WO2005070012A2 - Multi-player game employing dynamic re-sequencing - Google Patents

Multi-player game employing dynamic re-sequencing Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2005070012A2
WO2005070012A2 PCT/US2005/002277 US2005002277W WO2005070012A2 WO 2005070012 A2 WO2005070012 A2 WO 2005070012A2 US 2005002277 W US2005002277 W US 2005002277W WO 2005070012 A2 WO2005070012 A2 WO 2005070012A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
game
interceptor
initiator
intended receiver
qualifying
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2005/002277
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
WO2005070012A3 (en
Inventor
Andy Wang
Gabriel Law
Original Assignee
Netamin Communication Corp.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Netamin Communication Corp. filed Critical Netamin Communication Corp.
Priority to JP2006551393A priority Critical patent/JP2007518542A/en
Priority to EP05711964A priority patent/EP1708796A4/en
Publication of WO2005070012A2 publication Critical patent/WO2005070012A2/en
Publication of WO2005070012A3 publication Critical patent/WO2005070012A3/en

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L67/00Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
    • H04L67/01Protocols
    • H04L67/131Protocols for games, networked simulations or virtual reality
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A63SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
    • A63FCARD, BOARD, OR ROULETTE GAMES; INDOOR GAMES USING SMALL MOVING PLAYING BODIES; VIDEO GAMES; GAMES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • A63F13/00Video games, i.e. games using an electronically generated display having two or more dimensions
    • A63F13/30Interconnection arrangements between game servers and game devices; Interconnection arrangements between game devices; Interconnection arrangements between game servers
    • A63F13/35Details of game servers
    • A63F13/358Adapting the game course according to the network or server load, e.g. for reducing latency due to different connection speeds between clients
    • GPHYSICS
    • G07CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07FCOIN-FREED OR LIKE APPARATUS
    • G07F17/00Coin-freed apparatus for hiring articles; Coin-freed facilities or services
    • G07F17/32Coin-freed apparatus for hiring articles; Coin-freed facilities or services for games, toys, sports, or amusements
    • GPHYSICS
    • G07CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07FCOIN-FREED OR LIKE APPARATUS
    • G07F17/00Coin-freed apparatus for hiring articles; Coin-freed facilities or services
    • G07F17/32Coin-freed apparatus for hiring articles; Coin-freed facilities or services for games, toys, sports, or amusements
    • G07F17/326Game play aspects of gaming systems
    • G07F17/3272Games involving multiple players
    • G07F17/3276Games involving multiple players wherein the players compete, e.g. tournament
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L12/00Data switching networks
    • H04L12/28Data switching networks characterised by path configuration, e.g. LAN [Local Area Networks] or WAN [Wide Area Networks]
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A63SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
    • A63FCARD, BOARD, OR ROULETTE GAMES; INDOOR GAMES USING SMALL MOVING PLAYING BODIES; VIDEO GAMES; GAMES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • A63F2300/00Features of games using an electronically generated display having two or more dimensions, e.g. on a television screen, showing representations related to the game
    • A63F2300/40Features of games using an electronically generated display having two or more dimensions, e.g. on a television screen, showing representations related to the game characterised by details of platform network
    • A63F2300/407Data transfer via internet
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A63SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
    • A63FCARD, BOARD, OR ROULETTE GAMES; INDOOR GAMES USING SMALL MOVING PLAYING BODIES; VIDEO GAMES; GAMES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • A63F2300/00Features of games using an electronically generated display having two or more dimensions, e.g. on a television screen, showing representations related to the game
    • A63F2300/50Features of games using an electronically generated display having two or more dimensions, e.g. on a television screen, showing representations related to the game characterized by details of game servers
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A63SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
    • A63FCARD, BOARD, OR ROULETTE GAMES; INDOOR GAMES USING SMALL MOVING PLAYING BODIES; VIDEO GAMES; GAMES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • A63F2300/00Features of games using an electronically generated display having two or more dimensions, e.g. on a television screen, showing representations related to the game
    • A63F2300/50Features of games using an electronically generated display having two or more dimensions, e.g. on a television screen, showing representations related to the game characterized by details of game servers
    • A63F2300/53Features of games using an electronically generated display having two or more dimensions, e.g. on a television screen, showing representations related to the game characterized by details of game servers details of basic data processing
    • A63F2300/534Features of games using an electronically generated display having two or more dimensions, e.g. on a television screen, showing representations related to the game characterized by details of game servers details of basic data processing for network load management, e.g. bandwidth optimization, latency reduction
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A63SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
    • A63FCARD, BOARD, OR ROULETTE GAMES; INDOOR GAMES USING SMALL MOVING PLAYING BODIES; VIDEO GAMES; GAMES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • A63F2300/00Features of games using an electronically generated display having two or more dimensions, e.g. on a television screen, showing representations related to the game
    • A63F2300/50Features of games using an electronically generated display having two or more dimensions, e.g. on a television screen, showing representations related to the game characterized by details of game servers
    • A63F2300/55Details of game data or player data management
    • A63F2300/5593Details of game data or player data management involving scheduling aspects

Definitions

  • the video game program determines how best to mimic real life.
  • game programmers must consider network latency that will delay an action, or, in a multiplayer setting, display a different progression of the same game to players based on a variety of criteria.
  • the time difference of the display to respectively different players can be extremely small, perhaps no more than 500 ms (equivalent to approximately one half of a second), which may seem like a relatively insignificant passage of time; however, in a real-time game such a time difference may be determinative of game outcomes.
  • Network latency involves the time needed for packets of data (e.g., the information related to a character's action) to travel from a user's computer to the game server and then from the game server to the rest of the users.
  • packets of data e.g., the information related to a character's action
  • FIG. 1 illustrates the conventional way to compensate for network latency, in which the main idea is to build in a buffer where everyone is delayed by a set amount of time (in this case 500 milliseconds (ms)) minus the respective network latency time before any action occurs on the screen.
  • a set amount of time in this case 500 milliseconds (ms)
  • ms milliseconds
  • an intentional delay is built into the game so that each player of the game sees the start of the motion at the same time.
  • the server detects an average ping time for each player (ping time is defined herein as the time required for a packet of data to travel from a player's computer to a predetermined server, which in this case would be a game server).
  • ping time is defined herein as the time required for a packet of data to travel from a player's computer to a predetermined server, which in this case would be a game server).
  • the ping time is above 400 ms, the player will not enjoy a smooth game due to
  • the default allowance is 500 ms
  • player X has an average ping time of 300 ms
  • player Y has an average ping time of 100 ms.
  • Player Y is the intended receiver of the ball thrown by player X.
  • 800 ms elapses before both X and Y see that the ball is thrown.
  • t 0ms [X clicks mouse to initiate action]
  • t 300ms [Server receives signal from X]
  • t 400ms (300+100) [Y receives signal from server that X has initiated action and that the action will be shown 400 ms later]
  • t 600ms (300+300) [X receives signal from server that action will be shown 200 ms later]
  • t 800ms (300+100+400 or 300+300+200) [both X and Y see the throwing action]
  • U.S. Patent No. 6,475,090 to Roelofs is directed to in- game factors to compensate for network latency.
  • a method is provided for compensating for high-latency computer clients in a multi-player electronic game played on a plurality of terminals connected by a network.
  • a latency value is determined for computer clients operating the terminals, after which a latency compensation factor is determined from the latency value for each client computer.
  • the playing modality of a client computer can then be adjusted based on the latency compensation factor.
  • the compensation techniques are applied during the playing of the game time via the previously constructed latency compensation curve. For example, a compensation curve may be employed whereby a player would be afforded a compensation mechanism commensurate with his measured latency.
  • U.S. Patent No. 6,304,902 to Black et al. is directed to a method and system for determining network latency between clients in a computer network having at least two clients connected thereto in a manner that reduces network traffic at any given time.
  • Each client determines the network latency between each other client via a ping, response, and response-response protocol.
  • a first client places first time information such as a time stamp into a (ping) data packet and sends the packet to the second client, who places second time information into the packet and sends the packet as a response packet back to the first client.
  • the first client determines a first network latency based on its current time and the first time information returned in the response packet.
  • the first client then sends the packet back to the second client as a response to the response packet.
  • the second client determines a second latency based on the current time information at the second client and the second time information received in the response-response packet.
  • each local client sorts the IP addresses of the other remote clients into sets of clients, and pings the remote client or clients in each set once per predetermined period, thereby distributing the pinging operation to balance incoming and outgoing network traffic.
  • this solution matches players in proximity (and thereby lower network latency) to play each other, thus exempting the possibility that network latency may affect gameplay during the game.
  • this method only allows peer-to-peer (where action information in the form of data packets are sent from one player to other player(s)), not server/client, matches to take place.
  • a primary object of the present invention is to provide a massively multiplayer online game with a mechanism that enables seamless and simultaneous participation by remote users, such that an event can have an immediate and consequential effect on a related event without the unwanted effects of delay and desynchronized events resulting from network latency.
  • dynamic re-sequencing refers to such a mechanism. It is also an object of the present invention to provide a method to synchronize the game following dynamic re-sequencing thereof.
  • What is claimed is a method of compensating for network latency in an online multiplayer game requiring more than two participants, wherein the client structure of said game utilizes at least one server, comprising the steps of qualifying all participants in the game as members of either an active group or an awaiting group, qualifying a member of said active group as an initiator, qualifying at least one member of said active group as an intended receiver, qualifying at least one member of said active group as an interceptor, conveying an action initiated by said initiator and directed to said intended receiver first to said interceptor, wherein said interceptor has the initial opportunity to react to said action, and wherein a reaction by said interceptor results in an outcome signal, and conveying said outcome signal to each of said initiator, intended receiver and interceptor at a specific time for each, wherein each will witness the reaction concurrently.
  • FIG. 1 is a graphical description on traditional way of overcoming internet latency.
  • FIG. 2 is a graphical description on how this invention overcomes internet latency.
  • examples are provided with respect to a typical multiplayer online game.
  • users are represented in a virtual reality as their own avatar, or character.
  • Each character is assigned a particular designation based on their involvement in the game at a given point in time.
  • Character designations are reassigned continuously throughout the game, depending on various qualifying factors, which will be described in more detail below.
  • the terms "designating,” “assigning” and “qualifying” are used interchangeably herein to describe the mechanism for which a character is placed into a certain group and/or becomes an active participant in a game event such that the dynamic re-sequencing and synchronizing solutions of the present invention can be adequately conveyed.
  • the actual human participants in the game may be referred to with respect to the characters they control within the game.
  • the action group comprises an initiator, an intended receiver and potential interceptor(s).
  • the initiator is usually in possession of a game object (i.e., a ball) and an action initiated by the initiator is a game event.
  • An interceptor may attempt to capture the game object and although he may not actually gain possession thereof, he would have a chance to alter the outcome of what the initiator wants to achieve (e.g., to pass the ball to another teammate), which for purposes of this example will be called the goal.
  • the intended receiver is on the receiving end of this goal and, in some cases, there can be more than one intended receiver.
  • Characters in the awaiting group would queue up according to a predetermined, game-specific formula that qualifies them in a specific order to replace and assume the role of intended receiver and/or interceptor.
  • the qualification process takes place recurrently in very short intervals, and a new goal is established once the result of the previous goal is determined.
  • the present invention allows the interceptor to witness a game event a few milliseconds before the rest of the characters on field witness the beginning of said event, the interceptor being sequenced to react initially to said game event.
  • Such an arrangement allows the interceptor to determine at a slightly earlier time whether the outcome of the goal is to be altered.
  • the intended receiver will have the next chance to act upon the goal and determine its outcome.
  • the role of the original intended receiver will immediately change to that of one in the awaiting group, who may qualify as an interceptor.
  • a character in the awaiting group can qualify as the interceptor, while the role of intended receiver remains the same.
  • the determining factors of whether a character qualifies as one of the three members of the action group include, for example, distance to the event, performance aspects of the characters (such as speed), rules specific to the position the character is playing related to the sport and/or video game (e.g., a defensive lineman in an American football game would be unlikely to intercept a pass), network latency effects, hardware limitations, etc. It is worth noting that members from either team in a two-team game can be in the same pool of characters in the awaiting group. As characters are constantly making plays on the field, characters in the awaiting group will have ample chances to become either an intended receiver or an interceptor, and if intercepted successfully, become an initiator.
  • the game must dynamically sequence which characters can become an interceptor and thereby witness a game event earlier than the other characters.
  • Rules for determining the sequencing can originate from either the rules with respect to the game being simulated (such as a pass interference penalty in American football) or video game specific rules (such as only characters possessing certain traits can successfully complete certain action in time). Following are examples of different games in which the dynamic re-sequencing of the present invention is utilized.
  • characters engage in a baseball game, in which the most time-sensitive sequence of event occurs between the batter and the catcher.
  • the pitcher is the initiator, the batter the interceptor and the catcher the intended receiver.
  • the goal is to deliver the pitch safely to the catcher, while avoiding a hit by the batter.
  • a small fraction of a second will elapse when the ball travels past the batter (i.e., the batter does not make contact with the ball), which cannot be mimicked in an online multiplayer game realistically due to network latency.
  • the present invention allows the batter (interceptor) to see the pitch a split second before the rest of the characters do.
  • the batter decides whether to swing the bat or not in response to the location of the ball, the outcome is determined and the rest of the characters, including the catcher, will know what the result is and take the appropriate action(s).
  • the qualifications required to become an interceptor in this embodiment would be the rules of the game of baseball in that the batter is trying to hit a pitch delivered from the pitcher to the catcher.
  • characters engage in a soccer game, in which a player (an initiator who has possession of a soccer ball) is trying to pass the ball to a teammate (an intended receiver) while an opponent is trying to intercept the pass (the interceptor).
  • the interceptor Once the system determines the opponent player is qualified (perhaps due to the fact that he is stationed at the moment in the vicinity of the soccer ball), the character is allowed to see the action of the soccer ball moving from the initiator along a path to the intended receiver.
  • the virtual distance between the character and the ball, the character's speed and the user's ability to control the character the interceptor may change the outcome. If he does, he assumes the role of the initiator.
  • the qualifications required to become an interceptor in this scenario are firstly in-game factors (i.e., the distance to the soccer ball) and secondly the character's performance traits (i.e., that he is speedy enough to intercept).
  • characters engage in an American football game, in which a quarterback is making a throw to an intended receiver with three defenders nearby.
  • video game rules only a maximum of two defensive players may approach the intended receiver.
  • the furthest character from the ball or the slower of the characters
  • video game rules dictate that the closest defensive character will have a chance to try to intercept the ball first; if he fails, the remaining defensive character will have a chance. Therefore, the first defensive player will see the pass a split second before the rest of the characters, and then the second defensive player will see the pass, followed by the intended receiver.
  • the qualification required to become an interceptor in this scenario is in-game factors.
  • Sport game rules Characters playing certain defined positions on a team in a given sports game assume the role of being the potential interceptor. In the game of baseball, for example, the batter acts as an interceptor. It is important to note, however, that the present invention intends to address the event that has an immediate and consequential effect on the next event, so that the interceptor may not need to gain possession of the ball. Instead, the player merely needs to decide how his action will affect the next event. For example, a base runner may also act as an interceptor between an outfielder and an infielder; while the base runner would not actually gain possession of the ball, his action (whether or not safely reaching a base) has an immediate and consequential effect on whether the infielder will attempt to throw to another base in order to record an additional out.
  • Character parameters Every character has a set of parameters that determine how the avatar will perform. For example, in American football, in a passing situation, the cornerback should be able to intercept an action; however, if the cornerback character does not match up in speed to that of the intended receiver, he should be disqualified. Note that such an action is generated not purely from football rules, but from game design specific rules in the video game. Other examples of parameters include dexterity, agility and balance.
  • the primary thrust of the present invention is to provide a network latency solution by sequencing events and allowing an interceptor the opportunity to determine the outcome before the initiator or the intended receiver.
  • FIG. 2 a further example is provided to explain how the present invention overcomes network latency.
  • the game is an online baseball game, the details of which can be found in predecessor U.S. patent application Serial Nos. 10/002,976, and 09/716,853, incorporated by reference herein, which describe the novel action that the solutions detailed herein permit.
  • the initiator in this example is a pitcher, having a 250 ms delay
  • the intended receiver is a catcher, having a 125 ms delay
  • the interceptor is a batter, having a 400 ms delay.
  • the pitcher begins a given action by initiating a pitch.
  • the batter (interceptor) is permitted a brief moment to view the event and react thereto, in this case, several milliseconds, prior to the other players. If the batter succeeds in intercepting the object (i.e., making contact with the ball), he may experience a brief period of delay between the end of the event and the beginning of the next event so that all players can be synchronized to see the outcome i of the event at the same time. Thus, the batter may spend a few milliseconds dropping his bat and preparing to run to first base. At this point, the next interceptor will be determined.
  • the outcome signal contains within it an instruction with respect to when to display the outcome signal, so that each player witnesses the event at the same time.

Abstract

A solution for network latency inherent in a multiplayer online game involving more than two players. The solution is a dynamic re-sequencing and synchronization mechanism that enables seamless and simultaneous participation by remote users, such that an event can have an immediate and consequential effect on a related event without the unwanted effects resulting from network latency.

Description

MULTI-PLAYER GAME EMPLOYING DYNAMIC RE-SEQUENCING
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
[0001] This application is a contin ation-in-part of application U.S. Serial No.
10/002,976, filed November 14, 2001, which is a continuation-in-part of application U.S. Serial No. 09/716,853, filed November 14, 2000. This application expressly incorporates by reference the entirety of each of the above-referenced applications as if fully set forth herein.
STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT
[0002] Not applicable.
REFERENCE TO A COMPACT DISK APPENDIX [0003] Not applicable.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0004] With the rise of the popularity of the Internet, many forms of digital entertainment have crossed over from their traditional distribution medium to that of Internet. One notable example is radio broadcasting, where technology in the past decade has enabled listeners from around the world with access to the Internet to select the desired content and hear radio programs from their personal computers. While digital entertainment such as radio broadcasting has gained popularity, the genre is limited in the sense that the action is uni-directional, i.e. entertainment content flowing in one direction only from the provider to the users. Although this is convenient, the format does not fit well with the intrinsic nature of the Internet, which always has involved a high degree of interaction. The most basic example of a bidirectional form of communication with respect to the Internet is the interaction of users in clicking a link on a page in the World Wide Web to select content to be viewed. [0005] Interactive online digital entertainment has gained ground on many fronts in recent years, especially with respect to video gaming. For example, users can login to certain websites to first find an opponent and then play a game of chess in the virtual world. As a human player will be competing against another human player, the form of communication is bi-directional. However, not all video games can be played online. For a game of chess where time to make a move does not have an immediate and consequential effect on the outcome (also called a twitch game), players obviously have ample time to contemplate the next move, counter-move, game strategy and so on. However, in a majority of real-time video games, time needed to make a decision and act upon that decision is relatively short so that players involved feel a sense of realism. In such a real-time game, action must occur in close proximity in every aspect thereof to real life events. Real-time action is a must for the action genre (e.g., fighting games), simulation genre (e.g., flight simulators) and sport genre (e.g., baseball games).
[0006] With respect to video games played by single player (either on a console or personal computer (PC)), the video game program determines how best to mimic real life. On the other hand, with respect to games played over the Internet, game programmers must consider network latency that will delay an action, or, in a multiplayer setting, display a different progression of the same game to players based on a variety of criteria. The time difference of the display to respectively different players can be extremely small, perhaps no more than 500 ms (equivalent to approximately one half of a second), which may seem like a relatively insignificant passage of time; however, in a real-time game such a time difference may be determinative of game outcomes.
[0007] Network latency involves the time needed for packets of data (e.g., the information related to a character's action) to travel from a user's computer to the game server and then from the game server to the rest of the users. Ideally, if all users have the same network latency, there would be no issue as all events would just be delayed by the same amount of time. However, due to different geographical locations, as well as quality of Internet connection services, each user is likely to have a different latency. Thus, each user would be looking at a different point in time in the game, which would prevent crucial judgments (e.g., determining at a given moment the right strategy to defend an offensive play in a football game) from taking place and thereby would effectively eliminate the realism in the game.
[0008] Network latency has been addressed, for example, in U.S. Patent No.
5,695,400 to Fennell, Jr. et al.; U.S. Patent No. 5,775,996 to Othmer et al.; U.S. Patent No. 5,820,463 to O'Callaghan; U.S. Patent No. 5,838,909 to Roy et al.; U.S. Patent No. 5,899,810 to Smith; U.S. Patent No. 5,974,442 to Adams; U.S. Patent No. 6,006,254 to Waters et al.; U.S. Patent No. 6,012,096 to Link et al.; U.S. Patent No. 6,025,801 to Beitel; U.S. Patent No. 6,042,477 to Addink; U.S. Patent No. 6,304,902 to Black et al.; U.S. Patent No. 6,345,297 to Grimm et al.; U.S. Patent No. 6,415,317 to Yelon et al.; U.S. Patent No. 6,475,090 to Roelofs; each of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
[0009] FIG. 1 illustrates the conventional way to compensate for network latency, in which the main idea is to build in a buffer where everyone is delayed by a set amount of time (in this case 500 milliseconds (ms)) minus the respective network latency time before any action occurs on the screen. More particularly, in the prior art network latency solutions, an intentional delay is built into the game so that each player of the game sees the start of the motion at the same time. During the game or when players log in, the server detects an average ping time for each player (ping time is defined herein as the time required for a packet of data to travel from a player's computer to a predetermined server, which in this case would be a game server). Typically, if the ping time is above 400 ms, the player will not enjoy a smooth game due to the fact that the player's response to other player's actions will always be late.
[0010] Referring now to FIG. 1, the default allowance is 500 ms, player X has an average ping time of 300 ms and player Y has an average ping time of 100 ms. Player X initiates an action (throwing a ball) by clicking his mouse at t=0 ms. Player Y is the intended receiver of the ball thrown by player X. The server receives the signal from player X at t=300 ms (note that other players in the game do not at this instant know that X has initiated the throwing action). The server then calculates the difference between the player's average ping time and the default allowance, thus in this case 500 ms - 300 ms = 200 ms, which is the value of the intentional buffer. The server sends signals to other players in the game at t=300 ms, including player Y who has a player-specific buffer of 100 ms. The server then calculates the intentional buffer for Y (500 ms - 100 ms = 400 ms). Thus, as shown in FIG. 1, 800 ms elapses before both X and Y see that the ball is thrown. The timeline described above can be summarized as follows: t = 0ms [X clicks mouse to initiate action] t = 300ms [Server receives signal from X] t = 400ms (300+100) [Y receives signal from server that X has initiated action and that the action will be shown 400 ms later] t = 600ms (300+300) [X receives signal from server that action will be shown 200 ms later] t = 800ms (300+100+400 or 300+300+200) [both X and Y see the throwing action]
[0011] The above-described process is complicated tremendously if the network latency of player X is higher than a certain threshold, say, 500 ms. In such a case, the whole solution would be rendered useless because the delay in the action would be too great (i.e., more than 1 second). Thus, various methods have been proposed to address this problem.
[0012] For example, U.S. Patent No. 6,475,090 to Roelofs is directed to in- game factors to compensate for network latency. A method is provided for compensating for high-latency computer clients in a multi-player electronic game played on a plurality of terminals connected by a network. A latency value is determined for computer clients operating the terminals, after which a latency compensation factor is determined from the latency value for each client computer. The playing modality of a client computer can then be adjusted based on the latency compensation factor. The compensation techniques are applied during the playing of the game time via the previously constructed latency compensation curve. For example, a compensation curve may be employed whereby a player would be afforded a compensation mechanism commensurate with his measured latency. The compensation may, for example, provide the player with an increase in speed to enable him to compensate for his delay. There is, however, no buffering involved. [0013] U.S. Patent No. 6,304,902 to Black et al. is directed to a method and system for determining network latency between clients in a computer network having at least two clients connected thereto in a manner that reduces network traffic at any given time. Each client determines the network latency between each other client via a ping, response, and response-response protocol. To this end, a first client places first time information such as a time stamp into a (ping) data packet and sends the packet to the second client, who places second time information into the packet and sends the packet as a response packet back to the first client. The first client determines a first network latency based on its current time and the first time information returned in the response packet. The first client then sends the packet back to the second client as a response to the response packet. The second client determines a second latency based on the current time information at the second client and the second time information received in the response-response packet. For multiple clients such as in a gaming zone environment, each local client sorts the IP addresses of the other remote clients into sets of clients, and pings the remote client or clients in each set once per predetermined period, thereby distributing the pinging operation to balance incoming and outgoing network traffic. More particularly, this solution matches players in proximity (and thereby lower network latency) to play each other, thus exempting the possibility that network latency may affect gameplay during the game. However, this method only allows peer-to-peer (where action information in the form of data packets are sent from one player to other player(s)), not server/client, matches to take place.
[0014] Importantly, the above-described solutions do not permit a potential third party to intervene in the gameplay. Team sport games such as baseball, American football, soccer, ice hockey and basketball, for example, by their nature require multiple players to engage in possession of the game ball. While the aforementioned solutions address compensating network latency, the pertinent architecture focuses on one-on-one gameplay. The particular problem related to a multiplayer game having a TCP/IP server/client structure (in contrast to peer-to-peer structure), in which a solution to latency compensation (due to an event that has an immediate and consequential effect on another (or next) event) is required, has heretofore yet to be provided, [0015] Thus, with respect to multiplayer online games involving simultaneous participation of users positioned at different locations (i.e., users distanced remotely from one another, perhaps even in different countries), wherein the structure is TCP/IP server/client, there exists a need for an invention that can effectively overcome problems posed by network latency.
BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0016] Accordingly, a primary object of the present invention is to provide a massively multiplayer online game with a mechanism that enables seamless and simultaneous participation by remote users, such that an event can have an immediate and consequential effect on a related event without the unwanted effects of delay and desynchronized events resulting from network latency. For purposes of the invention described herein, the term "dynamic re-sequencing" refers to such a mechanism. It is also an object of the present invention to provide a method to synchronize the game following dynamic re-sequencing thereof.
[0017] What is claimed is a method of compensating for network latency in an online multiplayer game requiring more than two participants, wherein the client structure of said game utilizes at least one server, comprising the steps of qualifying all participants in the game as members of either an active group or an awaiting group, qualifying a member of said active group as an initiator, qualifying at least one member of said active group as an intended receiver, qualifying at least one member of said active group as an interceptor, conveying an action initiated by said initiator and directed to said intended receiver first to said interceptor, wherein said interceptor has the initial opportunity to react to said action, and wherein a reaction by said interceptor results in an outcome signal, and conveying said outcome signal to each of said initiator, intended receiver and interceptor at a specific time for each, wherein each will witness the reaction concurrently.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0018] FIG. 1 is a graphical description on traditional way of overcoming internet latency.
[0019] FIG. 2 is a graphical description on how this invention overcomes internet latency. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0020] The following detailed description should be read with reference to the drawings, in which like elements in different drawings are identically numbered. The drawings, which are not necessarily to scale, depict selected preferred embodiments and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention. The detailed description illustrates by way of example, not by way of limitation, the principles of the invention. This description will clearly enable one skilled in the art to make and use the invention, and describes several embodiments, adaptations, variations, alternatives and uses of the invention, including what is presently believed to be the best mode of carrying out the invention.
[0021] In order to describe the present invention, examples are provided with respect to a typical multiplayer online game. In these example, users are represented in a virtual reality as their own avatar, or character. Each character is assigned a particular designation based on their involvement in the game at a given point in time. Character designations are reassigned continuously throughout the game, depending on various qualifying factors, which will be described in more detail below. The terms "designating," "assigning" and "qualifying" are used interchangeably herein to describe the mechanism for which a character is placed into a certain group and/or becomes an active participant in a game event such that the dynamic re-sequencing and synchronizing solutions of the present invention can be adequately conveyed. Also, in the examples herein, the actual human participants in the game may be referred to with respect to the characters they control within the game.
[0022] In one example showing how the present solution to network latency is implemented, all characters on a given playing field are divided into one of two groups: an action group and an awaiting group. The action group comprises an initiator, an intended receiver and potential interceptor(s). The initiator is usually in possession of a game object (i.e., a ball) and an action initiated by the initiator is a game event. An interceptor may attempt to capture the game object and although he may not actually gain possession thereof, he would have a chance to alter the outcome of what the initiator wants to achieve (e.g., to pass the ball to another teammate), which for purposes of this example will be called the goal. The intended receiver is on the receiving end of this goal and, in some cases, there can be more than one intended receiver. Characters in the awaiting group would queue up according to a predetermined, game-specific formula that qualifies them in a specific order to replace and assume the role of intended receiver and/or interceptor. The qualification process takes place recurrently in very short intervals, and a new goal is established once the result of the previous goal is determined.
[0023] In basic terms, the present invention allows the interceptor to witness a game event a few milliseconds before the rest of the characters on field witness the beginning of said event, the interceptor being sequenced to react initially to said game event. Such an arrangement allows the interceptor to determine at a slightly earlier time whether the outcome of the goal is to be altered. In the event that the interceptor has not altered the initiator's goal, the intended receiver will have the next chance to act upon the goal and determine its outcome. At that instance, if another character from the awaiting group can qualify as an intended receiver, then the role of the original intended receiver will immediately change to that of one in the awaiting group, who may qualify as an interceptor. In another scenario, a character in the awaiting group can qualify as the interceptor, while the role of intended receiver remains the same. The determining factors of whether a character qualifies as one of the three members of the action group include, for example, distance to the event, performance aspects of the characters (such as speed), rules specific to the position the character is playing related to the sport and/or video game (e.g., a defensive lineman in an American football game would be unlikely to intercept a pass), network latency effects, hardware limitations, etc. It is worth noting that members from either team in a two-team game can be in the same pool of characters in the awaiting group. As characters are constantly making plays on the field, characters in the awaiting group will have ample chances to become either an intended receiver or an interceptor, and if intercepted successfully, become an initiator.
[0024] Thus, the game must dynamically sequence which characters can become an interceptor and thereby witness a game event earlier than the other characters. Rules for determining the sequencing can originate from either the rules with respect to the game being simulated (such as a pass interference penalty in American football) or video game specific rules (such as only characters possessing certain traits can successfully complete certain action in time). Following are examples of different games in which the dynamic re-sequencing of the present invention is utilized.
[0025] In a first example, characters engage in a baseball game, in which the most time-sensitive sequence of event occurs between the batter and the catcher. In this scenario, the pitcher is the initiator, the batter the interceptor and the catcher the intended receiver. The goal is to deliver the pitch safely to the catcher, while avoiding a hit by the batter. In real life, only a small fraction of a second will elapse when the ball travels past the batter (i.e., the batter does not make contact with the ball), which cannot be mimicked in an online multiplayer game realistically due to network latency. As explained above, the present invention allows the batter (interceptor) to see the pitch a split second before the rest of the characters do. Once the batter decides whether to swing the bat or not in response to the location of the ball, the outcome is determined and the rest of the characters, including the catcher, will know what the result is and take the appropriate action(s). The qualifications required to become an interceptor in this embodiment would be the rules of the game of baseball in that the batter is trying to hit a pitch delivered from the pitcher to the catcher.
[0026] In a second example, characters engage in a soccer game, in which a player (an initiator who has possession of a soccer ball) is trying to pass the ball to a teammate (an intended receiver) while an opponent is trying to intercept the pass (the interceptor). Once the system determines the opponent player is qualified (perhaps due to the fact that he is stationed at the moment in the vicinity of the soccer ball), the character is allowed to see the action of the soccer ball moving from the initiator along a path to the intended receiver. Depending on his response to this pass, the virtual distance between the character and the ball, the character's speed and the user's ability to control the character, the interceptor may change the outcome. If he does, he assumes the role of the initiator. The qualifications required to become an interceptor in this scenario are firstly in-game factors (i.e., the distance to the soccer ball) and secondly the character's performance traits (i.e., that he is speedy enough to intercept).
[0027] In a third example, characters engage in an American football game, in which a quarterback is making a throw to an intended receiver with three defenders nearby. By video game rules, only a maximum of two defensive players may approach the intended receiver. Thus, for example, the furthest character from the ball (or the slower of the characters) will not be involved in the play. Of the two remaining defensive players, video game rules dictate that the closest defensive character will have a chance to try to intercept the ball first; if he fails, the remaining defensive character will have a chance. Therefore, the first defensive player will see the pass a split second before the rest of the characters, and then the second defensive player will see the pass, followed by the intended receiver. The qualification required to become an interceptor in this scenario is in-game factors.
[0028] Intuitively, it is relatively easy to determine which player/character qualifies as the initiator and the intended receiver; however, the role of an interceptor is harder to assign because each character participating in the game should theoretically have an opportunity to intercept the object. Upon closer analysis, several rules determine whether a participant can qualify as an interceptor, three of which are explained in more detail below. It should be appreciated, however, that there are countless possible rules that could determine whether a player would qualify as an interceptor and therefore, the below list should not be construed as an exclusive list.
• Sport game rules: Characters playing certain defined positions on a team in a given sports game assume the role of being the potential interceptor. In the game of baseball, for example, the batter acts as an interceptor. It is important to note, however, that the present invention intends to address the event that has an immediate and consequential effect on the next event, so that the interceptor may not need to gain possession of the ball. Instead, the player merely needs to decide how his action will affect the next event. For example, a base runner may also act as an interceptor between an outfielder and an infielder; while the base runner would not actually gain possession of the ball, his action (whether or not safely reaching a base) has an immediate and consequential effect on whether the infielder will attempt to throw to another base in order to record an additional out.
• Character parameters: Every character has a set of parameters that determine how the avatar will perform. For example, in American football, in a passing situation, the cornerback should be able to intercept an action; however, if the cornerback character does not match up in speed to that of the intended receiver, he should be disqualified. Note that such an action is generated not purely from football rules, but from game design specific rules in the video game. Other examples of parameters include dexterity, agility and balance.
• In-game situations: Even if the player's position is consistent with the rules of the game and the parameters meet the minimum requirement, the potential interceptor must be in a physical position possible to make the interception or impose an immediate and consequential effect on the next event. The player must be in proximity of the intiator, for example, and the player must not be impeded by an obstacle. For example, in a game of soccer, a teammate in possession of the game ball would be the initiator, while almost any of his teammates could be qualified as the intended receiver. Should the initiator attempt to pass the ball to another teammate, an opponent would have the chance to intercept if he is near the ball and is not blocked from the initiator by another player.
[0029] Summarizing, the primary thrust of the present invention is to provide a network latency solution by sequencing events and allowing an interceptor the opportunity to determine the outcome before the initiator or the intended receiver. With reference to FIG. 2, a further example is provided to explain how the present invention overcomes network latency. In this example, the game is an online baseball game, the details of which can be found in predecessor U.S. patent application Serial Nos. 10/002,976, and 09/716,853, incorporated by reference herein, which describe the novel action that the solutions detailed herein permit. [003O] The initiator in this example is a pitcher, having a 250 ms delay, the intended receiver is a catcher, having a 125 ms delay, and the interceptor is a batter, having a 400 ms delay. The pitcher begins a given action by initiating a pitch. The server receives the signal of the pitch at t = 250 ms and transmits only to the batter at t
= 650 ms. As explained above, the batter (interceptor) is permitted a brief moment to view the event and react thereto, in this case, several milliseconds, prior to the other players. If the batter succeeds in intercepting the object (i.e., making contact with the ball), he may experience a brief period of delay between the end of the event and the beginning of the next event so that all players can be synchronized to see the outcome i of the event at the same time. Thus, the batter may spend a few milliseconds dropping his bat and preparing to run to first base. At this point, the next interceptor will be determined.
[0031] Referring to FIG. 2, the batter succeeds in hitting the ball at t = 750 ms.
The server receives the outcome signal (i.e., ball being hit) at t = 1150 ms and immediately sends the signal to the batter, who sees the batted ball at t = 1700 ms. The pitcher, on the other hand, doesn't see the pitch delivered until t = 1600, but then immediately sees the outcome signal also at t = 1700 ms. The catcher, like the pitcher, sees the pitch delivered at t = 1600 ms, and sees the outcome signal at t = 170O ms. It should be noted that although the pitcher (initiator), catcher (intended receiver) and batter (interceptor) in this example witness the outcome signal at the same time, the actual time at which the server conveys the outcome signal to each may be different. Thus, the outcome signal contains within it an instruction with respect to when to display the outcome signal, so that each player witnesses the event at the same time.
[0032] The present invention has been described above in terms of certain preferred embodiments so that an understanding of the present invention can be conveyed. However, there are many alternative arrangements for dynamic re- sequencing not specifically described herein, but with which the present invention is applicable. Although specific features have been provided, dynamic re-sequencing in the present invention would equally be embodied by other configurations not specifically recited herein. The scope of the present invention should therefore not be limited by the embodiments illustrated, but rather it should be understood that the present invention has wide applicability with respect to catheter systems generally. All modifications, variations, or equivalent elements and implementations that are within the scope of the appended claims should therefore be considered within the scope of the invention.

Claims

1. A method of compensating for network latency in an online multiplayer game requiring more than two participants, wherein the client structure of said game utilizes at least one server, comprising the steps of: qualifying all participants in the game as members of either an active group or an awaiting group; qualifying a member of said active group as an initiator; qualifying at least one member of said active group as an intended receiver; qualifying at least one member of said active group as an interceptor; conveying an action initiated by said initiator and directed to said intended receiver first to said interceptor, wherein said interceptor has the initial opportunity to react to said action, and wherein a reaction by said interceptor results in an outcome signal; and conveying said outcome signal to each of said initiator, intended receiver and interceptor at a specific time for each, wherein each will witness the reaction concurrently.
2. The method according to claim 1, wherein said outcome signal comprises instructions regarding the time to display said reaction.
3. The method according to claim 1, wherein said intended receiver has the initial opportunity to react to said reaction.
4. The method according to claim 1, wherein said step of qualifying an initiator comprises the step of determining which character is in possession of a game object.
5. The method according to claim 1, wherein said step of qualifying at least one intended receiver comprises the step of determining to which character said initiator is attempting to convey said game object.
6. The method according to claim 1, wherein said step of qualifying at least one interceptor comprises taking into account one or more of: the established rules of said game, the particular character parameters defined by said game, and in-game situations.
7. The method according to claim 1, wherein members of said awaiting group are qualified as members of said active group according to a pre-determined, game-specific formula.
8. The method according to claim 1, wherein said game comprises at least two teams, and wherein said initiator and said intended receiver are on the same team.
PCT/US2005/002277 2004-01-22 2005-01-24 Multi-player game employing dynamic re-sequencing WO2005070012A2 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2006551393A JP2007518542A (en) 2004-01-22 2005-01-24 Multiplayer game using dynamic reordering
EP05711964A EP1708796A4 (en) 2004-01-22 2005-01-24 Multi-player game employing dynamic re-sequencing

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/762,935 2004-01-22
US10/762,935 US7244181B2 (en) 2000-11-14 2004-01-22 Multi-player game employing dynamic re-sequencing

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2005070012A2 true WO2005070012A2 (en) 2005-08-04
WO2005070012A3 WO2005070012A3 (en) 2006-08-10

Family

ID=34807544

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2005/002277 WO2005070012A2 (en) 2004-01-22 2005-01-24 Multi-player game employing dynamic re-sequencing

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (2) US7244181B2 (en)
EP (1) EP1708796A4 (en)
JP (1) JP2007518542A (en)
KR (1) KR20060135764A (en)
WO (1) WO2005070012A2 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2450087A1 (en) * 2010-10-28 2012-05-09 Konami Digital Entertainment Co., Ltd. Game device, control method for a game device, a program, and a information storage medium

Families Citing this family (95)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7244181B2 (en) * 2000-11-14 2007-07-17 Netamin Communication Corp. Multi-player game employing dynamic re-sequencing
GB0222554D0 (en) * 2002-09-28 2002-11-06 Koninkl Philips Electronics Nv Data processing system and method of operation
US8893207B2 (en) * 2002-12-10 2014-11-18 Ol2, Inc. System and method for compressing streaming interactive video
US8387099B2 (en) * 2002-12-10 2013-02-26 Ol2, Inc. System for acceleration of web page delivery
US9314691B2 (en) 2002-12-10 2016-04-19 Sony Computer Entertainment America Llc System and method for compressing video frames or portions thereof based on feedback information from a client device
US8495678B2 (en) * 2002-12-10 2013-07-23 Ol2, Inc. System for reporting recorded video preceding system failures
US8840475B2 (en) * 2002-12-10 2014-09-23 Ol2, Inc. Method for user session transitioning among streaming interactive video servers
US10201760B2 (en) 2002-12-10 2019-02-12 Sony Interactive Entertainment America Llc System and method for compressing video based on detected intraframe motion
US8468575B2 (en) * 2002-12-10 2013-06-18 Ol2, Inc. System for recursive recombination of streaming interactive video
US8949922B2 (en) * 2002-12-10 2015-02-03 Ol2, Inc. System for collaborative conferencing using streaming interactive video
US9003461B2 (en) * 2002-12-10 2015-04-07 Ol2, Inc. Streaming interactive video integrated with recorded video segments
US9138644B2 (en) 2002-12-10 2015-09-22 Sony Computer Entertainment America Llc System and method for accelerated machine switching
US9032465B2 (en) 2002-12-10 2015-05-12 Ol2, Inc. Method for multicasting views of real-time streaming interactive video
US8661496B2 (en) * 2002-12-10 2014-02-25 Ol2, Inc. System for combining a plurality of views of real-time streaming interactive video
US9061207B2 (en) 2002-12-10 2015-06-23 Sony Computer Entertainment America Llc Temporary decoder apparatus and method
US8964830B2 (en) 2002-12-10 2015-02-24 Ol2, Inc. System and method for multi-stream video compression using multiple encoding formats
US8526490B2 (en) 2002-12-10 2013-09-03 Ol2, Inc. System and method for video compression using feedback including data related to the successful receipt of video content
US7558525B2 (en) 2002-12-10 2009-07-07 Onlive, Inc. Mass storage repository for a wireless network
US20090118019A1 (en) 2002-12-10 2009-05-07 Onlive, Inc. System for streaming databases serving real-time applications used through streaming interactive video
US9108107B2 (en) 2002-12-10 2015-08-18 Sony Computer Entertainment America Llc Hosting and broadcasting virtual events using streaming interactive video
US8711923B2 (en) 2002-12-10 2014-04-29 Ol2, Inc. System and method for selecting a video encoding format based on feedback data
US8366552B2 (en) 2002-12-10 2013-02-05 Ol2, Inc. System and method for multi-stream video compression
US9077991B2 (en) 2002-12-10 2015-07-07 Sony Computer Entertainment America Llc System and method for utilizing forward error correction with video compression
US9446305B2 (en) 2002-12-10 2016-09-20 Sony Interactive Entertainment America Llc System and method for improving the graphics performance of hosted applications
US8832772B2 (en) * 2002-12-10 2014-09-09 Ol2, Inc. System for combining recorded application state with application streaming interactive video output
US8549574B2 (en) 2002-12-10 2013-10-01 Ol2, Inc. Method of combining linear content and interactive content compressed together as streaming interactive video
US7849491B2 (en) * 2002-12-10 2010-12-07 Onlive, Inc. Apparatus and method for wireless video gaming
US9192859B2 (en) 2002-12-10 2015-11-24 Sony Computer Entertainment America Llc System and method for compressing video based on latency measurements and other feedback
US7593361B2 (en) * 2003-02-14 2009-09-22 Onlive, Inc. Method of operation for a three-dimensional, wireless network
US7584248B2 (en) * 2004-02-27 2009-09-01 Alcatel-Lucent Usa Inc. Apparatus and method for fair message exchanges in distributed multi-player games
US8870639B2 (en) 2004-06-28 2014-10-28 Winview, Inc. Methods and apparatus for distributed gaming over a mobile device
US8376855B2 (en) 2004-06-28 2013-02-19 Winview, Inc. Methods and apparatus for distributed gaming over a mobile device
US10226698B1 (en) 2004-07-14 2019-03-12 Winview, Inc. Game of skill played by remote participants utilizing wireless devices in connection with a common game event
WO2006025255A1 (en) * 2004-08-30 2006-03-09 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Client terminal for executing multiplayer application, group forming method, and group forming program
US20060135258A1 (en) * 2004-12-17 2006-06-22 Nokia Corporation System, network entity, client and method for facilitating fairness in a multiplayer game
US20060135259A1 (en) * 2004-12-17 2006-06-22 Nokia Corporation System, game server, terminal, and method for game event notification in a multiplayer game
US20060136584A1 (en) * 2004-12-17 2006-06-22 Nokia Corporation System, network entity, client, method and computer program product for managing a contact list
US8738694B2 (en) 2005-06-20 2014-05-27 Winview, Inc. Method of and system for managing client resources and assets for activities on computing devices
US10721543B2 (en) 2005-06-20 2020-07-21 Winview, Inc. Method of and system for managing client resources and assets for activities on computing devices
US20070021212A1 (en) * 2005-07-22 2007-01-25 Derek Liu Persistent and effecient game architecture
US20070050838A1 (en) * 2005-08-25 2007-03-01 Derek Liu Multi-protocol game engine
US9511287B2 (en) 2005-10-03 2016-12-06 Winview, Inc. Cellular phone games based upon television archives
US8149530B1 (en) 2006-04-12 2012-04-03 Winview, Inc. Methodology for equalizing systemic latencies in television reception in connection with games of skill played in connection with live television programming
US8705195B2 (en) 2006-04-12 2014-04-22 Winview, Inc. Synchronized gaming and programming
US9919210B2 (en) 2005-10-03 2018-03-20 Winview, Inc. Synchronized gaming and programming
JP3995257B2 (en) * 2005-10-04 2007-10-24 任天堂株式会社 Communication game program and communication game system
US20070087829A1 (en) * 2005-10-14 2007-04-19 Derek Liu Multi-player game architecture
US9056251B2 (en) 2006-01-10 2015-06-16 Winview, Inc. Method of and system for conducting multiple contests of skill with a single performance
US8002618B1 (en) 2006-01-10 2011-08-23 Winview, Inc. Method of and system for conducting multiple contests of skill with a single performance
US10556183B2 (en) 2006-01-10 2020-02-11 Winview, Inc. Method of and system for conducting multiple contest of skill with a single performance
US20070184903A1 (en) * 2006-02-08 2007-08-09 Derek Liu Network-based game system capable of serving massive number of game players
US7695370B2 (en) * 2006-02-08 2010-04-13 Gaia Interactive Inc. Massively scalable multi-player game system
US11082746B2 (en) * 2006-04-12 2021-08-03 Winview, Inc. Synchronized gaming and programming
US20080076573A1 (en) * 2006-09-08 2008-03-27 John Loehrer Network-based game system
US20080070688A1 (en) * 2006-09-20 2008-03-20 John Loehrer Real-time gaming system having scalable database
US8135018B1 (en) 2007-03-29 2012-03-13 Qurio Holdings, Inc. Message propagation in a distributed virtual world
US8116323B1 (en) 2007-04-12 2012-02-14 Qurio Holdings, Inc. Methods for providing peer negotiation in a distributed virtual environment and related systems and computer program products
US20080275769A1 (en) * 2007-05-04 2008-11-06 Shao Billy Jye-En Network-based interactive entertainment center
US8000328B1 (en) 2007-05-22 2011-08-16 Qurio Holdings, Inc. Filtering messages in a distributed virtual world based on virtual space properties
US7814154B1 (en) 2007-06-26 2010-10-12 Qurio Holdings, Inc. Message transformations in a distributed virtual world
US8825743B2 (en) * 2007-07-12 2014-09-02 Cornell University Semantic transactions in online applications
US8813112B1 (en) 2007-10-23 2014-08-19 Winview, Inc. Method of and apparatus for utilizing SMS while running an application on a mobile device controlling a viewer's participation with a broadcast
US9168457B2 (en) 2010-09-14 2015-10-27 Sony Computer Entertainment America Llc System and method for retaining system state
JP5258020B2 (en) * 2008-01-25 2013-08-07 インターナショナル・ビジネス・マシーンズ・コーポレーション Technology to control communication
EP2141689A1 (en) * 2008-07-04 2010-01-06 Koninklijke KPN N.V. Generating a stream comprising interactive content
TW201002405A (en) * 2008-07-15 2010-01-16 Jian-Yu Wang Chess game system and its processing method
US8678929B1 (en) * 2008-08-01 2014-03-25 Electronics Arts Inc. Client-side prediction of a local game object to reduce apparent network lag of multiplayer simulations
US8260873B1 (en) 2008-10-22 2012-09-04 Qurio Holdings, Inc. Method and system for grouping user devices based on dual proximity
US9716918B1 (en) 2008-11-10 2017-07-25 Winview, Inc. Interactive advertising system
US8357045B2 (en) * 2008-12-15 2013-01-22 Tetris Online, Inc. Interactive asynchronous computer game infrastructure
US8496531B2 (en) * 2008-12-15 2013-07-30 Tetris Online, Inc. Interactive hybrid asynchronous computer game infrastructure with dynamic difficulty adjustment
US9586139B2 (en) * 2009-03-03 2017-03-07 Mobilitie, Llc System and method for game play in a dynamic communication network
JP4718622B2 (en) * 2009-03-24 2011-07-06 株式会社スクウェア・エニックス GAME DEVICE, GAME PROGRESSING METHOD, GAME PROGRAM, AND RECORDING MEDIUM
US8721443B2 (en) * 2009-05-11 2014-05-13 Disney Enterprises, Inc. System and method for interaction in a virtual environment
US8222037B2 (en) * 2009-05-12 2012-07-17 Performance Designed Products Llc System and method for a local gamer network
US8747209B2 (en) * 2009-11-13 2014-06-10 Bonobo Plc Multi-draw game system
WO2011149564A1 (en) 2010-05-28 2011-12-01 Tetris Online, Inc. Interactive hybrid asynchronous computer game infrastructure
US8696461B2 (en) * 2011-06-01 2014-04-15 Microsoft Corporation Automated sensor driven match-making
US9886552B2 (en) 2011-08-12 2018-02-06 Help Lighting, Inc. System and method for image registration of multiple video streams
US20140024459A1 (en) * 2012-07-23 2014-01-23 Social Graph Studios Inc. Providing a real-time multiplayer gaming platform over a wide area network using clock-based timing methodology
US9674267B2 (en) 2013-01-29 2017-06-06 Sony Interactive Entertainment America, LLC Methods and apparatus for hiding latency in network multiplayer games
US9056252B2 (en) * 2013-03-13 2015-06-16 Sugarcane Development, Inc. Highly interactive online multiplayer video games
US9436483B2 (en) 2013-04-24 2016-09-06 Disney Enterprises, Inc. Enhanced system and method for dynamically connecting virtual space entities
US8998726B1 (en) 2013-04-30 2015-04-07 Kabam, Inc. System and method for associating a user to a shard based on third party latency
US9364754B1 (en) * 2013-05-16 2016-06-14 Kabam, Inc. System and method for facilitating communication between affiliated players in an online game via communication mediums external to the online game
US9445949B1 (en) 2013-05-31 2016-09-20 Kabam, Inc. System and method for processing commands in an online game
US9616330B1 (en) 2013-05-31 2017-04-11 Kabam, Inc. System and method for updating a game state in an online game
US9940750B2 (en) 2013-06-27 2018-04-10 Help Lighting, Inc. System and method for role negotiation in multi-reality environments
US10027731B2 (en) 2013-10-25 2018-07-17 Louis Gurtowski Selective capture with rapid sharing of user computer or mixed reality actions, states using interactive virtual streaming
US11165842B2 (en) 2013-10-25 2021-11-02 Louis Gurtowski Selective capture with rapid sharing of user or mixed reality actions and states using interactive virtual streaming
JP5602963B1 (en) * 2014-01-30 2014-10-08 グリー株式会社 GAME MANAGEMENT PROGRAM, GAME MANAGEMENT METHOD, AND GAME MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
JP5815901B2 (en) * 2015-03-19 2015-11-17 グリー株式会社 Game management method and game management system
US11551529B2 (en) 2016-07-20 2023-01-10 Winview, Inc. Method of generating separate contests of skill or chance from two independent events
US10924525B2 (en) 2018-10-01 2021-02-16 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Inducing higher input latency in multiplayer programs
US11308765B2 (en) 2018-10-08 2022-04-19 Winview, Inc. Method and systems for reducing risk in setting odds for single fixed in-play propositions utilizing real time input

Family Cites Families (82)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US359510A (en) * 1887-03-15 Peeley l
US4521014A (en) 1982-09-30 1985-06-04 Sitrick David H Video game including user visual image
US4572509A (en) 1982-09-30 1986-02-25 Sitrick David H Video game network
US4570930A (en) 1983-10-03 1986-02-18 At&T Bell Laboratories System, method, and station interface arrangement for playing video game over telephone lines
CA1245361A (en) 1984-06-27 1988-11-22 Kerry E. Thacher Tournament data system
US4738451A (en) 1986-05-20 1988-04-19 Atari Games Corporation Multi-player, multi-character cooperative play video game with independent player entry and departure
US5359510A (en) 1990-11-28 1994-10-25 Sabaliauskas Anthony L Automated universal tournament management system
JP2723367B2 (en) 1991-01-28 1998-03-09 三菱電機株式会社 Communication network equipment
US5350176A (en) 1991-05-31 1994-09-27 Peter Hochstein Video game
US5538255A (en) 1992-02-18 1996-07-23 Barker; Bruce J. Remote controlled multiplayer video game
US5405151A (en) 1992-11-20 1995-04-11 Sega Of America, Inc. Multi-player video game with cooperative mode and competition mode
DE4402419A1 (en) 1994-01-27 1995-08-03 Peter Eiba Process and system for the automatic handling of tournaments
WO1995031061A1 (en) 1994-05-05 1995-11-16 Catapult Entertainment, Inc. Network architecture for real-time video games
US5593349A (en) 1994-09-09 1997-01-14 Valley Recreation Products Inc. Automated league and tournament system for electronic games
WO1996014908A1 (en) 1994-11-14 1996-05-23 Catapult Entertainment, Inc. Method and apparatus for synchronizing the execution of multiple video game systems in a networked environment
US5685776A (en) 1994-11-23 1997-11-11 Tiger Electronics, Inc. Hand-held electronic game devices
US6200216B1 (en) 1995-03-06 2001-03-13 Tyler Peppel Electronic trading card
US5674127A (en) 1995-03-07 1997-10-07 Habilas, Inc. Multisite multiplayer interactive electronic entertainment system having a partially player defined universe
KR100276598B1 (en) 1995-05-19 2000-12-15 이리마지리 쇼우이치로 Picture processing device, picture processing method, game device using same
US5560603A (en) 1995-06-07 1996-10-01 Atlantic City Coin & Slot Service Company, Inc. Combined slot machine and racing game
US5779549A (en) 1996-04-22 1998-07-14 Walker Assest Management Limited Parnership Database driven online distributed tournament system
US6117011A (en) 1995-07-27 2000-09-12 Lvov; Denis Ernestovich Electronic game system, method of managing and regulating said system
JP2765814B2 (en) 1995-11-24 1998-06-18 コナミ株式会社 Video game device and play character growth control method for video game
US5823879A (en) 1996-01-19 1998-10-20 Sheldon F. Goldberg Network gaming system
US5695400A (en) 1996-01-30 1997-12-09 Boxer Jam Productions Method of managing multi-player game playing over a network
US5822523A (en) 1996-02-01 1998-10-13 Mpath Interactive, Inc. Server-group messaging system for interactive applications
US5820463A (en) 1996-02-06 1998-10-13 Bell Atlantic Network Services, Inc. Method and apparatus for multi-player gaming over a network
WO1997035258A1 (en) 1996-03-21 1997-09-25 Mpath Interactive, Inc. Network match maker for selecting clients based on attributes of servers and communication links
US5846132A (en) 1996-04-10 1998-12-08 William W. Junkin Trust Interactive system allowing simulated or real time participation in a league
US6134590A (en) 1996-04-16 2000-10-17 Webtv Networks, Inc. Method and apparatus for automatically connecting devices to a local network
US6048271A (en) 1996-05-07 2000-04-11 Barcelou; David M. Automated league and tournament device
US5810666A (en) 1996-05-08 1998-09-22 Mero; George T. Role playing game
US6009458A (en) 1996-05-09 1999-12-28 3Do Company Networked computer game system with persistent playing objects
US5838909A (en) 1996-05-23 1998-11-17 Sandcastle, Inc. Reducing latency when synchronizing access to a multi-user database over a network
US6025801A (en) 1996-10-01 2000-02-15 Philips Electronics North America Corporation Video game with local updates mitigates latency effects in wide area network
NL1004648C2 (en) 1996-11-11 1998-05-14 Johan Michiel Schaaij Computer game system.
US6042477A (en) 1996-12-12 2000-03-28 Addink; Dale H. Method of and system for minimizing the effects of time latency in multiplayer electronic games played on interconnected computers
US5974442A (en) 1996-12-31 1999-10-26 Intel Corporation Communication technique for interactive applications over a network with delays
US5984786A (en) 1997-01-03 1999-11-16 2 Am Inc. Run-time environment for simulations and games
US6080063A (en) * 1997-01-06 2000-06-27 Khosla; Vinod Simulated real time game play with live event
US5899810A (en) 1997-01-24 1999-05-04 Kaon Interactive Corporation Distributed game architecture to overcome system latency
US6152824A (en) 1997-03-06 2000-11-28 Mpath Interactive, Inc. Online gaming architecture
US6135881A (en) 1997-03-31 2000-10-24 Inventure, Inc. Sports forecasting game
US6012984A (en) 1997-04-11 2000-01-11 Gamesville.Com,Inc. Systems for providing large arena games over computer networks
GB9708061D0 (en) 1997-04-22 1997-06-11 Two Way Tv Ltd Interactive, predictive game control system
US6038599A (en) 1997-04-23 2000-03-14 Mpath Interactive, Inc. Latency server and matchmaker
US6106399A (en) 1997-06-16 2000-08-22 Vr-1, Inc. Internet audio multi-user roleplaying game
JPH1133230A (en) 1997-07-16 1999-02-09 Sega Enterp Ltd Communication game system
JPH1157215A (en) 1997-08-20 1999-03-02 Fuji Xerox Co Ltd Network game system, network game server device, network game client device, medium storing opponent selection program, and medium storing opponent information acquisition program
US6006254A (en) 1997-08-29 1999-12-21 Mitsubishi Electric Information Technology Center America, Inc. System for the reliable, fast, low-latency communication of object state updates over a computer network by combining lossy and lossless communications
KR100300973B1 (en) 1997-12-09 2001-09-03 윤종용 Method for processing messages in multilateral participating game program
US6196920B1 (en) 1998-03-31 2001-03-06 Masque Publishing, Inc. On-line game playing with advertising
US6012096A (en) 1998-04-23 2000-01-04 Microsoft Corporation Method and system for peer-to-peer network latency measurement
US6306036B1 (en) 1998-05-18 2001-10-23 Vis Interactive Computer game with replaceable character heads
US6463078B1 (en) 1998-07-22 2002-10-08 Microsoft Corporation Method for switching protocols transparently in multi-user applications
US6241612B1 (en) 1998-11-09 2001-06-05 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Voice communication during a multi-player game
JP2000167244A (en) 1998-12-11 2000-06-20 Konami Computer Entertainment Osaka:Kk Video game device, control method for joining invitation processing to pseudo team to video character and readable recording medium recording control program of joining invitation processing to pseudo team to video character
US6508711B1 (en) 1999-01-29 2003-01-21 Namco Ltd. Game machine having a main unit exchanging data with a portable slave machine
US6036601A (en) 1999-02-24 2000-03-14 Adaboy, Inc. Method for advertising over a computer network utilizing virtual environments of games
US20020026321A1 (en) * 1999-02-26 2002-02-28 Sadeg M. Faris Internet-based system and method for fairly and securely enabling timed-constrained competition using globally time-sychronized client subsystems and information servers having microsecond client-event resolution
US6473875B1 (en) * 1999-03-03 2002-10-29 Intel Corporation Error correction for network delivery of video streams using packet resequencing
US6352479B1 (en) 1999-08-31 2002-03-05 Nvidia U.S. Investment Company Interactive gaming server and online community forum
US6527641B1 (en) 1999-09-24 2003-03-04 Nokia Corporation System for profiling mobile station activity in a predictive command wireless game system
US6415317B1 (en) 1999-10-01 2002-07-02 Joshua Michael Yelon Software system for reducing the appearance of latency in a multi-user environment
US6755743B1 (en) 1999-12-08 2004-06-29 Kabushiki Kaisha Sega Enterprises Communication game system and processing method thereof
US6628287B1 (en) 2000-01-12 2003-09-30 There, Inc. Method and apparatus for consistent, responsive, and secure distributed simulation in a computer network environment
IL135554A0 (en) 2000-04-09 2001-05-20 Lea D Corp Ltd Method and system for end-to-end communication through the internet transmission infrastructure
US6845389B1 (en) 2000-05-12 2005-01-18 Nortel Networks Limited System and method for broadband multi-user communication sessions
JP4496619B2 (en) * 2000-07-27 2010-07-07 株式会社デンソー Circuit board connection structure
JP2002045569A (en) 2000-07-31 2002-02-12 Konami Computer Entertainment Osaka:Kk Computer readable recording medium on which game prigress control program is recorded, server and game progress control method
US6895011B1 (en) * 2000-08-15 2005-05-17 Lucent Technologies Inc. Method and apparatus for re-sequencing data packets
JP2002200363A (en) 2000-11-06 2002-07-16 Sony Computer Entertainment Inc Entertainment information generating device, generating method, entertainment terminal equipment, entertainment execution method, entertainment system, and entertainment information generating program
US7244181B2 (en) * 2000-11-14 2007-07-17 Netamin Communication Corp. Multi-player game employing dynamic re-sequencing
US20030177187A1 (en) * 2000-11-27 2003-09-18 Butterfly.Net. Inc. Computing grid for massively multi-player online games and other multi-user immersive persistent-state and session-based applications
JP3506671B2 (en) 2000-12-20 2004-03-15 株式会社インテリジェントシステムズ Communication game system
US6475090B2 (en) 2001-03-29 2002-11-05 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Compensating for network latency in a multi-player game
JP3815278B2 (en) 2001-08-30 2006-08-30 ソニー株式会社 Network game system, network game server device, network game terminal device, information processing method, and information processing program
US7889742B2 (en) * 2001-09-29 2011-02-15 Qualcomm, Incorporated Method and system for improving data throughput
US6653546B2 (en) * 2001-10-03 2003-11-25 Alto Research, Llc Voice-controlled electronic musical instrument
FR2835329A1 (en) 2002-01-30 2003-08-01 Koninkl Philips Electronics Nv PROCESS FOR PROCESSING BINARY FILES OF PROGRAMS
US6653545B2 (en) 2002-03-01 2003-11-25 Ejamming, Inc. Method and apparatus for remote real time collaborative music performance
US7577750B2 (en) 2003-05-23 2009-08-18 Microsoft Corporation Systems and methods for peer-to-peer collaboration to enhance multimedia streaming

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of EP1708796A4 *

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2450087A1 (en) * 2010-10-28 2012-05-09 Konami Digital Entertainment Co., Ltd. Game device, control method for a game device, a program, and a information storage medium
US8414393B2 (en) 2010-10-28 2013-04-09 Konami Digital Entertainment Co., Ltd. Game device, control method for a game device, and a non-transitory information storage medium
US8740704B2 (en) 2010-10-28 2014-06-03 Konami Digital Entertainment Co., Ltd. Game device, control method for a game device, and a non-transitory information storage medium

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2005070012A3 (en) 2006-08-10
US20070270225A1 (en) 2007-11-22
US7244181B2 (en) 2007-07-17
US20040152519A1 (en) 2004-08-05
KR20060135764A (en) 2006-12-29
EP1708796A4 (en) 2008-03-12
EP1708796A2 (en) 2006-10-11
JP2007518542A (en) 2007-07-12

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7244181B2 (en) Multi-player game employing dynamic re-sequencing
US11167217B2 (en) Video game system with spectator mode hud
JP7184913B2 (en) Creating Winner Tournaments with Fandom Influence
US10004989B2 (en) Methods and apparatus for hiding latency in network multiplayer games
Claypool et al. Latency can kill: precision and deadline in online games
US8636589B2 (en) Systems and methods that enable a spectator's experience for online active games
US20080125226A1 (en) Online Gaming
US20070265043A1 (en) Team-based networked video gaming and automatic event management
KR20140103033A (en) Augmented reality for live events
US20120034981A1 (en) Game system, game system control method and storage medium
JP2013244404A (en) Method for advancing mobile baseball game with changeable game mode
US20020107059A1 (en) Method of proceeding with a game while incorporating other elements into the actual game
JP6405479B1 (en) GAME SYSTEM, GAME TERMINAL, AND PROGRAM
KR20110105195A (en) On-line game data processing method on the basis of udp
KR101494150B1 (en) Method and system for determining winner in on-line game
JP2024000924A (en) Programs and information processing equipment
JP2019141563A (en) Game system, game device, and program

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BW BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EC EE EG ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NA NI NO NZ OM PG PH PL PT RO RU SC SD SE SG SK SL SY TJ TM TN TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VC VN YU ZA ZM ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): BW GH GM KE LS MW MZ NA SD SL SZ TZ UG ZM ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LT LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2005711964

Country of ref document: EP

Ref document number: 2006551393

Country of ref document: JP

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

WWW Wipo information: withdrawn in national office

Ref document number: DE

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 1020067016726

Country of ref document: KR

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 2005711964

Country of ref document: EP

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 1020067016726

Country of ref document: KR