WO2005002163A2 - Method and apparatus for improving the equalisation of block coded signals - Google Patents

Method and apparatus for improving the equalisation of block coded signals Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2005002163A2
WO2005002163A2 PCT/US2004/020360 US2004020360W WO2005002163A2 WO 2005002163 A2 WO2005002163 A2 WO 2005002163A2 US 2004020360 W US2004020360 W US 2004020360W WO 2005002163 A2 WO2005002163 A2 WO 2005002163A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
chip
slicer
symbol
filter
accurate
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2004/020360
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
WO2005002163A3 (en
Inventor
John E. Smee
Haitao Zhang
Original Assignee
Qualcomm, Incorporated
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Qualcomm, Incorporated filed Critical Qualcomm, Incorporated
Priority to MXPA05013707A priority Critical patent/MXPA05013707A/en
Priority to CN200480017800.9A priority patent/CN1813453B/en
Publication of WO2005002163A2 publication Critical patent/WO2005002163A2/en
Publication of WO2005002163A3 publication Critical patent/WO2005002163A3/en

Links

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L25/00Baseband systems
    • H04L25/02Details ; arrangements for supplying electrical power along data transmission lines
    • H04L25/03Shaping networks in transmitter or receiver, e.g. adaptive shaping networks
    • H04L25/03006Arrangements for removing intersymbol interference
    • H04L25/03012Arrangements for removing intersymbol interference operating in the time domain
    • H04L25/03019Arrangements for removing intersymbol interference operating in the time domain adaptive, i.e. capable of adjustment during data reception
    • H04L25/03057Arrangements for removing intersymbol interference operating in the time domain adaptive, i.e. capable of adjustment during data reception with a recursive structure
    • H04L25/03063Arrangements for removing intersymbol interference operating in the time domain adaptive, i.e. capable of adjustment during data reception with a recursive structure using fractionally spaced delay lines or combinations of fractionally and integrally spaced taps
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L25/00Baseband systems
    • H04L25/02Details ; arrangements for supplying electrical power along data transmission lines
    • H04L25/03Shaping networks in transmitter or receiver, e.g. adaptive shaping networks
    • H04L25/03006Arrangements for removing intersymbol interference
    • H04L25/03171Arrangements involving maximum a posteriori probability [MAP] detection

Definitions

  • the present invention relates generally to the field of wireless communications and more particularly relates to block coded digital communication systems.
  • a problem associated with this scheme is the delay that is inherent in channel decoding. Becauise the symbols are encoded, the efficiency of the process is either reduced by decoding the symbols or reduced by the higher error rate that is inherent with slicer decisions as opposed to decisions from the decoder output.
  • a decision feedback equalizer (“DFE") at the receiver to remove intersymbol interference (“ISI) exacerbates this problem because the input to the feedback filter (“FBF”) comprises the higher error rate slicer decisions.
  • DFE decision feedback equalizer
  • the DFE propagates the error and increases the likelihood of subsequent slicer errors and thereby diminishes performance.
  • Fig. 1 is an example graph diagram illustrating conventional slicer errors when unmodified symbol estimates are used as slicer input.
  • a slicer is employed by a decision feedback equalizer to slice chips of a code word from the encoded stream and pass them to a feedback filter. Based on the inherent correlation among the chips of a code word, certain instances of more reliable symbol estimates are derived from the sliced chips.
  • Figure 1 is an example graph diagram illustrating conventional slicer errors when unmodified symbol estimates are used as slicer input;
  • Figure 2 is a block diagram illustrating an example decision feedback equalizer according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • Figure 3 is an example graph diagram illustrating a reduced amount of slicer errors based on modified symbol estimates according to an embodiment of the present invention
  • Figure 4 is a block diagram illustrating an example chip slicer and feedback filter contents in a decision feedback equalizer according to an embodiment of the present invention
  • Figure 5 is a table diagram illustrating improved feedback filter contents according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • Figure 6A is an example pseudo code listing for creating more accurate sliced chips for least mean square and feed back filter tracking according to an embodiment of the present invention
  • Figure 6B is an example pseudo code listing for using more accurate sliced chips for better least mean square updating of a decision feedback equalizer, feed forward filter, and feed back filter according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • Figure 6C is an example pseudo code listing for using the more accurate sliced chips for improved feed back filter contents according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • Certain embodiments as disclosed herein provide for improved decision directed adaptation employed by a receiver in a block coded digital communication system. For example, one method as disclosed herein allows for the inherent correlation between the chips of a code word to be exploited to derive more reliable symbol estimates. These more reliable symbol estimates are then passed through a feedback filter to improve the accuracy of future input to the chip slicer. Additionally, the more reliable symbol estimates replace earlier symbol estimates in a feedback filter to further improve the total efficiency of the decision feedback equalizer.
  • Fig. 2 is a block diagram illustrating an example decision feedback equalizer ("DEE") 10 according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • the DFE 10 comprises an antenna 20, a preprocessor 30, a feed forward filter 40, a chip combiner 50, a chip slicer 60, and a feed back filter 70.
  • the antenna 20 can be any of a variety of antennas configured for wireless communications in a block coded digital communication system, as will be understood by one having skill in the art.
  • the preprocessor 30 preferably carries out signal processing tasks and provides the feed forward filter 40 with baseband samples (i.e., digital input), as will also be understood by one having skill in the art.
  • the feed forward filter 40 preferably processes the baseband samples and sends the digital data stream to the chip slicer 60, in combination with any signal added or subtracted by the chip combiner 50.
  • the feed back filter 70 can be a finite impulse response (“FIR”) filter that processes the previous slicer 60 outputs to subtract out postcursor inter symbol interference ("ISI”) from the current input to the slicer 60.
  • FIR finite impulse response
  • the length of the feedback filter 70 is not related to the length of the codewords.
  • the coefficients for the feed forward filter 40 and the feedback filter 70 can be selected based on the minimum mean square error ("MMSE") criterion using either adaptive techniques or based on computations involving a channel estimate.
  • MMSE minimum mean square error
  • the chip slicer 60 is preferably configured to extract a portion of the data stream that corresponds to a single chip of a code word.
  • Each sliced chip is preferably provided to the feed back filter 70, where the sliced chips are processed to determine any noise associated with the slicer decision.
  • the feed back filter 70 advantageously feeds the noise component back into the chip slicer 60 by way of the chip combiner 50. In this fashion, the noise component can be subtracted from next incoming signal from the feed forward filter 40 before it is fed into the slicer 60.
  • a stream of digital data is sent over the airwaves in analog form and received by the antenna 20.
  • the analog waves are interpreted by the preprocessor 30 and converted to digital form.
  • the digital signal comprises a frame that is divided into two portions, a training portion and a data portion. Within the data portion of the frame are a series of binary digits (i.e., ones and zeroes) that are encoded symbols which represent the data payload. These symbols can be broken down into a plurality of code words and each code word can be further broken down into a plurality of chips. For example, a complementary code keying ("CCK”) code word, as specified for the IEEE 802J lb 5.5 Mb/s data rate, is eight (8) chips long.
  • CCK complementary code keying
  • the chip slicer 60 When an encoded symbol is sent to the chip slicer 60, the chip slicer 60 preferably identifies a subset of the symbol that represents a single chip. The correct identification of a chip is very important because if a chip is not correctly identified, then DFE error propagation will result, where the incorrectly sliced chips fed into the feedback filter 70 can result in an output from the feedback filter 70 that incorrectly accounts for interference and therefore causes further errors in slicer decisions made by the chip slicer 60.
  • the chip slicer 60 sends the sliced chips to the feed back filter 70 in order to more accurately slice the next incoming chip.
  • code words introduces a certain correlation between the various chips that comprise a code word.
  • a CCK code word is eight (8) chips long and includes the following structure:
  • Fig. 3 is an example graph diagram illustrating a reduced amount of slicer errors based on improved symbol estimates according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • Fig. 4 is a block diagram illustrating an example chip slicer 62 and feedback filter contents 72 in a decision feedback equalizer 12 according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • the DFE 12 comprises a signal combiner 52, a chip slicer 62, and feed back filter 72.
  • the feed back filter 72 comprises a series of tap contents that each contain decisions from the slicer 62.
  • Each set of tap contents is shown as "Tc" in Fig. 4.
  • the DFE 12 can be switched so that the tap contents in the feed back filter 72 are updated only during the data portion of a frame.
  • this information can be stored in the tap contents of the feed back filter 72 and the known correlation between the chips in the code word can be exploited to modify the older tap contents in the feed back filter 72 based on the more reliable information. For example, after slicing each of the chips 3, 4, 7, and 8 and placing them into the first tap contents of the feed back filter 72, the tap contents of the feed back filter 72 that is two chips old can be replaced with a more reliable value by modifying the third tap contents of the feed back filter 72. The tap contents are appropriately mixed and combined to create the new estimate to be fed to the chip slicer 62.
  • this ensures that the contents of feed back filter 72 taps 3 and higher will reflect the increased accuracy of the modified slicer input and thereby decrease DFE error propagation.
  • the DFE may implement:
  • Fig. 5 is a table diagram illustrating improved feedback filter contents according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • the third and higher feed back filter tap contents reflect the improved accuracy of the chip estimates pursuant to the correlation between chips in the 8 chip CCK code words as previously described.
  • each row corresponds to a particular time index with time moving from top to bottom. Thus, the contents of feed back filter tap 9 are not modified until after the ninth row.
  • Figs. 6A - 6C are example code sections in pseudo code that illustrate methods for improving slicer output, using the improved slicer output in various filters, and storing the improved slicer output in a feedback filter to decrease the effects of DFE error propagation.
  • Fig. 6A is an example pseudo code listing for creating more accurate sliced chips for least mean square and feed back filter tracking according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • Fig. 6B is an example pseudo code listing for using more accurate sliced chips for better least mean square updating of a decision feedback equalizer, feed forward filter, and feed back filter according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • Fig. 6C is an example pseudo code listing for using the more accurate sliced chips for improved feed back filter contents according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Abstract

Improved decision directed adaptation and decision feedback equalizers are provided in a block coded digital communication system. The performance of a receiver is significantly improved by allowing the decision feedback equalizer to perform time-tracking and residual frequency offset compensation during the data portion of a frame. This is accomplished by capitalizing on the inherent correlation among the chips of a code word in a block coded digital communication system to identify certain instances where more reliable symbol estimates can be derived from a sliced chip without introduction the delay inherent in decoding. As the more reliable symbol estimates are fed back into the chip slicer, the total efficiency of the decision feedback equalizer is improved and the more reliable symbol estimates can be used to replace older content in the feedback filter to further improve the accuracy of the modified slicer input and further decrease the effects of error propagation by the decision feedback equalizer.

