WO2005086621A2 - Systems and methods for combining and extending routing protocols - Google Patents

Systems and methods for combining and extending routing protocols Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2005086621A2
WO2005086621A2 PCT/US2004/034123 US2004034123W WO2005086621A2 WO 2005086621 A2 WO2005086621 A2 WO 2005086621A2 US 2004034123 W US2004034123 W US 2004034123W WO 2005086621 A2 WO2005086621 A2 WO 2005086621A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
bgp
protocol
octets
octet
computer network
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2004/034123
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
WO2005086621A3 (en
Inventor
Susan Hares
Original Assignee
Nexthop Technologies, Inc.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nexthop Technologies, Inc. filed Critical Nexthop Technologies, Inc.
Publication of WO2005086621A2 publication Critical patent/WO2005086621A2/en
Publication of WO2005086621A3 publication Critical patent/WO2005086621A3/en

Links

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L45/00Routing or path finding of packets in data switching networks
    • H04L45/02Topology update or discovery
    • H04L45/04Interdomain routing, e.g. hierarchical routing
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L45/00Routing or path finding of packets in data switching networks
    • H04L45/02Topology update or discovery
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L45/00Routing or path finding of packets in data switching networks
    • H04L45/02Topology update or discovery
    • H04L45/026Details of "hello" or keep-alive messages
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L45/00Routing or path finding of packets in data switching networks
    • H04L45/02Topology update or discovery
    • H04L45/03Topology update or discovery by updating link state protocols

