WO2006115629A1 - Diesel particulate matter reduction system - Google Patents
Diesel particulate matter reduction system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2006115629A1 WO2006115629A1 PCT/US2006/010161 US2006010161W WO2006115629A1 WO 2006115629 A1 WO2006115629 A1 WO 2006115629A1 US 2006010161 W US2006010161 W US 2006010161W WO 2006115629 A1 WO2006115629 A1 WO 2006115629A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- reduction device
- diesel particulate
- particulate reduction
- diesel
- particulate
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F01—MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; ENGINE PLANTS IN GENERAL; STEAM ENGINES
- F01N—GAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; GAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES
- F01N3/00—Exhaust or silencing apparatus having means for purifying, rendering innocuous, or otherwise treating exhaust
- F01N3/02—Exhaust or silencing apparatus having means for purifying, rendering innocuous, or otherwise treating exhaust for cooling, or for removing solid constituents of, exhaust
- F01N3/021—Exhaust or silencing apparatus having means for purifying, rendering innocuous, or otherwise treating exhaust for cooling, or for removing solid constituents of, exhaust by means of filters
- F01N3/023—Exhaust or silencing apparatus having means for purifying, rendering innocuous, or otherwise treating exhaust for cooling, or for removing solid constituents of, exhaust by means of filters using means for regenerating the filters, e.g. by burning trapped particles
- F01N3/0231—Exhaust or silencing apparatus having means for purifying, rendering innocuous, or otherwise treating exhaust for cooling, or for removing solid constituents of, exhaust by means of filters using means for regenerating the filters, e.g. by burning trapped particles using special exhaust apparatus upstream of the filter for producing nitrogen dioxide, e.g. for continuous filter regeneration systems [CRT]
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D53/00—Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
- B01D53/34—Chemical or biological purification of waste gases
- B01D53/92—Chemical or biological purification of waste gases of engine exhaust gases
- B01D53/94—Chemical or biological purification of waste gases of engine exhaust gases by catalytic processes
- B01D53/9459—Removing one or more of nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide, or hydrocarbons by multiple successive catalytic functions; systems with more than one different function, e.g. zone coated catalysts
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F01—MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; ENGINE PLANTS IN GENERAL; STEAM ENGINES
- F01N—GAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; GAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES
- F01N13/00—Exhaust or silencing apparatus characterised by constructional features ; Exhaust or silencing apparatus, or parts thereof, having pertinent characteristics not provided for in, or of interest apart from, groups F01N1/00 - F01N5/00, F01N9/00, F01N11/00
- F01N13/009—Exhaust or silencing apparatus characterised by constructional features ; Exhaust or silencing apparatus, or parts thereof, having pertinent characteristics not provided for in, or of interest apart from, groups F01N1/00 - F01N5/00, F01N9/00, F01N11/00 having two or more separate purifying devices arranged in series
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F01—MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; ENGINE PLANTS IN GENERAL; STEAM ENGINES
- F01N—GAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; GAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES
- F01N13/00—Exhaust or silencing apparatus characterised by constructional features ; Exhaust or silencing apparatus, or parts thereof, having pertinent characteristics not provided for in, or of interest apart from, groups F01N1/00 - F01N5/00, F01N9/00, F01N11/00
- F01N13/009—Exhaust or silencing apparatus characterised by constructional features ; Exhaust or silencing apparatus, or parts thereof, having pertinent characteristics not provided for in, or of interest apart from, groups F01N1/00 - F01N5/00, F01N9/00, F01N11/00 having two or more separate purifying devices arranged in series
- F01N13/0093—Exhaust or silencing apparatus characterised by constructional features ; Exhaust or silencing apparatus, or parts thereof, having pertinent characteristics not provided for in, or of interest apart from, groups F01N1/00 - F01N5/00, F01N9/00, F01N11/00 having two or more separate purifying devices arranged in series the purifying devices are of the same type
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F01—MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; ENGINE PLANTS IN GENERAL; STEAM ENGINES
- F01N—GAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; GAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES
- F01N3/00—Exhaust or silencing apparatus having means for purifying, rendering innocuous, or otherwise treating exhaust
- F01N3/02—Exhaust or silencing apparatus having means for purifying, rendering innocuous, or otherwise treating exhaust for cooling, or for removing solid constituents of, exhaust
- F01N3/021—Exhaust or silencing apparatus having means for purifying, rendering innocuous, or otherwise treating exhaust for cooling, or for removing solid constituents of, exhaust by means of filters
- F01N3/033—Exhaust or silencing apparatus having means for purifying, rendering innocuous, or otherwise treating exhaust for cooling, or for removing solid constituents of, exhaust by means of filters in combination with other devices
- F01N3/035—Exhaust or silencing apparatus having means for purifying, rendering innocuous, or otherwise treating exhaust for cooling, or for removing solid constituents of, exhaust by means of filters in combination with other devices with catalytic reactors, e.g. catalysed diesel particulate filters
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D2255/00—Catalysts
- B01D2255/10—Noble metals or compounds thereof
- B01D2255/102—Platinum group metals
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D2255/00—Catalysts
- B01D2255/50—Zeolites
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D2255/00—Catalysts
- B01D2255/90—Physical characteristics of catalysts
- B01D2255/915—Catalyst supported on particulate filters
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D2258/00—Sources of waste gases
- B01D2258/01—Engine exhaust gases
- B01D2258/012—Diesel engines and lean burn gasoline engines
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F01—MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; ENGINE PLANTS IN GENERAL; STEAM ENGINES
- F01N—GAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; GAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES
- F01N2250/00—Combinations of different methods of purification
- F01N2250/02—Combinations of different methods of purification filtering and catalytic conversion
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F01—MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; ENGINE PLANTS IN GENERAL; STEAM ENGINES
- F01N—GAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; GAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES
- F01N2330/00—Structure of catalyst support or particle filter
- F01N2330/02—Metallic plates or honeycombs, e.g. superposed or rolled-up corrugated or otherwise deformed sheet metal
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F01—MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; ENGINE PLANTS IN GENERAL; STEAM ENGINES
- F01N—GAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; GAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES
- F01N2330/00—Structure of catalyst support or particle filter
- F01N2330/12—Metallic wire mesh fabric or knitting
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F01—MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; ENGINE PLANTS IN GENERAL; STEAM ENGINES
- F01N—GAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; GAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES
- F01N2330/00—Structure of catalyst support or particle filter
- F01N2330/30—Honeycomb supports characterised by their structural details
- F01N2330/32—Honeycomb supports characterised by their structural details characterised by the shape, form or number of corrugations of plates, sheets or foils
- F01N2330/325—Corrugations of omega form
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F01—MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; ENGINE PLANTS IN GENERAL; STEAM ENGINES
- F01N—GAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; GAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES
- F01N2330/00—Structure of catalyst support or particle filter
- F01N2330/30—Honeycomb supports characterised by their structural details
- F01N2330/38—Honeycomb supports characterised by their structural details flow channels with means to enhance flow mixing,(e.g. protrusions or projections)
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F01—MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; ENGINE PLANTS IN GENERAL; STEAM ENGINES
- F01N—GAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; GAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES
- F01N2330/00—Structure of catalyst support or particle filter
- F01N2330/30—Honeycomb supports characterised by their structural details
- F01N2330/42—Honeycomb supports characterised by their structural details made of three or more different sheets, foils or plates stacked one on the other
Definitions
- the present disclosure relates generally to diesel engine exhaust systems. More particularly, the present disclosure relates to systems and methods for controlling diesel engine exhaust emissions.
- Diesel engine exhaust contains particulate matter, the emission of which is regulated for environmental and health reasons.
- This particulate matter generally constitutes a soluble organic traction ("SOF") and a remaining portion of hard carbon.
- SOF soluble organic traction
- the soluble organic traction may be partially or wholly removed through oxidation in an oxidation catalyst; however, this typically results in a reduction of only about 20 percent of total particulate emissions.
- vehicles equipped with diesel engines may include diesel particulate filters for more completely removing the particulate matter from the exhaust stream, including the hard carbon portion.
- Conventional wall flow type diesel particulate filters may have particulate removal efficiencies of about 85 percent.
- diesel particulate filters, particularly those that have relatively high particulate filtration efficiency are generally associated with high back pressures because of the restriction to flow through the filter.
- soot or other carbon-based particulate matter accumulates on the diesel particulate filters causing the buildup of additional undesirable back pressure in the exhaust systems.
- Engines that have large particulate mass emission rates may develop excessive back pressure levels in a relatively short period of time. High back pressures decrease engine efficiency and reduce engine performance. Therefore, it is desired to have diesel particulate filtration systems that minimize back pressure while capturing a high percentage of the particulate matter in the exhaust.
- particulate matter may be oxidized by burning.off (i.e., oxidizing) the particulates that accumulate on the filters.
- burning.off i.e., oxidizing
- one method by which particulate matter may be oxidized is to raise the temperature of the exhaust gas sufficiently to allow the excess oxygen in the exhaust gas to oxidize the particulate matter.
- particulate matter may be oxidized at a lower temperature in the presence of sufficient amounts of nitrogen dioxide (NO 2 ).
- Diesel exhaust inherently contains nitrogen oxides (NO x ), which consist primarily of nitric oxide (NO) and nitrogen dioxide (NO 2 ).
- NO x nitrogen oxides
- NO 2 inherently present in the exhaust stream is a relatively small percentage of total NO x , such as in the range of 5 to 20 percent but usually in the range of 5 to 10 percent.
- NO x nitrogen oxides
- NO 2 inherently present in the exhaust stream is a relatively small percentage of total NO x , such as in the range of 5 to 20 percent but usually in the range of 5 to 10 percent.
- the effectiveness OfNO 2 in regenerating a particulate filter depends in part on the ratio ofNO x to particulate matter in the exhaust stream. This ratio varies across engine applications and engine model years, as both NO x and particulate matter are regulated species of diesel engine exhaust and the regulated limits vary by year.
- the nominal emissions limits over the Federal Test Procedure were 0.1 grams per brake horsepower hour for particulate matter and 4 to 5 grams per brake horsepower hour for NO x . This yields a NO x /particulate ratio of 40 to 50.
- the nominal limits are 0.1 grams per brake horsepower hour for particulate matter and 2.5 grams per brake horsepower hour for NO x , yielding a NO x / ⁇ articulate ratio of 25.
- the nominal emissions limit for particulate matter was 0.25 grams per brake horsepower hour and the nominal emissions limit for NO x was 5 grams per brake horsepower hour over the FTP test cycle, giving a NO x /particulate ratio of 20.
- the nominal particulate emissions limits were 0.6 grams per brake horsepower hour and the nominal NO x emissions limits were 6 to 7 grams per brake horsepower hour over the FTP test cycle, giving a NO x /particulate ratio of about 10.
- older engines tend to have lower NO x /particulate ratios (although the ratio does decrease for 2003 to 2006 engines relative to 1994 to 2002 engines).
- a lower NO x / ⁇ articulate ratio means that there is potentially less NO 2 in the exhaust stream per unit of particulate matter captured on the particulate filter, making regeneration of the particulate filter by NO 2 more difficult.
- a higher NCVparticulate ratio means that there is more NO 2 in the exhaust stream per unit of particulate matter, so that the particulate trapped on a particulate filter may more readily be regenerated by NO 2 .
- One method to produce sufficient quantities OfNO 2 is to use an oxidation catalyst to oxidize a portion of the NO present in the exhaust stream to
- NO2sys -(NO2)eng (N0x)eng must be less than 0.20. Applying an oxidation catalyst coating to a conventional diesel particulate filter may result in excessive NO 2 emissions. Therefore, it is desired that a diesel exhaust treatment system capture a high percentage of the particulate matter in the exhaust while minimizing both the back pressure in the exhaust system and the emission ofNO 2 to the atmosphere.
- a diesel exhaust treatment system includes first and second diesel particulate reduction devices.
- the first particulate reduction device is located upstream in the exhaust flow and contains an oxidation catalyst coating.
- the second particulate reduction device is located downstream from the first particulate reduction device and is un-catalyzed or lightly catalyzed.
- Each particulate reduction device comprises a flow-through-type filtration media with substantial internal turbulence.
- Flow-through-type filtration media is that which defines flow paths that extend through the length of the device and do not require the gas to pass through the filtration media in order for the gas to flow from the entry of the device to the exit of the device. This flow-through-type filtration media yields moderate filtration efficiencies, typically up to 50% per filter, with relatively low back pressure.
- the catalyst coating promotes the oxidation of the soluble organic fraction (SOF) of the particulate matter to gaseous components and also promotes the oxidation of a portion of the nitric oxide (NO) within the exhaust gas to nitrogen dioxide (NO 2 ). Furthermore, the filtration media of the upstream particulate reduction device captures a portion of the hard carbon particulate matter and a portion of the non-oxidized SOF present in the exhaust.
- SOF soluble organic fraction
- NO 2 nitrogen dioxide
- the relative volume weighted efficiency of the upstream particulate reduction device and of the downstream particulate reduction device are selected to optimize the overall system particle capture efficiency and backpressure, as well as to balance the amount OfNO 2 made with the amount of NO 2 consumed so as to minimize NO 2 emissions.
- Figure 1 schematically illustrates an exhaust system having features that are examples of inventive aspects in accordance with the principles of the present disclosure.
- Figure 2 illustrates a cross section of a diesel particulate reduction device.
- Figure 3 illustrates a close-up exploded view of a diesel particulate reduction device.
- Figure 4 illustrates the relationship between back pressure and time of a diesel particulate reduction device according to the present disclosure.
- FIG. 1 illustrates an exhaust system 20 that is in accordance with the inventive aspects of the present disclosure.
- the system includes an engine 22 (e.g., a diesel engine) and an exhaust conduit 24 for conveying exhaust gas away from the engine 22.
- a first diesel particulate reduction device 26 is positioned in the exhaust stream. Downstream from the first diesel particulate reduction device 26 is a second diesel particulate reduction device 28. It will be appreciated that the first diesel particulate reduction device 26 and the second diesel particulate reduction device 28 function together to treat the exhaust gas that passes through the conduit 24.
- first diesel particulate reduction device 26 and the second diesel particulate reduction device 28 may be separated by any distance, including being positioned in close proximity or even in direct contact.
- the first diesel particulate reduction device 26, also referred to as the upstream diesel particulate reduction device 26, is preferably constructed from multiple layers of metallic fabric fleece material 30 sandwiched between layers of corrugated metallic foil 32. A cross section of this construction is shown in Figure 2 and a close-up exploded view is shown in Figure 3.
- the corrugated metallic foil 32 defines elongated passageways 34 that are generally parallel to the net flow path of exhaust gases through the particulate reduction device. In operation, the exhaust gases enter through the exposed open ends of the passageways defined by the metallic foil.
- the metallic foil preferably contains mixing shovels 36 which direct the flow of the exhaust gases out of the passageways and into the fabric fleece material 30.
- the metallic fabric fleece material 30 is a woven-type material constructed from metallic fibers which capture particles both by impingement and by blocking their flow.
- the particle-blocking properties of the metallic fleece material 30 are determined in part by the diameter of the metallic fibers used to construct the fleece. For example, metallic fibers of 20 to 28 microns (millionths of a meter) and 35 to 45 microns have been found to work acceptably.
- the filtration material is manufactured by Emitec and referred to as "PM Kat.”
- the filtration material may, however, comprise any flow-through-type construction known to those of skill in the art, such as wire mesh, metallic or ceramic foam.
- the upstream diesel particulate reduction device 26 also contains a catalyst coating.
- catalyst coatings include precious metals such as platinum, palladium and rhodium, and other types of components such as base metals or zeolites.
- a preferred catalyst for the first particulate reduction device 26 is platinum with a loading level greater than 30 grams/cubic foot of substrate. In other embodiments the precious metal loading level is in the range of 30-100 grams/cubic foot of substrate. The greater the loading level of the catalyst, the greater is the potential for oxidizing gases such as NO to NO 2 and for oxidizing the SOF particulates.
- the second diesel particulate reduction device 28, also called the downstream diesel particulate reduction device 28, may comprise the same construction as the upstream diesel particulate reduction device 26, preferably having multiple layers of metallic fabric fleece material sandwiched between layers of corrugated metallic foil.
- the downstream diesel particulate reduction device 28 may, however, comprise any flow-through-type construction, such as wire mesh or metallic or ceramic foam.
- the downstream diesel particulate reduction device 28 is either coated with a base metal catalyst without precious metal or is coated with a catalyst with a precious metal loading between 0.001 grams/cubic foot and 15 grams/cubic foot, preferably 0.001 to 10 grams/cubic foot.
- the downstream diesel particulate reduction device 28 is generally constructed with different particle capture characteristics from those of the upstream device.
- the downstream diesel particulate reduction device 28 may be constructed from smaller diameter metallic fibers to increase the particulate capture efficiency.
- the required precious metal loading will depend in part on the residence time of NO within the particulate reduction device, which in turn depends on the mass flow rate of exhaust gas and the volume of the particulate reduction device.
- the NO residence time may be expressed as a space velocity, defined as the volumetric flow rate of exhaust gases divided by the volume of the device per unit of time.
- the ratio of the mass OfNO 2 to the mass of particulate matter in the exhaust stream should be between 3.5 and 16. More preferably, this ratio should be between 4.0 and 10. That is, the catalyst coating of the upstream diesel particulate reduction device is selected, based on the space velocity of the device, so that the sum of the NO 2 entering the upstream diesel particulate reduction device and the NO 2 generated within the upstream diesel particulate device is within the desired ratio. A certain amount of this NO 2 will be consumed in the upstream diesel particulate reduction device in reaction with the trapped particulate mass. However, a remaining portion of NO 2 will exit the upstream diesel particulate reduction device and enter the downstream diesel particulate reduction device.
- the amount OfNO 2 in this remaining portion of NO 2 will depend on the amount OfNO 2 generated in the upstream diesel particulate reduction device and the mass of particulate matter trapped in the upstream diesel particulate reduction device. If this remaining portion OfNO 2 is insufficient to regenerate the downstream diesel particulate reduction device, then the downstream diesel particulate device should include a precious metal catalyst coating.
- the precious metal loading of this catalyst coating is selected, based on the space velocity of the device, so that the combination of the NO 2 that enters the downstream diesel particulate reduction device and the NO 2 that is generated within the downstream particulate reduction device are together sufficient to fully regenerate the downstream diesel particulate reduction device without excessively increasing the NO 2 emissions.
- the volumetric weighted particle capture efficiency of each particulate reduction device must also be selected.
- the volumetric weighted particle capture efficiency is computed by, first, subtracting the mass of particulate matter that exits the particulate reduction device from the mass of particulate that enters the particulate reduction device and dividing by the mass of particulate that enters the particulate reduction device; second, multiplying this number by the fraction of the particulate that constitutes hard carbon; and third, dividing by the volume of the particulate reduction device. For example, if a particulate reduction device has a hard carbon filtration efficiency of 20 percent and a volume of 4 liters, then the volumetric weighted particle capture efficiency will be 5.0.
- volumetric weighted particle capture efficiency will also be 5.0.
- the volume-weighted efficiency for the upstream diesel particulate reduction device will be equal to or less than the volume weighted efficiency of the downstream particulate reduction device.
- the volume- weighted efficiency of either particulate reduction device will be between 3 and 12.5.
- the parameters that are adjusted to create the desired volumetric weighted particle capture efficiency of each particulate reduction device are the cross sectional flow area, the flow length, the fabric wire size, and volume. A longer length or a smaller fabric wire size increases particle capture efficiency per unit of volume. For a given particle capture efficiency, decreasing the volume of the particulate reduction device increases the volumetric weighted particle capture efficiency. However, because of the nature of the physical construction of the particulate reduction device, the particle capture efficiency will generally not exceed 50 percent for one device.
- each particulate reduction device is also typically constrained by the amount of space available on the vehicle.
- the exhaust treatment system will fit within the same space on a vehicle as occupied by a conventional muffler.
- a conventional vertical muffler is about 10 inches in diameter and about 45 inches long and a conventional horizontal muffler is about 11 inches in diameter and about 36 to 42 inches long.
- one preferred configuration would be for the upstream diesel particulate reduction device to be 10.5 inches in diameter and 6 inches long and made from 40 micron metallic fibers and for the downstream diesel particulate reduction device to be 10.5 inches in diameter, 3 inches in length and made from 25 micron metallic fibers.
- This configuration would give a space velocity of the upstream diesel particulate reduction device of no higher than about 450,000 per hour (volumetric flow of exhaust gas divided by volume of the device).
- the catalyst coating of the upstream diesel particulate reduction device would be about 50 g/ft 3 precious metal loading in order to generate sufficient NO 2 and yield a MVparticulate matter ratio of greater than 4.
- the 40 micron fiber diameter and the longer length of the upstream diesel particulate reduction device are chosen to achieve a hard carbon capture efficiency of about 36 percent and a volumetric weighted efficiency of about 4.5.
- the 25 micron metallic fiber diameter and the shorter length of the downstream diesel particulate reduction device are chosen to achieve a hard carbon capture efficiency of about 28 percent and a volumetric weighted efficiency of about 7.
- the upstream diesel particulate reduction device As a second example, to apply this system to an on-highway diesel engine with a displacement of 7.3 liters certified under the emissions regulations in place between 1991 and 2002, where the NO x /particulate ratio under the applicable regulations was between 20 and 50 (as discussed above), one preferred configuration would be for the upstream diesel particulate reduction device to be 3 inches long, 10 1/2 inches in diameter, and made from 40 micron metallic fibers and for the downstream diesel particulate reduction device to be 10 1/2 inches in diameter, 6 inches in length, and made from 25 micron metallic fibers.
- the maximum space velocity of the upstream diesel particulate reduction device is no higher than 900,000 per hour, and preferably is between 20,000 and 800,000 per hour.
- the catalyst coating of the upstream diesel particulate reduction device would be about 70 g/ft 3 precious metal loading in order to generate sufficient NO 2 and yield a NO 2 /particulate matter ratio of greater than 4.
- the 40 micron metallic fiber diameter for the upstream filter gives a hard carbon capture efficiency of about 20 percent, yielding a volumetric weighted efficiency of about 5.
- the 25 micron metallic fiber diameter for the downstream filter gives a hard carbon capture efficiency of about 48 percent, yielding a volumetric weighted efficiency of about 6.
- a first portion of the particulate matter contained in the diesel exhaust is deposited on the first diesel particulate reduction device 26 in an amount that is a function of the particle capture efficiency of the first diesel particulate reduction device 26.
- the exhaust gas exits the first diesel particulate reduction device 26 containing a residual portion of particulate matter, defined as the amount of particulate matter not deposited on the first diesel particulate reduction device 26.
- the exhaust gas thereafter enters the second diesel particulate reduction device 28, where a portion of the particulate matter present in the exhaust gas is deposited on the second diesel particulate reduction device 28 according to the particle capture efficiency of the second diesel particulate reduction device 28.
- the SOF portion of particulate matter is oxidized by contact with the oxidation catalyst coating. Furthermore, the NO present within the exhaust stream is converted to NO 2 by the oxidation catalyst coating within the first diesel particulate reduction device 26. A portion of this NO 2 , along with the NO 2 inherently present in the exhaust gas, reacts with the particulate matter trapped on the first diesel particulate reduction device 26.
- the preferred design of the particulate reduction devices create significant internal, three-dimensional, turbulent flow patterns by virtue of the highly tortuous, twisted flow vectors that result from flow impacting into the fabric fleece material 30 and being channeled into and out of the openings in the corrugated foil 32.
- Other flow through filter designs such as wire mesh or ceramic or metallic foams produce similar favorable internal turbulence. This internal local turbulence increases the interaction of the exhaust gas with the catalytic coating on the filtration substrate material, thereby promoting the conversion of NO to NO 2 .
- the design of the diesel particulate reduction device promotes the consumption of NO 2 and the regeneration of the particulate filter.
- the particulate capture efficiency of each individual particulate reduction device is no greater than about 50 percent, by arranging the devices according to this disclosure the net particulate capture efficiency may be greater than 50 percent and can approach 85 percent.
- the back pressure is substantially lower.
- the backpressure is lower both when the device is not loaded with particulate, such as immediately after being regenerated, and when the device is fully loaded with particulate. See Figure 4.
- the back pressure of the diesel particulate matter reduction system according to the present disclosure is no greater than 4.5 inches of mercury.
- the increase in NO 2 emissions are minimized.
- the exhaust treatment system of the present disclosure increases the NO 2 /NO X ratio by no more than 20 percent over the engine output NO 2 ZNO X ratio for engines that generate 0.25 grams per brake horsepower hour or less of particulate matter.
Abstract
A diesel exhaust treatment system is disclosed that includes first and second diesel particulate reduction devices. The first diesel particulate reduction device is located upstream in the exhaust flow and contains an oxidation catalyst coating. The second particulate reduction device is located downstream from the first particulate reduction device and is generally non-catalyzed or lightly catalyzed. Each particulate reduction device comprises a flow-through fabric-type filtration media with substantial internal turbulence. As exhaust gas passes through the catalyzed upstream particulate reduction device, nitric oxide (NO) is oxidized to form nitrogen dioxide (NO2), a portion of which interacts with the particulate trapped within the upstream diesel particulate reduction device to regenerate the upstream device. A remaining portion of exhaust gas containing NO2 enters the downstream diesel particulate reduction device, where an additional portion interacts with the trapped particulate to regenerate the device. The relative volume weighted efficiency of the upstream particulate reduction device and of the downstream particulate reduction device are selected to optimize the overall system particle capture efficiency and backpressure, as well as to balance the amount of NO2 made with the amount of NO2 consumed so as to minimize NO2 emissions.
Description
DIESEL PARTICULATE MATTER REDUCTION SYSTEM
This application is being filed on 20 March 2006, as a PCT International Patent application in the name of Donaldson Company, Inc., a U.S. national corporation, applicant for the designation of all countries except the US, and Wenzhong Zhang, Julian A. Imes, Todd R. Taubert, Timothy L. Ricke, and Theodore G. Angelo, all citizens of the U.S., applicants for the designation of the US only, and claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Serial No. 60/674,882, filed April 26, 2005, and U.S. Utility Patent Application No. unknown, filed March 10, 2006, which applications are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Technical Field
The present disclosure relates generally to diesel engine exhaust systems. More particularly, the present disclosure relates to systems and methods for controlling diesel engine exhaust emissions.
Background
Diesel engine exhaust contains particulate matter, the emission of which is regulated for environmental and health reasons. This particulate matter generally constitutes a soluble organic traction ("SOF") and a remaining portion of hard carbon. The soluble organic traction may be partially or wholly removed through oxidation in an oxidation catalyst; however, this typically results in a reduction of only about 20 percent of total particulate emissions. Thus, vehicles equipped with diesel engines may include diesel particulate filters for more completely removing the particulate matter from the exhaust stream, including the hard carbon portion. Conventional wall flow type diesel particulate filters may have particulate removal efficiencies of about 85 percent. However, diesel particulate filters, particularly those that have relatively high particulate filtration efficiency, are generally associated with high back pressures because of the restriction to flow through the filter. Further, with use, soot or other carbon-based particulate matter accumulates on the diesel particulate filters causing the buildup of additional undesirable back pressure in the exhaust systems. Engines that have large particulate mass emission
rates may develop excessive back pressure levels in a relatively short period of time. High back pressures decrease engine efficiency and reduce engine performance. Therefore, it is desired to have diesel particulate filtration systems that minimize back pressure while capturing a high percentage of the particulate matter in the exhaust.
To prevent diesel particulate filters from becoming excessively loaded with particulate matter, it is necessary to regenerate the diesel particulate filters by burning.off (i.e., oxidizing) the particulates that accumulate on the filters. It is known to those of skill in the art that one method by which particulate matter may be oxidized is to raise the temperature of the exhaust gas sufficiently to allow the excess oxygen in the exhaust gas to oxidize the particulate matter. Also well-known to those of skill in the art is that particulate matter may be oxidized at a lower temperature in the presence of sufficient amounts of nitrogen dioxide (NO2).
Diesel exhaust inherently contains nitrogen oxides (NOx), which consist primarily of nitric oxide (NO) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2). Typically, the NO2 inherently present in the exhaust stream is a relatively small percentage of total NOx, such as in the range of 5 to 20 percent but usually in the range of 5 to 10 percent. Although some regeneration of a diesel particulate filter occurs at such levels, it is insufficient to result in complete regeneration. The effectiveness OfNO2 in regenerating a particulate filter depends in part on the ratio ofNOx to particulate matter in the exhaust stream. This ratio varies across engine applications and engine model years, as both NOx and particulate matter are regulated species of diesel engine exhaust and the regulated limits vary by year. For example, for on-highway diesel engines, under the emissions regulations in place during the period from 1994 to 2002, the nominal emissions limits over the Federal Test Procedure ("FTP") were 0.1 grams per brake horsepower hour for particulate matter and 4 to 5 grams per brake horsepower hour for NOx. This yields a NOx/particulate ratio of 40 to 50. During the period from 2003 to 2006, the nominal limits are 0.1 grams per brake horsepower hour for particulate matter and 2.5 grams per brake horsepower hour for NOx, yielding a NOx/ρarticulate ratio of 25. During the period from 1991 to 1993, the nominal emissions limit for particulate matter was 0.25 grams per brake horsepower hour and the nominal emissions limit for NOx was 5 grams per brake horsepower hour over the FTP test cycle, giving a NOx/particulate ratio of 20. In the
period from 1988 to 1990, the nominal particulate emissions limits were 0.6 grams per brake horsepower hour and the nominal NOx emissions limits were 6 to 7 grams per brake horsepower hour over the FTP test cycle, giving a NOx/particulate ratio of about 10. In summary, older engines tend to have lower NOx/particulate ratios (although the ratio does decrease for 2003 to 2006 engines relative to 1994 to 2002 engines). A lower NOx/ρarticulate ratio means that there is potentially less NO2 in the exhaust stream per unit of particulate matter captured on the particulate filter, making regeneration of the particulate filter by NO2 more difficult. A higher NCVparticulate ratio means that there is more NO2 in the exhaust stream per unit of particulate matter, so that the particulate trapped on a particulate filter may more readily be regenerated by NO2.
To promote full regeneration, it is often necessary to increase the quantity of NO2 in the exhaust stream. This is particularly true where the NOx/particulate ratio is relatively small. One method to produce sufficient quantities OfNO2 is to use an oxidation catalyst to oxidize a portion of the NO present in the exhaust stream to
NO2. However, although nitrogen oxides have been a regulated constituent of diesel exhaust for some time, recent developments have suggested that emissions ofNO2 should be regulated separately from overall NOx because of the adverse environmental and health effects OfNO2. Therefore, it is desired that a diesel exhaust treatment system does not cause excessive increases in the amount of NO2 within the exhaust stream. One regulation proposed in California requires that the ratio OfNO2 to NOx in the exhaust gas downstream from an exhaust treatment system be no more than 20 percent greater than the ratio OfNO2 to NOx in the exhaust gas upstream from the exhaust treatment system. In other words, if the engine-out NOx mass flow rate is (NOx)eng, the engine-out NO2 mass flow rate is
(NO2)eng, and the exhaust-treatment-system-out NO2 mass flow rate is (N02)sys, then the ratio
(NO2)sys -(NO2)eng (N0x)eng must be less than 0.20. Applying an oxidation catalyst coating to a conventional diesel particulate filter may result in excessive NO2 emissions. Therefore, it is desired that a diesel exhaust treatment system capture a high percentage of the particulate matter in the
exhaust while minimizing both the back pressure in the exhaust system and the emission ofNO2 to the atmosphere.
Summary A diesel exhaust treatment system is disclosed that includes first and second diesel particulate reduction devices. The first particulate reduction device is located upstream in the exhaust flow and contains an oxidation catalyst coating. The second particulate reduction device is located downstream from the first particulate reduction device and is un-catalyzed or lightly catalyzed. Each particulate reduction device comprises a flow-through-type filtration media with substantial internal turbulence. Flow-through-type filtration media is that which defines flow paths that extend through the length of the device and do not require the gas to pass through the filtration media in order for the gas to flow from the entry of the device to the exit of the device. This flow-through-type filtration media yields moderate filtration efficiencies, typically up to 50% per filter, with relatively low back pressure. As exhaust gas containing particulate matter passes through the upstream particulate reduction device, the catalyst coating promotes the oxidation of the soluble organic fraction (SOF) of the particulate matter to gaseous components and also promotes the oxidation of a portion of the nitric oxide (NO) within the exhaust gas to nitrogen dioxide (NO2). Furthermore, the filtration media of the upstream particulate reduction device captures a portion of the hard carbon particulate matter and a portion of the non-oxidized SOF present in the exhaust. A portion of the net NO2 present, comprising the combination of the NO2 generated by the oxidation catalyst and the NO2 inherently present in diesel exhaust, reacts with the particulate matter trapped on the upstream particulate reduction device, according to the reaction NO2 + C = CO (or CO2) + NO. Ih doing so, the solid particulate matter is converted to a gas, which flows out of the particulate reduction device.
Not all of the particulate matter emitted from the engine is trapped in the upstream particulate reduction device. Moreover, not all of the NO2 present in the upstream particulate reduction device is consumed in the upstream particulate reduction device. Therefore, exhaust gas containing a residual portion of particulate matter and a residual portion of NO2 enters the downstream particulate reduction
device, where an additional fraction of particulate matter is trapped and an additional quantity of NO2 is consumed in reaction with the trapped particulate.
The relative volume weighted efficiency of the upstream particulate reduction device and of the downstream particulate reduction device are selected to optimize the overall system particle capture efficiency and backpressure, as well as to balance the amount OfNO2 made with the amount of NO2 consumed so as to minimize NO2 emissions.
Brief Description of the Drawings Figure 1 schematically illustrates an exhaust system having features that are examples of inventive aspects in accordance with the principles of the present disclosure.
Figure 2 illustrates a cross section of a diesel particulate reduction device. Figure 3 illustrates a close-up exploded view of a diesel particulate reduction device.
Figure 4 illustrates the relationship between back pressure and time of a diesel particulate reduction device according to the present disclosure.
Detailed Description The present disclosure relates to an exhaust treatment system for reducing emissions of particulate matter from a diesel engine. Figure 1 illustrates an exhaust system 20 that is in accordance with the inventive aspects of the present disclosure. The system includes an engine 22 (e.g., a diesel engine) and an exhaust conduit 24 for conveying exhaust gas away from the engine 22. A first diesel particulate reduction device 26 is positioned in the exhaust stream. Downstream from the first diesel particulate reduction device 26 is a second diesel particulate reduction device 28. It will be appreciated that the first diesel particulate reduction device 26 and the second diesel particulate reduction device 28 function together to treat the exhaust gas that passes through the conduit 24. It will also be appreciated that the first diesel particulate reduction device 26 and the second diesel particulate reduction device 28 may be separated by any distance, including being positioned in close proximity or even in direct contact.
The first diesel particulate reduction device 26, also referred to as the upstream diesel particulate reduction device 26, is preferably constructed from multiple layers of metallic fabric fleece material 30 sandwiched between layers of corrugated metallic foil 32. A cross section of this construction is shown in Figure 2 and a close-up exploded view is shown in Figure 3. The corrugated metallic foil 32 defines elongated passageways 34 that are generally parallel to the net flow path of exhaust gases through the particulate reduction device. In operation, the exhaust gases enter through the exposed open ends of the passageways defined by the metallic foil. The metallic foil preferably contains mixing shovels 36 which direct the flow of the exhaust gases out of the passageways and into the fabric fleece material 30. The metallic fabric fleece material 30 is a woven-type material constructed from metallic fibers which capture particles both by impingement and by blocking their flow. The particle-blocking properties of the metallic fleece material 30 are determined in part by the diameter of the metallic fibers used to construct the fleece. For example, metallic fibers of 20 to 28 microns (millionths of a meter) and 35 to 45 microns have been found to work acceptably. As the exhaust gases flow out of the foil 32 and into the fabric fleece material 30, significant internal turbulence is induced. Preferably, the filtration material is manufactured by Emitec and referred to as "PM Kat." The filtration material may, however, comprise any flow-through-type construction known to those of skill in the art, such as wire mesh, metallic or ceramic foam.
The upstream diesel particulate reduction device 26 also contains a catalyst coating. Exemplary catalyst coatings include precious metals such as platinum, palladium and rhodium, and other types of components such as base metals or zeolites. A preferred catalyst for the first particulate reduction device 26 is platinum with a loading level greater than 30 grams/cubic foot of substrate. In other embodiments the precious metal loading level is in the range of 30-100 grams/cubic foot of substrate. The greater the loading level of the catalyst, the greater is the potential for oxidizing gases such as NO to NO2 and for oxidizing the SOF particulates.
The second diesel particulate reduction device 28, also called the downstream diesel particulate reduction device 28, may comprise the same construction as the upstream diesel particulate reduction device 26, preferably
having multiple layers of metallic fabric fleece material sandwiched between layers of corrugated metallic foil. The downstream diesel particulate reduction device 28 may, however, comprise any flow-through-type construction, such as wire mesh or metallic or ceramic foam. However, unlike the upstream diesel particulate reduction device 26, the downstream diesel particulate reduction device 28 is either coated with a base metal catalyst without precious metal or is coated with a catalyst with a precious metal loading between 0.001 grams/cubic foot and 15 grams/cubic foot, preferably 0.001 to 10 grams/cubic foot. Furthermore, the downstream diesel particulate reduction device 28 is generally constructed with different particle capture characteristics from those of the upstream device. For example, the downstream diesel particulate reduction device 28 may be constructed from smaller diameter metallic fibers to increase the particulate capture efficiency.
To achieve the objectives of maximizing the system particulate capture efficiency, minimizing pressure drop, and minimizing NO2 emissions, it is necessary to carefully select the system design parameters. The selection of these design parameters will depend in part on the NCVparticulate ratio and the exhaust mass flow rate of the engine. As discussed above, the NOx/particulate ratio depends largely on the emissions regulations in place at the time the engine is manufactured and the mass flow rate is related to the displacement and power output of the engine. To ensure sufficient regeneration of the particulate reduction devices while minimizing NO2, it is necessary to select the relative precious metal loadings of the catalyst coatings of each particulate reduction device so as to generate the appropriate amount OfNO2. The required precious metal loading will depend in part on the residence time of NO within the particulate reduction device, which in turn depends on the mass flow rate of exhaust gas and the volume of the particulate reduction device. The NO residence time may be expressed as a space velocity, defined as the volumetric flow rate of exhaust gases divided by the volume of the device per unit of time.
Preferably, to ensure regeneration without excessive NO2 emissions, the ratio of the mass OfNO2 to the mass of particulate matter in the exhaust stream should be between 3.5 and 16. More preferably, this ratio should be between 4.0 and 10. That is, the catalyst coating of the upstream diesel particulate reduction device is selected, based on the space velocity of the device, so that the sum of the NO2 entering the
upstream diesel particulate reduction device and the NO2 generated within the upstream diesel particulate device is within the desired ratio. A certain amount of this NO2 will be consumed in the upstream diesel particulate reduction device in reaction with the trapped particulate mass. However, a remaining portion of NO2 will exit the upstream diesel particulate reduction device and enter the downstream diesel particulate reduction device. The amount OfNO2 in this remaining portion of NO2 will depend on the amount OfNO2 generated in the upstream diesel particulate reduction device and the mass of particulate matter trapped in the upstream diesel particulate reduction device. If this remaining portion OfNO2 is insufficient to regenerate the downstream diesel particulate reduction device, then the downstream diesel particulate device should include a precious metal catalyst coating. The precious metal loading of this catalyst coating is selected, based on the space velocity of the device, so that the combination of the NO2 that enters the downstream diesel particulate reduction device and the NO2 that is generated within the downstream particulate reduction device are together sufficient to fully regenerate the downstream diesel particulate reduction device without excessively increasing the NO2 emissions.
The volumetric weighted particle capture efficiency of each particulate reduction device must also be selected. The volumetric weighted particle capture efficiency is computed by, first, subtracting the mass of particulate matter that exits the particulate reduction device from the mass of particulate that enters the particulate reduction device and dividing by the mass of particulate that enters the particulate reduction device; second, multiplying this number by the fraction of the particulate that constitutes hard carbon; and third, dividing by the volume of the particulate reduction device. For example, if a particulate reduction device has a hard carbon filtration efficiency of 20 percent and a volume of 4 liters, then the volumetric weighted particle capture efficiency will be 5.0. Similarly, if a particulate reduction device has a hard carbon filtration efficiency of 40 percent and a volume of 8 liters, then the volumetric weighted particle capture efficiency will also be 5.0. Preferably, the volume-weighted efficiency for the upstream diesel particulate reduction device will be equal to or less than the volume weighted efficiency of the downstream particulate reduction device. Also preferably, the
volume- weighted efficiency of either particulate reduction device will be between 3 and 12.5.
The parameters that are adjusted to create the desired volumetric weighted particle capture efficiency of each particulate reduction device are the cross sectional flow area, the flow length, the fabric wire size, and volume. A longer length or a smaller fabric wire size increases particle capture efficiency per unit of volume. For a given particle capture efficiency, decreasing the volume of the particulate reduction device increases the volumetric weighted particle capture efficiency. However, because of the nature of the physical construction of the particulate reduction device, the particle capture efficiency will generally not exceed 50 percent for one device.
The dimensions of each particulate reduction device are also typically constrained by the amount of space available on the vehicle. Preferably, the exhaust treatment system will fit within the same space on a vehicle as occupied by a conventional muffler. On a typical truck application, a conventional vertical muffler is about 10 inches in diameter and about 45 inches long and a conventional horizontal muffler is about 11 inches in diameter and about 36 to 42 inches long. For example, to apply this system to an on-highway diesel engine with a displacement of 7.3 liters certified under the emissions regulations in place between 1988 and 1990, where the NOx/ particulate ratio under applicable regulations was 10 (as discussed above) and where the mass rate of particulate emissions was relatively large, one preferred configuration would be for the upstream diesel particulate reduction device to be 10.5 inches in diameter and 6 inches long and made from 40 micron metallic fibers and for the downstream diesel particulate reduction device to be 10.5 inches in diameter, 3 inches in length and made from 25 micron metallic fibers. This configuration would give a space velocity of the upstream diesel particulate reduction device of no higher than about 450,000 per hour (volumetric flow of exhaust gas divided by volume of the device). The catalyst coating of the upstream diesel particulate reduction device would be about 50 g/ft3 precious metal loading in order to generate sufficient NO2 and yield a MVparticulate matter ratio of greater than 4. The 40 micron fiber diameter and the longer length of the upstream diesel particulate reduction device are chosen to achieve a hard carbon capture efficiency of about 36 percent and a volumetric weighted efficiency of about
4.5. The 25 micron metallic fiber diameter and the shorter length of the downstream diesel particulate reduction device are chosen to achieve a hard carbon capture efficiency of about 28 percent and a volumetric weighted efficiency of about 7. These system parameters would generally be valid for engines with displacements between about 6 liters and about 13 liters, with rated power levels between about 175 horsepower and 375 horsepower.
As a second example, to apply this system to an on-highway diesel engine with a displacement of 7.3 liters certified under the emissions regulations in place between 1991 and 2002, where the NOx/particulate ratio under the applicable regulations was between 20 and 50 (as discussed above), one preferred configuration would be for the upstream diesel particulate reduction device to be 3 inches long, 10 1/2 inches in diameter, and made from 40 micron metallic fibers and for the downstream diesel particulate reduction device to be 10 1/2 inches in diameter, 6 inches in length, and made from 25 micron metallic fibers. The maximum space velocity of the upstream diesel particulate reduction device is no higher than 900,000 per hour, and preferably is between 20,000 and 800,000 per hour. The catalyst coating of the upstream diesel particulate reduction device would be about 70 g/ft3 precious metal loading in order to generate sufficient NO2 and yield a NO2/particulate matter ratio of greater than 4. The 40 micron metallic fiber diameter for the upstream filter gives a hard carbon capture efficiency of about 20 percent, yielding a volumetric weighted efficiency of about 5. The 25 micron metallic fiber diameter for the downstream filter gives a hard carbon capture efficiency of about 48 percent, yielding a volumetric weighted efficiency of about 6. These system parameters would generally be valid for engines with displacements between about 6 liters and about 13 liters, with rated power levels between about 175 horsepower and 375 horsepower.
As a third example, to apply this system to an on-highway diesel engine with a displacement of 7.3 liters certified under the emissions regulations in place between 2003 and 2006, where the NOx/particulate ratio under the applicable regulations was 25 (as discussed above), the system would assume the same configuration as for the 1991 to 2002 engines, except that the catalyst coating would preferably be 75 to 80 g/ft3 precious metal loading. The precious metal loading is
increased relative to the 1991 to 2002 engine application because of the lower NOχ/particulate ratio.
In operation, a first portion of the particulate matter contained in the diesel exhaust is deposited on the first diesel particulate reduction device 26 in an amount that is a function of the particle capture efficiency of the first diesel particulate reduction device 26. The exhaust gas exits the first diesel particulate reduction device 26 containing a residual portion of particulate matter, defined as the amount of particulate matter not deposited on the first diesel particulate reduction device 26. The exhaust gas thereafter enters the second diesel particulate reduction device 28, where a portion of the particulate matter present in the exhaust gas is deposited on the second diesel particulate reduction device 28 according to the particle capture efficiency of the second diesel particulate reduction device 28.