Description

IMPROVED SLICER INPUT AND FEEDBACK FILTER CONTENTS FOR BLOCK CODED DIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS
BACKGROUND
1. Field of the Invention
[01] The present invention relates generally to the field of wireless communications and more particularly relates to block coded digital communication systems.
2. Related Art
[02] Conventional block coded digital communication systems typically split a frame into known training symbols and known data symbols. Although the symbols are known, i.e., included in a predefined finite alphabet, the particular data symbols in any given frame are unknown to the receiver.
[03] During the training portion of a frame, it is well known to run tracking loops based on an error signal generated from the training data. For example, a time tracking loop or phase locked loop may be employed. Alternatively, or in combination, a least mean square ("LMS") equalizer updating procedure may also be used. These loops or procedures serve to provide critical information to the receiver of a wireless communication device.
[04] In these conventional block coded digital communication systems, it is often necessary to continue adapting the loops during the data portion of the frame, for example to compensate for a fading signal or timing error. A common method of such continuous adaptation is to employ decision-directed ("DD") adaptation. This scheme requires that the receiver estimate what symbols are received in the data stream. Typically, a slicer is employed to obtain tentative decisions for the transmitted data symbols and to determine the noise associated with the slicer decision. The final decisions for the transmitted data symbols are based on the decoder output.
[05] A problem associated with this scheme is the delay that is inherent in channel decoding. Becauise the symbols are encoded, the efficiency of the process is either reduced by decoding the symbols or reduced by the higher error rate that is inherent with slicer decisions as opposed to decisions from the decoder output.
[06] Furthermore, implementing a decision feedback equalizer ("DFE") at the receiver to remove intersymbol interference ("ISI") exacerbates this problem because the input to the feedback filter ("FBF") comprises the higher error rate slicer decisions. Thus, when the sliced symbols that are put into the FBF are in error, which is more likely when they are encoded, then the DFE propagates the error and increases the likelihood of subsequent slicer errors and thereby diminishes performance. Fig. 1 is an example graph diagram illustrating conventional slicer errors when unmodified symbol estimates are used as slicer input.
[07] Therefore, what is needed is a method for improving slicer input and the corresponding feedback filter contents in block coded communications to overcome these significant problems found in the conventional systems as described above.
SUMMARY
[08] Methods for improved decision directed adaptation and decision feedback equalizers are presented. In a block coded digital communication system the performance of a receiver is significantly improved by allowing decision directed adaptation through a decision feedback equalizer to perform time-tracking and residual frequency offset compensation during the data portion of a frame. . Additionally, DFE error propagation is decreased by modifying the contents of the feedback filter to include more reliable symbol estimates.
[09] As an encoded stream of symbols is received in a block coded digital communication system, a slicer is employed by a decision feedback equalizer to slice chips of a code word from the encoded stream and pass them to a feedback filter. Based on the inherent correlation among the chips of a code word, certain instances of more reliable symbol estimates are derived from the sliced chips.
[10] As the more reliable symbol estimates are fed back into the chip slicer, the total efficiency of the decision feedback equalizer is improved. Moreover, the more reliable symbol estimates are used to replace older content in the feedback filter to further improve the accuracy of the modified slicer input and decrease the effects of DFE error propagation.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[11] The details of the present invention, both as to its structure and operation, may be gleaned in part by study of the accompanying drawings, in which like reference numerals refer to like parts, and in which:
[12] Figure 1 is an example graph diagram illustrating conventional slicer errors when unmodified symbol estimates are used as slicer input;
[13] Figure 2 is a block diagram illustrating an example decision feedback equalizer according to an embodiment of the present invention;
[14] Figure 3 is an example graph diagram illustrating a reduced amount of slicer errors based on modified symbol estimates according to an embodiment of the present invention;
[15] Figure 4 is a block diagram illustrating an example chip slicer and feedback filter contents in a decision feedback equalizer according to an embodiment of the present invention;
[16] Figure 5 is a table diagram illustrating improved feedback filter contents according to an embodiment of the present invention;
[17] Figure 6A is an example pseudo code listing for creating more accurate sliced chips for least mean square and feed back filter tracking according to an embodiment of the present invention;
[18] Figure 6B is an example pseudo code listing for using more accurate sliced chips for better least mean square updating of a decision feedback equalizer, feed forward filter, and feed back filter according to an embodiment of the present invention; and