Definitions

  • This invention is related to the field of networking, and more particularly, to protocols and algorithms for routing in networks.
  • a packet comprises a unit of digital information that is individually routed hop-by-hop on from a source to a destination.
  • the routing of a packet entails that each node, or router, along a path traversed by the packet examines header information in the packet to compare this header against a local database; upon consulting the local database, the router forwards the packet to an appropriate next hop.
  • This local database is typically called the Forwarding Information Base or FIB.
  • the FIB is typically structured as a table, but may be instantiated in alternative formats. Entries in the FIB determine the next hop for the packet, i.e., the next router, or node, to which the respective packets are forwarded in order to reach the appropriate destination.
  • NTBs Network Information Bases
  • the FIB is typically derived from a collective database, i.e., a NIB, referred to as a Routing Information Database or RIB.
  • a RIB resident on a router amalgamates the routing information available to that router; one or more algorithms are typically used to map the entries, e.g., routes, in the RIB to those in the FIB, which, in turn, is used for forwarding packets to their next hop.
  • the IP RIB may be constructed by use of two techniques, which may be used in conjunction: (a) static configuration and (b) dynamic routing protocols.
  • Dynamic IP routing protocols may be further subdivided into two groups based on the part of the Internet in which they operate: exterior gateway protocols, or EGPs, are responsible for the dissemination of routing data between autonomous administrative domains, and interior gateway protocols, or IGPs, are responsible for dissemination of routing data within a single autonomous domain.
  • EGPs exterior gateway protocols
  • IGPs interior gateway protocols
  • two types of IGPs are in widespread use today: those that use; a distance- ector type of algorithm and those that use the link-state method.
  • Routers typically support route selection policies which enable the identification of a best route amongst alternative paths to a destination. Routing selection policies may be pre-defined by a protocol, or may be otherwise distributed through a network, either statically or dynamically.
  • An- example of an EGP protocol which pre-defines route selection policies is exemplified by the Border Gateway Protocol version 4 (BGP-4), which allows route selection policy based on destination address and the BGP Path information.
  • Routers also typically support route distribution policies, which govern the determination of which routes are sent to particular peers. Route distribution policies may be pre-defined by a protocol, statically configured, or dynamically learned. Dynamically learned policies can, in turn, be forwarded to a router within the same routing protocol, or, alternatively, forwarded via a separate protocol.
  • BGP-4 allows for the inclusion of outbound route filter policies within BGP packets; the Rout Policy Server Language sends route distribution policy in a separate protocol.
  • Some BGP-4 peers add or subtract BGP communities from e-BGP-4 path attributes, to mitigate policy processing on recipient peers.
  • the addition of the BGP-4 communities is sometimes called coloring of "dyeing" BGP-4 routes.
  • Link state routing protocols are typically based on a set of features uniquely tuned for each protocol. These features include:
  • the flooding link-state information Structure of link state information Algorithms for computing a shortest path tree Packets for communication.
  • Sub-protocols for neighbor acquisition and database synchronization typically include indications for whether a link is up or down, and the creation of peer adjacencies. Extensions to the link state protocols are also available which allow for improved scaling. These extensions include:
  • OSPF and IS-IS support two levels of hierarchy within the area of the network.
  • Extensions to IS-IS in M-ISIS allow multiple
  • Routing Information Bases with multiple level topologies be passed in the IS-IS protocol. Both the OSPF and ISIS protocols use a "hello" packet to signal that a peer is up on a link.
  • a 2- way hello sequence between two peers involves the 1st peer sending a hello and the 2nd peer responding to the hello.
  • a 3-way hello sequence between two peers involves the 1st peer sending a hello, the 2nd peer responding with a hello, and the 3rd peer responding with a third hello.
  • Some hello sequences in other protocols e.g., PLP
  • PLP Packet-you
  • Peer adjacency databases are generated per level per RIB, as are Shortest Path First (SPF) calculations; OSPF and ISIS utilize modified Dijkstra algorithms to compute shortest paths.
  • SPF Shortest Path First
  • a prominent example of a path vector protocol is the Border Gateway Protocol, BGP v4.
  • BGP v4 Border Gateway Protocol
  • reachability information is passed from BGP-specific routers.
  • Such reachability information may be inserted from Internal Gateway Protocols (IGPs), examples of which include OSPF, ISIS, RIP, IGRP or E-IGRP, an Exterior Gateway Protocol (EGP), which, in this case, is
  • BGP BGP, or static routes.
  • BGP policy operates on the information contained in the route (for e.g., reachable prefix, AS Path, Path Attributes, NextHop router), the peer the route was received from, and the interface with which the route was associated.
  • the Policy processing returns a metric that is associated with the route. Two routes first compare the two policy values to select the best route to be used.
  • the BGP protocol breaks ties between the two routes by comparison of the following: AS Path length Lowest origin, Least value for the MED (if the MED is comparable) Origin of : EGP 1st priority, IGP 2nd priority, The route sent by a router with the least interior cost in the IGP, Lower router-id of the peer sending the route, The lowest neighbor address of the route.
  • some implementations extend the BGP-4 specification to include the use the "time" of route creation for tie-breaking.
  • the prior art evinces a need for routing techniques which combine features of link state and path vector protocols. There is also a need for such new techniques to be interoperable with existing internet infrastructure.
  • This invention includes packet formats for routing protocols which combine link state and path vector routing techniques. Such protocols are referred to as Link State Path Vector (LSPN) protocols.
  • LSPN Link State Path Vector
  • Embodiments of the invention include extensions to protocols such as the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) and Intermediate Standard to Intermediate Standard (IS-IS).
  • Embodiments of the invention include packet formats for LSPN protocols which align the bytes of the one or more LSPN protocols with bytes in formats for protocols in the prior art.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates an overlay format for protocol headers in accordance with embodiments of the invention.
  • Figure 2 illustrates an overlay format of Hello packet headers in accordance with embodiments of the invention.
  • LSPVs may include extensions to existing link state or path vector protocols.
  • Embodiments of the invention include templates common to all LSPVs. Such embodiments include common formats for packet headers and PDUs, which may be overlayed over existing protocol formats.
  • One such overlay format is illustrated in Figure 1.
  • Figure 1 depicts a generic overlay template for LSPV protocols 100, and example formats for (1) LSPV extensions to BGP version 4 (BGP-4) 102, referred to herein as "BGP LSPV", and (2) LSPV extensions to IS-IS 104, referred to herein as "IS-IS PV".
  • BGP-4 BGP version 4
  • IS-IS PV LSPV extensions to IS-IS 104
  • Table 1 below describes the individual fields in the LSPV header overlay 100.
  • LSPN protocols may include one or more of the following types of messages, or Packet Data Units (PDUs):
  • PSNPs Partial Sequence Number Packets
  • BGP LSPN is an extension of BGP, referred to herein as BGP LSPN.
  • BGP LSPN is a Link-State Path Vector protocol (LSPV) which utilizes a link- state algorithm to calculate the BGP peer topology over virtual links.
  • LSPV Link-State Path Vector protocol
  • the BGP Path Vector allows multiple paths for a BGP route weighted by a vector.
  • the Path Vector portion of BGP utilizes routing policies to determine the vector of weights associated with each routes.
  • the Link State Path Vector combines these two calculations for each route.
  • BGP LSPV peers are connected via a virtual Unk topology, which may or may not comprise full mesh topologies.
  • BGP LSPV peers can be layered into multiple levels of Peer interconnection within a policy domain; a policy domain may comprise a single Autonomous System (AS) or multiple ASs, as further described in U.S. application 10/648,141, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
  • AS Autonomous System
  • BGP LSPV peers can communicate as I-BGP peers with n-levels, or as I-BGP and E-BGP peers at n-levels within an Autonomous System Confederations, or as I-BGP and E-BGP at n-levels within a policy domain.
  • BGP LSPV establishes peer sessions with BGP-4 peers via TCP connections, or with other BGP LSPV peers via TCP connections, GRE Tunnels or Multicast groups within an Autonomous System (AS).
  • these peers exchange one or more of the following types of packets: Hello Link State Packet (LSP) Complete Sequence Number Packet (CSNP) Partial Sequence Number Packet (PSNP) Policy packets, and BGP-v4 compatibility packets .
  • LSP Hello Link State Packet
  • CSNP Complete Sequence Number Packet
  • PSNP Partial Sequence Number Packet
  • BGP-v4 compatibility packets BGP-v4 compatibility packets
  • each of the packets has a fixed header and a variable amount of additional information following the PDU header.
  • the variable information is formatted in Type-Length- Value (TLV) fields.
  • TLV Type-Length- Value
  • Each TLV field may be in turn broken down into a variable length sub-TLV field.
  • Each sub-TLV field may in turn be broken down into other sub-fields.
  • the Hello packets are used to estabhsh a connection between BGP peers.
  • the Link State Packet transmits data between two peers.
  • the CSNP and PSNP are used to indicate which link state packets need to be resent to peers.
  • the CSNP and PSNP allow flooding to rese d any missed packets and to age out by flooding any over long packet.
  • the Policy packets allow for BGP policy to be sent to a peer out of band from the normal Link State Packets.
  • the BGP-v4 compatibility packet allows passage of the BGP LSPV packets.
  • Embodiments of the invention include overlays for Hello messages in LSPV protocols.
  • Figure 2 illustrates overlay formats for hello PDUs in accordance with some embodiments of the invention.
  • Fig. 2 illustrates an overlay template for Hello PDUs in LSPVs 200, alongside header formats for Hello PDUs in BGP LSPV 202, IS-IS LSPVs 204, and legacy protocols BGP 4 106, and OSPF 208 210, in accordance with embodiments of the invention.
  • Table 2 describes the individual fields of the overlay format for Hello messages in LSPV 200 in accordance with embodiments of the invention.
  • LANID 7 octets ID Length + 1 LAN ID from ISIS (#20-27) [1 Octet version 2 octets AS 2 octets Hold Time 2 octets BGP ID (1-2)
  • the Hello PDU includes variable fields, which may, in turn, be used to transmit BGP parameters.
  • these parameters may include one or more of the following:
  • variable fields may be expanded upon as follows:
  • Data format may specify one or more of the length of the IDs for BGP capabilities, AS path IDs, Policy metrics, Tie breaking info, and Label IDs. This field allows the expansion of the IDs into the bytes that fit the current format, after growth of the Internet address space. These formats allow BGP LSPV to be tailored to the minimum amount of space for a usage.
  • BGP AS Path 3 octets LSP
  • BGP Peer ID 4 octets LSP, Hello BGP Capability ID 1 octet LSP, Hello Security ID 1 octet LSP, Hello BGP RIB ID 1 octet LSP, Hello BGP Path Attribute 4 octets LSP Label ID 2 octets LSP Format ID 1 octet LSP, Hello BGP Peer's ISIS neighbor addresses
  • the BGP Peer neighbor addresses are specified as BGP-Identifiers with associated Unk information (TCP or other).
  • the BGP capability information may identify which BGP features this BGP- LSPV peer supports.
  • security information can link to BGP -LSPV format information, BGP neighbor information or BGP Capability information.
  • the security information can apply any field in the PDU.
  • the RIB information associates a RIB ID with RIB information.
  • the default format may include one or more of the following fields: RIB-id (1 octet), AFI (2 octets), SAFI (1 octet), Extended Communities field (count, communities (8 octets))
  • BGP peers can pass policy on which peers are accepted, and which links they will accept. This may include Peer addresses, capabilities of the peers, AS information, type of BGP protocol (BGP-4, BGP -LSPV or Both), type of peer (IBGP, EBGP, IBGP BGP-4 RR, IBGP BGP-4 RR client, IBGP BGP-4 AS confederation), capabilities of the peer (dynamic and static) including multiprotocol, route refresh and peer oscillation, and valid security associations.
  • BGP-4 BGP -LSPV or Both
  • type of peer IBGP, EBGP, IBGP BGP-4 RR, IBGP BGP-4 RR client, IBGP BGP-4 AS confederation
  • capabilities of the peer dynamic and static including multiprotocol, route refresh and peer oscillation, and valid security associations.
  • the "Unks" defined can be TCP, GRE or other links. Each link may also set TE parameters.
  • BGP Peer poUcy is passed between IBGP peers to allow all IBGP peers to obtain the same policy.
  • the BGP -LSPV protocol may either work with passing of BGP peer policy or via configuration for the BGP peer pohcy.
  • Embodiments of the invention include overlays for Link State messages in LSPV protocols.
  • Table 3 lists field types in headers for link state messages in accordance with embodiments of the invention.
  • Link State messages may further include one or more variable fields, examples of which are provided below:
  • Link State messages may also include one or more of the following optional headers:
  • I BGP Route Information contains the following information. RIB-ID, Prefix, label-id, BGP Path-id, PoUcy results-id, Security ID field definitions allow grouping of prefixes by RIB-ID.
  • BGP Path Attributes BGP path attribute information with: BGP -Path-id is a tuple with a set of IDs.
  • the default format may include one or more of the following: BGP Path-ID, Origin ID AS Path-id, Next_Hop-id, Next_hop ID, MED_id, Aggregator_ID, Community_id, MISC_id
  • MPLS label attributes associated with this path may also be communicated, in accordance with embodiments of the invention.
  • policy information associated with BGP routes includes one or more of the following: Policy-id: LOCAL_PREF info (received and calculated) MULTI_EXIT_DISC (received and calculated) Tie-break info (received and calculated) Policy-result-info [ variable field] PoUcy-match-info (variable field)
  • AS Paths This field contains a sequence of AS paths this BGP peer originates. Each of the AS path are identified by an AS Path ID of 4 bytes.
  • NEXT_HOPS This field lists the NEXT HOP information for a BGP peer.
  • This field contains the ATOMIC Aggregator and Aggregator information from a BGP Path.
  • the local miscellaneous Path Attributes this BGP Peer originates such as, by way of non-limiting example, ATOMIC attributes or any optional transitive attributes not defined by BGP-4 specifications.
  • Embodiments of the invention support the communication of Complete Sequence Number Packets in LSPVs.
  • the complete sequence number (CSN) packet indicate the life time, checksum and authentication of LSPs already sent.
  • the CSN provides a range of information handled by this PDU.
  • the LSP-ID format is as follows:
  • CSN packets may include one or more variable fields.
  • An example format for such variable fields is provided in Table 5.
  • Field length Field format Field definition is provided in Table 5.
  • Embodiments of the invention allow Partial Sequence Number (PSN) messages to be communicated in LSPVs.
  • PSN Partial Sequence Number
  • Table 6 An example of a format for such PSNs in accordance with embodiments of the invention is presented in Table 6.
  • PSNs may include variable fields, such as those presented in
  • the LSP indicates remaining Ufe, and a checksum Security information (type 3)
  • the security information includes authentication information and security identifiers.
  • Embodiments of the invention support the communication of policy filters in LSPVs, which contain a complete sequence number PDU listing the IDs of all LSP sent by the given node.
  • a header format used for such policy filters in accordance with embodiments of the invention is presented in Table 8.
  • LSP ID ID length+2 LSP-ID BGPv4 Identifier [4 octets] (#13-#20) NCID (high) [2 octets] PoUcy LSP ID [2 octets]
  • the Policy Filter PDUs may include variable fields, which may include one or more of the foUowing:
  • BGP Peer Policy TSN 7
  • BGP Route PoUcy Optional fields TSN 7
  • BGP-LSPV can co-exist with a BGP-4 peer on the same packets.
  • the BGP4 header includes 16 bytes of marker.
  • the BGP-LSPV fixed header overlays the marker field of the BGP-4 packets.
  • the BGPv4 specification indicates that the marker bytes is all Is.
  • the BGP-LSPV header allows for this marker field to be stuffed within it.
  • the intra-domain routing protocol Discriminator is set as0x85 as an architectural constant for BGP-LSPV. 0x85 was used by IDRP, an ISO Version of BGP.
  • the header portion of the BGP-LSPV packets are the same format as the IS-IS packets with a 6 octet ID field and additional variable length fields at the end.
  • the header portion of the BGP-LSPV packets can also overlay the maker field of the BGP-4 packets. These overlays provide BGP-LSPV with the ability to co-exist with either the BGP-4 or BGP-LSPV protocol on a link.
  • the discriminating factor is the intra-domain routing protocol discriminator 0x85 that indicates this is a BGP-LSPV protocol.
  • the BGP-4 packets may initiate the connection with the following exchange:
  • the BGP-4 may take down the connection with:
  • Source ID (6 octets) #10-#15 BGP ID BGP Peer Identifier - 4 bytes VCID-[2 bytes]

Abstract

Packet formats for routing protocols which combine link state and path vector routing techniques are described. Such protocols are referred to as Link State Vector (LSPV) protocols. Embodiments of the invention include extensions to protocols such as the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) and Intermediate Standard to Intermediate Standard (IS-IS). Embodiments also include packet formats for LSPV protocols which align the bytes of the one or more LSPV protocols with bytes in formats for protocols in the prior art.

Description

SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR COMBINING AND EXTENDING ROUTING PROTOCOLS
Technical Field
This invention is related to the field of networking, and more particularly, to protocols and algorithms for routing in networks.
Background of the Invention
In communications networks such as the Internet, information is transmitted in the form of packets. A packet comprises a unit of digital information that is individually routed hop-by-hop on from a source to a destination. The routing of a packet entails that each node, or router, along a path traversed by the packet examines header information in the packet to compare this header against a local database; upon consulting the local database, the router forwards the packet to an appropriate next hop. This local database is typically called the Forwarding Information Base or FIB. The FIB is typically structured as a table, but may be instantiated in alternative formats. Entries in the FIB determine the next hop for the packet, i.e., the next router, or node, to which the respective packets are forwarded in order to reach the appropriate destination. The
Forwarding information Bases are usually derived from global or network-wide information from a collective database. Each protocol names the collective databases to denote the type of information. Such databases are referred to generically herein as Network Information Bases (NTBs).
In implementations of the Internet Protocol (IP), the FIB is typically derived from a collective database, i.e., a NIB, referred to as a Routing Information Database or RIB. A RIB resident on a router amalgamates the routing information available to that router; one or more algorithms are typically used to map the entries, e.g., routes, in the RIB to those in the FIB, which, in turn, is used for forwarding packets to their next hop. The IP RIB may be constructed by use of two techniques, which may be used in conjunction: (a) static configuration and (b) dynamic routing protocols. Dynamic IP routing protocols may be further subdivided into two groups based on the part of the Internet in which they operate: exterior gateway protocols, or EGPs, are responsible for the dissemination of routing data between autonomous administrative domains, and interior gateway protocols, or IGPs, are responsible for dissemination of routing data within a single autonomous domain. Furthermore, two types of IGPs are in widespread use today: those that use; a distance- ector type of algorithm and those that use the link-state method.
Route Selection Policies and EGPs
Routers typically support route selection policies which enable the identification of a best route amongst alternative paths to a destination. Routing selection policies may be pre-defined by a protocol, or may be otherwise distributed through a network, either statically or dynamically. An- example of an EGP protocol which pre-defines route selection policies is exemplified by the Border Gateway Protocol version 4 (BGP-4), which allows route selection policy based on destination address and the BGP Path information. Routers also typically support route distribution policies, which govern the determination of which routes are sent to particular peers. Route distribution policies may be pre-defined by a protocol, statically configured, or dynamically learned. Dynamically learned policies can, in turn, be forwarded to a router within the same routing protocol, or, alternatively, forwarded via a separate protocol. As illustrative examples, BGP-4 allows for the inclusion of outbound route filter policies within BGP packets; the Rout Policy Server Language sends route distribution policy in a separate protocol. Some BGP-4 peers add or subtract BGP communities from e-BGP-4 path attributes, to mitigate policy processing on recipient peers. The addition of the BGP-4 Communities is sometimes called coloring of "dyeing" BGP-4 routes.
Link State Protocols
Link state routing protocols are typically based on a set of features uniquely tuned for each protocol. These features include:
The flooding link-state information. Structure of link state information Algorithms for computing a shortest path tree Packets for communication.
Sub-protocols for neighbor acquisition and database synchronization, and The sub-protocols for neighbor acquisition typically include indications for whether a link is up or down, and the creation of peer adjacencies. Extensions to the link state protocols are also available which allow for improved scaling. These extensions include:
Summarization of information within one level and area of the network for distribution into a higher level of routing process, Expansion of information at higher level toward a lower level.
Examples of common link state protocols include OSPF and IS-IS. OSPF and IS-IS support two levels of hierarchy within the area of the network. Extensions to IS-IS in M-ISIS allow multiple
Routing Information Bases (RIBs) with multiple level topologies be passed in the IS-IS protocol. Both the OSPF and ISIS protocols use a "hello" packet to signal that a peer is up on a link. A 2- way hello sequence between two peers involves the 1st peer sending a hello and the 2nd peer responding to the hello. A 3-way hello sequence between two peers involves the 1st peer sending a hello, the 2nd peer responding with a hello, and the 3rd peer responding with a third hello. Some hello sequences in other protocols (e.g., PLP) utilize a "heard-you" flag to indicate that the 2nd hello is in response to the first. Peer adjacency databases are generated per level per RIB, as are Shortest Path First (SPF) calculations; OSPF and ISIS utilize modified Dijkstra algorithms to compute shortest paths.
Path Vector Protocols
A prominent example of a path vector protocol is the Border Gateway Protocol, BGP v4. In this protocol, reachability information is passed from BGP-specific routers. Such reachability information may be inserted from Internal Gateway Protocols (IGPs), examples of which include OSPF, ISIS, RIP, IGRP or E-IGRP, an Exterior Gateway Protocol (EGP), which, in this case, is
BGP, or static routes. BGP policy operates on the information contained in the route (for e.g., reachable prefix, AS Path, Path Attributes, NextHop router), the peer the route was received from, and the interface with which the route was associated. The Policy processing returns a metric that is associated with the route. Two routes first compare the two policy values to select the best route to be used. If the policy values are the same, the BGP protocol breaks ties between the two routes by comparison of the following: AS Path length Lowest origin, Least value for the MED (if the MED is comparable) Origin of : EGP 1st priority, IGP 2nd priority, The route sent by a router with the least interior cost in the IGP, Lower router-id of the peer sending the route, The lowest neighbor address of the route.
Additionally, some implementations extend the BGP-4 specification to include the use the "time" of route creation for tie-breaking. The prior art evinces a need for routing techniques which combine features of link state and path vector protocols. There is also a need for such new techniques to be interoperable with existing internet infrastructure. These and other objectives are addressed by the invention described herein.
Summary of the Invention
This invention includes packet formats for routing protocols which combine link state and path vector routing techniques. Such protocols are referred to as Link State Path Vector (LSPN) protocols. Embodiments of the invention include extensions to protocols such as the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) and Intermediate Standard to Intermediate Standard (IS-IS). Embodiments of the invention include packet formats for LSPN protocols which align the bytes of the one or more LSPN protocols with bytes in formats for protocols in the prior art. These and other embodiments of the invention are described in further detail herein.
Brief Description of the Drawings
Figure 1 illustrates an overlay format for protocol headers in accordance with embodiments of the invention.
Figure 2 illustrates an overlay format of Hello packet headers in accordance with embodiments of the invention. ,
Detailed Description of the Invention
Introduction: Link State Path Vector Protocols
The concept of Link State Path Vector protocols is further described in U.S. utility application 10/648,758. LSPVs may include extensions to existing link state or path vector protocols. Embodiments of the invention include templates common to all LSPVs. Such embodiments include common formats for packet headers and PDUs, which may be overlayed over existing protocol formats. One such overlay format is illustrated in Figure 1. Figure 1 depicts a generic overlay template for LSPV protocols 100, and example formats for (1) LSPV extensions to BGP version 4 (BGP-4) 102, referred to herein as "BGP LSPV", and (2) LSPV extensions to IS-IS 104, referred to herein as "IS-IS PV". These header formats are shown alongside headers for two versions of the Open Shortest Path First protocol, OSPFv2 108 and OSPFv3 110, as well as BGP 4 106.
Table 1 below describes the individual fields in the LSPV header overlay 100.
Field Name Length # Format Description
[Intra-domain Routing 1 octet #1 integer architectural constant Protocol Discriminator] [0x85]
[length indicator] 1 octet #2 integer fixed header length [30] [Version/Protocol/ID] 1 octet #3 integer BGP version [5] [ID length] 1 octet #4 integer ID field length
[level] [PDU type] 1 octet #5 [LLLLL][PPP] Level-type field LLLLL - BGP Peer level PPP - pdu type
[version] 1 octet #6 bit-mask Minor version /ack field (Exact format depends on PDU)
[Policy Domain/ ack] 1 octet #7 [LL DDDDDD] Level ACK and Policy Domain [LL - level] [DDDDDD - domain] [maximum routes/prefix] 1 octet #8 integer max_rt [PDU specific header] n octets octets format based on PDU type [9-53 octets] and protocol Table 1
In embodiments of the invention, LSPN protocols may include one or more of the following types of messages, or Packet Data Units (PDUs):
Hello PDUs
Link State PDUs
Complete Sequence Number Packets (CSNPs)
Partial Sequence Number Packets (PSNPs)
Policy filters BGP-4 messages
These PDUs are elaborated upon further herein.
BGP LSPN
One extension of an existing path vector protocol to an LSPN, in accordance with embodiments of the invention, is an extension of BGP, referred to herein as BGP LSPN. In embodiments of the invention , BGP LSPN is a Link-State Path Vector protocol (LSPV) which utilizes a link- state algorithm to calculate the BGP peer topology over virtual links. The BGP Path Vector allows multiple paths for a BGP route weighted by a vector. The Path Vector portion of BGP utilizes routing policies to determine the vector of weights associated with each routes. In embodiments of the invention, the Link State Path Vector combines these two calculations for each route.
In embodiments, BGP LSPV peers are connected via a virtual Unk topology, which may or may not comprise full mesh topologies. BGP LSPV peers can be layered into multiple levels of Peer interconnection within a policy domain; a policy domain may comprise a single Autonomous System (AS) or multiple ASs, as further described in U.S. application 10/648,141, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. In embodiments of the invention, BGP LSPV peers can communicate as I-BGP peers with n-levels, or as I-BGP and E-BGP peers at n-levels within an Autonomous System Confederations, or as I-BGP and E-BGP at n-levels within a policy domain.
In embodiments of the invention, BGP LSPV establishes peer sessions with BGP-4 peers via TCP connections, or with other BGP LSPV peers via TCP connections, GRE Tunnels or Multicast groups within an Autonomous System (AS). In embodiments of the invention, these peers exchange one or more of the following types of packets: Hello Link State Packet (LSP) Complete Sequence Number Packet (CSNP) Partial Sequence Number Packet (PSNP) Policy packets, and BGP-v4 compatibility packets .
In embodiments of the invention, each of the packets has a fixed header and a variable amount of additional information following the PDU header. The variable information is formatted in Type-Length- Value (TLV) fields. Each TLV field may be in turn broken down into a variable length sub-TLV field. Each sub-TLV field may in turn be broken down into other sub-fields.
The Hello packets are used to estabhsh a connection between BGP peers. The Link State Packet transmits data between two peers. The CSNP and PSNP are used to indicate which link state packets need to be resent to peers. The CSNP and PSNP allow flooding to rese d any missed packets and to age out by flooding any over long packet. The Policy packets allow for BGP policy to be sent to a peer out of band from the normal Link State Packets. The BGP-v4 compatibility packet allows passage of the BGP LSPV packets.
Overlay of the Hello Header for All LSPV Protocols Embodiments of the invention include overlays for Hello messages in LSPV protocols. Figure 2 illustrates overlay formats for hello PDUs in accordance with some embodiments of the invention. In particular, Fig. 2 illustrates an overlay template for Hello PDUs in LSPVs 200, alongside header formats for Hello PDUs in BGP LSPV 202, IS-IS LSPVs 204, and legacy protocols BGP 4 106, and OSPF 208 210, in accordance with embodiments of the invention.
Table 2 describes the individual fields of the overlay format for Hello messages in LSPV 200 in accordance with embodiments of the invention.
Field length # Field format Field definition
[Intra-domain Routing 1 octet #1 integer architectural constant Protocol Discriminator] [0x85 - IDR protocol] [length indicator] 1 octet #2 integer fixed length [Version/Protocol/ID] 1 octet #3 integer BGP version [5] [ID length] 1 octet #4 integer BGP ID length [level] [PDU type] 1 octet #5 [LLLLL][PPP] Type-PDU field LLLLL - level of BGP peer PPP - 3 bits PDU type PDU type = 1
[version] 1 octet #6 [HHHHAAAA] Hello type, minor version HHHH - hello type AAAA - minor version ack
[Policy Domain/ack] 1 octet #7 [LL DDDDD] ACK count LL = level DDDDDD = ack count 1-254 is valid range
[maximum routes/prefix] 1 octet #8 integer 1-254 = maximum number of routes per prefix. [255 = extended format]
[Circuit ID/level] 1 octet #9 [000 000 LL] [level bits] LL = 00 - single level hello LL = 01 - bit mask (0-4) 10 - extended hello 11 - reserved
[Source ID] ID length Source ID (6 octets) (#10 - 15) BGP Peer Identifier - 4 bytes VCID-[2 bytes] [reserved/hold time] 1 octet #16 [0000 0001] reserved [0x01] or holding time
[PDU length] 2 octets #17 integer PDU length in octets [priority] 1 octet #19 [R][PPPPPP] priority [R] - reserved [PPP PPPP] - priority
LANID 7 octets ID Length + 1 LAN ID from ISIS (#20-27) [1 Octet version 2 octets AS 2 octets Hold Time 2 octets BGP ID (1-2)
