WO2005079305A2 - Method for in-furnace regulation of so3 in catalytic systems - Google Patents

Method for in-furnace regulation of so3 in catalytic systems Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2005079305A2
WO2005079305A2 PCT/US2005/004416 US2005004416W WO2005079305A2 WO 2005079305 A2 WO2005079305 A2 WO 2005079305A2 US 2005004416 W US2005004416 W US 2005004416W WO 2005079305 A2 WO2005079305 A2 WO 2005079305A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
staging
fuel
stage
combustion
scr
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2005/004416
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
WO2005079305A3 (en
Inventor
Brian S. Higgins
Original Assignee
Higgins Brian S
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Higgins Brian S filed Critical Higgins Brian S
Publication of WO2005079305A2 publication Critical patent/WO2005079305A2/en
Publication of WO2005079305A3 publication Critical patent/WO2005079305A3/en

Links

Classifications

    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F23COMBUSTION APPARATUS; COMBUSTION PROCESSES
    • F23JREMOVAL OR TREATMENT OF COMBUSTION PRODUCTS OR COMBUSTION RESIDUES; FLUES 
    • F23J15/00Arrangements of devices for treating smoke or fumes
    • F23J15/02Arrangements of devices for treating smoke or fumes of purifiers, e.g. for removing noxious material
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F23COMBUSTION APPARATUS; COMBUSTION PROCESSES
    • F23CMETHODS OR APPARATUS FOR COMBUSTION USING FLUID FUEL OR SOLID FUEL SUSPENDED IN  A CARRIER GAS OR AIR 
    • F23C6/00Combustion apparatus characterised by the combination of two or more combustion chambers or combustion zones, e.g. for staged combustion
    • F23C6/04Combustion apparatus characterised by the combination of two or more combustion chambers or combustion zones, e.g. for staged combustion in series connection
    • F23C6/045Combustion apparatus characterised by the combination of two or more combustion chambers or combustion zones, e.g. for staged combustion in series connection with staged combustion in a single enclosure
    • F23C6/047Combustion apparatus characterised by the combination of two or more combustion chambers or combustion zones, e.g. for staged combustion in series connection with staged combustion in a single enclosure with fuel supply in stages
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2258/00Sources of waste gases
    • B01D2258/02Other waste gases
    • B01D2258/0283Flue gases
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D53/00Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
    • B01D53/34Chemical or biological purification of waste gases
    • B01D53/74General processes for purification of waste gases; Apparatus or devices specially adapted therefor
    • B01D53/86Catalytic processes
    • B01D53/8621Removing nitrogen compounds
    • B01D53/8625Nitrogen oxides
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F23COMBUSTION APPARATUS; COMBUSTION PROCESSES
    • F23JREMOVAL OR TREATMENT OF COMBUSTION PRODUCTS OR COMBUSTION RESIDUES; FLUES 
    • F23J2215/00Preventing emissions
    • F23J2215/20Sulfur; Compounds thereof
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F23COMBUSTION APPARATUS; COMBUSTION PROCESSES
    • F23JREMOVAL OR TREATMENT OF COMBUSTION PRODUCTS OR COMBUSTION RESIDUES; FLUES 
    • F23J2219/00Treatment devices
    • F23J2219/10Catalytic reduction devices

Definitions

  • the present invention relates generally to a method for reducing byproducts emissions from combustion reactions, and, more particularly, to a method for regulating flue gas SO 3 in combustion furnaces with catalysts.
  • the flue gas of power generation plants has long been recognized as a source of atmospheric pollution.
  • acids such as SO 3 , NOx, HCl, HF, and the like.
  • SO 3 can become a problem if their concentrations exceed certain thresholds. For example, as the SO 3 concentration increases, the acid dewpoint temperature of the flue gas increases. If the temperature of the flue gas is less than the acid dewpoint temperature of the flue gas, the SO 3 in the gas will condense and react with water to form H SO , causing corrosion problems inside the furnace.
  • the particulate matter carried in the flue gas can be removed by electrostatic precipitators that cause the individual particles to accept an electrical charge and then use that charge to attract them to collector plates for disposal.
  • electrostatic precipitators that cause the individual particles to accept an electrical charge and then use that charge to attract them to collector plates for disposal.
  • the efficiency of such electrostatic precipitators is dependent upon the ability of the individual particles to take a charge, that is, the resistivity of the particles. It has been found that the presence of SO 3 in the flue gas effectively reduces the resistivity of the particles, making them easier to charge electrostatically.
  • the effectiveness of SO 3 in reducing the resistivity of the particulate matter in the flue gas depends upon the concentration of the SO 3 , with about 15 to 20 parts per million (ppm) giving optimal results. Therefore, precipitator efficiency is affected by the ability to adjust the amount of SO 3 in the flue gas, regardless of the sulfur content of the coal being burned, to provide an overall SO 3 concentration in the optimal range.
  • SO 3 is also produced in SCR (catalyst) installations by the oxidation of SO 2 and often exceeds the optimal 15 to 20 ppm optimal concentrations.
  • the catalyst blends typically used in the SCR to reduce NOx to N 2 (in the presence of ammonia) also oxidize SO 2 to SO 3 .
  • the rate of this reaction is strongly temperature dependent and, at higher temperatures, can convert more than 1 percent of SO 2 to SO 3 .
  • High sulfur U.S. coal generates anywhere from 2,000 to 3,000 ppm of SO 2 in the boiler, and therefore can result in 20 to 30 ppm of SO 3 out of the SCR.
  • the problem is that as much as 50 percent, or 10 to 15 ppm, of the SO 3 coming out of the SCR will make it past the scrubber and out of the stack.
  • SO 3 becomes visible as a blue plume.
  • SO 3 can also be produced catalytically on other boiler surfaces through interaction with elements/chemicals such as Vanadium.
  • any SO 3 formed prior to the SCR adds to the effluent SO , reducing the SO 3 formed prior to the SCR is important for reducing the effluent SO 3 and permits the use of SCR for the reduction of NOx for gases without generating excessive amounts of SO 3 .
  • the precipitator will operate at less than optimal efficiency.
  • the SO 3 concentration is too low, the precipitator will operate at less than optimal efficiency.
  • the SO 3 concentration is too high, the flue gas becomes highly acidic, creating a "blue plume" and contributing to acid rain.
  • acidic flue gases contribute to corrosion of the pipes carrying the flue gas, and, when combined with
  • NH 3 -type chemicals can clog the air heater. Furthermore, an SCR is often only intended to be used for six months per year (during the summer ozone control season), and are bypassed during the winter. This creates seasonal variability in the SO 3 concentrations at the precipitator, in the duct work, and out of the exhaust stack. It is therefore desirable to control the concentrations of SO 3 in the flue gas depending upon whether the SCR is in use or not. SO 3 concentrations approaching 40 ppm produce severe adverse local acid problems that are not necessarily regulated, but create local political problems for the facility. The U.S. EPA has indicated that future regulations on SO 3 emissions are to be expected.
  • Staging Combustion staging is the process of burning a fuel, i.e., coal, in two or more stages.
  • a fuel-rich stage, or simply, rich stage is one in which not enough air is available to fully burn the fuel.
  • a fuel-lean stage is one in which there is sufficient or extra air to fully burn the fuel.
  • Staging is used in the prior art to reduce NOx by a) reducing peak temperatures (thermal NOx) and b) providing a reducing environment (NOx reduction).
  • Macro-staging is the dividing of whole sections of a furnace into rich and lean stages and is accomplished through the use of such techniques as Over-Fired Air (OF A).
  • Micro-staging is the creation of proximal microenvironments with functionally different characteristics, such as reduction potential, temperature, and the like.
  • Micro-staging in a furnace can be achieved, for example, in the first stage of the furnace through the use of Low-NOx burners with adjustment of spin-vane settings and registers. Increased staging increases the residence time in a reducing atmosphere and increases the effect of the reducing atmosphere.
  • LNB Low-NOx burners
  • LNB primarily use micro-staging.
  • the flow through a LNB is designed such that the volatile components of the coal mix with the available near-field air at a stoichiometric ratio near unity (1.0), thus anchoring the flame.
  • the net combustion in the central core near the burners is overall fuel rich and does not produce much thermal NOx, as the temperatures are low.
  • the coal is eventually consumed over the depth of the furnace as more and more air slowly mixes into the central core.
  • the majority of the NOx created in this region is from the fuel- bound nitrogen reacting to NO through the intermediate HCN.
  • the rate at which the outer secondary air mixes into the core flow is set by the dampers and the spin vanes, as well as the spin vane in the coal pipe.
  • LNB systems decrease NOx by staging since there is a continuous mixing of the rich products of combustion and secondary air throughout the combustion zone. Staging is increased by decreasing the mixing rate between the rich core flow and the outer secondary air flow.
  • Macro- staging consists of highly mixed fuel and air in the lower furnace, mixed to a stoichiometric ratio below unity for a large part of the flow. Excess oxygen is ultimately required to assure that all of the fuel has burned and to reduce explosion risks. In a macro-staged furnace, excess air is introduced downstream of the burners. Increased staging is achieved by increasing the residence time, temperature, or reducing quality of the combustion products in the absence of oxygen.
  • LNB micro-staging
  • OFFA macro-staging
  • the present invention is directed to method of controlling SO 3 flue gas concentration in a combustion process utilizing a SCR using a sulfurous fuel.
  • Another aspect of the present invention provides a method of controlling SO 3 flue gas concentration in a combustion process utilizing a SCR using a sulfurous fuel, including the steps of:
  • Still another aspect of the present invention provides a combustion furnace operated with a method for reducing the acidity of the flue gas, the method steps including: a) providing a combustion system with low NOx burners and SCR
  • the present invention is directed to a method for in-furnace decrease and control of the acid dewpoint temperature using combustion staging.
  • the present invention is further directed to a method for in-furnace reduction and control of SO 3 using combustion staging.
  • Increased staging is advantageously used to simultaneously decrease the acidity, decrease the acid dewpoint temperature and reduce the SO 3 levels of the flue gas.
  • R is any reducing radical species.
  • the primary radical in fossil fuel combustion is the H radical.
  • Many radicals and molecules can be functional in a reducing environment; e.g., H, OH, C, CO, CH, CH 2 C 2 H, CH 3 , C n H m , N, NHi, and many others.
  • oxidative chemistry terminates due to greatly decreased (extinguished) concentrations of oxidative combustion species; e.g., OH, O, O 2 , HO 2 , H 2 O 2 , and many others.
  • species are very competitive for any available oxygen species. Molecules with oxygen '.atoms that exist in relatively small concentrations are consumed by oxygen-wanting species that exist in high concentration; e.g., the oxygen in NO is consumed by other species like C, CO, H, and CH. Molecules that have multiple oxygen atoms are particularly at risk; i.e., SO 3 will quickly revert to SO 2 through oxygen abstraction by just about anything around, most notably H atoms.
  • the net effect is that any SO 3 that is formed during combustion is quickly reduced to SO 2 in the first stage and SO 3 is not reformed by oxidation to SO 2 because there is not enough residence time at sufficiently high temperature in the furnace in the latter, fuel-lean stages.
  • the present invention advantageously uses the differences in reaction rates to reduce and maintain the SO 3 levels in the flue gas.
  • Increased staging increases the residence time in a reducing atmosphere, or increases the reducing potential of the atmosphere, to decrease SO 3 concentration and thereby lower the dewpoint temperature. Therefore, to increase the reduction of SO 3 , the residence time can be increased or the reducing potential in the flue gases can be increased. To increase residence time, several methods are available.
  • the distance between stages can be lengthened 2)
  • the mixing can be increased for macro-staging applications 3)
  • the mixing can be decreased for micro-staging applications 4)
  • the mass flow between stages can be reduced (deeper staging) 5)
  • the volumetric utilization between stages can be increased (e.g., swirl) 6)
  • the pressure can be increased 7)
  • the density can be increased To increase the reducing potential in the flue gases, several methods are available. 1)
  • the temperature can be increased 2)
  • the stoichiometric ratio i.e., the air-to-fuel ratio
  • the local fuel flow can be increased (for fixed air flow)
  • the local air flow can be decreased (for fixed fuel flow) Mixing within a stage also influences the reduction process.
  • a perfectly mixed stage with a stoichiometric mixture is the best, since these reaction conditions will give the highest temperature, while still maintaining the reducing environment; i.e., minimizing oxidation radicals like O radicals. But, since perfect mixing is impractical, in practice a stoichiometric ratio less than one is used, which minimizes the occurrence of localities with a stoichiometric ratio greater than one. However, as mixing is reduced, a longer residence time and/or higher temperature is needed to achieve a similar reduction of the total acidity, acid dewpoint temperature, and/or SO 3 concentration. However, the temperature of the combustion gases is dependent to a certain extent on the level of mixing, going down if mixing is decreased.
  • temperature must be increased by other means, such as preheating air, changing heat transfer characteristics of furnace, and the like.
  • the residence time in the reducing environment can be increased by delaying lean stage air introduction, such as OFA injection.
  • SO 3 is formed by the oxidation of SO 2 in a catalyst because a catalyst enables the oxidation of SO 2 though the following reaction:
  • any SO 3 that is reduced by the present invention independently reduces the exit S0 3 and is not affected by and does not affect SO 3 production in a catalyst.
  • the present invention thus provides a method for controlling and reducing flue gas acidity, specifically the flue gas concentrations of SO 3 , in order to beneficially (1) affect the efficiency of an electrostatic precipitator, and more particularly, (2) to reduce the concentration of SO 3 and other reducible acids in the flue gas in order to reduce the flue gas acidity and acid dewpoint, thereby reducing air heater pluggage, duct corrosion, and SO 3 emissions to the environment, which can be a source of visible plumes and localized acid rain.
  • macro-staging to regulate furnace acidity and SO 3 levels is achieved through the use of OFA.
  • micro-staging to regulate furnace acidity and SO 3 levels is achieved through the use of low-NOx burners.
  • macro-staging and micro- staging through the use of OFA and low-NOx burners in combination are used to regulate furnace acidity and SO 3 levels.
  • the acidity is preferably regulated to reduce total flue gas acidity.
  • the SO 3 is preferably regulated such that the SO 3 levels going to the ESP enhance or favor precipitation.
  • SO 3 levels between about 10 to about 15 ppm (by volume) in the exhaust is desirable for best ESP efficiency.
  • the dewpoint temperature is a convenient parameter for estimating and/or adjusting the reducing environment variables in order to achieve adequate reduction of acidity and/or desired SO 3 levels.
  • the dewpoint can be determined and the reducing environment variable adjusted accordingly to achieve the desired dewpoint.
  • Other methods of determining acidity and/or SO 3 level can be used for the same purpose without departing from the scope of the invention.
  • a power plant is operated to provide a deeply-staged, micro-stage or macro-stage reducing environment in the lower furnace.
  • the OFA in the upper furnace provides the necessary oxygen to ensure an acceptable level of burnout of the remaining unburned fuel, combustion intermediates, and CO.
  • an SCR can be used to reduce NOx.
  • an embodiment of the present invention includes a combustion furnace with OFA and low NOx burners for use with sulfur containing fuels to lower the dewpoint temperature and to reduce the SO 3 concentration.
  • an SCR can be provided to reduce NOx.
  • the low NOx burners are preferably of a grade that provides adequate mixing in the primary stage to provide adequate acid dewpoint temperature reducing and SO 3 concentration reduction, thus permitting the use of an SCR, if necessary.
  • an embodiment of the present invention includes a combustion furnace with high-grade low NOx burners for the purpose of reducing the flue gas acidity, lowering the acid dewpoint temperature and reducing the flue gas SO 3 concentration. This embodiment can further include an SCR.
  • An adequate reducing environment according to the present invention is one that will reduce SO3 to SO2 in less than about 2 seconds, more preferably, in less than about 0.5 seconds.
  • such a reducing environment can be achieved when the first stage flue gas temperature is greater than or equal to 900 Kelvin (1160 degrees F), more preferably greater than about 1255 K (1800 degrees F), even more preferably greater than about 1650 K (2500 degrees F).
  • a reducing environment is one where the ratio of the concentrations of reducing radicals to oxidizing radicals is greater than about 1; more specifically, the ratio of the concentrations of H radicals to O radicals is greater than about 1.
  • a better reducing environment is one where the ratio of the concentrations of reducing radicals to oxidizing radicals is greater than about 10; more specifically, the ratio of the concentrations of H radicals to O radicals is greater than about 10.
  • a method of controlling SO 3 flue gas concentration in a combustion process utilizing a SCR using a sulfurous fuel includes the steps of:
  • An alternative method according to the present invention of controlling SO 3 flue gas concentration in a combustion process utilizing a SCR using a sulfurous fuel includes the steps of:
  • a combustion furnace is operated with a method of controlling SO 3 flue gas concentration in a combustion process utilizing a SCR using a sulfurous fuel, comprising the steps of::
  • micro-staging and/or macro-staging can include the step of micro-staging and/or macro-staging the first stage fuel combustion and or macro.
  • the micro-staging can be provided through the use of low-NOx burners and the macro-staging through the use of over-fired air.
  • the fuel can be any fuel, especially carbonaceous fuels such as coal.
  • the reducing environment can be adjusted by any of the means herein described, including adjusting the first stage residence time.

Abstract

A method of controlling SO3 flue gas concentration in a combustion process utilizing a SCR using a sulfurous fuel, the method steps including: providing a combustion system with low NOx burners and SCR; partially combusting the fuel in a first stage to create a reducing environment; maintaining the reducing environment for a sufficient time period such that SO3 is reduced to SO2 to achieve a desirable level of SO3; combusting the remainder of the fuel and combustion intermediates in a second stage with oxidizing environment; reducing the remaining NOx with the SCR; thereby reducing emissions NOx.

Description

METHOD FOR EN-FURNACE REGULATION OF SO IN CATALYTIC SYSTEMS
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
This nonprovisional utility patent application claims the benefit of a prior filed provisional application: 60/544,724 filed February 14, 2004, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Background of the Invention
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to a method for reducing byproducts emissions from combustion reactions, and, more particularly, to a method for regulating flue gas SO3 in combustion furnaces with catalysts.
2. Description of the Prior Art
Acidity decrease
The flue gas of power generation plants has long been recognized as a source of atmospheric pollution. In the combustion of fossil fuels, some of the naturally present elements are oxidized to form acids, such as SO3, NOx, HCl, HF, and the like. These acids, especially SO3, can become a problem if their concentrations exceed certain thresholds. For example, as the SO3 concentration increases, the acid dewpoint temperature of the flue gas increases. If the temperature of the flue gas is less than the acid dewpoint temperature of the flue gas, the SO3 in the gas will condense and react with water to form H SO , causing corrosion problems inside the furnace. Also, flue gases exiting a furnace cool immediately and SO3 and other acids in the gas condense, creating localized acid rain, which is the condensation and precipitation of SO3 and other acids onto the surrounding land with subsequent corrosion. Excessive SO3 will condense into small droplets, creating a visible plume as it exits the furnace, which becomes an esthetic and local political problem. If NH3- like compounds are present in the flue gas, they can react with SO3 to form ammonium bisulfate (NH3HSO4) which then fouls the air heater. Thus, a need exists to decrease the acid dewpoint temperature of the flue gases such that the acid dewpoint temperature is lower than the flue-gas temperature in the coolest parts of the furnace, such as the ducts and stack. A further need exists to lower the acid content of the flue gases such that the localized acid rain and other problems associated with high-acid flue gas are minimized. SO3 increase
The particulate matter carried in the flue gas can be removed by electrostatic precipitators that cause the individual particles to accept an electrical charge and then use that charge to attract them to collector plates for disposal. The efficiency of such electrostatic precipitators is dependent upon the ability of the individual particles to take a charge, that is, the resistivity of the particles. It has been found that the presence of SO3 in the flue gas effectively reduces the resistivity of the particles, making them easier to charge electrostatically.
In the combustion of coal, some of the naturally present sulfur is converted to SO3.
On the other hand, the effectiveness of SO3 in reducing the resistivity of the particulate matter in the flue gas depends upon the concentration of the SO3, with about 15 to 20 parts per million (ppm) giving optimal results. Therefore, precipitator efficiency is affected by the ability to adjust the amount of SO3 in the flue gas, regardless of the sulfur content of the coal being burned, to provide an overall SO3 concentration in the optimal range. SO3 is also produced in SCR (catalyst) installations by the oxidation of SO2 and often exceeds the optimal 15 to 20 ppm optimal concentrations. The catalyst blends typically used in the SCR to reduce NOx to N2 (in the presence of ammonia) also oxidize SO2 to SO3. The rate of this reaction is strongly temperature dependent and, at higher temperatures, can convert more than 1 percent of SO2 to SO3. High sulfur U.S. coal generates anywhere from 2,000 to 3,000 ppm of SO2 in the boiler, and therefore can result in 20 to 30 ppm of SO3 out of the SCR. The problem is that as much as 50 percent, or 10 to 15 ppm, of the SO3 coming out of the SCR will make it past the scrubber and out of the stack. At about 8 to 10 ppm, depending upon the particulate concentration, SO3 becomes visible as a blue plume. Furthermore, SO3 can also be produced catalytically on other boiler surfaces through interaction with elements/chemicals such as Vanadium.
Therefore, because any SO3 formed prior to the SCR adds to the effluent SO , reducing the SO3 formed prior to the SCR is important for reducing the effluent SO3 and permits the use of SCR for the reduction of NOx for gases without generating excessive amounts of SO3.
SO3 control
If the SO3 concentration is too low, the precipitator will operate at less than optimal efficiency. On the other hand, if the SO3 concentration is too high, the flue gas becomes highly acidic, creating a "blue plume" and contributing to acid rain. In addition, acidic flue gases contribute to corrosion of the pipes carrying the flue gas, and, when combined with
NH3-type chemicals, can clog the air heater. Furthermore, an SCR is often only intended to be used for six months per year (during the summer ozone control season), and are bypassed during the winter. This creates seasonal variability in the SO3 concentrations at the precipitator, in the duct work, and out of the exhaust stack. It is therefore desirable to control the concentrations of SO3 in the flue gas depending upon whether the SCR is in use or not. SO3 concentrations approaching 40 ppm produce severe adverse local acid problems that are not necessarily regulated, but create local political problems for the facility. The U.S. EPA has indicated that future regulations on SO3 emissions are to be expected. It is desirable, therefore, to have an SO3 flue gas system that is capable of adjusting the concentrations of SO3 in a flue gas with or without an SCR installed to maintain the SO3 concentration at an optimal level for increased ESP performance, without increased localized SO3 emissions.
Staging Combustion staging is the process of burning a fuel, i.e., coal, in two or more stages.
A fuel-rich stage, or simply, rich stage, is one in which not enough air is available to fully burn the fuel. A fuel-lean stage is one in which there is sufficient or extra air to fully burn the fuel. Staging is used in the prior art to reduce NOx by a) reducing peak temperatures (thermal NOx) and b) providing a reducing environment (NOx reduction). Macro-staging is the dividing of whole sections of a furnace into rich and lean stages and is accomplished through the use of such techniques as Over-Fired Air (OF A). Micro-staging is the creation of proximal microenvironments with functionally different characteristics, such as reduction potential, temperature, and the like. Micro-staging in a furnace can be achieved, for example, in the first stage of the furnace through the use of Low-NOx burners with adjustment of spin-vane settings and registers. Increased staging increases the residence time in a reducing atmosphere and increases the effect of the reducing atmosphere.
Prior art has used micro-staging to reduce NOx emissions in combustion furnaces. Low-NOx burners (LNB) stage by delivering high-fuel-content primary air into the furnace that mixes with secondary air flowing through one or more secondary air registers. LNB primarily use micro-staging. The flow through a LNB is designed such that the volatile components of the coal mix with the available near-field air at a stoichiometric ratio near unity (1.0), thus anchoring the flame. The net combustion in the central core near the burners is overall fuel rich and does not produce much thermal NOx, as the temperatures are low. The coal is eventually consumed over the depth of the furnace as more and more air slowly mixes into the central core. The majority of the NOx created in this region is from the fuel- bound nitrogen reacting to NO through the intermediate HCN. The rate at which the outer secondary air mixes into the core flow is set by the dampers and the spin vanes, as well as the spin vane in the coal pipe. LNB systems decrease NOx by staging since there is a continuous mixing of the rich products of combustion and secondary air throughout the combustion zone. Staging is increased by decreasing the mixing rate between the rich core flow and the outer secondary air flow.
Prior art has used macro-staging to reduce emissions in combustion furnaces. Macro- staging consists of highly mixed fuel and air in the lower furnace, mixed to a stoichiometric ratio below unity for a large part of the flow. Excess oxygen is ultimately required to assure that all of the fuel has burned and to reduce explosion risks. In a macro-staged furnace, excess air is introduced downstream of the burners. Increased staging is achieved by increasing the residence time, temperature, or reducing quality of the combustion products in the absence of oxygen.
Prior art used both micro-staging (LNB) and macro-staging (OFA) to reduce NOx emissions in combustion furnaces. In the case of both micro-staging and macro-staging, components of each of the above are used and adjusted to achieve NOx emissions reduction.
Staging has nowhere been taught in the prior art for flue gas acidity reduction, acid dewpoint temperature control or SO concentration control in combustion gases.
Summary of the Invention
The present invention is directed to method of controlling SO3 flue gas concentration in a combustion process utilizing a SCR using a sulfurous fuel.
It is therefore an aspect of the present invention to provide a method of controlling SO3 flue gas concentration in a combustion process utilizing a SCR using a sulfurous fuel, including the steps of:
a) providing a combustion system with low NOx burners and SCR
b) partially combusting the fuel in a first stage to create a reducing environment;
c) maintaining the reducing environment for a sufficient time period such that SO3 is reduced to SO2 to achieve a desirable level of SO3;
d) combusting the remainder of the fuel and combustion intermediates in a second stage with oxidizing environment;
e) reducing the remaining NOx with the SCR;
thereby reducing emissions NOx. Another aspect of the present invention provides a method of controlling SO3 flue gas concentration in a combustion process utilizing a SCR using a sulfurous fuel, including the steps of:
a) providing a combustion furnace with low NOx burners and SCR
b) partially combusting the fuel in a first stage to create a reducing environment;
c) combusting the remainder of the fuel and combustion intermediates in a second stage with oxidizing environment;
d) measuring the acid dewpoint of the flue gas;
e) adjusting the reducing environment in the first stage such that the flue gas acid dewpoint is lowered to a desirable level;
thereby controlling the SO3 concentration of the flue gas.
Still another aspect of the present invention provides a combustion furnace operated with a method for reducing the acidity of the flue gas, the method steps including: a) providing a combustion system with low NOx burners and SCR
b) partially combusting the fuel in a first stage to create a reducing environment;
c) maintaining the reducing environment for a sufficient time period such that SO3 is reduced to SO2 to achieve a desirable level of SO3;
d) combusting the remainder of the fuel and combustion intermediates in a second stage with oxidizing environment;
e) reducing the remaining NOx with the SCR;
thereby reducing emissions NOx. These and other aspects of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art after a reading of the following description of preferred embodiment(s) when considered with the drawings. Detailed Description of the Invention In the following description, like reference characters designate like or corresponding parts throughout the several views. Also in the following description, it is to be understood that such terms as "forward," "rearward," "front," "back," "right," "left," "upwardly," "downwardly," and the like are words of convenience and are not to be construed as limiting terms. In the present invention, "reducible acid" refers to acids in which the acidity can be reduced or eliminated by the electrochemical reduction of the acid.
The present invention is directed to a method for in-furnace decrease and control of the acid dewpoint temperature using combustion staging. The present invention is further directed to a method for in-furnace reduction and control of SO3 using combustion staging.
Increased staging is advantageously used to simultaneously decrease the acidity, decrease the acid dewpoint temperature and reduce the SO3 levels of the flue gas.
Acidity, acid dewpoint temperature and SO3 reduction through micro-staging
Similar to how NOx is reduced back to N2 in a rich "reducing" environment, SO3 is reduced back to SO2 in a reducing environment. With macro-staging, the center of the furnace below the OFA ports is largely fuel-rich. This staged environment can be adjusted to be even less mixed to create reducing micro-stages within the first stage of the furnace. The mixing can be reduced by reducing the spin vane velocity settings of the primary air and coal flow, or additionally or otherwise, the secondary air spin vane and register settings, thus creating reducing micro-stages, or additionally or otherwise, the relative exit velocities between the primary air and coal flow and the secondary air flow can be changed.
While the majority of fuel-bound sulfur forms SO2, some forms SO3 directly during combustion of the fuel-bound sulfur. SO2 can react to form more SO3 through the following oxidative reaction:
SO2 + O (+M) → SO3 (+M)
However, this three-body reaction is very slow. An additional source for SO3 production in an oxidative environment is through the reaction:
502 + O2 → SO3 + O This reaction does not require three bodies to simultaneously collide; however, it is very sensitive to temperature, requiring high temperatures, and it is susceptible to reverse reaction:
503 + O → SO2 + O2
None of the above three reactions occur in any significant quantity in a reducing environment due to the lack of O and O2 species. In a reducing environment, the direct conversion of SO3 to SO2 takes place through the following general "reducing" reaction:
SO3 + R → SO2 + RO
Where R is any reducing radical species. The primary radical in fossil fuel combustion is the H radical. SO3 + H → SO2 + OH Many radicals and molecules can be functional in a reducing environment; e.g., H, OH, C, CO, CH, CH2 C2H, CH3, CnHm, N, NHi, and many others.
The above SO3 reducing reactions are very fast when there are significant concentrations of the reducing radicals ("R"). Sufficient concentrations exist primarily in reducing environments within the first (fuel-rich) stage of the furnace.
In a fuel-rich staged, reducing environment, oxidative chemistry terminates due to greatly decreased (extinguished) concentrations of oxidative combustion species; e.g., OH, O, O2, HO2, H2O2, and many others. In this environment, species are very competitive for any available oxygen species. Molecules with oxygen '.atoms that exist in relatively small concentrations are consumed by oxygen-wanting species that exist in high concentration; e.g., the oxygen in NO is consumed by other species like C, CO, H, and CH. Molecules that have multiple oxygen atoms are particularly at risk; i.e., SO3 will quickly revert to SO2 through oxygen abstraction by just about anything around, most notably H atoms.
Thus, in a reducing environment, the SO3 reduction reaction is very fast virtually irreversible while the reducing environment is maintained.
Surprisingly and importantly, with the present invention methods and systems, the net effect is that any SO3 that is formed during combustion is quickly reduced to SO2 in the first stage and SO3 is not reformed by oxidation to SO2 because there is not enough residence time at sufficiently high temperature in the furnace in the latter, fuel-lean stages. Thus, the present invention advantageously uses the differences in reaction rates to reduce and maintain the SO3 levels in the flue gas. Increased staging increases the residence time in a reducing atmosphere, or increases the reducing potential of the atmosphere, to decrease SO3 concentration and thereby lower the dewpoint temperature. Therefore, to increase the reduction of SO3, the residence time can be increased or the reducing potential in the flue gases can be increased. To increase residence time, several methods are available. 1) The distance between stages can be lengthened 2) The mixing can be increased for macro-staging applications 3) The mixing can be decreased for micro-staging applications 4) The mass flow between stages can be reduced (deeper staging) 5) The volumetric utilization between stages can be increased (e.g., swirl) 6) The pressure can be increased 7) The density can be increased To increase the reducing potential in the flue gases, several methods are available. 1) The temperature can be increased 2) The stoichiometric ratio (i.e., the air-to-fuel ratio) can be decreased. 3) The local fuel flow can be increased (for fixed air flow) 4) The local air flow can be decreased (for fixed fuel flow) Mixing within a stage also influences the reduction process. A perfectly mixed stage with a stoichiometric mixture is the best, since these reaction conditions will give the highest temperature, while still maintaining the reducing environment; i.e., minimizing oxidation radicals like O radicals. But, since perfect mixing is impractical, in practice a stoichiometric ratio less than one is used, which minimizes the occurrence of localities with a stoichiometric ratio greater than one. However, as mixing is reduced, a longer residence time and/or higher temperature is needed to achieve a similar reduction of the total acidity, acid dewpoint temperature, and/or SO3 concentration. However, the temperature of the combustion gases is dependent to a certain extent on the level of mixing, going down if mixing is decreased. Therefore, if an increased temperature is desired for a given degree of mixing, temperature must be increased by other means, such as preheating air, changing heat transfer characteristics of furnace, and the like. Alternatively or additionally, the residence time in the reducing environment can be increased by delaying lean stage air introduction, such as OFA injection.
Note that SO3 is formed by the oxidation of SO2 in a catalyst because a catalyst enables the oxidation of SO2 though the following reaction:
SO2 + Vι O2 → SO3
Production of SO3 in a catalyst is independent of the SO3 concentration in the gas, since the catalyzed reaction is only dependent on the SO2 and O2 concentration. Therefore, any SO3 that is reduced by the present invention independently reduces the exit S03 and is not affected by and does not affect SO3 production in a catalyst.
The present invention thus provides a method for controlling and reducing flue gas acidity, specifically the flue gas concentrations of SO3, in order to beneficially (1) affect the efficiency of an electrostatic precipitator, and more particularly, (2) to reduce the concentration of SO3 and other reducible acids in the flue gas in order to reduce the flue gas acidity and acid dewpoint, thereby reducing air heater pluggage, duct corrosion, and SO3 emissions to the environment, which can be a source of visible plumes and localized acid rain. In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, macro-staging to regulate furnace acidity and SO3 levels is achieved through the use of OFA. In another preferred embodiment, micro-staging to regulate furnace acidity and SO3 levels is achieved through the use of low-NOx burners. In yet another preferred embodiment, macro-staging and micro- staging through the use of OFA and low-NOx burners in combination are used to regulate furnace acidity and SO3 levels. For furnaces with SCRs in operation, the acidity is preferably regulated to reduce total flue gas acidity. For furnaces without SCRs or with by-passed SCRs, the SO3 is preferably regulated such that the SO3 levels going to the ESP enhance or favor precipitation. For current ESPs, SO3 levels between about 10 to about 15 ppm (by volume) in the exhaust is desirable for best ESP efficiency.
The dewpoint temperature is a convenient parameter for estimating and/or adjusting the reducing environment variables in order to achieve adequate reduction of acidity and/or desired SO3 levels. For a desired level of SO3 and operating relative humidity, the dewpoint can be determined and the reducing environment variable adjusted accordingly to achieve the desired dewpoint. Other methods of determining acidity and/or SO3 level can be used for the same purpose without departing from the scope of the invention.
In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, a power plant is operated to provide a deeply-staged, micro-stage or macro-stage reducing environment in the lower furnace. The OFA in the upper furnace provides the necessary oxygen to ensure an acceptable level of burnout of the remaining unburned fuel, combustion intermediates, and CO. Additionally, an SCR can be used to reduce NOx. Thus, an embodiment of the present invention includes a combustion furnace with OFA and low NOx burners for use with sulfur containing fuels to lower the dewpoint temperature and to reduce the SO3 concentration.. Additionally, an SCR can be provided to reduce NOx. The low NOx burners are preferably of a grade that provides adequate mixing in the primary stage to provide adequate acid dewpoint temperature reducing and SO3 concentration reduction, thus permitting the use of an SCR, if necessary. Thus, an embodiment of the present invention includes a combustion furnace with high-grade low NOx burners for the purpose of reducing the flue gas acidity, lowering the acid dewpoint temperature and reducing the flue gas SO3 concentration. This embodiment can further include an SCR.
An adequate reducing environment according to the present invention is one that will reduce SO3 to SO2 in less than about 2 seconds, more preferably, in less than about 0.5 seconds. In the present invention, such a reducing environment can be achieved when the first stage flue gas temperature is greater than or equal to 900 Kelvin (1160 degrees F), more preferably greater than about 1255 K (1800 degrees F), even more preferably greater than about 1650 K (2500 degrees F). A reducing environment is one where the ratio of the concentrations of reducing radicals to oxidizing radicals is greater than about 1; more specifically, the ratio of the concentrations of H radicals to O radicals is greater than about 1. A better reducing environment is one where the ratio of the concentrations of reducing radicals to oxidizing radicals is greater than about 10; more specifically, the ratio of the concentrations of H radicals to O radicals is greater than about 10.
Thus, a method of controlling SO3 flue gas concentration in a combustion process utilizing a SCR using a sulfurous fuel, includes the steps of:
a) providing a combustion system with low NOx burners and SCR
b) partially combusting the fuel in a first stage to create a reducing environment; c) maintaining the reducing environment for a sufficient time period such that SO3 is reduced to SO2 to achieve a desirable level of SO3;
d) combusting the remainder of the fuel and combustion intermediates in a second stage with oxidizing environment;
e) reducing the remaining NOx with the SCR;
thereby reducing emissions NOx.
An alternative method according to the present invention of controlling SO3 flue gas concentration in a combustion process utilizing a SCR using a sulfurous fuel, includes the steps of:
a) providing a combustion furnace with low NOx burners and SCR
a) partially combusting the fuel in a first stage to create a reducing environment;
b) combusting the remainder of the fuel and combustion intermediates in a second stage with oxidizing environment;
c) measuring the acid dewpoint of the flue gas;
d) adjusting the reducing environment in the first stage such that the flue gas acid dewpoint is lowered to a desirable level;
thereby controlling the SO3 concentration of the flue gas.
In another embodiment according to the present invention, a combustion furnace is operated with a method of controlling SO3 flue gas concentration in a combustion process utilizing a SCR using a sulfurous fuel, comprising the steps of::
a) providing a combustion furnace with low NOx burners and SCR b) partially combusting the fuel in a first stage to create a reducing environment;
c) maintaining the reducing environment for a sufficient time period such that reducible acids are reduced to achieve a desirable acidity concentration in the flue gas;
d) combusting the remainder of the fuel and combustion intermediates in a second stage with oxidizing environment;
e) reducing the remaining NOx with the SCR;
thereby controlling the flue gas SO3 levels going to the SCR.
These methods can include the step of micro-staging and/or macro-staging the first stage fuel combustion and or macro. The micro-staging can be provided through the use of low-NOx burners and the macro-staging through the use of over-fired air. The fuel can be any fuel, especially carbonaceous fuels such as coal. The reducing environment can be adjusted by any of the means herein described, including adjusting the first stage residence time.
Examples
The following examples illustrate the results that can be achieved using methods according to the present invention. Methods according to the present invention were used to control SO3 levels at 3 different power plants. The experimental data shown in Tables 1 and 2 were achieved through the use of high- velocity over-fired air and were measured by third- party companies.
Table 1. Effects of Staging Depth on SO3 levels at 2 different plants.
Figure imgf000018_0001
N/A - Data Not Available; * - Estimated based on assumption that 98.5% of the sulfur in coal goes to SO2 and 1.5% of the sulfur in coal goes to SO3. For the "shallow" staging cases, the over-fired air ports were nearly closed, but still contained cooling flow (around 10% of the total air). For the "mid" staging case, the over- fired air ports made up nearly 20% of the total air flow. For the "deep" staging cases, the over-fired air ports made up nearly 30% of the total air flow. All three units were corner-fired units and the OFA system was located well above the burner zone. Table 2. Effect of three levels of staging at a single plant (Plant 3, different from Table 1).
Figure imgf000018_0002
Thus, the experimental data demonstrate the ability to regulate the SO3 level using methods according to the present invention. Certain modifications and improvements will occur to those skilled in the art upon a reading of the foregoing description. All modifications and improvements have been deleted herein for the sake of conciseness and readability but are properly within the scope of the following claims.

Claims

CLAIMSWhat is claimed is:
1. A method of controlling SO flue gas concentration in a combustion process utilizing a SCR using a sulfurous fuel, comprising the steps of:
a) providing a combustion system with low NOx burners and SCR
b) partially combusting the fuel in a first stage to create a reducing environment;
c) maintaining the reducing environment for a sufficient time period such that SO3 is reduced to SO2 to achieve a desirable level of SO3;
d) combusting the remainder of the fuel and combustion intermediates in a second stage with oxidizing environment;
e) reducing the remaining NOx with the SCR;
thereby reducing emissions NOx.
2. The method of claim 1, further including the step of micro-staging the first stage fuel combustion.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein the micro-staging includes the use of low-NOx burners.
4. The method of claim 1, further including the step of macro-staging the first stage of fuel combustion.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein the macro-staging is provided through the use of over-fired air.
6. The method of claim 1, further including a combination of micro-staging and macro- staging.
7. The method of claim 6, wherein the micro-staging includes the use of low-NOx burners and the macro-staging is provided by over-fired air.
8. The method of claim 1, wherein the fuel is coal.
9. A combustion furnace operated with a method of controlling SO flue gas concentration in a combustion process utilizing a SCR using a sulfurous fuel, comprising the steps of:
a) providing a combustion furnace with low NOx burners and SCR
b) partially combusting the fuel in a first stage to create a reducing environment;
c) maintaining the reducing environment for a sufficient time period such that reducible acids are reduced to achieve a desirable acidity concentration in the flue gas;
d) combusting the remainder of the fuel and combustion intermediates in a second stage with oxidizing environment;
e) reducing the remaining NOx with the SCR;
thereby controlling the flue gas SO3 levels going to the SCR.
10. The method of claim 9, further including the step of micro-staging the first stage fuel combustion.
11. The method of claim 10, wherein the micro-staging is provided through the use of low-NOx burners.
12. The method of claim 9, further including the step of macro-staging the first stage of fuel combustion.
13. The method of claim 12, wherein the macro-staging is provided through the use of over-fired air.
14. The method of claim 9, further including a combination of micro-staging and macro- staging.
15. The method of claim 14, wherein the micro-staging is provided by low-NOx burners and the macro-staging is provided by over-fired air.
16. The method of claim 9, wherein the fuel is coal.
17. A method of controlling SO3 flue gas concentration in a combustion process utilizing a SCR using a sulfurous fuel, comprising the steps of:
a) providing a combustion furnace with low NOx burners and SCR
b) partially combusting the fuel in a first stage to create a reducing environment;
c) combusting the remainder of the fuel and combustion intermediates in a second stage with oxidizing environment;
d) measuring the acid dewpoint of the flue gas;
e) adjusting the reducing environment in the first stage such that the flue gas acid dewpoint is lowered to a desirable level;
thereby controlling the SO3 concentration of the flue gas.
18. The method of claim 17, wherein the step of adjusting the reducing environment includes adjusting the first stage residence time
19. The method of claim 17, further including the step of micro-staging the first stage fuel combustion.
20. The method of claim 19, wherein the micro-staging is provided through the use of low-NOx burners.
21. The method of claim 17, further including the step of macro-staging the first stage of fuel combustion.
22. The method of claim 21, wherein the macro-staging is provided through the use of over-fired air.
23. The method of claim 17, further including a combination of micro-staging and macro- staging.
24. The method of claim 23, wherein the micro-staging is provided by low-NOx burners and the macro-staging is provided by over-fired air.
25. The method of claim 17, wherein the fuel is coal.
PCT/US2005/004416 2004-02-14 2005-02-14 Method for in-furnace regulation of so3 in catalytic systems WO2005079305A2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US54472404P 2004-02-14 2004-02-14
US60/544,724 2004-02-14
US10/798,088 2004-03-11
US10/798,088 US7537743B2 (en) 2004-02-14 2004-03-11 Method for in-furnace regulation of SO3 in catalytic NOx reducing systems

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2005079305A2 true WO2005079305A2 (en) 2005-09-01
WO2005079305A3 WO2005079305A3 (en) 2006-09-08

Family

ID=34841194

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2005/004416 WO2005079305A2 (en) 2004-02-14 2005-02-14 Method for in-furnace regulation of so3 in catalytic systems

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (1) US7537743B2 (en)
WO (1) WO2005079305A2 (en)

Families Citing this family (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7670569B2 (en) 2003-06-13 2010-03-02 Mobotec Usa, Inc. Combustion furnace humidification devices, systems & methods
US8251694B2 (en) * 2004-02-14 2012-08-28 Nalco Mobotec, Inc. Method for in-furnace reduction flue gas acidity
WO2008004371A1 (en) * 2006-07-04 2008-01-10 Miura Co., Ltd. Boiler
WO2013016674A2 (en) * 2011-07-27 2013-01-31 Cormetech, Inc. Combustion apparatus and applications thereof
US10281140B2 (en) 2014-07-15 2019-05-07 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Low NOx combustion method and apparatus
CN112875652B (en) * 2021-05-06 2021-08-24 中国恩菲工程技术有限公司 Containing SO2Method for preparing sulfur from flue gas

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5585081A (en) * 1988-07-25 1996-12-17 The Babcock & Wilcox Company SOx, NOx and particulate removal system
US5853684A (en) * 1995-11-14 1998-12-29 The Hong Kong University Of Science & Technology Catalytic removal of sulfur dioxide from flue gas

Family Cites Families (101)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2004102A (en) * 1932-02-24 1935-06-11 Daniel A Dickey Hollow steel propeller construction
US3105540A (en) * 1954-04-07 1963-10-01 Babcock & Wilcox Co Method of and apparatus for burning low heat content fuel
US3528797A (en) * 1967-11-08 1970-09-15 Grace W R & Co Chemical suppression of nitrogen oxides
US3565575A (en) * 1968-05-22 1971-02-23 Chemical Construction Corp Removal of nitrogen oxides from a gas stream
US3847564A (en) * 1970-01-23 1974-11-12 Texaco Development Corp Apparatus and process for burning liquid hydrocarbons in a synthesis gas generator
US3773897A (en) * 1970-10-19 1973-11-20 Steel Corp Process for removing nitric oxide from gaseous mixtures
US3860384A (en) * 1972-05-25 1975-01-14 Intelcon Rad Tech Method to control NOX formation in fossil-fueled boiler furnaces
US4039446A (en) * 1972-06-28 1977-08-02 Sumitomo Chemical Company, Limited Heavy metal-binding agent process
GB1465785A (en) * 1973-03-12 1977-03-02 Tokyo Gas Co Ltd Burner and method of combustion-
US3900554A (en) * 1973-03-16 1975-08-19 Exxon Research Engineering Co Method for the reduction of the concentration of no in combustion effluents using ammonia
US4029752A (en) * 1973-05-29 1977-06-14 Exxon Research And Engineering Company Method of producing sulfur from sulfur dioxide
JPS50133995A (en) * 1974-04-11 1975-10-23
US4080423A (en) * 1974-04-17 1978-03-21 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Gas absorption
US4089639A (en) * 1974-11-26 1978-05-16 John Zink Company Fuel-water vapor premix for low NOx burning
US4208386A (en) * 1976-03-03 1980-06-17 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. Urea reduction of NOx in combustion effluents
JPS5314662A (en) * 1976-07-28 1978-02-09 Hitachi Ltd Method for decreasing nitrogen oxides concentration of combustion exhaust gas
JPS5372773A (en) * 1976-12-10 1978-06-28 Hitachi Ltd Direct reductive denitration method of ammonia
US4173454A (en) * 1977-07-18 1979-11-06 Heins Sidney M Method for removal of sulfur from coal in stoker furnaces
CA1092897A (en) 1977-09-16 1981-01-06 Arun K. Mehta Fuel firing method
US4325924A (en) * 1977-10-25 1982-04-20 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. Urea reduction of NOx in fuel rich combustion effluents
US4150631A (en) * 1977-12-27 1979-04-24 Combustion Engineering, Inc. Coal fired furance
US4154581A (en) * 1978-01-12 1979-05-15 Battelle Development Corporation Two-zone fluid bed combustion or gasification process
US4196057A (en) * 1978-08-31 1980-04-01 Petrolite Corporation Cold end corrosion rate probe
US4375949A (en) * 1978-10-03 1983-03-08 Exxon Research And Engineering Co. Method of at least partially burning a hydrocarbon and/or carbonaceous fuel
US4294178A (en) * 1979-07-12 1981-10-13 Combustion Engineering, Inc. Tangential firing system
JPS5742521Y2 (en) * 1979-07-19 1982-09-18
US4704084A (en) * 1979-12-26 1987-11-03 Battelle Development Corporation NOX reduction in multisolid fluidized bed combustors
US4381718A (en) * 1980-11-17 1983-05-03 Carver George P Low emissions process and burner
US4469050A (en) * 1981-12-17 1984-09-04 York-Shipley, Inc. Fast fluidized bed reactor and method of operating the reactor
US4504211A (en) * 1982-08-02 1985-03-12 Phillips Petroleum Company Combination of fuels
US4502633A (en) * 1982-11-05 1985-03-05 Eastman Kodak Company Variable capacity gasification burner
EP0111874B1 (en) * 1982-12-15 1987-04-22 Gewerkschaft Sophia-Jacoba Steinkohlenbergwerk A device for burning coal dust
US4506608A (en) * 1983-01-07 1985-03-26 Electrodyne Research Corp. Unfired drying and sorting apparatus for preparation of solid fuel and other solid material
US4672900A (en) * 1983-03-10 1987-06-16 Combustion Engineering, Inc. System for injecting overfire air into a tangentially-fired furnace
US4565137A (en) * 1983-08-08 1986-01-21 Aqua-Chem, Inc. Bio-mass suspension burner
DE3329633A1 (en) * 1983-08-17 1985-03-07 Gottfried Bischoff Bau kompl. Gasreinigungs- und Wasserrückkühlanlagen GmbH & Co KG, 4300 Essen METHOD AND WASHING TOWER FOR DESULFURING INDUSTRIAL SMOKE GASES
US4624840A (en) * 1983-11-10 1986-11-25 Exxon Research & Engineering Company Non-catalytic method for reducing the concentration of NO in combustion effluents by injection of ammonia at temperatures greater than about 1300° K.
US4507269A (en) * 1983-11-10 1985-03-26 Exxon Research & Engineering Co. Non-catalytic method for reducing the concentration of NO in combustion effluents by injection of ammonia at temperatures greater than about 1300 degree K
GB8334332D0 (en) * 1983-12-23 1984-02-01 Coal Industry Patents Ltd Combustors
ATE91672T1 (en) * 1985-10-04 1993-08-15 Fuel Tech Inc REDUCTION OF NITROGEN AND CARBON POLLUTANTS USING UREA SOLUTIONS.
US4751065A (en) * 1985-12-20 1988-06-14 Fuel Tech, Inc. Reduction of nitrogen- and carbon-based pollutants
US4927612A (en) * 1985-10-04 1990-05-22 Fuel Tech, Inc. Reduction of nitrogen- and carbon-based pollutants
US4809910A (en) * 1986-06-06 1989-03-07 Nelson Irrigation Corporation Apparatus for providing a semiautomatic irrigation system
US4842834A (en) * 1987-02-02 1989-06-27 Fuel Tech, Inc. Process for reducing the concentration of pollutants in an effluent
US4780289A (en) * 1987-05-14 1988-10-25 Fuel Tech, Inc. Process for nitrogen oxides reduction and minimization of the production of other pollutants
US4777024A (en) * 1987-03-06 1988-10-11 Fuel Tech, Inc. Multi-stage process for reducing the concentration of pollutants in an effluent
US5057293A (en) * 1987-02-13 1991-10-15 Fuel Tech, Inc. Multi-stage process for reducing the concentration of pollutants in an effluent
US5017347A (en) * 1987-02-13 1991-05-21 Fuel Tech, Inc. Process for nitrogen oxides reduction and minimization of the production of other pollutants
US4851201A (en) 1987-04-16 1989-07-25 Energy And Environmental Research Corporation Methods of removing NOx and SOx emissions from combustion systems using nitrogenous compounds
US4873930A (en) * 1987-07-30 1989-10-17 Trw Inc. Sulfur removal by sorbent injection in secondary combustion zones
US4824441A (en) * 1987-11-30 1989-04-25 Genesis Research Corporation Method and composition for decreasing emissions of sulfur oxides and nitrogen oxides
JP2637449B2 (en) * 1988-01-12 1997-08-06 三菱重工業株式会社 Fluidized bed combustion method
US4915036A (en) * 1988-02-26 1990-04-10 Fuel Tech, Inc. Boiler and injector for reducing the concentration of pollutants in an effluent
US4985218A (en) * 1989-03-03 1991-01-15 Fuel Tech, Inc. Process and injector for reducing the concentration of pollutants in an effluent
US5032154A (en) * 1989-04-14 1991-07-16 Wilhelm Environmental Technologies, Inc. Flue gas conditioning system
EP0432166A1 (en) * 1989-07-04 1991-06-19 Fuel Tech Europe Limited Lance-type injection apparatus for introducing chemical agents into flue gases
US4978514A (en) * 1989-09-12 1990-12-18 Fuel Tech, Inc. Combined catalytic/non-catalytic process for nitrogen oxides reduction
US5139754A (en) * 1989-09-12 1992-08-18 Fuel Tech, Inc. Catalytic/non-catalytic combination process for nitrogen oxides reduction
JPH0356011U (en) * 1989-10-03 1991-05-29
US5020456A (en) * 1990-02-28 1991-06-04 Institute Of Gas Technology Process and apparatus for emissions reduction from waste incineration
US5052921A (en) * 1990-09-21 1991-10-01 Southern California Gas Company Method and apparatus for reducing NOx emissions in industrial thermal processes
US5048432B1 (en) * 1990-12-27 1996-07-02 Nalco Fuel Tech Process and apparatus for the thermal decomposition of nitrous oxide
US5261602A (en) * 1991-12-23 1993-11-16 Texaco Inc. Partial oxidation process and burner with porous tip
US5240404A (en) * 1992-02-03 1993-08-31 Southern California Gas Company Ultra low NOx industrial burner
US5809910A (en) * 1992-05-18 1998-09-22 Svendssen; Allan Reduction and admixture method in incineration unit for reduction of contaminants
US5310334A (en) * 1992-06-03 1994-05-10 Air Duke Australia, Ltd. Method and apparatus for thermal destruction of waste
US5536482A (en) * 1992-10-13 1996-07-16 Nalco Fuel Tech Process for pollution control
US5489419A (en) * 1992-10-13 1996-02-06 Nalco Fuel Tech Process for pollution control
US5336081A (en) * 1992-11-24 1994-08-09 Bluenox Japan Kabushiki Kaisha Device and method for removing nitrogen oxides
US5345883A (en) * 1992-12-31 1994-09-13 Combustion Engineering, Inc. Reactivation of sorbent in a fluid bed boiler
US5326536A (en) * 1993-04-30 1994-07-05 The Babcock & Wilcox Company Apparatus for injecting NOx inhibiting liquid reagent into the flue gas of a boiler in response to a sensed temperature
US5759394A (en) * 1996-11-27 1998-06-02 Alliedsignal Inc. Elongate fiber filter mechanically securing solid adsorbent particles between adjacent multilobes
US5707596A (en) * 1995-11-08 1998-01-13 Process Combustion Corporation Method to minimize chemically bound nox in a combustion process
US5728357A (en) * 1996-04-10 1998-03-17 Nalco Fuel Tech Reduction of NOx emissions from rotary cement kilns by selective noncatalytic reduction
US5854173A (en) 1996-05-31 1998-12-29 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. Flake shaped sorbent particle for removing vapor phase contaminants from a gas stream and method for manufacturing same
US5690039A (en) * 1996-06-17 1997-11-25 Rjm Corporation Method and apparatus for reducing nitrogen oxides using spatially selective cooling
JPH1038261A (en) * 1996-07-18 1998-02-13 Toyota Motor Corp Combustion device
US5820838A (en) * 1996-09-27 1998-10-13 Foster Wheeler Energia Oy Method and an apparatus for injection of NOx reducing agent
FI102411B1 (en) * 1997-02-07 1998-11-30 Kvaerner Pulping Oy Method and apparatus for feeding air into a floating bed reactor
FI973932A (en) * 1997-10-10 1999-04-11 Kvaerner Pulping Oy Method and Arrangement for Optimizing Oxidation in Combustion of Gaseous and Liquid Fuels
US6213032B1 (en) * 1999-08-30 2001-04-10 Energy Systems Associates Use of oil water emulsion as a reburn fuel
JP2001143223A (en) * 1999-11-11 2001-05-25 Alps Electric Co Ltd Spin valve thin film magnetic element and thin film magnetic head
US6485289B1 (en) * 2000-01-12 2002-11-26 Altex Technologies Corporation Ultra reduced NOx burner system and process
US6315551B1 (en) * 2000-05-08 2001-11-13 Entreprise Generale De Chauffage Industriel Pillard Burners having at least three air feed ducts, including an axial air duct and a rotary air duct concentric with at least one fuel feed, and a central stabilizer
US6451723B1 (en) 2000-07-07 2002-09-17 Honeywell International Inc. Polymer-bound nitrogen adsorbent and method of making and using it
US6280695B1 (en) * 2000-07-10 2001-08-28 Ge Energy & Environmental Research Corp. Method of reducing NOx in a combustion flue gas
US6357367B1 (en) * 2000-07-18 2002-03-19 Energy Systems Associates Method for NOx reduction by upper furnace injection of biofuel water slurry
US6527828B2 (en) * 2001-03-19 2003-03-04 Advanced Technology Materials, Inc. Oxygen enhanced CDA modification to a CDO integrated scrubber
US6905534B2 (en) * 2001-04-16 2005-06-14 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. Method and apparatus for removing vapor phase contaminants from a flue gas stream
US6532905B2 (en) * 2001-07-17 2003-03-18 The Babcock & Wilcox Company CFB with controllable in-bed heat exchanger
AU2003232091B2 (en) * 2002-05-06 2009-08-13 Albemarle Corporation Sorbents and methods for the removal of mercury from combustion gases
US7341618B2 (en) * 2002-10-24 2008-03-11 Georgia Tech Research Corporation Filters and methods of making and using the same
US6979430B2 (en) 2002-12-18 2005-12-27 Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation System and method for controlling NOx emissions from boilers combusting carbonaceous fuels without using external reagent
US6818043B1 (en) * 2003-01-23 2004-11-16 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. Vapor-phase contaminant removal by injection of fine sorbent slurries
US20040185402A1 (en) * 2003-03-19 2004-09-23 Goran Moberg Mixing process for increasing chemical reaction efficiency and reduction of byproducts
US7335014B2 (en) * 2003-06-12 2008-02-26 Mobotec Usa, Inc. Combustion NOx reduction method
US20040185401A1 (en) * 2003-03-19 2004-09-23 Goran Moberg Mixing process for combustion furnaces
US20040185399A1 (en) * 2003-03-19 2004-09-23 Goran Moberg Urea-based mixing process for increasing combustion efficiency and reduction of nitrogen oxides (NOx)
US8353698B2 (en) * 2003-06-13 2013-01-15 Nalco Mobotec, Inc. Co-axial injection system
US7670569B2 (en) * 2003-06-13 2010-03-02 Mobotec Usa, Inc. Combustion furnace humidification devices, systems & methods
US7198769B2 (en) * 2003-12-02 2007-04-03 Cichanowicz J Edward Multi-stage process for SCR of NOx

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5585081A (en) * 1988-07-25 1996-12-17 The Babcock & Wilcox Company SOx, NOx and particulate removal system
US5853684A (en) * 1995-11-14 1998-12-29 The Hong Kong University Of Science & Technology Catalytic removal of sulfur dioxide from flue gas

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2005079305A3 (en) 2006-09-08
US7537743B2 (en) 2009-05-26
US20050180904A1 (en) 2005-08-18

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7600479B2 (en) Mercury reduction system and method in combustion flue gas using staging
JP5270661B2 (en) Exhaust gas control method and apparatus for oxyfuel boiler
JP5439563B2 (en) Exhaust gas purification system for pulverized coal boilers
US6357367B1 (en) Method for NOx reduction by upper furnace injection of biofuel water slurry
US6258336B1 (en) Method and apparatus for NOx reduction in flue gases
WO2005079305A2 (en) Method for in-furnace regulation of so3 in catalytic systems
US7531153B2 (en) Methods and apparatus for removing mercury from combustion flue gas
WO2005080868A1 (en) Method for in-furnace reduction and control of sulfur trioxide
Gaba et al. Reduction of air pollution by combustion processes
CN100540116C (en) The method of in-furnace reduction flue gas acidity
WO2005079324A2 (en) Method for in-furnace reduction flue gas acidity
CN205842694U (en) A kind of low NOx incinerator processing nitrogenous waste gas, waste liquid
Straitz III et al. Combat NOx with better burner design
KR20070030758A (en) Method for in-furnace reduction and control of sulfur trioxide
Liu Gaseous Emission Control
Sharma et al. Review of emissions control and NOx reduction techniques in coal fired thermal steam generators
Gomez Development of a Low NOx Burner System for Coal Fired Power Plants Using Coal and Biomass Blends
Trifan et al. Technologies used on maritime boilers for the reduction of NOx emissions
Williams et al. THE PRINCIPLES BEHIND CONTROLLING NO x EMISSIONS
Ogden Pulverized coal combustion: Flame attachment and nitrogen oxide emissions
JP2006526752A (en) Combustion method of sulfur-containing fuel
JPS6362645B2 (en)

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BW BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EC EE EG ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NA NI NO NZ OM PG PH PL PT RO RU SC SD SE SG SK SL SY TJ TM TN TR TT TZ UA UG UZ VC VN YU ZA ZM ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): BW GH GM KE LS MW MZ NA SD SL SZ TZ UG ZM ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LT LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

WWW Wipo information: withdrawn in national office

Country of ref document: DE

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 200580011222.2

Country of ref document: CN

32PN Ep: public notification in the ep bulletin as address of the adressee cannot be established

Free format text: NOTING OF LOSS OF RIGHTS PURSUANT TO RULE 69(1) EPC

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase