WO2006130366A2 - Touchscreen with one carbon nanotube conductive layer - Google Patents

Touchscreen with one carbon nanotube conductive layer Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2006130366A2
WO2006130366A2 PCT/US2006/019530 US2006019530W WO2006130366A2 WO 2006130366 A2 WO2006130366 A2 WO 2006130366A2 US 2006019530 W US2006019530 W US 2006019530W WO 2006130366 A2 WO2006130366 A2 WO 2006130366A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
touchscreen
carbon nanotubes
electrically conductive
conductive layer
electrode
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2006/019530
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
WO2006130366A3 (en
Inventor
Todd Mathew Spath
Glen Clifford Irvin, Jr.
Debasis Majumdar
Charles Chester Anderson
Original Assignee
Eastman Kodak Company
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Eastman Kodak Company filed Critical Eastman Kodak Company
Priority to EP06770710A priority Critical patent/EP1886212B1/en
Priority to JP2008514686A priority patent/JP2008546090A/en
Publication of WO2006130366A2 publication Critical patent/WO2006130366A2/en
Publication of WO2006130366A3 publication Critical patent/WO2006130366A3/en

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F3/00Input arrangements for transferring data to be processed into a form capable of being handled by the computer; Output arrangements for transferring data from processing unit to output unit, e.g. interface arrangements
    • G06F3/01Input arrangements or combined input and output arrangements for interaction between user and computer
    • G06F3/03Arrangements for converting the position or the displacement of a member into a coded form
    • G06F3/041Digitisers, e.g. for touch screens or touch pads, characterised by the transducing means
    • G06F3/045Digitisers, e.g. for touch screens or touch pads, characterised by the transducing means using resistive elements, e.g. a single continuous surface or two parallel surfaces put in contact
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10STECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S977/00Nanotechnology
    • Y10S977/70Nanostructure
    • Y10S977/734Fullerenes, i.e. graphene-based structures, such as nanohorns, nanococoons, nanoscrolls or fullerene-like structures, e.g. WS2 or MoS2 chalcogenide nanotubes, planar C3N4, etc.
    • Y10S977/742Carbon nanotubes, CNTs
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10TTECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T428/00Stock material or miscellaneous articles
    • Y10T428/249921Web or sheet containing structurally defined element or component
    • Y10T428/249924Noninterengaged fiber-containing paper-free web or sheet which is not of specified porosity
    • Y10T428/24994Fiber embedded in or on the surface of a polymeric matrix