[19] Figure 6C is an example pseudo code listing for using the more accurate sliced chips for improved feed back filter contents according to an embodiment of the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[20] Certain embodiments as disclosed herein provide for improved decision directed adaptation employed by a receiver in a block coded digital communication system. For example, one method as disclosed herein allows for the inherent correlation between the chips of a code word to be exploited to derive more reliable symbol estimates. These more reliable symbol estimates are then passed through a feedback filter to improve the accuracy of future input to the chip slicer. Additionally, the more reliable symbol estimates replace earlier symbol estimates in a feedback filter to further improve the total efficiency of the decision feedback equalizer.
[21] After reading this description it will become apparent to one skilled in the art how to implement the invention in various alternative embodiments and alternative applications. However, although various embodiments of the present invention will be described herein, it is understood that these embodiments are presented by way of example only, and not limitation. As such, this detailed description of various alternative embodiments should not be construed to limit the scope or breadth of the present invention as set forth in the appended claims.
[22] Fig. 2 is a block diagram illustrating an example decision feedback equalizer ("DEE") 10 according to an embodiment of the present invention. In the illustrated embodiment, the DFE 10 comprises an antenna 20, a preprocessor 30, a feed forward filter 40, a chip combiner 50, a chip slicer 60, and a feed back filter 70.
[23] The antenna 20 can be any of a variety of antennas configured for wireless communications in a block coded digital communication system, as will be understood by one having skill in the art. Similarly, the preprocessor 30 preferably carries out signal processing tasks and provides the feed forward filter 40 with baseband samples (i.e., digital input), as will also be understood by one having skill in the art. The feed forward filter 40 preferably processes the baseband samples and sends the digital data stream to the chip slicer 60, in combination with any signal added or subtracted by the chip combiner 50. In one embodiment, the feed back filter 70 can be a finite impulse response ("FIR") filter that processes the previous slicer 60 outputs to subtract out postcursor inter symbol interference ("ISI") from the current input to the slicer 60. [24] In one embodiment, the length of the feedback filter 70 is not related to the length of the codewords. For example, the coefficients for the feed forward filter 40 and the feedback filter 70 can be selected based on the minimum mean square error ("MMSE") criterion using either adaptive techniques or based on computations involving a channel estimate.
[25] The chip slicer 60 is preferably configured to extract a portion of the data stream that corresponds to a single chip of a code word. Each sliced chip is preferably provided to the feed back filter 70, where the sliced chips are processed to determine any noise associated with the slicer decision. The feed back filter 70 advantageously feeds the noise component back into the chip slicer 60 by way of the chip combiner 50. In this fashion, the noise component can be subtracted from next incoming signal from the feed forward filter 40 before it is fed into the slicer 60.
[26] For example, in block coded digital communications, a stream of digital data is sent over the airwaves in analog form and received by the antenna 20. The analog waves are interpreted by the preprocessor 30 and converted to digital form. The digital signal comprises a frame that is divided into two portions, a training portion and a data portion. Within the data portion of the frame are a series of binary digits (i.e., ones and zeroes) that are encoded symbols which represent the data payload. These symbols can be broken down into a plurality of code words and each code word can be further broken down into a plurality of chips. For example, a complementary code keying ("CCK") code word, as specified for the IEEE 802J lb 5.5 Mb/s data rate, is eight (8) chips long.
[27] When an encoded symbol is sent to the chip slicer 60, the chip slicer 60 preferably identifies a subset of the symbol that represents a single chip. The correct identification of a chip is very important because if a chip is not correctly identified, then DFE error propagation will result, where the incorrectly sliced chips fed into the feedback filter 70 can result in an output from the feedback filter 70 that incorrectly accounts for interference and therefore causes further errors in slicer decisions made by the chip slicer 60.
[28] Thus, in the training portion of the frame, it is well known to provide information relating to the identification of chips. However, when signal strength fades, for example, the information provided in the training portion of the frame may become obsolete during processing of the data portion of the frame. To account for such variations in the signal during the data portion of the frame, the chip slicer 60 sends the sliced chips to the feed back filter 70 in order to more accurately slice the next incoming chip.
[29] Advantageously, the construction of code words introduces a certain correlation between the various chips that comprise a code word. For example, a CCK code word is eight (8) chips long and includes the following structure:
[30] CCKchip(3) = CCKchip(l)
[31] CCKchip(4) = -CCKchip(2)
[32] CCKchip(5) = -CCKchip(7)
[33] CCKchip(6) = CCKchip(8)
[34] Knowledge of this structure allows the use of decision directed adaptation during the data portion of the frame in order to continuously calibrate the slicing of chips by the chip slicer 60. Thus, the symbol estimates created by the chip slicer 60 can be improved in fifty percent (50%) of the estimates according to:
[35] Improved_Estimate(3) = Estimate(3) + Estimate(l)
[36] Improved_Estimate(4) = Estimate(4) - Estimate(2)
[37] Improved_Estimate(7) = Estimate(7) - Estimate(5)
[38] Improved_Estimate(8) = Estimate(8) + Estimate(6)
[39] With the improved estimates from the slicer 60, an improved noise component can be fed back into the slicer 60 fifty percent (50%) of the time, resulting in significantly improved results and decreased DFE error propagation. Accordingly, Fig. 3 is an example graph diagram illustrating a reduced amount of slicer errors based on improved symbol estimates according to an embodiment of the present invention.
[40] Fig. 4 is a block diagram illustrating an example chip slicer 62 and feedback filter contents 72 in a decision feedback equalizer 12 according to an embodiment of the present invention. In the illustrated embodiment, the DFE 12 comprises a signal combiner 52, a chip slicer 62, and feed back filter 72. The feed back filter 72 comprises a series of tap contents that each contain decisions from the slicer 62. Each set of tap contents is shown as "Tc" in Fig. 4. Advantageously, the DFE 12 can be switched so that the tap contents in the feed back filter 72 are updated only during the data portion of a frame.
[41] For certain block coded digital communication systems, for example, the IEEE 802Jlb 5.5 Mb/s data rate system that uses CCK code words, the effects of DFE error propagation can be reduced by improving the reliability of slicer decisions that are stored in the tap contents of the feed back filter 72. In one embodiment, chips 3, 4, 7, and 8 of each CCK code word are known to contain more reliable information. Thus, these slicer decisions can be selectively fed back into the slicer 62 to improve the reliability of future slicer decisions.
[42] Additionally, once the slicer 62 has provided more reliable information, this information can be stored in the tap contents of the feed back filter 72 and the known correlation between the chips in the code word can be exploited to modify the older tap contents in the feed back filter 72 based on the more reliable information. For example, after slicing each of the chips 3, 4, 7, and 8 and placing them into the first tap contents of the feed back filter 72, the tap contents of the feed back filter 72 that is two chips old can be replaced with a more reliable value by modifying the third tap contents of the feed back filter 72. The tap contents are appropriately mixed and combined to create the new estimate to be fed to the chip slicer 62. Advantageously, after startup this ensures that the contents of feed back filter 72 taps 3 and higher will reflect the increased accuracy of the modified slicer input and thereby decrease DFE error propagation.
[43] For example, as k loops from 1 to 8 to represent the CCK chip index of the frame chip index n, the DFE may implement:
[44] If k = 3, y~[n-3] = y~[n-ι].
[45] If k = 4, y~[n-3] = -y~[n-l].
[46] If k = 7, y~[n-3] = -y~[n-l].
[47] If k = 8, y~[n-3] = y~[n-l].
[48] Thus, as k loops from 1 to 8, the sample that is two chips old is modified pursuant to the correlation properties of the CCK code words as previously described in the CCKchip equations. After several chips have been processed, the majority of the tap contents in feed back filter 72 will advantageously be based on the more accurate slicer input.
[49] Accordingly, Fig. 5 is a table diagram illustrating improved feedback filter contents according to an embodiment of the present invention. In the illustrated embodiment, the third and higher feed back filter tap contents reflect the improved accuracy of the chip estimates pursuant to the correlation between chips in the 8 chip CCK code words as previously described. Additionally, in the illustrated table, each row corresponds to a particular time index with time moving from top to bottom. Thus, the contents of feed back filter tap 9 are not modified until after the ninth row.
[50] Figs. 6A - 6C are example code sections in pseudo code that illustrate methods for improving slicer output, using the improved slicer output in various filters, and storing the improved slicer output in a feedback filter to decrease the effects of DFE error propagation. Specifically, Fig. 6A is an example pseudo code listing for creating more accurate sliced chips for least mean square and feed back filter tracking according to an embodiment of the present invention. Moreover, Fig. 6B is an example pseudo code listing for using more accurate sliced chips for better least mean square updating of a decision feedback equalizer, feed forward filter, and feed back filter according to an embodiment of the present invention. Furthermore, Fig. 6C is an example pseudo code listing for using the more accurate sliced chips for improved feed back filter contents according to an embodiment of the present invention.
[51] While the particular embodiment herein shown and described in detail is fully capable of attaining the above described objects of this invention, it is to be understood that the description and drawings presented herein represent a presently preferred embodiment of the invention and are therefore representative of the subject matter which is broadly contemplated by the present invention. It is further understood that the scope of the present invention fully encompasses other embodiments that may become obvious to those skilled in the art and that the scope of the present invention is accordingly limited by nothing other than the appended claims.
WHAT IS CLAIMED IS:

Claims

1. A method for improved digital communications, comprising: receiving a frame in a digital communications stream, the frame having a training portion and a data portion, wherein the data portion comprises an encoded symbol, the encoded symbol having a plurality of code words, wherein each code word has a plurality of chips; slicing a chip from the encoded symbol; removing interference from the chip; deriving a more accurate symbol estimate for the sliced chip based on a correlation among the chips in the code word; and providing the more accurate symbol estimate as input to the chip slicer.
2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the receiving step further comprises receiving the encoded symbol during the data portion of a frame.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein the providing step comprises decision directed updating during the data portion of a frame.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein at least fifty percent of the symbol estimates provided to the chip slicer are more accurate.
5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: providing the more accurate symbol estimate to the feedback filter; and storing the more accurate symbol estimate in the feedback filter.
6. The method of claim 5, where in the removing step further comprises using the more accurate symbol estimate stored in the feedback filter for improved performance in removing interference from the chip.
7. The method of claim 5, wherein at least fifty percent of the symbol estimates stored in the feedback filter are more accurate.
8. The method of claim 1, wherein the method is repeated to create more reliable symbol estimates relative to older symbol estimates already derived, and wherein the more reliable symbol estimates are used in a feedback filter to improve the accuracy of the symbol estimates being fed into the chip slicer.
9. A system for improved digital communications, comprising: a chip slicer for extracting a chip from a code word, the code word received as part of an encoded symbol in a digital communication stream; a feed back filter configured to remove interference from sliced chips, the feedback filter having a plurality of content registers; and a chip combiner configured to derive a more accurate symbol estimate for a sliced chip, wherein the chip combiner provides improved symbol estimates to the chip slicer.
10. The system of claim 9, wherein one or more content registers are updated with more accurate symbol estimates during decision directed updating.
11. The system of claim 10, wherein the majority of the plurality of content registers contain more accurate symbol estimates.
12. The system of claim 9, wherein the feed back filter is a finite impulse response ("FIR") filter, wherein the FIR subtracts out postcursor inter-symbol interference from the current slicer input.
13. The system of claim 9, wherein the chip combiner derives a more accurate symbol estimate based on a correlation among the chips in the code word.
14. A receiver for use in a block coded digital communications system, comprising: a preprocessor for carrying out signal processing tasks and for providing a feed forward filter with baseband samples; the feed forward filter for processing the baseband samples and for sending a digital data stream to a chip slicer in combination with any signal added or subtracted by a chip combiner; and a feedback filter for processing previous chip slicer outputs to subtract out postcurser inter symbol interference from the current input to the chip slicer.
15. The receiver of claim 14, wherein coefficients for the feed forward filter and the feedback filter are selected based on minimum mean square error (MMSE) criterion using either adaptive techniques or based on computations involving a channel estimate.
16. The receiver of claim 14, wherein the chip slicer is configured to extract a portion of the data stream that corresponds to a single chip of a code word.
17. The receiver of claim 14, wherein the feedback filter feeds the noise component back into the chip slicer by way of a chip combiner so that the noise component can be subtracted from the next incoming signal from the feed forward filter before the next incoming signal is fed into the chip slicer.
18. A receiver for use in a block coded digital communications system, comprising: means for receiving a frame in a digital communications stream, the frame having a training portion and a data portion, wherein the data portion comprises an encoded symbol, the encoded symbol having a plurality of code words, wherein each code word has a plurality of chips; means for slicing a chip from the encoded symbol; means for removing interference from the chip; means for deriving a more accurate symbol estimate for the sliced chip based on a correlation among the chips in the code word; and means for providing the more accurate symbol estimate as input to the chip slicer.
19. The receiver of claim 18, wherein the means for slicing a chip from the encoded symbol further comprises a chip slicer for extracting a chip from a code word, the code word received as part of an encoded symbol in a digital communication stream.
20. The receiver of Claim 19, wherein the means for removing interference from the chip further comprising a feed back filter configured to remove interference from sliced chips, the feed back filter having a plurality of content registers.
21. The receiver of claim 20, wherein the means for deriving a more accurate symbol estimate for the sliced chip based on a correlation among the chips in the code word further comprises a chip combiner configured to derive a more accurate symbol estimate for a sliced chip, and wherein the chip combiner provides improved symbol estimates to the chip slicer.
PCT/US2004/020360 2003-06-24 2004-06-23 Method and apparatus for improving the equalisation of block coded signals WO2005002163A2 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
MXPA05013707A MXPA05013707A (en) 2003-06-24 2004-06-23 Method and apparatus for improving the equalisation of block coded signals.
CN200480017800.9A CN1813453B (en) 2003-06-24 2004-06-23 Slicer input and feedback filter contents for block coded digital communications

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/602,508 US7342952B2 (en) 2003-06-24 2003-06-24 Slicer input and feedback filter contents for block coded digital communications
US10/602,508 2003-06-24

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2005002163A2 true WO2005002163A2 (en) 2005-01-06
WO2005002163A3 WO2005002163A3 (en) 2005-03-24

Family

ID=33539562

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2004/020360 WO2005002163A2 (en) 2003-06-24 2004-06-23 Method and apparatus for improving the equalisation of block coded signals

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (2) US7342952B2 (en)
CN (1) CN1813453B (en)
MX (1) MXPA05013707A (en)
WO (1) WO2005002163A2 (en)

Families Citing this family (24)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8761321B2 (en) 2005-04-07 2014-06-24 Iii Holdings 1, Llc Optimal feedback weighting for soft-decision cancellers
US7808937B2 (en) 2005-04-07 2010-10-05 Rambus, Inc. Variable interference cancellation technology for CDMA systems
US7876810B2 (en) 2005-04-07 2011-01-25 Rambus Inc. Soft weighted interference cancellation for CDMA systems
US7715508B2 (en) 2005-11-15 2010-05-11 Tensorcomm, Incorporated Iterative interference cancellation using mixed feedback weights and stabilizing step sizes
US8005128B1 (en) 2003-09-23 2011-08-23 Rambus Inc. Methods for estimation and interference cancellation for signal processing
US7324590B2 (en) * 2003-05-28 2008-01-29 Qualcomm Incoporated Equalizer with combined CCK encoding-decoding in feedback filtering of decision feedback equalizer
US7463681B2 (en) * 2004-05-13 2008-12-09 Ittiam Systems (P) Ltd. Architecture for feedback loops in decision feedback equalizers
US7457357B2 (en) * 2004-05-13 2008-11-25 Ittiam Systems (P) Ltd. Decision feedback equalizer design with interference removal and reduced error propagation
US7711075B2 (en) 2005-11-15 2010-05-04 Tensorcomm Incorporated Iterative interference cancellation using mixed feedback weights and stabilizing step sizes
US7991088B2 (en) * 2005-11-15 2011-08-02 Tommy Guess Iterative interference cancellation using mixed feedback weights and stabilizing step sizes
US7826516B2 (en) 2005-11-15 2010-11-02 Rambus Inc. Iterative interference canceller for wireless multiple-access systems with multiple receive antennas
US7702048B2 (en) * 2005-11-15 2010-04-20 Tensorcomm, Incorporated Iterative interference cancellation using mixed feedback weights and stabilizing step sizes
US20070110135A1 (en) 2005-11-15 2007-05-17 Tommy Guess Iterative interference cancellation for MIMO-OFDM receivers
US20090296803A1 (en) * 2008-06-03 2009-12-03 Mediatek Inc. Block-based equalizer and method thereof
CN102437978B (en) * 2010-09-29 2015-03-25 中兴通讯股份有限公司 Method and device for balancing digital microwaves
CN103326980B (en) * 2012-03-23 2016-04-20 联芯科技有限公司 OFDM system residual frequency offset tracking and device
CN107360109A (en) 2015-01-25 2017-11-17 瓦伦斯半导体有限责任公司 The transceiver and method recovered in less than 1 millisecond from quality deterioration
US9621445B2 (en) 2015-01-25 2017-04-11 Valens Semiconductor Ltd. Utilizing known data for status signaling
US10171182B2 (en) 2015-01-25 2019-01-01 Valens Semiconductor Ltd. Sending known data to support fast convergence
US9685991B2 (en) 2015-01-25 2017-06-20 Valens Semiconductor Ltd. Reducing transmission rate to support fast convergence
US10256920B2 (en) 2015-01-25 2019-04-09 Valens Semiconductor Ltd. Mode-conversion digital canceller for high bandwidth differential signaling
TWI748326B (en) * 2020-01-16 2021-12-01 瑞昱半導體股份有限公司 Signal processing device and signal processing method
US11212143B1 (en) * 2020-06-29 2021-12-28 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Sliding block decision equalizer
US11133963B1 (en) 2020-09-03 2021-09-28 Xilinx, Inc. Dsp cancellation of track-and-hold induced ISI in ADC-based serial links

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2000072540A1 (en) * 1999-05-21 2000-11-30 Home Wireless Networks, Inc. Equalization techniques for communication systems using orthogonal signaling
US6426972B1 (en) * 1998-06-19 2002-07-30 Nxtwave Communications Reduced complexity equalizer for multi mode signaling
US20040101068A1 (en) * 2002-11-25 2004-05-27 Tzu-Pai Wang Digital receiver capable of processing modulated signals at various data rates

Family Cites Families (21)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5790537A (en) * 1996-05-15 1998-08-04 Mcgill University Interference suppression in DS-CDMA systems
US6012161A (en) * 1997-11-26 2000-01-04 At&T Corp. System and method for joint coding and decision feedback equalization
US6603801B1 (en) * 1998-01-16 2003-08-05 Intersil Americas Inc. Spread spectrum transceiver for use in wireless local area network and having multipath mitigation
US6678310B1 (en) * 1998-01-16 2004-01-13 Intersil Americas Inc Wireless local area network spread spectrum transceiver with multipath mitigation
US6337878B1 (en) * 1999-03-03 2002-01-08 Nxt Wave Communications Adaptive equalizer with decision directed constant modulus algorithm
US6690715B2 (en) * 1999-06-29 2004-02-10 Intersil Americas Inc. Rake receiver with embedded decision feedback equalizer
US6233273B1 (en) * 1999-06-29 2001-05-15 Intersil Americas Inc. Rake receiver with embedded decision feedback equalizer
US6614836B1 (en) * 2000-01-28 2003-09-02 Intersil Americas Inc. Biased-corrected rake receiver for direct sequence spread spectrum waveform
US6661857B1 (en) * 2000-07-10 2003-12-09 Intersil Americas Inc. Rapid estimation of wireless channel impulse response
US6647077B1 (en) * 2000-07-31 2003-11-11 Rf Micro Devices, Inc. Multipath parameter estimation in spread-spectrum communications systems
US6700929B1 (en) * 2000-07-31 2004-03-02 Rf Micro Devices, Inc. Method and apparatus for multipath parameter estimation in spread-spectrum communications systems
US6728324B1 (en) * 2000-07-31 2004-04-27 Rf Micro Devices, Inc. Method and apparatus for multipath signal compensation in spread-spectrum communications systems
US7190710B2 (en) * 2001-06-08 2007-03-13 Broadcom Corporation Successive interference canceling for CMDA
ATE283580T1 (en) * 2001-07-05 2004-12-15 Mitsubishi Electric Inf Tech MULTI-USER DETECTION IN A MC-CDMA TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM
US7088673B2 (en) * 2001-11-02 2006-08-08 Intel Corporation Dynamically-scalable system and method for multiple user access utilzing multi-bit and multi-code orthogonal multiplexing
US7263119B1 (en) * 2001-11-29 2007-08-28 Marvell International Ltd. Decoding method and apparatus
US7027538B2 (en) * 2002-02-14 2006-04-11 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Method and system for joint decision feedback equalization and complementary code key decoding using a trellis
US7054396B2 (en) * 2002-08-20 2006-05-30 Rf Micro Devices, Inc. Method and apparatus for multipath signal compensation in spread-spectrum communications systems
US7606293B2 (en) * 2002-10-25 2009-10-20 Gct Semiconductor, Inc. Bidirectional turbo ISI canceller-based DSSS receiver for high-speed wireless LAN
US7206365B2 (en) * 2003-01-24 2007-04-17 Via Technologies Inc Decision sequence generating method and associated receiver with a decision feedback equalizer
US7324590B2 (en) * 2003-05-28 2008-01-29 Qualcomm Incoporated Equalizer with combined CCK encoding-decoding in feedback filtering of decision feedback equalizer

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6426972B1 (en) * 1998-06-19 2002-07-30 Nxtwave Communications Reduced complexity equalizer for multi mode signaling
WO2000072540A1 (en) * 1999-05-21 2000-11-30 Home Wireless Networks, Inc. Equalization techniques for communication systems using orthogonal signaling
US20040101068A1 (en) * 2002-11-25 2004-05-27 Tzu-Pai Wang Digital receiver capable of processing modulated signals at various data rates

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN1813453B (en) 2013-12-25
CN1813453A (en) 2006-08-02
WO2005002163A3 (en) 2005-03-24
US20080285641A1 (en) 2008-11-20
US7342952B2 (en) 2008-03-11
MXPA05013707A (en) 2006-03-13
US20040264552A1 (en) 2004-12-30
US8290025B2 (en) 2012-10-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8290025B2 (en) Slicer input and feedback filter contents for block coded digital communications
US6570919B1 (en) Iterative decoding of data packets employing decision feedback equalization
US7177352B1 (en) Pre-cursor inter-symbol interference cancellation
US4468786A (en) Nonlinear equalizer for correcting intersymbol interference in a digital data transmission system
US8743945B2 (en) Shift register based downsampled floating tap decision feedback equalization
US7006564B2 (en) Adaptive equalizer
CN100426806C (en) Method, receiver devices and systems for whitening signal disturbance in communication signal
US20070195874A1 (en) Method and apparatus for generating one or more clock signals for a decision-feedback equalizer using DFE detected data
EP1038365B1 (en) Method and device for improving DFE performance in a Trellis-coded system
RU2004139116A (en) RECEIVER BETWEEN A CORRECTOR WITH SOLVING FEEDBACK AND A LINEAR CORRECTOR WITH A DIRECT COMMUNICATION
US20080080610A1 (en) Method and apparatus for generating one or more clock signals for a decision-feedback equalizer using DFE detected data in the presence of an adverse pattern
US7606301B2 (en) Method and apparatus for adaptively establishing a sampling phase for decision-feedback equalization
EP1190542A1 (en) Power efficient equalization
US20090086807A1 (en) Methods and apparatus for determining threshold of one or more dfe transition latches based on incoming data eye
US6707850B1 (en) Decision-feedback equalizer with maximum-likelihood sequence estimation and associated methods
US7526022B2 (en) Low complexity equalizer
US8369396B2 (en) Communication signal receiver and signal processing method thereof
US11502879B2 (en) Multi-stage equalizer for inter-symbol interference cancellation
US20090052516A1 (en) Per-survivor based adaptive equalizer
US9112661B1 (en) Method and apparatus for data reception in high-speed applications
CN101124744A (en) Receiving device
Nefedov et al. Turbo equalization and iterative (turbo) estimation techniques for packet data transmission
EP3145143B1 (en) Differential detector
US20030191601A1 (en) Method for overflow testing of a blind equalizer
EP1206094A2 (en) Efficient equalization for the reception of data bursts

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BW BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EC EE EG ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NA NI NO NZ OM PG PH PL PT RO RU SC SD SE SG SK SL SY TJ TM TN TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VC VN YU ZA ZM ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): BW GH GM KE LS MW MZ NA SD SL SZ TZ UG ZM ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
DPEN Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed from 20040101)
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: PA/a/2005/013707

Country of ref document: MX

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 3501/CHENP/2005

Country of ref document: IN

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 20048178009

Country of ref document: CN

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase