WO2012045326A1 - Method and system for propagation of amendment made to a master to copies - Google Patents
Method and system for propagation of amendment made to a master to copies Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2012045326A1 WO2012045326A1 PCT/EP2010/006164 EP2010006164W WO2012045326A1 WO 2012045326 A1 WO2012045326 A1 WO 2012045326A1 EP 2010006164 W EP2010006164 W EP 2010006164W WO 2012045326 A1 WO2012045326 A1 WO 2012045326A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- master
- changes
- duplicate
- objects
- user
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B19/00—Programme-control systems
- G05B19/02—Programme-control systems electric
- G05B19/04—Programme control other than numerical control, i.e. in sequence controllers or logic controllers
- G05B19/042—Programme control other than numerical control, i.e. in sequence controllers or logic controllers using digital processors
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F16/20—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of structured data, e.g. relational data
- G06F16/23—Updating
- G06F16/2365—Ensuring data consistency and integrity
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B19/00—Programme-control systems
- G05B19/02—Programme-control systems electric
- G05B19/418—Total factory control, i.e. centrally controlling a plurality of machines, e.g. direct or distributed numerical control [DNC], flexible manufacturing systems [FMS], integrated manufacturing systems [IMS], computer integrated manufacturing [CIM]
- G05B19/41845—Total factory control, i.e. centrally controlling a plurality of machines, e.g. direct or distributed numerical control [DNC], flexible manufacturing systems [FMS], integrated manufacturing systems [IMS], computer integrated manufacturing [CIM] characterised by system universality, reconfigurability, modularity
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B19/00—Programme-control systems
- G05B19/02—Programme-control systems electric
- G05B19/04—Programme control other than numerical control, i.e. in sequence controllers or logic controllers
- G05B19/042—Programme control other than numerical control, i.e. in sequence controllers or logic controllers using digital processors
- G05B19/0426—Programming the control sequence
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F8/00—Arrangements for software engineering
- G06F8/70—Software maintenance or management
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F9/00—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units
- G06F9/06—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units using stored programs, i.e. using an internal store of processing equipment to receive or retain programs
- G06F9/44—Arrangements for executing specific programs
- G06F9/445—Program loading or initiating
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F9/00—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units
- G06F9/06—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units using stored programs, i.e. using an internal store of processing equipment to receive or retain programs
- G06F9/44—Arrangements for executing specific programs
- G06F9/445—Program loading or initiating
- G06F9/44505—Configuring for program initiating, e.g. using registry, configuration files
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B2219/00—Program-control systems
- G05B2219/20—Pc systems
- G05B2219/25—Pc structure of the system
- G05B2219/25059—Iterative configuration of identical modules, only config first one, copy to other
Definitions
- the invention refers to a method and a system for propagation of amendments in the configuration of technical equipment, e.g., transformers, generators, mills, and other automated machines or devices, by means of transfer of an amended configuration of a master comprising a specific apparatus or device to a non-limited number of duplicates of said master.
- technical equipment e.g., transformers, generators, mills, and other automated machines or devices
- the optimal workflow would be to finish the configuration of the first subunit, to test and optimize it, and then to copy and adapt the configuration for use with further subunits of the same type. But this is a slow process, since the work on the second subunit can only be started after the first one has finished.
- the process today is that the first subunit is configured, and then this configuration is copied to the other subunits, while the optimization and test of the configuration takes place after the copying. This leads to shorter overall project execution times but to a higher engineering effort because all units have to be optimized and tested separately.
- the aforementioned problem is being solved by a method which is characterized in that any changes which have been done in the master are propagated from the master to the copies in a semi-automated or fully automated manner whereas possible conflicts are indicated automatically by means of graphic display.
- the claimed method is characterized in that the propagation of changes done in the master comprises the following three steps: o matching whereas the data source is analyzed to identify master and duplicate or duplicates, thus a logical link between the objects of the master and the duplicate is present;
- the final decision needs to be taken by the engineer using the system but the decision is prepared by the system whereas the term "master” and “duplicate” refer to a usually large set of data objects typically being organized in one or more hierarchies whereas each object typically has a common and a specific set of information items.
- the common information comprises, e.g., an identifier like the name, a designation of the type of the object, and the creation time of the object; while the specific information depends on the type of the object, e.g., for an object representing a device of a certain kind, the specific information comprises, among others, the configuration parameters applicable to this kind of device.
- One preferred embodiment of the claimed method is characterized in that with the matching step the respective data source is analyzed in order to identify whether it is master or duplicate whereas a logical link between the objects of the master and the duplicate is present.
- a three-way match is used wherein the master is saved in a compare master directly after copying the master data.
- the compare master in order to identify if changes have been made to the master and/or the copies, whereas at any time when changes with the master are propagated to the duplicate, the current state of the master, master' is stored as the compare master as basis for later synchronization.
- the so-called compare master is stored as an action log whereas this action log is provided to detect and to determine the side on which a change has been made even if it has been deleted in the duplicate.
- This action log is as well an embodiment of the claimed method as of the claimed system according to the invention.
- Another advantageous embodiment of the method provides for the matching to be based on a set of prioritized rules.
- the method will apply the rule with the highest priority first, and only objects not matched so far will be considered for matching with lower-priority rules.
- An example of a matching rule is equality of the name of the objects.
- Another example is that the names are not identical but similar to a certain degree.
- metrics are used like the type of the object, the number of matching children, the position in the tree, property values and more, and suitable combinations of these.
- the user can choose which rules should be used for matching and in which order. He can also configure the individual rules when those offer parameters.
- a typical example is the following rule: "match by similar name”.
- One useful parameter may then be a "threshold" where objects are never matched when their names differ by e.g. more than 4 characters. If the engineer knows that in his project the naming is not a good way to match, he can deselect this option and choose other algorithms instead.
- potential matches are presented to the engineer as a preferred user of the invention. Furthermore it is possible to attach a weight (like "92% match") to each match in order to point out the quality of the match to the user who may review these matches.
- the matching step is configurable by the using engineer.
- a preferred embodiment of the method according to the claimed invention provides that conflicts are resolved by the user since the invention is also able to detect conflicts and shows these to the user.
- There may be simple conflicts where, e.g. both in master and in copy a single value item has been changed to two different values.
- There may also be more complex conflicts where multiple changes that belong together must be propagated together. E.g., when a function block has been inserted in a control diagram and its inputs and outputs have been connected, none of these single changes makes sense to propagate on its own. The combination of these changes is called a change group. If change groups are overlapping in the master and in the copy, this presents a conflict.
- a further part of the invention relates to a system where the method as illustrated before is applied to. Accordingly, this document discloses a system for propagation of changes in the configuration of technical equipment whereas two groups of objects are compared where the second group has been created by copying the first group but after copying one or both groups of objects have been changed.
- Such system provides for the claimed method an appropriate means for propagation of changes in the configuration of technical equipment whereas in a first step a user or the system identifies the roots of master and copy or copies to the matching step; then in a second step the system identifies matching objects in the first group and in the second group for comparison and synchronization; after that in a third step the system compares objects matched in the second step and detects changes in the first group and the second group and conflicts in the changes in the first group and the second group; and finally in a fourth step the system presents the found changes and conflicts to the user for change propagation and conflict resolution.
- the identification of matching objects is not based only on the objects having the same ID or the same name but also on the use of other algorithms like having similar names and the same type or the same number and types of children. There may be algorithms that are specifically tailored to a standardized naming scheme.
- the user decides which algorithms are applied for the matching step and in which order they are applied whereas the user parameterizes the algorithms if possible to do so.
- an embodiment of the system according to the invention is using a three- way comparison to determine if an identified change has been performed in the first group or in the second group.
- the system analyzes the two groups of objects being located in the same data set or in different data sets for changes and communicates or displays these changes to the user by means of any communication media whereas any changes being detected are done either on a structural level when for example whenobject-data level.
- a further preferred embodiment of the system according to the invention is characterized in that multiple changes are grouped if these changes depend on each other.
- the system can propagate changes to links between objects in the master.
- the new target of the link in the duplicate is the object in the duplicate that corresponds to the new target of the link in the master as determined in the matching step. I.e., if in the master an object A references an object B and is changed to reference an object C, then in the copy object A' will be changed from referencing B' to referencing C even though the names or identifiers of these objects are different from the objects they correspond to in the master.
- the user may filter for relevant changes by choosing relevant change cases where each change case is a type of change which may occur for a certain type of object.
- Fig. 3 the evolution of object structures "master” and “duplicate” over time and a three way comparison with a compare master after changes have been made
- Fig. 4 a possible screenshot of the system output showing matching of objects, differences detected, and change actions proposed to the user
- Fig. 5 a screenshot of a list of changes cases from which the user can select the ones relevant to him, and
- Fig. 6 a configuration where overlapping change groups present a conflict.
- Fig. 1 shows a very simple object structure, where the site "PresentationPlant” contains two boiler areas: “cfg_HYD_Boiler_301” and “cfg_HYD_Boiler_302", the latter being a - suitably renamed - duplicate of the first. They each contain four function diagrams and each function diagram has several signal objects (DI/DO) as children.
- the matching step the data source is analyzed to identify master and duplicate or duplicates. After this step, a logical link between the objects of the master and the duplicate is present.
- cfg_HYD_Boiler_301 and “cfg_HYD_Boiler_302” are the roots of sub trees that have a master-duplicate relationship. Then this needs to be repeated for all function diagrams below this level and again for each signal below the function diagrams.
- Fig. 2 shows a simple object structure with changes which may have been done to the master and the duplicate. The matching process will leave the objects
- the matching step is configurable by the user.
- the user can choose which algorithms should be used for matching and in which order. He can also configure the individual algorithms when those offer parameters.
- a typical example is the algorithm "match by similar name”.
- One useful parameter could then be a "threshold" where objects are never matched when they differ by more than 4 characters. If the engineer knows that in his project the naming is not a good way to match, he can deselect this option and choose other algorithms instead.
- an action log can be used as a compare master to detect the side on which a change has been made.
- this might be negligible information, but for the next step, the change propagation, this is crucial information: If the object has been added in the master, this change should be propagated to the duplicate. If it has been deleted in the duplicate, it is assumed that this has been done deliberately so and the object should not be added back to the copy.
- Fig. 3 a scheme is shown how this process works.
- step 1 After copying the master data (step 1 ), the master itself is saved either in a file or to some other kind of storage medium (step 2). Then the master or the duplicate or both are changed (step 3), resulting in master' and duplicate'.
- the master' will be compared to the original version of the master which is called “compare master” (step 4a). The compare master will also be compared to the duplicate' (step 4b).
- step 5 Every time changes are propagated to the duplicate' (step 5), a new export of the current master' to compare master' will also be done (step 6).
- Fig. 4 shows by means of a screenshot how the matching is displayed. Matched nodes are displayed on the same level. If the system detected a change that can be propagated to the duplicate, then this is shown as a labeled arrow from left to right in the middle column. Changed, deleted or added items are marked as such which is done by a background color in this embodiment of the invention.
- a change group is shown whereas it can be seen that one change action is "On page 1 add component add (1)" and this action has child actions. So, the change group consists of one added function block and three added connections which connect the new function block to the rest of the logic. Since the child actions depend on the parent action, a change group is used to build a meaningful set of items for a better overview, as well as to protect the system against inconsistencies which would result from partial execution of the change group's actions.
- the comparison step is configurable by the user, in that the user can choose which types of changes he wants to be detected. In almost any case, he would not like to compare the name or the creation date.
- Change cases are defined for every object type once. The user chooses during runtime which change cases he would like to see and which should be ignored.
- Fig. 5 shows some of the change cases defined for function diagrams. In this dialog, a user can choose which change cases are relevant for him.
- the invention is also able to detect conflicts and to show these to the user.
- There may be direct conflicts where, e.g. both in the master and in the duplicate, a constant value has been changed. The more complex cases are found by checking if change groups are overlapping.
- Fig. 6 shows an example whereas in the master, the "output" of the diagram reference on the top left has been negated.
- This is a simple change, which can also be regarded to be a change group consisting of just that change.
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (9)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
BR112013008405A BR112013008405A2 (en) | 2010-10-08 | 2010-10-08 | method and system for propagating changes made to a master for copies |
DE112010005924T DE112010005924T5 (en) | 2010-10-08 | 2010-10-08 | Method and system for passing changes to a master unit to duplicates |
GB1306492.8A GB2499531B (en) | 2010-10-08 | 2010-10-08 | Method and system for propagation of amendment made to a master to copies |
RU2013120952/08A RU2553054C2 (en) | 2010-10-08 | 2010-10-08 | Method and system for covering of copies by changes made in original |
PCT/EP2010/006164 WO2012045326A1 (en) | 2010-10-08 | 2010-10-08 | Method and system for propagation of amendment made to a master to copies |
AU2010362097A AU2010362097B2 (en) | 2010-10-08 | 2010-10-08 | Method and system for propagation of amendment made to a master to copies |
CN201080070572.7A CN103229115B (en) | 2010-10-08 | 2010-10-08 | Method and system for propagating the modification made to original to copy |
JP2013532052A JP2013539142A (en) | 2010-10-08 | 2010-10-08 | Method and system for communication of master-generated modifications to a copy |
US13/858,293 US20130226868A1 (en) | 2010-10-08 | 2013-04-08 | Method and system for propagation of amendments made to a master to copies |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2010/006164 WO2012045326A1 (en) | 2010-10-08 | 2010-10-08 | Method and system for propagation of amendment made to a master to copies |
Related Child Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US13/858,293 Continuation US20130226868A1 (en) | 2010-10-08 | 2013-04-08 | Method and system for propagation of amendments made to a master to copies |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2012045326A1 true WO2012045326A1 (en) | 2012-04-12 |
Family
ID=44454783
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2010/006164 WO2012045326A1 (en) | 2010-10-08 | 2010-10-08 | Method and system for propagation of amendment made to a master to copies |
Country Status (9)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20130226868A1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP2013539142A (en) |
CN (1) | CN103229115B (en) |
AU (1) | AU2010362097B2 (en) |
BR (1) | BR112013008405A2 (en) |
DE (1) | DE112010005924T5 (en) |
GB (1) | GB2499531B (en) |
RU (1) | RU2553054C2 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2012045326A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US11074239B2 (en) | 2018-02-26 | 2021-07-27 | Servicenow, Inc. | De-duplication of configuration items related to a managed network |
US11449579B2 (en) * | 2018-09-19 | 2022-09-20 | Servicenow, Inc. | File-based software application discovery |
Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20020120723A1 (en) * | 2001-02-23 | 2002-08-29 | Forth J. Bradford | Systems for in the field configuration of intelligent electronic devices |
US6449624B1 (en) * | 1999-10-18 | 2002-09-10 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Version control and audit trail in a process control system |
US20070061033A1 (en) * | 2003-02-18 | 2007-03-15 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Version control for objects in a process plant configuration system |
EP1770459A2 (en) * | 2005-09-30 | 2007-04-04 | Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. | Embedding data into controllers |
US20080228957A1 (en) * | 2004-12-23 | 2008-09-18 | Abb Patent Gmbh | Method for Configuring Field Devices |
Family Cites Families (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6167408A (en) * | 1998-08-31 | 2000-12-26 | International Business Machines Corporation | Comparative updates tracking to synchronize local operating parameters with centrally maintained reference parameters in a multiprocessing system |
US6711578B1 (en) * | 2001-01-17 | 2004-03-23 | Palmsource, Inc. | Rule-based, n-way, synchronization of multiple copies of a database |
US6970876B2 (en) * | 2001-05-08 | 2005-11-29 | Solid Information Technology | Method and arrangement for the management of database schemas |
JP4165451B2 (en) * | 2003-08-11 | 2008-10-15 | セイコーエプソン株式会社 | Printing system, printing request terminal, compression algorithm selection program, and printing method |
JP2005222244A (en) * | 2004-02-04 | 2005-08-18 | Language Craft Kenkyusho:Kk | Word retrieval device, word retrieval method, and information providing system equipped with word retrieval device |
US7720879B2 (en) * | 2005-04-22 | 2010-05-18 | Sap Ag | Methods of using an integrated development environment to configure business applications |
US7523146B2 (en) * | 2005-06-21 | 2009-04-21 | Apple Inc. | Apparatus and method for peer-to-peer N-way synchronization in a decentralized environment |
US7996442B2 (en) * | 2005-10-17 | 2011-08-09 | Oracle International Corporation | Method and system for comparing and re-comparing data item definitions |
US9235448B2 (en) * | 2008-11-25 | 2016-01-12 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for batchable hierarchical configuration |
US9614685B2 (en) * | 2009-03-09 | 2017-04-04 | Nokia Technologies Oy | Methods, apparatuses, and computer program products for facilitating synchronization of setting configurations |
US8255650B1 (en) * | 2009-12-29 | 2012-08-28 | Iomega Corporation | Systems and methods for making incremental physical to virtual backups of computer system data |
-
2010
- 2010-10-08 AU AU2010362097A patent/AU2010362097B2/en not_active Ceased
- 2010-10-08 JP JP2013532052A patent/JP2013539142A/en active Pending
- 2010-10-08 BR BR112013008405A patent/BR112013008405A2/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2010-10-08 GB GB1306492.8A patent/GB2499531B/en active Active
- 2010-10-08 CN CN201080070572.7A patent/CN103229115B/en active Active
- 2010-10-08 DE DE112010005924T patent/DE112010005924T5/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2010-10-08 RU RU2013120952/08A patent/RU2553054C2/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2010-10-08 WO PCT/EP2010/006164 patent/WO2012045326A1/en active Application Filing
-
2013
- 2013-04-08 US US13/858,293 patent/US20130226868A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6449624B1 (en) * | 1999-10-18 | 2002-09-10 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Version control and audit trail in a process control system |
US20020120723A1 (en) * | 2001-02-23 | 2002-08-29 | Forth J. Bradford | Systems for in the field configuration of intelligent electronic devices |
US20070061033A1 (en) * | 2003-02-18 | 2007-03-15 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. | Version control for objects in a process plant configuration system |
US20080228957A1 (en) * | 2004-12-23 | 2008-09-18 | Abb Patent Gmbh | Method for Configuring Field Devices |
EP1770459A2 (en) * | 2005-09-30 | 2007-04-04 | Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. | Embedding data into controllers |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20130226868A1 (en) | 2013-08-29 |
AU2010362097B2 (en) | 2016-05-12 |
GB2499531B (en) | 2019-10-02 |
GB201306492D0 (en) | 2013-05-22 |
CN103229115A (en) | 2013-07-31 |
AU2010362097A1 (en) | 2013-05-02 |
CN103229115B (en) | 2017-07-18 |
RU2553054C2 (en) | 2015-06-10 |
GB2499531A (en) | 2013-08-21 |
JP2013539142A (en) | 2013-10-17 |
RU2013120952A (en) | 2014-11-20 |
BR112013008405A2 (en) | 2016-06-21 |
DE112010005924T5 (en) | 2013-09-05 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN108415835B (en) | Distributed data library test method, device, equipment and computer-readable medium | |
CN104598376A (en) | Data driving layered automation test system and method | |
CN105808437A (en) | Automation testing method and system based on test case data table | |
US7483757B2 (en) | Control system migration | |
CN105320681B (en) | Database content merging method and device | |
CN111176991B (en) | Automatic generation method for embedded software interface use cases | |
CN106030524A (en) | Method and device for visually implementing software code | |
CN102981882B (en) | Analytic method and device | |
GB2499531B (en) | Method and system for propagation of amendment made to a master to copies | |
US20070156742A1 (en) | Visual modeling method and apparatus | |
KR20180123060A (en) | Configuration management system for large-scale capital projects | |
CN108667659B (en) | Method and system for searching loop node in network topological graph | |
JP2013077124A (en) | Software test case generation device | |
JP2014238820A (en) | Shared data definition supporting system, its supporting device and program | |
US20180074934A1 (en) | Method for checking equivalence of code, non-transitory computer-readable storage medium, computer program product and computer for implementing the method | |
KR101530888B1 (en) | Method for refactoring software for improving weapon system | |
Hoffmann | SysML-based systems engineering using a model-driven development approach | |
CN111142927A (en) | Configuration file merging and splitting processing method and device | |
CN113010230B (en) | Configuration information processing method, device, equipment and storage medium | |
US20100293018A1 (en) | Test Model Abstraction For Testability in Product Line Engineering | |
Yu et al. | From goal models to feature models: A rule-based approach for software product lines | |
CN113051580B (en) | Hyperledger Fabric intelligent contract problem detection method | |
CN110765020B (en) | Test case generation method based on domain knowledge | |
CN108133002A (en) | Industrial control software database creating system | |
EP3391296B1 (en) | Variations in experiment graphs for machine learning |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 10771652 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 2013532052 Country of ref document: JP Kind code of ref document: A |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 112010005924 Country of ref document: DE Ref document number: 1120100059241 Country of ref document: DE |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 1306492 Country of ref document: GB Kind code of ref document: A Free format text: PCT FILING DATE = 20101008 |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 1306492.8 Country of ref document: GB |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 2010362097 Country of ref document: AU Date of ref document: 20101008 Kind code of ref document: A |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 2013120952 Country of ref document: RU Kind code of ref document: A |
|
122 | Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase |
Ref document number: 10771652 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |
|
REG | Reference to national code |
Ref country code: BR Ref legal event code: B01A Ref document number: 112013008405 Country of ref document: BR |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 112013008405 Country of ref document: BR Kind code of ref document: A2 Effective date: 20130405 |