WO2012090189A1 - Method and apparatus for ascertaining data access permission of groups of users to groups of data elements - Google Patents

Method and apparatus for ascertaining data access permission of groups of users to groups of data elements Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2012090189A1
WO2012090189A1 PCT/IL2010/001090 IL2010001090W WO2012090189A1 WO 2012090189 A1 WO2012090189 A1 WO 2012090189A1 IL 2010001090 W IL2010001090 W IL 2010001090W WO 2012090189 A1 WO2012090189 A1 WO 2012090189A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
user
resource
groups
access permissions
multiplicity
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/IL2010/001090
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Yakov Faitelson
Ohad Korkus
Yzhar Keysar
Original Assignee
Varonis Systems, Inc.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Varonis Systems, Inc. filed Critical Varonis Systems, Inc.
Priority to CN201611141689.5A priority Critical patent/CN106650508A/en
Priority to CN201080071011.9A priority patent/CN103299268B/en
Priority to EP10861449.6A priority patent/EP2659351A4/en
Priority to PCT/IL2010/001090 priority patent/WO2012090189A1/en
Publication of WO2012090189A1 publication Critical patent/WO2012090189A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F21/00Security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
    • G06F21/60Protecting data
    • G06F21/604Tools and structures for managing or administering access control systems
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F21/00Security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
    • G06F21/70Protecting specific internal or peripheral components, in which the protection of a component leads to protection of the entire computer
    • G06F21/78Protecting specific internal or peripheral components, in which the protection of a component leads to protection of the entire computer to assure secure storage of data
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L63/00Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security
    • H04L63/10Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for controlling access to devices or network resources
    • H04L63/104Grouping of entities
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F2221/00Indexing scheme relating to security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
    • G06F2221/21Indexing scheme relating to G06F21/00 and subgroups addressing additional information or applications relating to security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
    • G06F2221/2141Access rights, e.g. capability lists, access control lists, access tables, access matrices