Definitions

  • the present invention relates in general to touchscreens for electronic devices.
  • the invention provides a touchscreen comprising touch side electrode and device side electrode wherein each electrode comprises an insulating substrate and an exposed electrically conductive layer, wherein said exposed electrically conductive layers are adjacent and separated by dielectric spacers, and wherein only one of the exposed electrically conductive layers comprises carbon nanotubes.
  • ITO indium tin oxide
  • the coating of ITO is carried out by vacuum sputtering methods, which involve high substrate temperature conditions up to 250 °C, and therefore, glass substrates are generally used.
  • plastic resins as a flexible substrate and carbon nanotube or organic electroconductive polymer layers as an electrode.
  • plastic electronics allow low cost devices with new properties.
  • FIG. 1 shows a typical prior art resistive-type touchscreen 10 comprising a first electrode 15 that is on the side of the touchscreen that is nearer to the device that is referred herein below as the device side electrode and a second electrode 16 that is on the side of the touchscreen that is nearer to the user that is referred herein below as the touch side electrode.
  • Device side electrode 15 comprises a transparent substrate 12, having a first conductive layer 14.
  • Touch side electrode 16 comprises a transparent support 17, that is typically a flexible transparent support, and a second conductive layer 18 that is physically separated from the first conductive layer 14 by dielectric (insulating) spacer elements 20.
  • a voltage is developed across the conductive layers.
  • the conductive layers 14 and 18 have a resistance selected to optimize power usage and position sensing accuracy. Deformation of the touch side electrode 16 by an external object such as a finger or stylus causes the second conductive layer 18 to make electrical contact with first conductive layer 14, thereby transferring a voltage between the conductive layers. The magnitude of this voltage is measured through connectors (not shown) connected to metal bus bar conductive patterns (not shown) formed on the edges of conductive layers 18 and 14 to locate the position of the deforming object.
  • ITO is commonly employed as the transparent conductive layer on the device side and touch side electrodes.
  • ITO tends to crack under stress and with the result that the conductivity of the electrodes, especially for the touch side electrode, is diminished and the performance of the touchscreen degraded.
  • More flexible conductive polymer-containing layers have also been considered for this application, but these conductive polymers are softer and less physically durable than ITO and therefore such conductive layers tend to degrade after repeated contacts.
  • Single wall carbon nanotubes SWCNTs
  • SWCNTs are essentially graphene sheets rolled into hollow cylinders thereby resulting in tubules composed of sp 2 hybridized carbon arranged in hexagons and pentagons, which have outer diameters between 0.4 nm and 10 nm.
  • SWCNTs are typically capped on each end with a hemispherical fullerene (buckyball) appropriately sized for the diameter of the SWCNT.
  • buckyball hemispherical fullerene
  • end caps may be removed via appropriate processing techniques leaving uncapped tubules.
  • SWCNTs can exist as single tubules or in aggregated form typically referred to as ropes or bundles. These ropes or bundles may contain several or a few hundred SWCNTs aggregated through Van der Waals interactions forming triangular lattices where the tube-tube separation is approximately 3-4 A. Ropes of SWCNTs may be composed of associated bundles of SWCNTs.
  • SWCNTs can possess high (e.g. metallic conductivities) electronic conductivities, high thermal conductivities, high modulus and tensile strength, high aspect ratio and other unique properties. Further, SWCNTs may be metallic, semi-metallic, or semiconducting dependant on the geometrical arrangement of the carbon atoms and the physical dimensions of the SWCNT. To specify the size and conformation of single-wall carbon nanotubes, a system has been developed, described below, and is currently utilized.
  • SWCNTs are described by an index (n, m), where n and m are integers that describe how to cut a single strip of hexagonal graphite such that its edges join seamlessly when the strip is wrapped into the form of a cylinder.
  • n m e.g. (n, n)
  • the resultant tube is said to be of the "arm-chair” or (n, n) type, since when the tube is cut perpendicularly to the tube axis, only the sides of the hexagons are exposed and their pattern around the periphery of the tube edge resembles the arm and seat of an arm chair repeated n times.
  • the resultant tube When m ⁇ O, the resultant tube is said to be of the "zig zag" or (n,0) type, since when the tube is cut perpendicular to the tube axis, the edge is a zig zag pattern.
  • the resulting tube has chirality.
  • the electronic properties are dependent on the conformation; for example, armchair tubes are metallic and have extremely high electrical conductivity.
  • Other tube types are semimetals or semi-conductors, depending on their conformation. SWCNTs have extremely high thermal conductivity and tensile strength irrespective of the chirality.
  • SWCNTs The work functions of the metallic (approximately 4.7 eV) and semiconducting (approximately 5.1 eV) types of SWCNTs are different. Similar to other forms of carbon allotropes (e.g. graphite, diamond) these SWCNTs are intractable and essentially insoluble in most solvents (organic and aqueous alike). Thus, SWCNTs have been extremely difficult to process for various uses. Several methods to make SWCNTs soluble in various solvents have been employed. One approach is to covalently functionalize the ends of the SWCNTs with either hydrophilic or hydrophobic moieties. A second approach is to add high levels of surfactant and/or dispersants (small molecule or polymeric) to help solubilize the SWCNTs.
  • surfactant and/or dispersants small molecule or polymeric
  • Lavin et al. in US Patent 6,426,134 disclose a method to form polymer composites using SWCNTs.
  • This method provides a means to melt extrude a SWCNT/polymer composite wherein at least one end of the SWCNT is chemically bonded to the polymer, where the polymer is selected from a linear or branched polyamide, polyester, polyimide, or polyurethane.
  • This method does not provide opportunities for solvent based processing and is limited to melt extrusion which can limit opportunities for patterning or device making.
  • the chemically bonded polymers identified typically have high molecular weights and could interfere with some material properties of the SWCNTs (e.g. electronic or thermal transport) via wrapping around the SWCNTs and preventing tube-tube contacts.
  • Connell et al in US Patent Application Publication 2003/0158323 Al describes a method to produce polymer/SWCNT composites that are electronically conductive and transparent.
  • the polymers polyimides, copolyimides, polyamide acid, polyaryleneether, polymethylmethacrylate
  • SWCNTs or MWCNTs are mixed in organic solvents (DMF, N 5 N- dimethlacetamide, N-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone, toluene,) to cast films that have conductivities in the range of 10 "5 - 10 "12 S/cm with varying transmissions in the visible spectrum.
  • monomers of the resultant polymers may be mixed with SWCNTs in appropriate solvents and polymerized in the presence of these SWCNTs to result in composites with varying weight ratios.
  • the conductivities achieved in these polymer composites are several orders of magnitude too low and not optimal for use in most electronic devices as electronic conductors or EMI shields.
  • the organic solvents used are toxic, costly and pose problems in processing.
  • the polymers used or polymerized are not conductive and can impede tube-tube contact further increasing the resistivity of the composite.
  • compositions to make suspended carbon nanotubes are composed of liquids and SWCNTs or MWCNTs with suitable surfactants (cetyl trimethylammonium bromide/chloride/iodide).
  • suitable surfactants cetyl trimethylammonium bromide/chloride/iodide.
  • the ratio by weight of surfactant to SWCNTs given in the examples range from 1.4 - 5.2.
  • This method is problematic, as it needs extremely large levels of surfactant to solubilize the SWCNTs.
  • the surfactant is insulating and impedes conductivity of a film deposited from this composition.
  • the surfactant may be washed from the film but this step adds complexity and may decrease efficiency in processing. Further, due to the structure formed in films deposited from such a composition, it would be very difficult to remove all the surfactant.
  • Papadaopoulos et al. in US Patent 5,576,162 describe an imaging element, which comprises carbon nanofibers to be used primarily as an anti-static material within the imaging element. These materials may not provide the highly transparent and highly conductive (low sheet resistance, Rs) layer that is necessary in many current electronic devices, especially displays.
  • Rs sheet resistance
  • the various derivative groups (alkyl chains, acyl, thiols, aminos, aryls etc.) are added to the ends of the SWCNTs.
  • the side-walls of the SWCNTs are functionalized primarily with fluorine groups resulting in fluorinated SWCNTs.
  • the solubility limit of such "fiuorotubes" in 2-propanol is approximately 0.1 mg/mL and in water or water/acetone mixtures the solubility is essentially zero.
  • the fluorinated SWCNTs were subjected to further chemical reactions to yield methylated SWCNTs and these tubes have a low solubility in Chloroform but not other solvents.
  • the method discloses functionalization of the tubule ends with various functionalization groups (acyl, aryl, aralkyl, halogen, alkyl, amino, halogen, thiol) but the end functionalization alone may not be enough to produce viable dispersions via solubilization. Further, the sidewall functionalization is done with fluorine only, which gives limited solubility in alcohols, which can make manufacturing and product fabrication more difficult.
  • the fiuorinated SWCNTs are insulators due to the fluorination and thereby are not useful for electronic devices especially as electronic conductors.
  • the chemical transformations needed to add these functional groups to the end points of the SWCNTs require additional processing steps and chemicals which can be hazardous and costly.
  • the method discloses functionalization of the tubule ends with various functionalization groups (acyl, aryl, aralkyl, halogen, alkyl, amino, halogen, thiol) but the end functionalization alone may not be enough to produce viable dispersions via solubilization.
  • the chemical transformations needed to add these functional groups to the end points of the SWCNTs require additional processing steps and chemicals which can be hazardous and costly.
  • the patent discloses a composition of matter, which is at least 99% by weight of single wall carbon molecules which obviously limits the amount of functionalization that can be put onto the SWCNTs thereby limiting its solubilization levels and processability.
  • Rinzler et al. in PCT Publication WO2004/009884 Al disclose a method of forming SWCNT films on a porous membrane such that it achieves 200 ohms/square and at least 30% transmission at a wavelength of 3 um.
  • This method is disadvantaged since it needs a porous membrane (e.g. polycarbonate or mixed cellulose ester) with a high volume of porosity with a plurality of sub-micron pores as a substrate which may lose a significant amount of the SWCNT dispersion through said pores thereby wasting a significant amount of material.
  • a porous membrane e.g. polycarbonate or mixed cellulose ester
  • such membranes may not have the optical transparency required for many electronic devices such as displays.
  • the membrane is set within a vacuum filtration system, which severely limits the processability of such a system and makes the roll-to-roll coating application of the SWCNT solution impossible.
  • the weight percent of the dispersion used to make the SWCNT film was 0.005 mg/mL in an aqueous solution. Such weight percents are impractical and unusable in most coating and deposition systems with such a high liquid load. Such high liquid loads make it virtually impossible to make patterned images due to solvent spreading and therefore image bleeding/destruction.
  • Blanchet-Fincher et al in Publication WO 02/080195Al and in US 20040065970 Al illustrate high conductivity compositions composed of polyaniline (PANI) and SWCNTs or MWCNTs and methods to deposit such compositions from a donor element onto a receiver substrate.
  • the nitrogen base salt derivative of emeraldine polyaniline is mixed with SWCNTs in organic solvents (toluene, xylene, turpinol, aromatics) and cast into films with conductivity values of 62 S/cm (lwt% SWCNT in PANI) and 44 S/cm (2wt% SWCNT in PANI).
  • These films alternatively may be produced as part of a multilayer donor structure suitable as use for a material transfer system.
  • PANI/SWCNT composite are transferred from the donor sheet to a suitable receiver substrate in imagewise form.
  • PANI is a highly colored conductive polymer and may result in a conductive composite with unsatisfactory transparency and color, which may be undesirable for applications such as displays.
  • Hsu in WO 2004/029176 Al disclose compositions for electronically conducting organic polymer/nanoparticle composites.
  • Polyaniline (Ormecon) or PEDT (Baytron P) are mixed with Molybdenum nanowires or carbon nanotubes (8 nm diameter, 20 um length, 60 S/cm).
  • the compositions disclosed in this invention are disadvantaged by marginal conductivity.
  • Arthur et al in PCT Publication WO 03/099709 A2 disclose methods for patterning carbon nanotubes coatings. Dilute dispersions (10 to 100 ppm) of SWCNTs in isopropyl alcohol (IPA) and water (which may include viscosity modifying agents) are spray coated onto substrates.
  • IPA isopropyl alcohol
  • water which may include viscosity modifying agents
  • a binder is printed in imagewise fashion and cured.
  • a photo-definable binder may be used to create the image using standard photolithographic processes. Materials not held to the substrate with binder are removed by washing. Dilute dispersions (10 to 100 ppm) of SWCNTs in isopropyl alcohol (IPA) and water with viscosity modifying agents are gravure coated onto substrates. Dilute dispersions (10 to 100 ppm) of SWCNTs in isopropyl alcohol (IPA) and water are spray coated onto substrates. The coated films are then exposed through a mask to a high intensity light source in order to significantly alter the electronic properties of the SWCNTs.
  • a binder coating follows this step.
  • Transparent electronically-conductive layers of metal oxides such as indium tin oxide (ITO), antimony doped tin oxide, and cadmium stannate (cadmium tin oxide) have been used in the manufacture of electrooptical display devices such as liquid crystal display devices (LCDs), electroluminescent display devices, photocells, touchscreens, solid-state image sensors and electrochromic windows or as components of these devices such as electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding.
  • ITO indium tin oxide
  • cadmium stannate cadmium stannate
  • EMI electromagnetic interference
  • Intrinsically conductive (also referred to as electronically conductive) polymers have recently received significant attention from various industries because of their electronic conductivity.
  • EP9910201 describes a light transmissive substrate having a light transmissive conductive polymer coating for use in resistive touchscreens.
  • U.S. Patent No. 5,738,934 describes touchscreen cover sheets having a conductive polymer coating.
  • the method suggests in-situ polymerization of an ethylenedioxythiohene monomer on glass, baking it at an elevated temperature and subsequent washing with tetra ethyl orthosilicate. Such an involved process may be difficult to practice for roll-to-roll production of a wide flexible plastic substrate.
  • the art discloses a wide variety of electronically conductive TCL compositions that can be incorporated in electronic devices.
  • the stringent requirements of high transparency, low surface electrical resistivity, flexibility, and robustness under repeated contacts demanded by modern display devices and, especially, touchscreens is extremely difficult to attain with the TCL compositions described in the prior art.
  • the TCL layers also must be highly transparent, must resist the effects of humidity change, be physically robust, and be manufacturable at a reasonable cost.
  • the present invention provides a touchscreen comprising touch side electrode and device side electrode wherein each electrode comprises an insulating substrate and an exposed electrically conductive layer, wherein said exposed electrically conductive layers are adjacent and separated by dielectric spacers, and wherein only one of the exposed electrically conductive layers comprises carbon nanotubes.
  • FIG 1. A schematic diagram showing a section of a resistive touchscreen of the prior art.
  • FIG 2. A schematic diagram showing a section of a resistive touchscreen employing asymmetric electrodes of the present invention.
  • FIG 3. Shows another embodiment of a resistive-type touchscreen of the invention.
  • FIG 4. Shows another embodiment of a resistive-type touchscreen of the invention.
  • FIG. An exploded view showing the construction of a touchscreen of the present invention.
  • FIGS 6A and 6B Schematic diagrams of pristine single wall carbon nanotubes having tubules with closed ends and with open ends.
  • FIGS 7 A and 7B Schematic diagrams of functionalized single wall carbon nanotubes having tubules with closed ends and with open ends
  • FIG 8. An exploded view showing the touchscreen fabricated in this invention for testing of single and multilayer electrodes of the instant invention.
  • FIG 9. Shows, based on the results of Comparative Example 1 below, the on-state resistance profile as a function of single point actuations for a single layer Bekaert ITO touch switch.
  • FIG 10. Shows, based on the results of Comparative Examplel below, the force to actuate the touchswitch as a function of single point actuations for single layer of Bekaert ITO.
  • FIG 11. Shows, based on the results of Comparative Example 2 below, the force to actuate the touchswitch as a function of single point actuations for single layer of Baytron P AG (PEDOT/PSS).
  • FIG 12. Shows, based on the results of Comparative Example 2 below, the on-state resistance profile as a function of single point actuations for single layer conductor Baytron P AG Touch Switch.
  • FIG 13 Shows, based on the results of Comparative Example 4 below, the force to actuate the touchswitch as a function of single point actuations for single layer conductor Keytec ITO Touch Switch.
  • FIG 14. Shows, based on the results of Comparative Example 4 below, the on-state resistance profile as a function of single point actuations for single layer conductor Keytec ITO Touch Switch.
  • FIG 15. Shows, based on the results of Comparative Example 5 below, the on-state resistance profile as a function of single point actuations for an asymmetric electrode touch switch with Keytec ITO and Baytron P AG as opposing electrodes.
  • FIG 16. Shows, based on the results of Instant Invention Example 1 below, the force to actuate the touchswitch as a function of single point actuations for an asymmetric electrode touch switch with Bekaert ITO and Single Wall Carbon Nanotubes as per the instant invention.
  • FIG 17. Shows, based on the results of Instant Invention Example 1 below, the on-state resistance profile as a function of single point actuations for an asymmetric electrode touch switch with Bekaert ITO and Single Wall Carbon Nanotubes as per the instant invention.
  • FIG 18. Shows, based on the results of Instant Invention Example 2 below, the force to actuate the touchswitch as a function of single point actuations for an asymmetric electrode touch switch with Baytron P AG
  • FIG 19. Shows, based on the results of Instant Invention Example 2 below, the on-state resistance profile as a function of single point actuations for an asymmetric electrode touch switch with Baytron P AG (containing crosslinking agent) and Single Wall Carbon Nanotubes as per the instant invention.
  • FIG 20 Shows, based on the results of Instant Invention Example 3 below, the force to actuate the touchswitch as a function of single point actuations for an asymmetric electrode touchswitch with Keytec ITO and Carbon Nanotube (exposed layer) and Pedot/PSS (first or buried layer) as Opposing Electrodes.
  • FIG 21 Shows, based on the results of Instant Invention Example 3 below, the on-state resistance profile as a function of single point actuations for an asymmetric electrode touchswitch with Keytec ITO and Carbon Nanotube (exposed layer) and Pedot/PSS (first or buried layer) as Opposing Electrodes.
  • the present invention provides a touchscreen comprising touch side electrode and device side electrode wherein each electrode comprises an insulating substrate and an exposed electrically conductive layer, wherein said exposed electrically conductive layers are adjacent and separated by dielectric spacers, and wherein only one of the exposed electrically conductive layers comprises carbon nanotubes.
  • Touchscreens of the present invention comprise electrodes that are asymmetric in composition. That is, a different conductive material is employed in the exposed electrically conductive layer on the touch side electrode compared to the exposed electrically conductive layer on the device side electrode, hi the present invention, either the touch side electrode or the device side electrode (but not both) has an exposed electrically conductive layer that comprises carbon nanotubes. Additionally, electrodes that are on opposite sides of the spacer elements may also be called opposing electrodes. Such opposing electrodes of the present invention comprise electrodes that are asymmetric in composition.
  • Touchscreens of the present invention wherein only one of the exposed conductive layers comprise carbon nanotubes, provide improved durability of the touchscreen compared with conventional touchscreens employing (symmetrical composition) touch side and device side electrodes comprising ITO.
  • FIG. 2 shows one embodiment of a resistive-type touchscreen of the invention 39 including a device side electrode 25 and a touch side electrode 26.
  • Device side electrode 25 comprises in order, an insulating substrate 29 and an exposed electrically conductive layer 24 in contact with said substrate.
  • Touch side electrode 26 comprises in order, an insulating substrate 27 and an exposed electrically conductive layer 28 in contact with said substrate.
  • said exposed electrically conductive layers 24 and 28 are adjacent and separated by dielectric spacers 32.
  • the exposed electrically conductive layers have a sheet resistance of between 100 and 10 6 Ohm per square.
  • either exposed electrically conductive layer 24 or 28 (but not both) comprises carbon nanotubes.
  • the carbon nanotubes are single wall carbon nanotubes (SWCNT).
  • the other exposed electrically conductive layer that does not comprise carbon nanotubes may comprise at least one material from the group consisting of electronically conductive polymers, transparent conducting oxides and transparent metal films.
  • Suitable electronically conductive polymers include polypyrrole, polyaniline or polythiophene.
  • Suitable transparent conducting oxides include tin doped indium oxide, fluorine doped zinc oxide, aluminum doped zinc oxide, indium doped zinc oxide, antimony doped tin oxide, fluorine doped tin oxide.
  • Suitable transparent metal films include silver, gold, copper or alloys of these materials.
  • Resistive touchscreens of the invention preferably are mechanically robust to point actuations by objects (plastic or metal stylus, fingers etc.).
  • a touchscreen is activated or actuated when the touch side and device side electrodes contact. Over time, repetitive contact and the force applied during such contact damage prior art touchscreens. Such damage requires that increasingly larger forces are necessary to actuate the touchscreen.
  • the force required to actuate a point on the touchscreen does not change by more than 500 percent over 500,000 single point actuations. More preferably, the force required to actuate the touchscreen does not change by more than 100 percent and most preferably more than 50 percent.
  • a single point actuation is the application of an object at a single point on the touchscreen to activate such touchscreen.
  • the carbon nanotubes suitable for use in the conductive layers of the invention may be formed by any known methods in the art (laser ablation, CVD, arc discharge).
  • the carbon nanotubes are preferred to have minimal or no impurities of carbonaceous impurities that are not carbon nanotubes (graphite, amorphous, diamond, non-tubular fullerenes, multiwall carbon nanotubes) or metal impurities. It is found that the transparency increases significantly with reduced levels of metallic and carbonaceous impurities.
  • Conductive layer film quality as evidenced by layer uniformity, surface roughness, and a reduction in particulates, also improves with a decrease in the amount of metal and carbonaceous impurities.
  • metallic SWCNTs are the most preferred type of carbon nanotube but semimetallic and semiconducting SWCNTs may also be used.
  • a pristine SWCNT means that the surface of the SWCNT is free of covalently functionalized materials either through synthetic prep, acid cleanup of impurities, annealing or directed functionalization.
  • the SWCNTS are preferably functionalized.
  • the preferred functional group is a hydrophilic species selected from carboxylic acid, carboxylate anion (carboxylic acid salt), hydroxyl, sulfur containing groups, carbonyl, phosphates, nitrates or combinations of these hydrophilic species.
  • other types of functionalization such as polymer, small molecule or combinations thereof may be required. For example, such functionalization may improve the compatibility of the SWCNT in a particular polymer matrix.
  • FIG. 5 pristine SWCNTs with either open or closed ends are illustrated. SWCNTs that are pristine are essentially intractable in most solvents, especially aqueous media, without the use of high levels of dispersants. Therefore, it is not possible to use only pristine SWCNTs and water to produce an aqueous coating composition.
  • Figure 6 exemplifies the basic structure of covalently functionalized SWCNTs.
  • the X in Figure 6 may be selected from one of the hydrophilic species listed above. It is worth noting that the X may be positioned at any point on the SWCNT, external or internal surface, open or closed end, or sidewall. It is preferred that the X be uniformly distributed across the external surface, potentially for the most effectiveness.
  • the most preferred covalent surface functionalization is carboxylic acid or a carboxylic acid salt or mixtures thereof (hereafter referred to as only carboxylic acid).
  • carboxylic acid based functionalization the preferred level of functionalized carbons on the SWCNT is 0.5 - 100 atomic percent, where 1 atomic percent functionalized carbons would be 1 out of every 100 carbons in the SWCNT have a functional group covalently attached.
  • the functionalized carbons may exist anywhere on the nanotubes (open or closed ends, external and internal sidewalls).
  • the functionalization is on the external surface of the SWCNTs. More preferably the functionalized percent range is 0.5 - 50 atomic percent, and most preferably 0.5 - 5 atomic percent.
  • Functionalization of the SWCNTs with these groups within these atomic percent ranges allows the preparation of stable dispersions at the solids loadings necessary to form highly conductive, transparent films by conventional coating means. This method allows for very effective dispersion in substantially aqueous dispersions and does not require a dispersion aid. Additionally, the most efficient level of functionalization will provide the desired dispersion without significantly altering the electronic properties of the carbon nanotubes. Transparency is defined as a conductive layer that has greater than 60% bulk transmission. This transparency may be achieved by producing thin coatings with thicknesses less than 1 micrometer. The functionalization may be carried out by a number of routes.
  • the raw material (unfunctionalized) SWCNTs are added to a bath of strongly oxidizing agents (hydrochloric acid, hydrofluoric acid, hydrobromic acid, hydroiodic acid, sulfuric acid, oleum, nitric acid, citric acid, oxalic acid, chlorosulfonic acid, phosphoric acid, trifluoromethane sulfonic acid, glacial acetic acid, monobasic organic acids, dibasic organic acids, potassium permanganate, persulfate, cerate, bromate, hydrogen peroxide, dichromate) which may be mixtures.
  • strongly oxidizing agents hydroochloric acid, hydrofluoric acid, hydrobromic acid, hydroiodic acid, sulfuric acid, oleum, nitric acid, citric acid, oxalic acid, chlorosulfonic acid, phosphoric acid, trifluoromethane sulfonic acid, glacial acetic acid, monobasic organic acids, dibasic organic acids, potassium
  • Sulfuric acid, nitric acid, permanganate, and chlorosulfonic acids are preferred due to the efficacy of the oxidation and functionalization.
  • Temperatures from 2O 0 C - 12O 0 C are typically used in reflux of this mixture of SWCNTs and strong oxidizing agents with appropriate agitation over 1 hr - several days process time. At the end of this process, the raw SWCNTs are now functionalized
  • the residual oxidizing agents are removed via separation technologies (filtration wash, centrifogation, cross-flow filtration) such that a powder of the functionalized SWCNTs (primarily carboxylic acid functionalities) remains after appropriate heating to dry.
  • separation technologies filtration wash, centrifogation, cross-flow filtration
  • a powder of the functionalized SWCNTs primarily carboxylic acid functionalities
  • the pH of the dispersion and the coating composition is important.
  • the carboxylic acid will be ionized thereby making the carboxylate anion, a bulky, repulsive group which can aid in the stability.
  • Preferred pH ranges from 3 - 10 pH. More preferred pH ranges from 3 - 6.
  • the length of the SWCNTs may be from 20 nm - 1 m, more typically from 20 nm to 50 urn.
  • the SWCNTs may exist as individual SWCNTs or as bundles of SWCNTs.
  • the diameter of a SWCNT in the conductive layer may be 0.05 nm - 5 nm.
  • the SWCNTs in bundled form may have diameters ranging from 1 nm - 1 um. Preferably such bundles will have diameters less than 50 nm and preferably less than 20 nm and lengths of between 20 nm and 50 um.
  • SWCNTs which may be at the internal position of the bundles and not accessible.
  • the ends of the SWCNTs may be closed by a hemispherical buckyball of appropriate size.
  • both of the ends of the SWCNTs may be open. Some cases may find one end open and the other end closed.
  • the functionalized SWCNTs (produced as described above or purchased from a vendor) are used to form aqueous dispersions with SWCNT solids loadings in the 0.05 - 10 wt% (500 - 100000) ppm range. More preferably the SWCNT solids loadings are 0.1 - 5wt%. Most preferably the solid loadings are 0.1 - lwt% SWCNT. This solids loading range allows for facile coating to occur and also minimizes the viscosity such that roll coating and/or inkjet printing can be performed in standard practice.
  • the functionalized SWCNTs are often in powder/flake form and require energy to disperse.
  • a typical dispersion process may use a high shear mixing apparatus (homogenizer, microfluidizer, cowles blade high shear mixer, automated media mill, ball mill) for several minutes to an hour.
  • a high shear mixing apparatus homogenizer, microfluidizer, cowles blade high shear mixer, automated media mill, ball mill
  • standard ultrasonication and bath sonication may be sufficient to disperse the functionalized SWCNTs.
  • a 1000 ppm SWCNT dispersion in deionized water is formed by bath sonication for 2 - 24 hrs (dependant on the level of hydrophilic functionalization).
  • pH can be adjusted to desired range.
  • a centrifugation or filtration process is used to remove large particulates. The resultant dispersion will be stable for several months on standing (dependant on the level of hydrophilic functionalization).
  • the conductive layer of the invention should contain about 0.1 to about 1000 mg/m 2 dry coating weight of the functionalized SWCNT.
  • the conductive layer should contain about 0.5 to about 500 mg/m 2 dry coating weight of the functionalized SWCNT.
  • This range of SWCNT in the dry coating is easily accessible by standard coating methods, will give the best transmission properties, and minimizes cost to achieve the desired sheet resistance.
  • the actual dry coating weight of the SWCNTs applied is determined by the properties for the particular conductive functionalized SWCNT employed and by the requirements for the particular application, the requirements may include, for example, the conductivity, transparency, optical density, cost, etc for the layer.
  • SWCNTs is prepared by applying a mixture containing:
  • each of R 1 and R 2 independently represents carboxylic acid, carboxylate anion (carboxylic acid salt), hydroxyl, sulfur containing groups, carbonyl, phosphates, nitrates, and the tube is a single wall carbon nanotube composed of carbon atoms substantially in hexagonal configuration, and, optionally b) a dispersant and, optionally c) a polymeric binder.
  • the R 1 and R 2 substituents may be uniformly or non-uniformly distributed across the SWCNT.
  • the dispersant loading in the dispersion is preferred to be minimal to none.
  • the maximum dispersant loading is preferred to be 50 wt% of the weight of the SWCNT.
  • the more preferred dispersant loading is less than 5 wt% of the weight of the SWCNT.
  • the most preferred dispersant loading is 0 wt%. With decreasing levels of dispersant, the electronic conductivity increases. There are many dispersants which may be chosen.
  • Preferred dispersants are octylphenol ethoxylate (TX-100), sodium dodecyl sulfate, sodium dodecylbenzenesulfonate, poly(styrene sulfonate), sodium salt, polyvinylpyrrolidone), block copolymers of ethylene oxide and propylene oxide (Pluronics or Poloxamers), Polyoxyethylene alkyl ethers (Brij 78, Brij 700), and cetyl or dodecyltrimethylammonium bromide.
  • TX-100 octylphenol ethoxylate
  • sodium dodecyl sulfate sodium dodecylbenzenesulfonate
  • poly(styrene sulfonate) sodium salt
  • polyvinylpyrrolidone block copolymers of ethylene oxide and propylene oxide (Pluronics or Poloxamers)
  • Polyoxyethylene alkyl ethers B
  • a preferred embodiment for functionalization of this invention can preferably be where the functional group is a sulfur containing group selected from:
  • R-SO x Z y Where R is a carbon within the lattice of a SWCNT, x may range from 1 - 3 and Z may be a Hydrogen atom or a metal cation such metals as Na, Mg, K, Ca, Zn, Mn, Ag, Au, Pd, Pt, Fe, Co and y may range from 0 - 1 or combinations these hydrophilic species.
  • the sulfur containing groups listed above may be sulfonic acid, sulfonic acid and/or sulfonic acid and/or the corresponding anions or mixtures thereof.
  • the most preferred sulfur containing group covalent surface functionalization is sulfonic acid or a sulfonic acid salt or mixtures thereof (hereafter referred to as only sulfonic acid).
  • Covalently attached sulfonic acid gives best dispersions of carbon nanotubes amongst the sulfur containing groups.
  • substantially aqueous dispersions of carbon nanotubes meaning at least 60 wt% water in the dispersion
  • Electronically conductive polymers that are suitable in the practice of the invention maybe soluble or dispersible in organic solvents or water or mixtures thereof.
  • the conductive poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT) may be supplied by either of two routes.
  • EDOT ethylenedioxythiophene
  • a suitable solvent e.g. butanol
  • ammonium persulfate ammonium persulfate
  • iron(III) salts of organic and inorganic acids e.g. ammonium persulfate, and iron(III) salts of organic and inorganic acids.
  • an aqueous dispersion of a cationic PEDOT mixed with a polyanion, such as polystyrenesulfonic acid may be used. For environmental reasons, aqueous compositions are preferred.
  • a preferred electronically conductive polymer comprises 3, 4- dialkoxy substituted polythiophene styrene sulfonate because of its relatively neutral color.
  • the most preferred electronically conductive polymers include poly(3,4-ethylene dioxythiophene styrene sulfonate) which comprises poly(3,4- ethylene dioxythiophene) in a cationic form with polystyrenesulfonic acid.
  • the advantage of choosing the aforementioned polymers arise from the fact that they are primarily water based, stable polymer structure to light and heat, stable dispersions and cause minimum concern for storage, health, environmental and handling.
  • the polystyrenesulfonic acid is preferred as it stabilizes the PEDOT polymer very efficiently and helps in dispersion in aqueous systems.
  • An alternative electronically conductive polymer is polyaniline.
  • the conductive poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) may be supplied by either of two routes. First, it may be synthesized via an in-situ oxidative polymerization where the monomer, ethylenedioxythiophene (EDOT), is dissolved within a suitable solvent (e.g. butanol). There are a number of oxidizing agents that maybe used including ammonium persulfate, and iron(III) salts of organic and inorganic acids. Second, an aqueous dispersion of a cationic PEDOT mixed with a polyanion, such as polystyrenesulfonic acid, may be used. For environmental reasons, aqueous compositions are preferred.
  • the electronically conductive polymer layer of the invention should contain about 0.1 to about 1000 mg/m 2 dry coating weight of the electronically conductive polymer.
  • the conductive layer should contain about 1 to about 500 mg/m 2 dry coating weight of the electronically conductive polymer.
  • the actual dry coating weight of the conductive polymer applied is determined by the properties of the particular conductive polymer employed and by the requirements of the particular application. These requirements include conductivity, transparency, optical density and cost for the layer.
  • the layer containing the electronically conductive polymer is prepared by applying a mixture comprising:
  • each of Rl and R2 independently represents hydrogen or a Cl -4 alkyl group or together represent an optionally substituted C 1-4 alkylene group or a cycloalkylene group, preferably an ethylene group, an optionally alkyl- substituted methylene group, an optionally Cl -12 alkyl- or phenyl-substituted 1,2- ethylene group, a 1,3-propylene group or a 1,2-cyclohexylene group; and n is 3 to 1000; and b) a polyanion compound;
  • the electronically conductive polymer and polyanion combination is soluble or dispersible in organic solvents or water or mixtures thereof.
  • aqueous systems are preferred.
  • Polyanions used with these electronically conductive polymers include the anions of polymeric carboxylic acids such as polyacrylic acids, poly(methacrylic acid), and poly(maleic acid), and polymeric sulfonic acids such as polystyrenesulfonic acids and polyvinylsulfonic acids, the polymeric sulfonic acids being preferred for use in this invention because they are widely available and water coatable.
  • polycarboxylic and polysulfonic acids may also be copolymers formed from vinylcarboxylic and vinylsulfonic acid monomers copolymerized with other polymerizable monomers such as the esters of acrylic acid and styrene.
  • the molecular weight of the polyacids providing the polyanions preferably is 1,000 to 2,000,000 and more preferably 2,000 to 500,000.
  • the polyacids or their alkali salts are commonly available, for example as polystyrenesulfonic acids and polyacrylic acids, or they may be produced using known methods. Instead of the free acids required for the formation of the electronically conducting polymers and polyanions, mixtures of alkali salts of polyacids and appropriate amounts of monoacids may also be used.
  • the polythiophene to polyanion weight ratio can widely vary between 1:99 to 99:1, however, optimum properties such as high electrical conductivity and dispersion stability and coatability are obtained between 85:15 and 15: 85, and more preferably between 50:50 and 15: 85.
  • the most preferred electronically conductive polymers include poly(3,4-ethylene dioxythiophene styrene sulfonate) which comprises poly(3,4-ethylene dioxythiophene) in a cationic form and polystyrenesulfonic acid because of its low optical density, stability, wide availability, high conductivity and ability to be coated from water.
  • CEA conductivity enhancing agent
  • Preferred CEAs are organic compounds containing dihydroxy, poly- hydroxy, carboxyl, amide, or lactam groups, such as
  • R is an alkylene group having 2 to 20 carbon atoms, an arylene group having 6 to 14 carbon atoms in the arylene chain, a pyran group, or a furan group
  • X is -OH or -NYZ, wherein Y and Z are independently hydrogen or an alkyl group; or (2) a sugar, sugar derivative, polyalkylene glycol, or glycerol compound; or
  • Particularly preferred conductivity enhancing agents are: sugar and sugar derivatives such as sucrose, glucose, fructose, lactose; sugar alcohols such as sorbitol, mannitol; furan derivatives such as 2-furancarboxylic acid, 3- furancarboxylic acid and alcohols.
  • sugar and sugar derivatives such as sucrose, glucose, fructose, lactose
  • sugar alcohols such as sorbitol, mannitol
  • furan derivatives such as 2-furancarboxylic acid, 3- furancarboxylic acid and alcohols.
  • Ethylene glycol, glycerol, di- or triethylene glycol are most preferred because they provide the maximum conductivity enhancement.
  • the CEA can be incorporated by any suitable method.
  • the CEA is added to the coating composition comprising the SWCNTs, the electronically conductive polymer, or both coating compositions.
  • the coated SWCNT layer and electronically conductive polymer layer can be exposed to the CEA by any suitable method, such as post-coating wash.
  • concentration of the CEA in the coating composition may vary widely depending on the particular organic compound used and the conductivity requirements. However, convenient concentrations that may be effectively employed in the practice of the present invention are about 0.5 to about 25 weight %; more conveniently 0.5 to 10 and more desirably 0.5 to 5 as it provides the minimum effective amount.
