WO2007056082A1 - Automatic change quantification from medical image sets - Google Patents

Automatic change quantification from medical image sets Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2007056082A1
WO2007056082A1 PCT/US2006/042850 US2006042850W WO2007056082A1 WO 2007056082 A1 WO2007056082 A1 WO 2007056082A1 US 2006042850 W US2006042850 W US 2006042850W WO 2007056082 A1 WO2007056082 A1 WO 2007056082A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
detected structure
modeling
change
deformation characteristics
uncertainty
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2006/042850
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Xiang Zhou
Arun Krishnan
Alok Gupta
Vaclav Potesil
Original Assignee
Siemens Medical Solutions Usa, Inc.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Siemens Medical Solutions Usa, Inc. filed Critical Siemens Medical Solutions Usa, Inc.
Publication of WO2007056082A1 publication Critical patent/WO2007056082A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06TIMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T7/00Image analysis
    • G06T7/0002Inspection of images, e.g. flaw detection
    • G06T7/0012Biomedical image inspection
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06TIMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T7/00Image analysis
    • G06T7/30Determination of transform parameters for the alignment of images, i.e. image registration
    • G06T7/38Registration of image sequences
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06TIMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T2207/00Indexing scheme for image analysis or image enhancement
    • G06T2207/30Subject of image; Context of image processing
    • G06T2207/30004Biomedical image processing

Definitions

  • the present disclosure relates to medical imaging and, more particularly, to systems and methods for providing automatic change quantification for medical
  • quantification can be applied to support: computer-aided diagnosis; therapy monitoring of surgical, interventional, radiation, drug therapies; and computer-aided drug development and clinical trials.
  • FIG. 1 Registration is the process of alignment of medical imaging data.
  • a change detection algorithm typically performs registration first and then performs subtraction or other difference operations. Given that these two tasks are mutually dependent, a sequential solution is not optimal and may produce false results. In fact, the purpose of image registration or image fusion is to discard geometrical changes. So there is a "chicken-and-egg" relationship between registration and change detection. In addition, existing solutions for image registration are highly susceptible to motion and algorithmic artifacts.
  • a method of automatic change quantification for medical decision support includes: automatically detecting a structure in a set of medical images; characterizing the detected structure including modeling of deformation
  • a memory device for storing a program
  • a processor in communication
  • the processor operative with the program to: automatically
  • a method for automatic tumor therapy monitoring includes: automatically segmenting a tumor in a set of medical images using deformation characteristics of the tumor, wherein a size measure of the tumor is constrained according to the deformation characteristics during warping; quantifying a change in a pathological parameter measured from the tumor; and estimating uncertainty in the quantified change in the tumor.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates examples of conventional medical image registration results.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates system for providing automatic change quantification for medical decision support, according to an exemplary embodiment of the present
  • FIG. 3 illustrates a system for providing automatic change quantification for
  • FIG. 4 illustrates an example of representing uncertainty in images
  • FIG. 5 is a flowchart showing a method of automatic change quantification
  • FIG. 6 illustrates a computer system for implementing a method of automatic change quantification for medical decision support, according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 7 is a flowchart showing a method of tumor therapy monitoring, according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 8 illustrates examples of the sources of uncertainty in images and volumes.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates a system for providing automatic change quantification for
  • the registration step includes
  • decision support uses the annotated databases 230 and clinical and/or biomedical data 210 to support statistical data fusion, alignment and robust change detection,
  • the clinical and/or biomedical data may include medical imaging data, such as for example, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography (PET), single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), X-ray, etc.
  • medical imaging data such as for example, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography (PET), single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), X-ray, etc.
  • the clinical and/or biomedical data may include lab data, physician notes, patient history, genetic data, genomic data, and/or proteomics data.
  • the clinical and/or biomedical data 210 can be collected from two or more time points.
  • the clinical and/or biomedical data 210 may include the clinical/biomedical data 1 collected at time point 1 , clinical/biomedical data 2 collected at time point 2, and clinical/biomedical data t collected at time point t. Changes can be detected among all or a subset of the clinical and/or biomedical data 210.
  • the system outputs 240 of the system 200 include the detected changes and the labeling of different contexts, such as for example, organs, tissues, tumors
  • databases 230 which may include one or more annotated databases, are used to support the context labeling. Statistical methods for estimating confidence of the
  • system outputs 240 may be used for achieving robustness of the system 200.
  • FIG. 3 illustrates a system for providing automatic change quantification for
  • the system 300 shown in FIG. 3 is similar to the system 200 for
  • FIG. 2 except for block 320. Further description of the clinical and/or biomedical data 210 and databases 230 is omitted in the clarity and simplicity.
  • one or more annotated databases 230 may be used to train discriminative data models and generative data models, as depicted in block 320.
  • the generative and discriminative data models may include whole-body atlases and boosting-based classifiers, respectively.
  • the generative and discriminative data models may be used for image interpretation.
  • Whole body atlases may comprise mathematical appearance and/or spatial models of organs or structures in one or multiple whole body imaging modalities.
  • Each model may comprise one or more organs, along with their appearances models and a distributional model to capture their relative locations.
  • Generative data models may be based on annotated training data.
  • generative learning and modeling
  • modules can extract statistics, find clusters, and build distributional appearance
  • Discriminative data models may be based on annotated training data.
  • embodiment of the present invention can formulate the problem of organ
  • one or more images are input ("image” can also refer to "volume”), and the system 300 performs automatic tumor detection.
  • the user can indicate the tumor location manually.
  • Automatic tumor detection may include identifying landmark points inside the image, identifying organ or tissue types and their borders, and using the extracted anatomical or geometrical information to constrain a registration algorithm.
  • landmark points may comprise an upper corner of a left lung, an upper corner of a right lung, a tip of a left kidney or a tip of a right kidney.
  • Automatic landmarking in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, comprises discriminative learning and modeling of local appearance and shape.
  • a change detected near the skin of a patient may carry different importance for different patients, depending on their clinical history. For example, a change detected near the skin of a patient
  • uncertainties include: intrinsic structural uncertainties associated with different
  • tissue-dependent uncertainties such as growth or deformation
  • FIG. 8 illustrates examples of the sources of uncertainty in images and volumes.
  • uncertainties associated with image formation include image blur and modality specific degradation such as sensor noise, intrinsic stochastic noise and partial volume effect.
  • Uncertainties associated with quantization and preprocessing include, for example, modality-specific degradation, device-specific degradation and acquisition parameters such as partial volume effect.
  • Measurement uncertainties include, for example, acquisition parameters, volume-of-interest (VOI) quantization, algorithm reproducibility such as segmentation parameters and error propagation, and reader reproducibility, such as
  • VOI volume-of-interest
  • the confidence estimation 240 may be fed back to the block 320.
  • the system 300 may feed back the estimated uncertainties to constrain a change detection process or a change quantification process.
  • organ/tissue/structure labeling parameters, organ/tissue/structure labeling, and/or detected changes.
  • an exemplary embodiment of the present invention uses covariance matrices.
  • FIG. 4 illustrates examples of structural uncertainty in an image using covariance matrices, according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
  • the examples of structural uncertainty are depicted as ellipses that represent a 95% confidence interval of such covariance matrices.
  • a confidence interval is an interval within which a true value of a measurement lies with a given probability.
  • Equations 1 and 2 Assuming conservation of image intensity and Gaussian noise, a least- square-based matching algorithm will have an uncertainty covariance matrix as given by Equations 1 and 2.
  • Equation 2 / represents image intensity, and xand yare the coordinates.
  • uncertainty analysis is applied to data types when an uncertainty value is assigned to each piece of information, regardless of its native form.
  • the uncertainty value can be compared when performing matching or change detection in different information sources.
  • FIG. 5 is a flowchart showing a method of automatic change quantification for medical decision support, according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
  • step 510 automatically detect a structure in a set of medical images.
  • the medical images may comprise two-dimensional medical images, three-dimensional medical images, or higher-dimensional medical images.
  • Detecting the structure in the set of medical images may include, for example, using a segmentation technique, a classification technique and/or a matching technique.
  • step 520 characterize the detected structure including modeling of deformation characteristics of the detected structure. For example, characterizing
  • the detected structure may include organ labeling and/or anatomical context
  • the characterizing step 520 may include geometrical or morphological
  • Modeling of deformation characteristics may include,
  • modeling of rigidity of bone structures for example, modeling of rigidity of bone structures and/or articulatory modeling of joints between bones or cartilages. Modeling of deformation characteristics may
  • step 530 match images based on the characterization of the detected structure, wherein a size measure of the detected structure is constrained according to the deformation characteristics.
  • the size measure of the detected structure may be, for example, volume, diameter, radius, projection length, a one- dimensional measure, two-dimensional measure or three-dimensional measure of the detected structure.
  • matching images based on the characterization of the structure may include the use of the characterization of the structure as constraints in a matching algorithm.
  • Matching images based on the characterization of the structure may include the prediction of correct matching based on the characterization of the structure and/or the use of the characterization of the
  • the characterization of the structure may include the use of the characterization of the structure to resolve matching ambiguities.
  • step 540 quantify a change in the detected structure. For example,
  • quantifying a change in the detected structure may include quantifying a change in a physiological, pathological or anatomical parameter measured from the detected
  • Estimating uncertainty in the quantified change in the detected structure may
  • Estimating uncertainty in the quantified change in the detected structure may include estimating intrinsic structural uncertainties associated with the set of medical images.
  • tissue dependent uncertainties may include growth or deformation characteristics of tumor versus healthy tissue.
  • Tissue dependent uncertainties may include growth or deformation characteristics of soft tissue versus bone.
  • the estimation of uncertainty in the quantified change in the detected structure may include estimating process-induced uncertainties. For example,
  • process-induced uncertainties include statistical behaviors of hardware, software or
  • step 530 includes a registration process, and the estimated uncertainty in the
  • the estimated uncertainty in the quantified change in the detected structure may be fed back to constrain quantifying a change in the detected
  • step 540
  • the present invention may be implemented in various forms of hardware, software, firmware, special purpose processors, or a combination thereof.
  • the present invention may be implemented in software as an application program tangibly embodied on a program storage device.
  • the application program may be uploaded to, and
  • a computer system 101 for implementing a method of automatic change quantification for medical decision support can comprise, inter alia, a central processing unit (CPU) 109, a memory 103 and an input/output (I/O) interface 104.
  • the computer system 101 is generally coupled through the I/O interface 104 to a display 105 and various input devices 106 such as a mouse and keyboard.
  • the support circuits can include circuits such as cache, power supplies, clock circuits,
  • the memory 103 can include random access memory
  • RAM random access memory
  • ROM read only memory
  • disk drive tape drive, etc., or a combination
  • the present invention can be implemented as a routine 107 that is stored
  • the computer system 101 is a general purpose computer system that becomes a specific purpose computer system when executing the
  • routine 107 of the present invention is a routine 107 of the present invention.
  • the computer platform 101 also includes an operating system and micro
  • peripheral devices may be connected to the computer platform such as an additional data storage device and a printing device.
  • a system for providing automatic change quantification for medical decision support comprises a memory device 103 for storing a program, and a processor 109 in communication with the memory device 103.
  • the processor 109 is operative with the program to: automatically detect a structure in a set of medical images; characterize the detected structure including modeling of deformation characteristics of the detected structure; match images based on the characterization of the detected structure, wherein a size measure of the detected structure is constrained according to the deformation characteristics; and quantify a change in the detected structure.
  • the medical images may comprise two-dimensional medical images, three- dimensional medical images, or higher-dimensional medical images.
  • the size measure of the detected structure may be, for example, a volume, diameter, radius,
  • processor 109 may be further operative with the program to perform a
  • segmentation technique a classification technique or a matching technique.
  • the processor 109 is further operative with the program to
  • organ labeling anatomical context labeling, or geometrical or morphological constraint of organs and structures.
  • the processor 109 may be further operative with the program to perform elasticity modeling of tissues or structures, modeling of soft tissue characteristics, modeling of fat deformation characteristics, modeling of rigidity of bone structures, and/or articulatory modeling of joints between bones or cartilages.
  • the processor 109 may be further operative with the program to perform modeling of pathological tissue deformation characteristics.
  • the processor 109 may be further operative with the program to use the characterization of the structure as constraints in a matching algorithm.
  • the processor 109 may be further operative with the program to predict correct
  • the processor 109 may be further operative with the program to use the characterization of the
  • the processor 109 When quantifying a change in the detected structure, the processor 109
  • pathological or anatomical parameter measured from the detected structure.
  • the processor 109 is further operative with the program code to estimate uncertainty in the quantified change in the detected structure.
  • the processor 109 is further operative with the program code to estimate uncertainty in the quantified change in the detected structure.
  • the processor 109 may be further operative with the program to estimate a change of a physiological, pathological or anatomical parameter measured from the detected structure.
  • the processor 109 may be further operative with the program to estimate intrinsic structural uncertainties associated with the set of medical images.
  • tissue dependent uncertainties may include, for example, growth or deformation characteristics of tumor versus healthy tissue, or
  • the processor 109 may be further operative with the program to estimate
  • Process-induced uncertainties include, for example,
  • the estimated uncertainty may be fed back to constrain the detecting step.
  • when matching when matching
  • the estimated uncertainty is fed back to constrain the registration process.
  • a system for providing automatic change quantification for medical decision support may include a medical images database.
  • the processor 109 may be further operative with the program to apply uncertainty analysis to data extracted from the medical images database.
  • the processor 109 may be further operative with the program to apply uncertainty analysis to clinical data.
  • Clinical data may comprise numerical, textual and/or categorical data.
  • FIG. 7 is a flowchart showing a method of tumor therapy monitoring
  • step 710 automatically segment a tumor in a set of medical images using
  • the medical images may comprise two-dimensional medical images, three-dimensional
  • the size measure of the tumor may be, for example, volume, diameter,
  • Segmenting a tumor may include
  • step 720 quantify a change in a pathological parameter measured from the tumor.
  • step 730 estimate uncertainty in the quantified change in the tumor. Estimating uncertainty in the quantified change in the tumor may be based on, for example, patient clinical history or genetic background. The estimated uncertainty may be fed back to constrain the segmenting step.
  • a method of tumor therapy monitoring includes identifying landmark points inside the set of medical images and/or identifying organ or tissue types and their borders in the set of medical images. Extracted anatomical or geometrical information may be used to constrain a registration process.

Abstract

A method of automatic change quantification for medical decision support includes: automatically detecting a structure in a set of medical images (510); characterizing the detected structure including modeling of deformation characteristics of the detected structure (520); matching images based on the characterization of the detected structure, wherein a size measure of the detected structure is constrained according to the deformation characteristics (530); and quantifying a change in the detected structure (540).

Description

AUTOMATIC CHANGE QUANTIFICATION FROM MEDICAL IMAGE SETS
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED PATENT APPLICATIONS
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Serial No. 60/733,224 (Attorney Docket No. 2005P20090US), filed November 3, 2005 and
entitled "Systems and Methods for Automatic and Robust Change Quantification for Medical Decision Support," the content of which is herein incorporated by reference
in its entirety. This application further claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Serial No. 60/832,829 (Attorney Docket No. 200615500US), filed July 24, 2006 and entitled "Statistical Characterization and Change Quantification Based on Multi-Modal and Multi-Time-Point Medical Images," the content of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Technical Field
The present disclosure relates to medical imaging and, more particularly, to systems and methods for providing automatic change quantification for medical
decision support.
2. Discussion of Related Art
Computer-aided automatic change detection and quantification can be
applied for computer-aided medical decision support to enable longitudinal studies of patient data. For example, computer-aided automatic change detection and
quantification can be applied to support: computer-aided diagnosis; therapy monitoring of surgical, interventional, radiation, drug therapies; and computer-aided drug development and clinical trials.
Registration is the process of alignment of medical imaging data. FIG. 1
illustrates examples of conventional medical image registration results. Image
registration using conventional algorithms may result in a "perfect" registration with no change detection (CD) or a reasonable registration with wrong change detection.
A change detection algorithm typically performs registration first and then performs subtraction or other difference operations. Given that these two tasks are mutually dependent, a sequential solution is not optimal and may produce false results. In fact, the purpose of image registration or image fusion is to discard geometrical changes. So there is a "chicken-and-egg" relationship between registration and change detection. In addition, existing solutions for image registration are highly susceptible to motion and algorithmic artifacts.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
According to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, a method of automatic change quantification for medical decision support is provided. The method includes: automatically detecting a structure in a set of medical images; characterizing the detected structure including modeling of deformation
characteristics of the detected structure; matching images based on the characterization of the detected structure, wherein a size measure of the detected
structure is constrained according to the deformation characteristics; and quantifying a change in the detected structure.
According to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, a system
for providing automatic change quantification for medical decision support comprises: a memory device for storing a program; a processor in communication
with the memory device, the processor operative with the program to: automatically
detect a structure in a set of medical images; characterize the detected structure
including modeling of deformation characteristics of the detected structure; match images based on the characterization of the detected structure, wherein a size
measure of the detected structure is constrained according to the deformation
characteristics; and quantify a change in the detected structure.
According to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, a method is provided for automatic tumor therapy monitoring. The method includes: automatically segmenting a tumor in a set of medical images using deformation characteristics of the tumor, wherein a size measure of the tumor is constrained according to the deformation characteristics during warping; quantifying a change in a pathological parameter measured from the tumor; and estimating uncertainty in the quantified change in the tumor.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The present invention will become more apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art when descriptions of exemplary embodiments thereof are read with reference to the accompanying drawings.
FIG. 1 illustrates examples of conventional medical image registration results.
FIG. 2 illustrates system for providing automatic change quantification for medical decision support, according to an exemplary embodiment of the present
invention. FIG. 3 illustrates a system for providing automatic change quantification for
medical decision support, according to an exemplary embodiment of the present
invention.
FIG. 4 illustrates an example of representing uncertainty in images and
volumes using covariance matrices, according to an exemplary embodiment of the
present invention.
FIG. 5 is a flowchart showing a method of automatic change quantification
for medical decision support, according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 6 illustrates a computer system for implementing a method of automatic change quantification for medical decision support, according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 7 is a flowchart showing a method of tumor therapy monitoring, according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 8 illustrates examples of the sources of uncertainty in images and volumes.
DESCRIPTION OF EXEMPLARY EMBODIMENTS
Hereinafter, exemplary embodiments of the present invention will be
described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings. Like reference numerals refer to similar or identical elements throughout the description of the
figures.
FIG. 2 illustrates a system for providing automatic change quantification for
medical decision support, according to an exemplary embodiment of the present
invention. Referring to FIG. 2, in the system 200 for providing automatic change quantification for medical decision support, the registration step includes
uncertainty modeling and context-aware intelligence learned from annotated
database.
The system 200 for providing automatic change quantification for medical
decision support uses the annotated databases 230 and clinical and/or biomedical data 210 to support statistical data fusion, alignment and robust change detection,
as depicted in block 220. The clinical and/or biomedical data may include medical imaging data, such as for example, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography (PET), single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), X-ray, etc. The clinical and/or biomedical data may include lab data, physician notes, patient history, genetic data, genomic data, and/or proteomics data.
The clinical and/or biomedical data 210 can be collected from two or more time points. For example, as illustrated in FIG. 2, the clinical and/or biomedical data 210 may include the clinical/biomedical data 1 collected at time point 1 , clinical/biomedical data 2 collected at time point 2, and clinical/biomedical data t collected at time point t. Changes can be detected among all or a subset of the clinical and/or biomedical data 210.
The system outputs 240 of the system 200 include the detected changes and the labeling of different contexts, such as for example, organs, tissues, tumors
or lesions, along with an estimated confidence of the detected changes and the
context labels. In an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, one or more
databases 230, which may include one or more annotated databases, are used to support the context labeling. Statistical methods for estimating confidence of the
system outputs 240 may be used for achieving robustness of the system 200.
FIG. 3 illustrates a system for providing automatic change quantification for
medical decision support, according to an exemplary embodiment of the present
invention. The system 300 shown in FIG. 3 is similar to the system 200 for
providing automatic change quantification for medical decision support according to the exemplary embodiment of the present invention described in connection with
FIG. 2, except for block 320. Further description of the clinical and/or biomedical data 210 and databases 230 is omitted in the clarity and simplicity.
In the system 300 for providing automatic change quantification for medical decision support, one or more annotated databases 230 may be used to train discriminative data models and generative data models, as depicted in block 320. The generative and discriminative data models may include whole-body atlases and boosting-based classifiers, respectively. The generative and discriminative data models may be used for image interpretation.
Whole body atlases may comprise mathematical appearance and/or spatial models of organs or structures in one or multiple whole body imaging modalities. Each model may comprise one or more organs, along with their appearances models and a distributional model to capture their relative locations.
Generative data models may be based on annotated training data. In an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, generative learning and modeling
modules can extract statistics, find clusters, and build distributional appearance
models or spatial relational models of organs or structures, or spatial or conceptual
dependency models for diseases. Discriminative data models may be based on annotated training data.
Discriminative learning and modeling modules, in accordance with an exemplary
embodiment of the present invention, can formulate the problem of organ
detection/segmentation as a discriminative learning problem, design/select
discriminative features, and build two-class or multi-class learning machines, such
as classifiers.
In an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, one or more images are input ("image" can also refer to "volume"), and the system 300 performs automatic tumor detection. Optionally, the user can indicate the tumor location manually. Automatic tumor detection may include identifying landmark points inside the image, identifying organ or tissue types and their borders, and using the extracted anatomical or geometrical information to constrain a registration algorithm. For example, landmark points may comprise an upper corner of a left lung, an upper corner of a right lung, a tip of a left kidney or a tip of a right kidney. Automatic landmarking, in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, comprises discriminative learning and modeling of local appearance and shape.
In applying statistical analysis, knowledge that changes in certain organs or anatomical regions is more significant than others can be useful. Even changes at
the same location may carry different importance for different patients, depending on their clinical history. For example, a change detected near the skin of a patient
may not be as important as changes detected inside the vertebra such as in a case
where the patient had lung cancer and is undergoing chemotherapy and radiation therapy. The system 300 for providing automatic change quantification for medical
decision support performs statistical analysis on matching uncertainties and outputs
parameters characterizing such uncertainties. Examples of the sources of
uncertainties include: intrinsic structural uncertainties associated with different
image patterns; tissue-dependent uncertainties such as growth or deformation
characteristics of tumor versus healthy tissue, growth or deformation characteristics of soft tissue versus bone, etc.; process-induced uncertainties such as the
statistical behaviors of hardware/software and selected algorithms; and patient priors based on clinical history and genetic background.
FIG. 8 illustrates examples of the sources of uncertainty in images and volumes. Referring to FIG. 8, uncertainties associated with image formation, for example, include image blur and modality specific degradation such as sensor noise, intrinsic stochastic noise and partial volume effect. Uncertainties associated with quantization and preprocessing include, for example, modality-specific degradation, device-specific degradation and acquisition parameters such as partial volume effect. Measurement uncertainties include, for example, acquisition parameters, volume-of-interest (VOI) quantization, algorithm reproducibility such as segmentation parameters and error propagation, and reader reproducibility, such as
for example, viewing conditions.
The system 300 for providing automatic change quantification for medical
decision support, according to the exemplary embodiment described in connection
with FIG. 3, may feed back the estimated uncertainties to constrain a registration
process. As shown in FIG. 3, the context labeling, change detection and/or
confidence estimation 240 may be fed back to the block 320. For example, the system 300 may feed back the estimated uncertainties to constrain a change detection process or a change quantification process.
In an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the system 300 for
providing automatic change quantification for medical decision support uses the
estimated uncertainties to compute or output 340 confidence values for matching
parameters, organ/tissue/structure labeling, and/or detected changes.
One form of representing uncertainty in images and volumes, according to
an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, uses covariance matrices.
FIG. 4 illustrates examples of structural uncertainty in an image using covariance matrices, according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention. Referring to FIG. 4, the examples of structural uncertainty are depicted as ellipses that represent a 95% confidence interval of such covariance matrices. A confidence interval is an interval within which a true value of a measurement lies with a given probability. Hereinafter, two methods of estimating structural uncertainty will be described.
Assuming conservation of image intensity and Gaussian noise, a least- square-based matching algorithm will have an uncertainty covariance matrix as given by Equations 1 and 2.
C = ^G-1 , ... (1 )
where G ... (2)
Figure imgf000011_0001
In Equation 2, / represents image intensity, and xand yare the coordinates. Without assuming "conservation of image intensity" or Gaussian noise, one
• can construct a response distribution RD, and estimate covariance matrix based on
the Hessian estimate H on RD, as can be expressed in Equation 3.
Figure imgf000012_0001
It is to be understood that the above-described systems and methods are
applicable to numerical, textual, or categorical data, as well as images. In an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, uncertainty analysis is applied to data types when an uncertainty value is assigned to each piece of information, regardless of its native form. The uncertainty value can be compared when performing matching or change detection in different information sources.
FIG. 5 is a flowchart showing a method of automatic change quantification for medical decision support, according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention. Referring to FIG. 5, in step 510, automatically detect a structure in a set of medical images. The medical images may comprise two-dimensional medical images, three-dimensional medical images, or higher-dimensional medical images. Detecting the structure in the set of medical images may include, for example, using a segmentation technique, a classification technique and/or a matching technique.
In step 520, characterize the detected structure including modeling of deformation characteristics of the detected structure. For example, characterizing
the detected structure may include organ labeling and/or anatomical context
labeling. The characterizing step 520 may include geometrical or morphological
constraint of organs and/or structures. In an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, modeling of
deformation characteristics of the detected structure includes elasticity modeling of
tissues or structures, modeling of soft tissue characteristics and/or modeling of fat
deformation characteristics. Modeling of deformation characteristics may include,
for example, modeling of rigidity of bone structures and/or articulatory modeling of joints between bones or cartilages. Modeling of deformation characteristics may
include modeling of pathological tissue deformation characteristics.
In step 530, match images based on the characterization of the detected structure, wherein a size measure of the detected structure is constrained according to the deformation characteristics. The size measure of the detected structure may be, for example, volume, diameter, radius, projection length, a one- dimensional measure, two-dimensional measure or three-dimensional measure of the detected structure.
For example, matching images based on the characterization of the structure may include the use of the characterization of the structure as constraints in a matching algorithm. Matching images based on the characterization of the structure may include the prediction of correct matching based on the characterization of the structure and/or the use of the characterization of the
structure as initial conditions for a matching algorithm. Matching images based on
the characterization of the structure may include the use of the characterization of the structure to resolve matching ambiguities.
In step 540, quantify a change in the detected structure. For example,
quantifying a change in the detected structure may include quantifying a change in a physiological, pathological or anatomical parameter measured from the detected
structure.
A method of automatic change quantification for medical decision support,
according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, includes
estimating uncertainty in the quantified change in the detected structure. Estimating uncertainty in the quantified change in the detected structure may
include, for example, estimating a confidence interval of a physiological, pathological or anatomical parameter measured from the detected structure. Estimating uncertainty in the quantified change in the detected structure may include estimating intrinsic structural uncertainties associated with the set of medical images.
Estimating such uncertainty may include estimating tissue-dependent uncertainties. For example, tissue dependent uncertainties may include growth or deformation characteristics of tumor versus healthy tissue. Tissue dependent uncertainties may include growth or deformation characteristics of soft tissue versus bone.
The estimation of uncertainty in the quantified change in the detected structure may include estimating process-induced uncertainties. For example,
process-induced uncertainties include statistical behaviors of hardware, software or
algorithms.
Estimating uncertainty in the quantified change in the detected structure
may be based on patient clinical history or genetic background. The estimated
uncertainty in the quantified change in the detected structure may be fed back to
constrain the detecting step 520. In an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the matching images
step 530 includes a registration process, and the estimated uncertainty in the
quantified change in the detected structure is fed back to constrain the registration
process. The estimated uncertainty in the quantified change in the detected structure may be fed back to constrain quantifying a change in the detected
structure, in step 540
It is to be understood that the present invention may be implemented in various forms of hardware, software, firmware, special purpose processors, or a combination thereof. In one embodiment, the present invention may be implemented in software as an application program tangibly embodied on a program storage device. The application program may be uploaded to, and
executed by, a machine comprising any suitable architecture.
Referring to Figure 5, according to an embodiment of the present disclosure, a computer system 101 for implementing a method of automatic change quantification for medical decision support can comprise, inter alia, a central processing unit (CPU) 109, a memory 103 and an input/output (I/O) interface 104. The computer system 101 is generally coupled through the I/O interface 104 to a display 105 and various input devices 106 such as a mouse and keyboard. The support circuits can include circuits such as cache, power supplies, clock circuits,
and a communications bus. The memory 103 can include random access memory
(RAM), read only memory (ROM), disk drive, tape drive, etc., or a combination
thereof. The present invention can be implemented as a routine 107 that is stored
in memory 103 and executed by the CPU 109 to process the signal from the signal
source 108. As such, the computer system 101 is a general purpose computer system that becomes a specific purpose computer system when executing the
routine 107 of the present invention.
The computer platform 101 also includes an operating system and micro
instruction code. The various processes and functions described herein may either
be part of the micro instruction code or part of the application program (or a combination thereof) which is executed via the operating system. In addition,
various other peripheral devices may be connected to the computer platform such as an additional data storage device and a printing device.
In an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, a system for providing automatic change quantification for medical decision support comprises a memory device 103 for storing a program, and a processor 109 in communication with the memory device 103. The processor 109 is operative with the program to: automatically detect a structure in a set of medical images; characterize the detected structure including modeling of deformation characteristics of the detected structure; match images based on the characterization of the detected structure, wherein a size measure of the detected structure is constrained according to the deformation characteristics; and quantify a change in the detected structure.
The medical images may comprise two-dimensional medical images, three- dimensional medical images, or higher-dimensional medical images. The size measure of the detected structure may be, for example, a volume, diameter, radius,
projection length, one-dimensional measure, two-dimensional measure or three- dimensional measure of the detected structure. When automatically detecting the structure in the set of medical images, the
processor 109 may be further operative with the program to perform a
segmentation technique, a classification technique or a matching technique.
In an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, when characterizing
the detected structure, the processor 109 is further operative with the program to
perform organ labeling, anatomical context labeling, or geometrical or morphological constraint of organs and structures.
When modeling deformation characteristics of the detected structure, the processor 109 may be further operative with the program to perform elasticity modeling of tissues or structures, modeling of soft tissue characteristics, modeling of fat deformation characteristics, modeling of rigidity of bone structures, and/or articulatory modeling of joints between bones or cartilages. When modeling deformation characteristics of the detected structure, the processor 109 may be further operative with the program to perform modeling of pathological tissue deformation characteristics.
When matching images based on the characterization of the detected
structure, the processor 109 may be further operative with the program to use the characterization of the structure as constraints in a matching algorithm. When matching images based on the characterization of the detected structure, the processor 109 may be further operative with the program to predict correct
matching based on the characterization of the structure, or use the characterization
of the structure as initial conditions for a matching algorithm. When matching
images based on the characterization of the detected structure, the processor 109 may be further operative with the program to use the characterization of the
structure to resolve matching ambiguities.
When quantifying a change in the detected structure, the processor 109
may be further operative with the program to quantify a change in a physiological,
pathological or anatomical parameter measured from the detected structure.
In an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the processor 109 is further operative with the program code to estimate uncertainty in the quantified change in the detected structure. When estimating uncertainty in the quantified
change in the detected structure, the processor 109 may be further operative with the program to estimate a change of a physiological, pathological or anatomical parameter measured from the detected structure. When estimating uncertainty in
the quantified change in the detected structure, the processor 109 may be further operative with the program to estimate intrinsic structural uncertainties associated with the set of medical images.
When estimating uncertainty in the quantified change in the detected structure, the processor 109 may be further operative with the program to estimate tissue dependent uncertainties. Tissue-dependent uncertainties may include, for example, growth or deformation characteristics of tumor versus healthy tissue, or
growth or deformation characteristics of soft tissue versus bone, etc.
When estimating uncertainty in the quantified change in the detected
structure, the processor 109 may be further operative with the program to estimate
process-induced uncertainties. Process-induced uncertainties include, for example,
statistical behaviors of hardware, software or algorithms.
The estimated uncertainty may be fed back to constrain the detecting step. In an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, when matching
images based on the characterization of the detected structure, the processor 109
is further operative with the program to perform a registration process, and wherein
the estimated uncertainty is fed back to constrain the registration process.
A system for providing automatic change quantification for medical decision support, according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, may include a medical images database. The processor 109 may be further operative with the program to apply uncertainty analysis to data extracted from the medical images database. The processor 109 may be further operative with the program to apply uncertainty analysis to clinical data. Clinical data may comprise numerical, textual and/or categorical data.
It is to be further understood that, because some of the constituent system components and method steps depicted in the accompanying figures may be implemented in software, the actual connections between the system components (or the process steps) may differ depending upon the manner in which the present invention is programmed. Given the teachings of the present invention provided herein, one of ordinary skill in the related art will be able to contemplate these and
similar implementations or configurations of the present invention.
FIG. 7 is a flowchart showing a method of tumor therapy monitoring,
according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention. Referring to FIG. 7, in step 710, automatically segment a tumor in a set of medical images using
deformation characteristics of the tumor, wherein a size measure of the tumor is
constrained according to the deformation characteristics during warping. The medical images may comprise two-dimensional medical images, three-dimensional
medical images, or higher-dimensional medical images.
The size measure of the tumor may be, for example, volume, diameter,
radius, projection length, a one-dimensional measure, two-dimensional measure or three-dimensional measure of the tumor. Segmenting a tumor may include
receiving a user input indicative of a tumor location.
In step 720, quantify a change in a pathological parameter measured from the tumor.
In step 730, estimate uncertainty in the quantified change in the tumor. Estimating uncertainty in the quantified change in the tumor may be based on, for example, patient clinical history or genetic background. The estimated uncertainty may be fed back to constrain the segmenting step.
A method of tumor therapy monitoring, according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, includes identifying landmark points inside the set of medical images and/or identifying organ or tissue types and their borders in the set of medical images. Extracted anatomical or geometrical information may be used to constrain a registration process.
A method of tumor therapy monitoring according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention includes modeling of deformation
characteristics of the tumor.
Although exemplary embodiments of the present invention have been
described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings for the purpose of
illustration, it is to be understood that the inventive processes and apparatus are
not to be construed as limited thereby. It will be readily apparent to those of reasonable skill in the art that various modifications to the foregoing exemplary
embodiments can be made without departing from the scope of the invention as
defined by the appended claims, with equivalents of the claims to be included
therein.

