WO2006021052A1 - Control system for a material handling facility - Google Patents
Control system for a material handling facility Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2006021052A1 WO2006021052A1 PCT/AU2005/001293 AU2005001293W WO2006021052A1 WO 2006021052 A1 WO2006021052 A1 WO 2006021052A1 AU 2005001293 W AU2005001293 W AU 2005001293W WO 2006021052 A1 WO2006021052 A1 WO 2006021052A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- material handling
- control system
- handling facility
- equipment
- destination
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/08—Logistics, e.g. warehousing, loading or distribution; Inventory or stock management
Definitions
- This invention relates to materials handling and dispatch systems including bulk material handling facilities, and in particular a control system for controlling the flow of materials in materials handling facilities.
- Bulk material handling facilities of the type that the invention has application in are facilities such as coal terminals, a bulk ore distribution and shipping facilities, and bulk grain receival, storage, and shipping facilities.
- the facilities in which the invention has application are characterised by being made up of a collection of material handling equipment, which can be identified as having at least one entry point for the materials and at least one departure point for the materials, and more than one possible route along which material may be conveyed.
- the equipment may move the materials in space, that is over a distance (eg on a conveyor), or in time, as in storage and later redistribution (eg a hopper).
- a control system for a material handling facility having at least one source, at least one destination, a plurality of transporters connecting said at least one source and said at least one destination, and more than one possible route along which material may be conveyed
- said system including interface means interfacing with control means for controlling each said transporter, said control system including a database to store specifications for each said transporter, and also store equipment configuration and inter-connection data for said material handling facility, said control system including a configuration module adapted to determine possible transport routes from said equipment configuration and inter-connection data wherein said database stores equipment configuration and inter-connection data on a single source to single destination basis, and wherein said configuration module utilises an overlay methodology of the individual single source to single destination routes to determine multiple source and/or multiple destination configurations and/or source, destination, transport route variations, before said control system implements determined configurations or variations via said interface means.
- the configuration module and database may form part of a computer or a PLC (programmable logic controller) or any other device or combination of devices capable of performing computational tasks and storing data.
- the control means may be any device capable of controlling a transporter device.
- the interface means may be any device capable of interfacing between the control means and the control system.
- each said source and each said destination have an associated said transporter connecting with at least one further transporter.
- the transporters associated with specific sources may comprise without limitation, material conveyors such as belt-type conveyors, discharge gates, augers, or other dispensers, or any type of material transport where material flow or flow rate can be controlled.
- the transporters associated with specific destinations may comprise, without limitation, material conveyors such as belt-type conveyors, ship loaders, or stackers. The function of such associated transporters is to convey material between sources and destinations and the further transporters.
- transporter includes within its scope, positioning equipment to change a flowpath, such as gates and shuttles.
- control system is arranged to implement live configuration changes.
- a new transport route can be implemented while the old transport route continues to operate.
- This arrangement obviates the need to shut down transport operations for lengthy periods in order to implement configuration changes.
- control system is arranged to perform real-time simulation of said material handling facility operations. In this manner, a variety of configuration changes may be simulated before implementation of the selected configuration.
- the invention provides a control system for material handling facilities where route definition is simplified to a single source to single destination configuration, and data pertaining to each possible configuration is stored for retrieval and use by the system.
- route definition is simplified to a single source to single destination configuration, and data pertaining to each possible configuration is stored for retrieval and use by the system.
- the single source to single destination route definition data for each - A - of the desired configurations is overlaid. This obviates the need for separate storage of route definition data for all possible route combinations, which in a complex material handling facility could be many more times the number of single source-single destination routes.
- control and simulation of a material handling facility operation is vastly simplified.
- Preferably said configuration module groups overlaid routes so the control system can operate them as an entity.
- control system includes means to monitor at least some of said transporters, sources, or destinations to determine any event of equipment failure and raise an alarm or exert over-riding control over said material handling facility.
- the interface means incorporates processor means which implements configurations determined by said configuration module.
- the processor means may conveniently comprise one or more programmable logic controllers.
- the processor means may include any equivalent device capable of being programmed in order to control the control means associated with the transporters.
- the processor means within said interface means is associated with memory means for storing configuration and operational data required to control operation of each said source, each said destination, and each said transporter, at least for configurations determined by said configuration module.
- the configuration module and the interface means utilise separate processor means. In this manner, facility operations are not dependent on the configuration module always being on-line.
- control system includes an operator interface having further processor means, independent from processor means of said configuration module and said interface means.
- a method of controlling a material handling facility having at least one source, at least one destination, a plurality of transporters connecting said at least one source and said at least one destination, and more than one possible route along which material may be conveyed, said method including providing a database to store specifications for each said transporter, and also store equipment configuration and inter ⁇ connection data for said material handling facility, said method including determining possible transport routes from said equipment configuration and inter-connection data wherein said method includes utilising said database to store equipment configuration and inter-connection data as a plurality of single source to single destination routes, and wherein said method utilises an overlay methodology of the individual single source to single destination routes to determine multiple source and/or multiple destination configurations and/or source, destination, transport route variations, before determined configurations or variations are implemented.
- each said source and each said destination have an associated said transporter connecting with at least one further transporter
- said transporters associated with specific sources comprising without limitation, material conveyors such as belt-type conveyors, discharge gates, augers, or other dispensers, or any type of material transport where material flow or flow rate can be controlled
- said transporters associated with specific destinations comprising without limitation, material conveyors such as belt-type conveyors, ship loaders, or stackers
- said further transporters including material conveyors such as belt-type conveyors, and positioning equipment to change a flowpath, such as gates and shuttles.
- Preferably said method includes implementation of live configuration changes.
- said method includes performing of real-time simulation of said material handling facility operations to allow simulation of a variety of configuration changes before implementation of the selected configuration.
- said method includes grouping of overlaid routes so the control system can operate them as an entity.
- Preferably said method includes monitoring at least some of said transporters, sources, or destinations to determine any event of equipment failure and raise an alarm or exert over-riding control over said material handling facility.
- said database is interfaced with a configuration module in which configurations are determined, and connected with interface means interfacing with control means for controlling each said transporter, wherein said interface means includes processor means and associated memory means for storing data pertaining to a configuration incorporating any transporter associated therewith.
- Figure 1 is a diagram showing a simplified example of a material handling facility having three sources and three destinations;
- Figure 2 is a schematic of the control system of the embodiment shown interfaced with material handling equipment
- Figure 3a is a diagram showing inter-relationship between components of the control system of the embodiment.
- Figure 3b is a diagram illustrating the key functions within part of the control system, and its relationship with the programmable logic controller components of the embodiment.
- Figure 4 is a chart illustrating key control system object model abstraction
- Figure 5 is a logic chart illustrating command resolution and equipment item control
- Figures 6 and 7 are a logic chart illustrating a typical overlay route command resolution for operating transporter equipment
- Figures 8 and 9 are a logic chart illustrating a typical overlay route command resolution for operating positioning transporter equipment; and Figures 10, 11 and 12 are a logic chart illustrating positioning equipment position setpoint resolution for operating positioning transporter equipment.
- the system configuration for a complicated material handling facility is capable of handling a large number of routes and hundreds of items of equipment including car dumpers, conveyors, shuttles, gates, splitters, trippers, processing plant, shiploaders, reclaimers, stackers, feeders and sample stations.
- the control system of the invention achieves this with a system configuration database which is managed using a configuration module.
- the configuration module has a route-generator that automatically establishes all possible base routes between each of the sources and destinations. These base routes are then be overlaid to form all desired route combinations.
- the equipment control attributes specify the operational parameters of equipment included in the material handling facility. This includes, without limitation: downstream equipment - which equipment can it feed to downstream, upstream equipment - which equipment can feed burden onto it, feed point from upstream equipment (distance in metres), for example where there are multiple feed points along a conveyor, whether the equipment is capable of variable speed operation, whether the equipment is capable reverse operation, full speed (m/s), drive power (kW), and stopping distance (m) - distance it takes to stop after receiving a stop command.
- the control system In order to control the equipment, the control system must communicate via interface means using control means in the form of equipment controlling Programmable Logic Controllers (PLCs).
- PLCs Programmable Logic Controllers
- the control means may typically be from different vendors such as GE Fanuc 90/70, GE Series Six and Allen Bradley ControlLogix.
- the communication in a retro-fitting application could typically be over 5 different communication networks such as Allen Bradley Ethernet, GE Fanuc 90/70 Ethernet over FDDI, Allen Bradley ControlNet and
- a route has been defined as an entity consisting of a combination of source(s) to a combination of destination(s) with each route combination counted as a separate entity.
- the material handling system shown in figure 1 comprises a material handling facility with three sources (a car dumper 11 , a processing plant 13, and a reclaimer 15) and three destinations (a shiploader 17, a stacker 19, and a tripper 21) and associated transporters in the form of conveyors A, B, C, E, F, and G. Conveyors A, B, and C lead to a conveyor D, which discharges to conveyors E, F, and G.
- Total Route Combinations ( m Ci+ m C 2 +... + " 1 Cm)C 1 C 1 H- 0 C 2 +...+ "C n )
- the system of the invention has a route definition where all the routes are defined as Single-Source-Single-Destination routes.
- the total number of routes for m sources and n destination using the single source-single destination route definition is " 1 C 1 "C 1
- Table 1 compares the number of routes in the control system route definition of the invention against those defined using traditional route definition.
- Table 1 assumes theoretical scenarios where all the sources and destinations are connected. This may not be the case in practice, hence the number of routes in a real system may be smaller. Using the single source to single destination route definition, the number of routes in a complicated material handling facility can be reduced from over 400,000 to less than 250 single source to single destination routes.
- Table 1 Comparison of Single Source - Single Destination (SSSD) Route Definition versus Traditional (Trad.) Definition
- the single source to single destination routes are A-D-E, A- D-F, A-D-G, B-D-E, B-D-F, B-D-G, C-D-E, C-D-F, and C-D-G.
- Multi-source to multi-destination routes are achieved by overlaying single source to single destination routes. Overlaid routes are grouped by the control system so that they can be operated as an entity, for example, synchronised starting, stopping and defined auto-divert (for a diverge route overlaid combination) and blending characteristics (for converge route overlaid combination).
- routes A-D-E and B-D-E are overlaid by the control system.
- a complicated route such as (A+B)-D-(E+F+G) which traditionally would have required individual configuration by a control system can therefore be defined as the overlay of three of these base routes, ie A-D-E, B-D-F, and either of A-D-G or B-D-G.
- the control system overlaid route operation concepts allow route equipment to be seamlessly shared by multiple routes; so that material flow-path can be changed by overlaying new routes and old routes which are no longer needed are removed whilst common equipment is kept running. This allowance for 'hot- swapping 1 of routes reduces valuable production downtime. It does not impose any structural limits to the maximum number of split/combined/blending routes other than the maximum number of concurrent routes that can operate within the system.
- the control system of the invention also uses the burden tracking information on each individual route equipment to allow faster startup of routes, as it automatically starts-up all equipment that are free of burden simultaneously.
- the control system of the invention has a centralised system database that can be modified using a configuration module. This allows control behaviour to be defined and modified globally and downloaded to interface means in the form of a master Programmable Logic Controller (PLC). Configurable control functionality is achieved by having a structure with two distinct components:
- Configurable attributes such as route recipes (configurations), strategies, schemas and equipment attributes; are set up using the configuration module and downloaded to the Master PLC. These attributes are the modifiers that provide the control parameters and enable/disable the selection of pre-configured control rules and algorithms. This approach eliminates the need to change the operation of the control algorithms.
- control system allows new equipment and its associated routes to be speedily integrated into the system in a matter of minutes.
- the control system incorporates within its programming, a full audit trail of changes to all configurable data (e.g. route, schema, equipment attributes). This facilitates the management of system data and data integrity. Further security is provided by providing all of the configured data downloaded from the configuration module with a checksum.
- the master PLC has an integrity verification algorithm that detects and reports any data corruption and can be configured to take the necessary shutdown procedure to ensure safe operation of the material handling facility.
- the control system also monitors any product incompatibility along any route. Upon detection of any product mismatch, the operator is alerted and a pre- configured action is executed such as disabling source from feeding.
- the control system is designed to minimise any unnecessary tripping under fault conditions.
- a route group can be configured to have an automatic divert capability. If equipment faults in one of the segments downstream, the system can automatically divert upstream burden to another healthy branch to maintain production. On recovery of the faulted branch, the system can automatically return the diverted equipment back to the pre-configured position.
- the control system monitors the dynamic loading of each transport equipment and automatically protects the equipment from any overloading by reducing the speed of upstream transport equipment so as to reduce the effective discharge rate.
- the control system includes a unique algorithmic alarm and event messaging system, allowing messages to be constructed dynamically. This facilitates a more comprehensive and diagnostic information system for faster fault ⁇ finding and fault recovery. Furthermore, it reduces the complexity of alarm management by facilitating the filtering and classification of alarms.
- the control system logs all critical event, process and alarms. This allows reconstruction of scenarios and facilitates determination of root causes of problems.
- the control system comprises a configuration module 31, an operator interface system 33, and interface means in the form of PLC equipment 35.
- the PLC equipment 35 comprises a master PLC 37 which is an Allen Bradley ControlLogix PLC with three CPUs.
- the first CPU HPTMC
- HPTMP is arranged to provide for burden tracking and management burden loading along the route.
- HPTMM is provided to handle the critical interlocking between equipment to prevent spillage between equipment.
- the master PLC 37 interfaces with generic PLCs 39 for controlling plant equipment. Also included in the interface means 35 are additional PLCs 41 for interfacing with and controlling legacy PLC equipment 43.
- the configuration module 31 provides a centralised engineering interface for defining, maintaining and downloading route and equipment attributes to the master PLC 37 and the operator interface system 33.
- the configuration module 31 is designed to be a purely configuration tool with no real-time control responsibility, ensuring robustness and high availability.
- the operator interface system 33 provides a user interface for operating the control system, providing route status and control function such as start, stop, and preload route commands, logging of the critical data in master PLC 37 so that in the event of a major fault that requires replacement of the master PLC 37, the data can be downloaded to the replacement master PLC so as to minimise the time required for system recovery.
- the operator interface system 33 has been designed to have no real time control responsibility, so that the system tolerates temporary loss of the operator interface system 33. This contributes to higher availability and robustness.
- control system software has an architecture which can be subdivided into a pre- configured selection of control rules and generic control algorithms which are stored as software routines in the main Master PLC 37 in the configuration module 31. The behaviour of these rules can only be changed by modifying the software.
- FIG. 3b shows the key software architecture of the operator interface component 33 of the control system and its data flow to the programmable controller component 37.
- This architecture makes this operator interface component modular and portable so that it can be easily re-deployed on other operator interface system platforms.
- the master PLC 37 has three CPUs identified as HPTMC, HPTMP, and HPTMM.
- HPTMC The first CPU in addition to processing user commands from the operator interface system 33 and performing route sequencing functions, also issues alarms to the operator interface system 33, handles the configuration download interface and data validation from the configuration module 31, and interfaces to other external systems such as power load management systems, product gap management systems, and dust management systems.
- Figure 4 shows the key control system object model abstraction. The following rules apply:
- a Route can only be owned by one Control Room at any one time.
- a Route may contain up to 28 Equipment Items and a route is formed based on the linkages between each of the equipment items.
- a Route may have a number of associated Overlaid Routes, however, a Route is only allowed to associate to one Route Group.
- a Route Group may include a number of Routes (Note that although the control system allows 28 routes to be grouped, due to the limit on maximum number of converging and diverging point behaviour specifications, the permissible number of routes in a route group has been limited to 6 - note this is a configurable parameter in the configuration module).
- a Route Group may have a maximum 6 Configured Diverge and 6 Configured Converge working behaviours.
- Equipment can have a number of Overlaid Routes as its owner (up to 28 Routes).
- Each equipment item can be "owned" by multiple routes. As shown in figure 5, each determined route gives rise to a command to operate a relevant item of equipment.
- the PLC equipment 37 of the control system uses the downloaded configuration from the configuration module 31 and resolves multiple commands from the various routes to generate a single equipment command. This single equipment command is then sent out to physical equipment, provided the control system does not detect a need to trip this equipment.
- a decision in relation to tripping of the equipment is made based on sensing an overload condition or downstream equipment failure or failure in the equipment itself, in order to prevent occurrence of any spillage.
- the control system uses the downloaded route configuration to define the tripping requirement.
- Control system alarms are multiplexed and transmitted to the operator interface system 33 (identified as HPTJDlS in figure 3a and 3b) via an event/alarm message tag which is an integer variable.
- Each master PLC processor will send its own alarm messages to the operator interface system 33.
- Each master PLC processor has its own series of First-in-first-out (FIFO) buffer event/alarm message queues (one per route). In order to ensure that the operator interface system 33 IO server has sufficient time to read the message, each message is shifted out to a HPT_OIS tag via a timer.
- FIFO First-in-first-out
- This alarm messaging system provides benefits where it facilitates production of customised operator information to provide the required level of alarm/message detail, and removes the need to hard-code route information into Citect alarm system.
- the operator interface system 33 event server monitors for new messages and once triggered, the HPT_OIS routine will decide which unused generic alarm (disk based PLC tag) to use - including what type of generic alarm (eg. alarm, warning or log).
- the routine will store extra information, such as Time Stamp, and Description on a corresponding 'Extra Information' disk based PLC tags for later reference.
- the routine will then switch the generic alarm tag on so that an alarm will occur.
- the routine will also store a control system message on a disk based PLC for later display.
- the description field for the alarm can be obtained from the alarm description routine which can be activated by performing a Point Detail (Control-P) with cursor on the alarm item.
- the alarm description routine will use the corresponding 'Extra Information' disk based PLC to determine the description for the alarm. This generic alarm with specific description will appear on the alarm banner or alarm page display.
- the alarms generated via this messaging method will be removed if the message has not been reported within the pre-configured time delay.
- the control system incorporates a unified product code (UPC) which may be assigned to materials being transported.
- UPC unified product code
- the UPC is specified by a 16 bit integer consisting of two components.
- the 12 least significant bits of the integer specifies the origin of the product (e.g. in an ore shipping facility, the mine from which the ore was sourced), and the 3 most significant bits of the integer specifies the refined product classification (e.g. in an ore shipping facility, fines, lumps and high grade)
- the unified product code definition has been designed to facilitate determination of product compatibility.
- Compatibility of Product A and Product B can be determined by simply performing a logical AND operation between the Compatibility Matrix of Product A and the UPC of Product B. If these are products are compatible the result of the ANDed operation should equal UPC of Product B.
- each object has its own configuration (e.g. configurable attributes) which are configured by configuration module 31 and then transfered to the operator interface system 33 and PLC equipment 37 for control and operation respectively.
- a route object configuration includes route recipes (configurations) which specify the sequential order of starting and stopping the equipment within the route both during a startup, shutdown or fault situation.
- each route has its own commands for each of the equipment. These logical route commands for each equipment are then resolved to provide the physical command to the equipment.
- Figure 6 and 7 shows typical command resolution for operating transporter equipment.
- Figures 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12 shows typical command resolution for operating positioning transporter equipment (equipment which can change the direction of flowpath of material). All of this is implemented in the interface means provided by the master PLC 37 in the configuration module 31.
- the embodiment of the invention provides a highly flexible and configurable route selection and sequencing system for controlling large bulk material handling facilities.
- the system has a generic control algorithm that can be configured to suit any material handling facility.
- the system can also be easily reconfigured to cater to plant expansion or modifications without incurring significant costs in testing and re-commissioning, thus achieving cost savings throughout a facility's lifecycle.
- the system of the invention lessens the complexity of the facilities control system. For example in a system having over 500 items of interconnected route equipment controlled by more than 60 dedicated equipment PLCs (Programmable Logic Controllers), the route definition concept embodied in the invention reduces the number of routes from over 400,000 to less than 250 base routes.
- the system architecture also takes advantage of the current generation of industrial controllers with multiple-processors to ensure good performance and robustness.
- the system of the invention offers the following productivity improvements:
- a burden management strategy that prevents overload of route equipment by automatically reducing the speed of transport equipment to prevent the discharge overloading its downstream equipment, and clamps source feed rate to the dynamic route capacity.
- a user-interface, alarm, advisory and process log system that minimises fault recovery time by providing diagnostic information with an audit trail.
- the system of the invention has the advantage of being able to simulate the entire facility off-line, with the performance and restrictions of the real equipment simulated.
- the system further uses a novel system to define the possible configurations and combinations of equipment in the facility, which can then be compared to provide the optimal solution of configuration for the desired production outcomes.
- the chosen configuration can then be downloaded to program the various PLC controllers on the site to reconfigure the system. In a complex facility, this reduces the time taken to reconfigure the material handling to a few hours. This time saving facilitates ease of plant optimisation and reduces the maintenance of cost associated to plant upgrades which involves additional/removal of equipment or flowpaths.
- control system of the embodiment Various modifications are contemplated to the control system of the embodiment, that would provide improvements or enhancement to the functionality and usefulness of the system. These include adding an inventory tracking system to allow tracking of accumulated batch material delivered from a source or to a destination for higher level manufacturing execution system or business information system. It is also contemplated to add a production feed control system to coordinate the feed rate setpoint from the various converging sources to control the production rate and prevent overloading the routes.
- product gap management could be added to allow automatic management of generation/termination of product gaps along the route to facilitate movement or cleaning of equipment (such as mobile machines, trippers, offline position devices) without the need of shutdown the route(s).
- master PLC 37 may be added to master PLC 37 or the additional PLCs 41 to manage any additional functionality and achieve faster system response time.
- master PLC 37 software could be re-deployed on other PLC platforms that support IEC1131-3 language to suit the intended user's preference on the type control system platform.
- operator interface component
- route group characteristics are only defined after the route has been activated.
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
AU2005276960A AU2005276960B2 (en) | 2004-08-27 | 2005-08-26 | Control system for a material handling facility |
BRPI0515052-3A BRPI0515052A (en) | 2004-08-27 | 2005-08-26 | control system of a material handling plant |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
AU2004904882A AU2004904882A0 (en) | 2004-08-27 | Control System for a Material Handling Facility | |
AU2004904882 | 2004-08-27 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2006021052A1 true WO2006021052A1 (en) | 2006-03-02 |
Family
ID=35967125
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/AU2005/001293 WO2006021052A1 (en) | 2004-08-27 | 2005-08-26 | Control system for a material handling facility |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
BR (1) | BRPI0515052A (en) |
WO (1) | WO2006021052A1 (en) |
ZA (1) | ZA200701459B (en) |
Cited By (16)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7799273B2 (en) | 2004-05-06 | 2010-09-21 | Smp Logic Systems Llc | Manufacturing execution system for validation, quality and risk assessment and monitoring of pharmaceutical manufacturing processes |
WO2010142001A2 (en) * | 2009-06-12 | 2010-12-16 | Technological Resources Pty Limited | A mine scheduling system |
EP2378740A1 (en) * | 2010-04-15 | 2011-10-19 | Rockwell Automation Inc. | Method for conducting communications among components of multidomain industrial automation system |
US8484401B2 (en) | 2010-04-15 | 2013-07-09 | Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. | Systems and methods for conducting communications among components of multidomain industrial automation system |
US8840848B2 (en) | 2010-07-23 | 2014-09-23 | Beckman Coulter, Inc. | System and method including analytical units |
US8973736B2 (en) | 2011-11-07 | 2015-03-10 | Beckman Coulter, Inc. | Magnetic damping for specimen transport system |
US9046506B2 (en) | 2011-11-07 | 2015-06-02 | Beckman Coulter, Inc. | Specimen container detection |
US9248982B2 (en) | 2011-05-13 | 2016-02-02 | Beckman Coulter, Inc. | System and method including laboratory product transport element |
US9392072B2 (en) | 2010-04-15 | 2016-07-12 | Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. | Systems and methods for conducting communications among components of multidomain industrial automation system |
US9446418B2 (en) | 2011-11-07 | 2016-09-20 | Beckman Coulter, Inc. | Robotic arm |
US9459273B2 (en) | 2011-05-13 | 2016-10-04 | Beckman Coulter, Inc. | Laboratory product transport element and path arrangement |
US9482684B2 (en) | 2011-11-07 | 2016-11-01 | Beckman Coulter, Inc. | Centrifuge system and workflow |
US9506943B2 (en) | 2011-11-07 | 2016-11-29 | Beckman Coulter, Inc. | Aliquotter system and workflow |
US9588038B2 (en) | 2012-09-14 | 2017-03-07 | Beckman Coulter, Inc. | Analytical system with capillary transport |
US9910054B2 (en) | 2011-11-07 | 2018-03-06 | Beckman Coulter, Inc. | System and method for processing samples |
US20230007852A1 (en) * | 2021-07-08 | 2023-01-12 | The Boston Consulting Group, Inc. | Blending flow configuration engine in a material processing system |
Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4829445A (en) * | 1987-03-11 | 1989-05-09 | National Semiconductor Corporation | Distributed routing unit for fully-automated flexible manufacturing system |
US5202832A (en) * | 1991-01-29 | 1993-04-13 | R. R. Donnelley & Sons Co. | Material handling automation system using portable transfer module |
EP1122194A1 (en) * | 2000-02-01 | 2001-08-08 | Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. | Apparatus and method for automated warehousing |
JP2002193408A (en) * | 2000-12-28 | 2002-07-10 | Toshiba Corp | Physical distribution automating system |
US6705523B1 (en) * | 2002-09-27 | 2004-03-16 | Honda Of America Mfg. Inc. | System and method for delivering supplies to a production line |
TW593097B (en) * | 2003-03-13 | 2004-06-21 | Powerchip Semiconductor Corp | Automated material handling system |
-
2005
- 2005-08-26 WO PCT/AU2005/001293 patent/WO2006021052A1/en active Application Filing
- 2005-08-26 BR BRPI0515052-3A patent/BRPI0515052A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
-
2007
- 2007-02-20 ZA ZA2007/01459A patent/ZA200701459B/en unknown
Patent Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4829445A (en) * | 1987-03-11 | 1989-05-09 | National Semiconductor Corporation | Distributed routing unit for fully-automated flexible manufacturing system |
US5202832A (en) * | 1991-01-29 | 1993-04-13 | R. R. Donnelley & Sons Co. | Material handling automation system using portable transfer module |
EP1122194A1 (en) * | 2000-02-01 | 2001-08-08 | Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. | Apparatus and method for automated warehousing |
JP2002193408A (en) * | 2000-12-28 | 2002-07-10 | Toshiba Corp | Physical distribution automating system |
US6705523B1 (en) * | 2002-09-27 | 2004-03-16 | Honda Of America Mfg. Inc. | System and method for delivering supplies to a production line |
TW593097B (en) * | 2003-03-13 | 2004-06-21 | Powerchip Semiconductor Corp | Automated material handling system |
Cited By (31)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7799273B2 (en) | 2004-05-06 | 2010-09-21 | Smp Logic Systems Llc | Manufacturing execution system for validation, quality and risk assessment and monitoring of pharmaceutical manufacturing processes |
WO2010142001A2 (en) * | 2009-06-12 | 2010-12-16 | Technological Resources Pty Limited | A mine scheduling system |
WO2010142001A3 (en) * | 2009-06-12 | 2011-03-10 | Technological Resources Pty Limited | A mine scheduling system |
US8984533B2 (en) | 2010-04-15 | 2015-03-17 | Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. | Systems and methods for conducting communications among components of multidomain industrial automation system |
EP2378740A1 (en) * | 2010-04-15 | 2011-10-19 | Rockwell Automation Inc. | Method for conducting communications among components of multidomain industrial automation system |
US8484401B2 (en) | 2010-04-15 | 2013-07-09 | Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. | Systems and methods for conducting communications among components of multidomain industrial automation system |
US9392072B2 (en) | 2010-04-15 | 2016-07-12 | Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. | Systems and methods for conducting communications among components of multidomain industrial automation system |
US9140715B2 (en) | 2010-07-23 | 2015-09-22 | Beckman Coulter, Inc. | System and method for controlling thermal cycler modules |
US9519000B2 (en) | 2010-07-23 | 2016-12-13 | Beckman Coulter, Inc. | Reagent cartridge |
US8962308B2 (en) | 2010-07-23 | 2015-02-24 | Beckman Coulter, Inc. | System and method including thermal cycler modules |
US8956570B2 (en) | 2010-07-23 | 2015-02-17 | Beckman Coulter, Inc. | System and method including analytical units |
US8996320B2 (en) | 2010-07-23 | 2015-03-31 | Beckman Coulter, Inc. | System and method including analytical units |
US9046455B2 (en) | 2010-07-23 | 2015-06-02 | Beckman Coulter, Inc. | System and method including multiple processing lanes executing processing protocols |
US8840848B2 (en) | 2010-07-23 | 2014-09-23 | Beckman Coulter, Inc. | System and method including analytical units |
US8932541B2 (en) | 2010-07-23 | 2015-01-13 | Beckman Coulter, Inc. | Pipettor including compliant coupling |
US9285382B2 (en) | 2010-07-23 | 2016-03-15 | Beckman Coulter, Inc. | Reaction vessel |
US9274132B2 (en) | 2010-07-23 | 2016-03-01 | Beckman Coulter, Inc. | Assay cartridge with reaction well |
US9248982B2 (en) | 2011-05-13 | 2016-02-02 | Beckman Coulter, Inc. | System and method including laboratory product transport element |
US10473676B2 (en) | 2011-05-13 | 2019-11-12 | Beckman Coulter, Inc. | Laboratory product transport element and path arrangement |
US9658239B2 (en) | 2011-05-13 | 2017-05-23 | Beckman Coulter, Inc. | Laboratory product transport element and path arrangement |
US9459273B2 (en) | 2011-05-13 | 2016-10-04 | Beckman Coulter, Inc. | Laboratory product transport element and path arrangement |
US8973736B2 (en) | 2011-11-07 | 2015-03-10 | Beckman Coulter, Inc. | Magnetic damping for specimen transport system |
US9506943B2 (en) | 2011-11-07 | 2016-11-29 | Beckman Coulter, Inc. | Aliquotter system and workflow |
US9482684B2 (en) | 2011-11-07 | 2016-11-01 | Beckman Coulter, Inc. | Centrifuge system and workflow |
US9446418B2 (en) | 2011-11-07 | 2016-09-20 | Beckman Coulter, Inc. | Robotic arm |
US9910054B2 (en) | 2011-11-07 | 2018-03-06 | Beckman Coulter, Inc. | System and method for processing samples |
US10048284B2 (en) | 2011-11-07 | 2018-08-14 | Beckman Coulter, Inc. | Sample container cap with centrifugation status indicator device |
US10274505B2 (en) | 2011-11-07 | 2019-04-30 | Beckman Coulter, Inc. | Robotic arm |
US9046506B2 (en) | 2011-11-07 | 2015-06-02 | Beckman Coulter, Inc. | Specimen container detection |
US9588038B2 (en) | 2012-09-14 | 2017-03-07 | Beckman Coulter, Inc. | Analytical system with capillary transport |
US20230007852A1 (en) * | 2021-07-08 | 2023-01-12 | The Boston Consulting Group, Inc. | Blending flow configuration engine in a material processing system |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
BRPI0515052A (en) | 2008-07-01 |
ZA200701459B (en) | 2008-03-26 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
WO2006021052A1 (en) | Control system for a material handling facility | |
US11429087B2 (en) | Method and manufacturing plant for producing a product | |
US20140059518A1 (en) | Method for Object Oriented Programming of Programmable Logic Controllers in Graphical Programming Languages | |
Brandin et al. | The supervisory control of the automated manufacturing system of the AIP | |
WO1994014106A1 (en) | A flexible method for building a recipe in a process control system | |
Adlemo et al. | Towards a truly flexible manufacturing system | |
Buckova et al. | Impact of digital factory tools on designing of warehouses | |
Vaisi et al. | Two-machine robotic cell sequencing under different uncertainties | |
AU2006267602A1 (en) | Article management system | |
EP3789836A1 (en) | Apparatus and method for distributed batch control for modular automation | |
Matsuyama et al. | A state-of-the-art automation system of an ASIC wafer fab in Japan | |
AU2005276960B2 (en) | Control system for a material handling facility | |
Agre et al. | A taxonomy of distributed real-time control systems | |
Vo | Development of insect production automation: Automated processes for the production of Black Soldier Fly (Hermetia illucens) | |
EP3958079A1 (en) | Inter-plant communication | |
Wang et al. | Research on Intelligent Optimization of Bulk Cargo Terminal Control System | |
Simeonov et al. | Simulation scheduling in food industry application | |
Tahmassebi | Industrial experience with a mathematical-programming based system for factory systems planning/scheduling | |
Bangsow et al. | Modeling of production processes | |
Mazur et al. | Industrial Petrochemical Applications: Analysis of Progrmmable Logic Controllers and Distributed Control Systems | |
US20050085936A1 (en) | Method for planning and/or configuring a project | |
Mohamad et al. | Architecture of reconfigurable conveyor system in manufacturing system | |
Liu et al. | Multiple-objective real-time scheduler for semiconductor wafer fab using colored timed object-oriented petri nets (CTOPN) | |
EP4151070A1 (en) | A system, a central control unit and a method for an agricultural facility | |
Caputo et al. | Capacity upgrade criteria of large‐intensive material handling and storage systems: a case study |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BW BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EC EE EG ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KM KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NA NG NI NO NZ OM PG PH PL PT RO RU SC SD SE SG SK SL SM SY TJ TM TN TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VC VN YU ZA ZM ZW |
|
AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): BW GH GM KE LS MW MZ NA SD SL SZ TZ UG ZM ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2005276960 Country of ref document: AU |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 245/MUMNP/2007 Country of ref document: IN |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 2005276960 Country of ref document: AU Date of ref document: 20050826 Kind code of ref document: A |
|
WWP | Wipo information: published in national office |
Ref document number: 2005276960 Country of ref document: AU |
|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application | ||
122 | Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase | ||
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: PI0515052 Country of ref document: BR |