  • a figure of merit can be assigned to the electronically conductive polymer within the conductive layer.
  • FOM values are determined by (1) measuring the visual light transmission (T) and the sheet resistance (Rs) of the conductive layer at various thickness values of the layer, (2) plotting these data in a In (1/T) vs. 1/Rs space, and (3) then determining the slope of a straight line best fitting these data points and passing through the origin of such a plot. Without being bound to any particular theory, it is found that In (1/T) vs.
  • FOM values of ⁇ 100, preferably ⁇ 5 O, and more preferably ⁇ 40 is found to generate most desired results for display applications
  • Visual light transmission value T is determined from the total optical density at 530 nm, after correcting for the contributions of the uncoated substrate.
  • a Model 361T X-Rite densitometer measuring total optical density at 530 nm, is best suited for this measurement.
  • Visual light transmission, T is related to the corrected total optical density at 530 nm, o.d.(corrected), by the following expression,
  • the Rs value is typically determined by a standard four-point electrical probe.
  • the transparency of the conductive layer of the invention can vary according to need.
  • the conductive layer is desired to be highly transparent.
  • the visual light transmission value T for the conductive layer of the invention is >65%, preferably >70%, more preferably >80%, and most preferably >90%.
  • the conductive layer need not form an integral whole, need not have a uniform thickness and need not be contiguous with the base substrate.
  • the touchscreen of the invention has a transparency of at least 70% in the visible light range.
  • the nanotubes and the electronically conductive polymer can be applied without the addition of a film-forming polymeric binder
  • a film- forming binder can be employed to improve the physical properties of the layers.
  • the layers may comprise from about 1 to 95% of the film- forming polymeric binder.
  • the presence of the film forming binder may increase the overall surface electrical resistivity of the layers.
  • the optimum weight percent of the film-forming polymer binder varies depending on the electrical properties of the carbon nanotubes and the electronically conductive polymer, the chemical composition of the polymeric binder, and the requirements for the particular touchscreen application.
  • Polymeric film-forming binders useful in the conductive layers of this invention can include, but are not limited to, water-soluble or water- dispersible hydrophilic polymers such as gelatin, gelatin derivatives, maleic acid or maleic anhydride copolymers, polystyrene sulfonates, cellulose derivatives (such as carboxymethyl cellulose, hydroxyethyl cellulose, cellulose acetate butyrate, diacetyl cellulose, and triacetyl cellulose), polyethylene oxide, polyvinyl alcohol, and poly-N-vinylpyrrolidone.
  • water-soluble or water- dispersible hydrophilic polymers such as gelatin, gelatin derivatives, maleic acid or maleic anhydride copolymers, polystyrene sulfonates, cellulose derivatives (such as carboxymethyl cellulose, hydroxyethyl cellulose, cellulose acetate butyrate, diacetyl cellulose, and triacetyl cellulose), polyethylene oxide,
  • Suitable binders include aqueous emulsions of addition-type homopolymers and copolymers prepared from ethylenically unsaturated monomers such as acrylates including acrylic acid, methacrylates including methacrylic acid, acrylamides and methacrylamides, itaconic acid and its half-esters and diesters, styrenes including substituted styrenes, acrylonitrile and methacrylonitrile, vinyl acetates, vinyl ethers, vinyl and vinylidene halides, and olefins and aqueous dispersions of polyurethanes and poryesterionomers.
  • acrylates including acrylic acid, methacrylates including methacrylic acid, acrylamides and methacrylamides, itaconic acid and its half-esters and diesters
  • styrenes including substituted styrenes
  • acrylonitrile and methacrylonitrile vinyl acetates
  • bite solvents can include any of the volatile aromatic compounds disclosed in U.S. Pat. No.
  • aromatic compounds comprising an aromatic ring substituted with at least one hydroxy group or a hydroxy substituted substituents group.
  • These compounds include phenol, 4-chloro-3 -methyl phenol, 4- chlorophenol, 2-cyanophenol, 2,6-dichlorophenol, 2-ethylphenol, resorcinol, benzyl alcohol, 3 -phenyl- 1-propanol, 4-methoxyphenol, 1,2- catechol, 2,4- dihydroxytoluene, 4-chloro-2-methyl phenol, 2,4- dinitrophenol, 4- chlororesorcinol, 1-naphthol, 1,3-naphthalenediol and the like.
  • bite solvents are particularly suitable for polyester based polymer sheets of the invention.
  • the most preferred compounds are resorcinol and 4-chloro-3 -methyl phenol.
  • Preferred surfactants suitable for these coatings include nonionic and anionic surfactants.
  • Preferred cross-linking agents suitable for these coatings include silane compounds such as those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,370,981.
  • the conductive layers are desired to be highly transparent. Accordingly, the visual light transmission value T for the conductive layers of the invention are >65%, preferably >70%, more preferably >80%, and most preferably >90%.
  • the conductive layers need not form an integral whole, need not have a uniform thickness and need not be contiguous with the base substrate.
  • the conductive layers of the invention can be formed on any rigid or flexible substrate.
  • the substrates can be transparent, translucent or opaque, and may be colored or colorless. Preferably, the substrate is colorless and transparent.
  • Rigid substrates can include glass, metal, ceramic and/or semiconductors.
  • Suitable rigid substrate thickness ranges from 50 um - 7000 um, depending on the actual material employed for the rigid substrate.
  • Flexible substrates especially those comprising a plastic substrate, are preferred for their versatility and ease of manufacturing, coating and finishing.
  • the flexible plastic substrate can be any flexible polymeric film.
  • "Plastic” means a high polymer, usually made from polymeric synthetic resins, which may be combined with other ingredients, such as curatives, fillers, reinforcing agents, colorants, and plasticizers. Plastic includes thermoplastic materials and thermosetting materials.
  • the flexible plastic film must have sufficient thickness and mechanical integrity so as to be self-supporting, yet should not be so thick as to be totally rigid.
  • Suitable flexible plastic substrate thickness ranges from 5 um - 500 um. To reduce the weight of the touchscreen while providing mechanical rigidity and thermal resistance, the thickness is preferably 50 - 250 um.
  • Another significant characteristic of the flexible plastic substrate material is its glass transition temperature (Tg). Tg is defined as the glass transition temperature at which plastic material will change from the glassy state to the rubbery state. It may comprise a range before the material may actually flow.
  • Suitable materials for the flexible plastic substrate include thermoplastics of a relatively low glass transition temperature, for example up to 150° C, as well as materials of a higher glass transition temperature, for example, above 150° C.
  • the choice of material for the flexible plastic substrate would depend on factors such as manufacturing process conditions, such as deposition temperature, and annealing temperature, as well as post-manufacturing conditions such as in a process line of a displays manufacturer. Certain of the plastic substrates discussed below can withstand higher processing temperatures of up to at least about 200° C, some up to 300°- 350° C, without damage.
  • the flexible plastic substrate is a polyester including polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polyethylene naphthalate (PEN), polyester ionomer, polyethersulfone (PES), polycarbonate (PC), polysulfone, a phenolic resin, an epoxy resin, polyester, polyimide, polyetherester, polyetheramide, cellulose nitrate, cellulose acetate, polyvinyl acetate), polystyrene, polyolefins including polyolefin ionomers, polyamide, aliphatic polyurethanes, polyacrylonitrile, polytetrafluoroethylenes, polyvinylidene fluorides, poly(methyl (x-methacrylates), an aliphatic or cyclic polyolefin, polyarylate (PAR), polyetherimide (PEI), polyethersulphone (PES), polyimide (PI), Teflon poly(perfluoro-alboxy) fluoropolymer (PFA), poly
  • Aliphatic polyolefms may include high density polyethylene (HDPE), low density polyethylene (LDPE), and polypropylene, including oriented polypropylene (OPP). Cyclic polyolefins may include poly(bis(cyclopentadiene)).
  • a preferred flexible plastic substrate is a cyclic polyolefin or a polyester. Various cyclic polyolefins are suitable for the flexible plastic substrate. Examples include Arton® made by Japan Synthetic Rubber Co., Tokyo, Japan; Zeanor T made by Zeon Chemicals L.P., Tokyo Japan; and Topas® made by Celanese A. G., Kronberg Germany.
  • the flexible plastic substrate can be a polyester.
  • a preferred polyester is an aromatic polyester such as Arylite.
  • the substrate can be transparent, translucent or opaque, for most display applications transparent members comprising transparent substrate(s) are preferred.
  • plastic substrates are set forth above, it should be appreciated that the flexible substrate can also be formed from other materials such as flexible glass and ceramic.
  • the most preferred flexible plastic substrate is polyester because of its superior mechanical and thermal properties as well as its availability in large quantity at a moderate price.
  • the particular polyester chosen for use can be a homo-polyester or a copolyester, or mixtures thereof as desired.
  • the polyester can be crystalline or amorphous or mixtures thereof as desired.
  • Polyesters are normally prepared by the condensation of an organic dicarboxylic acid and an organic diol and, therefore, illustrative examples of useful polyesters will be described herein below in terms of these diol and dicarboxylic acid precursors.
  • Polyesters which are suitable for use in this invention are those which are derived from the condensation of aromatic, cycloaliphatic, and aliphatic diols with aliphatic, aromatic and cycloaliphatic dicarboxylic acids and may be cycloaliphatic, aliphatic or aromatic polyesters.
  • Exemplary of useful cycloaliphatic, aliphatic and aromatic polyesters which can be utilized in the practice of their invention are poly(ethylene terephthalate), poly(cyclohexlenedimethylene), terephthalate) poly(ethylene dodecate), poly(butylene terephthalate), poly(ethylene naphthalate), poly(ethylene(2,7- naphthalate)), poly(methaphenylene isophthalate), poly(glycolic acid), poly(ethylene succinate), poly(ethylene adipate), polyethylene sebacate), poly(decamethylene azelate), poly(ethylene sebacate), poly(decamethylene adipate), poly(decamethylene sebacate), poly(dimethylpropiolactone), poly( ⁇ ara- hydroxybenzoate) (Ekonol), poly(ethylene oxybenzoate) (A-tell), poly(ethylene isophthalate), poly(tetramethylene terephthalate, poly(hexamethylene terephthalate), poly(decamethylene ter
  • Polyester compounds prepared from the condensation of a diol and an aromatic dicarboxylic acid is preferred for use in this invention.
  • aromatic carboxylic acids are terephthalic acid, isophthalic acid and an ⁇ -phthalic acid, 1,3- napthalenedicarboxylic acid, 1,4 napthalenedicarboxylic acid, 2,6- napthalenedicarboxylic acid, 2,7-napthalenedicarboxylic acid, 4,4'- diphenyldicarboxylic acid, 4,4'-diphenysulfphone-dicarboxylic acid, 1,1,3- trimethyl-5-carboxy-3-(p-carboxyphenyl)-idane, diphenyl ether 4,4'- dicarboxylic acid, bis-p(carboxy-phenyl) methane, and the like.
  • aromatic dicarboxylic acids those based on a benzene ring (such as terephthalic acid, isophthalic acid, orthophthalic acid) are preferred for use in the practice of this invention.
  • terephthalic acid is particularly preferred acid precursor.
  • polyesters for use in the practice of this invention include poly(ethylene terephthalate), poly(butylene terephthalate), poly(l,4- cyclohexylene dimethylene terephthalate) and poly(ethylene naphthalate) and copolymers and/or mixtures thereof.
  • poly(ethylene terephthalate) is most preferred because of its low cost, high transparency, and low coefficient of thermal expansion.
  • the aforesaid substrate can comprise a single layer or multiple layers according to need.
  • the multiplicity of layers may include any number of auxiliary layers such as hard coat layers, antistatic layers, tie layers or adhesion promoting layers, abrasion resistant layers, curl control layers, conveyance layers, barrier layers, splice providing layers, UV absorption layers, optical effect providing layers, such as antireflective and antiglare layers, waterproofing layers, adhesive layers, and the like.
  • the touch side electrode further comprises an anti-glare layer, anti-reflection layer, ultra violet light absorbing layer, or abrasion resistant hard coat layer on the side of the substrate opposite to the electrically conductive layers.
  • the anti-glare or hard coat layer has a pencil hardness (using the Standard Test Method for Hardness by Pencil Test ASTM D3363) of at least IH, more preferably a pencil hardness of 2H to 8H.
  • Particularly effective hard coat layers for use in the present invention comprise radiation or thermally cured compositions, and preferably the composition is radiation cured.
  • Ultraviolet (UV) radiation and electron beam radiation are the most commonly employed radiation curing methods.
  • UV curable compositions are particularly useful for creating the abrasion resistant layer of this invention and may be cured using two major types of curing chemistries, free radical chemistry and cationic chemistry.
  • Acrylate monomers (reactive diluents) and oligomers (reactive resins and lacquers) are the primary components of the free radical based formulations, giving the cured coating most of its physical characteristics.
  • Cationic chemistry utilizes cycloaliphatic epoxy resins and vinyl ether monomers as the primary components.
  • Photo-initiators absorb the UV light to form a Lewis acid, which attacks the epoxy ring initiating polymerization.
  • UV curing is meant ultraviolet curing and involves the use of UV radiation of wavelengths between 280 and 420nm preferably between 320 and 410nm.
  • UV radiation curable resins and lacquers usable for the abrasion layer useful in this invention are those derived from photo polymerizable monomers and oligomers such as acrylate and methacrylate oligomers (the term "(meth)acrylate” used herein refers to acrylate and methacrylate), of polyfunctional compounds, such as polyhydric alcohols and their derivatives having (meth)acrylate functional groups such as ethoxylated trimethylolpropane tri(meth)acrylate, tripropylene glycol di(meth)acrylate, trimethylolpropane tri(meth)acrylate, diethylene glycol di(meth)acrylate, pentaerythritol tetra(meth)acrylate, pentaerythritol tri(meth)acrylate, dipentaerythritol hexa(meth)acrylate, 1,6-hexanediol di(meth)acrylate, or neopentyl
  • Reactive diluents usable herein include monofunctional monomers, such as ethyl (meth)acrylate, ethylhexyl (meth)acrylate, styrene, vinyltoluene, and N-vinylpyrrolidone, and polyfunctional monomers, for example, trimethylolpropane tri(meth)acrylate, hexanediol (meth)acrylate, tripropylene glycol di(meth)acrylate, diethylene glycol di(meth)acrylate, pentaerythritol tri(meth)acrylate, dipentaerythritol hexa(meth)acrylate, 1,6-hexanediol di(meth)acrylate, or neopentyl glycol di(meth)acrylate.
  • monofunctional monomers such as ethyl (meth)acrylate, ethylhexyl (meth)acrylate, sty
  • conveniently used radiation curable lacquers include urethane (meth)acrylate oligomers. These are derived from reacting diisocyanates with a oligo(poly)ester or oligo(poly)ether polyol to yield an isocyanate terminated urethane. Subsequently, hydroxy terminated acrylates are reacted with the terminal isocyanate groups. This acrylation provides the unsaturation to the ends of the oligomer. The aliphatic or aromatic nature of the urethane acrylate is determined by the choice of diisocyanates.
  • An aromatic diisocyanate such as toluene diisocyanate
  • An aliphatic urethane acrylate will result from the selection of an aliphatic diisocyanate, such as isophorone diisocyanate or hexyl methyl diisocyanate.
  • polyol backbone plays a pivotal role in determining the performance of the final the oligomer. Polyols are generally classified as esters, ethers, or a combination of these two.
  • the oligomer backbone is terminated by two or more acrylate or methacrylate units, which serve as reactive sites for free radical initiated polymerization.
  • conveniently used radiation curable resins include polyfunctional acrylic compounds derived from polyhydric alcohols and their derivatives such as mixtures of acrylate derivatives of pentaerythritol such as pentaerythritol tetraacrylate and pentaerythritol triacrylate functionalized aliphatic urethanes derived from isophorone diisocyanate.
  • urethane acrylate oligomers used in the practice of this invention that are commercially available include oligomers from Sartomer Company (Exton, PA).
  • An example of a resin that is conveniently used in the practice of this invention is CN 968 ® from Sartomer Company.
  • a photo polymerization initiator such as an acetophenone compound, a benzophenone compound, Michler's benzoyl benzoate, ⁇ - amyloxime ester, or a thioxanthone compound and a photosensitizer such as n- butyl amine, triethylamine, or tri-rc-butyl phosphine, or a mixture thereof is incorporated in the ultraviolet radiation curing composition.
  • conveniently used initiators are 1-hydroxycyclohexyl phenyl ketone and 2-methyl-l-[4-(methyl thio) phenyl] -2-morpholinopropanone-l.
  • the UV polymerizable monomers and oligomers are coated and dried, and subsequently exposed to UV radiation to form an optically clear cross- linked abrasion resistant layer.
  • the preferred UV cure dosage is between 50 and lOOO mJ/cm 2 .
  • the thickness of the hard coat layer is generally about 0.5 to 50 micrometers preferably 1 to 20 micrometers, more preferably 2 to 10 micrometers.
  • an antiglare layer provides a roughened or textured surface that is used to reduce specular reflection. All of the unwanted reflected light is still present, but it is scattered rather than specularly reflected.
  • the antiglare layer preferably comprises a radiation cured composition that has a textured or roughened surface obtained by the addition of organic or inorganic (matting) particles or by embossing the surface.
  • the radiation cured compositions described hereinabove for the hard coat layer are also effectively employed in the antiglare layer.
  • Surface roughness is preferably obtained by the addition of matting particles to the radiation cured composition. Suitable particles include inorganic compounds having an oxide, nitride, sulfide or halide of a metal, metal oxides being particularly preferred.
  • the metal atom Na, K, Mg, Ca, Ba, Al, Zn, Fe, Cu, Ti, Sn, In, W, Y, Sb, Mn, Ga, V, Nb, Ta, Ag, Si, B, Bi, Mo, Ce, Cd, Be, Pb and Ni are suitable, and Mg, Ca, B and Si are more preferable.
  • An inorganic compound containing two types of metal may also be used.
  • a particularly preferable inorganic compound is silicon dioxide, namely silica.
  • the polymer substrate can be formed by any method known in the art such as those involving extrusion, coextrusion, quenching, orientation, heat setting, lamination, coating and solvent casting.
  • the polymer substrate is an oriented sheet formed by any suitable method known in the art, such as by a flat sheet process or a bubble or tubular process.
  • the flat sheet process involves extruding or coextruding the materials of the sheet through a slit die and rapidly quenching the extruded or coextruded web upon a chilled casting drum so that the polymeric component(s) of the sheet are quenched below their solidification temperature.
  • the quenched sheet is then biaxially oriented by stretching in mutually perpendicular directions at a temperature above the glass transition temperature of the polymer(s).
  • the sheet maybe stretched in one direction and then in a second direction or may be simultaneously stretched in both directions.
  • the preferred stretch ratio in any direction is at least 3:1. After the sheet has been stretched, it is heat set by heating to a temperature sufficient to crystallize the polymers while restraining to some degree the sheet against retraction in both directions of stretching.
  • the polymer sheet may be subjected to any number of coatings and treatments, after extrusion, coextrusion, orientation, etc. or between casting and full orientation, to improve its properties, such as printability, barrier properties, heat-sealability, spliceability, adhesion to other substrates and/or imaging layers.
  • coatings can be acrylic coatings for printability, polyvinylidene halide for heat seal properties, etc.
  • treatments can be flame, plasma and corona discharge treatment, ultraviolet radiation treatment, ozone treatment and electron beam treatment to improve coatability and adhesion.
  • Dielectric spacers that may be dot-shaped for example, are provided on the surface of the conductive layer at regular distances, such as every few millimeters.
  • the spacers are made of polymeric resin, and each spacer is about 10 urn in height and 10 um to 50 um in diameter.
  • Suitable polymeric resin that may be employed to prepare the spacers include light or thermal hardened epoxy, acrylated-urethanes, acrylic, and other compositions well known by the skilled artisan.
  • the spacers alternatively may be filled with nanoparticles such as silica, alumina, zinc oxide and others in order to modify the physical properties of the spacers.
  • FIG. 3 shows another embodiment of a resistive-type touchscreen of the invention 59 having electrodes 60 and 70. Electrode 60 may be the touch side electrode and electrode 70 may be the device side electrode or alternatively that electrode 70 may be the touch side electrode and electrode 60 may be the device side electrode.
  • Electrode 70 comprises in order, an insulating substrate 63, a buried electrically conductive layer 65 in contact with said substrate, and an exposed electrically conductive layer 67.
  • Electrode 60 comprises in order, an insulating substrate 62 and an exposed electrically conductive layer 66 in contact with said substrate. Wherein said exposed electrically conductive layers 66 and 67 are adjacent and separated by dielectric spacers 68.
  • either exposed electrically conductive layer 66 or 67 (but not both) comprises carbon nanotubes. Suitable carbon nanotubes have been described in detail herein above,
  • the other exposed electrically conductive layer that does not comprise carbon nanotubes may comprise at least one material from the group consisting of electronically conductive polymers, transparent conducting oxides and transparent metal films.
  • the buried electrically conductive layer 65 may comprise at least one material from the group consisting of carbon nanotubes, electronically conductive polymers, transparent conducting oxides and transparent metal films.
  • the buried electrically conductive layer has a sheet resistance of between 10 and 10,000 Ohm per square and the exposed electrically conductive layers have a sheet resistance of between 100 and 10 6 Ohm per square.
  • FIG. 4 shows yet another embodiment of a resistive-type touchscreen of the invention 129 having electrodes 130 and 140.
  • Electrode 130 may be the touch side electrode and electrode 140 may be the device side electrode or alternatively that electrode 130 may be the touch side electrode and electrode 140 may be the device side electrode.
  • Electrode 140 comprises in order, an insulating substrate 133, a buried electrically conductive layer 135 in contact with said substrate, and an exposed electrically conductive layer 137.
  • Electrode 130 comprises in order, an insulating substrate 132, a buried electrically conductive layer 134 in contact with said substrate and an exposed electrically conductive layer 136. Wherein said exposed electrically conductive layers 136 and 137 are adjacent and separated by dielectric spacers 138.
  • FIG. 1 shows an insulating substrate 133
  • Electrode 140 comprises in order, an insulating substrate 133, a buried electrically conductive layer 135 in contact with said substrate, and an exposed electrically conductive layer 137.
  • Electrode 130 comprises in order, an
  • exposed electrically conductive layer 136 or 137 comprises carbon nanotubes.
  • Suitable carbon nanotubes have been described in detail herein above,
  • the other exposed electrically conductive layer that does not comprise carbon nanotubes may comprise at least one material from the group consisting of electronically conductive polymers, transparent conducting oxides and transparent metal films.
  • the buried electrically conductive layers 134 and 135 may be the same or different in composition and comprise at least one material from the group consisting of carbon nanotubes, electronically conductive polymers, transparent conducting oxides and transparent metal films
  • the buried electrically conductive layer has a sheet resistance of between 10 and 10,000 Ohm per square and the exposed electrically conductive layers have a sheet resistance of between 100 and 10 6 Ohm per square.
  • the electronically conductive layer comprising carbon nanotubes has a sheet resistance of between 10 2 to 10 6 Ohm per square.
  • Resistive touchscreens of the invention preferably are mechanically robust to point actuations by objects (plastic or metal stylus, fingers etc.).
  • a touchscreen is activated or actuated when the touch side and device side electrodes contact. Over time, repetitive contact and the force applied during such contact damage prior art touchscreens. Such damage requires that increasingly larger forces are necessary to actuate the touchscreen.
  • the force required to actuate a point on the touchscreen does not change by more than 500 percent over 500,000 single point actuations. More preferably, the force required to actuate the touchscreen does not change by more than 100 percent and most preferably more than 50 percent.
  • a single point actuation is the application of an object at a single point on the touchscreen to activate such touchscreen.
  • the conventional construction of a resistive touch screen involves the sequential placement of materials upon the substrates.
  • the substrates are formed as described herein above, then uniform conductive layers are applied to the substrates.
  • the bus bars are applied to the touch side electrode and the spacers and bus bars are applied to the device side electrode and, finally, the touch side electrode is attached to the device side electrode.
  • FIG. 5 is an exploded view showing the construction of a touchscreen 100 of the present invention.
  • the touchscreen 100 is mainly composed of a touch side electrode 110 and a device side electrode 120.
  • the touch side electrode 110 and the device side electrode 120 are set facing each other, with dielectric spacers 30 being placed in between them so that an air gap is formed between the substrates.
  • the touch side electrode 110 is provided with a pair of bus bars 141 and 142 which are adhered to the exposed electrically conductive layer along its ends to be opposed to each other in the A direction.
  • the touch side electrode 110 is also provided with a pair of connector electrodes 143 and 144 at its edge, to which connectors (not shown) are connected.
  • the bus bars 141 and 142 are connected to the pair of connector electrodes 143 and 144 via wiring patterns 145 and 146.
  • the bus bars, connector electrodes, and wiring patterns comprise high conductivity materials. Suitable high conductivity materials include carbon black, silver, gold, platinum, palladium, copper or combinations of these materials. These materials may be applied by vacuum deposition, inkjet printing, thermal transfer, silk screen printing or other methods. These materials may be thermally or light hardened.
  • the device side electrode 120 is provided with a pair of bus bars 251 and 252 which are adhered to the exposed electrically conductive layer along its ends to be opposed to each other in the B direction that is perpendicular to the A direction.
  • the device side electrode 120 is also provided with a pair of connector electrodes 253 and 254 at its edge, to which connectors (not shown) are connected.
  • the pair of bus bars 251 and 252 are connected to the pair of connector electrodes 253 and 254 via wiring patterns 255 and 256.
  • Dot- shaped spacers 30, for example, are provided on the surface of the exposed conductive layer deposed on device side electrode 120, such as every few millimeters.
  • the spacers 30 are made of light-hardening acrylic resin for example, and each spacer is about 10 ⁇ m in height and 10 ⁇ m to 50 ⁇ m in diameter. Respective outer regions of the touch side electrode 110 and the device side electrode 120 are bonded together by an adhesive 40.
  • Touchscreens prepared as described above may be employed in a variety of display devices.
  • the display device comprises a liquid crystal display (LCD).
  • the touchscreen of the invention may be adhesively attached to a polarizer plate within the liquid crystal display device.
  • the conductive layers of the invention can be applied by any method known in the art. Particularly preferred methods include coating from a suitable liquid medium coating composition by any well known coating method such as air knife coating, gravure coating, hopper coating, roller coating, spray coating, electrochemical coating, inkjet printing, flexographic printing, and the like.
  • the first electrically conductive layer and the exposed electrically conductive layer may be applied sequentially or simultaneously.
  • the conductive layers can be transferred to a receiver member comprising the substrate from a donor member by the application of heat and/or pressure.
  • An adhesive layer may be preferably present between the donor member and the receiver member substrate to facilitate transfer.
  • the two conductive layers may be applied onto each substrate simultaneously from a single donor element or sequentially from two separate donor members as described in copending commonly assigned US Patent Applications 10/969,889 filed October 21, 2004, Majumdar et al, 11/062,416 filed February 22, 2005, Irvin et al., and 11/022,155, filed December 22, 2004, Majumdar et al.
  • the aforementioned thermal transfer element may comprise a number of auxiliary layers.
  • auxiliary layers may include radiation absorption layers, which can be a light to heat conversion layer, interlayer, release layer, adhesion promoting layer, operational layer (which is used in the operation of a device), non-operational layer (which is not used in the operation of a device but can facilitate, for example, transfer of a transfer layer, protection from damage and/or contact with outside elements).
  • Radi transfer of the conductive layers of the invention can be accomplished by the application of directed heat on a selected portion of the thermal transfer element. Heat can be generated using a heating element (e.g., a resistive heating element), converting radiation (e.g., a beam of light) to heat, and/or applying an electrical current to a layer of thermal transfer element to generate heat.
  • a heating element e.g., a resistive heating element
  • converting radiation e.g., a beam of light
  • Ra roughness
  • Coatings A & B were supplied by the vendors Bekaert and Keytec, respectively.
  • the Bekaert ITO is coated onto a 102 um PET substrate.
  • Keytec sample had a coating on the opposite surface of the ITO on PET.
  • the PET used in the Keytec sample is a 203 um substrate.
  • Coatings C, D, E and F were produced as follows. The following ingredients were used to form the coating composition for forming the multilayer examples and single layer comparative examples:
  • Baytron P AG aqueous dispersion of electronically conductive polythiophene and polyanion, namely, poly(3,4-ethylene dioxythiophene styrene sulfonate), supplied by H.C. Starck;
  • TX-100 nonionic surfactant coating aid supplied by Rohm & Haas;
  • the following coating composition A was prepared for coating suitable substrates to form the multilayer conductor examples:
  • Baytron P AG (1.3% active in aqueous) 266 g
  • Baytron P AG (1.3% active in aqueous) 266 g
  • the substrate used was polyethylene terephthalate (PET).
  • PET polyethylene terephthalate
  • the PET substrate was photographic grade with a thickness of 102 ⁇ m and surface roughness Ra of 0.5 nm.
  • On the coating side (frontside) of the PET a thin vinylidene chloride copolymer primer layer was applied at a thickness of 80 nm.
  • the coating composition H or I was applied to the frontside surface of the substrate by a hopper at different wet coverages to give dry coverages of Baytron P AG of between 170 mg/m 2 and 350 mg/m 2 , and each coating was dried at 82°C for five minutes.
  • coating composition M was applied over the dried Baytron P AG coating (previously deposited by coating composition H) at a single wet coverage to give a dry coverage of SWCNT of 8 mg/m 2 .
  • examples of multilayer conductors were created as per the instant invention, wherein conductive layers having different dry coverage of electronically conductive Baytron P AG were coated on the surface of the substrate in one layer and a second layer of SWCNT was applied over the Baytron P AG.
  • the coating composition V was applied to the frontside surface of the substrate by a hopper at different wet coverages to give dry coverages of SWCNT of between 10 mg/m 2 and 100 mg/m 2 , and each coating was dried at 82°C for five minutes.
  • a 1.27 cm x 3.8 cm "bottom" (device side) conductive coating 302 on flexible substrate was cut from a larger coated sheet.
  • the bottom conductive coating 302 was attached, conductive side up, along one long edge of a 25mm x 75mm glass microscope slide 301.
  • the bottom conductive coating 302 was retained by (2) 3.8 cm lengths of copper foil 304 tape (3M 1181 EMI Shielding Tape) applied across the 1.27 cm ends of the film strip and extending beyond the 2.5 cm dimension of the slide. The excess tape was folded back on itself to form an attachment tab for electrical connection.
  • spacer dots 303 of non-critical dimension were applied in a 4 x 4 matrix over the central 1.27 cm x 1.27 cm square area of the bottom conductor.
  • Spacer dot 303 dimensions can be called out as 0.1-1.0 mm diameter, preferably 0.1-0.3 mm diameter for uniformity of actuation force.
  • Dots were comprised of epoxy (Devcon No.14250 ) applied by hand using a pointed applicator.
  • a 1.27 cm square of non-conducting double sided tape 305 (Polyken) was applied to the glass slide adjacent to the spacer dot matrix.
  • a 1.27 cm x 3.8 cm strip of "top" (touch side) conductive coating 306 on flexible substrate was attached, conductive side down, over the double sided tape to form a "T" arrangement with one end of the strip covering the spacer dot array and the other end extending beyond the 2.54 cm dimension of the glass slide.
  • a 2.54 cm length of conductive copper foil 304 tape was wrapped around the overhanging top conductor to form ah electrical attachment.
  • a line of silver conducting paint (Ernest FuUam No. 14810) was applied across the copper tape / conductor layer interfaces to augment the conductive adhesive of the foil tape.
  • the touchscreen was electrically loaded by supplying a regulated 5V differential between the top and bottom conductors. At the mid point of the peak force period, the connections to the test device were electronically switched to force current in the reverse direction during the second half of the actuation cycle. Current flow through the touchscreen was monitored as a function of time and actuation force.
  • the touchscreen was considered to make and break at a resistance of or below 12 kOhms.
  • the data recorded were on-state resistance and the force required to achieve an on state e.g. to make a switch in state.
  • a touchscreen was considered to fail when routinely exceeding 12k ⁇ hms on-state resistance.
  • a touchscreen was constructed using Coating A from Table I (Bekaert ITO - Lot #5189376).
  • the single point actuation testing was performed and gave the results indicated in Figures 9 and 10 below.
  • the single layer of Bekaert ITO began to show significant changes in force to actuate as early as completing 10,000 single point actuations (SPA).
  • the on-state resistance showed significant deviation as early as 85,000 SPA.
  • the single layer of Bekaert ITO routinely exceeded an on-state resistance of 12,000 ohms and failed. Addtionally, by 88,000 SPA the actuation force was highly scattered and not stable.
  • a touchscreen was constructed using Coating C from Table I (344 mg/m Baytron P AG).
  • the SPA testing was performed and gave the results indicated in Figures 11 and 12 below.
  • the single layer of Baytron P AG began to show significant changes in force to actuate as early as completing 3,000 single point actuations (SPA).
  • the on-state resistance showed significant deviation as early as 6,000 SPA.
  • the single layer of Baytron P AG permanently exceeded an on-state resistance of 12,000 ohms, reaching a value of 100,000+ ohms. Addtionally, by 6,000 SPA the actuation force experienced an exponential increase and failed shortly thereafter.
  • Comparative Example 3 Single Layer Baytron P AG (containing crosslinking agent) Conductor Touchscreen.
  • a touchscreen was constructed using Coating D from Table I (344 mg/m 2 Baytron P AG w/ Silquest Al 87). The SPA testing was performed. This touchscreen experienced similar on-state resistance and actuation force profiles as Comparative Example 2 and failed after 17,000 SPA. It is clear that as the number of actuations increase, the reliability of the single layer Baytron P AG with hardening agent based touchscreen decreases as evidenced by the significant scatter in the data which corresponds to higher forces required to actuate and increasing on-state resistance which are not desirable. Additionally, the scattered data illustrates potential problems with resolution of point selection.
  • a touchscreen was constructed using Coating B from Table I (400 ohm/square Keytec ITO).
  • the SPA testing was performed and gave the results indicated in Figures 13 and 14 below.
  • the single layer of Keytec ITO had a linear increase in the force to actuate and began to show significant changes in force to actuate as early as completing 25,000 SPA.
  • the on-state resistance showed significant deviation as early as 35,000 SPA.
  • the single layer of Keytec ITO permanently exceeded an on-state resistance of 12,000 ohms, reaching a value of 13,000+ ohms and continued to increase to values as high as 10,000,000 ohms.
  • a touchscreen was constructed using Coating B from Table I (400 ohm/square Keytec ITO) as one electrode and using Coating C from Table I (344 mg/m 2 Baytron P AG).
  • the SPA testing was performed and gave the results indicated in Figure 15.
  • this touchscreen failed immediately due to displaying diode behavior as evidenced by the large differences in the measured forward and reverse resistances of the touchscreen.
  • a touchscreen made of such electrode combinations does not function. It is clear from the figure that the reliability of the Baytron P AG and Keytec ITO asymmetric electrode combination based touchscreen is not good as evidenced by the large separation in on-state resistance values for the forward and reverse measured resistance of the touchswitch. Additionally, the after only 250 cycles the resistance of forward and reverse become so high that the device is not functional.
  • a touchscreen was constructed using Coating A from Table I (Bekaert ITO - Lot #5189376) as one electrode and Coating SWCNT from Table I (SWCNT at 64.6 mg/m 2 ) as the second, opposing electrode.
  • the single point actuation testing was performed and gave the results indicated in Figures 16 and 17 below.
  • the asymmetric electrode touchscreen began to show changes in force to actuate after completing 50,000 single point actuations (SPA).
  • the on-state resistance showed deviation after 60,000 SPA.
  • the asymmetric electrode touchscreen of Bekaert ITO and SWCNTs routinely exceeded an on-state resistance of 12,000 ohms.
  • a touchscreen was constructed using Coating D from Table I (344 mg/m 2 Baytron P AG w/ Silquest Al 87) as one electrode and Coating SWCNT from Table I (SWCNT at 64.6 mg/m 2 ) as the second, opposing electrode.
  • the single point actuation testing was performed and gave the results indicated in Figures 18 and 19 below.
  • This asymmetric electrode touchscreen demonstrated essentially no change in the force to actuate after completing 1.1 Million SPA. hi fact, there was a small decrease in the force needed to actuate the touchscreen, as compared to the comparative examples that all exhibit increases in the force to actuate as the number of SPA cycles increased.
  • the on-state resistance shows essentially no deviation after 1.1 Million SPA.
  • This asymmetric electrode touchscreen demonstrates the significant robustness and operability conferred by using the instant invention.
  • Instant Invention 3 Asymmetric Electrode Touch Switch with Keytec ITO and a multilayer conductor of Baytron P AG (first or buried layer) and Single Wall Carbon Nanotubes (exposed layer)
  • An asymmetric electrode based touchscreen was constructed using Coating B from Table I (400 ohm/square Keytec ITO) as one electrode and Coating F from Table I (First layer 344 mg/m2 Baytron P AG with 8 mg/m 2 P3 SWCNT 2 nd layer) as the second electrode.
  • the single point actuation testing was performed and gave the results indicated in Figures 20 and 21 below.
  • This asymmetric electrode touchscreen demonstrated a linear increase in force to actuate to forces upwards of 300 g before failing.
  • the on-state resistance showed minor deviations after 60,000 SPA.
  • the instant invention gives significant improvements in robustness as demonstrated above.
  • the fact that the instant invention can sustain significantly more actuations than the comparative example touchscreens without failing (or failing later) and/or noticeable change in operation is important due to the improved reliability of the instant invention touchscreen.
  • the one embodiment of the instant invention eliminated the diode behavior exhibited by ITO and Baytron P AG thereby making those materials useful in combination. It is apparent that the exemplary embodiment can provide drastically enhanced conductor and/or electrode robustness.
  • touch side electrode insulating substrate of the invention 28 touch side exposed electrically conductive layer

Abstract

The present invention is directed to a touchscreen comprising touch side electrode and device side electrode wherein each electrode comprises an insulating substrate and an exposed electrically conductive layer, wherein said exposed electrically conductive layers are adjacent and separated by dielectric spacers, and wherein only one of the exposed electrically conductive layers comprises carbon nanotubes.

Description

TOUCHSCREENWITHONE CARBONNANOTUBE CONDUCTIVE
LAYER
FIELD OF THE INVENTION The present invention relates in general to touchscreens for electronic devices. In particular the invention provides a touchscreen comprising touch side electrode and device side electrode wherein each electrode comprises an insulating substrate and an exposed electrically conductive layer, wherein said exposed electrically conductive layers are adjacent and separated by dielectric spacers, and wherein only one of the exposed electrically conductive layers comprises carbon nanotubes.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Devices such as flat-panel displays typically contain a substrate provided with an indium tin oxide (ITO) layer as a transparent electrode. The coating of ITO is carried out by vacuum sputtering methods, which involve high substrate temperature conditions up to 250 °C, and therefore, glass substrates are generally used. The high cost of the fabrication methods and the low flexibility of such electrodes, due to the brittleness of the inorganic ITO layer as well as the glass substrate, limit the range of potential applications. As a result, there is a growing interest in making all-organic devices, comprising plastic resins as a flexible substrate and carbon nanotube or organic electroconductive polymer layers as an electrode. Such plastic electronics allow low cost devices with new properties. Flexible plastic substrates can be provided with an electroconductive polymer layer by continuous hopper or roller coating methods (compared to batch process such as sputtering) and the resulting organic electrodes enable the "roll to roll" fabrication of electronic devices which are more flexible, lower cost, and lower weight. Touchscreens (also referred to as touch panels or touch switches) are widely used in conventional CRTs and in flat-panel display devices in computers and in particular with portable computers. FIG. 1 shows a typical prior art resistive-type touchscreen 10 comprising a first electrode 15 that is on the side of the touchscreen that is nearer to the device that is referred herein below as the device side electrode and a second electrode 16 that is on the side of the touchscreen that is nearer to the user that is referred herein below as the touch side electrode. Device side electrode 15 comprises a transparent substrate 12, having a first conductive layer 14. Touch side electrode 16 comprises a transparent support 17, that is typically a flexible transparent support, and a second conductive layer 18 that is physically separated from the first conductive layer 14 by dielectric (insulating) spacer elements 20. A voltage is developed across the conductive layers. The conductive layers 14 and 18 have a resistance selected to optimize power usage and position sensing accuracy. Deformation of the touch side electrode 16 by an external object such as a finger or stylus causes the second conductive layer 18 to make electrical contact with first conductive layer 14, thereby transferring a voltage between the conductive layers. The magnitude of this voltage is measured through connectors (not shown) connected to metal bus bar conductive patterns (not shown) formed on the edges of conductive layers 18 and 14 to locate the position of the deforming object.
ITO is commonly employed as the transparent conductive layer on the device side and touch side electrodes. However, ITO tends to crack under stress and with the result that the conductivity of the electrodes, especially for the touch side electrode, is diminished and the performance of the touchscreen degraded. More flexible conductive polymer-containing layers have also been considered for this application, but these conductive polymers are softer and less physically durable than ITO and therefore such conductive layers tend to degrade after repeated contacts. Single wall carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) are essentially graphene sheets rolled into hollow cylinders thereby resulting in tubules composed of sp2 hybridized carbon arranged in hexagons and pentagons, which have outer diameters between 0.4 nm and 10 nm. These SWCNTs are typically capped on each end with a hemispherical fullerene (buckyball) appropriately sized for the diameter of the SWCNT. However, these end caps may be removed via appropriate processing techniques leaving uncapped tubules. SWCNTs can exist as single tubules or in aggregated form typically referred to as ropes or bundles. These ropes or bundles may contain several or a few hundred SWCNTs aggregated through Van der Waals interactions forming triangular lattices where the tube-tube separation is approximately 3-4 A. Ropes of SWCNTs may be composed of associated bundles of SWCNTs.
The inherent properties of SWCNTs make them attractive for use in many applications. SWCNTs can possess high (e.g. metallic conductivities) electronic conductivities, high thermal conductivities, high modulus and tensile strength, high aspect ratio and other unique properties. Further, SWCNTs may be metallic, semi-metallic, or semiconducting dependant on the geometrical arrangement of the carbon atoms and the physical dimensions of the SWCNT. To specify the size and conformation of single-wall carbon nanotubes, a system has been developed, described below, and is currently utilized. SWCNTs are described by an index (n, m), where n and m are integers that describe how to cut a single strip of hexagonal graphite such that its edges join seamlessly when the strip is wrapped into the form of a cylinder. When n=m e.g. (n, n), the resultant tube is said to be of the "arm-chair" or (n, n) type, since when the tube is cut perpendicularly to the tube axis, only the sides of the hexagons are exposed and their pattern around the periphery of the tube edge resembles the arm and seat of an arm chair repeated n times. When m^O, the resultant tube is said to be of the "zig zag" or (n,0) type, since when the tube is cut perpendicular to the tube axis, the edge is a zig zag pattern. Where n≠ m and m≠O, the resulting tube has chirality. The electronic properties are dependent on the conformation; for example, armchair tubes are metallic and have extremely high electrical conductivity. Other tube types are semimetals or semi-conductors, depending on their conformation. SWCNTs have extremely high thermal conductivity and tensile strength irrespective of the chirality. The work functions of the metallic (approximately 4.7 eV) and semiconducting (approximately 5.1 eV) types of SWCNTs are different. Similar to other forms of carbon allotropes (e.g. graphite, diamond) these SWCNTs are intractable and essentially insoluble in most solvents (organic and aqueous alike). Thus, SWCNTs have been extremely difficult to process for various uses. Several methods to make SWCNTs soluble in various solvents have been employed. One approach is to covalently functionalize the ends of the SWCNTs with either hydrophilic or hydrophobic moieties. A second approach is to add high levels of surfactant and/or dispersants (small molecule or polymeric) to help solubilize the SWCNTs.
Lavin et al. in US Patent 6,426,134 disclose a method to form polymer composites using SWCNTs. This method provides a means to melt extrude a SWCNT/polymer composite wherein at least one end of the SWCNT is chemically bonded to the polymer, where the polymer is selected from a linear or branched polyamide, polyester, polyimide, or polyurethane. This method does not provide opportunities for solvent based processing and is limited to melt extrusion which can limit opportunities for patterning or device making. The chemically bonded polymers identified typically have high molecular weights and could interfere with some material properties of the SWCNTs (e.g. electronic or thermal transport) via wrapping around the SWCNTs and preventing tube-tube contacts. Connell et al in US Patent Application Publication 2003/0158323 Al describes a method to produce polymer/SWCNT composites that are electronically conductive and transparent. The polymers (polyimides, copolyimides, polyamide acid, polyaryleneether, polymethylmethacrylate) and the SWCNTs or MWCNTs are mixed in organic solvents (DMF, N5N- dimethlacetamide, N-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone, toluene,) to cast films that have conductivities in the range of 10"5 - 10"12 S/cm with varying transmissions in the visible spectrum. Additionally, monomers of the resultant polymers may be mixed with SWCNTs in appropriate solvents and polymerized in the presence of these SWCNTs to result in composites with varying weight ratios. The conductivities achieved in these polymer composites are several orders of magnitude too low and not optimal for use in most electronic devices as electronic conductors or EMI shields. Additionally, the organic solvents used are toxic, costly and pose problems in processing. Moreover, the polymers used or polymerized are not conductive and can impede tube-tube contact further increasing the resistivity of the composite.
Kuper et al in Publication WO 03/060941 A2 disclose compositions to make suspended carbon nanotubes. The compositions are composed of liquids and SWCNTs or MWCNTs with suitable surfactants (cetyl trimethylammonium bromide/chloride/iodide). The ratio by weight of surfactant to SWCNTs given in the examples range from 1.4 - 5.2. This method is problematic, as it needs extremely large levels of surfactant to solubilize the SWCNTs. The surfactant is insulating and impedes conductivity of a film deposited from this composition. The surfactant may be washed from the film but this step adds complexity and may decrease efficiency in processing. Further, due to the structure formed in films deposited from such a composition, it would be very difficult to remove all the surfactant.
Papadaopoulos et al. in US Patent 5,576,162 describe an imaging element, which comprises carbon nanofibers to be used primarily as an anti-static material within the imaging element. These materials may not provide the highly transparent and highly conductive (low sheet resistance, Rs) layer that is necessary in many current electronic devices, especially displays.
Smalley et al in US Patent 6,645,455 disclose methods to chemically derivatize SWCNTs to facilitate solvation in various solvents.
Primarily the various derivative groups (alkyl chains, acyl, thiols, aminos, aryls etc.) are added to the ends of the SWCNTs. The side-walls of the SWCNTs are functionalized primarily with fluorine groups resulting in fluorinated SWCNTs. The solubility limit of such "fiuorotubes" in 2-propanol is approximately 0.1 mg/mL and in water or water/acetone mixtures the solubility is essentially zero. The fluorinated SWCNTs were subjected to further chemical reactions to yield methylated SWCNTs and these tubes have a low solubility in Chloroform but not other solvents. Such low concentrations are impractical and unusable for most deposition techniques useful in high quantity manufacturing. Further, such high liquid loads need extra drying considerations and can destroy patterned images due to intermixing from the excess solvent. In addition, the method discloses functionalization of the tubule ends with various functionalization groups (acyl, aryl, aralkyl, halogen, alkyl, amino, halogen, thiol) but the end functionalization alone may not be enough to produce viable dispersions via solubilization. Further, the sidewall functionalization is done with fluorine only, which gives limited solubility in alcohols, which can make manufacturing and product fabrication more difficult. Additionally, the fiuorinated SWCNTs are insulators due to the fluorination and thereby are not useful for electronic devices especially as electronic conductors. Moreover, the chemical transformations needed to add these functional groups to the end points of the SWCNTs require additional processing steps and chemicals which can be hazardous and costly.
Smalley et al. in US Patent 6,683,783 disclose methods to purify SWCNT materials resulting in SWCNTs with lengths from 5 - 500 nm. Within this patent, formulations are disclosed that use 0.5 wt% of a surfactant, Triton X- 100 to disperse 0.1 mg/mL of SWCNT in water. Such low concentrations are impractical and unusable for most deposition techniques useful in high quantity manufacturing. Further, such high liquid loads need extra drying considerations and can destroy patterned images due to intermixing from the excess solvent. In addition, the method discloses functionalization of the tubule ends with various functionalization groups (acyl, aryl, aralkyl, halogen, alkyl, amino, halogen, thiol) but the end functionalization alone may not be enough to produce viable dispersions via solubilization. Moreover, the chemical transformations needed to add these functional groups to the end points of the SWCNTs require additional processing steps and chemicals which can be hazardous and costly. Also, the patent discloses a composition of matter, which is at least 99% by weight of single wall carbon molecules which obviously limits the amount of functionalization that can be put onto the SWCNTs thereby limiting its solubilization levels and processability.
Rinzler et al. in PCT Publication WO2004/009884 Al disclose a method of forming SWCNT films on a porous membrane such that it achieves 200 ohms/square and at least 30% transmission at a wavelength of 3 um. This method is disadvantaged since it needs a porous membrane (e.g. polycarbonate or mixed cellulose ester) with a high volume of porosity with a plurality of sub-micron pores as a substrate which may lose a significant amount of the SWCNT dispersion through said pores thereby wasting a significant amount of material. Also, such membranes may not have the optical transparency required for many electronic devices such as displays. Further, the membrane is set within a vacuum filtration system, which severely limits the processability of such a system and makes the roll-to-roll coating application of the SWCNT solution impossible. Moreover, the weight percent of the dispersion used to make the SWCNT film was 0.005 mg/mL in an aqueous solution. Such weight percents are impractical and unusable in most coating and deposition systems with such a high liquid load. Such high liquid loads make it virtually impossible to make patterned images due to solvent spreading and therefore image bleeding/destruction.
Blanchet-Fincher et al in Publication WO 02/080195Al and in US 20040065970 Al illustrate high conductivity compositions composed of polyaniline (PANI) and SWCNTs or MWCNTs and methods to deposit such compositions from a donor element onto a receiver substrate. The nitrogen base salt derivative of emeraldine polyaniline is mixed with SWCNTs in organic solvents (toluene, xylene, turpinol, aromatics) and cast into films with conductivity values of 62 S/cm (lwt% SWCNT in PANI) and 44 S/cm (2wt% SWCNT in PANI). These films alternatively may be produced as part of a multilayer donor structure suitable as use for a material transfer system. The PANI/SWCNT composite are transferred from the donor sheet to a suitable receiver substrate in imagewise form. PANI is a highly colored conductive polymer and may result in a conductive composite with unsatisfactory transparency and color, which may be undesirable for applications such as displays.
Hsu in WO 2004/029176 Al disclose compositions for electronically conducting organic polymer/nanoparticle composites. Polyaniline (Ormecon) or PEDT (Baytron P) are mixed with Molybdenum nanowires or carbon nanotubes (8 nm diameter, 20 um length, 60 S/cm). The compositions disclosed in this invention are disadvantaged by marginal conductivity. Arthur et al in PCT Publication WO 03/099709 A2 disclose methods for patterning carbon nanotubes coatings. Dilute dispersions (10 to 100 ppm) of SWCNTs in isopropyl alcohol (IPA) and water (which may include viscosity modifying agents) are spray coated onto substrates. After application of the SWCNT coating, a binder is printed in imagewise fashion and cured. Alternatively, a photo-definable binder may be used to create the image using standard photolithographic processes. Materials not held to the substrate with binder are removed by washing. Dilute dispersions (10 to 100 ppm) of SWCNTs in isopropyl alcohol (IPA) and water with viscosity modifying agents are gravure coated onto substrates. Dilute dispersions (10 to 100 ppm) of SWCNTs in isopropyl alcohol (IPA) and water are spray coated onto substrates. The coated films are then exposed through a mask to a high intensity light source in order to significantly alter the electronic properties of the SWCNTs. A binder coating follows this step. The dispersion concentrations used in these methods make it very difficult to produce images via direct deposition (inkjet etc.) techniques. Further, such high solvent loads due to the low solids dispersions create long process times and difficulties handling the excess solvent. In addition, these patterning methods are subtractive processes, which unnecessarily waste the SWCNT material via additional removal steps thereby incurring cost and process time. This application also discloses method to make conductive compositions and coatings from such compositions but it does not teach satisfactory methods nor compositions to execute such methods.
Transparent electronically-conductive layers (TCL) of metal oxides such as indium tin oxide (ITO), antimony doped tin oxide, and cadmium stannate (cadmium tin oxide) have been used in the manufacture of electrooptical display devices such as liquid crystal display devices (LCDs), electroluminescent display devices, photocells, touchscreens, solid-state image sensors and electrochromic windows or as components of these devices such as electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding. Intrinsically conductive (also referred to as electronically conductive) polymers have recently received significant attention from various industries because of their electronic conductivity. Although many of these polymers are highly colored and are less suited for TCL applications, some of these intrinsically conductive polymers, such as substituted or unsubstituted pyrrole-containing polymers (as mentioned in U.S. Patents 5,665,498 and 5,674,654), substituted or unsubstituted thiophene-containing polymers (as mentioned in U.S. Patents 5,300,575, 5,312,681, 5,354,613, 5,370,981, 5,372,924, 5,391,472, 5,403,467, 5,443,944, 5,575,898, 4,987,042, and 4,731,408) and substituted or unsubstituted aniline-containing polymers (as mentioned in U.S. Patents 5,716,550, 5,093,439, and 4,070,189) are transparent and not prohibitively colored, at least when coated in thin layers at moderate coverage. Because of their electronic conductivity instead of ionic conductivity, these polymers are conducting even at low humidity.
The application of electronically conductive polymers in display related device has been envisioned in the past. European Patent Application EP9910201 describes a light transmissive substrate having a light transmissive conductive polymer coating for use in resistive touchscreens. U.S. Patent No. 5,738,934 describes touchscreen cover sheets having a conductive polymer coating.
Use of commercial polythiophene coated sheet such as Orgacon from Agfa has been suggested for manufacturing of thin film inorganic light- emitting diode has been suggested in U.S. Pat. No. 6,737,293. However, as discussed later, the transparency vs. surface electrical resistivity of such products may not be sufficient for some applications.
Use of conductive high molecular film for preventing the fringe field in the in-plane switching mode in liquid crystal display has been proposed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,959,708. However, the conductivity requirement for these films appears to be not very stringent. For example, in one embodiment (col.5, lines 6- 10) the high molecular film can be totally non-conductive. Moreover, U.S. Pat. No. 5,959,708 does not refer to any specification involving transmission characteristics of these films. Use of transparent coating on glass substrates for cathode ray tubes using polythiophene and silicon oxide composites has been disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,404,120. However, the method suggests in-situ polymerization of an ethylenedioxythiohene monomer on glass, baking it at an elevated temperature and subsequent washing with tetra ethyl orthosilicate. Such an involved process may be difficult to practice for roll-to-roll production of a wide flexible plastic substrate.
Use of in-situ polymerized polythiophene and polypyrrole has been proposed in U.S. Pat Appl. Pub. 2003/0008135 Al as conductive films, for ITO replacement. As mentioned earlier, such processes are difficult to implement for roll-to-roll production of conductive coatings, m the same patent application, a comparative example was created using a dispersion of poly (3,4 ethylene dioxythiophene)/ polystyrene sulfonic acid which resulted in inferior coating properties. Addition of conductivity enhancing agents such as organic compounds with dihydroxy or polyhydroxy and/or carboxyl groups or amide groups or lactam groups is suggested for incorporation in polythiophene in U.S. Pat. No. 5,766,515.
As indicated herein above, the art discloses a wide variety of electronically conductive TCL compositions that can be incorporated in electronic devices. However, the stringent requirements of high transparency, low surface electrical resistivity, flexibility, and robustness under repeated contacts demanded by modern display devices and, especially, touchscreens is extremely difficult to attain with the TCL compositions described in the prior art. Thus, there is still a critical need for transparent conductors that can be coated roll-to-roll on a wide variety of substrates under typical manufacturing conditions using environmentally desirable components, hi addition to providing superior touchscreen electrode performance, the TCL layers also must be highly transparent, must resist the effects of humidity change, be physically robust, and be manufacturable at a reasonable cost. PROBLEMTO BE SOLVEDBYTHE INVENTION
There is a need to provide improved touchscreen electrodes, preferably obtained by wet coating, roll-to-roll manufacturing methods, that more effectively meet the demanding requirements of touchscreens than those of the prior art.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention provides a touchscreen comprising touch side electrode and device side electrode wherein each electrode comprises an insulating substrate and an exposed electrically conductive layer, wherein said exposed electrically conductive layers are adjacent and separated by dielectric spacers, and wherein only one of the exposed electrically conductive layers comprises carbon nanotubes.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG 1. A schematic diagram showing a section of a resistive touchscreen of the prior art.
FIG 2. A schematic diagram showing a section of a resistive touchscreen employing asymmetric electrodes of the present invention. FIG 3. Shows another embodiment of a resistive-type touchscreen of the invention.
FIG 4. Shows another embodiment of a resistive-type touchscreen of the invention.
FIG 5. An exploded view showing the construction of a touchscreen of the present invention.
FIGS 6A and 6B. Schematic diagrams of pristine single wall carbon nanotubes having tubules with closed ends and with open ends.
FIGS 7 A and 7B. Schematic diagrams of functionalized single wall carbon nanotubes having tubules with closed ends and with open ends FIG 8. An exploded view showing the touchscreen fabricated in this invention for testing of single and multilayer electrodes of the instant invention.
FIG 9. Shows, based on the results of Comparative Example 1 below, the on-state resistance profile as a function of single point actuations for a single layer Bekaert ITO touch switch.
FIG 10. Shows, based on the results of Comparative Examplel below, the force to actuate the touchswitch as a function of single point actuations for single layer of Bekaert ITO.
FIG 11. Shows, based on the results of Comparative Example 2 below, the force to actuate the touchswitch as a function of single point actuations for single layer of Baytron P AG (PEDOT/PSS). FIG 12. Shows, based on the results of Comparative Example 2 below, the on-state resistance profile as a function of single point actuations for single layer conductor Baytron P AG Touch Switch.
FIG 13. Shows, based on the results of Comparative Example 4 below, the force to actuate the touchswitch as a function of single point actuations for single layer conductor Keytec ITO Touch Switch.
FIG 14. Shows, based on the results of Comparative Example 4 below, the on-state resistance profile as a function of single point actuations for single layer conductor Keytec ITO Touch Switch.
FIG 15. Shows, based on the results of Comparative Example 5 below, the on-state resistance profile as a function of single point actuations for an asymmetric electrode touch switch with Keytec ITO and Baytron P AG as opposing electrodes.
FIG 16. Shows, based on the results of Instant Invention Example 1 below, the force to actuate the touchswitch as a function of single point actuations for an asymmetric electrode touch switch with Bekaert ITO and Single Wall Carbon Nanotubes as per the instant invention.
FIG 17. Shows, based on the results of Instant Invention Example 1 below, the on-state resistance profile as a function of single point actuations for an asymmetric electrode touch switch with Bekaert ITO and Single Wall Carbon Nanotubes as per the instant invention.
FIG 18. Shows, based on the results of Instant Invention Example 2 below, the force to actuate the touchswitch as a function of single point actuations for an asymmetric electrode touch switch with Baytron P AG
(containing crosslinking agent) and Single Wall Carbon Nanotubes as per the instant invention.
FIG 19. Shows, based on the results of Instant Invention Example 2 below, the on-state resistance profile as a function of single point actuations for an asymmetric electrode touch switch with Baytron P AG (containing crosslinking agent) and Single Wall Carbon Nanotubes as per the instant invention.
FIG 20. Shows, based on the results of Instant Invention Example 3 below, the force to actuate the touchswitch as a function of single point actuations for an asymmetric electrode touchswitch with Keytec ITO and Carbon Nanotube (exposed layer) and Pedot/PSS (first or buried layer) as Opposing Electrodes.
FIG 21. Shows, based on the results of Instant Invention Example 3 below, the on-state resistance profile as a function of single point actuations for an asymmetric electrode touchswitch with Keytec ITO and Carbon Nanotube (exposed layer) and Pedot/PSS (first or buried layer) as Opposing Electrodes.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION The present invention provides a touchscreen comprising touch side electrode and device side electrode wherein each electrode comprises an insulating substrate and an exposed electrically conductive layer, wherein said exposed electrically conductive layers are adjacent and separated by dielectric spacers, and wherein only one of the exposed electrically conductive layers comprises carbon nanotubes.
Touchscreens of the present invention comprise electrodes that are asymmetric in composition. That is, a different conductive material is employed in the exposed electrically conductive layer on the touch side electrode compared to the exposed electrically conductive layer on the device side electrode, hi the present invention, either the touch side electrode or the device side electrode (but not both) has an exposed electrically conductive layer that comprises carbon nanotubes. Additionally, electrodes that are on opposite sides of the spacer elements may also be called opposing electrodes. Such opposing electrodes of the present invention comprise electrodes that are asymmetric in composition.
Touchscreens of the present invention, wherein only one of the exposed conductive layers comprise carbon nanotubes, provide improved durability of the touchscreen compared with conventional touchscreens employing (symmetrical composition) touch side and device side electrodes comprising ITO. These and other advantages will be apparent from the detailed description below.
FIG. 2 shows one embodiment of a resistive-type touchscreen of the invention 39 including a device side electrode 25 and a touch side electrode 26. Device side electrode 25 comprises in order, an insulating substrate 29 and an exposed electrically conductive layer 24 in contact with said substrate. Touch side electrode 26 comprises in order, an insulating substrate 27 and an exposed electrically conductive layer 28 in contact with said substrate. Wherein said exposed electrically conductive layers 24 and 28 are adjacent and separated by dielectric spacers 32. Preferably, the exposed electrically conductive layers have a sheet resistance of between 100 and 106 Ohm per square. In the embodiment depicted in FIG. 2, either exposed electrically conductive layer 24 or 28 (but not both) comprises carbon nanotubes. Preferably, the carbon nanotubes are single wall carbon nanotubes (SWCNT). The other exposed electrically conductive layer that does not comprise carbon nanotubes may comprise at least one material from the group consisting of electronically conductive polymers, transparent conducting oxides and transparent metal films. Suitable electronically conductive polymers include polypyrrole, polyaniline or polythiophene. Suitable transparent conducting oxides include tin doped indium oxide, fluorine doped zinc oxide, aluminum doped zinc oxide, indium doped zinc oxide, antimony doped tin oxide, fluorine doped tin oxide. Suitable transparent metal films include silver, gold, copper or alloys of these materials. Resistive touchscreens of the invention preferably are mechanically robust to point actuations by objects (plastic or metal stylus, fingers etc.). A touchscreen is activated or actuated when the touch side and device side electrodes contact. Over time, repetitive contact and the force applied during such contact damage prior art touchscreens. Such damage requires that increasingly larger forces are necessary to actuate the touchscreen. In a preferred embodiment of the instant invention, the force required to actuate a point on the touchscreen does not change by more than 500 percent over 500,000 single point actuations. More preferably, the force required to actuate the touchscreen does not change by more than 100 percent and most preferably more than 50 percent. A single point actuation is the application of an object at a single point on the touchscreen to activate such touchscreen.
The carbon nanotubes suitable for use in the conductive layers of the invention may be formed by any known methods in the art (laser ablation, CVD, arc discharge). The carbon nanotubes are preferred to have minimal or no impurities of carbonaceous impurities that are not carbon nanotubes (graphite, amorphous, diamond, non-tubular fullerenes, multiwall carbon nanotubes) or metal impurities. It is found that the transparency increases significantly with reduced levels of metallic and carbonaceous impurities. Conductive layer film quality, as evidenced by layer uniformity, surface roughness, and a reduction in particulates, also improves with a decrease in the amount of metal and carbonaceous impurities.
To achieve high electronic conductivity, metallic SWCNTs are the most preferred type of carbon nanotube but semimetallic and semiconducting SWCNTs may also be used. A pristine SWCNT means that the surface of the SWCNT is free of covalently functionalized materials either through synthetic prep, acid cleanup of impurities, annealing or directed functionalization. For the purpose of the present invention, however, the SWCNTS are preferably functionalized. The preferred functional group is a hydrophilic species selected from carboxylic acid, carboxylate anion (carboxylic acid salt), hydroxyl, sulfur containing groups, carbonyl, phosphates, nitrates or combinations of these hydrophilic species. In some applications other types of functionalization such as polymer, small molecule or combinations thereof may be required. For example, such functionalization may improve the compatibility of the SWCNT in a particular polymer matrix.
Turning now to Figure 5, pristine SWCNTs with either open or closed ends are illustrated. SWCNTs that are pristine are essentially intractable in most solvents, especially aqueous media, without the use of high levels of dispersants. Therefore, it is not possible to use only pristine SWCNTs and water to produce an aqueous coating composition. Figure 6 exemplifies the basic structure of covalently functionalized SWCNTs. The X in Figure 6 may be selected from one of the hydrophilic species listed above. It is worth noting that the X may be positioned at any point on the SWCNT, external or internal surface, open or closed end, or sidewall. It is preferred that the X be uniformly distributed across the external surface, potentially for the most effectiveness.
The most preferred covalent surface functionalization is carboxylic acid or a carboxylic acid salt or mixtures thereof (hereafter referred to as only carboxylic acid). For carboxylic acid based functionalization, the preferred level of functionalized carbons on the SWCNT is 0.5 - 100 atomic percent, where 1 atomic percent functionalized carbons would be 1 out of every 100 carbons in the SWCNT have a functional group covalently attached. The functionalized carbons may exist anywhere on the nanotubes (open or closed ends, external and internal sidewalls). As already mentioned, preferably the functionalization is on the external surface of the SWCNTs. More preferably the functionalized percent range is 0.5 - 50 atomic percent, and most preferably 0.5 - 5 atomic percent. Functionalization of the SWCNTs with these groups within these atomic percent ranges allows the preparation of stable dispersions at the solids loadings necessary to form highly conductive, transparent films by conventional coating means. This method allows for very effective dispersion in substantially aqueous dispersions and does not require a dispersion aid. Additionally, the most efficient level of functionalization will provide the desired dispersion without significantly altering the electronic properties of the carbon nanotubes. Transparency is defined as a conductive layer that has greater than 60% bulk transmission. This transparency may be achieved by producing thin coatings with thicknesses less than 1 micrometer. The functionalization may be carried out by a number of routes. Typically, the raw material (unfunctionalized) SWCNTs are added to a bath of strongly oxidizing agents (hydrochloric acid, hydrofluoric acid, hydrobromic acid, hydroiodic acid, sulfuric acid, oleum, nitric acid, citric acid, oxalic acid, chlorosulfonic acid, phosphoric acid, trifluoromethane sulfonic acid, glacial acetic acid, monobasic organic acids, dibasic organic acids, potassium permanganate, persulfate, cerate, bromate, hydrogen peroxide, dichromate) which may be mixtures. Sulfuric acid, nitric acid, permanganate, and chlorosulfonic acids are preferred due to the efficacy of the oxidation and functionalization. Temperatures from 2O0C - 12O0C are typically used in reflux of this mixture of SWCNTs and strong oxidizing agents with appropriate agitation over 1 hr - several days process time. At the end of this process, the raw SWCNTs are now functionalized
