WO2007058661A1 - Ticket auction - Google Patents

Ticket auction Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2007058661A1
WO2007058661A1 PCT/US2005/042357 US2005042357W WO2007058661A1 WO 2007058661 A1 WO2007058661 A1 WO 2007058661A1 US 2005042357 W US2005042357 W US 2005042357W WO 2007058661 A1 WO2007058661 A1 WO 2007058661A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
bid
customer
seats
auction
customers
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2005/042357
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Dale J. Young
Original Assignee
Young Dale J
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Young Dale J filed Critical Young Dale J
Priority to PCT/US2005/042357 priority Critical patent/WO2007058661A1/en
Publication of WO2007058661A1 publication Critical patent/WO2007058661A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce
    • G06Q30/06Buying, selling or leasing transactions
    • G06Q30/08Auctions

Definitions

  • This invention relates to the field of on-line auctions, and particularly to on-line auctions of
  • a central computer runs a ticket auction, leceiving and evaluating bids sent by bidders from remote terminals Although the bids are for seats in a single section with all
  • each seat is also preassigned a preferential rank After a predetermined bidding period, the central computer associates the seats with acceptable bids
  • auctions I mean auctions where bidding is done online, through telephone, or by similar means )
  • auctions can, and often do, last for days, even weeks. Indeed, it would be difficult to conduct a
  • one object of this invention is to remedy the above as well as related deficiencies in the prior art.
  • one object of this invention is to provide an automated method for remotely
  • the present invention provides for a computer-based,
  • remote ticket auctioning method that advises each participant, during the participant's registration with the auction or at some other time before bidding, that each bid represents an unconditional offer to purchase and therefore cannot be lowered or withdrawn. Also during the registration process, the participaat provides credit card information, or makes alternative payment arrangements.
  • the remote auctioning system will accept bids only from registered participants.
  • each participant specifies one of four options:
  • the central computer that runs the auction assigns a ⁇
  • selecting options 2-4 increases the participant's chances of obtaining the tickets at the bid amount because, for example, single scats
  • this invention To obviate the need for each bidder to check periodically the status of the bids, this invention
  • participant's bid automatically, to ensure purchase of tickets, up to the maximum bid amount
  • the participant may choose the "buy now” function to meme chase the tickets immediately, albeit at a high predetermined price
  • Figures IA & IB depict a flow chart of a preferred Internet-based implementation of the i emote auction in accordance with this invention
  • the ticket seller of the auction may break the available seats for the same event into multiple
  • the template (1 14) is displayed to the general public on the auction's Web site (1 16)
  • the customer may be asked if he would like to increase the bid automatically by piedetermined increments up to a certain amount if he is outbid This is the ' proxy bid ( 100)
  • the central computer may be programmed to accept bids at some
  • the next screen displayed to the customer shows a detailed summary ( 156) of the order and
  • processing the bid is a simple matter, otherwise, new credit card data is requested on a new screen, and the customer is asked if he wishes to use the new credit card as the means for future
  • the customer can also elect to have the "proxy bid" increase the customer's bid automatically
  • the central computer runs an algorithm ( 176) that determines the winning bids so as to maximize the total amount realized from ticket sales. Note that
  • the algorithm does not necessarily allocate the seats to the highest bidders; a higher bid can be
  • the customer's credit card (178) is billed prior to seats being allocated.
  • the auction site's operator submits a list of customers and seat allocations to the event's producer/operator. Each successful bidder is notified by e-mail that (1 ) he has won the bid on "x" seats, (2) the exact amount charged against the customer's credit card, (3)
  • the box-office must be notified who will be retrieving the tickets If the ticket purchase was a phone order, the customer is notified by phone under the same
  • the box office prints the tickets with the amounts for which they were purchased, which of

Abstract

This computer-based Internet ticket auctioning method preregisters potential bidders and advises them that all bids are conditional offers to purchase tickets, and therefore cannot be lowered or canceled at will. The auction's organizer programs the computer that runs the auction with dates and locations of various events, and with auditoria layout and locations of seats to be auctioned. Each registered customer can view the layout of a particular auditorium and submit a bid for one or more seats. The bidder specifies whether a partially filled order and noncontiguous seat assignments are acceptable. The bidder is also provided with an option to engage a 'proxy bid' that will increase the bid amount up to a limit set by the bidder, in order to ensure purchase of tickets. Each customer can also choose to bypass the auction process entirely, by submitting a purchase order at a high, preset price. This preset price is automatically accepted and purchase of tickets is guaranteed. At the conclusion of the auction, the computer runs a seat allocation algorithm that assigns the seats to the bidders so as to maximize the total amount realized from the auction. The seat assignment algorithm is also run periodically during the auction in order to determine which bidders have already being outbid, and to allow them to raise their bids.

Description

TICKET AUCTION
TECHNICAL FIELD
This invention relates to the field of on-line auctions, and particularly to on-line auctions of
tickets for entertainment events
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Seats for theatrical, musical, sporting, and other events are typically sold based on a pricing
system that uses broad categorizations for seat locations For example, all orchestra seats in a theater
usually are uniformly priced for a given performance The same system applies to sporting events
All tickets for movies are priced uniformly for each showing, though discounts for certain classes
of people, e g , students and senior citizens, may be available
This simple system disregards the fact that within each broad category some seats are moie
valuable than others Moreover, setting ticket prices well in advance of a perfoi mance, and keeping
ticket prices constant, often misjudges the demand and fails to optimize pricing Not sui pπsingly,
tickets foi a given performance often sell out upon their release, for ongoing events, pations often
have to wait too long to get desired tickets These are reliable indicators that the tickets are
underpriced, i e , that the total amount collected by the event's producer/organizer is lower than
could otherwise be achieved. Alternatively, if the ticket prices are set too high, many tickets may
remain unsold, also reducing the total amount collected by the event's producei . despite highei average ticket price Because producers, as most people, prefer a bird in hand to two in the bushes,
tickets are practically always underpriced. Occasionally, the sub-optimal pricing benefits the
consumer, more often than not, however, it benefits the illegal re-sellers, also known as ' scalpers "
Several on-line auction methods designed to optimize revenue fiom ticket sales, as well as
to solve other problems, have been described One method is the subject of U S Patent Number
6,023,685 issued 8 February 2000 to Brett el al ("Brett" hereinafter), hereby incorporated by reference as if fully described herein Brett also describes several other auctioning systems and
methods
According to Brett, a central computer runs a ticket auction, leceiving and evaluating bids sent by bidders from remote terminals Although the bids are for seats in a single section with all
seats subject to the same minimum bid requirement, each seat is also preassigned a preferential rank After a predetermined bidding period, the central computer associates the seats with acceptable bids
based on the bid amounts and the preferential ranks of the seats, presumably with highei bids being assigned higher ranking seats During the bidding period, however, the bidders can cancel, raise, oi lower bids at will Brett's method also provides for ensuring contiguous gi ouping of seats subject
to a single bid
Brett's method has several disadvantages First, allowing bidders to lower or even cancel
their bids wreaks havoc with the auctioning process For example, one bidder can be outbid by another, and so notified, then, the higher bidder can cancel the bid, making the first bid acceptable,
despite the notification It is not even clear at what point a bidder becomes legally obligated to pay
for the tickets In sum, allowing cancellation and lowering of the bids creates uncertainty, even
chaos. Another disadvantage is that remote auctions differ from live auctions (By "remote
auctions" I mean auctions where bidding is done online, through telephone, or by similar means )
In a remote auction, there is no reason to conduct the auction in a short period of time, with each
bidder responding (or choosing not to respond) to other bidders substantially in real time; remote
auctions can, and often do, last for days, even weeks. Indeed, it would be difficult to conduct a
widely accessible remote auction in real time because of potential for telecommunication equipment overload caused by simultaneous attempts of multiple bidders to place or change their bids. A bidder
in a remote auction would have to check the status of the bids periodically to avoid being outbid. This is an inconvenience; moreover, because most bidding will probably be done towards the conclusion of the auction, telecommunication equipment can still become overloaded, preventing the bidder from raising his bid.
Yet another problem with Brett's method is that the contiguity requirement is the same for all the bidders, i.e., the algorithm that ensures contiguous seating operates on all the bids; it does not
allow each bidder, individually, to specify whether the bidder will accept scattered seats. Similarly, the algorithm does not allow each bidder to specify initially whether partially filled orders are acceptable.
OBJECTS OF THE INVENTION
It is the object of this invention to remedy the above as well as related deficiencies in the prior art. In particular, one object of this invention is to provide an automated method for remotely
auctioning tickets that eliminates chaos resulting from cancellation and lowering of previously
entered bids. It is another object of this invention to provide each bidder in a remote ticket auction with
automatic means to increase the bid in response to actions of other bidders.
It is yet another object of the invention to allow each participant in a remote auction to bypass
the bidding process entirely and ensure purchase of tickets.
It is still another object of the invention to let each bidder in a remote auction to specify, at
the time of bidding, whether noncontiguous seating and a partially filled order are acceptable in order
to improve the bidder's chances of purchasing a ticket or tickets.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
To fulfill these and other objectives, the present invention provides for a computer-based,
remote ticket auctioning method that advises each participant, during the participant's registration with the auction or at some other time before bidding, that each bid represents an unconditional offer to purchase and therefore cannot be lowered or withdrawn. Also during the registration process, the participaat provides credit card information, or makes alternative payment arrangements.
The remote auctioning system will accept bids only from registered participants. When
bidding, each participant specifies one of four options:
1. Will only accept a full order with contiguous seats;
2. Will only accept a full order, but seats may be scattered;
3. Will accept a partial order, but seats must be contiguous, or
4. No restrictions - will accept a partial order with noncontiguous seats.
At the expiration of the bidding period, the central computer that runs the auction assigns aϋ
available tickets so as to maximize total amount received. Thus, selecting options 2-4 increases the participant's chances of obtaining the tickets at the bid amount because, for example, single scats
may be filled
To obviate the need for each bidder to check periodically the status of the bids, this invention
provides a "proxy bid" (100) - a way for the participant to enter the initial bid is to agree to a
predetermined, bid increment, and the maximum amount of the bid The proxy then increases the
participant's bid automatically, to ensure purchase of tickets, up to the maximum bid amount
Alternatively, if available, the participant may choose the "buy now" function to pui chase the tickets immediately, albeit at a high predetermined price
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
Figures IA & IB depict a flow chart of a preferred Internet-based implementation of the i emote auction in accordance with this invention
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
According to the method of this invention, producers of entertainment events transmit the
following information to the central computer (101) that implements the method
1 A seating chart (102) of a theater or stadium ("auditoπum"),
2 Seats to be auctioned,
3 Available performance dates (100),
4 Current price schedules (108) for different sections (1 10) of the auditoπum, and
5 Deadline (1 12) for accepting offers
The ticket seller of the auction may break the available seats for the same event into multiple
auctions, and thereby further minimizing scalping Templates (1 14) for the auditorium are obtained before an auction and stored on the central
computer (100) The best sources I know for these templates ( 1 14) are the following books Sandy
Millman, SEATS (for New York area), and Denise Cady, GOOD SEATS (for Los Angeles and
Chicago) The template (1 14) is displayed to the general public on the auction's Web site (1 16)
When a potential customer (potential auction participant or bidder) visits the site, the
customer is given the options of registering (1 18), logging-in (129), or browsing (122) the site If
the customer chooses to register, he will be prompted to enter identifying and billing information
( 124) Typical data ( 126) requested are
1 Log-In Name,
2 Password,
3 Name (first, last);
4 Address;
5 Telephone Number (voice, fax);
6 Credit Card Information (brand, expiration date), and
7 Email Address
After registering, the customer returns to the main page (128) of the web site Registered
(1 18) and non-registered browsing (122) customers can first click on a one of the available
geographical locations (128), e g , a State, which can potentially be anywhere in the world Typical
geographical choices presented are
New York,
California,
Nevada, Florida, and
Illinois.
Then the customer can indicate the type of event ( 13) he wishes to attend by clicking on an
appropriate symbol, such as.
Concerts,
Theater,
Opera,
Dance Performances,
Sports, or First Run Movies
The list of available events (13) in the category selected for that particular date (106) is displayed next Assume, for example, that the customer selected "Theaters" in "New York " If
available, the following shows would be listed.
Phantom of the Opera,
Les Miserables,
Chicago,
Rent,
Lion King The customer then selects the desired performance date ( 132) and goes to the next pa«c
Upon clicking on a specific event (130), a seating chart (102) appears Available seats ( 104) being auctioned will be listed, also base (minimum) prices (134) for bidding
If a given event is of interest to the customer, the customer indicates how many seats are
desned The amount needed to bid per seat (136) is displayed to the customer Note that the pei -seat
amount may depend on the number of seats desired if there are a hundred seats available and someone wants 6 seats, he might have to bid more per seat than someone who bids for one seat
depending upon bids already placed
Only registered customers (1 18) are allowed to bid, and no one may bid an amount less than
what is required to secure a ticket at the time of the bid That minimum amount can of course
increase as higher bids are received
At this time, the customer may be asked if he would like to increase the bid automatically by piedetermined increments up to a certain amount if he is outbid This is the ' proxy bid ( 100)
service described earlier
An order form is next presented to the customer The form requests the following
information
1 Number of tickets (138) desired to be purchased,
2 Amount bid per ticket,
3 If the bidder would be willing to accept non-contiguous seats (146) (optional),
4 If the bidder would accept a partial order (148) (optional)
To make bidding decisions more informed, the following data can be made available to all
browsers ( 1 ) bidding history (150), and (2) a running clock (152) indicating how long bidding will continue Based on this information, the bidder may increase his bid at any time, the bid, however,
may not be canceled or decreased
For those customers who absolutely "must" have the tickets, a way to bypass the auction may
be provided For example, the central computer may be programmed to accept bids at some
predetermined amount (154), at the time the bid is made, and to reserve the seats immediately
The next screen displayed to the customer shows a detailed summary ( 156) of the order and
what the order will cost if and when accepted, including service charges, if any The computer asks
the customer to confirm that (1 ) the bid is correct, and (2) the total charge is accurate and is authorized by the customer. The specifics (158) of the desired transaction are displayed to the customer to avoid any misunderstanding of expenses If the information is accurate, the customei
advances to the next screen, which asks for another confirmation
Do You Wish To Use The Credit Card On File?
If yes, processing the bid is a simple matter, otherwise, new credit card data is requested on a new screen, and the customer is asked if he wishes to use the new credit card as the means for future
payments
When the bid is complete, the customer is given a confirmation code ( 160) so that at any time
prior to the close of the auction the status of the desired seats can be obtained and the bid can be
raised Registered participants are able to access all current and past orders (164) As described
above, the customer can also elect to have the "proxy bid" increase the customer's bid automatically
at preestablished increments up to a certain amount. Throughout the process, each customer is repeatedly reminded that the bids are commitments
to purchase tickets, and are binding if accepted.
After a given offer is submitted, the customer will have the options of bidding on a different
event (168), exiting the site, and purchasing related materials (170). Under the last option, links can
be provided to sites (172) selling, for example, music CDs and memorabilia.
Before exiting the site, the customer is asked if he would like to receive e-mail notifications
(174) of other events. If so, a form listing the types of events of interest is presented to the customer.
When the time allotted for bidding expires, the central computer runs an algorithm ( 176) that determines the winning bids so as to maximize the total amount realized from ticket sales. Note that
the algorithm does not necessarily allocate the seats to the highest bidders; a higher bid can be
bypassed in favor of a lower bid when the total realized amount is increased by accepting the lower bid. This generally happens when some lower bid is made by someone willing to take a partial order or noncontiguous seats. Thus, a bidder willing to accept noncontiguous seats or partial orders
improves his chances of obtaining the tickets.
The customer's credit card (178) is billed prior to seats being allocated.
After completing the auction, the auction site's operator submits a list of customers and seat allocations to the event's producer/operator. Each successful bidder is notified by e-mail that (1 ) he has won the bid on "x" seats, (2) the exact amount charged against the customer's credit card, (3)
a special code (180) that will uniquely identify the successful bidder to the event's operator, and (4)
a reminder (182) that the e-mail should be printed and brought to the box office ( 184) along with
identification. If the tickets are a gift, the box-office must be notified who will be retrieving the tickets If the ticket purchase was a phone order, the customer is notified by phone under the same
protocol.
The box office prints the tickets with the amounts for which they were purchased, which of
course are the amounts of the winning bids. This should preclude any charge that the tickets have
been scalped; when tickets are scalped, they are sold for an amount higher than the price printed on
them. It will also allow the event's producer to verify the amounts for which the tickets were sold.
Three days after the event, the event's producer will be paid the contractual amount, for
example the base ticket price plus one half of the amount over the base price, less pro-rated credit card charges. If the event is canceled, refunds are automatically given to the customers, and the
producers are charged all credit card fees.
All information exchanges described in this document can also be made via telephones. It is, however, less cost efficient and more cumbersome than using the Internet
Although a number of specific features have been described in this specification, those
skilled in the art will be able to devise various other modifications that although not explicitly described or shown herein, embody the principles of the invention and are thus within its spirit and
scope.

Claims

1. A method for conducting a remote auction of event tickets from a central
computer to a plurality of customers at remote locations, each said customer connected
to the central computer by telecommunications apparatus for receiving and
transmitting information, the method comprising the steps of:
programming the computer with a template of an auditorium where the event is
scheduled to take place;
programming the computer with available seat data, the seat data identifying
seats intended for sale during the auction, each of the seats intended for sale
corresponding to a different ticket;
programming the computer with a minimum ticket price below which no ticket
may be sold during the auction;
transmitting from the central computer to the customers, before the individual
customer registers and before said customer makes any bids, a first message to notify
the customer that bids submitted by the customer during the auction are non-revocable;
further transmitting form the central computer to the customers a message that
customers can individually specify that partial orders and scattered seats are acceptable;
requesting registration information from at least a first customer, the registration
information, including the first customer's name, password, and payment information
registering the first customer for the auction; receiving bids from at last two of the customers, each of the bids including a seat
quantity indicating a number of seats bid for, an amount bid, means indicating whether
the customer who submitted said each bid is willing to accept noncontiguous
seats, and whether the customer who submitted each bid is willing to accept fewer seats
than indicated by said each bid's seat quantity, and
performing in a computer a seat assignment algorithm for allocating the seats
intended for sale during the auction among the received bids and incorporating at least
one of the customers indication of willingness to accept noncontiguous seats and partial
orders in a way that maximizes total amount receivable from the customers for the seats
intended for sale during the auction.
2. A method according to claim 1, further including the step of notifying
each customer who submitted at least one bid of the submitted bid's status, said status
including a notification of a first number of seats allocated to the submitted bid, a first
amount equal to the cost of the seats allocated to the submitted bid, and a unique
identifier of the submitted bid.
3. A method according to claim 1, further including the step of informing
each customer of a current minimum bid amount that the customer must bid to qualify
for seat allocation.
4. A method according to claim 1, further including the steps of:
setting a guaranteed purchase amount for the tickets intended for sale during the
auction, and
enabling the customer to purchase one or more tickets, without participating in
the auction at the guaranteed purchase amount.
5. A method according to claim 1 further including the step of enabling a
first customer who submitted a first bid to engage a proxy bid means for automatically
increasing the first bid by a predetermined increment up to a first limit.
6. A method according to claim 1, further including the step of sending from
the central computer to the telecommunications apparatus, a graphical representation
of the template and the available seat date.
7. A method according to any one of claims 1 - 6, wherein
the central computer and the telecommunications apparatus are connected via
the Internet, said steps of transmitting, registering, receiving bids, notifying, and
informing are performed through the Internet, and the step of registering the customers includes the step of receiving a second
customer's name, password and payment authorization.
8. A system for conducting a remote auction of event tickets, the system
comprising:
a central computer, the central computer including:
means for communicating with a plurality of customers at remote locations;
means for receiving and storing a template of an auditorium where the event is
scheduled to take place;
means for receiving and storing available seat data, the seat data identifying
seats intended for sale during the auction, each of the seats intended for sale
corresponding to a different ticket;
means for receiving and storing a minimum ticket price below which no ticket
may be sold during the auction;
means for transmitting from the central computer to the customers a message
that customers can individually specify that partial orders and scattered seats are
acceptable;
means for requesting registration information from a first customer, the
registration information including the first customer's name, password, and payment
information; means for receiving the requested registration information;
means for receiving bids, each bid including a seat quantity data item indicating
a number of seats bid for, the amount bid field, means indicating whether the customer
who submitted said each bid is willing to accept noncontiguous seats, and means
indicating whether the customer who submitted said each bid is willing to accept
partial orders than indicated by said each bid's seat quantity, and
means for performing a seat assignment algorithm for allocating the seats
intended for sale during the auction among the received bids wherein at least one of the
customers indication of willingness to accept noncontiguous seats and partial orders is
incorporated such that the total amount receivable from the customers for the seats
intended for sale during the auction is maximized.
1/2
Figure imgf000018_0001
2/2
Figure imgf000019_0001
FIG. IB
PCT/US2005/042357 2005-11-21 2005-11-21 Ticket auction WO2007058661A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/US2005/042357 WO2007058661A1 (en) 2005-11-21 2005-11-21 Ticket auction

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/US2005/042357 WO2007058661A1 (en) 2005-11-21 2005-11-21 Ticket auction

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2007058661A1 true WO2007058661A1 (en) 2007-05-24

Family

ID=38048943

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2005/042357 WO2007058661A1 (en) 2005-11-21 2005-11-21 Ticket auction

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2007058661A1 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2011090966A2 (en) * 2010-01-21 2011-07-28 Orenstein Andrew J System for maximizing profit from public sale of tickets for a ticketed public event

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6023685A (en) * 1996-05-23 2000-02-08 Brett; Kenton F. Computer controlled event ticket auctioning system
US6240396B1 (en) * 1996-09-04 2001-05-29 Priceline.Com Incorporated Conditional purchase offer management system for event tickets

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6023685A (en) * 1996-05-23 2000-02-08 Brett; Kenton F. Computer controlled event ticket auctioning system
US6240396B1 (en) * 1996-09-04 2001-05-29 Priceline.Com Incorporated Conditional purchase offer management system for event tickets

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2011090966A2 (en) * 2010-01-21 2011-07-28 Orenstein Andrew J System for maximizing profit from public sale of tickets for a ticketed public event
WO2011090966A3 (en) * 2010-01-21 2011-12-01 Orenstein Andrew J System for maximizing profit from public sale of tickets for a ticketed public event

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7003485B1 (en) Ticket auction
US7899717B2 (en) Apparatus and method for selling a ticket to an event and/or to a portion of an event or venue
AU2006203419B2 (en) Computer controlled event ticket auctioning system
AU754421B2 (en) Ticket redistribution system
US6240396B1 (en) Conditional purchase offer management system for event tickets
CA2929769C (en) Systems and methods for providing resource allocation in a networked environment
US20030236736A1 (en) Electronic system and method for trading seat licenses, event tickets and contingent event ticket certificates
US20040039696A1 (en) System and method for executing a payment transaction over a computer network
US20060277130A1 (en) Methods and apparatus to predict demand for a product or service
US20080208651A1 (en) Lead disbursement system and method
US20070244731A1 (en) System and Method for Mobile Virtual Mobile Ticketing
US20070016513A1 (en) Real Time Bidding Systems and Methods with Question Interface
US20060265289A1 (en) Community-based method and system for the sale of goods and services
US20110178827A1 (en) System for maximizing profit from public sale of tickets for a ticketed public event
US20120047076A1 (en) System, method and computer program for negotiating online transactions
CA2399155A1 (en) Computer controlled event ticket auctioning system
AU2007214305A1 (en) Computer controlled event ticket auctioning system
WO2007058661A1 (en) Ticket auction
JP2002197225A (en) Method for selling ticket
RU2727356C2 (en) Method and device for organizing events
JP2023138187A (en) Auction device and auction method
TR202010876A2 (en) SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CREATING ONLINE SHOPPING BETWEEN ROOM SEEKERS AND ROOM PROVIDERS TO NEGOTIATE ROOM PRICES
WO2003058559A2 (en) Ticket and reservation distribution system
WO2006055000A1 (en) International system to allocate vendue exclusivity ranking (isvaer)

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 05852026

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1