Claims

WHAT IS CLAIMED IS:
1. A method of automatic change quantification for medical decision
support, comprising:
automatically detecting a structure in a set of medical images; characterizing the detected structure including modeling of deformation
characteristics of the detected structure;
matching images based on the characterization of the detected structure,
wherein a size measure of the detected structure is constrained according to the deformation characteristics; and quantifying a change in the detected structure.
2. The method of claim 1 , wherein modeling of deformation characteristics of the detected structure comprises at least one of elasticity modeling of tissues or structures, modeling of soft tissue characteristics, modeling of fat deformation characteristics, modeling of rigidity of bone structures, or
articulatory modeling of joints between bones or cartilages.
3. The method of claim 1 , wherein modeling of deformation characteristics of the detected structure comprises modeling of pathological tissue
deformation characteristics.
4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the size measure of the detected structure comprises a volume, a diameter, a radius, a projection length, a one-
dimensional measure, two-dimensional measure or three-dimensional measure of
the detected structure.
5. The method of claim 1 , wherein quantifying a change in the detected
structure comprises quantifying a change in a physiological, pathological or anatomical parameter measured from the detected structure.
6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising estimating uncertainty in
the quantified change in the detected structure.
7. The method of claim 6, wherein estimating uncertainty in the quantified change in the detected structure comprises estimating a confidence interval of a physiological, pathological or anatomical parameter measured from the detected structure.
8. The method of claim 6, wherein estimating uncertainty in the quantified change in the detected structure comprises at least one of estimating process-induced uncertainties or estimating intrinsic structural uncertainties associated with the set of medical images.
9. The method of claim 6, wherein estimating uncertainty in the quantified change in the detected structure comprises estimating tissue-dependent
uncertainties.
10. The method of claim 6, wherein the estimated uncertainty is fed back
to constrain the detecting step.
11. The method of claim 6, wherein the step of matching images
includes a registration process, and wherein the estimated uncertainty is fed back
to constrain the registration process.
12. The method of claim 6, wherein the estimated uncertainty is fed back to constrain the step of quantifying a change in the detected structure.
13. A system for providing automatic change quantification for medical decision support, comprising:
a memory device for storing a program; a processor in communication with the memory device, the processor operative with the program to: automatically detect a structure in a set of medical images; characterize the detected structure including modeling of deformation characteristics of the detected structure; match images based on the characterization of the detected structure, wherein a size measure of the detected structure is constrained according to the deformation characteristics; and quantify a change in the detected structure.
14. The system of claim 13, wherein when modeling deformation
characteristics of the detected structure, the processor is further operative with the
program to perform at least one of elasticity modeling of tissues or structures,
modeling of soft tissue characteristics, modeling of fat deformation characteristics, modeling of rigidity of bone structures, or articulator modeling of joints between
bones or cartilages.
15. The system of claim 13, wherein when modeling deformation
characteristics of the detected structure, the processor is further operative with the program to perform modeling of deformation characteristics.
16. The system of claim 13, wherein when matching images based on the characterization of the detected structure, the processor is further operative
with the program to use the characterization of the structure to resolve matching ambiguities.
17. The system of claim 13, wherein when quantifying a change in the detected structure, the processor is further operative with the program to quantify a change in a physiological, pathological or anatomical parameter measured from the detected structure.
18. The system of claim 13, further comprising estimating uncertainty in the quantified change in the detected structure.
19. The system of claim 18 wherein when estimating uncertainty in the
quantified change in the detected structure, the processor is further operative with
the program to estimate a change of a physiological, pathological or anatomical parameter measured from the detected structure.
20. The system of claim 18, wherein when estimating uncertainty in the
quantified change in the detected structure, the processor is further operative with
the program to estimate at least one of process-induced uncertainties or intrinsic
structural uncertainties associated with the set of medical images.
21. The system of claim 18, wherein when estimating uncertainty in the quantified change in the detected structure, the processor is further operative with
the program to estimate tissue-dependent uncertainties.
22. The system of claim 18, wherein the estimated uncertainty is fed
back to constrain the detecting step.
23. The system of claim 18, wherein when matching images based on the characterization of the detected structure, the processor is further operative with the program to perform a registration process, and wherein the estimated uncertainty is fed back to constrain the registration process.
24. A method of automatic tumor therapy monitoring, comprising: automatically segmenting a tumor in a set of medical images using
deformation characteristics of the tumor, wherein a size measure of the tumor is constrained according to the deformation characteristics during warping;
quantifying a change in a pathological parameter measured from the tumor;
and
estimating uncertainty in the quantified change in the tumor.
25. The method of claim 24, wherein estimating uncertainty in the
quantified change in the tumor is based on patient clinical history or genetic
background.
26. The method of claim 24, wherein the estimated uncertainty is fed
back to constrain the segmenting step.
27. The method of claim 24, further comprising modeling of deformation characteristics of the tumor.
PCT/US2006/042850 2005-11-03 2006-11-01 Automatic change quantification from medical image sets WO2007056082A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (6)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US73322405P 2005-11-03 2005-11-03
US60/733,224 2005-11-03
US83282906P 2006-07-24 2006-07-24
US60/832,829 2006-07-24
US11/590,451 US7724930B2 (en) 2005-11-03 2006-10-31 Systems and methods for automatic change quantification for medical decision support
US11/590,451 2006-10-31

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2007056082A1 true WO2007056082A1 (en) 2007-05-18

Family

ID=37775259

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2006/042850 WO2007056082A1 (en) 2005-11-03 2006-11-01 Automatic change quantification from medical image sets

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (1) US7724930B2 (en)
WO (1) WO2007056082A1 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2453177A (en) * 2007-09-28 2009-04-01 Christie Hospital Nhs Foundation Trust Creating an enhanced image using information on the relationship of two images

Families Citing this family (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP5646128B2 (en) * 2007-02-28 2014-12-24 株式会社東芝 Medical image retrieval system
US20100259263A1 (en) * 2007-11-14 2010-10-14 Dominic Holland Longitudinal registration of anatomy in magnetic resonance imaging
EP2141506B1 (en) 2008-07-01 2019-04-03 The Regents of The University of California Identifying fiber tracts using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
US20110182493A1 (en) * 2010-01-25 2011-07-28 Martin Huber Method and a system for image annotation
DE102010012797B4 (en) * 2010-03-25 2019-07-18 Siemens Healthcare Gmbh Computer-aided evaluation of an image data set
US9404986B2 (en) 2011-05-06 2016-08-02 The Regents Of The University Of California Measuring biological tissue parameters using diffusion magnetic resonance imaging
EP3107477B1 (en) 2014-01-27 2018-07-04 Materialise N.V. Prediction of shapes

Family Cites Families (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7206462B1 (en) * 2000-03-17 2007-04-17 The General Hospital Corporation Method and system for the detection, comparison and volumetric quantification of pulmonary nodules on medical computed tomography scans
US6990368B2 (en) * 2002-04-04 2006-01-24 Surgical Navigation Technologies, Inc. Method and apparatus for virtual digital subtraction angiography
US7499578B2 (en) * 2002-10-18 2009-03-03 Cornell Research Foundation, Inc. System, method and apparatus for small pulmonary nodule computer aided diagnosis from computed tomography scans
US7490085B2 (en) * 2002-12-18 2009-02-10 Ge Medical Systems Global Technology Company, Llc Computer-assisted data processing system and method incorporating automated learning
US7187790B2 (en) * 2002-12-18 2007-03-06 Ge Medical Systems Global Technology Company, Llc Data processing and feedback method and system
US7545965B2 (en) * 2003-11-10 2009-06-09 The University Of Chicago Image modification and detection using massive training artificial neural networks (MTANN)
JP2005185560A (en) * 2003-12-25 2005-07-14 Konica Minolta Medical & Graphic Inc Medical image processing apparatus and medical image processing system
US7522779B2 (en) * 2004-06-30 2009-04-21 Accuray, Inc. Image enhancement method and system for fiducial-less tracking of treatment targets

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
HARTKENS T ET AL: "MEASUREMENT AND ANALYSIS OF BRAIN DEFORMATION DURING NEUROSURGERY", IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, IEEE SERVICE CENTER, PISCATAWAY, NJ, US, vol. 22, no. 1, January 2003 (2003-01-01), pages 82 - 92, XP001163885, ISSN: 0278-0062 *
HE WANG ET AL: "Validation of an accelerated 'demons' algorithm for deformable image registration in radiation therapy", PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS PUBLISHING, BRISTOL, GB, vol. 50, no. 12, 21 June 2005 (2005-06-21), pages 2887 - 2905, XP020084236, ISSN: 0031-9155 *

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2453177A (en) * 2007-09-28 2009-04-01 Christie Hospital Nhs Foundation Trust Creating an enhanced image using information on the relationship of two images
GB2453177B (en) * 2007-09-28 2010-03-24 Christie Hospital Nhs Foundati Image enhancement method

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US7724930B2 (en) 2010-05-25
US20070122018A1 (en) 2007-05-31

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US11423540B2 (en) Segmentation of anatomical regions and lesions
Bi et al. Automatic detection and classification of regions of FDG uptake in whole-body PET-CT lymphoma studies
US8588495B2 (en) Systems and methods for computer aided diagnosis and decision support in whole-body imaging
CN112001925B (en) Image segmentation method, radiation therapy system, computer device and storage medium
US8731255B2 (en) Computer aided diagnostic system incorporating lung segmentation and registration
EP2693951B1 (en) Image analysis for specific objects
Feng et al. Segmenting CT prostate images using population and patient‐specific statistics for radiotherapy
US7738683B2 (en) Abnormality detection in medical images
EP3355273B1 (en) Coarse orientation detection in image data
US7724930B2 (en) Systems and methods for automatic change quantification for medical decision support
US8958614B2 (en) Image-based detection using hierarchical learning
WO2019051356A1 (en) A system and method for automated labeling and annotating unstructured medical datasets
US9230320B2 (en) Computer aided diagnostic system incorporating shape analysis for diagnosing malignant lung nodules
US20170042495A1 (en) Medical image information system, medical image information processing method, and program
US9014456B2 (en) Computer aided diagnostic system incorporating appearance analysis for diagnosing malignant lung nodules
US20060122480A1 (en) Segmenting occluded anatomical structures in medical images
Peng et al. Segmentation of lung in chest radiographs using hull and closed polygonal line method
CN102938013A (en) Medical image processing apparatus and medical image processing method
Yoon et al. Medical image analysis using artificial intelligence
US20100189319A1 (en) Image segmentation system and method
Zhu et al. Automatic delineation of the myocardial wall from CT images via shape segmentation and variational region growing
CN114943714A (en) Medical image processing system, medical image processing apparatus, electronic device, and storage medium
Rastgarpour et al. The problems, applications and growing interest in automatic segmentation of medical images from the year 2000 till 2011
CN1836258B (en) Method and system for using structure tensors to detect lung nodules and colon polyps
US20050041869A1 (en) Method and system for fast normalized cross-correlation between an image and a gaussian for detecting spherical structures

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 06827401

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1