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to data security generally and more particularly to data security in large organizations having a large number of resources and a large number of users.
  • the present invention seeks to provide methodology and a system for ascertaining access permissions of users to computer resources in a large organization having a large number of resources and a large number of users.
  • a method for ascertaining access permissions of a first multiplicity of users to a second multiplicity of computer resources on at least one storage unit including:
  • the given user is a member of the one of the first plurality of groups, ascribing to the given user the user/resource access permissions of the one of the first plurality of groups,
  • the given resource is a member of the one of the second plurality of groups, ascribing to the given resource the resource/user access permissions of the one of the second plurality of groups.
  • the grouping users includes identifying a set of user security groups, each of the user security groups having access permissions to at least one of the second multiplicity of computer resources on the at least one storage unit, identifying, for each user of the first multiplicity of users, a subset of the user security groups of which the user is a member, and if a first subset of the user security groups, of which a first user of the first multiplicity of users is a member, is identical to a second subset of the user security groups, of which a second user of the first multiplicity of users is a member, grouping the first user and the second user in a single one of the first plurality of groups with respect to the at least one storage unit.
  • the grouping users includes dividing the second multiplicity of computer resources into at least two portions, and grouping the users, among the first multiplicity of users, into the first plurality of groups wherein all members of one of the first plurality of groups have at least nearly identical user/resource access permissions to computer resources included in one of the at least two portions.
  • the dividing includes for each user of the first multiplicity of users, calculating a fraction of the second multiplicity of computer resources to which the user has access permissions, and comparing the fraction to a threshold value, denoting each user, for whom the fraction is smaller than the threshold value, as a degenerate security group, and defining a first portion of the second multiplicity of computer resources to be the union of all computer resources which include access permissions for any degenerate security group.
  • computer resources in the second multiplicity of computer resources are arranged in a computer resource hierarchy.
  • the grouping resources includes for each resource in the computer resource hierarchy, retrieving the resource/user access permissions of the resource and the resource/user access permissions of an immediate ancestor of the resource in the computer resource hierarchy, and if the resource/user access permissions of the immediate ancestor are identical to the resource/user access permissions of the resource, grouping the resource and the immediate ancestor in a single one of the second plurality of groups.
  • the grouping the resource includes providing a pointer from the resource to the immediate ancestor and extending pointers which point to the resource to point to the immediate ancestor.
  • a method for ascertaining access permissions of a first multiplicity of users to a second multiplicity of computer resources on at least one storage unit including grouping users, among the first multiplicity of users, into a first plurality of groups wherein all members of at least one of the first plurality of groups have at least nearly identical user/resource access permissions to the second multiplicity of computer resources on the at least one storage unit, ascertaining whether a given user is a member of one of the first plurality of groups, and if the given user is a member of the one of the first plurality of groups, ascribing to the given user the user/resource access permissions of the one of the first plurality of groups.
  • the grouping users includes identifying a set of user security groups, each of the user security groups having access permissions to at least one of the second multiplicity of computer resources on the at least one storage unit, identifying, for each of the first multiplicity of users, a subset of the user security groups of which the user is a member, and if a first subset of the user security groups, of which a first user of the first multiplicity of users is a member, is identical to a second subset of the user security groups, of which a second user of the first multiplicity of users is a member, grouping the first user and the second user in a single one of the first plurality of groups with respect to the at least one storage unit.
  • the grouping users includes dividing the second multiplicity of computer resources into at least two portions, and grouping the users, among the first multiplicity of users, into the first plurality of groups wherein all members of one of the first plurality of groups have at least nearly identical user/resource access permissions to computer resources included in one of the at least two portions.
  • the dividing includes for each user of the first multiplicity of users, calculating a fraction of the second multiplicity of computer resources to which the user has access permissions, and comparing the fraction to a threshold value, denoting each user, for whom the fraction is smaller than the threshold value, as a degenerate security group, and defining a first portion of the second multiplicity of computer resources to be the union of all computer resources which include access permissions for any degenerate security group.
  • a method for ascertaining access permissions of a first multiplicity of users to a second multiplicity of computer resources on at least one storage unit including grouping resources, among the second multiplicity of computer resources, into a plurality of groups wherein all members of at least one of the plurality of groups have at least nearly identical resource/user access permissions, ascertaining whether a given resource is a member of one of the plurality of groups, and if the given resource is a member of the one of the plurality of groups, ascribing to the given resource the resource/user access permissions of the one of the plurality of groups.
  • the computer resources in the second multiplicity of computer resources are arranged in a computer resource hierarchy.
  • the grouping resources includes for each resource in the computer resource hierarchy, retrieving the resource/user access permissions of the resource and the resource/user access permissions of an immediate ancestor of the resource in the computer resource hierarchy, and if the resource/user access permissions of the immediate ancestor are identical to the resource/user access permissions of the resource, grouping the resource and the immediate ancestor in a single one of the second plurality of groups.
  • the grouping the resource includes providing a pointer from the resource to the immediate ancestor and extending pointers, which point to the resource to point to the immediate ancestor.
  • apparatus for ascertaining access permissions of a first multiplicity of users to a second multiplicity of computer resources on at least one storage unit, the apparatus including:
  • user grouping functionality operative to group users, among the first multiplicity of users, into a first plurality of groups wherein all members of at least one of the first plurality of groups have at least nearly identical user/resource access permissions to the second multiplicity of computer resources on the at least one storage unit,
  • computer resource grouping functionality operative to group computer resources, among the second multiplicity of computer resources, into a second plurality of groups wherein all members of at least one of the second plurality of groups have at least nearly identical resource/user access permissions
  • user access permissions ascribing functionality operative to ascertain whether a given user is a member of one of the first plurality of groups, and if the given user is a member of the one of the first plurality of groups, to ascribe to the given user the user/resource access permissions of the one of the first plurality of groups, and
  • computer resource access permissions ascribing functionality operative to ascertain whether a given computer resource is a member of one of the second plurality of groups, and if the given computer resource is a member of the one of the second plurality of groups, to ascribe to the given computer resource the resource/user access permissions of the one of the second plurality of groups.
  • the user grouping functionality includes user security group identification functionality operative to identify a plurality of user security groups, each of the user security groups having access permissions to at least one of the second multiplicity of computer resources on the at least one storage unit, user security group subset identification functionality operative to identify, for each of the first multiplicity of users, a subset of the user security groups of which the user is a member, and user subset comparison functionality operative to group a first user and a second user in a single one of the first plurality of groups, with respect to the at least one storage unit, if a first subset of the user security groups of which the first user is a member is identical to a second subset of the user security groups of which the second user is a member.
  • the apparatus also includes a computer resource dividing functionality operative to divide the second multiplicity of computer resources into at least two portions, and wherein the user grouping functionality is operative to group users, among the first multiplicity of users, into the first plurality of groups wherein all members of one of the first plurality of groups have at least nearly identical user/resource access permissions to computer resources included in one of the at least two portions.
  • the computer resource dividing functionality includes fraction calculating functionality operative, for each user of the first multiplicity of users, to calculate a fraction of the second multiplicity of computer resources to which the user has access permissions, and to compare the fraction to a threshold value, user denoting functionality operative to denote each user, for whom the fraction is smaller than the threshold value, as a degenerate security group, and portion defining functionality operative to define a first portion of the second multiplicity of computer resources to be the union of all computer resources which include access permissions for any degenerate security group.
  • computer resources in the second multiplicity of computer resources are arranged in a computer resource hierarchy.
  • the computer resource grouping functionality includes resource/user access permissions retrieval functionality operative, for each resource in the computer resource hierarchy, to retrieve the resource/user access permissions of the resource and the resource/user access permissions of an immediate ancestor of the resource in the computer resource hierarchy and resource/user access permissions comparison functionality, operative to compare the resource/user access permissions of the resource to the resource/user access permissions of the immediate ancestor, and if the resource/user access permissions of the immediate ancestor are identical to the resource/user access permissions of the given resource, to group the resource and the immediate ancestor in a single one of the second plurality of groups.
  • the resource/user access permissions comparison functionality is operative to provide a pointer from the resource to the immediate ancestor and to extend pointers which point to the resource to point to the immediate ancestor.
  • apparatus for ascertaining access permissions of a first multiplicity of users to a second multiplicity of computer resources on at least one storage unit including user grouping functionality operative to group users, among the first multiplicity of users, into a first plurality of groups wherein all members of at least one of the first plurality of groups have at least nearly identical user/resource access permissions to the second multiplicity of computer resources on the at least one storage unit, and user access permissions ascribing functionality operative to ascertain whether a given user is a member of one of the first plurality of groups, and if the given user is a member of the one of the first plurality of groups, to ascribe to the given user the user/resource access permissions of the one of the first plurality of groups.
  • the user grouping functionality includes user security group identification functionality operative to identify a plurality of user security groups, each of the user security groups having access permissions to at least one of the second multiplicity of computer resources on the at least one storage unit, user security group subset identification functionality operative to identify, for each of the first multiplicity of users, a subset of the user security groups of which the user is a member, and user subset comparison functionality operative to group a first user and a second user in a single one of the first plurality of groups, with respect to the at least one storage unit, if a first subset of the user security groups of which the first user is a member is identical to a second subset of the user security groups of which the second user is a member.
  • the apparatus also includes a computer resource dividing functionality operative to divide the second multiplicity of computer resources into at least two portions, and wherein the user grouping functionality is operative to group users, among the first multiplicity of users, into the first plurality of groups wherein all members of one of the first plurality of groups have at least nearly identical user/resource access permissions to computer resources included in one of the at least two portions.
  • the computer resource dividing functionality includes fraction calculating functionality operative, for each user of the first multiplicity of users, to calculate a fraction of the second multiplicity of computer resources to which the user has access permissions, and to compare the fraction to a threshold value, user denoting functionality operative to denote each user, for whom the fraction is smaller than the threshold value, as a degenerate security group, and portion defining functionality operative to define a first portion of the second multiplicity of computer resources to be the union of all computer resources which include access permissions for any degenerate security group.
  • apparatus for ascertaining access permissions of a first multiplicity of users to a second multiplicity of computer resources on at least one storage unit including computer resource grouping functionality operative to group resources, among the second multiplicity of computer resources, into a second plurality of groups wherein all members of at least one of the second plurality of groups have at least nearly identical resource/user access permissions, and computer resource access permissions ascribing functionality operative to ascertain whether a given computer resource is a member of one of the second plurality of groups, and if the given computer resource is a member of the one of the second plurality of groups, to ascribe to the given computer resource the resource/user access permissions of the one of the second plurality of groups.
  • computer resources in the second multiplicity of computer resources are arranged in a computer resource hierarchy.
  • the computer resource grouping functionality includes resource/user access permissions retrieval functionality operative, for each resource in the computer resource hierarchy, to retrieve the resource/user access permissions of the resource and the resource/user access permissions of an immediate ancestor of the resource in the computer resource hierarchy and resource/user access permissions comparison functionality, operative to compare the resource/user access permissions of the resource to the resource/user access permissions of the immediate ancestor, and if the resource/user access permissions of the immediate ancestor are identical to the resource/user access permissions of the resource, to group the resource and the immediate ancestor in a single one of the second plurality of groups.
  • the resource/user access permissions comparison functionality is operative to provide a pointer from the resource to the immediate ancestor and to extend pointers which point to the resource to point to the immediate ancestor.
  • Fig. 1 is a simplified illustration of operation of a preferred embodiment of the present invention in a large organization having a large number of resources and a large number of users;
  • Fig. 2 is a simplified flowchart illustrating general methodology for ascertaining access permissions of users to computer resources in a large organization having a large number of resources and a large number of users in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention
  • Figs. 3A and 3B taken together, are a simplified flowchart illustrating methodology for grouping users in a large organization based on their access permissions, which methodology forms part of the methodology of Fig. 2;
  • Figs. 4A and 4B taken together, are a simplified flowchart illustrating methodology for grouping computer resources in a large organization based on the access permissions to the computer resources, which methodology forms part of the methodology of Fig. 2;
  • Figs. 5A, 5B and 5C taken together, are a simplified flowchart illustrating methodology for computing a response to an access permissions query, which methodology forms part of the methodology of Fig. 2.
  • Data security policies typically determine who has access to an organization's data, which data is typically stored on various computer systems. These policies are rarely static. This is partly because users from within the organization, such as employees, partners and contractors, can pose a threat to sensitive data as severe as threats from outside the organization. Thus, as the structure and personnel makeup of the organization change ⁇ the security policy should be adjusted accordingly. Information technology departments often find it difficult to manage user data access permissions and to ensure that required information is conveniently available, while protecting the organization's sensitive data.
  • Large business organizations may operate computer systems comprising large numbers of servers, which are often geographically distributed. Storage elements in such systems may be accessible by a large numbers of users.
  • Various people associated with data access authorizations including information technology personnel, operational personnel such as account managers and third party reviewers such as legal advisors may need to routinely inquire as to user access permissions to specific data.
  • Access control technologies have not been optimally implemented in systems that utilize diverse access control models.
  • the state of the art today is such that there is no easy way for system administrators to know which users are authorized to access each specific data item in such environments.
  • a solution is also lacking for the related problems of redundant access permissions and of orphan accounts belonging to personnel who no longer belong to the organization.
  • improvements in controlling user access permissions in order to improve data security, prevent fraud, and improve company productivity.
  • misuse of data access permissions, even by authorized users is a concern for those charged with simplification and automation of system security.
  • FIG. 1 there is seen a schematic representation of a large organization having a first multiplicity of users and a second multiplicity of computer resources, such as computer files, which may reside on many file servers.
  • the users and the file servers may be geographically distributed independently of their function.
  • a hierarchical structure of the second multiplicity of computer resources, and/or a grouping of the first multiplicity of users in accordance with their access permissions with respect to computer resources residing on a specific server are employed when responding to access permission queries, thereby allowing for better response times to such queries.
  • the term "user/resource access permissions" relates to a list of computer resources, located on a specific server or storage unit, to which the given user has access permissions.
  • two users have identical user/resource access permissions if, with respect to a specific server or storage unit, both users have access permissions to an identical list of computer resources located on that server or storage unit.
  • resource/user access permissions relates to a list of users with access permissions to the given computer resource.
  • resource/user access permissions two computer resources have identical resource/user access permissions if an identical list of users has access permissions to both computer resources.
  • access permissions relates to reading permissions, writing permissions and executing permissions, or any combination thereof. For example, a given user has access permissions to a given resource if the user has reading permissions to the given resource, even if the user does not have writing permissions or executing permissions to the given resource.
  • a first plurality of groups of users is defined, wherein all members of each one of the first plurality of groups of users have at least nearly identical user/resource access permissions to the computer resources on a given file server 106.
  • a second plurality of groups of computer resources is defined, wherein all members of each one of the second plurality of groups of computer resources have at least nearly identical resource/user access permissions, for example each computer file in a given group is accessible by an identical or nearly identical group of users.
  • all files relating to accounts payable may be members of the same computer resource group, here designated by the letter 'a'.
  • all files relating to development of a door may be members of the same computer resource group, here designated by the letter 'd'.
  • all members of each user group have at least nearly identical user/resource access permission profiles. For example, all members of user group A have access to the company's accounts and all members of user group D have access to the engineering files.
  • all members of each computer resource group have at least nearly identical resource/user access permission profiles, for example all members of computer resource group 'a' are accessible by bookkeepers and all members of computer resource group'd' are accessible by design engineers.
  • FIG. 2 is a simplified flowchart illustrating general methodology for ascertaining access permissions of users to computer resources in a large organization having a large number of resources and a large number of users in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
  • a first preparatory stage users in the organization are divided into groups based on their access permissions with respect to a given server in the organization, as seen at step 200. Specifically, for each server, users in the organization are divided into a plurality of user groups, wherein users in each group have similar or preferably identical access permissions with respect to files in the server. The methodology for grouping the users is described in further detail hereinbelow with reference to Fig. 3.
  • the computer resources of the organization are grouped based on the access permissions thereto. Specifically, in a hierarchical server system, unless otherwise specified, a computer resource has the same access permissions as the direct ancestor thereof.
  • computer resources may be grouped such that each descendant computer resource, which has access permissions identical to those of its ancestor computer resource, points to the access control list of its ancestor, rather than duplicating that access control list.
  • the methodology for grouping the computer resources is described in further detail hereinbelow with reference to Fig. 4.
  • grouping of users of step 200 and grouping of computer resources of step 202 may be carried out in any sequence, or in parallel, and preferably is performed periodically, in order to account for changes in user access permissions and/or in the hierarchical structure of the computer resources in the organization.
  • an access permissions query is presented, typically by a member of the organization or a department thereof, as seen at step 204.
  • a typical query would comprise a subset of users and a subset of storage elements.
  • a response to such a query would list, for each user in the subset of users, access permissions to each of the storage elements in the subset of storage elements.
  • one query may include all the users in the organization as the user subset, and a given computer resource as the storage element subset. A response to this query would identify all the users who have permission to access the given computer resource.
  • the query may include all of the computer resources of the organization as the storage element subset, and a given user as the user subset. A response to this query would identify all the storage elements, which may be accessed by the given user.
  • the query is processed and a response thereto is computed.
  • the response to the query includes, for each user listed in the query, a list of a sub-group of the computer resources listed in the query to which the user has access.
  • the methodology for computing the response to the query is described in further detail hereinbelow with reference to Fig. 5.
  • the response to the query is then forwarded to the person or party who presented the access permissions query, indicated as step 208.
  • Figs. 3A and 3B are a simplified flowchart illustrating methodology for grouping users in a large organization based on their access permissions, which methodology constitutes the first preparatory stage 200 of the methodology of Fig. 2.
  • the goal of such grouping is to create user groups, wherein users in a single user group have similar, or preferably identical, access permissions with respect to computer resources stored on a given server.
  • a prerequisite for the creation of such user groups is the definition of user security groups, which is carried out prior to first step 300 of Fig. 3A.
  • User security groups are pre-defined by the system administrator. Typically, user security groups correspond to different departments within the organization. User security groups may include, for example, an accounting user security group, a research and development user security group, etc. Each respective user security group includes those users who belong to the department to which the user security group corresponds. Users may belong to more than one user security group. For example, the secretary of a research and development department may belong to an administrative user security group and a research and development user security group.
  • Each user security group has pre-assigned access permissions to computer resources on a given server.
  • An access control list for a given computer resource is a list of user security group access permissions to that computer resource.
  • a server is selected, as seen at step 300. It is appreciated that the users will be grouped only with respect to their access permissions to computer resources residing on the selected server.
  • the access control list for computer resources which reside on the selected server is reviewed, in order to extract those user security groups, and hence those users belonging to those user security groups, with permission to access at least some of the computer resources stored on the server, as seen at step 302.
  • the users' access permissions to computer resources stored on the selected server are compared to check whether they are identical with respect to all computer resources stored on the selected server as seen at decision step 304. If both users in the pair have identical access permissions to computer resources stored on the selected server they are assigned to the same initial user group with respect to the selected server, as seen at step 306. Otherwise, they are assigned to two different initial user groups with respect to the selected server, as seen at step 308.
  • the initial user groups are pre-runners of the user groups that this methodology seeks to create.
  • the initial user groups may require further refinement, as described below, to arrive at the desired final user groups. It is appreciated that two users may have very similar access permissions on the selected server, other than one or two specific computer resources to which their access permissions differ. This may happen, for example, when the server includes some users' home directories, in which case two users could have identical access permissions to all computer resources in the server other than the home directories, for which each user would have access permission to his or her own specific home directory, but would generally not have access permission to other users' home directories.
  • This situation may cause the server to be grouped into many small initial user groups or even singletons, even though there are larger potential initial user groups with very similar, although not identical, access permissions. As will be described hereinbelow, this situation may be overcome by virtually dividing the computer resources on the server into two or more virtual servers.
  • the number of resulting initial user groups and the sizes thereof are reviewed.
  • the number of initial user groups is compared to a first predetermined threshold number, as seen at decision step 310, and the number of singleton initial user groups is compared to a second predetermined threshold number, as seen at decision step 312. If the number of initial user groups does not exceed the first threshold number and if the number of singleton initial user groups does not exceed the second threshold number the user assignment is complete.
  • the initial user groups and singletons now constitute user groups, as referred to above, specifically in reference to step 200 of Fig. 2.
  • Fig. 3B it is seen that if the number of initial user groups exceeds the first threshold number, and/or if the number of singleton initial user groups exceeds the second threshold number, the server is divided into two virtual servers, as seen at step 314.
  • the number of computer resources stored on the server to which the specific user or user security group is permitted access is established, as seen at step 316.
  • the fraction of computer resources to which the specific user or user security group is permitted access is then calculated and compared to a fraction threshold value, such as 1%, as seen at decision step 318.
  • the user or user security group is denoted as a degenerate security group, as seen at step 320. Otherwise, the user or user security group is denoted as an important security group, as seen at step 322.
  • the union of computer resources including access permissions for the degenerate security groups is defined as one virtual server, denoted a disorganized virtual server, as seen at step 324.
  • the disorganized virtual server is assumed to include few computer resources with similar access control lists and/or few users with identical access permissions. Assignment of users to initial user groups based on the computer resources in the disorganized virtual server is likely to result in a large number of initial user groups and/or singleton initial user groups and is inefficient and therefore unnecessary.
  • the computer resources on the server which do not belong to the disorganized virtual server are defined as a second virtual server, denoted an organized virtual server, as seen at step 326.
  • the organized virtual server is assumed to include files with similar access control lists, such that assignment of users to initial user groups based on their access permissions to computer resources in this virtual server is likely to result in a small number of organized initial user groups.
  • the organized virtual server is selected as the server with respect to which users will be assigned to initial user groups, as seen at step 328. Subsequently, users are assigned to initial user groups again based on their access permissions to computer resources stored on the organized virtual server, as described hereinabove with reference to steps 302 to 308.
  • These initial user groups and singleton initial user groups now constitute user groups, as referred to above, specifically in reference to step 200 of Fig. 2.
  • Figs. 4A and 4B are a simplified flowchart illustrating methodology for grouping computer resources in a large organization based on access permissions to the computer resources, which methodology constitutes the second preparatory stage 202 of the methodology of Fig. 2.
  • a node of the computer resource hierarchy is selected for processing, as seen at step 400.
  • the computer resource hierarchy is processed from the leaves to the root, in which case the first nodes selected for processing are the leaves, or nodes at the lowest level of the computer resource hierarchy.
  • the existence of an immediate ancestor thereof in the hierarchy is checked, as seen at decision step 402. If the selected node does not have an immediate ancestor, it is deduced to be the root of the hierarchy. The node is designated as a distinct node as seen at step 404, and the process is finished. Otherwise, the access control list of the node is extracted as seen at step 405, and the access control list of the immediate ancestor of the selected node is extracted as seen at step 406. The access control lists of the selected node and of its immediate ancestor are subsequently compared, as seen at decision step 408.
  • a pointer which points from the selected node to the access control list of its immediate ancestor is added to the hierarchy, as seen at step 410. Additionally, all pointers pointing to the access control list of the selected node are moved to point to the access control list of the immediate ancestor of the selected node, as seen at step 412, and a processing indication, indicating that the node has been processed, is added to the selected node, as seen at step 414.
  • the node is designated as a distinct node as seen at step 416, and a processing indication, indicating that the node has been processed, is added to the selected node, as seen at step 418.
  • the level of the hierarchy to which the selected node belongs is reviewed in order to determine if there are any unprocessed nodes at that level, as seen at decision step 420. If there are any unprocessed nodes at the level of the selected node, a new node at that level is selected as seen at step 422, and the processing of that node proceeds as described hereinabove with reference to steps 402-418. Otherwise, a node which is located one level higher in the hierarchy than the selected node, such as the immediate ancestor of the selected node, is selected, as seen at step 424, and the processing thereof proceeds as described hereinabove with reference to steps 402-418.
  • Figs. 5 A, 5B and 5C are a simplified flowchart illustrating methodology for computing a response to an access permissions query, which methodology constitutes step 206 of the methodology of Fig. 2.
  • a group of computer resources to be processed is defined, as seen at step 500.
  • the group is typically empty and is populated during the processing of the query.
  • step 501 is performed for each computer resource included in the query, to detect all of the distinct computer resource nodes included in the query.
  • step 502 for each computer resource included in the query, it is detected whether it comprises a distinct node of the computer resource hierarchy.
  • the computer resource does comprise a distinct node of the computer resource hierarchy, it is added to the group of computer resources to be processed, as seen at step 504. If the computer resource does not comprise a distinct node, the pointer associated therewith is followed to an ancestor node that comprises a distinct node, as seen at step 506.
  • step 508 it is established if the computer resource comprising the ancestor node that comprises a distinct node has been previously added to the group of computer resources to be processed. If the computer resource comprising the ancestor node has been not previously added to the group of computer resources to be processed, it is now added to the group, as seen at step 510. If the computer resource comprising the ancestor node has been previously added to the group of computer resources to be processed, it is not added to the group a second time, but is associated, in the group of computer resources to be processed, with the currently processed computer resource, in order to enable the provision of a complete query response, as seen at step 512. This is typically achieved by defining a pointer which points from the currently processed computer resource to the instance of the distinct ancestor which is included in the group of computer resources to be processed.
  • a user included in the query whose access permissions will now be processed, is selected.
  • a computer resource which is included in the group of resources to be processed, is selected, and the physical server on which it resides is ascertained, as seen at step 515.
  • the specific user group to which the user belongs, with respect to the server on which the computer resource resides is ascertained, as seen at step 516. It is then checked whether, during the processing of this computer resource, the access permissions of another user belonging to the same specific user group have been computed, as seen at decision step 518.
  • the computed access permissions are assigned to the present user, as seen at step 520. Otherwise, the access permissions of the user, and/or of the user group to which the user belongs, to the computer resource, are extracted from the access control list associated with the computer resource, as seen at step 522.
  • a computer resource exists, that computer resource is selected, as seen at step 526, and is processed with respect to the selected user as described hereinabove with reference to steps 515 to 522. If no such computer resource exists, it is checked whether there are any users included in the query whose access permissions have not yet been computed, as seen at decision step 528. If such a user exists, that user is selected, as seen at step 530, and processing of access permissions thereof proceeds as described hereinabove with reference to steps 514 to 522.
  • a response to the query which comprises a paired list including a pair for each user and each computer resource included in the original query. It is appreciated that when generating such a query response, the results for each computer resource which comprises a distinct node ancestor for more than one of the computer resources included in the query are provided multiple times, in order to provide a query response for each computer resource included in the query.

Abstract

A method for ascertaining access permissions of users to computer resources on a storage unit, the method including grouping users into a plurality of user groups wherein all members of at least one of the user groups have at least nearly identical user/resource access permissions to the computer resources, grouping resources into a plurality of resource groups wherein all members of at least one of the resource groups have at least nearly identical resource/user access permissions, ascertaining whether a given user is a member of a user group, if the given user is a member of a user group, ascribing to the given user the user/resource access permissions of the user group, ascertaining whether a given resource is a member of a resource group, and if the given resource is a member of a resource group, ascribing to the given resource the resource/user access permissions of the resource group.

Description

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ASCERTAINING DATA ACCESS PERMISSION OF GROUPS OF USERS TO GROUPS OF DATA ELEMENTS
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to data security generally and more particularly to data security in large organizations having a large number of resources and a large number of users.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The following U.S. Patents are believed to represent the current state of the art: 6,772,350; 6,308,173 and 5,889,952.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention seeks to provide methodology and a system for ascertaining access permissions of users to computer resources in a large organization having a large number of resources and a large number of users.
There is thus provided in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention a method for ascertaining access permissions of a first multiplicity of users to a second multiplicity of computer resources on at least one storage unit, the method including:
grouping users, among the first multiplicity of users, into a first plurality of groups wherein all members of at least one of the first plurality of groups have at least nearly identical user/resource access permissions to the second multiplicity of computer resources on the at least one storage unit,
grouping resources, among the second multiplicity of computer resources, into a second plurality of groups wherein all members of at least one of the second plurality of groups have at least nearly identical resource/user access permissions,
ascertaining whether a given user is a member of one of the first plurality of groups,
if the given user is a member of the one of the first plurality of groups, ascribing to the given user the user/resource access permissions of the one of the first plurality of groups,
ascertaining whether a given resource is a member of one of the second plurality of groups, and
if the given resource is a member of the one of the second plurality of groups, ascribing to the given resource the resource/user access permissions of the one of the second plurality of groups.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the grouping users includes identifying a set of user security groups, each of the user security groups having access permissions to at least one of the second multiplicity of computer resources on the at least one storage unit, identifying, for each user of the first multiplicity of users, a subset of the user security groups of which the user is a member, and if a first subset of the user security groups, of which a first user of the first multiplicity of users is a member, is identical to a second subset of the user security groups, of which a second user of the first multiplicity of users is a member, grouping the first user and the second user in a single one of the first plurality of groups with respect to the at least one storage unit.
In accordance with a further preferred embodiment of the present invention the grouping users includes dividing the second multiplicity of computer resources into at least two portions, and grouping the users, among the first multiplicity of users, into the first plurality of groups wherein all members of one of the first plurality of groups have at least nearly identical user/resource access permissions to computer resources included in one of the at least two portions.
In accordance with another preferred embodiment of the present invention the dividing includes for each user of the first multiplicity of users, calculating a fraction of the second multiplicity of computer resources to which the user has access permissions, and comparing the fraction to a threshold value, denoting each user, for whom the fraction is smaller than the threshold value, as a degenerate security group, and defining a first portion of the second multiplicity of computer resources to be the union of all computer resources which include access permissions for any degenerate security group.
In accordance with another preferred embodiment of the present invention, computer resources in the second multiplicity of computer resources are arranged in a computer resource hierarchy. Preferably, the grouping resources includes for each resource in the computer resource hierarchy, retrieving the resource/user access permissions of the resource and the resource/user access permissions of an immediate ancestor of the resource in the computer resource hierarchy, and if the resource/user access permissions of the immediate ancestor are identical to the resource/user access permissions of the resource, grouping the resource and the immediate ancestor in a single one of the second plurality of groups. Additionally or alternatively, the grouping the resource includes providing a pointer from the resource to the immediate ancestor and extending pointers which point to the resource to point to the immediate ancestor.
There is additionally provided, in accordance with another preferred embodiment of the present invention, a method for ascertaining access permissions of a first multiplicity of users to a second multiplicity of computer resources on at least one storage unit, the method including grouping users, among the first multiplicity of users, into a first plurality of groups wherein all members of at least one of the first plurality of groups have at least nearly identical user/resource access permissions to the second multiplicity of computer resources on the at least one storage unit, ascertaining whether a given user is a member of one of the first plurality of groups, and if the given user is a member of the one of the first plurality of groups, ascribing to the given user the user/resource access permissions of the one of the first plurality of groups.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the grouping users includes identifying a set of user security groups, each of the user security groups having access permissions to at least one of the second multiplicity of computer resources on the at least one storage unit, identifying, for each of the first multiplicity of users, a subset of the user security groups of which the user is a member, and if a first subset of the user security groups, of which a first user of the first multiplicity of users is a member, is identical to a second subset of the user security groups, of which a second user of the first multiplicity of users is a member, grouping the first user and the second user in a single one of the first plurality of groups with respect to the at least one storage unit.
In accordance with another preferred embodiment of the present invention the grouping users includes dividing the second multiplicity of computer resources into at least two portions, and grouping the users, among the first multiplicity of users, into the first plurality of groups wherein all members of one of the first plurality of groups have at least nearly identical user/resource access permissions to computer resources included in one of the at least two portions. Preferably, the dividing includes for each user of the first multiplicity of users, calculating a fraction of the second multiplicity of computer resources to which the user has access permissions, and comparing the fraction to a threshold value, denoting each user, for whom the fraction is smaller than the threshold value, as a degenerate security group, and defining a first portion of the second multiplicity of computer resources to be the union of all computer resources which include access permissions for any degenerate security group.
There is additionally provided, in accordance with an additional preferred embodiment of the present invention, a method for ascertaining access permissions of a first multiplicity of users to a second multiplicity of computer resources on at least one storage unit, the method including grouping resources, among the second multiplicity of computer resources, into a plurality of groups wherein all members of at least one of the plurality of groups have at least nearly identical resource/user access permissions, ascertaining whether a given resource is a member of one of the plurality of groups, and if the given resource is a member of the one of the plurality of groups, ascribing to the given resource the resource/user access permissions of the one of the plurality of groups.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the computer resources in the second multiplicity of computer resources are arranged in a computer resource hierarchy. Preferably, the grouping resources includes for each resource in the computer resource hierarchy, retrieving the resource/user access permissions of the resource and the resource/user access permissions of an immediate ancestor of the resource in the computer resource hierarchy, and if the resource/user access permissions of the immediate ancestor are identical to the resource/user access permissions of the resource, grouping the resource and the immediate ancestor in a single one of the second plurality of groups.
In accordance with a further preferred embodiment of the present invention the grouping the resource includes providing a pointer from the resource to the immediate ancestor and extending pointers, which point to the resource to point to the immediate ancestor.
There is further provided in accordance with a yet another preferred embodiment of the present invention apparatus for ascertaining access permissions of a first multiplicity of users to a second multiplicity of computer resources on at least one storage unit, the apparatus including:
user grouping functionality operative to group users, among the first multiplicity of users, into a first plurality of groups wherein all members of at least one of the first plurality of groups have at least nearly identical user/resource access permissions to the second multiplicity of computer resources on the at least one storage unit,
computer resource grouping functionality operative to group computer resources, among the second multiplicity of computer resources, into a second plurality of groups wherein all members of at least one of the second plurality of groups have at least nearly identical resource/user access permissions,
user access permissions ascribing functionality operative to ascertain whether a given user is a member of one of the first plurality of groups, and if the given user is a member of the one of the first plurality of groups, to ascribe to the given user the user/resource access permissions of the one of the first plurality of groups, and
computer resource access permissions ascribing functionality operative to ascertain whether a given computer resource is a member of one of the second plurality of groups, and if the given computer resource is a member of the one of the second plurality of groups, to ascribe to the given computer resource the resource/user access permissions of the one of the second plurality of groups.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the user grouping functionality includes user security group identification functionality operative to identify a plurality of user security groups, each of the user security groups having access permissions to at least one of the second multiplicity of computer resources on the at least one storage unit, user security group subset identification functionality operative to identify, for each of the first multiplicity of users, a subset of the user security groups of which the user is a member, and user subset comparison functionality operative to group a first user and a second user in a single one of the first plurality of groups, with respect to the at least one storage unit, if a first subset of the user security groups of which the first user is a member is identical to a second subset of the user security groups of which the second user is a member.
In accordance with a further preferred embodiment of the present invention the apparatus also includes a computer resource dividing functionality operative to divide the second multiplicity of computer resources into at least two portions, and wherein the user grouping functionality is operative to group users, among the first multiplicity of users, into the first plurality of groups wherein all members of one of the first plurality of groups have at least nearly identical user/resource access permissions to computer resources included in one of the at least two portions.
In accordance with another preferred embodiment of the present invention the computer resource dividing functionality includes fraction calculating functionality operative, for each user of the first multiplicity of users, to calculate a fraction of the second multiplicity of computer resources to which the user has access permissions, and to compare the fraction to a threshold value, user denoting functionality operative to denote each user, for whom the fraction is smaller than the threshold value, as a degenerate security group, and portion defining functionality operative to define a first portion of the second multiplicity of computer resources to be the union of all computer resources which include access permissions for any degenerate security group. Preferably, computer resources in the second multiplicity of computer resources are arranged in a computer resource hierarchy.
In accordance with another preferred embodiment of the present invention the computer resource grouping functionality includes resource/user access permissions retrieval functionality operative, for each resource in the computer resource hierarchy, to retrieve the resource/user access permissions of the resource and the resource/user access permissions of an immediate ancestor of the resource in the computer resource hierarchy and resource/user access permissions comparison functionality, operative to compare the resource/user access permissions of the resource to the resource/user access permissions of the immediate ancestor, and if the resource/user access permissions of the immediate ancestor are identical to the resource/user access permissions of the given resource, to group the resource and the immediate ancestor in a single one of the second plurality of groups.
In accordance with another preferred embodiment of the present invention the resource/user access permissions comparison functionality is operative to provide a pointer from the resource to the immediate ancestor and to extend pointers which point to the resource to point to the immediate ancestor.
There is additionally provided, in accordance with still another preferred embodiment of the present invention, apparatus for ascertaining access permissions of a first multiplicity of users to a second multiplicity of computer resources on at least one storage unit, the apparatus including user grouping functionality operative to group users, among the first multiplicity of users, into a first plurality of groups wherein all members of at least one of the first plurality of groups have at least nearly identical user/resource access permissions to the second multiplicity of computer resources on the at least one storage unit, and user access permissions ascribing functionality operative to ascertain whether a given user is a member of one of the first plurality of groups, and if the given user is a member of the one of the first plurality of groups, to ascribe to the given user the user/resource access permissions of the one of the first plurality of groups.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the user grouping functionality includes user security group identification functionality operative to identify a plurality of user security groups, each of the user security groups having access permissions to at least one of the second multiplicity of computer resources on the at least one storage unit, user security group subset identification functionality operative to identify, for each of the first multiplicity of users, a subset of the user security groups of which the user is a member, and user subset comparison functionality operative to group a first user and a second user in a single one of the first plurality of groups, with respect to the at least one storage unit, if a first subset of the user security groups of which the first user is a member is identical to a second subset of the user security groups of which the second user is a member.
In accordance with another preferred embodiment of the present invention the apparatus also includes a computer resource dividing functionality operative to divide the second multiplicity of computer resources into at least two portions, and wherein the user grouping functionality is operative to group users, among the first multiplicity of users, into the first plurality of groups wherein all members of one of the first plurality of groups have at least nearly identical user/resource access permissions to computer resources included in one of the at least two portions. Preferably, the computer resource dividing functionality includes fraction calculating functionality operative, for each user of the first multiplicity of users, to calculate a fraction of the second multiplicity of computer resources to which the user has access permissions, and to compare the fraction to a threshold value, user denoting functionality operative to denote each user, for whom the fraction is smaller than the threshold value, as a degenerate security group, and portion defining functionality operative to define a first portion of the second multiplicity of computer resources to be the union of all computer resources which include access permissions for any degenerate security group.
There is additionally provided, in accordance with an additional preferred embodiment of the present invention, apparatus for ascertaining access permissions of a first multiplicity of users to a second multiplicity of computer resources on at least one storage unit, the apparatus including computer resource grouping functionality operative to group resources, among the second multiplicity of computer resources, into a second plurality of groups wherein all members of at least one of the second plurality of groups have at least nearly identical resource/user access permissions, and computer resource access permissions ascribing functionality operative to ascertain whether a given computer resource is a member of one of the second plurality of groups, and if the given computer resource is a member of the one of the second plurality of groups, to ascribe to the given computer resource the resource/user access permissions of the one of the second plurality of groups. Preferably, computer resources in the second multiplicity of computer resources are arranged in a computer resource hierarchy.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the computer resource grouping functionality includes resource/user access permissions retrieval functionality operative, for each resource in the computer resource hierarchy, to retrieve the resource/user access permissions of the resource and the resource/user access permissions of an immediate ancestor of the resource in the computer resource hierarchy and resource/user access permissions comparison functionality, operative to compare the resource/user access permissions of the resource to the resource/user access permissions of the immediate ancestor, and if the resource/user access permissions of the immediate ancestor are identical to the resource/user access permissions of the resource, to group the resource and the immediate ancestor in a single one of the second plurality of groups.
In accordance with another preferred embodiment of the present invention the resource/user access permissions comparison functionality is operative to provide a pointer from the resource to the immediate ancestor and to extend pointers which point to the resource to point to the immediate ancestor.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The present invention will be understood and appreciated more fully from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the drawings in which:
Fig. 1 is a simplified illustration of operation of a preferred embodiment of the present invention in a large organization having a large number of resources and a large number of users;
Fig. 2 is a simplified flowchart illustrating general methodology for ascertaining access permissions of users to computer resources in a large organization having a large number of resources and a large number of users in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention;
Figs. 3A and 3B, taken together, are a simplified flowchart illustrating methodology for grouping users in a large organization based on their access permissions, which methodology forms part of the methodology of Fig. 2;
Figs. 4A and 4B, taken together, are a simplified flowchart illustrating methodology for grouping computer resources in a large organization based on the access permissions to the computer resources, which methodology forms part of the methodology of Fig. 2; and
Figs. 5A, 5B and 5C, taken together, are a simplified flowchart illustrating methodology for computing a response to an access permissions query, which methodology forms part of the methodology of Fig. 2.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
Data security policies typically determine who has access to an organization's data, which data is typically stored on various computer systems. These policies are rarely static. This is partly because users from within the organization, such as employees, partners and contractors, can pose a threat to sensitive data as severe as threats from outside the organization. Thus, as the structure and personnel makeup of the organization change^ the security policy should be adjusted accordingly. Information technology departments often find it difficult to manage user data access permissions and to ensure that required information is conveniently available, while protecting the organization's sensitive data.
Large business organizations may operate computer systems comprising large numbers of servers, which are often geographically distributed. Storage elements in such systems may be accessible by a large numbers of users. Various people associated with data access authorizations, including information technology personnel, operational personnel such as account managers and third party reviewers such as legal advisors may need to routinely inquire as to user access permissions to specific data.
Maintenance of a conventional localized or distributed database suitable for responding to queries as to the access permissions of any particular user or group of users, or conversely, for responding to queries as to the access permissions relating to a particular storage element or group of storage elements, could overwhelm the capabilities of even the most sophisticated database management programs currently existing. Storage and retrieval of the data required in order to service such queries may have an adverse affect on the storage capacities of various servers. Additionally, execution of such queries may impact the performance of the servers and thus may impair the overall efficiency of the computer system. Furthermore, because processing a response to such queries often necessitates an exhaustive iterative search through the directories of many file servers and their access control lists, the time for responding to such queries becomes unacceptably long.
Access control technologies have not been optimally implemented in systems that utilize diverse access control models. The state of the art today is such that there is no easy way for system administrators to know which users are authorized to access each specific data item in such environments. As a result, in many organizations an unacceptably high number of users have inappropriate access permissions. A solution is also lacking for the related problems of redundant access permissions and of orphan accounts belonging to personnel who no longer belong to the organization. Hence, there is a need for improvements in controlling user access permissions in order to improve data security, prevent fraud, and improve company productivity. Furthermore, misuse of data access permissions, even by authorized users, is a concern for those charged with simplification and automation of system security.
Referring now to Fig. 1, there is seen a schematic representation of a large organization having a first multiplicity of users and a second multiplicity of computer resources, such as computer files, which may reside on many file servers. The users and the file servers may be geographically distributed independently of their function.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, a hierarchical structure of the second multiplicity of computer resources, and/or a grouping of the first multiplicity of users in accordance with their access permissions with respect to computer resources residing on a specific server, are employed when responding to access permission queries, thereby allowing for better response times to such queries.
With respect to a given user, the term "user/resource access permissions" relates to a list of computer resources, located on a specific server or storage unit, to which the given user has access permissions. Thus, two users have identical user/resource access permissions if, with respect to a specific server or storage unit, both users have access permissions to an identical list of computer resources located on that server or storage unit.
With respect to a given computer resource, the term "resource/user access permissions" relates to a list of users with access permissions to the given computer resource. Thus, two computer resources have identical resource/user access permissions if an identical list of users has access permissions to both computer resources.
It is further appreciated that in the context of the present invention the term
"access permissions" relates to reading permissions, writing permissions and executing permissions, or any combination thereof. For example, a given user has access permissions to a given resource if the user has reading permissions to the given resource, even if the user does not have writing permissions or executing permissions to the given resource.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, as seen in Fig. 1, there is provided a method for ascertaining access permissions of the first multiplicity of users, indicated generally by reference numeral 102, to the second multiplicity of computer resources, indicated generally by reference numeral 104, on at least one storage unit, preferably a plurality of file servers, indicated generally by reference numeral 106.
Preferably among the first multiplicity of users 102, a first plurality of groups of users is defined, wherein all members of each one of the first plurality of groups of users have at least nearly identical user/resource access permissions to the computer resources on a given file server 106.
For example, as seen in Fig. I, personnel in the accounting department, whether located in India, Brazil or Canada, may be members of the same user group, here designated by the letter A. Similarly, development engineers in the R&D department, whether located in Spain, Brazil or India, may be members of the same user group, here designated by the letter D.
In parallel, among the second multiplicity of computer resources, a second plurality of groups of computer resources is defined, wherein all members of each one of the second plurality of groups of computer resources have at least nearly identical resource/user access permissions, for example each computer file in a given group is accessible by an identical or nearly identical group of users.
For example, as seen in Fig. 1, all files relating to accounts payable may be members of the same computer resource group, here designated by the letter 'a'. Similarly, all files relating to development of a door may be members of the same computer resource group, here designated by the letter 'd'.
It is appreciated that all members of each user group have at least nearly identical user/resource access permission profiles. For example, all members of user group A have access to the company's accounts and all members of user group D have access to the engineering files. Similarly, it is appreciated that all members of each computer resource group have at least nearly identical resource/user access permission profiles, for example all members of computer resource group 'a' are accessible by bookkeepers and all members of computer resource group'd' are accessible by design engineers.
In order to respond to a query or otherwise prepare a report indicating access permission profiles for certain users or computer resources, it is possible to quickly ascertain whether a given user is a member of one of the first plurality of user groups, and if so, to quickly ascribe to that given user the user/resource access permissions of that one of the first plurality of user groups. Similarly it is possible to quickly ascertain whether a given computer resource is a member of one of the second plurality of computer resource groups, and if so, to quickly ascribe to that given computer resource the resource/user access permissions of that one of the second plurality of computer resource groups.
Thus the time consuming iterative processing employed in the prior art is obviated.
It is appreciated that embodiments of the invention, which only group either users or computer resources, but not both, are also within the scope of the present invention.
Methodology for carrying out the foregoing steps in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention will now be described, with reference to Fig. 2.
Reference is now made to Fig. 2, which is a simplified flowchart illustrating general methodology for ascertaining access permissions of users to computer resources in a large organization having a large number of resources and a large number of users in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
As seen in Fig. 2, in a first preparatory stage, users in the organization are divided into groups based on their access permissions with respect to a given server in the organization, as seen at step 200. Specifically, for each server, users in the organization are divided into a plurality of user groups, wherein users in each group have similar or preferably identical access permissions with respect to files in the server. The methodology for grouping the users is described in further detail hereinbelow with reference to Fig. 3. As seen at step 202, in a second preparatory stage, the computer resources of the organization are grouped based on the access permissions thereto. Specifically, in a hierarchical server system, unless otherwise specified, a computer resource has the same access permissions as the direct ancestor thereof. Thus, computer resources may be grouped such that each descendant computer resource, which has access permissions identical to those of its ancestor computer resource, points to the access control list of its ancestor, rather than duplicating that access control list. The methodology for grouping the computer resources is described in further detail hereinbelow with reference to Fig. 4.
It is appreciated that the grouping of users of step 200 and grouping of computer resources of step 202 may be carried out in any sequence, or in parallel, and preferably is performed periodically, in order to account for changes in user access permissions and/or in the hierarchical structure of the computer resources in the organization.
In a first processing stage, which follows the preparatory stages described hereinabove, an access permissions query is presented, typically by a member of the organization or a department thereof, as seen at step 204. A typical query would comprise a subset of users and a subset of storage elements. A response to such a query would list, for each user in the subset of users, access permissions to each of the storage elements in the subset of storage elements.
For example, one query may include all the users in the organization as the user subset, and a given computer resource as the storage element subset. A response to this query would identify all the users who have permission to access the given computer resource. In another example, the query may include all of the computer resources of the organization as the storage element subset, and a given user as the user subset. A response to this query would identify all the storage elements, which may be accessed by the given user.
As seen at step 206, the query is processed and a response thereto is computed. Typically, the response to the query includes, for each user listed in the query, a list of a sub-group of the computer resources listed in the query to which the user has access. The methodology for computing the response to the query is described in further detail hereinbelow with reference to Fig. 5. The response to the query is then forwarded to the person or party who presented the access permissions query, indicated as step 208.
Reference is now made to Figs. 3A and 3B, which, when taken together, are a simplified flowchart illustrating methodology for grouping users in a large organization based on their access permissions, which methodology constitutes the first preparatory stage 200 of the methodology of Fig. 2. The goal of such grouping is to create user groups, wherein users in a single user group have similar, or preferably identical, access permissions with respect to computer resources stored on a given server.
A prerequisite for the creation of such user groups is the definition of user security groups, which is carried out prior to first step 300 of Fig. 3A. User security groups are pre-defined by the system administrator. Typically, user security groups correspond to different departments within the organization. User security groups may include, for example, an accounting user security group, a research and development user security group, etc. Each respective user security group includes those users who belong to the department to which the user security group corresponds. Users may belong to more than one user security group. For example, the secretary of a research and development department may belong to an administrative user security group and a research and development user security group.
Each user security group has pre-assigned access permissions to computer resources on a given server. An access control list for a given computer resource is a list of user security group access permissions to that computer resource.
As seen in Fig. 3A, a server is selected, as seen at step 300. It is appreciated that the users will be grouped only with respect to their access permissions to computer resources residing on the selected server.
Subsequently, the access control list for computer resources which reside on the selected server is reviewed, in order to extract those user security groups, and hence those users belonging to those user security groups, with permission to access at least some of the computer resources stored on the server, as seen at step 302.
For any given pair of users listed belonging to any of the extracted user security groups, the users' access permissions to computer resources stored on the selected server are compared to check whether they are identical with respect to all computer resources stored on the selected server as seen at decision step 304. If both users in the pair have identical access permissions to computer resources stored on the selected server they are assigned to the same initial user group with respect to the selected server, as seen at step 306. Otherwise, they are assigned to two different initial user groups with respect to the selected server, as seen at step 308.
These initial user groups are pre-runners of the user groups that this methodology seeks to create. The initial user groups may require further refinement, as described below, to arrive at the desired final user groups. It is appreciated that two users may have very similar access permissions on the selected server, other than one or two specific computer resources to which their access permissions differ. This may happen, for example, when the server includes some users' home directories, in which case two users could have identical access permissions to all computer resources in the server other than the home directories, for which each user would have access permission to his or her own specific home directory, but would generally not have access permission to other users' home directories.
This situation may cause the server to be grouped into many small initial user groups or even singletons, even though there are larger potential initial user groups with very similar, although not identical, access permissions. As will be described hereinbelow, this situation may be overcome by virtually dividing the computer resources on the server into two or more virtual servers.
Therefore, following user assignment to initial user groups as seen in steps 304, 306 and 308, the number of resulting initial user groups and the sizes thereof are reviewed. Preferably, the number of initial user groups is compared to a first predetermined threshold number, as seen at decision step 310, and the number of singleton initial user groups is compared to a second predetermined threshold number, as seen at decision step 312. If the number of initial user groups does not exceed the first threshold number and if the number of singleton initial user groups does not exceed the second threshold number the user assignment is complete. The initial user groups and singletons now constitute user groups, as referred to above, specifically in reference to step 200 of Fig. 2.
Turning to Fig. 3B, it is seen that if the number of initial user groups exceeds the first threshold number, and/or if the number of singleton initial user groups exceeds the second threshold number, the server is divided into two virtual servers, as seen at step 314. In accordance with one exemplary embodiment for carrying out such a virtual division of the server, for each specific user or user security group, the number of computer resources stored on the server to which the specific user or user security group is permitted access is established, as seen at step 316. The fraction of computer resources to which the specific user or user security group is permitted access is then calculated and compared to a fraction threshold value, such as 1%, as seen at decision step 318.
If the fraction of computer resources to which a specific user or user security group is permitted access is smaller than the fraction threshold value, the user or user security group is denoted as a degenerate security group, as seen at step 320. Otherwise, the user or user security group is denoted as an important security group, as seen at step 322.
The union of computer resources including access permissions for the degenerate security groups is defined as one virtual server, denoted a disorganized virtual server, as seen at step 324. The disorganized virtual server is assumed to include few computer resources with similar access control lists and/or few users with identical access permissions. Assignment of users to initial user groups based on the computer resources in the disorganized virtual server is likely to result in a large number of initial user groups and/or singleton initial user groups and is inefficient and therefore unnecessary.
The computer resources on the server which do not belong to the disorganized virtual server are defined as a second virtual server, denoted an organized virtual server, as seen at step 326. The organized virtual server is assumed to include files with similar access control lists, such that assignment of users to initial user groups based on their access permissions to computer resources in this virtual server is likely to result in a small number of organized initial user groups.
Following the division of the server into two virtual servers, the organized virtual server is selected as the server with respect to which users will be assigned to initial user groups, as seen at step 328. Subsequently, users are assigned to initial user groups again based on their access permissions to computer resources stored on the organized virtual server, as described hereinabove with reference to steps 302 to 308. These initial user groups and singleton initial user groups now constitute user groups, as referred to above, specifically in reference to step 200 of Fig. 2.
Reference is now made to Figs. 4A and 4B, which, taken together, are a simplified flowchart illustrating methodology for grouping computer resources in a large organization based on access permissions to the computer resources, which methodology constitutes the second preparatory stage 202 of the methodology of Fig. 2.
As seen in Fig. 4A, a node of the computer resource hierarchy is selected for processing, as seen at step 400. Preferably, the computer resource hierarchy is processed from the leaves to the root, in which case the first nodes selected for processing are the leaves, or nodes at the lowest level of the computer resource hierarchy.
For the selected node, the existence of an immediate ancestor thereof in the hierarchy is checked, as seen at decision step 402. If the selected node does not have an immediate ancestor, it is deduced to be the root of the hierarchy. The node is designated as a distinct node as seen at step 404, and the process is finished. Otherwise, the access control list of the node is extracted as seen at step 405, and the access control list of the immediate ancestor of the selected node is extracted as seen at step 406. The access control lists of the selected node and of its immediate ancestor are subsequently compared, as seen at decision step 408.
It is appreciated that if no explicit access control list is associated with the node being processed, the node being processed inherits the access control list associated with the immediate ancestor node and the process continues with step 410.
Turning to Fig. 4B, it is seen that if the access control lists of the selected node and its immediate ancestor are the same, a pointer, which points from the selected node to the access control list of its immediate ancestor is added to the hierarchy, as seen at step 410. Additionally, all pointers pointing to the access control list of the selected node are moved to point to the access control list of the immediate ancestor of the selected node, as seen at step 412, and a processing indication, indicating that the node has been processed, is added to the selected node, as seen at step 414.
If the access control list of the selected node differs from that of its immediate ancestor, the node is designated as a distinct node as seen at step 416, and a processing indication, indicating that the node has been processed, is added to the selected node, as seen at step 418. Subsequently, the level of the hierarchy to which the selected node belongs is reviewed in order to determine if there are any unprocessed nodes at that level, as seen at decision step 420. If there are any unprocessed nodes at the level of the selected node, a new node at that level is selected as seen at step 422, and the processing of that node proceeds as described hereinabove with reference to steps 402-418. Otherwise, a node which is located one level higher in the hierarchy than the selected node, such as the immediate ancestor of the selected node, is selected, as seen at step 424, and the processing thereof proceeds as described hereinabove with reference to steps 402-418.
Reference, is now made to Figs. 5 A, 5B and 5C, which, taken together, are a simplified flowchart illustrating methodology for computing a response to an access permissions query, which methodology constitutes step 206 of the methodology of Fig. 2.
As seen in Fig. 5A, a group of computer resources to be processed is defined, as seen at step 500. When beginning to process a query the group is typically empty and is populated during the processing of the query.
As seen in Fig. 5 A, step 501 is performed for each computer resource included in the query, to detect all of the distinct computer resource nodes included in the query.
As seen in step 502, for each computer resource included in the query, it is detected whether it comprises a distinct node of the computer resource hierarchy.
If the computer resource does comprise a distinct node of the computer resource hierarchy, it is added to the group of computer resources to be processed, as seen at step 504. If the computer resource does not comprise a distinct node, the pointer associated therewith is followed to an ancestor node that comprises a distinct node, as seen at step 506.
At decision step 508, it is established if the computer resource comprising the ancestor node that comprises a distinct node has been previously added to the group of computer resources to be processed. If the computer resource comprising the ancestor node has been not previously added to the group of computer resources to be processed, it is now added to the group, as seen at step 510. If the computer resource comprising the ancestor node has been previously added to the group of computer resources to be processed, it is not added to the group a second time, but is associated, in the group of computer resources to be processed, with the currently processed computer resource, in order to enable the provision of a complete query response, as seen at step 512. This is typically achieved by defining a pointer which points from the currently processed computer resource to the instance of the distinct ancestor which is included in the group of computer resources to be processed.
As seen at step 513, a user included in the query, whose access permissions will now be processed, is selected.
Turning to Fig. 5B, it is seen at step 514 that a computer resource, which is included in the group of resources to be processed, is selected, and the physical server on which it resides is ascertained, as seen at step 515. Subsequently, the specific user group to which the user belongs, with respect to the server on which the computer resource resides, is ascertained, as seen at step 516. It is then checked whether, during the processing of this computer resource, the access permissions of another user belonging to the same specific user group have been computed, as seen at decision step 518.
If the access permissions of another user, belonging to the same specific user group, to the given computer resource have been previously computed, the computed access permissions are assigned to the present user, as seen at step 520. Otherwise, the access permissions of the user, and/or of the user group to which the user belongs, to the computer resource, are extracted from the access control list associated with the computer resource, as seen at step 522.
The existence of any computer resources included in the group which have not been processed with respect to the selected user is subsequently checked, as seen at decision step 524.
As seen in Fig. 5C, if such a computer resource exists, that computer resource is selected, as seen at step 526, and is processed with respect to the selected user as described hereinabove with reference to steps 515 to 522. If no such computer resource exists, it is checked whether there are any users included in the query whose access permissions have not yet been computed, as seen at decision step 528. If such a user exists, that user is selected, as seen at step 530, and processing of access permissions thereof proceeds as described hereinabove with reference to steps 514 to 522.
As seen at step 532, when the access permissions for all of the users in the query have been computed with respect to each of the computer resources included in the group of computer resources to be processed, a response to the query, which comprises a paired list including a pair for each user and each computer resource included in the original query, is generated. It is appreciated that when generating such a query response, the results for each computer resource which comprises a distinct node ancestor for more than one of the computer resources included in the query are provided multiple times, in order to provide a query response for each computer resource included in the query.
It will be appreciated by persons skilled in the art that the invention is not limited to what has been particularly shown and described hereinabove. Rather the scope of the invention includes both combinations and subcombinations of various features described hereinabove as well as modifications of such features which would occur to a person of ordinary skill in the art upon reading the foregoing description and which are not in the prior art.

Claims

C L A I M S
1. A method for ascertaining access permissions of a first multiplicity of users to a second multiplicity of computer resources on at least one storage unit, the method comprising:
grouping users, among said first multiplicity of users, into a first plurality of groups wherein all members of at least one of said first plurality of groups have at least nearly identical user/resource access permissions to said second multiplicity of computer resources on said at least one storage unit;
grouping resources, among said second multiplicity of computer resources, into a second plurality of groups wherein all members of at least one of said second plurality of groups have at least nearly identical resource/user access permissions;
ascertaining whether a given user is a member of one of said first plurality of groups;
if said given user is a member of said one of said first plurality of groups, ascribing to said given user the user/resource access permissions of said one of said first plurality of groups;
ascertaining whether a given resource is a member of one of said second plurality of groups; and
if said given resource is a member of said one of said second plurality of groups, ascribing to said given resource the resource/user access permissions of said one of said second plurality of groups.
2. A method according to claim 1 and wherein said grouping users comprises: identifying a set of user security groups, each of said user security groups having access permissions to at least one of said second multiplicity of computer resources on said at least one storage unit;
identifying, for each user of said first multiplicity of users, a subset of said user security groups of which said user is a member; and
if a first subset of said user security groups, of which a first user of said first multiplicity of users is a member, is identical to a second subset of said user security groups, of which a second user of said first multiplicity of users is a member, grouping said first user and said second user in a single one of said first plurality of groups with respect to said at least one storage unit.
3. A method according to claim 1 and wherein said grouping users comprises dividing said second multiplicity of computer resources into at least two portions, and grouping said users, among said first multiplicity of users, into said first plurality of groups wherein all members of one of said first plurality of groups have at least nearly identical user/resource access permissions to computer resources included in one of said at least two portions.
4. A method according to claim 3 and wherein said dividing comprises:
for each user of said first multiplicity of users, calculating a fraction of said second multiplicity of computer resources to which said user has access permissions, and comparing said fraction to a threshold value;
denoting each user, for whom said fraction is smaller than said threshold value, as a degenerate security group; and
defining a first portion of said second multiplicity of computer resources to be the union of all computer resources which include access permissions for any degenerate security group.
5. A method according to claim 1 and wherein computer resources in said second multiplicity of computer resources are arranged in a computer resource hierarchy.
6. A method according to claim 5 and wherein said grouping resources comprises: for each resource in said computer resource hierarchy, retrieving the resource/user access permissions of said resource and the resource/user access permissions of an immediate ancestor of said resource in said computer resource hierarchy; and
if said resource/user access permissions of said immediate ancestor are identical to said resource/user access permissions of said resource, grouping said resource and said immediate ancestor in a single one of said second plurality of groups.
7. A method according to claim 6 and wherein said grouping said resource comprises:
providing a pointer from said resource to said immediate ancestor; and extending pointers which point to said resource to point to said immediate ancestor.
8. A method for ascertaining access permissions of a first multiplicity of users to a second multiplicity of computer resources on at least one storage unit, the method comprising:
grouping users, among said first multiplicity of users, into a first plurality of groups wherein all members of at least one of said first plurality of groups have at least nearly identical user/resource access permissions to said second multiplicity of computer resources on said at least one storage unit;
ascertaining whether a given user is a member of one of said first plurality of groups; and
if said given user is a member of said one of said first plurality of groups, ascribing to said given user the user/resource access permissions of said one of said first plurality of groups.
9. A method according to claim 8 and wherein said grouping users comprises: identifying a set of user security groups, each of said user security groups having access permissions to at least one of said second multiplicity of computer resources on said at least one storage unit;
identifying, for each of said first multiplicity of users, a subset of said user security groups of which said user is a member; and
if a first subset of said user security groups, of which a first user of said first multiplicity of users is a member, is identical to a second subset of said user security groups, of which a second user of said first multiplicity of users is a member, grouping said first user and said second user in a single one of said first plurality of groups with respect to said at least one storage unit.
10. A method according to claim 8 and wherein said grouping users comprises dividing said second multiplicity of computer resources into at least two portions, and grouping said users, among said first multiplicity of users, into said first plurality of groups wherein all members of one of said first plurality of groups have at least nearly identical user/resource access permissions to computer resources included in one of said at least two portions.
11. A method according to claim 10 and wherein said dividing comprises:
for each user of said first multiplicity of users, calculating a fraction of said second multiplicity of computer resources to which said user has access permissions, and comparing said fraction to a threshold value;
denoting each user, for whom said fraction is smaller than said threshold value, as a degenerate security group; and
defining a first portion of said second multiplicity of computer resources to be the union of all computer resources which include access permissions for any degenerate security group.
12. A method for ascertaining access permissions of a first multiplicity of users to a second multiplicity of computer resources on at least one storage unit, the method comprising:
grouping resources, among said second multiplicity of computer resources, into a plurality of groups wherein all members of at least one of said plurality of groups have at least nearly identical resource/user access permissions;
ascertaining whether a given resource is a member of one of said plurality of groups; and
if said given resource is a member of said one of said plurality of groups, ascribing to said given resource the resource/user access permissions of said one of said plurality of groups.
13. A method according to claim 12 and wherein computer resources in said second multiplicity of computer resources are arranged in a computer resource hierarchy.
14. A method according to claim 13 and wherein said grouping resources comprises:
for each resource in said computer resource hierarchy, retrieving the resource/user access permissions of said resource and the resource/user access permissions of an immediate ancestor of said resource in said computer resource hierarchy; and
if said resource/user access permissions of said immediate ancestor are identical to said resource/user access permissions of said resource, grouping said resource and said immediate ancestor in a single one of said second plurality of groups.
15. A method according to claim 14 and wherein said grouping said resource comprises:
providing a pointer from said resource to said immediate ancestor; and extending pointers which point to said resource to point to said immediate ancestor.
16. Apparatus for ascertaining access permissions of a first multiplicity of users to a second multiplicity of computer resources on at least one storage unit, the apparatus comprising:
user grouping functionality operative to group users, among said first multiplicity of users, into a first plurality of groups wherein all members of at least one of said first plurality of groups have at least nearly identical user/resource access permissions to said second multiplicity of computer resources on said at least one storage unit;
computer resource grouping functionality operative to group computer resources, among said second multiplicity of computer resources, into a second plurality of groups wherein all members of at least one of said second plurality of groups have at least nearly identical resource/user access permissions;
user access permissions ascribing functionality operative to ascertain whether a given user is a member of one of said first plurality of groups, and if said given user is a member of said one of said first plurality of groups, to ascribe to said given user the user/resource access permissions of said one of said first plurality of groups; and
computer resource access permissions ascribing functionality operative to ascertain whether a given computer resource is a member of one of said second plurality of groups, and if said given computer resource is a member of said one of said second plurality of groups, to ascribe to said given computer resource the resource/user access permissions of said one of said second plurality of groups.
17. Apparatus according to claim 16 and wherein said user grouping functionality comprises:
user security group identification functionality operative to identify a plurality of user security groups, each of said user security groups having access permissions to at least one of said second multiplicity of computer resources on said at least one storage unit;
user security group subset identification functionality operative to identify, for each of said first multiplicity of users, a subset of said user security groups of which said user is a member; and
user subset comparison functionality operative to group a first user and a second user in a single one of said first plurality of groups, with respect to said at least one storage unit, if a first subset of said user security groups of which said first user is a member is identical to a second subset of said user security groups of which said second user is a member.
18. Apparatus according to claim 16 and also comprising a computer resource dividing functionality operative to divide said second multiplicity of computer resources into at least two portions, and wherein said user grouping functionality is operative to group users, among said first multiplicity of users, into said first plurality of groups wherein all members of one of said first plurality of groups have at least nearly identical user/resource access permissions to computer resources included in one of said at least two portions.
19. Apparatus according to claim 18 and wherein said computer resource dividing functionality comprises:
fraction calculating functionality operative, for each user of said first multiplicity of users, to calculate a fraction of said second multiplicity of computer resources to which said user has access permissions, and to compare said fraction to a threshold value;
user denoting functionality operative to denote each user, for whom said fraction is smaller than said threshold value, as a degenerate security group; and
portion defining functionality operative to define a first portion of said second multiplicity of computer resources to be the union of all computer resources which include access permissions for any degenerate security group.
20. Apparatus according to claim 16 and wherein computer resources in said second multiplicity of computer resources are arranged in a computer resource hierarchy.
21. Apparatus according to claim 20 and wherein said computer resource grouping functionality comprises:
resource/user access permissions retrieval functionality operative, for each resource in said computer resource hierarchy, to retrieve the resource/user access permissions of said resource and the resource/user access permissions of an immediate ancestor of said resource in said computer resource hierarchy; and
resource/user access permissions comparison functionality, operative to compare said resource/user access permissions of said resource to said resource/user access permissions of said immediate ancestor, and if said resource/user access permissions of said immediate ancestor are identical to said resource/user access permissions of said given resource, to group said resource and said immediate ancestor in a single one of said second plurality of groups.
22. Apparatus according to claim 21 and wherein said resource/user access permissions comparison functionality is operative to provide a pointer from said resource to said immediate ancestor and to extend pointers which point to said resource to point to said immediate ancestor.
23. Apparatus for ascertaining access permissions of a first multiplicity of users to a second multiplicity of computer resources on at least one storage unit, the apparatus comprising:
user grouping functionality operative to group users, among said first multiplicity of users, into a first plurality of groups wherein all members of at least one of said first plurality of groups have at least nearly identical user/resource access permissions to said second multiplicity of computer resources on said at least one storage unit; and
user access permissions ascribing functionality operative to ascertain whether a given user is a member of one of said first plurality of groups, and if said given user is a member of said one of said first plurality of groups, to ascribe to said given user the user/resource access permissions of said one of said first plurality of groups.
24. Apparatus according to claim 23 and wherein said user grouping functionality comprises:
user security group identification functionality operative to identify a plurality of user security groups, each of said user security groups having access permissions to at least one of said second multiplicity of computer resources on said at least one storage unit;
user security group subset identification functionality operative to identify, for each of said first multiplicity of users, a subset of said user security groups of which said user is a member; and
user subset comparison functionality operative to group a first user and a second user in a single one of said first plurality of groups, with respect to said at least one storage unit, if a first subset of said user security groups of which said first user is a member is identical to a second subset of said user security groups of which said second user is a member.
25. Apparatus according to claim 23 and also comprising a computer resource dividing functionality operative to divide said second multiplicity of computer resources into at least two portions, and wherein said user grouping functionality is operative to group users, among said first multiplicity of users, into said first plurality of groups wherein all members of one of said first plurality of groups have at least nearly identical user/resource access permissions to computer resources included in one of said at least two portions.
26. Apparatus according to claim 25 and wherein said computer resource dividing functionality comprises:
fraction calculating functionality operative, for each user of said first multiplicity of users, to calculate a fraction of said second multiplicity of computer resources to which said user has access permissions, and to compare said fraction to a threshold value;
user denoting functionality operative to denote each user, for whom said fraction is smaller than said threshold value, as a degenerate security group; and
portion defining functionality operative to define a first portion of said second multiplicity of computer resources to be the union of all computer resources which include access permissions for any degenerate security group.
27. Apparatus for ascertaining access permissions of a first multiplicity of users to a second multiplicity of computer resources on at least one storage unit, the apparatus comprising:
computer resource grouping functionality operative to group resources, among said second multiplicity of computer resources, into a second plurality of groups wherein all members of at least one of said second plurality of groups have at least nearly identical resource/user access permissions; and
computer resource access permissions ascribing functionality operative to ascertain whether a given computer resource is a member of one of said second plurality of groups, and if said given computer resource is a member of said one of said second plurality of groups, to ascribe to said given computer resource the resource/user access permissions of said one of said second plurality of groups.
28. Apparatus according to claim 27 and wherein computer resources in said second multiplicity of computer resources are arranged in a computer resource hierarchy.
29. Apparatus according to claim 28 and wherein said computer resource grouping functionality comprises:
resource/user access permissions retrieval functionality operative, for each resource in said computer resource hierarchy, to retrieve the resource/user access permissions of said resource and the resource/user access permissions of an immediate ancestor of said resource in said computer resource hierarchy; and
resource/user access permissions comparison functionality, operative to compare said resource/user access permissions of said resource to said resource/user access permissions of said immediate ancestor, and if said resource/user access permissions of said immediate ancestor are identical to said resource/user access permissions of said resource, to group said resource and said immediate ancestor in a single one of said second plurality of groups.
30. Apparatus according to claim 29 and wherein said resource/user access permissions comparison functionality is operative to provide a pointer from said resource to said immediate ancestor and to extend pointers which point to said resource to point to said immediate ancestor.
PCT/IL2010/001090 2010-12-29 2010-12-29 Method and apparatus for ascertaining data access permission of groups of users to groups of data elements WO2012090189A1 (en)

Priority Applications (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201611141689.5A CN106650508A (en) 2010-12-29 2010-12-29 Method and device for determining data access permission of user group for data element group
CN201080071011.9A CN103299268B (en) 2010-12-29 2010-12-29 For determining user's group method and device to the data access authority of data elements groups
EP10861449.6A EP2659351A4 (en) 2010-12-29 2010-12-29 Method and apparatus for ascertaining data access permission of groups of users to groups of data elements
PCT/IL2010/001090 WO2012090189A1 (en) 2010-12-29 2010-12-29 Method and apparatus for ascertaining data access permission of groups of users to groups of data elements

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/IL2010/001090 WO2012090189A1 (en) 2010-12-29 2010-12-29 Method and apparatus for ascertaining data access permission of groups of users to groups of data elements

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2012090189A1 true WO2012090189A1 (en) 2012-07-05

Family

ID=46382381

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/IL2010/001090 WO2012090189A1 (en) 2010-12-29 2010-12-29 Method and apparatus for ascertaining data access permission of groups of users to groups of data elements

Country Status (3)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2659351A4 (en)
CN (2) CN106650508A (en)
WO (1) WO2012090189A1 (en)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10320798B2 (en) 2013-02-20 2019-06-11 Varonis Systems, Inc. Systems and methodologies for controlling access to a file system
US10325679B2 (en) 2010-09-28 2019-06-18 The Diary Corporation Systems and methods for medical data collection and display
US10891816B2 (en) 2017-03-01 2021-01-12 Carrier Corporation Spatio-temporal topology learning for detection of suspicious access behavior
US11373472B2 (en) 2017-03-01 2022-06-28 Carrier Corporation Compact encoding of static permissions for real-time access control
US11687810B2 (en) 2017-03-01 2023-06-27 Carrier Corporation Access control request manager based on learning profile-based access pathways

Families Citing this family (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN104598778B (en) * 2013-10-30 2018-03-23 中国移动通信集团江苏有限公司 Authority dispatching method and device
CN105528553A (en) * 2014-09-30 2016-04-27 中国移动通信集团公司 A method and a device for secure sharing of data and a terminal
CN105653962B (en) * 2014-11-14 2018-07-31 中国科学院沈阳计算技术研究所有限公司 A kind of user role access authorization for resource model management method of object-oriented
WO2019127468A1 (en) * 2017-12-29 2019-07-04 华为技术有限公司 Grouped application using same key for sharing data
CN112465476A (en) * 2020-12-17 2021-03-09 中国农业银行股份有限公司 Access control method, device, equipment and medium

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20020026592A1 (en) * 2000-06-16 2002-02-28 Vdg, Inc. Method for automatic permission management in role-based access control systems
US20080034205A1 (en) * 2001-12-12 2008-02-07 Guardian Data Storage, Llc Methods and systems for providing access control to electronic data
US20080091682A1 (en) * 2005-12-29 2008-04-17 Blue Jungle Preventing Conflicts of Interests Between Two or More Groups Using Applications

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6772350B1 (en) * 1998-05-15 2004-08-03 E.Piphany, Inc. System and method for controlling access to resources in a distributed environment
US9697373B2 (en) * 2004-11-05 2017-07-04 International Business Machines Corporation Facilitating ownership of access control lists by users or groups
US7606801B2 (en) * 2005-06-07 2009-10-20 Varonis Inc. Automatic management of storage access control

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20020026592A1 (en) * 2000-06-16 2002-02-28 Vdg, Inc. Method for automatic permission management in role-based access control systems
US20080034205A1 (en) * 2001-12-12 2008-02-07 Guardian Data Storage, Llc Methods and systems for providing access control to electronic data
US20080091682A1 (en) * 2005-12-29 2008-04-17 Blue Jungle Preventing Conflicts of Interests Between Two or More Groups Using Applications

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See also references of EP2659351A4 *

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10325679B2 (en) 2010-09-28 2019-06-18 The Diary Corporation Systems and methods for medical data collection and display
US10320798B2 (en) 2013-02-20 2019-06-11 Varonis Systems, Inc. Systems and methodologies for controlling access to a file system
US10891816B2 (en) 2017-03-01 2021-01-12 Carrier Corporation Spatio-temporal topology learning for detection of suspicious access behavior
US11373472B2 (en) 2017-03-01 2022-06-28 Carrier Corporation Compact encoding of static permissions for real-time access control
US11687810B2 (en) 2017-03-01 2023-06-27 Carrier Corporation Access control request manager based on learning profile-based access pathways

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN103299268B (en) 2016-12-28
CN103299268A (en) 2013-09-11
EP2659351A1 (en) 2013-11-06
EP2659351A4 (en) 2014-09-10
CN106650508A (en) 2017-05-10

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US9641334B2 (en) Method and apparatus for ascertaining data access permission of groups of users to groups of data elements
WO2012090189A1 (en) Method and apparatus for ascertaining data access permission of groups of users to groups of data elements
KR102537275B1 (en) Obfuscation of user content in structured user data files
KR102464222B1 (en) Configurable annotations for privacy-sensitive user content
US20170154188A1 (en) Context-sensitive copy and paste block
CN101674334B (en) Access control method of network storage equipment
US20060136585A1 (en) Resource reconciliation
US20080005115A1 (en) Methods and apparatus for scoped role-based access control
US20080271157A1 (en) Evaluating removal of access permissions
Li et al. Protecting privacy against record linkage disclosure: A bounded swapping approach for numeric data
US20150213272A1 (en) Conjoint vulnerability identifiers
EP3196798A1 (en) Context-sensitive copy and paste block
JP2004158007A (en) Computer access authorization
Yan et al. A weighted k-member clustering algorithm for k-anonymization
CN112463839A (en) Enterprise information query method and system
US20080270408A1 (en) Data Processing System And Method
CN110019017B (en) High-energy physical file storage method based on access characteristics
JP4093811B2 (en) User access right control apparatus and method
US20160149925A1 (en) Systems and methodologies for controlling access to a file system
Suthaharan et al. An approach for automatic selection of relevance features in intrusion detection systems
US11741163B2 (en) Mapping of personally-identifiable information to a person based on natural language coreference resolution
JP5630193B2 (en) Operation restriction management program, operation restriction management apparatus, and operation restriction management method
WO2017019711A1 (en) Indexing structured data with security information
EP2667564A1 (en) Method and system for enabling multi-level policies enforcement
Wu et al. A differentially private random decision tree classifier with high utility

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 10861449

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2010861449

Country of ref document: EP