SWCNTs. The residual oxidizing agents are removed via separation technologies (filtration wash, centrifogation, cross-flow filtration) such that a powder of the functionalized SWCNTs (primarily carboxylic acid functionalities) remains after appropriate heating to dry. The pH of the dispersion and the coating composition is important.
As the pH becomes more basic (above the pKa of the carboxylic acid groups), the carboxylic acid will be ionized thereby making the carboxylate anion, a bulky, repulsive group which can aid in the stability. Preferred pH ranges from 3 - 10 pH. More preferred pH ranges from 3 - 6.
The length of the SWCNTs may be from 20 nm - 1 m, more typically from 20 nm to 50 urn. The SWCNTs may exist as individual SWCNTs or as bundles of SWCNTs. The diameter of a SWCNT in the conductive layer may be 0.05 nm - 5 nm. The SWCNTs in bundled form may have diameters ranging from 1 nm - 1 um. Preferably such bundles will have diameters less than 50 nm and preferably less than 20 nm and lengths of between 20 nm and 50 um. It is important that higher surface area is achieved to facilitate transfer of electrons and higher available surface area is achieved by having smaller bundle sizes thereby exposing surfaces of SWCNTs which may be at the internal position of the bundles and not accessible. The ends of the SWCNTs may be closed by a hemispherical buckyball of appropriate size. Alternatively, both of the ends of the SWCNTs may be open. Some cases may find one end open and the other end closed.
The functionalized SWCNTs (produced as described above or purchased from a vendor) are used to form aqueous dispersions with SWCNT solids loadings in the 0.05 - 10 wt% (500 - 100000) ppm range. More preferably the SWCNT solids loadings are 0.1 - 5wt%. Most preferably the solid loadings are 0.1 - lwt% SWCNT. This solids loading range allows for facile coating to occur and also minimizes the viscosity such that roll coating and/or inkjet printing can be performed in standard practice. The functionalized SWCNTs are often in powder/flake form and require energy to disperse. A typical dispersion process may use a high shear mixing apparatus (homogenizer, microfluidizer, cowles blade high shear mixer, automated media mill, ball mill) for several minutes to an hour. We have also found that standard ultrasonication and bath sonication may be sufficient to disperse the functionalized SWCNTs. Typically, a 1000 ppm SWCNT dispersion in deionized water is formed by bath sonication for 2 - 24 hrs (dependant on the level of hydrophilic functionalization). After the dispersion process, pH can be adjusted to desired range. A centrifugation or filtration process is used to remove large particulates. The resultant dispersion will be stable for several months on standing (dependant on the level of hydrophilic functionalization). This dispersion has solids loadings high enough to produce conductive coatings in single pass modes for many coating techniques. The conductive layer of the invention should contain about 0.1 to about 1000 mg/m2 dry coating weight of the functionalized SWCNT. Preferably, the conductive layer should contain about 0.5 to about 500 mg/m2 dry coating weight of the functionalized SWCNT. This range of SWCNT in the dry coating is easily accessible by standard coating methods, will give the best transmission properties, and minimizes cost to achieve the desired sheet resistance. The actual dry coating weight of the SWCNTs applied is determined by the properties for the particular conductive functionalized SWCNT employed and by the requirements for the particular application, the requirements may include, for example, the conductivity, transparency, optical density, cost, etc for the layer. hi a preferred embodiment, the layer containing the conductive
SWCNTs is prepared by applying a mixture containing:
a) a SWCNT according to Formula I;
Figure imgf000020_0001
wherein each of R1 and R2 independently represents carboxylic acid, carboxylate anion (carboxylic acid salt), hydroxyl, sulfur containing groups, carbonyl, phosphates, nitrates, and the tube is a single wall carbon nanotube composed of carbon atoms substantially in hexagonal configuration, and, optionally b) a dispersant and, optionally c) a polymeric binder. The R1 and R2 substituents may be uniformly or non-uniformly distributed across the SWCNT. The dispersant loading in the dispersion is preferred to be minimal to none. The maximum dispersant loading is preferred to be 50 wt% of the weight of the SWCNT. The more preferred dispersant loading is less than 5 wt% of the weight of the SWCNT. The most preferred dispersant loading is 0 wt%. With decreasing levels of dispersant, the electronic conductivity increases. There are many dispersants which may be chosen. Preferred dispersants are octylphenol ethoxylate (TX-100), sodium dodecyl sulfate, sodium dodecylbenzenesulfonate, poly(styrene sulfonate), sodium salt, polyvinylpyrrolidone), block copolymers of ethylene oxide and propylene oxide (Pluronics or Poloxamers), Polyoxyethylene alkyl ethers (Brij 78, Brij 700), and cetyl or dodecyltrimethylammonium bromide. These dispersants are able to effectively disperse carbon nanotubes at low dispersant loadings which is preferred so that the impact on electronic conductivity is minimal. Appropriate mixtures of these dispersants maybe utilized.
Additionally, a preferred embodiment for functionalization of this invention can preferably be where the functional group is a sulfur containing group selected from:
R-SOxZy Where R is a carbon within the lattice of a SWCNT, x may range from 1 - 3 and Z may be a Hydrogen atom or a metal cation such metals as Na, Mg, K, Ca, Zn, Mn, Ag, Au, Pd, Pt, Fe, Co and y may range from 0 - 1 or combinations these hydrophilic species. The sulfur containing groups listed above may be sulfonic acid, sulfonic acid and/or sulfonic acid and/or the corresponding anions or mixtures thereof. The most preferred sulfur containing group covalent surface functionalization is sulfonic acid or a sulfonic acid salt or mixtures thereof (hereafter referred to as only sulfonic acid). Covalently attached sulfonic acid gives best dispersions of carbon nanotubes amongst the sulfur containing groups. For environmental reasons, substantially aqueous dispersions of carbon nanotubes (meaning at least 60 wt% water in the dispersion) are preferred for application of the carbon nanotube layer. Electronically conductive polymers that are suitable in the practice of the invention maybe soluble or dispersible in organic solvents or water or mixtures thereof. The conductive poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT) may be supplied by either of two routes. First, it may be synthesized via an in-situ oxidative polymerization where the monomer, ethylenedioxythiophene (EDOT), is dissolved within a suitable solvent (e.g. butanol). There are a number of oxidizing agents that may be used including ammonium persulfate, and iron(III) salts of organic and inorganic acids. Second, an aqueous dispersion of a cationic PEDOT mixed with a polyanion, such as polystyrenesulfonic acid, may be used. For environmental reasons, aqueous compositions are preferred.
A preferred electronically conductive polymer comprises 3, 4- dialkoxy substituted polythiophene styrene sulfonate because of its relatively neutral color. The most preferred electronically conductive polymers include poly(3,4-ethylene dioxythiophene styrene sulfonate) which comprises poly(3,4- ethylene dioxythiophene) in a cationic form with polystyrenesulfonic acid. The advantage of choosing the aforementioned polymers arise from the fact that they are primarily water based, stable polymer structure to light and heat, stable dispersions and cause minimum concern for storage, health, environmental and handling. The polystyrenesulfonic acid is preferred as it stabilizes the PEDOT polymer very efficiently and helps in dispersion in aqueous systems. An alternative electronically conductive polymer is polyaniline.
The conductive poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT) may be supplied by either of two routes. First, it may be synthesized via an in-situ oxidative polymerization where the monomer, ethylenedioxythiophene (EDOT), is dissolved within a suitable solvent (e.g. butanol). There are a number of oxidizing agents that maybe used including ammonium persulfate, and iron(III) salts of organic and inorganic acids. Second, an aqueous dispersion of a cationic PEDOT mixed with a polyanion, such as polystyrenesulfonic acid, may be used. For environmental reasons, aqueous compositions are preferred. Preparation of the aforementioned polythiophene-based polymers has been discussed in detail in a publication titled "Poly(3,4- ethylenedioxythiophene) and its derivatives: past, present and future" by L.B. Groenendaal, F. Jonas, D. Freitag, H. Pielartzik and J.R. Reynolds in Advanced Materials, (2000), 12, No.7, pp.481-494, and references therein.
The electronically conductive polymer layer of the invention should contain about 0.1 to about 1000 mg/m2 dry coating weight of the electronically conductive polymer. Preferably, the conductive layer should contain about 1 to about 500 mg/m2 dry coating weight of the electronically conductive polymer. The actual dry coating weight of the conductive polymer applied is determined by the properties of the particular conductive polymer employed and by the requirements of the particular application. These requirements include conductivity, transparency, optical density and cost for the layer. hi a preferred embodiment, the layer containing the electronically conductive polymer is prepared by applying a mixture comprising:
a) a polythiophene according to Formula I
Figure imgf000023_0001
in a cationic form, wherein each of Rl and R2 independently represents hydrogen or a Cl -4 alkyl group or together represent an optionally substituted C 1-4 alkylene group or a cycloalkylene group, preferably an ethylene group, an optionally alkyl- substituted methylene group, an optionally Cl -12 alkyl- or phenyl-substituted 1,2- ethylene group, a 1,3-propylene group or a 1,2-cyclohexylene group; and n is 3 to 1000; and b) a polyanion compound;
It is preferred that the electronically conductive polymer and polyanion combination is soluble or dispersible in organic solvents or water or mixtures thereof. For environmental reasons, aqueous systems are preferred. Polyanions used with these electronically conductive polymers include the anions of polymeric carboxylic acids such as polyacrylic acids, poly(methacrylic acid), and poly(maleic acid), and polymeric sulfonic acids such as polystyrenesulfonic acids and polyvinylsulfonic acids, the polymeric sulfonic acids being preferred for use in this invention because they are widely available and water coatable. These polycarboxylic and polysulfonic acids may also be copolymers formed from vinylcarboxylic and vinylsulfonic acid monomers copolymerized with other polymerizable monomers such as the esters of acrylic acid and styrene. The molecular weight of the polyacids providing the polyanions preferably is 1,000 to 2,000,000 and more preferably 2,000 to 500,000. The polyacids or their alkali salts are commonly available, for example as polystyrenesulfonic acids and polyacrylic acids, or they may be produced using known methods. Instead of the free acids required for the formation of the electronically conducting polymers and polyanions, mixtures of alkali salts of polyacids and appropriate amounts of monoacids may also be used. The polythiophene to polyanion weight ratio can widely vary between 1:99 to 99:1, however, optimum properties such as high electrical conductivity and dispersion stability and coatability are obtained between 85:15 and 15: 85, and more preferably between 50:50 and 15: 85. The most preferred electronically conductive polymers include poly(3,4-ethylene dioxythiophene styrene sulfonate) which comprises poly(3,4-ethylene dioxythiophene) in a cationic form and polystyrenesulfonic acid because of its low optical density, stability, wide availability, high conductivity and ability to be coated from water.
Desirable results such as enhanced conductivity of the PEDOT/polystyrenesulfonic acid can be accomplished by incorporating a conductivity enhancing agent (CEA). Preferred CEAs (due to the effectiveness of reducing the resistivity) are organic compounds containing dihydroxy, poly- hydroxy, carboxyl, amide, or lactam groups, such as
(1) those represented by the following Formula II:
(OH)n-R-(COX)1n II wherein m and n are independently an integer of from 1 to 20, R is an alkylene group having 2 to 20 carbon atoms, an arylene group having 6 to 14 carbon atoms in the arylene chain, a pyran group, or a furan group, and X is -OH or -NYZ, wherein Y and Z are independently hydrogen or an alkyl group; or (2) a sugar, sugar derivative, polyalkylene glycol, or glycerol compound; or
(3) those selected from the group consisting of N- methylpyrrolidone, pyrrolidone, caprolactam, N-methyl caprolactam, dimethyl sulfoxide or N-octylpyrrolidone; or (4) a combination of the above.
Particularly preferred conductivity enhancing agents are: sugar and sugar derivatives such as sucrose, glucose, fructose, lactose; sugar alcohols such as sorbitol, mannitol; furan derivatives such as 2-furancarboxylic acid, 3- furancarboxylic acid and alcohols. Ethylene glycol, glycerol, di- or triethylene glycol are most preferred because they provide the maximum conductivity enhancement.
The CEA can be incorporated by any suitable method. Preferably the CEA is added to the coating composition comprising the SWCNTs, the electronically conductive polymer, or both coating compositions. Alternatively, the coated SWCNT layer and electronically conductive polymer layer can be exposed to the CEA by any suitable method, such as post-coating wash.
The concentration of the CEA in the coating composition may vary widely depending on the particular organic compound used and the conductivity requirements. However, convenient concentrations that may be effectively employed in the practice of the present invention are about 0.5 to about 25 weight %; more conveniently 0.5 to 10 and more desirably 0.5 to 5 as it provides the minimum effective amount.
A figure of merit (FOM) can be assigned to the electronically conductive polymer within the conductive layer. Such FOM values are determined by (1) measuring the visual light transmission (T) and the sheet resistance (Rs) of the conductive layer at various thickness values of the layer, (2) plotting these data in a In (1/T) vs. 1/Rs space, and (3) then determining the slope of a straight line best fitting these data points and passing through the origin of such a plot. Without being bound to any particular theory, it is found that In (1/T) vs. 1/Rs plots for electronically conductive polymer layers, particularly those comprising polythiophene in a cationic form with a polyanion compound, generate a linear relationship, preferably one passing through the origin, wherein the slope of such a linear plot is the FOM of the electronically conductive polymer layer. Without being bound to any particular theory, it is also found that lower the FOM value, the more desirable is the electrical and optical characteristics of the electronically conductive layer; namely, lower the FOM, lower is the Rs and higher is the transparency of the conductive layer. For the instant invention, FOM values of <100, preferably <5 O, and more preferably <40 is found to generate most desired results for display applications, Visual light transmission value T is determined from the total optical density at 530 nm, after correcting for the contributions of the uncoated substrate. A Model 361T X-Rite densitometer measuring total optical density at 530 nm, is best suited for this measurement.
Visual light transmission, T, is related to the corrected total optical density at 530 nm, o.d.(corrected), by the following expression,
<-p _ j i /i n o.d.(coπeoted)\
The Rs value is typically determined by a standard four-point electrical probe.
The transparency of the conductive layer of the invention can vary according to need. For use as an electrode in a touchscreen, the conductive layer is desired to be highly transparent. Accordingly, the visual light transmission value T for the conductive layer of the invention is >65%, preferably >70%, more preferably >80%, and most preferably >90%. The conductive layer need not form an integral whole, need not have a uniform thickness and need not be contiguous with the base substrate. Preferably, the touchscreen of the invention has a transparency of at least 70% in the visible light range.
While the nanotubes and the electronically conductive polymer can be applied without the addition of a film-forming polymeric binder, a film- forming binder can be employed to improve the physical properties of the layers. In such an embodiment, the layers may comprise from about 1 to 95% of the film- forming polymeric binder. However, the presence of the film forming binder may increase the overall surface electrical resistivity of the layers. The optimum weight percent of the film-forming polymer binder varies depending on the electrical properties of the carbon nanotubes and the electronically conductive polymer, the chemical composition of the polymeric binder, and the requirements for the particular touchscreen application.
Polymeric film-forming binders useful in the conductive layers of this invention can include, but are not limited to, water-soluble or water- dispersible hydrophilic polymers such as gelatin, gelatin derivatives, maleic acid or maleic anhydride copolymers, polystyrene sulfonates, cellulose derivatives (such as carboxymethyl cellulose, hydroxyethyl cellulose, cellulose acetate butyrate, diacetyl cellulose, and triacetyl cellulose), polyethylene oxide, polyvinyl alcohol, and poly-N-vinylpyrrolidone. Other suitable binders include aqueous emulsions of addition-type homopolymers and copolymers prepared from ethylenically unsaturated monomers such as acrylates including acrylic acid, methacrylates including methacrylic acid, acrylamides and methacrylamides, itaconic acid and its half-esters and diesters, styrenes including substituted styrenes, acrylonitrile and methacrylonitrile, vinyl acetates, vinyl ethers, vinyl and vinylidene halides, and olefins and aqueous dispersions of polyurethanes and poryesterionomers. Other ingredients that may be included in the conductive layers include but are not limited to surfactants, defoamers or coating aids, charge control agents, thickeners or viscosity modifiers, antiblocking agents, coalescing aids, crosslinking agents or hardeners, soluble and/or solid particle dyes, matte beads, inorganic or polymeric particles, adhesion, promoting agents, bite solvents or chemical etchants, lubricants, plasticizers, antioxidants, colorants or tints, and other addenda that are well-known in the art. Preferred bite solvents can include any of the volatile aromatic compounds disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,709,984, as "conductivity-increasing" aromatic compounds, comprising an aromatic ring substituted with at least one hydroxy group or a hydroxy substituted substituents group. These compounds include phenol, 4-chloro-3 -methyl phenol, 4- chlorophenol, 2-cyanophenol, 2,6-dichlorophenol, 2-ethylphenol, resorcinol, benzyl alcohol, 3 -phenyl- 1-propanol, 4-methoxyphenol, 1,2- catechol, 2,4- dihydroxytoluene, 4-chloro-2-methyl phenol, 2,4- dinitrophenol, 4- chlororesorcinol, 1-naphthol, 1,3-naphthalenediol and the like. These bite solvents are particularly suitable for polyester based polymer sheets of the invention. Of this group, the most preferred compounds are resorcinol and 4-chloro-3 -methyl phenol. Preferred surfactants suitable for these coatings include nonionic and anionic surfactants. Preferred cross-linking agents suitable for these coatings include silane compounds such as those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,370,981.
For use as an electrode in a touchscreen, the conductive layers are desired to be highly transparent. Accordingly, the visual light transmission value T for the conductive layers of the invention are >65%, preferably >70%, more preferably >80%, and most preferably >90%. The conductive layers need not form an integral whole, need not have a uniform thickness and need not be contiguous with the base substrate.
The conductive layers of the invention can be formed on any rigid or flexible substrate. The substrates can be transparent, translucent or opaque, and may be colored or colorless. Preferably, the substrate is colorless and transparent. Rigid substrates can include glass, metal, ceramic and/or semiconductors.
Suitable rigid substrate thickness ranges from 50 um - 7000 um, depending on the actual material employed for the rigid substrate. Flexible substrates, especially those comprising a plastic substrate, are preferred for their versatility and ease of manufacturing, coating and finishing.
The flexible plastic substrate can be any flexible polymeric film. "Plastic" means a high polymer, usually made from polymeric synthetic resins, which may be combined with other ingredients, such as curatives, fillers, reinforcing agents, colorants, and plasticizers. Plastic includes thermoplastic materials and thermosetting materials.
The flexible plastic film must have sufficient thickness and mechanical integrity so as to be self-supporting, yet should not be so thick as to be totally rigid. Suitable flexible plastic substrate thickness ranges from 5 um - 500 um. To reduce the weight of the touchscreen while providing mechanical rigidity and thermal resistance, the thickness is preferably 50 - 250 um. Another significant characteristic of the flexible plastic substrate material is its glass transition temperature (Tg). Tg is defined as the glass transition temperature at which plastic material will change from the glassy state to the rubbery state. It may comprise a range before the material may actually flow. Suitable materials for the flexible plastic substrate include thermoplastics of a relatively low glass transition temperature, for example up to 150° C, as well as materials of a higher glass transition temperature, for example, above 150° C. The choice of material for the flexible plastic substrate would depend on factors such as manufacturing process conditions, such as deposition temperature, and annealing temperature, as well as post-manufacturing conditions such as in a process line of a displays manufacturer. Certain of the plastic substrates discussed below can withstand higher processing temperatures of up to at least about 200° C, some up to 300°- 350° C, without damage.
Typically, the flexible plastic substrate is a polyester including polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polyethylene naphthalate (PEN), polyester ionomer, polyethersulfone (PES), polycarbonate (PC), polysulfone, a phenolic resin, an epoxy resin, polyester, polyimide, polyetherester, polyetheramide, cellulose nitrate, cellulose acetate, polyvinyl acetate), polystyrene, polyolefins including polyolefin ionomers, polyamide, aliphatic polyurethanes, polyacrylonitrile, polytetrafluoroethylenes, polyvinylidene fluorides, poly(methyl (x-methacrylates), an aliphatic or cyclic polyolefin, polyarylate (PAR), polyetherimide (PEI), polyethersulphone (PES), polyimide (PI), Teflon poly(perfluoro-alboxy) fluoropolymer (PFA), poly(ether ether ketone) (PEEK), poly(ether ketone) (PEK), poly(ethylene tetrafluoroethylene)fluoropolymer (PETFE), and poly(methyl methacrylate) and various acrylate/methacrylate copolymers (PMMA) natural and synthetic paper, resin-coated or laminated paper, voided polymers including polymeric foam, microvoided polymers and microporous materials, or fabric, or any combinations thereof.
Aliphatic polyolefms may include high density polyethylene (HDPE), low density polyethylene (LDPE), and polypropylene, including oriented polypropylene (OPP). Cyclic polyolefins may include poly(bis(cyclopentadiene)). A preferred flexible plastic substrate is a cyclic polyolefin or a polyester. Various cyclic polyolefins are suitable for the flexible plastic substrate. Examples include Arton® made by Japan Synthetic Rubber Co., Tokyo, Japan; Zeanor T made by Zeon Chemicals L.P., Tokyo Japan; and Topas® made by Celanese A. G., Kronberg Germany. Arton is a poly(bis(cyclopentadiene)) condensate that is a film of a polymer. Alternatively, the flexible plastic substrate can be a polyester. A preferred polyester is an aromatic polyester such as Arylite. Although the substrate can be transparent, translucent or opaque, for most display applications transparent members comprising transparent substrate(s) are preferred. Although various examples of plastic substrates are set forth above, it should be appreciated that the flexible substrate can also be formed from other materials such as flexible glass and ceramic.
The most preferred flexible plastic substrate is polyester because of its superior mechanical and thermal properties as well as its availability in large quantity at a moderate price. The particular polyester chosen for use can be a homo-polyester or a copolyester, or mixtures thereof as desired. The polyester can be crystalline or amorphous or mixtures thereof as desired. Polyesters are normally prepared by the condensation of an organic dicarboxylic acid and an organic diol and, therefore, illustrative examples of useful polyesters will be described herein below in terms of these diol and dicarboxylic acid precursors.
Polyesters which are suitable for use in this invention are those which are derived from the condensation of aromatic, cycloaliphatic, and aliphatic diols with aliphatic, aromatic and cycloaliphatic dicarboxylic acids and may be cycloaliphatic, aliphatic or aromatic polyesters. Exemplary of useful cycloaliphatic, aliphatic and aromatic polyesters which can be utilized in the practice of their invention are poly(ethylene terephthalate), poly(cyclohexlenedimethylene), terephthalate) poly(ethylene dodecate), poly(butylene terephthalate), poly(ethylene naphthalate), poly(ethylene(2,7- naphthalate)), poly(methaphenylene isophthalate), poly(glycolic acid), poly(ethylene succinate), poly(ethylene adipate), polyethylene sebacate), poly(decamethylene azelate), poly(ethylene sebacate), poly(decamethylene adipate), poly(decamethylene sebacate), poly(dimethylpropiolactone), poly(ρara- hydroxybenzoate) (Ekonol), poly(ethylene oxybenzoate) (A-tell), poly(ethylene isophthalate), poly(tetramethylene terephthalate, poly(hexamethylene terephthalate), poly(decamethylene terephthalate), poly(l,4-cyclohexane dimethyl ene terephthalate) (trans), poly(ethylene 1, 5 -naphthalate), poly(ethylene 2,6-naphthalate), poly(l,4-cyclohexylene dimethylene terephthalate), (Kodel) (cis), and poly(l,4-cyclohexylene dimethylene terephthalate (Kodel) (trans). Polyester compounds prepared from the condensation of a diol and an aromatic dicarboxylic acid is preferred for use in this invention. Illustrative of such useful aromatic carboxylic acids are terephthalic acid, isophthalic acid and an α-phthalic acid, 1,3- napthalenedicarboxylic acid, 1,4 napthalenedicarboxylic acid, 2,6- napthalenedicarboxylic acid, 2,7-napthalenedicarboxylic acid, 4,4'- diphenyldicarboxylic acid, 4,4'-diphenysulfphone-dicarboxylic acid, 1,1,3- trimethyl-5-carboxy-3-(p-carboxyphenyl)-idane, diphenyl ether 4,4'- dicarboxylic acid, bis-p(carboxy-phenyl) methane, and the like. Of the aforementioned aromatic dicarboxylic acids, those based on a benzene ring (such as terephthalic acid, isophthalic acid, orthophthalic acid) are preferred for use in the practice of this invention. Amongst these preferred acid precursors, terephthalic acid is particularly preferred acid precursor.
Preferred polyesters for use in the practice of this invention include poly(ethylene terephthalate), poly(butylene terephthalate), poly(l,4- cyclohexylene dimethylene terephthalate) and poly(ethylene naphthalate) and copolymers and/or mixtures thereof. Among these polyesters of choice, poly(ethylene terephthalate) is most preferred because of its low cost, high transparency, and low coefficient of thermal expansion.
The aforesaid substrate can comprise a single layer or multiple layers according to need. The multiplicity of layers may include any number of auxiliary layers such as hard coat layers, antistatic layers, tie layers or adhesion promoting layers, abrasion resistant layers, curl control layers, conveyance layers, barrier layers, splice providing layers, UV absorption layers, optical effect providing layers, such as antireflective and antiglare layers, waterproofing layers, adhesive layers, and the like.
In a preferred embodiment the touch side electrode further comprises an anti-glare layer, anti-reflection layer, ultra violet light absorbing layer, or abrasion resistant hard coat layer on the side of the substrate opposite to the electrically conductive layers. Preferably, the anti-glare or hard coat layer has a pencil hardness (using the Standard Test Method for Hardness by Pencil Test ASTM D3363) of at least IH, more preferably a pencil hardness of 2H to 8H.
Particularly effective hard coat layers for use in the present invention comprise radiation or thermally cured compositions, and preferably the composition is radiation cured. Ultraviolet (UV) radiation and electron beam radiation are the most commonly employed radiation curing methods. UV curable compositions are particularly useful for creating the abrasion resistant layer of this invention and may be cured using two major types of curing chemistries, free radical chemistry and cationic chemistry. Acrylate monomers (reactive diluents) and oligomers (reactive resins and lacquers) are the primary components of the free radical based formulations, giving the cured coating most of its physical characteristics. Photo-initiators are required to absorb the UV light energy, decompose to form free radicals, and attack the acrylate group C=C double bond to initiate polymerization. Cationic chemistry utilizes cycloaliphatic epoxy resins and vinyl ether monomers as the primary components. Photo-initiators absorb the UV light to form a Lewis acid, which attacks the epoxy ring initiating polymerization. By UV curing is meant ultraviolet curing and involves the use of UV radiation of wavelengths between 280 and 420nm preferably between 320 and 410nm.
Examples of UV radiation curable resins and lacquers usable for the abrasion layer useful in this invention are those derived from photo polymerizable monomers and oligomers such as acrylate and methacrylate oligomers (the term "(meth)acrylate" used herein refers to acrylate and methacrylate), of polyfunctional compounds, such as polyhydric alcohols and their derivatives having (meth)acrylate functional groups such as ethoxylated trimethylolpropane tri(meth)acrylate, tripropylene glycol di(meth)acrylate, trimethylolpropane tri(meth)acrylate, diethylene glycol di(meth)acrylate, pentaerythritol tetra(meth)acrylate, pentaerythritol tri(meth)acrylate, dipentaerythritol hexa(meth)acrylate, 1,6-hexanediol di(meth)acrylate, or neopentyl glycol di(meth)acrylate and mixtures thereof, and acrylate and methacrylate oligomers derived from low-molecular weight polyester resin, polyether resin, epoxy resin, polyurethane resin, alkyd resin, spiroacetal resin, epoxy acrylates, polybutadiene resin, and polythiol-polyene resin, and the like and mixtures thereof, and ionizing radiation-curable resins containing a relatively large amount of a reactive diluent. Reactive diluents usable herein include monofunctional monomers, such as ethyl (meth)acrylate, ethylhexyl (meth)acrylate, styrene, vinyltoluene, and N-vinylpyrrolidone, and polyfunctional monomers, for example, trimethylolpropane tri(meth)acrylate, hexanediol (meth)acrylate, tripropylene glycol di(meth)acrylate, diethylene glycol di(meth)acrylate, pentaerythritol tri(meth)acrylate, dipentaerythritol hexa(meth)acrylate, 1,6-hexanediol di(meth)acrylate, or neopentyl glycol di(meth)acrylate. Among others, in the present invention, conveniently used radiation curable lacquers include urethane (meth)acrylate oligomers. These are derived from reacting diisocyanates with a oligo(poly)ester or oligo(poly)ether polyol to yield an isocyanate terminated urethane. Subsequently, hydroxy terminated acrylates are reacted with the terminal isocyanate groups. This acrylation provides the unsaturation to the ends of the oligomer. The aliphatic or aromatic nature of the urethane acrylate is determined by the choice of diisocyanates. An aromatic diisocyanate, such as toluene diisocyanate, will yield an aromatic urethane acrylate oligomer. An aliphatic urethane acrylate will result from the selection of an aliphatic diisocyanate, such as isophorone diisocyanate or hexyl methyl diisocyanate. Beyond the choice of isocyanate, polyol backbone plays a pivotal role in determining the performance of the final the oligomer. Polyols are generally classified as esters, ethers, or a combination of these two. The oligomer backbone is terminated by two or more acrylate or methacrylate units, which serve as reactive sites for free radical initiated polymerization. Choices among isocyanates, polyols, and acrylate or methacrylate termination units allow considerable latitude in the development of urethane acrylate oligomers. Urethane acrylates like most oligomers, are typically high in molecular weight and viscosity. These oligomers are multifunctional and contain multiple reactive sites. Because of the increased number of reactive sites, the cure rate is improved and the final product is cross-linked. The oligomer functionality can vary from 2 to 6.
Among others, conveniently used radiation curable resins include polyfunctional acrylic compounds derived from polyhydric alcohols and their derivatives such as mixtures of acrylate derivatives of pentaerythritol such as pentaerythritol tetraacrylate and pentaerythritol triacrylate functionalized aliphatic urethanes derived from isophorone diisocyanate. Some examples of urethane acrylate oligomers used in the practice of this invention that are commercially available include oligomers from Sartomer Company (Exton, PA). An example of a resin that is conveniently used in the practice of this invention is CN 968 ® from Sartomer Company. A photo polymerization initiator, such as an acetophenone compound, a benzophenone compound, Michler's benzoyl benzoate, α- amyloxime ester, or a thioxanthone compound and a photosensitizer such as n- butyl amine, triethylamine, or tri-rc-butyl phosphine, or a mixture thereof is incorporated in the ultraviolet radiation curing composition. In the present invention, conveniently used initiators are 1-hydroxycyclohexyl phenyl ketone and 2-methyl-l-[4-(methyl thio) phenyl] -2-morpholinopropanone-l.
The UV polymerizable monomers and oligomers are coated and dried, and subsequently exposed to UV radiation to form an optically clear cross- linked abrasion resistant layer. The preferred UV cure dosage is between 50 and lOOO mJ/cm2.
The thickness of the hard coat layer is generally about 0.5 to 50 micrometers preferably 1 to 20 micrometers, more preferably 2 to 10 micrometers.
An antiglare layer provides a roughened or textured surface that is used to reduce specular reflection. All of the unwanted reflected light is still present, but it is scattered rather than specularly reflected. For the purpose of the present invention, the antiglare layer preferably comprises a radiation cured composition that has a textured or roughened surface obtained by the addition of organic or inorganic (matting) particles or by embossing the surface. The radiation cured compositions described hereinabove for the hard coat layer are also effectively employed in the antiglare layer. Surface roughness is preferably obtained by the addition of matting particles to the radiation cured composition. Suitable particles include inorganic compounds having an oxide, nitride, sulfide or halide of a metal, metal oxides being particularly preferred. As the metal atom, Na, K, Mg, Ca, Ba, Al, Zn, Fe, Cu, Ti, Sn, In, W, Y, Sb, Mn, Ga, V, Nb, Ta, Ag, Si, B, Bi, Mo, Ce, Cd, Be, Pb and Ni are suitable, and Mg, Ca, B and Si are more preferable. An inorganic compound containing two types of metal may also be used. A particularly preferable inorganic compound is silicon dioxide, namely silica. The polymer substrate can be formed by any method known in the art such as those involving extrusion, coextrusion, quenching, orientation, heat setting, lamination, coating and solvent casting. It is preferred that the polymer substrate is an oriented sheet formed by any suitable method known in the art, such as by a flat sheet process or a bubble or tubular process. The flat sheet process involves extruding or coextruding the materials of the sheet through a slit die and rapidly quenching the extruded or coextruded web upon a chilled casting drum so that the polymeric component(s) of the sheet are quenched below their solidification temperature. The quenched sheet is then biaxially oriented by stretching in mutually perpendicular directions at a temperature above the glass transition temperature of the polymer(s). The sheet maybe stretched in one direction and then in a second direction or may be simultaneously stretched in both directions. The preferred stretch ratio in any direction is at least 3:1. After the sheet has been stretched, it is heat set by heating to a temperature sufficient to crystallize the polymers while restraining to some degree the sheet against retraction in both directions of stretching.
The polymer sheet may be subjected to any number of coatings and treatments, after extrusion, coextrusion, orientation, etc. or between casting and full orientation, to improve its properties, such as printability, barrier properties, heat-sealability, spliceability, adhesion to other substrates and/or imaging layers. Examples of such coatings can be acrylic coatings for printability, polyvinylidene halide for heat seal properties, etc. Examples of such treatments can be flame, plasma and corona discharge treatment, ultraviolet radiation treatment, ozone treatment and electron beam treatment to improve coatability and adhesion.
Further examples of treatments can be calendaring, embossing and patterning to obtain specific effects on the surface of the web. The polymer sheet can be further incorporated in any other suitable substrate by lamination, adhesion, cold or heat sealing, extrusion coating, or any other method known in the art. Dielectric spacers, that may be dot-shaped for example, are provided on the surface of the conductive layer at regular distances, such as every few millimeters. The spacers are made of polymeric resin, and each spacer is about 10 urn in height and 10 um to 50 um in diameter. Suitable polymeric resin that may be employed to prepare the spacers include light or thermal hardened epoxy, acrylated-urethanes, acrylic, and other compositions well known by the skilled artisan. The spacers alternatively may be filled with nanoparticles such as silica, alumina, zinc oxide and others in order to modify the physical properties of the spacers.
Alternatively, it is known to form the spacers for example by spraying through a mask or pneumatically sputtering small diameter transparent glass or polymer particles, as described in US 5,062,198 issued to Sun, November 5, 1991. The transparent glass or polymer particles are typically 45 microns in diameter or less and mixed with a transparent polymer adhesive in a volatile solvent before application. The spacers may also be prepared by lithographic techniques that are well known in the art. FIG. 3 shows another embodiment of a resistive-type touchscreen of the invention 59 having electrodes 60 and 70. Electrode 60 may be the touch side electrode and electrode 70 may be the device side electrode or alternatively that electrode 70 may be the touch side electrode and electrode 60 may be the device side electrode. Electrode 70 comprises in order, an insulating substrate 63, a buried electrically conductive layer 65 in contact with said substrate, and an exposed electrically conductive layer 67. Electrode 60 comprises in order, an insulating substrate 62 and an exposed electrically conductive layer 66 in contact with said substrate. Wherein said exposed electrically conductive layers 66 and 67 are adjacent and separated by dielectric spacers 68. In the embodiment depicted in FIG. 3, either exposed electrically conductive layer 66 or 67 (but not both) comprises carbon nanotubes. Suitable carbon nanotubes have been described in detail herein above, The other exposed electrically conductive layer that does not comprise carbon nanotubes may comprise at least one material from the group consisting of electronically conductive polymers, transparent conducting oxides and transparent metal films. The buried electrically conductive layer 65 may comprise at least one material from the group consisting of carbon nanotubes, electronically conductive polymers, transparent conducting oxides and transparent metal films
Preferably, the buried electrically conductive layer has a sheet resistance of between 10 and 10,000 Ohm per square and the exposed electrically conductive layers have a sheet resistance of between 100 and 106 Ohm per square.
FIG. 4 shows yet another embodiment of a resistive-type touchscreen of the invention 129 having electrodes 130 and 140. Electrode 130 may be the touch side electrode and electrode 140 may be the device side electrode or alternatively that electrode 130 may be the touch side electrode and electrode 140 may be the device side electrode. Electrode 140 comprises in order, an insulating substrate 133, a buried electrically conductive layer 135 in contact with said substrate, and an exposed electrically conductive layer 137. Electrode 130 comprises in order, an insulating substrate 132, a buried electrically conductive layer 134 in contact with said substrate and an exposed electrically conductive layer 136. Wherein said exposed electrically conductive layers 136 and 137 are adjacent and separated by dielectric spacers 138. In the embodiment depicted in FIG. 4, either exposed electrically conductive layer 136 or 137 (but not both) comprises carbon nanotubes. Suitable carbon nanotubes have been described in detail herein above, The other exposed electrically conductive layer that does not comprise carbon nanotubes may comprise at least one material from the group consisting of electronically conductive polymers, transparent conducting oxides and transparent metal films.
The buried electrically conductive layers 134 and 135 may be the same or different in composition and comprise at least one material from the group consisting of carbon nanotubes, electronically conductive polymers, transparent conducting oxides and transparent metal films
Preferably, the buried electrically conductive layer has a sheet resistance of between 10 and 10,000 Ohm per square and the exposed electrically conductive layers have a sheet resistance of between 100 and 106 Ohm per square. Preferably, the electronically conductive layer comprising carbon nanotubes has a sheet resistance of between 102 to 106 Ohm per square.
Resistive touchscreens of the invention preferably are mechanically robust to point actuations by objects (plastic or metal stylus, fingers etc.). A touchscreen is activated or actuated when the touch side and device side electrodes contact. Over time, repetitive contact and the force applied during such contact damage prior art touchscreens. Such damage requires that increasingly larger forces are necessary to actuate the touchscreen. In a preferred embodiment of the instant invention, the force required to actuate a point on the touchscreen does not change by more than 500 percent over 500,000 single point actuations. More preferably, the force required to actuate the touchscreen does not change by more than 100 percent and most preferably more than 50 percent. A single point actuation is the application of an object at a single point on the touchscreen to activate such touchscreen. The conventional construction of a resistive touch screen involves the sequential placement of materials upon the substrates. The substrates are formed as described herein above, then uniform conductive layers are applied to the substrates. The bus bars are applied to the touch side electrode and the spacers and bus bars are applied to the device side electrode and, finally, the touch side electrode is attached to the device side electrode.
FIG. 5 is an exploded view showing the construction of a touchscreen 100 of the present invention. As shown in FIG. 5, the touchscreen 100 is mainly composed of a touch side electrode 110 and a device side electrode 120. The touch side electrode 110 and the device side electrode 120 are set facing each other, with dielectric spacers 30 being placed in between them so that an air gap is formed between the substrates.
As shown in FIG. 5, the touch side electrode 110 is provided with a pair of bus bars 141 and 142 which are adhered to the exposed electrically conductive layer along its ends to be opposed to each other in the A direction. The touch side electrode 110 is also provided with a pair of connector electrodes 143 and 144 at its edge, to which connectors (not shown) are connected. The bus bars 141 and 142 are connected to the pair of connector electrodes 143 and 144 via wiring patterns 145 and 146. The bus bars, connector electrodes, and wiring patterns comprise high conductivity materials. Suitable high conductivity materials include carbon black, silver, gold, platinum, palladium, copper or combinations of these materials. These materials may be applied by vacuum deposition, inkjet printing, thermal transfer, silk screen printing or other methods. These materials may be thermally or light hardened.
As shown in FIG. 5, the device side electrode 120 is provided with a pair of bus bars 251 and 252 which are adhered to the exposed electrically conductive layer along its ends to be opposed to each other in the B direction that is perpendicular to the A direction. The device side electrode 120 is also provided with a pair of connector electrodes 253 and 254 at its edge, to which connectors (not shown) are connected. The pair of bus bars 251 and 252 are connected to the pair of connector electrodes 253 and 254 via wiring patterns 255 and 256. Dot- shaped spacers 30, for example, are provided on the surface of the exposed conductive layer deposed on device side electrode 120, such as every few millimeters. The spacers 30 are made of light-hardening acrylic resin for example, and each spacer is about 10 μm in height and 10 μm to 50 μm in diameter. Respective outer regions of the touch side electrode 110 and the device side electrode 120 are bonded together by an adhesive 40.
Touchscreens prepared as described above may be employed in a variety of display devices. In a preferred embodiment, the display device comprises a liquid crystal display (LCD). Conveniently, the touchscreen of the invention may be adhesively attached to a polarizer plate within the liquid crystal display device.
The conductive layers of the invention can be applied by any method known in the art. Particularly preferred methods include coating from a suitable liquid medium coating composition by any well known coating method such as air knife coating, gravure coating, hopper coating, roller coating, spray coating, electrochemical coating, inkjet printing, flexographic printing, and the like. The first electrically conductive layer and the exposed electrically conductive layer may be applied sequentially or simultaneously.
Alternatively, the conductive layers can be transferred to a receiver member comprising the substrate from a donor member by the application of heat and/or pressure. An adhesive layer may be preferably present between the donor member and the receiver member substrate to facilitate transfer. The two conductive layers may be applied onto each substrate simultaneously from a single donor element or sequentially from two separate donor members as described in copending commonly assigned US Patent Applications 10/969,889 filed October 21, 2004, Majumdar et al, 11/062,416 filed February 22, 2005, Irvin et al., and 11/022,155, filed December 22, 2004, Majumdar et al.
Besides the conductive layers of the invention, the aforementioned thermal transfer element may comprise a number of auxiliary layers. These auxiliary layers may include radiation absorption layers, which can be a light to heat conversion layer, interlayer, release layer, adhesion promoting layer, operational layer (which is used in the operation of a device), non-operational layer (which is not used in the operation of a device but can facilitate, for example, transfer of a transfer layer, protection from damage and/or contact with outside elements). Thermal transfer of the conductive layers of the invention can be accomplished by the application of directed heat on a selected portion of the thermal transfer element. Heat can be generated using a heating element (e.g., a resistive heating element), converting radiation (e.g., a beam of light) to heat, and/or applying an electrical current to a layer of thermal transfer element to generate heat.
Typically, a very smooth surface, with low roughness (Ra) is desired for maximizing optical and barrier properties of the coated substrate. Preferred Ra values for the conductive layer of the invention is less than 1000 nm, more preferably less than 100 nm, and most preferably less than 20 nm. However, it is to be understood that if for some application a rougher surface is required higher Ra values can be attained within the scope of this invention, by any means known in the art.
EXAMPLES
The following non-limiting examples further describe the practice of the instant invention.
Examples of Single and Multilayer Conductors Used to Construct Touch Switches: Table I
Figure imgf000042_0001
Coatings A & B were supplied by the vendors Bekaert and Keytec, respectively. The Bekaert ITO is coated onto a 102 um PET substrate. The
Keytec sample had a coating on the opposite surface of the ITO on PET. The PET used in the Keytec sample is a 203 um substrate. Coatings C, D, E and F were produced as follows. The following ingredients were used to form the coating composition for forming the multilayer examples and single layer comparative examples:
Ingredients for coating composition
(a) Baytron P AG: aqueous dispersion of electronically conductive polythiophene and polyanion, namely, poly(3,4-ethylene dioxythiophene styrene sulfonate), supplied by H.C. Starck; (b) TX-100: nonionic surfactant coating aid supplied by Rohm & Haas;
(c) Ethanol;
(d) diethylene glycol: conductivity enhancing agent supplied by Aldrich;
(e) Silquest A 187: 3-glycidoxy-propyltrimethyoxysilane supplied by Crompton Corporation and (f) SWCNTs: P3 swcnt product supplied by Carbon Solutions
The following coating composition A was prepared for coating suitable substrates to form the multilayer conductor examples:
Coating composition H
Baytron P AG (1.3% active in aqueous) 266 g
TX-100 1.5 g
Diethylene glycol 12 g
Silquest A 187 5.4 g High purity water 28.47 g
Coating composition I
Baytron P AG (1.3% active in aqueous) 266 g
TX-100 1.5 g Diethylene glycol 12 g
High purity water 33.87 g Coating composition M P3 SWCNT - 0.075 wt% in water TX-100 - 0.015 wt% in water Ethanol - 25 wt% in water Balance high purity water
Coating composition V P3 SWCNT - 0.10 wt% in water Ethanol - 25 wt% in water Balance high purity water
The substrate used was polyethylene terephthalate (PET). The PET substrate was photographic grade with a thickness of 102 μm and surface roughness Ra of 0.5 nm. On the coating side (frontside) of the PET a thin vinylidene chloride copolymer primer layer was applied at a thickness of 80 nm. The coating composition H or I was applied to the frontside surface of the substrate by a hopper at different wet coverages to give dry coverages of Baytron P AG of between 170 mg/m2 and 350 mg/m2, and each coating was dried at 82°C for five minutes. When appropriate, in a second pass, coating composition M was applied over the dried Baytron P AG coating (previously deposited by coating composition H) at a single wet coverage to give a dry coverage of SWCNT of 8 mg/m2. hi this manner, examples of multilayer conductors were created as per the instant invention, wherein conductive layers having different dry coverage of electronically conductive Baytron P AG were coated on the surface of the substrate in one layer and a second layer of SWCNT was applied over the Baytron P AG. The coating composition V was applied to the frontside surface of the substrate by a hopper at different wet coverages to give dry coverages of SWCNT of between 10 mg/m2 and 100 mg/m2, and each coating was dried at 82°C for five minutes. The sheet resistance, Rs, (ohms/square) of the coatings was measured by a 4-point electrical probe. In order to evaluate the robustness of the single and multilayer conductors used as asymmetric electrodes of the instant invention, small touchscreens (termed touch switch hereafter) were created and tested as described below. Turning to Figure 8 Single and Multilayer conductor material combinations were evaluated for mechanical robustness by constructing a single pole-single throw touchscreen as follows:
A 1.27 cm x 3.8 cm "bottom" (device side) conductive coating 302 on flexible substrate was cut from a larger coated sheet. The bottom conductive coating 302 was attached, conductive side up, along one long edge of a 25mm x 75mm glass microscope slide 301. The bottom conductive coating 302 was retained by (2) 3.8 cm lengths of copper foil 304 tape (3M 1181 EMI Shielding Tape) applied across the 1.27 cm ends of the film strip and extending beyond the 2.5 cm dimension of the slide. The excess tape was folded back on itself to form an attachment tab for electrical connection.
Sixteen spacer dots 303 of non-critical dimension were applied in a 4 x 4 matrix over the central 1.27 cm x 1.27 cm square area of the bottom conductor. Spacer dot 303 dimensions can be called out as 0.1-1.0 mm diameter, preferably 0.1-0.3 mm diameter for uniformity of actuation force. Dots were comprised of epoxy (Devcon No.14250 ) applied by hand using a pointed applicator. A 1.27 cm square of non-conducting double sided tape 305 (Polyken) was applied to the glass slide adjacent to the spacer dot matrix. A 1.27 cm x 3.8 cm strip of "top" (touch side) conductive coating 306 on flexible substrate was attached, conductive side down, over the double sided tape to form a "T" arrangement with one end of the strip covering the spacer dot array and the other end extending beyond the 2.54 cm dimension of the glass slide. A 2.54 cm length of conductive copper foil 304 tape was wrapped around the overhanging top conductor to form ah electrical attachment.
A line of silver conducting paint (Ernest FuUam No. 14810) was applied across the copper tape / conductor layer interfaces to augment the conductive adhesive of the foil tape. Single Point Actuation Testing Method
Completed touchscreens were placed in the stationary nest of a test apparatus consisting of a brushless linear motor and force mode motion control. A polyurethane 0.79 cm spherical radius hemisphere switch actuating "finger" (McMaster-Carr # 95495K1) is mounted to a load cell, which is in turn mounted to the moving linear motor stage. The finger was pressed against the switch with a force profile consisting of zero force for 125 mS, a linear ramp to peak force over 125 mS, a hold at peak force for 125 mS, and a linear load reduction over 125 mS. The loading pattern was repeated continuously at 2 actuations/second for the duration of the test. Peak force was set for 200-300 grams force. The touchscreen was electrically loaded by supplying a regulated 5V differential between the top and bottom conductors. At the mid point of the peak force period, the connections to the test device were electronically switched to force current in the reverse direction during the second half of the actuation cycle. Current flow through the touchscreen was monitored as a function of time and actuation force.
The touchscreen was considered to make and break at a resistance of or below 12 kOhms. The data recorded were on-state resistance and the force required to achieve an on state e.g. to make a switch in state. A touchscreen was considered to fail when routinely exceeding 12kθhms on-state resistance.
Comparative Example 1 - Single Layer ITO Conductor Touchscreen
A touchscreen was constructed using Coating A from Table I (Bekaert ITO - Lot #5189376). The single point actuation testing was performed and gave the results indicated in Figures 9 and 10 below. The single layer of Bekaert ITO began to show significant changes in force to actuate as early as completing 10,000 single point actuations (SPA). The on-state resistance showed significant deviation as early as 85,000 SPA. At 88,000 SPA, the single layer of Bekaert ITO routinely exceeded an on-state resistance of 12,000 ohms and failed. Addtionally, by 88,000 SPA the actuation force was highly scattered and not stable. It is clear from the figures that as the number of actuations increase, the reliability of the touchscreen decreases as evidenced by the significant scatter in the data which corresponds to higher forces required to actuate and increasing on- state resistance which are not desirable. Additionally, the scattered data illustrates potential problems with resolution of point selection.
Comparative Example 2 - Single Layer Baytron P AG Conductor Touchscreen
A touchscreen was constructed using Coating C from Table I (344 mg/m Baytron P AG). The SPA testing was performed and gave the results indicated in Figures 11 and 12 below. The single layer of Baytron P AG began to show significant changes in force to actuate as early as completing 3,000 single point actuations (SPA). The on-state resistance showed significant deviation as early as 6,000 SPA. At 6,000 SPA, the single layer of Baytron P AG permanently exceeded an on-state resistance of 12,000 ohms, reaching a value of 100,000+ ohms. Addtionally, by 6,000 SPA the actuation force experienced an exponential increase and failed shortly thereafter. It is clear from the figures that as the number of actuations increase, the reliability of the single layer Baytron P AG based touchscreen decreases as evidenced by the significant scatter in the data which corresponds to higher forces required to actuate and increasing on-state resistance which are not desirable. Additionally, the scattered data illustrates potential problems with resolution of point selection.
Comparative Example 3 - Single Layer Baytron P AG (containing crosslinking agent) Conductor Touchscreen.
A touchscreen was constructed using Coating D from Table I (344 mg/m2 Baytron P AG w/ Silquest Al 87). The SPA testing was performed. This touchscreen experienced similar on-state resistance and actuation force profiles as Comparative Example 2 and failed after 17,000 SPA. It is clear that as the number of actuations increase, the reliability of the single layer Baytron P AG with hardening agent based touchscreen decreases as evidenced by the significant scatter in the data which corresponds to higher forces required to actuate and increasing on-state resistance which are not desirable. Additionally, the scattered data illustrates potential problems with resolution of point selection.
Comparative Example 4 - Single Layer Keytec ITO Conductor Touchscreen
A touchscreen was constructed using Coating B from Table I (400 ohm/square Keytec ITO). The SPA testing was performed and gave the results indicated in Figures 13 and 14 below. The single layer of Keytec ITO had a linear increase in the force to actuate and began to show significant changes in force to actuate as early as completing 25,000 SPA. The on-state resistance showed significant deviation as early as 35,000 SPA. At 38,000 SPA, the single layer of Keytec ITO permanently exceeded an on-state resistance of 12,000 ohms, reaching a value of 13,000+ ohms and continued to increase to values as high as 10,000,000 ohms. Addtionally, by 30,000 SPA the actuation force experienced an exponential increase and failed shortly thereafter with significant scatter in the force to actuate. It is clear from the figures that as the number of actuations increase, the reliability of the single layer Keytec ITO based touchscreen decreases as evidenced by the significant scatter in the data which corresponds to higher forces required to actuate and increasing on-state resistance which are not desirable. Additionally, the scattered data illustrates potential problems with resolution of point selection.
Comparative Example 5 - Asymmetric Electrode Touch Switch with Keytec ITO and Baytron P AG as Opposing Electrodes
A touchscreen was constructed using Coating B from Table I (400 ohm/square Keytec ITO) as one electrode and using Coating C from Table I (344 mg/m2 Baytron P AG). The SPA testing was performed and gave the results indicated in Figure 15. Surprisingly, this touchscreen failed immediately due to displaying diode behavior as evidenced by the large differences in the measured forward and reverse resistances of the touchscreen. A touchscreen made of such electrode combinations does not function. It is clear from the figure that the reliability of the Baytron P AG and Keytec ITO asymmetric electrode combination based touchscreen is not good as evidenced by the large separation in on-state resistance values for the forward and reverse measured resistance of the touchswitch. Additionally, the after only 250 cycles the resistance of forward and reverse become so high that the device is not functional.
Instant Invention Example 1 - Asymmetric Electrode Touch Switch with Bekaert ITO and Single Wall Carbon Nanotubes
A touchscreen was constructed using Coating A from Table I (Bekaert ITO - Lot #5189376) as one electrode and Coating SWCNT from Table I (SWCNT at 64.6 mg/m2) as the second, opposing electrode. The single point actuation testing was performed and gave the results indicated in Figures 16 and 17 below. The asymmetric electrode touchscreen began to show changes in force to actuate after completing 50,000 single point actuations (SPA). The on-state resistance showed deviation after 60,000 SPA. At approximately 400,000 SPA, the asymmetric electrode touchscreen of Bekaert ITO and SWCNTs routinely exceeded an on-state resistance of 12,000 ohms. It is important to note that when contrasted with Comparative Example 1, the usage of the asymmetric electrode architecture and corresponding materials significantly improved the lifetime of the Bekaert ITO for SPA lifetime. It is also evidenced by Instant Invention Example 1 that the force to actuate does not display such wide swings in value as does Comparative Example 1, e.g. at 50,000 cycles for Comparative Example 1 there are already swings as much as 100 g of force as compared to Instant Invention Example 1 with only as much as 20-30 g of force. Further, the rate of increase for force to actuate is significantly faster in Comparative Example 1. Instant Invention 2 - Asymmetric Electrode Touch Switch with Baytron P AG (containing crosslinking agent) and Single Wall Carbon Nanotubes
A touchscreen was constructed using Coating D from Table I (344 mg/m2 Baytron P AG w/ Silquest Al 87) as one electrode and Coating SWCNT from Table I (SWCNT at 64.6 mg/m2) as the second, opposing electrode. The single point actuation testing was performed and gave the results indicated in Figures 18 and 19 below. This asymmetric electrode touchscreen demonstrated essentially no change in the force to actuate after completing 1.1 Million SPA. hi fact, there was a small decrease in the force needed to actuate the touchscreen, as compared to the comparative examples that all exhibit increases in the force to actuate as the number of SPA cycles increased. The on-state resistance shows essentially no deviation after 1.1 Million SPA. This asymmetric electrode touchscreen demonstrates the significant robustness and operability conferred by using the instant invention.
Instant Invention 3 - Asymmetric Electrode Touch Switch with Keytec ITO and a multilayer conductor of Baytron P AG (first or buried layer) and Single Wall Carbon Nanotubes (exposed layer) An asymmetric electrode based touchscreen was constructed using Coating B from Table I (400 ohm/square Keytec ITO) as one electrode and Coating F from Table I (First layer 344 mg/m2 Baytron P AG with 8 mg/m2 P3 SWCNT 2nd layer) as the second electrode. The single point actuation testing was performed and gave the results indicated in Figures 20 and 21 below. This asymmetric electrode touchscreen demonstrated a linear increase in force to actuate to forces upwards of 300 g before failing. The on-state resistance showed minor deviations after 60,000 SPA. At approximately 200,000 SPA, this asymmetric electrode touchscreen exceeded an on-state resistance of 12,000 ohms routinely. It is important to note that when contrasted with Comparative Example 4, the usage of the asymmetric electrode architecture and corresponding materials significantly improved the lifetime of the Keytec ITO for SPA lifetime. The Keytec ITO touchscreen failed very sharply after a low number of actuations. The other interesting point is that by using the multilayer conductor of Baytron P AG and SWCNTs with the very thin film of SWCNT as the exposed layer, the diode behavior as exhibited in Comparative Example 5 was not displayed in Instant Invention Example 3 thereby making the Keytec ITO and Baytron P AG compatible.
It is surprising and clearly obvious that the instant invention gives significant improvements in robustness as demonstrated above. The fact that the instant invention can sustain significantly more actuations than the comparative example touchscreens without failing (or failing later) and/or noticeable change in operation is important due to the improved reliability of the instant invention touchscreen. For instance, as the force to actuate increases for a touchscreen (use a cellphone with a touchscreen component as example) over time it will be increasingly difficult to select certain points on the touchscreen whereas the instant invention clearly would not suffer such problems. Additionally, the one embodiment of the instant invention eliminated the diode behavior exhibited by ITO and Baytron P AG thereby making those materials useful in combination. It is apparent that the exemplary embodiment can provide drastically enhanced conductor and/or electrode robustness.
PARTS LIST
10 prior art resistive-type touchscreen
12 device side transparent substrate
14 first conductive layer, device side 15 device side first electrode
16 touch side electrode
17 touch side transparent support
18 second conductive layer, touch side 20 dielectric spacer element 39 resistive-type touchscreen of the invention
24 device side exposed electrically conductive layer of the invention
25 device side electrode of the invention
26 touch side electrode of the invention
27 touch side electrode insulating substrate of the invention 28 touch side exposed electrically conductive layer
29 device side electrode insulating substrate of the invention
32 dielectric spacer element
59 resistive type touchscreen of the invention
60 electrode of invention 62 insulating substrate
63 insulating substrate
65 buried electrically conductive layer
66 exposed electrically conductive layer
67 exposed electrically conductive layer 68 dielectric spacers
70 electrode of invention
129 resistive touchscreen of the invention
130 electrode of invention 132 insulating substrate 133 insulating substrate
134 buried electrically conductive layer 135 buried electrically conductive layer
136 exposed electrically conductive layer
137 exposed electrically conductive layer
138 dielectric spacers
140 electrode of invention
100 resistive touchscreen of the invention
110 touch side electrode
120 device side electrode
30 dielectric spacers
141 touch side bus bar
142 touch side bus bar
143 touch side connector electrode
144 touch side connector electrode
145 touch side wiring pattern
146 touch side wiring pattern
251 device side bus bars
252 device side bus bar
253 device side connector electrode
254 device side connector electrode
255 device side wiring pattern
256 device side wiring pattern
40 bonding adhesive
301 microscope slide
302 bottom device side electrode
303 dielectric spacer dots
304 copper foil tape
305 double sided adhesive tape
306 tot) touch side electrode

Claims

CLAIMS:
1. A touchscreen comprising touch side electrode and device side electrode wherein each electrode comprises an insulating substrate and an exposed electrically conductive layer, wherein said exposed electrically conductive layers are adjacent and separated by dielectric spacers, and wherein only one of the exposed electrically conductive layers comprises carbon nanotubes.
2. The touchscreen of Claim 1 wherein at least one of said electrodes comprises an electrically conductive layer comprising at least one material selected from the group consisting of electronically conductive polymers, transparent conducting oxides and transparent metal films.
3. The touchscreen of Claim 2 wherein said electrically conductive layer comprises a mixture of a cationic polyethylenedioxythiophene and polyanion.
4. The touchscreen of Claim 2 wherein said electrically conductive layer comprises polypyrrole, polyaniline or polythiophene.
5. The touchscreen of Claim 2 wherein said electrically conductive layer comprises tin doped indium oxide, fluorine doped zinc oxide, aluminum doped zinc oxide, indium doped zinc oxide, antimony doped tin oxide, or fluorine doped tin oxide.
6. The touchscreen of Claim 2 wherein said electrically conductive layer comprises a transparent metal film comprising silver, gold, copper, palladium, platinum or alloys of these materials.
7. The touchscreen of Claim 1 wherein said carbon nanotubes comprise single wall carbon nanotubes.
8. The touchscreen of Claim 1 wherein said carbon nanotubes comprise covalently attached hydrophilic species
9. The touchscreen of Claim 8 wherein the hydrophilic species is present in an amount of between 0.5 and 5 atomic %.
10. The touchscreen of Claim 8 wherein said hydrophilic species comprises carboxylic acid or carboxylic acid salt or mixtures thereof.
11. The touchscreen of Claim 8 wherein said hydrophilic species comprises a sulfur containing group selected from: SOxZy
Wherein x may range from 1 - 3 and Z may be a Hydrogen atom or a metal cation selected from the metals Na, Mg, K, Ca, Zn, Mn, Ag, Au, Pd, Pt, Fe, Co and y may range from 0 or 1.
12. The touchscreen of Claim 8 wherein said carbon nanotubes have an outer diameter of between 0.5 and 5 nanometers.
13. The touchscreen of Claim 8 wherein said carbon nanotubes comprise bundles of a diameter of between 1 and 50 nanometers.
14. The touchscreen of Claim 8 wherein said carbon nanotubes comprise bundles of a diameter of between 1 and 20 nanometers.
15. The touchscreen of Claim 8 wherein said carbon nanotubes have a length of between 20 nanometers and 50 microns.
16. The touchscreen of Claim 8 wherein said carbon nanotubes comprise bundles of a length of between 20 nanometers and 50 microns.
17. The touchscreen of Claim 8 wherein said carbon nanotubes are metallic carbon nanotubes.
18. The touchscreen of Claim 8 wherein said hydrophilic species comprises sulfonic acids or sulfonic acid salts or mixtures thereof.
19. The touchscreen of Claim 1 wherein said carbon nanotubes are open end carbon nanotubes.
20. The touchscreen of Claim 8 wherein said covalently attached hydrophilic species is present on the outside wall of said carbon nanotube.
21. The touchscreen of Claim 1 wherein the electronically conductive layer comprising carbon nanotubes further comprises a binder.
22. The touchscreen of Claim 1 wherein at least one of said electrodes further comprises an electronically conductive layer adjacent the substrate having a sheet resistance of between 10 and 10,000 Ohm per square.
23. The touchscreen of Claim 1 wherein said electronically conductive layer comprising carbon nanotubes have a sheet resistance of between 102 to 106 Ohm per square.
24. The touchscreen of Claim 2 wherein said electronically conductive polymer comprises a binder.
25. The touchscreen of Claim 24 wherein said binder comprises polyvinylalcohol, polyvinylbutyral, polyacrylates, polyurethanes or epoxies.
26. The touchscreen of Claim 1 wherein said screen is capable of greater than 500,000 single point actuations.
27. The touchscreen of Claim 1 wherein said touchscreen has a visible light transparency of greater than 70 percent.
28. The touchscreen of Claim 1 wherein said substrates have a visible light transparency of greater than 70 percent and comprise polyethyleneterephthalate, polyethylenenaphthalate, polycarbonate or glass.
29. The touchscreen of Claim 1 wherein said touch side substrate further comprises an anti-glare coat.
30. The touchscreen of Claim 1 wherein said touch side substrate further comprises an anti-reflection coat.
31. The touchscreen of Claim 1 wherein said touch side substrate further comprises a hard coat having a pencil hardness greater than 2H.
32. The touchscreen of Claim 1 wherein said touch side substrate further comprises a ultra violet light absorbing layer.
33. The touchscreen of Claim 1 wherein the force required to actuate a point on the touchscreen does not change by more than 50 percent over 500,000 single point actuations.
34. The touchscreen of Claim 1 wherein said the exposed layer comprising carbon nanotubes further comprises electrically conductive polymer, metal particles, or transparent conducting oxide particles.
35. The touchscreen of Claim 1 wherein the electrode that does not comprise carbon nanotubes comprises a mixture of electrically conductive polymer, metal particles, or transparent conducting oxide particles.
36. The touchscreen of Claim 3 wherein said mixture of a cationic polyethylenedioxythiophene and polyanion has a figure of merit of less than 50.
37. The touchscreen of Claim 1 wherein said exposed layer comprising carbon nanotubes is on the touch side of said touchscreen.
38. A device comprising a display device having attached thereto a touchscreen comprising touch side electrode and device side electrode wherein each electrode comprises an insulating substrate and an exposed electrically conductive layer, wherein said exposed electrically conductive layers are adjacent and separated by dielectric spacers, and wherein only one of the exposed electrically conductive layers comprises carbon nanotubes.
39. The device of Claim 38 wherein said display device comprises a LCD based display.
40. The device of Claim 39 wherein said LCD comprises a polarizer plate and the touchscreen is adhesively attached to said polarizer plate.
PCT/US2006/019530 2005-06-02 2006-05-19 Touchscreen with one carbon nanotube conductive layer WO2006130366A2 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP06770710A EP1886212B1 (en) 2005-06-02 2006-05-19 Touchscreen with one carbon nanotube conductive layer
JP2008514686A JP2008546090A (en) 2005-06-02 2006-05-19 Touch screen with one carbon nanotube conductive layer

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/143,539 2005-06-02
US11/143,539 US7535462B2 (en) 2005-06-02 2005-06-02 Touchscreen with one carbon nanotube conductive layer

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2006130366A2 true WO2006130366A2 (en) 2006-12-07
WO2006130366A3 WO2006130366A3 (en) 2007-07-19

Family

ID=36928367

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2006/019530 WO2006130366A2 (en) 2005-06-02 2006-05-19 Touchscreen with one carbon nanotube conductive layer

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (1) US7535462B2 (en)
EP (1) EP1886212B1 (en)
JP (2) JP2008546090A (en)
WO (1) WO2006130366A2 (en)

Cited By (34)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2008230935A (en) * 2007-03-23 2008-10-02 Chemicals Evaluation & Research Institute Method for dispersing carbon nanotube in water
JP2009104576A (en) * 2007-10-23 2009-05-14 Kofukin Seimitsu Kogyo (Shenzhen) Yugenkoshi Touch panel
JP2009146417A (en) * 2007-12-12 2009-07-02 Qinghua Univ Touch panel, its manufacturing method, and display device using the same
JP2009271662A (en) * 2008-05-02 2009-11-19 Fujitsu Component Ltd Touch panel substrate and touch panel having the same
JP2009283376A (en) * 2008-05-24 2009-12-03 Kuraray Co Ltd Electrode base material and touch panel
WO2010085709A1 (en) * 2009-01-23 2010-07-29 Shocking Technologies, Inc. Dielectric composition
US7793236B2 (en) 2007-06-13 2010-09-07 Shocking Technologies, Inc. System and method for including protective voltage switchable dielectric material in the design or simulation of substrate devices
US7825491B2 (en) 2005-11-22 2010-11-02 Shocking Technologies, Inc. Light-emitting device using voltage switchable dielectric material
KR101008501B1 (en) * 2009-04-10 2011-01-14 주식회사 디엠에스 Touch panel and manufacturing process for touch panel
US7968010B2 (en) 2006-07-29 2011-06-28 Shocking Technologies, Inc. Method for electroplating a substrate
US8117743B2 (en) 1999-08-27 2012-02-21 Shocking Technologies, Inc. Methods for fabricating current-carrying structures using voltage switchable dielectric materials
US8163595B2 (en) 2006-09-24 2012-04-24 Shocking Technologies, Inc. Formulations for voltage switchable dielectric materials having a stepped voltage response and methods for making the same
US8203421B2 (en) 2008-04-14 2012-06-19 Shocking Technologies, Inc. Substrate device or package using embedded layer of voltage switchable dielectric material in a vertical switching configuration
US8272123B2 (en) 2009-01-27 2012-09-25 Shocking Technologies, Inc. Substrates having voltage switchable dielectric materials
US8310064B2 (en) 2005-11-22 2012-11-13 Shocking Technologies, Inc. Semiconductor devices including voltage switchable materials for over-voltage protection
US8362871B2 (en) 2008-11-05 2013-01-29 Shocking Technologies, Inc. Geometric and electric field considerations for including transient protective material in substrate devices
TWI386831B (en) * 2007-12-31 2013-02-21 Hon Hai Prec Ind Co Ltd Touch panel and displaying device using the same
US8399773B2 (en) 2009-01-27 2013-03-19 Shocking Technologies, Inc. Substrates having voltage switchable dielectric materials
JP2013127985A (en) * 2008-08-20 2013-06-27 Seoul National Univ Industry Foundation Transparent conductive films
EP2275910A3 (en) * 2009-07-08 2013-08-21 Chimei InnoLux Corporation Touch panel and electronic device including the same
TWI416380B (en) * 2007-11-09 2013-11-21 Hon Hai Prec Ind Co Ltd Touch panel
TWI423084B (en) * 2007-12-31 2014-01-11 Hon Hai Prec Ind Co Ltd Touch panel and displaying device using the same
TWI423083B (en) * 2007-12-31 2014-01-11 Hon Hai Prec Ind Co Ltd Touch panel and displaying device using the same
JP5519497B2 (en) * 2008-05-24 2014-06-11 株式会社クラレ Touch panel
US8968606B2 (en) 2009-03-26 2015-03-03 Littelfuse, Inc. Components having voltage switchable dielectric materials
US9040159B2 (en) 2007-12-12 2015-05-26 Tsinghua University Electronic element having carbon nanotubes
US9053844B2 (en) 2009-09-09 2015-06-09 Littelfuse, Inc. Geometric configuration or alignment of protective material in a gap structure for electrical devices
US9077793B2 (en) 2009-06-12 2015-07-07 Tsinghua University Carbon nanotube based flexible mobile phone
US9082622B2 (en) 2010-02-26 2015-07-14 Littelfuse, Inc. Circuit elements comprising ferroic materials
US9208930B2 (en) 2008-09-30 2015-12-08 Littelfuse, Inc. Voltage switchable dielectric material containing conductive core shelled particles
US9208931B2 (en) 2008-09-30 2015-12-08 Littelfuse, Inc. Voltage switchable dielectric material containing conductor-on-conductor core shelled particles
US9224728B2 (en) 2010-02-26 2015-12-29 Littelfuse, Inc. Embedded protection against spurious electrical events
US9320135B2 (en) 2010-02-26 2016-04-19 Littelfuse, Inc. Electric discharge protection for surface mounted and embedded components
CN110045862A (en) * 2014-03-31 2019-07-23 宸盛光电有限公司 Capacitive touch device and preparation method thereof