Simultaneously, as the exhaust gases travel through the first diesel particulate reduction device 26, the SOF portion of particulate matter is oxidized by contact with the oxidation catalyst coating. Furthermore, the NO present within the exhaust stream is converted to NO2 by the oxidation catalyst coating within the first diesel particulate reduction device 26. A portion of this NO2, along with the NO2 inherently present in the exhaust gas, reacts with the particulate matter trapped on the first diesel particulate reduction device 26. By the reaction of NO2 + C = NO + CO or CO2, a portion of the particulate matter is oxidized and converted from a solid carbon form to carbon monoxide or carbon dioxide gas, which thereby exits the particulate reduction device. There is insufficient mass of soot, however, trapped on the first diesel particulate reduction device 26 to completely consume the NO2 present in the exhaust stream. Consequently, the exhaust gas exiting the first diesel particulate reduction device 26 contains a residual portion of NO2. This exhaust gas then enters the second diesel particulate reduction device 28. Because the second diesel particulate reduction device 28 is either not catalyzed or is lightly catalyzed, little or no additional NO2 is formed in the second device. However, because not all of the particulate matter in the exhaust was trapped on the upstream diesel particulate reduction device, there is additional soot present in the second particulate reduction device 28. The NO2 in the exhaust stream reacts with this soot, converting a portion
of the NO2 into NO. In this way, particulate matter is captured and the particulate reduction devices are regenerated while minimizing NO2 emissions.
Moreover, the preferred design of the particulate reduction devices create significant internal, three-dimensional, turbulent flow patterns by virtue of the highly tortuous, twisted flow vectors that result from flow impacting into the fabric fleece material 30 and being channeled into and out of the openings in the corrugated foil 32. Other flow through filter designs such as wire mesh or ceramic or metallic foams produce similar favorable internal turbulence. This internal local turbulence increases the interaction of the exhaust gas with the catalytic coating on the filtration substrate material, thereby promoting the conversion of NO to NO2.
Furthermore, this turbulence increases the interaction of the NO2 with the particulate matter trapped on the surfaces of the diesel particulate reduction device. In doing so, the design of the diesel particulate reduction device promotes the consumption of NO2 and the regeneration of the particulate filter. Although the particulate capture efficiency of each individual particulate reduction device is no greater than about 50 percent, by arranging the devices according to this disclosure the net particulate capture efficiency may be greater than 50 percent and can approach 85 percent. However, unlike conventional diesel particulate filter systems with comparable efficiencies, such as a wall flow type catalyzed diesel particulate filter, the back pressure is substantially lower. The backpressure is lower both when the device is not loaded with particulate, such as immediately after being regenerated, and when the device is fully loaded with particulate. See Figure 4. Preferably, the back pressure of the diesel particulate matter reduction system according to the present disclosure is no greater than 4.5 inches of mercury. Also, unlike conventional diesel particulate filter systems that include a catalyst coating, the increase in NO2 emissions are minimized. Generally, the exhaust treatment system of the present disclosure increases the NO2/NOX ratio by no more than 20 percent over the engine output NO2ZNOX ratio for engines that generate 0.25 grams per brake horsepower hour or less of particulate matter. It will be appreciated that the specific dimensions disclosed herein are examples applicable for certain embodiments in accordance with the principles of the disclosure, but that other embodiments in accordance with this disclosure may or may not include such dimensions.
Claims
1. A diesel exhaust treatment system comprising: a first diesel particulate reduction device; and a second diesel particulate reduction device, wherein the volumetric weighted efficiency of the first diesel particulate reduction device and the volumetric weighted efficiency of the second diesel particulate reduction device are each in the range of 3 to 12.5.
2. The system of claim 1 wherein the exhaust treatment system reduces emissions of particulate matter by greater than 50 percent and increases the
N02/N0x ratio of the exhaust gas to no more than 20 percent greater than the N02/N0x ratio of the exhaust gas emitted from the engine.
3. The system of claim 1, wherein the first diesel particulate reduction device comprises a catalyst coating with a precious metal loading of 30 to 100 grams per cubic foot of substrate material.
4. The system of claim 2, wherein the exhaust backpressure is no more than 4.5 inches mercury.
5. The system of claim 2, wherein the first diesel particulate reduction device and the second diesel particulate reduction device are each constructed from flow- through-type filtration media.
6. A diesel exhaust treatment system for use with a diesel engine certified under exhaust emissions regulations that limit particulate matter to 0.1 to 0.25 grams per brake horsepower hour and limit NOx to 2 to 5 grams/brake horsepower hour over the FTP test cycle, the system comprising: a first diesel particulate reduction device, said first diesel particulate reduction device having a diameter of approximately 3 inches and a length of approximately 10 1/2 inches; a second diesel particulate reduction device, wherein said second diesel particulate reduction device is downstream from said first diesel particulate reduction device in the direction of exhaust flow and wherein said second diesel particulate reduction device has a diameter of approximately 10 1/2 inches and a length of approximately 6 inches.
7. The system of claim 6, wherein the first diesel particulate reduction device further comprises a catalyst coating containing no more than 70 grams per cubic foot of substrate.
8. The system of claim 6, wherein the first diesel particulate reduction device is constructed from 40 micron metallic fibers.
9. The system of claim 6, wherein the second diesel particulate reduction device is constructed from 25 micron metallic fibers.
10. The system of claim 6, wherein the first diesel particulate device further comprises a catalyst coating containing 75 to 80 grams per cubic foot of substrate.
11. The system of claim 6, wherein the diesel engine is rated to produce 175 to 375 horsepower.
12. The system of claim 6, wherein the maximum space velocity of the upstream diesel particulate reduction device is less than 900,000.
Priority Applications (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP06739091A EP1877652B1 (en) | 2005-04-26 | 2006-03-20 | Diesel particulate matter reduction system |
AT06739091T ATE488675T1 (en) | 2005-04-26 | 2006-03-20 | SYSTEM FOR REDUCING DIESEL PARTICLES |
DE602006018279T DE602006018279D1 (en) | 2005-04-26 | 2006-03-20 | SYSTEM FOR REDUCING DIESEL PARTICLES |
Applications Claiming Priority (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US67488205P | 2005-04-26 | 2005-04-26 | |
US60/674,882 | 2005-04-26 | ||
US11/373,497 US7340888B2 (en) | 2005-04-26 | 2006-03-10 | Diesel particulate matter reduction system |
US11/373,497 | 2006-03-10 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2006115629A1 true WO2006115629A1 (en) | 2006-11-02 |
Family
ID=37185412
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2006/010161 WO2006115629A1 (en) | 2005-04-26 | 2006-03-20 | Diesel particulate matter reduction system |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US7340888B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1877652B1 (en) |
AT (1) | ATE488675T1 (en) |
DE (1) | DE602006018279D1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2006115629A1 (en) |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2008066767A1 (en) | 2006-11-29 | 2008-06-05 | Corning Incorporated | Partial wall-flow filter and diesel exhaust system and method |
US8673064B2 (en) | 2008-05-29 | 2014-03-18 | Corning Incorporated | Partial wall-flow filter and method |
Families Citing this family (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE102005049655A1 (en) * | 2005-10-18 | 2007-04-19 | Man Nutzfahrzeuge Ag | Preventing unwanted nitrogen dioxide emission from combustion engines involves adapting engine operating point and catalyzer state so only nitrogen dioxide required for exhaust gas treatment is present in exhaust gas downstream of catalyzer |
US7862640B2 (en) | 2006-03-21 | 2011-01-04 | Donaldson Company, Inc. | Low temperature diesel particulate matter reduction system |
US8057746B2 (en) * | 2007-05-02 | 2011-11-15 | Acr Co., Ltd. | Carrier for exhaust-gas purification and exhaust-gas purifier having the carrier |
DE102008035562A1 (en) * | 2008-07-30 | 2010-02-04 | Emitec Gesellschaft Für Emissionstechnologie Mbh | Emission control system for diesel engines of commercial vehicles |
US8499548B2 (en) * | 2008-12-17 | 2013-08-06 | Donaldson Company, Inc. | Flow device for an exhaust system |
KR101706398B1 (en) * | 2009-04-22 | 2017-02-27 | 바스프 코포레이션 | Partial filter substrates containing scr catalysts and emission treatment systems and methods of treating engine exhaust |
US8783022B2 (en) * | 2009-08-17 | 2014-07-22 | Donaldson Company, Inc. | Retrofit aftertreatment system for treating diesel exhaust |
CN102686304B (en) * | 2009-11-30 | 2016-01-13 | 康宁股份有限公司 | There is the honeycomb body device in flute profile intercellular hole |
US8938954B2 (en) | 2012-04-19 | 2015-01-27 | Donaldson Company, Inc. | Integrated exhaust treatment device having compact configuration |
US9863298B2 (en) | 2014-11-03 | 2018-01-09 | Caterpillar Inc. | Compression ignition engine system with improved regeneration via controlled ash deposits |
US9694321B2 (en) | 2015-09-01 | 2017-07-04 | Caterpillar Inc. | Exhaust treatment system with particulate filter having wall-flow and flow-through channels |
GB201704526D0 (en) | 2017-02-21 | 2017-05-03 | Porvair Filtration Group Ltd | Spacer and filtration apparatus containing it |
Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP0341832A2 (en) * | 1988-05-13 | 1989-11-15 | Johnson Matthey Inc. | Treatment of diesel exhaust gas |
US6516611B1 (en) * | 1999-05-22 | 2003-02-11 | Degussa-Huls Aktiengesellschaft | Process and device for removing soot from the exhaust gas of a diesel engine |
US6817174B1 (en) * | 1999-10-19 | 2004-11-16 | Hino Motors, Ltd. | Filtering means regenerating system for diesel engine |
Family Cites Families (95)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
NL284641A (en) | 1961-10-23 | |||
US3318128A (en) | 1964-04-15 | 1967-05-09 | Ford Motor Co | Plaiting |
GB1301667A (en) | 1969-05-09 | 1973-01-04 | ||
DE10020170C1 (en) | 2000-04-25 | 2001-09-06 | Emitec Emissionstechnologie | Process for removing soot particles from the exhaust gas of internal combustion engine comprises feeding gas through collecting element, and holding and/or fluidizing until there is sufficient reaction with nitrogen dioxide in exhaust gas |
US3712030A (en) | 1970-09-14 | 1973-01-23 | J Priest | Exhaust depurator |
GB1531134A (en) | 1975-08-20 | 1978-11-01 | Atomic Energy Authority Uk | Methods of fabricating bodies and to bodies so fabricated |
GB1557780A (en) | 1976-09-29 | 1979-12-12 | Covrad Ltd | Method and apparatus for forming louvred corrugations in strip or sheet metal |
US4319896A (en) | 1979-03-15 | 1982-03-16 | Texaco Inc. | Smoke filter rejuvenation system |
US4535588A (en) | 1979-06-12 | 1985-08-20 | Nippon Soken, Inc. | Carbon particulates cleaning device for diesel engine |
SE437542B (en) | 1979-10-01 | 1985-03-04 | Tom Ove Artur Rehnberg | PROCEDURE FOR OPTIMIZING DIESEL GAS CLEANING |
US4276071A (en) | 1979-12-03 | 1981-06-30 | General Motors Corporation | Ceramic filters for diesel exhaust particulates |
DE2951316A1 (en) | 1979-12-20 | 1981-07-02 | Degussa Ag, 6000 Frankfurt | CATALYTIC FILTER FOR DIESEL EXHAUST CLEANING |
US4372111A (en) | 1980-03-03 | 1983-02-08 | Texaco Inc. | Method for cyclic rejuvenation of an exhaust gas filter and apparatus |
US4416674A (en) | 1980-10-27 | 1983-11-22 | Texaco Inc. | Filter for treating a particle-carrying gaseous stream |
US4404007A (en) | 1980-12-11 | 1983-09-13 | Nippon Soken, Inc. | Exhaust gas cleaning element |
JPS57117326A (en) * | 1981-01-12 | 1982-07-21 | Toyota Motor Corp | Filter for exhaust gas of internal-combustion engine |
US4451441A (en) | 1981-01-27 | 1984-05-29 | W. R. Grace & Co. | Method for exhaust gas treatment |
US4464185A (en) | 1981-03-07 | 1984-08-07 | Nippon Soken, Inc. | Exhaust gas filter |
AU540009B2 (en) | 1982-02-16 | 1984-10-25 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Exhaust gas filter |
US4419108A (en) | 1982-02-22 | 1983-12-06 | Corning Glass Works | Filter apparatus and method of filtering |
US4462812A (en) | 1982-12-08 | 1984-07-31 | General Motors Corporation | Ceramic monolith particulate trap including filter support |
JPS59150918A (en) * | 1983-02-16 | 1984-08-29 | Hitachi Ltd | Exhaust gas purification device for diesel engine |
US4478618A (en) | 1983-08-01 | 1984-10-23 | General Motors Corporation | Diesel exhaust particulate trap with plural filter tubes |
DE3337903A1 (en) | 1983-10-19 | 1985-05-09 | Werner 7101 Flein Baum | Catalyst arrangement |
CA1242430A (en) | 1984-04-23 | 1988-09-27 | Joseph C. Dettling | Catalyzed diesel exhaust particulate filter |
US4625511A (en) | 1984-08-13 | 1986-12-02 | Arvin Industries, Inc. | Exhaust processor |
USRE33118E (en) | 1984-08-13 | 1989-11-28 | Arvin Industries, Inc. | Exhaust processor |
CH665002A5 (en) | 1984-11-09 | 1988-04-15 | Bbc Brown Boveri & Cie | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR OPERATING A DIESEL ENGINE WITH AN EXHAUST GAS FILTERING DEVICE. |
US4665690A (en) | 1985-01-14 | 1987-05-19 | Mazda Motor Corporation | Exhaust gas cleaning system for vehicle |
GB8516420D0 (en) | 1985-06-28 | 1985-07-31 | Ontario Research Foundation | Diesel particulate traps |
DE3545762A1 (en) | 1985-12-21 | 1987-07-02 | Leistritz Maschfabrik Paul | Soot filter |
CA1285493C (en) | 1986-01-06 | 1991-07-02 | Robert Hoch | Method and apparatus for filtering solid particulate matter from diesel engine exhaust |
DE3608635A1 (en) | 1986-03-14 | 1987-09-17 | Drache Keramikfilter | EXHAUST GAS REACTOR AND METHOD FOR THE PRODUCTION THEREOF |
JPS648311U (en) | 1987-07-07 | 1989-01-18 | ||
JPH01159029A (en) * | 1987-12-16 | 1989-06-22 | Toyota Motor Corp | Exhaust gas purification apparatus of diesel engines |
DE3744265C2 (en) | 1987-12-24 | 1996-07-11 | Emitec Emissionstechnologie | Soot filter for exhaust gas cleaning in motor vehicles |
US4916897A (en) | 1988-01-08 | 1990-04-17 | Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha | Exhaust gas purifying apparatus built-in to a muffler for a diesel engine |
US4814081A (en) | 1988-01-19 | 1989-03-21 | Malinowski Raymond J | Honeycombed filter support disc |
DE3805395A1 (en) | 1988-02-20 | 1989-08-31 | Man Technologie Gmbh | ELECTROSTATIC DIESEL PARTICLE FILTER |
US4961314A (en) | 1988-08-15 | 1990-10-09 | Arvin Industries, Inc. | Tuned exhaust processor assembly |
EP0369163A1 (en) | 1988-10-11 | 1990-05-23 | Sakai Chemical Industry Co., Ltd., | Particulate removing catalyst filter and particulate removing method using the same |
JPH02196120A (en) * | 1989-01-24 | 1990-08-02 | Nissan Motor Co Ltd | Exhaust particulate processing equipment for internal combustion engine |
JPH04504603A (en) | 1989-04-17 | 1992-08-13 | エミテツク ゲゼルシヤフト フユア エミツシオンス テクノロギー ミツト ベシユレンクテル ハフツング | Diesel soot filter with auxiliary equipment for reducing nitrogen oxides and/or oxidizing carbon monoxide |
EP0393257A1 (en) | 1989-04-17 | 1990-10-24 | Emitec Gesellschaft für Emissionstechnologie mbH | Diesel soot filter with an additional arrangement for the reduction of nitrogen oxides and/or the oxidation of carbon monoxide |
US5243819A (en) | 1989-12-12 | 1993-09-14 | J. Eberspacher | Exhaust gas cleaning device for diesel engines |
RU2066376C1 (en) | 1989-12-22 | 1996-09-10 | Эмитек Гезельшафт Фюр Эмиссионстехнологи Мбх | Internal combustion engine exhaust gas pipeline |
DE4002754C2 (en) | 1990-01-31 | 1994-03-17 | Daimler Benz Ag | Filter arrangement used in the supply air flow of a heating or air conditioning system of a motor vehicle |
US5065574A (en) | 1990-05-29 | 1991-11-19 | Caterpillar Inc. | Particulate trap regeneration apparatus and method |
DE4021495A1 (en) | 1990-07-05 | 1992-01-09 | Schwaebische Huettenwerke Gmbh | EXHAUST FILTER |
US5082479A (en) | 1990-07-16 | 1992-01-21 | Cummins Engine Company, Inc. | Diesel particulate trap mounting system |
US5212948A (en) | 1990-09-27 | 1993-05-25 | Donaldson Company, Inc. | Trap apparatus with bypass |
US5248482A (en) | 1991-04-05 | 1993-09-28 | Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company | Diesel particulate trap of perforated tubes wrapped with cross-wound inorganic yarn to form four-sided filter traps |
AU2246092A (en) | 1991-06-27 | 1993-01-25 | Donaldson Company Inc. | Trap apparatus with tubular filter element |
JPH05306614A (en) | 1992-04-28 | 1993-11-19 | Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd | Exhaust gas filter and manufacture thereof |
JP2894103B2 (en) | 1992-09-09 | 1999-05-24 | 松下電器産業株式会社 | Exhaust gas purification device |
JPH06294316A (en) * | 1993-04-09 | 1994-10-21 | Isuzu Ceramics Kenkyusho:Kk | Diesel particulate filter |
US5396764A (en) | 1994-02-14 | 1995-03-14 | Ford Motor Company | Spark ignition engine exhaust system |
US5787707A (en) | 1994-08-02 | 1998-08-04 | Corning Incorporated | In-line adsorber system |
EP0697505A1 (en) | 1994-08-02 | 1996-02-21 | Corning Incorporated | In-line adsorber system |
JP3899534B2 (en) | 1995-08-14 | 2007-03-28 | トヨタ自動車株式会社 | Exhaust gas purification method for diesel engine |
JP3434117B2 (en) | 1996-03-29 | 2003-08-04 | 住友電気工業株式会社 | Particulate trap for diesel engine |
GB9621215D0 (en) | 1996-10-11 | 1996-11-27 | Johnson Matthey Plc | Emission control |
DE19704147A1 (en) | 1997-02-04 | 1998-08-06 | Emitec Emissionstechnologie | Heat-resistant and regenerable filter body with flow paths |
US5771868A (en) | 1997-07-03 | 1998-06-30 | Turbodyne Systems, Inc. | Turbocharging systems for internal combustion engines |
DE19755354A1 (en) | 1997-12-12 | 1999-06-17 | Emitec Emissionstechnologie | Metal foil with openings |
GB9802504D0 (en) | 1998-02-06 | 1998-04-01 | Johnson Matthey Plc | Improvements in emission control |
GB9804739D0 (en) | 1998-03-06 | 1998-04-29 | Johnson Matthey Plc | Improvements in emissions control |
US6325834B1 (en) | 1998-05-18 | 2001-12-04 | Roberto Fonseca | Exhaust filter and catalyst structure |
EP1196234B1 (en) | 1999-07-02 | 2007-04-18 | Engelhard Corporation | Catalyst system for treating diesel engine exhaust gases and method |
US6669913B1 (en) | 2000-03-09 | 2003-12-30 | Fleetguard, Inc. | Combination catalytic converter and filter |
US6582490B2 (en) | 2000-05-18 | 2003-06-24 | Fleetguard, Inc. | Pre-form for exhaust aftertreatment control filter |
US6776814B2 (en) | 2000-03-09 | 2004-08-17 | Fleetguard, Inc. | Dual section exhaust aftertreatment filter and method |
JP3566905B2 (en) * | 2000-04-17 | 2004-09-15 | 日野自動車株式会社 | Exhaust gas purification device |
DE10026696A1 (en) | 2000-05-30 | 2001-12-20 | Emitec Emissionstechnologie | Particle trap |
JP2001355431A (en) * | 2000-06-16 | 2001-12-26 | Isuzu Motors Ltd | Exhaust emission control device for diesel engine |
DE10031200A1 (en) | 2000-06-27 | 2002-01-17 | Emitec Emissionstechnologie | Particle trap for separating particles from the flow of a fluid, method for separating particles from the flow of a fluid and use of a particle trap |
US6673136B2 (en) | 2000-09-05 | 2004-01-06 | Donaldson Company, Inc. | Air filtration arrangements having fluted media constructions and methods |
JP4889873B2 (en) | 2000-09-08 | 2012-03-07 | 日産自動車株式会社 | Exhaust gas purification system, exhaust gas purification catalyst used therefor, and exhaust purification method |
JP2002213227A (en) * | 2000-11-17 | 2002-07-31 | Toyota Motor Corp | Exhaust emission control system and method for controlling exhaust gas |
JP3925154B2 (en) | 2000-12-25 | 2007-06-06 | 株式会社デンソー | Exhaust gas purification filter |
EP1251248A1 (en) | 2001-04-18 | 2002-10-23 | OMG AG & Co. KG | Method and arrangement to remove soot particles from the exhaust gas of a diesel engine |
JP3840923B2 (en) | 2001-06-20 | 2006-11-01 | いすゞ自動車株式会社 | Diesel engine exhaust purification system |
DE20117659U1 (en) | 2001-10-29 | 2002-01-10 | Emitec Emissionstechnologie | Open particle filter with heating element |
DE10153284A1 (en) * | 2001-10-29 | 2003-05-15 | Emitec Emissionstechnologie | Filter assembly and process for its manufacture |
DE20117873U1 (en) | 2001-11-06 | 2002-02-14 | Emitec Emissionstechnologie | Open filter body with improved flow properties |
GB0218540D0 (en) | 2002-08-09 | 2002-09-18 | Johnson Matthey Plc | Engine exhaust treatment |
JP4172986B2 (en) | 2002-10-10 | 2008-10-29 | 日本碍子株式会社 | Honeycomb structure, manufacturing method thereof, and exhaust gas purification system using the honeycomb structure |
JP2004162613A (en) | 2002-11-13 | 2004-06-10 | Mitsubishi Fuso Truck & Bus Corp | Exhaust emission control device for internal combustion engine |
DE10254764A1 (en) | 2002-11-22 | 2004-06-03 | Emitec Gesellschaft Für Emissionstechnologie Mbh | exhaust system |
DE10257113A1 (en) | 2002-12-05 | 2004-06-24 | Emitec Gesellschaft Für Emissionstechnologie Mbh | Particle trap with coated fiber layer |
DE10304814C5 (en) | 2003-02-06 | 2009-07-02 | Emitec Gesellschaft Für Emissionstechnologie Mbh | Method and tool for producing structured sheet metal layers; The catalyst support body |
JP3711117B2 (en) * | 2003-03-25 | 2005-10-26 | 株式会社東芝 | Wireless receiver |
DE10321105A1 (en) | 2003-05-09 | 2004-12-02 | Emitec Gesellschaft Für Emissionstechnologie Mbh | Regeneration of a particle trap |
JP4333289B2 (en) * | 2003-09-03 | 2009-09-16 | いすゞ自動車株式会社 | Exhaust gas purification system |
JP2005180262A (en) | 2003-12-18 | 2005-07-07 | Tetsuo Toyoda | Particulate matter reducing device |
-
2006
- 2006-03-10 US US11/373,497 patent/US7340888B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2006-03-20 WO PCT/US2006/010161 patent/WO2006115629A1/en active Application Filing
- 2006-03-20 AT AT06739091T patent/ATE488675T1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2006-03-20 EP EP06739091A patent/EP1877652B1/en not_active Not-in-force
- 2006-03-20 DE DE602006018279T patent/DE602006018279D1/en active Active
Patent Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP0341832A2 (en) * | 1988-05-13 | 1989-11-15 | Johnson Matthey Inc. | Treatment of diesel exhaust gas |
US6516611B1 (en) * | 1999-05-22 | 2003-02-11 | Degussa-Huls Aktiengesellschaft | Process and device for removing soot from the exhaust gas of a diesel engine |
US6817174B1 (en) * | 1999-10-19 | 2004-11-16 | Hino Motors, Ltd. | Filtering means regenerating system for diesel engine |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
ANONYMOUS: "CRT Filter", DIESELNET TECHNOLOGY GUIDE, 15 March 2001 (2001-03-15), pages 1 - 5, XP002162969 * |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2008066767A1 (en) | 2006-11-29 | 2008-06-05 | Corning Incorporated | Partial wall-flow filter and diesel exhaust system and method |
US8673064B2 (en) | 2008-05-29 | 2014-03-18 | Corning Incorporated | Partial wall-flow filter and method |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20060236684A1 (en) | 2006-10-26 |
ATE488675T1 (en) | 2010-12-15 |
EP1877652B1 (en) | 2010-11-17 |
EP1877652A1 (en) | 2008-01-16 |
US7340888B2 (en) | 2008-03-11 |
DE602006018279D1 (en) | 2010-12-30 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7340888B2 (en) | Diesel particulate matter reduction system | |
CA2647064C (en) | Low temperature diesel particulate matter reduction system | |
JP6436615B2 (en) | Partial filter substrate including SCR catalyst, exhaust treatment system, and engine exhaust treatment method | |
CA2323359C (en) | Improvements in emissions control | |
KR101028548B1 (en) | A device for purifying exhaust gas | |
KR101631149B1 (en) | Diesel engine exhaust gas purification device having ammonia decomposition module | |
US9657625B2 (en) | Wall flow filter loaded with SCR catalyst, systems and methods of exhaust gas treatment | |
CN101550859B (en) | Apparatus for purifying exhaust gas | |
CN104295349B (en) | Exhausted gas post-processing system for reducing the method for the nitrogen oxides in diesel engine exhaust and for implementing the method | |
EP1446215B1 (en) | Rolling regeneration diesel particulate trap | |
EP2042227A2 (en) | Emission treatment system and method using a scr filter | |
RU2007131191A (en) | EXHAUST GAS TREATMENT SYSTEM | |
JP2004084666A (en) | Removal of soot fine particles from exhaust gas of diesel engine | |
KR20140062899A (en) | Exhaust gas purification system of vehicle | |
US20020170433A1 (en) | Process and device for removing soot particles from diesel engine exhaust gas | |
KR101011760B1 (en) | Novel SCR catalysts and after-treatment devices for diesel engine exhaust gas | |
KR101174113B1 (en) | Metal foam filter for diesel particulate filter trap | |
KR20110101277A (en) | An emission apparatus for diesel engine exhaust gas | |
JP2007332849A (en) | Exhaust gas purification apparatus | |
EP1251249A2 (en) | A process and device for removing soot particles from the exhaust gas from a diesel engine | |
KR20110065985A (en) | Unification catalytic converter apparatus to remove particulate matter and nitrogen oxide | |
KR101011758B1 (en) | After-treatment apparatus for treating exhaust gases from diesel engines | |
JP2005201155A (en) | Exhaust emission control device |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application | ||
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2006739091 Country of ref document: EP |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: RU |