Hold-time 2 octets #28 BGP ID 2 octets BGP ID (3-4) Variable fields n octets variable information (#28 - up) Table 2
Variable Header Fields for Hello PDUs
In embodiments of the invention, the Hello PDU includes variable fields, which may, in turn, be used to transmit BGP parameters. In some embodiments, these parameters may include one or more of the following:
Standard Variable fields: Fixed header Security TLV
Optional variable fields: Data format
BGP ISIS Neighbor Addresses BGP Neighbor Addresses
BGP Capability information BGP Security BGP LSP BGP RIB IDs
BGP Peer Policy
In embodiments of the invention, these optional variable fields may be expanded upon as follows:
Data Format
Data format may specify one or more of the length of the IDs for BGP capabilities, AS path IDs, Policy metrics, Tie breaking info, and Label IDs. This field allows the expansion of the IDs into the bytes that fit the current format, after growth of the Internet address space. These formats allow BGP LSPV to be tailored to the minimum amount of space for a usage.
Embodiments of the invention may utilizes the following default format:
ID field length of field PDU used in BGP Peer 4 octets Hello, LSP BGP Capability 1 octet Hello, LSP BGP Security 1 octet Hello, LSP BGP RIB ID 1 octet LSP BGP Path ID 4 octets LSP BGP Label
BGP AS Path 3 octets LSP BGP MED 1 octet LSP BGP Peer ID 4 octets LSP, Hello BGP Capability ID 1 octet LSP, Hello Security ID 1 octet LSP, Hello BGP RIB ID 1 octet LSP, Hello BGP Path Attribute 4 octets LSP Label ID 2 octets LSP Format ID 1 octet LSP, Hello BGP Peer's ISIS neighbor addresses The ISIS addresses associated with BGP peer. These addresses may include one or more of the ISIS NET, interface addresses, and the network reachability addresses.
BGP Neighbor Addresses
The BGP Peer neighbor addresses are specified as BGP-Identifiers with associated Unk information (TCP or other).
BGP Capability Information
The BGP capability information may identify which BGP features this BGP- LSPV peer supports.
Security Information
BGP Security information associated with this BGP peer session. In the hello packet, security information can link to BGP -LSPV format information, BGP neighbor information or BGP Capability information.
In LSP information, the security information can apply any field in the PDU.
LSP Entries LSP entries information that gives remaining life on LSP sent. LSP entry information is not vaUd in Hello or LSP packet. LSP entries are only valid in the Complete Sequence Number PDU or the Partial Sequence Number PDU.
RIB ID information The RIB information associates a RIB ID with RIB information. The default format may include one or more of the following fields: RIB-id (1 octet), AFI (2 octets), SAFI (1 octet), Extended Communities field (count, communities (8 octets))
BGP Peer Policy
BGP peers can pass policy on which peers are accepted, and which links they will accept. This may include Peer addresses, capabilities of the peers, AS information, type of BGP protocol (BGP-4, BGP -LSPV or Both), type of peer (IBGP, EBGP, IBGP BGP-4 RR, IBGP BGP-4 RR client, IBGP BGP-4 AS confederation), capabilities of the peer (dynamic and static) including multiprotocol, route refresh and peer oscillation, and valid security associations. The "Unks" defined can be TCP, GRE or other links. Each link may also set TE parameters.
In embodiments of the invention, BGP Peer poUcy is passed between IBGP peers to allow all IBGP peers to obtain the same policy. The BGP -LSPV protocol may either work with passing of BGP peer policy or via configuration for the BGP peer pohcy.
Link State PDU
Embodiments of the invention include overlays for Link State messages in LSPV protocols. Table 3 lists field types in headers for link state messages in accordance with embodiments of the invention.
Field length Field format Field definition
[Intra-domain Routing 1 octet #1 integer architectural constant Protocol Discriminator] [0x85]
[length indicator] 1 octet #2 integer fixed header length [28] [Version/Protocol/ID] 1 octet #3 integer BGP version [5] [ID length] 1 octet #4 integer ID field length [6] [level] [PDU type] 1 octet #5 [LLLLL][PPP] Level-type field LLLLL - BGP Peer level PPP - pdutype [2]
[version] 1 octet #6 [HHHHAAAA] Minor version [1]
[Policy Domain /reserved] 1 octet #7 [LL PPPPPPP] policy domain /level [LL - level PPPPPP - Policy Domain id
[maximum routes/prefix] 1 octet #8 integer max routes per prefix
PDU length 2 octets #9 integer pdu length
Remaining lifetime 2 octets #11 integer # of seconds before expires
[LSP ID] ID length+2 LSP-ID BGPv4 Identifier [4 octets] (#13-20) VCID (high) [2 octets] LSP ID [2 octets]
Sequence number length 4 octets integer sequence number of LSP #21-24
[Checksum] 2 octets octets checksum #25-26
[Reserve/Overflow] 1 octet [RRRD][O][LL] reserve/Overflow field #27 R -reserved, O - overflow LL - level (2 bits)
Variable fields n octets octets variable fields #28 - end Table 3.
In embodiments of the invention, Link State messages may further include one or more variable fields, examples of which are provided below:
Fixed header Link State
In embodiments of the invention, Link State messages may also include one or more of the following optional headers:
Data format BGP ISIS Neighbor Addresses
BGP Neighbor Addresses BGP Capability information
BGP Security
BGP LSP
BGP RIB IDs BGP Peer Policy
BGP Routes
BGP Path
BGP Labels
BGP Route PoUcy Results BGP AS Path
BGP NextHop
BGP Local Communities
BGP Aggregator
BGP MISC BGP PoUcy
In embodiments of the invention, these optional variable fields may be expanded upon as follows: I BGP Route Information The BGP route information contains the following information. RIB-ID, Prefix, label-id, BGP Path-id, PoUcy results-id, Security ID field definitions allow grouping of prefixes by RIB-ID.
BGP Path Attributes BGP path attribute information with: BGP -Path-id is a tuple with a set of IDs. In embodiments, the default format may include one or more of the following: BGP Path-ID, Origin ID AS Path-id, Next_Hop-id, Next_hop ID, MED_id, Aggregator_ID, Community_id, MISC_id
Label Attributes
MPLS label attributes associated with this path may also be communicated, in accordance with embodiments of the invention..
Policy Results
Includes policy information associated with BGP routes. In accordance with embodiments of the information included in the policy information may include one or more of the following: Policy-id: LOCAL_PREF info (received and calculated) MULTI_EXIT_DISC (received and calculated) Tie-break info (received and calculated) Policy-result-info [ variable field] PoUcy-match-info (variable field)
AS Paths This field contains a sequence of AS paths this BGP peer originates. Each of the AS path are identified by an AS Path ID of 4 bytes.
NEXT_HOPS This field lists the NEXT HOP information for a BGP peer.
Communities This field contains BGP Communities information
Local Aggregation Attributes
This field contains the ATOMIC Aggregator and Aggregator information from a BGP Path.
Misc BGP4 Path Attributes
The local miscellaneous Path Attributes this BGP Peer originates such as, by way of non-limiting example, ATOMIC attributes or any optional transitive attributes not defined by BGP-4 specifications. Route Policy
Policy for BGP Routes Access lists, ORF lists, route maps and policy.
Complete Sequence Number Packet
Embodiments of the invention support the communication of Complete Sequence Number Packets in LSPVs. In embodiments, the complete sequence number (CSN) packet indicate the life time, checksum and authentication of LSPs already sent. The CSN provides a range of information handled by this PDU.
An example format for CSN PDUs, in accordance with embodiments of the invention, is presented in Table 4.
Field length Field format Field definition [Intra-domain Routing 1 octet #1 architectural constant
Protocol Discriminator] [0x85]
[length indicator] 1 octet #2 length of fixed header [17]
[Version/Protocol/ID] 1 octet #3 integer [5] BGP version
[ID length] 1 octet #4 integer [6] BGP ID length [6]
[level] [PDU type] 1 octet #5 [LLLLL][PPP] level, pdu type [3]
[version] 1 octet #6 [HHHHAAAA] Minor version
[Policy Domain/ Ack] 1 octet #7 [LL DDDDDD] Policy domain ack
[maximum routes/prefix] 1 octet #8 integer 0-254 prefixes
PDU length 2 octets #9 [source ID] ID length SRC-ID BGP-ID [4 octets] + 1 octets VCID-high [2 octets] (#11-17) zero [1 octet]
[start LSP ID] ID length+2 LSP-ID of lst LSP (#18-#26) [2nd LSP ID] ID length +2 LSP-ID oflast LSP (#27-#34) (repeating of IDs)
.. repeat here for LSPs [Last LSP ID] ID length + 2 LSP-ID ofLast ID Table 4
In some embodiments, the LSP-ID format is as follows:
BGPv4 Identifier - 4 octets VCID - 2 octets LSP number - 2 octets
This format of the LSP allows IS-IS and BGP v4 to run on the same connection as BGP-LSPV. Other suitable LSP ID formats shall be apparent to those skilled in the art.
In embodiments of the invention, CSN packets may include one or more variable fields. An example format for such variable fields is provided in Table 5. Field length Field format Field definition
Code 1 octet integer Code point for type of field
Length 1 octet integer length of the field
Value length variables based on type
Table 5
Partial Sequence Number PDU
Embodiments of the invention allow Partial Sequence Number (PSN) messages to be communicated in LSPVs. An example of a format for such PSNs in accordance with embodiments of the invention is presented in Table 6.
Field length Field format Field definition
[Intra-domain Routing 1 octet #1 [0x85] architectural constant Protocol Discriminator] [0x85]
[length indicator] 1 octet #2 integer length of fixed header [18] [Version/Protocol/ID] 1 octet #3 integer BGP version [5] [ID length] 1 octet #4 integer BGP ID length [6]
[level] [PDU type] 1 octet #5 [LLLLL][PPP] level-type [5]
[version] 1 octet #6 [1] Minor version
[Policy Domain/reserved] 1 octet #7 [LL DDDDD] PoUcy Domain/acks
[maximum routes/prefix] 1 octet #8 integer 0-254 prefixes
PDU length 2 octets #9 integer length of PDU [source ID] ID length [source-id] BGP Identifier length + 2 octets VCID [2 bytes] (#11-18) Table 6
In embodiments of the invention, PSNs may include variable fields, such as those presented in
Table 7 below. Field length Field format Field definition
Code 1 octet integer Type of TLV
Length 1 octet integer length of the field
Value length variables based on type Table 7
Variable fields may also include one or more of the foUowing:
LSP entries (type 4)
The LSP indicates remaining Ufe, and a checksum Security information (type 3)
The security information includes authentication information and security identifiers.
PDU Format for Policy Filters
Embodiments of the invention support the communication of policy filters in LSPVs, which contain a complete sequence number PDU listing the IDs of all LSP sent by the given node. A header format used for such policy filters in accordance with embodiments of the invention is presented in Table 8. Field length Field format Field definition
[Intra-domain Routing 1 octet #1 [0x86] architectural constant
Protocol Discriminator] [0x85]
[length indicator] 1 octet #2 integer length of fixed header
[Version/Protocol/ID] 1 octet #3 integer [5] BGP version
[ID length] 1 octet #4 integer BGP ID length
[level] [PDU type] 1 octet #5 [LLLLL][PPP ] level, type [type: 5]
[version] 1 octet #6 [HHHH AAAA] Minor version
[Policy Domain /reserved] 1 octet #7 [LL PPPPPP] Policy domain
[maximum routes/prefix] 1 octet #8 integer 0-254 prefixes
PDU length 2 octets #9 integer length of full pdu
Remaining lifetime 2 octets #11 integer # of seconds before; expires
[LSP ID] ID length+2 LSP-ID BGPv4 Identifier [4 octets] (#13-#20) NCID (high) [2 octets] PoUcy LSP ID [2 octets]
[Sequence number length] 4 octets integer sequence number off LSP (#21-24)
[Checksum] 2 octets byte checksum (#25-26)
[R] [RRD] [O] [LL] 1 octet [RRRD] [ORLL] Overflow/reserved "bit (#27) R -reserved, O - overflow bit LL - level (2 bits) Table 8
In embodiments of the invention, the Policy Filter PDUs may include variable fields, which may include one or more of the foUowing:
BGP Security One of the two fields: BGP Peer Policy (TLN 7), BGP Route PoUcy Optional fields:
BGP Capabilities BGP RIBs BGP Peer Policy
BGP Route PoUcy
BGPv4 Packet
In embodiments of the invention, BGP-LSPV can co-exist with a BGP-4 peer on the same packets. The BGP4 header includes 16 bytes of marker. The BGP-LSPV fixed header overlays the marker field of the BGP-4 packets. Currently the BGPv4 specification indicates that the marker bytes is all Is. In embodiments of the invention, the BGP-LSPV header allows for this marker field to be stuffed within it. In some such embodiments, , the intra-domain routing protocol Discriminator is set as0x85 as an architectural constant for BGP-LSPV. 0x85 was used by IDRP, an ISO Version of BGP.
In embodiments of the invention, the header portion of the BGP-LSPV packets are the same format as the IS-IS packets with a 6 octet ID field and additional variable length fields at the end. The header portion of the BGP-LSPV packets can also overlay the maker field of the BGP-4 packets. These overlays provide BGP-LSPV with the ability to co-exist with either the BGP-4 or BGP-LSPV protocol on a link. The discriminating factor is the intra-domain routing protocol discriminator 0x85 that indicates this is a BGP-LSPV protocol.
In embodiments of the invention, the BGP-4 packets may initiate the connection with the following exchange:
Hello/Open [BGP LSPV hello/BGP v4 Hello] -» r~ HeUo/Open [BGP LSPV/BGP v4] - BGP4/Keepalive [BGP LSPV/BGPv4]
In the event of a failure, in embodiments of the invention the BGP-4 may take down the connection with:
BGP4/Notify >
A PDU format for such headers, in accordance with embodiments of the invention, is presented in Table 9
Field length Field format Field definition
[Intra-domain Routing 1 octet #1 architectural constant
Protocol Discriminator] [0x85 - IDR protocol]
[length indicator] 1 octet #2 integer fixed length [28]
[Version/Protocol/ID] 1 octet #3 integer BGP version [5]
[ID length] 1 octet #4 integer ID length [6]
[level] [PDU type] 1 octet #5 [LLLLL][PPP] Type-length [type 6]
[version] 1 octet #6 [HHHHAAAA] Minor version
[Policy] 1 octet #7 [reserved]
[maximum routes/prefix] 1 octet #8 1-254 maximum routes [255 = extended format]
Field length Field format Field definition [reserved/C id] 1 octet #9 [000 000 U] Level ID [1 = level bits]
[Source ID] ID length Source ID (6 octets) #10-#15 BGP ID BGP Peer Identifier - 4 bytes VCID-[2 bytes]
[holding time] 2 octets integer BGP-LSPV holding time #16-17
[PDU length] 2 octets integer PDU length in octets #18-19
[priority] 1 octet integer priority (7 bits) #20 [R] [PPP PPPP] lanID 7 octets ID Length + 1 . LAN ID from ISIS #21 -#27 [2 octets circuit/lan-id 2 octets BGP4 pdu length 1 octet BGP4 type 2 octets BGP4 info Table 9
Message Field format length Field definition
Update [2] BGP info 2 bytes # of withdrawn routes
Keepalive [3] BGP info 2 bytes nothing
Notify[4] BGP info 2 bytes 1 byte Error code 1 byte Error Sub-code
While various embodiments have been described above, it should be understood that they have been presented by way of example only, and not limitation. Thus, the breadth and scope of a preferred embodiment should not be limited by any of the above-described exemplary embodiments, but should be defined only in accordance with the foUowing claims and their equivalents.

Claims

Claims:
1. A computer network system for exchanging routing information in an inter-network, the system further including a link state path vector protocol for exchanging routes to destinations on the inter-network, wherein the routes are entered into link-state databases along with associated path vectors in order to select routes in the inter-network, and wherein packets excha iged via the link state path vector protocol are encoded in a prescribed format, the computer network system comprising:
a plurahty of packet data unit (PDU) types exchanged via the Unk state path vector parotocol, the plurality of PDU types including hello PDUs for initiating communication sessions between routers exchanging routes via the link state path vector protocol, link state PDUs indicating a set of adjacent routers in the inter-netwoπk;
a first plurahty of contiguous octets in the prescribed format, the first plurality of contiguous octets including one or more fields indicating an length indicator, a version number, s.n identifier for a source router for packets communicated by the link state path vector protocol;
a second plurality of contiguous octets following the first plurality of contiguous octets, the second plurality of contiguous octets including one or more fields indicating an identifier for a local area network and a PDU length for packets communicated by the link state patt vector protocol;
wherein the plurality of PDU types are formatted according to the prescribed format.
2. The computer network system of claim 1 , wherein the first plurality of contiguous octets are aligned with a marker field in a header format for Border Gateway Protocol version 4.
3. The computer network system of claim 1 , wherein the link state path vector protocol is an extension of Border Gateway Protocol (BGP).
4. The computer network system of claim 3, wherein the first plurality of contiguous octets includes a protocol discriminator field, the protocol discriminator field including a hexidecimal constant identifying the extension of Border Gateway protocol.
5. The computer network system of claim 4, wherein the hexidecimal constant equals 0x85.
6. The computer network system of claim 1 , wherein the Unk state path vector protocol includes an extension to Intermediate System- Intermediate System (IS-IS).
7. The computer network system of claim 1, wherein the plurality of packet types further include Partial Sequence Number Packets.
8. The computer network system of claim 1, wherein the plurality of packet types further include Complete Sequence Number Packets.
the system including a first protocol for exchanging routing information, wherein the first protocol is one of a legacy link state protocol and path vector protocol, complete sequence number PDUs indicating one or more of a lifetime, a checksum, and an authentication of routes exchanged
9. The computer network system of claim 1, wherein the plurality of PDU types further includes BGP Update messages.
10. The computer network system of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of PDU types further includes BGP Keepalive messages.
PCT/US2004/034123 2003-10-14 2004-10-14 Systems and methods for combining and extending routing protocols WO2005086621A2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US51140403P 2003-10-14 2003-10-14
US51128103P 2003-10-14 2003-10-14
US60/511,281 2003-10-14
US60/511,404 2003-10-14

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2005086621A2 true WO2005086621A2 (en) 2005-09-22
WO2005086621A3 WO2005086621A3 (en) 2006-08-10

Family

ID=34976049

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2004/034123 WO2005086621A2 (en) 2003-10-14 2004-10-14 Systems and methods for combining and extending routing protocols

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (1) US20050094566A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2005086621A2 (en)

Families Citing this family (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8868745B1 (en) * 2003-12-22 2014-10-21 Avaya Inc. Method and system for providing configurable route table limits in a service provider for managing VPN resource usage
US20050261970A1 (en) * 2004-05-21 2005-11-24 Wayport, Inc. Method for providing wireless services
US7787396B1 (en) 2004-05-27 2010-08-31 Cisco Technology, Inc. Automatic ORF-list creation for route partitioning across BGP route reflectors
US7460481B2 (en) * 2004-12-01 2008-12-02 Cisco Technology, Inc. Inter-domain TE-LSP with IGP extensions
US7318108B2 (en) * 2004-12-22 2008-01-08 Cisco Technology, Inc. Method and apparatus providing prioritized convergence in border gateway protocol
US7599313B2 (en) * 2005-04-28 2009-10-06 Cisco Technology, Inc. Method to scale hierarchical route reflectors using automated outbound route filtering-list mechanism
US7688819B2 (en) * 2006-03-06 2010-03-30 Cisco Technology, Inc. Faster routing protocol convergence using efficient message markup
US7929524B2 (en) * 2006-09-29 2011-04-19 Cisco Technology, Inc. Apparatus and method to hide transit only multi-access networks in OSPF
EP2026530A1 (en) 2007-07-12 2009-02-18 Wayport, Inc. Device-specific authorization at distributed locations
US7787399B2 (en) * 2008-07-25 2010-08-31 Alcatel-Lucent Usa Inc. Automatically configuring mesh groups in data networks
US7778204B2 (en) * 2008-07-25 2010-08-17 Alcatel-Lucent Usa Inc. Automatic maintenance of a distributed source tree (DST) network
US9253041B2 (en) * 2013-07-03 2016-02-02 Cisco Technology, Inc. Advertising layer 0 network topology information to a layer 3 network
CN110557317B (en) * 2018-06-01 2022-05-13 华为技术有限公司 Method and apparatus for managing virtual private network

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20030067924A1 (en) * 2001-10-05 2003-04-10 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Redundancy mechanization protocol for a massively parallel router

Family Cites Families (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6587475B1 (en) * 1998-09-04 2003-07-01 Lucent Technologies Inc. Method of assigning circuit ID's in an IS-IS compliant network
US6704795B1 (en) * 1999-10-12 2004-03-09 Cisco Technology, Inc. Technique for reducing consumption of router resources after BGP restart
US6636895B1 (en) * 1999-10-13 2003-10-21 Nortel Networks Limited System, device, and method for distributing multicast routing information in a protocol independent multicast network
US6820134B1 (en) * 2000-12-28 2004-11-16 Cisco Technology, Inc. Optimizing flooding of information in link-state routing protocol
US20050047353A1 (en) * 2003-08-25 2005-03-03 Susan Hares Systems and methods for routing employing link state and path vector techniques
US20050047406A1 (en) * 2003-08-25 2005-03-03 Susan Hares Nested components for network protocols
US20050047412A1 (en) * 2003-08-25 2005-03-03 Susan Hares Establishment and enforcement of policies in packet-switched networks

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20030067924A1 (en) * 2001-10-05 2003-04-10 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Redundancy mechanization protocol for a massively parallel router

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20050094566A1 (en) 2005-05-05
WO2005086621A3 (en) 2006-08-10

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US10826824B2 (en) Propagation of routing information in RSVP-TE for inter-domain TE-LSPS
US7814227B2 (en) Computation of a shortest inter-domain TE-LSP across a set of autonomous systems
US20050047353A1 (en) Systems and methods for routing employing link state and path vector techniques
US7460481B2 (en) Inter-domain TE-LSP with IGP extensions
EP2904748B1 (en) Segment routing techniques
US7616574B2 (en) Dynamic retrieval of routing information for inter-AS TE-LSPs
EP2036273B1 (en) A technique for efficiently determining acceptable link-based loop free alternatives in a computer network
EP1828895B1 (en) An efficient mechanism for fast recovery in case of border router node failure in a computer network
US8089968B2 (en) Automatic prioritization of BGP next-hop in IGP convergence
US7710872B2 (en) Technique for enabling traffic engineering on CE-CE paths across a provider network
EP1994697A2 (en) Technique for efficiently routing ip traffic on ce-ce paths across a provider network
WO2007084280A2 (en) Dynamic protection against failure of a head-end node of one or more te-lsps
US20050094566A1 (en) Systems and methods for combining and extending routing protocols
Cisco OSI Routing
Cisco OSI Routing
Cisco OSI Routing

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BW BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EC EE EG ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NA NI NO NZ OM PG PH PL PT RO RU SC SD SE SG SK SL SY TJ TM TN TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VC VN YU ZA ZM ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): BW GH GM KE LS MW MZ NA SD SL SZ TZ UG ZM ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase