WO2005045641A2

WO2005045641A2 - Master system of record

Info

Publication number: WO2005045641A2
Application number: PCT/US2004/036928
Authority: WO
Inventors: John Likas; Alan W. Hecht; Arlyn C. Schaible; Robert Scot Thomas
Original assignee: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Priority date: 2003-11-05
Filing date: 2004-11-04
Publication date: 2005-05-19
Also published as: US7925555B2; US20050097035A1; WO2005045641A3

Abstract

A method and apparatus containing a single master system of record that provides a record of all paper and electronic transactions during a predetermined period of time, that provides capability for directing the retrieval of images stored in multiple and distributed owned and un-owned archives, and that provides a link to all assisting transaction informational data and images, e.g. e-signature, pictures, and handwriting is provided.

Description

Master System of Record

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

TECHNICAL FIELD

The invention relates generally to transactions systems. More particularly, the invention relates to an all transactions relational data base carrying access and linking keys to multiple image archives and databases.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PRIOR ART

Financial institutions are generally required to maintain archives of financial documents and related data for several years. Further, many financial institutions find themselves in the situation where they need to keep up with the times with respect to the deployment of newer technologies, such as image technology. In practice, the deployment of image technology can involve billions of document images typically stored in check archives. Also, those institutions committed to such technical deployment find themselves financially committed in the range of up to several hundred million dollars. Therefore, because the deployment of new technology for financial institutions is a huge and expensive endeavor, such institutions are highly motivated to recoup their former investments and efforts in earlier technologies. In addition, financial institutions find that many customers are attracted to products based on new technology, such as image-based products.

The use of a computer-based image processing system or image capture platform to scan documents, such as checks and the like, and to then digitally store the results on storage devices is generally known in the art, as follows:

John Ray Copeland, III, Leslie Marie Doby, Larry Page Hobbs, Jr., Vil Patrick

Johnikin, Julie Ann Pridmore, Sterling Richardson Smith, Thomas Chester Smith,

Lori London Weaver, and Filip Jay Yeskel, Check Image Distribution and Processing

System and Method, US Patent Number 5,784,610 (July 21 , 1998) disclose a digital document image archive and distribution system that includes an archive system and a distributed digital document image retrieval system. The system has communication nodes located at an image capture site and at one or more remote archive retrieval sites, these sites forming a communications network operating as a chained client/server network composed of workstation components and a capture site host computer component. An originating remote workstation retrieves a digital document image from the image capture site by creating a transaction file that identifies a digital document image to be retrieved. This transaction file is sent to a remote server workstation whereat a plurality of transaction files are batched by priority. The batched transaction files are transmitted to the capture site workstation whereat the host component retrieves a group of digital document images from archive storage, including the digital document image that is identified by the transaction file. The host then sends the group of digital document images to a capture site server workstation, which workstation then sends the group of digital document images from the capture site server workstation to the remote server workstation, whereupon the group of digital document images is sent from the remote server workstation to the originating remote workstation. A visual display is then used to image process the group of digital document images at the originating remote workstation.

David T. Bellinger and Isabelle R. Moss, High Volume Financial Image Media Creation and Display System and Method, U.S. Patent Number 5,870,725 (February 9, 1999) disclose an apparatus and method for high volume, and high speed, financial image creation and manipulation. Images of cleared checks are captured and combined with MICR data and customer supplied account history. A customer additional data field is incorporated to facilitate searching and retrieval of checks and electronic transactions. Check images are delivered in multiple media, e.g. CD- ROM, microfilm, as pre-selected by bank customer. An image workstation allows customers to relate specific issue data to paid check data captured by the bank. Cumulative transaction item index covers multiple accounting periods. Front and back of image of cleared checks can be manipulated on screen, and exported to other applications. Graphical user interface trilogy of screens-search, results, and display, facilitate usage by customer. Thomas Cahill, John J. McMonagle, Richard H. Sferra, Glenn Levine, Saul Goldfisher, and PhilipWilson, Method And Apparatus For Storing Images Of Documents Having Magnetic Ink Code Line, U.S. Patent Number 5,917,965 (June 29, 1999) disclose a method and apparatus for storing and retrieving images of documents, e.g. checks. The method comprises placing a plurality of documents in a document imaging machine and forming an electronic image of each document, storing each electronic image in an electronic storage device, providing at least one user interface device in communication on a communication link with the electronic storage device, placing a request for at least one document image on the user interface device, transmitting the request by the communication link to the electronic storage device, searching the electronic storage device for the requested electronic image of the document, retrieving the at least one electronic image or providing an indication that the image was not found, storing the electronic image, if found, in an electronic file, for transmission to the user interface device at user option, providing the electronic image to the user interface device at command of a user at the user interface device for storage at the user interface device and displaying the requested electronic image on a display of the user interface device. Preferably, the electronic, images are stored with embedded identifying information in a TIFF.RTM. (trademark of Aldus Corp.) file format and the check images can be displayed on a display device which permits the user to view both sides of the checks simultaneously and perform functions such as zooming and rotation of the images.

Thomas Cahill, John J. McMonagle, and Richard H. Sferra, Method and Apparatus for Displaying Electronic Image of a Check, U.S. Patent Number 5,940,844 (August 17, 1999) disclose a method and apparatus for storing and retrieving images of documents, e.g. checks. The method comprises placing a plurality of documents in a document imaging machine and forming an electronic image of each document, storing each electronic image in an electronic storage device, providing at least one user interface device in communication on a communication link with the electronic storage device, placing a request for at least one document image on the user interface device, transmitting the request by the communication link to the electronic storage device, searching the electronic storage device for the requested electronic image of the document, retrieving the at least one electronic image or providing an indication that the image was not found, storing the electronic image, if found, in an electronic file, for transmission to the user interface device at user option, providing the electronic image to the user interface device at command of a user at the user interface device for storage at the user interface device and displaying the requested electronic image on a display of the user interface device. Preferably, the electronic, images are stored with embedded identifying information in a TIFF.RTM. (trademark of Aldus Corp.) file format and the check images can be displayed on a display device which permits the user to view both sides of the checks simultaneously and perform functions such as zooming and rotation of the images.

Thomas Cahill, Louise A. McNulty, John J. McMonagle, Richard H. Sferra, Glenn Levine, Saul Goldfisher, Philip Wilson, and Vladimir Koroteyev, Electronic Check Image Storage and Retrieval System, U.S. Patent Number 6,181 ,837 (January 30, 2001 ) disclose a method and apparatus for storing and retrieving images of documents, e.g. checks. The method comprises placing a plurality of documents in a document imaging machine and forming an electronic image of each document, storing each electronic image in an electronic storage device, providing at least one user interface device in communication on a communication link with the electronic storage device, placing a request for at least one document image on the user interface device, transmitting the request by the communication link to the electronic storage device, searching the electronic storage device for the requested electronic image of the document, retrieving the at least one electronic image or providing an indication that the image was not found, storing the electronic image, if found, in an electronic file, for transmission to the user interface device at user option, providing the electronic image to the user interface device at command of a user at the user interface device for storage at the user interface device and displaying the requested electronic image on a display of the user interface device. Preferably, the electronic, images are stored with embedded identifying information in a TIFF.RTM. (trademark of Aldus Corp.) file format and the check images can be displayed on a display device which permits the user to view both sides of the checks simultaneously and perform functions such as zooming and rotation of the images. Filip Jay Yeskel, High Volume Document Image Archive System and Method, U.S. Patent Number 6,115,509 (September 5, 2000) teaches high speed machine scanning of documents such as checks that produces digital check images that are placed in archival storage on mass storage devices for later retrieval. Images and/or documents are automatically reviewed by a machine in order to identify images and/or documents that are of suspect quality. Machine review of suspect images and/or documents provides a reject or accept decision. Only acceptable documents are archived. Accepted documents are formed into large data groups that contain a storage location identification for each individual document within the large data group. An index is stored for each such data group wherein the storage location of each document within the large data group is contained. Digital images are selectively converted to visual images, and these visual images are then reviewed by a human operator. This operator review is used to adjust the machine's accept/reject decision making process, thereby teaching the machine the correct manner of making its accept/reject decision.

It should be appreciated that the disclosures described hereinabove lack certain significant functionality as put forth hereinbelow:

None of the disclosures hereinabove provide a comprehensive index of all paper and electronic transactions allowing for all transactions to be matched to one or more images; provide a system and process capable of accessing multiple internal and external archive systems and operating independently from the archive systems; and provide a system and process capable of satisfying requests for images from microfilm at an item level.

It would therefore be advantageous to provide a comprehensive index of all paper and electronic transactions allowing for all transactions to be matched to one or more images; to provide a system and process capable of accessing multiple internal and external archive systems and operating independently from the archive systems; and to provide a system and process capable of satisfying requests for images from microfilm at an item level. Furthermore, it would be advantageous to provide means for leveraging previously developed and deployed check image archive investments; to manage a transaction level transition from microfilm storage to digital image storage; to provide a method and apparatus for handling customer transaction conversions while maintaining a path to the image at hand, e.g. conversions from paper payment transactions to electronic (ACH) transactions; to provide a method and apparatus for customers to store information about digital images; to establish a common set of delivery and access services to internal and external users; to provide a method and apparatus for ingesting information about purchased check images; to provide a method and apparatus for linking supporting transaction informational data or digital images to an individual transaction; to provide robust transaction search capability; and to provide a single source for proof of transaction.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

A method and apparatus containing a single master system of record that provides a record of all paper and electronic transactions during a predetermined period of time, that provides capability for directing the retrieval of images stored in multiple and distributed owned and ,un-owned archives, and that provides a link to all assisting transaction informational data and images, e.g. e-signature, pictures, and handwriting is provided.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Fig. 1 is a schematic diagram of the main components and their respective relationship according to the invention;

Fig. 2 is a schematic diagram of intra-day processing according to the invention;

Fig. 3 is a schematic diagram of final processing according to the invention; Fig. 4 is a schematic diagram of image exception processing according to the invention;

Fig. 5 is a schematic diagram of recaptured image processing according to the invention;

Fig. 6 is a schematic diagram of request/response processing according to the invention;

Fig. 7 is a logical database design according to the invention;

Fig. 8 is a table design according to the invention;

Fig. 9 is a table design according to the invention; and

Fig. 10 is a table design according to the invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Imaging is the ability to capture, store, retrieve, distribute, display, manage, and print business information in digital form. There are two high level groupings within the image family, referred to herein as Transaction Processing Image and File Folder Image. Transaction Processing Image represents the high volume, high speed capture of machine transportable standardized forms such as checks. File Folder

Image represents low speed, low volume, typically 8 1/2 by 11 inch documents such as loan documents. Image archives are the places where captured images of either or both Transaction Processing Image and File Folder Image documents are stored long term. Access to archive data is provided by various indexing schemes, for example: by date and Item Reference Number (IRN), or by account number and amount, etc.

The invention herein provides an indexing infrastructure and use thereof for a combined File Folder and Transaction Processing distributed image archive.

It should be appreciated that the invention is described with reference to a specific application of a transaction or payment system of record. Such area of application is meant by example only. Many other areas of application are possible and are still within the scope and spirit of the invention. Examples of such areas of application are the insurance industry and industries using blueprints.

The invention uses a central indexing methodology to access in-house and out-of- house archives. It provides seamless and ubiquitous access to archived images for an enterprise. The central indexing methodology works in conjunction with an infrastructure for distributed enterprise image archives.

Main Functionality of the Invention

Following is a list of brief descriptions of some of the main functionality of the invention.

• The invention records all in-house transactions, such as monetary transactions, whether there are associated images or not.

• The invention includes informational data, such as payment information, from out- of-house image capture applications where there is a relationship to provide images.

• Records, such as payment records, include a timestamp of when a unit of work was captured. • Archive maintenance facilities or mechanisms provide updates. For example, files of exceptions, files of additional captured items, and images eliminated from an archive system may each result in a need to update the initial data.

• Means for handling other types of related images, such as the non-monetary fingerprints, eSignature, and pictures images is provided.

• Archive location, archive index, and location of original images and microfilm images are recorded. Specifically, one embodiment of the invention provides means for recording the archive index and means for displaying the archive location and location of original images and microfilm images from an archive registry.

• The invention provides a single access point to multiple archives. This feature allows an enterprise to know if there is an image for an item and provides the access key for that item without having to look at each archive individually.

• The invention provides means for maintaining the number of years of history, such as for example that which is required by law, seven years and three months.

• The invention preferably provides means for handling requests for large numbers of images both online or via a batch process.

Searchable data elements are accessed by any of: Date, date range/account, account amount, account ABA, account serial, etc.; Date, date range/amount, amount account, etc; Date, date range/IRN; Date, Transaction Unit; and Optional Data Filters.

• The invention returns Expected Time of Retrieval (ETR) to each requester. An image request is a separate call to the actual image archive services. • The invention is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week with normal data center downtime.

• The provided system of record is accessible by both internal and external customers after passing appropriate security services such as RACF, Top Secret, and ACF2.

• The invention provides means for controlling incoming search requests, for example the invention allows editing incoming search requests.

• Images are viewable by using a preexisting enterprise standard browser.

• An audit trail is provided.

An example response time performance by query service for a 100 concurrent user environment according to the invention is depicted in Table A hereinbelow:

Table A

It should be appreciated that the response times stated hereinabove include those areas that are within the control of the provided master system of record. An Exemplary Payment System of Record

Following is an exemplary implementation of the invention. It should be appreciated that the specific implementation of databases used and table and data structure are meant by example only and that other implementations are possible and are within the scope and spirit of the invention. For example, the invention can be used for financial institutions, in the insurance industry, in the healthcare industry, and in retail.

Overview.

The invention can be described with reference to Fig. 1 , where Fig. 1 is a schematic overview diagram of the main input and table components of a payment system of record and their respective relationship according to the invention. Input comprising, but not limited to one or more check capture (ECOM) files 102, Image Exception files 104, EO recaptured files 106 which are done for the purpose of capturing the image, Registry Services APIs 110, and files of Other Image Data 112 provide data to a system of record processor 114. The processor 114 processes input data and provides resulting data (output data) to various logical entities comprising, but not limited to CITM Table 120, Hub CITM Table 122, SPIN Table 124, Hub SPIN Table 126, CIBL Table 128, Hub CIBL Table 130, Image Locator Table 132, Control Table 134, Hub Control Table 136, Hub File Control Table 138, Trace ID Cross Reference Table 140, Event Control Table 142 and Audit Table 144. Definitions and detailed descriptions of each of the components and their respective functionality are provided hereinbelow.

Fig. 2 is a schematic diagram of intra-day processing according to the invention. The intra-day check capture file 102 processing is preferably similar to the above check capture captured item flow The intra-day file 102 is processed to provide information for Hub CITM Table(s) 122, Hub SPIN Table(s) 126, Hub CIBL Table(s) 130 as in Fig. 1 , but in addition, new day data for image key and image type is provided in the input data. Also, each item having a microfilm is flagged as such. The invention uses an indicator field to identify items having a digital image, items having microfilm, and items having both. The processor 114 also provides data for loading into the Image Locator Table 132. A Hub Control Table 136 contains a unit number range for the particular check capture HUB being processed. A Hub is a specific source of monetary data, for example, a check processing site. The Hub File Control Table 138 and Event Control Table 142 provide processing control information and also the ability to perform incremental processing as needed.

Fig. 3 is a schematic diagram of End of Day processing according to the invention. The final check capture file 102 processing is preferably similar to the above check capture captured item flow. The check capture file 102 is processed to provide information for CITM Table(s) 120, SPIN Table(s) 124, CIBL Table(s) 128 as in Fig. 1 , but in addition, provides additional data for the current day, including image key and image type. Also, each item having a microfilm is flagged as such. The invention uses an image indicator field to identify items having a digital image, items having microfilm, and items having both. The processor 114 also provides data for loading into the Image Locator Table 132. A Hub Control Table 136 contains a unit number range that the processor 114 assigns to the current processing group. The Control Table 134 and Event Control Table 142 provide processing control information and also the ability to perform incremental processing as needed.

Fig. 4 is a schematic diagram of image exception processing according to the invention. An exception file is a new file received from a document repair system after the document repair process. The exception file contains MICR data, a TRACEJD and the date for items that were flagged as having an image, but after going through the archive document repair process, it was determined that a valid image was not available. The invention processes this file by updating the CITM Table 120, the ILOC Table 132 and the TIXF Table 140 (if cross referenced) for the associated record. The invention ensures that an indicator flag, IMAGEJND is set to indicate there is no image because the item is missing or unreadable. Such process is designed to run with only header and trailer information, i.e. no detail, in cases where there is no exception data to ensure application to application control.

Fig. 5 is a schematic diagram of recaptured image processing according to the invention. Recaptured MICR lines with image key information 106 are sent to the processor 114 as a separate input file. Such file contains MICR line and image information for items that have gone through an image lift recapture process. The original items are already loaded into the CITM Table 120 as part of the check capture file 102, i.e. intra-day or final input. A file of recaptured items is sent to the processor 114 containing the image key, image type, and all fields necessary to build a new CITM record. Such images and information sent include a new source and a new IRN. Data sent to the processor 114 from recapture includes the original MICR line, the original IRN and the original date so that the processor 114 can link such items from the original check capture file 102 and the recapture file 106. The processor 114 loads new record and new image information into the CITM Table 120 and the Image Locator Table 132 respectively. Using information sent for the original item, the processor 114 attempts to retrieve the original prime pass and/or repair item from the CITM Table 120. If the item is retrieved and the image indicator flag IMAGEJND is on, cross-reference entries are then built into the Trace ID Cross Reference Table 140 for ensuring the user is able to retrieve both images. If the item is retrieved and the image indicator flag IMAGEJND is not on, then the processor 114 sets the IMAGEJND to on for the original prime pass and/or repair item and adds the entries in the Trace ID Cross Reference Table 140 for the prime pass and/or the repair item to the new record.

Fig. 6 is a schematic diagram of request/response processing according to the invention. A request coming into the processor 114 through API of the invention is typically a request for a list of items. The processor 114 retrieves the list of items from the CITM table 120 and any associated SPIN Table 124 and CIBL Table 128 information. The CNTL Table 134 is used for determining where data resides. If it is determined that data has not yet been loaded to a final daily table, then the Hub Control Table 136 and various Hub Tables 702 are used for retrieving the data. Individual HUB tables are used to make data available to customers at the time the HUB completes capture of monetary items for that period, as opposed to waiting for all HUBs to complete to make data available. If the image field is set, the processor 114 retrieves the associated image key and image type from the Image Locator Table 132 and, using the associated trace id, retrieves any associated items from the Trace ID Cross Reference Table 112. Using items retrieved from the Trace ID Cross Reference Table 112, the processor 114 retrieves the image types of the associated items. After such data is retrieved, then a best image is determined. The processor 114 then uses the Registry Services API 110 for retrieving data needed for completing the request, such as, for example, Estimated Retrieval Time (ETR). A response is sent to the requestor.

DB2

In one embodiment of the invention, DB2 is the database methodology for the following reasons:

• Most of the data is created on the mainframe; therefore building the tables on the mainframe saves transmittal time and bandwidth.

• Mainframe DB2 is a solid, proven, stable product.

• Mainframe DB2 may have licensing already in place.

• Mainframe DB2 may be a sunk cost.

It has been found that mainframe DB2 provides exemplary retrieval processing performance.

Example Embodiment

The invention can use separate sets of tables for intra-day, daily, and weekly processing, respectively. Below is a discussion and description of example table functionality provided by the invention. It should be appreciated that such table layout and functionality is by example only and that other implementations are possible according to the invention.

Tables (Refer to Figures 7- 10)

Image Locator Table (ILOC) - This table holds the Image Key, Image Request Block (IRB) Adapter, and Image Type that are passed to the processor 114 and are used to retrieve the archive information. This table contains one record per image. This table has a primary key comprised of cluster number, item reference number, capture location (source id) and document type.

Hub File Control Table (HUBF) -This table is used to allow the individual capture sites to process multiple input files on a daily basis, but not necessarily always the same number of files, and contains control point information regarding the previous day's totals. This table also contains control point information for the individual entries sent in each captured data file. This table contains one record per entry processed. The primary key on this table is comprised of the cluster number and the beginning and ending unit numbers.

Hub Control Table (HUBC) - This table is used to determine which of the hub (intra- day) tables contain data that needs to be retrieved. The table contains information pertinent to the processing of the hub. The primary key is comprised of item capture date, hub number, hub sequence number and hub available flag.

Trace ID Cross Reference Table (TIXF) - Provides the ability to connect multiple images to a given item as well as cross connect recaptured item images. The primary key is comprised of the cluster number, capture location (source id) and item reference number.

Captured Item Table (CITM) - This is the primary table, housing all item data and used as the source for retrieval of data from other tables. In one embodiment of the invention, there is one Captured Item Table/day. The primary key is comprised of cluster number, account number, unit number, unit number sequence, and the serial number.

Special Indicator Table (SPIN) - This table houses the unposted item reason, as-of- dates and other special information for the items. In one embodiment of the invention, there is one Special Indicator Table/day. The primary key is comprised of the cluster number, unit number and unit number sequence.

Captured Item Balance Table (CIBL) - This table houses the transactions that are out of balance. This information provides a flag to customers that the transaction is on balance (credit dollars = debit dollars). In one embodiment of the invention, there is one Captured Item Balance Table per day. The primary key is comprised of the cluster number and the unit number.

Returned Item History Table (RITM) - This table is a specialized table of incoming returned item data that is fed to the processor 114 on a daily basis. This data is used to retrieve the image for a returned item.

Control Table (CNTL) - This table controls dates and indicates when a table has been loaded. The Control Table is an internal table used for processing the various hubs and indicating when data is available. The table also includes the database name, the tablespace number, and the collection id for the information.

Event Control Table (EVNTC) - This table is used to ensure that processing is completed for one intra-day cycle prior to the next intra-day cycle being initiated. The primary key is comprised of the capture date, capture location, event name, and event sequence number.

Audit Table (AUDT) - This table contains a record for each request made to the invention from a client system. The primary key is the stop timestamp.

Security The invention allows for all operations and files to be secured against unauthorized execution, modification, or access, such as by ACF2, TOP SECRET, and RACF.

Additionally, the invention allows the portal to have the responsibility of authenticating and controlling data access, which can be beneficial for external customers.

System Flow

Following is a description of an exemplary system flow for the example of adding captured items technology to the preexisting archive system. It should be appreciated that the description of system flow in the context of this example is by example only and that other implementations of system flow are possible and are within scope and spirit of the invention.

Input processing

One or more feeder applications deliver the Interface File for each individual entry. This allows the invention the capability to process by Hub, i.e. a check processing site, one at a time, several at a time, or all of them at a time.

When the invention extracts and processes one or several of packets (files or entries) each such packet or entry is recorded in the Hub File Control Table when it is processed. The invention also determines if an entry is re-extracted. The Cluster Number, Hub Number, Source Id, Entry Number, and File Sequence Number are the keys to this table. The Cycle Date, Source Id, Entry Number, and File Sequence Number are passed to the processor 114 in each packet. The processor 114 maps which Source Id belongs with which Hub.

Also, the processor 114 can send notification back to the feeder application to convey that the invention has successfully processed such entries. After the processor 114 has processed n packets and puts the data into the load format, the invention determines if any duplicate entries need to be deleted. If there are duplicate entries, the invention eliminates such entries by reading the previous processed file, which is an accumulation of all entries that were loaded the previous time, and deleting those records in the Unit Number range, originally assigned when the prior version of that entry was processed.

After any duplicate entries are eliminated, the invention resolves duplicate IRNs and sorts the data into Account Number order. Thus, data is ready to be loaded into a Hub Table.

The above processes handle the data that is to be loaded into the Captured Item Table. The same process for eliminating records from duplicate entries is used on the Special Indicator Table. The Image Locator Table and the Trace ID Cross Reference Table can have an intermediate file, i.e. non-loadable file, that contains the loadable data plus the additional Unit Number Field. The same process for eliminating records from duplicate entries is used on the intermediate files for the Image Locator Data and the Trace ID Cross Reference Data.

There are typically multiple sets of Detail Tables for each Hub that is processed in this fashion. An example set of Detail Tables is the following:

• Captured Item Table (CITM);

• Special Indicator Table (SPIN);

• Image Locator Table (ILOC); and

• Trace ID Cross Reference Table (TIXF).

It should be appreciated that in this embodiment of the invention, each set of detail tables is called an Intra-day table. When a set of Intra-day Tables are loaded, the Hub Control Table is updated to reflect which set of Intra-day Tables contains the most current accumulative data. This parameter in the Hub Control Table is read so the API programs access the correct set of intra-day tables..

When the feeder application, typically check processing for example, has finished processing all entries for a Hub for the cycle, the feeding application signals the processor 114 that it is finished sending entries for a Hub for the cycle. The feeding application also sends a Handshake file by Hub which is used by the processor 114 to perform a final cross-check that each entry has been received and processed.

In addition to the processing thus far, the capability to delete an entry from a hub in a cycle is handled automatically without programmer intervention. This step automates the removal of erroneous data, for example, an entry that is run on the wrong cycle that isn't caught until after the extract. When this happens, the feeding application sends this information to the processor 114, just as with a good entry. The difference is an indicator in the header indicating this entry has been deleted. When the processor 114 processes this packet, it updates a valid file flag and deletes the entry from the current processed file or the previous accumulated processed file.

Referring to Fig. 4, image exceptions processing according to the invention is described in further detail. It can be shown that the invention provides an exception file that is a file received from an archive processing system after it has completed a document repair process. These files will contain the MICR data, the TRACEJD and the date for the items that were flagged as having an image, but after going through the archive document repair process, it was determined that a valid image was not available. The invention processes these files by reading the TRACEID XREF table to determine if a cross-reference is available. If there is no cross- reference, the processor 114 updates the CITM table for the associated record to ensure that the IMAGEJND is set to indicate an image is not available and deletes the IMAGE LOCATOR record. If there is a cross-reference entry, the processor 114 deletes the corresponding IMAGE LOCATOR record but does not change the IMAGEJND. This process is designed to run with only header and trailer information (no detail), in cases where there is no exception data. The invention further provides a similar job process wherein the image indicator is turned on and ancillary image fields are added using this same file format. This job is used for an on-request run.

Refer to Fig. 5 to understand recaptured image processing according to the invention in further detail. A recapture file is sent to the processor 114 containing the image key, storage pattern, IRB, date of the recapture, information for finding the original CI record, as well as a new source id and new IRN. The information used for finding the original CI record is the capture location (source id), IRN, and capture date, or the account, amount and serial number. Using information sent for the original item, the invention retrieves the original prime pass and/or repair item from the CITM table. If the item is retrieved, the processor 114 builds an ILOC table record. If the image indicator flag is on, for the retrieved record, cross reference entries are then built into the TIXF (Trace ID Cross Reference) table for ensuring the user is able to retrieve both images. If the item is retrieved and the image indicator flag is not on, then the invention sets the image indicator flag to on for the original prime pass and/or repair item and adds the entries to the TIXF table for the prime pass and/or repair item to the new record.

Output processing

Message Units In the invention, Message Units (MU) are used as a means of providing APIs into the processor 114. The message unit technology is based on a fixed length data string for the request and a fixed or variable length data string for the response. There is a standard header associated with the request and response and a returning data area that is predefined.

This MU technology is the underlying method of accessing the current processor 114 discussed herein. The invention also implements the following additional communications interfaces:

:http and TCP/IP The Middleware Services (MWS) infrastructure currently has the capability to support :http and/or TCP/IP as a transport protocol from the client to the mainframe. All message units of the invention are available with a :http transport interface. MO

As a transport mechanism, MQSeries provides a cross-platform standard. The invention has the capability to accept Message Units that are transported via MQSeries, and to respond in kind. All message units of the invention are available with an MQSeries transport interface.

HTML/XML

XML is a growing standard throughout the industry. Although a good mainframe XML parser has not yet been identified, the invention could work with any front- end client that would like to use XML for communicating.

Interface Controls

Following are interface controls and their use, according to the invention.

Channel to Channel

The invention legislates file headers and trailers on all input files to meet this control requirement. Input files determined to be out-of-balance result in an abend which can be overridden from the JCL.

Handshake Controls The invention stores file count and/or amount information in the Hub File Control Table. Each new input file is validated against the prior day's count/amount to ensure against a duplicate input file. Suspect duplicates cause an abend which can be overridden from the JCL.

Application Balancing

The invention issues a warning if the count of the data loaded for a hub differs from the input count from the hub file control. The warning triggers a page to the application on- call person and e-mail to the project and district managers. For the loading of the daily tables, if the load counts do not match the accumulated hub counts, an abend occurs. The abend can be overridden from the JCL.

End-of-Life

In one embodiment of the invention, the proposed end-of-life for the data is seven years and three months. The design is that at the end of seven years and 3 months, the oldest table containing data is overwritten with new data. This takes place on a weekly basis.

The invention, at the end of seven years and three months, unloads the table that would be overwritten, extracts the data that needs to be saved (the data that has a longer retention period) and loads that subset of data into a new table. This adds processing complexity to the process, but greatly reduces DASD usage.

Data Loading

The invention loads data using the highest performance process available that meets the Service Level Agreement (SLA) and delivery requirements. For most hubs, such data loading continues to be a load to the early availability (hub) tables followed by a final daily table load when the final data is available from all input sources.

Exemplary Interfaces

Following are exemplary interface methodologies used by one embodiment of the invention. It should be appreciated that the descriptions of the interface functionality are meant by example only and by no means limit the invention by its application to this example. It should further be appreciated that the functionality provided by the invention is readily apparent and the example is for illustrative purposes only.

Following are three primary methods of retrieving data.

The first method is through the use of a capture file, referred to herein as the CAPTURE2 file, which is an all-items QSAM file, produced on a daily basis. The CAPTURE2 file can be transmitted from/to other sites.

The second method of retrieving data from the processor 114 is through the use of the batch API interface, referred to herein also as batch Message Units (MU). The same request and response block are used for the batch process as are used for the on-line MUs. The client batch program does a link to the API and the batch API processes the request.

The third method of accessing RE data is through the use of the on-line APIs, the MUs/MQ, etc. These are accessed either through native CICS using CICS applications, through MQ, or from client front-end systems utilizing either TCP/IP or :https as a transport protocol.

Accordingly, although the invention has been described in detail with reference to particular preferred embodiments, persons possessing ordinary skill in the art to which this invention pertains will appreciate that various modifications and enhancements may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the claims that follow.

Claims

1. An apparatus for providing an online single master system of record, said system comprising: a digital repository for storing a record of all paper and electronic transactions for a predetermined amount of time; means for directing retrieval of images stored in at least one of multiple distributed owned and un-owned digital archives, wherein said images are associated with said all paper and electronic transactions; means for linking to all assisting transaction images and information; and extensive search capabilities for finding any of: said all paper and electronic transactions; said images stored in at least one of multiple distributed owned and un- owned digital archives; and said all assisting transaction images and information.

2. The apparatus of Claim 1 , wherein said transactions are payment transactions and said images are payment images.

3. The apparatus of Claim 1 , wherein said assisting transaction images and information comprise any of: e-signatures, pictures, and handwriting.

4. A computerized method for providing an online single master system of record, said method comprising the steps of: storing a record of all paper and electronic transactions for a predetermined amount of time in a digital repository; directing retrieval of images stored in at least one of multiple distributed owned and un-owned digital archives, wherein said images are associated with said all paper and electronic transactions; linking to all assisting transaction images and information; and providing extensive search capabilities for finding any of: said all paper and electronic transactions; said images stored in at least one of multiple distributed owned and unowned digital archives; and said all assisting transaction images and information.

5. The computerized method of Claim 4, wherein said transactions are payment transactions and said images are payment images.

6. The computerized method of Claim 4, wherein said assisting transaction images and information comprise any of: e-signatures, pictures, and handwriting.

7. An apparatus for providing a digital online single master system of record for a plurality of records, said apparatus comprising: means for recording online all transactions as records regardless if said all transactions have corresponding digital images; means for said records comprising additional information from out-of-house digital image capture applications; means for said records comprising a digital timestamp of when a unit of work is captured; means for archive maintenance mechanisms providing updates; means for recording archive location, archive index, and location of original images and microfilm images; a single access point to multiple archives; means for maintaining a predetermined amount of time of history; means for handling requests for large numbers of digital images as well as records of imported or exported images; means for searching data elements using primary and multiple secondary keys; means for legislating response time performance; means for returning expected time to retrieve data to a requester; means for enabling available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week with normal data center downtime; accessibility by internal and external customers after said customers pass appropriate security services; means for controlling and editing incoming search requests; means for rendering images viewable from a standard browser; and an audit trail.

8. The apparatus of Claim 7, wherein said means for archive maintenance mechanisms providing updates further comprises: using files of exceptions; using files of additional captured items; and using MICR information for images eliminated.

9. The apparatus of Claim 8, wherein any of: said using files of exceptions; said using files of additional captured items; and said using MICR information for images eliminated result in updating initial input data.

10. The apparatus of Claim 7, further comprising: means for displaying said archive location and said location of original images and microfilm images from an archive registry.

11. The apparatus of Claim 7, wherein said predetermined amount of time of history is seven years and three months.

12. A computerized method for providing a digital online single master system of record for a plurality of records, said method comprising the steps of: recording online all transactions as records regardless if said all transactions have corresponding digital images; said records comprising additional information from out-of-house digital image capture applications; said records comprising a digital timestamp of when a unit of work is captured; archive maintenance mechanisms providing updates; recording archive location, archive index, and location of original images and microfilm images; providing a single access point to multiple archives; maintaining a predetermined amount of time of history; handling requests for large numbers of digital images as well as records of imported or exported images; searching data elements using primary and multiple secondary keys; legislating response time performance; returning expected time to retrieve data to a requester; enabling available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week with normal data center downtime; providing accessibility by internal and external customers after said customers pass appropriate security services; controlling and editing incoming search requests; rendering images viewable from a standard browser; and providing an audit trail.

13. The computerized method of Claim 12, wherein said means for archive maintenance mechanisms providing updates further comprises: using files of exceptions; using files of additional captured items; and using MICR information for images eliminated.

14. The computerized method of Claim 13, wherein any of: said using files of exceptions; said using files of additional captured items; and said using MICR information for images eliminated result in updating initial input data.

15. The computerized method of Claim 12, further comprising the step of: displaying said archive location and said location of original images and microfilm images from an archive registry.

16. The computerized method of Claim 12, wherein said predetermined amount of time of history is seven years and three months.

17. An apparatus for providing a single master system of record, said apparatus comprising: intra-day standard payment transaction input files, wherein said intra-day files comprise a preliminary standard payment transaction input file; image exception input files for image exception processing; recaptured input files for recaptured image processing; registry services API for request/response processing; other image data input files; and a system of record processor for processing data from any of said input files resulting in output data, said output data stored in any of a plurality of tables, said plurality of tables comprising, but not limited to: a CITM Table for determining where certain data resides, said CITM

Table housing all item data and used as a source for retrieval of data from other tables; a Hub CITM Table; a SPIN Table for housing unposted item reasons, as-of-dates, and other special information for items; a Hub SPIN Table; a CIBL Table for housing transactions that are out of balance, as well as the control records; a Hub CIBL Table; an ILOC Image Locator Table for holding Image Key, IRB Adapter, and

Image Type that are passed to said system of record processor and are used to retrieve the archive information, wherein said table contains one record per image; a CNTL Control Table for controlling dates and indicating when a table has been loaded; a HUBC Hub Control Table used for determining if a hub is fully loaded, said Hub Control Table containing information for processing a hub and containing one record per processing hub; a HUBF Hub File Control Table for allowing individual capture sites to process multiple input files on a daily basis, but not necessarily always the same number of files, said Hub File Control Table containing control point information regarding a previous day's totals; and a TIXF Trace ID Cross Reference Table for storing cross referenced data.

18. The apparatus of Claim 17, further comprising: means for said system of record processor processing said intra-day standard payment transaction input files for providing: informational data for said Hub CITM Table, Hub SPIN Table, Image Locator Table, and Hub CIBL Table; and new data for image key and image type for each item in said files having a corresponding image.

19. The apparatus of Claim 17, wherein said system of record processor uses indicator fields for indicating if an item any of: a corresponding digital image and a corresponding microfilm.

20. The apparatus of Claim 17, wherein said Hub Control Table comprises a unit number range for said system of record processor to assign to a current processing group.

21. The apparatus of Claim 17, wherein said image exception files are received after a document repair process; wherein said image exception files comprise MICR data, a trace identifier, and a date for items flagged as having an image, but after going through said document repair process, it was determined that a valid image was not available; wherein said system of record processor updates said CITM Table records for said associated image exception files; wherein said system of record processor ensures that an image indicator flag is set to indicate there is not an image because an associated item is missing; and wherein said image exception processing runs with only header and trailer information in cases where there is no exception data.

22. The apparatus of Claim 17, further comprising: means for said system of record processor loading said new CITM record and said other image information into said CITM Table and said Image Locator Table; and means for said system of record processor attempting to retrieve original prime pass item data and/or repair item data from said CITM Table; means for building cross-reference entries into said Trace ID Cross Reference

Table, for ensuring ability to retrieve both images, if said original prime pass item data and/or repair item data from said CITM Table is retrieved, and if an associated image indicator flag is on; means for said system of record processor setting said image indicator flag to on, and for adding associated entries in said Trace ID Cross Reference Table for said prime pass and/or the repair item to said new record, if said the item original prime pass item data and/or repair item data from said CITM Table is retrieved and said image indicator flag is not on; wherein recaptured MICR and image information is sent to said system of record processor as a separate recaptured input file; wherein said recaptured input file comprises MICR and image information for items that have gone through a prior recapture process; wherein original items are already loaded into said CITM Table as part of said intra-day or final input; wherein said recaptured input file comprises image key data, image type data, all data necessary to build a new CITM record; new source data; a new IRN data; wherein data sent from a recapture process comprises original MICR line, original IRN, and original date, such that said system of record processor can link such items from said original intra-day file and said recapture file.

23. The apparatus of Claim 17, wherein a request coming into said system of record processor is for a list of items and said system of record processor retrieves said list of items from said CITM Table and any associated SPIN Table and CIBL Table informational data; wherein if it is determined that data has not yet been loaded to a daily table, then said Hub Control Table and said various Hub Tables are used for retrieving said data; wherein if an image field is set positively, then said system of record processor retrieves associated image key data and image type data from said Image Locator Table, and, using an associated trace identifier, retrieves any associated items from said Trace ID Cross Reference Table; wherein, using said any associated items retrieved from said Trace ID Cross Reference Table retrieved from said Trace ID Cross Reference Table, said system of record processor retrieves corresponding images and types of said associated items; wherein after retrieving said corresponding images and types of said associated items, then determining which image is a best image; and wherein said system of record processor uses said registry services API for retrieving data needed for completing said request; and wherein a response is sent.

24. The apparatus of Claim 17, further comprising: communications methodology, said communications methodology comprising any of: message units technology for providing APIs into said system of record processor, wherein said message unit technology is based on a fixed length data string for a request and a fixed or variable length data string for a corresponding response, and wherein a request/response block is maintained through use of adapters ensuring that current clients are supported without mandatory changes to their systems; :http as a transport protocol from client to mainframe; MQ methodology for transport protocol for providing a cross-platform standard; and HTML/XML for allowing said system of record processor to work with any front-end client using XML.

25. The apparatus of Claim 17, further comprising: interface controls comprising any of: channel to channel, wherein input files determined to be out-of-balance result in an abend which can be overridden from the JCL; handshake controls, wherein said system of record processor stores file count and/or amount information in said Hub File Control Table, each new input file validated against a prior day's count and/or amount information for ensuring against a duplicate input file, and wherein suspect duplicate files cause an abend which can be overridden from the JCL; reasonability checking, wherein said system of record processor works with its feeding applications for establishing reasonable counts and/or amounts for each file, and wherein said counts and/or amounts are tabled by said system of record processor and are referenced by an input source, and wherein reasonability failure results in an abend which can be overridden from the JCL; threshold checking, wherein said system of record processor evaluates image exceptions and abends if an exception count exceeds a pre-determined threshold, and wherein abends can be overridden from the JCL; and application balancing, wherein said system of record processor issues a warning if a count of data loaded for a hub differs from an input count from a hub file control; wherein said warning triggers a page to an application on-call person and e-mail to project and district managers; wherein for loading of daily tables, if said load counts do not match accumulated hub counts, an abend occurs, wherein said abend can be overridden from the JCL.

26. The apparatus of Claim 17, wherein end-of-life is seven years and three months.

27. The apparatus of Claim 17, wherein data is loaded using the highest performance process available meeting SLA and delivery requirements; and wherein for most hubs, said data loading is a load to early availability (hub) tables followed by a final daily table load when the final data is available from all input sources.

28. A method for providing a single master system of record, said method comprising the steps of: providing intra-day standard payment transaction input files, wherein said intra-day files comprise a preliminary standard payment transaction input file; providing image exception input files for image exception processing; providing recaptured input files for recaptured image processing; providing registry services API in request/response processing; providing other image data input files; and providing a system of record processor for processing data from any of said input files resulting in output data, said output data stored in any of a plurality of tables, said plurality of tables comprising, but not limited to: a CITM Table for determining where certain data resides, said CITM Table housing all item data and used as a source for retrieval of data from other tables; a Hub CITM Table; a SPIN Table for housing unposted item reasons, as-of-dates, and other special information for items; a Hub SPIN Table; a CIBL Table for housing transactions that are out of balance, as well as the control records; a Hub CIBL Table; an ILOC Image Locator Table for holding Image Key, IRB Adapter, and Image Type that are passed to said system of record processor and are used to retrieve the archive information, wherein said table contains one record per image; a CNTL Control Table for controlling dates and indicating when a table has been loaded; a HUBC Hub Control Table used for determining if a hub is fully loaded, said Hub Control Table containing information for processing a hub and containing one record per processing hub; a HUBF Hub File Control Table for allowing individual capture sites to process multiple input files on a daily basis, but not necessarily always the same number of files, said Hub File Control Table containing control point information regarding a previous day's totals; and a TIXF Trace ID Cross Reference Table for storing cross referenced data.