface standard.
  • the air interface standard may be code division multiple access (CDMA), time division multiple access (TDMA), or
  • GSM Global System for Mobile communications
  • the RF link is made up of a forward link over which the base station
  • the subscriber unit (200) transmits to a subscriber unit (250).
  • the subscriber unit (250) transmits back to the base station (200) over a reverse link.
  • the subscriber unit (250) may be a mobile station or a fixed station such as in a wireless local loop system.
  • the base station (200) has the transmitters and receivers that enable the subscriber unit (250) to communicate with the public switched telephone network (PSTN) (230).
  • PSTN public switched telephone network
  • the base station may also link the subscriber unit (250) to other subscriber units that are communicating with other base stations.
  • the base station (200) is connected to the PSTN through a mobile switching center that handles the switching of calls with multiple base stations.
  • a host unit (201) is connected to the base station (200) through an RF link (215). In one embodiment, this link (215) is a coaxial cable. Other embodiments use other types of connections such as an air interface or an optical fiber carrying digital RF signals.
  • the host unit (201) is responsible for converting the RF signal from the base station (200) to a digital optical signal for transmission over an optical medium.
  • the host unit (201) also converts a received optical signal to an RF signal for transmission to the base station (200). In other embodiments, the host unit (201) performs additional functions.
  • One or more remote units (205 - 208) are connected to the host unit
  • the remote units (205 - 208) are placed in locations that require additional signal coverage due to a lack of coverage by the base station (200). [0038] For purposes of illustration, four remote units (205 - 208) are shown. However, alternate embodiments use other quantities of remote units depending on the application.
  • the embodiment of Figure 2 uses a single fiber optic line (220) for communication both to and from the remote units (205 - 208). This is accomplished by the single fiber (220) carrying multiple wavelengths.
  • the fiber optic line (220) uses a wavelength of ⁇ i for the digital signal from the host unit to the remote units (205 - 208).
  • the fiber optic line (220) also carries a digital summation signal with a wavelength of ⁇ 2 . This digital summation signal is the sum of the received signals from the remote units (205 - 208). The generation of this summation signal from the remote units is discussed subsequently.
  • Figure 3 illustrates a block diagram of one embodiment of a remote unit
  • the remote unit (105) transmits and receives RF communication signals over the antenna (135). Both the receive and transmit circuitry is connected to the antenna (135) through a diplexer (301). Alternate embodiments use other quantities of antennas. For example, one embodiment uses three antennas to cover three different sectors of an area. In other embodiments, diversity antennas are used.
  • An analog signal that is received on the antenna (135) is split off by the diplexer (301) to an analog-to-digital converter (305).
  • the analog-to-digital converter (305) digitizes the received analog signal by periodically sampling the signal. The sampling generates a digital representation of the received analog signal. In one embodiment, the digital signal comprises 14 bit samples of the received analog signal.
  • the digitized received signal is input to a summer (315) to be added to the digitized signals from the preceding remote units in the daisy-chain.
  • the input of the summer (315) therefore, is coupled to an output of a previous remote unit.
  • the output of the summer (315) is a summation signal that is coupled to either the input of a subsequent remote unit or to the host unit.
  • the host unit thus receives a summation signal that represents the sum of all the signals received by the remote units (105 — 108) of the system.
  • a digital signal from the host unit is coupled to a digital-to-analog converter (310).
  • the digital-to-analog converter (310) takes the digital representation of an analog signal and converts it to the analog signal for transmission by the antenna (135).
  • Optical-to-Electrical converters are located at the optical ports (330 and 335) of the remote unit (105). Each optical port (330 and 335) has an input and an output that are each coupled to an Optical-to-Electrical converter (320 - 323).
  • the remote unit (105) operates with electrical signals that are represented by the optical signals coming in through the optical ports (330 and 335)
  • the Optical-to-Electrical converters (320 - 323) are responsible for converting the optical signals to electrical signals for processing by the remote unit (105). Received electrical signals are converted from electrical to an optical representation for transmission over the optical fiber.
  • Figure 4 illustrates a block diagram of one embodiment of a remote unit
  • Each of the remote units (205 - 208) of the embodiment of Figure 1 is substantially identical in functional composition.
  • the remote unit (205) transmits and receives RF communication signals over the antenna (435). Both the receive and transmit circuitry are connected to the antenna (435) through a diplexer (401). Alternate embodiments use other quantities of antennas. For example, one embodiment uses three antennas to cover three different sectors of an area. In other embodiments, diversity antennas are used.
  • An analog signal that is received on the antenna (435) is split off by the diplexer (401) to an analog-to-digital converter (405).
  • (405) digitizes the received analog signal by periodically sampling the signal. The sampling generates a digital representation of the received analog signal.
  • the digital signal comprises 14 bit samples of the received analog signal.
  • the digitized received signal is input to a summer (415) to be added to the digitized signals from the preceding remote units in the daisy-chain.
  • the host unit thus receives a summation signal that represents the sum of all the signals received by the remote units (205 - 208) of the system.
  • a digital signal from the host unit is coupled to a digital-to-analog converter (410).
  • the digital-to-analog converter (410) takes the digital representation of an analog signal and converts it to the analog signal for transmission by the antenna
  • Optical-to-Electrical converters (420 - 423) are located at the optical ports (440 and 445) of the remote unit (205). Each optical port (440 and 445) has an input and an output that are each coupled to an Optical-to-Electrical converter (420 -
  • the remote unit (205) operates with electrical signals that are represented by the optical signals coming in through the optical ports (440 and 445)
  • the Optical-to-Electrical converters (420 - 423) are responsible for converting the optical signals to electrical signals for processing by the remote unit (205). Received electrical signals are converted from electrical to an optical representation for transmission over the optical fiber.
  • a wavelength division multiplexer (WDM) (430 and 431) is located at each optical port (440 and 445).
  • the WDMs (430 and 431) perform the optical processing necessary to combine several optical signals having several wavelengths.
  • the WDMs (430 and 431) also perform the optical demultiplexing necessary to split the multiple wavelengths of a single fiber to their own signal paths.
  • dB The amount of additional dynamic range required (in dB) is expressed as 20Log N, where N is the number of antenna ports.
  • the quantity of additional bits required in a frame in order to express the aggregate signal is expressed as Log 2 N.
  • 14 bits is 84 dB. To accommodate the aggregate dynamic range for 32 antenna ports, an additional 30 dB and 5 bits are required. In this case, the analog-to-digital resolution for each port still remains at 14 bits but the summation of all the antenna port signals is represented by 19 bits.
  • the distributed attenuation of the embodiments of the present invention use attenuators at antenna port inputs, outputs, or both.
  • the distributed control may use a head-end based controller with feedback to each antenna port, local controllers at each antenna port, or distributed control with distributed feedback.
  • AGL automatic gain limiting
  • AGC automatic gain control
  • AGL is active only when the signal exceeds some maximum value.
  • AGC continuously controls attenuation.
  • the embodiments of the present invention employ different methods of attenuation. These methods include stepped attenuation, continuous attenuation, and fair and balanced attenuation.
  • Stepped attenuation is used when the summation of all of the antenna ports exceeds the maximum threshold.
  • this threshold is unity.
  • the attenuator provides attenuation in discrete increments. For example, 6 dB increments can be accomplished in a binary number by bit shifting in the direction of a smaller value. One shift equals 6 dB, two shifts equals 12 dB, and three shifts equals 18 dB. This can be continued for as much attenuation as required. For 32 antenna ports, five shifts of 6 dB accommodates 30 dB of attenuation.
  • Continuous attenuation is continuous in value.
  • the attenuation need not be in fixed steps but the attenuation could be accomplished with exactly as much as needed. In other words, the attenuation could be proportional to the excess aggregate signal level. If the aggregate signal is 2.3 dB above the maximum, the attenuator introduces exactly 2.3 dB of attenuation.
  • This method of attenuation is accomplished by multiplying the aggregate value by the appropriate attenuation factor.
  • the attenuation factor is between 0, for infinite attenuation, and 1 for no attenuation.
  • FIG. 10 A block diagram of the fair and balanced attenuation method is illustrated in Figure 10. This method attenuates the smallest signals the least and the largest signals are attenuated the most. Some of the very small signals may not receive any attenuation. An additional benefit is that no portion of the dynamic range goes unused since it is progressively allocated to the larger signals. In one embodiment, the functions of Figure 10 are accomplished in the digital domain.
  • each individual antenna port input is sensed with a sampling function that is well known in the art to determine each input signal level.
  • the signal levels are applied to the sorter (1001).
  • the sorted signals are input to a threshold comparator (1005) and a gain calculator (1007).
  • a "fair share" threshold is also input to the threshold comparator.
  • the fair share threshold is dynamically redefined in order to divide any remaining dynamic range among the remaining signals.
  • the total remaining system dynamic range is calculated by a remaining dynamic range calculator (1009) that is also input to the threshold comparator (1005).
  • the remaining dynamic range calculator (1009) uses the signal range input from the gain calculator (1007) and the total dynamic range that is assumed to be unity in this embodiment.
  • the gain calculator generates a gain, G., from the threshold comparison results in order to progressively generate gain factors for Port 1 - Port N in ascending order.
  • the process of Figure 10 can be expressed as:
  • Figure 11 illustrates a flowchart of one embodiment of the fair and balanced attenuation method of the present invention. The method begins with determining if the input signal level is less than or equal to the threshold, K (1101). [0077] If they are not equal, the gain is determined to be the threshold divided by the input signal level (1111). The output signal level is then equal to the input signal level times the gain (1113).
  • FIG. 5 illustrates a block diagram of one embodiment of a system having distributed summation with head end common attenuation and gain control. For purposes of clarity, a functional equivalent of the above-described remote unit, in this and subsequent embodiments, is illustrated as an antenna (509) with a summation symbol (513).
  • the embodiment of Figure 5 includes the four remote units (501 - 504) and the host unit (505) as described previously.
  • Each remote unit (501 - 504) has an antenna (506 - 509) that receives RF signals that are digitized and summed (510 - 513) with any previous remote unit signals.
  • the summations (510 - 513) and transport path (530 - 532) to each remote unit should have sufficient dynamic range to deliver the aggregate dynamic range.
  • the full dynamic range is 19 bits for 32 antenna ports.
  • the host unit (505) located at the head end, performs the AGL (515) and attenuation (525) functions.
  • the AGL sampling function (515) samples (520) the aggregate signal (534) from the last remote unit (504) before the host unit (505). This signal requires 19 bits for a dynamic range of 114 dB.
  • Other embodiments have other bit quantities to represent different dynamic ranges.
  • the AGL function (515) determines that the aggregate signal (531) is greater than the maximum allowable dynamic range, the AGL function (515) instructs the attenuation function (525) to attenuate the signal.
  • the attenuation function (525) may use the stepped attenuation, the continuous attenuation, or other attenuation approaches.
  • Figure 6 illustrates a block diagram of one embodiment of a system having distributed summation and gain control with localized common attenuation. This embodiment uses a standard transport path (601 - 604) (e.g., 14 bits) by applying localized attenuation to its aggregate signal.
  • Each remote unit (620 - 623) attenuates its common output level so that the maximum level is not exceeded.
  • the aggregate of all summations (615 - 618) and attenuations (605 - 608) results in a head end aggregate signal (630) that does not exceed the maximum level.
  • the AGL function (610 - 613) of each remote unit (620 - 623) samples the signal level output (601 - 604) from the respective summation (615 - 618). If the signal level is greater than the allowable dynamic range, the AGL function (610 - 613) instructs its respective attenuation function (605 - 608) to attenuate that particular signal.
  • FIG. 7 illustrates a block diagram of one embodiment of a system having distributed summation and gain control with localized input attenuation.
  • each of the remote units (701 - 704) uses an AGL function (725 - 728) to control attenuation functions (710 - 713 and 720 - 723) on the summation (730 - 733) inputs.
  • the input signals that are attenuated in this embodiment include both the antenna port and the downstream port.
  • the AGL function (726) samples the downstream signal path (750) and the antenna port input (751). If the dynamic range of either input is greater than the allowable maximum, the AGL function (726) instructs the attenuation function (711 and/or 721) of the appropriate input to attenuate that particular signal.
  • Figure 8 illustrates a block diagram of one embodiment of a system having distributed summation and gain control with head end controlled, distributed attenuation. This embodiment uses an AGL function (820) at the host unit (825) to provide feedback (830) to the remote units (801 - 804).
  • Each remote unit (801 - 804) has an attenuation function (810 - 813) at the antenna port to provide appropriate attenuation to the input signal.
  • An AGL function (815 - 818) samples the antenna port's received signal in order to provide individual attenuation instructions to the attenuation functions (810 - 813).
  • the embodiment of Figure 8 additionally uses an AGL function (820) at the host unit (825) to sample the final aggregate signal (831).
  • the host unit's AGL function (820) provides a head end feedback attenuation signal (830) to the remote units' AGL functions (815 - 818) to use in conjunction with the sampled input communication signal levels.
  • This feedback signal (830) may take the form of one or more bits in the data being transmitted along the optical medium to the remote units (801 - 804) from the host unit (825).
  • the feedback attenuation signal is an attenuation factor that is comprised of a value between 0 and 1.
  • an unattenuated aggregate of 2 would be represented by an attenuation factor of 0.5.
  • the attenuation factor is not applied directly to the individual remote units' attenuation functions (810 - 813). Instead, if a port signal is more than 0.5 of the total dynamic range, the remote units' AGL function (815 - 818) instructs the appropriate attenuation function (810 - 813) to apply a 0.5 attenuation factor to the port input. If the signal is equal to or less than 0.5, attenuation is not applied.
  • the resulting aggregate signal may still be slightly too high.
  • the AGL function (820) at the host unit (825) adjusts its feedback attenuation factor to whatever value is needed (e.g., 0.4). This value is dynamic and is lowered until the desired aggregate signal level is achieved.
  • the host unit (825) samples the final aggregate signal (831) from the remote unit (804) nearest the head end. If the level of the final aggregate signal (831) is too large, the host unit (825) provides a feedback attenuation factor that starts at one and slews down toward zero. When the final aggregate signal level is within bounds (i.e., less than the maximum dynamic range), the host unit holds this attenuation factor. [0097] If the final aggregate signal level later decreases sufficiently, the host unit (825) slowly raises the attenuation factor back toward one. All of the remote units (801 - 804) apply attenuation only to their own ports according to the fair and balanced attenuation method discussed previously. This means that the applied attenuation depends on the respective antenna port's input level as well as the feedback factor (830).
  • the host unit (825) samples the final aggregate signal (831) from the remote unit (804) nearest the head end. If the final aggregate signal (831) is too large, the host unit (825) provides a feedback attenuation signal that is an attenuation number that starts at 0 and increments towards 6. This is assuming 6 dB steps. Other embodiments use other increments. [0099] When the final aggregate signal level is less than or equal to 0 dB (unity gain), the host unit's AGL function (820) holds this number. If the final aggregate signal level decreases to a predetermined level (e.g., -12 dB), the host unit decrements the number back towards 0. The decrementing occurs after a delay due to system end- to-end response.
  • a predetermined level e.g., -12 dB
  • all of the remote units (801 - 804) apply attenuation to their own ports according to the fair and balanced attenuation method discussed previously. This means that the applied attenuation depends on the respective antenna port's input level as well as the feedback number. [00101]
  • the following table illustrates one example of the stepped fair attenuation as applied to the embodiment of Figure 8:
  • Figure 9 illustrates a block diagram of one embodiment of a system having distributed summation and gain control. This embodiment puts the attenuation decision making with the individual remote units (901 - 904) while still providing the feedback of the attenuation factor.
  • the final aggregate signal is sampled and a feedback attenuation factor is passed toward the tail end of the system.
  • the feedback can be accomplished by embedding the attenuation factor in a data frame that is transmitted over the communication medium to the remote units.
  • the data frame format and use is well known in the art and not discussed further. In other embodiments, dedicated bits or a continuous value are used for the feedback.
  • the sampling AGL function passes an attenuation factor to the preceding remote unit's AGL function (910 - 913) in a data frame.
  • AGL function (910 - 913) has two attenuation factors: the one from its local evaluation of its antenna port (i.e., the local attenuation signal) and the one from the upstream unit (i.e., towards the head end).
  • the AGL function (910 - 913) applies the more severe factor of the two to its port attenuation and passes this factor on toward the tail end.
  • the host unit generates the highest attenuation factor because its aggregate signal is the largest. Because of the feedback, all remote units use this factor to apply attenuation. Since all of the remote units also sample their own antenna port, they will apply no attenuation or little attenuation to sufficiently small signals. The remote units will also apply large attenuation to large signals.
  • the aggregate sampling at each remote unit prevents any unit's aggregate signal from overflowing. Furthermore, all units from the tail end to the point of the break will perform fair sharing of the aggregate signals amongst themselves. Similarly, all units from the break to the head end will perform fair sharing of the aggregate signals amongst themselves. However, the tail end group is favored over the head end group.

Abstract

A method for signal gain adjustment in a multi-port, digital distributed antenna system uses a sorter to sort received signals in ascending order according to their signal levels. A threshold comparator generates a dynamic range fair threshold that is updated as any remaining system dynamic range is distributed amongst the remaining signals. Any received signal that is less than or equal to the threshold is attenuated with a unity gain factor. A signal that is greater than the threshold is attenuated with a gain factor that is inversely proportional to the signal level.

Description

SMALL SIGNAL THRESHOLD AND PROPORTIONAL GAIN DISTRIBUTED DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
[0001] The present application is related to, and claims the benefit of the filing date of, US Provisional Patent Application No. 60/430,435, filed on December 3, 2002.
TECHNICAL FIELD
[0002] The present invention relates generally to communications and particularly to gain control of signals in a distributed antenna system.
BACKGROUND
[0003] Various types of wireless communication systems have become prevalent around the world. For example, cellular communication systems cover most major metropolitan areas as well as major highways through remote areas. Cellular systems permit individuals with cellular handsets to communicate with base stations that are connected to the public switched telephone network (PSTN) or some other communication network.
[0004] As with any communication system, cellular systems can leave coverage
"holes" where the signal from the base stations cannot reach. The holes can be in tunnels, valleys, city streets between tall buildings, or any other location where a radio frequency (RF) signal is blocked.
[0005] Placing additional base stations where these coverage holes are located is not always an option. Base stations tend to be very expensive due not only to the cost of the equipment but also because of land acquisition costs. Additionally, large base station antennas may not fit within an area either physically or aesthetically. [0006] One solution to hole coverage is to use smaller distributed antennas where coverage is needed but a base station is not warranted or desired. There are problems, however, with using a distributed antenna system. [0007] Any system has a certain dynamic range over which signals are processed. For a system that has only one antenna port, the entire dynamic range is available to the single port signal. When the system has multiple antenna ports, as in the distributed antenna system, the same dynamic range is shared amongst the aggregate signal from all the ports. This reduces the dynamic range available for each port when multiple ports are simultaneously active. One problem with distributed antennas on a single signal path is that the aggregate signal along the signal path may exceed the system's allowable dynamic range. There is a resulting need in the art for adequately controlling the aggregate signal in a single path distributed antenna system.
SUMMARY
[0008] The embodiments of the present invention encompass a method for proportional gain distribution in a system comprising a plurality of distributed antennas. A sampling function senses a signal level at each of the plurality of distributed antennas. Each of the plurality of signal levels are compared with a dynamic range fair share threshold. Each signal level that is greater than the dynamic range fair share threshold is attenuated with a gain factor that is determined in response to a remaining portion of the total system dynamic range after attenuation of other signal levels. Each signal level that is less than or equal to the dynamic range fair share threshold are attenuated with a unity gain factor.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0009] Figure 1 shows a block diagram of one embodiment of a distributed digital antenna system of the present invention.
[0010] Figure 2 shows a block diagram of another embodiment of a distributed digital antenna system of the present invention. [0011] Figure 3 shows a block diagram of one embodiment of a remote unit in accordance with the system of Figure 1.
[0012] Figure 4 shows a block diagram of one embodiment of a remote unit in accordance with the system of Figure 2.
[0013] Figure 5 shows a block diagram of one embodiment of a system having distributed summation and gain control with head end common attenuation.
[0014] Figure 6 shows a block diagram of one embodiment of a system having distributed summation and gain control with localized common attenuation.
[0015] Figure 7 shows a block diagram of one embodiment of a system having distributed summation and gain control with localized input attenuation.
[0016] Figure 8 shows a block diagram of one embodiment of a system having distributed summation and gain control with head end common attenuation.
[0017] Figure 9 shows a block diagram of one embodiment of a system having distributed summation and gain control with head end common attenuation.
[0018] Figure 10 shows a block diagram of one embodiment of a method for fair and balanced gain control in a distributed summation and gain control system of the present invention.
[0019] Figure 11 shows a flowchart of one embodiment of the fair and balanced attenuation method of the present invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0020] By distributing signal attenuation and control of the attenuation, the embodiments of the present invention retain the original system dynamic range. A signal level threshold prevents small but valid signals from being attenuated to the point of being useless while the unused dynamic range is redistributed to signals that require the additional dynamic range.
[0021] The embodiments of the present invention refer to fiber optics as a communications medium between remote units and the host unit. However, the communications medium connecting the remote units to the host unit can take any form including a laser through an air interface, an RF signal over coaxial cable, or an RF signal through an air interface.
[0022] Figure 1 illustrates a block diagram of one embodiment of a distributed digital antenna system of the present invention. The system has a base station (100) that communicates over an RF link using an antenna (110). The base station communicates over the RF link using any appropriate air interface standard. For example, the air interface standard comprises one of Advanced Mobile Phone System (AMPS), code division multiple access (CDMA), time division multiple access (TDMA), Global System for Mobile communications (GSM), or any other appropriate air interface standard.
[0023] The RF link is made up of a forward link over which the base station
(100) transmits to a subscriber unit (150). The subscriber unit (150) transmits back to the base station (100) over a reverse link. The subscriber unit (150) is either a mobile station or a fixed station such as in a wireless local loop system. [0024] The base station (100) has the transmitters and receivers that enable the subscriber unit (150) to communicate with the public switched telephone network (PSTN) (130). In one embodiment, the base station links the subscriber unit (150) to other subscriber units that are communicating with other base stations. In one embodiment, the base station (100) is connected to the PSTN through a mobile switching center that handles the switching of calls with multiple base stations. [0025] A host unit (101) is connected to the base station (100) through an RF link (115). In one embodiment, this link (115) is a coaxial cable. Other embodiments use other types of connections such as an air interface or an optical fiber carrying digital RF signals. U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 09/619,431, assigned to ADC Telecommunications, Inc. and incorporated herein by reference, discloses digital RF signals.
[0026] The host unit (101) is responsible for converting the RF signal from the base station (100) to an optical signal for transmission over an optical medium. The host unit (101) also converts a received optical signal to an RF signal for transmission to the base station (100). In other embodiments, the host unit (101) performs additional functions. [0027] One or more remote units ( 105 - 108) are connected to the host unit
(101) through an optical medium, such as fiber optic lines (120 and 125), in a daisy- chain arrangement. The remote units (105 - 108) are placed in locations that require additional signal coverage due to a lack of coverage by the base station (100). The remote units (105 - 108) communicate with subscriber units in a particular remote unit's coverage area over an RF link provided by the remote unit antennas (135 - 138).
[0028] For purposes of illustration, four remote units (105 - 108) are shown.
However, alternate embodiments use other quantities of remote units. If only a small geographic area requires coverage, as few as one remote unit (105) is used. If a highway in a remote area requires additional coverage, more than four remote units are typically used.
[0029] The embodiment of Figure 1 uses a separate fiber optic line for each direction of communication. Each fiber carries a different wavelength. For example, the fiber optic line (120) from the host unit (101) to the remote units (105 - 108) carries a wavelength of λi. The fiber optic line (125) from the remote units (105 - 108) to the host unit (101) carries a wavelength of λ2. In alternate embodiments, each fiber carries the same wavelength.
[0030] The fiber optic line (120) from the host unit (101) to the remote units
(105 - 108) carries the digital optical signal for transmission by the remote units (105 -108). The fiber optic line (125) from the remote units (105 - 108) carries a digital optical signal comprising the sum of the received signals from each of the remote units (105 - 108). The generation of this summation signal from the remote units is discussed subsequently.
[0031] Figure 2 illustrates a block diagram of another embodiment of a distributed digital antenna system of the present invention. This system is similar to the embodiment of Figure 1 except that the remote units (205 - 208) are connected to the host unit (201) over a single optical medium (220).
[0032] The system of Figure 2 has a base station (200) that communicates over an RF link using an antenna (210). The base station can communicate over the RF link using any air interface standard. For example, the air interface standard may be code division multiple access (CDMA), time division multiple access (TDMA), or
Global System for Mobile communications (GSM).
[0033] The RF link is made up of a forward link over which the base station
(200) transmits to a subscriber unit (250). The subscriber unit (250) transmits back to the base station (200) over a reverse link. The subscriber unit (250) may be a mobile station or a fixed station such as in a wireless local loop system.
[0034] The base station (200) has the transmitters and receivers that enable the subscriber unit (250) to communicate with the public switched telephone network (PSTN) (230). The base station may also link the subscriber unit (250) to other subscriber units that are communicating with other base stations. In one embodiment, the base station (200) is connected to the PSTN through a mobile switching center that handles the switching of calls with multiple base stations. [0035] A host unit (201) is connected to the base station (200) through an RF link (215). In one embodiment, this link (215) is a coaxial cable. Other embodiments use other types of connections such as an air interface or an optical fiber carrying digital RF signals.
[0036] The host unit (201) is responsible for converting the RF signal from the base station (200) to a digital optical signal for transmission over an optical medium. The host unit (201) also converts a received optical signal to an RF signal for transmission to the base station (200). In other embodiments, the host unit (201) performs additional functions. [0037] One or more remote units (205 - 208) are connected to the host unit
(201) through an optical medium, such as a fiber optic line (220), that is connected in a daisy-chain arrangement. The remote units (205 - 208) are placed in locations that require additional signal coverage due to a lack of coverage by the base station (200). [0038] For purposes of illustration, four remote units (205 - 208) are shown. However, alternate embodiments use other quantities of remote units depending on the application.
[0039] The embodiment of Figure 2 uses a single fiber optic line (220) for communication both to and from the remote units (205 - 208). This is accomplished by the single fiber (220) carrying multiple wavelengths. For example, the fiber optic line (220) uses a wavelength of λi for the digital signal from the host unit to the remote units (205 - 208). The fiber optic line (220) also carries a digital summation signal with a wavelength of λ2. This digital summation signal is the sum of the received signals from the remote units (205 - 208). The generation of this summation signal from the remote units is discussed subsequently.
[0040] Figure 3 illustrates a block diagram of one embodiment of a remote unit
(105) of Figure 1. Each of the remote units (105 - 108) of the embodiment of Figure 1 are substantially identical in functional composition.
[0041] The remote unit (105) transmits and receives RF communication signals over the antenna (135). Both the receive and transmit circuitry is connected to the antenna (135) through a diplexer (301). Alternate embodiments use other quantities of antennas. For example, one embodiment uses three antennas to cover three different sectors of an area. In other embodiments, diversity antennas are used. [0042] An analog signal that is received on the antenna (135) is split off by the diplexer (301) to an analog-to-digital converter (305). The analog-to-digital converter (305) digitizes the received analog signal by periodically sampling the signal. The sampling generates a digital representation of the received analog signal. In one embodiment, the digital signal comprises 14 bit samples of the received analog signal. [0043] The digitized received signal is input to a summer (315) to be added to the digitized signals from the preceding remote units in the daisy-chain. The input of the summer (315), therefore, is coupled to an output of a previous remote unit. The output of the summer (315) is a summation signal that is coupled to either the input of a subsequent remote unit or to the host unit. The host unit thus receives a summation signal that represents the sum of all the signals received by the remote units (105 — 108) of the system.
[0044] A digital signal from the host unit is coupled to a digital-to-analog converter (310). The digital-to-analog converter (310) takes the digital representation of an analog signal and converts it to the analog signal for transmission by the antenna (135).
[0045] Optical-to-Electrical converters (320 - 323) are located at the optical ports (330 and 335) of the remote unit (105). Each optical port (330 and 335) has an input and an output that are each coupled to an Optical-to-Electrical converter (320 - 323). [0046] Since the remote unit (105) operates with electrical signals that are represented by the optical signals coming in through the optical ports (330 and 335), the Optical-to-Electrical converters (320 - 323) are responsible for converting the optical signals to electrical signals for processing by the remote unit (105). Received electrical signals are converted from electrical to an optical representation for transmission over the optical fiber.
[0047] Figure 4 illustrates a block diagram of one embodiment of a remote unit
(205) of Figure 2. Each of the remote units (205 - 208) of the embodiment of Figure 1 is substantially identical in functional composition.
[0048] The remote unit (205) transmits and receives RF communication signals over the antenna (435). Both the receive and transmit circuitry are connected to the antenna (435) through a diplexer (401). Alternate embodiments use other quantities of antennas. For example, one embodiment uses three antennas to cover three different sectors of an area. In other embodiments, diversity antennas are used.
[0049] An analog signal that is received on the antenna (435) is split off by the diplexer (401) to an analog-to-digital converter (405). The analog-to-digital converter
(405) digitizes the received analog signal by periodically sampling the signal. The sampling generates a digital representation of the received analog signal. In one embodiment, the digital signal comprises 14 bit samples of the received analog signal.
[0050] The digitized received signal is input to a summer (415) to be added to the digitized signals from the preceding remote units in the daisy-chain. The host unit thus receives a summation signal that represents the sum of all the signals received by the remote units (205 - 208) of the system.
[0051] A digital signal from the host unit is coupled to a digital-to-analog converter (410). The digital-to-analog converter (410) takes the digital representation of an analog signal and converts it to the analog signal for transmission by the antenna
(435).
[0052] Optical-to-Electrical converters (420 - 423) are located at the optical ports (440 and 445) of the remote unit (205). Each optical port (440 and 445) has an input and an output that are each coupled to an Optical-to-Electrical converter (420 -
423). [0053] Since the remote unit (205) operates with electrical signals that are represented by the optical signals coming in through the optical ports (440 and 445), the Optical-to-Electrical converters (420 - 423) are responsible for converting the optical signals to electrical signals for processing by the remote unit (205). Received electrical signals are converted from electrical to an optical representation for transmission over the optical fiber.
[0054] A wavelength division multiplexer (WDM) (430 and 431) is located at each optical port (440 and 445). The WDMs (430 and 431) perform the optical processing necessary to combine several optical signals having several wavelengths. The WDMs (430 and 431) also perform the optical demultiplexing necessary to split the multiple wavelengths of a single fiber to their own signal paths. [0055] In the above-described embodiments, if one antenna port uses up all of the system's dynamic range, none is available for the other antenna ports and the aggregate dynamic range needs to be increased. The amount of additional dynamic range required (in dB) is expressed as 20Log N, where N is the number of antenna ports. The quantity of additional bits required in a frame in order to express the aggregate signal is expressed as Log2N.
[0056] As an example of one embodiment of operation, the dynamic range for
14 bits is 84 dB. To accommodate the aggregate dynamic range for 32 antenna ports, an additional 30 dB and 5 bits are required. In this case, the analog-to-digital resolution for each port still remains at 14 bits but the summation of all the antenna port signals is represented by 19 bits.
[0057] In order to keep the original dynamic range and output signal levels, the distributed attenuation of the embodiments of the present invention use attenuators at antenna port inputs, outputs, or both. The distributed control may use a head-end based controller with feedback to each antenna port, local controllers at each antenna port, or distributed control with distributed feedback.
[0058] The various embodiments of the present invention use automatic gain limiting (AGL) as a gain control function. Alternate embodiments use automatic gain control (AGC) as a gain control function. AGL is active only when the signal exceeds some maximum value. AGC continuously controls attenuation. [0059] The embodiments of the present invention employ different methods of attenuation. These methods include stepped attenuation, continuous attenuation, and fair and balanced attenuation.
[0060] Stepped attenuation is used when the summation of all of the antenna ports exceeds the maximum threshold. In one embodiment, this threshold is unity. In this case, the attenuator provides attenuation in discrete increments. For example, 6 dB increments can be accomplished in a binary number by bit shifting in the direction of a smaller value. One shift equals 6 dB, two shifts equals 12 dB, and three shifts equals 18 dB. This can be continued for as much attenuation as required. For 32 antenna ports, five shifts of 6 dB accommodates 30 dB of attenuation.
[0061] Continuous attenuation is continuous in value. The attenuation need not be in fixed steps but the attenuation could be accomplished with exactly as much as needed. In other words, the attenuation could be proportional to the excess aggregate signal level. If the aggregate signal is 2.3 dB above the maximum, the attenuator introduces exactly 2.3 dB of attenuation.
[0062] This method of attenuation is accomplished by multiplying the aggregate value by the appropriate attenuation factor. In one embodiment, the attenuation factor is between 0, for infinite attenuation, and 1 for no attenuation.
[0063] Applying the attenuation to the aggregate signal means that all of the signals are treated the same. The smallest signals suffer the most. In fact, very small signals may be attenuated to a level below the least significant bit. At this point, such signals cease to exist.
[0064] A block diagram of the fair and balanced attenuation method is illustrated in Figure 10. This method attenuates the smallest signals the least and the largest signals are attenuated the most. Some of the very small signals may not receive any attenuation. An additional benefit is that no portion of the dynamic range goes unused since it is progressively allocated to the larger signals. In one embodiment, the functions of Figure 10 are accomplished in the digital domain.
[0065] Referring to Figure 10, in order to perform the fair and balanced attenuation method, each individual antenna port input is sensed with a sampling function that is well known in the art to determine each input signal level. The signal levels are applied to the sorter (1001). [0066] The sorter (1001) sorts the antenna port signals, designated x- in ascending order according to their level. In this case, j = 1 is the smallest and j = N is the largest, where N is the number of antenna ports. The sorted signals are input to a threshold comparator (1005) and a gain calculator (1007). A "fair share" threshold is also input to the threshold comparator. The dynamic range fair share threshold, K, is calculated as K = T/(n - j) where the total available system dynamic range is unity and is designated as T. In alternate embodiments, other appropriate threshold calculations are used.
[0067] The fair share threshold is dynamically redefined in order to divide any remaining dynamic range among the remaining signals. The total remaining system dynamic range is calculated by a remaining dynamic range calculator (1009) that is also input to the threshold comparator (1005). The remaining dynamic range calculator (1009) uses the signal range input from the gain calculator (1007) and the total dynamic range that is assumed to be unity in this embodiment. The total remaining dynamic range is expressed as T = T - y, where y, is the output signal from the antenna port. Alternate embodiments use other total dynamic ranges. [0068] The gain calculator generates a gain, G., from the threshold comparison results in order to progressively generate gain factors for Port 1 - Port N in ascending order. The process of Figure 10 can be expressed as:
if Xj < K, then Input signal, xj5 is less than fair share do forj=l to N
Figure imgf000012_0001
else Remaining input signals are more than fair share
Gj^ K xj Gain is inverse to signal level input j = G-*xJ Reduce level proportionally end if [0069] The fair and balanced attenuation embodiment of Figure 10 is illustrated in the following example using continuous attenuation:
Figure imgf000013_0001
[0070] It can be seen in the table that the smallest signal (e.g., Xj = 0.1) remains unchanged. It has been attenuated with a unity gain factor. The next smallest signal (e.g., Xj = 0.3) takes advantage of the dynamic range that is not used by the first signal. This signal is also attenuated with a unity gain factor.
[0071] The next largest signal (e.g., x,- = 0.4) is attenuated by a gain factor of
0.75. The largest signal (e.g., Xj = 0.5) is attenuated the most by a gain factor of 0.6. [0072] The process of Figure 10 can also be applied to a stepped attenuation embodiment. The following table illustrates such an embodiment. It should be noted that the 6 dB steps are for illustration purposes only and the present invention is not limited to any one attenuation increment.
Figure imgf000013_0002
[0073] This table shows that the smallest signal remains unchanged since it is attenuated with a unity gain factor. The next smallest signal takes advantage of the dynamic range not used by the first signal. This signal also is attenuated with a unity gain factor. [0074] The next largest signal is attenuated by a gain factor of 0.5. This is a 6 dB step. Similarly, the largest signal is attenuated by a gain factor of 0.5. In this embodiment, a portion (e.g., 0.15) of the dynamic range is not used. [0075] The following embodiments discuss certain transport path and aggregate signal levels (e.g., 14 bits). This is for illustration purposes only. The present invention is not limited to any one transport path size or aggregate signal level. [0076] Figure 11 illustrates a flowchart of one embodiment of the fair and balanced attenuation method of the present invention. The method begins with determining if the input signal level is less than or equal to the threshold, K (1101). [0077] If they are not equal, the gain is determined to be the threshold divided by the input signal level (1111). The output signal level is then equal to the input signal level times the gain (1113).
[0078] If the input signal level is less than or equal to the threshold (1101), the gain is set equal to one (1103). The output signal level is then computed to be the input signal level times the gain (1105). The remaining dynamic range is then reduced by the computed output signal level (1107). The threshold is also recomputed as the remaining dynamic range divided by the number of ports remaining (1109). [0079] Figure 5 illustrates a block diagram of one embodiment of a system having distributed summation with head end common attenuation and gain control. For purposes of clarity, a functional equivalent of the above-described remote unit, in this and subsequent embodiments, is illustrated as an antenna (509) with a summation symbol (513).
[0080] The embodiment of Figure 5 includes the four remote units (501 - 504) and the host unit (505) as described previously. Each remote unit (501 - 504) has an antenna (506 - 509) that receives RF signals that are digitized and summed (510 - 513) with any previous remote unit signals.
[0081] The summations (510 - 513) and transport path (530 - 532) to each remote unit should have sufficient dynamic range to deliver the aggregate dynamic range. For example, in one embodiment the full dynamic range is 19 bits for 32 antenna ports. This embodiment assumes that all of the remote units are substantially identical. [0082] In the embodiment of Figure 5, the host unit (505), located at the head end, performs the AGL (515) and attenuation (525) functions. The AGL sampling function (515) samples (520) the aggregate signal (534) from the last remote unit (504) before the host unit (505). This signal requires 19 bits for a dynamic range of 114 dB. Other embodiments have other bit quantities to represent different dynamic ranges.
[0083] If the AGL function (515) determines that the aggregate signal (531) is greater than the maximum allowable dynamic range, the AGL function (515) instructs the attenuation function (525) to attenuate the signal. The attenuation function (525) may use the stepped attenuation, the continuous attenuation, or other attenuation approaches.
[0084] In the example illustrated in Figure 5 where the aggregate signal is 19 bits, the attenuation function attenuates the signal to 14 bits. Thus, the signal from the host unit (505) to a base station will be within the allowable dynamic range. [0085] Figure 6 illustrates a block diagram of one embodiment of a system having distributed summation and gain control with localized common attenuation. This embodiment uses a standard transport path (601 - 604) (e.g., 14 bits) by applying localized attenuation to its aggregate signal.
[0086] Each remote unit (620 - 623) attenuates its common output level so that the maximum level is not exceeded. The aggregate of all summations (615 - 618) and attenuations (605 - 608) results in a head end aggregate signal (630) that does not exceed the maximum level.
[0087] The AGL function (610 - 613) of each remote unit (620 - 623) samples the signal level output (601 - 604) from the respective summation (615 - 618). If the signal level is greater than the allowable dynamic range, the AGL function (610 - 613) instructs its respective attenuation function (605 - 608) to attenuate that particular signal.
[0088] Figure 7 illustrates a block diagram of one embodiment of a system having distributed summation and gain control with localized input attenuation. In this embodiment, each of the remote units (701 - 704) uses an AGL function (725 - 728) to control attenuation functions (710 - 713 and 720 - 723) on the summation (730 - 733) inputs. [0089] The input signals that are attenuated in this embodiment include both the antenna port and the downstream port. For example, in one remote unit (702) the AGL function (726) samples the downstream signal path (750) and the antenna port input (751). If the dynamic range of either input is greater than the allowable maximum, the AGL function (726) instructs the attenuation function (711 and/or 721) of the appropriate input to attenuate that particular signal.
[0090] The fair and balanced attenuation method can be employed in the embodiment of Figure 7 as illustrated in Figures 10 and 11. However, this embodiment is not limited to any one attenuation method. [0091] Figure 8 illustrates a block diagram of one embodiment of a system having distributed summation and gain control with head end controlled, distributed attenuation. This embodiment uses an AGL function (820) at the host unit (825) to provide feedback (830) to the remote units (801 - 804).
[0092] Each remote unit (801 - 804) has an attenuation function (810 - 813) at the antenna port to provide appropriate attenuation to the input signal. An AGL function (815 - 818) samples the antenna port's received signal in order to provide individual attenuation instructions to the attenuation functions (810 - 813). [0093] The embodiment of Figure 8 additionally uses an AGL function (820) at the host unit (825) to sample the final aggregate signal (831). The host unit's AGL function (820) provides a head end feedback attenuation signal (830) to the remote units' AGL functions (815 - 818) to use in conjunction with the sampled input communication signal levels. This feedback signal (830) may take the form of one or more bits in the data being transmitted along the optical medium to the remote units (801 - 804) from the host unit (825).
[0094] For the case of continuous attenuation, the feedback attenuation signal is an attenuation factor that is comprised of a value between 0 and 1. For example, an unattenuated aggregate of 2 would be represented by an attenuation factor of 0.5. The attenuation factor is not applied directly to the individual remote units' attenuation functions (810 - 813). Instead, if a port signal is more than 0.5 of the total dynamic range, the remote units' AGL function (815 - 818) instructs the appropriate attenuation function (810 - 813) to apply a 0.5 attenuation factor to the port input. If the signal is equal to or less than 0.5, attenuation is not applied. [0095] Since some of the signals may not be attenuated, the resulting aggregate signal may still be slightly too high. In this case, the AGL function (820) at the host unit (825) adjusts its feedback attenuation factor to whatever value is needed (e.g., 0.4). This value is dynamic and is lowered until the desired aggregate signal level is achieved.
[0096] Using the continuous attenuation method, the host unit's AGL function
(820) samples the final aggregate signal (831) from the remote unit (804) nearest the head end. If the level of the final aggregate signal (831) is too large, the host unit (825) provides a feedback attenuation factor that starts at one and slews down toward zero. When the final aggregate signal level is within bounds (i.e., less than the maximum dynamic range), the host unit holds this attenuation factor. [0097] If the final aggregate signal level later decreases sufficiently, the host unit (825) slowly raises the attenuation factor back toward one. All of the remote units (801 - 804) apply attenuation only to their own ports according to the fair and balanced attenuation method discussed previously. This means that the applied attenuation depends on the respective antenna port's input level as well as the feedback factor (830).
[0098] Using the stepped attenuation method, the host unit (825) samples the final aggregate signal (831) from the remote unit (804) nearest the head end. If the final aggregate signal (831) is too large, the host unit (825) provides a feedback attenuation signal that is an attenuation number that starts at 0 and increments towards 6. This is assuming 6 dB steps. Other embodiments use other increments. [0099] When the final aggregate signal level is less than or equal to 0 dB (unity gain), the host unit's AGL function (820) holds this number. If the final aggregate signal level decreases to a predetermined level (e.g., -12 dB), the host unit decrements the number back towards 0. The decrementing occurs after a delay due to system end- to-end response.
[00100] In one embodiment, all of the remote units (801 - 804) apply attenuation to their own ports according to the fair and balanced attenuation method discussed previously. This means that the applied attenuation depends on the respective antenna port's input level as well as the feedback number. [00101] The following table illustrates one example of the stepped fair attenuation as applied to the embodiment of Figure 8:
Figure imgf000018_0001
[00102] It can be seen in the table that a remote unit's attenuation only affects its port signals. There is a 12 dB window between the decision to increase attenuation and the decision to decrease attenuation. If all ports have the same signal level, a step increment affects them all and causes 6 dB more attenuation in both the individual and aggregate signal levels. But if some of the signals are of different levels, only the largest signals are attenuated by 6 dB. This results in an aggregate additional level attenuation that is less than 6 dB.
[00103] Figure 9 illustrates a block diagram of one embodiment of a system having distributed summation and gain control. This embodiment puts the attenuation decision making with the individual remote units (901 - 904) while still providing the feedback of the attenuation factor.
[00104] In this embodiment, the final aggregate signal is sampled and a feedback attenuation factor is passed toward the tail end of the system. The feedback can be accomplished by embedding the attenuation factor in a data frame that is transmitted over the communication medium to the remote units. The data frame format and use is well known in the art and not discussed further. In other embodiments, dedicated bits or a continuous value are used for the feedback. [00105] Similarly, the AGL function (910 - 913) of each remote unit (901 -
904) also samples the aggregate signal at the output of the summation (920 - 923) for that particular unit. The sampling AGL function then passes an attenuation factor to the preceding remote unit's AGL function (910 - 913) in a data frame. [00106] As an example, the AGL function (913) of the head end remote unit
(904) samples the final aggregate signal level and generates an attenuation factor. This factor is fed back in the direction of the tail end to the next remote unit (903) in the daisy-chain. This remote unit (903) samples the signal level out of the summation (922) at that unit and generates an attenuation factor based on that level. This factor is fed back to the next remote unit (902) in the daisy-chain.
[00107] Every remote units' (901 - 904) AGL function (910 - 913) has two attenuation factors: the one from its local evaluation of its antenna port (i.e., the local attenuation signal) and the one from the upstream unit (i.e., towards the head end). The AGL function (910 - 913) applies the more severe factor of the two to its port attenuation and passes this factor on toward the tail end.
[00108] In this embodiment, the host unit generates the highest attenuation factor because its aggregate signal is the largest. Because of the feedback, all remote units use this factor to apply attenuation. Since all of the remote units also sample their own antenna port, they will apply no attenuation or little attenuation to sufficiently small signals. The remote units will also apply large attenuation to large signals.
[00109] If there is a break in the feedback path, the aggregate sampling at each remote unit prevents any unit's aggregate signal from overflowing. Furthermore, all units from the tail end to the point of the break will perform fair sharing of the aggregate signals amongst themselves. Similarly, all units from the break to the head end will perform fair sharing of the aggregate signals amongst themselves. However, the tail end group is favored over the head end group.
[00110] Numerous modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in light of the above teachings. It is therefore to be understood that within the scope of the appended claims, the invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described herein.

Claims

What is claimed is:
1. A method for gain distribution in a system comprising a plurality of distributed antennas and a total system dynamic range, the method comprising: sensing a signal level at each of the plurality of distributed antennas; comparing at least one of the plurality of signal levels with a dynamic range fair share threshold; and attenuating each of the at least one of the compared signal levels that is greater than the dynamic range fair share threshold with a gain factor that is determined in response to a remaining portion of the total system dynamic range after attenuation of other signal levels of the plurality of signal levels.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein the dynamic range fair share threshold is initially determined by an inverse of a quantity of the plurality of distributed antennas.
3. The method of claim 1 and further including: sorting the sensed signal levels in an ascending order prior to comparing; and updating the total system dynamic range, after attenuation of each signal level, by allocating unused total system dynamic range to subsequently attenuated signal levels.
4. The method of claim 1 and further including attenuating with unity gain signal levels that are less than or equal to the dynamic range fair share threshold.
5. The method of claim 1 wherein if the signal level is greater than the dynamic range fair share threshold, the gain factor applied to a first signal level is inversely proportional to the first signal level.
6. The method of claim 5 wherein the gain factor is substantially equal to KJ j where K is an inverse of a quantity of the plurality of distributed antennas and x,- is the first signal level.
7. A method for gain distribution in a distributed antenna system having a total dynamic range, the method comprising: sorting a plurality of signal levels from the distributed antenna system; comparing each of the sorted signal levels with a dynamic range fair share threshold; if a first signal level is less than or equal to the dynamic range fair share threshold, applying a unity gain factor to the first signal level and dividing remaining total dynamic range between remaining signal levels of the plurality of signal levels; and if the first signal level is greater than the dynamic range fair share threshold, applying a gain factor that is inversely proportional to the first signal level.
8. The method of claim 7 wherein the gain factor that is substantially equal to the inverse of the first signal level is equal to a quantity of distributed antennas in the distributed antenna system divided by the first signal level.
9. The method of claim 7 wherein the plurality of signal levels are sorted in ascending order.
10. A method for gain distribution in a distributed antenna system having a system dynamic range, the method comprising: sorting, in ascending order, a plurality of signal levels from the distributed antenna system; comparing a first signal level of the plurality of sorted signal levels with a dynamic range fair share threshold; if the first signal level is less than or equal to the dynamic range fair share threshold, applying a unity gain factor to the first signal level; if the unity gain factor has been applied to the first signal level, updating the dynamic range fair share threshold to allocate remaining system dynamic range between remaining signal levels; and if the first signal level is greater than the dynamic range fair share threshold, applying a first gain factor that is substantially equal to the dynamic range fair share threshold divided by the first signal level.
11. The method of claim 10 and further including applying a second gain factor to a second signal level if the second signal level is greater than the dynamic range fair share threshold, the second gain factor being substantially equal to the dynamic range fair share threshold divided by the second signal level.
12. The method of claim 10 and further including if the unity gain factor has been applied to the first signal level, updating the system dynamic range by decreasing the remaining system dynamic range by the first signal level to which the gain factor has been applied.
13. A method for gain distribution in a distributed antenna system having a system dynamic range, the method comprising: sensing a signal level for each of a plurality of received signals from the distributed antenna system; sorting, in ascending order, the plurality of signal levels; comparing a first signal level of the plurality of sorted signal levels with a dynamic range fair share threshold; if the first signal level is less than or equal to the dynamic range fair share threshold, applying a unity gain factor to the first signal level; if the unity gain factor has been applied to the first signal level, updating the dynamic range fair share threshold to allocate remaining system dynamic range between remaining signal levels; and if the first signal level is greater than the dynamic range fair share threshold, applying a first gain factor that is substantially equal to the dynamic range fair share threshold divided by the first signal level.
14. A distributed antenna system having gain distribution and a total dynamic range, the system comprising: a plurality of distributed antennas that receive signals each having a signal level; a sorter that sorts the received signals according to each signal level; a threshold comparator, coupled to the sorter, that generates comparison results in response to a comparison between a sorted signal and a dynamic range fair share threshold that is updated with a remaining system dynamic range; a remaining dynamic range calculator that generates the remaining system dynamic range by decreasing the total dynamic range by each attenuated signal level; and a gain calculator, coupled to the sorter, the threshold comparator, and the remaining dynamic range calculator, that progressively generates gain factors in response to the comparison results.
15. The distributed antenna system of claim 14 wherein the distributed antennas are coupled through distributed summers over a communication medium.
16. The distributed antenna system of claim 15 wherein the communication medium is an optical medium.
17. The distributed antenna system of claim 14 wherein the sorter sorts the received signals in ascending order in response to each signal level.
18. A distributed antenna system having gain distribution and a total dynamic range, the system comprising: a plurality of distributed antennas that receive signals each having a signal level; a signal level sampling function that senses each signal level; < a sorter that sorts the received signals in ascending order according to each signal level; a threshold comparator, coupled to the sorter, that generates a comparison result in response to a comparison between a sorted signal and a dynamic range fair share threshold that is updated with a remaining system dynamic range; a remaining dynamic range calculator that generates the remaining system dynamic range by decreasing the total dynamic range by each attenuated signal level; a gain calculator, coupled to the sorter, the threshold comparator, and the remaining dynamic range calculator, that progressively generates a gain factor for each received signal in ascending order in response to each comparison result; and a plurality of attenuators, each attenuator coupled to a received signal, for attenuating each received signal in response to its gain factor.
19. The system of claim 18 wherein the gain calculator generates a gain factor of unity for a received signal if its signal level is less than or equal to the dynamic range fair share threshold.
20. The system of claim 18 wherein the gain factors are generated in discrete increments.
21. A distributed antenna system having gain distribution and a total dynamic range, the system comprising: a plurality of distributed antennas that receive analog signals each having a signal level represented in a digital form; an analog to digital converter that converts the analog signals to digital signals; a sorter that sorts the digital signals according to each signal level; a threshold comparator, coupled to the sorter, that generates a comparison result in response to a comparison between a sorted signal and a dynamic range fair share threshold that is updated with a remaining system dynamic range; a remaining dynamic range calculator that generates the remaining system dynamic range by decreasing the total dynamic range by each attenuated signal level; and a gain calculator, coupled to the sorter, the threshold comparator, and the remaining dynamic range calculator, that progressively generates gain factors in response to the comparison results.
22. A method for gain distribution in a distributed antenna system having a system dynamic range, the distributed antenna system being coupled by an optical network, the method comprising: receiving a plurality of analog signals; converting each analog signal to a digital signal having a signal level expressed in a digital format; sorting, in ascending order, the plurality of digital signals according to their signal levels; comparing a first digital signal level of the plurality of digital signals with a dynamic range fair share threshold; if the first digital signal level is less than or equal to the dynamic range fair share threshold, applying a unity gain factor to the first digital signal level; if the unity gain factor has been applied to the first digital signal level, updating the dynamic range fair share threshold to allocate remaining system dynamic range between remaining digital signals; and if the first digital signal level is greater than the dynamic range fair share threshold, applying a first gain factor that is substantially equal to the dynamic range fair share threshold divided by the first digital signal level.
PCT/US2003/038354 2002-12-03 2003-12-03 Small signal threshold and proportional gain distributed digital communications WO2004051793A2 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP03809206A EP1570585A2 (en) 2002-12-03 2003-12-03 Small signal threshold and proportional gain distributed digital communications
AU2003302570A AU2003302570A1 (en) 2002-12-03 2003-12-03 Small signal threshold and proportional gain distributed digital communications

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US43043502P 2002-12-03 2002-12-03
US60/430,435 2002-12-03
US10/414,907 2003-04-16
US10/414,907 US7103377B2 (en) 2002-12-03 2003-04-16 Small signal threshold and proportional gain distributed digital communications

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2004051793A2 true WO2004051793A2 (en) 2004-06-17
WO2004051793A3 WO2004051793A3 (en) 2005-02-17

Family

ID=32396995

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2003/038354 WO2004051793A2 (en) 2002-12-03 2003-12-03 Small signal threshold and proportional gain distributed digital communications

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (2) US7103377B2 (en)
EP (1) EP1570585A2 (en)
KR (1) KR20050084177A (en)
AU (1) AU2003302570A1 (en)
TW (1) TW200423559A (en)
WO (1) WO2004051793A2 (en)

Families Citing this family (117)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5627879A (en) * 1992-09-17 1997-05-06 Adc Telecommunications, Inc. Cellular communications system with centralized base stations and distributed antenna units
US6704545B1 (en) 2000-07-19 2004-03-09 Adc Telecommunications, Inc. Point-to-multipoint digital radio frequency transport
US8811917B2 (en) 2002-05-01 2014-08-19 Dali Systems Co. Ltd. Digital hybrid mode power amplifier system
US8380143B2 (en) 2002-05-01 2013-02-19 Dali Systems Co. Ltd Power amplifier time-delay invariant predistortion methods and apparatus
US7171244B2 (en) * 2002-12-03 2007-01-30 Adc Telecommunications, Inc. Communication system and method with gain control for signals from distributed antennas
US8958789B2 (en) 2002-12-03 2015-02-17 Adc Telecommunications, Inc. Distributed digital antenna system
US7103377B2 (en) * 2002-12-03 2006-09-05 Adc Telecommunications, Inc. Small signal threshold and proportional gain distributed digital communications
EP1625675B1 (en) * 2003-05-09 2007-09-05 Nxp B.V. Method and arrangement for setting the transmission power of a mobile communication device
WO2006038263A1 (en) 2004-09-30 2006-04-13 Fujitsu Limited Amplifier gain controlling method and apparatus for multi-antenna wireless system
US20070008939A1 (en) * 2005-06-10 2007-01-11 Adc Telecommunications, Inc. Providing wireless coverage into substantially closed environments
CN100461786C (en) * 2005-12-01 2009-02-11 北京威讯紫晶科技有限公司 Auto-gain control method for receiving data in short distance wireless network
US7599711B2 (en) * 2006-04-12 2009-10-06 Adc Telecommunications, Inc. Systems and methods for analog transport of RF voice/data communications
US8873585B2 (en) 2006-12-19 2014-10-28 Corning Optical Communications Wireless Ltd Distributed antenna system for MIMO technologies
CN104202279A (en) 2006-12-26 2014-12-10 大力系统有限公司 Method and system for baseband predistortion linearization in multi-channel wideband communication systems
US20100054746A1 (en) 2007-07-24 2010-03-04 Eric Raymond Logan Multi-port accumulator for radio-over-fiber (RoF) wireless picocellular systems
US8175459B2 (en) 2007-10-12 2012-05-08 Corning Cable Systems Llc Hybrid wireless/wired RoF transponder and hybrid RoF communication system using same
EP2203799A4 (en) 2007-10-22 2017-05-17 Mobileaccess Networks Ltd. Communication system using low bandwidth wires
US8175649B2 (en) 2008-06-20 2012-05-08 Corning Mobileaccess Ltd Method and system for real time control of an active antenna over a distributed antenna system
US8644844B2 (en) 2007-12-20 2014-02-04 Corning Mobileaccess Ltd. Extending outdoor location based services and applications into enclosed areas
US8310963B2 (en) * 2008-06-24 2012-11-13 Adc Telecommunications, Inc. System and method for synchronized time-division duplex signal switching
US8213401B2 (en) 2009-01-13 2012-07-03 Adc Telecommunications, Inc. Systems and methods for IP communication over a distributed antenna system transport
US8346278B2 (en) 2009-01-13 2013-01-01 Adc Telecommunications, Inc. Systems and methods for mobile phone location with digital distributed antenna systems
USRE47466E1 (en) 2009-01-13 2019-06-25 Commscope Technologies Llc Systems and methods for IP communication over a distributed antenna system transport
US9673904B2 (en) 2009-02-03 2017-06-06 Corning Optical Communications LLC Optical fiber-based distributed antenna systems, components, and related methods for calibration thereof
CN102396171B (en) 2009-02-03 2015-09-30 康宁光缆系统有限责任公司 Based on the distributing antenna system of optical fiber, assembly and the correlation technique for monitoring and configure distributing antenna system based on optical fiber, assembly
WO2010091004A1 (en) 2009-02-03 2010-08-12 Corning Cable Systems Llc Optical fiber-based distributed antenna systems, components, and related methods for calibration thereof
US8897215B2 (en) 2009-02-08 2014-11-25 Corning Optical Communications Wireless Ltd Communication system using cables carrying ethernet signals
US8346091B2 (en) 2009-04-29 2013-01-01 Andrew Llc Distributed antenna system for wireless network systems
US8670722B2 (en) * 2009-05-20 2014-03-11 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) Automatic detection of erroneous connections between antenna ports and radio frequency paths
US9590733B2 (en) 2009-07-24 2017-03-07 Corning Optical Communications LLC Location tracking using fiber optic array cables and related systems and methods
US8280259B2 (en) 2009-11-13 2012-10-02 Corning Cable Systems Llc Radio-over-fiber (RoF) system for protocol-independent wired and/or wireless communication
US8275265B2 (en) 2010-02-15 2012-09-25 Corning Cable Systems Llc Dynamic cell bonding (DCB) for radio-over-fiber (RoF)-based networks and communication systems and related methods
CN102845001B (en) 2010-03-31 2016-07-06 康宁光缆系统有限责任公司 Based on positioning service in the distributed communication assembly of optical fiber and system and associated method
DE102010018492B4 (en) 2010-04-28 2011-12-08 Andrew Wireless Systems Gmbh Interface module for a unit of an antenna distribution system and antenna distribution system
US9525488B2 (en) 2010-05-02 2016-12-20 Corning Optical Communications LLC Digital data services and/or power distribution in optical fiber-based distributed communications systems providing digital data and radio frequency (RF) communications services, and related components and methods
US8509850B2 (en) 2010-06-14 2013-08-13 Adc Telecommunications, Inc. Systems and methods for distributed antenna system reverse path summation using signal-to-noise ratio optimization
EP2583383B1 (en) 2010-06-18 2017-11-15 CommScope Technologies LLC Digital distributed antenna system with improved data transmission features
US8594223B2 (en) 2010-06-18 2013-11-26 Andrew Llc Transport data reduction for DAS systems
US8472579B2 (en) 2010-07-28 2013-06-25 Adc Telecommunications, Inc. Distributed digital reference clock
US8570914B2 (en) 2010-08-09 2013-10-29 Corning Cable Systems Llc Apparatuses, systems, and methods for determining location of a mobile device(s) in a distributed antenna system(s)
WO2012024247A1 (en) 2010-08-16 2012-02-23 Corning Cable Systems Llc Remote antenna clusters and related systems, components, and methods supporting digital data signal propagation between remote antenna units
JP5911149B2 (en) * 2010-08-17 2016-05-11 ダリ システムズ カンパニー リミテッド Neutral host architecture for distributed antenna systems.
KR101835254B1 (en) 2010-08-17 2018-03-06 달리 시스템즈 씨오. 엘티디. Neutral host architecture for a distributed antenna system
KR102136940B1 (en) 2010-09-14 2020-07-23 달리 시스템즈 씨오. 엘티디. Remotely Reconfigurable Distributed Antenna System and Methods
US9160449B2 (en) 2010-10-13 2015-10-13 Ccs Technology, Inc. Local power management for remote antenna units in distributed antenna systems
US9252874B2 (en) 2010-10-13 2016-02-02 Ccs Technology, Inc Power management for remote antenna units in distributed antenna systems
US8532242B2 (en) 2010-10-27 2013-09-10 Adc Telecommunications, Inc. Distributed antenna system with combination of both all digital transport and hybrid digital/analog transport
US11296504B2 (en) 2010-11-24 2022-04-05 Corning Optical Communications LLC Power distribution module(s) capable of hot connection and/or disconnection for wireless communication systems, and related power units, components, and methods
EP2643947B1 (en) 2010-11-24 2018-09-19 Corning Optical Communications LLC Power distribution module(s) capable of hot connection and/or disconnection for distributed antenna systems, and related power units, components, and methods
US8462683B2 (en) 2011-01-12 2013-06-11 Adc Telecommunications, Inc. Distinct transport path for MIMO transmissions in distributed antenna systems
EP2678972B1 (en) 2011-02-21 2018-09-05 Corning Optical Communications LLC Providing digital data services as electrical signals and radio-frequency (rf) communications over optical fiber in distributed communications systems, and related components and methods
WO2012148938A1 (en) 2011-04-29 2012-11-01 Corning Cable Systems Llc Determining propagation delay of communications in distributed antenna systems, and related components, systems and methods
WO2012148940A1 (en) 2011-04-29 2012-11-01 Corning Cable Systems Llc Systems, methods, and devices for increasing radio frequency (rf) power in distributed antenna systems
DE202012013601U1 (en) 2011-09-15 2018-04-24 Andrew Wireless Systems Gmbh Configuration subsystem for telecommunication systems
EP3029862B1 (en) 2011-09-16 2017-08-16 Andrew Wireless Systems GmbH Integrated intermodulation detection sub-system for telecommunications systems
US8693342B2 (en) 2011-10-28 2014-04-08 Adc Telecommunications, Inc. Distributed antenna system using time division duplexing scheme
WO2013082042A1 (en) 2011-11-28 2013-06-06 Dali Systems Co. Ltd Distributed antenna system and method for bandwidth compression and transport of noncontiguous signal frequency blocks
EP2829152A2 (en) 2012-03-23 2015-01-28 Corning Optical Communications Wireless Ltd. Radio-frequency integrated circuit (rfic) chip(s) for providing distributed antenna system functionalities, and related components, systems, and methods
WO2013148986A1 (en) 2012-03-30 2013-10-03 Corning Cable Systems Llc Reducing location-dependent interference in distributed antenna systems operating in multiple-input, multiple-output (mimo) configuration, and related components, systems, and methods
US9781553B2 (en) 2012-04-24 2017-10-03 Corning Optical Communications LLC Location based services in a distributed communication system, and related components and methods
EP2842245A1 (en) 2012-04-25 2015-03-04 Corning Optical Communications LLC Distributed antenna system architectures
US8917996B2 (en) 2012-06-13 2014-12-23 Raytheon Company Simplified serial data over optical fiber for remote receiver/sensor applications
US9154222B2 (en) 2012-07-31 2015-10-06 Corning Optical Communications LLC Cooling system control in distributed antenna systems
EP2883416A1 (en) 2012-08-07 2015-06-17 Corning Optical Communications Wireless Ltd. Distribution of time-division multiplexed (tdm) management services in a distributed antenna system, and related components, systems, and methods
WO2014026005A1 (en) 2012-08-09 2014-02-13 Axell Wireless Ltd. A digital capactiy centric distributed antenna system
WO2014040608A1 (en) 2012-09-14 2014-03-20 Andrew Wireless Systems Gmbh Uplink path integrity detection in distributed antenna systems
US9455784B2 (en) 2012-10-31 2016-09-27 Corning Optical Communications Wireless Ltd Deployable wireless infrastructures and methods of deploying wireless infrastructures
EP2915301B1 (en) 2012-10-31 2017-09-20 CommScope Technologies LLC Digital baseband transport in telecommunications distribution systems
US10257056B2 (en) 2012-11-28 2019-04-09 Corning Optical Communications LLC Power management for distributed communication systems, and related components, systems, and methods
WO2014085115A1 (en) 2012-11-29 2014-06-05 Corning Cable Systems Llc HYBRID INTRA-CELL / INTER-CELL REMOTE UNIT ANTENNA BONDING IN MULTIPLE-INPUT, MULTIPLE-OUTPUT (MIMO) DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEMS (DASs)
US9647758B2 (en) 2012-11-30 2017-05-09 Corning Optical Communications Wireless Ltd Cabling connectivity monitoring and verification
US9158864B2 (en) 2012-12-21 2015-10-13 Corning Optical Communications Wireless Ltd Systems, methods, and devices for documenting a location of installed equipment
US9497706B2 (en) 2013-02-20 2016-11-15 Corning Optical Communications Wireless Ltd Power management in distributed antenna systems (DASs), and related components, systems, and methods
CN108811189B (en) 2013-02-22 2021-12-10 Adc电信股份有限公司 Universal remote radio head
EP3484060B1 (en) 2013-02-22 2021-04-07 ADC Telecommunications, Inc. Master reference for base station network interface sourced from distributed antenna system
EP3008828B1 (en) 2013-06-12 2017-08-09 Corning Optical Communications Wireless Ltd. Time-division duplexing (tdd) in distributed communications systems, including distributed antenna systems (dass)
CN105452951B (en) 2013-06-12 2018-10-19 康宁光电通信无线公司 Voltage type optical directional coupler
US9247543B2 (en) 2013-07-23 2016-01-26 Corning Optical Communications Wireless Ltd Monitoring non-supported wireless spectrum within coverage areas of distributed antenna systems (DASs)
US9661781B2 (en) 2013-07-31 2017-05-23 Corning Optical Communications Wireless Ltd Remote units for distributed communication systems and related installation methods and apparatuses
WO2015029028A1 (en) 2013-08-28 2015-03-05 Corning Optical Communications Wireless Ltd. Power management for distributed communication systems, and related components, systems, and methods
US9385810B2 (en) 2013-09-30 2016-07-05 Corning Optical Communications Wireless Ltd Connection mapping in distributed communication systems
US9787457B2 (en) 2013-10-07 2017-10-10 Commscope Technologies Llc Systems and methods for integrating asynchronous signals in distributed antenna system with direct digital interface to base station
US9750082B2 (en) 2013-10-07 2017-08-29 Commscope Technologies Llc Systems and methods for noise floor optimization in distributed antenna system with direct digital interface to base station
WO2015079435A1 (en) 2013-11-26 2015-06-04 Corning Optical Communications Wireless Ltd. Selective activation of communications services on power-up of a remote unit(s) in a distributed antenna system (das) based on power consumption
CN105122902B (en) * 2013-12-31 2019-05-03 华为技术有限公司 The method, apparatus and system for inhibiting uplink bottom to make an uproar in compartment system indoors
US9178635B2 (en) 2014-01-03 2015-11-03 Corning Optical Communications Wireless Ltd Separation of communication signal sub-bands in distributed antenna systems (DASs) to reduce interference
WO2015126828A1 (en) * 2014-02-18 2015-08-27 Commscope Technologiees Llc Selectively combining uplink signals in distributed antenna systems
US9775123B2 (en) 2014-03-28 2017-09-26 Corning Optical Communications Wireless Ltd. Individualized gain control of uplink paths in remote units in a distributed antenna system (DAS) based on individual remote unit contribution to combined uplink power
US9357551B2 (en) 2014-05-30 2016-05-31 Corning Optical Communications Wireless Ltd Systems and methods for simultaneous sampling of serial digital data streams from multiple analog-to-digital converters (ADCS), including in distributed antenna systems
WO2015191888A1 (en) 2014-06-11 2015-12-17 Adc Telecommunications, Inc. Bitrate efficient transport through distributed antenna systems
US9509133B2 (en) 2014-06-27 2016-11-29 Corning Optical Communications Wireless Ltd Protection of distributed antenna systems
US9525472B2 (en) 2014-07-30 2016-12-20 Corning Incorporated Reducing location-dependent destructive interference in distributed antenna systems (DASS) operating in multiple-input, multiple-output (MIMO) configuration, and related components, systems, and methods
US10164689B2 (en) 2014-08-22 2018-12-25 Commscope Technologies Llc Distributed antenna system to transport first cellular RF band concurrently with Ethernet or second cellular RF band
US10797759B2 (en) * 2014-08-22 2020-10-06 Commscope Technologies Llc Distributed antenna system with adaptive allocation between digitized RF data and IP formatted data
WO2016030880A2 (en) 2014-08-25 2016-03-03 Corning Optical Communications Wireless Ltd. Supporting an add-on remote unit (ru) in an optical fiber-based distributed antenna system (das) over an existing optical fiber communications medium using radio frequency (rf) multiplexing
US9730228B2 (en) 2014-08-29 2017-08-08 Corning Optical Communications Wireless Ltd Individualized gain control of remote uplink band paths in a remote unit in a distributed antenna system (DAS), based on combined uplink power level in the remote unit
US9653861B2 (en) 2014-09-17 2017-05-16 Corning Optical Communications Wireless Ltd Interconnection of hardware components
WO2016049002A1 (en) 2014-09-23 2016-03-31 Axell Wireless Ltd. Automatic mapping and handling pim and other uplink interferences in digital distributed antenna systems
US9602210B2 (en) 2014-09-24 2017-03-21 Corning Optical Communications Wireless Ltd Flexible head-end chassis supporting automatic identification and interconnection of radio interface modules and optical interface modules in an optical fiber-based distributed antenna system (DAS)
US9184960B1 (en) 2014-09-25 2015-11-10 Corning Optical Communications Wireless Ltd Frequency shifting a communications signal(s) in a multi-frequency distributed antenna system (DAS) to avoid or reduce frequency interference
US9420542B2 (en) 2014-09-25 2016-08-16 Corning Optical Communications Wireless Ltd System-wide uplink band gain control in a distributed antenna system (DAS), based on per band gain control of remote uplink paths in remote units
US10659163B2 (en) 2014-09-25 2020-05-19 Corning Optical Communications LLC Supporting analog remote antenna units (RAUs) in digital distributed antenna systems (DASs) using analog RAU digital adaptors
WO2016071902A1 (en) 2014-11-03 2016-05-12 Corning Optical Communications Wireless Ltd. Multi-band monopole planar antennas configured to facilitate improved radio frequency (rf) isolation in multiple-input multiple-output (mimo) antenna arrangement
WO2016075696A1 (en) 2014-11-13 2016-05-19 Corning Optical Communications Wireless Ltd. Analog distributed antenna systems (dass) supporting distribution of digital communications signals interfaced from a digital signal source and analog radio frequency (rf) communications signals
US9729267B2 (en) 2014-12-11 2017-08-08 Corning Optical Communications Wireless Ltd Multiplexing two separate optical links with the same wavelength using asymmetric combining and splitting
EP3235336A1 (en) 2014-12-18 2017-10-25 Corning Optical Communications Wireless Ltd. Digital interface modules (dims) for flexibly distributing digital and/or analog communications signals in wide-area analog distributed antenna systems (dass)
WO2016098111A1 (en) 2014-12-18 2016-06-23 Corning Optical Communications Wireless Ltd. Digital- analog interface modules (da!ms) for flexibly.distributing digital and/or analog communications signals in wide-area analog distributed antenna systems (dass)
AU2015371287A1 (en) 2014-12-23 2017-06-08 Axell Wireless Ltd. Harmonizing noise aggregation and noise management in distributed antenna system
CN107211429B (en) 2015-02-05 2021-05-28 康普技术有限责任公司 System and method for emulating uplink diversity signals
US20160249365A1 (en) 2015-02-19 2016-08-25 Corning Optical Communications Wireless Ltd. Offsetting unwanted downlink interference signals in an uplink path in a distributed antenna system (das)
US9785175B2 (en) 2015-03-27 2017-10-10 Corning Optical Communications Wireless, Ltd. Combining power from electrically isolated power paths for powering remote units in a distributed antenna system(s) (DASs)
US9681313B2 (en) 2015-04-15 2017-06-13 Corning Optical Communications Wireless Ltd Optimizing remote antenna unit performance using an alternative data channel
US9948349B2 (en) 2015-07-17 2018-04-17 Corning Optical Communications Wireless Ltd IOT automation and data collection system
US10560214B2 (en) 2015-09-28 2020-02-11 Corning Optical Communications LLC Downlink and uplink communication path switching in a time-division duplex (TDD) distributed antenna system (DAS)
US10499269B2 (en) 2015-11-12 2019-12-03 Commscope Technologies Llc Systems and methods for assigning controlled nodes to channel interfaces of a controller
US9648580B1 (en) 2016-03-23 2017-05-09 Corning Optical Communications Wireless Ltd Identifying remote units in a wireless distribution system (WDS) based on assigned unique temporal delay patterns
US10236924B2 (en) 2016-03-31 2019-03-19 Corning Optical Communications Wireless Ltd Reducing out-of-channel noise in a wireless distribution system (WDS)

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5774085A (en) * 1994-09-14 1998-06-30 Hewlett-Packard Company Apparatus and method for obtaining proper output signal in which gain and DC component are regulated based upon on measured amplitude distribution
US20010031014A1 (en) * 2000-02-01 2001-10-18 C.A. Subramanian Method for allocating bits and power in multi-carrier communication system
US20030133182A1 (en) * 2002-01-17 2003-07-17 Ng Eddie Kai Ho Method and apparatus for gain excursion minimiztion in automatic gain controlled optical systems
US6643498B1 (en) * 1999-03-29 2003-11-04 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Wireless receiver, wireless receiving method, and recording medium

Family Cites Families (38)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
IT1070376B (en) 1976-03-22 1985-03-29 Sina Spa METHOD AND EQUIPMENT FOR RADIOCOMMUNICATIONS AND/OR RADIO SIGNALS IN LIMITED ENVIRONMENTS WITH MAINLY LONGITUDINAL DEVELOPMENT AND CONNECTED WITH THE OUTSIDE AT THE ENDS, EVEN UNDERGROUND, ESPECIALLY TUNNELS EVEN OF CONSIDERABLE LENGTH
US4144411A (en) 1976-09-22 1979-03-13 Bell Telephone Laboratories, Incorporated Cellular radiotelephone system structured for flexible use of different cell sizes
US4451699A (en) 1979-12-31 1984-05-29 Broadcom, Inc. Communications system and network
US4485486A (en) 1982-08-03 1984-11-27 Motorola, Inc. Method and apparatus for assigning duplex radio channels and scanning duplex radio channels assigned to mobile and portable radio telephones in a cellular radiotelephone communications system
NL8203600A (en) 1982-09-17 1984-04-16 Philips Nv MAIN END AND RECEIVER FOR A SIGNAL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM.
US4691292A (en) 1983-04-13 1987-09-01 Rca Corporation System for digital multiband filtering
US4475010A (en) 1983-05-05 1984-10-02 At&T Bell Laboratories High density cellular mobile radio communications
DE3318774A1 (en) 1983-05-24 1984-11-29 ANT Nachrichtentechnik GmbH, 7150 Backnang METHOD FOR TRANSMITTING DIGITALLY CODED ANALOG SIGNALS
US4612990A (en) 1983-08-01 1986-09-23 Mobil Oil Corporation Method for diverting steam in thermal recovery process
US4628501A (en) 1983-12-29 1986-12-09 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army Optical communications systems
US4556760A (en) 1984-06-11 1985-12-03 Itt Corporation Hand-off filter for cellular mobile radio
US4849963A (en) 1985-10-15 1989-07-18 Minori Kawano Cellular radio telephone enhancement circuit
GB2197531B (en) 1986-11-08 1991-02-06 Stc Plc Distributed feedback laser
GB2214755B (en) 1988-01-29 1992-06-24 Walmore Electronics Limited Distributed antenna system
JPH022727A (en) 1988-06-17 1990-01-08 Shiyoudenriyoku Kosoku Tsushin Kenkyusho:Kk Radio wave transmission/reception system via optical fiber
GB8826476D0 (en) 1988-11-11 1988-12-14 British Telecomm Communications system
US4999831A (en) 1989-10-19 1991-03-12 United Telecommunications, Inc. Synchronous quantized subcarrier multiplexer for digital transport of video, voice and data
GB9008162D0 (en) 1990-04-10 1990-06-06 British Telecomm Signal distribution
CA2041705A1 (en) 1990-07-25 1992-01-26 Jesse Eugene Russell Method and apparatus for providing wireless communications between remote locations
US5067173A (en) 1990-12-20 1991-11-19 At&T Bell Laboratories Microcellular communications system using space diversity reception
US5802173A (en) 1991-01-15 1998-09-01 Rogers Cable Systems Limited Radiotelephony system
US5809395A (en) 1991-01-15 1998-09-15 Rogers Cable Systems Limited Remote antenna driver for a radio telephony system
CA2066946A1 (en) 1991-05-16 1992-11-17 George Philip Vella-Coleiro Apparatus and method for synchronizing a plurality of remote transmission and receiving stations
US5321849A (en) 1991-05-22 1994-06-14 Southwestern Bell Technology Resources, Inc. System for controlling signal level at both ends of a transmission link based on a detected valve
US5627879A (en) 1992-09-17 1997-05-06 Adc Telecommunications, Inc. Cellular communications system with centralized base stations and distributed antenna units
US5774789A (en) 1995-12-14 1998-06-30 Allen Telecom Inc. RF communication signal distribution system and method
ES2216144T3 (en) 1996-04-19 2004-10-16 Lgc Wireless, Inc. DISTRIBUTION OF RADIO FREQUENCY SIGNS THROUGH BASS WIDTH INFRASTRUCTURES.
US6580905B1 (en) * 1996-07-02 2003-06-17 Ericsson Inc. System and method for controlling the level of signals output to transmission media in a distributed antenna network
US6128470A (en) * 1996-07-18 2000-10-03 Ericsson Inc. System and method for reducing cumulative noise in a distributed antenna network
IL119832A (en) 1996-12-15 2001-01-11 Foxcom Wireless Ltd Wireless communications systems employing optical fibers
US6112086A (en) 1997-02-25 2000-08-29 Adc Telecommunications, Inc. Scanning RSSI receiver system using inverse fast fourier transforms for a cellular communications system with centralized base stations and distributed antenna units
US6223021B1 (en) 1997-12-24 2001-04-24 Transcept, Inc. Signal filtering in a transceiver for a wireless telephone system
US6349200B1 (en) 1997-12-24 2002-02-19 Transcept, Inc. Monitoring and command system for transceivers used to inter-connect wireless telephones to a broadband network
JP3940490B2 (en) * 1998-03-13 2007-07-04 株式会社東芝 Distributed antenna system
US6122529A (en) 1998-03-17 2000-09-19 Transcept, Inc. Simulcast with hierarchical cell structure overlay
US7184728B2 (en) 2002-02-25 2007-02-27 Adc Telecommunications, Inc. Distributed automatic gain control system
US7103377B2 (en) * 2002-12-03 2006-09-05 Adc Telecommunications, Inc. Small signal threshold and proportional gain distributed digital communications
US7171244B2 (en) * 2002-12-03 2007-01-30 Adc Telecommunications, Inc. Communication system and method with gain control for signals from distributed antennas

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5774085A (en) * 1994-09-14 1998-06-30 Hewlett-Packard Company Apparatus and method for obtaining proper output signal in which gain and DC component are regulated based upon on measured amplitude distribution
US6643498B1 (en) * 1999-03-29 2003-11-04 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Wireless receiver, wireless receiving method, and recording medium
US20010031014A1 (en) * 2000-02-01 2001-10-18 C.A. Subramanian Method for allocating bits and power in multi-carrier communication system
US20030133182A1 (en) * 2002-01-17 2003-07-17 Ng Eddie Kai Ho Method and apparatus for gain excursion minimiztion in automatic gain controlled optical systems

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2004051793A3 (en) 2005-02-17
US7539509B2 (en) 2009-05-26
US20040106387A1 (en) 2004-06-03
EP1570585A2 (en) 2005-09-07
US20070064506A1 (en) 2007-03-22
TW200423559A (en) 2004-11-01
KR20050084177A (en) 2005-08-26
AU2003302570A1 (en) 2004-06-23
US7103377B2 (en) 2006-09-05
AU2003302570A8 (en) 2004-06-23

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7103377B2 (en) Small signal threshold and proportional gain distributed digital communications
EP1570687B1 (en) Distributed signal summation and gain control
CN1113483C (en) Multiple code channel power control in radio communication system
US6192216B1 (en) Remotely controlled gain control of transceiver used to inter-connect wireless telephones to a broadband network
US7184728B2 (en) Distributed automatic gain control system
CN1086895C (en) Method and device for controlling transmission power in honeycomb shape mobile telephone system
US6374124B1 (en) Dynamic reallocation of transceivers used to interconnect wireless telephones to a broadband network
CN1278499C (en) Multiple antenna detection and selection method
US6198911B1 (en) Controlling transmitter gain in a wireless telecommunications system
US6223021B1 (en) Signal filtering in a transceiver for a wireless telephone system
US7085530B2 (en) Dynamic capacity allocation of in-building system
CN1167376A (en) Radio signal relay equipment of code classfied multi-address communication system
EP1142156A2 (en) Method in a telecommunication system
NO317831B1 (en) Scattered range of communication system and mobile station for this system
US7136654B1 (en) Power based channel assignment in a wireless communication system
US20020160801A1 (en) Radio communication apparatus and transmission power control method
EP2417805B1 (en) Filter for an indoor cellular system
KR100330407B1 (en) Apparatus for allocating sectors dynamically in a connected base station of optical repeater system for mobile telephone and method thereof
US20030076790A1 (en) Transmission device
JPH0795141A (en) Power control system for multi-channel frequency multiplex signal
CN1745520A (en) Small signal threshold and proportional gain distributed digital communications
KR20030063622A (en) Method for managing network in mobile communication system

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BW BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EC EE EG ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NI NO NZ OM PG PH PL PT RO RU SC SD SE SG SK SL SY TJ TM TN TR TT TZ UA UG UZ VC VN YU ZA ZM ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): BW GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZM ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LU MC NL PT RO SE SI SK TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 1020057010193

Country of ref document: KR

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2003809206

Country of ref document: EP

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 20038A93978

Country of ref document: CN

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 1020057010193

Country of ref document: KR

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 2003809206

Country of ref document: EP

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: JP

WWW Wipo information: withdrawn in national office

Country of ref document: JP