Families Citing this family (113)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN101037581A (en) 1999-08-25 2007-09-19 日立化成工业株式会社 Adhesive, method of connecting wiring terminals and wiring structure
US20100038119A1 (en) * 1999-08-27 2010-02-18 Lex Kosowsky Metal Deposition
US20100038121A1 (en) * 1999-08-27 2010-02-18 Lex Kosowsky Metal Deposition
JP4300203B2 (en) * 2005-06-30 2009-07-22 Tdk株式会社 Transparent conductive film manufacturing method and touch panel manufacturing method
US7796123B1 (en) * 2006-06-20 2010-09-14 Eastman Kodak Company Touchscreen with carbon nanotube conductive layers
KR101065870B1 (en) * 2006-07-21 2011-09-19 히다치 가세고교 가부시끼가이샤 Circuit connection material, circuit member connecting structure and method of connecting circuit member
US20080048996A1 (en) * 2006-08-11 2008-02-28 Unidym, Inc. Touch screen devices employing nanostructure networks
JP2008047028A (en) * 2006-08-21 2008-02-28 Fujitsu Component Ltd Touch panel using transparent conductive polymer film and manufacturing method therefor
JP5161446B2 (en) * 2006-08-22 2013-03-13 帝人デュポンフィルム株式会社 Conductive film and touch panel using the film
TWI328984B (en) * 2006-08-29 2010-08-11 Ind Tech Res Inst Substrate structures and fabrication methods thereof
US8137767B2 (en) 2006-11-22 2012-03-20 Fujifilm Corporation Antireflective film, polarizing plate and image display device
US20080152870A1 (en) * 2006-12-22 2008-06-26 Katsunori Takada Transparent electrically-conductive hard-coated substrate and method for producing the same
KR100907512B1 (en) * 2006-12-29 2009-07-14 (주)탑나노시스 Method of forming a touch panel and a conductive layer of the touch panel
US20080238882A1 (en) * 2007-02-21 2008-10-02 Ramesh Sivarajan Symmetric touch screen system with carbon nanotube-based transparent conductive electrode pairs
US8398532B2 (en) * 2007-03-07 2013-03-19 Lexmark International, Inc. Developer rolls having a tuned resistivity
KR101390082B1 (en) * 2007-08-01 2014-05-28 삼성전자주식회사 Mobile communication terminal with projector
KR101340052B1 (en) * 2007-08-24 2013-12-11 삼성디스플레이 주식회사 Liquid crystal display panel and method of manufacturing the same
KR20100063091A (en) 2007-08-29 2010-06-10 노쓰웨스턴유니버시티 Transparent electrical conductors prepared from sorted carbon nanotubes and methods of preparing same
US20090056589A1 (en) * 2007-08-29 2009-03-05 Honeywell International, Inc. Transparent conductors having stretched transparent conductive coatings and methods for fabricating the same
CN101458600B (en) * 2007-12-14 2011-11-30 清华大学 Touch screen and display device
CN101458604B (en) * 2007-12-12 2012-03-28 清华大学 Touch screen and display device
CN101458597B (en) * 2007-12-14 2011-06-08 清华大学 Touch screen, method for producing the touch screen, and display device using the touch screen
CN101458603B (en) * 2007-12-12 2011-06-08 北京富纳特创新科技有限公司 Touch screen and display device
CN101458598B (en) * 2007-12-14 2011-06-08 清华大学 Touch screen and display device
CN101470558B (en) * 2007-12-27 2012-11-21 清华大学 Touch screen and display equipment
CN101458608B (en) * 2007-12-14 2011-09-28 清华大学 Touch screen preparation method
CN101470559B (en) * 2007-12-27 2012-11-21 清华大学 Touch screen and display equipment
CN101470566B (en) * 2007-12-27 2011-06-08 清华大学 Touch control device
CN101464763B (en) * 2007-12-21 2010-09-29 清华大学 Production method of touch screen
CN101676832B (en) * 2008-09-19 2012-03-28 清华大学 Desktop computer
CN101458593B (en) * 2007-12-12 2012-03-14 清华大学 Touch screen and display device
CN101458609B (en) * 2007-12-14 2011-11-09 清华大学 Touch screen and display device
CN101419518B (en) * 2007-10-23 2012-06-20 清华大学 Touch panel
CN101458606B (en) * 2007-12-12 2012-06-20 清华大学 Touch screen, method for producing the touch screen, and display device using the touch screen
CN101458605B (en) * 2007-12-12 2011-03-30 鸿富锦精密工业(深圳)有限公司 Touch screen and display device
CN101458595B (en) * 2007-12-12 2011-06-08 清华大学 Touch screen and display device
CN101655720B (en) * 2008-08-22 2012-07-18 清华大学 Personal digital assistant
CN101470560B (en) * 2007-12-27 2012-01-25 清华大学 Touch screen and display equipment
CN101656769B (en) * 2008-08-22 2012-10-10 清华大学 Mobile telephone
CN101458596B (en) * 2007-12-12 2011-06-08 北京富纳特创新科技有限公司 Touch screen and display device
CN101458594B (en) * 2007-12-12 2012-07-18 清华大学 Touch screen and display device
CN101458599B (en) * 2007-12-14 2011-06-08 清华大学 Touch screen, method for producing the touch screen, and display device using the touch screen
CN101620454A (en) * 2008-07-04 2010-01-06 清华大学 Potable computer
CN101458607B (en) * 2007-12-14 2010-12-29 清华大学 Touch screen and display device
CN101458601B (en) * 2007-12-14 2012-03-14 清华大学 Touch screen and display device
CN101464757A (en) * 2007-12-21 2009-06-24 清华大学 Touch screen and display equipment
CN101464764B (en) * 2007-12-21 2012-07-18 清华大学 Touch screen and display equipment
CN101464766B (en) * 2007-12-21 2011-11-30 清华大学 Touch screen and display equipment
CN101470565B (en) * 2007-12-27 2011-08-24 清华大学 Touch screen and display equipment
CN101464765B (en) * 2007-12-21 2011-01-05 鸿富锦精密工业(深圳)有限公司 Touch screen and display equipment
US8574393B2 (en) * 2007-12-21 2013-11-05 Tsinghua University Method for making touch panel
US7727578B2 (en) * 2007-12-27 2010-06-01 Honeywell International Inc. Transparent conductors and methods for fabricating transparent conductors
US7642463B2 (en) * 2008-01-28 2010-01-05 Honeywell International Inc. Transparent conductors and methods for fabricating transparent conductors
US7960027B2 (en) * 2008-01-28 2011-06-14 Honeywell International Inc. Transparent conductors and methods for fabricating transparent conductors
TW200936734A (en) * 2008-02-26 2009-09-01 Wintek Corp Touch panel
US20090260897A1 (en) * 2008-04-16 2009-10-22 Infocus Corporation Capacitive touch sensor
US8237677B2 (en) * 2008-07-04 2012-08-07 Tsinghua University Liquid crystal display screen
US8390580B2 (en) 2008-07-09 2013-03-05 Tsinghua University Touch panel, liquid crystal display screen using the same, and methods for making the touch panel and the liquid crystal display screen
WO2010011779A2 (en) 2008-07-23 2010-01-28 Flextronics Ap, Llc Integration design for capacitive touch panels and liquid crystal displays
US9128568B2 (en) 2008-07-30 2015-09-08 New Vision Display (Shenzhen) Co., Limited Capacitive touch panel with FPC connector electrically coupled to conductive traces of face-to-face ITO pattern structure in single plane
US8673258B2 (en) * 2008-08-14 2014-03-18 Snu R&Db Foundation Enhanced carbon nanotube
CN101661362A (en) 2008-08-28 2010-03-03 比亚迪股份有限公司 Multipoint touch sensing device
TWI481922B (en) * 2008-09-05 2015-04-21 Hon Hai Prec Ind Co Ltd Personal digital assistant
TW201013708A (en) * 2008-09-30 2010-04-01 Efun Technology Co Ltd Transparent conductive film and the application thereof
US7915637B2 (en) 2008-11-19 2011-03-29 Nantero, Inc. Switching materials comprising mixed nanoscopic particles and carbon nanotubes and method of making and using the same
WO2010059152A1 (en) * 2008-11-19 2010-05-27 Nantero, Inc. Improved switching materials comprising mixed nanoscopic particles and carbon nanotubes and method of making and using the same
US8209861B2 (en) 2008-12-05 2012-07-03 Flextronics Ap, Llc Method for manufacturing a touch screen sensor assembly
US8274486B2 (en) 2008-12-22 2012-09-25 Flextronics Ap, Llc Diamond pattern on a single layer
JP2010165032A (en) 2009-01-13 2010-07-29 Hitachi Displays Ltd Touch panel display device
US9226391B2 (en) 2009-01-27 2015-12-29 Littelfuse, Inc. Substrates having voltage switchable dielectric materials
TWI404749B (en) * 2009-03-05 2013-08-11 Chung Shan Inst Of Science Polyaniline/c-mwnt nanocomposite and method for fabricating the same
JP5403738B2 (en) * 2009-04-02 2014-01-29 センカ株式会社 CNT dispersant and CNT dispersion using the same
US8048340B2 (en) * 2009-04-07 2011-11-01 Chung-Shan Institute of Science and Technology Armaments Bureau, Ministry of National Defense Polyaniline/c-MWNT nanocomposite and method for fabricating the same
TWI528249B (en) * 2009-04-15 2016-04-01 財團法人工業技術研究院 Structure of touch sensing device
CN101943964A (en) * 2009-07-08 2011-01-12 群康科技(深圳)有限公司 Touch panel
US10164135B2 (en) * 2009-08-07 2018-12-25 Guardian Glass, LLC Electronic device including graphene-based layer(s), and/or method or making the same
JP5499617B2 (en) * 2009-10-15 2014-05-21 コニカミノルタ株式会社 Transparent electrode and organic electroluminescence device
CN102087555B (en) * 2009-12-03 2013-01-30 北京富纳特创新科技有限公司 Touch screen
CN102103438A (en) * 2009-12-18 2011-06-22 鸿富锦精密工业(深圳)有限公司 Touch panel
WO2011085363A1 (en) * 2010-01-11 2011-07-14 William Marsh Rice University Immobilized carbon nanotubes on various surfaces
US8540902B2 (en) * 2010-01-13 2013-09-24 CNano Technology Limited Carbon nanotube based pastes
WO2011091263A1 (en) 2010-01-25 2011-07-28 The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University Fullerene-doped nanostructures and methods therefor
US8524525B2 (en) * 2010-01-25 2013-09-03 The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University Joined nanostructures and methods therefor
US8604332B2 (en) * 2010-03-04 2013-12-10 Guardian Industries Corp. Electronic devices including transparent conductive coatings including carbon nanotubes and nanowire composites, and methods of making the same
TWI426440B (en) * 2010-03-22 2014-02-11 Ind Tech Res Inst Flexible slide-touch controlling device and related contact location determination method thereof
US9285929B2 (en) 2010-03-30 2016-03-15 New Vision Display (Shenzhen) Co., Limited Touchscreen system with simplified mechanical touchscreen design using capacitance and acoustic sensing technologies, and method therefor
US8940194B2 (en) 2010-08-20 2015-01-27 The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University Electrodes with electrospun fibers
JP2014502653A (en) * 2010-12-30 2014-02-03 ▲海▼洋王照明科技股▲ふん▼有限公司 Conductive polymer material, production method and application thereof
TWI451299B (en) * 2011-06-10 2014-09-01 Innolux Corp Method and apparatus for determining touch point coordinates on a touch panel with anisotropic film
US9484123B2 (en) 2011-09-16 2016-11-01 Prc-Desoto International, Inc. Conductive sealant compositions
JP2013065450A (en) * 2011-09-16 2013-04-11 Fujifilm Corp Conductive member, method for manufacturing conductive member, touch panel, and solar cell
WO2013063034A1 (en) * 2011-10-25 2013-05-02 Unipixel Displays, Inc. Method of manufacturing a resistive touch sensor circuit by flexographic printing
US8525955B2 (en) 2012-01-31 2013-09-03 Multek Display (Hong Kong) Limited Heater for liquid crystal display
CN104145239A (en) * 2012-02-24 2014-11-12 松下电器产业株式会社 Input device
US9223162B2 (en) 2012-04-11 2015-12-29 Apple Inc. Display having a flexured element
US9329314B2 (en) 2012-07-13 2016-05-03 Apple Inc. Touch screen display with transparent electrical shielding layer
US9632542B2 (en) * 2013-05-02 2017-04-25 The Boeing Company Touch screens comprising graphene layers
CN105518764B (en) * 2013-09-09 2019-11-08 日本化药株式会社 The manufacturing method of optical component and ultraviolet-curing resin composition for the manufacturing method
CN104861785B (en) * 2013-12-23 2017-11-14 北京阿格蕾雅科技发展有限公司 High dispersive CNT composite conducting ink
CN104724691B (en) * 2013-12-23 2016-11-09 北京阿格蕾雅科技发展有限公司 A kind of method improving SWCN dispersiveness
CN104724692B (en) * 2013-12-23 2016-11-16 北京阿格蕾雅科技发展有限公司 The homodisperse method of SWCN
US9545042B2 (en) 2014-03-14 2017-01-10 Ppg Industries Ohio, Inc. P-static charge drain layer including carbon nanotubes
KR102251775B1 (en) * 2014-07-18 2021-05-12 삼성전자주식회사 Electrode structure and touch detecting sensor using the same
JP6300160B2 (en) * 2014-09-03 2018-03-28 大陽日酸株式会社 Transparent conductive film and method for producing the same
US10442549B2 (en) 2015-04-02 2019-10-15 Ppg Industries Ohio, Inc. Liner-type, antistatic topcoat system for aircraft canopies and windshields
JP6328592B2 (en) * 2015-07-31 2018-05-23 ファナック株式会社 Resistive touch panel
US10108231B2 (en) 2015-09-29 2018-10-23 Apple Inc. Overmolded force sensing gasket
CN105260056A (en) * 2015-09-30 2016-01-20 信利光电股份有限公司 Touch screen manufacturing method, touch screen and touch apparatus
CN106813316B (en) * 2017-01-17 2020-07-17 浙江科超环保有限公司 Can detect harmful gas's active carbon air purifier
TWI821234B (en) 2018-01-09 2023-11-11 美商康寧公司 Coated articles with light-altering features and methods for the production thereof
WO2020153693A1 (en) * 2019-01-21 2020-07-30 한국전자통신연구원 Shape-variable electronic device and operation method thereof
KR102413153B1 (en) 2019-01-21 2022-06-28 한국전자통신연구원 Shape-variable electronic device and operation method of the same
CN112180646B (en) * 2019-07-03 2022-06-17 中国科学院苏州纳米技术与纳米仿生研究所 Patterned multi-color film, its production method and application

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5062198A (en) 1990-05-08 1991-11-05 Keytec, Inc. Method of making a transparent touch screen switch assembly
US5766515A (en) 1994-05-06 1998-06-16 Bayer Aktiengessellschaft Conductive coatings
US6404120B1 (en) 1998-05-08 2002-06-11 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Light transmissive substrate carrying a light transmissive low ohmic coating
US20030008135A1 (en) 2001-06-27 2003-01-09 Koichi Kawamura Conductive film
US20030170492A1 (en) 2002-02-15 2003-09-11 Eastman Kodak Company Multilayer with radiation absorber and touch screen

Family Cites Families (44)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4070189A (en) * 1976-10-04 1978-01-24 Eastman Kodak Company Silver halide element with an antistatic layer
US4731408A (en) * 1985-12-20 1988-03-15 Polaroid Corporation Processable conductive polymers
DE3843412A1 (en) * 1988-04-22 1990-06-28 Bayer Ag NEW POLYTHIOPHENES, METHOD FOR THEIR PRODUCTION AND THEIR USE
DE3913857A1 (en) * 1989-04-27 1990-10-31 Agfa Gevaert Ag PHOTOGRAPHIC MATERIAL WITH AN ANTISTATIC LAYER
US5093439A (en) * 1989-10-19 1992-03-03 Ohio State University Research Foundation Processes for preparation of sulfonated polyaniline compositions and uses thereof
DE59010247D1 (en) * 1990-02-08 1996-05-02 Bayer Ag New polythiophene dispersions, their preparation and their use
DE4202337A1 (en) * 1992-01-29 1993-08-05 Bayer Ag METHOD FOR CONTACTING TWO-LAYER CIRCUITS AND MULTILAYERS
DE4211461A1 (en) * 1992-04-06 1993-10-07 Agfa Gevaert Ag Antistatic plastic parts
DE4216762A1 (en) * 1992-05-21 1993-11-25 Agfa Gevaert Ag Antistatic plastic parts
DE69319200T2 (en) * 1992-10-14 1999-01-28 Agfa Gevaert Nv Antistatic coating composition
US5443944A (en) * 1992-11-16 1995-08-22 Agta-Gevaert Ag Photographic material
DE69321567T2 (en) * 1992-12-17 1999-06-02 Agfa Gevaert Nv Antistatic, permanent primer
DE4436391A1 (en) * 1994-10-12 1996-04-18 Bayer Ag Process for direct galvanic through-plating of two-layer printed circuit boards and multilayers
DE69612377T2 (en) * 1995-06-06 2001-11-08 Tyco Electronics Corp ELECTRODED BENDABLE ITEM
US5716550A (en) * 1995-08-10 1998-02-10 Eastman Kodak Company Electrically conductive composition and elements containing solubilized polyaniline complex and solvent mixture
US5576162A (en) * 1996-01-18 1996-11-19 Eastman Kodak Company Imaging element having an electrically-conductive layer
JP3520688B2 (en) * 1996-09-17 2004-04-19 松下電器産業株式会社 Capacitor and manufacturing method thereof
US5853877A (en) * 1996-05-31 1998-12-29 Hyperion Catalysis International, Inc. Method for disentangling hollow carbon microfibers, electrically conductive transparent carbon microfibers aggregation film amd coating for forming such film
US5959708A (en) * 1996-06-21 1999-09-28 Hyundai Electronics Industries Co., Ltd. Liquid crystal display having a conductive high molecular film for preventing the fringe field in the in-plane switching mode
US5674654A (en) * 1996-09-19 1997-10-07 Eastman Kodak Company Imaging element containing an electrically-conductive polymer blend
US5665498A (en) * 1996-11-22 1997-09-09 Eastman Kodak Company Imaging element containing poly(3,4-ethylene dioxypyrrole/styrene sulfonate)
US6426134B1 (en) * 1998-06-30 2002-07-30 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Single-wall carbon nanotube-polymer composites
ATE440073T1 (en) * 1998-09-18 2009-09-15 Univ Rice William M CHEMICAL DERIVATIZATION OF SINGLE-WALLED CARBON NANO TUBES TO FACILITATE THEIR SOLVATATION AND USE OF DERIVATIZED NANO TUBES
EP1172831B1 (en) 2000-07-12 2012-10-24 Agfa-Gevaert N.V. Switch with at least one flexible conductive member
DE10038125A1 (en) 2000-08-04 2002-03-07 Infineon Technologies Ag Binding nanotube to polymer, useful for making microelectronic components, by derivatizing tube with reactive group that bonds covalently to polymer
US6737293B2 (en) * 2001-02-07 2004-05-18 Agfa-Gevaert Manufacturing of a thin film inorganic light emitting diode
EP1360700A1 (en) * 2001-02-16 2003-11-12 E.I. Dupont de Nemours and Company High conductivity polyaniline compositions and uses therefor
WO2002076724A1 (en) 2001-03-26 2002-10-03 Eikos, Inc. Coatings containing carbon nanotubes
US7588699B2 (en) * 2001-11-02 2009-09-15 The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration Electrically conductive, optically transparent polymer/carbon nanotube composites and process for preparation thereof
AU2003209248A1 (en) 2002-01-15 2003-07-30 Nanodynamics, Inc. Compositions of suspended carbon nanotubes, methods of making the same, and uses thereof
US6933064B2 (en) * 2002-02-15 2005-08-23 Eastman Kodak Company Multilayer with spacers, touch screen and method
JP2006513557A (en) 2002-05-21 2006-04-20 エイコス・インコーポレーテッド Method for patterning carbon nanotube coating and carbon nanotube wiring
US7261852B2 (en) 2002-07-19 2007-08-28 University Of Florida Research Foundation, Inc. Transparent electrodes from single wall carbon nanotubes
AU2002337064A1 (en) * 2002-09-02 2004-03-19 Agfa-Gevaert New 3,4-alkylenedioxythiophenedioxide compounds and polymers comprising monomeric units thereof
WO2004029176A1 (en) 2002-09-24 2004-04-08 E.I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Electrically conducting organic polymer/nanoparticle composites and methods for use thereof
US7125533B2 (en) * 2002-11-15 2006-10-24 William Marsh Rice University Method for functionalizing carbon nanotubes utilizing peroxides
EP1583715A2 (en) 2002-12-06 2005-10-12 Eikos, Inc. Optically transparent nanostructured electrical conductors
JP3959342B2 (en) * 2002-12-26 2007-08-15 株式会社プラスチック工学研究所 Sheet resin laminate for touch panel and touch panel
JP4411522B2 (en) * 2003-01-30 2010-02-10 Dic株式会社 Polylactic acid composition
JP2005010986A (en) * 2003-06-18 2005-01-13 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd Touch panel and method for manufacturing the same
US7956287B2 (en) * 2004-04-20 2011-06-07 Takiron Co., Ltd. Transparent conductive formed article for a touch panel and touch panel
US7645497B2 (en) * 2005-06-02 2010-01-12 Eastman Kodak Company Multi-layer conductor with carbon nanotubes
US7593004B2 (en) * 2005-06-02 2009-09-22 Eastman Kodak Company Touchscreen with conductive layer comprising carbon nanotubes
JP2007321131A (en) * 2006-06-05 2007-12-13 Fujikura Ltd Electroconductive polymer film, electrode substrate, and switch

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5062198A (en) 1990-05-08 1991-11-05 Keytec, Inc. Method of making a transparent touch screen switch assembly
US5766515A (en) 1994-05-06 1998-06-16 Bayer Aktiengessellschaft Conductive coatings
US6404120B1 (en) 1998-05-08 2002-06-11 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Light transmissive substrate carrying a light transmissive low ohmic coating
US20030008135A1 (en) 2001-06-27 2003-01-09 Koichi Kawamura Conductive film
US20030170492A1 (en) 2002-02-15 2003-09-11 Eastman Kodak Company Multilayer with radiation absorber and touch screen

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
P.J. GLATKOWSKI, CARBON NANOTUBE BASED TRANSPARENT CONDUCTIVE COATINGS, Retrieved from the Internet <URL://www.eikos.com/articles/conductive coatincilpdf>

Cited By (37)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8117743B2 (en) 1999-08-27 2012-02-21 Shocking Technologies, Inc. Methods for fabricating current-carrying structures using voltage switchable dielectric materials
US8310064B2 (en) 2005-11-22 2012-11-13 Shocking Technologies, Inc. Semiconductor devices including voltage switchable materials for over-voltage protection
US7825491B2 (en) 2005-11-22 2010-11-02 Shocking Technologies, Inc. Light-emitting device using voltage switchable dielectric material
US7968010B2 (en) 2006-07-29 2011-06-28 Shocking Technologies, Inc. Method for electroplating a substrate
US7981325B2 (en) 2006-07-29 2011-07-19 Shocking Technologies, Inc. Electronic device for voltage switchable dielectric material having high aspect ratio particles
US7968014B2 (en) 2006-07-29 2011-06-28 Shocking Technologies, Inc. Device applications for voltage switchable dielectric material having high aspect ratio particles
US7968015B2 (en) 2006-07-29 2011-06-28 Shocking Technologies, Inc. Light-emitting diode device for voltage switchable dielectric material having high aspect ratio particles
US8163595B2 (en) 2006-09-24 2012-04-24 Shocking Technologies, Inc. Formulations for voltage switchable dielectric materials having a stepped voltage response and methods for making the same
JP2008230935A (en) * 2007-03-23 2008-10-02 Chemicals Evaluation & Research Institute Method for dispersing carbon nanotube in water
US7793236B2 (en) 2007-06-13 2010-09-07 Shocking Technologies, Inc. System and method for including protective voltage switchable dielectric material in the design or simulation of substrate devices
JP2009104576A (en) * 2007-10-23 2009-05-14 Kofukin Seimitsu Kogyo (Shenzhen) Yugenkoshi Touch panel
TWI416380B (en) * 2007-11-09 2013-11-21 Hon Hai Prec Ind Co Ltd Touch panel
JP2009146417A (en) * 2007-12-12 2009-07-02 Qinghua Univ Touch panel, its manufacturing method, and display device using the same
US9040159B2 (en) 2007-12-12 2015-05-26 Tsinghua University Electronic element having carbon nanotubes
TWI423083B (en) * 2007-12-31 2014-01-11 Hon Hai Prec Ind Co Ltd Touch panel and displaying device using the same
TWI386831B (en) * 2007-12-31 2013-02-21 Hon Hai Prec Ind Co Ltd Touch panel and displaying device using the same
TWI423084B (en) * 2007-12-31 2014-01-11 Hon Hai Prec Ind Co Ltd Touch panel and displaying device using the same
US8203421B2 (en) 2008-04-14 2012-06-19 Shocking Technologies, Inc. Substrate device or package using embedded layer of voltage switchable dielectric material in a vertical switching configuration
JP2009271662A (en) * 2008-05-02 2009-11-19 Fujitsu Component Ltd Touch panel substrate and touch panel having the same
JP5519497B2 (en) * 2008-05-24 2014-06-11 株式会社クラレ Touch panel
JP2009283376A (en) * 2008-05-24 2009-12-03 Kuraray Co Ltd Electrode base material and touch panel
JP2013127985A (en) * 2008-08-20 2013-06-27 Seoul National Univ Industry Foundation Transparent conductive films
US9208930B2 (en) 2008-09-30 2015-12-08 Littelfuse, Inc. Voltage switchable dielectric material containing conductive core shelled particles
US9208931B2 (en) 2008-09-30 2015-12-08 Littelfuse, Inc. Voltage switchable dielectric material containing conductor-on-conductor core shelled particles
US8362871B2 (en) 2008-11-05 2013-01-29 Shocking Technologies, Inc. Geometric and electric field considerations for including transient protective material in substrate devices
WO2010085709A1 (en) * 2009-01-23 2010-07-29 Shocking Technologies, Inc. Dielectric composition
US8399773B2 (en) 2009-01-27 2013-03-19 Shocking Technologies, Inc. Substrates having voltage switchable dielectric materials
US8272123B2 (en) 2009-01-27 2012-09-25 Shocking Technologies, Inc. Substrates having voltage switchable dielectric materials
US8968606B2 (en) 2009-03-26 2015-03-03 Littelfuse, Inc. Components having voltage switchable dielectric materials
KR101008501B1 (en) * 2009-04-10 2011-01-14 주식회사 디엠에스 Touch panel and manufacturing process for touch panel
US9077793B2 (en) 2009-06-12 2015-07-07 Tsinghua University Carbon nanotube based flexible mobile phone
EP2275910A3 (en) * 2009-07-08 2013-08-21 Chimei InnoLux Corporation Touch panel and electronic device including the same
US9053844B2 (en) 2009-09-09 2015-06-09 Littelfuse, Inc. Geometric configuration or alignment of protective material in a gap structure for electrical devices
US9082622B2 (en) 2010-02-26 2015-07-14 Littelfuse, Inc. Circuit elements comprising ferroic materials
US9224728B2 (en) 2010-02-26 2015-12-29 Littelfuse, Inc. Embedded protection against spurious electrical events
US9320135B2 (en) 2010-02-26 2016-04-19 Littelfuse, Inc. Electric discharge protection for surface mounted and embedded components
CN110045862A (en) * 2014-03-31 2019-07-23 宸盛光电有限公司 Capacitive touch device and preparation method thereof

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP1886212B1 (en) 2012-03-14
WO2006130366A3 (en) 2007-07-19
US7535462B2 (en) 2009-05-19
US20060274047A1 (en) 2006-12-07
JP2013008376A (en) 2013-01-10
EP1886212A2 (en) 2008-02-13
JP2008546090A (en) 2008-12-18

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7535462B2 (en) Touchscreen with one carbon nanotube conductive layer
US7593004B2 (en) Touchscreen with conductive layer comprising carbon nanotubes
US7796123B1 (en) Touchscreen with carbon nanotube conductive layers
US7645497B2 (en) Multi-layer conductor with carbon nanotubes
US8198796B2 (en) Transparent electrode and production method of same
US20060062983A1 (en) Coatable conductive polyethylenedioxythiophene with carbon nanotubes
JP5212377B2 (en) Transparent electrode and method for producing transparent electrode
US8455043B2 (en) Method of making transparent conductive film
US20060188723A1 (en) Coating compositions containing single wall carbon nanotubes
US20060188721A1 (en) Adhesive transfer method of carbon nanotube layer
US20130101732A1 (en) Transparent electrode, manufacturing method of the same and organic electroluminescence element
JP5472290B2 (en) Method for producing transparent conductive film
JP5625256B2 (en) Transparent electrode, method for producing transparent electrode, and organic electroluminescence element
JP2010114066A (en) Organic conductive polymer coating liquid, organic conductive polymer film, conductor, and resistive film type touch panel
US20110197966A1 (en) Organic photoelectric conversion element and organic photoelectric conversion element manufacturing method
KR20140076268A (en) Substrate having transparent electrode for flexible display and method of fabricating the same
WO2011065213A1 (en) Dispersion, transparent electrode, and organic electro- luminescent element
JP5688395B2 (en) Method for forming conductive pattern and transparent conductive film

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2006770710

Country of ref document: EP

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2008514686

Country of ref document: JP

Kind code of ref document: A

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE